The Climate Surprise
The-Climate-Surprise_CO2C-New-Criterion-1
The-Climate-Surprise_CO2C-New-Criterion-1
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> climate surprise<br />
by William Happer<br />
<strong>The</strong> brief reports assembled here summarize<br />
talks at the conference <strong>The</strong> <strong>Climate</strong><br />
<strong>Surprise</strong>: Why CO Is Good for the Earth.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Conference, jointly organized by <strong>The</strong> New<br />
Criterion and the CO Coalion, took place at<br />
the Princeton Club in New York on March ,<br />
. <strong>The</strong> CO Coalion is a new and independent<br />
non-profit organizaon established in <br />
to educate thought leaders, policy makers, and<br />
the public about the vital contribuon made<br />
by carbon dioxide to our lives and our economy.<br />
Coalion members include climate sciensts,<br />
physicists, engineers, and economists of internaonal<br />
stature. More informaon about the<br />
coalion’s goals and membership can be found<br />
at its website, cocoalion.org.<br />
<strong>The</strong> mission of the Coalion is to<br />
present scienfic evidence showing<br />
that the trace atmospheric gas carbon<br />
dioxide or CO is a nutrient that<br />
is essenal to plant life. CO is not a<br />
pollutant. Increasing CO levels will<br />
enable plants and agricultural crops to<br />
grow more efficiently and to be more<br />
drought resistant.<br />
Moreover, observaons show that<br />
warming from doubling the amount<br />
of CO in the atmosphere is going<br />
to be about degree Celsius, much<br />
less than predicted by most computer<br />
models, and beneficial to the world.<br />
<strong>The</strong> CO Coalition is in favor<br />
of cost-effective regulation of the<br />
energy sector to minimize real environmental<br />
harm. But it notes that CO released by<br />
combuson of fossil fuels is actually a benefit<br />
to the world, not a pollutant. Energy<br />
sources like fossil fuels, nuclear power, hydropower,<br />
wind power, or solar power should<br />
be selected on the basis of cost, convenience,<br />
dependability, and ability to minimize real, as<br />
opposed to imaginary, environmental harm.<br />
With proper equipment to remove genuine<br />
pollutants, like fly ash, oxides of sulfur and<br />
nitrogen, volale organic compounds, and so<br />
on, the stack emissions of fossil fuel power<br />
plants are similar to those of human breath,<br />
as shown in Figure .. Humans and other<br />
Figure 1.1: <strong>The</strong> main components of the exhaust gas of a modern power<br />
plant are similar to the components in human breath. Humans and other<br />
living things must emit large amounts of CO2 to survive. <strong>The</strong>y have a very<br />
large “carbon footprint,” which is a benefi cial part of the cycle of life.<br />
5