MonTec - UNDP Albania
MonTec - UNDP Albania
MonTec - UNDP Albania
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Preliminary Environmental Assessment, Risk Assessment<br />
and Preparation of Bidding Documents and<br />
Action Plan for Repackaging and Temporary Store of<br />
Hazardous Chemicals - Bajza Hot-Spot<br />
Preliminary Environmental Assessment,<br />
Risk Assessment and<br />
Action Plan<br />
Prepared for <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />
Rr. Deshmoret e 4 shkurtit<br />
Villa 35<br />
Tirana<br />
<strong>Albania</strong><br />
30 November 2008<br />
Prepared by <strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH<br />
Ruhrorter Str. 187<br />
47119 Duisburg<br />
Germany<br />
Tel.: +49 203 482798 91<br />
Fax: +49 203 482798 71<br />
e-Mail: info@montecgmbh.eu
<strong>MonTec</strong><br />
report author date reviewed by date forwarded to date<br />
Site Assessment Linder 17.10.2008 Skark 20.10.2008 Linder 22.10.2008<br />
Linder 22.10.2008 Nolte, Vels 23.10.2008 <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> 23.10.2008<br />
<strong>UNDP</strong> 29.10.2008<br />
Linder/Skark 14.11.2008 Nolte, Vels 20.11.2008 <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> 30.11.2008
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
0 ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................1<br />
0.1 Inside the Storehouse .....................................................................................................1<br />
0.2 Outside the Storehouse...................................................................................................1<br />
0.3 Action ..............................................................................................................................2<br />
1 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ...........................................................................................3<br />
2 INVESTIGATION TIMETABLE AND DOCUMENTS DELIVERED ................................4<br />
3 BAJZA SITE ...................................................................................................................4<br />
3.1 Geography.......................................................................................................................5<br />
3.2 Climate ............................................................................................................................6<br />
3.2.1 Temperature....................................................................................................................6<br />
3.2.2 Precipitation.....................................................................................................................6<br />
3.2.3 Wind patterns ..................................................................................................................8<br />
3.3 Hydrology ........................................................................................................................8<br />
3.4 Geology ...........................................................................................................................9<br />
3.5 Hydrogeology ................................................................................................................13<br />
3.5.1 Karst aquifer ..................................................................................................................16<br />
3.5.2 Porous aquifer ...............................................................................................................24<br />
3.5.3 Hydrogeological conditions of the Bajza station............................................................26<br />
3.6 Socio-Economy and Population ....................................................................................27<br />
3.6.1 Population .....................................................................................................................27<br />
3.6.2 Economy .......................................................................................................................27<br />
3.7 Policies and Legislation.................................................................................................28<br />
4 SITE INVESTIGATON ..................................................................................................30<br />
4.1 Kick-off Meeting and first site investigation ...................................................................30<br />
4.2 Investigation on-site ......................................................................................................30<br />
4.2.1 Outside the Bajza station ..............................................................................................32<br />
4.2.2 Inside the Bajza station .................................................................................................33<br />
4.3 Sampling .......................................................................................................................41<br />
4.3.1 Samples in Storehouse 2 ..............................................................................................42<br />
4.3.2 Solid samples from outside the Storehouses ................................................................47<br />
4.3.3 Water sampling .............................................................................................................50<br />
4.4 Estimation of quantities .................................................................................................50<br />
I
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
5 ANALYSES...................................................................................................................51<br />
5.1 Analysis of samples.......................................................................................................51<br />
5.1.1 Analysis of samples from Room 3.................................................................................51<br />
5.1.2 Analysis of the dust samples S1 and S2 .......................................................................52<br />
5.1.3 Analysis of the samples B1 and B2 from the abandoned railway tracks.......................52<br />
5.1.4 Analysis of the soil samples B3 and B4.........................................................................52<br />
5.1.5 Analysis of water ...........................................................................................................52<br />
5.2 Performance of chemical and microbiological analyses................................................52<br />
5.3 Results of chemical and microbiological analyses ........................................................54<br />
5.3.1 Results for the leather sample (L) .................................................................................54<br />
5.3.2 Results for the stored material (M1 and M2) in Room 3 in Storehouse 2......................55<br />
5.3.3 Results for the dust/debris samples (S1 and S2) in Storehouse 2................................57<br />
5.3.4 Results for the samples around the abandoned railway wagons (B1 and B2)..............58<br />
5.3.5 Results for the soil samples (B3 and B4) ......................................................................59<br />
5.3.6 Results for the water sample of Sheganit spring (SiS)..................................................60<br />
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RISKS .......................................................................................61<br />
6.1 Inside the Storehouse ...................................................................................................61<br />
6.2 Outside the Storehouse.................................................................................................63<br />
6.3 General conclusions......................................................................................................64<br />
7 ACTION PLAN..............................................................................................................64<br />
8 LITERATURE................................................................................................................65<br />
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure 1: Location of Bajza Railway ..................................................................................... 5<br />
Figure 2: Topography of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000) ................ 7<br />
Figure 3: Geology of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000).................... 10<br />
Figure 4: Stratified Upper Jurassic limestone of Haxhajt Hill; on the top of the hill is<br />
situated the water supply reservoir of Bajza ....................................................... 11<br />
Figure 5: Thick bedded Low Cretaceous limestone in the Shkodra Lake shore side......... 11<br />
Figure 6: Gravel and conglomerate deposits along the bed of Përroi i Thatë Stream ....... 12<br />
Figure 7: The stony karst plain of Bajza filled by “terra rossa” and silty clay layer<br />
which is cultivated ............................................................................................... 13<br />
Figure 8: Hydrogeological Map (Original scale 1 : 10,000) with the lines of the cross<br />
sections............................................................................................................... 14<br />
II
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 9: Hydrogeological cross sections........................................................................... 15<br />
Figure 10: Plan of Syri i Sheganit karst spring and of surrounding spring issues<br />
(Google Earth)..................................................................................................... 17<br />
Figure 11: Hydrogeological cross section from Syri i Sheganit Spring to Urdhana<br />
Lakes 1 and 2...................................................................................................... 18<br />
Figure 12: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 1” (the smaller lake) ......................................... 19<br />
Figure 13: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 2” (the big lake) ................................................ 19<br />
Figure 14: Syri i Sheganit karst spring ................................................................................. 20<br />
Figure 15: Syri i Zi karst spring............................................................................................. 22<br />
Figure 16: In dug well nr 2 in limestone several individual pumps are installed.................. 23<br />
Figure 17: Measuring the groundwater level in borehole nr 4 .............................................. 25<br />
Figure 18: The top of dug well nr 5 is sculptured by the backed rope.................................. 26<br />
Figure 19: Overview Bajza Station ....................................................................................... 31<br />
Figure 20: Assumed groundwater downstream area of the site........................................... 32<br />
Figure 21: Groundwater sample at Syri i Sheganit karstic well ............................................ 33<br />
Figure 22: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks................................................. 35<br />
Figure 23: Storehouse 1, view south.................................................................................... 36<br />
Figure 24: Storehouse 1, Room 1, view south ..................................................................... 36<br />
Figure 25: Storehouse 1, Room 2, view south ..................................................................... 37<br />
Figure 26: Storehouse 1, Room 3, view south ..................................................................... 37<br />
Figure 27: Storehouse 2, view south.................................................................................... 38<br />
Figure 28: Storehouse 2, Room 1, view east ....................................................................... 38<br />
Figure 29: Storehouse 2, Room 2, view south ..................................................................... 39<br />
Figure 30: Storehouse 2, Room 3, view south ..................................................................... 39<br />
Figure 31: Railway Track 3, view north ................................................................................ 40<br />
Figure 32: Railway Track 4, view south................................................................................ 40<br />
Figure 33: Overview of the sampling locations..................................................................... 41<br />
Figure 34: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3 .................................................................... 43<br />
Figure 35: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3 ............................................................... 44<br />
Figure 36: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3 ............................................................... 44<br />
Figure 37: White and grey powder in Storehouse 2, Room 3 .............................................. 45<br />
Figure 38: Labelled bags in Storehouse 2, Room 3 ............................................................. 46<br />
