03.06.2017 Views

Connor Gravelle Portfolio (Selected Projects)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2017<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong>


Intro &<br />

Table of Contents


ABOUT THE COVER<br />

Having spent four years at SCI-Arc, it seems that my<br />

small body of work has become somewhat productively<br />

unruly. Though some themes permeate the larger<br />

structure of the work, collecting everything under one<br />

banner (let alone four) is sometimes difficult. For this<br />

reason, I have resisted the temptation to lift any single<br />

project to the status of covering a book. Instead, all covers<br />

(seen in each in its miniature to the left) come from<br />

one enlarged image taken over a year ago in a field<br />

outside of my hometown.<br />

What this image means to me aesthetically more than<br />

compensates for its non-linear entanglement with the<br />

projects inside these books. In its most basal sense, it<br />

is a photograph taken of the edge between a cornfield<br />

and the sky on a late summer’s day. The balmy summer’s<br />

sun in New England blinded the camera with<br />

its intensity. At low exposure, the camera approached<br />

the leafs at the ends of the cornstalks in an ultimately<br />

vulnerable condition, unable to encapsulate the truth of<br />

what it was tasked to capture. With a flick of my wrist,<br />

the camera found itself completely unable to comprehend<br />

what stood before it. Light failed to register on the<br />

machine’s sensor in a way to which you might ascribe<br />

any fidelity.<br />

A brief obsession with the Japanese author Yukio<br />

Mishima this year left me with this quote from his 1968<br />

book, Sun and Steel:<br />

“The upper atmosphere where there is no oxygen is<br />

surrounded with death… No movement, no sound,<br />

no memories… In this stillness was a beauty beyond<br />

words: No more body or spirit, pen or sword, male or<br />

female… I saw a giant circle coiled around the earth,<br />

a ring that resolved all contradictions, a ring vaster<br />

than death, more fragrant than any scent I have ever<br />

known.”<br />

This image, too, is a certain kind of death. It is the death<br />

of a word — the death of a “cornstalk”. It is the final point<br />

at which the nomination of what we see eludes us,<br />

leaving nameless what we desperately seek to identify.<br />

Where the atmosphere’s outer boundary scraped<br />

at the edge of what he breathed to puncture and peel<br />

at Mishima’s reality and its definitions, the camera’s<br />

strained lens breaks the identity of what stands before<br />

it. More than cornstalk or sky, this image is the last<br />

instance of time for an entire reality. It is the border at<br />

which nouns become insufficient to transcribe what is<br />

perceived.<br />

A weltanschauung of sorts, it resonates with a great<br />

deal of the work in these books in regards to the mutual<br />

cadence that each poses towards hardline truths. The<br />

atmosphere, the cornstalk and the building all stand<br />

to defy the qualities we presume for them. More than<br />

merely encapsulating something novel, their true power<br />

emerges in the moment we stand back from the spectacle<br />

and see again exactly what we saw before. To see<br />

the cornstalk anew is to liberate its identify to the extent<br />

that we accept its capability of ontological transgression<br />

without entrapping it to our subjective demands.<br />

Rather, from where we stand, a world lifted from us for<br />

only a second to be delivered back slightly askew offers<br />

a realignment of external reality so fundamental and yet<br />

so belonging that we too find ourselves changed.


About Me<br />

6


ABOUT ME<br />

Hello! My name is <strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong>, and I am currently a<br />

candidate for an undergraduate degree here at SCI-Arc,<br />

approaching thesis as I enter my final year here.<br />

This is my portfolio. Between its covers, you will find an<br />

amassing of what I think about as per my work in visual,<br />

architectural, designed and documented forms. Its<br />

organization has been curated to follow a genealogical<br />

order, which is described in further detail on the next<br />

page.<br />

I have a particular interest in resolving new ideas about<br />

the perspectives which are cast on architecture. Both<br />

the development of the field towards its current form<br />

in historical retrospective and the possibility of future<br />

tangents into new paradigms for our built world as a<br />

whole fascinate me.<br />

I believe that architecture holds the keen possibility to<br />

influence us, as the human race, on a profound level.<br />

It is perhaps the art which encapsulates us the most<br />

within its grasps, and, in those regards, its powers<br />

should be appropriated in order to further our understanding<br />

of the human condition as manifested in our<br />

designed reality.<br />

ACADEMICS<br />

––<br />

3.96 GPA at SCI-Arc<br />

––<br />

Instruction in the German language at<br />

Goethe Institut Boston (2008-2011)<br />

––<br />

4.1 Graduating GPA from Newburyport Public High<br />

School in Newburyport, Massachusetts in 2012<br />

AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS<br />

––<br />

Specially selected to represent SCI-Arc to prospective<br />

students on both tours and students panels<br />

––<br />

Chosen to display work at SCI-Arc’s annual Spring<br />

Show of student work for 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016<br />

––<br />

Chosen to participate among three students<br />

as SCI-Arc’s representation to the 2016 Julius<br />

Shulman Emerging Talent Award’s competition,<br />

organized by the LA Business Council<br />

––<br />

2012 winner of Scholastic Art Award in<br />

the Architecture category as well as subsequent<br />

Prismacolor Scholarship for design<br />

of “Mexican Border Memorial”<br />

CONTACT INFORMATION<br />

Address (LA) 411 South Main Street<br />

Unit 318<br />

Los Angeles, California 90013<br />

United States of America<br />

Address (MA) 5 Milk Street<br />

Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950<br />

United States of America<br />

Phone +1 978 918 2575<br />

Email connor_gravelle@sciarc.edu<br />

connor.gravelle@gmail.com (personal)<br />

7


Table of<br />

Contents<br />

8


Lima Museum of Art .............................................................................12<br />

Synopsis ..............................................................................................12<br />

The Core ..............................................................................................17<br />

Scales of Institutional Experience .....................................25<br />

Architecture and Freedom .....................................................25<br />

Subtle Deviations between Architectural<br />

Elements .........................................................................................30<br />

About Subtlety ...............................................................................30<br />

Where Subtlety Places Us ......................................................39<br />

Pondering the Lima Exposition Hall ................................39<br />

Learning from Grammar ..........................................................39<br />

Paseo Penasco House ........................................................................50<br />

Odd Blocks ................................................................................................. 78<br />

SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment ...................................102<br />

Synopsis ...........................................................................................102<br />

Project Scheme ...........................................................................102<br />

About Chinatown .......................................................................102<br />

Chinatown’s History ..................................................................120<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art ..................................................................128<br />

Elevations and the Politics of the Art Museum<br />

as a Contemporary Medium for Architecture ......132<br />

Circulatory Strategies ..............................................................136<br />

About the Façade .....................................................................140<br />

Organization ..................................................................................143<br />

Circulatory Vignettes .............................................................. 157<br />

[We] are LA ....................................................................................189<br />

Canonical Images in Fashion and Architecture .....194<br />

Pertaining Quotes ......................................................................194<br />

Skin ......................................................................................................194<br />

Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study ...........................206<br />

El Rosario Market Redevelopment ..........................................220<br />

The Situation in El Rosario ..................................................220<br />

Engagements of the Façade ..............................................220<br />

Contextualities ............................................................................220<br />

Urban Wallpaper ........................................................................225<br />

Lower 4th Street Masterplan ....................................................... 252<br />

Synopsis .......................................................................................... 252<br />

Site Ecology as Building Parameter .............................. 252<br />

Los Angeles Mall Office Tower ..................................................266<br />

The Education of a Neighborhood ................................266<br />

Preservation and Cultural Identity ................................. 270<br />

Urban Dichotomies .................................................................. 270<br />

Learning to Walk Again ......................................................... 270<br />

Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center .............................. 278<br />

Synopsis .......................................................................................... 278<br />

A New Federal Penitentiary No. 1 ................................... 278<br />

Tilting the Unité Model .......................................................... 278<br />

BAM Design Development ............................................................160<br />

SCI-Fa ..........................................................................................................170<br />

Synopsis ...........................................................................................170<br />

Thoughts on Program .............................................................170<br />

Thoughts on Institution ..........................................................170<br />

The Fourth Wall as Societal Device ............................... 176<br />

The Fourth Wall in Architecture........................................ 176<br />

F***, the Spline ............................................................................. 179<br />

A Mechanized Pool for Fashion ........................................183<br />

Los Angeles, or Epileptic Shock .......................................183<br />

Escape is Futile: LA Live .....................................................189<br />

Beginnings and Ends in Architecture ...........................189<br />

9


10  


11


LIMA MUSEUM OF ART<br />

Thesis Studio<br />

Spring 2017, Michael Young with AT Melissa Shin<br />

Awarded Blythe and Thom Mayne Best Undergraduate Thesis Prize<br />

Synopsis<br />

Our cultural moment might be described<br />

as one of intense self-reflection. Concerns<br />

of what it means to belong and<br />

what exactly an identity is have recently,<br />

more so than ever, foregrounded themselves<br />

as questions paramount to, if not<br />

at times even more bombastic than, the<br />

very definition of such terms in a given<br />

situation. Consequently, this problematizes<br />

the architectural practice as a<br />

transcriptive discipline for identifying,<br />

materializing and, most importantly, defining<br />

the ideological conditions of given<br />

contexts, cultures and programs.<br />

In particular terms, this extension to an<br />

existing art museum takes to task preservation<br />

for its immediate engagement<br />

with identity. Thus, questions of institution,<br />

context and even the literal tectonic<br />

manifestation of a building become<br />

crucial in understanding how a building<br />

might in itself establish the possibility of<br />

productively estranging what we take for<br />

granted. This opens a working ground on<br />

which the architectural formation of the<br />

project is constantly defined by its efficacy<br />

to unsettle (though not persistently to<br />

resist or to undermine) presumed tropes,<br />

values and institutional underpinnings.<br />

The Façade<br />

This process begins first in the demands<br />

of a competition brief that places heavy<br />

cultural worth in the elevations of the<br />

existing Neoclassical structure onsite.<br />

Rather than conforming below grade or<br />

retreatingly offer a building which disappears,<br />

the project literally exercises the<br />

original structure of its west façade and<br />

moves the amputated face 40 meters<br />

towards curbside. The leftover negative<br />

space of this operation provides the<br />

working room for the new contemporary<br />

art wing to infill the space between the<br />

original structure and its severed streetside<br />

face.<br />

The Screen and the Fake Materiality<br />

From the exterior, this elevational relationship<br />

is further challenged by the<br />

intermittent construction of a glass skin<br />

wrapping between the existing and new<br />

wings of the building. Fritted with an<br />

mere image of the original building, the<br />

misregistration of this surface from its<br />

literal material referent below problematizes<br />

the orthographic elevation for which<br />

the project brief places such implication<br />

in favor of an oblique.<br />

Likewise, a perforated metal cladding<br />

around the volume of the extension mimics<br />

traditional architectural materiality in<br />

its faux travertine patterns, further enlivening<br />

this sometimes-graphic, sometimes-spatial<br />

depth. Whatever sense of<br />

depth offered in the filigree ornament<br />

of the original building offered is both<br />

highlighted and contested in the visually<br />

uncertain contradiction between the<br />

absolute flatness yet experiential dimensionality<br />

of the screen and cladding.<br />

The Entrance<br />

Moving into the building, the museum<br />

consumes the site’s demand for a pedestrian<br />

underpass across a heavily trafficked<br />

thoroughfare as well as a subway<br />

entrance by gently, slightly pulling<br />

patrons, passersby, metro riders, delivery<br />

trucks and flaneurs alike below the masses<br />

of both structures through a crevice<br />

between the ground and the perceptual<br />

weight (something ostensibly of stone<br />

with a certain heaviness) of the museum<br />

extension. This circulatory flattening of<br />

the presumed hierarchy between museum<br />

lobby, public concourse and delivery<br />

dock challenges the institutional parameters<br />

of the architecture from its very<br />

moment of entry.<br />

The Core<br />

From here, visitor circulation branches off<br />

and ascends to a lobby space at grade<br />

with the street, pinched between a fragment<br />

of the original structure’s façade,<br />

the metal-as-stone cladding and an interstitial<br />

space, framed in glass, between<br />

the two which houses a café. Program<br />

becomes performance as the circulatory<br />

pathways of the build leverage their<br />

architectural intensity (as opposed to a<br />

more pragmatically blank space such as<br />

an office or gallery) to focus the experience<br />

of traversing the building.<br />

The Storage<br />

These subtle shifts in the relationships<br />

between floorplates and walls provide<br />

spaces of “betweenness” through which<br />

several stairways and elevators slip<br />

between levels to provide different rates<br />

of passage between the building. The<br />

primary visitor route of these becomes<br />

a central core, inhabiting the interstitial<br />

space of the section between the lobby<br />

and the galleries, itself bisecting the conservation<br />

and storage areas of the museum<br />

as it bridges between the ground and<br />

second floors. Moments of interstitiality<br />

create inhabitation in the sectional gray<br />

space typically reserved for institutional<br />

program, storage or mechanical space.<br />

As one passes through this space, the<br />

museum as a curatorial and collecting<br />

space is opened up, framing the experience<br />

of the art viewer not merely as one<br />

of passivity but as one of a kind of active<br />

transience (the art not on exhibition nevertheless<br />

becomes in a way public but<br />

12 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio


14 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Axonometric


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 15


New Wholes<br />

Lamination<br />

Subtleness<br />

Bent<br />

Irrelevance<br />

Composition<br />

Collage<br />

Mere Parts<br />

Leaned<br />

Rotated<br />

(“Boxes Galore”)<br />

Displaced<br />

Architectures (Left to Right):<br />

Heydar Aliyev Center, Zaha Hadid Architects, 2012<br />

Ordos 100, multiple authors, 2012<br />

Chicago Federal Center, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, 1960-1974<br />

Neue Staatsgalerie Stuttgart, James Stirling, 1977-1984<br />

Artworks (Left to Right):<br />

Shaved<br />

Orange Crush, Marylin Minter, 2009<br />

Untitled, Ryan McGinley, 2007<br />

My Bed, Tracey Emin, 1999<br />

Red Relief, Ellsworth Kelly, 2009<br />

Untitled, Kardashian Collage, Shana Sadeghi-Ray, ~2015<br />

the spatial positioning of its enclosure in<br />

relation to the pathway of circulation infers<br />

a kind of reverse performance on the<br />

part of visitors in a kind of institutional<br />

voyeurism). Opportunities for transparency<br />

engage new axial relationships<br />

with the surrounding park and its various<br />

structures while enframing the context<br />

of the experience of vertically moving<br />

through the museum.<br />

The Center<br />

Where the original building provided a<br />

direct, axial Beaux-Arts scheme centered<br />

around a courtyard, the rearrangement<br />

of the museum spaces in this project<br />

creates a charged and ideologically less<br />

certain choreography. Where one wing’s<br />

courtyard fetishizes centrality and the<br />

subject’s subordination to a panoptic<br />

condition of architecture, the other willfully<br />

enforces a constant state of peripheralization.<br />

The core of the new building<br />

is something unable to be experienced<br />

all at once, something that at times faces<br />

the visitor with abstraction and at other<br />

times with intense literality (such as in<br />

the storage spaces) but involved in a<br />

constancy of otherness.<br />

The Regard of Oldness<br />

This does not infer a constant subordination<br />

of the existing architecture or<br />

promote a fetishistic hierarchy between<br />

old and new, but instead proposes that<br />

the careful consideration of one might inform<br />

the capacity of the other to engage<br />

the cultural conversation at hand. For<br />

instance, the repetition of enfilade gallery<br />

spaces in the existing building repeats<br />

across the top level and makes impetus<br />

for skylights.<br />

Providing a wide, open space both performs<br />

the curatorial expectations of the<br />

exhibition spaces and engages the architectural<br />

ambition to establish (in this case<br />

through these skylights) a productively<br />

conversive and uneasy posture between<br />

old and new. It is this very formal repetition<br />

of the poché inferred in the enfilade<br />

through which one pops into the galleries<br />

from below.<br />

(Above) Diagram demarcating the<br />

barriers of subtlety between objects,<br />

attempting to establish a working space<br />

(Right) Interior rendering of<br />

space between public circulation<br />

and institutional storage<br />

16 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio


A constancy of interruption between<br />

spaces reminds one in each moment of<br />

an imminent “otherness”. Not always the<br />

primary focus of a space, there remains<br />

throughout the building slippages of<br />

space, both literally and figuratively that<br />

challenge the assumed boundary conditions<br />

between programmatic, material<br />

and formal conditions. These posit a<br />

state of belonging between old and new,<br />

and within the new itself, that is not necessarily<br />

binaristic. Architecture begins to<br />

blend in for the sake of standing out.<br />

In these terms, the project probes architecture<br />

as a method for producing alternative<br />

means of belonging beyond an<br />

outdated dichotomy between traditional<br />

vernacular and building as something we<br />

might call “object-gift” to the city. Settling<br />

into its situation in a gesture of perhaps<br />

unsettled belonging, it establishes a<br />

series of conversations which reframe its<br />

context, both literally in terms of a neighborhood<br />

and a park and more figuratively<br />

in terms of a culture and a value system.<br />

These concerns highlight the performative<br />

quality of architecture the contemporary<br />

cultural field as a method only for<br />

establishing value but for questioning it<br />

through tightly choreographed interventions,<br />

subtle adjacencies and their consequent<br />

conversational possibilities.<br />

The Core<br />

The circulation “core” does only a few<br />

things, but ponders an execution of such<br />

things in terms of extreme exactitude.<br />

Where sectional variability between the<br />

entrance, storage and exhibition spaces<br />

of the museum reveals only slight dimensional<br />

differences when regarded against<br />

the overall size of the museum itself,<br />

these very minor differences in level<br />

pose extreme problems for the articulation<br />

architectural elements with such<br />

finite requirements as stairs and ramps,<br />

whether those issues be the result of<br />

building codes, ergonomics or otherwise<br />

aesthetic considerations. This represents<br />

a moment of strange efficacy in terms of<br />

generic architectural elements around<br />

the possibility of an immediate adjacency<br />

between basal architectural prerogatives<br />

(such as circulation or code-conformation)<br />

and the very problem of conceiving<br />

(and realizing) an architecture.<br />

A series of alignments and level considerations<br />

become the primary drivers of<br />

the core’s articulation. While these may<br />

be banal in the overall summation of an<br />

architectural work, their manifestation<br />

is directly tied both to the experience of<br />

a building and the general set of possible<br />

influences for its very generation. A<br />

stair or a ramp have within themselves<br />

an entire accompaniment of geometries<br />

governing rise, run, angles, permissible<br />

head heights and widths. These values<br />

are in some sense more than enough in<br />

their combining to produce a believable<br />

building, but moreover in their confabulation<br />

they acquire the ability to produce<br />

an architecture.<br />

If a confabulation is the “disturbance of<br />

memory, defined as the production of<br />

fabricated, distorted or misinterpreted<br />

memories about oneself or the world,<br />

without the conscious intention to deceive”<br />

(Wikipedia), then the arbitration of<br />

these architectural standards (the widths,<br />

heights, spacings and rises-over-runs)<br />

must be the most ubiquitous confabulation<br />

imaginable. They are a confabulation<br />

whose character is completely unavoidable<br />

for the fact that architecture has no<br />

baseline concept of reality against which<br />

to attest a deviation. The first instantiation<br />

of any building is blankness, the<br />

utter absence of constructed material,<br />

and yet the architectural process could<br />

be thought of as standing to compensate<br />

that void.<br />

Moving outside, as the subtly shifted<br />

bars which define the interior project out<br />

into the park, their slight misalignments<br />

begin to consume the disorganization or<br />

the park and justify the immense variety<br />

of local conditions throughout the<br />

block. This aren’t okay when misaligned<br />

if there’s a clear, orthogonal system,<br />

against which everything must answer<br />

for itself constantly. But, if that system<br />

embraces the variability of everything,<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 17


37<br />

27<br />

29<br />

30<br />

32 33<br />

07 14<br />

15 16 18<br />

17<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

05<br />

28<br />

31<br />

06<br />

19<br />

20<br />

09<br />

09<br />

10<br />

08<br />

13<br />

14<br />

07<br />

06<br />

04<br />

26<br />

34<br />

36<br />

35<br />

08<br />

11 12 13<br />

23<br />

24<br />

22<br />

21<br />

20<br />

15<br />

39<br />

38<br />

37<br />

04<br />

05<br />

21<br />

16<br />

46<br />

45<br />

17<br />

44<br />

34<br />

19<br />

43<br />

18<br />

03<br />

40<br />

41<br />

33 31<br />

32<br />

48<br />

47<br />

25<br />

30<br />

29<br />

03<br />

50<br />

49<br />

36<br />

24<br />

52<br />

26<br />

02<br />

42<br />

54<br />

53<br />

51<br />

25<br />

22<br />

01<br />

02<br />

28<br />

56<br />

27<br />

61<br />

59<br />

58<br />

60<br />

57<br />

23<br />

01<br />

55<br />

63<br />

62<br />

01 Rc_A.01<br />

02 -<br />

03 Rc_A.02<br />

04 Rc_A.03<br />

05 Rc_B.01<br />

06 Rc_A.04<br />

07 Rc_A.05<br />

08 Rc_A.08<br />

09 Cr.10<br />

10 Sp_A.03<br />

11 Sp_A.02<br />

12 Cr.08<br />

13 Cr.09<br />

14 Ov_A.01<br />

15 Sp_A.01<br />

16 Sp_A.04<br />

17 Sp_B.04<br />

18 Sp_B.05<br />

Main Entrance Foyer<br />

Concourse to Subway<br />

Main Lobby Ramp<br />

Main Lobby Landing<br />

Main Lobby Exhibition Space<br />

Ticketing and Elevator Bank<br />

Ticketing Booth<br />

Aft Lobby<br />

Lobby Public WC Foyer<br />

Lobby Women's WC<br />

Lobby Men's WC<br />

Ticketing Hallway 1<br />

Ticketing Hallway 2<br />

Ticketing Offices<br />

Coat Check<br />

Lobby Staff WC<br />

Power Unit<br />

Power Control Room<br />

397 m2<br />

-<br />

338 m2<br />

215 m2<br />

323 m2<br />

106 m2<br />

57 m2<br />

165 m2<br />

14 m2<br />

23 m2<br />

21 m2<br />

18 m2<br />

8 m2<br />

20 m2<br />

53 m2<br />

12 m2<br />

51 m2<br />

24 m2<br />

19 Cr.06<br />

20 Ov_C.01<br />

21 Ov_C.02<br />

22 Sp_B.02<br />

23 Sp_B.03<br />

24 Cr.01<br />

25 Ov_B.01<br />

26 Rc_A.06<br />

27 Rc_C.01<br />

28 Sp_A.05<br />

29 Cr.02<br />

30 Cr.12<br />

31 Ov_C.05<br />

32 Sp_A.07<br />

33 Sp_A.08<br />

34 Re_A.01<br />

35 Re_A.06<br />

36 Re_A.05<br />

Lobby Administrative Access Hallway 62 m2<br />

Lobby Storage Room 1<br />

7 m2<br />

Lobby Storage Room 2<br />

7 m2<br />

Deliveries / Loading Dock<br />

334 m2<br />

Equiptment Room<br />

48 m2<br />

Ground Floor Freight Elevtor Lobby 45 m2<br />

Woodshop<br />

63 m2<br />

Education Foyer<br />

250 m2<br />

Main Café Space and Bar<br />

202 m2<br />

Café Kitchen<br />

33 m2<br />

Existing Stairwell North<br />

51 m2<br />

Café WC Access Hallway<br />

48 m2<br />

Library Storage Room<br />

11 m2<br />

Café Men's WC<br />

22 m2<br />

Café Women's WC<br />

22 m2<br />

Library<br />

364 m2<br />

Library Reading Room<br />

55 m2<br />

Library Book Depository<br />

25 m2<br />

38<br />

39<br />

40<br />

41<br />

42<br />

43<br />

44<br />

45<br />

46<br />

47<br />

48<br />

49<br />

50<br />

51<br />

52<br />

53<br />

54<br />

Cr.14<br />

Re_A.07<br />

Cr.13<br />

Rc_A.07<br />

Cr.15<br />

Ed_A.01<br />

Ed_B.04<br />

Ed_B.01<br />

Cr.16<br />

Sp_A.09<br />

Ed_B.05<br />

Ed_B.02<br />

Cr.17<br />

Sp_A.10<br />

Ed_B.06<br />

Ed_B.03<br />

Cr.18<br />

Sp_A.11<br />

Library Office Foyer<br />

Library Office<br />

Library Transitional Space<br />

Courtyard<br />

Education Main Hallway<br />

Lecture Hall (373 seats)<br />

Medium Classroom 1<br />

Small Classroom 1<br />

Education Classroom WC Foyer 1<br />

Classroom WC 1<br />

Medium Classroom 2<br />

Small Classroom 2<br />

Education Classroom WC Foyer 2<br />

Classroom WC 2<br />

Medium Classroom 3<br />

Small Classroom 3<br />

Education Classroom WC Foyer 3<br />

Classroom WC 3<br />

7 m2<br />

16 m2<br />

19 m2<br />

577 m2<br />

238 m2<br />

423 m2<br />

75 m2<br />

53 m2<br />

6 m2<br />

13 m2<br />

68 m2<br />

46 m2<br />

6 m2<br />

13 m2<br />

83 m2<br />

61 m2<br />

6 m2<br />

13 m2<br />

55 Ed_B.07<br />

56 Ed_C.03<br />

57 Cr.03<br />

58 Ed_B.08<br />

59 Cr.19<br />

60 Sp_A.13<br />

61 Sp_A.12<br />

62 Ed_C.02<br />

63 Ed_C.01<br />

Large Classroom<br />

Educational Storage<br />

Existing Stairwell South<br />

Education Breakout Space<br />

Education WC Foyer<br />

Education Women's WC<br />

Education Men's WC<br />

Education Offices Auxiliary<br />

Education Offices Main<br />

127 m2<br />

21 m2<br />

74 m2<br />

136 m2<br />

11 m2<br />

19 m2<br />

18 m2<br />

36 m2<br />

56 m2<br />

18 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Plans (-0,5, +1 and 2)


19<br />

26 25<br />

24<br />

23<br />

04<br />

09<br />

21<br />

22<br />

29<br />

18<br />

08<br />

03<br />

06<br />

05<br />

19<br />

17<br />

20<br />

07<br />

10<br />

02<br />

35<br />

12<br />

16<br />

13<br />

14<br />

01<br />

15<br />

27<br />

11<br />

28<br />

01 Ov_C.06<br />

02 Rc_A.09<br />

03 Cr.23<br />

04 Rc_A.10<br />

05 Rc_A.11<br />

06 Ov_A.04<br />

07 Ov_A.03<br />

08 Ov_A.02<br />

09 Ov_C.07<br />

10 Ov_C.08<br />

11 Ov_A.06<br />

12 Ov_A.07<br />

13 Ov_A.08<br />

14 Ov_A.05<br />

15 Ov_A.09<br />

16 Ov_A.10<br />

17 Ov_A.11<br />

18 Ov_A.12<br />

Collection Storage Vault<br />

844 m2<br />

Storage Foyer<br />

191 m2<br />

Administration West Access Ramp 63 m2<br />

Administration Lobby West 157 m2<br />

Administration Lobby East 233 m2<br />

Administration Workspace South 238 m2<br />

Administration Workspace North 108 m2<br />

Administration Foyer<br />

96 m2<br />

Museography Storage Room 105 m2<br />

Museography Storage Office 14 m2<br />

Small Office 1<br />

11 m2<br />

Small Office 2<br />

11 m2<br />

Small Office 3<br />

10 m2<br />

Conference Room<br />

36 m2<br />

Large Office 1<br />

18 m2<br />

Large Office 2<br />

18 m2<br />

Large Office 3<br />

18 m2<br />

Large Office 4<br />

16 m2<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

29<br />

30<br />

31<br />

32<br />

33<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

Sp_A.14<br />

Sp_A.15<br />

Ov_C.09<br />

Cr.22<br />

Sp_A.17<br />

Sp_A.16<br />

Cr.24<br />

Cr.20<br />

Ov_B.02<br />

Ov_B.04<br />

Cr.25<br />

Ov_B.05<br />

Cr.26<br />

Ov_B.06<br />

Ov_C.11<br />

Ov_B.03<br />

Cr.27<br />

Ov_C.11<br />

Administration Kitchen<br />

25 m2<br />

Administration Private WC<br />

7 m2<br />

Administration Storage<br />

47 m2<br />

Administration East Access Hallway 19 m2<br />

Administration Lobby Women's WC 28 m2<br />

Administration Lobby Men's WC 28 m2<br />

Conservation Area Access Hallway 34 m2<br />

Conservation Freight Elevator Lobby 35 m2<br />

Conservation Workshop 1<br />

231 m2<br />

Conservation Office 1<br />

34 m2<br />

Conservation Transitional Space 29 m2<br />

Conservation Office 2<br />

25 m2<br />

Conservation Workshop 2 Foyer 10 m2<br />

Conservation Office 3<br />

24 m2<br />

Conservation Storage Room 2 7 m2<br />

Conservation Workshop 2<br />

113 m2<br />

East Egress Breakout Space 61 m2<br />

Conservation Storage Room 1 16 m2<br />

01 Ex_E.01<br />

02 Ex_E.02<br />

03 Ex_E.03<br />

04 Ex_E.04<br />

05 Cr.28<br />

06 Sp_A.20<br />

07 Sp_A.19<br />

08 Ov_C.12<br />

09 Ex_B.05<br />

10 Ex_A.05<br />

11 Ex_A.01<br />

12 Ex_A.04<br />

13 Ex_C.01<br />

14 Ex_C.02<br />

15 Ex_A.02<br />

16 Ex_D.01<br />

17 Ex_D.02<br />

18 Ex_D.03<br />

Contemporary Art Hall South 908 m2<br />

Contemporary Art Hall East 617 m2<br />

Contemporary Art Hall West 687 m2<br />

Contemporary Art Hall North 1025 m2<br />

Gallery WC Foyer<br />

6 m2<br />

Gallery Women's WC<br />

22 m2<br />

Gallery Men's WC<br />

26 m2<br />

Cont. Gallery Storage Room<br />

17 m2<br />

Video Projection Room<br />

80 m2<br />

Auxiliary Special Collection Room 99 m2<br />

Textiles Room<br />

228 m2<br />

Silverworks Gallery<br />

331 m2<br />

South Hall Exhibition Space 1 73 m2<br />

South Hall Exhibition Space 2 40 m2<br />

Prado Room<br />

113 m2<br />

Modern Art Hall South<br />

139 m2<br />

Modern Art Hall<br />

148 m2<br />

Modern Art Hall North<br />

139 m2<br />

19 Ex_B.01<br />

20 Ex_B.03<br />

21 Ex_C.03<br />

22 Ex_C.04<br />

23 Ex_B.04<br />

24 Ex_A.03<br />

25 Ov_C.14<br />

26 Ov_C.13<br />

27 Ex_C.05<br />

28 Ov_C.15<br />

29 Ex_D.04<br />

Colonial and Precolumbian Art<br />

Republican Art<br />

North Hall Exhibition Space 1<br />

North Hall Exhibition Space 2<br />

Photography<br />

Drawing Gallery<br />

Drawing Gallery Storage Room 2<br />

Drawing Gallery Storage Room 1<br />

Auxiliary Exhibition Space<br />

Textiles Room Storage Room<br />

Modern Art Foyer<br />

295 m2<br />

251 m2<br />

74 m2<br />

40 m2<br />

113 m2<br />

354 m2<br />

18 m2<br />

18 m2<br />

33 m2<br />

18 m2<br />

185 m2<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 19


27<br />

30<br />

32 33<br />

29<br />

28<br />

31<br />

09<br />

08<br />

11<br />

34<br />

35<br />

36<br />

39<br />

38<br />

37<br />

46<br />

45<br />

44<br />

34<br />

43<br />

40<br />

41<br />

20 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Plan Details<br />

48<br />

47<br />

33 31<br />

32


08<br />

03<br />

07 14<br />

15 16<br />

06<br />

17<br />

18<br />

05<br />

06<br />

19<br />

20<br />

07<br />

10<br />

12 13<br />

23<br />

24<br />

22<br />

21<br />

02<br />

05<br />

04<br />

01<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 21


22 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Render: Circuation and Storage


