08.06.2017 Views

Newcastle News June 2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The JLD Edition<br />

Should celebrities’ right to privacy be respected?<br />

"I knew the paparazzi were going to be a<br />

reality in my life. . . . But I didn't know that I<br />

would feel anxiety every time I open my front<br />

door, [it] makes me feel scared and gets my<br />

adrenaline going every day."<br />

This is a quote from actress<br />

Jennifer Lawrence and illustrates<br />

how distressing the intrusion on a<br />

celebrity’s privacy can be. Despite<br />

this, there is uncertainty as to the<br />

level of protection a celebrity<br />

should receive under the law as it<br />

has been suggested that such<br />

individuals somehow forfeit their<br />

right to privacy as a consequence<br />

of their career choice. Though this<br />

may not be ethically correct, from<br />

a pragmatic point of view it must<br />

be acknowledged that celebrities<br />

rely on media attention to further<br />

their careers and to some extent<br />

promote a relationship with the<br />

press. This can blur the distinction<br />

between attacks on personal<br />

privacy and members of the press<br />

exercising their competing right to<br />

freedom of expression.<br />

The ‘injunction’ is one of the main<br />

remedies awarded in a privacy<br />

case to prevent or limit the<br />

publication of information.<br />

However, there have been<br />

concerns that the availability of<br />

the so-called ‘celebrity injunction’<br />

is sharply declining as in a recent<br />

Supreme Court case, PJS v <strong>News</strong><br />

Group <strong>News</strong>papers Ltd [2016]<br />

UKSC 26, no injunction was<br />

awarded on the basis that the<br />

information in question was<br />

‘common knowledge’ as it had<br />

been published in other countries.<br />

In fact in the Court of Appeal<br />

decision of PJS, it was noted that<br />

the internet and social networking<br />

have a life of their own, making<br />

the control of information very<br />

difficult. This forces us to question<br />

the effectiveness of the injunction<br />

as a remedy in celebrity privacy<br />

cases as information can be shared<br />

more rapidly than ever before.<br />

There are different approaches<br />

regarding how to answer this<br />

question. Professor Daniel Solove<br />

of George Washington University<br />

argues that celebrities do not<br />

consent to their loss of privacy and<br />

that it is not a legitimate<br />

requirement of their job to expect<br />

them to do so. Although this<br />

illustrates the importance of there<br />

being some protection for a<br />

celebrity’s right to privacy, the<br />

reality of their relationship with the<br />

media must be acknowledged.<br />

Jeremy King, editor of Media Week<br />

summarises this issue: “if you court<br />

the media in the first place and<br />

don't like it when they say<br />

something nasty, then<br />

unfortunately once you push the<br />

toothpaste out of the tube it's hard<br />

to get it back in."<br />

Given the co-dependent<br />

relationship between celebrities<br />

and the media and the difficulty of<br />

constraining the spread of<br />

information, perhaps celebrities<br />

must continue to tolerate the sort<br />

of intrusion of which Jennifer<br />

Lawrence complained.<br />

Mariko Yanagisawa<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> Student<br />

Representative for the<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> and North East JLD<br />

and 2nd Year student at<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> University<br />

Interesting fact.<br />

Mariko loves to cook, and her<br />

favourite dish to make is risotto.<br />

GDPR Seminar<br />

September <strong>2017</strong><br />

Are you ready for the implementation of the new General Data<br />

Processing Regulation which will come into force on 25th May 2018.<br />

At the invitation of <strong>Newcastle</strong> Law Society, Pearl Moses, Head of Risk<br />

and Compliance at the Law Society will visit <strong>Newcastle</strong> to deliver a<br />

seminar on the following:<br />

Northumbria University Family<br />

Law Prize<br />

Resolution’s + local Chairperson + Helen + Robson + presents + Claire Wilson<br />

who + is working + with + Gordon + Brown + solicitors + + with + the + + Northumbria + + +<br />

+ University + Family + + Law prize. + Well done + + on your + achievement + + + + Claire + +<br />

+ + + + + + + ++<br />

and good luck for your future career!<br />

• Requirements of the GDPR<br />

• How data can/cannot be used<br />

• Consent<br />

• Penalties<br />

• Preparing for implementation<br />

We are finalising arrangements but this is likely to be on Thursday<br />

the 14th of September between 1:30 and 3:30 pm at a central<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> location. Want to register your interest? Email us on<br />

mail@newcastlelawsociety .co.uk<br />

We will be extending the invitation to Practice Managers of member<br />

firms as well as our solicitors.<br />

Pearl Moses is head of Risk and Compliance at the Law Society.<br />

She is a solicitor with over 12 years' experience in private<br />

practice, legal publishing and advising on regulatory compliance<br />

issues. Pearl and her advisory team specialise in creating tailored<br />

compliance solutions and interventions to help firms and inhouse<br />

legal teams embed sound risk management principles and<br />

best practice.<br />

<strong>Newcastle</strong> <strong>News</strong> 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!