04.06.2017 Views

Diversity and spatial distribution of stem borers and their natural enemies on off season sorghum, Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench (Poaceae), in the Sudano-sahelian zone of Cameroon

Abstract Lepidopteran stem borers are among the most damaging insect pests of cultivated Poaceae in Africa. The objective of this study was to assess the diversity and the relative abundance of Lepidopteran stem borers and evaluate the larva-pupalparasitization in farmer’s fields. Surveys were conducted during two transplanted sorghum’ cropping seasons (2012/2013 and 2013/2014) in 3 agro-ecological sub-units in the Sudano-sahelian zone of Cameroon: Mandaras’ piedmonts (MP), Diamare plain (DP), Logon valley (LV). Destructive method was used to collect caterpillars and pupae from plants according to developmental stages of the sorghum this was followed by their identification. Pupae were reared under laboratory conditions and emerging insects were recorded. They were the expected moths or their parasitoids. During the two years, 180 fields were sampled. Three stem borers’ species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were identified and the most abundant being SesamiacreticaLederer (68.27%), followed by S. poephaga (27.54%) and then S. calamistis (0.19%). It was also appeared that S. cretica and S. poephaga were present in sampled areas whereas, S. calamistisoccurred only at LV. Parasitoids species obtained belong to 3 Orders: Hymenoptera,Diptera and Coleoptera. The most important pupalparasitoid of the zone was Tetrastichussp (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Highest parasitization (17.15±14.59%) was recorded at MD followed by LV (14.15±7.42%) and the DP (11.19±0.69%). Tetrastichussp is a potential biological control agent of stem borers and could be used in integrated pest management process to prevent economic damage ofthe sorghum by the borers.

Abstract
Lepidopteran stem borers are among the most damaging insect pests of cultivated Poaceae in Africa. The objective of this study was to assess the diversity and the relative abundance of Lepidopteran stem borers and
evaluate the larva-pupalparasitization in farmer’s fields. Surveys were conducted during two transplanted sorghum’ cropping seasons (2012/2013 and 2013/2014) in 3 agro-ecological sub-units in the Sudano-sahelian
zone of Cameroon: Mandaras’ piedmonts (MP), Diamare plain (DP), Logon valley (LV). Destructive method was used to collect caterpillars and pupae from plants according to developmental stages of the sorghum this was
followed by their identification. Pupae were reared under laboratory conditions and emerging insects were recorded. They were the expected moths or their parasitoids. During the two years, 180 fields were sampled.
Three stem borers’ species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were identified and the most abundant being SesamiacreticaLederer (68.27%), followed by S. poephaga (27.54%) and then S. calamistis (0.19%). It was also appeared that S. cretica and S. poephaga were present in sampled areas whereas, S. calamistisoccurred only at LV. Parasitoids species obtained belong to 3 Orders: Hymenoptera,Diptera and Coleoptera. The most important pupalparasitoid of the zone was Tetrastichussp (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Highest parasitization (17.15±14.59%) was recorded at MD followed by LV (14.15±7.42%) and the DP (11.19±0.69%). Tetrastichussp is a potential biological control agent of stem borers and could be used in integrated pest management process to prevent economic damage ofthe sorghum by the borers.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

RESEARCH PAPER<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agr<strong>on</strong>omy <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agricultural Research (IJAAR)<br />

ISSN: 2223-7054 (Pr<strong>in</strong>t) 2225-3610 (Onl<strong>in</strong>e)<br />

http://www.<strong>in</strong>nspub.net<br />

Vol. 7, No. 5, p. 51-58, 2015<br />

OPEN ACCESS<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Diversity</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>natural</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>enemies</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f seas<strong>on</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong>, <strong>Sorghum</strong> <strong>bicolour</strong> (L.)<br />

<strong>Moench</strong> (<strong>Poaceae</strong>), <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong><br />

Ngatanko Iliassa 1, 2* , NgamoT<strong>in</strong>keu S. Lé<strong>on</strong>ard 2 , Map<strong>on</strong>gmestsem Pierre Marie 2<br />

1<br />

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biological Sciences, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Maroua, Camero<strong>on</strong><br />

2<br />

Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Biological Sciences, University <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ngaoundéré, Camero<strong>on</strong><br />

Article published <strong>on</strong> November 21, 2015<br />

Key words: Camero<strong>on</strong>, Lepidopteran <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Pest c<strong>on</strong>trol, Parasotoid, Tetrastichus sp.<br />

Abstract<br />

Lepidopteran <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> are am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most damag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sect pests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cultivated <strong>Poaceae</strong> <strong>in</strong> Africa. The<br />

objective <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this study was to assess <strong>the</strong> diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> relative abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Lepidopteran <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> larva-pupalparasitizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> farmer’s fields. Surveys were c<strong>on</strong>ducted dur<strong>in</strong>g two transplanted<br />