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Render: Galleries and Circulation<br />

23


Roof<br />

Gallery-accessible patio<br />

Skylights<br />

Long-Span Roof Underside Structure<br />

130cm-depth structural truss<br />

Upper Level<br />

Galleries<br />

Core<br />

Façade Cladding<br />

Perforated Panels<br />

264cm standard width<br />

624.3cm standard (but variable) height<br />

Vierendeel System<br />

Upper Supports<br />

100cm x 60cm W-Sections primary<br />

80cm x 50cm W-Sections secondary<br />

Middle Level<br />

Administration<br />

Collection storage<br />

Conservation workshops<br />

Façade Cladding<br />

Metal Support Structure<br />

45cm x 20cm W-Sections vertically<br />

47.6cm x 23.8cm W-Sections horizontally<br />

10cm x 7.5cm C-Channel sliding connections<br />

12.5cm strut panel connectors<br />

Vierendeel System<br />

Main Crossing Members<br />

60cm x 30cm W-Sections primary horizontally<br />

40cm x 20cm W-Sections secondary horizontally<br />

50cm x 30cm W-Sections vertically<br />

Glass Screen<br />

Support Structure<br />

15cm x 5cm vertical clip struts<br />

10cm x 3cm horizontal tube steel members<br />

15cm x 5cm façade connectors<br />

Vierendeel System<br />

Vertical Supports<br />

100cm x 60cm W-Sections<br />

Lobby Hung Glass Ceiling<br />

526.5cm x 273.4cm standard glazed panels<br />

7.5cm tube steel connection frame<br />

5cm diameter hanging members<br />

Glass Screen<br />

Fritted Glass Panels<br />

350cm standard width<br />

900cm standard (but variable) height<br />

Ground Level<br />

Entrance concourse<br />

Education facilities<br />

Auditorium<br />

Deliveries<br />

24 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Exploded Axonometric of Structure


Subtle<br />

Subtlety<br />

Awkward<br />

~1600 C.E. (mid-16c. as a surname),<br />

sotil, "penetrating; ingenious;<br />

refined" (of the mind);<br />

"sophisticated, intricate, abstruse"<br />

(of arguments)<br />

Imported from Old French sotil,<br />

soutil, subtil "adept, adroit; cunning,<br />

wise; detailed; well-crafted"<br />

Originally Latin subtilis "fine, thin,<br />

delicate, finely woven;" figuratively<br />

"precise, exact, accurate,"<br />

in taste or judgment, "fine, keen,"<br />

of style, "plain, simple, direct,"<br />

from sub "under" + -tilis, from<br />

tela "web, net, warp of a fabric".<br />

~1600 C.E., sotilte, "skill, ingenuity,"<br />

from Old French sotilte "skillfulness,<br />

cunning" (Modern<br />

French subtilité),<br />

Originally Latin subtilitatem<br />

(nominative subtilitas) "fineness;<br />

simplicity, slenderness," noun of<br />

quality from subtilis "fine, thin,<br />

delicate" (see subtle).<br />

First attested in late 14th century<br />

as "cleverness, shrewdness;<br />

trickery, guile, craftiness," also<br />

"thinness, slenderness, smallness;<br />

rarity"<br />

~mid. 1500s C.E., "in the wrong<br />

direction," from awk, "back-handed",<br />

+ adverbial suffix weard.<br />

Meaning "clumsy" first recorded<br />

1520s<br />

→ Awk<br />

From Old Norse ofugr /ofigr /<br />

afigr, “turned backwards”, from<br />

which also come Danish avet,<br />

“backwards”, and Swedish avig,<br />

“turned backwards”<br />

Cognate with German äbich, and<br />

Gothic ibuks, “turned back”; Akin<br />

to Sanskrit अपाच् (apāc), “turned<br />

away”<br />

Subtlety<br />

in space<br />

Subtlety in angle<br />

Overall Disposition<br />

Minutia, Detail<br />

Endgame<br />

Means<br />

Object-Object Relations<br />

Nonsuperlative Statement<br />

Nonhierarchical Adjacency<br />

Subject-Object Relations<br />

Value Judgement<br />

Social Transgression<br />

Photos: Ruedi Walti, BBC, Hiroshi Sugimoto<br />

Etymologies: Etymonline, Wiktionary<br />

then the disorder of the park itself becomes<br />

an asset.<br />

Scales of Institutional Experience<br />

There should be two nearly distinct<br />

yet intertwined circulatory systems.<br />

The main system is a series of roughly<br />

4-meter wide ramps which wind down<br />

through the galleries, bisecting the storage<br />

space and administrative areas as<br />

they trudge down through the tertiary<br />

core (a lightwell, of sorts) of the building.<br />

Somewhat intertwined yet in more<br />

intimate spaces, 2-meter stairs offer short<br />

cuts between spaces, bridging the further<br />

removed programmatic areas, such<br />

as education to administration. One set<br />

of spaces offers the “public” experience<br />

of the institution as a singular, communal<br />

place in all its ‘placyness’, while<br />

the second provides for more solipsistic,<br />

individuated experiences by virtue of its<br />

more intimate scale and more expedient<br />

circulatory routes. The contemporary art<br />

museum is architecturally a space expected<br />

to deliver somewhat paradoxically<br />

on these distinct levels of experience.<br />

Where circulation can come to underline<br />

this capacity of architecture<br />

Architecture and Freedom<br />

We expect certain standards of our<br />

democratic instructions, such as universal<br />

treatment standards and bureaucratic<br />

transparency. Such exulting expectations<br />

of public institutions have in a<br />

way become aestheticized into a series<br />

of rather representational maneuvers,<br />

extending all the way into architecture.<br />

A prognosis of contemporary design in<br />

the public realm reveals a ubiquitous, yet<br />

unspoken, cadaver of material, organizational<br />

and infrastructural tendencies<br />

that proclaim the democratic values of<br />

our buildings. Far from truly denoting<br />

the internalized veneration of democracy<br />

that a building’s occupants might stand<br />

for, these are often a top-level gloss that<br />

(Above) Diagram of the differences<br />

between subtlety and awkwardness,<br />

both of which deal in terms of particular<br />

slight differences between things<br />

merely performs its support for liberatory<br />

politics. That bureaucratic office buildings<br />

in China, Russia, the United States<br />

and Germany might all look rather similar<br />

only proves the fallacy that we can indicate<br />

the progressiveness of a society in<br />

stone, metal and glass.<br />

While it may seem contradictory, this is<br />

not to undermine the innumerable investments<br />

made by certain architectural<br />

movements in the name of progressive<br />

architecture, particularly the Modernists.<br />

A great many Modern buildings<br />

do indeed (or rather did indeed in their<br />

prospective times) successfully align the<br />

materiality and organizational qualities<br />

of their architecture with political trends.<br />

This eloquent complexity can be found in<br />

Modernism’s dual capacity to represent<br />

in nearly identical maneuvers at once the<br />

transparency and freedom of Neimeyer’s<br />

work in Brasilia and Terragni’s work for<br />

the Italian Fascists. The problem contemporary<br />

architecture runs into which is<br />

successfully avoided in these examples<br />

is a misalignment between expressed<br />

political intent and the actuality of a<br />

building’s situation.<br />

A glass façade’s ability to express transparency<br />

makes only pathetic ripples<br />

in its wake if the institution behind its<br />

curtain wall is the American government’s<br />

National Security Agency. Until<br />

actual political change can take place,<br />

the architectural intent of this element is<br />

merely ironic and consequentially unsuccessful.<br />

This contextuality is precisely the<br />

reason why a fairly elected Italian city<br />

council can adequately perform its expected<br />

democratic functions in a building<br />

the origins of which hail from the wartime<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 25


Façade Cladding<br />

Perforated Panels<br />

264cm standard width<br />

624.3cm standard (but variable) height<br />

Façade Cladding<br />

Metal Support Structure<br />

45cm x 20cm W-Sections vertically<br />

47.6cm x 23.8cm W-Sections horizontally<br />

10cm x 7.5cm C-Channel sliding connections<br />

12.5cm strut panel connectors<br />

Long-Span Roof Undersid<br />

130cm-depth structural trus<br />

26 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Structure Axonometric (Details)<br />

Vie<br />

Ver<br />

100<br />

Vierendeel Sy<br />

Upper Suppor


Vierendeel System<br />

Upper Supports<br />

100cm x 60cm W-Sections primary<br />

80cm x 50cm W-Sections secondary<br />

t<br />

Roof<br />

Gallery-accessible patio<br />

Skylights<br />

Middle Level<br />

Administration<br />

Collection storage<br />

Conservation workshops<br />

Vierendeel System<br />

Main Crossing Members<br />

60cm x 30cm W-Sections primary horizontally<br />

40cm x 20cm W-Sections secondary horizontally<br />

50cm x 30cm W-Sections vertically<br />

Glass Screen<br />

Support Structure<br />

15cm x 5cm vertical clip<br />

10cm x 3cm horizontal<br />

15cm x 5cm façade con<br />

e Structure<br />

s<br />

Upper Level<br />

Galleries<br />

Core<br />

Vierendeel System<br />

Vertical Supports<br />

100cm x 60cm W-Sections<br />

Lobby Hung Glass Ceiling<br />

526.5cm x 273.4cm standard glazed panels<br />

7.5cm tube steel connection frame<br />

5cm diameter hanging members<br />

Glass Screen<br />

Fritted Glass Panels<br />

350cm standard width<br />

900cm standard (but va<br />

stem<br />

ts<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 27<br />

Ground Level<br />

Entrance concourse


28 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Model Photographs


Fascist construction campaign. It is the<br />

reason for which one might have a picnic<br />

at the Nuremburg Rally Grounds without<br />

indulging in the politics of the Nazi<br />

Party. A building is only as valuable as<br />

its political underpinnings, or rather the<br />

extent to which its continued inhabitation<br />

repudiates those foundations (such as in<br />

the case of the Rally Grounds or the civic<br />

buildings of Mussolini’s Italy).<br />

We must at once hold steadfast the trial<br />

by which architecture is kept to a strict<br />

moral code and allow for the slippage<br />

of this code to the extent that we might<br />

question the presumed expectations this<br />

forces us to enact on an architecture.<br />

Why do we continue to create building<br />

which so thoroughly fail to represent the<br />

progressive values of our age? Conversely,<br />

why do we expect architecture<br />

to free us? This is surely too tall an order<br />

and identifies the ultimate irony that<br />

proclaimed the downfall of High Modernism.<br />

If the sheer starkness of the difference<br />

between the Barbican’s tumultuous<br />

exaltation into architectural stardom and<br />

nearby Robin Hood Garden’s dilapidation<br />

alongside London’s docklands does not<br />

elucidate the point clearly enough, we<br />

must look harder to realize that architecture<br />

is ultimately subservient to the<br />

respective capabilities of its financers to<br />

provide for the proper services, maintenance<br />

and larger democratic ideals by<br />

which it thrives or in the lack of which it<br />

ruinates.<br />

Subtle Deviations between<br />

Architectural Elements<br />

Presumption frames everything in the<br />

field of one’s experience. In the same<br />

way, each architectural element comes<br />

alongside a series of expected functions,<br />

aesthetics and positions relative to the<br />

other systems which define a building.<br />

These ingrained complacencies<br />

of circumstance dictate a great deal of<br />

how we perceive the built environment,<br />

a stalemate status quo against which<br />

“radical” architecture has spent the<br />

majority of the last half century resisting,<br />

undermining and perverting in the name<br />

of producing a truly new architecture.<br />

This precipice has, time and time again,<br />

proven reticent to be crossed. Ostensibly<br />

radical architecture has focused almost<br />

solely on the foreground of human perception,<br />

at once ignoring the subtleties of<br />

the periphery and overwhelmingly failing<br />

to undertake the task of addressing political,<br />

economic and social concerns.<br />

About Subtlety<br />

Perhaps the thesis isn’t so much about<br />

overall subtlety, but an approach which<br />

takes each architectural element into<br />

account on its own scale. What would be<br />

the subtle manipulations of the standard<br />

architectural elements (a floor, a wall or a<br />

column) which would gently push them<br />

far enough beyond the typical boundaries<br />

of normative perception but within<br />

the borders of reconcilability as their<br />

own distinct elements? E.g. one needs to<br />

recognize something as a column prior<br />

(Below) West elevation showing<br />

the relationship between the glass<br />

screen, the removed façade and<br />

the fake stone panels behind<br />

(Right) Oblique axonometric drawing<br />

showing the organizational shifts<br />

between different architectural<br />

elements that produce ambiguity<br />

in the building’s organization<br />

30 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio West Elevation


Vierendeel Truss Supports<br />

Original East Façade<br />

Secondary Egress<br />

Core and Skylights<br />

Adminsitration Shortcut<br />

Gallery Egress<br />

New Façade<br />

Original Façade, Repositioned<br />

Skewed Building Layers<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Axonometric of Internal Shifts<br />

31


2 4 6 8<br />

8 7 6 5<br />

1 3 5 7<br />

Architectural End Matching<br />

1 2 3 4<br />

Panel End Matching<br />

Book Matching<br />

1_1 1_2 1_3<br />

Eight-Piece Sunburst Matching<br />

Box Matching<br />

Herringbone (V-Book) Matching<br />

2_1 2_2 2_3<br />

Continuous End Matching<br />

32 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Stone Material Studies


Slip Matching<br />

Random Matching<br />

1_4 1_5 1_6<br />

Reverse (End Grain) Box Matching<br />

Parquet Matching<br />

2_4 2_5 2_6<br />

Reverse Diamond Matching<br />

Swing Matching<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 33


5<br />

4<br />

13<br />

3<br />

14<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Section: Vertical Compression of Institutional Space<br />

34 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Section: Vertical Hierarchy of Spaces


6 7 8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11 12<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

-<br />

Rc_A.02<br />

Ov_C.06<br />

Ex_E.02<br />

Ex_E.01<br />

Ex_D.04<br />

Ex_C.01<br />

Concourse to Subway<br />

Main Lobby Ramp<br />

Collection Storage Vault<br />

Contemporary Art Hall East<br />

Contemporary Art Hall South<br />

Modern Art Foyer<br />

South Hall Exhibition Space 1<br />

-<br />

338 m2<br />

844 m2<br />

617 m2<br />

908 m2<br />

185 m2<br />

73 m2<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

Ex_C.02<br />

Ex_B.03<br />

Ed_A.01<br />

Ed_C.03<br />

Ed_B.07<br />

Ov_B.02<br />

Sp_B.0<br />

South Hall Exhibition Space 2<br />

Republican Art<br />

Lecture Hall<br />

Educational Storage<br />

Large Classroom<br />

Conservation Workshop 1<br />

Loading Dock<br />

40 m2<br />

251 m2<br />

423 m2<br />

21 m2<br />

127 m2<br />

231 m2<br />

143 m2<br />

1:200<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 35


36 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Model Photograph: Galleries


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photograph: Glass Screen<br />

37


5 6<br />

8 9 7<br />

3 4<br />

2<br />

1<br />

1 - Concourse to Subway<br />

-<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Rc_A.03<br />

Rc_A.09<br />

Ov_C.06<br />

Main Lobby Landing<br />

Storage Foyer<br />

Collection Storage Vault<br />

215 m2<br />

191 m2<br />

844 m2<br />

5 Ex_E.04 Contemporary Art Hall North 1025 m2<br />

6 Ex_E.01 Contemporary Art Hall South 908 m2<br />

7 Rc_A.10 Administration Lobby West<br />

157 m2<br />

8 Ov_C.07 Museography Storage Room 105 m2<br />

Section: Vertical Procession 9 Ov_C.08 Museography Storage Office<br />

14 m2 1:200<br />

7<br />

4 5 6 8 9<br />

10<br />

14 13 12<br />

15<br />

11<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

1 - Concourse to Subway<br />

- m2 9 Ex_D.02 Modern Art Hall<br />

148 m2<br />

2 Rc_A.02 Main Lobby Ramp<br />

338 m2 10 Ex_B.03 Republican Art<br />

251 m2<br />

3 Cr.15 Education Main Hallway<br />

238 m2 11 Sp_B.03 Equiptment Room<br />

48 m2<br />

4 Ex_E.03 Contemporary Art Hall West 687 m2 12 Cr.23 Administration Access Ramp 63 m2<br />

5 Ex_E.02 Contemporary Art Hall East<br />

617 m2 13 Ov_C.10 Conservation Storage Room 1 16 m2<br />

6 Ex_B.04 Photography<br />

113 m2 14 Cr.24 Conservation Area Access Hallway 34 m2<br />

7 Ov_C.121 Contemporary Art Gallery Storage 17 m2 15 Rc_A.11 Administration Lobby East<br />

233 m2<br />

Section: Contrasting Centers 8 Ex_B.02 Colonial Art<br />

149 m2<br />

1:200<br />

38 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Sections


to one’s recognition that it is a strange,<br />

unfamiliar or otherwise distinct column.<br />

Speaking economically, to what extent<br />

does this undermine or substantiate the<br />

value claim for expensive design? Political<br />

stances would presume that luxurious<br />

design is unsavory, but to what extent<br />

do expense and luxury as uncommon<br />

characteristic to an architecture deviate<br />

it from the norm? Where is the border<br />

between a normative, but expensive,<br />

building by Annabelle Selldorf and one<br />

is both abnormal and expensive, such<br />

as the more innovative sides of Zaha<br />

Hadid’s work?<br />

Where Subtlety Places Us<br />

We often think of architecture as paradoxically<br />

lodged between immediate and<br />

hinesight states of perception, creating<br />

totalizing environments and yet obfuscated<br />

to the pedestrian act providing inhabitable<br />

space. Always either battle cry or<br />

whisper, architecture seldom ‘just barely’<br />

positions itself within the world. This unexplored<br />

territory could be described as<br />

a subtle posture towards existence. While<br />

clearly demarcated identities are productive<br />

in their distinguishability, subtlety<br />

allows the simultaneous existence of two<br />

conditions within immediate self-adjacency<br />

to the extent that they engage a<br />

delicate contrapposto without flattening<br />

or laminating into a new whole.<br />

Rejecting forthright coherence, this tension<br />

between dichotomy and sameness<br />

allows architecture to stage conversions<br />

between things about identity and comparative<br />

value. This methodology undermines<br />

the simplicity of mere binary juxtapositions<br />

to acknowledge the complexity<br />

and ambiguity in conditions of subtle<br />

difference, arguably more attuned to our<br />

contemporary perceptions of identity. As<br />

early explorations employ slight adjustments<br />

on a grid to problematize conditions<br />

of joinery and coincidence between<br />

parts, the subsequent prerogative of this<br />

thesis shifts focus towards an interrogation<br />

of new readings found in the<br />

resultant subtleties of the forms through<br />

abstractions inherent to the process of<br />

representation, such as lighting exposure<br />

and blurriness.<br />

These new almost-wholes obfuscate singular<br />

reading to refute the demand that<br />

they assemble into cathartic objects —<br />

that is, they refuse to provide the viewer<br />

the traditionally clear or uncluttered<br />

comprehension in how they perceive the<br />

object. Part-to-part relationships taper to<br />

precarious tangencies rather than clear<br />

resolutions so that the reading of the object<br />

itself is constantly held at a distance,<br />

just beyond immediacy but within a<br />

blurry margin of error for ossifying one’s<br />

understanding of the object.<br />

Pondering the Lima Exposition Hall<br />

What is it? The current exposition hall<br />

that houses the Lima Museum of Art is a<br />

standard, rather generic late nineteenth<br />

century structure. It’s architecture is<br />

one positioned midway between sheer<br />

industrial efficiency and late neoclassical<br />

ornamentation, as evidenced in the<br />

strange coexistence of its rigid (yet heavily<br />

ornamented) iron column structural<br />

grid alongside a series of more traditional<br />

gallery spaces secured between<br />

the columns by permanent yet mostly<br />

superfluous, in terms of structural capacity,<br />

dividing walls. This condition produces<br />

an odd relationship in the existing<br />

structure between underlying structural<br />

strategies and more architecturally considered<br />

spaces. These two languages are<br />

not quite indifferent from one another yet<br />

retain a certain kind of ambivalence. Iron<br />

columns puncture dramatically through<br />

spaces typically reserved for a higher<br />

degree of spatial independence, such<br />

as circulatory hallways and entrance<br />

lobbies. For the most part, columns fail<br />

to align to walls not in an act of sheer<br />

ambivalence but remain uncomfortably<br />

nearby, as if set to a grid accidentally<br />

placed in slight disposition. More aptly<br />

described as siblings than mere neighbors,<br />

the two systems function as if they<br />

were Spanish and Italian, retaining a certain<br />

degree of mutual intelligibility while<br />

pronouncing distinct characteristics<br />

that are, in themselves, defined by their<br />

almost-but-not-quite perfect adjacency.<br />

Where is it? This mutual condition of<br />

strangely contingent ambivalence is in no<br />

way unfamiliar to Lima, a city startled between<br />

a series of seemingly oppositional<br />

forces. Such dichotomies as mountains<br />

and sea, wealth and poverty or Pre-<br />

Columbian and Colonial are the innate<br />

foundations of cultural identity for the<br />

city, predisposing its urbanity to become<br />

a cacophony of qualities, much akin to<br />

various other Latin American cities. Unlike<br />

its counterparts, Lima’s urbanistic<br />

history produces a variety of adjacency<br />

between different eras that runs horizontally,<br />

rather than along the vertical axis.<br />

While a place of considerable wealth and<br />

influence, Pre-Columbian settlements<br />

throughout the valleys currently woven<br />

with Lima’s sprawling suburbs primarily<br />

relied on irrigation systems to feed wide<br />

swaths of crops, focusing urban development<br />

less on clustered places of inhabitation<br />

than on singular religious sites to<br />

unite people located somewhat sparsely<br />

across farmlands. The city that became<br />

the Lima one currently understands<br />

was established among, not above, this<br />

situation in 1535. Because the city came<br />

to contend for space horizontally, rather<br />

than through the more typical process of<br />

vertical overlay witnessed in Mexico City<br />

or Paris, Lima retains a certain degree<br />

of heterogeneous sprawl. Ancient sites,<br />

both those celebrated culturally and<br />

neglected, dot the city’s landscape and<br />

intertwine between more recent architectural<br />

interventions. Many of the original<br />

Pre-Incan waterways were either filled<br />

in or forgotten historically to become<br />

geological ghosts in a forgotten lineage<br />

of seemingly prehistoric conception.<br />

What does it want to be? You’re unsure<br />

what space you’re in… so what? How<br />

does this spatial experience correspond<br />

the contemporary art gallery in a way<br />

that undermines the less progressive tendencies<br />

of the commercial art endeavor<br />

in a gallery context?<br />

Learning from Grammar<br />

Grammar absolves language from the<br />

burden of structure, leaving it instead to<br />

address purely the production of meaning.<br />

That is, a grammatical set of inflections<br />

defines for the speaker the precise<br />

intention of every word in a sentence.<br />

A particular examination of the nominal<br />

declensions of the Indo-European variety<br />

exemplifies this point:<br />

Ich sehe den Mann.<br />

Der Mann sieht mich.<br />

Above, the German language specifically<br />

annotates the declension of the noun<br />

“den Mann” (“the man”) as to be object<br />

of the sentence by changing its definite<br />

article from “der”, which denotes the<br />

nominative, or subject, of the sentence, to<br />

“den”, marking the accusative, or object.<br />

Thus, the sentence subtly differentiates<br />

the meanings of “I see than man” from<br />

“the man sees me” using, among other<br />

things, acute inflections of the grammatical<br />

syntax and vocabulary to deliver<br />

a point to be understood. Consider the<br />

Latin sentences for “I see the girl” and<br />

“the girl sees me”:<br />

Ego puellam video.<br />

Puella me videt.<br />

Inflecting the noun itself, Latin annotates<br />

the girl’s position as either direct object<br />

or subject through an inflectional morphing<br />

of the very noun itself. Nonetheless,<br />

the root word retains its legibility as “girl”.<br />

We might say that “girl”, in an abstractly<br />

distant sense, linguistically stands ready<br />

to take on its meaning. It is a kind of<br />

empty signifier awaiting its delegated<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 39


40 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Render: East Façade from Park


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 41


(animation)<br />

vimeo.com/<br />

215492926<br />

42 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 43


position within the semiotic context of<br />

a sentence. This pattern of inflectional<br />

morphologies permeates all languages,<br />

be they Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan or<br />

Semitic. Their significance relies on the<br />

simultaneous recognization of basic abstract<br />

units (“girl”) and complex morphological<br />

alterations (“puella” to “puellam”).<br />

Far from foreign to the production of<br />

cultural meaning in architecture, art and<br />

This quality resounds rather akin to the<br />

semiotic implications of both architectural<br />

elements (doors, windows, thresholds)<br />

and their derived spaces. The arousal of<br />

the architectural diagram and projective<br />

space alike over the past few decades<br />

only further elude this point. Descriptive<br />

geometry is its own kind of grammar,<br />

a conceptually subterranean structure<br />

to which the justification of a space is<br />

beholden.<br />

Precisely for this reason, a grammatical<br />

understanding of architecture’s creation<br />

benefits the discourse of the profession<br />

by loosening the perhaps selfish will<br />

towards intuitively and by advocating<br />

for the establishment a framework of<br />

abstract bases (think “girl”) from which<br />

more complex and appropriate spaces<br />

can be derived. Each of these qualities<br />

inherently equip architecture with a<br />

political stance by which to address the<br />

challenges of design and building in the<br />

early to mid 21st century.<br />

Addressing the first condition, we must<br />

accept that we have arrived at this<br />

period of architectural discourse in the<br />

wake of a violent acceleration in design.<br />

The skyrocketing success of a minority<br />

of practitioners in the second half of<br />

the 20th century fueled a fantasy of the<br />

“starchitect”, specifically rooted in the<br />

notion that he was one who had reached<br />

the apotheosis of his work. The pronouns<br />

of this exclamation are italicized to contest<br />

the patriarchal tendencies that this<br />

incredulous behavior lauded.<br />

With a handful of exceptions, the rise of<br />

the starchitect’s intuitive and individualistic<br />

approach to design, the notion that<br />

only he could deliver a project of such<br />

caliber and expertise, benefitted merely<br />

a class of privileged male architects who<br />

represented overwhelmingly the at times<br />

oppressive majorities of their respective<br />

nationalities. Their projects found themselves<br />

equally at home under oppressive<br />

regimes across vast swaths of humanity<br />

and in the high fashion boutiques that<br />

service the elite few with unaffordable,<br />

albeit well designed, luxury commodities.<br />

Starchitecture is parallel to the will of<br />

enforcing one’s vision onto others. The<br />

branding of architecture by firms’ recognizable<br />

brand identities and myopic prerogatives<br />

has lead the field unknowingly<br />

into the esoteric grumbling of irrelevance.<br />

Though these characteristics specifically<br />

indict neither intuitively nor artistry in design<br />

as the perpetrators of these trends, it<br />

casts them as willing accomplices to the<br />

criminals. There is therefore a political<br />

necessity to move away from the “finding<br />

one’s voice” model of architectural practice<br />

towards a more abstract, universal<br />

theology, if we might call it that, of design<br />

that stresses nuanced intention and<br />

restrained evocation on the part of the<br />

designer. Subtly is the design language of<br />

humility, and a grammar of architecture is<br />

the method by which this is calibrated.<br />

These injunctions against architecture<br />

seek the foundation of a new architectural<br />

project aligned with the universalist<br />

attitudes once exulted by the industry’s<br />

foremost figures. An inclination towards<br />

a grammatical understanding of the<br />

construction of space is the first step in<br />

the proposition of this framework. It is a<br />

provocation to democratize the conception<br />

of space into a process-based series<br />

of morphological permutations on basic<br />

elements (as any grammar does to its<br />

constituent parts) so that neither the basal<br />

unit nor its derived offspring wander<br />

too far from familiar comprehension.<br />

Both “puella” and “puellam” function<br />

to deliver their meanings to the reader<br />

or listener, yet both respect the basic<br />

premise that those who understand the<br />

language ought to hold the tools for<br />

deriving the meaning of the sentence. A<br />

stance towards grammar for architecture<br />

sees the developments of the past few<br />

decades as less of a language and more<br />

of a barbaric shouting match between<br />

unfamiliar adversaries. Unfortunately,<br />

architecture has foregone the semiotic<br />

commonalities of previous eras’ styles for<br />

a cacophony individual expression.<br />

The communities of design expression<br />

that we find in turn-of-the-century Chicago<br />

or postwar Japanese metabolism<br />

are indicative of collaborative practices<br />

establishing grammars of their own.<br />

These syntactical playbooks are thus<br />

introduced as items of cultural production<br />

for which a common understanding<br />

among both architects and the public<br />

can be established. This is their primary<br />

mode of communication.<br />

It is therefore absolutely parallel to an<br />

architecture affronted by its own impotence<br />

that it work steadfastly to reform<br />

its mode of expression. The grammatical<br />

understanding of basic forms and their<br />

repetitively ruled abstractions posits less<br />

of a formal answer to this dilemma than a<br />

provocation towards one. It is at once the<br />

call for an architecture that seeks to matter<br />

rather than to express, an architecture<br />

that exudes nuance rather than singularity<br />

and an architecture that emerges in<br />

lieu of cultural production rather than<br />

individual recognition.<br />

44 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio


400% 300%<br />

200% 100%<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Halftone Studies<br />