Figure 39: Dust and debris sampling in Storehouse 2, Room 2........................................... 47<br />
Figure 40: Overview of the sample locations outside the Storehouses................................ 48<br />
III
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 41: Material in a wagon ............................................................................................. 49<br />
Figure 42: Soil sampling at the railway tracks ...................................................................... 50<br />
Figure 43: Element composition according to the results of XRF analysis .......................... 57<br />
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table 1: Mean monthly temperature, T in °C, and mean monthly precipitation, P in<br />
mm, for the Climate Station of Shkodra; (Observation period 1931-1985) ........... 8<br />
Table 2: Some data about small karst lakes of Bajza area ............................................... 20<br />
Table 3: Analyses of water from Syri i Sheganit ............................................................... 22<br />
Table 4: Overview of sampled material and subsequent chemical analysis ..................... 51<br />
Table 5: Results of the analysis for total organic carbon (TOC) and extractable<br />
organic bound halogens (EOX)........................................................................... 55<br />
Table 6: Results of the XRF analysis ................................................................................ 56<br />
Table 7: Identified organic compounds in the GC-MS screening...................................... 58<br />
Table 8: Analysis of water from Syri i Sheganit (sampling 01.09.2008)............................ 60<br />
ANNEXES<br />
1 List of samples and tests<br />
2 List of results for each sample<br />
3 List of presumable pesticides in the "pesticide train"<br />
4 Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of the chemical<br />
waste in the storehouse<br />
IV
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS<br />
°C temperature in degrees Celsius<br />
AOX adsorbable organic halogens (water)<br />
asl above mean sea level<br />
b.d. below limit of detection<br />
bgs below the ground surface<br />
CAS chemical abstracts service (registry numbers)<br />
CIS cold injection system<br />
cm centimeter<br />
d day<br />
DBP di-butyl-phthalate<br />
DDP di-dodecyl-phthalate<br />
DEHP di-ethylhexyl-phthalate<br />
DEP di-ethyl-phthalate<br />
DOC dissolved organic carbon<br />
EC electric conductivity<br />
EOX extractable organic halogens (solids)<br />
GC-MS gas chromatography with mass-selective detection<br />
HC hydrocarbons<br />
HM heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)<br />
kg kilogram<br />
km kilometer<br />
l liter<br />
m meter<br />
m³ cubic meter<br />
mg milligram<br />
ml milliliter<br />
mm millimeter<br />
n.a. not analyzed<br />
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />
s second<br />
SME small and medium sized enterprises<br />
SPE solid phase extraction<br />
t ton (Mg)<br />
TOC total organic carbon<br />
XRF X-ray fluorescence<br />
V
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
0 ABSTRACT<br />
Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the frontier with Montenegro. During 1991 -<br />
1992 hazardous chemical waste (old pesticides) has been exported to <strong>Albania</strong> by train. Some of<br />
the load was discharged at the platforms and it was assumed that it is still stored at Bajza station.<br />
It was assumed that beside the contamination within the storage buildings of the Bajza<br />
station on-site a contamination of the surrounding soil and groundwater is likely too.<br />
That poses a variety of health risks to human and various impacts to the environment. The purpose<br />
of this study is to provide the <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> with the necessary technical information that<br />
will be used for a Preliminary Environmental Assessment and the Terms of References for repackaging<br />
and temporary store of the hazardous chemicals at the station.<br />
The international services for environmental consultancy for the Bajza Hot-Spot were done by<br />
an experienced consulting team:<br />
� <strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH, Duisburg Germany main consultant<br />
� IfW Institut für Wasserforschung, Schwerte Germany analyses<br />
� ITA Consult ltd. Consulting Engineers, Tirana <strong>Albania</strong> local hydrogeology.<br />
The field work and sampling took place in the beginning of September 2008. The chemical<br />
analyses are carried out in quality controlled laboratories in Germany.<br />
0.1 Inside the Storehouse<br />
There are two major storehouses at the Bajza Station. Both storehouses are empty and not<br />
used, besides chemicals and waste are stored in one room of the storehouses. The storehouses<br />
are in a poor condition, the roofs of the loading ramps are partially broken, the roof of<br />
the storehouse could be partially leaky. There is no information about the status of structures of<br />
the buildings.<br />
As a result of the preliminary site investigation, it can be stated that the main parts of the stored<br />
materials are leather waste, e.g. leather rags (shoes production) which are mainly stored loose<br />
but sometimes packed in plastic bags. Additionally on top of the leather waste a hazardous<br />
chemical material was dropped in front of the two open gates to the storehouse room. The mass<br />
of the leather waste is estimated to be approximately 200 t. The mass of the chemical material/waste<br />
can be seen as sodium hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6) and is estimated to be approximately<br />
80 t. Pesticides are not detected The occurrence of anthrax spores can be excluded as a<br />
result of a specific microbiological examination of a representative leather sample.<br />
In the next room with an open access gate to the room with hazardous waste, dust/debris can<br />
be found consisting of plaster rubbed off the walls and trickled roof material, remnants of stored<br />
hazardous chemical substances and some organic material. The composition of the dust/debris<br />
is characterized by the occurrence of asbestos fibers which can be a potential hazard by inhalation.<br />
30 November 2008 page 1 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Radioactive material or any remnants of this has not been detected in the storehouse and in the<br />
surrounding of that building.<br />
The Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of the chemical waste<br />
in the storehouse, dated 14.11.2008, cover the appropriate handling and protection of the staff<br />
during repackaging the waste and cleaning procedures of the rooms. With the measures described<br />
in the Terms of Reference, the today open stored hazardous waste in the storehouse<br />
will be safely treated for the final disposal.<br />
0.2 Outside the Storehouse<br />
Close to the Bajza Station storehouses and at the 2 railway tracks east of the storehouses hazardous<br />
material has not been detected so far except some leftovers of powder material in one<br />
railway wagon which contains at least remnants of the pesticide tetradifon.<br />
Neither the soil sampling nor the investigation of other conspicuous material gives any indication<br />
to an unacceptable pollution of the environment.<br />
The hydrogeological conditions of the area are characterized by karstic and coarse grained porous<br />
aquifers. Wells - natural karstic or artificial drilled ones - do not exist in the immediate vicinity<br />
of the Bajza Station. Investigation of groundwater quality relies on the karstic wells at the<br />
Shkodar Lake shore line (e.g. Syri i Sheganit). Until now the water sampling and analysis has<br />
not revealed any conspicuous result or any adverse impact of the Bajza site on the local<br />
groundwater in a greater distance.<br />
0.3 Action<br />
The following action is recommended:<br />
short term<br />
1. The open gates to the storehouses must be closed immediately.<br />
2. The repackaging of the hazardous materials inside the storehouse incl. the collecting<br />
of the loose residual pesticide material in the railway wagons should be<br />
started as soon as possible.<br />
long term<br />
3. A rehabilitation of the storehouses should be preceded by an investigation for hazardous<br />
construction material.<br />
4. Groundwater: A groundwater monitoring program can be recommended.<br />
5. Soil: An extended soil sampling and investigation program for the railway<br />
tracks can be recommended as a consequence of the groundwater monitoring and<br />
depending on its results.<br />
30 November 2008 page 2 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
1 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES<br />
Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the frontier with Montenegro, so its acts as a<br />
customs control point. There is no passenger traffic, but two freight trains pass through daily<br />
with approximately 10,000 t of freight being handled each month. The station is located at the<br />
shore of trans-boundary Shkoder/Skader Lake - the largest lake on the Balkan Peninsula that<br />
both <strong>Albania</strong> and Montenegro have officially designated as a cross-border protected area of<br />
Shkoder/Skader Lake together with Buna/Bojana River. In addition, with the designation of the<br />
<strong>Albania</strong>n part of the Shkoder Lake and Buna River as a Ramsar site the entire lake is now included<br />
in the Ramsar list.<br />
During 1991 - 1992 a German company Schmidt-Cretan exported hazardous chemical waste<br />
(old pesticides) to <strong>Albania</strong> by train. The hazardous waste could be shipped back, but some of<br />
the load was discharged at the platforms and/or is still stored at Bajza station. There are still<br />
chemicals/materials stored in one of the storehouses of the station and no record about the contents<br />
exists.<br />
It was assumed that beside the contamination within the storage buildings on-site a contamination<br />
of the surrounding soil and groundwater is likely too.<br />
That poses a variety of health risks to human and various impacts to the environment, e.g.:<br />
� Risks to human beings from toxic and carcinogenic substances, such as mercury, dioxins<br />
1 and organic contaminants,<br />
� Damages to the soil, due to leaking and emptying of the old drums and containers,<br />
� Damages to groundwater resources, due to diffuse contamination,<br />
� Damages to surface water resources, especially lakes and rivers, by contaminants from<br />
the groundwater,<br />
� Risks entailed by the clean-up activities themselves, e.g. additional release of contaminants.<br />
The purpose of this study is to provide the <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong> with the necessary technical information<br />
that will be used for<br />
� Preliminary Environmental Assessment<br />
� Risk Assessment incl. Bidding Documents and Action Plan for repackaging and temporary<br />
store of hazardous chemicals<br />
at the railway station in Bajza.<br />
1 According to the <strong>UNDP</strong> analyses of dioxins are not necessary and not considered in the analyses pro-<br />
gramme.<br />
30 November 2008 page 3 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
The international services for environmental consultancy for the Bajza Hot-Spot were done by<br />
an experienced consulting team:<br />
� <strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH, Duisburg Germany main consultant<br />
Mr. Linder<br />
� IfW Institut für Wasserforschung, Schwerte Germany analyses<br />
Mr. Skark<br />
� ITA Consult ltd. Consulting Engineers, Tirana <strong>Albania</strong> local hydrogeology<br />
Prof. Dr. Eftimi.<br />
This report represents the preliminary environmental assessment.<br />
2 INVESTIGATION TIMETABLE AND DOCUMENTS DELIVERED<br />
� Contract of the environmental consultancy services is dated 26.08.2008.<br />
� Kick-off meeting with the <strong>UNDP</strong> program manager Prof. Dr. Lirim Selfo<br />
in Tirana<br />
01.09.2008<br />
� First site and introduction to the director of the Bajza station,<br />
Mr. Valentin Popaj 01.09.2008<br />
� Investigation of the Bajza area and sampling of groundwater at wells 01.09.2008<br />
� Investigation of the Bajza station and sampling of waste and soil 02.09.2008<br />
� Hydrogeological Filed Trip 06.09.2008<br />
� Hydrogeological Filed Trip 15.09.2008<br />
� Inception Report of the project 16.09.2008<br />
� Interim Report of the project 29.09.2008<br />
� Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of<br />
the chemical waste in the storehouse (Draft) 06.10.2008<br />
� Preliminary Environmental Assessment (Draft) 23.10.2008<br />
� Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging<br />
and final disposal of the chemical waste 14.11.2008<br />
30 November 2008 page 4 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
3 BAJZA SITE<br />
3.1 Geography<br />
Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the border to Montenegro, so it acts as a customs<br />
