06.03.2017 Views

GlobalReport

QqMg309yB9H

QqMg309yB9H

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Global Report: Europe<br />

In the News continued from page 17<br />

UKRAINE: State Intellectual Property Service<br />

to Be Liquidated<br />

The Government of Ukraine adopted a resolution<br />

providing for (a) the liquidation of the<br />

State Intellectual Property Service of Ukraine<br />

(SIPS); (b) the transfer of functions related to<br />

implementation of the national policy in the<br />

field of IP to the Ministry of Economic Development<br />

and Trade of Ukraine (MEDT); (c) transfer<br />

of the management over the state enterprise<br />

“Ukrainian Intellectual Property Institute”<br />

(Ukrpatent), the state organization “Ukrainian<br />

Agency of Copyrights and Related Rights,” and<br />

the state enterprise “Intelzakhyst” from the<br />

SIPS to the MEDT.<br />

Resolution No. 585 was adopted on August<br />

23, 2016, in the framework of implementation<br />

of an action plan on realization of the concept<br />

of reforming the state system of intellectual<br />

property protection in Ukraine (Order No.<br />

632-р) and is aimed at the optimization of the<br />

activity of central bodies of executive power<br />

of the state system of IPR protection. In the<br />

course of implementation of the action plan, a<br />

particular emphasis will be placed on introduction<br />

of a transparent two-level structure of the<br />

state management in the field of intellectual<br />

property, reorganization of the collective copyrights<br />

management system, improvement of<br />

national legislation, and its harmonization with<br />

EU requirements.<br />

On the basis of Ukrpatent (through its reorganization)<br />

and SIPS, the National Intellectual<br />

Property Agency (NIPA) will be formed. Thus,<br />

A particular emphasis will be<br />

placed on introduction of a<br />

transparent two-level structure<br />

of the state management<br />

in the field of intellectual<br />

property, reorganization<br />

of the collective copyrights<br />

management system, improvement<br />

of national legislation,<br />

and its harmonization<br />

with EU requirements.<br />

there will be a single body responsible for implementation<br />

of the state policy in this sphere.<br />

NIPA will be coordinated by MEDT and will carry<br />

out examination of IP applications, issue registered<br />

IP rights, consider requests for invalidation<br />

of registrations of IP rights under administrative<br />

(out-of-court) procedures, register facts<br />

of disposal of proprietary intellectual property<br />

rights, and maintain respective registers of<br />

ownership of rights. The functions pertaining to<br />

monitoring compliance with the legislation are<br />

expected to be transferred to the law enforcement<br />

authorities, which is in line with the best<br />

European practices.<br />

At the same time, MEDT will fulfill functions<br />

related to developing policy in the field of IP, in<br />

particular developing and approving strategic<br />

directions in this field, elaborating legislative<br />

proposals and regulations, and maintaining<br />

continual public dialogue in the industry. As<br />

explained by Olena Minitch, Director of Department<br />

of Innovation and Intellectual Property,<br />

MEDT, there should be no technical problems<br />

with the issuance of protection documents<br />

(including trademark registration certificates),<br />

and no interruptions in the examining and<br />

appellate proceedings. The MEDT will provide<br />

for a specific sequence of steps to ensure no<br />

interruption in the consideration of applications<br />

and issuance of protection documents<br />

and legal continuity in court cases.<br />

Prior to the changes (the exact date of adoption<br />

has not been specified), the SIPS will continue<br />

performing its functions, including those<br />

related to examination and registration.<br />

Contributor: Antonina Pakharenko-Anderson<br />

Pakharenko and Partners, Kyiv, Ukraine<br />

Verifier: David Aylen<br />

Gowling WLG (International) Inc., Moscow, Russia<br />

Ms. Pakharenko-Anderson and Mr. Aylen are members<br />

of the INTA Bulletins Law & Practice—Europe<br />

Subcommittee.<br />

Additional Resources on INTA.org<br />

Country Guides<br />

Enforcement: An International Litigation<br />

Guide Global Portal<br />

International Opposition Guide<br />

Trademark Cancellations<br />

Madrid Agreement and Protocol<br />

Geographical Indications, Certification Marks<br />

and Collective Marks:<br />

An International Guide<br />

Trademark Office Benchmarking<br />

Testimony and Submissions:<br />

Review of the European Union<br />

Trademark System<br />

EU Observatory Work Programme 2017<br />

Regional Resources<br />

EUIPO<br />

EUROPA<br />

European Commission<br />

European Parliament<br />

continued on page 20<br />

18 INTA Global Report, February 2017

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!