Connor Gravelle Portfolio (Selected Projects)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2017<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong>
Intro &<br />
Table of Contents
ABOUT THE COVER<br />
Having spent four years at SCI-Arc, it seems that my<br />
small body of work has become somewhat productively<br />
unruly. Though some themes permeate the larger<br />
structure of the work, collecting everything under one<br />
banner (let alone four) is sometimes difficult. For this<br />
reason, I have resisted the temptation to lift any single<br />
project to the status of covering a book. Instead, all covers<br />
(seen in each in its miniature to the left) come from<br />
one enlarged image taken over a year ago in a field<br />
outside of my hometown.<br />
What this image means to me aesthetically more than<br />
compensates for its non-linear entanglement with the<br />
projects inside these books. In its most basal sense, it<br />
is a photograph taken of the edge between a cornfield<br />
and the sky on a late summer’s day. The balmy summer’s<br />
sun in New England blinded the camera with<br />
its intensity. At low exposure, the camera approached<br />
the leafs at the ends of the cornstalks in an ultimately<br />
vulnerable condition, unable to encapsulate the truth of<br />
what it was tasked to capture. With a flick of my wrist,<br />
the camera found itself completely unable to comprehend<br />
what stood before it. Light failed to register on the<br />
machine’s sensor in a way to which you might ascribe<br />
any fidelity.<br />
A brief obsession with the Japanese author Yukio<br />
Mishima this year left me with this quote from his 1968<br />
book, Sun and Steel:<br />
“The upper atmosphere where there is no oxygen is<br />
surrounded with death… No movement, no sound,<br />
no memories… In this stillness was a beauty beyond<br />
words: No more body or spirit, pen or sword, male or<br />
female… I saw a giant circle coiled around the earth,<br />
a ring that resolved all contradictions, a ring vaster<br />
than death, more fragrant than any scent I have ever<br />
known.”<br />
This image, too, is a certain kind of death. It is the death<br />
of a word — the death of a “cornstalk”. It is the final point<br />
at which the nomination of what we see eludes us,<br />
leaving nameless what we desperately seek to identify.<br />
Where the atmosphere’s outer boundary scraped<br />
at the edge of what he breathed to puncture and peel<br />
at Mishima’s reality and its definitions, the camera’s<br />
strained lens breaks the identity of what stands before<br />
it. More than cornstalk or sky, this image is the last<br />
instance of time for an entire reality. It is the border at<br />
which nouns become insufficient to transcribe what is<br />
perceived.<br />
A weltanschauung of sorts, it resonates with a great<br />
deal of the work in these books in regards to the mutual<br />
cadence that each poses towards hardline truths. The<br />
atmosphere, the cornstalk and the building all stand<br />
to defy the qualities we presume for them. More than<br />
merely encapsulating something novel, their true power<br />
emerges in the moment we stand back from the spectacle<br />
and see again exactly what we saw before. To see<br />
the cornstalk anew is to liberate its identify to the extent<br />
that we accept its capability of ontological transgression<br />
without entrapping it to our subjective demands.<br />
Rather, from where we stand, a world lifted from us for<br />
only a second to be delivered back slightly askew offers<br />
a realignment of external reality so fundamental and yet<br />
so belonging that we too find ourselves changed.
About Me<br />
6
ABOUT ME<br />
Hello! My name is <strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong>, and I am currently a<br />
candidate for an undergraduate degree here at SCI-Arc,<br />
approaching thesis as I enter my final year here.<br />
This is my portfolio. Between its covers, you will find an<br />
amassing of what I think about as per my work in visual,<br />
architectural, designed and documented forms. Its<br />
organization has been curated to follow a genealogical<br />
order, which is described in further detail on the next<br />
page.<br />
I have a particular interest in resolving new ideas about<br />
the perspectives which are cast on architecture. Both<br />
the development of the field towards its current form<br />
in historical retrospective and the possibility of future<br />
tangents into new paradigms for our built world as a<br />
whole fascinate me.<br />
I believe that architecture holds the keen possibility to<br />
influence us, as the human race, on a profound level.<br />
It is perhaps the art which encapsulates us the most<br />
within its grasps, and, in those regards, its powers<br />
should be appropriated in order to further our understanding<br />
of the human condition as manifested in our<br />
designed reality.<br />
ACADEMICS<br />
––<br />
3.96 GPA at SCI-Arc<br />
––<br />
Instruction in the German language at<br />
Goethe Institut Boston (2008-2011)<br />
––<br />
4.1 Graduating GPA from Newburyport Public High<br />
School in Newburyport, Massachusetts in 2012<br />
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS<br />
––<br />
Specially selected to represent SCI-Arc to prospective<br />
students on both tours and students panels<br />
––<br />
Chosen to display work at SCI-Arc’s annual Spring<br />
Show of student work for 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016<br />
––<br />
Chosen to participate among three students<br />
as SCI-Arc’s representation to the 2016 Julius<br />
Shulman Emerging Talent Award’s competition,<br />
organized by the LA Business Council<br />
––<br />
2012 winner of Scholastic Art Award in<br />
the Architecture category as well as subsequent<br />
Prismacolor Scholarship for design<br />
of “Mexican Border Memorial”<br />
CONTACT INFORMATION<br />
Address (LA) 411 South Main Street<br />
Unit 318<br />
Los Angeles, California 90013<br />
United States of America<br />
Address (MA) 5 Milk Street<br />
Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950<br />
United States of America<br />
Phone +1 978 918 2575<br />
Email connor_gravelle@sciarc.edu<br />
connor.gravelle@gmail.com (personal)<br />
7
Table of<br />
Contents<br />
8
Lima Museum of Art .............................................................................12<br />
Synopsis ..............................................................................................12<br />
The Core ..............................................................................................17<br />
Scales of Institutional Experience .....................................25<br />
Architecture and Freedom .....................................................25<br />
Subtle Deviations between Architectural<br />
Elements .........................................................................................30<br />
About Subtlety ...............................................................................30<br />
Where Subtlety Places Us ......................................................39<br />
Pondering the Lima Exposition Hall ................................39<br />
Learning from Grammar ..........................................................39<br />
Paseo Penasco House ........................................................................50<br />
Odd Blocks ................................................................................................. 78<br />
SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment ...................................102<br />
Synopsis ...........................................................................................102<br />
Project Scheme ...........................................................................102<br />
About Chinatown .......................................................................102<br />
Chinatown’s History ..................................................................120<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art ..................................................................128<br />
Elevations and the Politics of the Art Museum<br />
as a Contemporary Medium for Architecture ......132<br />
Circulatory Strategies ..............................................................136<br />
About the Façade .....................................................................140<br />
Organization ..................................................................................143<br />
Circulatory Vignettes .............................................................. 157<br />
[We] are LA ....................................................................................189<br />
Canonical Images in Fashion and Architecture .....194<br />
Pertaining Quotes ......................................................................194<br />
Skin ......................................................................................................194<br />
Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study ...........................206<br />
El Rosario Market Redevelopment ..........................................220<br />
The Situation in El Rosario ..................................................220<br />
Engagements of the Façade ..............................................220<br />
Contextualities ............................................................................220<br />
Urban Wallpaper ........................................................................225<br />
Lower 4th Street Masterplan ....................................................... 252<br />
Synopsis .......................................................................................... 252<br />
Site Ecology as Building Parameter .............................. 252<br />
Los Angeles Mall Office Tower ..................................................266<br />
The Education of a Neighborhood ................................266<br />
Preservation and Cultural Identity ................................. 270<br />
Urban Dichotomies .................................................................. 270<br />
Learning to Walk Again ......................................................... 270<br />
Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center .............................. 278<br />
Synopsis .......................................................................................... 278<br />
A New Federal Penitentiary No. 1 ................................... 278<br />
Tilting the Unité Model .......................................................... 278<br />
BAM Design Development ............................................................160<br />
SCI-Fa ..........................................................................................................170<br />
Synopsis ...........................................................................................170<br />
Thoughts on Program .............................................................170<br />
Thoughts on Institution ..........................................................170<br />
The Fourth Wall as Societal Device ............................... 176<br />
The Fourth Wall in Architecture........................................ 176<br />
F***, the Spline ............................................................................. 179<br />
A Mechanized Pool for Fashion ........................................183<br />
Los Angeles, or Epileptic Shock .......................................183<br />
Escape is Futile: LA Live .....................................................189<br />
Beginnings and Ends in Architecture ...........................189<br />
9
10
11
LIMA MUSEUM OF ART<br />
Thesis Studio<br />
Spring 2017, Michael Young with AT Melissa Shin<br />
Awarded Blythe and Thom Mayne Best Undergraduate Thesis Prize<br />
Synopsis<br />
Our cultural moment might be described<br />
as one of intense self-reflection. Concerns<br />
of what it means to belong and<br />
what exactly an identity is have recently,<br />
more so than ever, foregrounded themselves<br />
as questions paramount to, if not<br />
at times even more bombastic than, the<br />
very definition of such terms in a given<br />
situation. Consequently, this problematizes<br />
the architectural practice as a<br />
transcriptive discipline for identifying,<br />
materializing and, most importantly, defining<br />
the ideological conditions of given<br />
contexts, cultures and programs.<br />
In particular terms, this extension to an<br />
existing art museum takes to task preservation<br />
for its immediate engagement<br />
with identity. Thus, questions of institution,<br />
context and even the literal tectonic<br />
manifestation of a building become<br />
crucial in understanding how a building<br />
might in itself establish the possibility of<br />
productively estranging what we take for<br />
granted. This opens a working ground on<br />
which the architectural formation of the<br />
project is constantly defined by its efficacy<br />
to unsettle (though not persistently to<br />
resist or to undermine) presumed tropes,<br />
values and institutional underpinnings.<br />
The Façade<br />
This process begins first in the demands<br />
of a competition brief that places heavy<br />
cultural worth in the elevations of the<br />
existing Neoclassical structure onsite.<br />
Rather than conforming below grade or<br />
retreatingly offer a building which disappears,<br />
the project literally exercises the<br />
original structure of its west façade and<br />
moves the amputated face 40 meters<br />
towards curbside. The leftover negative<br />
space of this operation provides the<br />
working room for the new contemporary<br />
art wing to infill the space between the<br />
original structure and its severed streetside<br />
face.<br />
The Screen and the Fake Materiality<br />
From the exterior, this elevational relationship<br />
is further challenged by the<br />
intermittent construction of a glass skin<br />
wrapping between the existing and new<br />
wings of the building. Fritted with an<br />
mere image of the original building, the<br />
misregistration of this surface from its<br />
literal material referent below problematizes<br />
the orthographic elevation for which<br />
the project brief places such implication<br />
in favor of an oblique.<br />
Likewise, a perforated metal cladding<br />
around the volume of the extension mimics<br />
traditional architectural materiality in<br />
its faux travertine patterns, further enlivening<br />
this sometimes-graphic, sometimes-spatial<br />
depth. Whatever sense of<br />
depth offered in the filigree ornament<br />
of the original building offered is both<br />
highlighted and contested in the visually<br />
uncertain contradiction between the<br />
absolute flatness yet experiential dimensionality<br />
of the screen and cladding.<br />
The Entrance<br />
Moving into the building, the museum<br />
consumes the site’s demand for a pedestrian<br />
underpass across a heavily trafficked<br />
thoroughfare as well as a subway<br />
entrance by gently, slightly pulling<br />
patrons, passersby, metro riders, delivery<br />
trucks and flaneurs alike below the masses<br />
of both structures through a crevice<br />
between the ground and the perceptual<br />
weight (something ostensibly of stone<br />
with a certain heaviness) of the museum<br />
extension. This circulatory flattening of<br />
the presumed hierarchy between museum<br />
lobby, public concourse and delivery<br />
dock challenges the institutional parameters<br />
of the architecture from its very<br />
moment of entry.<br />
The Core<br />
From here, visitor circulation branches off<br />
and ascends to a lobby space at grade<br />
with the street, pinched between a fragment<br />
of the original structure’s façade,<br />
the metal-as-stone cladding and an interstitial<br />
space, framed in glass, between<br />
the two which houses a café. Program<br />
becomes performance as the circulatory<br />
pathways of the build leverage their<br />
architectural intensity (as opposed to a<br />
more pragmatically blank space such as<br />
an office or gallery) to focus the experience<br />
of traversing the building.<br />
The Storage<br />
These subtle shifts in the relationships<br />
between floorplates and walls provide<br />
spaces of “betweenness” through which<br />
several stairways and elevators slip<br />
between levels to provide different rates<br />
of passage between the building. The<br />
primary visitor route of these becomes<br />
a central core, inhabiting the interstitial<br />
space of the section between the lobby<br />
and the galleries, itself bisecting the conservation<br />
and storage areas of the museum<br />
as it bridges between the ground and<br />
second floors. Moments of interstitiality<br />
create inhabitation in the sectional gray<br />
space typically reserved for institutional<br />
program, storage or mechanical space.<br />
As one passes through this space, the<br />
museum as a curatorial and collecting<br />
space is opened up, framing the experience<br />
of the art viewer not merely as one<br />
of passivity but as one of a kind of active<br />
transience (the art not on exhibition nevertheless<br />
becomes in a way public but<br />
12 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio
14 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Axonometric
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 15
New Wholes<br />
Lamination<br />
Subtleness<br />
Bent<br />
Irrelevance<br />
Composition<br />
Collage<br />
Mere Parts<br />
Leaned<br />
Rotated<br />
(“Boxes Galore”)<br />
Displaced<br />
Architectures (Left to Right):<br />
Heydar Aliyev Center, Zaha Hadid Architects, 2012<br />
Ordos 100, multiple authors, 2012<br />
Chicago Federal Center, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, 1960-1974<br />
Neue Staatsgalerie Stuttgart, James Stirling, 1977-1984<br />
Artworks (Left to Right):<br />
Shaved<br />
Orange Crush, Marylin Minter, 2009<br />
Untitled, Ryan McGinley, 2007<br />
My Bed, Tracey Emin, 1999<br />
Red Relief, Ellsworth Kelly, 2009<br />
Untitled, Kardashian Collage, Shana Sadeghi-Ray, ~2015<br />
the spatial positioning of its enclosure in<br />
relation to the pathway of circulation infers<br />
a kind of reverse performance on the<br />
part of visitors in a kind of institutional<br />
voyeurism). Opportunities for transparency<br />
engage new axial relationships<br />
with the surrounding park and its various<br />
structures while enframing the context<br />
of the experience of vertically moving<br />
through the museum.<br />
The Center<br />
Where the original building provided a<br />
direct, axial Beaux-Arts scheme centered<br />
around a courtyard, the rearrangement<br />
of the museum spaces in this project<br />
creates a charged and ideologically less<br />
certain choreography. Where one wing’s<br />
courtyard fetishizes centrality and the<br />
subject’s subordination to a panoptic<br />
condition of architecture, the other willfully<br />
enforces a constant state of peripheralization.<br />
The core of the new building<br />
is something unable to be experienced<br />
all at once, something that at times faces<br />
the visitor with abstraction and at other<br />
times with intense literality (such as in<br />
the storage spaces) but involved in a<br />
constancy of otherness.<br />
The Regard of Oldness<br />
This does not infer a constant subordination<br />
of the existing architecture or<br />
promote a fetishistic hierarchy between<br />
old and new, but instead proposes that<br />
the careful consideration of one might inform<br />
the capacity of the other to engage<br />
the cultural conversation at hand. For<br />
instance, the repetition of enfilade gallery<br />
spaces in the existing building repeats<br />
across the top level and makes impetus<br />
for skylights.<br />
Providing a wide, open space both performs<br />
the curatorial expectations of the<br />
exhibition spaces and engages the architectural<br />
ambition to establish (in this case<br />
through these skylights) a productively<br />
conversive and uneasy posture between<br />
old and new. It is this very formal repetition<br />
of the poché inferred in the enfilade<br />
through which one pops into the galleries<br />
from below.<br />
(Above) Diagram demarcating the<br />
barriers of subtlety between objects,<br />
attempting to establish a working space<br />
(Right) Interior rendering of<br />
space between public circulation<br />
and institutional storage<br />
16 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio
A constancy of interruption between<br />
spaces reminds one in each moment of<br />
an imminent “otherness”. Not always the<br />
primary focus of a space, there remains<br />
throughout the building slippages of<br />
space, both literally and figuratively that<br />
challenge the assumed boundary conditions<br />
between programmatic, material<br />
and formal conditions. These posit a<br />
state of belonging between old and new,<br />
and within the new itself, that is not necessarily<br />
binaristic. Architecture begins to<br />
blend in for the sake of standing out.<br />
In these terms, the project probes architecture<br />
as a method for producing alternative<br />
means of belonging beyond an<br />
outdated dichotomy between traditional<br />
vernacular and building as something we<br />
might call “object-gift” to the city. Settling<br />
into its situation in a gesture of perhaps<br />
unsettled belonging, it establishes a<br />
series of conversations which reframe its<br />
context, both literally in terms of a neighborhood<br />
and a park and more figuratively<br />
in terms of a culture and a value system.<br />
These concerns highlight the performative<br />
quality of architecture the contemporary<br />
cultural field as a method only for<br />
establishing value but for questioning it<br />
through tightly choreographed interventions,<br />
subtle adjacencies and their consequent<br />
conversational possibilities.<br />
The Core<br />
The circulation “core” does only a few<br />
things, but ponders an execution of such<br />
things in terms of extreme exactitude.<br />
Where sectional variability between the<br />
entrance, storage and exhibition spaces<br />
of the museum reveals only slight dimensional<br />
differences when regarded against<br />
the overall size of the museum itself,<br />
these very minor differences in level<br />
pose extreme problems for the articulation<br />
architectural elements with such<br />
finite requirements as stairs and ramps,<br />
whether those issues be the result of<br />
building codes, ergonomics or otherwise<br />
aesthetic considerations. This represents<br />
a moment of strange efficacy in terms of<br />
generic architectural elements around<br />
the possibility of an immediate adjacency<br />
between basal architectural prerogatives<br />
(such as circulation or code-conformation)<br />
and the very problem of conceiving<br />
(and realizing) an architecture.<br />
A series of alignments and level considerations<br />
become the primary drivers of<br />
the core’s articulation. While these may<br />
be banal in the overall summation of an<br />
architectural work, their manifestation<br />
is directly tied both to the experience of<br />
a building and the general set of possible<br />
influences for its very generation. A<br />
stair or a ramp have within themselves<br />
an entire accompaniment of geometries<br />
governing rise, run, angles, permissible<br />
head heights and widths. These values<br />
are in some sense more than enough in<br />
their combining to produce a believable<br />
building, but moreover in their confabulation<br />
they acquire the ability to produce<br />
an architecture.<br />
If a confabulation is the “disturbance of<br />
memory, defined as the production of<br />
fabricated, distorted or misinterpreted<br />
memories about oneself or the world,<br />
without the conscious intention to deceive”<br />
(Wikipedia), then the arbitration of<br />
these architectural standards (the widths,<br />
heights, spacings and rises-over-runs)<br />
must be the most ubiquitous confabulation<br />
imaginable. They are a confabulation<br />
whose character is completely unavoidable<br />
for the fact that architecture has no<br />
baseline concept of reality against which<br />
to attest a deviation. The first instantiation<br />
of any building is blankness, the<br />
utter absence of constructed material,<br />
and yet the architectural process could<br />
be thought of as standing to compensate<br />
that void.<br />
Moving outside, as the subtly shifted<br />
bars which define the interior project out<br />
into the park, their slight misalignments<br />
begin to consume the disorganization or<br />
the park and justify the immense variety<br />
of local conditions throughout the<br />
block. This aren’t okay when misaligned<br />
if there’s a clear, orthogonal system,<br />
against which everything must answer<br />
for itself constantly. But, if that system<br />
embraces the variability of everything,<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 17
37<br />
27<br />
29<br />
30<br />
32 33<br />
07 14<br />
15 16 18<br />
17<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
05<br />
28<br />
31<br />
06<br />
19<br />
20<br />
09<br />
09<br />
10<br />
08<br />
13<br />
14<br />
07<br />
06<br />
04<br />
26<br />
34<br />
36<br />
35<br />
08<br />
11 12 13<br />
23<br />
24<br />
22<br />
21<br />
20<br />
15<br />
39<br />
38<br />
37<br />
04<br />
05<br />
21<br />
16<br />
46<br />
45<br />
17<br />
44<br />
34<br />
19<br />
43<br />
18<br />
03<br />
40<br />
41<br />
33 31<br />
32<br />
48<br />
47<br />
25<br />
30<br />
29<br />
03<br />
50<br />
49<br />
36<br />
24<br />
52<br />
26<br />
02<br />
42<br />
54<br />
53<br />
51<br />
25<br />
22<br />
01<br />
02<br />
28<br />
56<br />
27<br />
61<br />
59<br />
58<br />
60<br />
57<br />
23<br />
01<br />
55<br />
63<br />
62<br />
01 Rc_A.01<br />
02 -<br />
03 Rc_A.02<br />
04 Rc_A.03<br />
05 Rc_B.01<br />
06 Rc_A.04<br />
07 Rc_A.05<br />
08 Rc_A.08<br />
09 Cr.10<br />
10 Sp_A.03<br />
11 Sp_A.02<br />
12 Cr.08<br />
13 Cr.09<br />
14 Ov_A.01<br />
15 Sp_A.01<br />
16 Sp_A.04<br />
17 Sp_B.04<br />
18 Sp_B.05<br />
Main Entrance Foyer<br />
Concourse to Subway<br />
Main Lobby Ramp<br />
Main Lobby Landing<br />
Main Lobby Exhibition Space<br />
Ticketing and Elevator Bank<br />
Ticketing Booth<br />
Aft Lobby<br />
Lobby Public WC Foyer<br />
Lobby Women's WC<br />
Lobby Men's WC<br />
Ticketing Hallway 1<br />
Ticketing Hallway 2<br />
Ticketing Offices<br />
Coat Check<br />
Lobby Staff WC<br />
Power Unit<br />
Power Control Room<br />
397 m2<br />
-<br />
338 m2<br />
215 m2<br />
323 m2<br />
106 m2<br />
57 m2<br />
165 m2<br />
14 m2<br />
23 m2<br />
21 m2<br />
18 m2<br />
8 m2<br />
20 m2<br />
53 m2<br />
12 m2<br />
51 m2<br />
24 m2<br />
19 Cr.06<br />
20 Ov_C.01<br />
21 Ov_C.02<br />
22 Sp_B.02<br />
23 Sp_B.03<br />
24 Cr.01<br />
25 Ov_B.01<br />
26 Rc_A.06<br />
27 Rc_C.01<br />
28 Sp_A.05<br />
29 Cr.02<br />
30 Cr.12<br />
31 Ov_C.05<br />
32 Sp_A.07<br />
33 Sp_A.08<br />
34 Re_A.01<br />
35 Re_A.06<br />
36 Re_A.05<br />
Lobby Administrative Access Hallway 62 m2<br />
Lobby Storage Room 1<br />
7 m2<br />
Lobby Storage Room 2<br />
7 m2<br />
Deliveries / Loading Dock<br />
334 m2<br />
Equiptment Room<br />
48 m2<br />
Ground Floor Freight Elevtor Lobby 45 m2<br />
Woodshop<br />
63 m2<br />
Education Foyer<br />
250 m2<br />
Main Café Space and Bar<br />
202 m2<br />
Café Kitchen<br />
33 m2<br />
Existing Stairwell North<br />
51 m2<br />
Café WC Access Hallway<br />
48 m2<br />
Library Storage Room<br />
11 m2<br />
Café Men's WC<br />
22 m2<br />
Café Women's WC<br />
22 m2<br />
Library<br />
364 m2<br />
Library Reading Room<br />
55 m2<br />
Library Book Depository<br />
25 m2<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
43<br />
44<br />
45<br />
46<br />
47<br />
48<br />
49<br />
50<br />
51<br />
52<br />
53<br />
54<br />
Cr.14<br />
Re_A.07<br />
Cr.13<br />
Rc_A.07<br />
Cr.15<br />
Ed_A.01<br />
Ed_B.04<br />
Ed_B.01<br />
Cr.16<br />
Sp_A.09<br />
Ed_B.05<br />
Ed_B.02<br />
Cr.17<br />
Sp_A.10<br />
Ed_B.06<br />
Ed_B.03<br />
Cr.18<br />
Sp_A.11<br />
Library Office Foyer<br />
Library Office<br />
Library Transitional Space<br />
Courtyard<br />
Education Main Hallway<br />
Lecture Hall (373 seats)<br />
Medium Classroom 1<br />
Small Classroom 1<br />
Education Classroom WC Foyer 1<br />
Classroom WC 1<br />
Medium Classroom 2<br />
Small Classroom 2<br />
Education Classroom WC Foyer 2<br />
Classroom WC 2<br />
Medium Classroom 3<br />
Small Classroom 3<br />
Education Classroom WC Foyer 3<br />
Classroom WC 3<br />
7 m2<br />
16 m2<br />
19 m2<br />
577 m2<br />
238 m2<br />
423 m2<br />
75 m2<br />
53 m2<br />
6 m2<br />
13 m2<br />
68 m2<br />
46 m2<br />
6 m2<br />
13 m2<br />
83 m2<br />
61 m2<br />
6 m2<br />
13 m2<br />
55 Ed_B.07<br />
56 Ed_C.03<br />
57 Cr.03<br />
58 Ed_B.08<br />
59 Cr.19<br />
60 Sp_A.13<br />
61 Sp_A.12<br />
62 Ed_C.02<br />
63 Ed_C.01<br />
Large Classroom<br />
Educational Storage<br />
Existing Stairwell South<br />
Education Breakout Space<br />
Education WC Foyer<br />
Education Women's WC<br />
Education Men's WC<br />
Education Offices Auxiliary<br />
Education Offices Main<br />
127 m2<br />
21 m2<br />
74 m2<br />
136 m2<br />
11 m2<br />
19 m2<br />
18 m2<br />
36 m2<br />
56 m2<br />
18 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Plans (-0,5, +1 and 2)
19<br />
26 25<br />
24<br />
23<br />
04<br />
09<br />
21<br />
22<br />
29<br />
18<br />
08<br />
03<br />
06<br />
05<br />
19<br />
17<br />
20<br />
07<br />
10<br />
02<br />
35<br />
12<br />
16<br />
13<br />
14<br />
01<br />
15<br />
27<br />
11<br />
28<br />
01 Ov_C.06<br />
02 Rc_A.09<br />
03 Cr.23<br />
04 Rc_A.10<br />
05 Rc_A.11<br />
06 Ov_A.04<br />
07 Ov_A.03<br />
08 Ov_A.02<br />
09 Ov_C.07<br />
10 Ov_C.08<br />
11 Ov_A.06<br />
12 Ov_A.07<br />
13 Ov_A.08<br />
14 Ov_A.05<br />
15 Ov_A.09<br />
16 Ov_A.10<br />
17 Ov_A.11<br />
18 Ov_A.12<br />
Collection Storage Vault<br />
844 m2<br />
Storage Foyer<br />
191 m2<br />
Administration West Access Ramp 63 m2<br />
Administration Lobby West 157 m2<br />
Administration Lobby East 233 m2<br />
Administration Workspace South 238 m2<br />
Administration Workspace North 108 m2<br />
Administration Foyer<br />
96 m2<br />
Museography Storage Room 105 m2<br />
Museography Storage Office 14 m2<br />
Small Office 1<br />
11 m2<br />
Small Office 2<br />
11 m2<br />
Small Office 3<br />
10 m2<br />
Conference Room<br />
36 m2<br />
Large Office 1<br />
18 m2<br />
Large Office 2<br />
18 m2<br />
Large Office 3<br />
18 m2<br />
Large Office 4<br />
16 m2<br />
20<br />
21<br />
22<br />
23<br />
24<br />
25<br />
26<br />
27<br />
28<br />
29<br />
30<br />
31<br />
32<br />
33<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
Sp_A.14<br />
Sp_A.15<br />
Ov_C.09<br />
Cr.22<br />
Sp_A.17<br />
Sp_A.16<br />
Cr.24<br />
Cr.20<br />
Ov_B.02<br />
Ov_B.04<br />
Cr.25<br />
Ov_B.05<br />
Cr.26<br />
Ov_B.06<br />
Ov_C.11<br />
Ov_B.03<br />
Cr.27<br />
Ov_C.11<br />
Administration Kitchen<br />
25 m2<br />
Administration Private WC<br />
7 m2<br />
Administration Storage<br />
47 m2<br />
Administration East Access Hallway 19 m2<br />
Administration Lobby Women's WC 28 m2<br />
Administration Lobby Men's WC 28 m2<br />
Conservation Area Access Hallway 34 m2<br />
Conservation Freight Elevator Lobby 35 m2<br />
Conservation Workshop 1<br />
231 m2<br />
Conservation Office 1<br />
34 m2<br />
Conservation Transitional Space 29 m2<br />
Conservation Office 2<br />
25 m2<br />
Conservation Workshop 2 Foyer 10 m2<br />
Conservation Office 3<br />
24 m2<br />
Conservation Storage Room 2 7 m2<br />
Conservation Workshop 2<br />
113 m2<br />
East Egress Breakout Space 61 m2<br />
Conservation Storage Room 1 16 m2<br />
01 Ex_E.01<br />
02 Ex_E.02<br />
03 Ex_E.03<br />
04 Ex_E.04<br />
05 Cr.28<br />
06 Sp_A.20<br />
07 Sp_A.19<br />
08 Ov_C.12<br />
09 Ex_B.05<br />
10 Ex_A.05<br />
11 Ex_A.01<br />
12 Ex_A.04<br />
13 Ex_C.01<br />
14 Ex_C.02<br />
15 Ex_A.02<br />
16 Ex_D.01<br />
17 Ex_D.02<br />
18 Ex_D.03<br />
Contemporary Art Hall South 908 m2<br />
Contemporary Art Hall East 617 m2<br />
Contemporary Art Hall West 687 m2<br />
Contemporary Art Hall North 1025 m2<br />
Gallery WC Foyer<br />
6 m2<br />
Gallery Women's WC<br />
22 m2<br />
Gallery Men's WC<br />
26 m2<br />
Cont. Gallery Storage Room<br />
17 m2<br />
Video Projection Room<br />
80 m2<br />
Auxiliary Special Collection Room 99 m2<br />
Textiles Room<br />
228 m2<br />
Silverworks Gallery<br />
331 m2<br />
South Hall Exhibition Space 1 73 m2<br />
South Hall Exhibition Space 2 40 m2<br />
Prado Room<br />
113 m2<br />
Modern Art Hall South<br />
139 m2<br />
Modern Art Hall<br />
148 m2<br />
Modern Art Hall North<br />
139 m2<br />
19 Ex_B.01<br />
20 Ex_B.03<br />
21 Ex_C.03<br />
22 Ex_C.04<br />
23 Ex_B.04<br />
24 Ex_A.03<br />
25 Ov_C.14<br />
26 Ov_C.13<br />
27 Ex_C.05<br />
28 Ov_C.15<br />
29 Ex_D.04<br />
Colonial and Precolumbian Art<br />
Republican Art<br />
North Hall Exhibition Space 1<br />
North Hall Exhibition Space 2<br />
Photography<br />
Drawing Gallery<br />
Drawing Gallery Storage Room 2<br />
Drawing Gallery Storage Room 1<br />
Auxiliary Exhibition Space<br />
Textiles Room Storage Room<br />
Modern Art Foyer<br />
295 m2<br />
251 m2<br />
74 m2<br />
40 m2<br />
113 m2<br />
354 m2<br />
18 m2<br />
18 m2<br />
33 m2<br />
18 m2<br />
185 m2<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 19
27<br />
30<br />
32 33<br />
29<br />
28<br />
31<br />
09<br />
08<br />