<strong>sorghum</strong>’ cropp<strong>in</strong>g seas<strong>on</strong>s (2012/2013 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2013/2014) <strong>in</strong> 3 agro-ecological sub-units <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong><br />

z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>: M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>aras’ piedm<strong>on</strong>ts (MP), Diamare pla<strong>in</strong> (DP), Log<strong>on</strong> valley (LV). Destructive method was<br />

used to collect caterpillars <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> pupae from plants accord<strong>in</strong>g to developmental stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> this was<br />

followed by <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> identificati<strong>on</strong>. Pupae were reared under laboratory c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> emerg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sects were<br />

recorded. They were <strong>the</strong> expected moths or <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasitoids. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two years, 180 fields were sampled.<br />

Three <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) were identified <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> most abundant be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

SesamiacreticaLederer (68.27%), followed by S. poephaga (27.54%) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>n S. calamistis (0.19%). It was also<br />

appeared that S. cretica <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. poephaga were present <strong>in</strong> sampled areas whereas, S. calamistisoccurred <strong>on</strong>ly at<br />

LV. Parasitoids species obta<strong>in</strong>ed bel<strong>on</strong>g to 3 Orders: Hymenoptera,Diptera <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Coleoptera. The most important<br />

pupalparasitoid <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e was Tetrastichussp (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Highest parasitizati<strong>on</strong><br />

(17.15±14.59%) was recorded at MD followed by LV (14.15±7.42%) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> DP (11.19±0.69%). Tetrastichussp is a<br />

potential biological c<strong>on</strong>trol agent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> could be used <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated pest management process to<br />

prevent ec<strong>on</strong>omic damage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> by <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

* Corresp<strong>on</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g Author: Ngatanko Iliassa ngatanko@gmail.com<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Page 51


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

Because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its seeds, its sugar c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> its feed<br />

quality, <strong>Sorghum</strong> is a major cereal produced<br />

worldwide (Liu et al., 2009). Transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

is an <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f-seas<strong>on</strong> crop specific <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lake Chad Bas<strong>in</strong><br />

(Carsky et al., 2002; Seignobos, 2008) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn Camero<strong>on</strong>, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Nigeria <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> West <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Chad. It is a staple crop for smallholders whose<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> depends ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

ra<strong>in</strong>y seas<strong>on</strong>. Transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributes to<br />

alleviate negative impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food shortage <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Camero<strong>on</strong>. However, diverse <strong>in</strong>sect pests attack <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

destroy transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> field ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

Lepidopterous <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>. They are most important<br />

<strong>in</strong>sect pests <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maize, Zea mays L. <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

(Polaszek, 1998). It is recently reported (Djodda et al.,<br />

2013) that Lepidopterous <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>, particularly<br />

Sesamiaspc<strong>on</strong>stituted <strong>the</strong> major pest <strong>on</strong> transplanted<br />

<strong>sorghum</strong> at Diamare (north Camero<strong>on</strong>).<br />

The very first step to put <strong>in</strong> place <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated<br />

pest management approach is to access <strong>the</strong> diversity,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong> relative abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

pest <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>reafter, elicit <strong>the</strong> pest status <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

targeted <strong>in</strong>sect. It is established that survival <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Lepidopterous <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> is under envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s (Bosque-Pe´rez <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Schul<strong>the</strong>ss, 1998;<br />

Ong’amo et al., 2006, T<strong>on</strong>ou et al., 2013). Some<br />

particularities expla<strong>in</strong> specificity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

some species <strong>in</strong> précised ecosy<str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. For <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />

Busueolafuscais <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer species <strong>in</strong><br />

highl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s while Chilopartellus (Sw<strong>in</strong>hoe) (Lepidoptera:<br />

Crambidae) dom<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>in</strong> lowl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (Emana et<br />

al., 2008; Asmare et al., 2014). Overholt et al., (2001)<br />

reported that Sesamiacalamistis<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Eldanasacchar<strong>in</strong>aare<br />

<strong>the</strong> major pests <strong>in</strong> West Africa whereas B.<br />

fusca<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> C. partellusare <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant species <strong>in</strong> East<br />

Africa. In <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>,<br />

previous studies reported lepidopteran attacks caused<br />

heavy damage (Ayaji et al., 1996; Mathieu et al.,<br />

2006; Aboubakar et al., 2008). Never<strong>the</strong>less, <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se species through <strong>the</strong> different<br />

agro-ecological sub-units <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e is not yet<br />

known. Thus, underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g species <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer communities will c<strong>on</strong>stitute<br />

basic <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> necessary for <strong>the</strong> implementati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> efficient <strong>in</strong>tegrated pest management strategies.<br />