point. The station is located about 1 km west to the center of the village and about 3 km<br />
east to Shkodra (Skadar) Lake (see Figure 1). Administratively Bajza is part of Koplik Commune,<br />
one of five communes of Malesi e Madhe District. East to Bajza the North <strong>Albania</strong>n Alps<br />
are developed which represent one of most beautiful and in the same time one of most remote<br />
parts of <strong>Albania</strong>.<br />
� Bajza<br />
Figure 1: Location of Bajza Railway<br />
30 November 2008 page 5 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Bajza and the Railway Station are situated at an elevation of approx. 45 m above mean sea<br />
level (asl). West to the Station the Bajza karst plain is situated, which is separated adjacent the<br />
Shkodra Lake by some limestone hills with an elevation of 200 to 250 m asl. The field located<br />
east of the Station is filled with coarse material. It borders to Zagora high karst plateau situated<br />
at elevations between 400 and 500 m asl (see Figure 2).<br />
3.2 Climate<br />
Bajza area is situated in the North Mediterranean Hilly Climate Sub-Zone (IHM, 1984). It encompasses<br />
the North <strong>Albania</strong>n low mountain areas which elevation varies mostly from 200 to<br />
600 m asl. This sub-zone is characterized by relatively warm and wet winter and dry and hot<br />
summer. The following description of the climate elements is based on the data of the Shkodra<br />
climate station which is the nearest to Bajza.<br />
3.2.1 Temperature<br />
Winter in the region is relatively warm and the mean temperatures in January are about 5°C.<br />
The mean daily minimum temperature for January is about 1.1°C, and the absolute daily minimum<br />
temperature may fall below -10°C. The mean daily maximal January temperature is about<br />
8.4°C. During the summer the mean daily monthly temperatures vary about 25°C. The mean<br />
daily maximum temperature for June and August is about 31°C to 32°C, and the absolute daily<br />
maximum temperature may reach up to 40°C. The mean daily minimal temperature is about<br />
18°C to 19°C.<br />
Spring is fresh, with mean monthly temperature in the central spring months about 14°C. During<br />
the autumn the mean monthly temperature falls from about 21.4°C during September to about<br />
11.2°C during November.<br />
3.2.2 Precipitation<br />
The annual amount of the precipitation in the region for the period 1931-1965 in Shkodra is<br />
1,797 mm (IHM, 1984), but some mountainous areas receive over 3,000 mm. The very characteristic<br />
of the <strong>Albania</strong>n climate is the non-uniform distribution of the precipitation; most of which -<br />
about 70 % of yearly precipitations - falls during the period October - March, while during the<br />
summer months (June - August) usually fall less than 10 % of the yearly precipitations. In Table<br />
1 some averaged data about the air temperature and precipitation of Shkodra climate station<br />
are summarized.<br />
30 November 2008 page 6 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 2: Topography of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000)<br />
30 November 2008 page 7 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Table 1: Mean monthly temperature, T in °C, and mean monthly precipitation, P in mm, for<br />
the Climate Station of Shkodra; (Observation period 1931-1985)<br />
Element I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Average<br />
T °C 4.7 6.0 9.4 14.0 18.0 22.2 24.9 25.2 21.4 16.1 11.2 6.8 15.0<br />
P mm 210 179 158 127 113 56 33 45 132 248 235 261 1,797<br />
The quantity of snow varies within a wide range, but usually about 5 to 10 % of the winter precipitation<br />
is snow, while in the areas elevated higher than 1000 m the snow contributes about<br />
20 % of the winter precipitations. The maximum daily precipitation in the Shkodra is about 200 -<br />
240 mm.<br />
Storm events are characteristically for the climate of <strong>Albania</strong>. According to some data of<br />
Shkodra Meteorological Station the 15 minutes precipitation height reaches 30 to 40 mm, the<br />
30 minutes rainfall may reach up to 80 mm, while the rainfall for 1, 2 and 3 hours are registered<br />
to be respectively 120 mm, 152 mm and 161 mm (all data are referring to a repetition probability<br />
of one storm event during one year; n = 1).<br />
3.2.3 Wind patterns<br />
The region is characterized by good aeration conditions. According to the observations made by<br />
the Tirana Institute of Hydrometeorology, the prevailing winds in Shkodra are east and southeast<br />
winds over all round the year. The mean monthly wind speeds are about 2.0 m/s in<br />
Shkodra and the biggest wind speeds registered in Shkodra are about 35 to 40 m/s. There are<br />
15 types of winds, which are known in Shkodra lake basin, Murlan and Shiroka are the most<br />
important.<br />
3.3 Hydrology<br />
The most important hydrological element of the area is Shkodra Lake, which is the largest on<br />
the Balkan Peninsula. The lake area varies between 353 km 2 at a minimum lake level of 4.6 m<br />
asl and 500 km 2 at a maximum lake level of 9.8 m.<br />
The most important tributaries of Lake Shkodra enter the lake from the north in Montenegro<br />
territory: Mora�a, Crnojevi�a, Orahovistica, Karaturana and Baragurska River; only Rjoli and<br />
Vraka River are in <strong>Albania</strong>n Territory. Precipitation on the lake, groundwater of alluvial aquifer<br />
and karst springs contribute also to the inflow. Bajza area is a transmission territory for the intensive<br />
inflow to Shkodra Lake, both from the coarse alluvial-proluvial deposits and from the<br />
carbonate rocks often as big karst springs.<br />
The main surface stream of Koplik area is Përroi i Thatë stream which is mostly dry interrupted<br />
by short periods of very high discharges during heavy rains. The stream flows on coarse allu-<br />
30 November 2008 page 8 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
vial-proluvial deposits which consist mostly out of gravel and conglomerate. According to “Hydrology<br />
of <strong>Albania</strong>” (1984) the calculated average maximal flow of Përroi i Thatë stream is<br />
135 m 3 /s and the mean discharge ratio in the Përroi i Thatë - Koplik area ranges between 50 to<br />
55 l/(s*km 2 ) which discharges mostly as groundwater.<br />
In the Montenegrin Lake Shkodra most of the pollutants originate from Podgorica. On the <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />
territory the main pollution source is the City of Shkodra with its solid waste and wastewater.<br />
The potential pollution from the hazardous chemicals stored in Bajza Hot-Spot are object of<br />
this project.<br />
According to the Lake Shkoder Transboundary Diagnostics Analysis WORLD BANK (IBRD)<br />
(2006), during the past three decades the lake and its basin have experienced varying states of<br />
pollution. The content of dissolved oxygen in the lake water varies from 7 to 12 mg/l in the upper<br />
water layers and from 5 to 12 mg/l in the bottom layers. Free carbon dioxide (CO2) is recorded<br />
in very small concentration in the lake water. The highest recorded value is 13.07 mg/l among<br />
the macrophytes, under reductive chemical conditions and very low intensity of natural light.<br />
Lake Shkodra water is low mineralized and can be classified as a Bicarbonate - Calcium type.<br />
The total dissolved elektrolytes has been assessed between 98 and 164 mg/l in the pelagic water<br />
and 102 - 240 mg/l in the littoral water, while the water conductivity varies from 100 �S/cm to<br />
343 �S/cm. Carbonate concentration varies from 2 mg/l to 19 mg/l, while the bicarbonate content<br />
ranges from 86.6 mg/l to 254 mg/l. Water alkalinity varies between 1.47 and 4.18 mmol<br />
(eq)/l, while pH is between 7.1 and 8.5, but it usually remains between 7.9 and 8.2. These pH<br />
values fall within the optimum of 6.9 - 8.5 for the development of a high diverse biota.<br />
The lake water is characterized by a high content of calcium, with an average 31 mg/l to<br />
42 mg/l, but values up to 132 mg/l are measured in some lake areas. Content of silica ranges<br />
from 1.3 mg/l to 3.45 mg/l, magnesium 4.8 mg/l to74.8 mg/l and sulphate 3.2 mg/l to 30 mg/l.<br />
Values of phosphates in the lake waters are 0.002 mg/l to 0.004 mg/l. In certain periods, in littoral<br />
parts near the mouths of Cernojevi�a and Mora�a rivers these values increase up to 150 -<br />
1,000 times. Probably the same situation can also be found near the waste water inflow of<br />
Shkodra to the Lake. Content of nitrates in pelagic waters varies between 0.012 mg/l to<br />
1.200 mg/l, but it's inter seasonal variation is high. Nitrite concentration may reach 0.030 mg/l,<br />
with the highest values in the littoral. Chlorine content amount to 6 mg/l to 9.8 mg/l in the most<br />
parts of the lake area, but show very low concentration in the karst wells “eyes".<br />
3.4 Geology<br />
Geologically Bajza is located in western periphery of the geological zone of the North <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />
Alps. This zone is the southernmost part of the Dinarides which are developed parallel to the<br />
current shore of the Adriatic coast. The western part of the <strong>Albania</strong>n Alps consists of the Malesia<br />
e Madhe Sub-Zone, while the eastern and south-eastern part subsumed the Valbona Sub-<br />
Zone, (MEÇO &ALIAJ, 2000). Bajza area belongs to the Malesia e Madhe Sub-Zone. In general,<br />
the Malesia e Madhe Sub-Zone is structurally a large monocline split by faults into separate<br />
30 November 2008 page 9 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
blocks with 20° to 25° dip angles inclining to northern or north-eastern direction. In the western<br />
periphery this monocline bends by dipping south-west at an angle of 10 to 15° under Pliocene to<br />
Quaternary molasses and the Shkodra Lake. Stratigraphically, the profile of Malesia e Madhe<br />
Sub-Zone started in the Upper Triassic with intercalated dolomites and limestone.<br />
On the geological map (Figure 3) is shown the geological situation of Bajza area, including the<br />
Station. As could be seen on this map the northern hilly-mountainous part of the area consists<br />
of stratified Upper Jurassic limestone locally dolomitized (see Figure 4) which provides well<br />
developed bedding fissures interconnected by at least two perpendicular or quasi perpendicular<br />
fractures. The intensive fracturing of the limestone has assisted the development of the karst.<br />
Figure 3: Geology of Bajza area (from the topographic map scale 1:25,000)<br />
30 November 2008 page 10 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 4: Stratified Upper Jurassic limestone of Haxhajt Hill; on the top of the hill is situated<br />
the water supply reservoir of Bajza<br />
The Low Cretaceous deposits outcrop on the hilly chain along the Shkodra Lake, as well as in<br />
Bajza karst plain. These deposits mainly consist of thick bedded to massive limestone, which is<br />
intensively fractured and karstified (see Figure 5).<br />
Figure 5: Thick bedded Low Cretaceous limestone in the Shkodra Lake shore side<br />
During Pleistocene and Holocene steep and high energy torrents, like that of Përroi i Thatë (Dry<br />
Stream), have formed wide and thick cones of deposits mainly consisting of heterogeneous porous<br />
materials, from pebbles, gravel and sand to silt and clay. Often these materials are cemented<br />
and form thick conglomerate layers (Figure 6). Some relatively deep water wells prove<br />
(testimony) that the thickness of cone deposits is more than 60 m. Bajza is located in the north-<br />
30 November 2008 page 11 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
ern part of the big cone of Përroi i Thatë stream and just at the border with the Cretaceous limestone<br />
rocks of Bajza karst plain.<br />
Figure 6: Gravel and conglomerate deposits along the bed of Përroi i Thatë Stream<br />
In the North <strong>Albania</strong>n tectonic zone vertical tectonic faults are intensively developed splitting the<br />
area into separate big and small blocks. The Bajza karst plain belongs to the big Kastrati block<br />
and represents a second order down faulting block which partially is covered by the cone deposits.<br />
Shkodra Lake is also a big down faulting block which represents a graben (Geology of<br />
<strong>Albania</strong> - in <strong>Albania</strong>n, ShGjSh, Tirana 2002).<br />
The geomorphology of Bajza area is determined by vertical faulting, as well as by intensive surface<br />
erosion of limestone rocks. A geomorphologic characteristic of the <strong>Albania</strong>n Alps in general<br />
and of the Bajza area in particular, is the intensive karstification. This is manifested by the presence<br />
of various karst forms like, shallow and deep karren, karst canals and wells, caves and<br />
huge karst springs. Most significant karst phenomenon of the studied area is the karst plain of<br />
Bajza which border to the station on the East, and to the Lake Shkodra on the West. On the<br />
surface of this plain innumerous sinkholes are developed which are fused with each other and<br />
form a stony plain filled with “terra rossa” mostly covered by a silty clay layer which is cultivated<br />