11<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
39<br />
38<br />
37<br />
46<br />
45<br />
44<br />
34<br />
43<br />
40<br />
41<br />
20 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Plan Details<br />
48<br />
47<br />
33 31<br />
32
08<br />
03<br />
07 14<br />
15 16<br />
06<br />
17<br />
18<br />
05<br />
06<br />
19<br />
20<br />
07<br />
10<br />
12 13<br />
23<br />
24<br />
22<br />
21<br />
02<br />
05<br />
04<br />
01<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 21
22 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Render: Circuation and Storage
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Render: Galleries and Circulation<br />
23
Roof<br />
Gallery-accessible patio<br />
Skylights<br />
Long-Span Roof Underside Structure<br />
130cm-depth structural truss<br />
Upper Level<br />
Galleries<br />
Core<br />
Façade Cladding<br />
Perforated Panels<br />
264cm standard width<br />
624.3cm standard (but variable) height<br />
Vierendeel System<br />
Upper Supports<br />
100cm x 60cm W-Sections primary<br />
80cm x 50cm W-Sections secondary<br />
Middle Level<br />
Administration<br />
Collection storage<br />
Conservation workshops<br />
Façade Cladding<br />
Metal Support Structure<br />
45cm x 20cm W-Sections vertically<br />
47.6cm x 23.8cm W-Sections horizontally<br />
10cm x 7.5cm C-Channel sliding connections<br />
12.5cm strut panel connectors<br />
Vierendeel System<br />
Main Crossing Members<br />
60cm x 30cm W-Sections primary horizontally<br />
40cm x 20cm W-Sections secondary horizontally<br />
50cm x 30cm W-Sections vertically<br />
Glass Screen<br />
Support Structure<br />
15cm x 5cm vertical clip struts<br />
10cm x 3cm horizontal tube steel members<br />
15cm x 5cm façade connectors<br />
Vierendeel System<br />
Vertical Supports<br />
100cm x 60cm W-Sections<br />
Lobby Hung Glass Ceiling<br />
526.5cm x 273.4cm standard glazed panels<br />
7.5cm tube steel connection frame<br />
5cm diameter hanging members<br />
Glass Screen<br />
Fritted Glass Panels<br />
350cm standard width<br />
900cm standard (but variable) height<br />
Ground Level<br />
Entrance concourse<br />
Education facilities<br />
Auditorium<br />
Deliveries<br />
24 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Exploded Axonometric of Structure
Subtle<br />
Subtlety<br />
Awkward<br />
~1600 C.E. (mid-16c. as a surname),<br />
sotil, "penetrating; ingenious;<br />
refined" (of the mind);<br />
"sophisticated, intricate, abstruse"<br />
(of arguments)<br />
Imported from Old French sotil,<br />
soutil, subtil "adept, adroit; cunning,<br />
wise; detailed; well-crafted"<br />
Originally Latin subtilis "fine, thin,<br />
delicate, finely woven;" figuratively<br />
"precise, exact, accurate,"<br />
in taste or judgment, "fine, keen,"<br />
of style, "plain, simple, direct,"<br />
from sub "under" + -tilis, from<br />
tela "web, net, warp of a fabric".<br />
~1600 C.E., sotilte, "skill, ingenuity,"<br />
from Old French sotilte "skillfulness,<br />
cunning" (Modern<br />
French subtilité),<br />
Originally Latin subtilitatem<br />
(nominative subtilitas) "fineness;<br />
simplicity, slenderness," noun of<br />
quality from subtilis "fine, thin,<br />
delicate" (see subtle).<br />
First attested in late 14th century<br />
as "cleverness, shrewdness;<br />
trickery, guile, craftiness," also<br />
"thinness, slenderness, smallness;<br />
rarity"<br />
~mid. 1500s C.E., "in the wrong<br />
direction," from awk, "back-handed",<br />
+ adverbial suffix weard.<br />
Meaning "clumsy" first recorded<br />
1520s<br />
→ Awk<br />
From Old Norse ofugr /ofigr /<br />
afigr, “turned backwards”, from<br />
which also come Danish avet,<br />
“backwards”, and Swedish avig,<br />
“turned backwards”<br />
Cognate with German äbich, and<br />
Gothic ibuks, “turned back”; Akin<br />
to Sanskrit अपाच् (apāc), “turned<br />
away”<br />
Subtlety<br />
in space<br />
Subtlety in angle<br />
Overall Disposition<br />
Minutia, Detail<br />
Endgame<br />
Means<br />
Object-Object Relations<br />
Nonsuperlative Statement<br />
Nonhierarchical Adjacency<br />
Subject-Object Relations<br />
Value Judgement<br />
Social Transgression<br />
Photos: Ruedi Walti, BBC, Hiroshi Sugimoto<br />
Etymologies: Etymonline, Wiktionary<br />
then the disorder of the park itself becomes<br />
an asset.<br />
Scales of Institutional Experience<br />
There should be two nearly distinct<br />
yet intertwined circulatory systems.<br />
The main system is a series of roughly<br />
4-meter wide ramps which wind down<br />
through the galleries, bisecting the storage<br />
space and administrative areas as<br />
they trudge down through the tertiary<br />
core (a lightwell, of sorts) of the building.<br />
Somewhat intertwined yet in more<br />
intimate spaces, 2-meter stairs offer short<br />
cuts between spaces, bridging the further<br />
removed programmatic areas, such<br />
as education to administration. One set<br />
of spaces offers the “public” experience<br />
of the institution as a singular, communal<br />
place in all its ‘placyness’, while<br />
the second provides for more solipsistic,<br />
individuated experiences by virtue of its<br />
more intimate scale and more expedient<br />
circulatory routes. The contemporary art<br />
museum is architecturally a space expected<br />
to deliver somewhat paradoxically<br />
on these distinct levels of experience.<br />
Where circulation can come to underline<br />
this capacity of architecture<br />
Architecture and Freedom<br />
We expect certain standards of our<br />
democratic instructions, such as universal<br />
treatment standards and bureaucratic<br />
transparency. Such exulting expectations<br />
of public institutions have in a<br />
way become aestheticized into a series<br />
of rather representational maneuvers,<br />
extending all the way into architecture.<br />
A prognosis of contemporary design in<br />
the public realm reveals a ubiquitous, yet<br />
unspoken, cadaver of material, organizational<br />
and infrastructural tendencies<br />
that proclaim the democratic values of<br />
our buildings. Far from truly denoting<br />
the internalized veneration of democracy<br />
that a building’s occupants might stand<br />
for, these are often a top-level gloss that<br />
(Above) Diagram of the differences<br />
between subtlety and awkwardness,<br />
both of which deal in terms of particular<br />
slight differences between things<br />
merely performs its support for liberatory<br />
politics. That bureaucratic office buildings<br />
in China, Russia, the United States<br />
and Germany might all look rather similar<br />
only proves the fallacy that we can indicate<br />
the progressiveness of a society in<br />
stone, metal and glass.<br />
While it may seem contradictory, this is<br />
not to undermine the innumerable investments<br />
made by certain architectural<br />
movements in the name of progressive<br />
architecture, particularly the Modernists.<br />
A great many Modern buildings<br />
do indeed (or rather did indeed in their<br />
prospective times) successfully align the<br />
materiality and organizational qualities<br />
of their architecture with political trends.<br />
This eloquent complexity can be found in<br />
Modernism’s dual capacity to represent<br />
in nearly identical maneuvers at once the<br />
transparency and freedom of Neimeyer’s<br />
work in Brasilia and Terragni’s work for<br />
the Italian Fascists. The problem contemporary<br />
architecture runs into which is<br />
successfully avoided in these examples<br />
is a misalignment between expressed<br />
political intent and the actuality of a<br />
building’s situation.<br />
A glass façade’s ability to express transparency<br />
makes only pathetic ripples<br />
in its wake if the institution behind its<br />
curtain wall is the American government’s<br />
National Security Agency. Until<br />
actual political change can take place,<br />
the architectural intent of this element is<br />
merely ironic and consequentially unsuccessful.<br />
This contextuality is precisely the<br />
reason why a fairly elected Italian city<br />
council can adequately perform its expected<br />
democratic functions in a building<br />
the origins of which hail from the wartime<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 25
Façade Cladding<br />
Perforated Panels<br />
264cm standard width<br />
624.3cm standard (but variable) height<br />
Façade Cladding<br />
Metal Support Structure<br />
45cm x 20cm W-Sections vertically<br />
47.6cm x 23.8cm W-Sections horizontally<br />
10cm x 7.5cm C-Channel sliding connections<br />
12.5cm strut panel connectors<br />
Long-Span Roof Undersid<br />
130cm-depth structural trus<br />
26 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Structure Axonometric (Details)<br />
Vie<br />
Ver<br />
100<br />
Vierendeel Sy<br />
Upper Suppor
Vierendeel System<br />
Upper Supports<br />
100cm x 60cm W-Sections primary<br />
80cm x 50cm W-Sections secondary<br />
t<br />
Roof<br />
Gallery-accessible patio<br />
Skylights<br />
Middle Level<br />
Administration<br />
Collection storage<br />
Conservation workshops<br />
Vierendeel System<br />
Main Crossing Members<br />
60cm x 30cm W-Sections primary horizontally<br />
40cm x 20cm W-Sections secondary horizontally<br />
50cm x 30cm W-Sections vertically<br />
Glass Screen<br />
Support Structure<br />
15cm x 5cm vertical clip<br />
10cm x 3cm horizontal<br />
15cm x 5cm façade con<br />
e Structure<br />
s<br />
Upper Level<br />
Galleries<br />
Core<br />
Vierendeel System<br />
Vertical Supports<br />
100cm x 60cm W-Sections<br />
Lobby Hung Glass Ceiling<br />
526.5cm x 273.4cm standard glazed panels<br />
7.5cm tube steel connection frame<br />
5cm diameter hanging members<br />
Glass Screen<br />
Fritted Glass Panels<br />
350cm standard width<br />
900cm standard (but va<br />
stem<br />
ts<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 27<br />
Ground Level<br />
Entrance concourse
28 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Model Photographs
Fascist construction campaign. It is the<br />
reason for which one might have a picnic<br />
at the Nuremburg Rally Grounds without<br />
indulging in the politics of the Nazi<br />
Party. A building is only as valuable as<br />
its political underpinnings, or rather the<br />
extent to which its continued inhabitation<br />
repudiates those foundations (such as in<br />
the case of the Rally Grounds or the civic<br />
buildings of Mussolini’s Italy).<br />
We must at once hold steadfast the trial<br />
by which architecture is kept to a strict<br />
moral code and allow for the slippage<br />
of this code to the extent that we might<br />
question the presumed expectations this<br />
forces us to enact on an architecture.<br />
Why do we continue to create building<br />
which so thoroughly fail to represent the<br />
progressive values of our age? Conversely,<br />
why do we expect architecture<br />
to free us? This is surely too tall an order<br />
and identifies the ultimate irony that<br />
proclaimed the downfall of High Modernism.<br />
If the sheer starkness of the difference<br />
between the Barbican’s tumultuous<br />
exaltation into architectural stardom and<br />
nearby Robin Hood Garden’s dilapidation<br />
alongside London’s docklands does not<br />
elucidate the point clearly enough, we<br />
must look harder to realize that architecture<br />
is ultimately subservient to the<br />
respective capabilities of its financers to<br />
provide for the proper services, maintenance<br />
and larger democratic ideals by<br />
which it thrives or in the lack of which it<br />
ruinates.<br />
Subtle Deviations between<br />
Architectural Elements<br />
Presumption frames everything in the<br />
field of one’s experience. In the same<br />
way, each architectural element comes<br />
alongside a series of expected functions,<br />
aesthetics and positions relative to the<br />
other systems which define a building.<br />
These ingrained complacencies<br />
of circumstance dictate a great deal of<br />
how we perceive the built environment,<br />
a stalemate status quo against which<br />
“radical” architecture has spent the<br />
majority of the last half century resisting,<br />
undermining and perverting in the name<br />
of producing a truly new architecture.<br />
This precipice has, time and time again,<br />
proven reticent to be crossed. Ostensibly<br />
radical architecture has focused almost<br />
solely on the foreground of human perception,<br />
at once ignoring the subtleties of<br />
the periphery and overwhelmingly failing<br />
to undertake the task of addressing political,<br />
economic and social concerns.<br />
About Subtlety<br />
Perhaps the thesis isn’t so much about<br />
overall subtlety, but an approach which<br />
takes each architectural element into<br />
account on its own scale. What would be<br />
the subtle manipulations of the standard<br />
architectural elements (a floor, a wall or a<br />
column) which would gently push them<br />
far enough beyond the typical boundaries<br />
of normative perception but within<br />
the borders of reconcilability as their<br />
own distinct elements? E.g. one needs to<br />
recognize something as a column prior<br />
(Below) West elevation showing<br />
the relationship between the glass<br />
screen, the removed façade and<br />
the fake stone panels behind<br />
(Right) Oblique axonometric drawing<br />
showing the organizational shifts<br />
between different architectural<br />
elements that produce ambiguity<br />
in the building’s organization<br />
30 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio West Elevation
Vierendeel Truss Supports<br />
Original East Façade<br />
Secondary Egress<br />
Core and Skylights<br />
Adminsitration Shortcut<br />
Gallery Egress<br />
New Façade<br />
Original Façade, Repositioned<br />
Skewed Building Layers<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Axonometric of Internal Shifts<br />
31
2 4 6 8<br />
8 7 6 5<br />
1 3 5 7<br />
Architectural End Matching<br />
1 2 3 4<br />
Panel End Matching<br />
Book Matching<br />
1_1 1_2 1_3<br />
Eight-Piece Sunburst Matching<br />
Box Matching<br />
Herringbone (V-Book) Matching<br />
2_1 2_2 2_3<br />
Continuous End Matching<br />
32 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Stone Material Studies
Slip Matching<br />
Random Matching<br />
1_4 1_5 1_6<br />
Reverse (End Grain) Box Matching<br />
Parquet Matching<br />
2_4 2_5 2_6<br />
Reverse Diamond Matching<br />
Swing Matching<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 33
5<br />
4<br />
13<br />
3<br />
14<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Section: Vertical Compression of Institutional Space<br />
34 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Section: Vertical Hierarchy of Spaces
6 7 8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11 12<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
-<br />
Rc_A.02<br />
Ov_C.06<br />
Ex_E.02<br />
Ex_E.01<br />
Ex_D.04<br />
Ex_C.01<br />
Concourse to Subway<br />
Main Lobby Ramp<br />
Collection Storage Vault<br />
Contemporary Art Hall East<br />
Contemporary Art Hall South<br />
Modern Art Foyer<br />
South Hall Exhibition Space 1<br />
-<br />
338 m2<br />
844 m2<br />
617 m2<br />
908 m2<br />
185 m2<br />
73 m2<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
Ex_C.02<br />
Ex_B.03<br />
Ed_A.01<br />
Ed_C.03<br />
Ed_B.07<br />
Ov_B.02<br />
Sp_B.0<br />
South Hall Exhibition Space 2<br />
Republican Art<br />
Lecture Hall<br />
Educational Storage<br />
Large Classroom<br />
Conservation Workshop 1<br />
Loading Dock<br />
40 m2<br />
251 m2<br />
423 m2<br />
21 m2<br />
127 m2<br />
231 m2<br />
143 m2<br />
1:200<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 35
36 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Model Photograph: Galleries
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photograph: Glass Screen<br />
37
5 6<br />
8 9 7<br />
3 4<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1 - Concourse to Subway<br />
-<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
Rc_A.03<br />
Rc_A.09<br />
Ov_C.06<br />
Main Lobby Landing<br />
Storage Foyer<br />
Collection Storage Vault<br />
215 m2<br />
191 m2<br />
844 m2<br />
5 Ex_E.04 Contemporary Art Hall North 1025 m2<br />
6 Ex_E.01 Contemporary Art Hall South 908 m2<br />
7 Rc_A.10 Administration Lobby West<br />
157 m2<br />
8 Ov_C.07 Museography Storage Room 105 m2<br />
Section: Vertical Procession 9 Ov_C.08 Museography Storage Office<br />
14 m2 1:200<br />
7<br />
4 5 6 8 9<br />
10<br />
14 13 12<br />
15<br />
11<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1 - Concourse to Subway<br />
- m2 9 Ex_D.02 Modern Art Hall<br />
148 m2<br />
2 Rc_A.02 Main Lobby Ramp<br />
338 m2 10 Ex_B.03 Republican Art<br />
251 m2<br />
3 Cr.15 Education Main Hallway<br />
238 m2 11 Sp_B.03 Equiptment Room<br />
48 m2<br />
4 Ex_E.03 Contemporary Art Hall West 687 m2 12 Cr.23 Administration Access Ramp 63 m2<br />
5 Ex_E.02 Contemporary Art Hall East<br />
617 m2 13 Ov_C.10 Conservation Storage Room 1 16 m2<br />
6 Ex_B.04 Photography<br />
113 m2 14 Cr.24 Conservation Area Access Hallway 34 m2<br />
7 Ov_C.121 Contemporary Art Gallery Storage 17 m2 15 Rc_A.11 Administration Lobby East<br />
233 m2<br />
Section: Contrasting Centers 8 Ex_B.02 Colonial Art<br />
149 m2<br />
1:200<br />
38 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Sections
to one’s recognition that it is a strange,<br />
unfamiliar or otherwise distinct column.<br />
Speaking economically, to what extent<br />
does this undermine or substantiate the<br />
value claim for expensive design? Political<br />
stances would presume that luxurious<br />
design is unsavory, but to what extent<br />
do expense and luxury as uncommon<br />
characteristic to an architecture deviate<br />
it from the norm? Where is the border<br />
between a normative, but expensive,<br />
building by Annabelle Selldorf and one<br />
is both abnormal and expensive, such<br />
as the more innovative sides of Zaha<br />
Hadid’s work?<br />
Where Subtlety Places Us<br />
We often think of architecture as paradoxically<br />
lodged between immediate and<br />
hinesight states of perception, creating<br />
totalizing environments and yet obfuscated<br />
to the pedestrian act providing inhabitable<br />
space. Always either battle cry or<br />
whisper, architecture seldom ‘just barely’<br />
positions itself within the world. This unexplored<br />
territory could be described as<br />
a subtle posture towards existence. While<br />
clearly demarcated identities are productive<br />
in their distinguishability, subtlety<br />
allows the simultaneous existence of two<br />
conditions within immediate self-adjacency<br />
to the extent that they engage a<br />
delicate contrapposto without flattening<br />
or laminating into a new whole.<br />
Rejecting forthright coherence, this tension<br />
between dichotomy and sameness<br />
allows architecture to stage conversions<br />
between things about identity and comparative<br />
value. This methodology undermines<br />
the simplicity of mere binary juxtapositions<br />
to acknowledge the complexity<br />
and ambiguity in conditions of subtle<br />
difference, arguably more attuned to our<br />
contemporary perceptions of identity. As<br />
early explorations employ slight adjustments<br />
on a grid to problematize conditions<br />
of joinery and coincidence between<br />
parts, the subsequent prerogative of this<br />
thesis shifts focus towards an interrogation<br />
of new readings found in the<br />
resultant subtleties of the forms through<br />
abstractions inherent to the process of<br />
representation, such as lighting exposure<br />
and blurriness.<br />
These new almost-wholes obfuscate singular<br />
reading to refute the demand that<br />
they assemble into cathartic objects —<br />
that is, they refuse to provide the viewer<br />
the traditionally clear or uncluttered<br />
comprehension in how they perceive the<br />
object. Part-to-part relationships taper to<br />
precarious tangencies rather than clear<br />
resolutions so that the reading of the object<br />
itself is constantly held at a distance,<br />
just beyond immediacy but within a<br />
blurry margin of error for ossifying one’s<br />
understanding of the object.<br />
Pondering the Lima Exposition Hall<br />
What is it? The current exposition hall<br />
that houses the Lima Museum of Art is a<br />
standard, rather generic late nineteenth<br />
century structure. It’s architecture is<br />
one positioned midway between sheer<br />
industrial efficiency and late neoclassical<br />
ornamentation, as evidenced in the<br />
strange coexistence of its rigid (yet heavily<br />
ornamented) iron column structural<br />
grid alongside a series of more traditional<br />
gallery spaces secured between<br />
the columns by permanent yet mostly<br />
superfluous, in terms of structural capacity,<br />
dividing walls. This condition produces<br />
an odd relationship in the existing<br />
structure between underlying structural<br />
strategies and more architecturally considered<br />
spaces. These two languages are<br />
not quite indifferent from one another yet<br />
retain a certain kind of ambivalence. Iron<br />
columns puncture dramatically through<br />
spaces typically reserved for a higher<br />
degree of spatial independence, such<br />
as circulatory hallways and entrance<br />
lobbies. For the most part, columns fail<br />
to align to walls not in an act of sheer<br />
ambivalence but remain uncomfortably<br />
nearby, as if set to a grid accidentally<br />
placed in slight disposition. More aptly<br />
described as siblings than mere neighbors,<br />
the two systems function as if they<br />
were Spanish and Italian, retaining a certain<br />
degree of mutual intelligibility while<br />
pronouncing distinct characteristics<br />
that are, in themselves, defined by their<br />
almost-but-not-quite perfect adjacency.<br />
Where is it? This mutual condition of<br />
strangely contingent ambivalence is in no<br />
way unfamiliar to Lima, a city startled between<br />
a series of seemingly oppositional<br />
forces. Such dichotomies as mountains<br />
and sea, wealth and poverty or Pre-<br />
Columbian and Colonial are the innate<br />
foundations of cultural identity for the<br />
city, predisposing its urbanity to become<br />
a cacophony of qualities, much akin to<br />
various other Latin American cities. Unlike<br />
its counterparts, Lima’s urbanistic<br />
history produces a variety of adjacency<br />
between different eras that runs horizontally,<br />
rather than along the vertical axis.<br />
While a place of considerable wealth and<br />
influence, Pre-Columbian settlements<br />
throughout the valleys currently woven<br />
with Lima’s sprawling suburbs primarily<br />
relied on irrigation systems to feed wide<br />
swaths of crops, focusing urban development<br />
less on clustered places of inhabitation<br />
than on singular religious sites to<br />
unite people located somewhat sparsely<br />
across farmlands. The city that became<br />
the Lima one currently understands<br />
was established among, not above, this<br />
situation in 1535. Because the city came<br />
to contend for space horizontally, rather<br />
than through the more typical process of<br />
vertical overlay witnessed in Mexico City<br />
or Paris, Lima retains a certain degree<br />
of heterogeneous sprawl. Ancient sites,<br />
both those celebrated culturally and<br />
neglected, dot the city’s landscape and<br />
intertwine between more recent architectural<br />
interventions. Many of the original<br />
Pre-Incan waterways were either filled<br />
in or forgotten historically to become<br />
geological ghosts in a forgotten lineage<br />
of seemingly prehistoric conception.<br />
What does it want to be? You’re unsure<br />
what space you’re in… so what? How<br />
does this spatial experience correspond<br />
the contemporary art gallery in a way<br />
that undermines the less progressive tendencies<br />
of the commercial art endeavor<br />
in a gallery context?<br />
Learning from Grammar<br />
Grammar absolves language from the<br />
burden of structure, leaving it instead to<br />
address purely the production of meaning.<br />
That is, a grammatical set of inflections<br />
defines for the speaker the precise<br />
intention of every word in a sentence.<br />
A particular examination of the nominal<br />
declensions of the Indo-European variety<br />
exemplifies this point:<br />
Ich sehe den Mann.<br />
Der Mann sieht mich.<br />
Above, the German language specifically<br />
annotates the declension of the noun<br />
“den Mann” (“the man”) as to be object<br />
of the sentence by changing its definite<br />
article from “der”, which denotes the<br />
nominative, or subject, of the sentence, to<br />
“den”, marking the accusative, or object.<br />
Thus, the sentence subtly differentiates<br />
the meanings of “I see than man” from<br />
“the man sees me” using, among other<br />
things, acute inflections of the grammatical<br />
syntax and vocabulary to deliver<br />
a point to be understood. Consider the<br />
Latin sentences for “I see the girl” and<br />
“the girl sees me”:<br />
Ego puellam video.<br />
Puella me videt.<br />
Inflecting the noun itself, Latin annotates<br />
the girl’s position as either direct object<br />
or subject through an inflectional morphing<br />
of the very noun itself. Nonetheless,<br />
the root word retains its legibility as “girl”.<br />
We might say that “girl”, in an abstractly<br />
distant sense, linguistically stands ready<br />
to take on its meaning. It is a kind of<br />
empty signifier awaiting its delegated<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 39
40 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Render: East Façade from Park
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 41
(animation)<br />
vimeo.com/<br />
215492926<br />
42 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 43
position within the semiotic context of<br />
a sentence. This pattern of inflectional<br />
morphologies permeates all languages,<br />
be they Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan or<br />
Semitic. Their significance relies on the<br />
simultaneous recognization of basic abstract<br />
units (“girl”) and complex morphological<br />
alterations (“puella” to “puellam”).<br />
Far from foreign to the production of<br />
cultural meaning in architecture, art and<br />
This quality resounds rather akin to the<br />
semiotic implications of both architectural<br />
elements (doors, windows, thresholds)<br />
and their derived spaces. The arousal of<br />
the architectural diagram and projective<br />
space alike over the past few decades<br />
only further elude this point. Descriptive<br />
geometry is its own kind of grammar,<br />
a conceptually subterranean structure<br />
to which the justification of a space is<br />
beholden.<br />
Precisely for this reason, a grammatical<br />
understanding of architecture’s creation<br />
benefits the discourse of the profession<br />
by loosening the perhaps selfish will<br />
towards intuitively and by advocating<br />
for the establishment a framework of<br />
abstract bases (think “girl”) from which<br />
more complex and appropriate spaces<br />
can be derived. Each of these qualities<br />
inherently equip architecture with a<br />
political stance by which to address the<br />
challenges of design and building in the<br />
early to mid 21st century.<br />
Addressing the first condition, we must<br />
accept that we have arrived at this<br />
period of architectural discourse in the<br />
wake of a violent acceleration in design.<br />
The skyrocketing success of a minority<br />
of practitioners in the second half of<br />
the 20th century fueled a fantasy of the<br />
“starchitect”, specifically rooted in the<br />
notion that he was one who had reached<br />
the apotheosis of his work. The pronouns<br />
of this exclamation are italicized to contest<br />
the patriarchal tendencies that this<br />
incredulous behavior lauded.<br />
With a handful of exceptions, the rise of<br />
the starchitect’s intuitive and individualistic<br />
approach to design, the notion that<br />
only he could deliver a project of such<br />
caliber and expertise, benefitted merely<br />
a class of privileged male architects who<br />
represented overwhelmingly the at times<br />
oppressive majorities of their respective<br />
nationalities. Their projects found themselves<br />
equally at home under oppressive<br />
regimes across vast swaths of humanity<br />
and in the high fashion boutiques that<br />
service the elite few with unaffordable,<br />
albeit well designed, luxury commodities.<br />
Starchitecture is parallel to the will of<br />
enforcing one’s vision onto others. The<br />
branding of architecture by firms’ recognizable<br />
brand identities and myopic prerogatives<br />
has lead the field unknowingly<br />
into the esoteric grumbling of irrelevance.<br />
Though these characteristics specifically<br />
indict neither intuitively nor artistry in design<br />
as the perpetrators of these trends, it<br />
casts them as willing accomplices to the<br />
criminals. There is therefore a political<br />
necessity to move away from the “finding<br />
one’s voice” model of architectural practice<br />
towards a more abstract, universal<br />
theology, if we might call it that, of design<br />
that stresses nuanced intention and<br />
restrained evocation on the part of the<br />
designer. Subtly is the design language of<br />
humility, and a grammar of architecture is<br />
the method by which this is calibrated.<br />
These injunctions against architecture<br />
seek the foundation of a new architectural<br />
project aligned with the universalist<br />
attitudes once exulted by the industry’s<br />
foremost figures. An inclination towards<br />
a grammatical understanding of the<br />
construction of space is the first step in<br />
the proposition of this framework. It is a<br />
provocation to democratize the conception<br />
of space into a process-based series<br />
of morphological permutations on basic<br />
elements (as any grammar does to its<br />
constituent parts) so that neither the basal<br />
unit nor its derived offspring wander<br />
too far from familiar comprehension.<br />
Both “puella” and “puellam” function<br />
to deliver their meanings to the reader<br />
or listener, yet both respect the basic<br />
premise that those who understand the<br />
language ought to hold the tools for<br />
deriving the meaning of the sentence. A<br />
stance towards grammar for architecture<br />
sees the developments of the past few<br />
decades as less of a language and more<br />
of a barbaric shouting match between<br />
unfamiliar adversaries. Unfortunately,<br />
architecture has foregone the semiotic<br />
commonalities of previous eras’ styles for<br />
a cacophony individual expression.<br />
The communities of design expression<br />
that we find in turn-of-the-century Chicago<br />
or postwar Japanese metabolism<br />
are indicative of collaborative practices<br />
establishing grammars of their own.<br />
These syntactical playbooks are thus<br />
introduced as items of cultural production<br />
for which a common understanding<br />
among both architects and the public<br />
can be established. This is their primary<br />
mode of communication.<br />
It is therefore absolutely parallel to an<br />
architecture affronted by its own impotence<br />
that it work steadfastly to reform<br />
its mode of expression. The grammatical<br />
understanding of basic forms and their<br />
repetitively ruled abstractions posits less<br />
of a formal answer to this dilemma than a<br />
provocation towards one. It is at once the<br />
call for an architecture that seeks to matter<br />
rather than to express, an architecture<br />
that exudes nuance rather than singularity<br />
and an architecture that emerges in<br />
lieu of cultural production rather than<br />
individual recognition.<br />
44 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio
400% 300%<br />
200% 100%<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Halftone Studies<br />
45
46 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Model Photograph: Façade Articulation
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photograph: Circulation to Gallery<br />
47
PASEO PENASCO HOUSE<br />
4A Studio<br />
Fall 2015, Ramiro Diaz-Granados<br />
This project was specially selected to be<br />
featured in SCI-Arc’s Spring Show 2016.<br />
Our relationship with the architecture of<br />
the home has often been one of selfafirmation.<br />
Man becomes master of his<br />
domain, his property, his home. It is with<br />
more than a mere etymological bond<br />
that entangles architecture (the “domus”)<br />
domesticity. Domesticity is an explicit<br />
problem of Architecture. It’s about time<br />
that architecture decenter, destabilize<br />
and decouple the numbly comfortable<br />
proximity between our expectations of a<br />
space and its realization through material,<br />
form and content. This is an argument<br />
for an architecture which prolongs the<br />
sensorial exposure between the subject<br />
and a space, which draws out our comprehension<br />
of what’s before us in order<br />
to suspend the complacencies we have<br />
come to expect of a home. More than the<br />
mere quest for an unfamiliar building, this<br />
excavates the possibility of a space that<br />
challenges domesticity and the presumptions,<br />
malices and addictions that come<br />
along with it.<br />
We sometimes presume that a house<br />
exists to attend to us. We subordinate the<br />
architecture to a certain kind of servitude<br />
to our latent cultural expectations.<br />
