Why do we need HELVETICA 2nd Edition
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WHY DO<br />
WE<br />
NEED<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>
09<br />
WHY DO WE NEED<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>?<br />
08<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>’S<br />
HISTORY<br />
14<br />
20<br />
THE TREND OF<br />
GLOBALIZATION<br />
CONTINUES<br />
20<br />
THE<br />
MULTINATIONALS ’<br />
TYPEFACE<br />
22<br />
24<br />
WORLDWIDE<br />
SUCCESS<br />
24<br />
WHY DO WE NEED<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>?<br />
2 nd EDITION<br />
2010 / 2015<br />
A PLAGUE<br />
BY THE NAME<br />
OF ARIAL<br />
26<br />
ORIGINAL<br />
Heitlinger, Paulo<br />
“Para que é que precisamos da Helvetica?”<br />
Cadernos da Tipografia, Nr. 1<br />
Tipografos.net<br />
Mar. 2007<br />
DESIGN, CONCEPT<br />
& TRANSLATION<br />
Carlos Gaspar<br />
28<br />
THE ANSWER<br />
A MESSAGE<br />
TO PAULO<br />
HEITLINGER<br />
28<br />
32
09<br />
WHY DO<br />
WE<br />
NEED<br />
HEL-<br />
VETICA?<br />
LET’S<br />
SEE WHY<br />
The 50th anniversary of Helvetica - a font family<br />
created in 1957 by Swiss Max Miedinger - was<br />
the excuse to shoot a <strong>do</strong>cumentary that illustrates<br />
the expansion of this <strong>we</strong>ll-known typeface.<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>FILM<br />
Helvetica metal type<br />
(with Manfred Schulz)<br />
http://www.helveticafilm.com/media/<br />
It reignites a controversy that goes back some<br />
years ago and which is worth resuming.<br />
8<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
11<br />
When the<br />
Swiss publisher<br />
LARS<br />
MULLER<br />
Slightly bigger than a Helvetic<br />
(Swiss) passport and (...) with<br />
a red cover, a H instead of the<br />
white cross, this little book<br />
brings together hundreds<br />
of photos to illustrate the ubiquity of this type,<br />
used for both logos of multinationals such as<br />
Panasonic, Texaco,Samsung, Hoover, Lufthansa,<br />
Kawasaki, Evian, Agip, BMW and Caterpillar,<br />
as <strong>we</strong>ll as for urban signage systems, from<br />
Hong-Kong to Istambul.<br />
published his book<br />
HOMMAGE<br />
TO A<br />
TYPEFACE,<br />
argued that:<br />
“ THIS TYPEFACE<br />
CAN DO EVERYTHING,<br />
AND THAT IS WHY<br />
IT’S SO GREAT (...)<br />
I wanted to publish this book to counteract<br />
the inflation of typefaces. We now have nearly<br />
30,000 typefaces, that <strong>do</strong>n’t serve much. Rather<br />
than invent new typefaces, it would be better<br />
to renew typography with existing typefaces.<br />
This is the way that points to the success of Helvetica.”<br />
10 WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
13<br />
IN RESPONSE<br />
TO LARS MÜLLER<br />
I must argue that for a swiss native,<br />
Helvetica can serve for many applications,<br />
but for me it <strong>do</strong>esn’t serve as much since<br />
it lacks a typographical personality.<br />
WHY DO WE STILL<br />
NEED THIS TYPEFACE<br />
WITH SUCH<br />
A HORRIFYING<br />
AESTHETICS, (...)<br />
“DEPERSONALIZED”,<br />
“NEUTRAL”<br />
We have thousands of fonts available for<br />
several distinctive applications, so the<br />
relevant question is:<br />
<strong>Why</strong> <strong>do</strong> <strong>we</strong> still <strong>need</strong> this typeface with such<br />
a horrifying aesthetics, created in the fiftys<br />
to attend the <strong>need</strong>s of customers looking<br />
for a typeface “depersonalized”, “neutral”,<br />
able to guarantee them an easy access to<br />
a global market?<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong> ARTWORK<br />
by Roberto Blake<br />
http://robertoblake.com/blog/2009/11/<br />
typography-i-<strong>do</strong>-love-helvetica/<br />
12<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
15<br />
Helvetica is the most<br />
associated typeface<br />
