YEL-SD Supplier Score Card 2012 Manual Final - YAZAKI Europe
YEL-SD Supplier Score Card 2012 Manual Final - YAZAKI Europe
YEL-SD Supplier Score Card 2012 Manual Final - YAZAKI Europe
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Content:<br />
<strong>Supplier</strong> Quality <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong><br />
M A N U A L<br />
<strong>YEL</strong> - <strong>Supplier</strong> Development \ Supply Management<br />
• Classification of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)<br />
• Definition of KPIs<br />
• Severity of KPIs<br />
• Calculation of KPIs (charts and tables)<br />
• <strong>Score</strong> table<br />
• <strong>Supplier</strong> ranking<br />
• Additional information and analysis<br />
<strong>Manual</strong> prepared by Hanxiu Lei<br />
© <strong>2012</strong> by <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>SD</strong><br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 1
1. Introduction<br />
In order to drive supplier improvement towards excellence, Yazaki measures the<br />
performance of all suppliers continuously. This evaluation is reflected in the `<strong>Supplier</strong><br />
<strong>Score</strong> card´ and is applicable to suppliers who deliver production material to Yazaki<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> (<strong>YEL</strong>) managed affiliates, including India and North-Africa affiliates. This<br />
manual explains the new <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> model which was updated to align with the<br />
Yazaki Global <strong>Supplier</strong> Development program.<br />
2. Definition of KPIs<br />
<strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> KPIs now exist out Yazaki global harmonized and <strong>Europe</strong>an specific KPIs.<br />
Type KPIs Definition<br />
Global PPM Performance Defective parts per million parts delivered *<br />
Global 3D Reactivity Performance<br />
Global 8D Reactivity Performance<br />
Percentage of 3D reply given within 24 hours, Concerns without<br />
answer (in pending) are counted as not on time<br />
Percentage of 8D reply given within agreed time<br />
without answer (in pending) are counted as not on time<br />
Global Rejection Performance Ratio of Rejections per million parts delivered (RPM) **<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> Number of Rejections Total No of Rejections (NOR)<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> Documentation Performance<br />
Percentage of submitted documents(drawings, parts<br />
Specification and PSWs) in relation to this of requested<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> No of Line Stops Number of the Line Stops in <strong>YEL</strong>-Plant caused by suppliers<br />
<strong>Europe</strong><br />
3D Reactivity of Customer<br />
Concerns<br />
No of end customer concerns and 3D reply not on time ***<br />
<strong>Europe</strong> Delivery Performance Percentage of Shipments on time<br />
Please be noticed that KPIs are based on rolling 12 months data.<br />
* All materials entering <strong>YEL</strong> managed affiliates are considered.<br />
** Rejections are quality, logistics and warranty concerns/ incidents in GQRSC.<br />
*** Customer concerns are those concerns originated by customers/OEMs and Yazaki Resident<br />
Engineers.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 2
3. Severity of KPIs<br />
4. Explanation of the Charts and Tables<br />
A: PPM Performance<br />
Calculation of PPM on 2 levels<br />
• Monthly: displaying monthly trend<br />
• Rolling 12 months: displaying PPM 12 months average<br />
Defective quantities are shown in the table and the received quantities in the chart.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 3
Ranking of PPM (<strong>Score</strong> Table)<br />
PPM POINTS RANK<br />
0 10 A<br />
1-9 9 A<br />
11-20 8 B<br />
21-30 7 B<br />
31-40 6 C<br />
41-50 5 C<br />
51-60 4 D<br />
61-70 3 D<br />
71-80 2 D<br />
81-100 1 D<br />
>100 0 D<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 4
B: Rejection Performance (RPM and NOR)<br />
Both RPM and NOR belong to rejection performance, while RPM belongs to globally<br />
harmonized KPIs and NOR (Number of Rejections) to <strong>Europe</strong>an specific KPIs.<br />
All the complaints are divided into 2 groups according to their Status:<br />
• Open: concern still in “open” GQRSC status, 3D/ 8D and/ or Cost Agreement<br />
open<br />
• Closed: concern in closed status, 8D and Cost Agreement closed<br />
• RPM ranking is based on the rolling 12 months value.<br />
• NOR: No of the rejections rolling 12 months.<br />
Note: For this KPI we have no additional charts.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 5
Ranking of RPM (<strong>Score</strong> Table)<br />
C: 3D/8D Reactivity Performance<br />
Calculation of both, 3D (to be answered within 24 hours after receiving the<br />
complaint) and 8D (to be answered within 14 days) response time and status.<br />
Evaluation of 3D RP with max. achievable 30 points and 8D RP max. 10 points.<br />
