13.12.2012 Views

MonTec - UNDP Albania

MonTec - UNDP Albania

MonTec - UNDP Albania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Preliminary Environmental Assessment, Risk Assessment<br />

and Preparation of Bidding Documents and<br />

Action Plan for Repackaging and Temporary Store of<br />

Hazardous Chemicals - Bajza Hot-Spot<br />

Preliminary Environmental Assessment,<br />

Risk Assessment and<br />

Action Plan<br />

Prepared for <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />

Rr. Deshmoret e 4 shkurtit<br />

Villa 35<br />

Tirana<br />

<strong>Albania</strong><br />

30 November 2008<br />

Prepared by <strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH<br />

Ruhrorter Str. 187<br />

47119 Duisburg<br />

Germany<br />

Tel.: +49 203 482798 91<br />

Fax: +49 203 482798 71<br />

e-Mail: info@montecgmbh.eu


<strong>MonTec</strong><br />

report author date reviewed by date forwarded to date<br />

Site Assessment Linder 17.10.2008 Skark 20.10.2008 Linder 22.10.2008<br />

Linder 22.10.2008 Nolte, Vels 23.10.2008 <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> 23.10.2008<br />

<strong>UNDP</strong> 29.10.2008<br />

Linder/Skark 14.11.2008 Nolte, Vels 20.11.2008 <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> 30.11.2008


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

0 ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................1<br />

0.1 Inside the Storehouse .....................................................................................................1<br />

0.2 Outside the Storehouse...................................................................................................1<br />

0.3 Action ..............................................................................................................................2<br />

1 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................3<br />

2 INVESTIGATION TIMETABLE AND DOCUMENTS DELIVERED ................................4<br />

3 BAJZA SITE ...................................................................................................................4<br />

3.1 Geography.......................................................................................................................5<br />

3.2 Climate ............................................................................................................................6<br />

3.2.1 Temperature....................................................................................................................6<br />

3.2.2 Precipitation.....................................................................................................................6<br />

3.2.3 Wind patterns ..................................................................................................................8<br />

3.3 Hydrology ........................................................................................................................8<br />

3.4 Geology ...........................................................................................................................9<br />

3.5 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................13<br />

3.5.1 Karst aquifer ..................................................................................................................16<br />

3.5.2 Porous aquifer ...............................................................................................................24<br />

3.5.3 Hydrogeological conditions of the Bajza station............................................................26<br />

3.6 Socio-Economy and Population ....................................................................................27<br />

3.6.1 Population .....................................................................................................................27<br />

3.6.2 Economy .......................................................................................................................27<br />

3.7 Policies and Legislation.................................................................................................28<br />

4 SITE INVESTIGATON ..................................................................................................30<br />

4.1 Kick-off Meeting and first site investigation ...................................................................30<br />

4.2 Investigation on-site ......................................................................................................30<br />

4.2.1 Outside the Bajza station ..............................................................................................32<br />

4.2.2 Inside the Bajza station .................................................................................................33<br />

4.3 Sampling .......................................................................................................................41<br />

4.3.1 Samples in Storehouse 2 ..............................................................................................42<br />

4.3.2 Solid samples from outside the Storehouses ................................................................47<br />

4.3.3 Water sampling .............................................................................................................50<br />

4.4 Estimation of quantities .................................................................................................50<br />

I


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

5 ANALYSES...................................................................................................................51<br />

5.1 Analysis of samples.......................................................................................................51<br />

5.1.1 Analysis of samples from Room 3.................................................................................51<br />

5.1.2 Analysis of the dust samples S1 and S2 .......................................................................52<br />

5.1.3 Analysis of the samples B1 and B2 from the abandoned railway tracks.......................52<br />

5.1.4 Analysis of the soil samples B3 and B4.........................................................................52<br />

5.1.5 Analysis of water ...........................................................................................................52<br />

5.2 Performance of chemical and microbiological analyses................................................52<br />

5.3 Results of chemical and microbiological analyses ........................................................54<br />

5.3.1 Results for the leather sample (L) .................................................................................54<br />

5.3.2 Results for the stored material (M1 and M2) in Room 3 in Storehouse 2......................55<br />

5.3.3 Results for the dust/debris samples (S1 and S2) in Storehouse 2................................57<br />

5.3.4 Results for the samples around the abandoned railway wagons (B1 and B2)..............58<br />

5.3.5 Results for the soil samples (B3 and B4) ......................................................................59<br />

5.3.6 Results for the water sample of Sheganit spring (SiS)..................................................60<br />

6 CONCLUSIONS AND RISKS .......................................................................................61<br />

6.1 Inside the Storehouse ...................................................................................................61<br />

6.2 Outside the Storehouse.................................................................................................63<br />

6.3 General conclusions......................................................................................................64<br />

7 ACTION PLAN..............................................................................................................64<br />

8 LITERATURE................................................................................................................65<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

Figure 1: Location of Bajza Railway ..................................................................................... 5<br />

Figure 2: Topography of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000) ................ 7<br />

Figure 3: Geology of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000).................... 10<br />

Figure 4: Stratified Upper Jurassic limestone of Haxhajt Hill; on the top of the hill is<br />

situated the water supply reservoir of Bajza ....................................................... 11<br />

Figure 5: Thick bedded Low Cretaceous limestone in the Shkodra Lake shore side......... 11<br />

Figure 6: Gravel and conglomerate deposits along the bed of Përroi i Thatë Stream ....... 12<br />

Figure 7: The stony karst plain of Bajza filled by “terra rossa” and silty clay layer<br />

which is cultivated ............................................................................................... 13<br />

Figure 8: Hydrogeological Map (Original scale 1 : 10,000) with the lines of the cross<br />

sections............................................................................................................... 14<br />

II


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 9: Hydrogeological cross sections........................................................................... 15<br />

Figure 10: Plan of Syri i Sheganit karst spring and of surrounding spring issues<br />

(Google Earth)..................................................................................................... 17<br />

Figure 11: Hydrogeological cross section from Syri i Sheganit Spring to Urdhana<br />

Lakes 1 and 2...................................................................................................... 18<br />

Figure 12: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 1” (the smaller lake) ......................................... 19<br />

Figure 13: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 2” (the big lake) ................................................ 19<br />

Figure 14: Syri i Sheganit karst spring ................................................................................. 20<br />

Figure 15: Syri i Zi karst spring............................................................................................. 22<br />

Figure 16: In dug well nr 2 in limestone several individual pumps are installed.................. 23<br />

Figure 17: Measuring the groundwater level in borehole nr 4 .............................................. 25<br />

Figure 18: The top of dug well nr 5 is sculptured by the backed rope.................................. 26<br />

Figure 19: Overview Bajza Station ....................................................................................... 31<br />

Figure 20: Assumed groundwater downstream area of the site........................................... 32<br />

Figure 21: Groundwater sample at Syri i Sheganit karstic well ............................................ 33<br />

Figure 22: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks................................................. 35<br />

Figure 23: Storehouse 1, view south.................................................................................... 36<br />

Figure 24: Storehouse 1, Room 1, view south ..................................................................... 36<br />

Figure 25: Storehouse 1, Room 2, view south ..................................................................... 37<br />

Figure 26: Storehouse 1, Room 3, view south ..................................................................... 37<br />

Figure 27: Storehouse 2, view south.................................................................................... 38<br />

Figure 28: Storehouse 2, Room 1, view east ....................................................................... 38<br />

Figure 29: Storehouse 2, Room 2, view south ..................................................................... 39<br />

Figure 30: Storehouse 2, Room 3, view south ..................................................................... 39<br />

Figure 31: Railway Track 3, view north ................................................................................ 40<br />

Figure 32: Railway Track 4, view south................................................................................ 40<br />

Figure 33: Overview of the sampling locations..................................................................... 41<br />

Figure 34: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3 .................................................................... 43<br />

Figure 35: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3 ............................................................... 44<br />

Figure 36: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3 ............................................................... 44<br />

Figure 37: White and grey powder in Storehouse 2, Room 3 .............................................. 45<br />

Figure 38: Labelled bags in Storehouse 2, Room 3 ............................................................. 46<br />

Figure 39: Dust and debris sampling in Storehouse 2, Room 2........................................... 47<br />

Figure 40: Overview of the sample locations outside the Storehouses................................ 48<br />

III


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 41: Material in a wagon ............................................................................................. 49<br />

Figure 42: Soil sampling at the railway tracks ...................................................................... 50<br />

Figure 43: Element composition according to the results of XRF analysis .......................... 57<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table 1: Mean monthly temperature, T in °C, and mean monthly precipitation, P in<br />

mm, for the Climate Station of Shkodra; (Observation period 1931-1985) ........... 8<br />

Table 2: Some data about small karst lakes of Bajza area ............................................... 20<br />

Table 3: Analyses of water from Syri i Sheganit ............................................................... 22<br />

Table 4: Overview of sampled material and subsequent chemical analysis ..................... 51<br />

Table 5: Results of the analysis for total organic carbon (TOC) and extractable<br />

organic bound halogens (EOX)........................................................................... 55<br />

Table 6: Results of the XRF analysis ................................................................................ 56<br />

Table 7: Identified organic compounds in the GC-MS screening...................................... 58<br />

Table 8: Analysis of water from Syri i Sheganit (sampling 01.09.2008)............................ 60<br />

ANNEXES<br />

1 List of samples and tests<br />

2 List of results for each sample<br />

3 List of presumable pesticides in the "pesticide train"<br />

4 Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of the chemical<br />

waste in the storehouse<br />

IV


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS<br />

°C temperature in degrees Celsius<br />

AOX adsorbable organic halogens (water)<br />

asl above mean sea level<br />

b.d. below limit of detection<br />

bgs below the ground surface<br />

CAS chemical abstracts service (registry numbers)<br />

CIS cold injection system<br />

cm centimeter<br />

d day<br />

DBP di-butyl-phthalate<br />

DDP di-dodecyl-phthalate<br />

DEHP di-ethylhexyl-phthalate<br />

DEP di-ethyl-phthalate<br />

DOC dissolved organic carbon<br />

EC electric conductivity<br />

EOX extractable organic halogens (solids)<br />

GC-MS gas chromatography with mass-selective detection<br />

HC hydrocarbons<br />

HM heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)<br />

kg kilogram<br />

km kilometer<br />

l liter<br />

m meter<br />

m³ cubic meter<br />

mg milligram<br />

ml milliliter<br />

mm millimeter<br />

n.a. not analyzed<br />

PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />

s second<br />

SME small and medium sized enterprises<br />

SPE solid phase extraction<br />

t ton (Mg)<br />

TOC total organic carbon<br />

XRF X-ray fluorescence<br />

V


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

0 ABSTRACT<br />

Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the frontier with Montenegro. During 1991 -<br />

1992 hazardous chemical waste (old pesticides) has been exported to <strong>Albania</strong> by train. Some of<br />

the load was discharged at the platforms and it was assumed that it is still stored at Bajza station.<br />

It was assumed that beside the contamination within the storage buildings of the Bajza<br />

station on-site a contamination of the surrounding soil and groundwater is likely too.<br />

That poses a variety of health risks to human and various impacts to the environment. The purpose<br />

of this study is to provide the <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> with the necessary technical information that<br />

will be used for a Preliminary Environmental Assessment and the Terms of References for repackaging<br />

and temporary store of the hazardous chemicals at the station.<br />

The international services for environmental consultancy for the Bajza Hot-Spot were done by<br />

an experienced consulting team:<br />

� <strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH, Duisburg Germany main consultant<br />

� IfW Institut für Wasserforschung, Schwerte Germany analyses<br />

� ITA Consult ltd. Consulting Engineers, Tirana <strong>Albania</strong> local hydrogeology.<br />

The field work and sampling took place in the beginning of September 2008. The chemical<br />

analyses are carried out in quality controlled laboratories in Germany.<br />

0.1 Inside the Storehouse<br />

There are two major storehouses at the Bajza Station. Both storehouses are empty and not<br />

used, besides chemicals and waste are stored in one room of the storehouses. The storehouses<br />

are in a poor condition, the roofs of the loading ramps are partially broken, the roof of<br />

the storehouse could be partially leaky. There is no information about the status of structures of<br />

the buildings.<br />

As a result of the preliminary site investigation, it can be stated that the main parts of the stored<br />

materials are leather waste, e.g. leather rags (shoes production) which are mainly stored loose<br />

but sometimes packed in plastic bags. Additionally on top of the leather waste a hazardous<br />

chemical material was dropped in front of the two open gates to the storehouse room. The mass<br />

of the leather waste is estimated to be approximately 200 t. The mass of the chemical material/waste<br />

can be seen as sodium hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6) and is estimated to be approximately<br />

80 t. Pesticides are not detected The occurrence of anthrax spores can be excluded as a<br />

result of a specific microbiological examination of a representative leather sample.<br />

In the next room with an open access gate to the room with hazardous waste, dust/debris can<br />

be found consisting of plaster rubbed off the walls and trickled roof material, remnants of stored<br />

hazardous chemical substances and some organic material. The composition of the dust/debris<br />

is characterized by the occurrence of asbestos fibers which can be a potential hazard by inhalation.<br />

30 November 2008 page 1 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Radioactive material or any remnants of this has not been detected in the storehouse and in the<br />

surrounding of that building.<br />

The Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of the chemical waste<br />

in the storehouse, dated 14.11.2008, cover the appropriate handling and protection of the staff<br />

during repackaging the waste and cleaning procedures of the rooms. With the measures described<br />

in the Terms of Reference, the today open stored hazardous waste in the storehouse<br />

will be safely treated for the final disposal.<br />

0.2 Outside the Storehouse<br />

Close to the Bajza Station storehouses and at the 2 railway tracks east of the storehouses hazardous<br />

material has not been detected so far except some leftovers of powder material in one<br />

railway wagon which contains at least remnants of the pesticide tetradifon.<br />

Neither the soil sampling nor the investigation of other conspicuous material gives any indication<br />

to an unacceptable pollution of the environment.<br />

The hydrogeological conditions of the area are characterized by karstic and coarse grained porous<br />

aquifers. Wells - natural karstic or artificial drilled ones - do not exist in the immediate vicinity<br />

of the Bajza Station. Investigation of groundwater quality relies on the karstic wells at the<br />

Shkodar Lake shore line (e.g. Syri i Sheganit). Until now the water sampling and analysis has<br />

not revealed any conspicuous result or any adverse impact of the Bajza site on the local<br />

groundwater in a greater distance.<br />

0.3 Action<br />

The following action is recommended:<br />

short term<br />

1. The open gates to the storehouses must be closed immediately.<br />

2. The repackaging of the hazardous materials inside the storehouse incl. the collecting<br />

of the loose residual pesticide material in the railway wagons should be<br />

started as soon as possible.<br />

long term<br />

3. A rehabilitation of the storehouses should be preceded by an investigation for hazardous<br />

construction material.<br />

4. Groundwater: A groundwater monitoring program can be recommended.<br />

5. Soil: An extended soil sampling and investigation program for the railway<br />

tracks can be recommended as a consequence of the groundwater monitoring and<br />

depending on its results.<br />

30 November 2008 page 2 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

1 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES<br />

Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the frontier with Montenegro, so its acts as a<br />

customs control point. There is no passenger traffic, but two freight trains pass through daily<br />

with approximately 10,000 t of freight being handled each month. The station is located at the<br />

shore of trans-boundary Shkoder/Skader Lake - the largest lake on the Balkan Peninsula that<br />

both <strong>Albania</strong> and Montenegro have officially designated as a cross-border protected area of<br />

Shkoder/Skader Lake together with Buna/Bojana River. In addition, with the designation of the<br />

<strong>Albania</strong>n part of the Shkoder Lake and Buna River as a Ramsar site the entire lake is now included<br />

in the Ramsar list.<br />

During 1991 - 1992 a German company Schmidt-Cretan exported hazardous chemical waste<br />

(old pesticides) to <strong>Albania</strong> by train. The hazardous waste could be shipped back, but some of<br />

the load was discharged at the platforms and/or is still stored at Bajza station. There are still<br />

chemicals/materials stored in one of the storehouses of the station and no record about the contents<br />

exists.<br />

It was assumed that beside the contamination within the storage buildings on-site a contamination<br />

of the surrounding soil and groundwater is likely too.<br />

That poses a variety of health risks to human and various impacts to the environment, e.g.:<br />

� Risks to human beings from toxic and carcinogenic substances, such as mercury, dioxins<br />

1 and organic contaminants,<br />

� Damages to the soil, due to leaking and emptying of the old drums and containers,<br />

� Damages to groundwater resources, due to diffuse contamination,<br />

� Damages to surface water resources, especially lakes and rivers, by contaminants from<br />

the groundwater,<br />

� Risks entailed by the clean-up activities themselves, e.g. additional release of contaminants.<br />

The purpose of this study is to provide the <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> with the necessary technical information<br />

that will be used for<br />

� Preliminary Environmental Assessment<br />

� Risk Assessment incl. Bidding Documents and Action Plan for repackaging and temporary<br />

store of hazardous chemicals<br />

at the railway station in Bajza.<br />

1 According to the <strong>UNDP</strong> analyses of dioxins are not necessary and not considered in the analyses pro-<br />

gramme.<br />

30 November 2008 page 3 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

The international services for environmental consultancy for the Bajza Hot-Spot were done by<br />

an experienced consulting team:<br />

� <strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH, Duisburg Germany main consultant<br />

Mr. Linder<br />

� IfW Institut für Wasserforschung, Schwerte Germany analyses<br />

Mr. Skark<br />

� ITA Consult ltd. Consulting Engineers, Tirana <strong>Albania</strong> local hydrogeology<br />

Prof. Dr. Eftimi.<br />

This report represents the preliminary environmental assessment.<br />

2 INVESTIGATION TIMETABLE AND DOCUMENTS DELIVERED<br />

� Contract of the environmental consultancy services is dated 26.08.2008.<br />

� Kick-off meeting with the <strong>UNDP</strong> program manager Prof. Dr. Lirim Selfo<br />

in Tirana<br />

01.09.2008<br />

� First site and introduction to the director of the Bajza station,<br />

Mr. Valentin Popaj 01.09.2008<br />

� Investigation of the Bajza area and sampling of groundwater at wells 01.09.2008<br />

� Investigation of the Bajza station and sampling of waste and soil 02.09.2008<br />

� Hydrogeological Filed Trip 06.09.2008<br />

� Hydrogeological Filed Trip 15.09.2008<br />

� Inception Report of the project 16.09.2008<br />

� Interim Report of the project 29.09.2008<br />

� Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of<br />

the chemical waste in the storehouse (Draft) 06.10.2008<br />

� Preliminary Environmental Assessment (Draft) 23.10.2008<br />

� Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging<br />

and final disposal of the chemical waste 14.11.2008<br />

30 November 2008 page 4 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

3 BAJZA SITE<br />

3.1 Geography<br />

Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the border to Montenegro, so it acts as a customs<br />

point. The station is located about 1 km west to the center of the village and about 3 km<br />

east to Shkodra (Skadar) Lake (see Figure 1). Administratively Bajza is part of Koplik Commune,<br />

one of five communes of Malesi e Madhe District. East to Bajza the North <strong>Albania</strong>n Alps<br />

are developed which represent one of most beautiful and in the same time one of most remote<br />

parts of <strong>Albania</strong>.<br />

� Bajza<br />

Figure 1: Location of Bajza Railway<br />

30 November 2008 page 5 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Bajza and the Railway Station are situated at an elevation of approx. 45 m above mean sea<br />

level (asl). West to the Station the Bajza karst plain is situated, which is separated adjacent the<br />

Shkodra Lake by some limestone hills with an elevation of 200 to 250 m asl. The field located<br />

east of the Station is filled with coarse material. It borders to Zagora high karst plateau situated<br />

at elevations between 400 and 500 m asl (see Figure 2).<br />

3.2 Climate<br />

Bajza area is situated in the North Mediterranean Hilly Climate Sub-Zone (IHM, 1984). It encompasses<br />

the North <strong>Albania</strong>n low mountain areas which elevation varies mostly from 200 to<br />

600 m asl. This sub-zone is characterized by relatively warm and wet winter and dry and hot<br />

summer. The following description of the climate elements is based on the data of the Shkodra<br />

climate station which is the nearest to Bajza.<br />

3.2.1 Temperature<br />

Winter in the region is relatively warm and the mean temperatures in January are about 5°C.<br />

