GTM Research--US Energy Storage Monitor Q2 2017 -Exec Summary
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>:<br />
<strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong> <strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong><br />
June <strong>2017</strong>
Tables of Contents (Full Report)<br />
1. Introduction and Key Findings 5<br />
2. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Market Overview 6<br />
3. In Focus: Bridging the Gap – ESA’s 35 GW Target 39<br />
4. Utility-Scale Market Trends 48<br />
5. Behind-the-Meter Market Trends 66<br />
6. Non-Residential Market Trends 75<br />
7. Residential Market Trends 84<br />
8. Appendices 94<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
1
About This Report<br />
U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong> is a quarterly publication of <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> and the <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Association (ESA). Each quarter, we gather data on U.S. energy storage<br />
deployments, prices, policies, regulations and business models. We compile this information in this report, which is intended to provide the most comprehensive, timely<br />
analysis of energy storage in the U.S.<br />
Notes:<br />
• All forecasts are from <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>; ESA does not predict future pricing, costs or deployments<br />
• References, data, charts and analysis from this report should be attributed to “<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>”<br />
• Media inquiries should be directed to Mike Munsell from <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (munsell@gtmresearch.com) or Matt Roberts with the <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Association<br />
(m.roberts@energystorage.org)<br />
For more information or to purchase the full report, visit www.energystoragemonitor.com.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
2
Deployments (MW)<br />
U.S. Q1 <strong>2017</strong> Deployments in Megawatts Up 276% Over Previous Year<br />
U.S. Quarterly <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by Segment (MW), 2013-Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
-<br />
Q1 2013 <strong>Q2</strong> 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 <strong>Q2</strong> 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 <strong>Q2</strong> 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 <strong>Q2</strong> 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />
Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />
• The U.S. deployed 71 MW of energy storage in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>, a 50% decrease from the 140.8 MW deployed in Q4 2016 and up 276% from t he 18.9 MW deployed in Q1 2016.<br />
The follows the trend of the first quarter of each year generally seeing a smaller megawatt deployment level after an active fourth quarter.<br />
• Behind-the-meter deployments decreased 22% from Q4 2016. The residential market held roughly flat, falling only 5% quarter-over-quarter. In contrast, the non-residential<br />
segment fell 26%. The majority of this decline is attributable to the drop in California’s non -residential market, much of which resulted from players awaiting the next phase<br />
of the Self-Generation Incentive Program.<br />
• Overall, behind-the-meter deployments accounted for 9% of the total market in MW terms in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
3
Deployments (MWh)<br />
U.S. Q1 <strong>2017</strong> Deployments in Megawatt-Hours Up 944% Over Previous Year<br />
U.S. Quarterly <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by Segment, 2013-Q1 <strong>2017</strong> (MWh)<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
-<br />
Q1 2013 <strong>Q2</strong> 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 <strong>Q2</strong> 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 <strong>Q2</strong> 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 <strong>Q2</strong> 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />
Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />
• The U.S. deployed 233.7 MWh in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>, a 2% increase over Q4 2016 and up 944% over Q1 2016, when 22.4 MWh were deployed. Q1 <strong>2017</strong> marked a record quarter in<br />
MWh terms, breaking the record set in the previous quarter.<br />
• Behind-the-meter deployments dropped 21% from Q4 2016. The residential market held roughly flat quarter-over-quarter, and in fact increased 1% from Q4 2016 to Q1 <strong>2017</strong>.<br />
In contrast, the non-residential market fell 24% during the same period. The majority of this decline is attributable to the drop in California’s non-residential market, much of<br />
which resulted from players awaiting the next phase of the SGIP.<br />
• Overall, behind-the-meter deployments accounted for 6% of total deployments in MWh terms.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
4
Top <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Markets, Q1 <strong>2017</strong>: California Remains Powerhouse, Hawaii Grows<br />
Top 3 Markets by Segment in Q1 <strong>2017</strong> (Power Capacity)<br />
Rank Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />
1 All Others* California California<br />
2 Hawaii Hawaii Hawaii<br />
3 California All Others* Arizona<br />