Foyers are for collecting the many shoes<br />
we’ve bought for our family, bay windows<br />
are for gazing across the lawn onto our<br />
colleagues, who by chance inhabit an<br />
identical but differently painted version<br />
of our dream. We are Behr Premium Plus<br />
#M270-3 Cream Custard, they are Benjamin<br />
Moore Opal Essence 680 – no more,<br />
no less. Perhaps, a house might aspire<br />
not be the backdrop to our homely fantasies<br />
but to engage us as people, subjects<br />
capable to thinking as they establish<br />
independent, experience-driven positions<br />
within the world.<br />
This is therefore a problem of displacing<br />
the centrality of a space and our<br />
anticipations for it. This is about creating<br />
a space for living that protracts the<br />
immediacy of what we expect. Edges,<br />
corners and cusps draw back just as they<br />
capture our attention to invert the affinity<br />
in legibility between a form and its contours.<br />
While a clear, geometric foundation<br />
provides a framework for us to nurture<br />
an understanding of what we encounter,<br />
the rules of the game quickly unravel at<br />
the very moment we presume they have<br />
exhausted their explanatory potential –<br />
a wall torts into a ceiling and then into<br />
a floor, a rectangular opening on one<br />
side of a partition squirms around into<br />
a figural yet ambiguous slice along the<br />
other. The typical repertoire of architectural<br />
elements defy obedience in order to<br />
confront the form-function connotations<br />
we have confined them to.<br />
Every moment of this house is calibrated<br />
to its ability at performing these tasks. A<br />
winding driveway cuts slowly between an<br />
artificial ground and an existing topography,<br />
prolonging the full perception of the<br />
building’s tilted bars and supple tangencies.<br />
The individual perspective is constantly<br />
made incapable of gathering the<br />
totality of what we encounter. Even once<br />
we do manage to confront the it, a series<br />
of tightly choreographed moves fracture<br />
our capacity to understand the house<br />
in its whole from any one angle. The<br />
alignment of windows across masses,<br />
the conic stitching of their intersections<br />
and unexpected seam languages these<br />
produce all obscure concrete readings.<br />
What appears to be two bars from one<br />
perspective dissolves into two in another.<br />
Where we thought we found an edge, we<br />
move only slightly to reveal that it is actually<br />
a smooth transition along two faces.<br />
In doing so, this project posits that the<br />
line between form and shape is not tensile<br />
and crisp but swerving and blurred.<br />
The legibility of any “proper” shape is<br />
thoroughly withheld to the extent that<br />
we never manage to assemble a singular<br />
reading. Clearly defined bars entangle<br />
with one another such that we are incapable<br />
of enumerating exactly how many<br />
bars there are. On the interior, rectangular<br />
voids slice through deep poché to<br />
emerge as figural profiles. The encounter<br />
between the subject and the house<br />
becomes a cinematic experience. One is<br />
provoked to reorient oneself, to crosscheck<br />
constantly a fluid understanding of<br />
the house’s nature, and thus also of the<br />
nature of its modes of inhabitation and<br />
its content. In the place of social center<br />
like the fireplace or the living room, one<br />
instead finds circulation.<br />
The home becomes a realm of withheld<br />
expectations, a space which continually<br />
displaces itself at the very moment we<br />
believe we have come truly to perceive it.<br />
These methods recast the typified roles<br />
of a house and thus liberate its inhabitants<br />
from the overwrought narrative that<br />
domesticity asserts on the home. We<br />
explore a space of uprooted expectations,<br />
uneasy forms and non-conventional programming<br />
in the hopes that we productively<br />
disorient ourselves, that when we<br />
do come to realize what our home might<br />
be, we see anew its resistance to be defined,<br />
its refusal to be dogmatized.<br />
(Above) Conceptual process of geometry<br />
joinery between intersected bars<br />
(Right) Rendering of building on site<br />
showing the dialectic of the groundplane,<br />
where the surrounding site represents<br />
untouched nature, the natural growth<br />
curated in the slots portrays a fake nature<br />
of sorts, and piles of chrome spheres<br />
complete the triad with total artificiality.<br />
50
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Large Scale Physical Chunk Model<br />
53
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Elevations<br />
55
56 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio<br />
Large Scale Physical Chunk Model<br />
Details
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 57
1<br />
3 2<br />
4<br />
Drawing Key<br />
1 Guest Bedroom 1<br />
2 Central Foyer Hallway<br />
3 Central Foyer Landing<br />
4 Parking<br />
1 : 60<br />
2<br />
1<br />
3 4<br />
Drawing Key<br />
1 Kitchen<br />
2 Central Foyer<br />
3 Parking Entrance<br />
4 Footpath Entrance<br />
58 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Sections
7<br />
6<br />
2<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
1<br />
11<br />
8<br />
10<br />
9<br />
Drawing Key<br />
1 Central Foyer 613 ft 2<br />
2 Dining Room 225 ft 2<br />
3 Kitchen 157 ft 2<br />
4 Pantry 50 ft 2<br />
5 Den 403 ft 2<br />
6 Den Full Bath 65 ft 2<br />
7 Guest Bedroom 1 481 ft 2<br />
8 Guest Bath 25 ft 2<br />
9 Guest Bedroom 2 439 ft 2<br />
10 Master Bedroom 608 ft 2<br />
11 Master Bath 47 ft 2<br />
3113 ft 2<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Main Plan<br />
59
60 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Slitscan of Center Staircase
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 61
62 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Center Void Construction Geometry
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Cener Void Model Photos<br />
63
64 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Abstract Core Physical Model
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 65
66 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Structural Strategies
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 67
68 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Center Stair
Primary Ring Structure<br />
7”X7” Steel Tube members<br />
Tertiary Supports<br />
6.5”x2” W-Section members<br />
Ceiling Covering<br />
Corian Skin Primary Support<br />
Laterally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />
Corian Skin Secondary Support<br />
Longitudinally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />
Corian Skin Primary Support<br />
Laterally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />
Vertical Secondary Support to Upper Support Connectors<br />
Corian Panel to Secondary Support Connectors<br />
Laterally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />
Hung Corian Panels<br />
Interior Wall Covering<br />
Interior Partitions<br />
8” Standard Stud Walls<br />
Skin slits<br />
3/16” tubes or milled indentations<br />
aligned at 1” on center<br />
Skin panels<br />
8”metal panels<br />
Aperture Strategy<br />
Skin slits gather around apertures, arbitrating the reading<br />
of the conic geometries in the surface treatment around<br />
apertures. While other areas of the skin have a more subtle<br />
reflection, the slits accentuate the curvature of the massing<br />
around the apertures.<br />
Skin Panelization<br />
Major divisions subdivide along edges to produce<br />
new figuralities along the envelope, sometimes<br />
seaming between corners and folds to unite the<br />
mass while at other times dividing it or accentuating<br />
interior apertures.<br />
Primary Ring Structure<br />
7”x7” Steel Tube Members<br />
Primary Corss Bracing<br />
7”x10” Steel Tube Members<br />
Tertiary Vertical Structure<br />
6.5”x2” W-Section Members<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Exploded Chunk<br />
69
70 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio 3D Printed Center Void and Staircase
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 71
72 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 73
74 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Aperture Construction Geometry
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 75
ODD BLOCKS<br />
4A Studio<br />
Fall 2015, Ramiro Diaz-Granados<br />
This project explored a seriesof possible<br />
bar aggregations as the platform for<br />
further development into an architectural<br />
project.<br />
Initial explorations dealt specifically with<br />
the issue of the center. How might abstract<br />
aggregations of geometric primitives<br />
begin to speak to the architectural<br />
ramifications of displaced or misregistered<br />
centers? Given the eventual typological<br />
goal of the project to be a single<br />
family home, how could inferences into<br />
the center begin to offer programmatic or<br />
formal manipulations on our understanding<br />
of centerhood which might speak to<br />
the political and social ramifications of<br />
altering the default condition of how we<br />
arrange our homes?<br />
For each object, a ground plane was also<br />
developed which furthered the concepts<br />
at hand in the massing. Throughout the<br />
series, a theme of awkwardness and<br />
misfitting came forward as a means by<br />
which the formal legibility of the bar<br />
typology could be read against the static<br />
nature of a ground. Filleted edges and<br />
strange alignments prompted questions<br />
of legibility. Does one see three intersected<br />
bars which avoid one another or four<br />
bent bars that entangle?<br />
Explorations of multiple centers began<br />
to entice a displacement of the center.<br />
Rather than a singular void, the multiple<br />
involution of the massing onto itself allows<br />
a distinctly difficult reading of the<br />
overall form. Filigree adjustments in filletting<br />
and massing allow further difficulties<br />
in immediate reading to be introduced.<br />
These techniques combined to produce<br />
a kind of lexicon of formal maneuvers<br />
which could be introduced in the process<br />
of refining aggregatory systems. How<br />
does one differentiate one particular iteration<br />
as more ideal than another when<br />
the terms of engagement are as abstract<br />
as pure geometry? Such questions<br />
became pivotal in the development of a<br />
personal position on centerhood, as the<br />
geometric result gradually merged with<br />
the theoretical hypothesis throughout the<br />
maturation of the process.<br />
78
79
Deformation continues to propagate<br />
New, less axial org<br />
80 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Plan Diagrams
anization emerges<br />
Slight estrangement of highly standard organization<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 81
Horiztonal striation of masses along normative groundplane<br />
Masses set slightly askew, deforming ground with them<br />
Reorientation of masses provides void space<br />
Conic interventions recalibrate void space<br />
82 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Section Diagrams
84 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Axonometric Diagrams
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 85
86 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Model Photos
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 2, Model Photos<br />
87
Masses organize into coincident intersections,<br />
center of volume emerges<br />
Masses rotate in three-dimensional space,<br />
breaking clear interpretation of center<br />
Masses blend on roofplane through extension of adjacent surfaces,<br />
promoting a new organizational reading<br />
Surface articulation further breaks down heirarchy,<br />
leaving system precariously close to multiple readings<br />
88 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 2, Plan Diagrams
Intersected masses with bipolar centers<br />
Groundplane deformation reorients systems<br />
Further deformations force reactions on masses’ orientations<br />
Masses estrange from groundplane condition, each retains partial autonomy<br />
Conics question heirarchy of overall mass profile and ground relationship<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 2, Secion Diagrams<br />
91
92 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 3, Axonometric Diagram
Masses rest atop normative ground plane<br />
Sectionally distorted ground plane reorients objects’ bouyancy,<br />
negaitve space forms from discrepency between objects and ground<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 3, Section Diagrams<br />
93
Overlapped masses<br />
Strong and r<br />
interior<br />
94 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 3, Plan Diagrams
ecognizable<br />
figure<br />
Conics articulate interior, reconfiguring<br />
heirarchy but leaving exterior legible<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 95
96 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 3, Model Photos
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 97
Dual systems aggregate around shared center<br />
Center as void<br />
Conics defer reading of center, question massing heirarchy<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 4, Plan Diagrams<br />
99
100 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 4, Model Photos
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 101
SP CHINATOWN DEPOT REDEVELOPMENT<br />
5A Vertical Studio<br />
Fall 2016, Elena Manferdini<br />
Synopsis<br />
Chinatown in Los Angeles is an uncertain<br />
ground. Its history is one simultaneously<br />
composed of displacement and<br />
development. It therefore stands that in<br />
order to approach the creation of anything<br />
new in Chinatown, one must first<br />
comprehend the myriad forms which<br />
preceded.<br />
This project sought the creation of a<br />
large, 600+ unit, residential development<br />
in the heart of Chinatown, between two<br />
sites spanning a major thoroughfare. The<br />
very creation of it, and part of its creation<br />
is the instantiation of an architecture<br />
capable of annunciating these historical<br />
understandings. To create this history is<br />
to engage in a form of cultural filtering<br />
that necessarily takes on as its responsibility<br />
the curation of an identity.<br />
It thus becomes a key prerogative of this<br />
project that the architecture become<br />
capable of receiving the various pasts<br />
of Chinatown, curating their presentation<br />
and, in their projection forward,<br />
posing critical questions that engage<br />
the process of history-making such that<br />
Plinth-Ground Operations<br />
Indifference<br />
Ground as truth<br />
Object as fiction<br />
Ground as fiction<br />
Object as truth<br />
Ambiguous Ground<br />
Ground-Ground Operations<br />
Absolute Mono-Hierarchical Dually Refuted Otherness<br />
When does the ground itself become a plinth?<br />
careful study the relationships among<br />
plinth, ground and building allowed a<br />
thoughtful curation of what it might mean<br />
to establish a new ground on such a<br />
contested site. This new ground, itself<br />
an engagement of the strange privatepublic<br />
infrastructure so pervasive in the<br />
large developments of late capitalist Los<br />
Angeles, allowed a series of contemplations<br />
on belonging and civil space in the<br />
American West.<br />
Project Scheme<br />
This endeavor in turn begs the contemplation<br />
of historical meaning in the<br />
context of Chinatown’s development<br />
both from retroactive and progressive<br />
perspectives. That is to say, part of<br />
understanding Chinatown’s history is the<br />
Moveable<br />
Mass<br />
Maleable<br />
Ground<br />
New Authenticities<br />
Performative<br />
Conceptual<br />
the resultant building stand as a cultural<br />
bookmark in the conception of a place’s<br />
identity.<br />
About Chinatown<br />
Old Chinatown is dead. A 1926 ballot<br />
measure assured its flattening below<br />
the then newly proposed Union Station.<br />
102 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Render: Posture along College Street<br />
103
Static<br />
Of the Earth<br />
Plinth emerges from ground<br />
≈<br />
Ground as origin<br />
Plinth recedes into ground<br />
≈<br />
Ground as receptor<br />
Plinth lifts, second ground delaminates<br />
≈<br />
Ground as invalidated<br />
Second ground laminates to plinth<br />
≈<br />
Ground as holder<br />
104 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Ground Relationships
Wobbly<br />
Sunken<br />
Plinth deforms ground bidirectionally<br />
≈<br />
Ground as uncertainty<br />
Plinth rests into ground<br />
≈<br />
Ground as pliant<br />
Second ground bifurcates<br />
≈<br />
Noncathartic Ground<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 105
106 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Figural Plinth Studies
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 107
108 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Elevation
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 109
110 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Plans
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 111
112 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Plan Details
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 113
Apartments<br />
Held above plinths and<br />
circulatory columns<br />
144 Starter Apartments<br />
81 Studios<br />
81 Deluxe Studios<br />
239 1-Bedrooms<br />
51 Large 1-Bedrooms<br />
33 Bedrooms<br />
Plinths and Circulatory Columns<br />
Provide parking, commerical space<br />
and vertical access to apartments<br />
629 units total<br />
Raised Ground<br />
Circilation across street, up to Metro,<br />
Sports-related amenities for public such<br />
as basketball and tennis court<br />
Public Ground Level<br />
Pool, lecture space, commerical areas, restaurant<br />
116 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Exploded Axonometric of Elements
Amid a series of possible alternative<br />
sites, the Los Angeles Times successfully<br />
stirred public resentment of the city’s<br />
Chinese-American population towards<br />
the eventual citing of the development<br />
along Alameda Street, declaring that the<br />
new station would “forever do away with<br />
Chinatown and its environs”.<br />
This is not to indicate that Old Chinatown<br />
was by any means a site of truth<br />
or viture. What emerged from the early<br />
Pueblo’s “Calle de los Negros” [“Street of<br />
the Dark Ones”] — initially inhabited by<br />
a collection of Pre-Columbian families<br />
living within the administrative bounds<br />
of the ramshackle settlement — was a<br />
space that transcended multiple generations<br />
to continuously house the marginalized<br />
populations of young Los Angeles.<br />
From the confined indigeneous groups<br />
of North America to stigmatized Chinese<br />
laborers and those drawn to the red light<br />
district that called it home, Calle de los<br />
Negros was a space of demographic<br />
displacement.<br />
This does not mean that these people<br />
were allowed to inhabit the street without<br />
disturbance. Quite the opposite, Old<br />
Chinatown was the scene of America’s<br />
most deadly mass lynching, in which a<br />
crowd of some 500 white men viscerally<br />
murdered 18 Chinese workers. Although<br />
conditions improved between the 1870s<br />
(when Chinese immigrants began to<br />
settle along Calle de los Negros) and the<br />
1920s, the neighborhood always stood for<br />
the marginalization of a population within<br />
the city core such that its vital labor<br />
potential in other parts of the city could<br />
be leveraged alongside the containment<br />
of its population within a confined urban<br />
setting.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 117
Chinatown’s History<br />
Following the 1926 ballot measure,<br />
Chinatown was subsequently located<br />
slightly north in its current location.<br />
Alternative sites, such as one across the<br />
river in Boyle Heights, proved unsuccessful<br />
against the perceived benefit of<br />
disbanding the local Chinese population.<br />
A secondary effect of the measure was<br />
to evade the construction of a series of<br />
elevated railways. It is therefore impossible<br />
to extricate Chinatown’s displacement<br />
from the creation of what would<br />
become the cultural ethos of Los Angeles<br />
towards suburban sprawl and automotive<br />
fetishization.<br />
Chinatown then was an urban statement<br />
that propagated racism and population<br />
de-densification. Chinatown today is an<br />
urban canvas that might either come<br />
to stand for gentrification — undoubtedly<br />
at the expense of the children of<br />
those displaced in 1926 — or for a new<br />
understanding of what it means to have<br />
placehood in contemporary Los Angeles,<br />
depending on the course of its current<br />
actions.<br />
(Above) Possible sectional<br />
exploits from ground gestures<br />
(Right) Axonometric of complete<br />
site showing relationship with<br />
park, street and metro station<br />
120 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 121
122 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Model Photograph: Chunk Model
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photograph (Detail)<br />
123
124 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Parking Plinth Constructive Geometries
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 125
126 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 127
BERKELEY MUSEUM OF ART<br />
3B Studio<br />
Spring 2015, David Freeland<br />
With Johan Wijesinghe<br />
This project fundamentally questions the<br />
immediate legibility of a piece of architecture<br />
through subtle manipulations in<br />
formal organization, surface treatment<br />
and circulation. To these ends, it takes<br />
up the contemporary project of the art<br />
museum as a platform to question the<br />
project of iconicity, reducing the legibility<br />
of the work of architecture itself beyond<br />
the immediate ability of perception. By<br />
withholding reading rather than privileging<br />
it, the project becomes impossible to<br />
understand through one human vantage,<br />
geometrical orientation or specific depth.<br />
This invites certain tactility to the subject<br />
hood one experiences when encountering<br />
the building. Those who gaze across<br />
the façade are practically required to<br />
adjust their position towards the building<br />
in order to gain a more complete comprehension<br />
of its geometry.<br />
Unable to be perceived in a singular<br />
vision, the multiplicity of readings<br />
produced by the façade initiates a deep<br />
questioning of geometry. An intentional<br />
set of choreographed overlaps between<br />
the building’s seven “objects” employ<br />
shifting material definitions and incongruent<br />
geometrical principles alongside<br />
architectural tropes such as a shadow or<br />
corner to provoke an uncertainty about<br />
what one perceives. While one surface<br />
may have a diagonal hatching, rendered<br />
in deep slices along its run, an adjacent<br />
surface might have another orientation<br />
while matching the slice direction. This<br />
dichotomy between surface identification<br />
and what we have come to expect<br />
from architecture (in terms of the façade,<br />
ground and roof) combine less than conjunctly<br />
in order to estrange the individual<br />
from their egocentric perspective onto<br />
the building. Explicated on the interior,<br />
this takes host in an intertwined procession<br />
of spaces that at times celebrates<br />
the difference between objects and at<br />
others obfuscates such understandings.<br />
(Right) Details from elevations<br />
(Next Page) Roof plan<br />
128 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 129
+ 15'<br />
Men's WC<br />
UP<br />
Lockers<br />
199<br />
Women's WC<br />
Gallery 00<br />
Cleaning Room<br />
424<br />
Office 4<br />
127<br />
Marketing<br />
303<br />
Office 1<br />
192<br />
Office 3<br />
153<br />
Gallery 02<br />
+ 23'<br />
DN<br />
Gallery 17<br />
+ 23'<br />
+ 0'<br />
Gallery 01<br />
+ 23'<br />
UP<br />
DN<br />
Gallery 03<br />
+ 23'<br />
DN<br />
Gallery 04<br />
+ 23'<br />
Gallery 15<br />
+ 23'<br />
+ 0'<br />
Visitor WC 2<br />
Mechanical<br />
UP<br />
DN<br />
UP<br />
UP<br />
UP<br />
Gallery 06<br />
+ 15'<br />
DN<br />
DN<br />
Gallery 11<br />
Gallery 05<br />
+ 17'<br />
130 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Plan of Galleries
Elevations and the Politics of the Art Museum as a Contemporary Medium for Architecture<br />
After a decade of high profile competitions<br />
for art museums which, for the<br />
most part, have amounted to little other<br />
than esoteric spectacles, it is time to take<br />
the art museum to its task as the staging<br />
ground for architectural intervention,<br />
exploration and permutation. Taking the<br />
typology as a platform, this project questions<br />
the legibility of the object, denying<br />
a clear reading part to whole relationships.<br />
This is achieved through subtle<br />
manipulations in formal organization,<br />
surface treatment and circulation.<br />
Along the building’s elevations, a series<br />
of tectonic bands (see Façade Detail)<br />
confuse the legibility of a single entity. In<br />
response to the highly spectacle-driven<br />
business that museum architecture has<br />
become, this invalidates the “money<br />
shot” as a method for curating phenomenology<br />
in architecture. This political move<br />
is intended to invigorate visitors and<br />
other constituents of the site (students<br />
and passersby, in particular) to move<br />
around the structure in order to pull apart<br />
the experiential trickery unfolding before<br />
them.<br />
Bands cross between objects on a system<br />
curated specifically to question the<br />
distinction between formal and “graphic”<br />
(when seen from a distance) differentiations<br />
in the surface. What might appear<br />
in one view as one object is in fact two,<br />
or what might appear as two distinct<br />
faces is in reality a graphically divided<br />
single swatch. Because the bands were<br />
indeed tectonic and not purely graphical,<br />
their response to changing conditions of<br />
light throughout the day further intensifies<br />
the multiplicity of readings possible.<br />
An animation was employed to explore<br />
this property in greater depth.<br />
132 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Elevation along Bancroft
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Elevation along Durant<br />
133
Cafe<br />
Circulatory Strategies<br />
Circulation is a continuous sequence<br />
of intertwined gallery spaces, Sectional<br />
enfilades, and particular thresholds that<br />
negotiates the differences between objects<br />
and at other moments obfuscates<br />
their relationship.<br />
These thresholds and lines begins to<br />
carry through as circulation, taking host<br />
as intertwined processions of gallery<br />
spaces, sectional enfilades, that at times<br />
celebrates the fragmented difference between<br />
objects and at others obfuscates<br />
their relationship.<br />
Gallery 02<br />
1682<br />
Lockers<br />
Sec. Office<br />
199<br />
222<br />
Office 5 Office 6 Office 7<br />
283 225 219<br />
Gallery 01<br />
1350<br />
(Right Top) Plan of upper gallery<br />
level. Circulatory pathways begin to<br />
breakdown distinction of objects as<br />
read from the exterior. Vertical lightwells<br />
provide opportunities for circulation<br />
as well as natural illumination.<br />
Gallery 09<br />
3619<br />
Gallery 03<br />
1318<br />
Visitor WC 2<br />
(Right Bottom) Plan of ground<br />
concourse. A public “alley” of courtyard<br />
space weaves through the building,<br />
connecting public spaces like the shops,<br />
lecture hall, library and café. These<br />
remain open and accessible while three<br />
stairs offer varied entrances into the<br />
ticketed areas of the galleries above.<br />
Gallery 08 (Tiered)<br />
992<br />
Gallery 07<br />
1016<br />
Gallery 10<br />
1243<br />
Gallery 12<br />
993<br />
(Next Page) Axonometric of circulatory<br />
pathways. A public concourse cuts<br />
through the building and between<br />
the objects to provide access up<br />
into galleries. From there, stairs also<br />
provide the main entrance into the<br />
lobby from the parking garage, as well<br />
as opportunities to exit the building<br />
onto a series of curated terraces.<br />
Lobby<br />
Admin<br />
Learning Center<br />
Shop<br />
Theater<br />
136 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Plans +2 and +0
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 1: Lobby<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
Level 3: Artists’ Studios<br />
OBJECT 5<br />
Level 1: Lobby<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
Level 3-4: Artists’ Studios<br />
AFT ENTRANCE<br />
OBJECT 1<br />
Level 1: Theater<br />
Level 2/3: Galleries<br />
OBJECT 7<br />
Administration<br />
OBJECT 2<br />
Level -1: Loading Dock<br />
Level 1: Media Lounge<br />
Level 2-4: Galleries<br />
OBJECT 4<br />
Level 1: Shop<br />
Level 2/3: Galleries<br />
OBJECT 2<br />
Level 1: Café<br />
Level 2/3: Galleries<br />
MAIN ENTRANCE<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Circulation and Vertical Cores<br />
137
About the Façade<br />
The volumes which are unable to be<br />
perceived in a singular vantage point create<br />
a multiplicity of readings. Legibility of<br />
the object is further complicated by the<br />
façade, with lines that are amplified by<br />
varied shade and shadow that both bind<br />
the objects together and introduce new<br />
distinctions.<br />
How do you interweave the form and<br />
demands of conventional architectural<br />
systems of a museum (floor plates, stairs,<br />
walls to hang art) of a museum into a<br />
decentralized object.<br />
How do we keep something separate by<br />
nature(of the shells), coherent and whole,<br />
with demands of convention floor plates,<br />
stairs, walls to hang art, and procession,<br />
while simultaneously adapting a the language<br />
and intention of fluid but distinct<br />
spaces?<br />
Fiber-Reinforced Panels<br />
FRP panels of standard 4’ by 8’ dimension<br />
Horizontal bracketing<br />
along horizontal members<br />
Seams allow FRP panels<br />
to abutt structure while<br />
being tied to L brackets in<br />
the horizontal direction<br />
and T brakcets in the<br />
vertical direction<br />
Vertical fin attachments to<br />
every other vertical member<br />
140 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Façade Detail
Floorplates<br />
Generic connections between<br />
floorplates and façade employ<br />
balloon framing logic to structuralize<br />
floorplates when available. Formal<br />
interests direct towards articulated<br />
interior voids rather than superficial<br />
disjointing between envelope and<br />
inhabital planes.<br />
45” dropped ceiling cavity<br />
for total 4’ flooplate depth<br />
Generic 6” poured<br />
concrete decking<br />
Standard 18” by 6”<br />
i-beams along floorplate<br />
Structural Frame<br />
Mitered conditions arbitrate<br />
adjacencies along FRP<br />
panels and structure<br />
Constant 14” void runs along<br />
envelope, standardizing connections<br />
between FRP panels and interior<br />
structure. Bidirectional members fill<br />
in space to support both exterior<br />
clading and interior elements.<br />
Secondary Horizontal Members<br />
8’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />
Thin seam language leverages<br />
tectonic reading towards a legibility<br />
of the bands cut into the FRP<br />
panels, concealing expressions of<br />
inner structure and jointing<br />
Primary Horizontal Members<br />
16’ Increment, 6” by 18” Profile<br />
Secondary Vertical Members<br />
4’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />
Primary Vertical Members<br />
12’ Increment, 12” by 14” Profile<br />
Assembled Façade<br />
1” Seaming<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Structure Detail<br />
141
Aft Courtyard<br />
LEVEL +1<br />
Galleries and Administration<br />
LEVEL +2<br />
Auxiliary Galleries, Admin, Lower<br />
Artist Studios and Art Storage<br />
LEVEL +3<br />
Upper Artist Studios<br />
UPPER LEVELS<br />
Gallery spaces and artist studios<br />
gather in large chunks around the<br />
courtyard. A circulatory corridor<br />
cuts through (and sometimes<br />
blends) into these, winding<br />
to-and-fro about the level,<br />
sometimes connecting to the<br />
exterior geometry and sometimes<br />
cutting across to create bridges<br />
over the courtyards. Lightwells<br />
project down from the roof to<br />
naturally illuminate three central<br />
spaces.<br />
GROUND FLOOR<br />
Large spaces of public outreach<br />
gather around two courtyards.<br />
Other public programs not directly<br />
related to the infrastructure of the<br />
museum (café, bar and shop)<br />
cluster around, accessing intimate<br />
outdoor areas and main circulatory<br />
pathways.<br />
Main Rooms<br />
Artists<br />
Maintenance<br />
Administration<br />
Storage<br />
Facilities<br />
GROUND<br />
Public groundplane pulls visitors<br />
either into forward / aft courtyards<br />
or subtly diverts those crossing the<br />
site diagonally up the hill to the<br />
other ends of the Berkeley campus.<br />
Ground manipulations and<br />
landscaping create back-and-forth<br />
ciruclation which engages the<br />