The mean daily minimum temperature for January is about 1.1°C, and the absolute daily minimum<br />

temperature may fall below -10°C. The mean daily maximal January temperature is about<br />

8.4°C. During the summer the mean daily monthly temperatures vary about 25°C. The mean<br />

daily maximum temperature for June and August is about 31°C to 32°C, and the absolute daily<br />

maximum temperature may reach up to 40°C. The mean daily minimal temperature is about<br />

18°C to 19°C.<br />

Spring is fresh, with mean monthly temperature in the central spring months about 14°C. During<br />

the autumn the mean monthly temperature falls from about 21.4°C during September to about<br />

11.2°C during November.<br />

3.2.2 Precipitation<br />

The annual amount of the precipitation in the region for the period 1931-1965 in Shkodra is<br />

1,797 mm (IHM, 1984), but some mountainous areas receive over 3,000 mm. The very characteristic<br />

of the <strong>Albania</strong>n climate is the non-uniform distribution of the precipitation; most of which -<br />

about 70 % of yearly precipitations - falls during the period October - March, while during the<br />

summer months (June - August) usually fall less than 10 % of the yearly precipitations. In Table<br />

1 some averaged data about the air temperature and precipitation of Shkodra climate station<br />

are summarized.<br />

30 November 2008 page 6 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 2: Topography of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000)<br />

30 November 2008 page 7 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Table 1: Mean monthly temperature, T in °C, and mean monthly precipitation, P in mm, for<br />

the Climate Station of Shkodra; (Observation period 1931-1985)<br />

Element I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Average<br />

T °C 4.7 6.0 9.4 14.0 18.0 22.2 24.9 25.2 21.4 16.1 11.2 6.8 15.0<br />

P mm 210 179 158 127 113 56 33 45 132 248 235 261 1,797<br />

The quantity of snow varies within a wide range, but usually about 5 to 10 % of the winter precipitation<br />

is snow, while in the areas elevated higher than 1000 m the snow contributes about<br />

20 % of the winter precipitations. The maximum daily precipitation in the Shkodra is about 200 -<br />

240 mm.<br />

Storm events are characteristically for the climate of <strong>Albania</strong>. According to some data of<br />

Shkodra Meteorological Station the 15 minutes precipitation height reaches 30 to 40 mm, the<br />

30 minutes rainfall may reach up to 80 mm, while the rainfall for 1, 2 and 3 hours are registered<br />

to be respectively 120 mm, 152 mm and 161 mm (all data are referring to a repetition probability<br />

of one storm event during one year; n = 1).<br />

3.2.3 Wind patterns<br />

The region is characterized by good aeration conditions. According to the observations made by<br />

the Tirana Institute of Hydrometeorology, the prevailing winds in Shkodra are east and southeast<br />

winds over all round the year. The mean monthly wind speeds are about 2.0 m/s in<br />

Shkodra and the biggest wind speeds registered in Shkodra are about 35 to 40 m/s. There are<br />

15 types of winds, which are known in Shkodra lake basin, Murlan and Shiroka are the most<br />

important.<br />

3.3 Hydrology<br />

The most important hydrological element of the area is Shkodra Lake, which is the largest on<br />

the Balkan Peninsula. The lake area varies between 353 km 2 at a minimum lake level of 4.6 m<br />

asl and 500 km 2 at a maximum lake level of 9.8 m.<br />

The most important tributaries of Lake Shkodra enter the lake from the north in Montenegro<br />

territory: Mora�a, Crnojevi�a, Orahovistica, Karaturana and Baragurska River; only Rjoli and<br />

Vraka River are in <strong>Albania</strong>n Territory. Precipitation on the lake, groundwater of alluvial aquifer<br />

and karst springs contribute also to the inflow. Bajza area is a transmission territory for the intensive<br />

inflow to Shkodra Lake, both from the coarse alluvial-proluvial deposits and from the<br />

carbonate rocks often as big karst springs.<br />

The main surface stream of Koplik area is Përroi i Thatë stream which is mostly dry interrupted<br />

by short periods of very high discharges during heavy rains. The stream flows on coarse allu-<br />

30 November 2008 page 8 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

vial-proluvial deposits which consist mostly out of gravel and conglomerate. According to “Hydrology<br />

of <strong>Albania</strong>” (1984) the calculated average maximal flow of Përroi i Thatë stream is<br />

135 m 3 /s and the mean discharge ratio in the Përroi i Thatë - Koplik area ranges between 50 to<br />

55 l/(s*km 2 ) which discharges mostly as groundwater.<br />

In the Montenegrin Lake Shkodra most of the pollutants originate from Podgorica. On the <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />

territory the main pollution source is the City of Shkodra with its solid waste and wastewater.<br />

The potential pollution from the hazardous chemicals stored in Bajza Hot-Spot are object of<br />

this project.<br />

According to the Lake Shkoder Transboundary Diagnostics Analysis WORLD BANK (IBRD)<br />

(2006), during the past three decades the lake and its basin have experienced varying states of<br />

pollution. The content of dissolved oxygen in the lake water varies from 7 to 12 mg/l in the upper<br />

water layers and from 5 to 12 mg/l in the bottom layers. Free carbon dioxide (CO2) is recorded<br />

in very small concentration in the lake water. The highest recorded value is 13.07 mg/l among<br />

the macrophytes, under reductive chemical conditions and very low intensity of natural light.<br />

Lake Shkodra water is low mineralized and can be classified as a Bicarbonate - Calcium type.<br />

The total dissolved elektrolytes has been assessed between 98 and 164 mg/l in the pelagic water<br />

and 102 - 240 mg/l in the littoral water, while the water conductivity varies from 100 �S/cm to<br />

343 �S/cm. Carbonate concentration varies from 2 mg/l to 19 mg/l, while the bicarbonate content<br />

ranges from 86.6 mg/l to 254 mg/l. Water alkalinity varies between 1.47 and 4.18 mmol<br />

(eq)/l, while pH is between 7.1 and 8.5, but it usually remains between 7.9 and 8.2. These pH<br />

values fall within the optimum of 6.9 - 8.5 for the development of a high diverse biota.<br />

The lake water is characterized by a high content of calcium, with an average 31 mg/l to<br />

42 mg/l, but values up to 132 mg/l are measured in some lake areas. Content of silica ranges<br />

from 1.3 mg/l to 3.45 mg/l, magnesium 4.8 mg/l to74.8 mg/l and sulphate 3.2 mg/l to 30 mg/l.<br />

Values of phosphates in the lake waters are 0.002 mg/l to 0.004 mg/l. In certain periods, in littoral<br />

parts near the mouths of Cernojevi�a and Mora�a rivers these values increase up to 150 -<br />

1,000 times. Probably the same situation can also be found near the waste water inflow of<br />

Shkodra to the Lake. Content of nitrates in pelagic waters varies between 0.012 mg/l to<br />

1.200 mg/l, but it's inter seasonal variation is high. Nitrite concentration may reach 0.030 mg/l,<br />

with the highest values in the littoral. Chlorine content amount to 6 mg/l to 9.8 mg/l in the most<br />

parts of the lake area, but show very low concentration in the karst wells “eyes".<br />

3.4 Geology<br />

Geologically Bajza is located in western periphery of the geological zone of the North <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />

Alps. This zone is the southernmost part of the Dinarides which are developed parallel to the<br />

current shore of the Adriatic coast. The western part of the <strong>Albania</strong>n Alps consists of the Malesia<br />

e Madhe Sub-Zone, while the eastern and south-eastern part subsumed the Valbona Sub-<br />

Zone, (MEÇO &ALIAJ, 2000). Bajza area belongs to the Malesia e Madhe Sub-Zone. In general,<br />

the Malesia e Madhe Sub-Zone is structurally a large monocline split by faults into separate<br />

30 November 2008 page 9 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

blocks with 20° to 25° dip angles inclining to northern or north-eastern direction. In the western<br />

periphery this monocline bends by dipping south-west at an angle of 10 to 15° under Pliocene to<br />

Quaternary molasses and the Shkodra Lake. Stratigraphically, the profile of Malesia e Madhe<br />

Sub-Zone started in the Upper Triassic with intercalated dolomites and limestone.<br />

On the geological map (Figure 3) is shown the geological situation of Bajza area, including the<br />

Station. As could be seen on this map the northern hilly-mountainous part of the area consists<br />

of stratified Upper Jurassic limestone locally dolomitized (see Figure 4) which provides well<br />

developed bedding fissures interconnected by at least two perpendicular or quasi perpendicular<br />

fractures. The intensive fracturing of the limestone has assisted the development of the karst.<br />

Figure 3: Geology of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000)<br />

30 November 2008 page 10 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 4: Stratified Upper Jurassic limestone of Haxhajt Hill; on the top of the hill is situated<br />

the water supply reservoir of Bajza<br />

The Low Cretaceous deposits outcrop on the hilly chain along the Shkodra Lake, as well as in<br />

Bajza karst plain. These deposits mainly consist of thick bedded to massive limestone, which is<br />

intensively fractured and karstified (see Figure 5).<br />

Figure 5: Thick bedded Low Cretaceous limestone in the Shkodra Lake shore side<br />

During Pleistocene and Holocene steep and high energy torrents, like that of Përroi i Thatë (Dry<br />

Stream), have formed wide and thick cones of deposits mainly consisting of heterogeneous porous<br />

materials, from pebbles, gravel and sand to silt and clay. Often these materials are cemented<br />

and form thick conglomerate layers (Figure 6). Some relatively deep water wells prove<br />

(testimony) that the thickness of cone deposits is more than 60 m. Bajza is located in the north-<br />

30 November 2008 page 11 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

ern part of the big cone of Përroi i Thatë stream and just at the border with the Cretaceous limestone<br />

rocks of Bajza karst plain.<br />

Figure 6: Gravel and conglomerate deposits along the bed of Përroi i Thatë Stream<br />

In the North <strong>Albania</strong>n tectonic zone vertical tectonic faults are intensively developed splitting the<br />

area into separate big and small blocks. The Bajza karst plain belongs to the big Kastrati block<br />

and represents a second order down faulting block which partially is covered by the cone deposits.<br />

Shkodra Lake is also a big down faulting block which represents a graben (Geology of<br />

<strong>Albania</strong> - in <strong>Albania</strong>n, ShGjSh, Tirana 2002).<br />

The geomorphology of Bajza area is determined by vertical faulting, as well as by intensive surface<br />

erosion of limestone rocks. A geomorphologic characteristic of the <strong>Albania</strong>n Alps in general<br />

and of the Bajza area in particular, is the intensive karstification. This is manifested by the presence<br />

of various karst forms like, shallow and deep karren, karst canals and wells, caves and<br />

huge karst springs. Most significant karst phenomenon of the studied area is the karst plain of<br />

Bajza which border to the station on the East, and to the Lake Shkodra on the West. On the<br />

surface of this plain innumerous sinkholes are developed which are fused with each other and<br />

form a stony plain filled with “terra rossa” mostly covered by a silty clay layer which is cultivated<br />

(see Figure 7).<br />

30 November 2008 page 12 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 7: The stony karst plain of Bajza filled by “terra rossa” and silty clay layer which is cultivated<br />

3.5 Hydrogeology<br />

During the first half of September 2008 we conducted a detailed field investigation of Bajza<br />

area. During this investigation the significant karst phenomenon closely connected with<br />

groundwater movement and use like natural karst vertical wells and karst lakes were described.<br />

Particular attention was paid to the description of the karst springs. For the description of the<br />

hydrogeology of Bajza area we referred also to the former investigations conducted by the <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />

Hydrogeological Service which unfortunately are not detailed concerning this issue. During<br />

the last years in Bajza area some private deep wells are drilled, but unfortunately any register<br />

or any technical evidence of them are not available. The hydrogeological situation of the<br />

area is synthesized on the Hydrogeological Map, shown on scale 1:10,000 (see Figure 8).<br />

As shown also in the Hydrogeological Map of <strong>Albania</strong>, scale 1:200,000 (Eftimi et al., 1985) on<br />

hydrogeological point of view Bajza area is characterized by the presence of two important aquifers:<br />

� the karst aquifer, which is related to the Mesozoic carbonate rocks, and<br />

� the porous aquifer, which is related to the Quaternary coarse grained sediments.<br />

Both aquifers occupy the Koplik Bajza area and the Bajza Railway Station is bordering to both<br />

aquifers. East to the Station mainly the porous aquifer is developed, and west to the Station<br />

mainly the karst aquifer is developed (see Figure 8 and Figure 9).<br />

30 November 2008 page 13 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 8: Hydrogeological Map (Original scale 1 : 10,000) with the lines of the cross sections<br />

30 November 2008 page 14 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 9: Hydrogeological cross sections<br />

30 November 2008 page 15 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

3.5.1 Karst aquifer<br />

This aquifer outcrops mostly in the center and the northern Bajza area. It consists of Upper Jurassic<br />

and Low Cretaceous carbonate rocks representing mainly limestone. On the hydrogeological<br />

cross-section (Figure 9) could be seen that the karst aquifer is also developed under<br />

the porous aquifer in eastern and southern part of Bajza area. Most of the Station is placed on<br />

the porous aquifer which overlies the karst aquifer cropping out west of the Bajza station.<br />

These rocks are intensively karstified and as a result they are characterized by a very high but<br />

heterogeneously developed permeability. Initially the permeability occurs along the bedding<br />

fractures and faults which are enlarged by the karstification. It is very easy to verify in the field<br />

the presence of karst canals or openings of different dimensions. The intensive karstification<br />

undoubtedly suggests the conclusion that most of groundwater flows on preferential pathways<br />

which represent well developed karst canals.<br />

Most significant surface karst phenomenons are the karst lakes and karst vertical wells, which<br />

are located near the big karst spring of “Syri i Sheganit” (see Figure 10).The lakes are nondrained<br />

springs and are connected through karst canals with the Syri i Sheganit Spring (see the<br />

Hydrogeological cross - section, Figure 11).<br />

30 November 2008 page 16 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 10: Plan of Syri i Sheganit karst spring and of surrounding spring issues (Google Earth)<br />

There are three small karst lakes: Urdhana Lake 1 (Figure 12), Urdhana Lake 2 (Figure 13)<br />

and Urdhana e Kalbet Lake. Some data about the small karst lakes are shown in Table 2.<br />

30 November 2008 page 17 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 11: Hydrogeological cross section from Syri i Sheganit Spring to Urdhana Lakes 1 and 2<br />

30 November 2008 page 18 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 12: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 1” (the smaller lake)<br />

Figure 13: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 2” (the big lake)<br />

30 November 2008 page 19 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Table 2: Some data about small karst lakes of Bajza area<br />

Lake Big diameter<br />

m<br />

Small diameter<br />

m<br />

Depth<br />

m<br />

Elevation of water surface<br />

m<br />

Urdhana 1 60 - 65 35 - 40 > 10 Practically the same as Lake<br />

Shkodra level<br />

Urdhana 2 35 - 40 About 30 > 10 As above<br />

Urdhana e Kalbet About 15 About 15 > 10 As above<br />

The small karst lakes communicate through the big karst canals with the Lake Shkodra as well<br />

as with Syri i Sheganit. This is the reason why the water level in the lakes varies accordingly to<br />

the variation of the Lake Shkodra level, so the yearly amplitude of the lake’s level variation is<br />

about 5 m. Urdhana Lake 2 for many years is used for the irrigation of the surrounding cultivated<br />

lands. The pumping station with a capacity of about 200 -250 l/s nowadays is not working<br />

any more.<br />

As seen on the hydrogeological map (Figure 8) there are two important perennial karst springs<br />

in Bajza area:<br />

� Syri i Sheganit (Figure 14) and<br />

� Syri i Zi (Figure 15).<br />

Figure 14: Syri i Sheganit karst spring<br />

30 November 2008 page 20 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Both springs appear as small round lakes with a diameter about 15 - 20 m which by the local<br />

population are called “Syri” which means “Eye”. On Lake Shkodra shore also many temporary<br />

springs issue which are only active during short periods of intensive rains or during the snow<br />

melting period.<br />

Syri i Sheganit Spring issues on the Lake Shkodra shore at a distance about 2.3 km southwest<br />

the Station. Near to Syri i Sheganit also some other springs discharge which are shown in<br />

Figure 10. According to the former Institute of Hydrometeorology the measured discharge of the<br />

spring varies from 0.25 m 3 /s to more than 2.7 m 3 /s. During the field trip on 01.09.2008 the<br />

measured discharge ranges from 0.05 to 0.065 m 3 /s under the prevailing base flow conditions.<br />

According to an investigation by HAXHIU &UÇI (1995) on 28.04.1990 the discharge of Syri i<br />

Sheganit Spring is estimated to 10 m 3 /s. In the same study some other springs, which are<br />

shown on Figure 10 are mentioned in the vicinity of Syri i Sheganit. The discharge of these<br />

other springs e.g. Vija e Mullirit or Syri i Ragamit is estimated to 5 m 3 /s or 2 m 3 /s respectively in<br />

the above mentioned study. It seems that these spring discharges has been overestimated as<br />

they have not been measured by any instruments.<br />

In the above mentioned investigation there are given also the following important conclusions<br />

which help to understand the hydraulic mechanism of the springs in the area around Syri i<br />

Sheganit better:<br />

a) Despite the small differences of the physical-chemical, hydrochemical composition and<br />

small Tritium content differences between the considered springs, the findings suggest<br />

that the recharges of the different springs (e.g. Vija e Mullirit, Syri i Ragamit or Syri i<br />

Sheganit) are provided by separate karst canals. The groundwater flow to the springs<br />

may have different recharge zones and different residence time in the underground.<br />

b) Syri i Sheganit and Urdhana Lakes, however, are connected by well developed karst canals.<br />

By a dying method the flow velocity can determined in a range from 1.0 to 1.1 m/s<br />

(Urdhana Lake 1 and Syri i Sheganit Spring, distance 270 m).<br />

The measured electric conductivity shows a low mineralization of the spring water which is<br />

proved also by the chemical analyses. In Table 3 the results of two chemical analyses from the<br />

1980s and the 1990s are opposed to the analytical results of water sampled on 01.09.2008.<br />

The concentrations of the main components are small. The spring water can be characterized<br />

as soft and can be subsumed to a bicarbonate – calcium type. The chemical composition of Syri<br />

i Sheganit is typical for limestone karst water of intensive circulation. Regarding the micro components<br />

and the pesticide concentration the results will be given in the chapter 5.3.6.<br />

Syri i Zi Spring issues about 2 km north to Syri i Sheganit, on the lake shore (see Figure 15).<br />

The spring outlet is shaped in an oval form like a funnel; the big diameter is about 20 m and the<br />

smaller one is about 15 m. The depth of funnel is more than 10 m. The spring discharges confined<br />

groundwater. According to the explanation of the local people the discharge of the spring<br />

varies within a great range. On September 15 the estimated discharge was about 15 l/s to 20<br />

30 November 2008 page 21 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

l/s. On the limestone rocks near the spring clear signs of the high level spring discharges are<br />

found at an elevation of approx. 4 m above the actual water level (15.09.2008). It is supposed<br />

the maximum discharge of the spring will be in the order of magnitude of several m 3 /s.<br />

Figure 15: Syri i Zi karst spring<br />

The electrical conductivity of Syri i Zi water was measured 230 �S/cm and the temperature<br />

18.4° C. For this spring chemical analyses are not available but it seems that its water quality is<br />

more or less similar to that of Syri i Sheganit.<br />

During the field investigation of Bajza area also some artificial wells are documented which<br />

were constructed by the local population for the abstraction of karst water. Among them can be<br />

mentioned the dug well nr 2 (see Figure 16), and the boreholes nr 3 and nr 10 B /95.<br />

30 November 2008 page 22 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Table 3: Analyses of water from Syri i Sheganit<br />

Parameter Dimension Concentration<br />

date 1987 1995 01.09.2008<br />

sodium mg/l 6.2 9.0 2<br />

potasium mg/l n.a. n.a.