Note: Concerns with `pending` status are considered as NOT on time.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 6
and 8D to be answered within 14 days or within Target date agreed.<br />
Remark: 8D responses of the last month reported and in pending status are<br />
considered as on time. Some concerns might be still within the target date at the<br />
time of GQRSC data download (shown grey shaded).<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 7
Ranking of 3D and 8D reactivity performance<br />
D: Documentation performance<br />
Calculation of responses to Yazaki documentation requests (Drawings, PSW/ PPAP,<br />
Specifications, Handling manuals, etc.).<br />
Responsiveness percentage of documents submitted on time (10 working days or<br />
confirmed and agreed target date). Calculation of accumulated rolling 12 months.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 8
Ranking of the Documentation Performance (<strong>Score</strong> Table)<br />
Doc Perf<br />
( % )<br />
Points Rank<br />
0% 0 D<br />
50% 1 D<br />
51- 52 2 D<br />
53 - 54 3 D<br />
55 - 56 4 D<br />
57 - 58 5 D<br />
59 - 60 6 D<br />
61 - 62 7 D<br />
63 - 64 8 D<br />
65 - 66 9 D<br />
67- 68 10 D<br />
69 - 70 11 C<br />
71 - 72 12 C<br />
73 - 74 13 C<br />
75 - 76 14 C<br />
77 - 78 15 C<br />
DOC [30 POINTS]<br />
Doc Perf<br />
( % )<br />
Points Rank<br />
79 - 80 16 C<br />
81 - 82 17 C<br />
83 - 84 18 C<br />
85 -86 19 B<br />
87 - 88 20 B<br />
89 - 90 21 B<br />
91 22 B<br />
92 23 B<br />
93 24 B<br />
94 25 A<br />
95 26 A<br />
96 27 A<br />
97 28 A<br />
98 29 A<br />
99 30 A<br />
100 30 A<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 9
E: Delivery performance<br />
The delivery performance of the suppliers are calculated based on the ratio of on time<br />
delivered shipments to the total number of the shipments.<br />
F: Line stop<br />
Line stops, caused by supplier in the <strong>YEL</strong> Plant are counted and reflected in the <strong>Score</strong><br />
card.<br />
A calculation example:<br />
<strong>Supplier</strong> A supplies 2 plastic components to one of our <strong>Europe</strong>an Yazaki affiliates.<br />
As a result of delayed deliveries caused by the supplier (confirmed delivery date was<br />
not met), the affected Yazaki affiliate has a stop of its production for 2 days.<br />
Consequently, the supplier has caused 4 Line Stops.<br />
The Number of Line Stops is defined by the number of delayed components multiplied<br />
with the number of days our production is stopped.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 10
G: 3D Reactivity Performance of Customer Concern<br />
As end customer concerns have a major impact to Yazaki, a new KPI has been<br />
established. Number of end customers concerns not on time are displayed.<br />
For example: <strong>Supplier</strong> ABC has caused 10 end customer concerns in rolling 12 months,<br />
2 of them with 3D answered after 24 hours. The value of this KPI is 2. Refer to the<br />
score table below, resulting in 13 points for this KPI.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 11
Ranking of this KPI<br />
3D Customer Concern<br />
[20 P]<br />
3D RP POINTS RANK<br />
0 20 A<br />
1 15 B<br />
2 13 C<br />
3 10 D<br />
4 5 D<br />
>=5 0 D<br />
H: <strong>Score</strong> summery (all KPIs)<br />
This summary of all 8 KPIs shows the achievement per KPI and the total ranking level.<br />
The <strong>Score</strong> history shows yearly data about the development trend of the total<br />
performance.<br />
Note: The score before August <strong>2012</strong> is calculated by the old evaluation method,<br />
these scores are frozen and will not be changed.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 12
I: <strong>Supplier</strong> Certification performance<br />
It is the aim of Yazaki to cooperate with suppliers who are fully certified in accordance<br />
to automotive, environmental, safety and social accountability standards.<br />
Therefore, supplier certification status of all active supplier sites (including<br />
Manufacturing locations, Sales offices & Logistic/Warehouses) are being tracked.<br />
<strong>Supplier</strong>s having no valid ISO/TS 16949 and ISO14001 certificates can achieve a<br />
maximum B level score, having none ISO9001 certification, max. C level.<br />
J: Overall Ranking (A, B, C, D level)<br />
The achieved overall performance score in percentage defines the overall supplier<br />
ranking.<br />
5. Additional Information and analysis<br />
1) Concern Class<br />
Total number of Quality, Warranty and Logistic concerns per month.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 13
2) Number of concern per <strong>YEL</strong> plant<br />
Total number of supplier concerns per <strong>YEL</strong>-plant.<br />
3) Defect Pareto<br />
Shows the pareto of the defect types per Yazaki Part Number rolling 12 months.<br />
In case of any specific questions, please contact your responsible SQE.<br />
| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 14