with swiss typography<br />
from the post-war and<br />
the “International<br />
School”, because<br />
of its chronic lack<br />
of personality.<br />
IT APPEARED IN THE ‘50s,<br />
DURING THE RECOVERY<br />
OF THE ECONOMIC<br />
CONJUNCTURE<br />
AFTER WORLD<br />
WAR II.<br />
Many German and Swiss companies,<br />
eager to launch new international<br />
markets, <strong>need</strong>ed a clear, neutral,<br />
modern and global typeface, which<br />
could relate itself with all countries<br />
and cultures - with the characteristics<br />
of Switzerland.<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>’S<br />
HISTORY<br />
Especially in the german afterwar,<br />
where a neutral typeface was<br />
sought, and which didn’t recall the<br />
country’s shameful Nazi past, now<br />
“democratized”, and looking more<br />
than ever to overcome it as soon as<br />
possible. The elected type, chosen<br />
by the multinational companies<br />
was Helvetica, the font of the<br />
globalization of the ‘60s and ‘70s<br />
(and, as <strong>we</strong> shall see, also of the<br />
t<strong>we</strong>nty-first century).<br />
THE IMPORTANT THING<br />
WAS TO MAKE IT<br />
“MODERN” WITHOUT<br />
REFLECTING SOME<br />
SORT OF A NATIONAL<br />
ASSOCIATION, OR<br />
ANY SPECIFIC<br />
CULTURAL<br />
AFFILIATION.<br />
14<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
17<br />
“<br />
FIT<br />
MAY A<br />
UNIVERSAL<br />
TYPEFACE<br />
COME! ”<br />
FOR ALL<br />
APPLICATIONS, ALL<br />
PURPOSES, ALL<br />
LANGUAGES AND<br />
ALL CULTURES.<br />
DURING<br />
THE ‘20s<br />
AND ‘30s<br />
IT HAD BEEN<br />
THE BAUHAUS<br />
SUPPORTERS<br />
WHO WHERE<br />
DEMANDING<br />
FOR A<br />
UNIVERSAL<br />
TYPEFACE<br />
At that time, the claims<br />
of the vangardists caused<br />
little resonance; much<br />
later, after the war, the<br />
industry and commerce<br />
had finally gotten the<br />
message, and demanded:<br />
“May a universal typeface<br />
come!”<br />
It started to be commercialized as<br />
Neue Haas Grotesk, since it was a<br />
reformulation of Haas Grotesk (owned<br />
by the Haas foundry, the company that<br />
commissioned Max Miedinger the typeface<br />
modernization).<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong> WAS<br />
DESIGNED TO<br />
BE A MODERNIZED<br />
VERSION OF AKZI<br />
DENZ-GROTESK<br />
(owned by H.<br />
Berthold AG)<br />
THE FIRST VERSION<br />
WAS PRESENTED<br />
IN 1957, AT THE<br />
GRAPHIC ‘57 FAIR,<br />
HELD IN LAUSANNE<br />
This typeface, then called Helvetia was<br />
marketed alongside the famous Univers, by Adrian Frutiger. Shortly<br />
thereafter, the German foundry D. Stempel AG purchased the rights<br />
of Helvetia and added various <strong>we</strong>ights and degrees of condensation,<br />
rebaptizing and relaunching as Helvetica in 1961.<br />
At that time, already 50% of D. Stempel AG’s capital was in possession<br />
of Linotype AG, representing, within the Linotype’s goup, “the metalic<br />
type foundry” sector for traditional and manual composition -<br />
the fotocomposition had begun around the year 1955.<br />
During its birth, helvetica didn’t have a<br />
structural concept as Adrian Frutiger cleverly<br />
gave to Univers, when he invented a<br />
system to calibrate the numerical <strong>we</strong>ights<br />
and degrees of condensation / expansion.<br />
This lack of systematic, reflected in the<br />
poor aesthetics of the variants, which<br />
made it a requirement to redesign it, like<br />
it happened in 1980 as Neue Helvetica.<br />
16<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
19<br />
‘ CAUSE THEY SAY<br />
EVERYTHING<br />
LOOKS WAY WAY<br />
BETTER<br />
IN <strong>HELVETICA</strong><br />
COWS
21<br />
THE<br />
TREND<br />
OF<br />
GLOBALIZATION<br />
CONTINUES<br />
IN THE<br />
XXI CENTURY,<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong><br />
CONTINUES<br />
TO BE USED,<br />
THROUGH<br />