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

ter level was found at 12.5 m below the ground surface (bgs) while some of the pumps were<br />

working during the measurement. The total capacity of the pumps is about 15 l/s.<br />

Borehole 3 is 94 m deep with a groundwater level at 48 m bgs on 06.09.2008, which coincides<br />

with the Shkodra Lake level.<br />

During the period 1993 - 1995 in Bajza-Hoti area 17 water wells were drilled in limestone sediments<br />

with depth varying from 60 to 100 m. Five wells fell practically dry and the averaged specific<br />

discharges of the remaining 12 wells range from 0.2 to 0.6 l * s -1 * m -1 (KALAJA &RUDI,<br />

1996). These findings corroborate the heterogeneity of the permeability of the karst rocks of<br />

Bajza area.<br />

3.5.2 Porous aquifer<br />

Porous aquifer is related to the Quaternary coarse grained cone sediments widely outcropping<br />

in the eastern part and in the south-western corner of the area, near Shkodra Lake (Figure 3<br />

and Figure 8). As mentioned above, when the geology was described, the thickness of this aquifer<br />

in Bajza area exceeds 60 m. The aquifer consists of gravel and sand. The coarse grained<br />

sediments are irregularly cemented and contain often thick conglomerate lenses, which are<br />

characterized by low permeability.<br />

In this porous aquifer system two water-bearing strata can be distinguished:<br />

a) the main porous aquifer with loose, uncemented granular sediments and<br />

b) the local porous aquifer with conglomerate lenses<br />

(see Hydrogeological cross-sections of Bajza area, Figure 9).<br />

The main porous aquifer contains unconfined groundwater hydraulically connected with the<br />

deep karst aquifer and both aquifers form a regional water body. Loose porous aquifer is usually<br />

characterized by high permeability and transmissivity. According to the results of some groundwater<br />

wells located in the adjacent area south to the investigated one the hydraulic conductivity<br />

of the uncemented porous aquifer exceeds 250 m/d (3 * 10 -3 m/s) and the transmissivity is more<br />

than 6,000 m 2 /d (0.07 m²/s).<br />

The groundwater level of the main porous aquifer at a given place is controlled by the elevation<br />

of the measuring site and by the elevation of Shkodra Lake level.<br />

Borehole nr 4 has a depth of 113 m and taps both, the limestone aquifer as well as the main<br />

porous aquifer. The groundwater level was stabilized at 38 m bgs on 06.09.2008 (Figure 17). In<br />

the area of Bajza Railway Station the groundwater table varies between 35 and 40 m bgs.<br />

30 November 2008 page 24 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 17: Measuring the groundwater level in borehole nr 4<br />

The porous granular aquifer of Bajza area realizes the hydraulic connection of karst groundwater<br />

developed in eastern mountainous Zagora karst area with that of Bajza karst plain developed<br />

in the west. The groundwater of porous and karst aquifers flows to the west, to Shkodra<br />

lake, which represents the regional drainage area.<br />

The local porous aquifer is related to the conglomerate lenses, which are characterized by low<br />

permeability. Sometimes they are practically impermeable. Often on such lenses perched<br />

groundwater bodies are formed. In these groundwater bodies the depth to the water table is<br />

smaller than in the main aquifer. The perched aquifers are very important for the local water<br />

supply realized by relatively shallow dug wells.<br />

A typical example of a local porous aquifer is that developed within Bajza village. In the center<br />

of village the dug well nr 5 taps an important local groundwater body developed on a conglomerate<br />

lens. This well is 13 m deep and the groundwater level is measured at the depth 11 m bgs<br />

on 06.09.2008. This well is very old but is still in use and has been the main water supply<br />

source for Bajza (Figure 18).<br />

30 November 2008 page 25 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 18: The top of dug well nr 5 is sculptured by the backed rope<br />

According to some chemical analyses performed in the past by the <strong>Albania</strong>n Hydrogeological<br />

Service the groundwater results in low mineralization, low hardness and can be characterized<br />

as Bicarbonate-Calcium type. The electrical conductivity varies between 230 and 300 �S/cm<br />

and the total hardness ranges mostly from 6 to 8 German degrees.<br />

The water supply of Bajza is centralized and fed by Riolli karst spring which issues in the North<br />

<strong>Albania</strong>n Alps about 18 km east to Bajza. As the water supply system can not provide a normal<br />

water supply for 24 hours the local population drills deep private wells increasingly.<br />

3.5.3 Hydrogeological conditions of the Bajza station<br />

The hydrogeological conditions of the Bajza station could be summarized as follows:<br />

a) The Station is located mainly on the porous aquifer and partially (the southern and western<br />

part) on the karst aquifer.<br />

b) The maximal thickness of the porous aquifer is supposed to be about 30 m to 40 m.<br />

c) Both aquifers, the porous and the karstic ones, are hydraulically connected and have a<br />

common groundwater level.<br />

d) The groundwater level is controlled by the elevation of the measuring site and by the<br />

elevation of Shkodra Lake level. In the area of the Station the groundwater level ranges<br />

between 35 m and 40 m bgs.<br />

30 November 2008 page 26 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

e) Both aquifers, karstic and porous ones, are characterized by a very high permeability.<br />

This is the reason why in Bajza area the surface water is practically missing, as water<br />

will infiltrate from the surface to deeper levels.<br />

f) Both aquifers are intensively recharged by the abundant precipitations of the area (average<br />

2000 mm/year). The groundwater recharge in the investigated area can be estimated<br />

with an average of 1000 mm/year, which corresponds to a recharge rate of<br />

32 l * s -1 * (km 2 ) -1 ;<br />

g) The Bajza area and its aquifers are streamed by the groundwater of the North <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />

Alps, which drain to Shkodra Lake forming important karst springs, e.g. Syri i Sheganit<br />

and Syri i Zi with an average total discharge of several m 3 /s;<br />

h) The groundwater shows a low mineralization as well as a low hardness and can be seen<br />

as a Bicarbonate-Calcium type. The conductivity varies from 230 to 300 �S/cm and the<br />

total hardness ranges mostly from 6 to 8 German degrees.<br />

3.6 Socio-Economy and Population<br />

3.6.1 Population<br />

According to the Strategic Action Plan SAP FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA (2007) approximately<br />

500,000 inhabitants live in the watershed of Shkodra Lake. In <strong>Albania</strong> the majority of this population<br />

belongs to Shkodra Region, while in Montenegro several regions participate. The current<br />

population growth in <strong>Albania</strong> it is 0.6%. The population living below the poverty line is estimated<br />

to approximately 30%.<br />

Shkodra is the only main town of the area while there are around 20 villages and 2 municipalities.<br />

From those, 10 villages with 300 - 1,000 inhabitants are located more closely to the lake.<br />

Shkodra is the most developed centre of the region and the biggest municipality of the lake<br />

area. It is situated on the south-eastern part of the lake. It has a population of 110,000 inhabitants.<br />

The population of Shkodra city represents 32% of the total population of Shkodra Region<br />

(Qarku Shkoder) and the 45% of population of Shkodra District (Rrethi Shkoder).<br />

The movement of the population from the villages to the urban areas within the region has in<br />

fact been more evident compared to the movement from the cities itself.<br />

The village of Bajza is located in the community of Koplik with a population of 12,900 and 3,040<br />

families.<br />

3.6.2 Economy<br />

According to the Strategic Action Plan SAP FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA (2007) <strong>Albania</strong> has made<br />

significant economic progress since its transition from a communist regime towards a democ-<br />

30 November 2008 page 27 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

ratic market-based economy. The country’s economy has been increasing since 1993 at an<br />

annual rate of about 8%. Although agriculture has traditionally played an important role in the<br />

economy, recent growth has been driven by the services and construction sectors. Agriculture in<br />

<strong>Albania</strong> counts for about 25% of its GDP. About 20% of the land is cultivated and approximately<br />

50% of the labor force is engaged in agriculture; the majority of the balance is involved in industries.<br />

In Shkodra region the main activities of the processing industry were the processing of tobacco<br />

and manufacture of cigarettes, production of conserved foods, sugar-based foods, soft and alcoholic<br />

drinks, pasta, bread, rice and vegetable oil. The main activities of the textile industry<br />

were focused on garments and silk products. The city also had a wood-processing and paperproduction<br />

plant. The most important mechanical engineering industries concerned wire manufacturing,<br />

elevator manufacturing and bus assembly. Two important handicraft enterprises well<br />

known in <strong>Albania</strong> were the Artisan Products Enterprise and the Straw and Reed Enterprise.<br />

As a result of market economy reforms after 90s, big changes took place in the economic structure<br />

of Shkodra, so that some nine-tenths of the former state-owned enterprises in the city were<br />

privatized. However, the majority of these privatized businesses did not continue their original<br />

production lines, particularly in the mechanical engineering industry, which had been unique in<br />

the country and had a guaranteed national market. Food processing, wood processing and the<br />

artisan production, which contributed the largest production in former time, were closed and<br />

transformed into a large number of small enterprises (SMEs).<br />

Meanwhile, tobacco processing and the cigarette manufacturing industry were completely destroyed:<br />

incapability to invest in technological renovation and competition from imported products<br />

caused its bankruptcy.<br />

In Shkodra region agricultural land occupies approximately 13% of the whole area, while forests,<br />

pastures and abandoned land contribute approximately 64%. The two main regional land<br />

use activities are agriculture and livestock rising.<br />

The main agricultural plants are field plants like wheat, maize, green beans, potatoes, vegetables,<br />

forage crops, tobacco etc. Almost 50% of the total surface is used for fodder and this<br />

clearly indicates that livestock is a very important activity in this region.<br />

3.7 Policies and Legislation<br />

According to the Lake Shkoder Transboundary Diagnostics Analysis, WORLD BANK (IBRD)<br />

(2006), the Constitution of <strong>Albania</strong> gives a special place to the environment. The Ministry of Environment<br />

(MoE), established in 2001, is the main policy-making public institution in the country.<br />

Until recently, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Forests and Waters had some responsibilities<br />

for environmental protection and biodiversity conservation. The MoE has been given the<br />

additional responsibilities of forest and water administration sectors and is now the Ministry of<br />

Environment, Forests and Water Administration.<br />

30 November 2008 page 28 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Recently, the <strong>Albania</strong>n government has proclaimed its part of Lake Shkoder a “Managed Natural<br />

Reserve” through the Council of Ministers’ decision No. 684 dated 02.11.2005.<br />

In <strong>Albania</strong>, the legislation for the environmental protection and management can be said to be<br />

mostly in place. The law (No. 8934 of 5 September 2002) entitled “On Environmental Protection”<br />

is the legal act which regulates the protection and conservation of the environment in the country<br />

(Compendium of Environmental Legislation of <strong>Albania</strong>, 2004). Article 7 of Chapter II of the<br />

law lays down the policy guidelines on environment to be followed by the State.<br />

In addition to the law on Environmental Protection (2002), most important for waters resources<br />

and biodiversity conservation are the following laws:<br />

� On Water Resources, Law no. 8093, dated 21.03.1996. This law is yet to be implemented;<br />

� On Protected Areas, Law No. 8906, dated 06 .06.2002;<br />

� On Environmental Impact Assessment, Law No. 8990 dated 23.01.2003.<br />

Further, various acts and regulations have been passed by the government to enforce environmental<br />

protection in the country. Most relevant are:<br />

� On Protection of Transboundary Lakes, Law No. 9103 dated 10.07.2003;<br />

� On Urban Planning, Law No. 8405 dated 17.09.1998;<br />

� On Public Disposal of Waste, Law No. 8094 dated 21.03.1996;<br />

� On Environmental Administration of Solid Waste, Law No. 9010, dated 13.02.2003;<br />

� On Regulatory Framework of Water Supply Sector and Disposal & Treatment of Wastewater,<br />

Law No. 8102 dated 28.03.1996;<br />

� On Irrigation and Drainage, Law No. 8518 dated 30.07.1999;<br />

� On Development of Areas with Priority for Tourism, Law No. 7665 dated 21.01.1993;<br />

� On protection of air from pollution, Law No. 8897 dated 16.05.2002;<br />

� Government Decision No. 103 dated 31.03.2002, “On Environmental Monitoring in the<br />

Republic of <strong>Albania</strong>”. This decision states, among others, the indicators to be used in<br />

monitoring the environments of the country;<br />

� Government decision No. 103 dated 31.03.2002 on “Environmental Monitoring”;<br />

� Government decision No. 266 dated 24.04.2003 on “Administration of Protected Areas”;<br />

� the <strong>Albania</strong>n Penal Code (Articles 201-207) provides the penalization of acts related to<br />

the violation of the environmental laws.<br />

Most recent legislative and administrative decisions, noteworthy with respect to the environment<br />

conservation are:<br />

30 November 2008 page 29 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

� Council of Minister’s decision No. 683 dated 02.11.2005 on “Proclamation of Shkodra<br />

Lake and Buna river Wetland Complex, Natural Area especially protected and its inclusion<br />

in the list of internationally important wetlands, especially as waterfowl habitats”;<br />

� Council of Minister’s decision No. 684 dated 02.11.2005 on “Proclamation of the <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />

Part of Shkodra Lake as Managed Natural Reserve”.<br />

Clearly, the <strong>Albania</strong>n government has taken legislative measures which reflect its desire to towards<br />

environment conservation and management in the country. But the enforcement of the<br />

laws and regulations and implementation of the government decisions are still weak.<br />

4 SITE INVESTIGATON<br />

4.1 Kick-off Meeting and first site investigation<br />

The first Kick-off meeting took place on 01.09.2008 09:00 h at the office of Mr. Selfo in Tirana.<br />

The participants were Mr. Selfo, as project coordinator for the <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, Mr. Linder, as<br />

team leader of <strong>MonTec</strong> and Mr. Skark, as expert for chemistry and pesticides of <strong>MonTec</strong> as well<br />

as Mr. Eftimi, as local expert. Mr. Selfo introduced the project goals to the team.<br />

Interview<br />

On 01.09.2008 13:00 h a first site investigation at Bajza took place. Besides Mr. Selfo and the<br />

<strong>MonTec</strong> team the director of the station Mr. Popaj participated. The results of this interview<br />

were:<br />

� the supposed hazardous chemical material/waste is stored in only one room at the<br />

storehouses,<br />

� the material is supposed to be stored since the beginning of the 1990 th ,<br />

� the old and abandoned railway wagons, deposited east of the storehouses are assumed<br />

to be not part of the German train with the pesticides,<br />

� the German train with the pesticides is supposed to be already removed and it is assumed<br />

that no pesticides of the train are stored in the storehouses,<br />

� the station itself is a secured and restricted area and should have no public access,<br />

� the train station is in operation for commercial transport of goods, there are no passenger<br />

transportation trains,<br />

� the storehouses are not in operation,<br />

� the station of Bajza is looking forward to use the storehouses in the future.<br />

4.2 Investigation on-site<br />

The Figure 19 shows an overview of the Bajza Station Site.<br />

30 November 2008 page 30 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

station administration<br />

storehouses<br />

Figure 19: Overview Bajza Station<br />

fenced area<br />

to Bajza village<br />

30 November 2008 page 31 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

4.2.1 Outside the Bajza station<br />

In the afternoon of the 01.09.2008 the surrounding area of the Bajza station was investigated<br />

with the focus on the groundwater flows downstream the site area. In approximately 1 km distance<br />

to the Bajza station the karstic groundwater is accessible. There are two karstic wells with<br />

no drain-off and one karstic well (Syri i Sheganit) with a drain-off to the Shkodra Lake (see<br />

Figure 20).<br />

Syri i Sheganit (well)<br />

assumed<br />

Groundwater flow direction<br />

Figure 20: Assumed groundwater downstream area of the site<br />

The flow velocity in the spillway of the Syri i Sheganit spring has been estimated between 0.05<br />

and 0.06 m/s which results in a discharge between 0.05 and 0.065 m³/s under the prevailing<br />

base flow conditions during the field trip.<br />

The water in the Syri i Sheganit spillway has a temperature of 18.7° C, a low electrical conductivity<br />

(EC) of 267 μS/cm indicating an expected low content of total dissolved solids and a pH<br />

value between 6 and 7. The water of the undrained karstic wells shows the same pH range, a<br />

higher temperature (26° C - 27° C) and in one case almost the same EC of 276 μS/cm. The<br />

water of the second undrained karstic spring located south to the first one gives an even lower<br />

EC with 197 μS/cm, a hint for a lower mineralization.<br />

At this site (Syri i Sheganit) a groundwater sample could be taken (see Figure 21).<br />

Bajza Station<br />

30 November 2008 page 32 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 21: Groundwater sample at Syri i Sheganit karstic well<br />

4.2.2 Inside the Bajza station<br />

On 02.09.2008 the storehouses and the railway tracks are investigated. At the same day the<br />

sampling took place.<br />

Figure 22 shows an overview of the storehouses and railway tracks with the definition of names<br />

of the objects used in this investigation. The following list gives an overview of the objects of the<br />

site investigation. The objects of detailed investigations and sampling are highlighted bold. See<br />

also the photographic documentation in Figure 23 to Figure 32.<br />

� Storehouse 1 with loading ramps left and right, not used<br />

- Room 1: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor<br />

- Room 2: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor, children used<br />

the dust as playground<br />

- Room 3: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor<br />

� Storehouse 2 with loading ramps left and right, not used<br />

- Room 1: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor, an old machinery<br />

in one corner<br />

- Room 2: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...), single leather rags on the<br />

floor; Room 2 has direct access to Room 3<br />

- Room 3: loaded with chemical material/waste, leather rags; some chemical material was<br />

found outside of the Room 3 on the Ramp2 left as well as in Room 2 close to the<br />

doors/gates of the Room 3<br />

30 November 2008 page 33 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

- Room 4: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor, there is no direct<br />

access to Room 3<br />

� Railway Track 1: in use during visit, one abandoned wagon deposited the north end of<br />

the track<br />

� Railway Track 2: in use during visit<br />

� Railway Track 3: not in use, 25 empty and abandoned wagons deposited on the track,<br />

supposed to be a track for the German train with pesticides<br />

� Platform between Track 3 and 4 : not in use and empty<br />

� Railway Track 4: not in use, 35 empty and abandoned wagons deposited on the track<br />

plus 2 abandoned wagons loaded with soil (overgrown) north of it.<br />

30 November 2008 page 34 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 22: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks<br />

30 November 2008 page 35 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 23: Storehouse 1, view south<br />

Figure 24: Storehouse 1, Room 1, view south<br />

30 November 2008 page 36 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 25: Storehouse 1, Room 2, view south<br />

Figure 26: Storehouse 1, Room 3, view south<br />

30 November 2008 page 37 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 27: Storehouse 2, view south<br />

Figure 28: Storehouse 2, Room 1, view east<br />

30 November 2008 page 38 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 29: Storehouse 2, Room 2, view south<br />

Figure 30: Storehouse 2, Room 3, view south<br />

30 November 2008 page 39 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 31: Railway Track 3, view north<br />

Figure 32: Railway Track 4, view south<br />

30 November 2008 page 40 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

4.3 Sampling<br />

As a conclusion of the information from Mr. Selfo and Mr. Popaj the <strong>MonTec</strong> team carried out<br />

the site visitation and focused the sampling to the major subjects of interest:<br />

� Storehouse 2, Room 3 with the supposed hazardous chemical material/waste and leather<br />

rugs.<br />

� Storehouse 2, Room 2 with dust and assumed remnants of the chemical materials in the<br />

adjacent Room 3 to which it has an open access at the southern wall. This material was focused<br />

at as a further storeroom for the hazardous materials in Room 3 after repacking.<br />

� Storehouse 2, Room 1 and 4 with dust and unknown further composition.<br />

� Abandoned railway wagons at track 3 and 4 were searched for leftovers of pesticides.<br />

� Topsoil was sampled in the direct vicinity of the railway tracks 3 and 4 in order to follow up<br />

spilled pesticides.<br />

Figure 33 shows an overview of the sampling locations.<br />

Figure 33: Overview of the sampling locations<br />

30 November 2008 page 41 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

During sampling procedure of solids at the Bajza site one member of the sampling personnel<br />

