11.12.2012 Views

Jacques Bidet a Stathis Kouvelakis

Jacques Bidet a Stathis Kouvelakis

Jacques Bidet a Stathis Kouvelakis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Althusser • 527<br />

Althusser to produce a concept that is dif� cult to integrate as such into his<br />

own problematic – ‘ideology of a scienti� c character’:<br />

For the first time in history, we can thus be present at the birth of a<br />

radically new phenomenon: the constitution of a transformed ideology,<br />

because produced by the action of scienti� c principles on existing ideology: the<br />

constitution of a new ideology that is ideological in its form and increasingly<br />

scienti� c in its content. 60<br />

But a desperate work, like all the other Althusserian projects of this kind,<br />

in that it aims to compete with Stalinist ‘diamat’ on its own ground: that of<br />

an ontology of the working class and the party. On this ground, obviously,<br />

Althusser was defeated from the outset.<br />

In the image of his own life, Althusser constructed his whole œuvre in<br />

the dimension of catastrophe. For better or worse, he always saw to it that<br />

his concepts are undermined from within by their opposites, and thus constantly<br />

threatened with immediate collapse. At the end of this trajectory, there<br />

remains something like a incredible tension of the concept, characteristic of a<br />

style unlike any other – or rather, of one of Althusser’s styles. For there were<br />

in fact several styles, bound up with projects that everything in a sense separates<br />

and yet unites. If the real catastrophe supervened when the violence of<br />

the ontology of the party asserted itself, the tension of the concept is never<br />

very far off. Conversely, when the tension of the concept is asserted, the violence<br />

of the ontology is always subjacent. Althusser can at one and the same<br />

time write Reading ‘Capital’ and ‘Theory, Theoretical Practice and Theoretical<br />

Formation’, Reply to John Lewis and Machiavelli and Us. He can simultaneously<br />

practice symptomatic reading and reading at sight. At all events, the theoretician<br />

of the purity of the concept always wrote under the régime of the impurity<br />

of the concept.<br />

60 Untitled manual on the principles of Marxism (1966–7), IMEC archives, p. 121.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!