17.11.2016 Views

November Business First

November issue of Business First, Northern Ireland's Business Magazine

November issue of Business First, Northern Ireland's Business Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BEST PRACTICE<br />

The tricky business of litigation<br />

funding in Northern Ireland<br />

Matthew Howse, Litigation and Dispute Resolution Partner at leading law firm Arthur Cox, explains the nuances of<br />

litigation funding in Northern Ireland.<br />

or professionals such as company<br />

financial directors, who deal largely in<br />

Fthe ‘black and white’ of numbers, the<br />

risk and uncertainty associated with pursuing<br />

a legal claim can often be difficult to justify<br />

when evaluating the costs of running a case to<br />

conclusion.<br />

The availability of third party funding to<br />

help meet litigation costs can often be<br />

something that is welcomed by those charged<br />

with keeping a steady hand on the tiller of a<br />

company’s finances.<br />

That is certainly the case in England and<br />

Wales, where the growth in the use of<br />

‘litigation funding’ products has been fuelled<br />

by changes to the legal position, and by large<br />

corporates and their representatives making<br />

active use of these changes.<br />

Risk<br />

Traditionally, a party to litigation funds its<br />

own legal costs, either on an interim basis as<br />

the case progresses or at the end of the case.<br />

A party who has a lawful interest or some<br />

other close connection to the litigation –<br />

shareholders or creditors, for example – can<br />

legitimately fund a party’s case, although they<br />

should be aware that they risk being made<br />

liable for the costs of the litigation if the case<br />

is unsuccessful.<br />

So what are some of the alternatives to the<br />

traditional funding model available in<br />

Northern Ireland?<br />

Professional third party litigation funding is<br />

where a commercial organisation,<br />

unconnected to the litigation in question,<br />

funds the litigation with a view to making a<br />

profit.<br />

Integrity<br />

Traditionally, such funding fell foul of the<br />

ancient rules relating to ‘champerty’ and<br />

‘maintenance’, designed to uphold the<br />

integrity of the litigation system – namely to<br />

prevent trafficking in litigation for profit, and<br />

to prevent people with an improper motive<br />

influencing litigation.<br />

In England and Wales, those rules have<br />

been substantially relaxed over time. And in<br />

the Republic of Ireland, a case has been<br />

appealed to the Supreme Court (likely<br />

hearing early 2017) which will address the<br />

question of whether the existing prohibition<br />

on third party litigation funding in the<br />

Republic should be lifted.<br />

In Northern Ireland, reported cases are<br />

scant, largely because the statutory<br />

28 www.businessfirstonline.co.uk<br />

framework is not on all fours with that in<br />

England and Wales.<br />

Whilst in England and Wales there is an<br />

Association of Litigation Funders, established<br />

in 2011 to regulate the conduct of its<br />

members, there is no such body in Northern<br />

Ireland.<br />

Reforms<br />

This is because there is simply not an<br />

established market in Northern Ireland, for<br />

the legal and technical reasons mentioned<br />

above, as well as other factors including<br />

cultural reasons (“if I can’t afford to bring a<br />

case, I won’t bring it”); the legal aid system in<br />

Northern Ireland (although subject to intense<br />

review and reform, legal aid still remains<br />

more widely available than in England and<br />

Wales); and for other, less tangible reasons.<br />

The “no win, no fee” system (conditional fee<br />

agreements), which TV adverts are fond of<br />

promoting, is legal in England and Wales<br />

(although greatly scaled back of late), but is<br />

not currently legal in Northern Ireland.<br />

The recent ‘Access to Justice Review Part 2’<br />

report has, however, shown support for<br />

introducing this practice in certain cases in<br />

Northern Ireland and time will tell how far<br />

these reforms go.<br />

Finally, after the event insurance (ATE), a<br />

type of insurance enabling plaintiffs to insure<br />

against the risk of having to pay a defendant’s<br />

legal costs, and cover their own<br />

disbursements such as barrister’s fees, is not<br />

only legal in Northern Ireland, but also<br />

increasingly common and there are providers<br />

offering these products. Existing insurance<br />

policies should be checked for the existence<br />

of pre­existing insurance cover for legal<br />

claims.<br />

It remains to be seen whether support for<br />

alternative methods of funding litigation in<br />

Northern Ireland will grow.<br />

What is clear is that there are changes on<br />

the horizon – at Arthur Cox we will give you<br />

all the guidance you need on this sometimes<br />

complex area.<br />

MOREINFORMATION<br />

The Litigation and Dispute<br />

Resolution team at Arthur Cox is<br />

well positioned to advise on the<br />

emerging trends in the civil<br />

justice system in Northern<br />

Ireland. Please call 028 9023<br />

0007 for further information from<br />

Matthew or your regular Arthur<br />

Cox contact.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!