(see Figure 7).<br />
30 November 2008 page 12 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 7: The stony karst plain of Bajza filled by “terra rossa” and silty clay layer which is cultivated<br />
3.5 Hydrogeology<br />
During the first half of September 2008 we conducted a detailed field investigation of Bajza<br />
area. During this investigation the significant karst phenomenon closely connected with<br />
groundwater movement and use like natural karst vertical wells and karst lakes were described.<br />
Particular attention was paid to the description of the karst springs. For the description of the<br />
hydrogeology of Bajza area we referred also to the former investigations conducted by the <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />
Hydrogeological Service which unfortunately are not detailed concerning this issue. During<br />
the last years in Bajza area some private deep wells are drilled, but unfortunately any register<br />
or any technical evidence of them are not available. The hydrogeological situation of the<br />
area is synthesized on the Hydrogeological Map, shown on scale 1:10,000 (see Figure 8).<br />
As shown also in the Hydrogeological Map of <strong>Albania</strong>, scale 1:200,000 (Eftimi et al., 1985) on<br />
hydrogeological point of view Bajza area is characterized by the presence of two important aquifers:<br />
� the karst aquifer, which is related to the Mesozoic carbonate rocks, and<br />
� the porous aquifer, which is related to the Quaternary coarse grained sediments.<br />
Both aquifers occupy the Koplik Bajza area and the Bajza Railway Station is bordering to both<br />
aquifers. East to the Station mainly the porous aquifer is developed, and west to the Station<br />
mainly the karst aquifer is developed (see Figure 8 and Figure 9).<br />
30 November 2008 page 13 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 8: Hydrogeological Map (Original scale 1 : 10,000) with the lines of the cross sections<br />
30 November 2008 page 14 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 9: Hydrogeological cross sections<br />
30 November 2008 page 15 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
3.5.1 Karst aquifer<br />
This aquifer outcrops mostly in the center and the northern Bajza area. It consists of Upper Jurassic<br />
and Low Cretaceous carbonate rocks representing mainly limestone. On the hydrogeological<br />
cross-section (Figure 9) could be seen that the karst aquifer is also developed under<br />
the porous aquifer in eastern and southern part of Bajza area. Most of the Station is placed on<br />
the porous aquifer which overlies the karst aquifer cropping out west of the Bajza station.<br />
These rocks are intensively karstified and as a result they are characterized by a very high but<br />
heterogeneously developed permeability. Initially the permeability occurs along the bedding<br />
fractures and faults which are enlarged by the karstification. It is very easy to verify in the field<br />
the presence of karst canals or openings of different dimensions. The intensive karstification<br />
undoubtedly suggests the conclusion that most of groundwater flows on preferential pathways<br />
which represent well developed karst canals.<br />
Most significant surface karst phenomenons are the karst lakes and karst vertical wells, which<br />
are located near the big karst spring of “Syri i Sheganit” (see Figure 10).The lakes are nondrained<br />
springs and are connected through karst canals with the Syri i Sheganit Spring (see the<br />
Hydrogeological cross - section, Figure 11).<br />
30 November 2008 page 16 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 10: Plan of Syri i Sheganit karst spring and of surrounding spring issues (Google Earth)<br />
There are three small karst lakes: Urdhana Lake 1 (Figure 12), Urdhana Lake 2 (Figure 13)<br />
and Urdhana e Kalbet Lake. Some data about the small karst lakes are shown in Table 2.<br />
30 November 2008 page 17 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 11: Hydrogeological cross section from Syri i Sheganit Spring to Urdhana Lakes 1 and 2<br />
30 November 2008 page 18 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 12: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 1” (the smaller lake)<br />
Figure 13: Karst lake “Urdhana e Sheganit 2” (the big lake)<br />
30 November 2008 page 19 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Table 2: Some data about small karst lakes of Bajza area<br />
Lake Big diameter<br />
m<br />
Small diameter<br />
m<br />
Depth<br />
m<br />
Elevation of water surface<br />
m<br />
Urdhana 1 60 - 65 35 - 40 > 10 Practically the same as Lake<br />
Shkodra level<br />
Urdhana 2 35 - 40 About 30 > 10 As above<br />
Urdhana e Kalbet About 15 About 15 > 10 As above<br />
The small karst lakes communicate through the big karst canals with the Lake Shkodra as well<br />
as with Syri i Sheganit. This is the reason why the water level in the lakes varies accordingly to<br />
the variation of the Lake Shkodra level, so the yearly amplitude of the lake’s level variation is<br />
about 5 m. Urdhana Lake 2 for many years is used for the irrigation of the surrounding cultivated<br />
lands. The pumping station with a capacity of about 200 -250 l/s nowadays is not working<br />
any more.<br />
As seen on the hydrogeological map (Figure 8) there are two important perennial karst springs<br />
in Bajza area:<br />
� Syri i Sheganit (Figure 14) and<br />
� Syri i Zi (Figure 15).<br />
Figure 14: Syri i Sheganit karst spring<br />
30 November 2008 page 20 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Both springs appear as small round lakes with a diameter about 15 - 20 m which by the local<br />
population are called “Syri” which means “Eye”. On Lake Shkodra shore also many temporary<br />
springs issue which are only active during short periods of intensive rains or during the snow<br />
melting period.<br />
Syri i Sheganit Spring issues on the Lake Shkodra shore at a distance about 2.3 km southwest<br />
the Station. Near to Syri i Sheganit also some other springs discharge which are shown in<br />
Figure 10. According to the former Institute of Hydrometeorology the measured discharge of the<br />
spring varies from 0.25 m 3 /s to more than 2.7 m 3 /s. During the field trip on 01.09.2008 the<br />
measured discharge ranges from 0.05 to 0.065 m 3 /s under the prevailing base flow conditions.<br />
According to an investigation by HAXHIU &UÇI (1995) on 28.04.1990 the discharge of Syri i<br />
Sheganit Spring is estimated to 10 m 3 /s. In the same study some other springs, which are<br />
shown on Figure 10 are mentioned in the vicinity of Syri i Sheganit. The discharge of these<br />
other springs e.g. Vija e Mullirit or Syri i Ragamit is estimated to 5 m 3 /s or 2 m 3 /s respectively in<br />
the above mentioned study. It seems that these spring discharges has been overestimated as<br />
they have not been measured by any instruments.<br />
In the above mentioned investigation there are given also the following important conclusions<br />
which help to understand the hydraulic mechanism of the springs in the area around Syri i<br />
Sheganit better:<br />
a) Despite the small differences of the physical-chemical, hydrochemical composition and<br />
small Tritium content differences between the considered springs, the findings suggest<br />
that the recharges of the different springs (e.g. Vija e Mullirit, Syri i Ragamit or Syri i<br />
Sheganit) are provided by separate karst canals. The groundwater flow to the springs<br />
may have different recharge zones and different residence time in the underground.<br />
b) Syri i Sheganit and Urdhana Lakes, however, are connected by well developed karst canals.<br />
By a dying method the flow velocity can determined in a range from 1.0 to 1.1 m/s<br />
(Urdhana Lake 1 and Syri i Sheganit Spring, distance 270 m).<br />
The measured electric conductivity shows a low mineralization of the spring water which is<br />
proved also by the chemical analyses. In Table 3 the results of two chemical analyses from the<br />
1980s and the 1990s are opposed to the analytical results of water sampled on 01.09.2008.<br />
The concentrations of the main components are small. The spring water can be characterized<br />
as soft and can be subsumed to a bicarbonate – calcium type. The chemical composition of Syri<br />
i Sheganit is typical for limestone karst water of intensive circulation. Regarding the micro components<br />
and the pesticide concentration the results will be given in the chapter 5.3.6.<br />
Syri i Zi Spring issues about 2 km north to Syri i Sheganit, on the lake shore (see Figure 15).<br />
The spring outlet is shaped in an oval form like a funnel; the big diameter is about 20 m and the<br />
smaller one is about 15 m. The depth of funnel is more than 10 m. The spring discharges confined<br />
groundwater. According to the explanation of the local people the discharge of the spring<br />
varies within a great range. On September 15 the estimated discharge was about 15 l/s to 20<br />
30 November 2008 page 21 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
l/s. On the limestone rocks near the spring clear signs of the high level spring discharges are<br />
found at an elevation of approx. 4 m above the actual water level (15.09.2008). It is supposed<br />
the maximum discharge of the spring will be in the order of magnitude of several m 3 /s.<br />
Figure 15: Syri i Zi karst spring<br />
The electrical conductivity of Syri i Zi water was measured 230 �S/cm and the temperature<br />
18.4° C. For this spring chemical analyses are not available but it seems that its water quality is<br />
more or less similar to that of Syri i Sheganit.<br />
During the field investigation of Bajza area also some artificial wells are documented which<br />
were constructed by the local population for the abstraction of karst water. Among them can be<br />
mentioned the dug well nr 2 (see Figure 16), and the boreholes nr 3 and nr 10 B /95.<br />
30 November 2008 page 22 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Table 3: Analyses of water from Syri i Sheganit<br />
Parameter Dimension Concentration<br />
date 1987 1995 01.09.2008<br />
sodium mg/l 6.2 9.0 2<br />
potasium mg/l n.a. n.a.
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
ter level was found at 12.5 m below the ground surface (bgs) while some of the pumps were<br />
working during the measurement. The total capacity of the pumps is about 15 l/s.<br />
Borehole 3 is 94 m deep with a groundwater level at 48 m bgs on 06.09.2008, which coincides<br />
with the Shkodra Lake level.<br />
During the period 1993 - 1995 in Bajza-Hoti area 17 water wells were drilled in limestone sediments<br />
with depth varying from 60 to 100 m. Five wells fell practically dry and the averaged specific<br />
discharges of the remaining 12 wells range from 0.2 to 0.6 l * s -1 * m -1 (KALAJA &RUDI,<br />
1996). These findings corroborate the heterogeneity of the permeability of the karst rocks of<br />
Bajza area.<br />
3.5.2 Porous aquifer<br />
Porous aquifer is related to the Quaternary coarse grained cone sediments widely outcropping<br />
in the eastern part and in the south-western corner of the area, near Shkodra Lake (Figure 3<br />
and Figure 8). As mentioned above, when the geology was described, the thickness of this aquifer<br />
in Bajza area exceeds 60 m. The aquifer consists of gravel and sand. The coarse grained<br />
sediments are irregularly cemented and contain often thick conglomerate lenses, which are<br />
characterized by low permeability.<br />
In this porous aquifer system two water-bearing strata can be distinguished:<br />
a) the main porous aquifer with loose, uncemented granular sediments and<br />
b) the local porous aquifer with conglomerate lenses<br />
(see Hydrogeological cross-sections of Bajza area, Figure 9).<br />
The main porous aquifer contains unconfined groundwater hydraulically connected with the<br />
deep karst aquifer and both aquifers form a regional water body. Loose porous aquifer is usually<br />
characterized by high permeability and transmissivity. According to the results of some groundwater<br />
wells located in the adjacent area south to the investigated one the hydraulic conductivity<br />
of the uncemented porous aquifer exceeds 250 m/d (3 * 10 -3 m/s) and the transmissivity is more<br />
than 6,000 m 2 /d (0.07 m²/s).<br />
The groundwater level of the main porous aquifer at a given place is controlled by the elevation<br />
of the measuring site and by the elevation of Shkodra Lake level.<br />
Borehole nr 4 has a depth of 113 m and taps both, the limestone aquifer as well as the main<br />
porous aquifer. The groundwater level was stabilized at 38 m bgs on 06.09.2008 (Figure 17). In<br />
the area of Bajza Railway Station the groundwater table varies between 35 and 40 m bgs.<br />
30 November 2008 page 24 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 17: Measuring the groundwater level in borehole nr 4<br />
The porous granular aquifer of Bajza area realizes the hydraulic connection of karst groundwater<br />
developed in eastern mountainous Zagora karst area with that of Bajza karst plain developed<br />
in the west. The groundwater of porous and karst aquifers flows to the west, to Shkodra<br />
