13.12.2012 Views

Download

Download

Download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.1.2.2 Tc-Dimercaptosuccinic Acid<br />

Two different 99m Tc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) complexes are in clinical use,<br />

99m 99m<br />

Tc(III)-DMSA with high binding affinity for renal tubuli and Tc(V)-DMSA with<br />

tumor affinity.<br />

At acidic pH, at least four 99m Tc-DMSA complexes have been identified in dependence<br />

of pH and stannous ion concentration (Ikeda et al. 1977 b). Formation of a<br />

99m<br />

Tc(III)-DMSA complex is favored at pH 2.5, using an excess amount of stannous ion<br />

(Ikeda et al. 1976). This formulation is used for renal scintigraphy (Ikeda et al. 1977 a).<br />

The coordination characteristics of the 99m Tc(III)-DMSA complex have not yet been established.<br />

At an elevated pH (pH 7.5±8.0), a 99 Tc-DMSA complex was produced, which accumulated<br />

in the skeleton (Johannsen et al. 1979). Further studies performing ligand exchange<br />

with Tc(V)-gluconate (Spies et al. 1980) led to the identification of a pentavalent<br />

99m<br />

Tc-DMSA complex with two DMSA molecules coordinated to a Tc(V)oxo core (Bandoli<br />

et al. 1984) (Fig. 2.1.3).<br />

Pentavalent 99m Tc-DMSA has been evaluated as a soft tumor-imaging agent (Yokoyama<br />

et al. 1985).<br />

Fig. 2.1.3. Meso-[TcO(dimercaptosuccinic acid) 2] ±<br />

2.1.2.3 Tc-Penicillamine<br />

Chapter 2 Technetium in Medicine 11<br />

Figure 2.1.4 shows the structure of a 99 Tc complex with two molecules of penicillamine,<br />

confirmed by x-ray crystallography (Franklin et al. 1982). Yet when reduction of 99m Tcpertechnetate<br />

had been performed with SnCl2, a complex with a Tc(IV) oxidation state<br />

was reported (Yokoyama et al. 1979).<br />

Fig. 2.1.4. [TcO(penicil) 2]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!