03.03.2017 Views

Management of HCV G4 Kasr Alainy

How would you treat HCV genotype 4 in 2017

How would you treat HCV genotype 4 in 2017

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> Patients<br />

with <strong>HCV</strong> Genotype 4<br />

Cairo, February 23, 2017<br />

Imam Waked, MD, FAASLD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />

National Liver Institute, Egypt


Global Distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>G4</strong><br />

<strong>G4</strong><br />

14%<br />

G5<br />

1%<br />

G6<br />

2%<br />

G2<br />

14%<br />

G3<br />

21%<br />

G1<br />

47%<br />

• <strong>G4</strong> mainly in Egypt, Middle East, Sub-Saharan Africa<br />

• Prevalence increasing in Europe: 15% in Belgium, 13.9% in Greece,10.1% in Switzerland<br />

• Over-represented in the <strong>HCV</strong>–HIV co-infected population, In the EUROSIDA cohort 14.7% in central,<br />

16.2% in southern Europe, 21.8% in France, 22.8% in Spain<br />

Messina J, et al. Hepatology. 2015 Alberti A, et al., J. Med. Virol. 2016


SVR12 (%)<br />

S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir-RBV<br />

• 2 studies SOF-RBV 12 or 24<br />

weeks<br />

• <strong>G4</strong> patients <strong>of</strong> Egyptian<br />

ancestry in the US (n=60)<br />

• <strong>G4</strong> patients in Egypt (n=103)<br />

• >30% with cirrhosis<br />

• >40% PEG-RBV experienced<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

68<br />

21<br />

31<br />

US Study<br />

n=60<br />

12 weeks 24 weeks<br />

93 90<br />

77<br />

27<br />

29<br />

40<br />

52<br />

46<br />

51<br />

Egypt Study<br />

n=103<br />

Ruane PJ, et al. J Hepatol, 2015 Doss W. et al. J Hepatol. 2015


SVR-12 (%)<br />

SVR12 %<br />

S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir-Ledipasvir<br />

NIAID SYNERGY: SOF-LDV in <strong>HCV</strong> <strong>G4</strong><br />

Treatment-Naive and -Experienced<br />

Patients<br />

100 95<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20 20<br />

10 21<br />

0<br />

SVR12<br />

One patient dropped out<br />

Kohli A, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015<br />

• 44 patients: 22 treatment naïve, 22 treatment experienced<br />

• <strong>G4</strong> subtypes: 4a= 25; 4d = 10; other subtypes, n = 9.<br />

• 10 (23%) had compensated cirrhosis.<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

95<br />

21<br />

22<br />

Tretament<br />

Naïve<br />

91<br />

20<br />

22<br />

Treatment<br />

experiencd<br />

100<br />

10<br />

10<br />

. With<br />

cirrhosis<br />

91 93<br />

31<br />

34<br />

Without<br />

cirrhosis<br />

Abergel A et al. Hepatology 2016<br />

41<br />

44<br />

.. Overall


SVR12, %<br />

S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir-Ledipasvir<br />

N=355<br />

Treatment naïve,<br />

n=170<br />

Week 0 8 1<br />

2<br />

LDV/SOF<br />

LDV/SOF<br />

LDV/SOF + RBV<br />

LDV/SOF + RBV<br />

20<br />

SVR12<br />

24<br />

LDV/SOF 8 wk LDV/SOF + RBV 8 wk<br />

LDV/SOF 12 wk LDV/SOF + RBV 12 wk<br />

95 90 98 98 94 100 100<br />

IFN experienced,<br />

n=74<br />

LDV/SOF<br />

LDV/SOF + RBV<br />

SOF experienced,<br />

n=11<br />

LDV/SOF + RBV<br />

• Randomized, open-label study at 4 sites in Egypt<br />

• Treatment naïve and IFN experienced patients<br />

• Randomized to treatment, stratified by presence/absence <strong>of</strong><br />

cirrhosis<br />

• Approximately 25% with compensated cirrhosis<br />

• SOF experienced patients<br />

• prior treatment with SOF + RBV for 12 or 24 weeks or LDV/SOF ±<br />

RBV for 8 weeks<br />

• assigned to LDV + SOF + RBV for 12 weeks<br />

Shiha G. et al., AASLD 2016<br />

41<br />

43<br />

38<br />

42<br />

42<br />

43<br />

Treatment Naïve<br />

41<br />

42<br />

34<br />

36<br />

38<br />

38<br />

IFN<br />

Experienced<br />

11<br />

11<br />

SOF<br />

Experienced<br />

6


SVR12 %<br />

S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir-Velpatasvir<br />

• ASTRAL-1:<br />

• Treatment-naive and<br />

treatment-experienced<br />

patients<br />

• G-4: 116 Patients<br />

• Randomized 5:1 to 12-weeks<br />

<strong>of</strong> SOF-VEL or placebo<br />

• Subtypes:<br />

• 16 <strong>G4</strong>: 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4f, 4k, 4l, 4n, 4o, 4r,<br />

