03.07.2017 Views

GTM Research--US Energy Storage Monitor Q2 2017 -Exec Summary

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>:<br />

<strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong> <strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong><br />

June <strong>2017</strong>


Tables of Contents (Full Report)<br />

1. Introduction and Key Findings 5<br />

2. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Market Overview 6<br />

3. In Focus: Bridging the Gap – ESA’s 35 GW Target 39<br />

4. Utility-Scale Market Trends 48<br />

5. Behind-the-Meter Market Trends 66<br />

6. Non-Residential Market Trends 75<br />

7. Residential Market Trends 84<br />

8. Appendices 94<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

1


About This Report<br />

U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong> is a quarterly publication of <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> and the <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Association (ESA). Each quarter, we gather data on U.S. energy storage<br />

deployments, prices, policies, regulations and business models. We compile this information in this report, which is intended to provide the most comprehensive, timely<br />

analysis of energy storage in the U.S.<br />

Notes:<br />

• All forecasts are from <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>; ESA does not predict future pricing, costs or deployments<br />

• References, data, charts and analysis from this report should be attributed to “<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>”<br />

• Media inquiries should be directed to Mike Munsell from <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (munsell@gtmresearch.com) or Matt Roberts with the <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Association<br />

(m.roberts@energystorage.org)<br />

For more information or to purchase the full report, visit www.energystoragemonitor.com.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

2


Deployments (MW)<br />

U.S. Q1 <strong>2017</strong> Deployments in Megawatts Up 276% Over Previous Year<br />

U.S. Quarterly <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by Segment (MW), 2013-Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

-<br />

Q1 2013 <strong>Q2</strong> 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 <strong>Q2</strong> 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 <strong>Q2</strong> 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 <strong>Q2</strong> 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />

Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />

• The U.S. deployed 71 MW of energy storage in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>, a 50% decrease from the 140.8 MW deployed in Q4 2016 and up 276% from t he 18.9 MW deployed in Q1 2016.<br />

The follows the trend of the first quarter of each year generally seeing a smaller megawatt deployment level after an active fourth quarter.<br />

• Behind-the-meter deployments decreased 22% from Q4 2016. The residential market held roughly flat, falling only 5% quarter-over-quarter. In contrast, the non-residential<br />

segment fell 26%. The majority of this decline is attributable to the drop in California’s non -residential market, much of which resulted from players awaiting the next phase<br />

of the Self-Generation Incentive Program.<br />

• Overall, behind-the-meter deployments accounted for 9% of the total market in MW terms in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

3


Deployments (MWh)<br />

U.S. Q1 <strong>2017</strong> Deployments in Megawatt-Hours Up 944% Over Previous Year<br />

U.S. Quarterly <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by Segment, 2013-Q1 <strong>2017</strong> (MWh)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

-<br />

Q1 2013 <strong>Q2</strong> 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 <strong>Q2</strong> 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 <strong>Q2</strong> 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 <strong>Q2</strong> 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />

Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />

• The U.S. deployed 233.7 MWh in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>, a 2% increase over Q4 2016 and up 944% over Q1 2016, when 22.4 MWh were deployed. Q1 <strong>2017</strong> marked a record quarter in<br />

MWh terms, breaking the record set in the previous quarter.<br />

• Behind-the-meter deployments dropped 21% from Q4 2016. The residential market held roughly flat quarter-over-quarter, and in fact increased 1% from Q4 2016 to Q1 <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

In contrast, the non-residential market fell 24% during the same period. The majority of this decline is attributable to the drop in California’s non-residential market, much of<br />

which resulted from players awaiting the next phase of the SGIP.<br />

• Overall, behind-the-meter deployments accounted for 6% of total deployments in MWh terms.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

4


Top <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Markets, Q1 <strong>2017</strong>: California Remains Powerhouse, Hawaii Grows<br />

Top 3 Markets by Segment in Q1 <strong>2017</strong> (Power Capacity)<br />

Rank Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />

1 All Others* California California<br />

2 Hawaii Hawaii Hawaii<br />

3 California All Others* Arizona<br />

*<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is currently monitoring eight individual markets. Complete coverage of all markets is available in the full report.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