*<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is currently monitoring eight individual markets. Complete coverage of all markets is available in the full report.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
5
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by<br />
Technology (MW)<br />
Lithium-Ion Technology Continues the Trend of More Than 95% Share<br />
Quarterly <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployment Share by Technology (MW %)<br />
100%<br />
90%<br />
80%<br />
70%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
0%<br />
Q1 2013 <strong>Q2</strong> 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 <strong>Q2</strong> 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 <strong>Q2</strong> 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 <strong>Q2</strong> 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />
Lithium Ion Lead Acid Sodium Chemistries Flow - Vanadium Flow - Zinc Other<br />
Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
• Lithium-ion batteries dominated the energy storage market for the tenth straight quarter, holding 96.5% of the market in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>. The majority of utility-scale projects deployed in Q1<br />
<strong>2017</strong> employed lithium-ion chemistry, and the technology is also favored in the behind-the-meter segment. Growing acceptance of lithium-ion is expected to cause this trend to continue<br />
over the next few years.<br />
• Vanadium flow batteries came in second place with 3% of the market, as a single vanadium-redox project was deployed in California.<br />
• Lead-acid came in third place with 0.7% of the market.<br />
* “Other” includes flywheel and unidentified energy storage technologies<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
6
Front-of-the-Meter Policy and Market Developments, <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
Nevada<br />
SB 204 would require regulators to consider<br />
implementing energy storage targets; SB 65<br />
could alter how resources are dispatched<br />
Washington<br />
Washington Utilities and<br />
Transportation Commission<br />
directed utilities to consider<br />
storage within IRPs.<br />
Indiana<br />
Vectren’s grid modernization<br />
filing includes a 1 MW battery<br />
storage system paired with 4<br />
MW of solar energy.<br />
Massachusetts<br />
Massachusetts Clean <strong>Energy</strong> Center<br />
(MassCEC) released an RFP for its Advancing<br />
Commonwealth <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> (ACES)<br />
Program for projects; MA DOER will set an<br />
energy storage target in July <strong>2017</strong>.<br />
California<br />
SDG&E announced winners for its 2016<br />
preferred resources RFP; California State<br />
Legislature introduced AB 1405, which would<br />
establish a clean peak standard for California;<br />
SDG&E released a Distribution<br />
Reliability/Power Quality RFP; the CPUC<br />
announced an additional 500 MW of<br />
distributed energy targets for the three main<br />
IOUs, distributed evenly among the three.<br />
CAISO released latest ESDER revision.<br />
Arizona<br />
New York<br />
NYSERDA offered up to $15.5 million for energy<br />
storage demonstration projects via PON 3541; Con Ed<br />
announced new details on its mobile 1 MW / 4 MWh<br />
energy storage system.<br />
PJM<br />
Complaints have been filed with FERC over changes<br />
to PJM’s frequency regulation market; Ongoing<br />
meetings on markets and reliability, including<br />
implementation of new RegD signal<br />
APS announces its <strong>2017</strong> Integrated Resource<br />
Plan (IRP), including more than 500 MW of<br />
energy storage.v<br />
Virginia<br />
Maryland<br />
Hawaii<br />
KIUC’s 13 MW / 52 MWh energy storage<br />
project, developed by SolarCity, came on-line.<br />
Appalachian Power filed an<br />
IRP which included a proposal<br />
for 10 MW of battery storage<br />
by 2025.<br />
State legislature enrolled bills to instruct Power<br />
Plant <strong>Research</strong> Program to investigate market<br />
incentives and regulatory reforms necessary or beneficial<br />
to bolster implementation of storage.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
7
Behind-the-Meter Policy and Market Developments, <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
Nevada<br />
State legislature saw the introduction of SB 145 and SB 146, the former<br />
proposing the establishment of a behind-the-meter storage incentive program,<br />
and the latter directing utilities to explore distributed resource plans.<br />
New York<br />
NY PSC issued an order regarding the valuation of DERs and the successor to NEM. NYSERDA offered up to $15.5<br />
million for energy storage demonstration projects via PON 3541. NREL, CUNY and Meister released a report<br />
identifying the value of storage for resiliency. Solar 1 issued an RFQ for a community solar-plus-storage program.<br />
California<br />
CPUC approved doubling of the SGIP budget for <strong>2017</strong><br />
through 2019; also considered a proposed decision<br />
on Track 2 <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Issues. The state<br />
legislature is considering a bill to develop an energy<br />
storage rebate program, with a particular focus on<br />
systems deployed in low-income communities. CAISO<br />
released its latest ESDER revision.<br />
Arizona<br />