(Mr. Skark) used an electronic radiation dosimeter which was able to record possible radioactive<br />

impact on humans with a detection limit of 50 nSv/h. Over a period of 6 h no radioactivity was<br />

recorded (0 μSv). Thus, it can be concluded that no radioactive material or any remnants of this<br />

are stored in storehouse 2 and in the surrounding of that building.<br />

4.3.1 Samples in Storehouse 2<br />

Samples in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

During the sampling work in Storehouse 2, Room 3, it was discovered that the main parts of the<br />

stored materials are leather rags (shoes production) without and within plastic bags. The chemical<br />

material/waste was only dropped on top of the leather rugs in front of the two open access<br />

doors to the storehouse room. Figure 34 shows an overview of the investigated mixture of materials<br />

and sampling locations.<br />

The thickness of the deposited material in this room is less than 0.70 m.<br />

30 November 2008 page 42 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

� white powder<br />

Figure 34: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

�<br />

proven depth of piled rags<br />

� proven depth of piled rags<br />

� proven depth of piled rags<br />

30 November 2008 page 43 of 66<br />

�<br />

grey and white powder


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

The main part of the stored material consisted of tanned leather remnants, which remained<br />

after cutting out pieces for the production of shoes and other leather goods. This material is almost<br />

80 % of the stored material. These leather rags were piled up to 60 cm in the Room 3 and<br />

occurred at different sites (Figure 34, Figure 35 and Figure 36). The cuttings were sometimes<br />

sacked in woven polyester bags. Some of the bags were labeled indicating the former content<br />

as vegetal tanning agent (acacia bark, Figure 38). Remnants of torn bags were mixed with the<br />

leather cuttings. For further investigation a representative sample of the leather was taken<br />

(Table 4, L).<br />

Figure 35: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

Figure 36: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

30 November 2008 page 44 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

To a lesser extent (< 20 %) a white and a grey powder were found in hall 3 (Figure 18). Both<br />

powders consist of small acicular crystals (size < 0.1 mm) and were often cemented due to infiltrated<br />

and evaporated humidity. The grey powder seemed to be a soiled variant of the white<br />

powder due to the contact with the tanned leather and some excremental material (birds?,<br />

rats?). The mass relation between white and grey powder was estimated to 80 : 20.<br />

Figure 37: White and grey powder in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

Most of the substances were sacked to torn bags which were labelled at several bags with<br />

Na2SiF6, sodium hexafluorosilicate, indicating the <strong>Albania</strong>n origin of the material (Figure 38).<br />

Some field tests showed: The material was soluble in water to a certain extent. The solution<br />

smelled like hydrochloric acid and had a pH value between 3 and 4. No reaction with diluted<br />

hydrochloric acid (HCl, 3 Vol-%) was found. Both substances, the white and the grey powder,<br />

were sampled separately by 10 penetrations with a metal mortar to a bucket and were mixed<br />

thoroughly in order to receive a representative composite sample (Table 4, M1 and M2).<br />

30 November 2008 page 45 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 38: Labelled bags in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

Samples from other Rooms in Storehouse 2<br />

The dust/debris in the other rooms consisted of rubbed plastering and trickled roof material,<br />

remnants of stored chemical substances and some organic material (animal hair [goats … ],<br />

dried animal excrements and charcoal remnants). In Room 2 additionally some leather rags<br />

were found.<br />

Sampling of the dust/debris in Room 2 focused at the southern part of the room with the open<br />

door to room 3 (S1). In order to get a composite sample of the dust materials 10 single samples<br />

were mixed thoroughly (Figure 39). The mass of dust in Room 2 can be roughly estimated by<br />

less than 100 kg.<br />

30 November 2008 page 46 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 39: Dust and debris sampling in Storehouse 2, Room 2<br />

From the dust and debris material on the floor in the Rooms 1 and 4 one composite sample was<br />

mixed from 10 single samples in Room 1 and 4 each (S2). The amount of dust and debris in<br />

each Room was estimated to be less than 50 kg.<br />

The material of both samples contained probably carbonate which had been proven by a test<br />

with diluted hydrochloric acid.<br />

4.3.2 Solid samples from outside the Storehouses<br />

Sampling of solids outside the Storehouse concentrated on peculiar remnants of chemicals in or<br />

around the abandoned railway wagons or the topsoil in the direct vicinity of the railway tracks 3<br />

and 4.<br />

30 November 2008 page 47 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 40: Overview of the sample locations outside the Storehouses<br />

Abandoned railway wagons<br />

Sample point<br />

soil �<br />

Sample point soil �<br />

Sample point soil<br />

�<br />

� Sample point soil<br />

� Sample point soil<br />

� Sample in wagon (powder)<br />

� Sample point soil<br />

� Sample point red material<br />

In all the railway wagons the floor was made of wood that had been torn out and only the basic<br />

steel girder construction was visible.<br />

30 November 2008 page 48 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

At one point at track 4 a grey-white powder with an obvious small density was found in a wagon<br />

(Figure 41) and could be sampled (Table 4, B1). The mass of that powder can be estimated<br />

with 10 kg.<br />

Figure 41: Material in a wagon<br />

At another point, west of track 3 and south of the Storehouse 2 a red material with round blackwhite<br />

inclusions was found. The material showed a massive consistence. It might either be a<br />

natural substance like mudstone, brick or grog clay. On the other hand, it might represent the<br />

remnants of a condensed synthetic chemical substance. The mass can be assumed to less<br />

than 5 kg. It was sampled (Table 4, B2).<br />

Soil sampling at the railway tracks 3 and 4<br />

For soil sampling 3 small pits were dug in order to collect material from topsoil west of track 3.<br />

Each pit was approximately 30 cm deep (Figure 42). The soil material was unified in a bucket,<br />

thoroughly mixed and a composite sample was filled into a glass (Table 4, B3). This sampling<br />

procedure was repeated east of track 4 (sample B4).<br />

30 November 2008 page 49 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Figure 42: Soil sampling at the railway tracks<br />

In no case a top sealing by a confining clay layer or any other cohesive soil material was found.<br />

The humid top soil consisted of a sandy silt layer with a large amount of well rounded gravel.<br />

The silt was rich in carbonates proven by a test with hydrochloric acid. The consistence of the<br />

topsoil will not hinder the infiltration of any precipitation. It can be assumed that the topsoil will<br />

provide only a moderate sorption capacity to organic chemicals like pesticides.<br />

4.3.3 Water sampling<br />

Water sampling was already performed on 01.09.2008 at the Syri I Sheganit karstic well.<br />

See chapter 4.2.1.<br />

4.4 Estimation of quantities<br />

The estimation of the quantities gives the following results:<br />

� Storehouse 2<br />

- Room 1: Dust and debris on the floor < 50 kg<br />

- Room 2: Dust and debris on the floor ~ 100 kg<br />

30 November 2008 page 50 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

- Room 3: Leather waste ~ 200 t<br />

Chemical Waste ~ 80 t<br />

- Room 4: Dust and debris on the floor < 50 kg.<br />

5 ANALYSES<br />

The following Table 4 (see also Annex 1) gives an overview of the sampled material and the<br />

subsequent chemical analysis which was performed after the sample transport to Germany.<br />

Table 4: Overview of sampled material and subsequent chemical analysis<br />

Nr. short<br />

name<br />

description material colour analytical procedure<br />

1 M1 material 1 powder white XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS, density analysis<br />

2 M2 material 2 powder grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

3 L leather leather brown microbiology, HM after water extraction, GC-MS<br />

4 S1 dust 1 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, asbestos, GC-MS<br />

5 S2 dust 2 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

6 B1 railway-wagon 1 powder greywhite XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

7 B2 railway-wagon 2 mudstone? red XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

8 B3 railway 3, soil soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

9 B4 railway 4, soil soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

10 SiS water water<br />

chloroorganic pesticides, GC-MS, Ca, Mg, Na,<br />

K, Cl, SO4, (NO3, NH4, DOC), HM, AOX,<br />

AOX – adsorbable organic halogens (water)<br />

DOC – dissolved organic carbon<br />

EOX – extractable organic halogens (solids)<br />

GC-MS – screening test with gas chromatography and mass-selective detection after extraction with solvents of<br />

different polarity (methanol, hexane)<br />

HM – heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)<br />

TOC – total organic carbon<br />

XRF – X-ray fluorescence<br />

5.1 Analysis of samples<br />

5.1.1 Analysis of samples from Room 3<br />

One of the possible hazards in leather remnants is the contamination with anthrax spores. This<br />

can only be identified by a specific microbiological and molecular-biological analytic procedure<br />

which is done in a special laboratory at the Stuttgart-Hohenheim University. Due to tanning<br />

processes the leather may contain residues of mineral or vegetal tanning substances which<br />

might be eluted after the future disposal at a landfill. For assessing the mineral elution potential<br />

of the leather (L) an elution by water has been performed (S4 test according DEV, elution by<br />

demineralised water for 24 hours at a solid to liquid ratio of 1 : 10) and the leachate has been<br />

tested on heavy metals, particularly chromium, mercury, nickel, and aluminium. For tracking<br />

vegetal tanning agents a further elution of the leather sample (L) with organic solvents of differ-<br />

30 November 2008 page 51 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

ent polarity (methanol and hexane) has been performed. The extracts are analysed by gaschromatography<br />

with a mass-selective detection (GC-MS) in order to identify certain tannic acids<br />

(Table 4).<br />

The composite samples of the white and grey powder (M1 and M2) are investigated by X-ray<br />

fluorescence (XRF) which may prove the most likely inorganic composition of the material. In<br />

addition the material was tested for total organic carbon (TOC) and extractable organic halogens<br />

(EOX). Finally, extracts with 2 organic solvents (methanol and hexane) are analyzed by<br />

GC-MS in order to identify potential organic compounds (e.g. pesticides, Table 4). A density<br />

analysis of M1 has resulted in a density of approximately 2.5 g/cm³ which corroborates the assumption<br />

of sodium hexafluoro silicate. The pure Na2SiF6 has a density of 2.7 g/cm³ but the<br />

sampled material may not reach this value due to the technical purity grade and contamination<br />

during the storage.<br />

5.1.2 Analysis of the dust samples S1 and S2<br />

Apart from the analytical procedure as described for the chemical material M1 and M2 in Room<br />

2 the dust sample S1 is additionally analyzed for asbestos fibres which may be included to the<br />

dust from trickling roof material (Table 4).<br />

5.1.3 Analysis of the samples B1 and B2 from the abandoned railway tracks<br />

Both peculiar materials B1 and B2 are analyzed in the same procedure as the samples M1 and<br />

M2 (Table 4). B2 sample has to be crushed by a hammer as a preparation for further analysis.<br />

Particularly the GC-MS screening proves whether these materials contain organic pollutants like<br />

pesticides.<br />

5.1.4 Analysis of the soil samples B3 and B4<br />

Soil samples B3 and B4 are be analyzed with respect to the parameters TOC, EOX and after<br />

extraction with methanol and hexane by GC-MS in order to identify residues of any spilled pesticide<br />

or other organic pollutants.<br />

5.1.5 Analysis of water<br />

Due to the transport condition water analysis focuses on conservative inorganic ions (Ca 2+ ,<br />

Mg 2+ , Na + , K + , Cl - , SO4 2- and heavy metals). For orientation purpose the non-conservative parameters<br />

like nitrate, ammonia and dissolved organic carbon are also analyzed. Persistent pesticides<br />

or other organic pollutants may be identified by GC-MS screening procedure.<br />

5.2 Performance of chemical and microbiological analyses<br />

The microbiological tests of leather aiming at the exclusion of the occurrence of Bacillus anthracis<br />

were performed by a specialized laboratory at the University Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Institut<br />

für Umwelt- und Tierhygiene, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany (Prof. Dr. R. Böhm). The analysis<br />

30 November 2008 page 52 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

was done as microbiological cultivating on a semi-selective nutrient medium and as a molecular-biological<br />

procedure like polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR).<br />

The X-ray fluorescence investigations (XRF) of several solid samples were performed by Friedrich-Schiller-University<br />

Jena, Institute for Geo-Sciences, Department of Mineralogy, 07749<br />

Jena, Germany (Prof. Dr. L. Viereck-Götte). Main constituents were analyzed after a melting<br />

preparation whereas trace elements were determined after a compression-moulding with potassium<br />

bromide. The XRF device was characterized by a rhodium cathode as primary X-ray radiation<br />

source and a lithium fluoride crystal for the analysis of the excited fluorescence radiation.<br />

The quantification was aiming at elements from the 3 rd to the 7 th period in the periodic table<br />

while the results for the 2 nd period were only qualitative (including fluorine). Carbon compounds<br />

were burnt during the annealing process at 900°C but some of the constituents were oxygenated<br />

in this process resulting in negative annealing losses. As the XRF analysis at the Jena<br />

laboratory generally aimed to natural rocks and their constituents the following elements from<br />

the 3 rd and 4 th period in the periodic table were seen as main components: sodium, magnesium,<br />

aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, titan, manganese, and iron. These elements<br />

were quantified after the melting preparation. The following elements from the 3 rd to the<br />

7 th period of the periodic table were seen as traces and were quantified after compressionmoulding:<br />

sulphur, chlorine, vanadium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, rubidium, strontium,<br />

yttrium, zirconium, niobium, barium, lead, and uranium.<br />

Asbestos fiber identification was performed by raster electron microscopy (REM) and further<br />

confirmation by fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) by CRB Analysen Service,<br />

37818 Hardegsen, Germany.<br />

In preparation of the gas chromatography screening aliquots of the solid samples (2 - 3 g) were<br />

being extracted separately with methanol and hexane (20 ml each) for 30 min in an ultrasonic<br />

bath. The supernatants were used for further analyses. The water samples were extracted on<br />

solid phase material (SPE) of different polarity and eluted by solvents of different polarity. One<br />

liter of water was filtrated either on a 6 ml SPE column SDB1 (styrenevinylbenzene by BAKER)<br />

or on a 6 ml SPE column HRX (polystyrenevinylbenzene by MACHEREY & NAGEL). The SDB 1<br />

column was eluted by 8 ml methanol, the HRX column by 8 ml ethylacetate. Both eluates were<br />

dried by evaporation and the residues were solved in methanol prior to the GC procedure.<br />

The boundary conditions for the GC-MS analysis are characterized as follows:<br />

For sample feeding a cold injection system (CIS; KAS 3 by GERSTEL) was used. The volume of<br />

2 μl sample extract was injected to the GC by the CIS under solvent venting at 40°C.<br />

The GC device (gas chromatograph 5890 series II by AGILENT with auto sampling device<br />

AS7673) was equipped by a capillary column J&W DB5 (length 30 m, inner diameter 0.25 mm,<br />

film thickness 0.25 μm). The realized temperature program started with an initial temperature of<br />

50°C (1 min), continued with a heating period at a rate of 8°C/min and finished with a final temperature<br />

of 270°C (5 min). The total time elapsed for one run was 33.5 min.<br />

30 November 2008 page 53 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

The mass selective detection device (quadrupole MSD 5972 by AGILENT) of the gas chromatograph<br />

screened in the full scan mode masses between 50 and 500 m/z, which were identified<br />

by a comparison with spectra libraries (NBS-75K [74,828 compounds]; EHRENSTORFER [1,141<br />

compounds]; HP-PESTICIDE LIBRARY [340 compounds]). Particularly the last 2 libraries are specialized<br />

to pesticide identification whereas the NBS library includes a broad variety of organic<br />

compounds. Nevertheless the GC-MS screening targets mainly at the identification of pesticides<br />

which had been stored at Bajza Station in the early 1990’s. It can be assumed that 37 different<br />

active organic ingredients of pesticides were stored temporarily in rail wagons at the Bajza site.<br />

The occurrence of these organic pesticides can not be excluded a priory. From the total number<br />

of 37 compounds the spectra of 29 substances were included in the GC-MS screening process.<br />

The identification of a specific compound based on the retention time in the chromatographic<br />

column which was added by a comparison of the observed fragments and their relative intensities<br />

at that retention time with the spectra libraries. The proposed occurrence of a compound in<br />

a sample is only adopted when the match quality with the library spectrum exceeds 50 % probability<br />

and the chromatogram shows a peak of relevant intensity indicating a significant abundance<br />

in the sample (at least more than 5 % of the integrated area). Thus, by the GC-MS<br />

screening only the main organic compounds were qualitatively assigned. No further attempt for<br />

quantification was performed due to the lack of appropriate standards for quantification. In addition<br />

further appropriate clean up steps were needed for the extract preparation.<br />

All other analytical procedures were performed according to DIN standards.<br />

5.3 Results of chemical and microbiological analyses<br />

The following describes the results of the chemical and microbiological analyses. The complete<br />

results are listed in the tables in Annex 2. Annex 3 gives a detailed list of presumable pesticides<br />

of the "pesticide train" and the possible GC-MS screening.<br />

5.3.1 Results for the leather sample (L)<br />

By the microbiological investigation Bacillus anthracis could not be found with a limit of detection<br />

at 20 spores in a 15 g aliquot of the sample.<br />

The elution of solutes by the demineralised water gave a hint to soluble chromium and aluminium<br />

(aluminium 2.06 mg/l, chromium 1.48 mg/l) whereas mercury and nickel were only found on<br />

a trace level (mercury 1.6 μg/l, nickel 19 μg/l). A further analysis for chromium (IV) could not be<br />

performed due to the colour of the eluate and matrix effects.<br />

As a result of the GC-MS screening several plasticizers could be identified. In both extracts,<br />

methanol and hexane, 2-ethyl-hexyl-diphenyl-phosphat (C20H27O4P, Octicizer, USAN, CAS<br />

1241-94-7), a phosphor acid ester, was identified, which is used as plasticizer and flame retardant<br />

(Table 7). Further more in the hexane extract di-butyl-phthalate (DBP, CAS 84-74-2) and in<br />

the methanol extract di-(2-ethyl-hexyl)-phthalate (DEHP; CAS 117-81-7), two other plasticizers,<br />

were detected. Residues of vegetal tanning agents were not identified in the leather rags although<br />

some of the remnants were packed in bags indicating the use of acacia tanning agents<br />

30 November 2008 page 54 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

(mimosa), condensed tanning compounds like catechin and other flavandiols (Figure 38,<br />

SCHUBERT ET AL., 1978).<br />

So it can be concluded that the leather was tanned by mineral salts which may be soluble after<br />

dumping the material in a landfill. The occurrence of the plasticizers described above may not<br />

pose any additional risk either for the occupational safety during repackaging or for an environmental<br />

impact after a landfill disposal (BG Chemie, 1995).<br />

5.3.2 Results for the stored material (M1 and M2) in Room 3 in Storehouse 2<br />

In both sampled powders M1 and M2 extractable organic bound halogens were not found (see<br />

Table 5). Particularly the white powder M1 provided a low organic carbon content (900 mg/kg)<br />

whereas the grey powder M2 was a little richer in organic carbon (20 g/kg).<br />

Table 5: Results of the analysis for total organic carbon (TOC) and extractable organic bound<br />

halogens (EOX)<br />

Nr.<br />

short<br />

name<br />

description<br />

TOC<br />

[%]<br />

EOX<br />

[mg/kg]<br />

1 M1 material 1 0.09 < 1<br />

2 M2 material 2 2.0 < 1<br />

4 S1 dust 1 3.0 < 1<br />

5 S2 dust 2 3.1 < 1<br />

6 B1 railway-waggon 1 40.4 22<br />

7 B2 railway-waggon 2 0.34 < 1<br />

8 B3 railway 3, soil 7.7 < 1<br />

9 B4 railway 4, soil 6.2 < 1<br />

limit of quantification TOC 0.01 %, EOX 1 mg/kg<br />

By XRF analysis sodium and silicon could be identified as the main constituents of M1 and M2<br />

(see Table 6, Figure 43). These both elements summed up to c. 400 g/kg while all other quantified<br />

elements resulted in 7 or 38 g/kg (M1 respectively M2). Pure sodium hexafluoro silicate,<br />

Na2SiF6, (CAS 16893-85-9) should have a stoichiometric ratio of Na : Si : F of 24.5 : 14.9 : 60.6<br />

which was almost met by the sodium and silicon fraction in M1 and M2. The respective ratio (Na<br />