lake, which represents the regional drainage area.<br />
The local porous aquifer is related to the conglomerate lenses, which are characterized by low<br />
permeability. Sometimes they are practically impermeable. Often on such lenses perched<br />
groundwater bodies are formed. In these groundwater bodies the depth to the water table is<br />
smaller than in the main aquifer. The perched aquifers are very important for the local water<br />
supply realized by relatively shallow dug wells.<br />
A typical example of a local porous aquifer is that developed within Bajza village. In the center<br />
of village the dug well nr 5 taps an important local groundwater body developed on a conglomerate<br />
lens. This well is 13 m deep and the groundwater level is measured at the depth 11 m bgs<br />
on 06.09.2008. This well is very old but is still in use and has been the main water supply<br />
source for Bajza (Figure 18).<br />
30 November 2008 page 25 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 18: The top of dug well nr 5 is sculptured by the backed rope<br />
According to some chemical analyses performed in the past by the <strong>Albania</strong>n Hydrogeological<br />
Service the groundwater results in low mineralization, low hardness and can be characterized<br />
as Bicarbonate-Calcium type. The electrical conductivity varies between 230 and 300 �S/cm<br />
and the total hardness ranges mostly from 6 to 8 German degrees.<br />
The water supply of Bajza is centralized and fed by Riolli karst spring which issues in the North<br />
<strong>Albania</strong>n Alps about 18 km east to Bajza. As the water supply system can not provide a normal<br />
water supply for 24 hours the local population drills deep private wells increasingly.<br />
3.5.3 Hydrogeological conditions of the Bajza station<br />
The hydrogeological conditions of the Bajza station could be summarized as follows:<br />
a) The Station is located mainly on the porous aquifer and partially (the southern and western<br />
part) on the karst aquifer.<br />
b) The maximal thickness of the porous aquifer is supposed to be about 30 m to 40 m.<br />
c) Both aquifers, the porous and the karstic ones, are hydraulically connected and have a<br />
common groundwater level.<br />
d) The groundwater level is controlled by the elevation of the measuring site and by the<br />
elevation of Shkodra Lake level. In the area of the Station the groundwater level ranges<br />
between 35 m and 40 m bgs.<br />
30 November 2008 page 26 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
e) Both aquifers, karstic and porous ones, are characterized by a very high permeability.<br />
This is the reason why in Bajza area the surface water is practically missing, as water<br />
will infiltrate from the surface to deeper levels.<br />
f) Both aquifers are intensively recharged by the abundant precipitations of the area (average<br />
2000 mm/year). The groundwater recharge in the investigated area can be estimated<br />
with an average of 1000 mm/year, which corresponds to a recharge rate of<br />
32 l * s -1 * (km 2 ) -1 ;<br />
g) The Bajza area and its aquifers are streamed by the groundwater of the North <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />
Alps, which drain to Shkodra Lake forming important karst springs, e.g. Syri i Sheganit<br />
and Syri i Zi with an average total discharge of several m 3 /s;<br />
h) The groundwater shows a low mineralization as well as a low hardness and can be seen<br />
as a Bicarbonate-Calcium type. The conductivity varies from 230 to 300 �S/cm and the<br />
total hardness ranges mostly from 6 to 8 German degrees.<br />
3.6 Socio-Economy and Population<br />
3.6.1 Population<br />
According to the Strategic Action Plan SAP FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA (2007) approximately<br />
500,000 inhabitants live in the watershed of Shkodra Lake. In <strong>Albania</strong> the majority of this population<br />
belongs to Shkodra Region, while in Montenegro several regions participate. The current<br />
population growth in <strong>Albania</strong> it is 0.6%. The population living below the poverty line is estimated<br />
to approximately 30%.<br />
Shkodra is the only main town of the area while there are around 20 villages and 2 municipalities.<br />
From those, 10 villages with 300 - 1,000 inhabitants are located more closely to the lake.<br />
Shkodra is the most developed centre of the region and the biggest municipality of the lake<br />
area. It is situated on the south-eastern part of the lake. It has a population of 110,000 inhabitants.<br />
The population of Shkodra city represents 32% of the total population of Shkodra Region<br />
(Qarku Shkoder) and the 45% of population of Shkodra District (Rrethi Shkoder).<br />
The movement of the population from the villages to the urban areas within the region has in<br />
fact been more evident compared to the movement from the cities itself.<br />
The village of Bajza is located in the community of Koplik with a population of 12,900 and 3,040<br />
families.<br />
3.6.2 Economy<br />
According to the Strategic Action Plan SAP FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA (2007) <strong>Albania</strong> has made<br />
significant economic progress since its transition from a communist regime towards a democ-<br />
30 November 2008 page 27 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
ratic market-based economy. The country’s economy has been increasing since 1993 at an<br />
annual rate of about 8%. Although agriculture has traditionally played an important role in the<br />
economy, recent growth has been driven by the services and construction sectors. Agriculture in<br />
<strong>Albania</strong> counts for about 25% of its GDP. About 20% of the land is cultivated and approximately<br />
50% of the labor force is engaged in agriculture; the majority of the balance is involved in industries.<br />
In Shkodra region the main activities of the processing industry were the processing of tobacco<br />
and manufacture of cigarettes, production of conserved foods, sugar-based foods, soft and alcoholic<br />
drinks, pasta, bread, rice and vegetable oil. The main activities of the textile industry<br />
were focused on garments and silk products. The city also had a wood-processing and paperproduction<br />
plant. The most important mechanical engineering industries concerned wire manufacturing,<br />
elevator manufacturing and bus assembly. Two important handicraft enterprises well<br />
known in <strong>Albania</strong> were the Artisan Products Enterprise and the Straw and Reed Enterprise.<br />
As a result of market economy reforms after 90s, big changes took place in the economic structure<br />
of Shkodra, so that some nine-tenths of the former state-owned enterprises in the city were<br />
privatized. However, the majority of these privatized businesses did not continue their original<br />
production lines, particularly in the mechanical engineering industry, which had been unique in<br />
the country and had a guaranteed national market. Food processing, wood processing and the<br />
artisan production, which contributed the largest production in former time, were closed and<br />
transformed into a large number of small enterprises (SMEs).<br />
Meanwhile, tobacco processing and the cigarette manufacturing industry were completely destroyed:<br />
incapability to invest in technological renovation and competition from imported products<br />
caused its bankruptcy.<br />
In Shkodra region agricultural land occupies approximately 13% of the whole area, while forests,<br />
pastures and abandoned land contribute approximately 64%. The two main regional land<br />
use activities are agriculture and livestock rising.<br />
The main agricultural plants are field plants like wheat, maize, green beans, potatoes, vegetables,<br />
forage crops, tobacco etc. Almost 50% of the total surface is used for fodder and this<br />
clearly indicates that livestock is a very important activity in this region.<br />
3.7 Policies and Legislation<br />
According to the Lake Shkoder Transboundary Diagnostics Analysis, WORLD BANK (IBRD)<br />
(2006), the Constitution of <strong>Albania</strong> gives a special place to the environment. The Ministry of Environment<br />
(MoE), established in 2001, is the main policy-making public institution in the country.<br />
Until recently, the Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Forests and Waters had some responsibilities<br />
for environmental protection and biodiversity conservation. The MoE has been given the<br />
additional responsibilities of forest and water administration sectors and is now the Ministry of<br />
Environment, Forests and Water Administration.<br />
30 November 2008 page 28 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Recently, the <strong>Albania</strong>n government has proclaimed its part of Lake Shkoder a “Managed Natural<br />
Reserve” through the Council of Ministers’ decision No. 684 dated 02.11.2005.<br />
In <strong>Albania</strong>, the legislation for the environmental protection and management can be said to be<br />
mostly in place. The law (No. 8934 of 5 September 2002) entitled “On Environmental Protection”<br />
is the legal act which regulates the protection and conservation of the environment in the country<br />
(Compendium of Environmental Legislation of <strong>Albania</strong>, 2004). Article 7 of Chapter II of the<br />
law lays down the policy guidelines on environment to be followed by the State.<br />
In addition to the law on Environmental Protection (2002), most important for waters resources<br />
and biodiversity conservation are the following laws:<br />
� On Water Resources, Law no. 8093, dated 21.03.1996. This law is yet to be implemented;<br />
� On Protected Areas, Law No. 8906, dated 06 .06.2002;<br />
� On Environmental Impact Assessment, Law No. 8990 dated 23.01.2003.<br />
Further, various acts and regulations have been passed by the government to enforce environmental<br />
protection in the country. Most relevant are:<br />
� On Protection of Transboundary Lakes, Law No. 9103 dated 10.07.2003;<br />
� On Urban Planning, Law No. 8405 dated 17.09.1998;<br />
� On Public Disposal of Waste, Law No. 8094 dated 21.03.1996;<br />
� On Environmental Administration of Solid Waste, Law No. 9010, dated 13.02.2003;<br />
� On Regulatory Framework of Water Supply Sector and Disposal & Treatment of Wastewater,<br />
Law No. 8102 dated 28.03.1996;<br />
� On Irrigation and Drainage, Law No. 8518 dated 30.07.1999;<br />
� On Development of Areas with Priority for Tourism, Law No. 7665 dated 21.01.1993;<br />
� On protection of air from pollution, Law No. 8897 dated 16.05.2002;<br />
� Government Decision No. 103 dated 31.03.2002, “On Environmental Monitoring in the<br />
Republic of <strong>Albania</strong>”. This decision states, among others, the indicators to be used in<br />
monitoring the environments of the country;<br />
� Government decision No. 103 dated 31.03.2002 on “Environmental Monitoring”;<br />
� Government decision No. 266 dated 24.04.2003 on “Administration of Protected Areas”;<br />
� the <strong>Albania</strong>n Penal Code (Articles 201-207) provides the penalization of acts related to<br />
the violation of the environmental laws.<br />
Most recent legislative and administrative decisions, noteworthy with respect to the environment<br />
conservation are:<br />
30 November 2008 page 29 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
� Council of Minister’s decision No. 683 dated 02.11.2005 on “Proclamation of Shkodra<br />
Lake and Buna river Wetland Complex, Natural Area especially protected and its inclusion<br />
in the list of internationally important wetlands, especially as waterfowl habitats”;<br />
� Council of Minister’s decision No. 684 dated 02.11.2005 on “Proclamation of the <strong>Albania</strong>n<br />
Part of Shkodra Lake as Managed Natural Reserve”.<br />
Clearly, the <strong>Albania</strong>n government has taken legislative measures which reflect its desire to towards<br />
environment conservation and management in the country. But the enforcement of the<br />
laws and regulations and implementation of the government decisions are still weak.<br />
4 SITE INVESTIGATON<br />
4.1 Kick-off Meeting and first site investigation<br />
The first Kick-off meeting took place on 01.09.2008 09:00 h at the office of Mr. Selfo in Tirana.<br />
The participants were Mr. Selfo, as project coordinator for the <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong>, Mr. Linder, as<br />
team leader of <strong>MonTec</strong> and Mr. Skark, as expert for chemistry and pesticides of <strong>MonTec</strong> as well<br />
as Mr. Eftimi, as local expert. Mr. Selfo introduced the project goals to the team.<br />
Interview<br />
On 01.09.2008 13:00 h a first site investigation at Bajza took place. Besides Mr. Selfo and the<br />
<strong>MonTec</strong> team the director of the station Mr. Popaj participated. The results of this interview<br />
were:<br />
� the supposed hazardous chemical material/waste is stored in only one room at the<br />
storehouses,<br />
� the material is supposed to be stored since the beginning of the 1990 th ,<br />
