Corporate Governance - Accounting Theory

Buy here:
http://homework.plus/corporate-governance-accounting-t
heory/
Product Description
Corporate Governance - Accounting Theory
Subtopic: Independent directors
Report title: ​Independent directors and ‘skin in the game’.
Your task: (Article ​ Critique)
Identify and apply any of the theories covered in
Accounting Theory that you believe would assist a reader to understand the issues
being discussed in the three articles below.
The 3 articles
1. (Academic article) MANDATED DIVORCE: COMPANY BOARDS,
‘INDEPENDENCE’ AND PERFORMANCE: ​ ​POLICY • Vol. 32 No. 2 • Winter 2016, pp.3-9,
< https://www.cis.org.au/app/uploads/2016/06/32-2-swan-peter.pdf>.
2. (Magazine) ‘Skin in the game,’ ​Company ​ Directors Magazine. May 2016, pp.37-9 <
http://www.companydirectors.com.au/director-resource-centre/publications/companydirector-magazine/2016-back-editions/may/skin-in-the-game
>.

3. (Newspaper) Tue Jun 28, 2016 Tesla investor group wants more independent
board, cites Musk ties. ,
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-solarcity-m-a-tesla-idUSKCN0ZE2ZL
Research in order to find secondary sources on matters where a relevance to
theoretical issue of accounting theory can be demonstrated
1. 1. Identify the theoretical issue of accounting theory that relates with
the most salience (relevance) to the contents of your selected articles.
2. 2. Provide examples of agreements, disagreements or coverage
disparities between the contents of the articles and the contents of the
chosen accounting theory topic Readings and textbook. To do this, you
need to compare the articles' content with the content of the various
resources used in accounting theory and in that comparison, you should
identify agreements (similarities), disagreements (differences) and
disparities (where one source mentions something and the other does
not).
3. 3. Critique the articles. To do this you should at least:
4. 4. Assess the significance of agreements, disagreements or disparities
identified in the previous section.
5. 5. Assess whether you are in a position to form an opinion on the
accuracy of the content of the articles (for example, are sources of
information revealed in the articles? Or is the author in a position to be
trusted in respect to this topic?)
6. 6. Question if the articles’ coverage of the issues has been balanced and
comprehensive enough to present useful information (more than a single
perspective identified and presented)

7. 7. Evaluate the worth of the articles to a decision maker who must
consider similar issues in their respective roles (e.g. an investor seeking
to evaluate investment opportunities; a manager wanting to make a
resource allocation decision; a citizen wishing to exercise her civic rights;
etc).
8. 8. Reference List (Harvard Referencing)with in text reference