Hand-outs for 3rd May - double sided FINAL
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SODC Local Plan Consultation Closing Date: 5pm Wednesday 17 <strong>May</strong><br />
How to submit your comments:<br />
• ONLINE (registration is required)<br />
http://www.southoxon.gov.uk/services-and-advice/planning-and-building/planningpolicy/local-plan-second-preferred-options-consul<br />
• Download a copy of the SODC Comment Form from the website and<br />
- Email it to planning.policy@southoxon.gov.uk<br />
- Or post it to SODC Planning Policy, 135 Eastern Avenue, Milton Park, Abingdon, OX14 4SB,<br />
• Pick up a <strong>for</strong>m on the way out and post it to the above address<br />
• Write an email or letter write to SODC using the above addresses.<br />
• You must put your name and address on your consultation comments<br />
• Put your comments into your own words<br />
Comments Structured <strong>for</strong> the SODC Consultation Form<br />
Policy STRAT 1 – The Overall Strategy - point 2 ‘major development at Chalgrove’<br />
Object: Disagree that all strategic development should be in central ‘heart’ of South Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire area<br />
and point out that Chalgrove is a site poorly located <strong>for</strong> the infrastructure and jobs near Ox<strong>for</strong>d.<br />
Policy STRAT 3- ‘The Unmet Housing requirements from Ox<strong>for</strong>d City’<br />
Object: This is flawed, as no site identified truly meets Ox<strong>for</strong>d’s unmet need as the strategic sites are<br />
not well located <strong>for</strong> Ox<strong>for</strong>d.<br />
Alternative sites on the Green Belt that are close to Ox<strong>for</strong>d that have been rejected by SODC, have not<br />
been given sufficient consideration, e.g. Wick Hill, Thornhill, Grenoble Road<br />
Use the arguments outlined in the bullets on the reverse of this page.<br />
Policy STRAT 9 Land at Chalgrove Airfield<br />
Object: The case <strong>for</strong> development is very weak, main reason given in consultation document “it is flat<br />
and centrally placed in South Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire.”<br />
The site is unsustainable, and has many significant disadvantages highlighted in the Sustainability<br />
Analysis carried out by SODC.<br />
Use the arguments outlined in the bullets on the reverse of this page.<br />
Policy STRAT 4 Didcot Garden Town<br />
Support<br />
Policy STRAT 6/7/8 Development at Culham and Berinsfield<br />
Support<br />
Policy STRAT 10 Land at Wheatley<br />
Support
Feedback on the South Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire Local Plan Second Preferred Options Consultation Documents<br />
Points to consider including in your website or email/written responses<br />
Please use your own words and personal arguments in logging your concerns regarding Chalgrove and Harrington proposals<br />
with South Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire District Council.<br />
• The Second Preferred Options document is a significant improvement on previous proposals prepared by SODC<br />
last year. We share SODC’s recognition of the need <strong>for</strong> more housing to serve Ox<strong>for</strong>d’s need.<br />
• Delighted to see proposals <strong>for</strong> green belt developments adjacent to Ox<strong>for</strong>d’s need in Culham and Berinsfield.<br />
• Proposals <strong>for</strong> a new town at Chalgrove were scored poorly in SODC’s own sustainability assessment in 2016 and<br />
there are no changes to the proposals that would change this low score.<br />
• The proposed development at Chalgrove airfield would be isolated. The site is 13 miles to Ox<strong>for</strong>d and not well<br />
connected by public transport. Realistically, travel to Ox<strong>for</strong>d would be 40 minutes in light traffic and considerably<br />
longer at peak times. The amount of traffic generated from 3,000 houses at Chalgrove would most likely increase<br />
such journey times to Ox<strong>for</strong>d and other settlements significantly, and commuters to work could suffer very severe<br />
traffic congestion. Cycling to the main areas of employment is unlikely to be practical <strong>for</strong> the majority of<br />
commuters.<br />
• Remote location of Chalgrove and poor connections to places of likely employment, leisure activities and shops<br />
would inevitably lead to significant car based development, significantly increasing traffic in the area, thereby<br />
increasing pollution and failing to meet Ox<strong>for</strong>d’s need.<br />
• With poor road links to Ox<strong>for</strong>d, bypasses at Stadhampton, Watlington and Benson will become necessary, taking<br />
up large quantities of farmland at huge unnecessary cost compared to straight<strong>for</strong>ward road links at sites directly<br />
adjacent to Ox<strong>for</strong>d.<br />
• The population increase in Chalgrove would put significant pressure on community cohesion. This would be<br />
exacerbated by poor access between the existing village and new development, potentially creating an “us and<br />
them” attitude.<br />
• The flooding problems that already beset Chalgrove Village are likely to be made significantly worse due to the<br />
surface water runoff from the new development.<br />
• The site will suffer from noise problems as it is on the flight path from RAF Benson and itself contains a runway<br />
actively used by the Martin Baker organisation. For the Chalgrove development to proceed, the existing runway<br />
will need to be moved to the northern end of the site. It is understood that this will cost around £12m.<br />
• Chalgrove historical battlefield presents a significant heritage constraint on the eastern side of the site.<br />
• The site’s relative proximity to the M40 means that, rather than serving Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire’s employment need, it will<br />
more likely become a commuter town <strong>for</strong> people working in London, High Wycombe, etc.. Additionally the number<br />
of cars seeking to access the M40 (at junction 6 or 7) will place huge pressure on the surrounding roads many of<br />
which are single-track and completely unsuitable <strong>for</strong> the weight of traffic the new development would bring.<br />
• The sites closer to Ox<strong>for</strong>d which have been assessed within SOSC’s sustainability appraisals (Grenoble Road, Wick<br />
Farm, Lower Earlfield and Thornhill) are far better suited to meeting the Ox<strong>for</strong>d unmet housing need.<br />
• The primary reason <strong>for</strong> rejecting the sites closer to Ox<strong>for</strong>d has been given to be due to them being within the<br />
Ox<strong>for</strong>d Green Belt, but this now seems irrational as the Culham, Berinsfield and Wheatley developments will be on<br />
Green Belt land.<br />
• The proposed site at Harrington that continues to be promoted independently is the least suited of all proposals.<br />
This site faces many of the same environmental and transport challenges as Chalgrove. The proposal is<br />
unsustainable and rightly not being supported by SODC.