One <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> most important steps <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g this is<br />

by describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> area <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cultivati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f seas<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Camero<strong>on</strong>.In <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

h<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>, some previous studies d<strong>on</strong>e where <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

are effective crop pest reported that <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> populati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

are regulated by diverse groups <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both <strong>in</strong>digenous<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> exotic parasitoids (B<strong>on</strong>h<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> et al., 1997; Zhou et<br />

al., 2003; Mailafiya et al., 2009). They are for some<br />

solitary <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for o<strong>the</strong>r gregarious, <strong>the</strong>y feed <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

host <strong>in</strong>ternally (endoparasitoids) or externally<br />

(ectoparasitoids) (Metcalfe <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Luckmann, 1975).<br />

The work to carry out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present research <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f<br />

seas<strong>on</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> is <strong>the</strong> diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasitoids <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> efficiency to reduce <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer<br />

damages <strong>on</strong> crops is reduced.<br />

Material <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods<br />

Presentati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites<br />

Surveys were c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> 3 agro-ecological subunits<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>. The<br />

Waza Log<strong>on</strong>e Flood pla<strong>in</strong> or Log<strong>on</strong> valley (LV) is<br />

characterised by annual average ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>ferior to<br />

600 mm. It is <strong>the</strong> low-altitude unit with 290m above<br />

sea level <strong>in</strong> mean. The penepla<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Diamare or<br />

Diamare’s pla<strong>in</strong> (DP) is characterised by annual<br />

average ra<strong>in</strong>fall <strong>in</strong>cluded to 600-800mm. The Mount<br />

M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ara piedm<strong>on</strong>t (MP) is situated <strong>in</strong> altitude, about<br />

550 above <strong>the</strong> sea level. The ra<strong>in</strong>fall is best, around<br />

100mm per year. The study areas experience<br />

unimodal ra<strong>in</strong>fall, <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong>y seas<strong>on</strong> is short, ma<strong>in</strong> ra<strong>in</strong><br />

July to August. Annual total precipitati<strong>on</strong> is between<br />

400mm at LV to 1000mm at MP. Annual mean<br />

temperature <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e is 28°C. The Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

<strong>Sudano</strong>-Sahelian regi<strong>on</strong> (LV) is experienc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>cidences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> drought <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> desert<br />

advancement.<br />

Sampl<strong>in</strong>g procedures<br />

Surveys were c<strong>on</strong>ducted dur<strong>in</strong>g two cropp<strong>in</strong>g seas<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

to October 2012 at February 2013 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> to October<br />

2013 at February 2014. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> relative<br />

importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong> area at each<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Page 52


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

sub-agro-ecological unit, r<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>omly, selected 12, 4 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

2 localities were c<strong>on</strong>sidered from respectively DP, LV<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> MP (Table 1). To each selected locality, five well<br />

managed farmers’ fields (untreated) with a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

size <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 0.25 ha were selected. The fields were selected<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> accessibility <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> area coverage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>sorghum</strong>; all fields were covered with <strong>the</strong> safraari<br />

<strong>sorghum</strong> cultivar.<br />

Table 1. Locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> selected sampl<strong>in</strong>g sites.<br />

Agro ecologicalsub-units Localities L<strong>on</strong>gitude Latitude Altitude (m)<br />

Papata 14°35213 10°76507 390<br />

Lara 14°48983 10°14636 404<br />

Godola 14°28101 10°68018 459<br />

Wawili 14°02332 11°18625 387<br />

Mangavé 14°21889 10°93425 419<br />

Diamare’s pla<strong>in</strong><br />

Moutourwa 14°20230 10°23313 472<br />

(DP)<br />

Padam 14°36162 10°11730 419<br />

M<strong>in</strong>dif 14°45605 10°34126 407<br />

Pivou 14°41973 11°32420 309<br />

Ibba 14°43867 10°69740 367<br />

Dargala 14°61086 10°52831 354<br />

Kousseri 14°97240 12°08608 290<br />

Log<strong>on</strong>e valley<br />

Magam 14°41189 12°36914 285<br />

(LV)<br />

Oudah 14°74490 12°19511 291<br />

Dabanga 14°63887 11°90600 290<br />

M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ara piedm<strong>on</strong>t Zamay 13°91079 10°61991 617<br />

(MP)<br />

Mowo 14°01391 10°59325 593<br />

A total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 90 fields from 18 localities was assessed. In<br />

each field, five plots with 10×10 m sizes were<br />

sampled. The assessments were c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong><br />

vegetative, flower<strong>in</strong>g, seedl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> harvest<strong>in</strong>g stages<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sorghum</strong>. The same fields were used for different<br />

time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sampl<strong>in</strong>g. In each plot, all plants were<br />

counted, two attacked plants per plot (10 plants per<br />

field) were cut down at every sampl<strong>in</strong>g visit, dissected<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> data <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> larvae, pre-pupa <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

pupae were collected.<br />

Larvae collected are preserved <strong>in</strong> alcohol at 70° <strong>the</strong>n<br />

subsequently identified accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> key <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

identificati<strong>on</strong> provided with Moyal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tran (1989),<br />