A PERSISTENT<br />
REVIVAL THAT HAS<br />
BEEN AFFLICTING US<br />
FOR YEARS.<br />
TANK<br />
Helvetica, Moleskine.<br />
© 2009 Jim Antonopoulos<br />
http://www.tankstudio.com.au/blog/?tag=helvetica<br />
THE ANSWER,<br />
THOUGH I DON’T LIKE IT,<br />
IS SIMPLE...<br />
The renowned canadian designer and critic<br />
Nick Shinn, denouncing the evil effects of<br />
the authority of mass fashion, wrote:<br />
“ Helvetica returned at large. On the street,<br />
<strong>we</strong> see it in advertising campaigns for<br />
companies as diverse as IBM and The Gap.<br />
In online sales, it’s always on the top of the<br />
list as the most sold typeface...“<br />
The font that the type designer and writer Nick<br />
Shinn rightly nicknames as face of uniformity,<br />
has come to occupy positions for which it was<br />
never conceived, but contemporary designers,<br />
afraid to assert their cultural roots and regional<br />
contexts, prefer the “typeface without<br />
personality“. Never has a typeface so barren,<br />
with such a poor readability and aesthetics,<br />
had a virulent proliferation - adverse effects of<br />
globalization on principles of the XXI century...<br />
20<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?<br />
Don’t miss Nick Shinn’s article at: www.shinntype.com/stories/uniformity.pdf
23<br />
THE<br />
MULTI-<br />
NATIONALS’<br />
TYPEFACE<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong>FILM<br />
Lon<strong>do</strong>n streets<br />
FROM THE<br />
1960’S, MANY<br />
INTERNATIONAL<br />
COMPANIES<br />
HAVE ADOPTED<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong> FOR ITS<br />
COMMUNICATION...<br />
http://www.helveticafilm.com/media/<br />
Lufthansa, advised by Otl Aicher, a<strong>do</strong>pt it as the<br />
corporate’s typeface. KLM, the American Airlines<br />
and other airlines follo<strong>we</strong>d this trend. Then came<br />
BASF, a chemical pharmaceutical consortium<br />
which in that time, already occupied about 300<br />
printing workshops around the globe, as <strong>we</strong>ll<br />
as numerous advertising agencies. Even the<br />
consortia Bayer and Hoechst, two other giants<br />
of the chemical industry, started to use Helvetica<br />
anywhere in the world where there was business.<br />
In the automotive sector, it was follo<strong>we</strong>d by Opel<br />
and then BMW, which now uses a font similar<br />
to Helvetica. MAN and AEG also opted for the<br />
“type without characteristics”.<br />
Decidedly, the omnipresent Helvetica has become<br />
labeled as “modern, progressive, cosmopolitan<br />
and international”. But in reality, it continued to<br />
be of poor aesthetics, quietly bourgeois, stridently<br />
annoying, charmless, without elegance - failing<br />
of any temperament, vitality and emotion.<br />
Therefore, Helvetica was the winner of the International<br />
Style, and preferred by the masters of<br />
graphic design, as the swiss Max Bill and Josef<br />
Müller-Brockmann. Past 45 years after its introduction,<br />
Linotype already lists around 115 different<br />
Helvetica familly members on the market today...<br />
a long tipographic yawn.<br />
22<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
25<br />
DUST TOKY JAPAN<br />
by 4funz<br />
http://4funz.wordpress.com/2009/01/05/<br />
hq-japan-wallpapers/dusk-tokyo-japan/<br />
Despite these obstacles, Helvetica has been the most successful and most widely used<br />
typeface of the 60’s and 70’s. It quickly replaced, in 1897, Old Akzidenz Grotesk, which in<br />
the playful words of Erik Spiekermann, was showing "a lot of wrinkles". Their lack of a<br />
national and regional character - that’s why it’s called the “typeface without character” -<br />
was sometimes offset by the use of color, like in advertising posters. Moreover, the creative<br />
imagination of those who chose helvetica, was reduced markedly to explore geometric<br />