+ Si) : F has to be 39.4 : 60.6 which is also approximately complied in the tested material. Additionally<br />

fluorine was qualitatively found in both samples to a certain amount but could not be<br />

quantified as described before.<br />

30 November 2008 page 55 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Table 6: Results of the XRF analysis<br />

Element<br />

Sample /<br />

Dimension<br />

M 1 M2 S1 S2 B1 B2<br />

Na [g/kg] 262.5 248.8 7.3 10.9 2.5 b.d.<br />

Mg [g/kg] 0.2 2.6 16.5 25.0 3.6 1.6<br />

Al [g/kg] 5.2 8.3 49.7 54.6 19.0 356.3<br />

Si [g/kg] 143.5 152.1 220.4 224.2 135.8 12.9<br />

P [g/kg] 0.1 0.4 1.6 1.0 4.8 0.4<br />

S [g/kg] < 0.005 7.3 7.533 15.447 8.9 0.031<br />

Cl [g/kg] 0.3 3.1 0.224 0.331 1.3 < 0.005<br />

K [g/kg] 0.4 1.5 8.1 9.5 3.4 0.5<br />

Ca [g/kg] 0.4 11.5 224.3 162.1 49.5 1.4<br />

Ti [g/kg] 0.04 0.2 2.1 2.8 0.8 23.62<br />

V [g/kg] 0.004 0.01 0.095 0.134 0.20 1.06<br />

Cr [g/kg] < 0.005 0.06 0.33 0.683 0.33 2.046<br />

Mn [g/kg] 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.3<br />

Fe [g/kg] 0.3 3.0 35.3 74.0 54.4 172.6<br />

Co [g/kg] < 0.005 < 0.005 0.009 0.032 0.03 0.08<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0.02 0.04 0.115 0.212 0.09 0.834<br />

Cu [g/kg] 0.01 0.02 0.056 0.085 0.20 < 0.005<br />

Zn [g/kg] < 0.005 0.06 0.23 0.907 1.12 0.265<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0.01 0.01 0.035 0.038 0.14 0.007<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0.01 0.07 0.358 0.212 0.14 0.071<br />

Y [g/kg] 0.001 0.002 0.01 0.012 < 0.005 0.085<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0.02 0.03 0.095 0.079 0.05 0.613<br />

Nb [g/kg] 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.006 < 0.005 0.042<br />

Ba [g/kg] < 0.005 0.06 0.38 0.611 0.25 0.443<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0.004 0.01 0.046 0.052 0.06 0.089<br />

U [g/kg] < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.008 0.002<br />

sum [g/kg] 413.1 439.2 575.3 583.8 287.7 576.3<br />

annealing<br />

loss<br />

(%) -4.07 -16.47 24.80 24.21 6.32 12.92<br />

limit of quantification 0.005 g/kg, b.d. – below limit of detection<br />

The combination of all results - low TOC, EOX below the limit of quantification, density c. 2.5<br />

g/cm³, prevailing sodium and silicon, qualitative detection of fluorine - gave strong constraints<br />

for the corroboration of the sodium hexafluoro silicate assumption. Sodium hexafluoro silicate<br />

has biocide properties and can be used as a wood preserving agent and insecticide but it can<br />

also be used as the intermediate material for further chemical synthesis (e.g. kryolithe production<br />

for aluminium smelting, TOMLIN, 1997). This inorganic fluorine compound forms white hexagonal<br />

crystals, has a water solubility of 6.5 g/L and decomposes at 500°C when it is heated.<br />

This hazardous chemical substance is classified as toxic particularly when it is inhaled, ingested<br />

30 November 2008 page 56 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

or in contact with the bare skin during working processes (HANEKE &CARSON, 2001; KÜHN –<br />

BIRETT, 2008).<br />

mass concentration [g/kg]<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Na Mg Al Si P S Cl K Ca Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Ba Pb U<br />

increasing atomic number<br />

Figure 43: Element composition according to the results of XRF analysis<br />

The GC-MS screening resulted in both extracts in the identification of the plasticizers DBP and<br />

DEHP without any hint to further components (Table 7).<br />

5.3.3 Results for the dust/debris samples (S1 and S2) in Storehouse 2<br />

In the dust/debris sample S1 asbestos fibres were found and specified as chrysotile asbestos.<br />

This result could also be held for true for the sample S2 as the most likely source of the asbestos<br />

fibres was trickled roof material. The occurrence of asbestos in the dust will put serious constraints<br />

for the occupational protection during the cleaning of the Room 2 and 3.<br />

XRF analysis of the dust samples S1 and S2 resulted in the prevailing inorganic constituents<br />

silicon, calcium, aluminium, and iron which were contributing c. 52 % of the inorganic fraction<br />

(Table 6). A large amount of the calcium was presumably bound as calcium carbonate which<br />

explained the annealing loss of c. 24 % due to inorganic carbon. The investigation of the melting<br />

preparation showed oxygen apart from carbon as the main component of the 2 nd period in the<br />

periodic table because the sum of the oxidized forms of the elements gave a recovery near<br />

30 November 2008 page 57 of 66<br />

M1<br />

M2<br />

S1<br />

S2<br />

B1<br />

B2


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

100 %. So it could be assumed that fluorine and fluorine compounds occurred only subordinately<br />

in the dust/debris.<br />

In both samples EOX could not be detected and organic carbon had a fraction of c. 3 % (see<br />

Table 5) which can be seen as low in comparison to inorganic bound carbon.<br />

The screening by GC-MS revealed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and phthalates<br />

(DEHP, DBP, and diethyl-phthalate [DEP]) as the relevant organic compounds in the dust/debris<br />

(Table 7). In S2 additionally phenol was identified. Phthalates and PAH can be seen as ubiquitous<br />

pollutants. Although these compounds were not quantified, it can be assumed that their<br />

occurrence do not pose an additional environmental hazard.<br />

5.3.4 Results for the samples around the abandoned railway wagons (B1 and B2)<br />

The grey-white powder from a railway-wagon (B1, Figure 41) was the only sample which revealed<br />

a quantifiable amount of EOX (22 mg/kg). The material consists to a great fraction of<br />

organic carbon (40 %, see Table 5).<br />

According to this result of the TOC analysis the XRF investigation of B1 resulted in a small recovery<br />

of material (< 30 %, see Table 6). The elements silicon, calcium and iron were contributing<br />

most of the inorganic fraction (sum 24 %) whereas all other quantified elements summed to<br />

4.8 % among which sulphur had the greatest part (0.9 %).<br />

Table 7: Identified organic compounds in the GC-MS screening<br />

Nr.<br />

short<br />

name<br />

1 M1 material 1<br />

2 M2 material 2<br />

description<br />

Extract<br />

hexane methanol<br />

DBP, DEHP DBP, DEHP<br />

3 L leather DBP, Octicizer DEHP, octicizer<br />

4 S1 dust 1 DBP, DEHP, PAH DEP, DDP, DEHP, PAH<br />

5 S2 dust 2 DBP, DEHP, PAH DBP, DEP, DEHP, PAH, phenol<br />

6 B1 railway wagon 1 DBP, tetradifon DEHP, tetradifon<br />

7 B2 railway wagon 2 HC HC<br />

8 B3 railway track 3, soil HC bisabolene, myristicin<br />

9 B4 railway track 4, soil HC DBP, DEP, PAK<br />

DBP – di-butyl-phthalate<br />

DDP – di-dodecyl-phthalate<br />

DEP – di–ethyl-phthalate<br />

DEHP – di-ethylhexyl-phthalate<br />

HC – hydrocarbons<br />

PAH – polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />

The GC-MS screening of sample B1 revealed phthalates (DEHP, DBP) and a pesticide, tetradifon<br />

(Table 7). The common name tetradifon stands for 4-chlorphenyl 2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone<br />

(C12H6Cl4O2S, CAS 116-29-0) which is an acaricide agent (TOMLIN, 1997). The mass frac-<br />

30 November 2008 page 58 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

tion of carbon in the compound should amount to 40 %. Tetradifon should be one of the pesticides<br />

which were transported in the “pesticide train” from Germany to Bajza, <strong>Albania</strong> in 1992.<br />

The compound provides only a small solubility to water and a high octanol-water partition coefficient<br />

(log Pow 4.61) indicating a high sorption affinity to the organic substance in the soil<br />

(TOMLIN, 1997). Thus it can not be characterized as a fast leaching substance. Nevertheless it is<br />

classified as a harmful substance which can be toxic to aquatic organisms and it pose also a<br />

risk if it is inhaled as particle from dust (IPCS, 1986, 1997). Therefore all obvious remnants of<br />

this material should be collected and disposed in a safe way in order to avoid any adverse environmental<br />

impact or any hazard for human health.<br />

On the other hand the GC-MS screening of sample B2 showed only hydrocarbons but the organic<br />

carbon content is low and EOX were not present at all (see Table 5 and Table 7).<br />

The XRF analysis of sample B2 gave aluminium and iron as predominant inorganic components<br />

and titanium as an important trace element. The material B2 can be seen as a mixture of inorganic<br />

compounds with uncertain origin but no hints to relevant pesticides can be found. The<br />

analytic results did not give any hint for an environmental impact of the material residues or any<br />

exigence for the removal of the material.<br />

5.3.5 Results for the soil samples (B3 and B4)<br />

In the soil samples EOX were not detected but organic carbon reached content up to 7.7 % (see<br />

Table 5).<br />

In the GC-MS screening the following groups of compounds were identified: Hydrocarbons,<br />

PAH and phthalates (DBP, DEP, see Table 7). However, no compound was found which could<br />

be seen as a pesticide.<br />

In sample B3 one of the relevant compounds found had the molecular formula C15H24 which can<br />

be described as �-bisabolene (CAS 495-61-4), a terpenoid substance, which occurs as a fragrance<br />

in many plants and acts as an information substance among insects (pheromone). The<br />

spectrum match quality for this identification is with 93 % rather high. This compound is insoluble<br />

in water and can be used as flavor in food (Bedoukian Research, 2008; EC/2002/113). Nevertheless<br />

the molecular formula C15H24 may have other forms of molecular binding than bisabolene<br />

resulting in different chemical properties and in only slightly different mass spectra (e.g. �farnesene,<br />

CAS 18794-84-8; �-cadinene, CAS 39029-41-9; �-gurjunene, CAS 489-40-7; gemacrene<br />

A, CAS 28387-44-2). Many of these alternative substances with a molecular formula<br />

C15H24 are terpenes like bisabolene.<br />

The second relevant organic compound in sample B3 identified by GC-MS screening showed a<br />

molecular formula C11H12O3 and was assigned to be myristicin (match quality 99 %, CAS 607-<br />

91-0) which is a phenylpropanoide and is described as an essential constituent of nutmeg oil<br />

with a small solubility in water. As described before alternative chemical binding of C11H12O3<br />

may result in different compounds (e.g. carpacin, CAS 23953-63-1; ethyl benzoylacetate, CAS<br />

94-02-0).<br />

30 November 2008 page 59 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

All these organic compounds identified in the soil material along the railway tracks are not pesticides.<br />

They can not be quantified and according to the actual knowledge they may not pose any<br />

hazard to the environment or to man which demand any remediation or mitigation measure.<br />

5.3.6 Results for the water sample of Sheganit spring (SiS)<br />

As the on-site measurement of electrical conductivity had shown a low mineralization of the<br />

spring water was expected which was proven by the laboratory analysis (see Table 3 and Table<br />

8). Among the cations only calcium and magnesium had a relevant concentration. The concentration<br />

of anions amounted only to few milligrams. Hydrogen-carbonate might contribute the<br />

missing fraction in the ion balance but was not analyzed because the sample could not be<br />

transported refrigerated and a subsequent analysis for this parameter would be misleading.<br />

Also the values for ammonium, nitrate and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) might be lower than<br />

they would be after a refrigerated transport.<br />

Table 8: Analysis of water from Syri i Sheganit (sampling 01.09.2008)<br />

Parameter Dimension Concentration<br />

aluminium μg/L 50<br />

cadmium μg/L < 0.3<br />

chromium μg/L < 2<br />

copper μg/L < 5<br />

lead μg/L < 1<br />

mercury μg/L < 0.1<br />

nickel μg/L < 2<br />

zinc μg/L < 5<br />

DOC mg/L 0.8<br />

AOX μg/L 10<br />

DOC concentration and the content of adsorbable organic bound halogens were unobtrusively<br />

low. Heavy metal concentrations lied below the respective limits of detection (Table 8).<br />

The quantitative analysis of chlororganics did not reveal any pesticide concentration above the<br />

limit of quantification of 0.0025 μg/L. The following pesticides were tested: aldrin, o,p-DDT, p,p-<br />

DDT, o,p-DDE, p,p-DDE, o,p-DDD, p,p-DDD, dieldrin, �-endosulfan, �-endosulfan, hexachlorobenzene,<br />

�-hexachlorohexane (HCH), �-HCH, �-HCH (lindane), �-HCH, heptachlore, cisheptachlorepoxid,<br />

trans-heptachlorepoxid, methoxychlor.<br />

The GC-MS screening of the water did not result in any relevant signal for an organic trace<br />

compound particularly no hint for any pesticide was given.<br />

30 November 2008 page 60 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

6 CONCLUSIONS AND RISKS<br />

6.1 Inside the Storehouse<br />

There are two major storehouses at the Bajza Station. Both storehouses are empty, besides the<br />

stored chemicals and waste. Figure 22 and the following list shows an overview of the storehouses<br />

and railway tracks in-between the storehouses.<br />

� Storehouse 1 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not in use.<br />

� Railway Track 1 in operation<br />

� Railway Track 2 in operation<br />

� Storehouse 2 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not used.<br />

o Room 1: empty<br />

o Room 2: empty, dust and debris on the floor. There is a direct access to Room 3.<br />

o Room 3: loaded with chemical material/waste, leather rags<br />

o Room 4: empty.<br />

Some of the wooden gates to the rooms of the storehouses are missing, others malfunction.<br />

The gates have direct access to the loading ramps of the storehouse. The storehouses are in a<br />

poor condition, the roofs of the loading ramps are partially broken, the roof of the storehouse<br />

could be partially leaky. There is no information about the status of structures of the buildings.<br />

The station of Bajza is looking forward to use the storehouses in the future. It is unknown if any<br />

restructuring planning exists.<br />

The supposed hazardous chemical material/waste is only stored in Storehouse 2, Room 3. As a<br />

result of the preliminary site investigation it could be detected that the main parts of the stored<br />

materials are leather waste, e.g. leather rags (shoes production) which are mainly stored loose<br />

but sometimes packed in plastic bags. The hazardous chemical material was dropped on top of<br />

the leather waste in front of the two open gates to the Storehouse Room 3. Figure 34 shows an<br />

overview of the investigated mixture of materials and their position in Room 3. The height of the<br />

material deposited in this room does not exceed 0.70 m.<br />

Some material similar to the waste stored in Room 3 could be found outside the Room 3, close<br />

to the gate to Room 2 as well as at the gate on the left loading ramp.<br />

It is estimated that almost 80 % of the stored material consists of tanned leather remnants,<br />

which remained after cutting out pieces for the production of shoes and other leather goods.<br />

These leather rags pile up to 0.60 m in Room 3. The cuttings are sometimes sacked in woven<br />

polyester bags. Some of the bags are labeled indicating the former content as vegetal tanning<br />

agent (acacia bark). Remnants of torn bags are mixed with the leather cuttings. The mass of the<br />

leather waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 200 t.<br />

30 November 2008 page 61 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

The chemical analyses of the leather waste proved that it had undergone a tanning process with<br />

mineral salts. By a specific microbiological examination of a representative leather sample the<br />

occurrence of anthrax spores can be excluded.<br />

To a less extent (< 20 %) white and a grey powders were found in Room 3. Both powders consist<br />

of small acicular crystals (size < 0.1 mm) and are often cemented due to infiltrated and<br />

evaporated humidity. The grey powder seemed to be a soiled variant of the white powder due to<br />

the contact with the tanned leather and some excremental material (birds, rats etc.). The mass<br />

relation between white and grey powder is estimated to 80 : 20. Most of the substances are<br />

sacked to damaged bags several of which are labeled with Na2SiF6, sodium hexafluorosilicate,<br />

indicating the <strong>Albania</strong>n origin of the material. As a result of the chemical analyses the material<br />

can be seen as sodium hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6) with a degree of purity exceeding 90 %.<br />

The mass of the chemical material/waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 80 t.<br />

In Room 2 with an open access gate to Room 3 dust/debris can be found consisting of plaster<br />

rubbed off the walls and trickled roof material, remnants of stored hazardous chemical substances<br />

and some organic material (animal hair, dried animal excrements, charcoal remnants<br />

etc.) as well as some leather rags were found. The mass of dust in Room 2 is roughly estimated<br />

to be less than 100 kg. The composition of the dust/debris is characterized by the occurrence of<br />

asbestos fibers.<br />

Radioactive material or any remnants of this has not been detected in Storehouse 2 and in the<br />

surrounding of that building.<br />

Inside the Storehouse 2 pesticides are not detected. The only compound with biocide properties<br />

found was sodium hexafluorosilicate.<br />

The detected waste inside the storehouse is hazardous for human beings when it is inhaled,<br />

ingested or in contact with the bare skin. The contact with water should be prevented because<br />

of the acid producing reaction. Therefore the waste should be repacked immediately. Any unauthorized<br />

access to the waste should be inhibiting.<br />

The Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of the chemical waste<br />

in the storehouse, dated 14.11.2008, cover the appropriate handling and protection of the staff<br />

during repackaging the waste and cleaning procedures of the rooms (see the Annex 4).<br />

The main constraints for the occupational protection during the cleaning and the repackaging<br />

procedure are given by the following results:<br />

� The occurrence of sodium hexafluoro silicate (M1 and M2) in Room 3 of Storehouse 2<br />

which is a hazardous chemical substance and classified as toxic particularly when it is<br />

inhaled, ingested or in contact with the bare skin.<br />

� The occurrence of asbestos fibers in the dust/debris (S1) of Room 2 in Storehouse 2 indicates<br />

that an inhalation is dangerous.<br />

30 November 2008 page 62 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

� Although the occurrence of anthrax spores in the leather rags (L) was excluded by a<br />

specific microbiological examination, the repacking of the leather rags should be done<br />

under appropriate protection of the handling personnel for precautionary reasons however.<br />

Particular constraints for the repackaging material are posed by the classification of sodium<br />

hexafluoro silicate (M1 and M2) to UN hazard class 6.1 (UN No. 2674) which has to be complied<br />

by the used material.<br />

With the measures described in the Terms of Reference (see the Annex 4), the today open<br />

stored hazardous waste in the storehouse will be treated for the final disposal.<br />

The repackaging will last approximately 4 weeks. The budget can roughly be estimated with:<br />

� Site preparation 45,000 US$<br />

� Classification 5,000 US$<br />

� Repackaging, Transport and Disposal 260,000 US$<br />

� Out of Pocket expenses 20,000 US$<br />

� total 330,00 US$<br />

6.2 Outside the Storehouse<br />

Close to the Bajza Station storehouses and at the 2 railway tracks east of the storehouses hazardous<br />

material has not been detected so far except the grey-white powder in one railway<br />

wagon (B1) which contains at least remnants of the pesticide tetradifon (UN hazard class 6.1,<br />

UN No 2761). Neither the soil sampling nor the investigations of other conspicuous material<br />

(e.g. B2) give any indication to an unacceptable pollution of the environment. Particularly pesticides<br />

are not found apart from the grey-white powder B1. The B1 material however should be<br />

recollected and disposed in a safe way.<br />

As the hydrogeological conditions of the area are determined by the karstic and the coarse<br />

grained porous aquifer wells - natural karstic or artificial drilled ones - do not exist in the immediate<br />

vicinity of the Bajza Station. Thus the possible investigation of groundwater in the near<br />

field of the Station is excluded unless new boreholes and wells are constructed.<br />

At the moment the investigation of groundwater quality relies on the karstic wells at the Shkodar<br />

Lake shore line (e.g. Syri i Sheganit). Until now the water sampling and analysis has not revealed<br />

any conspicuous result or any adverse impact of the Bajza site on the local groundwater<br />

in a greater distance. Further monitoring of water quality can affirm this finding and is recommended.<br />

30 November 2008 page 63 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

6.3 General conclusions<br />

Apart from the storehouses and the operation of the Bajza freight station several other activities<br />

in the immediate vicinity or in the wider surroundings may pose a hazard to environment. Following<br />

practices have to be mentioned:<br />

� the supposed diesel fuel storage southwest of the Bajza station (Kuquqi Hill)<br />

� disperse waste disposal and waste burning in Bajza village and single homesteads in<br />

the Bajza karst plain<br />

� infiltration of untreated waste water to the underground at the same places<br />