� the old and abandoned railway wagons, deposited east of the storehouses are assumed<br />
to be not part of the German train with the pesticides,<br />
� the German train with the pesticides is supposed to be already removed and it is assumed<br />
that no pesticides of the train are stored in the storehouses,<br />
� the station itself is a secured and restricted area and should have no public access,<br />
� the train station is in operation for commercial transport of goods, there are no passenger<br />
transportation trains,<br />
� the storehouses are not in operation,<br />
� the station of Bajza is looking forward to use the storehouses in the future.<br />
4.2 Investigation on-site<br />
The Figure 19 shows an overview of the Bajza Station Site.<br />
30 November 2008 page 30 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
station administration<br />
storehouses<br />
Figure 19: Overview Bajza Station<br />
fenced area<br />
to Bajza village<br />
30 November 2008 page 31 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
4.2.1 Outside the Bajza station<br />
In the afternoon of the 01.09.2008 the surrounding area of the Bajza station was investigated<br />
with the focus on the groundwater flows downstream the site area. In approximately 1 km distance<br />
to the Bajza station the karstic groundwater is accessible. There are two karstic wells with<br />
no drain-off and one karstic well (Syri i Sheganit) with a drain-off to the Shkodra Lake (see<br />
Figure 20).<br />
Syri i Sheganit (well)<br />
assumed<br />
Groundwater flow direction<br />
Figure 20: Assumed groundwater downstream area of the site<br />
The flow velocity in the spillway of the Syri i Sheganit spring has been estimated between 0.05<br />
and 0.06 m/s which results in a discharge between 0.05 and 0.065 m³/s under the prevailing<br />
base flow conditions during the field trip.<br />
The water in the Syri i Sheganit spillway has a temperature of 18.7° C, a low electrical conductivity<br />
(EC) of 267 μS/cm indicating an expected low content of total dissolved solids and a pH<br />
value between 6 and 7. The water of the undrained karstic wells shows the same pH range, a<br />
higher temperature (26° C - 27° C) and in one case almost the same EC of 276 μS/cm. The<br />
water of the second undrained karstic spring located south to the first one gives an even lower<br />
EC with 197 μS/cm, a hint for a lower mineralization.<br />
At this site (Syri i Sheganit) a groundwater sample could be taken (see Figure 21).<br />
Bajza Station<br />
30 November 2008 page 32 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 21: Groundwater sample at Syri i Sheganit karstic well<br />
4.2.2 Inside the Bajza station<br />
On 02.09.2008 the storehouses and the railway tracks are investigated. At the same day the<br />
sampling took place.<br />
Figure 22 shows an overview of the storehouses and railway tracks with the definition of names<br />
of the objects used in this investigation. The following list gives an overview of the objects of the<br />
site investigation. The objects of detailed investigations and sampling are highlighted bold. See<br />
also the photographic documentation in Figure 23 to Figure 32.<br />
� Storehouse 1 with loading ramps left and right, not used<br />
- Room 1: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor<br />
- Room 2: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor, children used<br />
the dust as playground<br />
- Room 3: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor<br />
� Storehouse 2 with loading ramps left and right, not used<br />
- Room 1: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor, an old machinery<br />
in one corner<br />
- Room 2: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...), single leather rags on the<br />
floor; Room 2 has direct access to Room 3<br />
- Room 3: loaded with chemical material/waste, leather rags; some chemical material was<br />
found outside of the Room 3 on the Ramp2 left as well as in Room 2 close to the<br />
doors/gates of the Room 3<br />
30 November 2008 page 33 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
- Room 4: empty, dust and animal excrements (goats, birds ...) on the floor, there is no direct<br />
access to Room 3<br />
� Railway Track 1: in use during visit, one abandoned wagon deposited the north end of<br />
the track<br />
� Railway Track 2: in use during visit<br />
� Railway Track 3: not in use, 25 empty and abandoned wagons deposited on the track,<br />
supposed to be a track for the German train with pesticides<br />
� Platform between Track 3 and 4 : not in use and empty<br />
� Railway Track 4: not in use, 35 empty and abandoned wagons deposited on the track<br />
plus 2 abandoned wagons loaded with soil (overgrown) north of it.<br />
30 November 2008 page 34 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 22: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks<br />
30 November 2008 page 35 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 23: Storehouse 1, view south<br />
Figure 24: Storehouse 1, Room 1, view south<br />
30 November 2008 page 36 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 25: Storehouse 1, Room 2, view south<br />
Figure 26: Storehouse 1, Room 3, view south<br />
30 November 2008 page 37 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 27: Storehouse 2, view south<br />
Figure 28: Storehouse 2, Room 1, view east<br />
30 November 2008 page 38 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 29: Storehouse 2, Room 2, view south<br />
Figure 30: Storehouse 2, Room 3, view south<br />
30 November 2008 page 39 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 31: Railway Track 3, view north<br />
Figure 32: Railway Track 4, view south<br />
30 November 2008 page 40 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
4.3 Sampling<br />
As a conclusion of the information from Mr. Selfo and Mr. Popaj the <strong>MonTec</strong> team carried out<br />
the site visitation and focused the sampling to the major subjects of interest:<br />
� Storehouse 2, Room 3 with the supposed hazardous chemical material/waste and leather<br />
rugs.<br />
� Storehouse 2, Room 2 with dust and assumed remnants of the chemical materials in the<br />
adjacent Room 3 to which it has an open access at the southern wall. This material was focused<br />
at as a further storeroom for the hazardous materials in Room 3 after repacking.<br />
� Storehouse 2, Room 1 and 4 with dust and unknown further composition.<br />
� Abandoned railway wagons at track 3 and 4 were searched for leftovers of pesticides.<br />
� Topsoil was sampled in the direct vicinity of the railway tracks 3 and 4 in order to follow up<br />
spilled pesticides.<br />
Figure 33 shows an overview of the sampling locations.<br />
Figure 33: Overview of the sampling locations<br />
30 November 2008 page 41 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
During sampling procedure of solids at the Bajza site one member of the sampling personnel<br />
(Mr. Skark) used an electronic radiation dosimeter which was able to record possible radioactive<br />
impact on humans with a detection limit of 50 nSv/h. Over a period of 6 h no radioactivity was<br />
recorded (0 μSv). Thus, it can be concluded that no radioactive material or any remnants of this<br />
are stored in storehouse 2 and in the surrounding of that building.<br />
4.3.1 Samples in Storehouse 2<br />
Samples in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
During the sampling work in Storehouse 2, Room 3, it was discovered that the main parts of the<br />
stored materials are leather rags (shoes production) without and within plastic bags. The chemical<br />
material/waste was only dropped on top of the leather rugs in front of the two open access<br />
doors to the storehouse room. Figure 34 shows an overview of the investigated mixture of materials<br />
and sampling locations.<br />
The thickness of the deposited material in this room is less than 0.70 m.<br />
30 November 2008 page 42 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
� white powder<br />
Figure 34: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
�<br />
proven depth of piled rags<br />
� proven depth of piled rags<br />
� proven depth of piled rags<br />
30 November 2008 page 43 of 66<br />
�<br />
grey and white powder
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
The main part of the stored material consisted of tanned leather remnants, which remained<br />
after cutting out pieces for the production of shoes and other leather goods. This material is almost<br />
80 % of the stored material. These leather rags were piled up to 60 cm in the Room 3 and<br />
occurred at different sites (Figure 34, Figure 35 and Figure 36). The cuttings were sometimes<br />
sacked in woven polyester bags. Some of the bags were labeled indicating the former content<br />
as vegetal tanning agent (acacia bark, Figure 38). Remnants of torn bags were mixed with the<br />
leather cuttings. For further investigation a representative sample of the leather was taken<br />
(Table 4, L).<br />
Figure 35: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
Figure 36: Leather rags in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
30 November 2008 page 44 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
To a lesser extent (< 20 %) a white and a grey powder were found in hall 3 (Figure 18). Both<br />
powders consist of small acicular crystals (size < 0.1 mm) and were often cemented due to infiltrated<br />
and evaporated humidity. The grey powder seemed to be a soiled variant of the white<br />
powder due to the contact with the tanned leather and some excremental material (birds?,<br />
rats?). The mass relation between white and grey powder was estimated to 80 : 20.<br />
Figure 37: White and grey powder in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
Most of the substances were sacked to torn bags which were labelled at several bags with<br />
Na2SiF6, sodium hexafluorosilicate, indicating the <strong>Albania</strong>n origin of the material (Figure 38).<br />
Some field tests showed: The material was soluble in water to a certain extent. The solution<br />
smelled like hydrochloric acid and had a pH value between 3 and 4. No reaction with diluted<br />
hydrochloric acid (HCl, 3 Vol-%) was found. Both substances, the white and the grey powder,<br />
were sampled separately by 10 penetrations with a metal mortar to a bucket and were mixed<br />
thoroughly in order to receive a representative composite sample (Table 4, M1 and M2).<br />
30 November 2008 page 45 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 38: Labelled bags in Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
Samples from other Rooms in Storehouse 2<br />
The dust/debris in the other rooms consisted of rubbed plastering and trickled roof material,<br />
remnants of stored chemical substances and some organic material (animal hair [goats … ],<br />
dried animal excrements and charcoal remnants). In Room 2 additionally some leather rags<br />
were found.<br />
Sampling of the dust/debris in Room 2 focused at the southern part of the room with the open<br />
door to room 3 (S1). In order to get a composite sample of the dust materials 10 single samples<br />
were mixed thoroughly (Figure 39). The mass of dust in Room 2 can be roughly estimated by<br />
less than 100 kg.<br />
30 November 2008 page 46 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 39: Dust and debris sampling in Storehouse 2, Room 2<br />
From the dust and debris material on the floor in the Rooms 1 and 4 one composite sample was<br />
mixed from 10 single samples in Room 1 and 4 each (S2). The amount of dust and debris in<br />
each Room was estimated to be less than 50 kg.<br />
The material of both samples contained probably carbonate which had been proven by a test<br />
with diluted hydrochloric acid.<br />
4.3.2 Solid samples from outside the Storehouses<br />
Sampling of solids outside the Storehouse concentrated on peculiar remnants of chemicals in or<br />
around the abandoned railway wagons or the topsoil in the direct vicinity of the railway tracks 3<br />
and 4.<br />
30 November 2008 page 47 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 40: Overview of the sample locations outside the Storehouses<br />
Abandoned railway wagons<br />
Sample point<br />
soil �<br />
Sample point soil �<br />
Sample point soil<br />
�<br />
� Sample point soil<br />
� Sample point soil<br />
� Sample in wagon (powder)<br />
� Sample point soil<br />
� Sample point red material<br />
In all the railway wagons the floor was made of wood that had been torn out and only the basic<br />
steel girder construction was visible.<br />
30 November 2008 page 48 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
At one point at track 4 a grey-white powder with an obvious small density was found in a wagon<br />
(Figure 41) and could be sampled (Table 4, B1). The mass of that powder can be estimated<br />
with 10 kg.<br />
Figure 41: Material in a wagon<br />
At another point, west of track 3 and south of the Storehouse 2 a red material with round blackwhite<br />
inclusions was found. The material showed a massive consistence. It might either be a<br />
natural substance like mudstone, brick or grog clay. On the other hand, it might represent the<br />