shapes, diagonal angles and / or take advantage of the wide range of <strong>we</strong>ights and cuts of<br />
the letter that became the universal typeface of the second half of the t<strong>we</strong>ntieth century.<br />
24<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
A<br />
<strong>HELVETICA</strong><br />
HAS BEEN<br />
VIOLENTLY<br />
PIRATED<br />
- ANOTHER<br />
EXPRESSION<br />
OF ITS UBIQUITY<br />
AND POPULARITY.<br />
SCOURGE<br />
CALLED<br />
Those who didn’t want to invest in<br />
the original product, bought one<br />
of the multiple clones, for much<br />
cheaper: even worse copies than<br />
the original, called ‘Swiss’, ‘Geneve’,<br />
‘Zürich’, etc.<br />
R<br />
I<br />
FROM BAD<br />
TO WORSE,<br />
the degradation continued when<br />
the still young Microsoft, decided<br />
to avoid purchasing Helvetica, and<br />
commissioned in 1982, the Arial<br />
typeface to Monotype. Included in<br />
the package of the operating system<br />
as one of the Win<strong>do</strong>ws core,<br />
A<br />
L<br />
ARIAL, IS ANOTHER TYPEFACE<br />
OF UNPARALLELED BANALITY,<br />
AND CAN BE UGLIER THAN<br />
THE ORIGINAL.<br />
HOWEVER,<br />
even Microsoft has already noticed<br />
this, and in its new version of Win<strong>do</strong>ws,<br />
both Arial and Times are no longer<br />
part of the core fonts...<br />
27<br />
26<br />
WHY DO WE NEED <strong>HELVETICA</strong>?
OR<br />
OTHING<br />
FINALLY, TO ANSWER<br />
THE QUESTION POSED<br />
IN THE TITLE<br />
OF THIS ARTICLE:<br />
29<br />
28
BY THE WAY
In 1994, Albert-Jan Pool and Erik<br />
Spiekermann took a cab together<br />
from the ATypI conference to the<br />
San Francisco airport. Spiekermann<br />
knew that Pool’s employer <strong>we</strong>nt bust,<br />
so he told him that if he wanted to<br />
earn some money with type design,<br />
he should have a look at fonts such<br />
as OCR and DIN. Spiekermann saw<br />
the old DIN type-face on the market<br />
in two <strong>we</strong>ights and noticed that<br />
several designers began using it.<br />
He thought:<br />
“why is this happening?”<br />
These <strong>we</strong>re leading designers, he saw<br />
them going on and he thought:<br />
“Hm, <strong>we</strong> should <strong>do</strong> something about<br />
it. <strong>Why</strong> <strong>do</strong> they use this unusable<br />
typeface? Let’s ask someone who<br />
can make something useful out of it.<br />
Then it might work even better.”<br />
So, he invited Pool to Berlin to discuss<br />
the idea in detail.<br />
One year later, FontFont published<br />
Pool’s typeface FF OCR-F, follo<strong>we</strong>d<br />
by the family FF DIN. Spiekermann<br />
had the skill to point out an empty<br />
space in the market. Digital DIN fonts<br />
<strong>we</strong>re available at that time, ho<strong>we</strong>ver,<br />
only in two <strong>we</strong>ights and solely in pure<br />
geometric shape. Pool designed a<br />
family of five <strong>we</strong>ights, he added true<br />
italics and also some alternative<br />
characters, such as the “i” with a<br />
round <strong>do</strong>t and the lo<strong>we</strong>r case figures.<br />
With time, five <strong>we</strong>ights of DIN Condensed<br />
<strong>we</strong>re added, as <strong>we</strong>ll as Greek<br />
and Cyrillic versions. The shape of the<br />
new FF DIN differs from the original<br />
mostly by thinner horizontal strokes<br />
and by more fluent curves.<br />
Despite its primitive, technical look<br />
and the clear reference to the German<br />
motorway signboards, FF DIN became<br />
a phenomenon. The typeface has even<br />
pervaded book and magazine typography,<br />
and found its place in posters<br />
of cultural institutions.<br />
PAULO HEITLINGER<br />
WOULD<br />
LOVE TO READ<br />
THIS WORK<br />
ABOUT <strong>HELVETICA</strong><br />
DRESSED WITH<br />
DIN TYPEFACE<br />
OR...<br />
MAYBE<br />
NOT<br />
in: http://dinfont.com/story/