APS and TEP submitted rate-case dockets to the<br />
Arizona Corporation Commission.<br />
Massachusetts<br />
MassCEC launched the ACES program.<br />
Maryland<br />
The state legislature enrolled bills to<br />
instruct Power Plant <strong>Research</strong> Program<br />
to investigate market incentives and<br />
regulatory reforms necessary or<br />
beneficial to bolster implementation of<br />
storage; also considering bill to create a<br />
tax credit for behind-the-meter energy<br />
storage systems.<br />
Hawaii<br />
The state legislature is considering HB 1593, a bill<br />
that would establish a storage rebate program.<br />
Florida<br />
The state legislature passed SB 90 to exempt<br />
80% of storage system value from ad valorem<br />
taxation.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
8
MW<br />
ESA’s 27th Annual Conference and Expo Sets Bold Target: 35 GW of <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> by 2025<br />
ESA’s 35 GW by 2025 Vision<br />
40,000<br />
35,000<br />
• At ESA’s 27th Annual Conference and Expo in Denver in April <strong>2017</strong>,<br />
Matt Roberts, ESA's executive director, laid out a bold vision for<br />
advanced energy storage’s future, calling for 35 GW to be deployed in<br />
the United States by 2025.<br />
30,000<br />
25,000<br />
20,000<br />
• During his opening keynote, Roberts stated: "Electrification will<br />
fundamentally transform the entire power sector – and this<br />
confluence of forces is putting us on a path to deploy more than 35<br />
GW of energy storage by 2025.” He cited cost declines, market and<br />
regulatory reforms, and increasing recognition of the diverse value of<br />
storing energy as drivers for this growth.<br />
15,000<br />
10,000<br />
5,000<br />
-<br />
<strong>2017</strong> 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025<br />
Total Utility-Scale (MW)<br />
Total Behind-the-Meter (MW)<br />
Source: ESA<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
9
2012<br />
2013<br />
2014<br />
2015<br />
2016<br />
<strong>2017</strong><br />
2018<br />
2019<br />
2020<br />
2021<br />
2022<br />
2023<br />
2024<br />
2025<br />
Cumulative Installations (GW)<br />
Bridging the Gap – 35 GW by 2025: Acceleration or Inflation?<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Total Cumulative 5-Year Forecast<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
The “hockey stick” effect:<br />
Beyond the five-year<br />
horizon, significant<br />
disruptors could drive 8 to<br />
10 GW of annual growth.<br />
Inflation: Short-term<br />
incremental changes drive<br />
new business models and<br />
accelerate existing forecasts<br />
beyond expected levels.<br />
• These signposts suggest several ways to bridge the policy gap from current forecasts to<br />
2022 to ESA’s 35 GW target – unexpected short-term disruptions to the market that<br />
would inflate current forecasts, or medium- and long-term changes that would drive<br />
exponential growth beyond the five-year time frame.<br />
• Inflation: Short-term policy and regulatory movement could front-load forecasted<br />
growth, pushing the 1 GW annual threshold up and making future growth easier as<br />
scale drives innovation and cost declines, which in turn drive new business models<br />
and market opportunities. <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> updates its forecasts quarterly, so if this<br />
trend emerges, it will be reflected in adjusted 5-year outlooks moving forward. These<br />
short-term disruptions would have to occur quickly, likely in the next year, to drive<br />
forecasts significantly upward.<br />
• Acceleration: Long-term resource planning, legislation, and market reforms could<br />
create a new “boom” for energy storage, allowing levels to proceed at roughly their<br />
current pace before suddenly accelerating around the five-year horizon. This “hockey<br />
stick” effect would create a tremendous opportunity as stakeholders scramble to move<br />
at scale in a suddenly expanded market.<br />
0<br />
Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
Residential Non-Residential Utility ESA Target<br />
• The next one to two years will be key as energy storage is being actively examined<br />
nationwide at the state, ISO and federal level, and the decisions made now will<br />
determine how the market looks eight years from now.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
10
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by<br />
Segment (MW)<br />
U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Annual Deployments Will Reach 2.6 GW by 2022<br />
U.S. Annual <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployment Forecast, 2012-2022E (MW)<br />
3,000<br />
2,500<br />
2,567<br />
2,000<br />
1,500<br />
1,000<br />
500<br />
221<br />
395<br />
Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
-<br />
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <strong>2017</strong>E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E<br />
Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />
• <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> expects the U.S. energy storage market to grow to roughly 2.6 GW in 2022, almost 12 times the size of the 2016 market (221 MW).<br />
• The behind-the-meter segment represented 20% of the 2016 market. This will grow to 53% of the annual storage market by 2022.<br />