4t, 4ad, 4ak, 4alv, 4dr, 4pt<br />

Feld JJ et al., N Engl J Med. 2015<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

116<br />

116<br />

All Patients<br />

27<br />

27<br />

52<br />

52<br />

All Patients With cirrhosis PEG-RBV<br />

experienced


SOF-RBV, SOF-LED, SOF-VEL<br />

• Integrated Analysis <strong>of</strong> SOF+RBV, LDV/SOF or SOF/VEL for the<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> Genotype 4 Chronic <strong>HCV</strong> Infection<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Asselah T. et al. AASLD 2016<br />

74%<br />

SOF-RBV<br />

12 wks<br />

Study 114, 138<br />

n=83<br />

SVR12 in Patients with <strong>HCV</strong>-<strong>G4</strong><br />

91% 95% 100%<br />

SOF-RBV<br />

24 wks<br />

Study 114, 138<br />

n=80<br />

SOF-LDV<br />

12 wks<br />

Synergy<br />

n=73<br />

SOF-VEL<br />

12 wks<br />

Astral 1<br />

n=116


SOF-VEL-VOX<br />

NS-5A<br />

Experienced<br />

DAA<br />

Naiive<br />

Bouliere M. et al. AASLD 2016, Jacobson I. et al. AASLD 2016


SVR12 %<br />

Grazoprevir-Elbasvir<br />

EBR + GZR + RBV 12 wks<br />

• C-SCAPE<br />

• 12 weeks GZR + EBR with or<br />

without RBV<br />

• Treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic<br />

genotype 2,4,5, and 6.<br />

• <strong>G4</strong>: 20<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

100<br />

10<br />

10<br />

<strong>G4</strong><br />

EBR + GZR 12 wks<br />

90<br />

9<br />

10<br />

Brown A. et al. EASL 2015


SVR 12 (%)<br />

Grazoprevir-Elbasvir<br />

• C-EDGE<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

100<br />

18<br />

18<br />

96<br />

27<br />

28<br />

78<br />

7<br />

9<br />

12 weeks 12 weeks 12 weeks 12 weeks + RBV 16 weeks 16 weeks + RBV<br />

93<br />

14<br />

15<br />

60<br />

3<br />

5<br />

100<br />

8<br />

8<br />

C-EDGE TN<br />

Treatment<br />

Naive<br />

C-EDGE<br />

HIV Coinfection<br />

C-EDGE TE<br />

Treatment Exp.<br />

Zeuzem S et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Rockstroh J et al. Lancet HIV 2015 Kwo P et al. EASL 2015.


SVR-12 %<br />

S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir-Simeprevir<br />

• The PLUTO trial:<br />

• 40 patients <strong>G4</strong>, SVR12: 100%<br />

• The OSIRIS trial: 100 92<br />

F0-F3<br />

n=40<br />

F4<br />

n=23<br />

SOF+SMV 8 weeks<br />

SOF + SMV 12 weeks<br />

SOF + SMV 12 weeks<br />

0 8 12 24<br />

Buti M et al, EASL 2016 El-Raziky et al. J Viral Hepatitis, 2016<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

58<br />

63<br />

75<br />

15<br />

20<br />

Overall 8 weeks 12 weeks<br />

F0-F3<br />

100 100<br />

20<br />

20<br />

23<br />

23<br />

12 weeks<br />

F4


Pariteprevir-ritonavir-Ombitasvir<br />

Agate I: Study Design<br />

• Multinational<br />

• <strong>HCV</strong>-GT-4 with compensated<br />

cirrhosis<br />

Agate II: Study Design<br />

• Patients living in Egypt with <strong>HCV</strong> GT4 infection<br />

without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis<br />

• N=160 Tx-naïve and prior PegIFN/RBVexperienced<br />

<strong>HCV</strong> GT4<br />

Naive or<br />

Peg/RBV<br />

Exp<br />

12 weeks<br />

2D+RBV: N=59<br />

16 weeks<br />

2D+RBV: N=61<br />

No cirrhosis,<br />

naive or<br />

experienced<br />

With Cirrhosis,<br />

naive or<br />

experienced<br />

2D + RBV (n=100)<br />

2D + RBV (n=31)<br />

2D + RBV (n=29)<br />

0 12 16<br />

Week<br />

All arms received 2-DAA OBV/PTV/r once-daily with weight based RBV.<br />

Asselah et al. Lancet Gastro Hep. 2016 Waked et al. Lancet Gastro Hep. 2016<br />