45


46 Lima Museum of Art Thesis Studio Model Photograph: Façade Articulation


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photograph: Circulation to Gallery<br />

47


PASEO PENASCO HOUSE<br />

4A Studio<br />

Fall 2015, Ramiro Diaz-Granados<br />

This project was specially selected to be<br />

featured in SCI-Arc’s Spring Show 2016.<br />

Our relationship with the architecture of<br />

the home has often been one of selfafirmation.<br />

Man becomes master of his<br />

domain, his property, his home. It is with<br />

more than a mere etymological bond<br />

that entangles architecture (the “domus”)<br />

domesticity. Domesticity is an explicit<br />

problem of Architecture. It’s about time<br />

that architecture decenter, destabilize<br />

and decouple the numbly comfortable<br />

proximity between our expectations of a<br />

space and its realization through material,<br />

form and content. This is an argument<br />

for an architecture which prolongs the<br />

sensorial exposure between the subject<br />

and a space, which draws out our comprehension<br />

of what’s before us in order<br />

to suspend the complacencies we have<br />

come to expect of a home. More than the<br />

mere quest for an unfamiliar building, this<br />

excavates the possibility of a space that<br />

challenges domesticity and the presumptions,<br />

malices and addictions that come<br />

along with it.<br />

We sometimes presume that a house<br />

exists to attend to us. We subordinate the<br />

architecture to a certain kind of servitude<br />

to our latent cultural expectations.<br />

Foyers are for collecting the many shoes<br />

we’ve bought for our family, bay windows<br />

are for gazing across the lawn onto our<br />

colleagues, who by chance inhabit an<br />

identical but differently painted version<br />

of our dream. We are Behr Premium Plus<br />

#M270-3 Cream Custard, they are Benjamin<br />

Moore Opal Essence 680 – no more,<br />

no less. Perhaps, a house might aspire<br />

not be the backdrop to our homely fantasies<br />

but to engage us as people, subjects<br />

capable to thinking as they establish<br />

independent, experience-driven positions<br />

within the world.<br />

This is therefore a problem of displacing<br />

the centrality of a space and our<br />

anticipations for it. This is about creating<br />

a space for living that protracts the<br />

immediacy of what we expect. Edges,<br />

corners and cusps draw back just as they<br />

capture our attention to invert the affinity<br />

in legibility between a form and its contours.<br />

While a clear, geometric foundation<br />

provides a framework for us to nurture<br />

an understanding of what we encounter,<br />

the rules of the game quickly unravel at<br />

the very moment we presume they have<br />

exhausted their explanatory potential –<br />

a wall torts into a ceiling and then into<br />

a floor, a rectangular opening on one<br />

side of a partition squirms around into<br />

a figural yet ambiguous slice along the<br />

other. The typical repertoire of architectural<br />

elements defy obedience in order to<br />

confront the form-function connotations<br />

we have confined them to.<br />

Every moment of this house is calibrated<br />

to its ability at performing these tasks. A<br />

winding driveway cuts slowly between an<br />

artificial ground and an existing topography,<br />

prolonging the full perception of the<br />

building’s tilted bars and supple tangencies.<br />

The individual perspective is constantly<br />

made incapable of gathering the<br />

totality of what we encounter. Even once<br />

we do manage to confront the it, a series<br />

of tightly choreographed moves fracture<br />

our capacity to understand the house<br />

in its whole from any one angle. The<br />

alignment of windows across masses,<br />

the conic stitching of their intersections<br />

and unexpected seam languages these<br />

produce all obscure concrete readings.<br />

What appears to be two bars from one<br />

perspective dissolves into two in another.<br />

Where we thought we found an edge, we<br />

move only slightly to reveal that it is actually<br />

a smooth transition along two faces.<br />

In doing so, this project posits that the<br />

line between form and shape is not tensile<br />

and crisp but swerving and blurred.<br />

The legibility of any “proper” shape is<br />

thoroughly withheld to the extent that<br />

we never manage to assemble a singular<br />

reading. Clearly defined bars entangle<br />

with one another such that we are incapable<br />

of enumerating exactly how many<br />

bars there are. On the interior, rectangular<br />

voids slice through deep poché to<br />

emerge as figural profiles. The encounter<br />

between the subject and the house<br />

becomes a cinematic experience. One is<br />

provoked to reorient oneself, to crosscheck<br />

constantly a fluid understanding of<br />

the house’s nature, and thus also of the<br />

nature of its modes of inhabitation and<br />

its content. In the place of social center<br />

like the fireplace or the living room, one<br />

instead finds circulation.<br />

The home becomes a realm of withheld<br />

expectations, a space which continually<br />

displaces itself at the very moment we<br />

believe we have come truly to perceive it.<br />

These methods recast the typified roles<br />

of a house and thus liberate its inhabitants<br />

from the overwrought narrative that<br />

domesticity asserts on the home. We<br />

explore a space of uprooted expectations,<br />

uneasy forms and non-conventional programming<br />

in the hopes that we productively<br />

disorient ourselves, that when we<br />

do come to realize what our home might<br />

be, we see anew its resistance to be defined,<br />

its refusal to be dogmatized.<br />

(Above) Conceptual process of geometry<br />

joinery between intersected bars<br />

(Right) Rendering of building on site<br />

showing the dialectic of the groundplane,<br />

where the surrounding site represents<br />

untouched nature, the natural growth<br />

curated in the slots portrays a fake nature<br />

of sorts, and piles of chrome spheres<br />

complete the triad with total artificiality.<br />

50


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Large Scale Physical Chunk Model<br />

53


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Elevations<br />

55


56 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio<br />

Large Scale Physical Chunk Model<br />

Details


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 57


1<br />

3 2<br />

4<br />

Drawing Key<br />

1 Guest Bedroom 1<br />

2 Central Foyer Hallway<br />

3 Central Foyer Landing<br />

4 Parking<br />

1 : 60<br />

2<br />

1<br />

3 4<br />

Drawing Key<br />

1 Kitchen<br />

2 Central Foyer<br />

3 Parking Entrance<br />

4 Footpath Entrance<br />

58 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Sections


7<br />

6<br />

2<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

1<br />

11<br />

8<br />

10<br />

9<br />

Drawing Key<br />

1 Central Foyer 613 ft 2<br />

2 Dining Room 225 ft 2<br />

3 Kitchen 157 ft 2<br />

4 Pantry 50 ft 2<br />

5 Den 403 ft 2<br />

6 Den Full Bath 65 ft 2<br />

7 Guest Bedroom 1 481 ft 2<br />

8 Guest Bath 25 ft 2<br />

9 Guest Bedroom 2 439 ft 2<br />

10 Master Bedroom 608 ft 2<br />

11 Master Bath 47 ft 2<br />

3113 ft 2<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Main Plan<br />

59


60 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Slitscan of Center Staircase


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 61


62 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Center Void Construction Geometry


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Cener Void Model Photos<br />

63


64 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Abstract Core Physical Model


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 65


66 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Structural Strategies


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 67


68 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Center Stair


Primary Ring Structure<br />

7”X7” Steel Tube members<br />

Tertiary Supports<br />

6.5”x2” W-Section members<br />

Ceiling Covering<br />

Corian Skin Primary Support<br />

Laterally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />

Corian Skin Secondary Support<br />

Longitudinally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />

Corian Skin Primary Support<br />

Laterally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />

Vertical Secondary Support to Upper Support Connectors<br />

Corian Panel to Secondary Support Connectors<br />

Laterally spanning Unistrut P2000 channels<br />

Hung Corian Panels<br />

Interior Wall Covering<br />

Interior Partitions<br />

8” Standard Stud Walls<br />

Skin slits<br />

3/16” tubes or milled indentations<br />

aligned at 1” on center<br />

Skin panels<br />

8”metal panels<br />

Aperture Strategy<br />

Skin slits gather around apertures, arbitrating the reading<br />

of the conic geometries in the surface treatment around<br />

apertures. While other areas of the skin have a more subtle<br />

reflection, the slits accentuate the curvature of the massing<br />

around the apertures.<br />

Skin Panelization<br />

Major divisions subdivide along edges to produce<br />

new figuralities along the envelope, sometimes<br />

seaming between corners and folds to unite the<br />

mass while at other times dividing it or accentuating<br />

interior apertures.<br />

Primary Ring Structure<br />

7”x7” Steel Tube Members<br />

Primary Corss Bracing<br />

7”x10” Steel Tube Members<br />

Tertiary Vertical Structure<br />

6.5”x2” W-Section Members<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Exploded Chunk<br />

69


70 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio 3D Printed Center Void and Staircase


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 71


72 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 73


74 Paseo Penasco House 4A Studio Aperture Construction Geometry


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 75


ODD BLOCKS<br />

4A Studio<br />

Fall 2015, Ramiro Diaz-Granados<br />

This project explored a seriesof possible<br />

bar aggregations as the platform for<br />

further development into an architectural<br />

project.<br />

Initial explorations dealt specifically with<br />

the issue of the center. How might abstract<br />

aggregations of geometric primitives<br />

begin to speak to the architectural<br />

ramifications of displaced or misregistered<br />

centers? Given the eventual typological<br />

goal of the project to be a single<br />

family home, how could inferences into<br />

the center begin to offer programmatic or<br />

formal manipulations on our understanding<br />

of centerhood which might speak to<br />

the political and social ramifications of<br />

altering the default condition of how we<br />

arrange our homes?<br />

For each object, a ground plane was also<br />

developed which furthered the concepts<br />

at hand in the massing. Throughout the<br />

series, a theme of awkwardness and<br />

misfitting came forward as a means by<br />

which the formal legibility of the bar<br />

typology could be read against the static<br />

nature of a ground. Filleted edges and<br />

strange alignments prompted questions<br />

of legibility. Does one see three intersected<br />

bars which avoid one another or four<br />

bent bars that entangle?<br />

Explorations of multiple centers began<br />

to entice a displacement of the center.<br />

Rather than a singular void, the multiple<br />

involution of the massing onto itself allows<br />

a distinctly difficult reading of the<br />

overall form. Filigree adjustments in filletting<br />

and massing allow further difficulties<br />

in immediate reading to be introduced.<br />

These techniques combined to produce<br />

a kind of lexicon of formal maneuvers<br />

which could be introduced in the process<br />

of refining aggregatory systems. How<br />

does one differentiate one particular iteration<br />

as more ideal than another when<br />

the terms of engagement are as abstract<br />

as pure geometry? Such questions<br />

became pivotal in the development of a<br />

personal position on centerhood, as the<br />

geometric result gradually merged with<br />

the theoretical hypothesis throughout the<br />

maturation of the process.<br />

78


79


Deformation continues to propagate<br />

New, less axial org<br />

80 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Plan Diagrams


anization emerges<br />

Slight estrangement of highly standard organization<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 81


Horiztonal striation of masses along normative groundplane<br />

Masses set slightly askew, deforming ground with them<br />

Reorientation of masses provides void space<br />

Conic interventions recalibrate void space<br />

82 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Section Diagrams


84 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Axonometric Diagrams


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 85


86 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 1, Model Photos


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 2, Model Photos<br />

87


Masses organize into coincident intersections,<br />

center of volume emerges<br />

Masses rotate in three-dimensional space,<br />

breaking clear interpretation of center<br />

Masses blend on roofplane through extension of adjacent surfaces,<br />

promoting a new organizational reading<br />

Surface articulation further breaks down heirarchy,<br />

leaving system precariously close to multiple readings<br />

88 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 2, Plan Diagrams


Intersected masses with bipolar centers<br />

Groundplane deformation reorients systems<br />

Further deformations force reactions on masses’ orientations<br />

Masses estrange from groundplane condition, each retains partial autonomy<br />

Conics question heirarchy of overall mass profile and ground relationship<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 2, Secion Diagrams<br />

91


92 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 3, Axonometric Diagram


Masses rest atop normative ground plane<br />

Sectionally distorted ground plane reorients objects’ bouyancy,<br />

negaitve space forms from discrepency between objects and ground<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 3, Section Diagrams<br />

93


Overlapped masses<br />

Strong and r<br />

interior<br />

94 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 3, Plan Diagrams


ecognizable<br />

figure<br />

Conics articulate interior, reconfiguring<br />

heirarchy but leaving exterior legible<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 95


96 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 3, Model Photos


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 97


Dual systems aggregate around shared center<br />

Center as void<br />

Conics defer reading of center, question massing heirarchy<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object 4, Plan Diagrams<br />

99


100 Odd Blocks 4A Studio Object 4, Model Photos


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 101


SP CHINATOWN DEPOT REDEVELOPMENT<br />

5A Vertical Studio<br />

Fall 2016, Elena Manferdini<br />

Synopsis<br />

Chinatown in Los Angeles is an uncertain<br />

ground. Its history is one simultaneously<br />

composed of displacement and<br />

development. It therefore stands that in<br />

order to approach the creation of anything<br />

new in Chinatown, one must first<br />

comprehend the myriad forms which<br />

preceded.<br />

This project sought the creation of a<br />

large, 600+ unit, residential development<br />

in the heart of Chinatown, between two<br />

sites spanning a major thoroughfare. The<br />

very creation of it, and part of its creation<br />

is the instantiation of an architecture<br />

capable of annunciating these historical<br />

understandings. To create this history is<br />

to engage in a form of cultural filtering<br />

that necessarily takes on as its responsibility<br />

the curation of an identity.<br />

It thus becomes a key prerogative of this<br />

project that the architecture become<br />

capable of receiving the various pasts<br />

of Chinatown, curating their presentation<br />

and, in their projection forward,<br />

posing critical questions that engage<br />

the process of history-making such that<br />

Plinth-Ground Operations<br />

Indifference<br />

Ground as truth<br />

Object as fiction<br />

Ground as fiction<br />

Object as truth<br />

Ambiguous Ground<br />

Ground-Ground Operations<br />

Absolute Mono-Hierarchical Dually Refuted Otherness<br />

When does the ground itself become a plinth?<br />

careful study the relationships among<br />

plinth, ground and building allowed a<br />

thoughtful curation of what it might mean<br />

to establish a new ground on such a<br />

contested site. This new ground, itself<br />

an engagement of the strange privatepublic<br />

infrastructure so pervasive in the<br />

large developments of late capitalist Los<br />

Angeles, allowed a series of contemplations<br />

on belonging and civil space in the<br />

American West.<br />

Project Scheme<br />

This endeavor in turn begs the contemplation<br />

of historical meaning in the<br />

context of Chinatown’s development<br />

both from retroactive and progressive<br />

perspectives. That is to say, part of<br />

understanding Chinatown’s history is the<br />

Moveable<br />

Mass<br />

Maleable<br />

Ground<br />

New Authenticities<br />

Performative<br />

Conceptual<br />

the resultant building stand as a cultural<br />

bookmark in the conception of a place’s<br />

identity.<br />

About Chinatown<br />

Old Chinatown is dead. A 1926 ballot<br />

measure assured its flattening below<br />

the then newly proposed Union Station.<br />

102 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Render: Posture along College Street<br />

103


Static<br />

Of the Earth<br />

Plinth emerges from ground<br />

≈<br />

Ground as origin<br />

Plinth recedes into ground<br />

≈<br />

Ground as receptor<br />

Plinth lifts, second ground delaminates<br />

≈<br />

Ground as invalidated<br />

Second ground laminates to plinth<br />

≈<br />

Ground as holder<br />

104 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Ground Relationships


Wobbly<br />

Sunken<br />

Plinth deforms ground bidirectionally<br />

≈<br />

Ground as uncertainty<br />

Plinth rests into ground<br />

≈<br />

Ground as pliant<br />

Second ground bifurcates<br />

≈<br />

Noncathartic Ground<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 105


106 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Figural Plinth Studies


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 107


108 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Elevation


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 109


110 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Plans


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 111


112 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Plan Details


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 113


Apartments<br />

Held above plinths and<br />

circulatory columns<br />

144 Starter Apartments<br />

81 Studios<br />

81 Deluxe Studios<br />

239 1-Bedrooms<br />

51 Large 1-Bedrooms<br />

33 Bedrooms<br />

Plinths and Circulatory Columns<br />

Provide parking, commerical space<br />

and vertical access to apartments<br />

629 units total<br />

Raised Ground<br />

Circilation across street, up to Metro,<br />

Sports-related amenities for public such<br />

as basketball and tennis court<br />

Public Ground Level<br />

Pool, lecture space, commerical areas, restaurant<br />

116 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Exploded Axonometric of Elements


Amid a series of possible alternative<br />

sites, the Los Angeles Times successfully<br />

stirred public resentment of the city’s<br />

Chinese-American population towards<br />

the eventual citing of the development<br />

along Alameda Street, declaring that the<br />

new station would “forever do away with<br />

Chinatown and its environs”.<br />

This is not to indicate that Old Chinatown<br />

was by any means a site of truth<br />

or viture. What emerged from the early<br />

Pueblo’s “Calle de los Negros” [“Street of<br />

the Dark Ones”] — initially inhabited by<br />

a collection of Pre-Columbian families<br />

living within the administrative bounds<br />

of the ramshackle settlement — was a<br />

space that transcended multiple generations<br />

to continuously house the marginalized<br />

populations of young Los Angeles.<br />

From the confined indigeneous groups<br />

of North America to stigmatized Chinese<br />

laborers and those drawn to the red light<br />

district that called it home, Calle de los<br />

Negros was a space of demographic<br />

displacement.<br />

This does not mean that these people<br />

were allowed to inhabit the street without<br />

disturbance. Quite the opposite, Old<br />

Chinatown was the scene of America’s<br />

most deadly mass lynching, in which a<br />

crowd of some 500 white men viscerally<br />

murdered 18 Chinese workers. Although<br />

conditions improved between the 1870s<br />

(when Chinese immigrants began to<br />

settle along Calle de los Negros) and the<br />

1920s, the neighborhood always stood for<br />

the marginalization of a population within<br />

the city core such that its vital labor<br />

potential in other parts of the city could<br />

be leveraged alongside the containment<br />

of its population within a confined urban<br />

setting.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 117


Chinatown’s History<br />

Following the 1926 ballot measure,<br />

Chinatown was subsequently located<br />

slightly north in its current location.<br />

Alternative sites, such as one across the<br />

river in Boyle Heights, proved unsuccessful<br />

against the perceived benefit of<br />

disbanding the local Chinese population.<br />

A secondary effect of the measure was<br />

to evade the construction of a series of<br />

elevated railways. It is therefore impossible<br />

to extricate Chinatown’s displacement<br />

from the creation of what would<br />

become the cultural ethos of Los Angeles<br />

towards suburban sprawl and automotive<br />

fetishization.<br />

Chinatown then was an urban statement<br />

that propagated racism and population<br />

de-densification. Chinatown today is an<br />

urban canvas that might either come<br />

to stand for gentrification — undoubtedly<br />

at the expense of the children of<br />

those displaced in 1926 — or for a new<br />

understanding of what it means to have<br />

placehood in contemporary Los Angeles,<br />

depending on the course of its current<br />

actions.<br />

(Above) Possible sectional<br />

exploits from ground gestures<br />

(Right) Axonometric of complete<br />

site showing relationship with<br />

park, street and metro station<br />

120 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 121


122 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Model Photograph: Chunk Model


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photograph (Detail)<br />

123


124 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio Parking Plinth Constructive Geometries


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 125


126 SP Chinatown Depot Redevelopment 5A Vertical Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 127


BERKELEY MUSEUM OF ART<br />

3B Studio<br />

Spring 2015, David Freeland<br />

With Johan Wijesinghe<br />

This project fundamentally questions the<br />

immediate legibility of a piece of architecture<br />

through subtle manipulations in<br />

formal organization, surface treatment<br />

and circulation. To these ends, it takes<br />

up the contemporary project of the art<br />

museum as a platform to question the<br />

project of iconicity, reducing the legibility<br />

of the work of architecture itself beyond<br />

the immediate ability of perception. By<br />

withholding reading rather than privileging<br />

it, the project becomes impossible to<br />

understand through one human vantage,<br />

geometrical orientation or specific depth.<br />

This invites certain tactility to the subject<br />

hood one experiences when encountering<br />

the building. Those who gaze across<br />

the façade are practically required to<br />

adjust their position towards the building<br />

in order to gain a more complete comprehension<br />

of its geometry.<br />

Unable to be perceived in a singular<br />

vision, the multiplicity of readings<br />

produced by the façade initiates a deep<br />

questioning of geometry. An intentional<br />

set of choreographed overlaps between<br />

the building’s seven “objects” employ<br />

shifting material definitions and incongruent<br />

geometrical principles alongside<br />

architectural tropes such as a shadow or<br />

corner to provoke an uncertainty about<br />

what one perceives. While one surface<br />

may have a diagonal hatching, rendered<br />

in deep slices along its run, an adjacent<br />

surface might have another orientation<br />

while matching the slice direction. This<br />

dichotomy between surface identification<br />

and what we have come to expect<br />

from architecture (in terms of the façade,<br />

ground and roof) combine less than conjunctly<br />

in order to estrange the individual<br />

from their egocentric perspective onto<br />

the building. Explicated on the interior,<br />

this takes host in an intertwined procession<br />

of spaces that at times celebrates<br />

the difference between objects and at<br />

others obfuscates such understandings.<br />

(Right) Details from elevations<br />

(Next Page) Roof plan<br />

128 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 129


+ 15'<br />

Men's WC<br />

UP<br />

Lockers<br />

199<br />

Women's WC<br />

Gallery 00<br />

Cleaning Room<br />

424<br />

Office 4<br />

127<br />

Marketing<br />

303<br />

Office 1<br />

192<br />

Office 3<br />

153<br />

Gallery 02<br />

+ 23'<br />

DN<br />

Gallery 17<br />

+ 23'<br />

+ 0'<br />

Gallery 01<br />

+ 23'<br />

UP<br />

DN<br />

Gallery 03<br />

+ 23'<br />

DN<br />

Gallery 04<br />

+ 23'<br />

Gallery 15<br />

+ 23'<br />

+ 0'<br />

Visitor WC 2<br />

Mechanical<br />

UP<br />

DN<br />

UP<br />

UP<br />

UP<br />

Gallery 06<br />

+ 15'<br />

DN<br />

DN<br />

Gallery 11<br />

Gallery 05<br />

+ 17'<br />

130 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Plan of Galleries


Elevations and the Politics of the Art Museum as a Contemporary Medium for Architecture<br />

After a decade of high profile competitions<br />

for art museums which, for the<br />

most part, have amounted to little other<br />

than esoteric spectacles, it is time to take<br />

the art museum to its task as the staging<br />

ground for architectural intervention,<br />

exploration and permutation. Taking the<br />

typology as a platform, this project questions<br />

the legibility of the object, denying<br />

a clear reading part to whole relationships.<br />

This is achieved through subtle<br />

manipulations in formal organization,<br />

surface treatment and circulation.<br />

Along the building’s elevations, a series<br />

of tectonic bands (see Façade Detail)<br />

confuse the legibility of a single entity. In<br />

response to the highly spectacle-driven<br />

business that museum architecture has<br />

become, this invalidates the “money<br />

shot” as a method for curating phenomenology<br />

in architecture. This political move<br />

is intended to invigorate visitors and<br />

other constituents of the site (students<br />

and passersby, in particular) to move<br />

around the structure in order to pull apart<br />

the experiential trickery unfolding before<br />

them.<br />

Bands cross between objects on a system<br />

curated specifically to question the<br />

distinction between formal and “graphic”<br />

(when seen from a distance) differentiations<br />

in the surface. What might appear<br />

in one view as one object is in fact two,<br />

or what might appear as two distinct<br />

faces is in reality a graphically divided<br />

single swatch. Because the bands were<br />

indeed tectonic and not purely graphical,<br />

their response to changing conditions of<br />

light throughout the day further intensifies<br />

the multiplicity of readings possible.<br />

An animation was employed to explore<br />

this property in greater depth.<br />

132 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Elevation along Bancroft


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Elevation along Durant<br />

133


Cafe<br />

Circulatory Strategies<br />

Circulation is a continuous sequence<br />

of intertwined gallery spaces, Sectional<br />

enfilades, and particular thresholds that<br />

negotiates the differences between objects<br />

and at other moments obfuscates<br />

their relationship.<br />

These thresholds and lines begins to<br />

carry through as circulation, taking host<br />

as intertwined processions of gallery<br />

spaces, sectional enfilades, that at times<br />

celebrates the fragmented difference between<br />

objects and at others obfuscates<br />

their relationship.<br />

Gallery 02<br />

1682<br />

Lockers<br />

Sec. Office<br />

199<br />

222<br />

Office 5 Office 6 Office 7<br />

283 225 219<br />

Gallery 01<br />

1350<br />

(Right Top) Plan of upper gallery<br />

level. Circulatory pathways begin to<br />

breakdown distinction of objects as<br />

read from the exterior. Vertical lightwells<br />

provide opportunities for circulation<br />

as well as natural illumination.<br />

Gallery 09<br />

3619<br />

Gallery 03<br />

1318<br />

Visitor WC 2<br />

(Right Bottom) Plan of ground<br />

concourse. A public “alley” of courtyard<br />

space weaves through the building,<br />

connecting public spaces like the shops,<br />

lecture hall, library and café. These<br />

remain open and accessible while three<br />

stairs offer varied entrances into the<br />

ticketed areas of the galleries above.<br />

Gallery 08 (Tiered)<br />

992<br />

Gallery 07<br />

1016<br />

Gallery 10<br />

1243<br />

Gallery 12<br />

993<br />

(Next Page) Axonometric of circulatory<br />

pathways. A public concourse cuts<br />

through the building and between<br />

the objects to provide access up<br />

into galleries. From there, stairs also<br />

provide the main entrance into the<br />

lobby from the parking garage, as well<br />

as opportunities to exit the building<br />

onto a series of curated terraces.<br />

Lobby<br />

Admin<br />

Learning Center<br />

Shop<br />

Theater<br />

136 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Plans +2 and +0


OBJECT 3<br />

Level 1: Lobby<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

Level 3: Artists’ Studios<br />

OBJECT 5<br />

Level 1: Lobby<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

Level 3-4: Artists’ Studios<br />

AFT ENTRANCE<br />

OBJECT 1<br />

Level 1: Theater<br />

Level 2/3: Galleries<br />

OBJECT 7<br />

Administration<br />

OBJECT 2<br />

Level -1: Loading Dock<br />

Level 1: Media Lounge<br />

Level 2-4: Galleries<br />

OBJECT 4<br />

Level 1: Shop<br />

Level 2/3: Galleries<br />

OBJECT 2<br />

Level 1: Café<br />

Level 2/3: Galleries<br />

MAIN ENTRANCE<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Circulation and Vertical Cores<br />

137


About the Façade<br />

The volumes which are unable to be<br />

perceived in a singular vantage point create<br />

a multiplicity of readings. Legibility of<br />

the object is further complicated by the<br />

façade, with lines that are amplified by<br />

varied shade and shadow that both bind<br />

the objects together and introduce new<br />

distinctions.<br />

How do you interweave the form and<br />

demands of conventional architectural<br />

systems of a museum (floor plates, stairs,<br />

walls to hang art) of a museum into a<br />

decentralized object.<br />

How do we keep something separate by<br />

nature(of the shells), coherent and whole,<br />

with demands of convention floor plates,<br />

stairs, walls to hang art, and procession,<br />

while simultaneously adapting a the language<br />

and intention of fluid but distinct<br />

spaces?<br />

Fiber-Reinforced Panels<br />

FRP panels of standard 4’ by 8’ dimension<br />

Horizontal bracketing<br />

along horizontal members<br />

Seams allow FRP panels<br />

to abutt structure while<br />

being tied to L brackets in<br />

the horizontal direction<br />

and T brakcets in the<br />

vertical direction<br />

Vertical fin attachments to<br />

every other vertical member<br />

140 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Façade Detail


Floorplates<br />

Generic connections between<br />

floorplates and façade employ<br />

balloon framing logic to structuralize<br />

floorplates when available. Formal<br />

interests direct towards articulated<br />

interior voids rather than superficial<br />

disjointing between envelope and<br />

inhabital planes.<br />

45” dropped ceiling cavity<br />

for total 4’ flooplate depth<br />

Generic 6” poured<br />

concrete decking<br />

Standard 18” by 6”<br />

i-beams along floorplate<br />

Structural Frame<br />

Mitered conditions arbitrate<br />

adjacencies along FRP<br />

panels and structure<br />

Constant 14” void runs along<br />

envelope, standardizing connections<br />

between FRP panels and interior<br />

structure. Bidirectional members fill<br />

in space to support both exterior<br />

clading and interior elements.<br />

Secondary Horizontal Members<br />

8’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />

Thin seam language leverages<br />

tectonic reading towards a legibility<br />

of the bands cut into the FRP<br />

panels, concealing expressions of<br />

inner structure and jointing<br />

Primary Horizontal Members<br />

16’ Increment, 6” by 18” Profile<br />

Secondary Vertical Members<br />

4’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />

Primary Vertical Members<br />

12’ Increment, 12” by 14” Profile<br />

Assembled Façade<br />

1” Seaming<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Structure Detail<br />