building from a multiplicity of<br />
scales and vantages.<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 05<br />
855 ft 2<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 04<br />
VERTICAL CIRCULATION<br />
COMMUNITY ROOM<br />
834 ft 2<br />
LIGHTWELLS<br />
962 ft 2<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 03<br />
789 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 03<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 08<br />
3030 ft 2 GALLERY 09<br />
X.<br />
854 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 05<br />
1526 ft<br />
EQUIPTMENT 2<br />
2<br />
2423 ft 2<br />
559 ft 2 P.<br />
V.<br />
O.<br />
W.<br />
VISITOR WC 3<br />
325 ft 2<br />
N.<br />
T. U.<br />
VISITOR WC 3<br />
GALLERY 16<br />
318 ft 2<br />
M.<br />
1260 ft 2<br />
S.<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 09<br />
Z.<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 02<br />
900 ft<br />
732 ft 2<br />
2<br />
GALLERY 17<br />
GALLERY 11<br />
1409 ft 2<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 10<br />
Y.<br />
L.<br />
R.<br />
1096 ft 2<br />
592 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 18<br />
Q.<br />
ARTIST STUDIO 01<br />
K.<br />
1791 ft 2 968 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 13<br />
GALLERY 06 ART STORAGE 1<br />
STAFF WC 4<br />
1434 ft 2<br />
1690 ft 2 1492 ft 2 414 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 14<br />
690 ft 2 GALLERY 12<br />
933 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 02<br />
GALLERY 19<br />
4512 ft<br />
GALLERY 08<br />
1531 ft 2<br />
2<br />
1806 ft 2 GALLERY 04<br />
2382 ft 2<br />
GALLERY 01<br />
CORRIDORS<br />
3924 ft 2 G.<br />
E.<br />
F.<br />
D.<br />
C.<br />
A.<br />
TICKETING<br />
B.<br />
1996 ft 2 MEDIA<br />
LOUNGE<br />
H.<br />
1917 ft 2<br />
WORKSHOP 1<br />
J.<br />
WKSP. 2 1241 ft 2<br />
983 ft 2 COATS<br />
SHOP I.<br />
706 ft<br />
WC 1<br />
2<br />
1368 ft 2<br />
246 ft 2 LEAERNING CENTER<br />
2347 ft 2<br />
CAFÉ / BAR<br />
1879 ft 2<br />
THEATER /<br />
SUPPORT SPACES<br />
3162 ft 2<br />
Organization<br />
The museum composed of seven<br />
volumes that roll and shuffle down the<br />
hillside from Bancroft (the University in<br />
the North) to Durant (The dormitories in<br />
the South).<br />
The volumes choreograph a meandering<br />
path between the seven asymmetrical<br />
carved conically developed masses.<br />
The volumes fold, shear, over-hang, and<br />
overlap each other, producing interstitial<br />
courtyards syncopated by light wells.<br />
Program takes a more horizontal approach,<br />
respecting the authority of the<br />
floorplate in the contemporary art gallery.<br />
Subsidiary galleries and public spaces<br />
(courtyards, shops and a café) align<br />
along the bottom level above a parking<br />
garage and loading dock. Moving up,<br />
staff spaces and the main galleries fill<br />
the next two levels. Artist spaces nestle<br />
above along the roofline.<br />
Public $ (Ticket-Purchasing)<br />
Private (Institutional)<br />
Public<br />
Private (Artists in Residence)<br />
SCULPTURE<br />
GARDEN<br />
TOWER 7<br />
TOWER 6<br />
TOWER 5<br />
Freight<br />
(Left) Rendering of main entrance<br />
(Following Spreads)<br />
Diagrams and sections<br />
Campus<br />
Entry<br />
TOWER 4<br />
Forward<br />
Courtyard<br />
3164 ft 2 CAFÉ<br />
TOWER 3<br />
GARDENS /<br />
TOWER 1<br />
TOWER 2<br />
LANDSCAPING<br />
6035 ft 2 AMIPTHEATER /<br />
MULTIUSE AREA<br />
5093 ft 2<br />
Dorms<br />
Entry<br />
Parking<br />
1879 ft 2<br />
LABEL KEY<br />
A. Media Lab ........................ 573 ft 2 Q. Artist Studio 12 ............... 737 ft 2<br />
B. Artists’ Library .................. 584 ft 2 R. Art Storage 2 .................... 1519 ft 2<br />
C. Marketing ......................... 347 ft 2 S. Artist Studio 15 ............... 474 ft 2<br />
D. Cleaning Room ................. 541 ft 2 T. Material Storage ............... 249 ft 2<br />
E. Locker Room .................... 285 ft 2 U. Meeting Room .................. 334 ft 2<br />
F. Equiptment Room 1 ......... 502 ft 2 V. Staff WC 3 ....................... 170 ft 2<br />
G. Computer Room ............... 257 ft 2 W. Office 10 ........................... 231 ft 2<br />
H. Pre Ticket Sales ................ 374 ft 2<br />
Office 11 ........................... 224 ft 2<br />
I. Kitchen and Freezer ......... 700 ft 2<br />
Kitchen ............................ 205 ft 2<br />
J. Staff WC 1 ....................... 115 ft 2 X. Director’s Office ................ 397 ft 2<br />
Secretary’s Office ............. 198 ft 2<br />
K. Gallery 07 ........................ 2117 ft 2 Office 12 .......................... 291 ft 2<br />
L. Gallery 13 ........................ 1434 ft 2<br />
M. Staff WC 2 ....................... 106 ft 2 Y. Artist Studio 11 ............... 733 ft 2<br />
N. Office 4 ............................ 207 ft 2<br />
Artist Studio 13 ............... 925 ft 2<br />
Office 5 ............................ 208 ft 2<br />
Artist Studio 14 ............... 603 ft 2<br />
Office 6 ............................ 208 ft 2 Z. Artist Studio 06 ............... 556 ft 2<br />
O. Office 1 ............................ 196 ft 2<br />
Artist Studio 07 ............... 823 ft 2<br />
Office 2 ............................ 206 ft 2<br />
Office 3 ............................ 240 ft 2<br />
P. Office 7 ............................ 165 ft 2<br />
Office 8 ............................ 270 ft 2<br />
Office 9 ............................ 288 ft 2<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Distribution of Program<br />
143
Perpendicularily set wall frames running in<br />
opposite directions align into a corner.<br />
Floorplate thickness necessitates a<br />
four-foot offset between.<br />
Floorplate space trims between forms to<br />
unite inhabitable areas. Conical distortions<br />
in plan skew the corner relationship,<br />
producing spatial slippage.<br />
Conical distortions along surface edges<br />
redefines the previously two-dimensional<br />
intersection of the forms into a dynamic,<br />
three-dimensional torque.<br />
144 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Conical Strategies
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photo of Conical Intersection<br />
145
+55'<br />
+45'<br />
+23'<br />
+9'<br />
+0'<br />
-14'<br />
146 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Section down Slope
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 147
148 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Photos of Modeled Lightwell
Void form punches through<br />
volume of object to outline<br />
lightwell.<br />
Conical distortions begin to<br />
question the inherent<br />
relationship between vertical<br />
surfaces of form and horizontal<br />
spaces of inhabitation.<br />
Stairs cut back-and-forth along edges of void<br />
envelope, twisting into and out of of the void itself.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Lightwell Strategies<br />
149
(animation)<br />
vimeo.com/<br />
126487089
152 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Oblique Section across Courtyard
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 153
154 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Massing Models
Circulatory Vignettes<br />
Circulatory spaces became a primary<br />
interest in this project because of the<br />
way they orient and focus the human<br />
perception. In regards to both the architectural<br />
experience and the perceptions<br />
of individual people to others within the<br />
museum, the circulatory pathways were<br />
specifically curated to employ the formal<br />
assets of architecture to experiential<br />
ends. Deepened and distorted spaces<br />
between otherwise regular floorplates<br />
established vantages from which the circulation<br />
posits visitors to experience others<br />
in the museum. These spaces flatten,<br />
elongate and skew the typical perceptual<br />
abilities of the human eye to estrange<br />
those within them. This is with the hopes<br />
that it entices people to reconceptualize<br />
how they experience architecture, the<br />
world and thus their selves.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Circulation and Spatial Disorientation<br />
157
BAM DESIGN DEVELOPMENT<br />
Design Development<br />
Fall 2015, Pavel Getov and Scott Uriu<br />
With Thomas Ferrer, Adrian<br />
Wong and Jinwen Yu<br />
The objectives of this class centered<br />
around continuing architectural processes<br />
from the previous semesters studio<br />
projects, running a conceptual proposal<br />
of an art museum in Berkeley, California,<br />
through a natural set of refinements<br />
though design development (DD).<br />
At the core of the class’ visual repertoire<br />
was the construction of a single “mega<br />
drawing” which encapsulated not only<br />
many smaller drawings but an overall<br />
aesthetic conglomeration.<br />
At the same time, a notebook set was<br />
gathered to simulate the typical planning<br />
procedures that would accompany the<br />
submission of a prospective design to<br />
the relevant permitting authorities. This<br />
coincided along with a series of lectures<br />
from various offices around Los Angeles,<br />
including representatives from Gehry<br />
Partners, detailing the normal regulatory<br />
parameters surrounding items such as<br />
ADA, egress and cost estimation, among<br />
others. More than a mere repository for<br />
drawings, the notebook set became a<br />
new way to conceptualize the presentation<br />
of the project within the rigid legal<br />
framework that surrounds architecture.<br />
Though the design was rather speculative<br />
at conception, this development<br />
process acted as a rigorous exercise in<br />
the execution of progressive architecture<br />
within the confines of the normative contemporary<br />
sphere of building.<br />
160 BAM Design Development Design Development 1 : 4 Mega Drawing Samples
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Mega Drawing<br />
161
162 BAM Design Development Design Development Mega Drawing Detail
Ring Members<br />
Steel Structure<br />
Structural grid sandwhiched<br />
between Gypsum board interior<br />
walls and exterior paneling<br />
Exterior Courtyard Paneling<br />
Poured concrete panels<br />
conceal geometry and provide<br />
tame interior expression<br />
Ring Members<br />
Tube steel members run along edges<br />
of masses to connect larger sections<br />
of primary and secondary structure<br />
Primary Members<br />
W-sections running vertically through<br />
structural void between interior and exterior<br />
paneling<br />
Secondary Members<br />
W-sections running horizontally and at<br />
perpendiculars to primary members<br />
Dialgonal Bracing<br />
Bracing connects between primary<br />
and secondary members<br />
Floorplates<br />
Standardized steel sheet decking with<br />
poured concrete, underlaid by standard<br />
steel substructure<br />
Direction 1 Panels<br />
Panels angled at ~60° from<br />
ground.<br />
Direction 2 Panels<br />
Panels angled at ~240°<br />
from ground (~ –120°)<br />
Direction 3 Panels<br />
Panels angled at ~45° from<br />
ground.<br />
Panel Seams<br />
Seams express themselves tectonically,<br />
but combination with slotting produces<br />
graphic effect<br />
Base Panels<br />
Panels of all directions extend onto the bases,<br />
topped eitherwith circulation, landscaping or outdoor<br />
gathering spaces, such as the outdoor auditorium<br />
20” x 20” steel tubes<br />
Skin System 1<br />
~60° slots<br />
Skin System 2<br />
~240° slots<br />
Primary Members<br />
14” W-sections<br />
Secondary Members<br />
10” W-sections<br />
Core 1<br />
Structural Strategy<br />
Each object stands structurally independent,<br />
leaning on one another. Cores in<br />
two objects provide vertical circulation.<br />
Interior Courtyard<br />
6” x 5’ x 10’ precast concrete panels<br />
Core 2<br />
Circulatory Surfaces<br />
6” poured concrete panels<br />
Skin System 3<br />
~45° slots<br />
Basement Retailing Wall<br />
12” poured concrete<br />
Skin Composition<br />
Slots tilted in multiple directions,<br />
sometimes aligning along<br />
physical seams and other times<br />
producing purely graphic seams<br />
through tectonic articulation.<br />
Basement Columns<br />
2’ diameter concrete columns<br />
Foundations (Caissons below)<br />
5’ x 5’ poured concrete members<br />
Foundation Beam Structure<br />
3’ x 3’ concrete beams below<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Overall Structural Strategies<br />
163
Secondary Steel Member<br />
L Brackets<br />
Bracket Bolting<br />
Primary Steel Member<br />
Primary Steel<br />
20” rolled steel members<br />
run along edges of masses<br />
Secondary Steel Direction 1<br />
16” W-section members running along primary<br />
direction of surfaces<br />
Secondary Steel Direction 2<br />
14” W-section members running<br />
along secondary direction of surfaces<br />
Structural Joint<br />
Generic 6” Poured Concrete<br />
over Metal Decking<br />
Hung Ceiling Connectors<br />
Primary Structure<br />
Secondary Structure<br />
Floorplate Edges<br />
Vertical Clips<br />
Façade Panels<br />
Façade Clips<br />
164 BAM Design Development Design Development Façade Structures
ADA / Accessible Path of Travel<br />
Return Vents<br />
Supply Vents<br />
Air Handling Units<br />
Several locations house multiple<br />
air handling units, each of which<br />
separately serves each object<br />
OBJECT 7<br />
OBJECT 7<br />
Level 1-2: Galleries<br />
3260 sqft<br />
Type B<br />
Factor: 100<br />
Load: 32<br />
2582 sqft<br />
Type B<br />
Factor: 100<br />
Load: 25<br />
OBJECT 6<br />
Level 2-4: Galleries<br />
3892 sqft<br />
OBJECT 5<br />
Level 3-4: Studios<br />
2037 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 35<br />
Load: 58<br />
OBJECT 5<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
2192 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 146<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 259<br />
OBJECT 4<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
2421 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 161<br />
OBJECT 4<br />
Level 3: Galleries<br />
1816 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 121<br />
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 4: Studios<br />
2490 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 35<br />
Load: 71<br />
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 3: Studios<br />
2456 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 35<br />
Load: 69<br />
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
3555 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 237<br />
MAIN ENTRANCE<br />
AFT ENTRANCE<br />
OBJECT 2<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
2394 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 159<br />
OBJECT 2<br />
Level 3: Galleries<br />
2300 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 153<br />
OBJECT 1<br />
Level 3: Galleries<br />
5618 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 374<br />
OBJECT 1<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
5120 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 341<br />
Egress / Circulation<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 (Above) HVAC, (Below) Egress and ADA<br />
165
166 BAM Design Development Design Development Mega Drawing Excerpts
Pre Cast Concrete panel<br />
Interlockng Joint<br />
Primary Steel<br />
Water Sealent<br />
End Mullion<br />
Poured in Place Concrete<br />
Steel Rebar<br />
Rain gutter<br />
Low-E Coated Glass<br />
Air Gap<br />
Interior Glass<br />
Mullion<br />
Clip-On Fin<br />
Precast Concrete Pan<br />
Interlocking Joint<br />
Topping Slab<br />
Structural Slab<br />
Metal Decking<br />
Drop Ceiling<br />
Silicone Seal<br />
Secondary Seal<br />
Primary Seal<br />
Moisture Barrier<br />
Steel Stud Blocking<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 3D Details<br />
167
PROPOSED ELEVATION ALONG BANCROFT STREET<br />
Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE, SCALE @ SIZE<br />
PROPOSED ELEVATION ALONG DURANT STREET<br />
Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE, SCALE @ SIZE<br />
Fiber-Reinforced Panels<br />
Seams allow FRP panels<br />
to abutt structure while<br />
being tied to L brackets in<br />
the horizontal direction<br />
and T brakcets in the<br />
vertical direction<br />
FRP panels of standard 4’ by 8’ dimension<br />
Vertical fin attachments to<br />
every other vertical member<br />
Horizontal bracketing<br />
along horizontal members<br />
UP<br />
DN<br />
Gallery 03<br />
+ 23'<br />
Gallery 04<br />
+ 23'<br />
DN<br />
Gallery 05<br />
+ 15'<br />
Gallery 02<br />
+ 23'<br />
Gallery 06<br />
+ 15'<br />
+ 0'<br />
Constant 14” void runs along<br />
envelope, standardizing connections<br />
between FRP panels and interior<br />
structure. Bidirectional members fill<br />
in space to support both exterior<br />
clading and interior elements.<br />
Gallery 01<br />
+ 23'<br />
Structural Frame<br />
DN<br />
Secondary Vertical Members<br />
4’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />
UP<br />
UP<br />
Gallery 11<br />
+ 17'<br />
+ 0'<br />
Gallery 00<br />
Gallery 15<br />
+ 23'<br />
UP<br />
DN<br />
Mechanical<br />
Visitor WC 2<br />
Primary Vertical Members<br />
12’ Increment, 12” by 14” Profile<br />
UP<br />
Men's WC<br />
Lockers<br />
199<br />
Women's WC<br />
Marketing<br />
303<br />
Gallery 17<br />
+ 23'<br />
UP<br />
DN<br />
DN<br />
Floorplates<br />
Generic connections between<br />
floorplates and façade employ<br />
balloon framing logic to structuralize<br />
floorplates when available. Formal<br />
interests direct towards articulated<br />
interior voids rather than superficial<br />
disjointing between envelope and<br />
inhabital planes.<br />
45” dropped ceiling cavity<br />
for total 4’ flooplate depth<br />
Standard 18” by 6”<br />
i-beams along floorplate<br />
Mitered conditions arbitrate<br />
adjacencies along FRP<br />
panels and structure<br />
Secondary Horizontal Members<br />
8’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />
Primary Horizontal Members<br />
16’ Increment, 6” by 18” Profile<br />
Cleaning Room<br />
424<br />
Office 1<br />
192<br />
Office 4<br />
127<br />
Office 3<br />
153<br />
Assembled Façade<br />
1” Seaming<br />
Generic 6” poured<br />
concrete decking<br />
Thin seam language leverages<br />
tectonic reading towards a legibility<br />
of the bands cut into the FRP<br />
panels, concealing expressions of<br />
inner structure and jointing<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Checked:<br />
Scale:<br />
JW<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
PROPOSED<br />
TYPICAL UPPER FLOOR PLAN<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: CG<br />
Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: FAÇADE DETAIL<br />
CG<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: CG<br />
Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: PROPOSED<br />
PRIMARY ELEVATIONS<br />
CG<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
CG<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Pre-cast Concrete Panels<br />
4”x6” Studs<br />
Scilicone Seal<br />
4”x6” Studs<br />
W18 Steel<br />
Gypsum Board<br />
Moisture Barrier<br />
Batt insulation<br />
Moisture Barrier<br />
Gypsum Board<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV.<br />
Drawn: JW, CG<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: PROPOSED<br />
SITE PLAN<br />
Checked:<br />
Scale:<br />
CG<br />
1/64”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV.<br />
Checked:<br />
Scale:<br />
CG, JW<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
PROPOSED<br />
TRANSVERSE SECTION (OBLIQUE)<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
AW<br />
Scale:<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SKIN PANEL DETAIL<br />
CG<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked: -<br />
CG<br />
Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
SKIN PANELING<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Ring Members<br />
20” x 20” steel tubes<br />
Primary Members<br />
14” W-sections<br />
Secondary Members<br />
10” W-sections<br />
Core 1<br />
Gallery 09<br />
3619<br />
Gallery 07<br />
1016<br />
Gallery 01<br />
1350<br />
Gallery 02<br />
1682<br />
Gallery 08 (Tiered)<br />
992<br />
Gallery 03<br />
1318<br />
Gallery 10<br />
1243<br />
Visitor WC 2<br />
Gallery 12<br />
993<br />
Steel Structure<br />
Structural grid sandwhiched<br />
between Gypsum board interior<br />
walls and exterior paneling<br />
Exterior Courtyard Paneling<br />
Poured concrete panels<br />
conceal geometry and provide<br />
tame interior expression<br />
Lockers<br />
Sec. Office<br />
199<br />
222<br />
Office 5 Office 6 Office 7<br />
283 225 219<br />
Core 2<br />
Ring Members<br />
Tube steel members run along edges<br />
of masses to connect larger sections<br />
of primary and secondary structure<br />
Primary Members<br />
W-sections running vertically through<br />
structural void between interior and<br />
exterior paneling<br />
Secondary Members<br />
W-sections running horizontally and at<br />
perpendiculars to primary members<br />
Dialgonal Bracing<br />
Bracing connects between primary<br />
and secondary members<br />
Floorplates<br />
Standardized steel sheet decking with<br />
poured concrete, underlaid by standard<br />
steel substructure<br />
Basement Columns<br />
2’ diameter concrete columns<br />
Foundations (Caissons below)<br />
5’ x 5’ poured concrete members<br />
Foundation Beam Structure<br />
3’ x 3’ concrete beams below<br />
ground floor decks above<br />
-14'<br />
Direction 1 Panels<br />
Panels angled at ~60° from<br />
ground.<br />
Direction 2 Panels<br />
Panels angled at ~240°<br />
from ground (~ –120°)<br />
Direction 3 Panels<br />
Panels angled at ~45° from<br />
ground.<br />
Panel Seams<br />
Seams express themselves tectonically,<br />
but combination with slotting produces<br />
graphic effect<br />
Base Panels<br />
Panels of all directions extend onto the bases,<br />
topped eitherwith circulation, landscaping or<br />
outdoor gathering spaces, such as the outdoor<br />
auditorium<br />
+55'<br />
+45'<br />
+23'<br />
+9'<br />
+0'<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: JW<br />
Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: PROPOSED<br />
GROUND FLOOR PLAN<br />
CG<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: JW, CG Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: PROPOSED<br />
LONGITUDINAL SECTION<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: CG<br />
Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: EXPLODED STRUCTURE<br />
DRAWING<br />
CG<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
CG<br />
Scale:<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
METAL STRUCTURING<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Berkeley Emerging<br />
Art Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and<br />
the Pacific Film Archive<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong><br />
Thomas Ferrer<br />
Adrian C.W. Wong<br />
Jinwen (Iris) Yu<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-001<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-010<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-011<br />
001-A-101<br />
001-A-102<br />
Skin System 1<br />
~60° slots<br />
Skin System 2<br />
~240° slots<br />
Structural Strategy<br />
Each object stands structura ly independent,<br />
leaning on one another. Cores in<br />
two objects provide vertical circulation.<br />
Interior Courtyard<br />
6” x 5’ x 10’ precast concrete panels<br />
Circulatory Surfaces<br />
6” poured concrete panels<br />
01<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-201<br />
Skin System 3<br />
~45° slots<br />
Basement Retailing Wall<br />
12” poured concrete<br />
Skin Composition<br />
Slots tilted in multiple directions,<br />
sometimes aligning along<br />
physical seams and other times<br />
producing purely graphic seams<br />
through tectonic articulation.<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-301<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-302<br />
02<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-303<br />
001-A-304<br />
001-A-401<br />
168 BAM Design Development Design Development Notebook Set
End Mullion<br />
Poured in Place Concrete<br />
Steel Rebar<br />
Image courtsey Sanaa<br />
Secondary Steel Member<br />
L Brackets<br />
Bracket Bolting<br />
Primary Steel Member<br />
Hôtel Tassel image courtesy Prestel Publishing, glass image courtsey FinePoint<br />
Structural Joint<br />
Vertical Clips<br />
Façade Panels<br />
Façade Clips<br />
Primary Steel<br />
20” rolled steel members<br />
run along edges of masses<br />
Secondary Steel Direction 1<br />
16” W-section members running along<br />
primary direction of surfaces<br />
Secondary Steel Direction 2<br />
14” W-section members running<br />
along secondary direction of surfaces<br />
Generic 6” Poured Concrete<br />
over Metal Decking<br />
Hung Ceiling Connectors<br />
Primary Structure<br />
Secondary Structure<br />
Floorplate Edges<br />
Image courtesy Snøhetta<br />
Image courtesy Architectural Record<br />
Water Sealent<br />
Rain gutter<br />
Low-E Coated Glass<br />
Air Gap<br />
Interior Glass<br />
Mullion<br />
Clip-On Fin<br />
Pre Cast Concrete panel<br />
Interlockng Joint<br />
Primary Steel<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked: -<br />
CG<br />
Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
ASSORTED SKIN DETAILS<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked: -<br />
TF<br />
Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
DETAIL: GLAZING TO SKIN<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked: CG<br />
Drawn: CG<br />
Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
Title: MATERIAL REFERENCE PALATE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Retaining Wall<br />
Drainage Mat<br />
WPM<br />
Protection Board<br />
OBJECT 1 OBJECT 1<br />
Level 3: Galleries Level 2: Galleries<br />
5618 sqft<br />
5120 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 374<br />
Load: 341<br />
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 4: Studios<br />
2490 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 35<br />
Load: 71<br />
AFT ENTRANCE<br />
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 3: Studios<br />
2456 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 35<br />
Load: 69<br />
MAIN ENTRANCE<br />
OBJECT 3<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
3555 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 237<br />
Precast Concrete Panels Structural Steel Cores<br />
Foundation Beams and Columns<br />
HVAC<br />
Foundation and Retaining Walls<br />
Parking Asphalt<br />
OBJECT 5<br />
Level 3-4: Studios<br />
2037 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 35<br />
Load: 58<br />
OBJECT 5<br />
Level 2: Galleries<br />
2192 sqft<br />
Type E<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 146<br />
OBJECT 2 OBJECT 2<br />
Level 2: Galleries Level 3: Galleries<br />
2394 sqft 2300 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15 Factor: 15<br />
Load: 159 Load: 153<br />
OBJECT 4 OBJECT 4<br />
Level 2: Galleries Level 3: Galleries<br />
2421 sqft 1816 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15 Factor: 15<br />
Load: 161 Load: 121<br />
Primary Steel<br />
Secondary Steel<br />
Dual Glazing<br />
FRP Panels<br />
Gypsum Wall<br />
PFR Panels<br />
OBJECT 6<br />
Level 2-4: Galleries<br />
3892 sqft<br />
Type A3<br />
Factor: 15<br />
Load: 259<br />
Metal Edge Angle<br />
HVAC Supply<br />
HVAC Return<br />
C-Channels<br />
Metal Decking<br />
Gypsum Ceiling<br />
W-18 Floor Structure<br />
OBJECT 7 OBJECT 7<br />
Level 3-4: Offices Level 1-2: Galleries<br />
3260 sqft<br />
2582 sqft<br />
Type B<br />
Type B<br />
Factor: 100 Factor: 100<br />
Load: 32<br />
Load: 25<br />
ADA / Accessible Path of Travel<br />
Egress / Circulation<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
JW<br />
Scale:<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
BUILDING CHUNK<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV.<br />
Checked:<br />
Scale:<br />
CG<br />
AW<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
PROPOSED<br />
ADA AND EGRESS DIAGRAM<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: CG<br />
Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: COST ANALYSIS AND<br />
ESTIMATE<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
Drawn: TF<br />
Scale:<br />
Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />
Title: DETAIL: INTERNAL<br />
FLOORPLATE TO SKIN<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Group 8 Design Development<br />
<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />
Ferrer, Thomas<br />
Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />
Yu, J.W. Iris<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
Revisions:<br />
No. Date Description By<br />
Notes:<br />
Do not scale from this drawing<br />
Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />
Status:<br />
Drawn:<br />
Date:<br />
Title:<br />
DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />
CG<br />
Scale:<br />
07 DEC 2015<br />
HVAC DIAGRAM<br />
-<br />
1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />
SCALE @ SIZE<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />
G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />
used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />
they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />
of G+FWY.<br />
Precast Concrete Pan<br />
Interlocking Joint<br />
Structure Joinery<br />
Topping Slab<br />
Silicone Seal<br />
Structural Slab<br />
Secondary Seal<br />
Metal Decking<br />
Primary Seal<br />
Drop Ceiling<br />
Moisture Barrier<br />
Steel Stud Blocking<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Structural Joint<br />
001-A-402<br />
001-A-501<br />
001-A-502<br />
Exploded Façade<br />
Return Vents<br />
Supply Vents<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
Air Handling Units<br />
Several locations house multiple<br />
air handling units, each of which<br />
separately serves each object<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-503<br />
001-A-601<br />
001-A-602<br />
Shell and Façade<br />
Exterior Façade Paneling<br />
Fiber-reinforced panels (FRP),<br />
broken down in modules of<br />
roughly 5 by 8 feet, attached to<br />
underlying steel structure.<br />
These are to be painted white<br />
and milled with as crisp edges as<br />
possible, enticing sharp shadows.<br />
Precast Concrete Panels 413276 Ft 2 $ 75 / Ft 2 $ 30995700<br />
Rolled Ring Steel Members (14”x14”) 11046 Ft $300 / Ft $ 3313800<br />
Primary Steel Direction 1 (14”x10”) 6851 Ft $ 150 / Ft $ 1027650<br />
Primary Steel Direction 2 (14”x10”) 9994 Ft $ 150 / Ft $ 1499100<br />
Secondary Members (14”x7”) 17664 Ft $ 150 / Ft $ 2649600<br />
Glass Panels 12921 Ft 2 $ 65 / Ft 2 $ 839865<br />
Interior Cores and Finishes<br />
Cores 15577 Ft 2 $ 120 / Ft 2 $ 1869240<br />
Floor Finishes 71815 Ft 2 $ 50 / Ft 2 $ 3590750<br />
Gypsum 123175 Ft 2 $ 2.5 / Ft 2 $ 307938<br />
Fire Sprinklers 71815 Ft 2 $ 5 / Ft 2 $ 359075<br />
HVAC 71815 Ft 2 $ 40 / Ft 2 $ 2872600<br />
Additional Architectural Elements<br />
Flooring and Ceilings<br />
Polished concrete with minimal but still<br />
noticeable reflectivity creates deep spaces<br />
with subtle, blurred reflections that place<br />
the visitor between two bare, abstract planes<br />
of experience when within the galleries.<br />
Comparable to Sanaa’s 21 st Century Museum<br />
of Contemporary Art Kanazawa, this<br />
austere approach should constantly hold in<br />
juxtaposition to itself the boldness of the sky,<br />
constantly referenced by the various cores’<br />
skylights and open courtyard.<br />
Interior Courtyard Façade<br />
Stark cast-in-place concrete<br />
panels line the interior courtyard,<br />
providing a space of articulation<br />
which is minimal and without the<br />
exuberance of the outer envelope.<br />
Transitions occur in seams<br />
between objects.<br />
Interior Concrete Slabs 71815 Ft 2 $ 120 / Ft 2 $ 8617800<br />
Interior Partition Walls 6781 Ft 2 $ 30 / Ft 2 $ 203430<br />
Floorplate Steel (W-24) 21191 Ft $ 100 / Ft $ 2119100<br />
Basement Retaining Wall 9318 Ft 2 $ 180 / Ft 2 $ 1677240<br />
Parking Garage Asphalt 46326 Ft $ 4 / Ft $ 185304<br />
Concrete Foundation 15384 Ft $ 200 / Ft $ 3076800<br />
Foundation Columns 12691 Ft 3 $ 100 / Ft 3 $ 1269100<br />
Foundation Beams 61464 Ft 3 $ 100 / Ft 3 $ 6146400<br />
Subtotal $ 67878652<br />
Overheads<br />
Architect’s Overhead 15% $ 10181798<br />
MEP Overhead 1% $ 678787<br />
Structural Overhead 3% $ 2036360<br />
Contingencies<br />
Estimating Contingency 5% $ 3393933<br />
Construction Contingency 10% $ 6787865<br />
Total $ 90957394<br />
Filigree Detailing<br />
Fine metal elements should have a hard, sturdy but elegant feeling,<br />
accentuating the space as if lines in space.<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-701<br />
Berkeley Emerging Art<br />
Foundation (BEAF)<br />
001-A-801<br />
Cast iron railings in lieu of Victor Horta’s Hôtel Tassel and details<br />
around the stairs (backed by a reflective layer of dark glass) should<br />
make a screen of sorts which follows circulation throughout the<br />
building.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 169
SCI-FA<br />
2B Studio<br />
Spring 2014, Heather Flood<br />
This project was specially selected to be<br />
featured in SCI-Arc’s Spring Show 2014.<br />
Synopsis<br />
SCI-Fa (The Southern California Institute<br />
of Fashion) is an exploration in programmatic<br />
and formal ambiguity of space.<br />
This formal production applies a logic of<br />
transformational conics in order to eschew<br />