5


<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by<br />

Technology (MW)<br />

Lithium-Ion Technology Continues the Trend of More Than 95% Share<br />

Quarterly <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployment Share by Technology (MW %)<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Q1 2013 <strong>Q2</strong> 2013 Q3 2013 Q4 2013 Q1 2014 <strong>Q2</strong> 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 <strong>Q2</strong> 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 <strong>Q2</strong> 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 <strong>2017</strong><br />

Lithium Ion Lead Acid Sodium Chemistries Flow - Vanadium Flow - Zinc Other<br />

Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

• Lithium-ion batteries dominated the energy storage market for the tenth straight quarter, holding 96.5% of the market in Q1 <strong>2017</strong>. The majority of utility-scale projects deployed in Q1<br />

<strong>2017</strong> employed lithium-ion chemistry, and the technology is also favored in the behind-the-meter segment. Growing acceptance of lithium-ion is expected to cause this trend to continue<br />

over the next few years.<br />

• Vanadium flow batteries came in second place with 3% of the market, as a single vanadium-redox project was deployed in California.<br />

• Lead-acid came in third place with 0.7% of the market.<br />

* “Other” includes flywheel and unidentified energy storage technologies<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

6


Front-of-the-Meter Policy and Market Developments, <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

Nevada<br />

SB 204 would require regulators to consider<br />

implementing energy storage targets; SB 65<br />

could alter how resources are dispatched<br />

Washington<br />

Washington Utilities and<br />

Transportation Commission<br />

directed utilities to consider<br />

storage within IRPs.<br />

Indiana<br />

Vectren’s grid modernization<br />

filing includes a 1 MW battery<br />

storage system paired with 4<br />

MW of solar energy.<br />

Massachusetts<br />

Massachusetts Clean <strong>Energy</strong> Center<br />

(MassCEC) released an RFP for its Advancing<br />

Commonwealth <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> (ACES)<br />

Program for projects; MA DOER will set an<br />

energy storage target in July <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

California<br />

SDG&E announced winners for its 2016<br />

preferred resources RFP; California State<br />

Legislature introduced AB 1405, which would<br />

establish a clean peak standard for California;<br />

SDG&E released a Distribution<br />

Reliability/Power Quality RFP; the CPUC<br />

announced an additional 500 MW of<br />

distributed energy targets for the three main<br />

IOUs, distributed evenly among the three.<br />

CAISO released latest ESDER revision.<br />

Arizona<br />

New York<br />

NYSERDA offered up to $15.5 million for energy<br />

storage demonstration projects via PON 3541; Con Ed<br />

announced new details on its mobile 1 MW / 4 MWh<br />

energy storage system.<br />

PJM<br />

Complaints have been filed with FERC over changes<br />

to PJM’s frequency regulation market; Ongoing<br />

meetings on markets and reliability, including<br />

implementation of new RegD signal<br />

APS announces its <strong>2017</strong> Integrated Resource<br />

Plan (IRP), including more than 500 MW of<br />

energy storage.v<br />

Virginia<br />

Maryland<br />

Hawaii<br />

KIUC’s 13 MW / 52 MWh energy storage<br />

project, developed by SolarCity, came on-line.<br />

Appalachian Power filed an<br />

IRP which included a proposal<br />

for 10 MW of battery storage<br />

by 2025.<br />

State legislature enrolled bills to instruct Power<br />

Plant <strong>Research</strong> Program to investigate market<br />

incentives and regulatory reforms necessary or beneficial<br />

to bolster implementation of storage.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

7


Behind-the-Meter Policy and Market Developments, <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

Nevada<br />

State legislature saw the introduction of SB 145 and SB 146, the former<br />

proposing the establishment of a behind-the-meter storage incentive program,<br />

and the latter directing utilities to explore distributed resource plans.<br />

New York<br />

NY PSC issued an order regarding the valuation of DERs and the successor to NEM. NYSERDA offered up to $15.5<br />

million for energy storage demonstration projects via PON 3541. NREL, CUNY and Meister released a report<br />

identifying the value of storage for resiliency. Solar 1 issued an RFQ for a community solar-plus-storage program.<br />