0 12 16<br />

24


Pariteprevir-ritonavir-Ombitasvir<br />

Asselah et al. Lancet Gastro Hep. 2016 Waked et al. Lancet Gastro Hep. 2016


SVR12 %<br />

SVR-12 %<br />

Pariteprevir-ritonavir-Ombitasvir<br />

Agate I: Results<br />

Agate II: Results<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

97 98<br />

57<br />

58<br />

60<br />

61<br />

12 Weeks 16 Weeks<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

94 97<br />

94<br />

100<br />

No cirrhosis<br />

12 weeks<br />

30<br />

31<br />

Compensated<br />

cirrhosis<br />

12 weeks<br />

93<br />

27<br />

29<br />

Compensted<br />

cirrhosis<br />

24 weeks<br />

Asselah et al. Lancet Gastro Hep. 2016 Waked et al. Lancet Gastro Hep. 2016


Pariteprevir-ritonavir-Ombitasvir<br />

Agate II: Liver Tests<br />

Waked et al. AASLD 2016


Pariteprevir-ritonavir-Ombitasvir<br />

SVR12<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

100%<br />

France<br />

ANRS HEPATHER<br />

n=54<br />

96.20% 96%<br />

Spain<br />

Real Life<br />

n=122<br />

Saudi Arabia<br />

Real Life<br />

n=117<br />

Fontaine H. et al. AASLD 2016, Crespo J et al, AASLD 2016, Alswat K, et al. AASLD 2016


Gelcaprevir-Pibrentasvir (GP)<br />

Surveyor 4<br />

G2, 4-6, Without cirrhosis G/P 8 wks<br />

Expedition 4<br />

G1-6, Renal impairment, G/P 12 wks,<br />

GT4: n= 20<br />

Hassanein T. et al. AASLD 2016, Gane E. et al. AASLD 2016


S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir + Daclatasvir<br />

• ALLY-1: SOF+DCV in advanced cirrhosis or post-LTx<br />

• 4 <strong>G4</strong> patients, SVR-12 100%<br />

• ALLY-2: SOF+DCV in HIV coinfection:<br />

• 3 <strong>G4</strong> patients, SVR12 100%<br />

• ANRS CUPILT: Post LTx<br />

• 11 <strong>G4</strong> patients, SVR12 91% (10/11)<br />

• Europe: Advanced Liver Disease, real world:<br />

• 19 <strong>G4</strong> patients, SVR12 100%<br />

Poordad et al. Hepatology. 2016 Wyles DL, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Coilly et al., J Hepatol. 2016<br />

Welzel TM, et al. Gut 2016


SVR 12 (%)<br />

Outcome <strong>of</strong> DAA Treatment in Egypt: 2015-2016<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