primitive geometries to the ends of<br />
producing simultaneities of program and<br />
formal rarifications of space which suppose<br />
an entirely unconventional architecture<br />
both outwardly experiential and<br />
esoteric to the medium of Architecture.<br />
Of specific importance to the project are<br />
its representational qualities, especially<br />
in relation to the formal agendas at hand.<br />
Regarding the bent form of the building,<br />
the conventions of typical plans and sections<br />
were invalidated as meek in their<br />
explicative possibilities for the inherently<br />
three-dimensional nature in the spatial<br />
instantiations of bending. This fundamentally<br />
shifted the project’s presentation to<br />
rely both on an animation and a series<br />
of peelings or slicings (entitled “Scoop<br />
Drawings”) of the building’s components<br />
(skin, massing et cetera) as more adequate<br />
methods for the description of its<br />
assets in terms formal, programmatic and<br />
representative.<br />
Thoughts on Program<br />
As briefed, SCI-Fa longs to be a sweatshop<br />
of production value, stuffed mostly<br />
with compartments accessed indirectly<br />
from distant corners of a primarily<br />
medium-space-filled building shrouded<br />
in privacy. Clearly, sheer adherence to the<br />
provided programmatic distributions will<br />
be ineffectual in procuring unique intersections<br />
of space and constituencies.<br />
Particularly of interest, given the diverse<br />
site and nearby orgy of demographics,<br />
it seems strange that an educational<br />
institution would allot spaces overwhelmingly<br />
geared towards production,<br />
nearly altogether forgoing more traditional<br />
roles of education. It is clear that<br />
the prerogative of the institution is not<br />
situated within the momentary incidents<br />
of academia, but rather centered on the<br />
necessitated production of fashion materials<br />
and the like. The facility is effectively<br />
established on the grounds of its own<br />
labor, the individual meaningless and the<br />
collective but a mere tool in this aesthetic<br />
machinery. What becomes ironic about<br />
such institutions, generally speaking,<br />
seems to be their often reclusive nature,<br />
as if to boast solely within granted circles<br />
their accomplishments of material and<br />
craft. Why shouldn’t such a factory be in<br />
your face? What withholds an institution<br />
like SCI-Fa to the state of secondary or<br />
tertiary status in a vibrancy to the likes of<br />
Downtown Los Angeles?<br />
Thus, the institution’s interactions with<br />
the public sphere, both theatrical and<br />
revealing in nature, are of the utmost<br />
importance for demonstrative value in its<br />
architecture. Its architecture should read:<br />
this is not a place of observation, rather<br />
a directly confrontational experiment<br />
of empirical phenomenology. Melding<br />
perfectly with the clear delineation of<br />
“middle spaces” (those medium-sized<br />
areas of interstitial importance, the<br />
organization of the program outlined in<br />
the project’s brief ought to engage and to<br />
stimulate the barrier between the public<br />
and the institution (the exo and the eso,<br />
that is to say) both from outside-in and<br />
within-out.<br />
Also inherent to this observation is the<br />
unique structure of power invested<br />
elsewhere in the provided spaces. Of<br />
noteworthiness is the second largest<br />
allocation of area, divided between the<br />
building’s facilities and the institution’s<br />
administration. This combined mass<br />
is still to be deemed more spatially<br />
important in the reading of the brief’s<br />
interpreted agendas than straightforward<br />
instruction, vested half-heartedly<br />
in fleeting seminar rooms and secluded<br />
studio plots. Thus, a hierarchical relationship<br />
is established wherein a metaphorically<br />
panoptic distribution of importance<br />
oversees the highly controlled (and thus<br />
only secondarily conditioned) spaces of<br />
traditional “education”. Again, the powerhouse<br />
of production overtakes this<br />
positioning, as if to engage a mutated<br />
beast, the purpose of which borders<br />
between the refinements procured by<br />
a disciplined body of pupils below an<br />
overseeing administrative caste and the<br />
let-wild machinery of production.<br />
How might this architecture, and in particular<br />
its programmatic distributions and<br />
spatial accordances, enable this loosely<br />
defined pedagogy to foster in a method<br />
conducive to the interaction between<br />
this subculture and a larger context (Los<br />
Angeles, herself). In so doing, spaces<br />
otherwise perceived as afterthoughts or<br />
prerequisites might take prominence in<br />
facilitating such interactions. Id est, the<br />
institution’s shop or auditorium might be<br />
recast as crucial political arenas throughout<br />
which a diagrammatic goal of integration<br />
and discourse carries itself out,<br />
both captive and parasitic to the institutional<br />
framework which has spawned.<br />
Thoughts on Institution<br />
The strange thing about polemic intuitions,<br />
once realized in architecture as<br />
built things, seems to be their resistance<br />
towards syndication in their perspective<br />
environments. That is to say, it prevails<br />
that the integration of the institution is<br />
perceived as counterintuitive to its core<br />
radicalism, which, quite paradoxically, it<br />
seeks to interject into a larger context.<br />
Thus, it is as if a cognitive membrane<br />
of glass exists to separate an institution<br />
from its surroundings. Whatever<br />
the purpose of that institution might be,<br />
it might appear that this disconnection<br />
has severed critically unexploited links<br />
which could foster between those exo<br />
and those eso to these alternative definitions<br />
of otherwise complacent notions so<br />
intrinsic to an avant-garde practice.<br />
The result of these tendencies manifests<br />
Thus, the institution’s<br />
interactions with the<br />
public sphere, both<br />
theatrical and revealing<br />
in nature, are of the<br />
utmost importance for<br />
demonstrative value<br />
in its architecture.<br />
itself several perplexingly convoluted<br />
circumstances:<br />
Truly innovative approaches to the practices<br />
respective to these institutions are<br />
rendered temporarily null in their eras.<br />
Appreciation is acquired ex post facto as<br />
a kind of post-rationalization by the larger<br />
community. While the immediacy of the<br />
avant-garde does in fact leave beneficial<br />
scars on the functions of whichever<br />
discipline in question, it rarely becomes<br />
170 SCI-Fa 2B Studio
A.1.Y<br />
P.1<br />
P.2<br />
E.S.1<br />
A.1<br />
S<br />
A.1.X<br />
R<br />
1. 2. 3.<br />
A.2.Y<br />
P.1<br />
E.S.1<br />
E.C<br />
B<br />
V.R<br />
H.C<br />
N°<br />
V.R<br />
A.2<br />
A.1.X<br />
A.2.Y<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
P.1<br />
D.1 C.1 C.2<br />
D.2<br />
R.2<br />
R.1 E.S.3<br />
E.S.2<br />
P.2<br />
7. 8. 9.<br />
172 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Transformation Diagram
Of specific importance to the<br />
project are its representational<br />
qualities, especially in relation<br />
to the formal agendas at hand.<br />
Regarding the bent form of the<br />
building, the conventions of plans<br />
and sections were invalidated<br />
as meek in their explicative<br />
possibilities for the inherently<br />
three-dimensional nature in the<br />
spatial instantiations of bending.<br />
173
174 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Transformation Process
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 175
acknowledged by the greater society<br />
until it is either extinct or festering on its<br />
deathbed. What might occur if leading<br />
thinkers in avant-garde practices were to<br />
engage society? Obviously, this cannot<br />
be enforced in any authoritarian manner<br />
onto personal agendas, but, instead,<br />
architecture may offer us a method by<br />
which to shift the performances both of<br />
such practices and prospective members<br />
of societal constituencies to the ends that<br />
their brief scraping one another would<br />
produce magnificent intersections.<br />
The actualized objectives of these institutions<br />
suffer such significantly lengthened<br />
realizations within a culture that neither<br />
their creators nor their intended audiences<br />
are able to partake in the spoils of<br />
progression. Thus, Ikea is the effectual<br />
gravestone of a once beloved Bauhaus.<br />
Beleaguered bachelors and strapped<br />
students alike were punished by history<br />
to endure a semicentury before innovative<br />
spatializations of Modernist design<br />
reached their grasps within reason. Of<br />
course among other circumstances, part<br />
of this is must be attributed to stagnant<br />
time and prolonged distancing between<br />
innovators and their audiences. Obviously,<br />
many factors contribute to this snailpaced<br />
progression, and few of these can<br />
be addressed by architecture. Still, the<br />
spatial division between those pushing<br />
forward the intensification of culture<br />
and their constituencies as manifest by<br />
architecture can be reduced not only to a<br />
negligible level but perhaps can even be<br />
promoted and appropriated.<br />
Both those within and outside institutions<br />
seem to be completely ignorant of each<br />
other’s existence or importance. While<br />
some have posted this as both an inherent<br />
elitism of the avant-garde and an<br />
ignorance of the masses, it is the distinct<br />
hypothesis that in at least some circumstances<br />
a purely architectural inefficiency<br />
may be of responsibility to the symptom.<br />
How might it be if these two groups were<br />
to be compressed within one atmosphere?<br />
Their entanglement, rendered as<br />
the dissolution of divisitory space could,<br />
in effect, render each obsolete by mutual<br />
ingestion. An enlightened citizenry could<br />
engulf the ostracized radicals just as<br />
these societal separatists might return to<br />
a world forever changed by their esoteric<br />
contemplations.<br />
Unfortunately, architecture to this point<br />
has to these ends remained rather unhelpful.<br />
Bauhaus became a household<br />
name only long after its dissipation, The<br />
Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies<br />
evades the common New Yorker (a<br />
being so thirsty for unsettlement) to this<br />
day, and SCI-Arc remains unbeknownced<br />
even to those living beside it, to name a<br />
few situations inherent to the discipline of<br />
architecture. These circumstances must<br />
implode, rendering in their wake the<br />
complete disruption of previously held<br />
ideals about the agency and impotence<br />
of the avant-garde. Though largely untested,<br />
the results or perspective failure<br />
of such an action is far too great a possibility<br />
of which to continue a distasteful<br />
avoidance.<br />
The Fourth Wall as Societal Device<br />
The Fourth Wall is a term pertaining to<br />
the theory of theater, constituting not<br />
in material but in perception the final<br />
enclosing “wall” of a stage set which<br />
metaphysically divides the performances<br />
occurring with the audience spectating.<br />
In more traditional roles, this division is<br />
not to be engaged. The theater-goers sit<br />
before their spectacle in complete compliance,<br />
idly engrossing themselves in<br />
only the representation of an event. This<br />
has come under considerable challenge<br />
in more contemporary works, whereby<br />
the wall itself is rendered variously null,<br />
enabling the fluid interaction between<br />
audience and actor. Not always with<br />
consequence to the reiterated production<br />
before them, this at the purest state<br />
encapsulates a constituent engagement<br />
with results dramatic in their repurcisions<br />
for understanding and experience alike.<br />
It seems that much of contemporary life,<br />
no less of that in a city, rests behind a<br />
fourth wall. Especially in regards to architecture,<br />
much is left behind our grasp,<br />
a mere representation of intentions and<br />
actions. Our persistence (and, thus, reliance)<br />
in the Fourth Wall is unequivocal<br />
to all else. We cling to its protection from<br />
the realities, effectively ammounting to<br />
a schism between our sensorial contact<br />
with the world itself sui generis and its<br />
ramifications towards our lives.<br />
Thus, it appears, much of the institutional<br />
and societal frameworks we have<br />
established seek to sustain this buffer<br />
between the rawness of contemporary<br />
existence and the comfort prerequesite<br />
to a sustainable life. We wretch in fear as<br />
these boundaries crumble in rare occasions.<br />
Take, for example, a crash of an<br />
airliner. We look to this object as a whole,<br />
a sort of container for people – passengers.<br />
Few engage this as a mechanized<br />
system, instead relying wholy on the<br />
perception of its geometric essence as<br />
one body. In the event of a crash, we are<br />
often times presented with a failure of<br />
the object to sustain the singular form<br />
we expect of it. We see its entrails spewn<br />
about as if to signify before us that our<br />
creation has failed. Once the skin of the<br />
beast is lifted from its framing, we find<br />
ourselves disgusted by the estrangement<br />
pronowned. An assembledge of heterogeneous<br />
parts, it repels our notions of<br />
truth and verity to see the actuality that<br />
is the machine, a loosly composed set of<br />
bolts and panels.<br />
We might look at the Lockerbie bombing,<br />
in a brief detour, to illustrate this point.<br />
After the bombing of Pan American Flight<br />
103 over the small Scottish village, a media<br />
extravaganza presented the populace<br />
with a face-to-face depiction of tragedy.<br />
In regards to airline travel, the fourth wall,<br />
in its division of the passenger from the<br />
ramifications of both political wills related<br />
to the subject and the delicate structural<br />
systems of a Boeing 747 during flight,<br />
was utterly decimated. Surreal images of<br />
a ruined cockpit strewn about a bucolic<br />
field in the rural enclave, especially with<br />
the cause of the crash taken into consideration,<br />
irrevocably altered the relationship<br />
between the passenger and the<br />
machine. To see an image of the jetliner<br />
before the crash is to reengage the territorialized<br />
notions we had attained in<br />
the immediate foreground to the disaster.<br />
These are forever shattered by the<br />
presentation of images after the matter,<br />
and it may be said that we can never<br />
truly gaze onto the condition of the object<br />
before the event without irresistibly<br />
allowing our minds to venture onto the<br />
tragedy of which we have been informed<br />
by the reciprocal interchange of information<br />
they share.<br />
That, of course, was an example with<br />
rather morbid associations. Rather, the<br />
Fourth Wall might function in society in<br />
a strata of roles and circumstances. Critically<br />
speaking, its existence buffers the<br />
life of the individual from the myriad of<br />
complications presented by the outside<br />
world. The theatergoer, in this function, is<br />
in many instances in need of the division<br />
between the representational aspects<br />
of the performance and the perception<br />
occurring in his or her psyche. When this<br />
is removed, a new relationship is transfigured<br />
by the space between the stage<br />
and the seating. Obvious ramifications of<br />
grand importance rest in the presence or<br />
avoidance of this tactic within theatrical<br />
theory.<br />
In most other circumstances, the Fourth<br />
Wall’s persistence causes riffs in the<br />
understandings between constituencies<br />
of society. Specifically to a political end,<br />
these allot for much of the estrangement<br />
we face in a Postindustrial legacy.<br />
Our clothing, furniture, our buildings and<br />
any other manufactured good rest firmly<br />
behind a differentiation of metaphysical<br />
separation. Often, it seems, the dilution<br />
of this barrier results in consequences<br />
either disturbing or disruptional.<br />
The Fourth Wall in Architecture<br />
In the case of architecture, its function<br />
inherent as a container of program, constituencies<br />
and functions thereof bounds<br />
the capacity of most structures to the<br />
roles of uniform boxes. Even with formal<br />
experimentation, the Fourth Wall is hard<br />
broken even by the most radical of strategies.<br />
A cliché has thus formed around<br />
the solution to this problem, centered<br />
around a knee-jerk reaction of complete<br />
spatial implosion. It is rather inneffectual<br />
in many circumstances to demolish all<br />
walls. Instead, a myraid of other spatial<br />
strategies and media can be uptaken<br />
in the progression towards integrated<br />
space.<br />
Particularly in the sense of institutional<br />
architecture, it seems pervasive that a<br />
Fourth Wall exists between those exoand<br />
esoteric to the organization. This<br />
division is perhaps most often manifest in<br />
the form of a wall, but otherwise its forms<br />
can be seen in various architectural<br />
tropes.<br />
Recently, much has been made in the<br />
real of connecting those outside the institution<br />
to those within, but, under closer<br />
examination, it is possible to deduce that<br />
these relationships are superficial at best.<br />
Furthermore, they often involve the interplay<br />
of constituencies in a linear manner.<br />
That is to say, either those from within<br />
experience those outside or vise versa,<br />
but rarely does the situation present<br />
itself that a complete orgy of interaction<br />
occurs. Such an event might be labeled<br />
preemptively as counterproductive to<br />
the ends of an institution, but it can also<br />
be interpreted that the explicit function<br />
of such an organization is to create this<br />
kind of interaction. Thus, it effectively<br />
176 SCI-Fa 2B Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Study Models<br />
177
2.1<br />
18.2<br />
12.2<br />
VLLY<br />
35.2<br />
13.2<br />
34.2<br />
VLLY<br />
VLLY<br />
VLLY<br />
39.1<br />
26.1<br />
37.2<br />
38.2<br />
36.2<br />
39.2<br />
VLLY<br />
40.1<br />
34.1<br />
42.1<br />
41.1<br />
UP, R = 49.25<br />
33.2<br />
32.2<br />
32.1<br />
33.1<br />
35.1<br />
36.1<br />
Central Mass (Main)<br />
Urban Lobby (Main)<br />
VLLY<br />
37.1<br />
UP, R = 9.13c<br />
20.1<br />
20.2<br />
19.2<br />
17.2<br />
23.2<br />
VLLY<br />
19.1<br />
UP, R = 32c<br />
16.2<br />
3.1<br />
14.1<br />
17.1<br />
18.1<br />
(Cut and Join Seamlessly)<br />
3.2<br />
28.2<br />
UP, R = 6.67c<br />
DOWN, R = 28.28c<br />
4.1<br />
DOWN, R = 28.28<br />
16.1<br />
MNTN<br />
MNTN<br />
21.2<br />
4.2<br />
15.2<br />
23.1<br />
42.2<br />
27.2<br />
26.2<br />
Central Mass (Void)<br />
Central Mass (Main)<br />
5.1<br />
Urban Lobby (Insert)<br />
Urban Lobby (Main)<br />
5.2<br />
UP, R = 20.00<br />
29.2<br />
30.2<br />
31.2<br />
24.2<br />
22.1<br />
15.1<br />
21.1<br />
6.2<br />
41.2<br />
25.2<br />
MNTN<br />
DOWN, R = 13.33c<br />
MNTN<br />
DOWN, R = 39.75c<br />
UP, R = 29.58<br />
UP, R = 7.35c<br />
UP, R = 16.58<br />
13.1<br />
12.1<br />
UP, R = 34.58<br />
11.2<br />
UP, R = 5<br />
14.2<br />
40.2<br />
38.1<br />
VLLY<br />
25.1<br />
27.1<br />
VLLY<br />
28.1<br />
10.2<br />
24.1<br />
DOWN, R = 5<br />
UP, R = 28.28<br />
DOWN, R = 10<br />
9.2<br />
11.1<br />
2.2<br />
8.2<br />
10.1<br />
9.1<br />
UP, R = 7.5<br />
1.2<br />
UP, R = 10<br />
VLLY<br />
8.1<br />
DOWN, R = 28.28<br />
7.2<br />
22.2<br />
30.1<br />
31.1<br />
29.1<br />
DOWN, R = 35.92c<br />
7.1<br />
DOWN, R = 29.05<br />
6.1<br />
Urban Lobby (Main)<br />
Auditorium<br />
DOWN, R = 36.55<br />
1.1<br />
178 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Unrolled Massing
avoids the trope of being cut off from the<br />
outside world.<br />
Especially in the case of a fashion school,<br />
it is integral that those inside experientially<br />
partake in the interactions of those<br />
outside, and that, conversely, those outside<br />
are changed fundamentally in their<br />
perspective by those within. Obviously,<br />
this cannot be predicted to the point that<br />
one consequence is available. In some<br />
cases, the events might even end poorly<br />
by a traditional sense of success. Events<br />
such as the flood of homeless into the<br />
Seattle Public Library come to mind, but<br />
are these really that bad?<br />
Often, the case is that our realities are<br />
highly curated by our statuses within the<br />
complex structures of society. This predetermined<br />
interaction establishes a narrow<br />
framework that functions quite actively to<br />
remain fairly static. Within this, a backlogged<br />
cycle seems to have occurred by<br />
many accounts in which those who have<br />
climbed the ranks resist the ascension of<br />
contemporaries below. Without the necessity<br />
to explicate this in further detail, it<br />
is clear that its ranks pertain to those of<br />
the fashion industry in particular.<br />
Urbanity<br />
Circulation as Runway for<br />
Newly Purchased Dress<br />
Commerce<br />
Dress becomes External Representation<br />
Internal Production to Product<br />
Dress becomes Product at Store<br />
Libraries<br />
Raw Material to Assembly<br />
Sewing Room<br />
Dying Room<br />
Academia<br />
Knowledge to Application<br />
Craftwork to Display<br />
Dress is Complete<br />
Dress is Begun<br />
Printmaking Lab<br />
Toy Room<br />
Runway<br />
Therefore, with a site as ontologically<br />
compromised in such a diverse fashion<br />
as that at the corner of Olympic and<br />
Main, it is paramount to the success of<br />
any institution there that architecture<br />
arbitrate the contemporaneously choreographed<br />
and unimpaired interaction<br />
among the subsets of society. Even<br />
within the institution, an obvious hierarchy<br />
is bound to form. This has, in other<br />
cases, been the demise of a truly radical<br />
establishment, a fermented sign of complacency<br />
and presumption. In a place like<br />
Especially in the case of a fashion school, it<br />
seems integral that those inside experientially<br />
partake in the interactions of those outside, and<br />
that, conversely, those outside are changed<br />
fundamentally in their perspective by those within.<br />
Los Angeles, who can ever say what is<br />
above or below anything else? The hierarchies<br />
otherwise established the guard<br />
the ramparts of our social structures have<br />
utterly fallen within this city, at least as far<br />
as explicated by the physical world.<br />
What if an architecture profoundly<br />
changed the manner by which these<br />
various groups of people, both those<br />
internal and external to the institution, interacted<br />
with one another? Were they to<br />
be removed from their typical frames of<br />
reference, they might find before them an<br />
entirely reshuffled perception of reality.<br />
F***, the Spline<br />
This design is arrived to by the effective<br />
bending of space. Whereas typically<br />
Cartesian geometries preclude the<br />
three-dimensional transoformation of<br />
their domains, the action of being has<br />
been employed to the ends of creating<br />
a space of pulled and distorted proportions.<br />
Still, it remains ever valient that<br />
those within this capsule are cognizant<br />
of their surroundings. The ghosts of a<br />
Cartesian past are pervasive throughout<br />
both interior and exterior moments<br />
across the scheme. Such is the overarching<br />
use of the grid, a persistent reference<br />
which begs those within its grasp to read<br />
the transformative logic of its application.<br />
This is achieved through a conic/circular<br />
dimension which is controposed to<br />
the otherwise orthagonal reliance of the<br />
building.<br />
Of particular interest is the emergence<br />
of complex spatial relationships with a<br />
series of typical geometries. We have<br />
become so complacent with our technological<br />
surfaces and morphologies that<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 179
Education Bar<br />
Studios<br />
Seminar Rooms<br />
Urban Lobby<br />
Store<br />
Lounge<br />
Auditoria<br />
Street<br />
Media Core<br />
Libraries<br />
Computer Lab<br />
Offices<br />
Cafe<br />
Sewing Room<br />
Dying Room<br />
Production Spiral<br />
Printmaking Lab<br />
Toy Room<br />
Runway<br />
Urban Fabric<br />
180 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Circulation Diagram
Studios / Printmaking Lab<br />
Libraries<br />
to Urban Lobby<br />
Sewing Farm<br />
Tiered Toy Room<br />
Dyes<br />
to Rooftop<br />
to Runway<br />
Student Entrance<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Circulation Detail: Production Spiral<br />
181
182 SCI-Fa 2B Studio 3/8” : 1’ Model
we often forget the nacent abilities of<br />
primitive geometries. While a spline can<br />
only engage the fairly recent discourse of<br />
form through a reference to complexity<br />
and surface, the culmination of primtitive<br />
geometries which we set our eyes so<br />
often upon in buildings throughout the<br />
history of architecture prove their capacity<br />
to more effectively attain contemporary<br />
discourses.<br />
Passing through these spaces, an inhabitant<br />
of the environment is placed in constant<br />
relation both to him or her self and<br />
to his or her piers. Ipso facto, a dialogue<br />
of perceptions is established. Vantages<br />
provided by the undulations in the stairs’<br />
trajectories or the interior’s bends, among<br />
other things, present new perspectives<br />
onto inhabitation through an abstraction<br />
of the borders of program. The visual and<br />
the spatial intertwine to procure a sort<br />
of blurred reality in which the user is to<br />
heighten an engagement of the architecture<br />
through the conscious intensification<br />
or nullification of the senses. Auditory<br />
and visual references are eschewed at<br />
unexpected points, allotting a experience<br />
utterly reliant upon the recognition of<br />
the subject to his implications within it.<br />
It is his, her or their acknowledgement<br />
of their experience which validates this<br />
space. Never does the building become<br />
obtrusive, as it works at deep levels<br />
to relay in each breath agency to the<br />
spectator. The aforementioned Cartesian<br />
systems, juxtapositions between complex<br />
and primitive geometries and decisive<br />
choices in placements of irregular spaces<br />
allow a fluid existence of space wherein<br />
references against what the typical user<br />
is accoustomed to offer opportunities for<br />
defamiliarization.<br />
A Mechanized Pool for Fashion<br />
In Koolhaas’ “The Story of the Pool”, we<br />
find a derelict avant-garde, cast from<br />
its disconcerting motherland adrift to<br />
a Land whose image exceeds its own<br />
reality. Inasmuch as this transformation is<br />
through the foreseeable future tangential<br />
to other mass emigrations from Europe<br />
during its time of diaspora to the New<br />
World, its architectural foundations lie in<br />
the mechanization of this metamorphosis<br />
(or rather, in the Constructivist Pool’s<br />
case, stasis) facilitated by the pool and its<br />
human literalism. This is to say that both<br />
the pool and its swimmers are mutually<br />
ineffectual. Likewise, the arrival of an<br />
institution for high fashion in Downtown<br />
Los Angeles might produce a series of<br />
programmatic interactions unexpected<br />
and both repulsive yet productive for<br />
each party involved.<br />
We see in the migration a radicalism<br />
inherent to the world of fashion as<br />
removed from the social realities and<br />
economic contemporaneity as were the<br />
Constructivists in the fledgling Soviet<br />
Union. This Constituency, encapsulated<br />
within the object of their institution, are<br />
to arrive into the greatest dichotomy of<br />
metropolitan America, a slice of urbanity<br />
in an otherwise suburban wasteland, a<br />
riffing drag of Congestion between the<br />
weavings of a bucolic superficiality. What<br />
it once knew, the welcome of Paris or<br />
the citadel of New York, are sure to be<br />
demolished. Realistically speaking, DTLA<br />
is unlikely to integrate well a conventional<br />
(or complacent) ideal of the interaction<br />
between the typical institution of haute<br />
couture and its constituencies, be they<br />
financial, creative or laboral.<br />
It is in this rejection of the conventional<br />
that SCI-Fa must sustain itself, and, in<br />
this essence, its architecture might manifest<br />
itself into a spatial sequence which<br />
seeks to dynamically displace all those<br />
involved.<br />
Los Angeles, or Epileptic Shock<br />
Los Angeles presents before us a temporal<br />
disconnect between the subject and<br />
his object to the ends that our perception<br />
of reality is inexorably estranged<br />
from any frame of reference. A transient<br />
landscape crumples beneath our feet<br />
the erudition of all certainty and conclusion,<br />
a waypoint in the quest towards an<br />
impermanent state of urban liquidity.<br />
This blurred urbanity serves to free us<br />
from the choking complacency otherwise<br />
ridden across our lives. In effect, such a<br />
complete ostracization from the typical<br />
is achieved through the eradication of<br />
the normative perspective. Like the films<br />
so famously composed by Hollywood,<br />
Los Angeles has effectively become a<br />
compiled set of shots. As we pass across<br />
the city, this ludicrous reversal of roles<br />
flips the stale humanism so pervasive in<br />
other places. The continuity of the human<br />
eye having been substituted by something<br />
more akin to an induced epileptic<br />
shock, we discover a place constituted<br />
by misfit puzzle pieces or a whole from<br />
mutilated parts – specificity by complete<br />
unspecification. Primarily, this tactic<br />
explicates itself through the juxtaposition<br />
of Angeleno constituencies in a manner<br />
completely unique from any other form of<br />
urban composition. It is by the very fact<br />
that boutiques and homeless exist within<br />
meters of one another that we begin to<br />
lust the irrationality of LA.<br />
Whereas other cities have with both the<br />
utmost complacency and unwise joviality<br />
taken for granted their definitions, we<br />
experience a city who refutes the very<br />
existence of a trope. That is to say, no one<br />
part is allotted the subsistence required<br />
to compel a singular reading. A mishmashed<br />
tangle of parts reads before us,<br />
Spectators, a string of non sequitur arguments<br />
against rationality. By doing this,<br />
we ourselves are in effect empowered<br />
We see in the migration a radicalism<br />
inherent to the world of fashion as<br />
removed from the social realities and<br />
economic contemporaneity… This<br />
Constituency, encapsulated within<br />
the object of their institution, are to<br />
arrive into the greatest dichotomy<br />
of metropolitan America…<br />
as the actors in this deranged production.<br />
Both at once those on the stage and<br />
those before it, we foremost see performed<br />
a surreal entanglement of human<br />
wills and urban serendipities. The mere<br />
existence of the Fourth Wall is inconsequent<br />
at a theater where one can say<br />
with neither certainty nor authority who<br />
is the actor and who the witness.<br />
Where do we stand within this irreconcilable<br />
interplay of constituencies? Without<br />
much remorse, Los Angeles has fatefully<br />
removed the linear narrative to this problem<br />
of perception, founding superordinate<br />
to its imposition a world of theatrical<br />
transitions. Inasmuch as this approach<br />
foregoes the prescription of a generic<br />
definition for the city, it enables an infinite<br />
possibility of existences to propagate.<br />
This is the exponentially confusing LA we<br />
must learn to foster, a rampant urbanity<br />
which preemptively eludes all the<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 183
(animation)<br />
vimeo.com/<br />
92414158<br />
In addition to drawings, renderings and<br />
other conventional representations,<br />
an animation was produced to detail<br />
the experiential procession attained by<br />
the building’s circulatory systems. In<br />
particular, the staircase was explored as<br />
a productive means by which to explicate<br />
distinctly posthuman encounters between<br />
individuals, constituencies and various<br />
media within the building. This was by<br />
no means a purely presentational game,<br />
but rather a tool by which to guage the<br />
experiential characteristics of the stairs<br />
and forms which assembled to conduct<br />
the flow of the building’s spaces. Nor<br />
does the animation deal only with<br />
rendered images of experience. A series<br />
of diagrams supplant the visuals as<br />
demonstrations of the formal intentions<br />
behind the spaces. Likewise, a calibrated<br />
soundtrack and series of vignettes<br />
portray the building as conducive to<br />
more than purely optical sensations.