Tran (1981) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> that <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Polaszek <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Delvare<br />

(2000).Pupae were taken alive at <strong>the</strong> laboratory <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

kept separately <strong>in</strong> a glass tube closed with cott<strong>on</strong> until<br />

emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasitoid or <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer. Parasitoids<br />

emerg<strong>in</strong>g from pupa were collected, counted,<br />

preserved at alcohol at 70° <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>sect sample was<br />

identified accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> key <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> identificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Polaszek <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Delvare (2000). Death pupae that did<br />

not produce parasitoids were dissected <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> those<br />

c<strong>on</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g some stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasitoid were c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

as parasitized.<br />

Analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> sampled<br />

Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species sampled were assessed us<strong>in</strong>g 3<br />

diversity <strong>in</strong>dexes: Shann<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex (H), Simps<strong>on</strong>'s<br />

diversity <strong>in</strong>dex (D) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hill's diversity numbers.<br />

Shann<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex (H)<br />

Shann<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex (H) value allows know<strong>in</strong>g not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong><br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species but also <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

species am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> community. If <strong>the</strong> species are<br />

evenly distributed <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> H value would be high. H<br />

is calculated accord<strong>in</strong>g to formula:<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Page 53


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Shann<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex, p is <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> (n/N) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividuals <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e particular species found (n) divided<br />

by <strong>the</strong> total number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>dividuals found (N), ln is <strong>the</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>natural</str<strong>on</strong>g> log, Σ is <strong>the</strong> sum <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> s is<br />

<strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species.<br />

Simps<strong>on</strong>'s diversity <strong>in</strong>dex (D)<br />

Simps<strong>on</strong>'s <strong>in</strong>dex (D) is a ma<strong>the</strong>matical measure that<br />

characterizes species diversity <strong>in</strong> a given community.<br />

The proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species i relative to <strong>the</strong> total<br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species (pi) is calculated, squared,<br />

summed, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> reciprocal is taken accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to follow formula:<br />

S. poephaga) at <strong>the</strong> transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Diamaré, <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> three sub-agro-ecological units<br />

studied here. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> present research<br />

c<strong>on</strong>firm <strong>the</strong> previous results, though, it highlight <strong>the</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se species through <strong>the</strong> study z<strong>on</strong>e.<br />

The underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

borer communities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Camero<strong>on</strong> such as <strong>in</strong>dicated by ours results c<strong>on</strong>stitute<br />

basic <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> necessary for future development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

management strategies aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>se pests.<br />

S.<br />

calamistis%<br />

1%<br />

Hill's diversity numbers<br />

A generalized notati<strong>on</strong> provided by HILL that<br />

<strong>in</strong>cludes, as a special case, two <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten used<br />

heterogeneity <strong>in</strong>dices, D <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> H. It’s calculated<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to formula:<br />

S.<br />

poephaga%<br />

33%<br />

S. cretica%<br />

66%<br />

D, is Simps<strong>on</strong>'s <strong>in</strong>dex <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> H, is Shann<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex.<br />

Results <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> discussi<strong>on</strong><br />

Species compositi<strong>on</strong> (<str<strong>on</strong>g>Diversity</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> relative<br />

abundance)<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> study, a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 720 visits<br />

were made <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18 localities chosen to represent <strong>the</strong><br />

three sub-agro-ecological units studied. 7,200 plants<br />

were dissected <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 38,974 <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’<br />

larvae were collected. Larvae bel<strong>on</strong>g to 3 different<br />

species <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong>ly family <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Noctuidae, specially,<br />

Sesamia Genera. Stem <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> larvae recovered were<br />

identified as S. calamistis, S. cretica, S. poephaga.<br />

The relative abundance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> each species <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />

with <strong>the</strong> three sub agro-ecological units studied is<br />

giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Table 2. These species varied <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> three sub-agro-ecological units. The most<br />

abundant specie was S. cretica (68.27%), followed by<br />

S. poephaga (27.54%) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>n S. calamistis (0.19%)<br />

(Fig. 1). Ajayi et al. (1996) <strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>the</strong> presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Sesamiasp as ma<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer <strong>on</strong> transplanted<br />

<strong>sorghum</strong> at this z<strong>on</strong>e. Recently, Djodda et al. (2013)<br />

were identified two species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sesamia (S. cretica <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Fig. 1. Mean yield <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> three <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> species <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> study.<br />

Stem <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three subagro-ecological<br />

units (biogeography)<br />

S. cretica <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. poephaga were species found <strong>in</strong> all<br />