141


Aft Courtyard<br />

LEVEL +1<br />

Galleries and Administration<br />

LEVEL +2<br />

Auxiliary Galleries, Admin, Lower<br />

Artist Studios and Art Storage<br />

LEVEL +3<br />

Upper Artist Studios<br />

UPPER LEVELS<br />

Gallery spaces and artist studios<br />

gather in large chunks around the<br />

courtyard. A circulatory corridor<br />

cuts through (and sometimes<br />

blends) into these, winding<br />

to-and-fro about the level,<br />

sometimes connecting to the<br />

exterior geometry and sometimes<br />

cutting across to create bridges<br />

over the courtyards. Lightwells<br />

project down from the roof to<br />

naturally illuminate three central<br />

spaces.<br />

GROUND FLOOR<br />

Large spaces of public outreach<br />

gather around two courtyards.<br />

Other public programs not directly<br />

related to the infrastructure of the<br />

museum (café, bar and shop)<br />

cluster around, accessing intimate<br />

outdoor areas and main circulatory<br />

pathways.<br />

Main Rooms<br />

Artists<br />

Maintenance<br />

Administration<br />

Storage<br />

Facilities<br />

GROUND<br />

Public groundplane pulls visitors<br />

either into forward / aft courtyards<br />

or subtly diverts those crossing the<br />

site diagonally up the hill to the<br />

other ends of the Berkeley campus.<br />

Ground manipulations and<br />

landscaping create back-and-forth<br />

ciruclation which engages the<br />

building from a multiplicity of<br />

scales and vantages.<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 05<br />

855 ft 2<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 04<br />

VERTICAL CIRCULATION<br />

COMMUNITY ROOM<br />

834 ft 2<br />

LIGHTWELLS<br />

962 ft 2<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 03<br />

789 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 03<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 08<br />

3030 ft 2 GALLERY 09<br />

X.<br />

854 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 05<br />

1526 ft<br />

EQUIPTMENT 2<br />

2<br />

2423 ft 2<br />

559 ft 2 P.<br />

V.<br />

O.<br />

W.<br />

VISITOR WC 3<br />

325 ft 2<br />

N.<br />

T. U.<br />

VISITOR WC 3<br />

GALLERY 16<br />

318 ft 2<br />

M.<br />

1260 ft 2<br />

S.<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 09<br />

Z.<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 02<br />

900 ft<br />

732 ft 2<br />

2<br />

GALLERY 17<br />

GALLERY 11<br />

1409 ft 2<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 10<br />

Y.<br />

L.<br />

R.<br />

1096 ft 2<br />

592 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 18<br />

Q.<br />

ARTIST STUDIO 01<br />

K.<br />

1791 ft 2 968 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 13<br />

GALLERY 06 ART STORAGE 1<br />

STAFF WC 4<br />

1434 ft 2<br />

1690 ft 2 1492 ft 2 414 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 14<br />

690 ft 2 GALLERY 12<br />

933 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 02<br />

GALLERY 19<br />

4512 ft<br />

GALLERY 08<br />

1531 ft 2<br />

2<br />

1806 ft 2 GALLERY 04<br />

2382 ft 2<br />

GALLERY 01<br />

CORRIDORS<br />

3924 ft 2 G.<br />

E.<br />

F.<br />

D.<br />

C.<br />

A.<br />

TICKETING<br />

B.<br />

1996 ft 2 MEDIA<br />

LOUNGE<br />

H.<br />

1917 ft 2<br />

WORKSHOP 1<br />

J.<br />

WKSP. 2 1241 ft 2<br />

983 ft 2 COATS<br />

SHOP I.<br />

706 ft<br />

WC 1<br />

2<br />

1368 ft 2<br />

246 ft 2 LEAERNING CENTER<br />

2347 ft 2<br />

CAFÉ / BAR<br />

1879 ft 2<br />

THEATER /<br />

SUPPORT SPACES<br />

3162 ft 2<br />

Organization<br />

The museum composed of seven<br />

volumes that roll and shuffle down the<br />

hillside from Bancroft (the University in<br />

the North) to Durant (The dormitories in<br />

the South).<br />

The volumes choreograph a meandering<br />

path between the seven asymmetrical<br />

carved conically developed masses.<br />

The volumes fold, shear, over-hang, and<br />

overlap each other, producing interstitial<br />

courtyards syncopated by light wells.<br />

Program takes a more horizontal approach,<br />

respecting the authority of the<br />

floorplate in the contemporary art gallery.<br />

Subsidiary galleries and public spaces<br />

(courtyards, shops and a café) align<br />

along the bottom level above a parking<br />

garage and loading dock. Moving up,<br />

staff spaces and the main galleries fill<br />

the next two levels. Artist spaces nestle<br />

above along the roofline.<br />

Public $ (Ticket-Purchasing)<br />

Private (Institutional)<br />

Public<br />

Private (Artists in Residence)<br />

SCULPTURE<br />

GARDEN<br />

TOWER 7<br />

TOWER 6<br />

TOWER 5<br />

Freight<br />

(Left) Rendering of main entrance<br />

(Following Spreads)<br />

Diagrams and sections<br />

Campus<br />

Entry<br />

TOWER 4<br />

Forward<br />

Courtyard<br />

3164 ft 2 CAFÉ<br />

TOWER 3<br />

GARDENS /<br />

TOWER 1<br />

TOWER 2<br />

LANDSCAPING<br />

6035 ft 2 AMIPTHEATER /<br />

MULTIUSE AREA<br />

5093 ft 2<br />

Dorms<br />

Entry<br />

Parking<br />

1879 ft 2<br />

LABEL KEY<br />

A. Media Lab ........................ 573 ft 2 Q. Artist Studio 12 ............... 737 ft 2<br />

B. Artists’ Library .................. 584 ft 2 R. Art Storage 2 .................... 1519 ft 2<br />

C. Marketing ......................... 347 ft 2 S. Artist Studio 15 ............... 474 ft 2<br />

D. Cleaning Room ................. 541 ft 2 T. Material Storage ............... 249 ft 2<br />

E. Locker Room .................... 285 ft 2 U. Meeting Room .................. 334 ft 2<br />

F. Equiptment Room 1 ......... 502 ft 2 V. Staff WC 3 ....................... 170 ft 2<br />

G. Computer Room ............... 257 ft 2 W. Office 10 ........................... 231 ft 2<br />

H. Pre Ticket Sales ................ 374 ft 2<br />

Office 11 ........................... 224 ft 2<br />

I. Kitchen and Freezer ......... 700 ft 2<br />

Kitchen ............................ 205 ft 2<br />

J. Staff WC 1 ....................... 115 ft 2 X. Director’s Office ................ 397 ft 2<br />

Secretary’s Office ............. 198 ft 2<br />

K. Gallery 07 ........................ 2117 ft 2 Office 12 .......................... 291 ft 2<br />

L. Gallery 13 ........................ 1434 ft 2<br />

M. Staff WC 2 ....................... 106 ft 2 Y. Artist Studio 11 ............... 733 ft 2<br />

N. Office 4 ............................ 207 ft 2<br />

Artist Studio 13 ............... 925 ft 2<br />

Office 5 ............................ 208 ft 2<br />

Artist Studio 14 ............... 603 ft 2<br />

Office 6 ............................ 208 ft 2 Z. Artist Studio 06 ............... 556 ft 2<br />

O. Office 1 ............................ 196 ft 2<br />

Artist Studio 07 ............... 823 ft 2<br />

Office 2 ............................ 206 ft 2<br />

Office 3 ............................ 240 ft 2<br />

P. Office 7 ............................ 165 ft 2<br />

Office 8 ............................ 270 ft 2<br />

Office 9 ............................ 288 ft 2<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Distribution of Program<br />

143


Perpendicularily set wall frames running in<br />

opposite directions align into a corner.<br />

Floorplate thickness necessitates a<br />

four-foot offset between.<br />

Floorplate space trims between forms to<br />

unite inhabitable areas. Conical distortions<br />

in plan skew the corner relationship,<br />

producing spatial slippage.<br />

Conical distortions along surface edges<br />

redefines the previously two-dimensional<br />

intersection of the forms into a dynamic,<br />

three-dimensional torque.<br />

144 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Conical Strategies


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photo of Conical Intersection<br />

145


+55'<br />

+45'<br />

+23'<br />

+9'<br />

+0'<br />

-14'<br />

146 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Section down Slope


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 147


148 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Photos of Modeled Lightwell


Void form punches through<br />

volume of object to outline<br />

lightwell.<br />

Conical distortions begin to<br />

question the inherent<br />

relationship between vertical<br />

surfaces of form and horizontal<br />

spaces of inhabitation.<br />

Stairs cut back-and-forth along edges of void<br />

envelope, twisting into and out of of the void itself.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Lightwell Strategies<br />

149


(animation)<br />

vimeo.com/<br />

126487089


152 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Oblique Section across Courtyard


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 153


154 Berkeley Museum of Art 3B Studio Massing Models


Circulatory Vignettes<br />

Circulatory spaces became a primary<br />

interest in this project because of the<br />

way they orient and focus the human<br />

perception. In regards to both the architectural<br />

experience and the perceptions<br />

of individual people to others within the<br />

museum, the circulatory pathways were<br />

specifically curated to employ the formal<br />

assets of architecture to experiential<br />

ends. Deepened and distorted spaces<br />

between otherwise regular floorplates<br />

established vantages from which the circulation<br />

posits visitors to experience others<br />

in the museum. These spaces flatten,<br />

elongate and skew the typical perceptual<br />

abilities of the human eye to estrange<br />

those within them. This is with the hopes<br />

that it entices people to reconceptualize<br />

how they experience architecture, the<br />

world and thus their selves.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Circulation and Spatial Disorientation<br />

157


BAM DESIGN DEVELOPMENT<br />

Design Development<br />

Fall 2015, Pavel Getov and Scott Uriu<br />

With Thomas Ferrer, Adrian<br />

Wong and Jinwen Yu<br />

The objectives of this class centered<br />

around continuing architectural processes<br />

from the previous semesters studio<br />

projects, running a conceptual proposal<br />

of an art museum in Berkeley, California,<br />

through a natural set of refinements<br />

though design development (DD).<br />

At the core of the class’ visual repertoire<br />

was the construction of a single “mega<br />

drawing” which encapsulated not only<br />

many smaller drawings but an overall<br />

aesthetic conglomeration.<br />

At the same time, a notebook set was<br />

gathered to simulate the typical planning<br />

procedures that would accompany the<br />

submission of a prospective design to<br />

the relevant permitting authorities. This<br />

coincided along with a series of lectures<br />

from various offices around Los Angeles,<br />

including representatives from Gehry<br />

Partners, detailing the normal regulatory<br />

parameters surrounding items such as<br />

ADA, egress and cost estimation, among<br />

others. More than a mere repository for<br />

drawings, the notebook set became a<br />

new way to conceptualize the presentation<br />

of the project within the rigid legal<br />

framework that surrounds architecture.<br />

Though the design was rather speculative<br />

at conception, this development<br />

process acted as a rigorous exercise in<br />

the execution of progressive architecture<br />

within the confines of the normative contemporary<br />

sphere of building.<br />

160 BAM Design Development Design Development 1 : 4 Mega Drawing Samples


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Mega Drawing<br />

161


162 BAM Design Development Design Development Mega Drawing Detail


Ring Members<br />

Steel Structure<br />

Structural grid sandwhiched<br />

between Gypsum board interior<br />

walls and exterior paneling<br />

Exterior Courtyard Paneling<br />

Poured concrete panels<br />

conceal geometry and provide<br />

tame interior expression<br />

Ring Members<br />

Tube steel members run along edges<br />

of masses to connect larger sections<br />

of primary and secondary structure<br />

Primary Members<br />

W-sections running vertically through<br />

structural void between interior and exterior<br />

paneling<br />

Secondary Members<br />

W-sections running horizontally and at<br />

perpendiculars to primary members<br />

Dialgonal Bracing<br />

Bracing connects between primary<br />

and secondary members<br />

Floorplates<br />

Standardized steel sheet decking with<br />

poured concrete, underlaid by standard<br />

steel substructure<br />

Direction 1 Panels<br />

Panels angled at ~60° from<br />

ground.<br />

Direction 2 Panels<br />

Panels angled at ~240°<br />

from ground (~ –120°)<br />

Direction 3 Panels<br />

Panels angled at ~45° from<br />

ground.<br />

Panel Seams<br />

Seams express themselves tectonically,<br />

but combination with slotting produces<br />

graphic effect<br />

Base Panels<br />

Panels of all directions extend onto the bases,<br />

topped eitherwith circulation, landscaping or outdoor<br />

gathering spaces, such as the outdoor auditorium<br />

20” x 20” steel tubes<br />

Skin System 1<br />

~60° slots<br />

Skin System 2<br />

~240° slots<br />

Primary Members<br />

14” W-sections<br />

Secondary Members<br />

10” W-sections<br />

Core 1<br />

Structural Strategy<br />

Each object stands structurally independent,<br />

leaning on one another. Cores in<br />

two objects provide vertical circulation.<br />

Interior Courtyard<br />

6” x 5’ x 10’ precast concrete panels<br />

Core 2<br />

Circulatory Surfaces<br />

6” poured concrete panels<br />

Skin System 3<br />

~45° slots<br />

Basement Retailing Wall<br />

12” poured concrete<br />

Skin Composition<br />

Slots tilted in multiple directions,<br />

sometimes aligning along<br />

physical seams and other times<br />

producing purely graphic seams<br />

through tectonic articulation.<br />

Basement Columns<br />

2’ diameter concrete columns<br />

Foundations (Caissons below)<br />

5’ x 5’ poured concrete members<br />

Foundation Beam Structure<br />

3’ x 3’ concrete beams below<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Overall Structural Strategies<br />

163


Secondary Steel Member<br />

L Brackets<br />

Bracket Bolting<br />

Primary Steel Member<br />

Primary Steel<br />

20” rolled steel members<br />

run along edges of masses<br />

Secondary Steel Direction 1<br />

16” W-section members running along primary<br />

direction of surfaces<br />

Secondary Steel Direction 2<br />

14” W-section members running<br />

along secondary direction of surfaces<br />

Structural Joint<br />

Generic 6” Poured Concrete<br />

over Metal Decking<br />

Hung Ceiling Connectors<br />

Primary Structure<br />

Secondary Structure<br />

Floorplate Edges<br />

Vertical Clips<br />

Façade Panels<br />

Façade Clips<br />

164 BAM Design Development Design Development Façade Structures


ADA / Accessible Path of Travel<br />

Return Vents<br />

Supply Vents<br />

Air Handling Units<br />

Several locations house multiple<br />

air handling units, each of which<br />

separately serves each object<br />

OBJECT 7<br />

OBJECT 7<br />

Level 1-2: Galleries<br />

3260 sqft<br />

Type B<br />

Factor: 100<br />

Load: 32<br />

2582 sqft<br />

Type B<br />

Factor: 100<br />

Load: 25<br />

OBJECT 6<br />

Level 2-4: Galleries<br />

3892 sqft<br />

OBJECT 5<br />

Level 3-4: Studios<br />

2037 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 35<br />

Load: 58<br />

OBJECT 5<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

2192 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 146<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 259<br />

OBJECT 4<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

2421 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 161<br />

OBJECT 4<br />

Level 3: Galleries<br />

1816 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 121<br />

OBJECT 3<br />

Level 4: Studios<br />

2490 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 35<br />

Load: 71<br />

OBJECT 3<br />

Level 3: Studios<br />

2456 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 35<br />

Load: 69<br />

OBJECT 3<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

3555 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 237<br />

MAIN ENTRANCE<br />

AFT ENTRANCE<br />

OBJECT 2<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

2394 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 159<br />

OBJECT 2<br />

Level 3: Galleries<br />

2300 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 153<br />

OBJECT 1<br />

Level 3: Galleries<br />

5618 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 374<br />

OBJECT 1<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

5120 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 341<br />

Egress / Circulation<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 (Above) HVAC, (Below) Egress and ADA<br />

165


166 BAM Design Development Design Development Mega Drawing Excerpts


Pre Cast Concrete panel<br />

Interlockng Joint<br />

Primary Steel<br />

Water Sealent<br />

End Mullion<br />

Poured in Place Concrete<br />

Steel Rebar<br />

Rain gutter<br />

Low-E Coated Glass<br />

Air Gap<br />

Interior Glass<br />

Mullion<br />

Clip-On Fin<br />

Precast Concrete Pan<br />

Interlocking Joint<br />

Topping Slab<br />

Structural Slab<br />

Metal Decking<br />

Drop Ceiling<br />

Silicone Seal<br />

Secondary Seal<br />

Primary Seal<br />

Moisture Barrier<br />

Steel Stud Blocking<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 3D Details<br />

167


PROPOSED ELEVATION ALONG BANCROFT STREET<br />

Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE, SCALE @ SIZE<br />

PROPOSED ELEVATION ALONG DURANT STREET<br />

Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE, SCALE @ SIZE<br />

Fiber-Reinforced Panels<br />

Seams allow FRP panels<br />

to abutt structure while<br />

being tied to L brackets in<br />

the horizontal direction<br />

and T brakcets in the<br />

vertical direction<br />

FRP panels of standard 4’ by 8’ dimension<br />

Vertical fin attachments to<br />

every other vertical member<br />

Horizontal bracketing<br />

along horizontal members<br />

UP<br />

DN<br />

Gallery 03<br />

+ 23'<br />

Gallery 04<br />

+ 23'<br />

DN<br />

Gallery 05<br />

+ 15'<br />

Gallery 02<br />

+ 23'<br />

Gallery 06<br />

+ 15'<br />

+ 0'<br />

Constant 14” void runs along<br />

envelope, standardizing connections<br />

between FRP panels and interior<br />

structure. Bidirectional members fill<br />

in space to support both exterior<br />

clading and interior elements.<br />

Gallery 01<br />

+ 23'<br />

Structural Frame<br />

DN<br />

Secondary Vertical Members<br />

4’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />

UP<br />

UP<br />

Gallery 11<br />

+ 17'<br />

+ 0'<br />

Gallery 00<br />

Gallery 15<br />

+ 23'<br />

UP<br />

DN<br />

Mechanical<br />

Visitor WC 2<br />

Primary Vertical Members<br />

12’ Increment, 12” by 14” Profile<br />

UP<br />

Men's WC<br />

Lockers<br />

199<br />

Women's WC<br />

Marketing<br />

303<br />

Gallery 17<br />

+ 23'<br />

UP<br />

DN<br />

DN<br />

Floorplates<br />

Generic connections between<br />

floorplates and façade employ<br />

balloon framing logic to structuralize<br />

floorplates when available. Formal<br />

interests direct towards articulated<br />

interior voids rather than superficial<br />

disjointing between envelope and<br />

inhabital planes.<br />

45” dropped ceiling cavity<br />

for total 4’ flooplate depth<br />

Standard 18” by 6”<br />

i-beams along floorplate<br />

Mitered conditions arbitrate<br />

adjacencies along FRP<br />

panels and structure<br />

Secondary Horizontal Members<br />

8’ Increment, 6” by 8” Profile<br />

Primary Horizontal Members<br />

16’ Increment, 6” by 18” Profile<br />

Cleaning Room<br />

424<br />

Office 1<br />

192<br />

Office 4<br />

127<br />

Office 3<br />

153<br />

Assembled Façade<br />

1” Seaming<br />

Generic 6” poured<br />

concrete decking<br />

Thin seam language leverages<br />

tectonic reading towards a legibility<br />

of the bands cut into the FRP<br />

panels, concealing expressions of<br />

inner structure and jointing<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Checked:<br />

Scale:<br />

JW<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

PROPOSED<br />

TYPICAL UPPER FLOOR PLAN<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: CG<br />

Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: FAÇADE DETAIL<br />

CG<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: CG<br />

Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: PROPOSED<br />

PRIMARY ELEVATIONS<br />

CG<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

CG<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Pre-cast Concrete Panels<br />

4”x6” Studs<br />

Scilicone Seal<br />

4”x6” Studs<br />

W18 Steel<br />

Gypsum Board<br />

Moisture Barrier<br />

Batt insulation<br />

Moisture Barrier<br />

Gypsum Board<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV.<br />

Drawn: JW, CG<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: PROPOSED<br />

SITE PLAN<br />

Checked:<br />

Scale:<br />

CG<br />

1/64”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV.<br />

Checked:<br />

Scale:<br />

CG, JW<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

PROPOSED<br />

TRANSVERSE SECTION (OBLIQUE)<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

AW<br />

Scale:<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SKIN PANEL DETAIL<br />

CG<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked: -<br />

CG<br />

Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

SKIN PANELING<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Ring Members<br />

20” x 20” steel tubes<br />

Primary Members<br />

14” W-sections<br />

Secondary Members<br />

10” W-sections<br />

Core 1<br />

Gallery 09<br />

3619<br />

Gallery 07<br />

1016<br />

Gallery 01<br />

1350<br />

Gallery 02<br />

1682<br />

Gallery 08 (Tiered)<br />

992<br />

Gallery 03<br />

1318<br />

Gallery 10<br />

1243<br />

Visitor WC 2<br />

Gallery 12<br />

993<br />

Steel Structure<br />

Structural grid sandwhiched<br />

between Gypsum board interior<br />

walls and exterior paneling<br />

Exterior Courtyard Paneling<br />

Poured concrete panels<br />

conceal geometry and provide<br />

tame interior expression<br />

Lockers<br />

Sec. Office<br />

199<br />

222<br />

Office 5 Office 6 Office 7<br />

283 225 219<br />

Core 2<br />

Ring Members<br />

Tube steel members run along edges<br />

of masses to connect larger sections<br />

of primary and secondary structure<br />

Primary Members<br />

W-sections running vertically through<br />

structural void between interior and<br />

exterior paneling<br />

Secondary Members<br />

W-sections running horizontally and at<br />

perpendiculars to primary members<br />

Dialgonal Bracing<br />

Bracing connects between primary<br />

and secondary members<br />

Floorplates<br />

Standardized steel sheet decking with<br />

poured concrete, underlaid by standard<br />

steel substructure<br />

Basement Columns<br />

2’ diameter concrete columns<br />

Foundations (Caissons below)<br />

5’ x 5’ poured concrete members<br />

Foundation Beam Structure<br />

3’ x 3’ concrete beams below<br />

ground floor decks above<br />

-14'<br />

Direction 1 Panels<br />

Panels angled at ~60° from<br />

ground.<br />

Direction 2 Panels<br />

Panels angled at ~240°<br />

from ground (~ –120°)<br />

Direction 3 Panels<br />

Panels angled at ~45° from<br />

ground.<br />

Panel Seams<br />

Seams express themselves tectonically,<br />

but combination with slotting produces<br />

graphic effect<br />

Base Panels<br />

Panels of all directions extend onto the bases,<br />

topped eitherwith circulation, landscaping or<br />

outdoor gathering spaces, such as the outdoor<br />

auditorium<br />

+55'<br />

+45'<br />

+23'<br />

+9'<br />

+0'<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: JW<br />

Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: PROPOSED<br />

GROUND FLOOR PLAN<br />

CG<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: JW, CG Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: PROPOSED<br />

LONGITUDINAL SECTION<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: CG<br />

Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: EXPLODED STRUCTURE<br />

DRAWING<br />

CG<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

CG<br />

Scale:<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

METAL STRUCTURING<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Berkeley Emerging<br />

Art Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and<br />

the Pacific Film Archive<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong><br />

Thomas Ferrer<br />

Adrian C.W. Wong<br />

Jinwen (Iris) Yu<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-001<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-010<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-011<br />

001-A-101<br />

001-A-102<br />

Skin System 1<br />

~60° slots<br />

Skin System 2<br />

~240° slots<br />

Structural Strategy<br />

Each object stands structura ly independent,<br />

leaning on one another. Cores in<br />

two objects provide vertical circulation.<br />

Interior Courtyard<br />

6” x 5’ x 10’ precast concrete panels<br />

Circulatory Surfaces<br />

6” poured concrete panels<br />

01<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-201<br />

Skin System 3<br />

~45° slots<br />

Basement Retailing Wall<br />

12” poured concrete<br />

Skin Composition<br />

Slots tilted in multiple directions,<br />

sometimes aligning along<br />

physical seams and other times<br />

producing purely graphic seams<br />

through tectonic articulation.<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-301<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-302<br />

02<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-303<br />

001-A-304<br />

001-A-401<br />

168 BAM Design Development Design Development Notebook Set


End Mullion<br />

Poured in Place Concrete<br />

Steel Rebar<br />

Image courtsey Sanaa<br />

Secondary Steel Member<br />

L Brackets<br />

Bracket Bolting<br />

Primary Steel Member<br />

Hôtel Tassel image courtesy Prestel Publishing, glass image courtsey FinePoint<br />

Structural Joint<br />

Vertical Clips<br />

Façade Panels<br />

Façade Clips<br />

Primary Steel<br />

20” rolled steel members<br />

run along edges of masses<br />

Secondary Steel Direction 1<br />

16” W-section members running along<br />

primary direction of surfaces<br />

Secondary Steel Direction 2<br />

14” W-section members running<br />

along secondary direction of surfaces<br />

Generic 6” Poured Concrete<br />

over Metal Decking<br />

Hung Ceiling Connectors<br />

Primary Structure<br />

Secondary Structure<br />

Floorplate Edges<br />

Image courtesy Snøhetta<br />

Image courtesy Architectural Record<br />

Water Sealent<br />

Rain gutter<br />

Low-E Coated Glass<br />

Air Gap<br />

Interior Glass<br />

Mullion<br />

Clip-On Fin<br />

Pre Cast Concrete panel<br />

Interlockng Joint<br />

Primary Steel<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked: -<br />

CG<br />

Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

ASSORTED SKIN DETAILS<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked: -<br />

TF<br />

Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

DETAIL: GLAZING TO SKIN<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked: CG<br />

Drawn: CG<br />

Scale: 1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

Title: MATERIAL REFERENCE PALATE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Retaining Wall<br />

Drainage Mat<br />

WPM<br />

Protection Board<br />

OBJECT 1 OBJECT 1<br />

Level 3: Galleries Level 2: Galleries<br />

5618 sqft<br />

5120 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 374<br />

Load: 341<br />

OBJECT 3<br />

Level 4: Studios<br />

2490 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 35<br />

Load: 71<br />

AFT ENTRANCE<br />

OBJECT 3<br />

Level 3: Studios<br />

2456 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 35<br />

Load: 69<br />

MAIN ENTRANCE<br />

OBJECT 3<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

3555 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 237<br />

Precast Concrete Panels Structural Steel Cores<br />

Foundation Beams and Columns<br />

HVAC<br />

Foundation and Retaining Walls<br />

Parking Asphalt<br />

OBJECT 5<br />

Level 3-4: Studios<br />

2037 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 35<br />

Load: 58<br />

OBJECT 5<br />

Level 2: Galleries<br />

2192 sqft<br />

Type E<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 146<br />

OBJECT 2 OBJECT 2<br />

Level 2: Galleries Level 3: Galleries<br />

2394 sqft 2300 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15 Factor: 15<br />

Load: 159 Load: 153<br />

OBJECT 4 OBJECT 4<br />

Level 2: Galleries Level 3: Galleries<br />

2421 sqft 1816 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15 Factor: 15<br />

Load: 161 Load: 121<br />

Primary Steel<br />

Secondary Steel<br />

Dual Glazing<br />

FRP Panels<br />

Gypsum Wall<br />

PFR Panels<br />

OBJECT 6<br />

Level 2-4: Galleries<br />

3892 sqft<br />

Type A3<br />

Factor: 15<br />

Load: 259<br />

Metal Edge Angle<br />

HVAC Supply<br />

HVAC Return<br />

C-Channels<br />

Metal Decking<br />

Gypsum Ceiling<br />

W-18 Floor Structure<br />

OBJECT 7 OBJECT 7<br />

Level 3-4: Offices Level 1-2: Galleries<br />

3260 sqft<br />

2582 sqft<br />

Type B<br />

Type B<br />

Factor: 100 Factor: 100<br />

Load: 32<br />

Load: 25<br />

ADA / Accessible Path of Travel<br />

Egress / Circulation<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

JW<br />

Scale:<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

BUILDING CHUNK<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV.<br />

Checked:<br />

Scale:<br />

CG<br />

AW<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

PROPOSED<br />

ADA AND EGRESS DIAGRAM<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: CG<br />

Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: COST ANALYSIS AND<br />

ESTIMATE<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status: DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

Drawn: TF<br />

Scale:<br />

Date: 07 DEC 2015<br />

Title: DETAIL: INTERNAL<br />

FLOORPLATE TO SKIN<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Group 8 Design Development<br />

<strong>Gravelle</strong>, <strong>Connor</strong><br />

Ferrer, Thomas<br />

Wong, C.W. Adrian<br />

Yu, J.W. Iris<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

Revisions:<br />

No. Date Description By<br />

Notes:<br />

Do not scale from this drawing<br />

Berkeley Museum of Art (BAM) and Pacific Film Archive<br />

Status:<br />

Drawn:<br />

Date:<br />

Title:<br />

DESIGN DEV. Checked:<br />

CG<br />

Scale:<br />

07 DEC 2015<br />

HVAC DIAGRAM<br />

-<br />

1/32”:1’ @ SIZE<br />

SCALE @ SIZE<br />

All Rights Reserved<br />

These drawing, concepts, designs and ideas are the property of<br />

G+FWY. They may not be copied, reproduced, disclosed to others or<br />

used in connection with any work other than the specified project for which<br />

they are prepared, in whole or in part, without the prior written authorization<br />

of G+FWY.<br />

Precast Concrete Pan<br />

Interlocking Joint<br />

Structure Joinery<br />

Topping Slab<br />

Silicone Seal<br />

Structural Slab<br />

Secondary Seal<br />

Metal Decking<br />

Primary Seal<br />

Drop Ceiling<br />

Moisture Barrier<br />

Steel Stud Blocking<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Structural Joint<br />

001-A-402<br />

001-A-501<br />

001-A-502<br />

Exploded Façade<br />

Return Vents<br />

Supply Vents<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

Air Handling Units<br />

Several locations house multiple<br />

air handling units, each of which<br />

separately serves each object<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-503<br />