� abandoned petrol stations in the surroundings of Bajza village.<br />

For achieving a concluding regional environmental impact assessment the further investigation<br />

of the referred activities and an evaluation of their potential impact on the environment will be<br />

necessary and can not be ignored even for further environmental assessment of the Bajza station.<br />

Further investigations on the above mentioned topics will contribute to several goals in a sustainable<br />

development of the Shkodar Lake region, which are among others:<br />

� Support for the preservation of the wildlife habitat at a Ramsar site.<br />

� Module to the protection of the regional water resources and the development of an integrated<br />

water resources management.<br />

� Enhancement for initiatives which try to mitigate potential environmental hazards by solid<br />

and liquid waste as well as waste water impact on the water resources of Lake Shkodar.<br />

The achievement of these goals can be assumed as middle- to long-term tasks. A further strategic<br />

environmental planning has to be seen beside the immediate rehabilitation of hazards by<br />

waste storage at the Bajza Station. Recommendations for short- to long-term activities concerning<br />

environmental hazards in the surroundings of the Bajza station are given in the following<br />

chapter.<br />

7 ACTION PLAN<br />

The following action is recommended in rank of priority:<br />

Short term action<br />

1. As seen during the site visitation and sampling process, the storehouses are situated<br />

in the restricted station area but there is an open access to all rooms. As consequence<br />

children can play in the dust and loose goats can enter the Storehouses.<br />

It can be assumed that the asbestos fibers can be found in Storehouse 1, too. It<br />

30 November 2008 page 64 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

should be advised that the open gates to the storehouses must be closed immediately<br />

in order to confine the access to authorized personnel only.<br />

2. The repackaging and final disposal of the hazardous materials inside Storehouse 2<br />

is described in the Terms of References for the Repackaging as well as the collecting<br />

of the loose residual pesticide material in the railway wagons out side the storehouse.<br />

The repackaging should be started as soon as possible.<br />

Long term action<br />

3. Before a rehabilitation of the storehouses there should be an investigation for hazardous<br />

construction material.<br />

4. Groundwater: In order to evaluate the local groundwater quality at the Bajza site<br />

monitoring wells should be installed (1 in the groundwater upstream and two in the<br />

groundwater downstream of the railway tracks 3 an 4). To affirm the results on<br />

groundwater quality a groundwater monitoring program can be recommended.<br />

5. Soil: It can be assumed that 37 different active organic ingredients of pesticides<br />

were stored temporarily in rail wagons at the Bajza site. In the soil pesticides have<br />

not been found so far. In case the groundwater monitoring does not affirm these<br />

findings an extended soil sampling and investigation program for the railway<br />

tracks can be recommended.<br />

8 LITERATURE<br />

AGS (ALBANIAN GEOLOGICAL SERVICE, 2002): Geology of <strong>Albania</strong>, Tirana<br />

BEDOUKIAN RESEARCH (2008): Bisabolene – BRI#828, www.bedoukian.com<br />

BG CHEMIE (BERUFSGENOSSENSCHAFT DER CHEMISCHEN INDUSTRIE, 1995): Diphenyl-2ethylhexylphosphat,<br />

Kurzfassung Toxikologische Bewertungen, Nr. 194,<br />

www.bgchemie.de<br />

COMPENDIUM OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION OF ALBANIA (2004): Compendium of Environmental<br />

Legislation of <strong>Albania</strong> , March 2004, p. 279<br />

EC (EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, 2002): Commission Decision of 23 January 2002 amending Commission<br />

Decision 1999/217/EC as regards the register of flavouring substances used in or<br />

on foodstuffs, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 49 Volume 45<br />

EFTIMI, R. & TAFILAJ, I. et al., (1985): Hydrogeological Map of <strong>Albania</strong>, 1 : 200,000, sheet Koplik<br />

Tirana<br />

HANEKE, K.E.; CARSON, B.L. (2001): Sodium Hexafluorosilicate [CASRN 16893-85-9] and<br />

Fluorosilicic Acid [CASRN 16961-83-4] - Review of toxicological literature, Raleigh, North<br />

Carolina<br />

30 November 2008 page 65 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

HAXHIU, P. & UÇI, A. (1995): The complex geophysical-hydrochemical study of karstic springs at<br />

Bajza field, Scutari region, <strong>Albania</strong>.- in: Beck, B.F.; Pearson, F.M. (eds.): Karst Geohazards.-<br />

Proceedings of the 5th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering<br />

and environmental impacts of Karst, Gatlinburg, Tennessee.- Balkema, Rotterdam,<br />

117-123.<br />

IHM (Institute of Hydrometeorology, 1984): Climate of <strong>Albania</strong>, Tirana.<br />

IHM (Institute of Hydrometeorology, 1984): Hydrology of <strong>Albania</strong>; Tirana<br />

INSTAT (2001): Population of <strong>Albania</strong>.- Shkoder.<br />

IPCS (INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY, 1986): Tetradifon, Environmental<br />

Health Criteria, 67, Geneva<br />

IPCS (INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY, 1997): Tetradifon, International Occupational<br />

Safety and Health Information Centre , Data sheet ICSC: 0747, www.ilo.org<br />

KALAJA, F.&RUDI, N. (1996): The characteristics of karst area of Shkodra.- in: The water a big<br />

national richness.- (in <strong>Albania</strong>n) Tirana.<br />

KÜHN –BIRETT (2008): Natriumhexafluorosilikat, Merkblätter Gefährliche Arbeitsstoffe, N 037,<br />

ecomed Verlag, Landsberg, FRG<br />

MEÇO,S.&ALIAJ, S. (2000): Geology of <strong>Albania</strong>, Stuttgart.<br />

SAP FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA (2007): LAKE Global Environment Facility (GEF), World Bank<br />

(WB): LAKE SKADAR/SHKODRA INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT<br />

PROJECT: THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN (SAP) FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA LAKE,<br />

ALBANIA & MONTENEGRO, Ministry of Tourism and Environment of Montenegro (MoTE)<br />

and Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water Administration of <strong>Albania</strong> (MEFWA), Tirana<br />

SCHUBERT, R.; FABER, K.; SPAHRKÄS, H.;EITEL, K.; SCHADE, F.; TRÄUBEL, H.; HARMENING,G.<br />

(1978): Leder.- in: Ullmanns Encyklopädie der technischen Chemie.- 4. Auflage, Bd. 16,<br />

109-177.<br />

TOMLIN, C.D.S. (1997): The pesticide manual.- 11 th edition, British Crop Protection Council,<br />

Farnham, UK, 1606 p..<br />

WORLD BANK (IBRD) (2006): Lake Shkoder Transboundary Diagnostics Analysis, <strong>Albania</strong> &<br />

Montenegro; Final Report: Main Document 9P6515<br />

<strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH<br />

Duisburg, Germany 30 November 2008<br />

Dr. Bernd Vels Nikolaus Lindert<br />

Managing Director Project Manager<br />

30 November 2008 page 66 of 66


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 1: List of Samples<br />

short<br />

Nr.<br />

name<br />

description location<br />

material colour analytical procedure<br />

1 M1 material 1 SH 2, R 3 powder white XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS, density<br />

analysis<br />

2 M2 material 2 SH 2, R 3 powder grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

3 L leather SH 2, R 3 leather brown microbiology, HM after water<br />

extraction, GC-MS<br />

4 S1 dust 1 SH 2, R 2 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, asbestos, GC-MS<br />

5 S2 dust 2 SH 2, R 1 + 4 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

6 B1 railway-waggon 1 cf. Fig. 38 powder greywhite XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

7 B2 railway-waggon 2 cf. Fig. 38 mudstone? red XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

8 B3 railway 3, soil cf. Fig. 38 W soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

9 B4 railway 4, soil cf. Fig. 38 E soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />

10 SiS water Syri i Sheganit water chloroorganic pesticides, GC-MS, Ca,<br />

Mg, Na, K, Cl, SO4, NO3, NH4, DOC,<br />

HM, AOX,<br />

AOX – adsorbable organic halogens (water)<br />

DOC – dissolved organic carbon<br />

EOX – extractable organic halogens (solids)<br />

GC-MS – screening test with gas chromatography and<br />

mass-selective detection after extraction with solvents of different polarity (methanol, hexane)<br />

HM – heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)<br />

TOC – total organic carbon<br />

R - room<br />

SH - storehouse<br />

XRF – X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy<br />

30 November 2008 page 1 of 1


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 1<br />

short name M1<br />

description material 1<br />

location Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

material powder<br />

colour white<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 0.09 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

XRF Na [g/kg] 262,5 XRF, mp<br />

Mg [g/kg] 0,2 XRF, mp<br />

Al [g/kg] 5,2 XRF, mp<br />

Si [g/kg] 143,5 XRF, mp<br />

P [g/kg] 0,1 XRF, mp<br />

S [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Cl [g/kg] 0,3 XRF, cm<br />

K [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />

Ca [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />

Ti [g/kg] 0,04 XRF, mp<br />

V [g/kg] 0,004 XRF, cm<br />

Cr [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Mn [g/kg] 0,0 XRF, mp<br />

Fe [g/kg] 0,3 XRF, mp<br />

Co [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0,02 XRF, cm<br />

Cu [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

Zn [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

Y [g/kg] 0,001 XRF, cm<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0,02 XRF, cm<br />

Nb [g/kg] 0,001 XRF, cm<br />

Ba [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0,004 XRF, cm<br />

U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />

DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

30 November 2008 page 1 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 2<br />

short name M2<br />

description material 2<br />

location Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

material powder<br />

colour grey<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 2.0 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

XRF Na [g/kg] 248,8 XRF, mp<br />

Mg [g/kg] 2,6 XRF, mp<br />

Al [g/kg] 8,3 XRF, mp<br />

Si [g/kg] 152,1 XRF, mp<br />

P [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />

S [g/kg] 7,3 XRF, cm<br />

Cl [g/kg] 3,1 XRF, cm<br />

K [g/kg] 1,5 XRF, mp<br />

Ca [g/kg] 11,5 XRF, mp<br />

Ti [g/kg] 0,2 XRF, mp<br />

V [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

Cr [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />

Mn [g/kg] 0,1 XRF, mp<br />

Fe [g/kg] 3,0 XRF, mp<br />

Co [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0,04 XRF, cm<br />

Cu [g/kg] 0,02 XRF, cm<br />

Zn [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0,07 XRF, cm<br />

Y [g/kg] 0,002 XRF, cm<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0,03 XRF, cm<br />

Nb [g/kg] 0,002 XRF, cm<br />

Ba [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />

DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

30 November 2008 page 2 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 3<br />

short name L<br />

description leather<br />

location Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

material leather<br />

colour brown<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

S4 Al [mg/L] 2.06 EN ISO 11885 0.01<br />

Cr [mg/L] 1.48 EN ISO 11885 0.002<br />

Hg [μg/L] 1.60 EN ISO 1483 0.1<br />

Ni [μg/L] 19.00 EN ISO 11885 2<br />

Remarks: after elution with demineralised water DIN 38414 - S4<br />

solid to liquid ratio 1 : 10<br />

GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />

Octicizer positive GC-MS, hexane 1241-94-7<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />

Octicizer positive GC-MS, methanol 1241-94-7<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

Octicizer - 2-ethyl-hexyl-diphenyl-phosphate<br />

Microbiology Bacillus anthracis negative cultivation<br />

Bacillus anthracis negative PCR<br />

Remarks: PCR - limit of detection: 20 spores/g<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

PCR - Polymerase chain reaction<br />

30 November 2008 page 3 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 4<br />

short name S1<br />

description dust 1<br />

location Storehouse 2, Room 2<br />

material solid<br />

colour grey<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 3.0 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

XRF Na [g/kg] 7,3 XRF, mp<br />

Mg [g/kg] 16,5 XRF, mp<br />

Al [g/kg] 49,7 XRF, mp<br />

Si [g/kg] 220,4 XRF, mp<br />

P [g/kg] 1,6 XRF, mp<br />

S [g/kg] 7,533 XRF, cm<br />

Cl [g/kg] 0,224 XRF, cm<br />

K [g/kg] 8,1 XRF, mp<br />

Ca [g/kg] 224,3 XRF, mp<br />

Ti [g/kg] 2,1 XRF, mp<br />

V [g/kg] 0,095 XRF, cm<br />

Cr [g/kg] 0,33 XRF, cm<br />

Mn [g/kg] 0,5 XRF, mp<br />

Fe [g/kg] 35,3 XRF, mp<br />

Co [g/kg] 0,009 XRF, cm<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0,115 XRF, cm<br />

Cu [g/kg] 0,056 XRF, cm<br />

Zn [g/kg] 0,23 XRF, cm<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0,035 XRF, cm<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0,358 XRF, cm<br />

Y [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0,095 XRF, cm<br />

Nb [g/kg] 0,004 XRF, cm<br />

Ba [g/kg] 0,38 XRF, cm<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0,046 XRF, cm<br />

U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />

PAH positive GC-MS, hexane<br />

DDP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />

DEP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

PAH positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

PAH - several single compounds<br />

asbestos asbestos positive REM/EDXA<br />

type of asbestos chrysotile FT-IR<br />

cm - compression moulding<br />

FT-IR - Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

mp - melting procedure<br />

REM/ EDXA - Raster Electron Microscopy / Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis<br />

30 November 2008 page 4 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 5<br />

short name S2<br />

description dust 2<br />

location Storehouse 2, R 1 + 4<br />

material solid<br />

colour grey<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 3.1 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

XRF Na [g/kg] 10,9 XRF, mp<br />

Mg [g/kg] 25,0 XRF, mp<br />

Al [g/kg] 54,6 XRF, mp<br />

Si [g/kg] 224,2 XRF, mp<br />

P [g/kg] 1,0 XRF, mp<br />

S [g/kg] 15,447 XRF, cm<br />

Cl [g/kg] 0,331 XRF, cm<br />

K [g/kg] 9,5 XRF, mp<br />

Ca [g/kg] 162,1 XRF, mp<br />

Ti [g/kg] 2,8 XRF, mp<br />

V [g/kg] 0,134 XRF, cm<br />

Cr [g/kg] 0,683 XRF, cm<br />

Mn [g/kg] 0,9 XRF, mp<br />

Fe [g/kg] 74,0 XRF, mp<br />

Co [g/kg] 0,032 XRF, cm<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0,212 XRF, cm<br />

Cu [g/kg] 0,085 XRF, cm<br />

Zn [g/kg] 0,907 XRF, cm<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0,038 XRF, cm<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0,212 XRF, cm<br />

Y [g/kg] 0,012 XRF, cm<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0,079 XRF, cm<br />

Nb [g/kg] 0,006 XRF, cm<br />

Ba [g/kg] 0,611 XRF, cm<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0,052 XRF, cm<br />

U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />

PAH positive GC-MS, hexane<br />

DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />

DEP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

PAH positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

phenol positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

PAH - several single compounds<br />

cm - compression moulding<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

mp - melting procedure<br />

30 November 2008 page 5 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 6<br />

short name B1<br />

description railway-waggon 1<br />

location cf. Fig. 38<br />

material powder<br />

colour greywhite<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 40.4 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] 22 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

XRF Na [g/kg] 2,5 XRF, mp<br />

Mg [g/kg] 3,6 XRF, mp<br />

Al [g/kg] 19,0 XRF, mp<br />

Si [g/kg] 135,8 XRF, mp<br />

P [g/kg] 4,8 XRF, mp<br />

S [g/kg] 8,9 XRF, cm<br />

Cl [g/kg] 1,3 XRF, cm<br />

K [g/kg] 3,4 XRF, mp<br />

Ca [g/kg] 49,5 XRF, mp<br />

Ti [g/kg] 0,8 XRF, mp<br />

V [g/kg] 0,20 XRF, cm<br />

Cr [g/kg] 0,33 XRF, cm<br />

Mn [g/kg] 1,2 XRF, mp<br />

Fe [g/kg] 54,4 XRF, mp<br />

Co [g/kg] 0,03 XRF, cm<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0,09 XRF, cm<br />

Cu [g/kg] 0,20 XRF, cm<br />

Zn [g/kg] 1,12 XRF, cm<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0,14 XRF, cm<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0,14 XRF, cm<br />

Y [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0,05 XRF, cm<br />

Nb [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Ba [g/kg] 0,25 XRF, cm<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />

U [g/kg] 0,008 XRF, cm<br />

GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />

Tetradifon positive GC-MS, hexane 116-29-0<br />

DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />

Tetradifon positive GC-MS, methanol 116-29-0<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

Tetradifon - 4-chlorphenyl-2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone<br />

cm - compression moulding<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

mp - melting procedure<br />

30 November 2008 page 6 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 7<br />

short name B2<br />

description railway-waggon 2<br />

location cf. Fig. 38<br />

material mudstone?<br />

colour red<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 0.34 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

XRF Na [g/kg] 0.1 XRF, mp<br />

Mg [g/kg] 1,6 XRF, mp<br />

Al [g/kg] 356,3 XRF, mp<br />

Si [g/kg] 12,9 XRF, mp<br />

P [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />

S [g/kg] 0,031 XRF, cm<br />

Cl [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

K [g/kg] 0,5 XRF, mp<br />

Ca [g/kg] 1,4 XRF, mp<br />

Ti [g/kg] 23,62 XRF, mp<br />

V [g/kg] 1,06 XRF, cm<br />

Cr [g/kg] 2,046 XRF, cm<br />

Mn [g/kg] 1,3 XRF, mp<br />

Fe [g/kg] 172,6 XRF, mp<br />

Co [g/kg] 0,08 XRF, cm<br />

Ni [g/kg] 0,834 XRF, cm<br />

Cu [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />

Zn [g/kg] 0,265 XRF, cm<br />

Rb [g/kg] 0,007 XRF, cm<br />

Sr [g/kg] 0,071 XRF, cm<br />

Y [g/kg] 0,085 XRF, cm<br />

Zr [g/kg] 0,613 XRF, cm<br />

Nb [g/kg] 0,042 XRF, cm<br />

Ba [g/kg] 0,443 XRF, cm<br />

Pb [g/kg] 0,089 XRF, cm<br />

U [g/kg] 0,002 XRF, cm<br />

GC-MS Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, hexane<br />

Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

cm - compression moulding<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

mp - melting procedure<br />

30 November 2008 page 7 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 8<br />

short name B3<br />

description railway 3, soil<br />

location cf. Fig. 38 W<br />

material soil<br />

colour greybrown<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 7.7 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

GC-MS Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, hexane<br />

bisabolene positive GC-MS, methanol 495-61-4<br />

myristicin positive GC-MS, methanol 607-91-0<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

bisabolene - C15H24<br />

myristicin - C11H12O3<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

30 November 2008 page 8 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 9<br />

short name B4<br />

description railway 4, soil<br />

location cf. Fig. 38 E<br />

material soil<br />

colour greybrown<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />

TOC [%] 6.2 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />

EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />

GC-MS Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, hexane<br />

DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />

DEP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

PAH positive GC-MS, methanol<br />

Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

PAH - several single compounds<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

30 November 2008 page 9 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />

Nr. 10<br />

short name SiS<br />

description water<br />

location Syri i Sheganit<br />

material water<br />

colour colourless<br />

Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ<br />

el. conductivity μS/cm 267 EN 27888<br />

pH-value - 7,79 DIN 38404-5<br />

sodium mg/L 2 EN ISO 14911 2<br />

potassium mg/L < 1 EN ISO 14911 1<br />

calcium mg/L 44 EN ISO 14911 1<br />

magnesium mg/L 7.2 EN ISO 14911 0.1<br />

ammonium mg/L 0.07 EN ISO 14911 0.05<br />

chloride mg/L 3 DIN EN ISO 1034-1 1<br />

sulphate mg/L 5 DIN EN ISO 1034-1 1<br />

nitrate mg/L 3.2 DIN EN ISO 1034-1 0.5<br />

aluminium μg/L 50 EN ISO 11885 10<br />

cadmium μg/L < 0.3 EN ISO 5961 0.3<br />

chromium μg/L < 2 EN ISO 11885 2<br />

copper μg/L < 5 EN ISO 11885 5<br />

lead μg/L < 1 DIN 38406 Teil 6 1<br />

mercury μg/L < 0.1 EN ISO 1483 0.1<br />

nickel μg/L < 2 EN ISO 11885 2<br />

zinc μg/L < 5 EN ISO 11885 5<br />

DOC mg/L 0.8 DIN EN 1484 0.5<br />

AOX μg/L 10 EN ISO 9562 5<br />

Remarks: conductivity - field measurement<br />

pH-value - laboratory measurement<br />

chlororganic Hexachlorbenzol (HCB) [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />

pesticides Aldrin [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

o,p-DDD [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

p,p-DDD [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

o,p-DDE [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

p,p-DDE [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

o,p-DDT [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

p,p-DDT [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

Dieldrin [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

alpha-Endosulfan [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

beta-Endosulfan [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

Endrin [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

alpha-HCH [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />

beta-HCH [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />

gamma-HCH (Lindan) [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />

delta-HCH [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />

Heptachlor [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

cis-Heptachlorepoxid [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

trans-Heptachlorepoxid [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

Methoxychlor [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />

GC-MS GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />

Remarks: No relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />

LOQ - limit of quantification<br />

30 November 2008 page 10 of 10


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 3: List of presumable pesticides in the "pesticide train"<br />

