07.02.2017 Views

Dan Mayer Essential Evidence-based Medicine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The medical literature: an overview 27<br />

techniques in clinical settings. 1 Thus, while this book focuses on clinical<br />

studies, the principles discussed also apply to your critical appraisal of basic science<br />

research studies.<br />

Editorials<br />

Editorials are opinion pieces written by a recognized expert on a given topic.<br />

Most often they are published in response to a study in the same journal issue.<br />

Editorials are the vehicle that puts a study into perspective and shows its usefulness<br />

in clinical practice. They give contextual commentary to the study, but,<br />

because they are written by an expert who is giving an opinion, the piece incorporates<br />

that expert’s biases. Editorials should be well referenced and they should<br />

be read with a skeptical eye and not be the only article that you use to form your<br />

opinion.<br />

Clinical review<br />

A clinical review article seeks to review all the important studies on a given subject<br />

to date. It is written by an expert or someone with a special interest in the<br />

topic and is more up to date than a textbook. Clinical reviews are most useful for<br />

new learners updating their background information. Because a clinical review<br />

is written by a single author, it is subject to the writer’s biases in reporting the<br />

results of the referenced studies. Due to this, it should not be accepted uncritically.<br />

However, if you are familiar with the background literature and can determine<br />

the accuracy of the citations and subsequent recommendations, a review<br />

can help to put clinical problems into perspective. The overall strength of the<br />

review depends upon the strength (validity and impact) of each individual study.<br />

Meta-analysis or systematic review<br />

Meta-analysis or systematic review is a relatively new technique to provide a<br />

comprehensive and objective analysis of all clinical studies on a given topic. It<br />

attempts to combine many studies and is more objective in reviewing these studies<br />

than a clinical review. The authors apply statistical techniques to quantitatively<br />

combine the results of the selected studies. We will discuss the details on<br />

evaluating these types of article in Chapter 33.<br />

Components of a clinical research study<br />

Clinical studies should be reported upon in a standardized manner. The most<br />

important reporting style is referred to as the IMRAD style. This stands for<br />

1 S. T. Bogardus, Jr., J. Concato & A. R. Feinstein. Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic<br />

research: the need for methodological standards. JAMA 1999; 281: 1919–1926.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!