09.12.2012 Views

15th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research - TAIR

15th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research - TAIR

15th International Conference on Arabidopsis Research - TAIR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

T01-005<br />

PATTERN OF FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTION OF THE<br />

FLORAL MERISTEM IDENTITY PROTEIN LEAFY<br />

Alexis Maizel(1, 2), Detlef Weigel(1, 2)<br />

1-Departement of Molecular Biology, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, D-72076<br />

Tübingen, Germany<br />

2-Salk Institute, La Jolla CA 92037, USA<br />

Two genes, LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1), are required to specify floral<br />

identity in <strong>Arabidopsis</strong>. Expressi<strong>on</strong> of LFY in otherwise n<strong>on</strong>-reproductive<br />

meristems can cause their c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> into floral meristems in a variety of<br />

species, dem<strong>on</strong>strating that it is a master regulator of floral development.<br />

AP1 is a direct target of LFY, and both act in a partially redundant manner to<br />

specify floral meristem identity. At least some of this functi<strong>on</strong> is due to activati<strong>on</strong><br />

and regulati<strong>on</strong> of various homeotic genes, which c<strong>on</strong>trol the identity of<br />

different floral organs. Biochemically, LFY is a sequence specific DNA-binding<br />

protein with no similarity to any other plant or animal protein.<br />

Homologs of LFY have been cl<strong>on</strong>ed from many seed plants (angiosperms and<br />

gymnosperms), as well as from the more distant n<strong>on</strong>-flowering Pteridophytes<br />

and Bryophytes (ferns and mosses). All share two highly c<strong>on</strong>served domains.<br />

Despite their similarity to their seed plant counterparts, the functi<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

LFY homologs in species that arose prior to evoluti<strong>on</strong> of floral structure is<br />

unclear.<br />

We have decided to take advantage of the molecular diversity generated<br />

during evoluti<strong>on</strong> to obtain insights into the structure-functi<strong>on</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ships of<br />

LFY. We sampled a set of homologs derived from all major clades of extant<br />

plants and tested the functi<strong>on</strong>ality in several ways. By combining classical<br />

phenotypic analysis with genome-wide molecular profiling, we assayed the<br />

potency of the different homologs to rescue a str<strong>on</strong>g null allele of LFY. We<br />

also assayed in yeast models their transcripti<strong>on</strong>al activity and DNA binding<br />

activity. Several c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s arose from this study. First, flowers and activity<br />

of LFY homologs in <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> date to the same evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary time point.<br />

Almost all angiosperms homologs are functi<strong>on</strong>ally interchangeable. However,<br />

homologs from the n<strong>on</strong>-flowering clades can <strong>on</strong>ly partially complement a<br />

lfy null allele, their potency being inversely proporti<strong>on</strong>al to their evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary<br />

distance. Sec<strong>on</strong>d, am<strong>on</strong>g the molecular targets of LFY, AP1 is the main<br />

output. AP1 is the <strong>on</strong>ly target upregulated by the homologs from n<strong>on</strong>-flowering<br />

plants. Third, the different homologs vary in their DNA binding affinity.<br />

By building chimera between reference homologs, we have established that<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>served domains c<strong>on</strong>tribute more than the n<strong>on</strong>-c<strong>on</strong>served domains<br />

to diversificati<strong>on</strong> of LFY activity. Finally the role of criticals amino-acids for<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong> of LFY functi<strong>on</strong> is examined.<br />

15 th <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>ference</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Arabidopsis</strong> <strong>Research</strong> 2004 · Berlin<br />

T01-006<br />

A genetic model for floral meristem development<br />

Hao Yu(1, 2), Toshiro Ito(1), Frank Wellmer(1), Elliot M Meyerowitz(1)<br />

1-Divisi<strong>on</strong> of Biology 156-29, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA<br />

2-Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Nati<strong>on</strong>al University of Singapore, 10<br />

Science Drive 4, Singapore117543<br />

The transiti<strong>on</strong> from vegetative to reproductive growth is a dramatic developmental<br />

change in the life of plants, in which newly formed meristems acquire<br />

floral rather than inflorescence identity. Floral meristem identity genes LEAFY<br />

(LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) promote establishment and maintenance of floral<br />

identity in newly formed floral primordia. Without their activity, the floral<br />

primordia develop with inflorescence characteristics. The underlying molecular-genetic<br />

mechanism remains unknown. Our studies show that these phenotypes<br />

are due in large part to the ectopic expressi<strong>on</strong> of AGAMOUS-LIKE 24<br />

(AGL24), a central regulator of floral meristem identity. We present evidence<br />

that AGL24 is an early target of transcripti<strong>on</strong>al repressi<strong>on</strong> by LFY and AP1.<br />

Without such repressi<strong>on</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>tinued AGL24 expressi<strong>on</strong> in floral meristems is<br />

sufficient to cause floral reversi<strong>on</strong> regardless of the activati<strong>on</strong> of floral organ<br />

identity genes. This reveals that LFY and AP1 promote floral development not<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly by positively regulating genes activated in flower development, but also<br />

by repressing AGL24, a promoter of inflorescence fate.<br />

Yu, H., Ito, T., Wellmer, F., Meyerowitz, E.M. (2004) Nature Genetics 36, 157-161.<br />

T01 Development 1 (Flower, Fertilizati<strong>on</strong>, Fruit, Seed)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!