Presumable organic pesticides in the "pesticide train" 1992<br />

which are included in the GS-MS screening by an entry in one of the used spectra libraries<br />

Nr.<br />

common name<br />

active ingredient<br />

chemical name<br />

CAS-RN synonym<br />

1 2,4-D 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid 94-75-7<br />

2 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid 93-76-5<br />

3 Ametryn N-ethyl-N-isopropyl-6-methylthio-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamime 834-12-8<br />

4 Azocyclotin tri(cyclohexyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yltin 41083-11-8<br />

5 Bromuron N-(4-bromphenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea 3408-97-7<br />

6 Bronopol 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 52-51-7<br />

7 Camphechlor chlorinated camphenes 8001-35-2 Toxaphene<br />

8 Carbaryl 1-naphthyl-carbamate 63-25-2<br />

9 Carbendazim methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate 10605-21-7<br />

10 Chlorfenvinphos 2-chloro-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)vinyl diethyl phosphate 470-90-6<br />

11 Chlorpropham isoprppyl 3 -chlorocarbanilate 101-21-3 CIPC<br />

12 Dazomet 3,5-dimethyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinane-2-thione 533-74-4<br />

13 Dichlorvos 2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 62-73-7<br />

14 Dicofol 2,2,2-trichloro-1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethanol 115-32-2<br />

15 DNOC 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol 534-52-1<br />

16 Fenazox Azoxybenzene 495-48-7<br />

17 Lindan 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachlorocyclohexane 608-73-1 �-HCH<br />

18 Methoxychlor 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)ethane 72-43-5<br />

19 Metiram zinc ammoniate ethylenebis(dithiocarbamate) 9006-42-2<br />

20 Maleic Hydrazide 6-hydroxy-2H-pyridazin-3-one 123-33-1<br />

21 Naled 1,2-dibromo-2,2-dichloroethyl dimethyl phosphate 300-76-5<br />

22 Nitrofen 2,4-dichlorophenyl 4-nitrophenyl ether 1836-75-5<br />

23 Parathion-methyl O,O-dimethyl O-4 Nitrophenyl phosphorothioate 298-00-0<br />

24 Prometryn N,N-di-isopropyl-6-methylthio-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine 7287-19-6<br />

25 Propham isopropyl phenylcarbamate 122-42-9<br />

26 Simazin 6-chloro-N,N-diethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine 122-34-9<br />

27 Tetradifon 4-chlorophenyl 2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone 116-29-0<br />

28 Thiram tetramethylthiuram disulfide 137-26-8<br />

29 Trichlorfon dimethyl 2,2,2-trichloro-1-hydroxyethylphosphonate 52-68-6<br />

Presumable organic pesticides in the "pesticide train" 1992<br />

which are not included in the GS-MS screening by an entry in one of the used spectra libraries<br />

Nr.<br />

common name<br />

active ingredient<br />

chemical name<br />

CAS-RN synonym<br />

30 Chinomethionat S,S-(6-methylquinoxaline-2,3-diyl) dithiocarbonate 2439-01-2<br />

31 Lenacil 3-cyclohexyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydrocyclopentapyrimidine-2,4(3H)-dione 2164-08-1<br />

32 Metham sodium<br />

Methylmercury<br />

methyldithiocarbamic acid 144-54-7<br />

33 toluenesulphamide 102280-93-3<br />

34 PMA phenylmercury acetate 62-38-4<br />

35 Proximpham O-(N-phenylcarbamoyl)-propanonoxim 2828-42-4<br />

36 Trichlordinitrobenzene 1,3,4-trichloro-2,6-dinitrobenzene 2678-21-9<br />

37 Zineb zinc ethylenebis(ithiocarbamate) 12122-67-7<br />

30 November 2008 page 1 of 1


<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />

Annex 4<br />

Terms of References for the Bidding Documents<br />

for the repackaging of the chemical waste in the<br />

storehouse


Terms of References<br />

for<br />

Repackaging, Treatment und Disposal of Hazardous<br />

Chemicals at Bajza Railway Station - Bajza Hot-Spot -<br />

<strong>Albania</strong><br />

Table of Contents Page<br />

1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2<br />

2 SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................................................... 4<br />

3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STOREHOUSE AND THE CHEMICAL WASTE .......... 4<br />

3.1 Storehouse........................................................................................................................... 4<br />

3.2 Chemical Waste / Waste in the Storehouse 2...................................................................... 6<br />

3.3 Pesticides outside the Storehouse in an abandoned wagon................................................. 9<br />

4 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORKS............................................................................... 10<br />

4.1 Public Safety & Site Security - Fencing ........................................................................... 10<br />

4.1.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 10<br />

4.1.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11<br />

4.2 Working Program and Site Preparation ............................................................................ 11<br />

4.2.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 11<br />

4.2.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11<br />

4.3 Classification and Repackaging of Waste......................................................................... 12<br />

4.3.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 12<br />

4.3.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 13<br />

4.4 Collecting of leftovers of pesticides in abandoned wagons at track 4 .............................. 13<br />

4.4.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 13<br />

4.4.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 14<br />

4.5 Transportation and Trans-frontier Shipment of Waste ..................................................... 14<br />

4.5.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 14<br />

4.5.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 14<br />

4.6 Final Disposal of the Waste .............................................................................................. 15<br />

4.6.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 15<br />

4.6.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 15<br />

4.7 Site Cleaning Up and Take-over by the Contracting Authority........................................ 15<br />

4.7.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 15<br />

4.7.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 15<br />

5 THE CONTRACTORS KEY PERSONNEL............................................................... 16<br />

5.1 General experience............................................................................................................ 16<br />

5.2 Key Personnel ................................................................................................................... 16<br />

6 ENVIRONMENT AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY.................... 17<br />

6.1 Occupational Health and Safety........................................................................................ 17<br />

6.1.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 17<br />

6.1.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 17<br />

6.2 Protection of the Environment .......................................................................................... 17<br />

6.2.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 17<br />

6.2.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 17<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 1 of 20


6.3 Emergency Preparedness and Response ........................................................................... 18<br />

6.3.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 18<br />

6.3.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 18<br />

7 REPORTING .................................................................................................................. 18<br />

7.1 Daily Reporting................................................................................................................. 18<br />

7.2 Weekly Reporting .............................................................................................................18<br />

7.3 Final Report ...................................................................................................................... 18<br />

8 FACILITIES TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT MANAGER.................... 19<br />

8.1 Specifications.................................................................................................................... 19<br />

8.2 Performance Criteria.........................................................................................................19<br />

9 ANCILLARY CONDITIONS........................................................................................ 19<br />

9.1 Duration of assignment ..................................................................................................... 19<br />

9.2 Duty station....................................................................................................................... 19<br />

9.3 Submission of application................................................................................................. 19<br />

Table of Figures Page<br />

Figure 1: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks.............................................................. 5<br />

Figure 2: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3 ................................................................................. 7<br />

Figure 3: Leftover of pesticides in an abandoned railway wagon on track 4 .................................. 9<br />

Figure 4: Overview of the abandoned wagons on the tracks and the location of the wagon<br />

with the leftover of the pesticides .................................................................................. 10<br />

Annex: Price Schedule<br />

1 BACKGROUND<br />

Environmental issues have not been amongst the top national priorities in the Western<br />

Balkans. Understandably, priorities to date have focused on the reforms needed to<br />

strengthen security, to rebuild the economy and to improve general living conditions.<br />

As a result, much-needed investment in environmental infrastructure such as wastewater<br />

treatment, air-pollution abatement and monitoring, and industrial and communal waste<br />

management are still waiting their turn. Clearly, this is a situation that raises humanitarian,<br />

social, economic and environmental concerns.<br />

In addition, a number of industrial towns and regions face a complex challenge of past<br />

industrial development and pollution legacy and the need to generate economic growth for<br />

the future. The environmental situation in these hot spots is a direct cause of poor health<br />

and related poverty and presents a major barrier to future investments and related economic<br />

opportunities for the local population. On one hand they face the requirements for<br />

environmental clean up and on the other hand they are struggling with problems of poverty,<br />

lack of infrastructure and services and lack of prospects for the young generations.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 2 of 20


UNEP commissioned studies in 2000 1 and 2006 2 revealed that many of these closed<br />

industrial sites pose serious risks to human health and the surrounding environment.<br />

Many of these environmental hotspots identified by the Ministry of Environment, Forestry<br />

and Water Management pose risks not only to the environment in <strong>Albania</strong> but to the whole<br />

Balkan region. Such trans-boundary impacts include increased mercury residues in the sea<br />

and the sea-biota close to the Vlora PVC plant, ground and surface water contamination by<br />

arsenic and chromium around the mining tailing areas and their eventual discharge to<br />

Adriatic sea or to trans-boundary lakes like Ohrid and Shkoder. In addition,<br />

mismanagement of outdated pesticides and other chemicals in watershed areas such as<br />

trans-boundary Shkoder lake and Lunja river in Lushnja poses serious risks of<br />

contaminating internationally important wetlands and lakes.<br />

Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the frontier with Montenegro, so its acts<br />

as a customs control point. There is no passenger traffic, but two freight trains pass through<br />

daily with approximately 10,000 t of freight being handled each month. The station is<br />

located at the shore of trans-boundary Shkoder (Skadar) Lake – the largest lake on the<br />

Balkan Peninsula that both <strong>Albania</strong> and Montenegro have officially designated as a crossborder<br />

protected area of Shkoder/Skader Lake together with Buna/Bojana River. In<br />

addition, with the designation of the <strong>Albania</strong>n part of the Shkoder (Skader) Lake and Buna<br />

(Bojana) River as a Ramsar site the entire lake is now included in the Ramsar list.<br />

During the early 1990s hazardous chemical waste (old pesticides) was exported to <strong>Albania</strong><br />

by train. Most of the hazardous waste could be shipped back, but part of the load was<br />

discharged at the platforms and/or is still stored at Bajza station. Still there are<br />

chemicals/materials stored in one of the storehouses of the station and no record about the<br />

contents and their origin exists.<br />

That poses a variety of potential health risks to human beings and various impacts to the<br />

environment, e.g.:<br />

� Risks to human beings from toxic and carcinogenic substances<br />

� Damages to the soil and groundwater resources<br />

� Risks entailed by the clean-up activities themselves, e.g. additional release of<br />

contaminants.<br />

The umbrella program “Strengthening capacities in the Western Balkan countries to<br />

address environmental hot spots through an integrated approach” aims to:<br />

� Strengthen regional co-operation in the Western Balkan to solve problems of cross<br />

border contamination due to industrial and mining activities, and<br />

� Increase capacity of the national and local governments in the Western Balkan to<br />

implement environmental policies and sustainable development in accordance with<br />

EU standards.<br />

1 In 2000 UNEP had carried out “Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment <strong>Albania</strong>” with the support<br />

from the Dutch government. The rapid assessment identified five “environmental hotspot” that require<br />

urgent attention in order to halt dangerous risks to human health and the surrounding environment and<br />

four other sites that have serious environmental problems.<br />

2 In 2006 UNEP has also updated the “Mining Desk Assessment” as a part of the ADA supported<br />

program “Improving regional cooperation for risk management from pollution hotspots as well as transboundary<br />

management of shared natural resources”.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 3 of 20


In order to achieve the overall objectives set by the regional program, <strong>Albania</strong> will aim to<br />

achieve the following outputs that are translated from the regional program component<br />

outputs:<br />

1. Full clean up and site assessment/remediation of stockpile of toxic or harmful<br />

chemicals at Bajza railway station, Shkoder, enabling the local government and<br />

Bajza railway station to fully utilize the rehabilitated storehouse and improve<br />

sustainable development in the area;<br />

2. Strengthen the mechanisms of good governance and policy integration at central<br />

and local level;<br />

3. Strengthen and mobilize the national capacity for policy development, integration,<br />

implementation and evaluation at the national and regional level.<br />

The stored chemicals were investigated, balanced and identified by an international<br />

consultancy team in September 2008 in the framework of a preliminary site assessment.<br />

2 SCOPE OF WORK<br />

The scope of work will cover all activities related to the<br />

1. Preparation of a clean and safe working place in the storehouse,<br />

2. safe repackaging of the hazardous chemicals and waste in the storehouse and some<br />

leftover pesticides in an abandoned wagon outside using packages which allow a<br />

3. safe transport of the waste material to a final disposal.<br />

The activities of the Contractor will be technically supervised by the Contracting Authority<br />

or its representative (the Project Manager).<br />

3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STOREHOUSE AND THE CHEMICAL<br />

WASTE<br />

3.1 Storehouse<br />

There are two major storehouses at the Bajza Station. Both storehouses are empty, besides<br />

the stored chemicals and waste. Figure 1 and the following list shows an overview of the<br />

storehouses and railway tracks with the definition of object denotation used in this project.<br />

� Storehouse 1 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not in<br />

use. There is a truck access to the left ramp and train access to the right ramp.<br />

� Railway Track 1 in operation<br />

� Railway Track 2 in operation<br />

� Storehouse 2 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not<br />

used. There is a truck access to the left ramp and train access to the right ramp.<br />

o Room 1: empty<br />

o Room 2: empty, dust and debris on the floor. There is a direct access to<br />

Room 3.<br />

o Room 3: loaded with chemical material/waste, leather rags<br />

o Room 4: empty<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 4 of 20


The wooden gates to the rooms in the storehouses are 2.35 m wide and 2.85 m high. Some<br />

doors are missing, others malfunction. The gates have direct access to the loading ramps of<br />

the storehouse.<br />

Figure 1: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 5 of 20


The storehouses are in a poor condition, the roofs of the loading ramps are partially broken,<br />

the roof of the storehouse could be partially leaky.<br />

There is no information about the status of structures of the buildings.<br />

The usage of fork-lifts seems to be possible. The Contractor is responsible for the usage of<br />

machinery on site.<br />

The station of Bajza is looking forward to use the storehouses in the future. It is unknown if<br />

any restructuring planning exists.<br />

3.2 Chemical Waste / Waste in the Storehouse 2<br />

The supposed hazardous chemical material/waste is only stored in Storehouse 2, Room 3.<br />

As a result of the preliminary site investigation, it could be detected, that the main parts of<br />

the stored materials are leather waste, e.g. leather rags (shoes production) which are mainly<br />

stored loose but sometimes packed in plastic bags. The supposed hazardous chemical<br />

material was dropped on top of the leather waste in front of the two open gates to the<br />

Storehouse Room 3. Figure 2 shows an overview of the investigated mixture of materials<br />

and their position in Room 3.<br />

The height of the material deposited in this room does not exceed 0.70 m.<br />

Some material similar to the waste stored in Room 3 could be found outside the Room 3,<br />

close to the gate to Room 2 as well as at the gate on the left loading ramp. The removal and<br />

repackaging of these marginal deposits or leftovers are also part of the contract.<br />

It is estimated that almost 80 % of the stored material consists of tanned leather remnants,<br />

which remained after cutting out pieces for the production of shoes and other leather goods.<br />

These leather rags pile up to 0.60 m in Room 3. The cuttings are sometimes sacked in<br />

woven polyester bags. Some of the bags are labelled indicating the former content as<br />

vegetal tanning agent (acacia bark). Remnants of torn bags are mixed with the leather<br />

cuttings.<br />

The mass of the leather waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 200 t.<br />

The chemical analyses of the leather waste proved that it had undergone a tanning process<br />

with mineral salts. Residues of the mineral tanning agents like chromium or aluminum may<br />

be leached by seepage water after a final deposition in a landfill. An additional treatment<br />

with vegetal tanning agents can not be excluded. By a specific microbiological examination<br />

of a representative leather sample the occurrence of anthrax spores can be excluded. For<br />

precautionary reasons however, the repacking of the leather rags should be done under<br />

appropriate protection of the handling personnel. Hazardous substances in the leather waste<br />

may be present subordinately as a disperse distribution of the stored chemical<br />

material/waste and trickled roof material may occur.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 6 of 20


Figure 2: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 7 of 20


To a less extent (< 20 %) white and a grey powders were found in Room 3. Both powders<br />

consist of small acicular crystals (size < 0.1 mm) and are often cemented due to infiltrated<br />

and evaporated humidity. The grey powder seemed to be a soiled variant of the white<br />

powder due to the contact with the tanned leather and some excremental material (birds,<br />

rats etc.). The mass relation between white and grey powder is estimated to 80 : 20. Most of<br />

the substances are sacked to damaged bags several of which are labeled with Na2SiF6,<br />

sodium hexafluorosilicate, indicating the <strong>Albania</strong>n origin of the material.<br />

The mass of the chemical material/waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 80 t.<br />

As a result of the chemical analyses the chemical material/waste can be seen as sodium<br />

hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6) with a degree of purity exceeding 90 %.<br />

EG-Number: 240-934-8<br />

CAS-Number: 16893-85-9<br />

Kühn/Birett Nr.: N 037<br />

This inorganic fluorine compound is a hazardous chemical substance which is classified as<br />

toxic particularly when it is inhaled, ingested or in contact with the bare skin during<br />

working processes. Repackaging requires appropriate protection of the concerned<br />

personnel.<br />

Packaging UN and IBC Portable tanks 3<br />

1 UN No. 2674<br />

2 Name and description SODIUM<br />

FLUOROSILICATE<br />

3 Class or division 6.1<br />

4 Subsidiary risk<br />

5 UN packing group III<br />

6 Special provisions<br />

7 Limited quantities 5 kg<br />

8 Packing and IBC's - Packing instruction P002, IBC08, LP02<br />

9 Packing and IBC's - Special provisions B3<br />

10 Portable tanks - Portable tank instruction<br />

11 Portable tanks - Portable tank special provisions<br />

In Room 2 with an open access gate to Room 3 dust/debris can be found consisting of<br />

plaster rubbed off the walls and trickled roof material, remnants of stored hazardous<br />

chemical substances and some organic material (animal hair, dried animal excrements,<br />

charcoal remnants etc.) as well as some leather rags were found. The mass of dust in Room<br />

2 is roughly estimated to be less than 100 kg.<br />

The composition of the dust/debris is characterized by the occurrence of asbestos fibers<br />

and remnants of the hazardous chemical substances as described above which requires also<br />

an appropriate handling and protection of the staff during cleaning procedure of the Room<br />

2.<br />

3<br />

Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS, Model Regulations Twelfth<br />

revised edition, UNITED NATIONS ,<br />

http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/unrec/English/Recommend.pdf<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 8 of 20


Radioactive material or any remnants of this has not been detected in Storehouse 2 and in<br />

the surrounding of that building.<br />

3.3 Pesticides outside the Storehouse in an abandoned wagon<br />

In all the abandoned railway wagons on track 3 and track 4 the floor was made of wood<br />

that had been torn out and only the basic steel girder construction is visible. At one point at<br />

track 4 a grey-white powder, identified as leftover of pesticides was found in a wagon, see<br />

figure 3.<br />

Figure 3: Leftover of pesticides in an abandoned railway wagon on track 4<br />

The material could be identified as (DEHP, DBP) and a pesticide, tetradifon. The common<br />

name tetradifon stands for 4-chlorphenyl 2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone (C12H6Cl4O2S, CAS<br />