to Entrance<br />
ENGAGES STORE<br />
M<br />
R = 9.5<br />
ENGAGES VOID<br />
R = 3<br />
R = 11 R = 1.5<br />
to Auditorium<br />
R = 1.5<br />
R = 9.5<br />
M<br />
R = 8<br />
T<br />
R = 1.5<br />
M<br />
R = 1.5<br />
R = 9.5<br />
OBSERVES MAIN STREET<br />
R = 9.5<br />
OBSERVES OLYMPIC BOULEVARD<br />
186 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Regulating Geometry of Stairs (Right)
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Scoop Drawing: Vertical Core<br />
187
188 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Interior Renderings
numbed complacency of quotidian life.<br />
Escape is Futile: LA Live<br />
As DTLA gentrifies, the oppressive invasion<br />
of new commerce can be felt weighing<br />
on nearly every square inch of the<br />
otherwise pure ground. Although some<br />
reluctance comes at labeling it either<br />
good or evil, it can certainly be said that<br />
one of the most imminent factors in the<br />
experiential forces involved within this<br />
change can be felt in the Fashion District,<br />
where the constant presence of LA Live<br />
seems to clutter the air with a thickened<br />
sense of disdain.<br />
As if constantly within reminder, the<br />
flicker of this phallic monument to<br />
consumption can be seen at the most<br />
unexpected times, glimmering between<br />
the buildings at the most advantageous<br />
moments in Los Angeles’ gridded wasteland<br />
of urbanity. One cannot help but to<br />
feel as if he has been observed, judged<br />
and subsequently overtaken by the sheer<br />
theatricality with which LA Live perches<br />
itself in the neighborhood. Allies and<br />
street corners which would in any other<br />
situation be of the most mundane nature<br />
become battlegrounds for a display of<br />
purely hierarchical glory on the part of<br />
the Ritz Carlton.<br />
This seems to be the unfortunate partition<br />
of gentrification reserved for the<br />
most putrid corner of the New Downtown,<br />
a gleaming symbol of both equal<br />
parts commercialism and façadism. As<br />
aforementioned, it cannot be purely<br />
ironic bathos that the building most<br />
resembles perhaps the most contentious<br />
piece of male anatomy, long accused<br />
itself of having imposed its presence in<br />
various places unwelcome.<br />
It feels very much as if this development,<br />
wallpapered by glitz of Coca-Cola, has<br />
become an urban Bastille, forever the<br />
ultimate representation of the rampantly<br />
overt capitalization of the distraught<br />
American urbanism. As is such, it can be<br />
purposed that the citizens of Los Angeles<br />
gather and ‘brick by brick’ (or sheet<br />
of glass by sheet of glass, in any case)<br />
disassemble this oppressive symbol of<br />
architectural subordination. After all, the<br />
destruction of the Bastille, it being important<br />
to note that a mere seven prisoners<br />
were freed in its liberation, is inherently<br />
an architectural spectacle by the people<br />
of a begrudgingly and long-accepted<br />
hierarchy. In many ways, architecture can<br />
come to represent something, irrespective<br />
of the wills of architect, client or<br />
community. This brings the only acceptable<br />
conclusion: LA Live is a parasitic<br />
imposition by larger commercial initiates<br />
which effectively renders itself an enemy<br />
of the urban subset of Our Los Angeles.<br />
What can be done to cure such an ailment?<br />
Perhaps, the best action (having<br />
accepted the futile nature of any plan to<br />
dismantle the complex democratically)<br />
is to counter it with better architecture.<br />
If we come to the logical conclusion<br />
about the project’s representational<br />
consequences, then it stands by inverse<br />
logic that other architecture could work<br />
to reverse its effects. What, in the place<br />
of LA Live could help to impose a better<br />
urbanity on DTLA? Could, in fact, there<br />
be such a scenario as Architecture and<br />
Revolution?<br />
Beginnings and Ends in Architecture<br />
Contemporary architecture seems to<br />
have a complete fetishism with a dissolution<br />
between interior and exterior.<br />
Ambiguous spaces abound, and those<br />
currently at the helm seem pervasively to<br />
recommend such gradients. This is well<br />
within reason, but is there no value left to<br />
the dramatic juxtaposition between that<br />
which is inside and that which is outside?<br />
Perhaps, a most successful architecture<br />
might take on an interplay between these<br />
states. Humanistically speaking, the phenomenological<br />
experience ascertained<br />
from such an endeavor might produce<br />
effects which would make those involved<br />
even more cogniscent of their positions<br />
within the power of architecture. For example,<br />
when someone enters a building,<br />
they are subconsciously subscribing to<br />
a world. This goes to conclude that they<br />
are actively partaking in an experience<br />
which exists both external to and integrated<br />
within an extant reality. Their actions<br />
taken within such a space would, by<br />
logical consequence, have then to both<br />
establish and contest their relationship to<br />
the prior reality. At beast, this metamorphosis<br />
of the individual might produce<br />
an entirely novel perception of what once<br />
was and what might be. Reality is by the<br />
best accounts such a fluid experience,<br />
so haphazardly shaped by the mundane<br />
complacencies and parameters of our<br />
lives.<br />
An architecture must grasp this, presenting<br />
us with both versions: that which<br />
directly confronts us with reality by way<br />
of total estrangement (“there is outside,<br />
here is inside”) and something more fluid<br />
(“Where am I? Where are We”?).<br />
This can become particularly troubling<br />
when faced with such a heterogeneous<br />
environment as Los Angeles. What is the<br />
agency of a both a juxtaposition and an<br />
integration in a landscape where nothing<br />
really exists? That is to say, everything<br />
in LA is in a state of complete disarray.<br />
Though the condition aforementioned is<br />
no catastrophic presistence, necessarily,<br />
it causes an interesting predicament<br />
when it comes to the flow of space.<br />
To break from a city’s fabric, there has to<br />
be an established order against which<br />
first to work. The Guggenheim defies the<br />
gridded logic of orthagonal Manhattan<br />
for a more organic presentation of reality.<br />
Likewise yet opposite, many works of<br />
contemporary Parametricism purport<br />
completely to become extensions of realities<br />
already extant, deeply tied to both<br />
cultural and logical coherencies to the<br />
ends that the building almost vanishes.<br />
[We] are LA<br />
Los Angeles holds a monopoly on the<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 189
190 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Scoop Drawing: Runway
The sheer urbanity of the city<br />
has presumed the potential for<br />
serendipitous human interaction,<br />
instead forging a vortex of<br />
complications, entanglements<br />
and overlaps. In these ephemeral<br />
crossings, the citizenry of<br />
the city coincide, their lives<br />
scraping one another in the<br />
most minuscule of strokes. To<br />
amplify this scar is to heighten<br />
their awareness of the transient<br />
nature which they cohabitate.<br />
191
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photos<br />
193
infinitely variable situations of humankind.<br />
Woven into its fate-set tapestry<br />
is a simple mechanism which denies<br />
the possible creation of new scenarios.<br />
Blankly put, nothing new can emerge.<br />
Every variable has been fulfilled; every<br />
possible interaction has already been<br />
satisfied. We are therefore bound to an<br />
endless encore, a chain of repeat performances<br />
to the ends only that the monster<br />
prevails. The actors are unimportant,<br />
minor expendables under the shade of<br />
the theatricality.<br />
Canonical Images in Fashion<br />
and Architecture<br />
Fashion has an inherently representational<br />
agenda, a trait too often ignored by<br />
both those within and outside the field.<br />
Such a facet of its dichotomy parallels<br />
conditions of architecture. To expose<br />
through serendipity these dichotomies is<br />
to critically engage fashion and architecture<br />
alike as fascinations of contemporary<br />
culture through material manifestations.<br />
Alphabetical organizations arbitrate these<br />
juxtapositions, establishing at times new<br />
comparisons and at others reinforcing<br />
existing understandings.<br />
Dior’s New Look vs. Audrey Hepburn<br />
Twiggy vs. Tinker v. Des Moines<br />
Punks vs. Corporate Businessmen<br />
1950’s Housewife vs. Bra-Burning<br />
Case Studyvs. Skid Row<br />
James Dean vs. Drag Queens at Stonewall<br />
Jacqueline Kennedy Idealic vs. Jacqueline<br />
Kennedy Mourning<br />
Bridget Bardot vs. Pamela Anderson<br />
Haute Couture vs. Everday<br />
Marilyn Monroe vs. Herself<br />
Woodstock vs. Army<br />
Tribe (via Riefenstahl) Fashion vs. Western<br />
Fashion<br />
Authoritarian Uniformity vs. Rejective<br />
Individuality (Nuremburg vs. Punks)<br />
Pertaining Quotes<br />
“I just use fashion… to talk about politics.”<br />
– Vivienne Westwood.<br />
“Give me time, and I’ll give you a revolution.”<br />
– Alexander McQueen.<br />
“I don’t want art for a few…” – William<br />
Morris.<br />
“Fashion is not just about trends. It’s<br />
about political history.” – Daphne Guinness.<br />
“Clothes are but a symbol of something<br />
hid deep beneath.” – Virginia Woolf<br />
Skin<br />
The following is a series of excerpts from<br />
Alejandro Zaera Polo’s “The Politics<br />
of the Envelope: A Political Critique of<br />
Materialism”; highlighted text below each<br />
quote explicates its relationship to the<br />
issues at hand:<br />
“The building envelope is possibly the<br />
oldest and most primitive architectural<br />
element. It materializes the separation of<br />
the inside and the outside, natural and<br />
artificial and it demarcates private property<br />
and land ownership (one of the most<br />
primitive political acts). When it becomes<br />
a façade, the envelope operates also as<br />
a representational device in addition to<br />
its crucial environmental and territorial<br />
roles.” (77)<br />
Especially in the context of Downtown<br />
Los Angeles, a disparaging set of economic<br />
and political factors have facilitated<br />
dramatic dynamics between social<br />
strata. In the same stretch of sidewalk,<br />
some of society’s most affluent walk<br />
beside some of their most (socioeconomically)<br />
downtrodden counterparts.<br />
Unfortunately, while urban planning may<br />
have allowed for (or at least functions<br />
complacently with) this estranged human<br />
operative, architecture has been less<br />
forthcoming in allowing such overlaps.<br />
Traditionally, it has merely fortified the<br />
horrid divisions of a society all-too-willing<br />
to forget the discrepancies it creates at<br />
full joviality among its ranks. Perhaps,<br />
this could be rectified by an architecture<br />
that fosters adjacencies.<br />
“The envelope exceeds the surface by<br />
incorporating a much wider set of attachments<br />
within the issues of construction<br />
and representation that converge in the<br />
design of the physical limit of a building.<br />
It includes the crust of space affected by<br />
the physical construction of the surface,<br />
by the scale and dimension of the space<br />
contained, by its permeability to daylight<br />
194 SCI-Fa 2B Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Scoop Drawing: Sectional Bifurcation<br />
195
196 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Model Façade Detail
Corporate Conformity vs. Punk Individualism<br />
Midcentury Domestication vs. Bra-Burning<br />
Marilyn Monroe vs. Herself<br />
Nonwestern Ideals of Beauty vs. Western Canonizations Thereof<br />
Rebellious Self Expression vs. Mass Dogmatization<br />
In its dogmatic intake of trends, fashion introduces a series<br />
of dichotomies which speak to larger conditions of its<br />
socioeconomic contexts. Left as the media aftermath of its own<br />
existence – that is to say, in the form of newspapers, blogs,<br />
videos et cetera – this can be explicated as a set of didactic<br />
images. Across the façade, these are mapped to letters which<br />
themselves correspond to larger quotes. The randomization of<br />
this correspondence produces serendipitous adjacencies of<br />
these images. By selectively filtering light, this both produces a<br />
meaningful and affective quality of the building. From within, the<br />
effects of the light in terms of shadow and texture entice charged<br />
environments, while the macro legibility of the panels instigates<br />
discourse. From outside, a connection with urbanity is fostered.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 On Fashion’s Dichotomies<br />
197
The set of the<br />
Viktor & Rolf show<br />
Saturday afternoon<br />
in the Tuileries<br />
looked like the<br />
inside of a<br />
white-tiled<br />
bathroom at some<br />
The set of the<br />
Viktor & Rolf show<br />
Saturday afternoon<br />
in the Tuileries<br />
looked like the<br />
inside of a<br />
white-tiled<br />
bathroom at some<br />
The set of the<br />
Viktor & Rolf show<br />
Saturday afternoon<br />
in the Tuileries<br />
looked like the<br />
inside of a<br />
white-tiled<br />
bathroom at some<br />
The set of the<br />
Viktor & Rolf show<br />
Saturday afternoon<br />
in the Tuileries<br />
looked like the<br />
inside of a<br />
white-tiled<br />
bathroom at some<br />
The set of the<br />
Viktor & Rolf show<br />
Saturday afternoon<br />
in the Tuileries<br />
looked like the<br />
inside of a<br />
white-tiled<br />
bathroom at some<br />
The elaborate sets<br />
favored by Marc<br />
Jacobs, Mr.<br />
Ghesquière’s<br />
predecessor as<br />
artistic director<br />
of Louis Vuitton,<br />
were nowhere to be<br />
The elaborate sets<br />
favored by Marc<br />
Jacobs, Mr.<br />
Ghesquière’s<br />
predecessor as<br />
artistic director<br />
of Louis Vuitton,<br />
were nowhere to be<br />
The elaborate sets<br />
favored by Marc<br />
Jacobs, Mr.<br />
Ghesquière’s<br />
predecessor as<br />
artistic director<br />
of Louis Vuitton,<br />
were nowhere to be<br />
The elaborate sets<br />
favored by Marc<br />
Jacobs, Mr.<br />
Ghesquière’s<br />
predecessor as<br />
artistic director<br />
of Louis Vuitton,<br />
were nowhere to be<br />
The elaborate sets<br />
favored by Marc<br />
Jacobs, Mr.<br />
Ghesquière’s<br />
predecessor as<br />
artistic director<br />
of Louis Vuitton,<br />
were nowhere to be<br />
This is why events<br />
unnerve me,<br />
They find it all,<br />
a different story,<br />
Notice whom for<br />
wheels are turning,<br />
Oh, I'll<br />
break them down,<br />
This is why events<br />
unnerve me,<br />
They find it all,<br />
a different story,<br />
Notice whom for<br />
wheels are turning,<br />
Oh, I'll<br />
break them down,<br />
This is why events<br />
unnerve me,<br />
They find it all,<br />
a different story,<br />
Notice whom for<br />
wheels are turning,<br />
Oh, I'll<br />
break them down,<br />
This is why events<br />
unnerve me,<br />
They find it all,<br />
a different story,<br />
Notice whom for<br />
wheels are turning,<br />
Oh, I'll<br />
break them down,<br />
This is why events<br />
unnerve me,<br />
They find it all,<br />
a different story,<br />
Notice whom for<br />
wheels are turning,<br />
Oh, I'll<br />
break them down,<br />
Two popular color<br />
trends brightening<br />
this drawn-out<br />
winter are<br />
sapphire blue,<br />
which popped up<br />
last fall and came<br />
into full flower<br />
Two popular color<br />
trends brightening<br />
this drawn-out<br />
winter are<br />
sapphire blue,<br />
which popped up<br />
last fall and came<br />
into full flower<br />
Two popular color<br />
trends brightening<br />
this drawn-out<br />
winter are<br />
sapphire blue,<br />
which popped up<br />
last fall and came<br />
into full flower<br />
Two popular color<br />
trends brightening<br />
this drawn-out<br />
winter are<br />
sapphire blue,<br />
which popped up<br />
last fall and came<br />
into full flower<br />
Two popular color<br />
trends brightening<br />
this drawn-out<br />
winter are<br />
sapphire blue,<br />
which popped up<br />
last fall and came<br />
into full flower<br />
On the evidence of<br />
the fall collections<br />
that wrapped<br />
last week, you<br />
might suppose that<br />
fashion had<br />
decided to return<br />
the favor, offer-<br />
On the evidence of<br />
the fall collections<br />
that wrapped<br />
last week, you<br />
might suppose that<br />
fashion had<br />
decided to return<br />
the favor, offer-<br />
On the evidence of<br />
the fall collections<br />
that wrapped<br />
last week, you<br />
might suppose that<br />
fashion had<br />
decided to return<br />
the favor, offer-<br />
On the evidence of<br />
the fall collections<br />
that wrapped<br />
last week, you<br />
might suppose that<br />
fashion had<br />
decided to return<br />
the favor, offer-<br />
On the evidence of<br />
the fall collections<br />
that wrapped<br />
last week, you<br />
might suppose that<br />
fashion had<br />
decided to return<br />
the favor, offer-<br />
Architecture, soft<br />
or rigid, was an<br />
overarching theme<br />
for fall, as an<br />
influential<br />
handful of designers<br />
experimented<br />
with lines and<br />
Architecture, soft<br />
or rigid, was an<br />
overarching theme<br />
for fall, as an<br />
influential<br />
handful of designers<br />
experimented<br />
with lines and<br />
Architecture, soft<br />
or rigid, was an<br />
overarching theme<br />
for fall, as an<br />
influential<br />
handful of designers<br />
experimented<br />
with lines and<br />
Architecture, soft<br />
or rigid, was an<br />
overarching theme<br />
for fall, as an<br />
influential<br />
handful of designers<br />
experimented<br />
with lines and<br />
Architecture, soft<br />
or rigid, was an<br />
overarching theme<br />
for fall, as an<br />
influential<br />
handful of designers<br />
experimented<br />
with lines and<br />
For many in the<br />
crowd, it was the<br />
return of the<br />
prodigal son after<br />
his sudden and<br />
bitter departure<br />
from Balenciaga<br />
and its parent<br />
For many in the<br />
crowd, it was the<br />
return of the<br />
prodigal son after<br />
his sudden and<br />
bitter departure<br />
from Balenciaga<br />
and its parent<br />
For many in the<br />
crowd, it was the<br />
return of the<br />
prodigal son after<br />
his sudden and<br />
bitter departure<br />
from Balenciaga<br />
and its parent<br />
For many in the<br />
crowd, it was the<br />
return of the<br />
prodigal son after<br />
his sudden and<br />
bitter departure<br />
from Balenciaga<br />
and its parent<br />
For many in the<br />
crowd, it was the<br />
return of the<br />
prodigal son after<br />
his sudden and<br />
bitter departure<br />
from Balenciaga<br />
and its parent<br />
Minutes after the<br />
Chanel fall 2014<br />
show ended at the<br />
Grand Palais on<br />
Tuesday morning,<br />
many in attendance<br />
converged on the<br />
set — a faux<br />
Minutes after the<br />
Chanel fall 2014<br />
show ended at the<br />
Grand Palais on<br />
Tuesday morning,<br />
many in attendance<br />
converged on the<br />
set — a faux<br />
Minutes after the<br />
Chanel fall 2014<br />
show ended at the<br />
Grand Palais on<br />
Tuesday morning,<br />
many in attendance<br />
converged on the<br />
set — a faux<br />
Minutes after the<br />
Chanel fall 2014<br />
show ended at the<br />
Grand Palais on<br />
Tuesday morning,<br />
many in attendance<br />
converged on the<br />
set — a faux<br />
Minutes after the<br />
Chanel fall 2014<br />
show ended at the<br />
Grand Palais on<br />
Tuesday morning,<br />
many in attendance<br />
converged on the<br />
set — a faux<br />
The most surprising<br />
thing about<br />
the new Dries Van<br />
Noten exhibition,<br />
which runs through<br />
Aug. 31 at the<br />
Musée des Arts<br />
Décoratifs here,<br />
The most surprising<br />
thing about<br />
the new Dries Van<br />
Noten exhibition,<br />
which runs through<br />
Aug. 31 at the<br />
Musée des Arts<br />
Décoratifs here,<br />
The most surprising<br />
thing about<br />
the new Dries Van<br />
Noten exhibition,<br />
which runs through<br />
Aug. 31 at the<br />
Musée des Arts<br />
Décoratifs here,<br />
The most surprising<br />
thing about<br />
the new Dries Van<br />
Noten exhibition,<br />
which runs through<br />
Aug. 31 at the<br />
Musée des Arts<br />
Décoratifs here,<br />
The most surprising<br />
thing about<br />
the new Dries Van<br />
Noten exhibition,<br />
which runs through<br />
Aug. 31 at the<br />
Musée des Arts<br />
Décoratifs here,<br />
Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />
has been designing<br />
his namesake label<br />
since 1986. He has<br />
28 years of<br />
collections to<br />
draw upon, even<br />
more if you count<br />
Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />
has been designing<br />
his namesake label<br />
since 1986. He has<br />
28 years of<br />
collections to<br />
draw upon, even<br />
more if you count<br />
Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />
has been designing<br />
his namesake label<br />
since 1986. He has<br />
28 years of<br />
collections to<br />
draw upon, even<br />
more if you count<br />
Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />
has been designing<br />
his namesake label<br />
since 1986. He has<br />
28 years of<br />
collections to<br />
draw upon, even<br />
more if you count<br />
Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />
has been designing<br />
his namesake label<br />
since 1986. He has<br />
28 years of<br />
collections to<br />
draw upon, even<br />
more if you count<br />
“First of all,<br />
packing the<br />
clothes was<br />
already quite<br />
something,” he<br />
said. “Quite often<br />
there were people<br />
on my creative<br />
“First of all,<br />
packing the<br />
clothes was<br />
already quite<br />
something,” he<br />
said. “Quite often<br />
there were people<br />
on my creative<br />
“First of all,<br />
packing the<br />
clothes was<br />
already quite<br />
something,” he<br />
said. “Quite often<br />
there were people<br />
on my creative<br />
“First of all,<br />
packing the<br />
clothes was<br />
already quite<br />
something,” he<br />
said. “Quite often<br />
there were people<br />
on my creative<br />
“First of all,<br />
packing the<br />
clothes was<br />
already quite<br />
something,” he<br />
said. “Quite often<br />
there were people<br />
on my creative<br />
But what is as<br />
notable about the<br />
show is how much<br />
of it is not by<br />
Dries Van Noten.<br />
There are garments<br />
by fellow designers<br />
who have<br />
But what is as<br />
notable about the<br />
show is how much<br />
of it is not by<br />
Dries Van Noten.<br />
There are garments<br />
by fellow designers<br />
who have<br />
But what is as<br />
notable about the<br />
show is how much<br />
of it is not by<br />
Dries Van Noten.<br />
There are garments<br />
by fellow designers<br />
who have<br />
But what is as<br />
notable about the<br />
show is how much<br />
of it is not by<br />
Dries Van Noten.<br />
There are garments<br />
by fellow designers<br />
who have<br />
But what is as<br />
notable about the<br />
show is how much<br />
of it is not by<br />
Dries Van Noten.<br />
There are garments<br />
by fellow designers<br />
who have<br />
Arranged by loose<br />
themes, the show<br />
charts the vertiginous<br />
twistings of<br />
Mr. Van Noten’s<br />
imagination, and<br />
the way he absorbs<br />
and digests source<br />
Arranged by loose<br />
themes, the show<br />
charts the vertiginous<br />
twistings of<br />
Mr. Van Noten’s<br />
imagination, and<br />
the way he absorbs<br />
and digests source<br />
Arranged by loose<br />
themes, the show<br />
charts the vertiginous<br />
twistings of<br />
Mr. Van Noten’s<br />
imagination, and<br />
the way he absorbs<br />
and digests source<br />
Arranged by loose<br />
themes, the show<br />
charts the vertiginous<br />
twistings of<br />
Mr. Van Noten’s<br />
imagination, and<br />
the way he absorbs<br />
and digests source<br />
Arranged by loose<br />
themes, the show<br />
charts the vertiginous<br />
twistings of<br />
Mr. Van Noten’s<br />
imagination, and<br />
the way he absorbs<br />
and digests source<br />
198 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Alphabet of Stylistic Dichotomies
A room arranged<br />
under the rubric<br />
“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />
a Giovanni<br />
Boldini portrait<br />
of Count Robert de<br />
Montesquiou<br />
borrowed from the<br />
More than half of<br />
the 400-plus<br />
pieces on display<br />
were borrowed from<br />
other museums and<br />
private collections.<br />
The challenge<br />
was not only<br />
The Sturm und<br />
Drang of four<br />
weeks of international<br />
collections<br />
ended Wednesday on<br />
a gentle note as<br />
Hermès closed the<br />
autumn/winter 2014<br />
“I’ve been here<br />
since 5,” said Tom<br />
Ford, his hands<br />
encircling Anne<br />
Hathaway’s slim<br />
waist at the<br />
entrance to the<br />
Vanity Fair Oscars<br />
This collection,<br />
if shown during<br />
the Paris haute<br />
couture season,<br />
would illuminate<br />
the fading calendar<br />
and underscore<br />
the meld of<br />
And a desire-provoking<br />
one. “When<br />
I saw it at the<br />
show, I said ‘I<br />
want this dress,’<br />
” said Wendy<br />
Goodman, the<br />
design editor of<br />
Perhaps the most<br />
captivating<br />
fashion statement<br />
this season in New<br />
York was not on<br />
the runway or the<br />
street, but at the<br />
Winter Antiques<br />
Striped tube socks<br />
moved from the<br />
soccer field to<br />
the runway when<br />
Miuccia Prada<br />
showed footless<br />
tube-sock leg<br />
warmers for<br />
The designer<br />
Christophe Lemaire<br />
has finally moved<br />
into this gentle<br />
pace, sending out<br />
a fine collection.<br />
It started with<br />
double-face<br />
Last month, Mr.<br />
Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />
Lipinski, 31, were<br />
a pair of retired<br />
figure skaters,<br />
memorable for<br />
their sequined<br />
outfits and<br />
If you want to be<br />
in vogue next<br />
fall, you had best<br />
start saving now,<br />
for there was fur<br />
on the runway in<br />
show after show,<br />
especially in<br />
Through the fire<br />
and through the<br />
flames, You won't<br />
even say your<br />
name, Only "I am<br />
that I am", But<br />
who could ever<br />
live that way? Ut<br />
When I was 12, I<br />
worried that I<br />
might never grow<br />
breasts. There I<br />
was, all of 80<br />
pounds, nothing<br />
but skin and<br />
bones, bruised<br />
A room arranged<br />
under the rubric<br />
“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />
a Giovanni<br />
Boldini portrait<br />
of Count Robert de<br />
Montesquiou<br />
borrowed from the<br />
More than half of<br />
the 400-plus<br />
pieces on display<br />
were borrowed from<br />
other museums and<br />
private collections.<br />
The challenge<br />
was not only<br />
The Sturm und<br />
Drang of four<br />
weeks of international<br />
collections<br />
ended Wednesday on<br />
a gentle note as<br />
Hermès closed the<br />
autumn/winter 2014<br />
“I’ve been here<br />
since 5,” said Tom<br />
Ford, his hands<br />
encircling Anne<br />
Hathaway’s slim<br />
waist at the<br />
entrance to the<br />
Vanity Fair Oscars<br />
This collection,<br />
if shown during<br />
the Paris haute<br />
couture season,<br />
would illuminate<br />
the fading calendar<br />
and underscore<br />
the meld of<br />
And a desire-provoking<br />
one. “When<br />
I saw it at the<br />
show, I said ‘I<br />
want this dress,’<br />
” said Wendy<br />
Goodman, the<br />
design editor of<br />
Perhaps the most<br />
captivating<br />
fashion statement<br />
this season in New<br />
York was not on<br />
the runway or the<br />
street, but at the<br />
Winter Antiques<br />
Striped tube socks<br />
moved from the<br />
soccer field to<br />
the runway when<br />
Miuccia Prada<br />
showed footless<br />
tube-sock leg<br />
warmers for<br />
The designer<br />
Christophe Lemaire<br />
has finally moved<br />
into this gentle<br />
pace, sending out<br />
a fine collection.<br />
It started with<br />
double-face<br />
Last month, Mr.<br />
Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />
Lipinski, 31, were<br />
a pair of retired<br />
figure skaters,<br />
memorable for<br />
their sequined<br />
outfits and<br />
If you want to be<br />
in vogue next<br />
fall, you had best<br />
start saving now,<br />
for there was fur<br />
on the runway in<br />
show after show,<br />
especially in<br />
Through the fire<br />
and through the<br />
flames, You won't<br />
even say your<br />
name, Only "I am<br />
that I am", But<br />
who could ever<br />
live that way? Ut<br />
When I was 12, I<br />
worried that I<br />
might never grow<br />
breasts. There I<br />
was, all of 80<br />
pounds, nothing<br />
but skin and<br />
bones, bruised<br />
A room arranged<br />
under the rubric<br />
“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />
a Giovanni<br />
Boldini portrait<br />
of Count Robert de<br />
Montesquiou<br />
borrowed from the<br />
More than half of<br />
the 400-plus<br />
pieces on display<br />
were borrowed from<br />
other museums and<br />
private collections.<br />
The challenge<br />
was not only<br />
The Sturm und<br />
Drang of four<br />
weeks of international<br />
collections<br />
ended Wednesday on<br />
a gentle note as<br />
Hermès closed the<br />
autumn/winter 2014<br />
“I’ve been here<br />
since 5,” said Tom<br />
Ford, his hands<br />
encircling Anne<br />
Hathaway’s slim<br />
waist at the<br />
entrance to the<br />
Vanity Fair Oscars<br />
This collection,<br />
if shown during<br />
the Paris haute<br />
couture season,<br />
would illuminate<br />
the fading calendar<br />
and underscore<br />
the meld of<br />
And a desire-provoking<br />
one. “When<br />
I saw it at the<br />
show, I said ‘I<br />
want this dress,’<br />
” said Wendy<br />
Goodman, the<br />
design editor of<br />