<strong>the</strong> surveyed areas but, S. calamistis was recorded<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly at LV sub-unit (Fig. 2, Table 2). As dem<strong>on</strong>strated<br />

by Ong’amo et al., (2012), <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer’s species was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> host preference. Batalden et al.,<br />

(2007) c<strong>on</strong>cluded also that <strong>the</strong> current climate<br />

variability can be a source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> abundance or <strong>the</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g>-borer pests. S. calamistis which<br />

was recorded <strong>on</strong>ly at LV was described as ma<strong>in</strong> pests<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> millet <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maize than <strong>the</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>rs species which<br />

attack preferentially <strong>sorghum</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> maize than millet.<br />

Djimm<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>oungar (2002) recorded S. calamistis at<br />

both transplanted <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ra<strong>in</strong>y seas<strong>on</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> at<br />

Djamena, border<strong>in</strong>g LV. The presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> S. calamistis<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly at LV might be due to proximity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this unit to<br />

Sahel z<strong>on</strong>e where millet c<strong>on</strong>stitutes <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> cereal<br />

crop. This suggests that pest species have higher<br />

aff<strong>in</strong>ity with <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> host, <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs words, <strong>the</strong><br />

Page 54


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> host <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

pest.This first part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> study permitted to establish<br />

<strong>the</strong> map <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species <strong>on</strong> transplanted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Table2.Percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> different <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three sub-agro-ecological studied units.<br />

S.<br />

cretica%<br />

S.<br />

poephaga%<br />

S.<br />

calamistis%<br />

LV 62.27±2.81 36.67±2.63 1.02±0.45<br />

DP 74.49±2.98 25.50±2.98 0<br />

MP 62.27±2.81 36.67±2.63 0<br />

Map <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’<strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong><br />

Legends :<br />

Localities<br />

S. calamistis<br />

S. poephaga<br />

S. cretica<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al limit<br />

LV<br />

PD<br />

MP<br />

<strong>in</strong> term <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species. Values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hill <strong>in</strong>dex c<strong>on</strong>firm <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> few species at <strong>the</strong> studied z<strong>on</strong>e. It might<br />

be c<strong>on</strong>cluded that transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong> was attacked<br />

by a limited number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species at<br />

sudano-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>. As regards <str<strong>on</strong>g>spatial</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species identified <strong>on</strong><br />

transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong>, <strong>the</strong> calculated values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

repartiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>dex (I) are superior to 1 (Table 4). This<br />

testifies <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an aggregate <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

pests <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fields. Generally, gregarious <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species <strong>in</strong>dicates a c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> food resource.<br />

Animal have tendency to ga<strong>the</strong>r around <strong>the</strong> source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

food. Indeed, Sesamiasp, ma<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer present at<br />

<strong>the</strong> study z<strong>on</strong>e lay a mass <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> eggs <strong>on</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong>. After<br />

hatch<strong>in</strong>g, youngest larvae feed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se plants, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

mov<strong>in</strong>g to o<strong>the</strong>rs proximate plants, this can expla<strong>in</strong>s<br />

<strong>the</strong> gregarious <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

studied z<strong>on</strong>e.<br />

Table 3.Calculated diversity Indices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three<br />

agro-ecological sub-units.<br />

Indices Years LV DP MP<br />

2012/2013 0.69 0.62 0.53<br />

H 2013/2014 0.64 0.58 0.66<br />

2012/2013 0.58 0.54 0.76<br />

J’ 2013/2014 0.62 0.52 0.52<br />

2012/2013 0.54 0.56 0.58<br />

D 2013/2014 0.55 0.57 0.54<br />

2012/2013 0.93 0.96 0.99<br />

Hill 2013/2014 0.95 0.98 0.96<br />

Fig. 2. Spatial <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong>.<br />

Structur<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ communities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> three<br />

sub-agro-ecological units<br />

Tables 3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 4 present respectively <strong>the</strong> calculated<br />

diversity <strong>in</strong>dices <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> three studied areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dex <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> repartiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> through <strong>the</strong> study z<strong>on</strong>e.<br />

Values <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> calculated H varied to 0.53 at <strong>the</strong> PPM at<br />

0.69 at <strong>the</strong> LV. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Fr<strong>on</strong>tier (1983),<br />

<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species at a given ecosy<str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

can be expressed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> H value.<br />

Results <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> three sub-agro-ecological<br />

units studied have approximately equivalent richness<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Table 4.Index <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> repartiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ species.<br />

species LV DP MP<br />

S. cretica 13.61 15.76 19.92<br />

S. poephaga 6.43 12.18 16.15<br />

S. calamistis 9.69 / /<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Diversity</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> occurrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasites<br />

Occurrence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasites<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> study period, a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3195, 1030 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 467<br />

pupae were recovered respectively at PD, LV <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> MP.<br />