95%<br />

96% 98% 97% 95%<br />

76%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

SOF-PEG-RBV<br />

12 weeks<br />

n=16,418<br />

SOF-PEG-RBV<br />

12 weeks<br />

SOF-RBV<br />

24 weeks<br />

n=8,091<br />

SOF-RBV<br />

24 weeks<br />

SOF-SMV<br />

12 weeks<br />

n=10,747<br />

SOF-SMV<br />

12 weeks<br />

SOF-DCV<br />

12 weeks<br />

n=43,870<br />

SOF-DCV<br />

12 weeks<br />

SOF-DCV-<br />

SOF-DCV-RBV<br />

12 weeks<br />

n=29,581 RBV<br />

12 weeks<br />

Total<br />

n=109,572<br />

Number 17,283 8,091 10,747 43,870 29,581 109,572<br />

SVR12 # (%) 16,418 6,149 10,339 43,015 28,711 104,633<br />

Non-response # (%) 432 970 290 430 590 2,712<br />

Relapse # (%) 432 970 118 425 280 2,225<br />

Total


SVR 24 (%)<br />

S<strong>of</strong>osbuvir + Ravidasvir<br />

• 300 patients<br />

• 130 (43%) with<br />

cirrhosis<br />

100.0<br />

80.0<br />

98<br />

92<br />

100 96<br />

• 50% treatment naive<br />

• 12 weeks SOF+RVD<br />

+/-RBV<br />

• Experienced with<br />

cirrhosis: 16 wks<br />

+RBV<br />

60.0<br />

40.0<br />

20.0<br />

0.0<br />

167<br />

170<br />

No<br />

cirrhosis<br />

87<br />

95<br />

cirrhosis<br />

12 weeks<br />

35<br />

35<br />

cirrhosis<br />

16 weeks<br />

289<br />

300<br />

Overall<br />

Esmat et al. EASL 2016


http://www.hcvguidelines.org, accessed September 10, 2016<br />

AASLD Recommendations<br />

• <strong>G4</strong>: without and with compensated-cirrhosis<br />

• PAR-r-OMB + RBV 12 weeks<br />

• SOF-VEL 12 weeks<br />

• SOF-LDV 12 weeks<br />

• GZR-EBR 12 weeks (treatment naïve or PEG-RBV relapse)<br />

16 weeks + RBV (PEG-RBV on-treatment failure<br />

(null response or breakthrough)


EASL 2016<br />

EASL Recommendations 2016<br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>HCV</strong>-mono-infected or <strong>HCV</strong>/HIV co-infected patients<br />

Genotype 4<br />

Previous<br />

Treatment<br />

SOF-<br />

LDV<br />

SOF-<br />

VEL<br />

OMB-<br />

PAR-r<br />

GRZ-<br />

ELB<br />

SOF-<br />

DCV<br />

SOF-<br />

SMV<br />

Naive<br />

12 wk<br />

No RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

No RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

WITH RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

No RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

No RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

No RBV<br />

PEG-RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

NO RBV<br />

12 wk No RBV if<br />

RNA 800,000<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

NO RBV<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

NO RBV


EASL Recommendations 2016<br />

Retreatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>HCV</strong>-mono-infected or <strong>HCV</strong>/HIV co-infected patients who failed<br />

prior DAA therapy: Genotype 4<br />

Previous<br />

Treatment<br />

SOF-<br />

LDV<br />

SOF-<br />

VEL<br />

OMB-<br />

PAR-r<br />

GRZ-<br />

ELB<br />

SOF-<br />

DCV<br />

SOF-<br />

SMV<br />

SOF-<br />

OMB-<br />

PAR-r<br />

SOF-<br />

GRZ-<br />

ELB<br />

SOF-<br />

DCV-<br />

SMV<br />

SOF<br />

SOF-RBV<br />

SOF-PEG-<br />

RBV<br />

NS5A<br />

containing<br />

regimen<br />

(DCV, LDV,<br />

VEL, OMB,<br />

ELB)<br />

EASL 2016<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4)<br />

12 wk with RBV<br />

(F0-F3) and<br />

RNA 800,000<br />

and (F3-F4)<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4)<br />

NO NO NO NO NO NO<br />

NO NO NO<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4<br />

12 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F0-F3)<br />

or<br />

24 wk<br />

with RBV<br />

(F3-F4)


de Ledinghen V, et al. AASL D2016<br />

New DAAs for Re-Treatment <strong>of</strong> NS5A Failures<br />

SOF + Grazoprevir-Elbasvir + RBV (ANRS REVENGE study)<br />

• SOF-GRZ-ELB-RBV retreatment<br />

• G1 or <strong>G4</strong> with NS5A or NS3 RASs<br />

• SOF-LDV or SOF-DCV or SOF-SMV treatment failure<br />

• 16 vs 24 wks<br />

• 26 patients, 20 G1, 6 <strong>G4</strong><br />

• NS-5A RASs in 24 patients (Y93H, n=17; L31M, n=7; Q30R, n=4)<br />

• NS3 RAS in 2 patients<br />

• SVR-4: 25 (96%), one died after LTX and was RNA –ve<br />

• No relapse<br />

• No treatment related SAE, no discontinuation due to SAEs.


Conclusion<br />

• Treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>HCV</strong> <strong>G4</strong> has become very effective<br />

• Most regimens <strong>of</strong> DAAs associated with high SVR rates<br />

(>90%): SOF +: LDV, VEL, SMV, DAC; PAR-r-OMB, GZR+EBR<br />

• Real-life data with several regimens confirmed high SVR<br />

rates in clinical trials<br />

• Shorter duration treatment (8 weeks) coming soon<br />

• Generic DAAs effective


Thank You

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!