11.12.2012 Views

The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia

The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia

The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Addiction <strong>in</strong> America: <strong>The</strong> Root <strong>of</strong> the Problem<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Politics</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hero<strong>in</strong></strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asia</strong><br />

Addiction <strong>in</strong> America: <strong>The</strong> Root <strong>of</strong> the Problem<br />

Long before opium and hero<strong>in</strong> addiction became a law enforcement problem, it was a major cause for social concern <strong>in</strong><br />

the United States. By the late 1800s Americans were tak<strong>in</strong>g opium-based drugs with the same alarm<strong>in</strong>g frequency as<br />

they now consume tranquilizers, pa<strong>in</strong> killers, and diet pills. Even popular children's medic<strong>in</strong>es were frequently opium<br />

based. When hero<strong>in</strong> was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to the United States by the German pharmaceutical company, Bayer, <strong>in</strong> 1898, it<br />

was, as has already been mentioned, declared nonaddictive, and was widely prescribed <strong>in</strong> hospitals and by private<br />

practitioners as a safe substitute for morph<strong>in</strong>e. After opium smok<strong>in</strong>g was outlawed <strong>in</strong> the United States ten years later,<br />

many opium addicts turned to hero<strong>in</strong> as a legal substitute, and America's hero<strong>in</strong> problem was born,<br />

By the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> World War I the most conservative estimate <strong>of</strong> America's addict population was 200,000, and<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g alarm over the uncontrolled use <strong>of</strong> narcotics resulted <strong>in</strong> the first attempts at control. In 1914 Congress passed<br />

the Harrison Narcotics Act. It turned out to be a rather ambiguous statute, requir<strong>in</strong>g only the registration <strong>of</strong> all those<br />

handl<strong>in</strong>g opium and coca products and establish<strong>in</strong>g a stamp tax <strong>of</strong> one cent an ounce on these drugs. A medical doctor<br />

was allowed to prescribe opium, morph<strong>in</strong>e, or hero<strong>in</strong> to a patient, "<strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> his pr<strong>of</strong>essional practice only." <strong>The</strong><br />

law, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with public awareness <strong>of</strong> the plight <strong>of</strong> return<strong>in</strong>g World War I veterans who had become addicted to<br />

medical morph<strong>in</strong>e, resulted <strong>in</strong> the open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> public drug ma<strong>in</strong>tenance cl<strong>in</strong>ics. Most cl<strong>in</strong>ics tried to cure<br />

the addict by gradually reduc<strong>in</strong>g his <strong>in</strong>take <strong>of</strong> hero<strong>in</strong> and morph<strong>in</strong>e. However, <strong>in</strong> 1923 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled,<br />

<strong>in</strong> United States vs. Behrman, that the Harrison Act made it illegal for a medical doctor to prescribe morph<strong>in</strong>e or<br />

hero<strong>in</strong> to an addict under any circumstances. <strong>The</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ics shut their doors and a new figure appeared on the American<br />

scene-the pusher.<br />

file:///I|/drugtext/local/library/books/McCoy/book/06.htm[24-8-2010 15:09:31]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!