Calculated mean parasitizati<strong>on</strong> level was 11.19±0.69%<br />

at PD, 14.15±7.42% at LV <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 17.15±14.59% at MP.<br />

This suggested that parasitoids were good mortality<br />

factors reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Page 55


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

Mailafiya et al., 2011, have obta<strong>in</strong>ed a 15.0% level<br />

larval parasitizati<strong>on</strong>. At <strong>the</strong> DP, <strong>the</strong> parasitizati<strong>on</strong><br />

level was rema<strong>in</strong>ed c<strong>on</strong>stant, around 11% throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> different stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> (Fig. 3).<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> parasitisati<strong>on</strong> level at <strong>the</strong> LV <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

MP was high (25.22% <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 36.67% respectively) at<br />

vegetative stage <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> was notorious decreased at<br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g, seedl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> harvest<strong>in</strong>g stages (Fig. 3).<br />

These results show that parasitoids attack <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> early s<strong>in</strong>ce vegetative stage. This means that<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> utilizati<strong>on</strong> at this stage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> could<br />

prevent or reduce number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> early emerg<strong>in</strong>g moths<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sible <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> massive attacks <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sorghum</strong> at<br />

succeed<strong>in</strong>g stages.<br />

Fig. 3. Parasitizati<strong>on</strong> level dur<strong>in</strong>g different<br />

developmental stages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>sorghum</strong>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Diversity</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasites<br />

Parasitoids reared from <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> bel<strong>on</strong>ged to<br />

three orders, namely Diptera, Coleoptera <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Hymenoptera. The two families <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hymenopteran<br />

order were Eulophidae <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Pteromalidae. The major<br />

specie collected was Tetrastichus sp. This specie was<br />

recorded as parasitiz<strong>in</strong>g pupae <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some Lepidoptera<br />

(Du<strong>on</strong>g et al., 2011; Vergas et al., 2011).Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

table 5, <strong>the</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tetrastichussp collected was<br />

important throughout <strong>the</strong> study z<strong>on</strong>e compared to <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r species. This suggested that Tetrastichu ssp is<br />

well adapted at <strong>the</strong> study z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> could be an<br />

important potential biological c<strong>on</strong>trol agent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

borer pest <strong>in</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-sahalian z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>. All<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hymenopteran parasitoids recorded were <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

(endoparsitoid). Dipteran, Megaseliasp is a solitary<br />

parasitoid while Hymenopteran are gregarious <strong>on</strong>es<br />

as so<strong>on</strong> as <strong>the</strong> Coleopteran parasitoid. Parasitoids are<br />

<strong>in</strong>sects which lay <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> egg <strong>in</strong> or <strong>on</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong>sects <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

f<strong>in</strong>ally kill <strong>the</strong>m. Generally, <strong>the</strong> most known<br />

parasitoid bel<strong>on</strong>g to Diptera or Hymenoptera (Vergas<br />

et al., 2011; Wisdom et al., 2012, Fabricio et al.,<br />

2015), however, dur<strong>in</strong>g this study Coleopteran were<br />

emerged from a <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer pupa. Deeper study must<br />

be c<strong>on</strong>ducted to def<strong>in</strong>e exactly <strong>the</strong> status <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

Coleopterans <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> utilizati<strong>on</strong> as potential<br />

biological c<strong>on</strong>trol agent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Table 5. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Diversity</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> relative abundance parasitoids.<br />

Number per sub-unit<br />

Orders Families Species MP LV DP<br />

Hymenoptera Eulophidae Tetrastichussp 2046 2971 7199<br />

Hymenoptera Pteromalidae nd 0 65 1320<br />

Diptera Phoridae Megaseliasp 0 0 1<br />

Coleoptera nd nd 0 0 32<br />

nd : not identified<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

The results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> present study provided <strong>the</strong> map <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer species through <strong>the</strong> <strong>Sudano</strong>-<strong>sahelian</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>natural</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>enemies</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>, ma<strong>in</strong>ly Tretrastichussp.<br />

Parasitiz<strong>in</strong>g Sesamia sp. pupa. Potential utilizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

this larva-pupalparasitoid should, however, be<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigated for improvement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mass rear<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />

dispersi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> associati<strong>on</strong> with o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

potential eggs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> larvae parasitoids.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Authors are grateful to farmers for accord<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

farms dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> two years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this work. They<br />

Page 56


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

acknowledge <strong>the</strong> technical assistance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fered by some<br />

agricultural technicians dur<strong>in</strong>g field collecti<strong>on</strong><br />

materials<br />

References<br />

Aboubakary, Ratnadass A, Mathieu B. 2008.<br />

Chemical <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> botanical protecti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> transplanted<br />

<strong>sorghum</strong> from <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer (Sesamiacretica) damage<br />

<strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn Camero<strong>on</strong>. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SAT Agricultural<br />

Research 6, 43-47.<br />

Ajayi O, Tabo R, Ali D. 1996. Incidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> post ra<strong>in</strong>y-seas<strong>on</strong> transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Camero<strong>on</strong>, Nigeria <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chad <strong>in</strong> 1995/96.<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Sorghum</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Millets Newsletter 37, 58-<br />

59.<br />

Asmare D, Emana G, Ferdu A, Amare A. 2014.<br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Busseolafusca (Fuller)<br />

(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chilopartellus<br />

(Sw<strong>in</strong>hoe) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

Ethiopia. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Entomology <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nematology6,<br />

1-13.<br />

Batalden RV, Oberhauser K, Peters<strong>on</strong> AA.<br />

2007. Ecological niches <strong>in</strong> sequential generati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

eastern North American M<strong>on</strong>arch butterflies<br />

(Lepidoptera: Danaidae): <strong>the</strong> ecology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> migrati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> likely climate change implicati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Entomology 36, 1365-1373.<br />

B<strong>on</strong>h<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> MJ, Overholt WA, Van Huis A,<br />

Polaszek A. 1997. Natural <str<strong>on</strong>g>enemies</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cereal <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> east Africa: a review. Insect Science <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> its<br />

Applicati<strong>on</strong> 17, 18-35.<br />

Bosque-Perez N A, Schul<strong>the</strong>ss F. 1998. Maize:<br />

West <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Central Africa. In: Polaszek A (ed) African<br />

Cereal Stem <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Importance<br />

Tax<strong>on</strong>omy, Natural Enemies <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>trol. CAB<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>in</strong> associati<strong>on</strong> with <strong>the</strong> ACP-EU<br />

Technical Centre for Agricultural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rural Cooperati<strong>on</strong><br />

CTA, Wall<strong>in</strong>gford pp 11–24.<br />

Carsky RJ, Ndikawa R, S<strong>in</strong>gh l. 2002.<br />

Establishment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> optimum Plant densities for dry<br />

seas<strong>on</strong> <strong>sorghum</strong> grown <strong>on</strong> vertisols<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> semi-arid<br />

z<strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Camero<strong>on</strong>. African Crop Science Journal 10,<br />

23-30.<br />

Djimadoumngar K. 2002. Inventaire et cycles<br />

biologiques des Lépidoptères foreurs des tiges du<br />

sorgho et de leurs pr<strong>in</strong>cipaux parasitoïdes dans la<br />

régi<strong>on</strong> de N'Djamena (Tchad). Thèse de Doctorat,<br />

Faculté des Sciences Exactes et Appliquées de<br />

N'Djamena/UMR INRA/INSA Biologie f<strong>on</strong>cti<strong>on</strong>nelle<br />

Ly<strong>on</strong>. 194p.<br />

Djodda J, Nuken<strong>in</strong>e E, Ngassam P, Hamawa Y.<br />

2013. Degree <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>festati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> transplanted <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong> <strong>bicolour</strong> (L) <strong>Moench</strong> by Lepidoptera <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> biodiversity <strong>in</strong> Diamaré (Maroua,<br />

Camero<strong>on</strong>). American Open Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agricultural<br />

Research 1, 1-7.<br />

Du<strong>on</strong>g CA, Diep DN, Hung HQ. 2011. Survey <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

sugarcane moth <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast Vietnan.<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Sugar Journal 113,732-737.<br />

Emana G, Abrham T, Asmare D, Mulugeta N,<br />

Tadele T. 2008. Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> entomological research<br />

<strong>on</strong> maize, <strong>sorghum</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> millet. In Abrham (ed.),<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>g Crop Producti<strong>on</strong> through Improved Plant<br />

Protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Addis Ababa,Ethiopia, Institute<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>Agricultural Research.AddisAbaba 167-244.<br />

Fabricio FP, Samir OK, Vanessa RFC,<br />

Elizangela LV, Harley NO, José CZ. 2015.<br />

Parasitism <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> emergence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tetrastichushowardi<br />

(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) <strong>on</strong> Diatraeasaccharalis<br />

(Lepidoptera: Crambidae) larvae, pupae <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> adults.<br />

Florida Entomologist 98, 377-380.<br />

Fr<strong>on</strong>tier S. 1983. L’échantill<strong>on</strong>nage de la diversité<br />

spécifique. In: Statégie d’échantill<strong>on</strong>nage en écologie.<br />

Mass<strong>on</strong>, Paris 494 p.<br />

Liu GS, Zhou QY, S<strong>on</strong>g SQ, J<strong>in</strong>g HC, Gu WB, Li<br />

XF, Su M. 2009. Research advances <strong>in</strong>to germplasm<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Page 57