116-29-0) which is an acaricide agent. It is classified as a harmful substance which can be<br />

toxic to aquatic organisms and it pose also a risk if it is inhaled as particle from dust. The<br />

mass can be estimated with approximately 10 kg.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 9 of 20


Figure 4: Overview of the abandoned wagons on the tracks and the location of the wagon<br />

with the leftover of the pesticides<br />

4 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORKS<br />

4.1 Public Safety & Site Security - Fencing<br />

4.1.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall estimate how much space he will need in order to carry out the works<br />

in a safe manner. He shall take possession of the site as it appears at the time of the site<br />

visit.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 10 of 20


The Contractor shall establish a fence around the required working site in order to carry out<br />

the work without interference from unauthorized visitors.<br />

4.1.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall as the first works activity install a fence in order to prevent<br />

unauthorized entrance to the site during the works period. The Contractor shall furthermore<br />

install an information board at the gate of the fence in <strong>Albania</strong>n and English language and<br />

ensure that the fence is adequately signed and marked indicating the restricted access for<br />

authorized personnel only.<br />

The fence shall be provided with a number of emergency exit points (see paragraph 6.3<br />

below).<br />

4.2 Working Program and Site Preparation<br />

4.2.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall include a preliminary program in his bid. The preliminary program<br />

shall describe the general methods, arrangements, order, and timing for all works activities.<br />

The preliminary program shall be consolidated, detailed at the commencement of the work<br />

and consulted with the ordering party.<br />

The Contractor shall prepare on basis of the preliminary program a final work program to<br />

be approved by the Contracting Authority or his representative (the Project Manager).<br />

The required working zones and the foreseen temporary storage area have to been cleaned<br />

(decontaminated) according to the process of activities and the occupational safety<br />

regulations.<br />

4.2.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall in his bid describe how he intends to prepare and manage the site.<br />

The preliminary program shall therefore include a site map (scale 1: 200) showing the<br />

fenced site, and describe the following issues (list is not exhaustive):<br />

Site Plan:<br />

1. Entrance facilities and sluice arrangements, signposts<br />

2. Safety zones<br />

3. Internal roads and parking, illumination<br />

4. Staff, office and laboratory facilities<br />

5. Existing buildings and structures<br />

6. Working zones (clean/contaminated)<br />

7. De-contamination facilities for personnel<br />

Working methodology:<br />

8. Contaminated building materials and debris, grabbing and separation the waste<br />

material, repackaging, temporary storage areas, treatment, transport and final<br />

disposal<br />

Management Plans:<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 11 of 20


9. Repackaging, logistics and cleaning activities, see also paragraph 4.3 below<br />

10. Occupational Health and Safety Planning, see also paragraph 6.1, below<br />

11. Protection of the Environment, see also paragraph 6.2 below<br />

12. Emergency Preparedness and Response Planning, see also paragraph 6.3 below<br />

Time Schedule:<br />

13. Overall time schedule<br />

The preliminary program shall describe what kind of packing material the Contractor will<br />

provide and how long the repacked material can be temporally stored in the foreseen area.<br />

The preliminary program shall furthermore take care about the provision of water supply,<br />

electricity and telecommunication which is in the responsibility of the contractor. The<br />

station can provide water supply and electricity considering the temporary local<br />

breakdowns. The program should describe how he will dispose of waste water and solid<br />

waste from staff, office and laboratory facilities.<br />

The final working program has to fulfill the above mentioned criteria.<br />

The Contractor must ensure that the occupational safety requirements are at all times met<br />

according to national and international regulations. Proof for decontamination of the<br />

different rooms and areas and compliance to occupational safety requirements are air<br />

quality measurements i.e. for asbestos fibers.<br />

4.3 Classification and Repackaging of Waste<br />

4.3.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall as part of his offer identify and provide all personnel, equipment,<br />

tools, repacking materials etc. required for the classification and repackaging operation.<br />

The Contractor shall repackage the waste in order to ensure safe transport to the temporary<br />

storage on-site and furthermore to a final disposal destination. The Contractor must<br />

calculate that all amounts of waste shall be repackaged, as the existing packaging has<br />

deteriorated in time. Empty and emptied packaging materials shall be disposed as well.<br />

The Contractor shall classify the waste for the appropriate repackaging, temporary storage<br />

and final disposal. The Contractor shall therefore develop a classification procedure to be<br />

approved by the Contracting Authority or his representative (the Project Manager).<br />

The waste is - as described above - located inside Room 3 of Storehouse 2. The Contractor<br />

shall take into consideration, that the buildings are contaminated by the waste stored in<br />

them.<br />

Room 2 of Storehouse 2 has an open access gate to Room 3. The room has enough space<br />

for repacking, decontamination and storing of the repacked material. The Contractor shall<br />

take into consideration, that the buildings are contaminated by the waste stored in them (see<br />

also Paragraph 3.2 above).<br />

The rooms shall be decontaminated and sealed at the end of the site works as part of this<br />

tender.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 12 of 20


In case of the needs out the working program the Contractor must establish designated<br />

storage areas for repackaged materials waiting for latter transport to a final disposal.<br />

4.3.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall as part of his offer submit a waste classification strategy.<br />

The Contractor shall at the latest 6 (six) weeks after agreement and minimum 2 (two)<br />

weeks before the repackaging activities start submitting his classification procedure to the<br />

Project Manager for approval. The procedure shall describe in detail the waste classes, the<br />

sampling and analyses procedures, and repackaging and disposal.<br />

The Contractor shall deliver all packaging materials necessary. All containers used for<br />

repackaging shall be UN certified and comply with the ADR of 2005 4. The containers used<br />

for repackaging shall be selected in a way to avoid any additional repackaging for a safe<br />

transport to the disposal facility/-ies.<br />

The Contractor shall specify as a part of his offer the type and amount of containers he will<br />

use for repackaging of the different classes of waste. All empty original packaging material<br />

- if it is possible to separate - shall also be repacked in adequate containers to the final<br />

disposal site.<br />

Each container shall be registered with respect to its contents and weight and every single<br />

container shall be labeled according to the relevant regulations, using the correspondent<br />

UN/ADR identification codes. The registry shall be available on site for the Project<br />

Manager at all times. The net weight of the hazardous waste including old packaging<br />

material but excluding new packaging material shall be the basis of the payment per ton in<br />

the Bill of Quantity.<br />

All repackaging activities shall be performed inside the fenced area in designated zones, i.e.<br />

inside the Storehouse 2. If the repackaging is planned to take place outside the storage<br />

buildings, the Contractor shall describe in his offer how he will ensure that no secondary<br />

contamination of the soil and surface- and/or ground water can take place. In case there is a<br />

need the Contractor shall present design criteria for all temporary storage activities in his<br />

program.<br />

4.4 Collecting of leftovers of pesticides in abandoned wagons at track 4<br />

4.4.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall collect and repackage the leftovers of pesticides in the abandoned<br />

wagon at railway track 4 in order to ensure safe transport to the temporary storage on-site<br />

and furthermore to a final disposal destination.<br />

The Contractor shall classify the waste for the appropriate repackaging, temporary storage<br />

and final disposal. The Contractor shall therefore develop a classification procedure to be<br />

approved by the Contracting Authority or his representative (the Project Manager).<br />

4<br />

European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR). <strong>Albania</strong> has<br />

acceded the Agreement on January 26 th , 2005.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 13 of 20


4.4.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall as part of his offer submit a waste classification strategy.<br />

The Contractor shall at the latest 6 (six) weeks after agreement and minimum 2 (two)<br />

weeks before the repackaging activities start submitting his classification procedure to the<br />

Project Manager for approval. The procedure shall describe in detail the waste classes, the<br />

sampling and analyses procedures, and repackaging and final disposal.<br />

The Contractor shall deliver all packaging materials necessary. All containers used for<br />

repackaging shall be UN certified and comply with the ADR of 2005 5. The containers used<br />

for repackaging shall be selected in a way to avoid any additional repackaging for a safe<br />

transport to the disposal facility/-ies.<br />

The Contractor shall specify as a part of his offer the type and amount of containers he will<br />

use for repackaging of the waste.<br />

Each container shall be registered with respect to its contents and weight and every single<br />

container shall be labeled according to the relevant regulations, using the correspondent<br />

UN/ADR identification codes. The registry shall be available on site for the Project<br />

Manager at all times. The net weight of the hazardous waste excluding new packaging<br />

material shall be the basis of the payment per ton in the Bill of Quantity.<br />

The Contractor shall describe in his offer how he will ensure that no secondary<br />

contamination of the soil and surface- and/or ground water can take place during the<br />

collection process.<br />

4.5 Transportation and Trans-frontier Shipment of Waste<br />

4.5.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor is responsible for the loading and transport of the repackaged waste to the<br />

final disposal destination(s). The waste may be transported by road, rail and/or ship and in<br />

accordance with the national and international legislation and rules for transport of<br />

dangerous goods. The net weight of the hazardous waste including old packaging material<br />

but excluding new packaging material shall be the basis of the payment per ton in the Bill<br />

of Quantity.<br />

4.5.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall be aware of the regulation in force in <strong>Albania</strong> and in other<br />

countries of transport. He shall apply the necessary procedures for transboundary<br />

transport of dangerous materials, and respect designated routes and needed<br />

documentation.<br />

The Contractor shall in his time schedule allocate sufficient time for the necessary<br />

processing of applications of international and national transportation of dangerous<br />

goods.<br />

5<br />

European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR). <strong>Albania</strong> has<br />

acceded the Agreement on January 26 th , 2005.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 14 of 20


The Contractor shall after consultation with the appropriate national and international<br />

authorities describe the route of transportation from the site to the final disposal<br />

destination(s). The route planning with copies of the approved transport documentation<br />

shall be submitted to the Project Manager at least one week before the transport shall<br />

begin.<br />

4.6 Final Disposal of the Waste<br />

4.6.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall destruct and/or neutralise the waste with appropriate method(s) at a<br />

facility inside the European Union. The net weight of the hazardous waste including old<br />

packaging material but excluding new packaging material shall be the basis of the payment<br />

per ton in the Bill of Quantity.<br />

4.6.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall in his offer propose destruction/neutralisation procedures and methods<br />

for the proposed classes of waste. Regardless EU policies on waste recycling, the<br />

Contractor shall assume that all waste must be final disposed of in accordance with<br />

international and national legislation in the disposal country in question.<br />

The Contractor shall in his offer document the compliance of the final disposal method(s)<br />

with the relevant national legislation.<br />

4.7 Site Cleaning Up and Take-over by the Contracting Authority<br />

4.7.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall ensure that the sites used for proceedings of this contract and at least<br />

the Rooms 2 and 3 of Storehouse 2 as well as the marginal materials on the loading ramps<br />

are decontaminated and cleaned up from the waste stored. There is no need for a<br />

rehabilitation of neither the building itself nor possible hazardous materials eg. asbestos<br />

fibers of the building itself.<br />

Fencing and other items imported to the site by the Contractor has to be removed<br />

completely after the work.<br />

4.7.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall clean up walls and floors in the buildings in order to ensure that all<br />

chemical and leather waste are removed from the Site. No particular cleaning procedures of<br />

buildings and building materials are foreseen.<br />

The Contractor shall remove any solid waste from the outside ramps, tracks and drainage<br />

pits around Room 3 of Storehouse 2.<br />

The Contractor shall seal the building at least the Rooms 2 and 3 of Storehouse 2 including<br />

all doors. The Project Manager shall final inspect and approve the buildings before sealing.<br />

Photo documentation of the interior of the buildings at the time of sealing shall be handed<br />

over to the Project Manager. A written documentation of the proceedings of this contract<br />

shall be handed over.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 15 of 20


5 THE CONTRACTORS KEY PERSONNEL<br />

5.1 General experience<br />

All waste located at the Site is regarded dangerous to humans. There may furthermore be a<br />

risk of decomposition of some chemical material when being heated. The Contractor shall<br />

therefore include staff in his team which has considerable experience with repackaging of<br />

hazardous materials including chemical waste i.e. the sodium hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6),<br />

pesticides and asbestos fibers.<br />

5.2 Key Personnel<br />

The following Profiles are regarded as necessary expertise for a professional works<br />

implementation:<br />

Profile General Experience Specific Experience<br />

General Manager Degree/Diploma in<br />

Engineering or related natural<br />

Site Manager<br />

(full time on Site)<br />

Safety Expert<br />

(full time on Site)<br />

Repackaging personnel<br />

(number according to<br />

Contractors work schedule)<br />

sciences. Fluent in English.<br />

Degree/Diploma. in Chemistry<br />

and/or Chemical engineering.<br />

More that 10 years of<br />

experience with hazardous<br />

waste management and<br />

disposal. Fluent in English.<br />

Knowledge of <strong>Albania</strong>n is an<br />

advantage.<br />

Degree/Diploma in<br />

Engineering or related natural<br />

sciences. Fluent in English.<br />

Knowledge of <strong>Albania</strong>n is an<br />

advantage.<br />

More than 10 years of<br />

experience with hazardous<br />

waste management and disposal<br />

Experience as a site manager<br />

from at least 3 similar project<br />

and/or more than 10 years of<br />

experience from hazardous<br />

waste management and disposal<br />

in chemical industry.<br />

Experience with risk<br />

management, environmental<br />

protection measures and<br />

occupational health and safety<br />

issues in relation to hazardous<br />

waste are essential.<br />

not assessed not assessed<br />

More than 10 years of<br />

experience in emergency<br />

preparedness and response<br />

planning and management,<br />

preferably from the chemical<br />

industry. Alternatively<br />

experience from the oil and gas<br />

industry and/or from National<br />

Emergency Management is<br />

acceptable.<br />

An English/<strong>Albania</strong>n interpreter shall be on site at all times of ongoing works. The<br />

Contractor shall prepare the repackaging personnel for the works implementation and<br />

ensure appropriate instructions are given in the working methods.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 16 of 20


The instructions shall include introduction and training in the foreseen specific methods<br />

and procedures, the use of personal protection equipment and all safety procedures to be<br />

applied as part of the works activities.<br />

6 ENVIRONMENT AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY<br />

6.1 Occupational Health and Safety<br />

6.1.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall be responsible for all occupational health and safety issues related to<br />

the works, including repackaging, transport and final disposal of the waste.<br />

All repackaging personnel shall - prior to starting the works - be given instruction and<br />

training in procedures where special risks are involved. The repackaging personnel shall be<br />

instructed in the rules established, and the Contractor shall ensure that the procedures in<br />

case of incidents and accidents are understood. Only when the personnel have received the<br />

instructions and have signed that they understand the purpose and content the work, they<br />

may start work.<br />

All workers shall be submitted to an initial medical check, focused on the specific risks of<br />

the works execution. The medical check shall be repeated upon termination of the works.<br />

All instructions shall be presented orally and written in <strong>Albania</strong>n language.<br />

6.1.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall in a separate management plan describe how he will ensure<br />

occupational health and safety of all activities and all personnel working on the Site. The<br />

Contractor shall describe type and usage of personal protection equipment and the<br />

procedures for clean and contaminated working zones.<br />

6.2 Protection of the Environment<br />

6.2.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall be responsible for all environmental protection issues related to the<br />

works, including repackaging, removal, transport and temporary disposal. He shall ensure<br />

that no additional contamination will take place and that all activities are screened for<br />

environmental impacts before start of the activity.<br />

Where environmental impacts are likely, the Contractor shall propose environmental<br />

protection measures to be implemented.<br />

6.2.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall in a separate management plan describe how he will ensure that no<br />

additional environmental impacts will occur, and how he will ensure for all the working<br />

activities that adequate environmental protection measures are installed.<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 17 of 20


6.3 Emergency Preparedness and Response<br />

6.3.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall be responsible for the implementation of an emergency preparedness<br />

and response organization ensuring the appropriate preparedness for acting in situations<br />

with sudden and acute danger.<br />

6.3.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall describe in a separate management plan his Emergency Preparedness<br />

and Response Plan. The Plan shall be based on an analyses of the 3 worst scenarios (e.g.<br />

fires in accordance with the requirements for sodium hexafluoro silicate, contamination of<br />

staff, collapse of roof structures) and include a description of the organization and the<br />

procedures on how to respond to the dangers that may occur in these scenarios.<br />

The Contractor shall identify all local, regional and national authorities involved in<br />

Emergency Response activities and establish an agreed plan with clear descriptions of tasks<br />

and responsibilities.<br />

The Contractor shall train his personnel in Emergency Response.<br />

7 REPORTING<br />

7.1 Daily Reporting<br />

The Contractor shall establish daily reporting of his works activities. The daily reporting<br />

shall comprise:<br />

� Establishing and maintaining registry of all personnel and visitors to the site (at<br />

entrance gate)<br />

� Establishing and maintaining logbook of repackaging, collection, transportation and<br />

disposal activities, and of all incidents and accidents at the site and the response<br />

given.<br />

Both registry and logbook shall be available for the Project Manager at all time.<br />

7.2 Weekly Reporting<br />

The Contractor shall prepare a weekly report for the site meetings to be handed over to the<br />

Project Manager at the latest the day before the site meeting summarizing the entries in the<br />

above-mentioned daily reports. The weekly reports shall furthermore include a plan for the<br />

coming week’s activities and an updated time schedule.<br />

The weekly reports shall be submitted to the Project Manager every Monday before 12.00<br />

am.<br />

7.3 Final Report<br />

The Contractor shall elaborate a final report describing the completed work. The final<br />

report shall justify the take-over of the Site and the official finalization of the work.<br />

The final report may fall in three sections:<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 18 of 20


1. Final Report for the take-over of Bajza Site<br />

2. Report for the repackaging, temporary storage and classification of the waste<br />

3. Report describing the completion conditions at the site including an assessment of<br />

risks and hazards.<br />

The latter report shall provide background for further activities at the site, e.g. rehabilitation<br />

of the storage buildings.<br />

8 FACILITIES TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT MANAGER<br />

8.1 Specifications<br />

The Contractor shall provide office facilities, transportation and H&S equipment for the<br />

sole use of the Project Manager on site.<br />

8.2 Performance Criteria<br />

The Contractor shall make separate office space (for 1 person) available for the supervisory<br />

staff at the Site. The office shall be equipped with telecommunication (email connection),<br />

fax/copy/printer access and office furniture.<br />

The Contractor shall provide all necessary H&S equipment for the Project Manager in<br />

order for the Project Manager to inspect all parts of the works.<br />

9 ANCILLARY CONDITIONS<br />

9.1 Duration of assignment<br />

Duration of assignment: 4 weeks, starting from ……….<br />

9.2 Duty station<br />

Duty station: Bajza Railway station<br />

9.3 Submission of application<br />

Closing date for the submission of application: …………….<br />

Name of Office: <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />

Office address: Rr. Deshmoret e 4 shurtit, Villa 35, Tirana<br />

Telephone: +355 4 2276600/2233122<br />

Fax: +355 4 2232075<br />

e-mail: registry.al@undp.org<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 19 of 20


Annex<br />

Price Schedule<br />

…<br />

The price schedule must provide a detailed cost breakdown. Provide if necessary separate<br />

figures for each functional grouping or category.<br />

Estimates for cost-reimbursable items, if any, such as travel and out of pocket expenses<br />

should be listed separately.<br />

The format shown in the following should be used in preparing the price schedule. The<br />

format includes specific expenditures, which may or may not be required or applicable but<br />

are indicated to serve as examples.<br />

The amount of repackaging is estimated, the final payment is according to the actual<br />

repackaged amount.<br />

…<br />

Description of activity Estimated<br />

Amount<br />

US$ per t Total US$<br />

1 Site preparation - lump sum<br />

2 Classification - -<br />

2.1 Classification - lump sum<br />

2.2 Analyses please specify<br />

3 Repacking, Transport and final Disposal - -<br />

3.1 Dust and debris, existing packages - lump sum<br />

3.2 Repackaging of chemical waste 80 t<br />

3.3 Repackaging of leather waste 200 t<br />

3.4 Collecting of pesticides in wagon - lump sum<br />

4 Site Cleaning Up and Take-over - lump sum<br />

5 Out of Pocket expenses<br />

5.1 Travel<br />

5.2 Per diem allowances<br />

5.3 Communications<br />

5.4 Reports and Reproductions<br />

5.5 Equipment and other items<br />

ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 20 of 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!