12.12.2012 Views

YEL-SD Supplier Score Card 2012 Manual Final - YAZAKI Europe

YEL-SD Supplier Score Card 2012 Manual Final - YAZAKI Europe

YEL-SD Supplier Score Card 2012 Manual Final - YAZAKI Europe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Content:<br />

<strong>Supplier</strong> Quality <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong><br />

M A N U A L<br />

<strong>YEL</strong> - <strong>Supplier</strong> Development \ Supply Management<br />

• Classification of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)<br />

• Definition of KPIs<br />

• Severity of KPIs<br />

• Calculation of KPIs (charts and tables)<br />

• <strong>Score</strong> table<br />

• <strong>Supplier</strong> ranking<br />

• Additional information and analysis<br />

<strong>Manual</strong> prepared by Hanxiu Lei<br />

© <strong>2012</strong> by <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>SD</strong><br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 1


1. Introduction<br />

In order to drive supplier improvement towards excellence, Yazaki measures the<br />

performance of all suppliers continuously. This evaluation is reflected in the `<strong>Supplier</strong><br />

<strong>Score</strong> card´ and is applicable to suppliers who deliver production material to Yazaki<br />

<strong>Europe</strong> (<strong>YEL</strong>) managed affiliates, including India and North-Africa affiliates. This<br />

manual explains the new <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> model which was updated to align with the<br />

Yazaki Global <strong>Supplier</strong> Development program.<br />

2. Definition of KPIs<br />

<strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> KPIs now exist out Yazaki global harmonized and <strong>Europe</strong>an specific KPIs.<br />

Type KPIs Definition<br />

Global PPM Performance Defective parts per million parts delivered *<br />

Global 3D Reactivity Performance<br />

Global 8D Reactivity Performance<br />

Percentage of 3D reply given within 24 hours, Concerns without<br />

answer (in pending) are counted as not on time<br />

Percentage of 8D reply given within agreed time<br />

without answer (in pending) are counted as not on time<br />

Global Rejection Performance Ratio of Rejections per million parts delivered (RPM) **<br />

<strong>Europe</strong> Number of Rejections Total No of Rejections (NOR)<br />

<strong>Europe</strong> Documentation Performance<br />

Percentage of submitted documents(drawings, parts<br />

Specification and PSWs) in relation to this of requested<br />

<strong>Europe</strong> No of Line Stops Number of the Line Stops in <strong>YEL</strong>-Plant caused by suppliers<br />

<strong>Europe</strong><br />

3D Reactivity of Customer<br />

Concerns<br />

No of end customer concerns and 3D reply not on time ***<br />

<strong>Europe</strong> Delivery Performance Percentage of Shipments on time<br />

Please be noticed that KPIs are based on rolling 12 months data.<br />

* All materials entering <strong>YEL</strong> managed affiliates are considered.<br />

** Rejections are quality, logistics and warranty concerns/ incidents in GQRSC.<br />

*** Customer concerns are those concerns originated by customers/OEMs and Yazaki Resident<br />

Engineers.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 2


3. Severity of KPIs<br />

4. Explanation of the Charts and Tables<br />

A: PPM Performance<br />

Calculation of PPM on 2 levels<br />

• Monthly: displaying monthly trend<br />

• Rolling 12 months: displaying PPM 12 months average<br />

Defective quantities are shown in the table and the received quantities in the chart.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 3


Ranking of PPM (<strong>Score</strong> Table)<br />

PPM POINTS RANK<br />

0 10 A<br />

1-9 9 A<br />

11-20 8 B<br />

21-30 7 B<br />

31-40 6 C<br />

41-50 5 C<br />

51-60 4 D<br />

61-70 3 D<br />

71-80 2 D<br />

81-100 1 D<br />

>100 0 D<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 4


B: Rejection Performance (RPM and NOR)<br />

Both RPM and NOR belong to rejection performance, while RPM belongs to globally<br />

harmonized KPIs and NOR (Number of Rejections) to <strong>Europe</strong>an specific KPIs.<br />

All the complaints are divided into 2 groups according to their Status:<br />

• Open: concern still in “open” GQRSC status, 3D/ 8D and/ or Cost Agreement<br />

open<br />

• Closed: concern in closed status, 8D and Cost Agreement closed<br />

• RPM ranking is based on the rolling 12 months value.<br />

• NOR: No of the rejections rolling 12 months.<br />

Note: For this KPI we have no additional charts.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 5


Ranking of RPM (<strong>Score</strong> Table)<br />

C: 3D/8D Reactivity Performance<br />

Calculation of both, 3D (to be answered within 24 hours after receiving the<br />

complaint) and 8D (to be answered within 14 days) response time and status.<br />

Evaluation of 3D RP with max. achievable 30 points and 8D RP max. 10 points.<br />

Note: Concerns with `pending` status are considered as NOT on time.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 6


and 8D to be answered within 14 days or within Target date agreed.<br />

Remark: 8D responses of the last month reported and in pending status are<br />

considered as on time. Some concerns might be still within the target date at the<br />

time of GQRSC data download (shown grey shaded).<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 7