Int. J. Agri. & Agri. R.<br />

resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> molecular biology <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> energy plant<br />

sweet <strong>sorghum</strong>. Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Bullet<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Botany 44, 253–<br />

261.<br />

Polaszek A, Khan ZR. 1998. Host plants. <strong>in</strong>:<br />

African cereal <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g>. CAB Internati<strong>on</strong>al.<br />

Nairobi.<br />

Mailafiya DM, Le Ru BP, Kairu EW, Calatayud<br />

PA, Dupas S. 2009. Species diversity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

lepidopteran<str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer parasitoids <strong>in</strong> cultivated <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>natural</str<strong>on</strong>g> habitats <strong>in</strong> Kenya. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Applied<br />

Entomology 133, 416-429.<br />

Mathieu B, Ratnadass A, Aboubakary A, Beyo<br />

J, Moyal P. 2006. Losses Caused by Stem Borer to<br />

Transplanted <strong>Sorghum</strong> Crops <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Camero<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Sorghum</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Millets Newsletter 47, 75-<br />

77.<br />

Metcalfe LR, Luckmann HW. 1975. Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

to Insect management. John Wiley <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> S<strong>on</strong>s, New<br />

York 147-152.<br />

Polaszek A, Delvare G. 2000. Les foreurs des tiges<br />

de céréales en Afrique. Importance éc<strong>on</strong>omique,<br />

systématique, ennemis naturels et méthodes de lutte.<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tpellier: CIRAD/CTA534 p.<br />

Seignobos C. 2008. Les sorghos repiqués<br />

muskuwaari au Cameroun In : Agricultures<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gulières. Institut de recherche pour le<br />

développement, Paris 2008, pp 39-41.<br />

Tounou AK, Agboka K, Agbodzavu KM, Wegbe<br />

K. 2013. Maize <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>distributi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, <str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>the</strong>ir</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>natural</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>enemies</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> farmers’ percepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> climate change<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn Togo. Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Applied<br />

Biosciences 64, 4773-4786.<br />

Moyal P, Tran M. 1989. Etude morphologique des<br />

stades pré-imag<strong>in</strong>aux en z<strong>on</strong>e des savanes de Côted’Ivoire<br />

des Lépidoptères foreurs du maïs. Annales de<br />

la Société Entomologique de France 25, 461-472.<br />

Tran M. 1981. Rec<strong>on</strong>naissance des pr<strong>in</strong>cipaux<br />

foreurs des tiges du riz, du maïs et de la canne à sucre<br />

en Côte d'Ivoire. Initiati<strong>on</strong>s Documentati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Techniques. ORSTOM Paris., ORSTOM 48.<br />

Ong’amo G, Le Ru B, Dupas S, Moyal P,<br />

Muchugu E, Calatayud PA, Silva<strong>in</strong> JF. 2006.<br />

Distributi<strong>on</strong>, pest status <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> agro-climatic<br />

preferences <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lepidopteran <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>borers</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maize <strong>in</strong><br />

Kenya. Annales de la Société Entomologique de<br />

France 42, 171-177.<br />

Ong’amo GO, Le Ru BP, Calatayud P-A, Silva<strong>in</strong><br />

J-F. 2012. Compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer communities <strong>in</strong><br />

selected vegetati<strong>on</strong> mosaics <strong>in</strong> Kenya. Arthropod-<br />

Plant Interacti<strong>on</strong>s 6, DOI 10. 1007/s11829-012-9241.<br />

Overholt WA, Maes KVN, Goebel FR. 2001.<br />

Field guide to <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g>borer larvae <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maize, <strong>sorghum</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sugarcane <strong>in</strong> Eastern <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sou<strong>the</strong>rnAfrica. ICIPE<br />

Science Nairobi 31 p.<br />

Vargas EL, Fagundes PF, Teixeira TM, Pastori<br />

PL. 2011. Record <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Tetrastichushowardi<br />

(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitiz<strong>in</strong>g Diatraeasp.<br />

(Lepidoptera: Crambidae) <strong>in</strong> sugarcane crop <strong>in</strong> Brazil.<br />

Entomotropica 26, 143-146.<br />

Wisdom H, Hordzi K, Botchey MA. 2012. Some<br />

Parasitoids <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Lepidopterous Stem Borer Pests <strong>on</strong><br />

Maize <strong>in</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Ghana. Bullet<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Envir<strong>on</strong>mental,<br />

Pharmacological <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Life Science 1, 77-83.<br />

Zhou G, Overholt WA, Kimani-Njogu SW.<br />

2003. Species richness <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasitism <strong>in</strong> assemblage<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parasitoids attack<strong>in</strong>g maize <str<strong>on</strong>g>stem</str<strong>on</strong>g> borer <strong>in</strong> coastal<br />

Kenya. Ecological Entomology 28, 109-118.<br />

Iliassa et al.<br />

Page 58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!