remnants of a condensed synthetic chemical substance. The mass can be assumed to less<br />
than 5 kg. It was sampled (Table 4, B2).<br />
Soil sampling at the railway tracks 3 and 4<br />
For soil sampling 3 small pits were dug in order to collect material from topsoil west of track 3.<br />
Each pit was approximately 30 cm deep (Figure 42). The soil material was unified in a bucket,<br />
thoroughly mixed and a composite sample was filled into a glass (Table 4, B3). This sampling<br />
procedure was repeated east of track 4 (sample B4).<br />
30 November 2008 page 49 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Figure 42: Soil sampling at the railway tracks<br />
In no case a top sealing by a confining clay layer or any other cohesive soil material was found.<br />
The humid top soil consisted of a sandy silt layer with a large amount of well rounded gravel.<br />
The silt was rich in carbonates proven by a test with hydrochloric acid. The consistence of the<br />
topsoil will not hinder the infiltration of any precipitation. It can be assumed that the topsoil will<br />
provide only a moderate sorption capacity to organic chemicals like pesticides.<br />
4.3.3 Water sampling<br />
Water sampling was already performed on 01.09.2008 at the Syri I Sheganit karstic well.<br />
See chapter 4.2.1.<br />
4.4 Estimation of quantities<br />
The estimation of the quantities gives the following results:<br />
� Storehouse 2<br />
- Room 1: Dust and debris on the floor < 50 kg<br />
- Room 2: Dust and debris on the floor ~ 100 kg<br />
30 November 2008 page 50 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
- Room 3: Leather waste ~ 200 t<br />
Chemical Waste ~ 80 t<br />
- Room 4: Dust and debris on the floor < 50 kg.<br />
5 ANALYSES<br />
The following Table 4 (see also Annex 1) gives an overview of the sampled material and the<br />
subsequent chemical analysis which was performed after the sample transport to Germany.<br />
Table 4: Overview of sampled material and subsequent chemical analysis<br />
Nr. short<br />
name<br />
description material colour analytical procedure<br />
1 M1 material 1 powder white XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS, density analysis<br />
2 M2 material 2 powder grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
3 L leather leather brown microbiology, HM after water extraction, GC-MS<br />
4 S1 dust 1 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, asbestos, GC-MS<br />
5 S2 dust 2 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
6 B1 railway-wagon 1 powder greywhite XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
7 B2 railway-wagon 2 mudstone? red XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
8 B3 railway 3, soil soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
9 B4 railway 4, soil soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
10 SiS water water<br />
chloroorganic pesticides, GC-MS, Ca, Mg, Na,<br />
K, Cl, SO4, (NO3, NH4, DOC), HM, AOX,<br />
AOX – adsorbable organic halogens (water)<br />
DOC – dissolved organic carbon<br />
EOX – extractable organic halogens (solids)<br />
GC-MS – screening test with gas chromatography and mass-selective detection after extraction with solvents of<br />
different polarity (methanol, hexane)<br />
HM – heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)<br />
TOC – total organic carbon<br />
XRF – X-ray fluorescence<br />
5.1 Analysis of samples<br />
5.1.1 Analysis of samples from Room 3<br />
One of the possible hazards in leather remnants is the contamination with anthrax spores. This<br />
can only be identified by a specific microbiological and molecular-biological analytic procedure<br />
which is done in a special laboratory at the Stuttgart-Hohenheim University. Due to tanning<br />
processes the leather may contain residues of mineral or vegetal tanning substances which<br />
might be eluted after the future disposal at a landfill. For assessing the mineral elution potential<br />
of the leather (L) an elution by water has been performed (S4 test according DEV, elution by<br />
demineralised water for 24 hours at a solid to liquid ratio of 1 : 10) and the leachate has been<br />
tested on heavy metals, particularly chromium, mercury, nickel, and aluminium. For tracking<br />
vegetal tanning agents a further elution of the leather sample (L) with organic solvents of differ-<br />
30 November 2008 page 51 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
ent polarity (methanol and hexane) has been performed. The extracts are analysed by gaschromatography<br />
with a mass-selective detection (GC-MS) in order to identify certain tannic acids<br />
(Table 4).<br />
The composite samples of the white and grey powder (M1 and M2) are investigated by X-ray<br />
fluorescence (XRF) which may prove the most likely inorganic composition of the material. In<br />
addition the material was tested for total organic carbon (TOC) and extractable organic halogens<br />
(EOX). Finally, extracts with 2 organic solvents (methanol and hexane) are analyzed by<br />
GC-MS in order to identify potential organic compounds (e.g. pesticides, Table 4). A density<br />
analysis of M1 has resulted in a density of approximately 2.5 g/cm³ which corroborates the assumption<br />
of sodium hexafluoro silicate. The pure Na2SiF6 has a density of 2.7 g/cm³ but the<br />
sampled material may not reach this value due to the technical purity grade and contamination<br />
during the storage.<br />
5.1.2 Analysis of the dust samples S1 and S2<br />
Apart from the analytical procedure as described for the chemical material M1 and M2 in Room<br />
2 the dust sample S1 is additionally analyzed for asbestos fibres which may be included to the<br />
dust from trickling roof material (Table 4).<br />
5.1.3 Analysis of the samples B1 and B2 from the abandoned railway tracks<br />
Both peculiar materials B1 and B2 are analyzed in the same procedure as the samples M1 and<br />
M2 (Table 4). B2 sample has to be crushed by a hammer as a preparation for further analysis.<br />
Particularly the GC-MS screening proves whether these materials contain organic pollutants like<br />
pesticides.<br />
5.1.4 Analysis of the soil samples B3 and B4<br />
Soil samples B3 and B4 are be analyzed with respect to the parameters TOC, EOX and after<br />
extraction with methanol and hexane by GC-MS in order to identify residues of any spilled pesticide<br />
or other organic pollutants.<br />
5.1.5 Analysis of water<br />
Due to the transport condition water analysis focuses on conservative inorganic ions (Ca 2+ ,<br />
Mg 2+ , Na + , K + , Cl - , SO4 2- and heavy metals). For orientation purpose the non-conservative parameters<br />
like nitrate, ammonia and dissolved organic carbon are also analyzed. Persistent pesticides<br />
or other organic pollutants may be identified by GC-MS screening procedure.<br />
5.2 Performance of chemical and microbiological analyses<br />
The microbiological tests of leather aiming at the exclusion of the occurrence of Bacillus anthracis<br />
were performed by a specialized laboratory at the University Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Institut<br />
für Umwelt- und Tierhygiene, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany (Prof. Dr. R. Böhm). The analysis<br />
30 November 2008 page 52 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
was done as microbiological cultivating on a semi-selective nutrient medium and as a molecular-biological<br />
procedure like polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR).<br />
The X-ray fluorescence investigations (XRF) of several solid samples were performed by Friedrich-Schiller-University<br />
Jena, Institute for Geo-Sciences, Department of Mineralogy, 07749<br />
Jena, Germany (Prof. Dr. L. Viereck-Götte). Main constituents were analyzed after a melting<br />
preparation whereas trace elements were determined after a compression-moulding with potassium<br />
bromide. The XRF device was characterized by a rhodium cathode as primary X-ray radiation<br />
source and a lithium fluoride crystal for the analysis of the excited fluorescence radiation.<br />
The quantification was aiming at elements from the 3 rd to the 7 th period in the periodic table<br />
while the results for the 2 nd period were only qualitative (including fluorine). Carbon compounds<br />
were burnt during the annealing process at 900°C but some of the constituents were oxygenated<br />
in this process resulting in negative annealing losses. As the XRF analysis at the Jena<br />
laboratory generally aimed to natural rocks and their constituents the following elements from<br />
the 3 rd and 4 th period in the periodic table were seen as main components: sodium, magnesium,<br />
aluminium, silicon, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, titan, manganese, and iron. These elements<br />
were quantified after the melting preparation. The following elements from the 3 rd to the<br />
7 th period of the periodic table were seen as traces and were quantified after compressionmoulding:<br />
sulphur, chlorine, vanadium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, rubidium, strontium,<br />
yttrium, zirconium, niobium, barium, lead, and uranium.<br />
Asbestos fiber identification was performed by raster electron microscopy (REM) and further<br />
confirmation by fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) by CRB Analysen Service,<br />
37818 Hardegsen, Germany.<br />
In preparation of the gas chromatography screening aliquots of the solid samples (2 - 3 g) were<br />
being extracted separately with methanol and hexane (20 ml each) for 30 min in an ultrasonic<br />
bath. The supernatants were used for further analyses. The water samples were extracted on<br />
solid phase material (SPE) of different polarity and eluted by solvents of different polarity. One<br />
liter of water was filtrated either on a 6 ml SPE column SDB1 (styrenevinylbenzene by BAKER)<br />
or on a 6 ml SPE column HRX (polystyrenevinylbenzene by MACHEREY & NAGEL). The SDB 1<br />
column was eluted by 8 ml methanol, the HRX column by 8 ml ethylacetate. Both eluates were<br />
dried by evaporation and the residues were solved in methanol prior to the GC procedure.<br />
The boundary conditions for the GC-MS analysis are characterized as follows:<br />
For sample feeding a cold injection system (CIS; KAS 3 by GERSTEL) was used. The volume of<br />
2 μl sample extract was injected to the GC by the CIS under solvent venting at 40°C.<br />
The GC device (gas chromatograph 5890 series II by AGILENT with auto sampling device<br />
AS7673) was equipped by a capillary column J&W DB5 (length 30 m, inner diameter 0.25 mm,<br />
film thickness 0.25 μm). The realized temperature program started with an initial temperature of<br />
50°C (1 min), continued with a heating period at a rate of 8°C/min and finished with a final temperature<br />
of 270°C (5 min). The total time elapsed for one run was 33.5 min.<br />
30 November 2008 page 53 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
The mass selective detection device (quadrupole MSD 5972 by AGILENT) of the gas chromatograph<br />
screened in the full scan mode masses between 50 and 500 m/z, which were identified<br />
by a comparison with spectra libraries (NBS-75K [74,828 compounds]; EHRENSTORFER [1,141<br />
compounds]; HP-PESTICIDE LIBRARY [340 compounds]). Particularly the last 2 libraries are specialized<br />
to pesticide identification whereas the NBS library includes a broad variety of organic<br />
compounds. Nevertheless the GC-MS screening targets mainly at the identification of pesticides<br />
which had been stored at Bajza Station in the early 1990’s. It can be assumed that 37 different<br />
active organic ingredients of pesticides were stored temporarily in rail wagons at the Bajza site.<br />
The occurrence of these organic pesticides can not be excluded a priory. From the total number<br />
of 37 compounds the spectra of 29 substances were included in the GC-MS screening process.<br />
The identification of a specific compound based on the retention time in the chromatographic<br />
column which was added by a comparison of the observed fragments and their relative intensities<br />
at that retention time with the spectra libraries. The proposed occurrence of a compound in<br />
a sample is only adopted when the match quality with the library spectrum exceeds 50 % probability<br />
and the chromatogram shows a peak of relevant intensity indicating a significant abundance<br />
in the sample (at least more than 5 % of the integrated area). Thus, by the GC-MS<br />
screening only the main organic compounds were qualitatively assigned. No further attempt for<br />
quantification was performed due to the lack of appropriate standards for quantification. In addition<br />
further appropriate clean up steps were needed for the extract preparation.<br />
All other analytical procedures were performed according to DIN standards.<br />
5.3 Results of chemical and microbiological analyses<br />
The following describes the results of the chemical and microbiological analyses. The complete<br />
results are listed in the tables in Annex 2. Annex 3 gives a detailed list of presumable pesticides<br />
of the "pesticide train" and the possible GC-MS screening.<br />
5.3.1 Results for the leather sample (L)<br />