Ranking of 3D and 8D reactivity performance<br />

D: Documentation performance<br />

Calculation of responses to Yazaki documentation requests (Drawings, PSW/ PPAP,<br />

Specifications, Handling manuals, etc.).<br />

Responsiveness percentage of documents submitted on time (10 working days or<br />

confirmed and agreed target date). Calculation of accumulated rolling 12 months.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 8


Ranking of the Documentation Performance (<strong>Score</strong> Table)<br />

Doc Perf<br />

( % )<br />

Points Rank<br />

0% 0 D<br />

50% 1 D<br />

51- 52 2 D<br />

53 - 54 3 D<br />

55 - 56 4 D<br />

57 - 58 5 D<br />

59 - 60 6 D<br />

61 - 62 7 D<br />

63 - 64 8 D<br />

65 - 66 9 D<br />

67- 68 10 D<br />

69 - 70 11 C<br />

71 - 72 12 C<br />

73 - 74 13 C<br />

75 - 76 14 C<br />

77 - 78 15 C<br />

DOC [30 POINTS]<br />

Doc Perf<br />

( % )<br />

Points Rank<br />

79 - 80 16 C<br />

81 - 82 17 C<br />

83 - 84 18 C<br />

85 -86 19 B<br />

87 - 88 20 B<br />

89 - 90 21 B<br />

91 22 B<br />

92 23 B<br />

93 24 B<br />

94 25 A<br />

95 26 A<br />

96 27 A<br />

97 28 A<br />

98 29 A<br />

99 30 A<br />

100 30 A<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 9


E: Delivery performance<br />

The delivery performance of the suppliers are calculated based on the ratio of on time<br />

delivered shipments to the total number of the shipments.<br />

F: Line stop<br />

Line stops, caused by supplier in the <strong>YEL</strong> Plant are counted and reflected in the <strong>Score</strong><br />

card.<br />

A calculation example:<br />

<strong>Supplier</strong> A supplies 2 plastic components to one of our <strong>Europe</strong>an Yazaki affiliates.<br />

As a result of delayed deliveries caused by the supplier (confirmed delivery date was<br />

not met), the affected Yazaki affiliate has a stop of its production for 2 days.<br />

Consequently, the supplier has caused 4 Line Stops.<br />

The Number of Line Stops is defined by the number of delayed components multiplied<br />

with the number of days our production is stopped.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 10


G: 3D Reactivity Performance of Customer Concern<br />

As end customer concerns have a major impact to Yazaki, a new KPI has been<br />

established. Number of end customers concerns not on time are displayed.<br />

For example: <strong>Supplier</strong> ABC has caused 10 end customer concerns in rolling 12 months,<br />

2 of them with 3D answered after 24 hours. The value of this KPI is 2. Refer to the<br />

score table below, resulting in 13 points for this KPI.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 11


Ranking of this KPI<br />

3D Customer Concern<br />

[20 P]<br />

3D RP POINTS RANK<br />

0 20 A<br />

1 15 B<br />

2 13 C<br />

3 10 D<br />

4 5 D<br />

>=5 0 D<br />

H: <strong>Score</strong> summery (all KPIs)<br />

This summary of all 8 KPIs shows the achievement per KPI and the total ranking level.<br />

The <strong>Score</strong> history shows yearly data about the development trend of the total<br />

performance.<br />

Note: The score before August <strong>2012</strong> is calculated by the old evaluation method,<br />

these scores are frozen and will not be changed.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 12


I: <strong>Supplier</strong> Certification performance<br />

It is the aim of Yazaki to cooperate with suppliers who are fully certified in accordance<br />

to automotive, environmental, safety and social accountability standards.<br />

Therefore, supplier certification status of all active supplier sites (including<br />

Manufacturing locations, Sales offices & Logistic/Warehouses) are being tracked.<br />

<strong>Supplier</strong>s having no valid ISO/TS 16949 and ISO14001 certificates can achieve a<br />

maximum B level score, having none ISO9001 certification, max. C level.<br />

J: Overall Ranking (A, B, C, D level)<br />

The achieved overall performance score in percentage defines the overall supplier<br />

ranking.<br />

5. Additional Information and analysis<br />

1) Concern Class<br />

Total number of Quality, Warranty and Logistic concerns per month.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 13


2) Number of concern per <strong>YEL</strong> plant<br />

Total number of supplier concerns per <strong>YEL</strong>-plant.<br />

3) Defect Pareto<br />

Shows the pareto of the defect types per Yazaki Part Number rolling 12 months.<br />

In case of any specific questions, please contact your responsible SQE.<br />

| <strong>YAZAKI</strong> | <strong>YEL</strong>-<strong>Supplier</strong> Development | <strong>Supplier</strong> <strong>Score</strong> <strong>Card</strong> | <strong>Manual</strong> Page: 14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!