09.12.2012 Views

15th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research - TAIR

15th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research - TAIR

15th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research - TAIR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

T02-011<br />

A model of <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> leaf development<br />

Sarah Cooks<strong>on</strong>(1), Christine Granier(1)<br />

1-Laboratoire d'Ecophysiologie des Plantes sous Stress Envir<strong>on</strong>nementaux (LEPSE), ENSAM-INRA,<br />

2 Place Viala, 34060 M<strong>on</strong>tpellier, France<br />

There are internal genetic differences in leaf development between species,<br />

superimposed up<strong>on</strong> this, regulati<strong>on</strong> of leaf growth resp<strong>on</strong>ds to envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

signals. The aim of this work was to investigate the regulati<strong>on</strong> of leaf growth<br />

in <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> thaliana by genetic (mutati<strong>on</strong>) and envir<strong>on</strong>mental (light) factors.<br />

Two leaf development mutants were selected from EMS-induced mutants<br />

(Berná et al., 1999). One with increased (r<strong>on</strong>2-1) and <strong>on</strong>e with reduced<br />

(ang4) leaf area. Wild type (Landsberg erecta, Ler) and mutant plants were<br />

grown in rigorously c<strong>on</strong>trolled envir<strong>on</strong>mental c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s and subjected to<br />

various light treatments.<br />

In all light c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, r<strong>on</strong>2-1 produced leaves with significantly higher areas<br />

than the wild type while ang4 produced leaves with significantly lower areas.<br />

In all genotypes, final leaf area was reduced by reduced incident light. Finally,<br />

the internal and external regulatory factors exploited in this study produced a<br />

16-fold difference between the largest and smallest mean final leaf 6 area.<br />

They also caused differences in all leaf growth variables such as durati<strong>on</strong><br />

of leaf expansi<strong>on</strong>, relative and absolute leaf expansi<strong>on</strong> rates, leaf initiati<strong>on</strong><br />

rate, leaf emergence rate and, at the cellular scale, epidermal cell size and<br />

epidermal cell number. The presence of any relati<strong>on</strong>ships between the leaf<br />

growth variables was investigated in this large range of growth curves and a<br />

model of leaf development was created from these relati<strong>on</strong>ships.<br />

Our results indicate that c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s affecting early events of leaf development<br />

(initial relative expansi<strong>on</strong> rate, cell divisi<strong>on</strong>) have an impact <strong>on</strong> late processes<br />

such as the durati<strong>on</strong> of expansi<strong>on</strong> or final cell size. Such a model could help<br />

to resolve the existing c<strong>on</strong>troversy about the role of cell divisi<strong>on</strong> in organ<br />

formati<strong>on</strong> (Fleming, 2002) and also to identify a role for endoreduplicati<strong>on</strong> in<br />

leaf development.<br />

Berná et al., 1999, Genetics, 152:729-742<br />

Fleming, 2002, Planta, 216 :17-22<br />

T02 Development 2 (Shoot, Root)<br />

T02-012<br />

Synergistic interacti<strong>on</strong> of ERECTA-family receptorlike<br />

kinases regulate cell proliferati<strong>on</strong>, patterning,<br />

and organ growth<br />

Keiko U. Torii(1), Chris T. Berthiaume(1), Emi J. Hill(1), Lynn J. Pillitteri(1), Elena D.<br />

Shpak(1)<br />

1-Department of Biology, University of Washingt<strong>on</strong>, Seattle, WA 98195 USA<br />

Growth of plant organs relies <strong>on</strong> coordinated cell proliferati<strong>on</strong> followed by cell<br />

growth, but nature of cell-cell signal that specifies organ size remains elusive.<br />

The <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> receptor-like kinase (RLK) ERECTA regulates inflorescence<br />

architecture. Our previous study using a dominant-negative fragment of<br />

ERECTA revealed the presence of redundancy in the ERECTA-mediated signal<br />

transducti<strong>on</strong> pathway. We found that <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> ERL1 and ERL2, two functi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

paralogs of ERECTA, play redundant but unique roles in a subset of the<br />

ERECTA signaling pathway and that synergistic interacti<strong>on</strong> of three ERECTAfamily<br />

RLKs define aerial organ size. While erl1 and erl2 mutati<strong>on</strong>s c<strong>on</strong>ferred<br />

no detectable phenotype, they enhanced erecta defects in a unique manner.<br />

Overlapping but distinct roles of ERL1 and ERL2 can be largely ascribed to<br />

their intricate expressi<strong>on</strong> patterns rather than their functi<strong>on</strong>s as receptor<br />

kinases. Loss of the entire ERECTA family genes led to striking dwarfism,<br />

reduced organ size, and abnormal flower development, including defects in<br />

petal polar expansi<strong>on</strong>, carpel el<strong>on</strong>gati<strong>on</strong>, and anther and ovule differentiati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

These defects are due to severely reduced cell proliferati<strong>on</strong>. We propose that<br />

ERECTA-family RLKs act as redundant receptors that link cell proliferati<strong>on</strong><br />

to organ growth and patterning. The specific roles of ERECTA-family RLKs<br />

during epidermal cell-type specificati<strong>on</strong> and patterning will be discussed.<br />

Shpak et al. (2003) Plant Cell 15: 1095-<br />

Shpak et al. (2004) Development 131: 1491-<br />

15 th <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> <strong>Research</strong> 2004 · Berlin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!