001-A-601<br />

001-A-602<br />

Shell and Façade<br />

Exterior Façade Paneling<br />

Fiber-reinforced panels (FRP),<br />

broken down in modules of<br />

roughly 5 by 8 feet, attached to<br />

underlying steel structure.<br />

These are to be painted white<br />

and milled with as crisp edges as<br />

possible, enticing sharp shadows.<br />

Precast Concrete Panels 413276 Ft 2 $ 75 / Ft 2 $ 30995700<br />

Rolled Ring Steel Members (14”x14”) 11046 Ft $300 / Ft $ 3313800<br />

Primary Steel Direction 1 (14”x10”) 6851 Ft $ 150 / Ft $ 1027650<br />

Primary Steel Direction 2 (14”x10”) 9994 Ft $ 150 / Ft $ 1499100<br />

Secondary Members (14”x7”) 17664 Ft $ 150 / Ft $ 2649600<br />

Glass Panels 12921 Ft 2 $ 65 / Ft 2 $ 839865<br />

Interior Cores and Finishes<br />

Cores 15577 Ft 2 $ 120 / Ft 2 $ 1869240<br />

Floor Finishes 71815 Ft 2 $ 50 / Ft 2 $ 3590750<br />

Gypsum 123175 Ft 2 $ 2.5 / Ft 2 $ 307938<br />

Fire Sprinklers 71815 Ft 2 $ 5 / Ft 2 $ 359075<br />

HVAC 71815 Ft 2 $ 40 / Ft 2 $ 2872600<br />

Additional Architectural Elements<br />

Flooring and Ceilings<br />

Polished concrete with minimal but still<br />

noticeable reflectivity creates deep spaces<br />

with subtle, blurred reflections that place<br />

the visitor between two bare, abstract planes<br />

of experience when within the galleries.<br />

Comparable to Sanaa’s 21 st Century Museum<br />

of Contemporary Art Kanazawa, this<br />

austere approach should constantly hold in<br />

juxtaposition to itself the boldness of the sky,<br />

constantly referenced by the various cores’<br />

skylights and open courtyard.<br />

Interior Courtyard Façade<br />

Stark cast-in-place concrete<br />

panels line the interior courtyard,<br />

providing a space of articulation<br />

which is minimal and without the<br />

exuberance of the outer envelope.<br />

Transitions occur in seams<br />

between objects.<br />

Interior Concrete Slabs 71815 Ft 2 $ 120 / Ft 2 $ 8617800<br />

Interior Partition Walls 6781 Ft 2 $ 30 / Ft 2 $ 203430<br />

Floorplate Steel (W-24) 21191 Ft $ 100 / Ft $ 2119100<br />

Basement Retaining Wall 9318 Ft 2 $ 180 / Ft 2 $ 1677240<br />

Parking Garage Asphalt 46326 Ft $ 4 / Ft $ 185304<br />

Concrete Foundation 15384 Ft $ 200 / Ft $ 3076800<br />

Foundation Columns 12691 Ft 3 $ 100 / Ft 3 $ 1269100<br />

Foundation Beams 61464 Ft 3 $ 100 / Ft 3 $ 6146400<br />

Subtotal $ 67878652<br />

Overheads<br />

Architect’s Overhead 15% $ 10181798<br />

MEP Overhead 1% $ 678787<br />

Structural Overhead 3% $ 2036360<br />

Contingencies<br />

Estimating Contingency 5% $ 3393933<br />

Construction Contingency 10% $ 6787865<br />

Total $ 90957394<br />

Filigree Detailing<br />

Fine metal elements should have a hard, sturdy but elegant feeling,<br />

accentuating the space as if lines in space.<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-701<br />

Berkeley Emerging Art<br />

Foundation (BEAF)<br />

001-A-801<br />

Cast iron railings in lieu of Victor Horta’s Hôtel Tassel and details<br />

around the stairs (backed by a reflective layer of dark glass) should<br />

make a screen of sorts which follows circulation throughout the<br />

building.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 169


SCI-FA<br />

2B Studio<br />

Spring 2014, Heather Flood<br />

This project was specially selected to be<br />

featured in SCI-Arc’s Spring Show 2014.<br />

Synopsis<br />

SCI-Fa (The Southern California Institute<br />

of Fashion) is an exploration in programmatic<br />

and formal ambiguity of space.<br />

This formal production applies a logic of<br />

transformational conics in order to eschew<br />

primitive geometries to the ends of<br />

producing simultaneities of program and<br />

formal rarifications of space which suppose<br />

an entirely unconventional architecture<br />

both outwardly experiential and<br />

esoteric to the medium of Architecture.<br />

Of specific importance to the project are<br />

its representational qualities, especially<br />

in relation to the formal agendas at hand.<br />

Regarding the bent form of the building,<br />

the conventions of typical plans and sections<br />

were invalidated as meek in their<br />

explicative possibilities for the inherently<br />

three-dimensional nature in the spatial<br />

instantiations of bending. This fundamentally<br />

shifted the project’s presentation to<br />

rely both on an animation and a series<br />

of peelings or slicings (entitled “Scoop<br />

Drawings”) of the building’s components<br />

(skin, massing et cetera) as more adequate<br />

methods for the description of its<br />

assets in terms formal, programmatic and<br />

representative.<br />

Thoughts on Program<br />

As briefed, SCI-Fa longs to be a sweatshop<br />

of production value, stuffed mostly<br />

with compartments accessed indirectly<br />

from distant corners of a primarily<br />

medium-space-filled building shrouded<br />

in privacy. Clearly, sheer adherence to the<br />

provided programmatic distributions will<br />

be ineffectual in procuring unique intersections<br />

of space and constituencies.<br />

Particularly of interest, given the diverse<br />

site and nearby orgy of demographics,<br />

it seems strange that an educational<br />

institution would allot spaces overwhelmingly<br />

geared towards production,<br />

nearly altogether forgoing more traditional<br />

roles of education. It is clear that<br />

the prerogative of the institution is not<br />

situated within the momentary incidents<br />

of academia, but rather centered on the<br />

necessitated production of fashion materials<br />

and the like. The facility is effectively<br />

established on the grounds of its own<br />

labor, the individual meaningless and the<br />

collective but a mere tool in this aesthetic<br />

machinery. What becomes ironic about<br />

such institutions, generally speaking,<br />

seems to be their often reclusive nature,<br />

as if to boast solely within granted circles<br />

their accomplishments of material and<br />

craft. Why shouldn’t such a factory be in<br />

your face? What withholds an institution<br />

like SCI-Fa to the state of secondary or<br />

tertiary status in a vibrancy to the likes of<br />

Downtown Los Angeles?<br />

Thus, the institution’s interactions with<br />

the public sphere, both theatrical and<br />

revealing in nature, are of the utmost<br />

importance for demonstrative value in its<br />

architecture. Its architecture should read:<br />

this is not a place of observation, rather<br />

a directly confrontational experiment<br />

of empirical phenomenology. Melding<br />

perfectly with the clear delineation of<br />

“middle spaces” (those medium-sized<br />

areas of interstitial importance, the<br />

organization of the program outlined in<br />

the project’s brief ought to engage and to<br />

stimulate the barrier between the public<br />

and the institution (the exo and the eso,<br />

that is to say) both from outside-in and<br />

within-out.<br />

Also inherent to this observation is the<br />

unique structure of power invested<br />

elsewhere in the provided spaces. Of<br />

noteworthiness is the second largest<br />

allocation of area, divided between the<br />

building’s facilities and the institution’s<br />

administration. This combined mass<br />

is still to be deemed more spatially<br />

important in the reading of the brief’s<br />

interpreted agendas than straightforward<br />

instruction, vested half-heartedly<br />

in fleeting seminar rooms and secluded<br />

studio plots. Thus, a hierarchical relationship<br />

is established wherein a metaphorically<br />

panoptic distribution of importance<br />

oversees the highly controlled (and thus<br />

only secondarily conditioned) spaces of<br />

traditional “education”. Again, the powerhouse<br />

of production overtakes this<br />

positioning, as if to engage a mutated<br />

beast, the purpose of which borders<br />

between the refinements procured by<br />

a disciplined body of pupils below an<br />

overseeing administrative caste and the<br />

let-wild machinery of production.<br />

How might this architecture, and in particular<br />

its programmatic distributions and<br />

spatial accordances, enable this loosely<br />

defined pedagogy to foster in a method<br />

conducive to the interaction between<br />

this subculture and a larger context (Los<br />

Angeles, herself). In so doing, spaces<br />

otherwise perceived as afterthoughts or<br />

prerequisites might take prominence in<br />

facilitating such interactions. Id est, the<br />

institution’s shop or auditorium might be<br />

recast as crucial political arenas throughout<br />

which a diagrammatic goal of integration<br />

and discourse carries itself out,<br />

both captive and parasitic to the institutional<br />

framework which has spawned.<br />

Thoughts on Institution<br />

The strange thing about polemic intuitions,<br />

once realized in architecture as<br />

built things, seems to be their resistance<br />

towards syndication in their perspective<br />

environments. That is to say, it prevails<br />

that the integration of the institution is<br />

perceived as counterintuitive to its core<br />

radicalism, which, quite paradoxically, it<br />

seeks to interject into a larger context.<br />

Thus, it is as if a cognitive membrane<br />

of glass exists to separate an institution<br />

from its surroundings. Whatever<br />

the purpose of that institution might be,<br />

it might appear that this disconnection<br />

has severed critically unexploited links<br />

which could foster between those exo<br />

and those eso to these alternative definitions<br />

of otherwise complacent notions so<br />

intrinsic to an avant-garde practice.<br />

The result of these tendencies manifests<br />

Thus, the institution’s<br />

interactions with the<br />

public sphere, both<br />

theatrical and revealing<br />

in nature, are of the<br />

utmost importance for<br />

demonstrative value<br />

in its architecture.<br />

itself several perplexingly convoluted<br />

circumstances:<br />

Truly innovative approaches to the practices<br />

respective to these institutions are<br />

rendered temporarily null in their eras.<br />

Appreciation is acquired ex post facto as<br />

a kind of post-rationalization by the larger<br />

community. While the immediacy of the<br />

avant-garde does in fact leave beneficial<br />

scars on the functions of whichever<br />

discipline in question, it rarely becomes<br />

170 SCI-Fa 2B Studio


A.1.Y<br />

P.1<br />

P.2<br />

E.S.1<br />

A.1<br />

S<br />

A.1.X<br />

R<br />

1. 2. 3.<br />

A.2.Y<br />

P.1<br />

E.S.1<br />

E.C<br />

B<br />

V.R<br />

H.C<br />

N°<br />

V.R<br />

A.2<br />

A.1.X<br />

A.2.Y<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

P.1<br />

D.1 C.1 C.2<br />

D.2<br />

R.2<br />

R.1 E.S.3<br />

E.S.2<br />

P.2<br />

7. 8. 9.<br />

172 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Transformation Diagram


Of specific importance to the<br />

project are its representational<br />

qualities, especially in relation<br />

to the formal agendas at hand.<br />

Regarding the bent form of the<br />

building, the conventions of plans<br />

and sections were invalidated<br />

as meek in their explicative<br />

possibilities for the inherently<br />

three-dimensional nature in the<br />

spatial instantiations of bending.<br />

173


174 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Transformation Process


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 175


acknowledged by the greater society<br />

until it is either extinct or festering on its<br />

deathbed. What might occur if leading<br />

thinkers in avant-garde practices were to<br />

engage society? Obviously, this cannot<br />

be enforced in any authoritarian manner<br />

onto personal agendas, but, instead,<br />

architecture may offer us a method by<br />

which to shift the performances both of<br />

such practices and prospective members<br />

of societal constituencies to the ends that<br />

their brief scraping one another would<br />

produce magnificent intersections.<br />

The actualized objectives of these institutions<br />

suffer such significantly lengthened<br />

realizations within a culture that neither<br />

their creators nor their intended audiences<br />

are able to partake in the spoils of<br />

progression. Thus, Ikea is the effectual<br />

gravestone of a once beloved Bauhaus.<br />

Beleaguered bachelors and strapped<br />

students alike were punished by history<br />

to endure a semicentury before innovative<br />

spatializations of Modernist design<br />

reached their grasps within reason. Of<br />

course among other circumstances, part<br />

of this is must be attributed to stagnant<br />

time and prolonged distancing between<br />

innovators and their audiences. Obviously,<br />

many factors contribute to this snailpaced<br />

progression, and few of these can<br />

be addressed by architecture. Still, the<br />

spatial division between those pushing<br />

forward the intensification of culture<br />

and their constituencies as manifest by<br />

architecture can be reduced not only to a<br />

negligible level but perhaps can even be<br />

promoted and appropriated.<br />

Both those within and outside institutions<br />

seem to be completely ignorant of each<br />

other’s existence or importance. While<br />

some have posted this as both an inherent<br />

elitism of the avant-garde and an<br />

ignorance of the masses, it is the distinct<br />

hypothesis that in at least some circumstances<br />

a purely architectural inefficiency<br />

may be of responsibility to the symptom.<br />

How might it be if these two groups were<br />

to be compressed within one atmosphere?<br />

Their entanglement, rendered as<br />

the dissolution of divisitory space could,<br />

in effect, render each obsolete by mutual<br />

ingestion. An enlightened citizenry could<br />

engulf the ostracized radicals just as<br />

these societal separatists might return to<br />

a world forever changed by their esoteric<br />

contemplations.<br />

Unfortunately, architecture to this point<br />

has to these ends remained rather unhelpful.<br />

Bauhaus became a household<br />

name only long after its dissipation, The<br />

Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies<br />

evades the common New Yorker (a<br />

being so thirsty for unsettlement) to this<br />

day, and SCI-Arc remains unbeknownced<br />

even to those living beside it, to name a<br />

few situations inherent to the discipline of<br />

architecture. These circumstances must<br />

implode, rendering in their wake the<br />

complete disruption of previously held<br />

ideals about the agency and impotence<br />

of the avant-garde. Though largely untested,<br />

the results or perspective failure<br />

of such an action is far too great a possibility<br />

of which to continue a distasteful<br />

avoidance.<br />

The Fourth Wall as Societal Device<br />

The Fourth Wall is a term pertaining to<br />

the theory of theater, constituting not<br />

in material but in perception the final<br />

enclosing “wall” of a stage set which<br />

metaphysically divides the performances<br />

occurring with the audience spectating.<br />

In more traditional roles, this division is<br />

not to be engaged. The theater-goers sit<br />

before their spectacle in complete compliance,<br />

idly engrossing themselves in<br />

only the representation of an event. This<br />

has come under considerable challenge<br />

in more contemporary works, whereby<br />

the wall itself is rendered variously null,<br />

enabling the fluid interaction between<br />

audience and actor. Not always with<br />

consequence to the reiterated production<br />

before them, this at the purest state<br />

encapsulates a constituent engagement<br />

with results dramatic in their repurcisions<br />

for understanding and experience alike.<br />

It seems that much of contemporary life,<br />

no less of that in a city, rests behind a<br />

fourth wall. Especially in regards to architecture,<br />

much is left behind our grasp,<br />

a mere representation of intentions and<br />

actions. Our persistence (and, thus, reliance)<br />

in the Fourth Wall is unequivocal<br />

to all else. We cling to its protection from<br />

the realities, effectively ammounting to<br />

a schism between our sensorial contact<br />

with the world itself sui generis and its<br />

ramifications towards our lives.<br />

Thus, it appears, much of the institutional<br />

and societal frameworks we have<br />

established seek to sustain this buffer<br />

between the rawness of contemporary<br />

existence and the comfort prerequesite<br />

to a sustainable life. We wretch in fear as<br />

these boundaries crumble in rare occasions.<br />

Take, for example, a crash of an<br />

airliner. We look to this object as a whole,<br />

a sort of container for people – passengers.<br />

Few engage this as a mechanized<br />

system, instead relying wholy on the<br />

perception of its geometric essence as<br />

one body. In the event of a crash, we are<br />

often times presented with a failure of<br />

the object to sustain the singular form<br />

we expect of it. We see its entrails spewn<br />

about as if to signify before us that our<br />

creation has failed. Once the skin of the<br />

beast is lifted from its framing, we find<br />

ourselves disgusted by the estrangement<br />

pronowned. An assembledge of heterogeneous<br />

parts, it repels our notions of<br />

truth and verity to see the actuality that<br />

is the machine, a loosly composed set of<br />

bolts and panels.<br />

We might look at the Lockerbie bombing,<br />

in a brief detour, to illustrate this point.<br />

After the bombing of Pan American Flight<br />

103 over the small Scottish village, a media<br />

extravaganza presented the populace<br />

with a face-to-face depiction of tragedy.<br />

In regards to airline travel, the fourth wall,<br />

in its division of the passenger from the<br />

ramifications of both political wills related<br />

to the subject and the delicate structural<br />

systems of a Boeing 747 during flight,<br />

was utterly decimated. Surreal images of<br />

a ruined cockpit strewn about a bucolic<br />

field in the rural enclave, especially with<br />

the cause of the crash taken into consideration,<br />

irrevocably altered the relationship<br />

between the passenger and the<br />

machine. To see an image of the jetliner<br />

before the crash is to reengage the territorialized<br />

notions we had attained in<br />

the immediate foreground to the disaster.<br />

These are forever shattered by the<br />

presentation of images after the matter,<br />

and it may be said that we can never<br />

truly gaze onto the condition of the object<br />

before the event without irresistibly<br />

allowing our minds to venture onto the<br />

tragedy of which we have been informed<br />

by the reciprocal interchange of information<br />

they share.<br />

That, of course, was an example with<br />

rather morbid associations. Rather, the<br />

Fourth Wall might function in society in<br />

a strata of roles and circumstances. Critically<br />

speaking, its existence buffers the<br />

life of the individual from the myriad of<br />

complications presented by the outside<br />

world. The theatergoer, in this function, is<br />

in many instances in need of the division<br />

between the representational aspects<br />

of the performance and the perception<br />

occurring in his or her psyche. When this<br />

is removed, a new relationship is transfigured<br />

by the space between the stage<br />

and the seating. Obvious ramifications of<br />

grand importance rest in the presence or<br />

avoidance of this tactic within theatrical<br />

theory.<br />

In most other circumstances, the Fourth<br />

Wall’s persistence causes riffs in the<br />

understandings between constituencies<br />

of society. Specifically to a political end,<br />

these allot for much of the estrangement<br />

we face in a Postindustrial legacy.<br />

Our clothing, furniture, our buildings and<br />

any other manufactured good rest firmly<br />

behind a differentiation of metaphysical<br />

separation. Often, it seems, the dilution<br />

of this barrier results in consequences<br />

either disturbing or disruptional.<br />

The Fourth Wall in Architecture<br />

In the case of architecture, its function<br />

inherent as a container of program, constituencies<br />

and functions thereof bounds<br />

the capacity of most structures to the<br />

roles of uniform boxes. Even with formal<br />

experimentation, the Fourth Wall is hard<br />

broken even by the most radical of strategies.<br />

A cliché has thus formed around<br />

the solution to this problem, centered<br />

around a knee-jerk reaction of complete<br />

spatial implosion. It is rather inneffectual<br />

in many circumstances to demolish all<br />

walls. Instead, a myraid of other spatial<br />

strategies and media can be uptaken<br />

in the progression towards integrated<br />

space.<br />

Particularly in the sense of institutional<br />

architecture, it seems pervasive that a<br />

Fourth Wall exists between those exoand<br />

esoteric to the organization. This<br />

division is perhaps most often manifest in<br />

the form of a wall, but otherwise its forms<br />

can be seen in various architectural<br />

tropes.<br />

Recently, much has been made in the<br />

real of connecting those outside the institution<br />

to those within, but, under closer<br />

examination, it is possible to deduce that<br />

these relationships are superficial at best.<br />

Furthermore, they often involve the interplay<br />

of constituencies in a linear manner.<br />

That is to say, either those from within<br />

experience those outside or vise versa,<br />

but rarely does the situation present<br />

itself that a complete orgy of interaction<br />

occurs. Such an event might be labeled<br />

preemptively as counterproductive to<br />

the ends of an institution, but it can also<br />

be interpreted that the explicit function<br />

of such an organization is to create this<br />

kind of interaction. Thus, it effectively<br />

176 SCI-Fa 2B Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Study Models<br />

177


2.1<br />

18.2<br />

12.2<br />

VLLY<br />

35.2<br />

13.2<br />

34.2<br />

VLLY<br />

VLLY<br />

VLLY<br />

39.1<br />

26.1<br />

37.2<br />

38.2<br />

36.2<br />

39.2<br />

VLLY<br />

40.1<br />

34.1<br />

42.1<br />

41.1<br />

UP, R = 49.25<br />

33.2<br />

32.2<br />

32.1<br />

33.1<br />

35.1<br />

36.1<br />

Central Mass (Main)<br />

Urban Lobby (Main)<br />

VLLY<br />

37.1<br />

UP, R = 9.13c<br />

20.1<br />

20.2<br />

19.2<br />

17.2<br />

23.2<br />

VLLY<br />

19.1<br />

UP, R = 32c<br />

16.2<br />

3.1<br />

14.1<br />

17.1<br />

18.1<br />

(Cut and Join Seamlessly)<br />

3.2<br />

28.2<br />

UP, R = 6.67c<br />

DOWN, R = 28.28c<br />

4.1<br />

DOWN, R = 28.28<br />

16.1<br />

MNTN<br />

MNTN<br />

21.2<br />

4.2<br />

15.2<br />

23.1<br />

42.2<br />

27.2<br />

26.2<br />

Central Mass (Void)<br />

Central Mass (Main)<br />

5.1<br />

Urban Lobby (Insert)<br />

Urban Lobby (Main)<br />

5.2<br />

UP, R = 20.00<br />

29.2<br />

30.2<br />

31.2<br />

24.2<br />

22.1<br />

15.1<br />

21.1<br />

6.2<br />

41.2<br />

25.2<br />

MNTN<br />

DOWN, R = 13.33c<br />

MNTN<br />

DOWN, R = 39.75c<br />

UP, R = 29.58<br />

UP, R = 7.35c<br />

UP, R = 16.58<br />

13.1<br />

12.1<br />

UP, R = 34.58<br />

11.2<br />

UP, R = 5<br />

14.2<br />

40.2<br />

38.1<br />

VLLY<br />

25.1<br />

27.1<br />

VLLY<br />

28.1<br />

10.2<br />

24.1<br />

DOWN, R = 5<br />

UP, R = 28.28<br />

DOWN, R = 10<br />

9.2<br />

11.1<br />

2.2<br />

8.2<br />

10.1<br />

9.1<br />

UP, R = 7.5<br />

1.2<br />

UP, R = 10<br />

VLLY<br />

8.1<br />

DOWN, R = 28.28<br />

7.2<br />

22.2<br />

30.1<br />

31.1<br />

29.1<br />

DOWN, R = 35.92c<br />

7.1<br />

DOWN, R = 29.05<br />

6.1<br />

Urban Lobby (Main)<br />

Auditorium<br />

DOWN, R = 36.55<br />

1.1<br />

178 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Unrolled Massing


avoids the trope of being cut off from the<br />

outside world.<br />

Especially in the case of a fashion school,<br />

it is integral that those inside experientially<br />

partake in the interactions of those<br />

outside, and that, conversely, those outside<br />

are changed fundamentally in their<br />

perspective by those within. Obviously,<br />

this cannot be predicted to the point that<br />

one consequence is available. In some<br />

cases, the events might even end poorly<br />

by a traditional sense of success. Events<br />

such as the flood of homeless into the<br />

Seattle Public Library come to mind, but<br />

are these really that bad?<br />

Often, the case is that our realities are<br />

highly curated by our statuses within the<br />

complex structures of society. This predetermined<br />

interaction establishes a narrow<br />

framework that functions quite actively to<br />

remain fairly static. Within this, a backlogged<br />

cycle seems to have occurred by<br />

many accounts in which those who have<br />

climbed the ranks resist the ascension of<br />

contemporaries below. Without the necessity<br />

to explicate this in further detail, it<br />

is clear that its ranks pertain to those of<br />

the fashion industry in particular.<br />

Urbanity<br />

Circulation as Runway for<br />

Newly Purchased Dress<br />

Commerce<br />

Dress becomes External Representation<br />

Internal Production to Product<br />

Dress becomes Product at Store<br />

Libraries<br />

Raw Material to Assembly<br />

Sewing Room<br />

Dying Room<br />

Academia<br />

Knowledge to Application<br />

Craftwork to Display<br />

Dress is Complete<br />

Dress is Begun<br />

Printmaking Lab<br />

Toy Room<br />

Runway<br />

Therefore, with a site as ontologically<br />

compromised in such a diverse fashion<br />

as that at the corner of Olympic and<br />

Main, it is paramount to the success of<br />

any institution there that architecture<br />

arbitrate the contemporaneously choreographed<br />

and unimpaired interaction<br />

among the subsets of society. Even<br />

within the institution, an obvious hierarchy<br />

is bound to form. This has, in other<br />

cases, been the demise of a truly radical<br />

establishment, a fermented sign of complacency<br />

and presumption. In a place like<br />

Especially in the case of a fashion school, it<br />

seems integral that those inside experientially<br />

partake in the interactions of those outside, and<br />

that, conversely, those outside are changed<br />

fundamentally in their perspective by those within.<br />

Los Angeles, who can ever say what is<br />

above or below anything else? The hierarchies<br />

otherwise established the guard<br />

the ramparts of our social structures have<br />

utterly fallen within this city, at least as far<br />

as explicated by the physical world.<br />

What if an architecture profoundly<br />

changed the manner by which these<br />

various groups of people, both those<br />

internal and external to the institution, interacted<br />

with one another? Were they to<br />

be removed from their typical frames of<br />

reference, they might find before them an<br />

entirely reshuffled perception of reality.<br />

F***, the Spline<br />

This design is arrived to by the effective<br />

bending of space. Whereas typically<br />

Cartesian geometries preclude the<br />

three-dimensional transoformation of<br />

their domains, the action of being has<br />

been employed to the ends of creating<br />

a space of pulled and distorted proportions.<br />

Still, it remains ever valient that<br />

those within this capsule are cognizant<br />

of their surroundings. The ghosts of a<br />

Cartesian past are pervasive throughout<br />

both interior and exterior moments<br />

across the scheme. Such is the overarching<br />

use of the grid, a persistent reference<br />

which begs those within its grasp to read<br />

the transformative logic of its application.<br />

This is achieved through a conic/circular<br />

dimension which is controposed to<br />

the otherwise orthagonal reliance of the<br />

building.<br />

Of particular interest is the emergence<br />

of complex spatial relationships with a<br />

series of typical geometries. We have<br />

become so complacent with our technological<br />

surfaces and morphologies that<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 179


Education Bar<br />

Studios<br />

Seminar Rooms<br />

Urban Lobby<br />

Store<br />

Lounge<br />

Auditoria<br />

Street<br />

Media Core<br />

Libraries<br />

Computer Lab<br />

Offices<br />

Cafe<br />

Sewing Room<br />

Dying Room<br />

Production Spiral<br />

Printmaking Lab<br />

Toy Room<br />

Runway<br />

Urban Fabric<br />

180 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Circulation Diagram


Studios / Printmaking Lab<br />

Libraries<br />

to Urban Lobby<br />

Sewing Farm<br />

Tiered Toy Room<br />

Dyes<br />

to Rooftop<br />

to Runway<br />

Student Entrance<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Circulation Detail: Production Spiral<br />

181


182 SCI-Fa 2B Studio 3/8” : 1’ Model


we often forget the nacent abilities of<br />

primitive geometries. While a spline can<br />

only engage the fairly recent discourse of<br />

form through a reference to complexity<br />

and surface, the culmination of primtitive<br />

geometries which we set our eyes so<br />

often upon in buildings throughout the<br />

history of architecture prove their capacity<br />

to more effectively attain contemporary<br />

discourses.<br />

Passing through these spaces, an inhabitant<br />

of the environment is placed in constant<br />

relation both to him or her self and<br />

to his or her piers. Ipso facto, a dialogue<br />

of perceptions is established. Vantages<br />

provided by the undulations in the stairs’<br />

trajectories or the interior’s bends, among<br />

other things, present new perspectives<br />

onto inhabitation through an abstraction<br />

of the borders of program. The visual and<br />

the spatial intertwine to procure a sort<br />

of blurred reality in which the user is to<br />

heighten an engagement of the architecture<br />

through the conscious intensification<br />

or nullification of the senses. Auditory<br />

and visual references are eschewed at<br />

unexpected points, allotting a experience<br />

utterly reliant upon the recognition of<br />

the subject to his implications within it.<br />

It is his, her or their acknowledgement<br />

of their experience which validates this<br />

space. Never does the building become<br />

obtrusive, as it works at deep levels<br />

to relay in each breath agency to the<br />

spectator. The aforementioned Cartesian<br />

systems, juxtapositions between complex<br />

and primitive geometries and decisive<br />

choices in placements of irregular spaces<br />

allow a fluid existence of space wherein<br />

references against what the typical user<br />

is accoustomed to offer opportunities for<br />

defamiliarization.<br />

A Mechanized Pool for Fashion<br />

In Koolhaas’ “The Story of the Pool”, we<br />

find a derelict avant-garde, cast from<br />

its disconcerting motherland adrift to<br />

a Land whose image exceeds its own<br />

reality. Inasmuch as this transformation is<br />

through the foreseeable future tangential<br />

to other mass emigrations from Europe<br />

during its time of diaspora to the New<br />

World, its architectural foundations lie in<br />

the mechanization of this metamorphosis<br />

(or rather, in the Constructivist Pool’s<br />

case, stasis) facilitated by the pool and its<br />

human literalism. This is to say that both<br />

the pool and its swimmers are mutually<br />

ineffectual. Likewise, the arrival of an<br />

institution for high fashion in Downtown<br />

Los Angeles might produce a series of<br />

programmatic interactions unexpected<br />

and both repulsive yet productive for<br />

each party involved.<br />

We see in the migration a radicalism<br />

inherent to the world of fashion as<br />

removed from the social realities and<br />

economic contemporaneity as were the<br />

Constructivists in the fledgling Soviet<br />

Union. This Constituency, encapsulated<br />

within the object of their institution, are<br />

to arrive into the greatest dichotomy of<br />

metropolitan America, a slice of urbanity<br />

in an otherwise suburban wasteland, a<br />

riffing drag of Congestion between the<br />

weavings of a bucolic superficiality. What<br />

it once knew, the welcome of Paris or<br />

the citadel of New York, are sure to be<br />

demolished. Realistically speaking, DTLA<br />

is unlikely to integrate well a conventional<br />

(or complacent) ideal of the interaction<br />

between the typical institution of haute<br />

couture and its constituencies, be they<br />

financial, creative or laboral.<br />

It is in this rejection of the conventional<br />

that SCI-Fa must sustain itself, and, in<br />

this essence, its architecture might manifest<br />

itself into a spatial sequence which<br />

seeks to dynamically displace all those<br />

involved.<br />

Los Angeles, or Epileptic Shock<br />

Los Angeles presents before us a temporal<br />

disconnect between the subject and<br />

his object to the ends that our perception<br />

of reality is inexorably estranged<br />

from any frame of reference. A transient<br />

landscape crumples beneath our feet<br />

the erudition of all certainty and conclusion,<br />

a waypoint in the quest towards an<br />

impermanent state of urban liquidity.<br />

This blurred urbanity serves to free us<br />

from the choking complacency otherwise<br />

ridden across our lives. In effect, such a<br />

complete ostracization from the typical<br />

is achieved through the eradication of<br />

the normative perspective. Like the films<br />

so famously composed by Hollywood,<br />

Los Angeles has effectively become a<br />

compiled set of shots. As we pass across<br />

the city, this ludicrous reversal of roles<br />

flips the stale humanism so pervasive in<br />

other places. The continuity of the human<br />

eye having been substituted by something<br />

more akin to an induced epileptic<br />

shock, we discover a place constituted<br />

by misfit puzzle pieces or a whole from<br />

mutilated parts – specificity by complete<br />

unspecification. Primarily, this tactic<br />

explicates itself through the juxtaposition<br />

of Angeleno constituencies in a manner<br />

completely unique from any other form of<br />

urban composition. It is by the very fact<br />

that boutiques and homeless exist within<br />

meters of one another that we begin to<br />

lust the irrationality of LA.<br />

Whereas other cities have with both the<br />

utmost complacency and unwise joviality<br />

taken for granted their definitions, we<br />

experience a city who refutes the very<br />

existence of a trope. That is to say, no one<br />

part is allotted the subsistence required<br />

to compel a singular reading. A mishmashed<br />

tangle of parts reads before us,<br />

Spectators, a string of non sequitur arguments<br />

against rationality. By doing this,<br />

we ourselves are in effect empowered<br />

We see in the migration a radicalism<br />

inherent to the world of fashion as<br />

removed from the social realities and<br />

economic contemporaneity… This<br />

Constituency, encapsulated within<br />

the object of their institution, are to<br />

arrive into the greatest dichotomy<br />

of metropolitan America…<br />

as the actors in this deranged production.<br />

Both at once those on the stage and<br />

those before it, we foremost see performed<br />

a surreal entanglement of human<br />

wills and urban serendipities. The mere<br />

existence of the Fourth Wall is inconsequent<br />

at a theater where one can say<br />

with neither certainty nor authority who<br />

is the actor and who the witness.<br />

Where do we stand within this irreconcilable<br />

interplay of constituencies? Without<br />

much remorse, Los Angeles has fatefully<br />

removed the linear narrative to this problem<br />

of perception, founding superordinate<br />

to its imposition a world of theatrical<br />

transitions. Inasmuch as this approach<br />

foregoes the prescription of a generic<br />

definition for the city, it enables an infinite<br />

possibility of existences to propagate.<br />

This is the exponentially confusing LA we<br />

must learn to foster, a rampant urbanity<br />

which preemptively eludes all the<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 183