• California will remain the undisputed emperor of the U.S. storage market over the next five years. Arizona, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York and Texas will all battle for second place, with<br />
each market accounting for a significant chunk of deployments through 2022.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
11
Annual <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Market Size<br />
(Million $)<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Will Be a $3.2 Billion Market in the U.S. by 2022<br />
U.S. Annual <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Market Size, 2012-2022E (Million $)<br />
$3,500<br />
$3,189<br />
$3,000<br />
$2,500<br />
$2,000<br />
$1,500<br />
$1,000<br />
$500<br />
$320<br />
$618<br />
$0<br />
Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <strong>2017</strong>E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E<br />
Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />
• By 2022, the U.S. energy storage market is expected to be worth $3.2 billion, a tenfold increase from 2016, and a fivefold increase from this year. Cumulative <strong>2017</strong>-2022 storage<br />
market revenues will be $11 billion.<br />
• Revenues in 2016 ended up slightly higher than the previous year, as system prices have continued to be pushed down aggressively, and the overall deployments in megawatts were<br />
down 3%. Also, the typically higher-priced residential segment, despite its mainstream buzz, only brought in about 4% of storage market revenues in 2016.<br />
• Revenues in <strong>2017</strong> will grow almost twofold over 2016, with the residential segment providing the biggest percentage jump with 650% growth, while the utility segment will see the<br />
highest growth in dollar terms, of $128 million versus the previous year.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
12
U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong><br />
Produced in a collaboration between <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> and the <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Association (ESA), the U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong> is the industry’s only comprehensive quarterly research<br />
report on energy storage markets, deployments, policies, financing and regulations in the U.S. The report is available for purchase quarterly or as an annual subscription.<br />
<strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong> vs. Full Report Content<br />
Content <strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong> Full Report<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments National Aggregate By State and Market Segment<br />
Technology Coverage Deployments by Technology Status by Technology<br />
Market Trends National Highlights Detailed Analysis<br />
Pricing Data Not Available Quarterly Index<br />
Deployment Forecast National Aggregate By State and Segment<br />
Report Pricing<br />
Full Report (PDF Enterprise License)<br />
Member Status<br />
<strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong><br />
Individual Quarterly Report Annual Subscription (4 Reports)<br />
ESA Members<br />
$2,000 $6,000<br />
Free<br />
Non-ESA Members $4,000 $10,000<br />
This report is relevant to:<br />
Technology Firms<br />
Component Manufacturers<br />
System Integrators<br />
Third-Party Financiers<br />
Project Developers<br />
Utilities and IPPs<br />
Universities<br />
Policymakers and Regulators<br />
For more information, contact<br />
storagesubscription@gtmresearch.com or<br />
visit www.energystoragemonitor.com<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
13
About Greentech Media<br />
News/Online<br />
Greentech Media delivers business-to-business news, analysis and events at the forefront of the global energy transformation. Our<br />
coverage area extends across the clean energy industry with a focus on solar power and the electric utility market’s evolution.<br />
Greentech Media’s industry-leading coverage is provided by a team of analysts from our market intelligence arm, <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, as<br />
well as our world-class journalists and global network of expert contributors.<br />
<strong>Research</strong><br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is the market analysis and consulting arm of Greentech Media. <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>’s analysts cover the solar, grid edge,<br />
and energy storage markets, combining diverse backgrounds in energy, environmental, emerging technology, information<br />
technology and strategic consulting sectors. This diverse team provides critical and timely market analysis in the form of research<br />
reports, consulting and data subscription services.<br />
Events<br />
Greentech Media and <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> experts come together to produce all of Greentech Media’s industry conferences throughout<br />
the year. These summits provide a platform for our latest market intelligence and draw together the industry influencers from<br />
organizations across the value chain.<br />
<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />
14
Thank you!<br />
Interested in other <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> products and services? Please visit www.gtmresearch.com or contact sales@greentechmedia.com<br />
June <strong>2017</strong>