California<br />

CPUC approved doubling of the SGIP budget for <strong>2017</strong><br />

through 2019; also considered a proposed decision<br />

on Track 2 <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Issues. The state<br />

legislature is considering a bill to develop an energy<br />

storage rebate program, with a particular focus on<br />

systems deployed in low-income communities. CAISO<br />

released its latest ESDER revision.<br />

Arizona<br />

APS and TEP submitted rate-case dockets to the<br />

Arizona Corporation Commission.<br />

Massachusetts<br />

MassCEC launched the ACES program.<br />

Maryland<br />

The state legislature enrolled bills to<br />

instruct Power Plant <strong>Research</strong> Program<br />

to investigate market incentives and<br />

regulatory reforms necessary or<br />

beneficial to bolster implementation of<br />

storage; also considering bill to create a<br />

tax credit for behind-the-meter energy<br />

storage systems.<br />

Hawaii<br />

The state legislature is considering HB 1593, a bill<br />

that would establish a storage rebate program.<br />

Florida<br />

The state legislature passed SB 90 to exempt<br />

80% of storage system value from ad valorem<br />

taxation.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

8


MW<br />

ESA’s 27th Annual Conference and Expo Sets Bold Target: 35 GW of <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> by 2025<br />

ESA’s 35 GW by 2025 Vision<br />

40,000<br />

35,000<br />

• At ESA’s 27th Annual Conference and Expo in Denver in April <strong>2017</strong>,<br />

Matt Roberts, ESA's executive director, laid out a bold vision for<br />

advanced energy storage’s future, calling for 35 GW to be deployed in<br />

the United States by 2025.<br />

30,000<br />

25,000<br />

20,000<br />

• During his opening keynote, Roberts stated: "Electrification will<br />

fundamentally transform the entire power sector – and this<br />

confluence of forces is putting us on a path to deploy more than 35<br />

GW of energy storage by 2025.” He cited cost declines, market and<br />

regulatory reforms, and increasing recognition of the diverse value of<br />

storing energy as drivers for this growth.<br />

15,000<br />

10,000<br />

5,000<br />

-<br />

<strong>2017</strong> 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025<br />

Total Utility-Scale (MW)<br />

Total Behind-the-Meter (MW)<br />

Source: ESA<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

9


2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

<strong>2017</strong><br />

2018<br />

2019<br />

2020<br />

2021<br />

2022<br />

2023<br />

2024<br />

2025<br />

Cumulative Installations (GW)<br />

Bridging the Gap – 35 GW by 2025: Acceleration or Inflation?<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> Total Cumulative 5-Year Forecast<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

The “hockey stick” effect:<br />

Beyond the five-year<br />

horizon, significant<br />

disruptors could drive 8 to<br />

10 GW of annual growth.<br />

Inflation: Short-term<br />

incremental changes drive<br />

new business models and<br />

accelerate existing forecasts<br />

beyond expected levels.<br />

• These signposts suggest several ways to bridge the policy gap from current forecasts to<br />

2022 to ESA’s 35 GW target – unexpected short-term disruptions to the market that<br />

would inflate current forecasts, or medium- and long-term changes that would drive<br />

exponential growth beyond the five-year time frame.<br />

• Inflation: Short-term policy and regulatory movement could front-load forecasted<br />

growth, pushing the 1 GW annual threshold up and making future growth easier as<br />

scale drives innovation and cost declines, which in turn drive new business models<br />

and market opportunities. <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> updates its forecasts quarterly, so if this<br />

trend emerges, it will be reflected in adjusted 5-year outlooks moving forward. These<br />

short-term disruptions would have to occur quickly, likely in the next year, to drive<br />

forecasts significantly upward.<br />

• Acceleration: Long-term resource planning, legislation, and market reforms could<br />

create a new “boom” for energy storage, allowing levels to proceed at roughly their<br />

current pace before suddenly accelerating around the five-year horizon. This “hockey<br />

stick” effect would create a tremendous opportunity as stakeholders scramble to move<br />

at scale in a suddenly expanded market.<br />

0<br />

Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

Residential Non-Residential Utility ESA Target<br />

• The next one to two years will be key as energy storage is being actively examined<br />

nationwide at the state, ISO and federal level, and the decisions made now will<br />

determine how the market looks eight years from now.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

10


<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments by<br />

Segment (MW)<br />

U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Annual Deployments Will Reach 2.6 GW by 2022<br />

U.S. Annual <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployment Forecast, 2012-2022E (MW)<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,567<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

221<br />

395<br />

Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

-<br />

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <strong>2017</strong>E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E<br />

Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />

• <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> expects the U.S. energy storage market to grow to roughly 2.6 GW in 2022, almost 12 times the size of the 2016 market (221 MW).<br />