(animation)<br />

vimeo.com/<br />

92414158<br />

In addition to drawings, renderings and<br />

other conventional representations,<br />

an animation was produced to detail<br />

the experiential procession attained by<br />

the building’s circulatory systems. In<br />

particular, the staircase was explored as<br />

a productive means by which to explicate<br />

distinctly posthuman encounters between<br />

individuals, constituencies and various<br />

media within the building. This was by<br />

no means a purely presentational game,<br />

but rather a tool by which to guage the<br />

experiential characteristics of the stairs<br />

and forms which assembled to conduct<br />

the flow of the building’s spaces. Nor<br />

does the animation deal only with<br />

rendered images of experience. A series<br />

of diagrams supplant the visuals as<br />

demonstrations of the formal intentions<br />

behind the spaces. Likewise, a calibrated<br />

soundtrack and series of vignettes<br />

portray the building as conducive to<br />

more than purely optical sensations.


to Entrance<br />

ENGAGES STORE<br />

M<br />

R = 9.5<br />

ENGAGES VOID<br />

R = 3<br />

R = 11 R = 1.5<br />

to Auditorium<br />

R = 1.5<br />

R = 9.5<br />

M<br />

R = 8<br />

T<br />

R = 1.5<br />

M<br />

R = 1.5<br />

R = 9.5<br />

OBSERVES MAIN STREET<br />

R = 9.5<br />

OBSERVES OLYMPIC BOULEVARD<br />

186 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Regulating Geometry of Stairs (Right)


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Scoop Drawing: Vertical Core<br />

187


188 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Interior Renderings


numbed complacency of quotidian life.<br />

Escape is Futile: LA Live<br />

As DTLA gentrifies, the oppressive invasion<br />

of new commerce can be felt weighing<br />

on nearly every square inch of the<br />

otherwise pure ground. Although some<br />

reluctance comes at labeling it either<br />

good or evil, it can certainly be said that<br />

one of the most imminent factors in the<br />

experiential forces involved within this<br />

change can be felt in the Fashion District,<br />

where the constant presence of LA Live<br />

seems to clutter the air with a thickened<br />

sense of disdain.<br />

As if constantly within reminder, the<br />

flicker of this phallic monument to<br />

consumption can be seen at the most<br />

unexpected times, glimmering between<br />

the buildings at the most advantageous<br />

moments in Los Angeles’ gridded wasteland<br />

of urbanity. One cannot help but to<br />

feel as if he has been observed, judged<br />

and subsequently overtaken by the sheer<br />

theatricality with which LA Live perches<br />

itself in the neighborhood. Allies and<br />

street corners which would in any other<br />

situation be of the most mundane nature<br />

become battlegrounds for a display of<br />

purely hierarchical glory on the part of<br />

the Ritz Carlton.<br />

This seems to be the unfortunate partition<br />

of gentrification reserved for the<br />

most putrid corner of the New Downtown,<br />

a gleaming symbol of both equal<br />

parts commercialism and façadism. As<br />

aforementioned, it cannot be purely<br />

ironic bathos that the building most<br />

resembles perhaps the most contentious<br />

piece of male anatomy, long accused<br />

itself of having imposed its presence in<br />

various places unwelcome.<br />

It feels very much as if this development,<br />

wallpapered by glitz of Coca-Cola, has<br />

become an urban Bastille, forever the<br />

ultimate representation of the rampantly<br />

overt capitalization of the distraught<br />

American urbanism. As is such, it can be<br />

purposed that the citizens of Los Angeles<br />

gather and ‘brick by brick’ (or sheet<br />

of glass by sheet of glass, in any case)<br />

disassemble this oppressive symbol of<br />

architectural subordination. After all, the<br />

destruction of the Bastille, it being important<br />

to note that a mere seven prisoners<br />

were freed in its liberation, is inherently<br />

an architectural spectacle by the people<br />

of a begrudgingly and long-accepted<br />

hierarchy. In many ways, architecture can<br />

come to represent something, irrespective<br />

of the wills of architect, client or<br />

community. This brings the only acceptable<br />

conclusion: LA Live is a parasitic<br />

imposition by larger commercial initiates<br />

which effectively renders itself an enemy<br />

of the urban subset of Our Los Angeles.<br />

What can be done to cure such an ailment?<br />

Perhaps, the best action (having<br />

accepted the futile nature of any plan to<br />

dismantle the complex democratically)<br />

is to counter it with better architecture.<br />

If we come to the logical conclusion<br />

about the project’s representational<br />

consequences, then it stands by inverse<br />

logic that other architecture could work<br />

to reverse its effects. What, in the place<br />

of LA Live could help to impose a better<br />

urbanity on DTLA? Could, in fact, there<br />

be such a scenario as Architecture and<br />

Revolution?<br />

Beginnings and Ends in Architecture<br />

Contemporary architecture seems to<br />

have a complete fetishism with a dissolution<br />

between interior and exterior.<br />

Ambiguous spaces abound, and those<br />

currently at the helm seem pervasively to<br />

recommend such gradients. This is well<br />

within reason, but is there no value left to<br />

the dramatic juxtaposition between that<br />

which is inside and that which is outside?<br />

Perhaps, a most successful architecture<br />

might take on an interplay between these<br />

states. Humanistically speaking, the phenomenological<br />

experience ascertained<br />

from such an endeavor might produce<br />

effects which would make those involved<br />

even more cogniscent of their positions<br />

within the power of architecture. For example,<br />

when someone enters a building,<br />

they are subconsciously subscribing to<br />

a world. This goes to conclude that they<br />

are actively partaking in an experience<br />

which exists both external to and integrated<br />

within an extant reality. Their actions<br />

taken within such a space would, by<br />

logical consequence, have then to both<br />

establish and contest their relationship to<br />

the prior reality. At beast, this metamorphosis<br />

of the individual might produce<br />

an entirely novel perception of what once<br />

was and what might be. Reality is by the<br />

best accounts such a fluid experience,<br />

so haphazardly shaped by the mundane<br />

complacencies and parameters of our<br />

lives.<br />

An architecture must grasp this, presenting<br />

us with both versions: that which<br />

directly confronts us with reality by way<br />

of total estrangement (“there is outside,<br />

here is inside”) and something more fluid<br />

(“Where am I? Where are We”?).<br />

This can become particularly troubling<br />

when faced with such a heterogeneous<br />

environment as Los Angeles. What is the<br />

agency of a both a juxtaposition and an<br />

integration in a landscape where nothing<br />

really exists? That is to say, everything<br />

in LA is in a state of complete disarray.<br />

Though the condition aforementioned is<br />

no catastrophic presistence, necessarily,<br />

it causes an interesting predicament<br />

when it comes to the flow of space.<br />

To break from a city’s fabric, there has to<br />

be an established order against which<br />

first to work. The Guggenheim defies the<br />

gridded logic of orthagonal Manhattan<br />

for a more organic presentation of reality.<br />

Likewise yet opposite, many works of<br />

contemporary Parametricism purport<br />

completely to become extensions of realities<br />

already extant, deeply tied to both<br />

cultural and logical coherencies to the<br />

ends that the building almost vanishes.<br />

[We] are LA<br />

Los Angeles holds a monopoly on the<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 189


190 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Scoop Drawing: Runway


The sheer urbanity of the city<br />

has presumed the potential for<br />

serendipitous human interaction,<br />

instead forging a vortex of<br />

complications, entanglements<br />

and overlaps. In these ephemeral<br />

crossings, the citizenry of<br />

the city coincide, their lives<br />

scraping one another in the<br />

most minuscule of strokes. To<br />

amplify this scar is to heighten<br />

their awareness of the transient<br />

nature which they cohabitate.<br />

191


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Model Photos<br />

193


infinitely variable situations of humankind.<br />

Woven into its fate-set tapestry<br />

is a simple mechanism which denies<br />

the possible creation of new scenarios.<br />

Blankly put, nothing new can emerge.<br />

Every variable has been fulfilled; every<br />

possible interaction has already been<br />

satisfied. We are therefore bound to an<br />

endless encore, a chain of repeat performances<br />

to the ends only that the monster<br />

prevails. The actors are unimportant,<br />

minor expendables under the shade of<br />

the theatricality.<br />

Canonical Images in Fashion<br />

and Architecture<br />

Fashion has an inherently representational<br />

agenda, a trait too often ignored by<br />

both those within and outside the field.<br />

Such a facet of its dichotomy parallels<br />

conditions of architecture. To expose<br />

through serendipity these dichotomies is<br />

to critically engage fashion and architecture<br />

alike as fascinations of contemporary<br />

culture through material manifestations.<br />

Alphabetical organizations arbitrate these<br />

juxtapositions, establishing at times new<br />

comparisons and at others reinforcing<br />

existing understandings.<br />

Dior’s New Look vs. Audrey Hepburn<br />

Twiggy vs. Tinker v. Des Moines<br />

Punks vs. Corporate Businessmen<br />

1950’s Housewife vs. Bra-Burning<br />

Case Studyvs. Skid Row<br />

James Dean vs. Drag Queens at Stonewall<br />

Jacqueline Kennedy Idealic vs. Jacqueline<br />

Kennedy Mourning<br />

Bridget Bardot vs. Pamela Anderson<br />

Haute Couture vs. Everday<br />

Marilyn Monroe vs. Herself<br />

Woodstock vs. Army<br />

Tribe (via Riefenstahl) Fashion vs. Western<br />

Fashion<br />

Authoritarian Uniformity vs. Rejective<br />

Individuality (Nuremburg vs. Punks)<br />

Pertaining Quotes<br />

“I just use fashion… to talk about politics.”<br />

– Vivienne Westwood.<br />

“Give me time, and I’ll give you a revolution.”<br />

– Alexander McQueen.<br />

“I don’t want art for a few…” – William<br />

Morris.<br />

“Fashion is not just about trends. It’s<br />

about political history.” – Daphne Guinness.<br />

“Clothes are but a symbol of something<br />

hid deep beneath.” – Virginia Woolf<br />

Skin<br />

The following is a series of excerpts from<br />

Alejandro Zaera Polo’s “The Politics<br />

of the Envelope: A Political Critique of<br />

Materialism”; highlighted text below each<br />

quote explicates its relationship to the<br />

issues at hand:<br />

“The building envelope is possibly the<br />

oldest and most primitive architectural<br />

element. It materializes the separation of<br />

the inside and the outside, natural and<br />

artificial and it demarcates private property<br />

and land ownership (one of the most<br />

primitive political acts). When it becomes<br />

a façade, the envelope operates also as<br />

a representational device in addition to<br />

its crucial environmental and territorial<br />

roles.” (77)<br />

Especially in the context of Downtown<br />

Los Angeles, a disparaging set of economic<br />

and political factors have facilitated<br />

dramatic dynamics between social<br />

strata. In the same stretch of sidewalk,<br />

some of society’s most affluent walk<br />

beside some of their most (socioeconomically)<br />

downtrodden counterparts.<br />

Unfortunately, while urban planning may<br />

have allowed for (or at least functions<br />

complacently with) this estranged human<br />

operative, architecture has been less<br />

forthcoming in allowing such overlaps.<br />

Traditionally, it has merely fortified the<br />

horrid divisions of a society all-too-willing<br />

to forget the discrepancies it creates at<br />

full joviality among its ranks. Perhaps,<br />

this could be rectified by an architecture<br />

that fosters adjacencies.<br />

“The envelope exceeds the surface by<br />

incorporating a much wider set of attachments<br />

within the issues of construction<br />

and representation that converge in the<br />

design of the physical limit of a building.<br />

It includes the crust of space affected by<br />

the physical construction of the surface,<br />

by the scale and dimension of the space<br />

contained, by its permeability to daylight<br />

194 SCI-Fa 2B Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Scoop Drawing: Sectional Bifurcation<br />

195


196 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Model Façade Detail


Corporate Conformity vs. Punk Individualism<br />

Midcentury Domestication vs. Bra-Burning<br />

Marilyn Monroe vs. Herself<br />

Nonwestern Ideals of Beauty vs. Western Canonizations Thereof<br />

Rebellious Self Expression vs. Mass Dogmatization<br />

In its dogmatic intake of trends, fashion introduces a series<br />

of dichotomies which speak to larger conditions of its<br />

socioeconomic contexts. Left as the media aftermath of its own<br />

existence – that is to say, in the form of newspapers, blogs,<br />

videos et cetera – this can be explicated as a set of didactic<br />

images. Across the façade, these are mapped to letters which<br />

themselves correspond to larger quotes. The randomization of<br />

this correspondence produces serendipitous adjacencies of<br />

these images. By selectively filtering light, this both produces a<br />

meaningful and affective quality of the building. From within, the<br />

effects of the light in terms of shadow and texture entice charged<br />

environments, while the macro legibility of the panels instigates<br />

discourse. From outside, a connection with urbanity is fostered.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 On Fashion’s Dichotomies<br />

197


The set of the<br />

Viktor & Rolf show<br />

Saturday afternoon<br />

in the Tuileries<br />

looked like the<br />

inside of a<br />

white-tiled<br />

bathroom at some<br />

The set of the<br />

Viktor & Rolf show<br />

Saturday afternoon<br />

in the Tuileries<br />

looked like the<br />

inside of a<br />

white-tiled<br />

bathroom at some<br />

The set of the<br />

Viktor & Rolf show<br />

Saturday afternoon<br />

in the Tuileries<br />

looked like the<br />

inside of a<br />

white-tiled<br />

bathroom at some<br />

The set of the<br />

Viktor & Rolf show<br />

Saturday afternoon<br />

in the Tuileries<br />

looked like the<br />

inside of a<br />

white-tiled<br />

bathroom at some<br />

The set of the<br />

Viktor & Rolf show<br />

Saturday afternoon<br />

in the Tuileries<br />

looked like the<br />

inside of a<br />

white-tiled<br />

bathroom at some<br />

The elaborate sets<br />

favored by Marc<br />

Jacobs, Mr.<br />

Ghesquière’s<br />

predecessor as<br />

artistic director<br />

of Louis Vuitton,<br />

were nowhere to be<br />

The elaborate sets<br />

favored by Marc<br />

Jacobs, Mr.<br />

Ghesquière’s<br />

predecessor as<br />

artistic director<br />

of Louis Vuitton,<br />

were nowhere to be<br />

The elaborate sets<br />

favored by Marc<br />

Jacobs, Mr.<br />

Ghesquière’s<br />

predecessor as<br />

artistic director<br />

of Louis Vuitton,<br />

were nowhere to be<br />

The elaborate sets<br />

favored by Marc<br />

Jacobs, Mr.<br />

Ghesquière’s<br />

predecessor as<br />

artistic director<br />

of Louis Vuitton,<br />

were nowhere to be<br />

The elaborate sets<br />

favored by Marc<br />

Jacobs, Mr.<br />

Ghesquière’s<br />

predecessor as<br />

artistic director<br />

of Louis Vuitton,<br />

were nowhere to be<br />

This is why events<br />

unnerve me,<br />

They find it all,<br />

a different story,<br />

Notice whom for<br />

wheels are turning,<br />

Oh, I'll<br />

break them down,<br />

This is why events<br />

unnerve me,<br />

They find it all,<br />

a different story,<br />

Notice whom for<br />

wheels are turning,<br />

Oh, I'll<br />

break them down,<br />

This is why events<br />

unnerve me,<br />

They find it all,<br />

a different story,<br />

Notice whom for<br />

wheels are turning,<br />

Oh, I'll<br />

break them down,<br />

This is why events<br />

unnerve me,<br />

They find it all,<br />

a different story,<br />

Notice whom for<br />

wheels are turning,<br />

Oh, I'll<br />

break them down,<br />

This is why events<br />

unnerve me,<br />

They find it all,<br />

a different story,<br />

Notice whom for<br />

wheels are turning,<br />

Oh, I'll<br />

break them down,<br />

Two popular color<br />

trends brightening<br />

this drawn-out<br />

winter are<br />

sapphire blue,<br />

which popped up<br />

last fall and came<br />

into full flower<br />

Two popular color<br />

trends brightening<br />

this drawn-out<br />

winter are<br />

sapphire blue,<br />

which popped up<br />

last fall and came<br />

into full flower<br />

Two popular color<br />

trends brightening<br />

this drawn-out<br />

winter are<br />

sapphire blue,<br />

which popped up<br />

last fall and came<br />

into full flower<br />

Two popular color<br />

trends brightening<br />

this drawn-out<br />

winter are<br />

sapphire blue,<br />

which popped up<br />

last fall and came<br />

into full flower<br />

Two popular color<br />

trends brightening<br />

this drawn-out<br />

winter are<br />

sapphire blue,<br />

which popped up<br />

last fall and came<br />

into full flower<br />

On the evidence of<br />

the fall collections<br />

that wrapped<br />

last week, you<br />

might suppose that<br />

fashion had<br />

decided to return<br />

the favor, offer-<br />

On the evidence of<br />

the fall collections<br />

that wrapped<br />

last week, you<br />

might suppose that<br />

fashion had<br />

decided to return<br />

the favor, offer-<br />

On the evidence of<br />

the fall collections<br />

that wrapped<br />

last week, you<br />

might suppose that<br />

fashion had<br />

decided to return<br />

the favor, offer-<br />

On the evidence of<br />

the fall collections<br />

that wrapped<br />

last week, you<br />

might suppose that<br />

fashion had<br />

decided to return<br />

the favor, offer-<br />

On the evidence of<br />

the fall collections<br />

that wrapped<br />

last week, you<br />

might suppose that<br />

fashion had<br />

decided to return<br />

the favor, offer-<br />

Architecture, soft<br />

or rigid, was an<br />

overarching theme<br />

for fall, as an<br />

influential<br />

handful of designers<br />

experimented<br />

with lines and<br />

Architecture, soft<br />

or rigid, was an<br />

overarching theme<br />

for fall, as an<br />

influential<br />

handful of designers<br />

experimented<br />

with lines and<br />

Architecture, soft<br />

or rigid, was an<br />

overarching theme<br />

for fall, as an<br />

influential<br />

handful of designers<br />

experimented<br />

with lines and<br />

Architecture, soft<br />

or rigid, was an<br />

overarching theme<br />

for fall, as an<br />

influential<br />

handful of designers<br />

experimented<br />

with lines and<br />

Architecture, soft<br />

or rigid, was an<br />

overarching theme<br />

for fall, as an<br />

influential<br />

handful of designers<br />

experimented<br />

with lines and<br />

For many in the<br />

crowd, it was the<br />

return of the<br />

prodigal son after<br />

his sudden and<br />

bitter departure<br />

from Balenciaga<br />

and its parent<br />

For many in the<br />

crowd, it was the<br />

return of the<br />

prodigal son after<br />

his sudden and<br />

bitter departure<br />

from Balenciaga<br />

and its parent<br />

For many in the<br />

crowd, it was the<br />

return of the<br />

prodigal son after<br />

his sudden and<br />

bitter departure<br />

from Balenciaga<br />

and its parent<br />

For many in the<br />

crowd, it was the<br />

return of the<br />

prodigal son after<br />

his sudden and<br />

bitter departure<br />

from Balenciaga<br />

and its parent<br />

For many in the<br />

crowd, it was the<br />

return of the<br />

prodigal son after<br />

his sudden and<br />

bitter departure<br />

from Balenciaga<br />

and its parent<br />

Minutes after the<br />

Chanel fall 2014<br />

show ended at the<br />

Grand Palais on<br />

Tuesday morning,<br />

many in attendance<br />

converged on the<br />

set — a faux<br />

Minutes after the<br />

Chanel fall 2014<br />

show ended at the<br />

Grand Palais on<br />

Tuesday morning,<br />

many in attendance<br />

converged on the<br />

set — a faux<br />

Minutes after the<br />

Chanel fall 2014<br />

show ended at the<br />

Grand Palais on<br />

Tuesday morning,<br />

many in attendance<br />

converged on the<br />

set — a faux<br />

Minutes after the<br />

Chanel fall 2014<br />

show ended at the<br />

Grand Palais on<br />

Tuesday morning,<br />

many in attendance<br />

converged on the<br />

set — a faux<br />

Minutes after the<br />

Chanel fall 2014<br />

show ended at the<br />

Grand Palais on<br />

Tuesday morning,<br />

many in attendance<br />

converged on the<br />

set — a faux<br />

The most surprising<br />

thing about<br />

the new Dries Van<br />

Noten exhibition,<br />

which runs through<br />

Aug. 31 at the<br />

Musée des Arts<br />

Décoratifs here,<br />

The most surprising<br />

thing about<br />

the new Dries Van<br />

Noten exhibition,<br />

which runs through<br />

Aug. 31 at the<br />

Musée des Arts<br />

Décoratifs here,<br />

The most surprising<br />

thing about<br />

the new Dries Van<br />

Noten exhibition,<br />

which runs through<br />

Aug. 31 at the<br />

Musée des Arts<br />

Décoratifs here,<br />

The most surprising<br />

thing about<br />

the new Dries Van<br />

Noten exhibition,<br />

which runs through<br />

Aug. 31 at the<br />

Musée des Arts<br />

Décoratifs here,<br />

The most surprising<br />

thing about<br />

the new Dries Van<br />

Noten exhibition,<br />

which runs through<br />

Aug. 31 at the<br />

Musée des Arts<br />

Décoratifs here,<br />

Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />

has been designing<br />

his namesake label<br />

since 1986. He has<br />

28 years of<br />

collections to<br />

draw upon, even<br />

more if you count<br />

Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />

has been designing<br />

his namesake label<br />

since 1986. He has<br />

28 years of<br />

collections to<br />

draw upon, even<br />

more if you count<br />

Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />

has been designing<br />

his namesake label<br />

since 1986. He has<br />

28 years of<br />

collections to<br />

draw upon, even<br />

more if you count<br />

Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />

has been designing<br />

his namesake label<br />

since 1986. He has<br />

28 years of<br />

collections to<br />

draw upon, even<br />

more if you count<br />

Mr. Van Noten, 55,<br />

has been designing<br />

his namesake label<br />

since 1986. He has<br />

28 years of<br />

collections to<br />

draw upon, even<br />

more if you count<br />

“First of all,<br />

packing the<br />

clothes was<br />

already quite<br />

something,” he<br />

said. “Quite often<br />

there were people<br />

on my creative<br />

“First of all,<br />

packing the<br />

clothes was<br />

already quite<br />

something,” he<br />

said. “Quite often<br />

there were people<br />

on my creative<br />

“First of all,<br />

packing the<br />

clothes was<br />

already quite<br />

something,” he<br />

said. “Quite often<br />

there were people<br />

on my creative<br />

“First of all,<br />

packing the<br />

clothes was<br />

already quite<br />

something,” he<br />

said. “Quite often<br />

there were people<br />

on my creative<br />

“First of all,<br />

packing the<br />

clothes was<br />

already quite<br />

something,” he<br />

said. “Quite often<br />

there were people<br />

on my creative<br />

But what is as<br />

notable about the<br />

show is how much<br />

of it is not by<br />

Dries Van Noten.<br />

There are garments<br />

by fellow designers<br />

who have<br />

But what is as<br />

notable about the<br />

show is how much<br />

of it is not by<br />

Dries Van Noten.<br />

There are garments<br />

by fellow designers<br />

who have<br />

But what is as<br />

notable about the<br />

show is how much<br />

of it is not by<br />

Dries Van Noten.<br />

There are garments<br />

by fellow designers<br />

who have<br />

But what is as<br />

notable about the<br />

show is how much<br />

of it is not by<br />

Dries Van Noten.<br />

There are garments<br />

by fellow designers<br />

who have<br />

But what is as<br />

notable about the<br />

show is how much<br />

of it is not by<br />

Dries Van Noten.<br />

There are garments<br />

by fellow designers<br />

who have<br />

Arranged by loose<br />

themes, the show<br />

charts the vertiginous<br />

twistings of<br />

Mr. Van Noten’s<br />

imagination, and<br />

the way he absorbs<br />

and digests source<br />

Arranged by loose<br />

themes, the show<br />

charts the vertiginous<br />

twistings of<br />

Mr. Van Noten’s<br />

imagination, and<br />

the way he absorbs<br />

and digests source<br />

Arranged by loose<br />

themes, the show<br />

charts the vertiginous<br />

twistings of<br />

Mr. Van Noten’s<br />

imagination, and<br />

the way he absorbs<br />

and digests source<br />

Arranged by loose<br />

themes, the show<br />

charts the vertiginous<br />

twistings of<br />

Mr. Van Noten’s<br />

imagination, and<br />

the way he absorbs<br />

and digests source<br />

Arranged by loose<br />

themes, the show<br />

charts the vertiginous<br />

twistings of<br />

Mr. Van Noten’s<br />

imagination, and<br />

the way he absorbs<br />

and digests source<br />

198 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Alphabet of Stylistic Dichotomies