Perhaps the most<br />
captivating<br />
fashion statement<br />
this season in New<br />
York was not on<br />
the runway or the<br />
street, but at the<br />
Winter Antiques<br />
Striped tube socks<br />
moved from the<br />
soccer field to<br />
the runway when<br />
Miuccia Prada<br />
showed footless<br />
tube-sock leg<br />
warmers for<br />
The designer<br />
Christophe Lemaire<br />
has finally moved<br />
into this gentle<br />
pace, sending out<br />
a fine collection.<br />
It started with<br />
double-face<br />
Last month, Mr.<br />
Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />
Lipinski, 31, were<br />
a pair of retired<br />
figure skaters,<br />
memorable for<br />
their sequined<br />
outfits and<br />
If you want to be<br />
in vogue next<br />
fall, you had best<br />
start saving now,<br />
for there was fur<br />
on the runway in<br />
show after show,<br />
especially in<br />
Through the fire<br />
and through the<br />
flames, You won't<br />
even say your<br />
name, Only "I am<br />
that I am", But<br />
who could ever<br />
live that way? Ut<br />
When I was 12, I<br />
worried that I<br />
might never grow<br />
breasts. There I<br />
was, all of 80<br />
pounds, nothing<br />
but skin and<br />
bones, bruised<br />
A room arranged<br />
under the rubric<br />
“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />
a Giovanni<br />
Boldini portrait<br />
of Count Robert de<br />
Montesquiou<br />
borrowed from the<br />
More than half of<br />
the 400-plus<br />
pieces on display<br />
were borrowed from<br />
other museums and<br />
private collections.<br />
The challenge<br />
was not only<br />
The Sturm und<br />
Drang of four<br />
weeks of international<br />
collections<br />
ended Wednesday on<br />
a gentle note as<br />
Hermès closed the<br />
autumn/winter 2014<br />
“I’ve been here<br />
since 5,” said Tom<br />
Ford, his hands<br />
encircling Anne<br />
Hathaway’s slim<br />
waist at the<br />
entrance to the<br />
Vanity Fair Oscars<br />
This collection,<br />
if shown during<br />
the Paris haute<br />
couture season,<br />
would illuminate<br />
the fading calendar<br />
and underscore<br />
the meld of<br />
And a desire-provoking<br />
one. “When<br />
I saw it at the<br />
show, I said ‘I<br />
want this dress,’<br />
” said Wendy<br />
Goodman, the<br />
design editor of<br />
Perhaps the most<br />
captivating<br />
fashion statement<br />
this season in New<br />
York was not on<br />
the runway or the<br />
street, but at the<br />
Winter Antiques<br />
Striped tube socks<br />
moved from the<br />
soccer field to<br />
the runway when<br />
Miuccia Prada<br />
showed footless<br />
tube-sock leg<br />
warmers for<br />
The designer<br />
Christophe Lemaire<br />
has finally moved<br />
into this gentle<br />
pace, sending out<br />
a fine collection.<br />
It started with<br />
double-face<br />
Last month, Mr.<br />
Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />
Lipinski, 31, were<br />
a pair of retired<br />
figure skaters,<br />
memorable for<br />
their sequined<br />
outfits and<br />
If you want to be<br />
in vogue next<br />
fall, you had best<br />
start saving now,<br />
for there was fur<br />
on the runway in<br />
show after show,<br />
especially in<br />
Through the fire<br />
and through the<br />
flames, You won't<br />
even say your<br />
name, Only "I am<br />
that I am", But<br />
who could ever<br />
live that way? Ut<br />
When I was 12, I<br />
worried that I<br />
might never grow<br />
breasts. There I<br />
was, all of 80<br />
pounds, nothing<br />
but skin and<br />
bones, bruised<br />
A room arranged<br />
under the rubric<br />
“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />
a Giovanni<br />
Boldini portrait<br />
of Count Robert de<br />
Montesquiou<br />
borrowed from the<br />
More than half of<br />
the 400-plus<br />
pieces on display<br />
were borrowed from<br />
other museums and<br />
private collections.<br />
The challenge<br />
was not only<br />
The Sturm und<br />
Drang of four<br />
weeks of international<br />
collections<br />
ended Wednesday on<br />
a gentle note as<br />
Hermès closed the<br />
autumn/winter 2014<br />
“I’ve been here<br />
since 5,” said Tom<br />
Ford, his hands<br />
encircling Anne<br />
Hathaway’s slim<br />
waist at the<br />
entrance to the<br />
Vanity Fair Oscars<br />
This collection,<br />
if shown during<br />
the Paris haute<br />
couture season,<br />
would illuminate<br />
the fading calendar<br />
and underscore<br />
the meld of<br />
And a desire-provoking<br />
one. “When<br />
I saw it at the<br />
show, I said ‘I<br />
want this dress,’<br />
” said Wendy<br />
Goodman, the<br />
design editor of<br />
Perhaps the most<br />
captivating<br />
fashion statement<br />
this season in New<br />
York was not on<br />
the runway or the<br />
street, but at the<br />
Winter Antiques<br />
Striped tube socks<br />
moved from the<br />
soccer field to<br />
the runway when<br />
Miuccia Prada<br />
showed footless<br />
tube-sock leg<br />
warmers for<br />
The designer<br />
Christophe Lemaire<br />
has finally moved<br />
into this gentle<br />
pace, sending out<br />
a fine collection.<br />
It started with<br />
double-face<br />
Last month, Mr.<br />
Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />
Lipinski, 31, were<br />
a pair of retired<br />
figure skaters,<br />
memorable for<br />
their sequined<br />
outfits and<br />
If you want to be<br />
in vogue next<br />
fall, you had best<br />
start saving now,<br />
for there was fur<br />
on the runway in<br />
show after show,<br />
especially in<br />
Through the fire<br />
and through the<br />
flames, You won't<br />
even say your<br />
name, Only "I am<br />
that I am", But<br />
who could ever<br />
live that way? Ut<br />
When I was 12, I<br />
worried that I<br />
might never grow<br />
breasts. There I<br />
was, all of 80<br />
pounds, nothing<br />
but skin and<br />
bones, bruised<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 199
and ventilation and by its insulation values<br />
and solar-shading capacities.” (78)<br />
An irresponsibility has arisen in contemporary<br />
architecture which allows for<br />
the simplification of a building’s skin to<br />
mere millimeters. This must be adverted,<br />
under proper circumstances and wills,<br />
so that, when desired, the interactions<br />
procured by decisive design choices enable<br />
greater levels of both permeability<br />
and closure. This is not to attack literally<br />
the depth of these skins, but to propose<br />
the hijacking of their phenomenological<br />
affects politically to both the reward and<br />
the power of the architecture (thus, the<br />
architect) and its constituencies.<br />
“Is architecture socially constructed, or is<br />
it a faithful representation of reality? Or<br />
is it rather the missing link between the<br />
community of humans and the community<br />
of things as political entities?” (79)<br />
As Zaera Polo goes onward to note,<br />
either definition may prove limiting to the<br />
aspects of architecture’s true capabilities<br />
in the world. Of this, it may be difficult in<br />
a short manner to pontificate. Rather, the<br />
inadequacies of either approach can be<br />
outlined as a preemptive assumption of<br />
their roles and strengths. Firstly, socially<br />
constructed architecture depends on<br />
social consensus, which has, as proven<br />
throughout human history, resulted in the<br />
necessity of politics, the ends of which<br />
do not always benefit all those involved.<br />
Maybe, compromise is impossible. In any<br />
case, the ramifications of these actions<br />
can cause collateral of both natures, and<br />
such consequences must be considered,<br />
whatever their difficulty in foresight or<br />
planning pertains. Secondly, the presumption<br />
of architecture to a faithful<br />
representation of reality is problematic in<br />
its formalistic overtones. To limit architecture<br />
to the understandings of architects<br />
is to forge an elite group, forging delineations<br />
between those in and those outside<br />
“the know”. This is an absolutely horrid<br />
afterbirth of architecture, and must be<br />
avoided at all costs. It is purely formal<br />
snobbery, estranging the public and driving<br />
away interest by outside constituencies.<br />
Although internal investigations are<br />
helpful to the field, there should be no<br />
reason that they are to be thrust unknowingly<br />
unto the populace as an unknowing<br />
whole. This is mere oppression, in and of<br />
itself representing the God Complex so<br />
pervasive with architects qua fascists.<br />
“It is at this level [in a building’s façade]<br />
that the discussion of the qualities and<br />
structure of material organizations —<br />
such as different and repetition, consistency<br />
and variation, flexibility, transparency,<br />
permeability, local and global and the<br />
definition of the ground — that architecture<br />
becomes political. The politicization<br />
of architecture may also be induced by<br />
virtue of representation — and not just by<br />
synthesizing physical expressions of political<br />
concepts, but by literally redesigning<br />
typical living conditions or lifestyles<br />
— or by disrupting political norms or<br />
assumed environmental imperatives.<br />
It is vital that we bring more than a<br />
phenomenological understanding to the<br />
affects of architecture. Too pervasively,<br />
these aspects are pontificated on purely<br />
experiential levels. What does the experience<br />
mean? In a particularly political<br />
context which is unavoidable throughout<br />
so many high-profile projects of late,<br />
these comprehensions must be leveled<br />
against the agencies of architecture at<br />
play, lest we fall behind our own game<br />
and unwittingly engage a dichotomy of<br />
esoteric values and grand misunderstandings.<br />
“Political expression and identity are<br />
particularly important in the dynamics of<br />
the envelope as regulators of exchanges<br />
between inside and outside. The fenestration<br />
pattern in a building’s façade has<br />
psychological and symbolic connotations<br />
and has been historically attached to<br />
political representations.” (87)<br />
When the interconnections between the<br />
experiential and political substances of<br />
architecture are left without proper contemplation,<br />
the field easily oscillates into<br />
a form overtaken by ephemeral instances<br />
of wills on the part of the individual or<br />
oligarchical constituency. Architecture<br />
which does not shout loud enough is<br />
easily overwritten by those willing to<br />
speak for it. Specifically, how are these<br />
in their relationships with those involved<br />
with a building? It would seem that much<br />
contemporary architecture either ignores<br />
or subordinates its users. That is to say,<br />
theirs is a role usually reserved to that of<br />
being spectator, prisoner or accomplice.<br />
What is their agency in the projects? It<br />
would seem detrimental to any contemporary<br />
architecture if it were willing to do<br />
such crimes to its own users, yet such<br />
behaviors shine as pervasive.<br />
200 SCI-Fa 2B Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Scoop Drawing: Production Spiral<br />
201
202 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Final Model
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Interior Model<br />
203
NELSON ATKINS MUSEUM PRECEDENT STUDY<br />
3B Studio<br />
Spring 2015, David Freeland<br />
With Johan Wijesinghe<br />
We encounter at the Nelson-Atkins<br />
museum a middle ground of human<br />
experience. Neither monumental nor<br />
rather quaint, materially rich yet sterilely<br />
abstract, the project rides a certain<br />
division between the strata of spatial<br />
reactions architecture might elicit. In so<br />
doing, the project conceptualizes contemporary<br />
architecture as something<br />
resolutely non-iconic, all the while unique<br />
in its cultivation of space as voluminous<br />
entities through and around which we<br />
flow, explore, obfuscate and discover.<br />
The borders between different conditions,<br />
innate to the situation around<br />
Steven Holl’s Nelson-Atkins Museum of<br />
Art in Kansas City (Missouri) are sensibilities<br />
of architectural coherency, pliable<br />
geometries and manipulated boundaries.<br />
Holl challenges the often awkward and<br />
problematic issue of museum expansion,<br />
confronting coexistence through contrast.<br />
Holl, subverts the typified approach, confiscating<br />
the immediate architectural joint<br />
of the expansion below grade tying the<br />
Beaux Arts wing to the present through<br />
de-materialization of both landscape and<br />
weightless translucent boxes (Lenses).<br />
This initiates a series of consequences in<br />
the massing of the landscape and gallery<br />
spaces alike, bending and folding in a<br />
manner both referential to the natural<br />
slope of the site and defiant in their<br />
relegation of the understanding of the<br />
existing architecture.<br />
Where Holl eschews complete comprehension,<br />
allowing formal reading<br />
neither exclusively in terms of exterior or<br />
interior experience at any one time, the<br />
architectural prerogatives of the project<br />
create deep interior cavities into which<br />
the scheme infills gallery space. This<br />
mutual xclusivity entitles two distinct<br />
experiences: Between the path and the<br />
galleries, drawn to punctuations Gallery<br />
spaces awash in diffused light within<br />
and, beyond their walls, a distinctly playful<br />
stance of the project’s massing. The<br />
ambitions of the project, choreographs<br />
light as both a way to view the art in<br />
a full spectrum and a methodology of<br />
circulation. There the translucent boxes,<br />
as Steven Holl refers to “lenses”, the most<br />
visible part of an underground world,<br />
risingfrom the landscape enveloped by<br />
a park and framing sculpture courts in<br />
the in-between confronting the issue<br />
light. Experienced from the galleries, Half<br />
vaulted walls funnel the a mixed spectrum<br />
of the more blue northern light and<br />
red southern light.<br />
(Right) Situation, bordered to the North<br />
by the existing museum complex, to<br />
the South and West by the park and to<br />
the East by Middle America suburbia.<br />
(Next Spreads) Plans and sections<br />
detailing the distribution of spaces<br />
between the galleries, below<br />
grade, and the boxes which<br />
allow in light from above.<br />
206
208 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio Basement and Roof Plans
B<br />
B<br />
A<br />
A<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Plan with Regulating Geometry<br />
209
Section showing relationship to existing<br />
museum. By connecting the two<br />
underground, gallery space is allowed to<br />
be function as if continuous even though<br />
the outward reading of the buildings<br />
would suggest two autonomous<br />
organization. While this operation is<br />
typically taken under in plan, part of the<br />
eloquence of the Nelson Atkins’ design<br />
is to carry this out effectively in section.<br />
210 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio
Read along its gallery length, the project<br />
establishes a clear dichotomy between<br />
vertical spaces of light infiltration,<br />
serving little programmatic function<br />
aside from a main building to the North<br />
of the site, and more shallow spaces of<br />
horizontal circulation and gallery space.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 211
212 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 213
(Previous Spread) Within vertical<br />
spaces, a careful abstraction of the<br />
archetypal vault breaks the solidity of the<br />
architectural trope and splits its authority<br />
along two distinct sides, allowing light<br />
to enter the gallery spaces. Punches<br />
through this form provide circulation<br />
across, while the walls themselves<br />
provide space for artwork to be hung.<br />
(This Spread) A play of axial shifting<br />
and misalignment occurs across<br />
the site in order to formally drive the<br />
composition and “bending” of the<br />
boxes. While a major alignment strikes<br />
the street running alongside to the<br />
East, most others are formal measures<br />
taken in without consideration to site<br />
or context, rather conceptualizing the<br />
geometrical organization of the museum<br />
as something of its own world. From<br />
ground level, this evokes something<br />
reminiscent of follies, allowing guests<br />
to stumble between each box as they<br />
explore the gradual change in landscape<br />
between the park to the South and<br />
museum complex to the North.<br />
214
215
Explicated within the boxes, this system<br />
of axial torquing defines both the formal<br />
organization of the vaults (above) and<br />
the overall geometry of the boxes (right).<br />
216 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio
217
218 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio Torqued Boxes
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 219
EL ROSARIO MARKET REDEVELOPMENT<br />
4B Vertical Studio<br />
Spring 2016, John Enright<br />
(Above) Map showing location of<br />
the site (red) within the lager Unité<br />
scheme (yellow) and adjacent industrial<br />
or warehouse zones (purple)<br />
(Below) Otto Wagner, Majolica<br />
House, Vienna, 1899<br />
(Next Page) Axonometric showing<br />
the contextual fitting of the building’s<br />
mass between the existing bars<br />
of the site’s housing blocks<br />
With Kevin Ng<br />
This project was specially selected to be<br />
featured in SCI-Arc’s Spring Show 2016.<br />
The Situation in El Rosario<br />
Situated on the outskirts of Mexico City,<br />
the social housing development at El<br />
Rosario has a mixed character. Occupied<br />
to full capacity as one of the largest<br />
Unité-model residential schemes in Latin<br />
America, the neighborhood has been<br />
rattled with gang-related crime and high<br />
rates of drug addiction. The Mexican<br />
state reports rates upwards of 44% in<br />
terms of drug addiction among the area’s<br />
inhabitants.<br />
At the same time, a thriving crafts market<br />
exists, filling a void left by the departure<br />
of manufacturing jobs from the area. This<br />
impromptu bazaar is so prominent that<br />
the government has gone so far as to<br />
implement programs to instruct locals on<br />
marketing and sales.<br />
These are the contradictory conditions<br />
with which the redevelopment of El Rosario<br />
must content. At once appropriate<br />
and outdated, adequate but insufficient,<br />
the conditions of the area hold both the<br />
promise for improvement and the threat<br />
of further degradation. Responding to<br />
the conditions of this urban collision, the<br />
project proposes a facility containing a<br />
large open-air market, a drug rehabilitation<br />
facility and a job center.<br />
Engagements of the Façade<br />
In realizing these typologies, the building’s<br />
façade becomes engaged as an<br />
architectural element capable of pliantly<br />
adjusting its identity to fit the conditions<br />
of its need. In large swaths of the site,<br />
this takes the form of two specific material<br />
conditions, each tuned specifically<br />
to its scale, constituency and context.<br />
Larger portions of the envelope are<br />
colored in abstractions of Hudson Valley<br />
School paintings, while lower level areas<br />
around the base have an applied floral<br />
texture with a slight degree of abstraction.<br />
Beyond the phenomenological<br />
implications these attain upon encounter,<br />
each engages a specific dialogue around<br />
its reference and constituency. While the<br />
abstract colored panels above have little<br />
legibility in terms of their precedent, the<br />
floral patterns retain a high degree of<br />
fidelity even after their abstraction. These<br />
characteristics account for the scalar difference<br />
in experience between them and<br />
the more distant, larger painting-based<br />
areas. They are specifically designed to<br />
be interacted with at a humanly scale<br />
and, thus, hold a certain referential<br />
iconography that enables them to be<br />
recognized as such.<br />
Further implications deal with a conversation<br />
around the idea of a market place,<br />
which is indeed the program holding<br />
the vast majority of the lowest level. By<br />
contrast, the larger areas of the upper<br />
colored panels are never interacted with<br />
directly, therefore holding a more restrained,<br />
urban situation. As the Hudson<br />
Valley school became the first Western<br />
conceptualization within the artistic<br />
cannon of the aestheticization of the<br />
North American continent by those who<br />
inhabited and raised its lands, it seems<br />
appropriate that the building’s sheathing<br />
would similarly deal with the aesthetic<br />
questions around expansiveness and<br />
landscape. As with Otto Wagner’s Majolica<br />
House in Vienna, both approaches<br />
touch on the concept of what we might<br />
call “Urban Wallpaper”, positing that an<br />
encounter with an architectural object<br />
might become the possibility for a graphic<br />
engagement with cultural, sociological<br />
or formal qualities a constituency shares<br />
with its architecture.<br />
Contextualities<br />
Rather than resisting the tendencies<br />
of the site, this project supposes that<br />
legitimate architectural moves can be<br />
achieved within complete relegation<br />
to extant qualities of its surroundings.<br />
This approach begins with the building’s<br />
massing, which slenderly wiggles<br />
between the existing structures. Further<br />
engagements begin to implement<br />
programmatic changes even beyond the<br />
scope of completely new construction.<br />
As the ground floors in many of the site’s<br />
structures have already been converted<br />
ad hoc to commercial spaces, the project<br />
formalizes the programmatic distinction<br />
by renovating these areas to appropriately<br />
address their designations. Other sitebased<br />
approaches include an appreciation<br />
for the existing amount of trees and<br />
pedestrian traversability, as seen in the<br />
building’s large public walkway, navigating<br />
sectionally from across the street to a<br />
nearby park.<br />
Rather than antagonizing existing conditions,<br />
the redevelopment of El Rosario<br />
attempts to imbue itself with a certain<br />
palimpsestic quality, challenging the dichotomy<br />
between new and old as fertile<br />
grounds for architectural intervention.<br />
220
222 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Photographs of Circulatory Inadequacies
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Study of Existing Tree Coverage on Site<br />
223
Flower Still-Life<br />
Rachel Ruysch, 1726<br />
Hydrangea Camomile Floral Wallpaper<br />
Laura Ash<br />
Floral Vintage Wallpaper<br />
FreeCreatives<br />
Signature Country Floral FRL004-02-01<br />
Ralph Lauren<br />
Clem<br />
Sand<br />
Floral on a Black Background<br />
Unknown artist<br />
Floral on a Black Background<br />
Recolored<br />
Floral on a Black Background<br />
Recolored, intensified and blurred<br />
Bloem Wallpaper<br />
Clementine 223298<br />
Bloem Wallpaper + Clementine 223298<br />
Bloem Wallpaper + Clementine 223298<br />
Cropped and reformatted<br />
Cropped and reformatted<br />
Imagery overlaid<br />
Lower layers blurred<br />
224 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Initial Floral Investigations
entine 223298<br />
erson<br />
Bloem Wallpaper<br />
Unknown artist<br />
Floral on a Black Background<br />
Misregistered grayscale halftone<br />
Floral on a Black Background<br />
Misregistered grayscale halftone, colorized<br />
Bloem Wallpaper + Clementine 223298<br />
Halftoned using averaged reference colors<br />
Urban Wallpaper<br />
The concept of urban wallpaper can be<br />
found in many well attested sources, from<br />
MVRDV’s market in Rotterdam to Otto<br />
Wagner’s Majolica House in Vienna. To<br />
choreograph an encounter with the urban<br />
object is to entice the experience between<br />
a constituency and an architecture which<br />
may or may not be specified for their use. On<br />
these terms, an urban wallpaper posits the<br />
potential for an experiential endgame for all<br />
passersby. Rather than forgoing a building<br />
as an anonymous object, an engaged façade<br />
with an embedded wallpaper, realized either<br />
graphically or tectonically, allows an association<br />
to form with both place and culture to<br />
emerge.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 225
226 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Floral Print Intensifications
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Resultant Collages<br />
227
228 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Abstracted Floral Prints
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 229
232 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Variable Fritting
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Render: Result of Fritting on Shadow<br />
233
234 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Section: Marketplace and Walkway
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 235
236 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Ground Plan
238 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Section: Market, Housing and Rehab
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 239
240 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Façade Patterning
(Left) Thomas Moran,<br />
“Mosquito Trail”, 1874<br />
(Right) Frederic Edwin<br />
Church, “Cotopaxi”, 1855<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Façade Pattern Studies<br />
241
242 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Chunk Model
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 243
244 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Chunk Model Façade Panels
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Chunk Model Conic Surfacing<br />
245
(animation)<br />
vimeo.com/<br />
165098864<br />
246
247
248 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Market Interior
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Market Entrance from Park<br />
249
LOWER 4TH STREET MASTERPLAN<br />
Smart Sustainable Systems<br />
Fall 2015, Jamey Lyzun<br />
Synopsis<br />
This project speculates on a masterplan<br />
for the extension of the campus for the<br />
Southern California Institute of Architecture<br />
(SCI-Arc). Programmatically, the plan<br />
calls for an expansion of roughly 72,000<br />
square feet, divided between two existing<br />
buildings on site. Particular emphasis is<br />
placed on the ecological responses of the<br />
building with its Los Angeles context.<br />
Site Ecology as Building Parameter<br />
Rather than formally molding a scheme<br />
to match regulatory demands such as<br />
LEED, this project presupposes a kind<br />
of design guidance which might exist<br />
inherently in any site or context. Beyond<br />
cliché green design tactics which project<br />
unrealistic expectations such as green<br />
roofs onto inappropriate sites, this is an<br />
approach which takes into account the<br />
inherent limitations of its surroundings.<br />
In doing so, we can highlight specific<br />
architectural responses that speak to<br />
chosen factors of ecological engagement<br />
in order to lessen the impact of the building<br />
and its masterplan on the environment.<br />
These tactics include deep consideration<br />
of orientation and sun exposure,<br />
facilitating a series of direct architectural<br />
responses in the forms of double skins,<br />
air shafts and calibrated apertures.<br />
On the exterior, the project purposes a<br />
pedestrianization of an otherwise unnecessary<br />
cross street. Slight redirections in<br />
traffic actually streamline the experience<br />
of driving through the neighborhood and<br />
allow the creation of a large, public plaza<br />
spanning the distance between the two<br />
buildings. Covered by a series of variably<br />
shaped fins, this becomes an enhanced<br />
public space that entices connection<br />
between institution and public.<br />
252 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 253
1 Santa Fe<br />
1 Santa Fe<br />
SCI-Arc<br />
SCI-Arc<br />
Annex<br />
Bldgs. 1 & 2<br />
Annex<br />
Bldg. 2<br />
Annex Bldg. 3<br />
Annex Bldg. 3<br />
254 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Circulation Strategy Diagrams
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Exterior of Gym and Café<br />
255
256 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Situation Plan
WC<br />
Lecture Steps<br />
1530 Ft 2<br />
Open Flexible Space<br />
8889 Ft 2<br />
203 Ft 2 +3, Dormitories 7 to 13<br />
WC<br />
203 Ft 2<br />
Classroom 2<br />
1257 Ft 2<br />
Breakout Space<br />
3577 Ft 2 Classroom 1<br />
1816 Ft 2<br />
+0, Ground Floor Concourse<br />
+1, Flexible Classroom Space<br />
WC<br />
Dorm 03<br />
203 Ft<br />
Dorm 02<br />
2 589 Ft 2<br />
835 Ft<br />
Dorm 01<br />
2 Dorm 04<br />
700 Ft 2<br />
WC<br />
Dorm 09<br />
203 Ft<br />
Dorm 08<br />
2 589 Ft 2<br />
835 Ft<br />
Dorm 07<br />
2 Dorm 10<br />
700 Ft 2 609 Ft 2 Dorm 11<br />
609 Ft 2 Dorm 05<br />
609 Ft 2 Dorm 12<br />
609 Ft 2 Dorm 06<br />
449 Ft 2 Dorm 13<br />
Communal<br />
Space<br />
371 Ft 2<br />
449 Ft 2 +5, Flexible Rooftop Space and HVAC Plant<br />
3888 Ft 2<br />
Communal<br />
Space<br />
4069 Ft 2<br />
+2, Dormitories 1 to 6<br />
Flexible Rooftop Space<br />
8052 Ft 2<br />
WC<br />
Dorm 16<br />
203 Ft<br />
Dorm 15<br />
2 589 Ft 2<br />
835 Ft<br />
Dorm 14<br />
2 Dorm 17<br />
700 Ft 2<br />
HVAC Plant<br />
2367 Ft 2<br />
609 Ft 2 Dorm 18<br />
609 Ft 2 Dorm 19<br />
449 Ft 2 Dorm 20<br />
Communal<br />
Space<br />
425 Ft 2<br />
3151 Ft 2<br />
+4, Dormitories 14 to 20<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Axonometric Plans<br />
257
258 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Daylight Hour Studies
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Fins from Above<br />
259
ZONE 1<br />
Dorms, bathrooms, classrooms and the core, all<br />
requiring heavy access to climate control and other<br />
systems, are kept away from direct sunlight and<br />
within easy access of operable windows.<br />