• The behind-the-meter segment represented 20% of the 2016 market. This will grow to 53% of the annual storage market by 2022.<br />

• California will remain the undisputed emperor of the U.S. storage market over the next five years. Arizona, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York and Texas will all battle for second place, with<br />

each market accounting for a significant chunk of deployments through 2022.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

11


Annual <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Market Size<br />

(Million $)<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Will Be a $3.2 Billion Market in the U.S. by 2022<br />

U.S. Annual <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Market Size, 2012-2022E (Million $)<br />

$3,500<br />

$3,189<br />

$3,000<br />

$2,500<br />

$2,000<br />

$1,500<br />

$1,000<br />

$500<br />

$320<br />

$618<br />

$0<br />

Source: <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong><br />

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 <strong>2017</strong>E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E<br />

Residential Non-Residential Utility<br />

• By 2022, the U.S. energy storage market is expected to be worth $3.2 billion, a tenfold increase from 2016, and a fivefold increase from this year. Cumulative <strong>2017</strong>-2022 storage<br />

market revenues will be $11 billion.<br />

• Revenues in 2016 ended up slightly higher than the previous year, as system prices have continued to be pushed down aggressively, and the overall deployments in megawatts were<br />

down 3%. Also, the typically higher-priced residential segment, despite its mainstream buzz, only brought in about 4% of storage market revenues in 2016.<br />

• Revenues in <strong>2017</strong> will grow almost twofold over 2016, with the residential segment providing the biggest percentage jump with 650% growth, while the utility segment will see the<br />

highest growth in dollar terms, of $128 million versus the previous year.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

12


U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong><br />

Produced in a collaboration between <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> and the <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Association (ESA), the U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong> is the industry’s only comprehensive quarterly research<br />

report on energy storage markets, deployments, policies, financing and regulations in the U.S. The report is available for purchase quarterly or as an annual subscription.<br />

<strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong> vs. Full Report Content<br />

Content <strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong> Full Report<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> Deployments National Aggregate By State and Market Segment<br />

Technology Coverage Deployments by Technology Status by Technology<br />

Market Trends National Highlights Detailed Analysis<br />

Pricing Data Not Available Quarterly Index<br />

Deployment Forecast National Aggregate By State and Segment<br />

Report Pricing<br />

Full Report (PDF Enterprise License)<br />

Member Status<br />

<strong>Exec</strong>utive <strong>Summary</strong><br />

Individual Quarterly Report Annual Subscription (4 Reports)<br />

ESA Members<br />

$2,000 $6,000<br />

Free<br />

Non-ESA Members $4,000 $10,000<br />

This report is relevant to:<br />

Technology Firms<br />

Component Manufacturers<br />

System Integrators<br />

Third-Party Financiers<br />

Project Developers<br />

Utilities and IPPs<br />

Universities<br />

Policymakers and Regulators<br />

For more information, contact<br />

storagesubscription@gtmresearch.com or<br />

visit www.energystoragemonitor.com<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

13


About Greentech Media<br />

News/Online<br />

Greentech Media delivers business-to-business news, analysis and events at the forefront of the global energy transformation. Our<br />

coverage area extends across the clean energy industry with a focus on solar power and the electric utility market’s evolution.<br />

Greentech Media’s industry-leading coverage is provided by a team of analysts from our market intelligence arm, <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>, as<br />

well as our world-class journalists and global network of expert contributors.<br />

<strong>Research</strong><br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is the market analysis and consulting arm of Greentech Media. <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>’s analysts cover the solar, grid edge,<br />

and energy storage markets, combining diverse backgrounds in energy, environmental, emerging technology, information<br />

technology and strategic consulting sectors. This diverse team provides critical and timely market analysis in the form of research<br />

reports, consulting and data subscription services.<br />

Events<br />

Greentech Media and <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> experts come together to produce all of Greentech Media’s industry conferences throughout<br />

the year. These summits provide a platform for our latest market intelligence and draw together the industry influencers from<br />

organizations across the value chain.<br />

<strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong>/ESA | U.S. <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Storage</strong> <strong>Monitor</strong>: <strong>Q2</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

14


Thank you!<br />

Interested in other <strong>GTM</strong> <strong>Research</strong> products and services? Please visit www.gtmresearch.com or contact sales@greentechmedia.com<br />

June <strong>2017</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!