A room arranged<br />

under the rubric<br />

“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />

a Giovanni<br />

Boldini portrait<br />

of Count Robert de<br />

Montesquiou<br />

borrowed from the<br />

More than half of<br />

the 400-plus<br />

pieces on display<br />

were borrowed from<br />

other museums and<br />

private collections.<br />

The challenge<br />

was not only<br />

The Sturm und<br />

Drang of four<br />

weeks of international<br />

collections<br />

ended Wednesday on<br />

a gentle note as<br />

Hermès closed the<br />

autumn/winter 2014<br />

“I’ve been here<br />

since 5,” said Tom<br />

Ford, his hands<br />

encircling Anne<br />

Hathaway’s slim<br />

waist at the<br />

entrance to the<br />

Vanity Fair Oscars<br />

This collection,<br />

if shown during<br />

the Paris haute<br />

couture season,<br />

would illuminate<br />

the fading calendar<br />

and underscore<br />

the meld of<br />

And a desire-provoking<br />

one. “When<br />

I saw it at the<br />

show, I said ‘I<br />

want this dress,’<br />

” said Wendy<br />

Goodman, the<br />

design editor of<br />

Perhaps the most<br />

captivating<br />

fashion statement<br />

this season in New<br />

York was not on<br />

the runway or the<br />

street, but at the<br />

Winter Antiques<br />

Striped tube socks<br />

moved from the<br />

soccer field to<br />

the runway when<br />

Miuccia Prada<br />

showed footless<br />

tube-sock leg<br />

warmers for<br />

The designer<br />

Christophe Lemaire<br />

has finally moved<br />

into this gentle<br />

pace, sending out<br />

a fine collection.<br />

It started with<br />

double-face<br />

Last month, Mr.<br />

Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />

Lipinski, 31, were<br />

a pair of retired<br />

figure skaters,<br />

memorable for<br />

their sequined<br />

outfits and<br />

If you want to be<br />

in vogue next<br />

fall, you had best<br />

start saving now,<br />

for there was fur<br />

on the runway in<br />

show after show,<br />

especially in<br />

Through the fire<br />

and through the<br />

flames, You won't<br />

even say your<br />

name, Only "I am<br />

that I am", But<br />

who could ever<br />

live that way? Ut<br />

When I was 12, I<br />

worried that I<br />

might never grow<br />

breasts. There I<br />

was, all of 80<br />

pounds, nothing<br />

but skin and<br />

bones, bruised<br />

A room arranged<br />

under the rubric<br />

“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />

a Giovanni<br />

Boldini portrait<br />

of Count Robert de<br />

Montesquiou<br />

borrowed from the<br />

More than half of<br />

the 400-plus<br />

pieces on display<br />

were borrowed from<br />

other museums and<br />

private collections.<br />

The challenge<br />

was not only<br />

The Sturm und<br />

Drang of four<br />

weeks of international<br />

collections<br />

ended Wednesday on<br />

a gentle note as<br />

Hermès closed the<br />

autumn/winter 2014<br />

“I’ve been here<br />

since 5,” said Tom<br />

Ford, his hands<br />

encircling Anne<br />

Hathaway’s slim<br />

waist at the<br />

entrance to the<br />

Vanity Fair Oscars<br />

This collection,<br />

if shown during<br />

the Paris haute<br />

couture season,<br />

would illuminate<br />

the fading calendar<br />

and underscore<br />

the meld of<br />

And a desire-provoking<br />

one. “When<br />

I saw it at the<br />

show, I said ‘I<br />

want this dress,’<br />

” said Wendy<br />

Goodman, the<br />

design editor of<br />

Perhaps the most<br />

captivating<br />

fashion statement<br />

this season in New<br />

York was not on<br />

the runway or the<br />

street, but at the<br />

Winter Antiques<br />

Striped tube socks<br />

moved from the<br />

soccer field to<br />

the runway when<br />

Miuccia Prada<br />

showed footless<br />

tube-sock leg<br />

warmers for<br />

The designer<br />

Christophe Lemaire<br />

has finally moved<br />

into this gentle<br />

pace, sending out<br />

a fine collection.<br />

It started with<br />

double-face<br />

Last month, Mr.<br />

Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />

Lipinski, 31, were<br />

a pair of retired<br />

figure skaters,<br />

memorable for<br />

their sequined<br />

outfits and<br />

If you want to be<br />

in vogue next<br />

fall, you had best<br />

start saving now,<br />

for there was fur<br />

on the runway in<br />

show after show,<br />

especially in<br />

Through the fire<br />

and through the<br />

flames, You won't<br />

even say your<br />

name, Only "I am<br />

that I am", But<br />

who could ever<br />

live that way? Ut<br />

When I was 12, I<br />

worried that I<br />

might never grow<br />

breasts. There I<br />

was, all of 80<br />

pounds, nothing<br />

but skin and<br />

bones, bruised<br />

A room arranged<br />

under the rubric<br />

“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />

a Giovanni<br />

Boldini portrait<br />

of Count Robert de<br />

Montesquiou<br />

borrowed from the<br />

More than half of<br />

the 400-plus<br />

pieces on display<br />

were borrowed from<br />

other museums and<br />

private collections.<br />

The challenge<br />

was not only<br />

The Sturm und<br />

Drang of four<br />

weeks of international<br />

collections<br />

ended Wednesday on<br />

a gentle note as<br />

Hermès closed the<br />

autumn/winter 2014<br />

“I’ve been here<br />

since 5,” said Tom<br />

Ford, his hands<br />

encircling Anne<br />

Hathaway’s slim<br />

waist at the<br />

entrance to the<br />

Vanity Fair Oscars<br />

This collection,<br />

if shown during<br />

the Paris haute<br />

couture season,<br />

would illuminate<br />

the fading calendar<br />

and underscore<br />

the meld of<br />

And a desire-provoking<br />

one. “When<br />

I saw it at the<br />

show, I said ‘I<br />

want this dress,’<br />

” said Wendy<br />

Goodman, the<br />

design editor of<br />

Perhaps the most<br />

captivating<br />

fashion statement<br />

this season in New<br />

York was not on<br />

the runway or the<br />

street, but at the<br />

Winter Antiques<br />

Striped tube socks<br />

moved from the<br />

soccer field to<br />

the runway when<br />

Miuccia Prada<br />

showed footless<br />

tube-sock leg<br />

warmers for<br />

The designer<br />

Christophe Lemaire<br />

has finally moved<br />

into this gentle<br />

pace, sending out<br />

a fine collection.<br />

It started with<br />

double-face<br />

Last month, Mr.<br />

Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />

Lipinski, 31, were<br />

a pair of retired<br />

figure skaters,<br />

memorable for<br />

their sequined<br />

outfits and<br />

If you want to be<br />

in vogue next<br />

fall, you had best<br />

start saving now,<br />

for there was fur<br />

on the runway in<br />

show after show,<br />

especially in<br />

Through the fire<br />

and through the<br />

flames, You won't<br />

even say your<br />

name, Only "I am<br />

that I am", But<br />

who could ever<br />

live that way? Ut<br />

When I was 12, I<br />

worried that I<br />

might never grow<br />

breasts. There I<br />

was, all of 80<br />

pounds, nothing<br />

but skin and<br />

bones, bruised<br />

A room arranged<br />

under the rubric<br />

“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />

a Giovanni<br />

Boldini portrait<br />

of Count Robert de<br />

Montesquiou<br />

borrowed from the<br />

More than half of<br />

the 400-plus<br />

pieces on display<br />

were borrowed from<br />

other museums and<br />

private collections.<br />

The challenge<br />

was not only<br />

The Sturm und<br />

Drang of four<br />

weeks of international<br />

collections<br />

ended Wednesday on<br />

a gentle note as<br />

Hermès closed the<br />

autumn/winter 2014<br />

“I’ve been here<br />

since 5,” said Tom<br />

Ford, his hands<br />

encircling Anne<br />

Hathaway’s slim<br />

waist at the<br />

entrance to the<br />

Vanity Fair Oscars<br />

This collection,<br />

if shown during<br />

the Paris haute<br />

couture season,<br />

would illuminate<br />

the fading calendar<br />

and underscore<br />

the meld of<br />

And a desire-provoking<br />

one. “When<br />

I saw it at the<br />

show, I said ‘I<br />

want this dress,’<br />

” said Wendy<br />

Goodman, the<br />

design editor of<br />

Perhaps the most<br />

captivating<br />

fashion statement<br />

this season in New<br />

York was not on<br />

the runway or the<br />

street, but at the<br />

Winter Antiques<br />

Striped tube socks<br />

moved from the<br />

soccer field to<br />

the runway when<br />

Miuccia Prada<br />

showed footless<br />

tube-sock leg<br />

warmers for<br />

The designer<br />

Christophe Lemaire<br />

has finally moved<br />

into this gentle<br />

pace, sending out<br />

a fine collection.<br />

It started with<br />

double-face<br />

Last month, Mr.<br />

Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />

Lipinski, 31, were<br />

a pair of retired<br />

figure skaters,<br />

memorable for<br />

their sequined<br />

outfits and<br />

If you want to be<br />

in vogue next<br />

fall, you had best<br />

start saving now,<br />

for there was fur<br />

on the runway in<br />

show after show,<br />

especially in<br />

Through the fire<br />

and through the<br />

flames, You won't<br />

even say your<br />

name, Only "I am<br />

that I am", But<br />

who could ever<br />

live that way? Ut<br />

When I was 12, I<br />

worried that I<br />

might never grow<br />

breasts. There I<br />

was, all of 80<br />

pounds, nothing<br />

but skin and<br />

bones, bruised<br />

A room arranged<br />

under the rubric<br />

“Foppish” juxtaposes<br />

a Giovanni<br />

Boldini portrait<br />

of Count Robert de<br />

Montesquiou<br />

borrowed from the<br />

More than half of<br />

the 400-plus<br />

pieces on display<br />

were borrowed from<br />

other museums and<br />

private collections.<br />

The challenge<br />

was not only<br />

The Sturm und<br />

Drang of four<br />

weeks of international<br />

collections<br />

ended Wednesday on<br />

a gentle note as<br />

Hermès closed the<br />

autumn/winter 2014<br />

“I’ve been here<br />

since 5,” said Tom<br />

Ford, his hands<br />

encircling Anne<br />

Hathaway’s slim<br />

waist at the<br />

entrance to the<br />

Vanity Fair Oscars<br />

This collection,<br />

if shown during<br />

the Paris haute<br />

couture season,<br />

would illuminate<br />

the fading calendar<br />

and underscore<br />

the meld of<br />

And a desire-provoking<br />

one. “When<br />

I saw it at the<br />

show, I said ‘I<br />

want this dress,’<br />

” said Wendy<br />

Goodman, the<br />

design editor of<br />

Perhaps the most<br />

captivating<br />

fashion statement<br />

this season in New<br />

York was not on<br />

the runway or the<br />

street, but at the<br />

Winter Antiques<br />

Striped tube socks<br />

moved from the<br />

soccer field to<br />

the runway when<br />

Miuccia Prada<br />

showed footless<br />

tube-sock leg<br />

warmers for<br />

The designer<br />

Christophe Lemaire<br />

has finally moved<br />

into this gentle<br />

pace, sending out<br />

a fine collection.<br />

It started with<br />

double-face<br />

Last month, Mr.<br />

Weir, 29, and Ms.<br />

Lipinski, 31, were<br />

a pair of retired<br />

figure skaters,<br />

memorable for<br />

their sequined<br />

outfits and<br />

If you want to be<br />

in vogue next<br />

fall, you had best<br />

start saving now,<br />

for there was fur<br />

on the runway in<br />

show after show,<br />

especially in<br />

Through the fire<br />

and through the<br />

flames, You won't<br />

even say your<br />

name, Only "I am<br />

that I am", But<br />

who could ever<br />

live that way? Ut<br />

When I was 12, I<br />

worried that I<br />

might never grow<br />

breasts. There I<br />

was, all of 80<br />

pounds, nothing<br />

but skin and<br />

bones, bruised<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 199


and ventilation and by its insulation values<br />

and solar-shading capacities.” (78)<br />

An irresponsibility has arisen in contemporary<br />

architecture which allows for<br />

the simplification of a building’s skin to<br />

mere millimeters. This must be adverted,<br />

under proper circumstances and wills,<br />

so that, when desired, the interactions<br />

procured by decisive design choices enable<br />

greater levels of both permeability<br />

and closure. This is not to attack literally<br />

the depth of these skins, but to propose<br />

the hijacking of their phenomenological<br />

affects politically to both the reward and<br />

the power of the architecture (thus, the<br />

architect) and its constituencies.<br />

“Is architecture socially constructed, or is<br />

it a faithful representation of reality? Or<br />

is it rather the missing link between the<br />

community of humans and the community<br />

of things as political entities?” (79)<br />

As Zaera Polo goes onward to note,<br />

either definition may prove limiting to the<br />

aspects of architecture’s true capabilities<br />

in the world. Of this, it may be difficult in<br />

a short manner to pontificate. Rather, the<br />

inadequacies of either approach can be<br />

outlined as a preemptive assumption of<br />

their roles and strengths. Firstly, socially<br />

constructed architecture depends on<br />

social consensus, which has, as proven<br />

throughout human history, resulted in the<br />

necessity of politics, the ends of which<br />

do not always benefit all those involved.<br />

Maybe, compromise is impossible. In any<br />

case, the ramifications of these actions<br />

can cause collateral of both natures, and<br />

such consequences must be considered,<br />

whatever their difficulty in foresight or<br />

planning pertains. Secondly, the presumption<br />

of architecture to a faithful<br />

representation of reality is problematic in<br />

its formalistic overtones. To limit architecture<br />

to the understandings of architects<br />

is to forge an elite group, forging delineations<br />

between those in and those outside<br />

“the know”. This is an absolutely horrid<br />

afterbirth of architecture, and must be<br />

avoided at all costs. It is purely formal<br />

snobbery, estranging the public and driving<br />

away interest by outside constituencies.<br />

Although internal investigations are<br />

helpful to the field, there should be no<br />

reason that they are to be thrust unknowingly<br />

unto the populace as an unknowing<br />

whole. This is mere oppression, in and of<br />

itself representing the God Complex so<br />

pervasive with architects qua fascists.<br />

“It is at this level [in a building’s façade]<br />

that the discussion of the qualities and<br />

structure of material organizations —<br />

such as different and repetition, consistency<br />

and variation, flexibility, transparency,<br />

permeability, local and global and the<br />

definition of the ground — that architecture<br />

becomes political. The politicization<br />

of architecture may also be induced by<br />

virtue of representation — and not just by<br />

synthesizing physical expressions of political<br />

concepts, but by literally redesigning<br />

typical living conditions or lifestyles<br />

— or by disrupting political norms or<br />

assumed environmental imperatives.<br />

It is vital that we bring more than a<br />

phenomenological understanding to the<br />

affects of architecture. Too pervasively,<br />

these aspects are pontificated on purely<br />

experiential levels. What does the experience<br />

mean? In a particularly political<br />

context which is unavoidable throughout<br />

so many high-profile projects of late,<br />

these comprehensions must be leveled<br />

against the agencies of architecture at<br />

play, lest we fall behind our own game<br />

and unwittingly engage a dichotomy of<br />

esoteric values and grand misunderstandings.<br />

“Political expression and identity are<br />

particularly important in the dynamics of<br />

the envelope as regulators of exchanges<br />

between inside and outside. The fenestration<br />

pattern in a building’s façade has<br />

psychological and symbolic connotations<br />

and has been historically attached to<br />

political representations.” (87)<br />

When the interconnections between the<br />

experiential and political substances of<br />

architecture are left without proper contemplation,<br />

the field easily oscillates into<br />

a form overtaken by ephemeral instances<br />

of wills on the part of the individual or<br />

oligarchical constituency. Architecture<br />

which does not shout loud enough is<br />

easily overwritten by those willing to<br />

speak for it. Specifically, how are these<br />

in their relationships with those involved<br />

with a building? It would seem that much<br />

contemporary architecture either ignores<br />

or subordinates its users. That is to say,<br />

theirs is a role usually reserved to that of<br />

being spectator, prisoner or accomplice.<br />

What is their agency in the projects? It<br />

would seem detrimental to any contemporary<br />

architecture if it were willing to do<br />

such crimes to its own users, yet such<br />

behaviors shine as pervasive.<br />

200 SCI-Fa 2B Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Scoop Drawing: Production Spiral<br />

201


202 SCI-Fa 2B Studio Final Model


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Interior Model<br />

203


NELSON ATKINS MUSEUM PRECEDENT STUDY<br />

3B Studio<br />

Spring 2015, David Freeland<br />

With Johan Wijesinghe<br />

We encounter at the Nelson-Atkins<br />

museum a middle ground of human<br />

experience. Neither monumental nor<br />

rather quaint, materially rich yet sterilely<br />

abstract, the project rides a certain<br />

division between the strata of spatial<br />

reactions architecture might elicit. In so<br />

doing, the project conceptualizes contemporary<br />

architecture as something<br />

resolutely non-iconic, all the while unique<br />

in its cultivation of space as voluminous<br />

entities through and around which we<br />

flow, explore, obfuscate and discover.<br />

The borders between different conditions,<br />

innate to the situation around<br />

Steven Holl’s Nelson-Atkins Museum of<br />

Art in Kansas City (Missouri) are sensibilities<br />

of architectural coherency, pliable<br />

geometries and manipulated boundaries.<br />

Holl challenges the often awkward and<br />

problematic issue of museum expansion,<br />

confronting coexistence through contrast.<br />

Holl, subverts the typified approach, confiscating<br />

the immediate architectural joint<br />

of the expansion below grade tying the<br />

Beaux Arts wing to the present through<br />

de-materialization of both landscape and<br />

weightless translucent boxes (Lenses).<br />

This initiates a series of consequences in<br />

the massing of the landscape and gallery<br />

spaces alike, bending and folding in a<br />

manner both referential to the natural<br />

slope of the site and defiant in their<br />

relegation of the understanding of the<br />

existing architecture.<br />

Where Holl eschews complete comprehension,<br />

allowing formal reading<br />

neither exclusively in terms of exterior or<br />

interior experience at any one time, the<br />

architectural prerogatives of the project<br />

create deep interior cavities into which<br />

the scheme infills gallery space. This<br />

mutual xclusivity entitles two distinct<br />

experiences: Between the path and the<br />

galleries, drawn to punctuations Gallery<br />

spaces awash in diffused light within<br />

and, beyond their walls, a distinctly playful<br />

stance of the project’s massing. The<br />

ambitions of the project, choreographs<br />

light as both a way to view the art in<br />

a full spectrum and a methodology of<br />

circulation. There the translucent boxes,<br />

as Steven Holl refers to “lenses”, the most<br />

visible part of an underground world,<br />

risingfrom the landscape enveloped by<br />

a park and framing sculpture courts in<br />

the in-between confronting the issue<br />

light. Experienced from the galleries, Half<br />

vaulted walls funnel the a mixed spectrum<br />

of the more blue northern light and<br />

red southern light.<br />

(Right) Situation, bordered to the North<br />

by the existing museum complex, to<br />

the South and West by the park and to<br />

the East by Middle America suburbia.<br />

(Next Spreads) Plans and sections<br />

detailing the distribution of spaces<br />

between the galleries, below<br />

grade, and the boxes which<br />

allow in light from above.<br />

206


208 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio Basement and Roof Plans


B<br />

B<br />

A<br />

A<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Plan with Regulating Geometry<br />

209


Section showing relationship to existing<br />

museum. By connecting the two<br />

underground, gallery space is allowed to<br />

be function as if continuous even though<br />

the outward reading of the buildings<br />

would suggest two autonomous<br />

organization. While this operation is<br />

typically taken under in plan, part of the<br />

eloquence of the Nelson Atkins’ design<br />

is to carry this out effectively in section.<br />

210 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio


Read along its gallery length, the project<br />

establishes a clear dichotomy between<br />

vertical spaces of light infiltration,<br />

serving little programmatic function<br />

aside from a main building to the North<br />

of the site, and more shallow spaces of<br />

horizontal circulation and gallery space.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 211


212 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 213


(Previous Spread) Within vertical<br />

spaces, a careful abstraction of the<br />

archetypal vault breaks the solidity of the<br />

architectural trope and splits its authority<br />

along two distinct sides, allowing light<br />

to enter the gallery spaces. Punches<br />

through this form provide circulation<br />

across, while the walls themselves<br />

provide space for artwork to be hung.<br />

(This Spread) A play of axial shifting<br />

and misalignment occurs across<br />

the site in order to formally drive the<br />

composition and “bending” of the<br />

boxes. While a major alignment strikes<br />

the street running alongside to the<br />

East, most others are formal measures<br />

taken in without consideration to site<br />

or context, rather conceptualizing the<br />

geometrical organization of the museum<br />

as something of its own world. From<br />

ground level, this evokes something<br />

reminiscent of follies, allowing guests<br />

to stumble between each box as they<br />

explore the gradual change in landscape<br />

between the park to the South and<br />

museum complex to the North.<br />

214


215


Explicated within the boxes, this system<br />

of axial torquing defines both the formal<br />

organization of the vaults (above) and<br />

the overall geometry of the boxes (right).<br />

216 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio


217


218 Nelson Atkins Museum Precedent Study 3B Studio Torqued Boxes


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 219


EL ROSARIO MARKET REDEVELOPMENT<br />

4B Vertical Studio<br />

Spring 2016, John Enright<br />

(Above) Map showing location of<br />

the site (red) within the lager Unité<br />

scheme (yellow) and adjacent industrial<br />

or warehouse zones (purple)<br />

(Below) Otto Wagner, Majolica<br />

House, Vienna, 1899<br />

(Next Page) Axonometric showing<br />

the contextual fitting of the building’s<br />

mass between the existing bars<br />

of the site’s housing blocks<br />

With Kevin Ng<br />

This project was specially selected to be<br />

featured in SCI-Arc’s Spring Show 2016.<br />

The Situation in El Rosario<br />

Situated on the outskirts of Mexico City,<br />

the social housing development at El<br />

Rosario has a mixed character. Occupied<br />

to full capacity as one of the largest<br />

Unité-model residential schemes in Latin<br />

America, the neighborhood has been<br />

rattled with gang-related crime and high<br />

rates of drug addiction. The Mexican<br />

state reports rates upwards of 44% in<br />

terms of drug addiction among the area’s<br />

inhabitants.<br />

At the same time, a thriving crafts market<br />

exists, filling a void left by the departure<br />

of manufacturing jobs from the area. This<br />

impromptu bazaar is so prominent that<br />

the government has gone so far as to<br />

implement programs to instruct locals on<br />

marketing and sales.<br />

These are the contradictory conditions<br />

with which the redevelopment of El Rosario<br />

must content. At once appropriate<br />

and outdated, adequate but insufficient,<br />

the conditions of the area hold both the<br />

promise for improvement and the threat<br />

of further degradation. Responding to<br />

the conditions of this urban collision, the<br />

project proposes a facility containing a<br />

large open-air market, a drug rehabilitation<br />

facility and a job center.<br />

Engagements of the Façade<br />

In realizing these typologies, the building’s<br />

façade becomes engaged as an<br />

architectural element capable of pliantly<br />

adjusting its identity to fit the conditions<br />

of its need. In large swaths of the site,<br />

this takes the form of two specific material<br />

conditions, each tuned specifically<br />

to its scale, constituency and context.<br />

Larger portions of the envelope are<br />

colored in abstractions of Hudson Valley<br />

School paintings, while lower level areas<br />

around the base have an applied floral<br />

texture with a slight degree of abstraction.<br />

Beyond the phenomenological<br />

implications these attain upon encounter,<br />

each engages a specific dialogue around<br />

its reference and constituency. While the<br />

abstract colored panels above have little<br />

legibility in terms of their precedent, the<br />

floral patterns retain a high degree of<br />

fidelity even after their abstraction. These<br />

characteristics account for the scalar difference<br />

in experience between them and<br />

the more distant, larger painting-based<br />

areas. They are specifically designed to<br />

be interacted with at a humanly scale<br />

and, thus, hold a certain referential<br />

iconography that enables them to be<br />

recognized as such.<br />

Further implications deal with a conversation<br />

around the idea of a market place,<br />

which is indeed the program holding<br />

the vast majority of the lowest level. By<br />

contrast, the larger areas of the upper<br />

colored panels are never interacted with<br />

directly, therefore holding a more restrained,<br />

urban situation. As the Hudson<br />

Valley school became the first Western<br />

conceptualization within the artistic<br />

cannon of the aestheticization of the<br />

North American continent by those who<br />

inhabited and raised its lands, it seems<br />

appropriate that the building’s sheathing<br />

would similarly deal with the aesthetic<br />

questions around expansiveness and<br />

landscape. As with Otto Wagner’s Majolica<br />

House in Vienna, both approaches<br />

touch on the concept of what we might<br />

call “Urban Wallpaper”, positing that an<br />

encounter with an architectural object<br />

might become the possibility for a graphic<br />

engagement with cultural, sociological<br />

or formal qualities a constituency shares<br />

with its architecture.<br />

Contextualities<br />

Rather than resisting the tendencies<br />

of the site, this project supposes that<br />

legitimate architectural moves can be<br />

achieved within complete relegation<br />

to extant qualities of its surroundings.<br />

This approach begins with the building’s<br />

massing, which slenderly wiggles<br />

between the existing structures. Further<br />

engagements begin to implement<br />

programmatic changes even beyond the<br />

scope of completely new construction.<br />

As the ground floors in many of the site’s<br />

structures have already been converted<br />

ad hoc to commercial spaces, the project<br />

formalizes the programmatic distinction<br />

by renovating these areas to appropriately<br />

address their designations. Other sitebased<br />

approaches include an appreciation<br />

for the existing amount of trees and<br />

pedestrian traversability, as seen in the<br />

building’s large public walkway, navigating<br />

sectionally from across the street to a<br />

nearby park.<br />

Rather than antagonizing existing conditions,<br />

the redevelopment of El Rosario<br />

attempts to imbue itself with a certain<br />

palimpsestic quality, challenging the dichotomy<br />

between new and old as fertile<br />

grounds for architectural intervention.<br />

220


222 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Photographs of Circulatory Inadequacies


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Study of Existing Tree Coverage on Site<br />

223


Flower Still-Life<br />

Rachel Ruysch, 1726<br />

Hydrangea Camomile Floral Wallpaper<br />

Laura Ash<br />

Floral Vintage Wallpaper<br />

FreeCreatives<br />

Signature Country Floral FRL004-02-01<br />

Ralph Lauren<br />

Clem<br />

Sand<br />

Floral on a Black Background<br />

Unknown artist<br />

Floral on a Black Background<br />

Recolored<br />

Floral on a Black Background<br />

Recolored, intensified and blurred<br />

Bloem Wallpaper<br />

Clementine 223298<br />

Bloem Wallpaper + Clementine 223298<br />

Bloem Wallpaper + Clementine 223298<br />

Cropped and reformatted<br />

Cropped and reformatted<br />

Imagery overlaid<br />

Lower layers blurred<br />

224 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Initial Floral Investigations


entine 223298<br />

erson<br />

Bloem Wallpaper<br />

Unknown artist<br />

Floral on a Black Background<br />

Misregistered grayscale halftone<br />

Floral on a Black Background<br />

Misregistered grayscale halftone, colorized<br />

Bloem Wallpaper + Clementine 223298<br />

Halftoned using averaged reference colors<br />

Urban Wallpaper<br />

The concept of urban wallpaper can be<br />

found in many well attested sources, from<br />

MVRDV’s market in Rotterdam to Otto<br />

Wagner’s Majolica House in Vienna. To<br />

choreograph an encounter with the urban<br />

object is to entice the experience between<br />

a constituency and an architecture which<br />

may or may not be specified for their use. On<br />

these terms, an urban wallpaper posits the<br />

potential for an experiential endgame for all<br />

passersby. Rather than forgoing a building<br />

as an anonymous object, an engaged façade<br />

with an embedded wallpaper, realized either<br />

graphically or tectonically, allows an association<br />

to form with both place and culture to<br />

emerge.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 225


226 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Floral Print Intensifications


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Resultant Collages<br />

227


228 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Abstracted Floral Prints


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 229


232 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Variable Fritting


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Render: Result of Fritting on Shadow<br />

233


234 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Section: Marketplace and Walkway


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 235


236 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Ground Plan


238 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Section: Market, Housing and Rehab


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 239


240 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Façade Patterning


(Left) Thomas Moran,<br />

“Mosquito Trail”, 1874<br />

(Right) Frederic Edwin<br />

Church, “Cotopaxi”, 1855<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Façade Pattern Studies<br />

241


242 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Chunk Model


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 243


244 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Chunk Model Façade Panels


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Chunk Model Conic Surfacing<br />

245


(animation)<br />

vimeo.com/<br />

165098864<br />

246


247


248 El Rosario Market Redevelopment 4B Vertical Studio Market Interior


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Market Entrance from Park<br />

249


LOWER 4TH STREET MASTERPLAN<br />

Smart Sustainable Systems<br />

Fall 2015, Jamey Lyzun<br />

Synopsis<br />

This project speculates on a masterplan<br />

for the extension of the campus for the<br />

Southern California Institute of Architecture<br />

(SCI-Arc). Programmatically, the plan<br />

calls for an expansion of roughly 72,000<br />

square feet, divided between two existing<br />

buildings on site. Particular emphasis is<br />

placed on the ecological responses of the<br />

building with its Los Angeles context.<br />

Site Ecology as Building Parameter<br />

Rather than formally molding a scheme<br />

to match regulatory demands such as<br />

LEED, this project presupposes a kind<br />

of design guidance which might exist<br />

inherently in any site or context. Beyond<br />

cliché green design tactics which project<br />

unrealistic expectations such as green<br />

roofs onto inappropriate sites, this is an<br />

approach which takes into account the<br />

inherent limitations of its surroundings.<br />

In doing so, we can highlight specific<br />

architectural responses that speak to<br />

chosen factors of ecological engagement<br />

in order to lessen the impact of the building<br />

and its masterplan on the environment.<br />

These tactics include deep consideration<br />

of orientation and sun exposure,<br />

facilitating a series of direct architectural<br />

responses in the forms of double skins,<br />

air shafts and calibrated apertures.<br />

On the exterior, the project purposes a<br />

pedestrianization of an otherwise unnecessary<br />

cross street. Slight redirections in<br />

traffic actually streamline the experience<br />

of driving through the neighborhood and<br />

allow the creation of a large, public plaza<br />

spanning the distance between the two<br />

buildings. Covered by a series of variably<br />

shaped fins, this becomes an enhanced<br />

public space that entices connection<br />

between institution and public.<br />

252 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 253


1 Santa Fe<br />

1 Santa Fe<br />

SCI-Arc<br />

SCI-Arc<br />

Annex<br />

Bldgs. 1 & 2<br />

Annex<br />

Bldg. 2<br />

Annex Bldg. 3<br />

Annex Bldg. 3<br />

254 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Circulation Strategy Diagrams


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Exterior of Gym and Café<br />

255


256 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Situation Plan


WC<br />

Lecture Steps<br />

1530 Ft 2<br />

Open Flexible Space<br />

8889 Ft 2<br />

203 Ft 2 +3, Dormitories 7 to 13<br />

WC<br />

203 Ft 2<br />

Classroom 2<br />

1257 Ft 2<br />

Breakout Space<br />

3577 Ft 2 Classroom 1<br />

1816 Ft 2<br />

+0, Ground Floor Concourse<br />

+1, Flexible Classroom Space<br />

WC<br />

Dorm 03<br />

203 Ft<br />

Dorm 02<br />

2 589 Ft 2<br />

835 Ft<br />

Dorm 01<br />

2 Dorm 04<br />

700 Ft 2<br />

WC<br />

Dorm 09<br />

203 Ft<br />

Dorm 08<br />

2 589 Ft 2<br />

835 Ft<br />

Dorm 07<br />

2 Dorm 10<br />

700 Ft 2 609 Ft 2 Dorm 11<br />

609 Ft 2 Dorm 05<br />

609 Ft 2 Dorm 12<br />

609 Ft 2 Dorm 06<br />

449 Ft 2 Dorm 13<br />

Communal<br />

Space<br />

371 Ft 2<br />

449 Ft 2 +5, Flexible Rooftop Space and HVAC Plant<br />

3888 Ft 2<br />

Communal<br />

Space<br />

4069 Ft 2<br />

+2, Dormitories 1 to 6<br />

Flexible Rooftop Space<br />

8052 Ft 2<br />

WC<br />

Dorm 16<br />

203 Ft<br />

Dorm 15<br />

2 589 Ft 2<br />

835 Ft<br />

Dorm 14<br />

2 Dorm 17<br />

700 Ft 2<br />

HVAC Plant<br />

2367 Ft 2<br />

609 Ft 2 Dorm 18<br />

609 Ft 2 Dorm 19<br />

449 Ft 2 Dorm 20<br />

Communal<br />

Space<br />

425 Ft 2<br />

3151 Ft 2<br />

+4, Dormitories 14 to 20<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Axonometric Plans<br />

