10.12.2012 Views

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

MR Microinsurance_2012_03_29.indd - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 Emerging issues<br />

4. Distribution channel: A fourth approach, sometimes used by insurance companies,<br />

is to define microinsurance by the intermediary involved. For example, if<br />

products are distributed by microfinance institutions (MFIs), low-cost retailers<br />

or other organizations that typically reach the low-income market, then they<br />

could be considered as microinsurance by the insurer.<br />

All of these ways of defining microinsurance have advantages and disadvantages.<br />

Consequently, a mixed approach – looking at the concept of serving the<br />

low-income market, coupled with a quantitative product definition and allowance<br />

for provider and distribution types – may be most appropriate. For example,<br />

Allianz is piloting a microinsurance “stress test” that considers 12 parameters<br />

to assess if an insurance product qualifies as micro, which includes elements of<br />

the target group, product and distribution channel definitions.<br />

Regardless of how one defines microinsurance, product design and access are<br />

key differentiators. The focus on simplicity and accessibility, and the efficiency of<br />

processes, separates microinsurance from traditional insurance. For example,<br />

insurance with a long application form, numerous exclusions, and other requirements<br />

may not qualify as microinsurance, even if the premiums are low and the<br />

product is intended for the low-income market.<br />

<strong>Microinsurance</strong> should be defined in a manner that responds to the national<br />

or corporate objectives of regulators and insurers respectively, and thus the definitions<br />

will vary. Indeed, the trend is important not simply because the definition<br />

itself is becoming operational, but because insurers and policymakers are<br />

actually interested in putting it into practice in their operations. This indicates<br />

that they are taking this target group more seriously, and possibly creating incentives<br />

or special structures to protect the poor.<br />

There is nothing magical about the term “microinsurance”. Popular insurance<br />

provided through financial cooperatives for many years could be called microinsurance<br />

where the members of those cooperatives are poor. The mass-market<br />

insurance delivered by insurers through affinity groups – such as the members of<br />

unions or the customers of retailers or utility companies – could qualify as well.<br />

Nevertheless, the term “microinsurance” continues to be used because it emphasizes<br />

the importance of understanding the needs, preferences and characteristics<br />

of this target group: the low-income household, the working poor and the<br />

under-served.<br />

In this book, an inclusive definition is used because the primary concern is to<br />

ensure that low-income households can manage important risks more effectively.<br />

A market-based approach is relevant for some target groups, such as the working<br />

poor with small disposable incomes that insurers have not reached in the past,<br />

but it will not effectively reach the poorest of the poor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!