ZONE 2<br />
Circulation and communal<br />
spaces. Ventilated to lobby<br />
void but within access of<br />
some HVAC.<br />
ZONE 3<br />
Large lobby with most spaces not habitated. Due to<br />
these factors, it is largely ventilated naturally<br />
through a stack effect along a void on its Northern<br />
edge, which itself doubles to block direct light.<br />
CALIBRATED CLIMATE ZONES<br />
Circulatory and communal spaces can remain warmer<br />
while retaining comfort levels, so these are kept immediately<br />
adjacent to the air shaft, to which they naturally<br />
ventilate in order to lessen intensive HVAC expenditure.<br />
OPERABLE WINDOWS<br />
Living spaces are intentionally<br />
placed directly along the North<br />
façade with easy access to<br />
operable windows for natural<br />
ventilation and cooling<br />
Dorms, Level +4<br />
Circulation<br />
Open Rooftop<br />
DOUBLE SKIN<br />
The Southwest and Southeast façades ar<br />
a double skin, blocking direct radiation to<br />
on the interior. Much of the heat that doe<br />
is rendered null passing through an air b<br />
the lobby which borders the envelope.<br />
Dorms, Level +3<br />
Dorms, Level +2<br />
Communal Spaces<br />
STACK EFFECT<br />
The shaft between the inner<br />
layer of the envelope and the<br />
edge of the lobby’s wall<br />
passively cools the space<br />
with a stack effect<br />
FINS PROVIDE S<br />
Fins block a large<br />
light from entering<br />
allowing some diff<br />
ample natural illum<br />
Classrooms, Level +1<br />
Lobby / Public Lecture Hall, Level +0<br />
SOUTH FAÇADE OFFSET<br />
Offsetting back the<br />
programmatic core of the<br />
building conceals it from<br />
direct sun exposure.<br />
GRAYWATER HARVESTING<br />
The geometry of the fins inherently<br />
siphons water into collected channels,<br />
which in turn feed larger collection<br />
tanks on site for graywater reuse.<br />
ANNEX BUILDING 1<br />
Dormitories for 60-100 students (in 20 dorm rooms),<br />
public lecture hall, flexible use lobby space, classrooms<br />
in both flexible and enclosed configurations<br />
and an open publicly accessible rooftop<br />
MATEO STREET PLAZA<br />
Large open plaza made by pede<br />
functionally insignificant cross s<br />
public and private events, open<br />
general circulatory space<br />
260 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Section with Green Strategies
e conditioned with<br />
reduce heat loads<br />
s enter the building<br />
arrier in the void of<br />
HADE<br />
deal of direct<br />
the plaza, still<br />
use light in for<br />
ination.<br />
VARIABLE LIGHTING CONDITIONS<br />
To allow maximum flexibility in terms of<br />
programming and climatizing the plaza, the<br />
fins run along variable sweeps, producing a<br />
diverse set of lighting conditions.<br />
FINS CHANNEL RAIN<br />
The fin’s profile is designed to collect water<br />
by channeling it to particular streams, thus<br />
dually sheltering from rain and harnessing<br />
it for graywater collection.<br />
OFFSET FAÇADE<br />
The offset façade along the plaza perimeter of Building 2<br />
allows consistently shaded areas to border the building.<br />
When opened, the operable panels of the façade allow a<br />
chimney-like stack effect to naturally cool the interior.<br />
Gym / Food Hall<br />
ACCESS TO PLAZA FROM INTERIOR<br />
Operable exterior panels along the envelope<br />
of the buildings’ lowest floors allows optional<br />
access directly to the courtyard. Programs<br />
such as the café, gym and lobby can spill<br />
out into the plaza for events for during<br />
particularily active days.<br />
strianization of a<br />
treet to be used for<br />
air markets and<br />
INTERSTITIAL (BREAKOUT) SPACE<br />
Open shaded areas between the buildings and plaza<br />
allow for spill out of program into the plaza when<br />
needed<br />
ANNEX BUILDING 2<br />
Café for student body, gym as well as service areas<br />
and all-purpose kitchen; operable envelope panels<br />
along café and gym perimeter allow significant<br />
breakout into the plaza<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 261
SCI-Arc<br />
Rainwater<br />
collection<br />
pools<br />
Annex<br />
Building 1<br />
Mateo Street Plaza<br />
Annex Building 2
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 (Left) Plan, (Above) Northeast Façade<br />
263
Cathedral of Our<br />
LOS ANGELES MALL OFFICE TOWER<br />
Julius Shulman Competition<br />
Spring 2016, Tom Wiscombe<br />
With Deborah Garcia and Adrian Wong<br />
This project done as a submission on behalf<br />
of SCI-Arc for the 2016 Julius Shulman<br />
Emerging Talent Award, hosted by the LA<br />
Business Council. Tom Wiscombe served<br />
as a faculty advisor.<br />
The Education of a Neighborhood<br />
The proposal put forth will approach<br />
community betterment through an<br />
emphasis on both health and education.<br />
The civic offi ce buildings of Downtown<br />
Los Angeles are home to a vast amount<br />
of employees and occupants. The surrounding<br />
areas are crucial in providing<br />
services that better the quality of life for<br />
the inhabitants of the area. For many<br />
years Downtown has faced a challenge<br />
of meeting these necessities within the<br />
urban fabric of the city. The Los Angeles<br />
Mall is located at the center of this area,<br />
and its placement is integral to the connection<br />
of various important landmarks<br />
and city buildings. Not only does it provide<br />
a link between important locations,<br />
but it is the heart of a neighborhood.<br />
Our proposal introduces various elements<br />
which will promote connectivity<br />
and vibrance within the Downtown<br />
community. The Los Angeles Downtown<br />
Trail - This meandering path functions<br />
not only as a recreational track but as a<br />
flexible space that simultaneously exists<br />
as promenade and urban walkway. Occupants<br />
of the surrounding buildings are<br />
provided with a much needed area to<br />
exercise and revitalize the spirit of pedestrian<br />
activity in Downtown. The city-trail<br />
makes its way from the ground level and<br />
up onto the elevated ground level. At this<br />
elevation the path begins to unfold as an<br />
architectural, historical, and topographic<br />
journey, making its way around, below,<br />
and even through the buildings on the<br />
site. The formal windings of the track pull<br />
visitors along a carefully choreographed<br />
path that highlights views of City Hall,<br />
frames the streets of Downtown, and<br />
gently introduces a new physical terrain<br />
within the heart of Los Angeles.<br />
Public Amphitheater/ Community<br />
Learning Spaces - As the walking track<br />
makes its way through the site, it leads<br />
to various open spaces that have been<br />
designed<br />
LA DWP Building<br />
Ahmanson Theatre<br />
LA County<br />
Doathy Chandler<br />
Treasurer<br />
Pavilion<br />
Disney Concert Hall /<br />
Frank Gehry<br />
Stanley Mosk<br />
Courthouse<br />
Lady of the Angels /<br />
Rafael Moneo<br />
LA County<br />
Planning<br />
High School #9 /<br />
Coop Himmelb(l)au<br />
Hall of Justice<br />
LA Superior<br />
US Courthouse<br />
Court<br />
The Broad /<br />
LA Law Library<br />
DS+R<br />
Grand Park<br />
MOCA<br />
US Courthouse<br />
City Hall<br />
LA Times Building<br />
Police Headquarters<br />
Olivera Street<br />
Chinese American<br />
Museum<br />
US Department of<br />
Homeland Security<br />
US Bankruptcy<br />
Court<br />
Union Station<br />
(Left) Map of prominent locations<br />
and destinations around the mall<br />
site, itself reconceptualized as an<br />
ideal hub for future urban growth<br />
in Downtown Los Angeles due to<br />
its extremely central location<br />
(Right) Rendering from inside the East<br />
Tower’s communal staircase, looking<br />
towards the respective circulatory spaces<br />
on the West Tower. Spatial adjacencies<br />
and similar materialities connect both<br />
spaces and foster a bond between<br />
the differently programmed towers.<br />
(Next Spread) Solar analysis simulations<br />
to determine massing and orientations,<br />
as well as envelope treatments,<br />
based on shading from both City<br />
Hall and its neighboring annex, as<br />
well as the adjacent court building.<br />
Caltrans District 7 /<br />
Morphosis<br />
MOCA Geffen<br />
The Cathedral of<br />
Saint Vibiana<br />
Japanese American<br />
National Museum<br />
266
Solar Radiation on Plazas<br />
21 December<br />
Solar Radiation on Plazas<br />
21 June<br />
Sunlight Hours on Plazas<br />
21 December<br />
Sunlight Hours on Plazas<br />
21 June<br />
268 Los Angeles Mall Office Tower Julius Shulman Competition Solar Analysis Simulations
Solar Radiation on Towers<br />
21 December<br />
Solar Radiation on Towers<br />
21 June<br />
Sunlight Hours on Towers<br />
21 December<br />
Sunlight Hours on Towers<br />
21 June<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 269
for community use. These range from a<br />
large amphitheater at ground level, to<br />
smaller meeting spaces on the elevated<br />
ground level, and stepped seating areas<br />
that are ideal for audiences. For example,<br />
the Triforium sculpture by Joseph Young<br />
sits at the center of one of these outdoor<br />
spaces. The design of specific and deliberate<br />
viewing areas encourage public art<br />
and community activities that may range<br />
from local meetings to per formative<br />
events. The neighborhood is given the<br />
opportunity to foster its own educational<br />
and cultural environment.<br />
Furthermore, elements of sustainability<br />
addressed in the project are maximizing<br />
daylight to reduce use of power for<br />
retail spaces and facade design focuses<br />
on best orientation for advantageous<br />
exposure.<br />
Preservation and Cultural Identity<br />
This proposal seeks to retain and support<br />
the current landmarks of the Los Angeles<br />
Downtown area. The height restriction<br />
set to the elevated ground plane does not<br />
excessively remove the pedestrian from<br />
the urban fabric, instead by lifting the occupant<br />
off the ground to a calibrated and<br />
carefully situated distance the pedestrian<br />
will experience the surrounding buildings<br />
from various vantage points being able to<br />
at once understand the immediate neighborhood<br />
in connection to a much larger<br />
context. There is an interplay between<br />
immediate scale at the individual level, as<br />
well as at the scale of the city as a whole.<br />
This proposed scheme would provide the<br />
ideal way to experience the landmarks<br />
of Los Angeles and would encourage<br />
the preservation of that history for many<br />
more generations to come.<br />
Urban Dichotomies<br />
The Recreational Fitness Track, also<br />
known as the Los Angeles Downtown<br />
Trail winds around the complex’s roof.<br />
The concept of an ‘urban trail’ fi ts well<br />
in city that needs to return the focus to<br />
the pedestrian. This proposed walkway<br />
will encourage pedestrian activity as well<br />
as introduce an experience that is fully<br />
based on the human scale. The track is<br />
large enough for various activities to take<br />
place simultaneously. Inclines are kept<br />
within an average slope, and handicap<br />
accessibility is provided where necessary.<br />
Learning to Walk Again<br />
The history of the downtown area of Los<br />
Angeles is one filled with a rich timeline<br />
of innovation, construction, and development.<br />
Like many other fast-growing<br />
cities, Los Angeles too has faced the<br />
unavoidable disengagement that occurs<br />
between pedestrians and the city around<br />
them. Busy intersections, speeding highways,<br />
and winding freeways have come<br />
to mark Los Angeles as a bustling center<br />
of energy and action. Los Angeles is<br />
always in flux, and so are its inhabitants.<br />
This proposal seeks to satisfy the<br />
Angele-no’s desire to reclaim the ground<br />
beneath their feet. This new city center<br />
introduces the concept of an urban trail,<br />
providing a new topographical experience<br />
in a city of uncharted topographies.<br />
It is here that Los Angeles will learn to<br />
walk again.<br />
(Above) Rendeirng demonstrating<br />
siting of project with massings and<br />
relationship between communal<br />
staircases winding along each tower<br />
(Right, Top) Roof plan with track<br />
and pathways highlighted<br />
(Right, Bottom) Ground plan showing<br />
communal plaza areas and entry lobbies<br />
270 Los Angeles Mall Office Tower Julius Shulman Competition
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Roof Plan (Top), Ground Plan (Bottom)<br />
271
272 Los Angeles Mall Office Tower Julius Shulman Competition Section along Los Angeles Street
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 273
10<br />
15<br />
134<br />
55<br />
85<br />
85<br />
190<br />
RANCHO SAN JUAN REHABILITATION CENTER<br />
4B Vertical Studio<br />
Spring 2016, John Enright<br />
With Kevin Ng<br />
Synopsis<br />
Tasked with repurposing a derelict public<br />
housing development on the suburban<br />
outskirts of metropolitan Mexico City,<br />
this proposal engages a notorious federal<br />
penitentiary which exists immediately adjacent<br />
to the site as a method for reframing<br />
the prerogatives around housing and<br />
redevelopment, in effect interrogating the<br />
prison typology.<br />
Much like that of social housing, the<br />
basic demands of program for prison<br />
facilities approach an equivalence with<br />
large scale residential blocks that allow a<br />
productive conversation to be had. Rancho<br />
San Juan Federal Penitentiary puts<br />
pressure on the typical presumptions<br />
of iconicity, visibility and inhabitability<br />
through which we often phrase discussions<br />
about housing, the welfare state<br />
and societal views on justice.<br />
A New Federal Penitentiary No. 1<br />
Like other suburban developments<br />
propagated by recent administrations<br />
of the Mexican government, Rancho<br />
San Juan performs severely below its<br />
expectations. Crippling rates of vacancy,<br />
perceived safety issues and unrequited<br />
commercial investment have produced a<br />
delinquent suburbia strangely supplanted<br />
within the agrarian farmlands outside of<br />
Toluca, itself defined primarily in periphery<br />
to the capital.<br />
Perhaps most intriguing about the site<br />
is the strange resonance with its surroundings.<br />
Within a kilometer, one comes<br />
across highway access, a major recycling<br />
plant for the nearby metropolises and<br />
abundantly fertile fields. Nonetheless,<br />
it is the extreme adjacency of the site<br />
to Federal Prison No. 1 which suggests<br />
a productive point of commencement<br />
for an architectural project. Beyond the<br />
obvious correspondence between the<br />
site’s vacancy in the prison’s overcrowding<br />
(now at around 130% capacity),<br />
the juxtaposition of incarceration and<br />
suburbia posits the possibility for a series<br />
of interventions onto both architectural<br />
typologies to the ends that we might reexamine<br />
not only the exploitation of their<br />
mutually beneficial shortcomings but<br />
that we could begin to construct a firm<br />
statement about the current state of both<br />
excess residential housing and societally<br />
untimely perceptions about the penitentiary<br />
system.<br />
This project reinterprets the notions of<br />
confinement and surveillance within the<br />
context of housing. A series of horizontal<br />
bars drift across the landscape of the<br />
site, spewing out from the interior of the<br />
prison. Treading Northwards as they<br />
cross the development, their gradual<br />
transition from a typology of dense, vertical<br />
hosing to that of a horizontal scaffold<br />
provides the impetus for an architectural<br />
form-making with immediacy between<br />
physical limitation, housing prisoners in<br />
traditional cells ostracized from the world<br />
by their lifted positioning far above the<br />
ground, and more contemporary understanding<br />
of electronic means for control,<br />
such as ankle bracelets and ubiquitous<br />
digital surveillance from the large, overhanging<br />
scaffold at the freest end of the<br />
project.<br />
The programmatic transformation of<br />
Rancho San Juan combines these methods<br />
to reinterpret the failed suburbia as<br />
incarceration center, redeploying the site<br />
as a place of reintegration for prisoners<br />
into Mexican society. Given the current<br />
dilemmas facing the Mexican prison system,<br />
such as debilitating stigmatization,<br />
prisoner overcrowding and high degrees<br />
of recidivism, the project demands the invention<br />
of both new architectural typologies<br />
and corresponding formal developments<br />
to tackle the intricate sociological<br />
problems of incarceration and housing.<br />
Tilting the Unité Model<br />
There is a strange reciprocity between<br />
social housing and prisons. Both adhere<br />
to a believed relationship between<br />
government intervention, in the form<br />
of spatial confinement, and projected<br />
behavioral improvement on the part of<br />
those contained. Too often, these processes<br />
become mere static boundaries<br />
within which a set of proscribed interactions<br />
are sanctioned. In each case, these<br />
aspire to better the lives of those within.<br />
(Top) Le Corbusier, Unité<br />
d’Habitation, Marseille, 1952<br />
(Above) Diagram of the greater Mexico<br />
City region, including neighboring<br />
Toluca. With over one million residents<br />
and a planned high speed train<br />
connection (diagrammed on next<br />
spread), the expansion of which might<br />
one day pass directly beside the site,<br />
the situation of Altiplano Prison finds<br />
itself in close proximity to series of<br />
intriguing contextual hubs. Likewise,<br />
55<br />
Toluca<br />
15<br />
Where a prison employs walls and bars<br />
presumably to enforce retribution for<br />
social deviance, a social housing development<br />
equivalently wagers that government<br />
sanctioned living conditions will<br />
entice economic prosperity.<br />
In both conditions, the connection<br />
between architectural realization and political<br />
intention becomes rather abstract.<br />
There exists material evidence for the<br />
correspondences between neither solitary<br />
meditation and self-betterment nor<br />
enforced habitation and economic betterment.<br />
When one studies the discrepancies<br />
in success between notable social<br />
housing projects, such as that between<br />
Robin Hood Gardens and the Barbican<br />
Centre, it becomes clear that architecture<br />
has little power over the inevitable<br />
57<br />
68<br />
95<br />
50<br />
Mexico City, D.F.<br />
this collision of constituencies renders<br />
the extant facilities as incapable of<br />
addressing contemporary Mexico.<br />
(Right) Harold Fisk’s 1944 “Geological<br />
Investigation of the Alluvial Valley of<br />
the Lower Mississippi River”, showing<br />
the plethora of identites that one linear<br />
stream of material can contain (in<br />
this case literally manifest as such).<br />
The new Federal Penitentiary No. 1<br />
replays this formal logic to reform the<br />
process of in-prison rehabilitation.<br />
57<br />
36<br />
278 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Harold Fisk’s Mississippi River Drawings<br />
279
340 KM<br />
Guanajuato / Celaya<br />
595,740 (+2.7 Hr.)<br />
7,649<br />
300 KM<br />
330 KM<br />
Tarimoro<br />
59,571<br />
La Moncada<br />
4,130<br />
310 KM<br />
Michoacán / Acámbaro<br />
169,900 (+2.2 Hr.)<br />
290 KM<br />
260 KM<br />
250 KM<br />
240 KM<br />
230 KM<br />
220 KM<br />
210 KM<br />
200 KM<br />
190 KM<br />
180 KM<br />
Estado de México / El Oro<br />
278,264 (+1 Hr.)<br />
170 KM<br />
(León)<br />
(1,578,626 ) (+115 KM) (+2.9 Hr.)<br />
(Guadaljara)<br />
(1,495,189) (+250 KM) (+5.3 Hr.)<br />
San Nicolás de los Agustinos<br />
6,878<br />
San Pedro de los Naranjos<br />
4,365<br />
San Andrés de Salvatierra<br />
34,066<br />
Maravatío del Encinal<br />
3,262<br />
San Miguel Eménguaro<br />
1,526<br />
CELAYA<br />
468,469<br />
Santa María del Refugio<br />
2,453<br />
320 KM<br />
Panales Jamaica<br />
2,073<br />
Urireo<br />
Chamácuaro<br />
1,298<br />
Parácuaro<br />
25,582<br />
Jaral del Refugio<br />
724<br />
280 KM<br />
ACÁMBARO<br />
55,082<br />
270 KM<br />
San Ramón<br />
629<br />
La Encarnación<br />
1,423<br />
Santa Inés<br />
347<br />
San José de Porto<br />
429<br />
Tarandacuao<br />
11,583<br />
Maravatío<br />
70,170<br />
Tungareo<br />
3,931<br />
EL ORO<br />
31,847<br />
280 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Proposed High Speed Rail Link
México, D. F.<br />
4,174,928 (+10 Min.)<br />
3600 M<br />
1800 M<br />
5400 M<br />
0 KM<br />
TLALNEPANTLA DE BAZ<br />
Gustavo A. Madero<br />
664,225<br />
1,185,772<br />
Azcapotzalco<br />
10 KM<br />
425,298<br />
Tlalnepantla de Baz<br />
664,225<br />
Naucalpan de Juárez<br />
872,320<br />
20 KM<br />
Miguel Hidalgo<br />
353,534<br />
Huixquilucan<br />
9,554<br />
160 KM<br />
150 KM<br />
Santa María Citendeje 140 KM<br />
5,641<br />
Atlacomulco de Fabela<br />
San Miguel Tenochtitlán<br />
22,774<br />
San Felipe del Progreso<br />
5,280<br />
4,001<br />
140 KM<br />
San Juan Jalpa Centro<br />
2,209<br />
San Cristóbal los Baños<br />
Dolores Hidalgo<br />
4,099<br />
54,843 La Concepción los Baños<br />
6,498<br />
130 KM<br />
San Bartolo del Llano<br />
11,421<br />
San Juan de las Manzanas<br />
3,128<br />
120 KM<br />
Ixtlahuaca de Rayón<br />
126,505<br />
110 KM<br />
Valle de México / Toluca<br />
1,717,747 (+20 Min.)<br />
SITE<br />
100 KM<br />
San Cayetano Morelos<br />
4,439<br />
Almoloya de Juárez<br />
126,163<br />
San Pablo Autopan<br />
35,141<br />
90 KM<br />
30 KM<br />
Huixquilucan de Degollado<br />
242,167<br />
40 KM<br />
50 KM<br />
Santa María Atarasquillo<br />
Ocoyoacac<br />
13,769<br />
61,805<br />
60 KM<br />
Cerrillo Vista Hermosa<br />
6,444<br />
San Pedro Cholula<br />
113,436<br />
San Miguel Totoltepec<br />
4,572<br />
80 KM<br />
San Marcos Yachihuacaltepec<br />
5,917<br />
TOLUCA DE LERDO<br />
819,561<br />
Santa Cruz Otzacatipan<br />
4,191<br />
San Mateo Atenco<br />
66,740<br />
70 KM<br />
San Gaspar Tlahuelilpan<br />
7,397<br />
Metepec<br />
206,005<br />
(In Planning)<br />
~3.9 Mil. (38 Min.)<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 281
Security Designation Data<br />
Point Total<br />
Public Saftey Factors Security Level<br />
Severity of Current Offense<br />
Criminal History Score<br />
Type of Detainer<br />
Age<br />
Education Level<br />
Drug / Alcohol Abuse<br />
No (0)<br />
Yes (-3)<br />
Voluntary Surrender Status Deportable Alien<br />
Lowest (0)<br />
Low Moderate (1)<br />
Moderate (2)<br />
High (5)<br />
Greatest (7)<br />
1-2 (0)<br />
2-03 (2)<br />
4-6 (4)<br />
7-9 (6)<br />
10-12 (8)<br />
13+ (10)<br />
None (0)<br />
Lowest / Low Moderate (1)<br />
Moderate (3)<br />
High (5)<br />
Greatest (7)<br />
55 and over (0)<br />
36 through 54 (2)<br />
25 through 35 (4)<br />
24 or less (8)<br />
High school or GED (0)<br />
Currently attaining GED (1)<br />
No degree (2)<br />
Never or >5 Years (0)<br />
10 Years<br />
Sentence Remaining > 20 Years<br />
Sentence Remaining > 30 Years<br />
Non-Parolable Life Sentence<br />
Serious Escape<br />
Disruptive Group<br />
Prison Disturbance<br />
No Public Saftey Factors<br />
Serious Escape<br />
Sentence Remaining > 10 Years<br />
Sentence Remaining > 20 Years<br />
Sentence Remaining > 30 Years<br />
Non-Parolable Life Sentence<br />
Disruptive Group<br />
Prison Disturbance<br />
No Public Saftey Factors<br />
Disruptive Group<br />
Prison Disturbance<br />
Sentence Remaining > 30<br />
Non-Parolable Life Sentence<br />
No Public Saftey Factors<br />
All Cases<br />
Minimum<br />
Low<br />
Medium<br />
High<br />
None (0)<br />
History of Escape<br />
Minor History of Escape<br />
>15 Years (1)<br />
10-15 Years (1)<br />
5-10 Years (2)<br />
15 Years (3)<br />
10-15 Years (3)<br />
5-10 Years (3)<br />
15 Years (1)<br />
10-15 Years (1)<br />
5-10 Years (3)<br />
15 Years (2)<br />
10-15 Years (4)<br />
5-10 Years (6)<br />
286 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio
prospects of a government initiative.<br />
Rather, a choreographed intersection<br />
of policy, enforcement and, finally, built<br />
form are necessary to achieve success.<br />
This quality far from belittles architecture,<br />
instead freeing the architectural response<br />
to work broadly on its own terms.<br />
This project resists the temptation to<br />
deliver a single, ossified solution to the<br />
problem of incarceration in Mexico in<br />
a built form. Although the result of the<br />
investigation is indeed a built urbanity,<br />
easily recognizable as such, its premise<br />
revolves less around the adherence to<br />
a singular type of confinement than the<br />
proliferation of variable living conditions.<br />
To these ends, the project adopts the<br />
Corbusian model of Unité housing as a<br />
point of departure. The aforementioned<br />
reciprocity between social housing and<br />
imprisonment, both of which are encountered<br />
on site before any intervention,<br />
binds these concepts to access a variety<br />
of living conditions that avoid the belief<br />
that various individuals should find moral<br />
salvation when subjected to a series of<br />
monotonous spaces.<br />
A set of theoretically minor interventions<br />
into the Unité model permit this diversification<br />
of conditions. These include a<br />
unique set of façade geometries which<br />
assure each cell corresponds to uniquely<br />
individual levels of interior visibility,<br />
exterior accessibility and light penetration.<br />
As the form tilts to its side, this set of<br />
variables doubles, further engaging the<br />
possibility of novel modes of incarceration.<br />
Finally released into the retained<br />
suburbanity of the Rancho San Juan<br />
facility below, prisoners are taken along<br />
a gradient of confinement, encountering<br />
along the way various typologies of access,<br />
solitude and exposure.<br />
(Left) Exploded axonometric drawing<br />
showing the various layers of<br />
functional bands combined to form<br />
the various structures, pathways and<br />
security features of the prison.<br />
(Above) Program diagram showing<br />
the existing facilities and the initially<br />
planned expansion of the prison. Though<br />
greatly expanded upon in the final<br />
scheme, preliminary explorations easily<br />
demonstrated both the programmatic<br />
response to prevalent prison<br />
overcrowding and the comparative<br />
dual expansions in cell sizes and<br />
employee-related facilities to ameliorate<br />
the inhumane spatial parameters<br />
currently used in prison design.<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Program Compositions<br />
287
288 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Plan Details for Junctions and Objects
Healthcare Facility<br />
Administrative Center<br />
and High Speed Rail Link<br />
Education Building<br />
Community Center<br />
Courthouse Complex<br />
and Parking<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object Buildings<br />
289
290 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Cutaway Axonometric
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Sections in Block 1<br />
291
Iteration 1.1<br />
Iteration 3.1<br />
Iteration 3.2<br />
Iteration 5.2<br />
Level Shift:<br />
False Cell Randomization: False<br />
Level Shift Minimum: - Randomization Level: -<br />
Level Shift Maximum: - End Preservation: -<br />
Level Shift Randomization: 0<br />
Level Shift:<br />
True Cell Randomization: False<br />
Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: -<br />
Level Shift Maximum: +20 End Preservation: -<br />
Level Shift Randomization: 0<br />
Level Shift:<br />
True Cell Randomization: False<br />
Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: -<br />
Level Shift Maximum: +20 End Preservation: -<br />
Level Shift Randomization: .15<br />
Level Shift:<br />
True<br />
Level Shift Minimum: -10<br />
Level Shift Maximum: +20<br />
Level Shift Randomization: .15<br />
292 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Façade Variation Studies
Iteration 5.3<br />
Iteration 6.2<br />
Iteration 7<br />
Cell Randomization: True<br />
Randomization Level: .003<br />
End Preservation: .025<br />
Level Shift:<br />
True Cell Randomization: True<br />
Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: .005<br />
Level Shift Maximum: +20 End Preservation: .025<br />
Level Shift Randomization: .15<br />
Level Shift:<br />
True Cell Randomization: True<br />
Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: .007<br />
Level Shift Maximum: +15 End Preservation: .025<br />
Level Shift Randomization: .1<br />
Level Shift:<br />
True Cell Randomization: True<br />
Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: .008<br />
Level Shift Maximum: +15 End Preservation: .03<br />
Level Shift Randomization: .07<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 293
294
(animation)<br />
vimeo.com/<br />
165098217<br />
295
296 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio
-68.5°<br />
Panel B1.2_6_78<br />
Panel B1.2_4_46<br />
65°<br />
58°<br />
42°<br />
13°<br />
-18.2°<br />
0.268<br />
0.711<br />
0.374<br />
0.854<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Aperture Geometry Parameters<br />
297
298 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Section in Block 2
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 299
37.2°<br />
31.0%<br />
11.1°<br />
9.2%<br />
+25.9°<br />
0.0°<br />
-11.3°<br />
-4.3°<br />
-15.4°<br />
33.2°<br />
20.0%<br />
9.5°<br />
5.9%<br />
300 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Prison Cell Geometry Parameters
7.8°<br />
4.8%<br />
+26.7°<br />
28.1°<br />
23.4%<br />
-1.4°<br />
0.0°<br />
-2.6°<br />
27.6°<br />
23.0%<br />
-30.2°<br />
7.6°<br />
6.3%<br />
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 301
302 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Light Variations in Cells and Objects
<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Sections in Block 4 and Scaffold<br />
303
End<br />
Thank you for taking your time<br />
to look at my portfolio!<br />
For contact information, please<br />
refer to the information pages at<br />
the beginning of the book.