257


258 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Daylight Hour Studies


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Fins from Above<br />

259


ZONE 1<br />

Dorms, bathrooms, classrooms and the core, all<br />

requiring heavy access to climate control and other<br />

systems, are kept away from direct sunlight and<br />

within easy access of operable windows.<br />

ZONE 2<br />

Circulation and communal<br />

spaces. Ventilated to lobby<br />

void but within access of<br />

some HVAC.<br />

ZONE 3<br />

Large lobby with most spaces not habitated. Due to<br />

these factors, it is largely ventilated naturally<br />

through a stack effect along a void on its Northern<br />

edge, which itself doubles to block direct light.<br />

CALIBRATED CLIMATE ZONES<br />

Circulatory and communal spaces can remain warmer<br />

while retaining comfort levels, so these are kept immediately<br />

adjacent to the air shaft, to which they naturally<br />

ventilate in order to lessen intensive HVAC expenditure.<br />

OPERABLE WINDOWS<br />

Living spaces are intentionally<br />

placed directly along the North<br />

façade with easy access to<br />

operable windows for natural<br />

ventilation and cooling<br />

Dorms, Level +4<br />

Circulation<br />

Open Rooftop<br />

DOUBLE SKIN<br />

The Southwest and Southeast façades ar<br />

a double skin, blocking direct radiation to<br />

on the interior. Much of the heat that doe<br />

is rendered null passing through an air b<br />

the lobby which borders the envelope.<br />

Dorms, Level +3<br />

Dorms, Level +2<br />

Communal Spaces<br />

STACK EFFECT<br />

The shaft between the inner<br />

layer of the envelope and the<br />

edge of the lobby’s wall<br />

passively cools the space<br />

with a stack effect<br />

FINS PROVIDE S<br />

Fins block a large<br />

light from entering<br />

allowing some diff<br />

ample natural illum<br />

Classrooms, Level +1<br />

Lobby / Public Lecture Hall, Level +0<br />

SOUTH FAÇADE OFFSET<br />

Offsetting back the<br />

programmatic core of the<br />

building conceals it from<br />

direct sun exposure.<br />

GRAYWATER HARVESTING<br />

The geometry of the fins inherently<br />

siphons water into collected channels,<br />

which in turn feed larger collection<br />

tanks on site for graywater reuse.<br />

ANNEX BUILDING 1<br />

Dormitories for 60-100 students (in 20 dorm rooms),<br />

public lecture hall, flexible use lobby space, classrooms<br />

in both flexible and enclosed configurations<br />

and an open publicly accessible rooftop<br />

MATEO STREET PLAZA<br />

Large open plaza made by pede<br />

functionally insignificant cross s<br />

public and private events, open<br />

general circulatory space<br />

260 Lower 4th Street Masterplan Smart Sustainable Systems Section with Green Strategies


e conditioned with<br />

reduce heat loads<br />

s enter the building<br />

arrier in the void of<br />

HADE<br />

deal of direct<br />

the plaza, still<br />

use light in for<br />

ination.<br />

VARIABLE LIGHTING CONDITIONS<br />

To allow maximum flexibility in terms of<br />

programming and climatizing the plaza, the<br />

fins run along variable sweeps, producing a<br />

diverse set of lighting conditions.<br />

FINS CHANNEL RAIN<br />

The fin’s profile is designed to collect water<br />

by channeling it to particular streams, thus<br />

dually sheltering from rain and harnessing<br />

it for graywater collection.<br />

OFFSET FAÇADE<br />

The offset façade along the plaza perimeter of Building 2<br />

allows consistently shaded areas to border the building.<br />

When opened, the operable panels of the façade allow a<br />

chimney-like stack effect to naturally cool the interior.<br />

Gym / Food Hall<br />

ACCESS TO PLAZA FROM INTERIOR<br />

Operable exterior panels along the envelope<br />

of the buildings’ lowest floors allows optional<br />

access directly to the courtyard. Programs<br />

such as the café, gym and lobby can spill<br />

out into the plaza for events for during<br />

particularily active days.<br />

strianization of a<br />

treet to be used for<br />

air markets and<br />

INTERSTITIAL (BREAKOUT) SPACE<br />

Open shaded areas between the buildings and plaza<br />

allow for spill out of program into the plaza when<br />

needed<br />

ANNEX BUILDING 2<br />

Café for student body, gym as well as service areas<br />

and all-purpose kitchen; operable envelope panels<br />

along café and gym perimeter allow significant<br />

breakout into the plaza<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 261


SCI-Arc<br />

Rainwater<br />

collection<br />

pools<br />

Annex<br />

Building 1<br />

Mateo Street Plaza<br />

Annex Building 2


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 (Left) Plan, (Above) Northeast Façade<br />

263


Cathedral of Our<br />

LOS ANGELES MALL OFFICE TOWER<br />

Julius Shulman Competition<br />

Spring 2016, Tom Wiscombe<br />

With Deborah Garcia and Adrian Wong<br />

This project done as a submission on behalf<br />

of SCI-Arc for the 2016 Julius Shulman<br />

Emerging Talent Award, hosted by the LA<br />

Business Council. Tom Wiscombe served<br />

as a faculty advisor.<br />

The Education of a Neighborhood<br />

The proposal put forth will approach<br />

community betterment through an<br />

emphasis on both health and education.<br />

The civic offi ce buildings of Downtown<br />

Los Angeles are home to a vast amount<br />

of employees and occupants. The surrounding<br />

areas are crucial in providing<br />

services that better the quality of life for<br />

the inhabitants of the area. For many<br />

years Downtown has faced a challenge<br />

of meeting these necessities within the<br />

urban fabric of the city. The Los Angeles<br />

Mall is located at the center of this area,<br />

and its placement is integral to the connection<br />

of various important landmarks<br />

and city buildings. Not only does it provide<br />

a link between important locations,<br />

but it is the heart of a neighborhood.<br />

Our proposal introduces various elements<br />

which will promote connectivity<br />

and vibrance within the Downtown<br />

community. The Los Angeles Downtown<br />

Trail - This meandering path functions<br />

not only as a recreational track but as a<br />

flexible space that simultaneously exists<br />

as promenade and urban walkway. Occupants<br />

of the surrounding buildings are<br />

provided with a much needed area to<br />

exercise and revitalize the spirit of pedestrian<br />

activity in Downtown. The city-trail<br />

makes its way from the ground level and<br />

up onto the elevated ground level. At this<br />

elevation the path begins to unfold as an<br />

architectural, historical, and topographic<br />

journey, making its way around, below,<br />

and even through the buildings on the<br />

site. The formal windings of the track pull<br />

visitors along a carefully choreographed<br />

path that highlights views of City Hall,<br />

frames the streets of Downtown, and<br />

gently introduces a new physical terrain<br />

within the heart of Los Angeles.<br />

Public Amphitheater/ Community<br />

Learning Spaces - As the walking track<br />

makes its way through the site, it leads<br />

to various open spaces that have been<br />

designed<br />

LA DWP Building<br />

Ahmanson Theatre<br />

LA County<br />

Doathy Chandler<br />

Treasurer<br />

Pavilion<br />

Disney Concert Hall /<br />

Frank Gehry<br />

Stanley Mosk<br />

Courthouse<br />

Lady of the Angels /<br />

Rafael Moneo<br />

LA County<br />

Planning<br />

High School #9 /<br />

Coop Himmelb(l)au<br />

Hall of Justice<br />

LA Superior<br />

US Courthouse<br />

Court<br />

The Broad /<br />

LA Law Library<br />

DS+R<br />

Grand Park<br />

MOCA<br />

US Courthouse<br />

City Hall<br />

LA Times Building<br />

Police Headquarters<br />

Olivera Street<br />

Chinese American<br />

Museum<br />

US Department of<br />

Homeland Security<br />

US Bankruptcy<br />

Court<br />

Union Station<br />

(Left) Map of prominent locations<br />

and destinations around the mall<br />

site, itself reconceptualized as an<br />

ideal hub for future urban growth<br />

in Downtown Los Angeles due to<br />

its extremely central location<br />

(Right) Rendering from inside the East<br />

Tower’s communal staircase, looking<br />

towards the respective circulatory spaces<br />

on the West Tower. Spatial adjacencies<br />

and similar materialities connect both<br />

spaces and foster a bond between<br />

the differently programmed towers.<br />

(Next Spread) Solar analysis simulations<br />

to determine massing and orientations,<br />

as well as envelope treatments,<br />

based on shading from both City<br />

Hall and its neighboring annex, as<br />

well as the adjacent court building.<br />

Caltrans District 7 /<br />

Morphosis<br />

MOCA Geffen<br />

The Cathedral of<br />

Saint Vibiana<br />

Japanese American<br />

National Museum<br />

266


Solar Radiation on Plazas<br />

21 December<br />

Solar Radiation on Plazas<br />

21 June<br />

Sunlight Hours on Plazas<br />

21 December<br />

Sunlight Hours on Plazas<br />

21 June<br />

268 Los Angeles Mall Office Tower Julius Shulman Competition Solar Analysis Simulations


Solar Radiation on Towers<br />

21 December<br />

Solar Radiation on Towers<br />

21 June<br />

Sunlight Hours on Towers<br />

21 December<br />

Sunlight Hours on Towers<br />

21 June<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 269


for community use. These range from a<br />

large amphitheater at ground level, to<br />

smaller meeting spaces on the elevated<br />

ground level, and stepped seating areas<br />

that are ideal for audiences. For example,<br />

the Triforium sculpture by Joseph Young<br />

sits at the center of one of these outdoor<br />

spaces. The design of specific and deliberate<br />

viewing areas encourage public art<br />

and community activities that may range<br />

from local meetings to per formative<br />

events. The neighborhood is given the<br />

opportunity to foster its own educational<br />

and cultural environment.<br />

Furthermore, elements of sustainability<br />

addressed in the project are maximizing<br />

daylight to reduce use of power for<br />

retail spaces and facade design focuses<br />

on best orientation for advantageous<br />

exposure.<br />

Preservation and Cultural Identity<br />

This proposal seeks to retain and support<br />

the current landmarks of the Los Angeles<br />

Downtown area. The height restriction<br />

set to the elevated ground plane does not<br />

excessively remove the pedestrian from<br />

the urban fabric, instead by lifting the occupant<br />

off the ground to a calibrated and<br />

carefully situated distance the pedestrian<br />

will experience the surrounding buildings<br />

from various vantage points being able to<br />

at once understand the immediate neighborhood<br />

in connection to a much larger<br />

context. There is an interplay between<br />

immediate scale at the individual level, as<br />

well as at the scale of the city as a whole.<br />

This proposed scheme would provide the<br />

ideal way to experience the landmarks<br />

of Los Angeles and would encourage<br />

the preservation of that history for many<br />

more generations to come.<br />

Urban Dichotomies<br />

The Recreational Fitness Track, also<br />

known as the Los Angeles Downtown<br />

Trail winds around the complex’s roof.<br />

The concept of an ‘urban trail’ fi ts well<br />

in city that needs to return the focus to<br />

the pedestrian. This proposed walkway<br />

will encourage pedestrian activity as well<br />

as introduce an experience that is fully<br />

based on the human scale. The track is<br />

large enough for various activities to take<br />

place simultaneously. Inclines are kept<br />

within an average slope, and handicap<br />

accessibility is provided where necessary.<br />

Learning to Walk Again<br />

The history of the downtown area of Los<br />

Angeles is one filled with a rich timeline<br />

of innovation, construction, and development.<br />

Like many other fast-growing<br />

cities, Los Angeles too has faced the<br />

unavoidable disengagement that occurs<br />

between pedestrians and the city around<br />

them. Busy intersections, speeding highways,<br />

and winding freeways have come<br />

to mark Los Angeles as a bustling center<br />

of energy and action. Los Angeles is<br />

always in flux, and so are its inhabitants.<br />

This proposal seeks to satisfy the<br />

Angele-no’s desire to reclaim the ground<br />

beneath their feet. This new city center<br />

introduces the concept of an urban trail,<br />

providing a new topographical experience<br />

in a city of uncharted topographies.<br />

It is here that Los Angeles will learn to<br />

walk again.<br />

(Above) Rendeirng demonstrating<br />

siting of project with massings and<br />

relationship between communal<br />

staircases winding along each tower<br />

(Right, Top) Roof plan with track<br />

and pathways highlighted<br />

(Right, Bottom) Ground plan showing<br />

communal plaza areas and entry lobbies<br />

270 Los Angeles Mall Office Tower Julius Shulman Competition


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Roof Plan (Top), Ground Plan (Bottom)<br />

271


272 Los Angeles Mall Office Tower Julius Shulman Competition Section along Los Angeles Street


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 273


10<br />

15<br />

134<br />

55<br />

85<br />

85<br />

190<br />

RANCHO SAN JUAN REHABILITATION CENTER<br />

4B Vertical Studio<br />

Spring 2016, John Enright<br />

With Kevin Ng<br />

Synopsis<br />

Tasked with repurposing a derelict public<br />

housing development on the suburban<br />

outskirts of metropolitan Mexico City,<br />

this proposal engages a notorious federal<br />

penitentiary which exists immediately adjacent<br />

to the site as a method for reframing<br />

the prerogatives around housing and<br />

redevelopment, in effect interrogating the<br />

prison typology.<br />

Much like that of social housing, the<br />

basic demands of program for prison<br />

facilities approach an equivalence with<br />

large scale residential blocks that allow a<br />

productive conversation to be had. Rancho<br />

San Juan Federal Penitentiary puts<br />

pressure on the typical presumptions<br />

of iconicity, visibility and inhabitability<br />

through which we often phrase discussions<br />

about housing, the welfare state<br />

and societal views on justice.<br />

A New Federal Penitentiary No. 1<br />

Like other suburban developments<br />

propagated by recent administrations<br />

of the Mexican government, Rancho<br />

San Juan performs severely below its<br />

expectations. Crippling rates of vacancy,<br />

perceived safety issues and unrequited<br />

commercial investment have produced a<br />

delinquent suburbia strangely supplanted<br />

within the agrarian farmlands outside of<br />

Toluca, itself defined primarily in periphery<br />

to the capital.<br />

Perhaps most intriguing about the site<br />

is the strange resonance with its surroundings.<br />

Within a kilometer, one comes<br />

across highway access, a major recycling<br />

plant for the nearby metropolises and<br />

abundantly fertile fields. Nonetheless,<br />

it is the extreme adjacency of the site<br />

to Federal Prison No. 1 which suggests<br />

a productive point of commencement<br />

for an architectural project. Beyond the<br />

obvious correspondence between the<br />

site’s vacancy in the prison’s overcrowding<br />

(now at around 130% capacity),<br />

the juxtaposition of incarceration and<br />

suburbia posits the possibility for a series<br />

of interventions onto both architectural<br />

typologies to the ends that we might reexamine<br />

not only the exploitation of their<br />

mutually beneficial shortcomings but<br />

that we could begin to construct a firm<br />

statement about the current state of both<br />

excess residential housing and societally<br />

untimely perceptions about the penitentiary<br />

system.<br />

This project reinterprets the notions of<br />

confinement and surveillance within the<br />

context of housing. A series of horizontal<br />

bars drift across the landscape of the<br />

site, spewing out from the interior of the<br />

prison. Treading Northwards as they<br />

cross the development, their gradual<br />

transition from a typology of dense, vertical<br />

hosing to that of a horizontal scaffold<br />

provides the impetus for an architectural<br />

form-making with immediacy between<br />

physical limitation, housing prisoners in<br />

traditional cells ostracized from the world<br />

by their lifted positioning far above the<br />

ground, and more contemporary understanding<br />

of electronic means for control,<br />

such as ankle bracelets and ubiquitous<br />

digital surveillance from the large, overhanging<br />

scaffold at the freest end of the<br />

project.<br />

The programmatic transformation of<br />

Rancho San Juan combines these methods<br />

to reinterpret the failed suburbia as<br />

incarceration center, redeploying the site<br />

as a place of reintegration for prisoners<br />

into Mexican society. Given the current<br />

dilemmas facing the Mexican prison system,<br />

such as debilitating stigmatization,<br />

prisoner overcrowding and high degrees<br />

of recidivism, the project demands the invention<br />

of both new architectural typologies<br />

and corresponding formal developments<br />

to tackle the intricate sociological<br />

problems of incarceration and housing.<br />

Tilting the Unité Model<br />

There is a strange reciprocity between<br />

social housing and prisons. Both adhere<br />

to a believed relationship between<br />

government intervention, in the form<br />

of spatial confinement, and projected<br />

behavioral improvement on the part of<br />

those contained. Too often, these processes<br />

become mere static boundaries<br />

within which a set of proscribed interactions<br />

are sanctioned. In each case, these<br />

aspire to better the lives of those within.<br />

(Top) Le Corbusier, Unité<br />

d’Habitation, Marseille, 1952<br />

(Above) Diagram of the greater Mexico<br />

City region, including neighboring<br />

Toluca. With over one million residents<br />

and a planned high speed train<br />

connection (diagrammed on next<br />

spread), the expansion of which might<br />

one day pass directly beside the site,<br />

the situation of Altiplano Prison finds<br />

itself in close proximity to series of<br />

intriguing contextual hubs. Likewise,<br />

55<br />

Toluca<br />

15<br />

Where a prison employs walls and bars<br />

presumably to enforce retribution for<br />

social deviance, a social housing development<br />

equivalently wagers that government<br />

sanctioned living conditions will<br />

entice economic prosperity.<br />

In both conditions, the connection<br />

between architectural realization and political<br />

intention becomes rather abstract.<br />

There exists material evidence for the<br />

correspondences between neither solitary<br />

meditation and self-betterment nor<br />

enforced habitation and economic betterment.<br />

When one studies the discrepancies<br />

in success between notable social<br />

housing projects, such as that between<br />

Robin Hood Gardens and the Barbican<br />

Centre, it becomes clear that architecture<br />

has little power over the inevitable<br />

57<br />

68<br />

95<br />

50<br />

Mexico City, D.F.<br />

this collision of constituencies renders<br />

the extant facilities as incapable of<br />

addressing contemporary Mexico.<br />

(Right) Harold Fisk’s 1944 “Geological<br />

Investigation of the Alluvial Valley of<br />

the Lower Mississippi River”, showing<br />

the plethora of identites that one linear<br />

stream of material can contain (in<br />

this case literally manifest as such).<br />

The new Federal Penitentiary No. 1<br />

replays this formal logic to reform the<br />

process of in-prison rehabilitation.<br />

57<br />

36<br />

278 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Harold Fisk’s Mississippi River Drawings<br />

279


340 KM<br />

Guanajuato / Celaya<br />

595,740 (+2.7 Hr.)<br />

7,649<br />

300 KM<br />

330 KM<br />

Tarimoro<br />

59,571<br />

La Moncada<br />

4,130<br />

310 KM<br />

Michoacán / Acámbaro<br />

169,900 (+2.2 Hr.)<br />

290 KM<br />

260 KM<br />

250 KM<br />

240 KM<br />

230 KM<br />

220 KM<br />

210 KM<br />

200 KM<br />

190 KM<br />

180 KM<br />

Estado de México / El Oro<br />

278,264 (+1 Hr.)<br />

170 KM<br />

(León)<br />

(1,578,626 ) (+115 KM) (+2.9 Hr.)<br />

(Guadaljara)<br />

(1,495,189) (+250 KM) (+5.3 Hr.)<br />

San Nicolás de los Agustinos<br />

6,878<br />

San Pedro de los Naranjos<br />

4,365<br />

San Andrés de Salvatierra<br />

34,066<br />

Maravatío del Encinal<br />

3,262<br />

San Miguel Eménguaro<br />

1,526<br />

CELAYA<br />

468,469<br />

Santa María del Refugio<br />

2,453<br />

320 KM<br />

Panales Jamaica<br />

2,073<br />

Urireo<br />

Chamácuaro<br />

1,298<br />

Parácuaro<br />

25,582<br />

Jaral del Refugio<br />

724<br />

280 KM<br />

ACÁMBARO<br />

55,082<br />

270 KM<br />

San Ramón<br />

629<br />

La Encarnación<br />

1,423<br />

Santa Inés<br />

347<br />

San José de Porto<br />

429<br />

Tarandacuao<br />

11,583<br />

Maravatío<br />

70,170<br />

Tungareo<br />

3,931<br />

EL ORO<br />

31,847<br />

280 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Proposed High Speed Rail Link


México, D. F.<br />

4,174,928 (+10 Min.)<br />

3600 M<br />

1800 M<br />

5400 M<br />

0 KM<br />

TLALNEPANTLA DE BAZ<br />

Gustavo A. Madero<br />

664,225<br />

1,185,772<br />

Azcapotzalco<br />

10 KM<br />

425,298<br />

Tlalnepantla de Baz<br />

664,225<br />

Naucalpan de Juárez<br />

872,320<br />

20 KM<br />

Miguel Hidalgo<br />

353,534<br />

Huixquilucan<br />

9,554<br />

160 KM<br />

150 KM<br />

Santa María Citendeje 140 KM<br />

5,641<br />

Atlacomulco de Fabela<br />

San Miguel Tenochtitlán<br />

22,774<br />

San Felipe del Progreso<br />

5,280<br />

4,001<br />

140 KM<br />

San Juan Jalpa Centro<br />

2,209<br />

San Cristóbal los Baños<br />

Dolores Hidalgo<br />

4,099<br />

54,843 La Concepción los Baños<br />

6,498<br />

130 KM<br />

San Bartolo del Llano<br />

11,421<br />

San Juan de las Manzanas<br />

3,128<br />

120 KM<br />

Ixtlahuaca de Rayón<br />

126,505<br />

110 KM<br />

Valle de México / Toluca<br />

1,717,747 (+20 Min.)<br />

SITE<br />

100 KM<br />

San Cayetano Morelos<br />

4,439<br />

Almoloya de Juárez<br />

126,163<br />

San Pablo Autopan<br />

35,141<br />

90 KM<br />

30 KM<br />

Huixquilucan de Degollado<br />

242,167<br />

40 KM<br />

50 KM<br />

Santa María Atarasquillo<br />

Ocoyoacac<br />

13,769<br />

61,805<br />

60 KM<br />

Cerrillo Vista Hermosa<br />

6,444<br />

San Pedro Cholula<br />

113,436<br />

San Miguel Totoltepec<br />

4,572<br />

80 KM<br />

San Marcos Yachihuacaltepec<br />

5,917<br />

TOLUCA DE LERDO<br />

819,561<br />

Santa Cruz Otzacatipan<br />

4,191<br />

San Mateo Atenco<br />

66,740<br />

70 KM<br />

San Gaspar Tlahuelilpan<br />

7,397<br />

Metepec<br />

206,005<br />

(In Planning)<br />

~3.9 Mil. (38 Min.)<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 281


Security Designation Data<br />

Point Total<br />

Public Saftey Factors Security Level<br />

Severity of Current Offense<br />

Criminal History Score<br />

Type of Detainer<br />

Age<br />

Education Level<br />

Drug / Alcohol Abuse<br />

No (0)<br />

Yes (-3)<br />

Voluntary Surrender Status Deportable Alien<br />

Lowest (0)<br />

Low Moderate (1)<br />

Moderate (2)<br />

High (5)<br />

Greatest (7)<br />

1-2 (0)<br />

2-03 (2)<br />

4-6 (4)<br />

7-9 (6)<br />

10-12 (8)<br />

13+ (10)<br />

None (0)<br />

Lowest / Low Moderate (1)<br />

Moderate (3)<br />

High (5)<br />

Greatest (7)<br />

55 and over (0)<br />

36 through 54 (2)<br />

25 through 35 (4)<br />

24 or less (8)<br />

High school or GED (0)<br />

Currently attaining GED (1)<br />

No degree (2)<br />

Never or >5 Years (0)<br />

10 Years<br />

Sentence Remaining > 20 Years<br />

Sentence Remaining > 30 Years<br />

Non-Parolable Life Sentence<br />

Serious Escape<br />

Disruptive Group<br />

Prison Disturbance<br />

No Public Saftey Factors<br />

Serious Escape<br />

Sentence Remaining > 10 Years<br />

Sentence Remaining > 20 Years<br />

Sentence Remaining > 30 Years<br />

Non-Parolable Life Sentence<br />

Disruptive Group<br />

Prison Disturbance<br />

No Public Saftey Factors<br />

Disruptive Group<br />

Prison Disturbance<br />

Sentence Remaining > 30<br />

Non-Parolable Life Sentence<br />

No Public Saftey Factors<br />

All Cases<br />

Minimum<br />

Low<br />

Medium<br />

High<br />

None (0)<br />

History of Escape<br />

Minor History of Escape<br />

>15 Years (1)<br />

10-15 Years (1)<br />

5-10 Years (2)<br />

15 Years (3)<br />

10-15 Years (3)<br />

5-10 Years (3)<br />

15 Years (1)<br />

10-15 Years (1)<br />

5-10 Years (3)<br />

15 Years (2)<br />

10-15 Years (4)<br />

5-10 Years (6)<br />


286 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio


prospects of a government initiative.<br />

Rather, a choreographed intersection<br />

of policy, enforcement and, finally, built<br />

form are necessary to achieve success.<br />

This quality far from belittles architecture,<br />

instead freeing the architectural response<br />

to work broadly on its own terms.<br />

This project resists the temptation to<br />

deliver a single, ossified solution to the<br />

problem of incarceration in Mexico in<br />

a built form. Although the result of the<br />

investigation is indeed a built urbanity,<br />

easily recognizable as such, its premise<br />

revolves less around the adherence to<br />

a singular type of confinement than the<br />

proliferation of variable living conditions.<br />

To these ends, the project adopts the<br />

Corbusian model of Unité housing as a<br />

point of departure. The aforementioned<br />

reciprocity between social housing and<br />

imprisonment, both of which are encountered<br />

on site before any intervention,<br />

binds these concepts to access a variety<br />

of living conditions that avoid the belief<br />

that various individuals should find moral<br />

salvation when subjected to a series of<br />

monotonous spaces.<br />

A set of theoretically minor interventions<br />

into the Unité model permit this diversification<br />

of conditions. These include a<br />

unique set of façade geometries which<br />

assure each cell corresponds to uniquely<br />

individual levels of interior visibility,<br />

exterior accessibility and light penetration.<br />

As the form tilts to its side, this set of<br />

variables doubles, further engaging the<br />

possibility of novel modes of incarceration.<br />

Finally released into the retained<br />

suburbanity of the Rancho San Juan<br />

facility below, prisoners are taken along<br />

a gradient of confinement, encountering<br />

along the way various typologies of access,<br />

solitude and exposure.<br />

(Left) Exploded axonometric drawing<br />

showing the various layers of<br />

functional bands combined to form<br />

the various structures, pathways and<br />

security features of the prison.<br />

(Above) Program diagram showing<br />

the existing facilities and the initially<br />

planned expansion of the prison. Though<br />

greatly expanded upon in the final<br />

scheme, preliminary explorations easily<br />

demonstrated both the programmatic<br />

response to prevalent prison<br />

overcrowding and the comparative<br />

dual expansions in cell sizes and<br />

employee-related facilities to ameliorate<br />

the inhumane spatial parameters<br />

currently used in prison design.<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Program Compositions<br />

287


288 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Plan Details for Junctions and Objects


Healthcare Facility<br />

Administrative Center<br />

and High Speed Rail Link<br />

Education Building<br />

Community Center<br />

Courthouse Complex<br />

and Parking<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Object Buildings<br />

289


290 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Cutaway Axonometric


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Sections in Block 1<br />

291


Iteration 1.1<br />

Iteration 3.1<br />

Iteration 3.2<br />

Iteration 5.2<br />

Level Shift:<br />

False Cell Randomization: False<br />

Level Shift Minimum: - Randomization Level: -<br />

Level Shift Maximum: - End Preservation: -<br />

Level Shift Randomization: 0<br />

Level Shift:<br />

True Cell Randomization: False<br />

Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: -<br />

Level Shift Maximum: +20 End Preservation: -<br />

Level Shift Randomization: 0<br />

Level Shift:<br />

True Cell Randomization: False<br />

Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: -<br />

Level Shift Maximum: +20 End Preservation: -<br />

Level Shift Randomization: .15<br />

Level Shift:<br />

True<br />

Level Shift Minimum: -10<br />

Level Shift Maximum: +20<br />

Level Shift Randomization: .15<br />

292 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Façade Variation Studies


Iteration 5.3<br />

Iteration 6.2<br />

Iteration 7<br />

Cell Randomization: True<br />

Randomization Level: .003<br />

End Preservation: .025<br />

Level Shift:<br />

True Cell Randomization: True<br />

Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: .005<br />

Level Shift Maximum: +20 End Preservation: .025<br />

Level Shift Randomization: .15<br />

Level Shift:<br />

True Cell Randomization: True<br />

Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: .007<br />

Level Shift Maximum: +15 End Preservation: .025<br />

Level Shift Randomization: .1<br />

Level Shift:<br />

True Cell Randomization: True<br />

Level Shift Minimum: -10 Randomization Level: .008<br />

Level Shift Maximum: +15 End Preservation: .03<br />

Level Shift Randomization: .07<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 293


294


(animation)<br />

vimeo.com/<br />

165098217<br />

295


296 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio


-68.5°<br />

Panel B1.2_6_78<br />

Panel B1.2_4_46<br />

65°<br />

58°<br />

42°<br />

13°<br />

-18.2°<br />

0.268<br />

0.711<br />

0.374<br />

0.854<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Aperture Geometry Parameters<br />

297


298 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Section in Block 2


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 299


37.2°<br />

31.0%<br />

11.1°<br />

9.2%<br />

+25.9°<br />

0.0°<br />

-11.3°<br />

-4.3°<br />

-15.4°<br />

33.2°<br />

20.0%<br />

9.5°<br />

5.9%<br />

300 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Prison Cell Geometry Parameters


7.8°<br />

4.8%<br />

+26.7°<br />

28.1°<br />

23.4%<br />

-1.4°<br />

0.0°<br />

-2.6°<br />

27.6°<br />

23.0%<br />

-30.2°<br />

7.6°<br />

6.3%<br />

<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 301


302 Rancho San Juan Rehabilitation Center 4B Vertical Studio Light Variations in Cells and Objects


<strong>Connor</strong> <strong>Gravelle</strong> <strong>Portfolio</strong> 2012-2015 Sections in Block 4 and Scaffold<br />

303


End<br />

Thank you for taking your time<br />

to look at my portfolio!<br />

For contact information, please<br />

refer to the information pages at<br />

the beginning of the book.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!