By the microbiological investigation Bacillus anthracis could not be found with a limit of detection<br />
at 20 spores in a 15 g aliquot of the sample.<br />
The elution of solutes by the demineralised water gave a hint to soluble chromium and aluminium<br />
(aluminium 2.06 mg/l, chromium 1.48 mg/l) whereas mercury and nickel were only found on<br />
a trace level (mercury 1.6 μg/l, nickel 19 μg/l). A further analysis for chromium (IV) could not be<br />
performed due to the colour of the eluate and matrix effects.<br />
As a result of the GC-MS screening several plasticizers could be identified. In both extracts,<br />
methanol and hexane, 2-ethyl-hexyl-diphenyl-phosphat (C20H27O4P, Octicizer, USAN, CAS<br />
1241-94-7), a phosphor acid ester, was identified, which is used as plasticizer and flame retardant<br />
(Table 7). Further more in the hexane extract di-butyl-phthalate (DBP, CAS 84-74-2) and in<br />
the methanol extract di-(2-ethyl-hexyl)-phthalate (DEHP; CAS 117-81-7), two other plasticizers,<br />
were detected. Residues of vegetal tanning agents were not identified in the leather rags although<br />
some of the remnants were packed in bags indicating the use of acacia tanning agents<br />
30 November 2008 page 54 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
(mimosa), condensed tanning compounds like catechin and other flavandiols (Figure 38,<br />
SCHUBERT ET AL., 1978).<br />
So it can be concluded that the leather was tanned by mineral salts which may be soluble after<br />
dumping the material in a landfill. The occurrence of the plasticizers described above may not<br />
pose any additional risk either for the occupational safety during repackaging or for an environmental<br />
impact after a landfill disposal (BG Chemie, 1995).<br />
5.3.2 Results for the stored material (M1 and M2) in Room 3 in Storehouse 2<br />
In both sampled powders M1 and M2 extractable organic bound halogens were not found (see<br />
Table 5). Particularly the white powder M1 provided a low organic carbon content (900 mg/kg)<br />
whereas the grey powder M2 was a little richer in organic carbon (20 g/kg).<br />
Table 5: Results of the analysis for total organic carbon (TOC) and extractable organic bound<br />
halogens (EOX)<br />
Nr.<br />
short<br />
name<br />
description<br />
TOC<br />
[%]<br />
EOX<br />
[mg/kg]<br />
1 M1 material 1 0.09 < 1<br />
2 M2 material 2 2.0 < 1<br />
4 S1 dust 1 3.0 < 1<br />
5 S2 dust 2 3.1 < 1<br />
6 B1 railway-waggon 1 40.4 22<br />
7 B2 railway-waggon 2 0.34 < 1<br />
8 B3 railway 3, soil 7.7 < 1<br />
9 B4 railway 4, soil 6.2 < 1<br />
limit of quantification TOC 0.01 %, EOX 1 mg/kg<br />
By XRF analysis sodium and silicon could be identified as the main constituents of M1 and M2<br />
(see Table 6, Figure 43). These both elements summed up to c. 400 g/kg while all other quantified<br />
elements resulted in 7 or 38 g/kg (M1 respectively M2). Pure sodium hexafluoro silicate,<br />
Na2SiF6, (CAS 16893-85-9) should have a stoichiometric ratio of Na : Si : F of 24.5 : 14.9 : 60.6<br />
which was almost met by the sodium and silicon fraction in M1 and M2. The respective ratio (Na<br />
+ Si) : F has to be 39.4 : 60.6 which is also approximately complied in the tested material. Additionally<br />
fluorine was qualitatively found in both samples to a certain amount but could not be<br />
quantified as described before.<br />
30 November 2008 page 55 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Table 6: Results of the XRF analysis<br />
Element<br />
Sample /<br />
Dimension<br />
M 1 M2 S1 S2 B1 B2<br />
Na [g/kg] 262.5 248.8 7.3 10.9 2.5 b.d.<br />
Mg [g/kg] 0.2 2.6 16.5 25.0 3.6 1.6<br />
Al [g/kg] 5.2 8.3 49.7 54.6 19.0 356.3<br />
Si [g/kg] 143.5 152.1 220.4 224.2 135.8 12.9<br />
P [g/kg] 0.1 0.4 1.6 1.0 4.8 0.4<br />
S [g/kg] < 0.005 7.3 7.533 15.447 8.9 0.031<br />
Cl [g/kg] 0.3 3.1 0.224 0.331 1.3 < 0.005<br />
K [g/kg] 0.4 1.5 8.1 9.5 3.4 0.5<br />
Ca [g/kg] 0.4 11.5 224.3 162.1 49.5 1.4<br />
Ti [g/kg] 0.04 0.2 2.1 2.8 0.8 23.62<br />
V [g/kg] 0.004 0.01 0.095 0.134 0.20 1.06<br />
Cr [g/kg] < 0.005 0.06 0.33 0.683 0.33 2.046<br />
Mn [g/kg] 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.3<br />
Fe [g/kg] 0.3 3.0 35.3 74.0 54.4 172.6<br />
Co [g/kg] < 0.005 < 0.005 0.009 0.032 0.03 0.08<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0.02 0.04 0.115 0.212 0.09 0.834<br />
Cu [g/kg] 0.01 0.02 0.056 0.085 0.20 < 0.005<br />
Zn [g/kg] < 0.005 0.06 0.23 0.907 1.12 0.265<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0.01 0.01 0.035 0.038 0.14 0.007<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0.01 0.07 0.358 0.212 0.14 0.071<br />
Y [g/kg] 0.001 0.002 0.01 0.012 < 0.005 0.085<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0.02 0.03 0.095 0.079 0.05 0.613<br />
Nb [g/kg] 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.006 < 0.005 0.042<br />
Ba [g/kg] < 0.005 0.06 0.38 0.611 0.25 0.443<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0.004 0.01 0.046 0.052 0.06 0.089<br />
U [g/kg] < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.008 0.002<br />
sum [g/kg] 413.1 439.2 575.3 583.8 287.7 576.3<br />
annealing<br />
loss<br />
(%) -4.07 -16.47 24.80 24.21 6.32 12.92<br />
limit of quantification 0.005 g/kg, b.d. – below limit of detection<br />
The combination of all results - low TOC, EOX below the limit of quantification, density c. 2.5<br />
g/cm³, prevailing sodium and silicon, qualitative detection of fluorine - gave strong constraints<br />
for the corroboration of the sodium hexafluoro silicate assumption. Sodium hexafluoro silicate<br />
has biocide properties and can be used as a wood preserving agent and insecticide but it can<br />
also be used as the intermediate material for further chemical synthesis (e.g. kryolithe production<br />
for aluminium smelting, TOMLIN, 1997). This inorganic fluorine compound forms white hexagonal<br />
crystals, has a water solubility of 6.5 g/L and decomposes at 500°C when it is heated.<br />
This hazardous chemical substance is classified as toxic particularly when it is inhaled, ingested<br />
30 November 2008 page 56 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
or in contact with the bare skin during working processes (HANEKE &CARSON, 2001; KÜHN –<br />
BIRETT, 2008).<br />
mass concentration [g/kg]<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Na Mg Al Si P S Cl K Ca Ti V Cr Mn Fe Co Ni Cu Zn Rb Sr Y Zr Nb Ba Pb U<br />
increasing atomic number<br />
Figure 43: Element composition according to the results of XRF analysis<br />
The GC-MS screening resulted in both extracts in the identification of the plasticizers DBP and<br />
DEHP without any hint to further components (Table 7).<br />
5.3.3 Results for the dust/debris samples (S1 and S2) in Storehouse 2<br />
In the dust/debris sample S1 asbestos fibres were found and specified as chrysotile asbestos.<br />
This result could also be held for true for the sample S2 as the most likely source of the asbestos<br />
fibres was trickled roof material. The occurrence of asbestos in the dust will put serious constraints<br />
for the occupational protection during the cleaning of the Room 2 and 3.<br />
XRF analysis of the dust samples S1 and S2 resulted in the prevailing inorganic constituents<br />
silicon, calcium, aluminium, and iron which were contributing c. 52 % of the inorganic fraction<br />
(Table 6). A large amount of the calcium was presumably bound as calcium carbonate which<br />
explained the annealing loss of c. 24 % due to inorganic carbon. The investigation of the melting<br />
preparation showed oxygen apart from carbon as the main component of the 2 nd period in the<br />
periodic table because the sum of the oxidized forms of the elements gave a recovery near<br />
30 November 2008 page 57 of 66<br />
M1<br />
M2<br />
S1<br />
S2<br />
B1<br />
B2
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
100 %. So it could be assumed that fluorine and fluorine compounds occurred only subordinately<br />
in the dust/debris.<br />
In both samples EOX could not be detected and organic carbon had a fraction of c. 3 % (see<br />
Table 5) which can be seen as low in comparison to inorganic bound carbon.<br />
The screening by GC-MS revealed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and phthalates<br />
(DEHP, DBP, and diethyl-phthalate [DEP]) as the relevant organic compounds in the dust/debris<br />
(Table 7). In S2 additionally phenol was identified. Phthalates and PAH can be seen as ubiquitous<br />
pollutants. Although these compounds were not quantified, it can be assumed that their<br />
occurrence do not pose an additional environmental hazard.<br />
5.3.4 Results for the samples around the abandoned railway wagons (B1 and B2)<br />
The grey-white powder from a railway-wagon (B1, Figure 41) was the only sample which revealed<br />
a quantifiable amount of EOX (22 mg/kg). The material consists to a great fraction of<br />
organic carbon (40 %, see Table 5).<br />
According to this result of the TOC analysis the XRF investigation of B1 resulted in a small recovery<br />
of material (< 30 %, see Table 6). The elements silicon, calcium and iron were contributing<br />
most of the inorganic fraction (sum 24 %) whereas all other quantified elements summed to<br />
4.8 % among which sulphur had the greatest part (0.9 %).<br />
Table 7: Identified organic compounds in the GC-MS screening<br />
Nr.<br />
short<br />
name<br />
1 M1 material 1<br />
2 M2 material 2<br />
description<br />
Extract<br />
hexane methanol<br />
DBP, DEHP DBP, DEHP<br />
3 L leather DBP, Octicizer DEHP, octicizer<br />
4 S1 dust 1 DBP, DEHP, PAH DEP, DDP, DEHP, PAH<br />
5 S2 dust 2 DBP, DEHP, PAH DBP, DEP, DEHP, PAH, phenol<br />
6 B1 railway wagon 1 DBP, tetradifon DEHP, tetradifon<br />
7 B2 railway wagon 2 HC HC<br />
8 B3 railway track 3, soil HC bisabolene, myristicin<br />
9 B4 railway track 4, soil HC DBP, DEP, PAK<br />
DBP – di-butyl-phthalate<br />
DDP – di-dodecyl-phthalate<br />
DEP – di–ethyl-phthalate<br />
DEHP – di-ethylhexyl-phthalate<br />
HC – hydrocarbons<br />
PAH – polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons<br />
The GC-MS screening of sample B1 revealed phthalates (DEHP, DBP) and a pesticide, tetradifon<br />
(Table 7). The common name tetradifon stands for 4-chlorphenyl 2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone<br />
(C12H6Cl4O2S, CAS 116-29-0) which is an acaricide agent (TOMLIN, 1997). The mass frac-<br />
30 November 2008 page 58 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
tion of carbon in the compound should amount to 40 %. Tetradifon should be one of the pesticides<br />
which were transported in the “pesticide train” from Germany to Bajza, <strong>Albania</strong> in 1992.<br />
The compound provides only a small solubility to water and a high octanol-water partition coefficient<br />
(log Pow 4.61) indicating a high sorption affinity to the organic substance in the soil<br />
(TOMLIN, 1997). Thus it can not be characterized as a fast leaching substance. Nevertheless it is<br />
classified as a harmful substance which can be toxic to aquatic organisms and it pose also a<br />
risk if it is inhaled as particle from dust (IPCS, 1986, 1997). Therefore all obvious remnants of<br />
this material should be collected and disposed in a safe way in order to avoid any adverse environmental<br />
impact or any hazard for human health.<br />
On the other hand the GC-MS screening of sample B2 showed only hydrocarbons but the organic<br />
carbon content is low and EOX were not present at all (see Table 5 and Table 7).<br />
The XRF analysis of sample B2 gave aluminium and iron as predominant inorganic components<br />
and titanium as an important trace element. The material B2 can be seen as a mixture of inorganic<br />
compounds with uncertain origin but no hints to relevant pesticides can be found. The<br />
analytic results did not give any hint for an environmental impact of the material residues or any<br />
exigence for the removal of the material.<br />
5.3.5 Results for the soil samples (B3 and B4)<br />
In the soil samples EOX were not detected but organic carbon reached content up to 7.7 % (see<br />
Table 5).<br />
In the GC-MS screening the following groups of compounds were identified: Hydrocarbons,<br />
PAH and phthalates (DBP, DEP, see Table 7). However, no compound was found which could<br />
be seen as a pesticide.<br />
In sample B3 one of the relevant compounds found had the molecular formula C15H24 which can<br />
be described as �-bisabolene (CAS 495-61-4), a terpenoid substance, which occurs as a fragrance<br />
in many plants and acts as an information substance among insects (pheromone). The<br />
spectrum match quality for this identification is with 93 % rather high. This compound is insoluble<br />
in water and can be used as flavor in food (Bedoukian Research, 2008; EC/2002/113). Nevertheless<br />
the molecular formula C15H24 may have other forms of molecular binding than bisabolene<br />
resulting in different chemical properties and in only slightly different mass spectra (e.g. �farnesene,<br />
CAS 18794-84-8; �-cadinene, CAS 39029-41-9; �-gurjunene, CAS 489-40-7; gemacrene<br />
A, CAS 28387-44-2). Many of these alternative substances with a molecular formula<br />
C15H24 are terpenes like bisabolene.<br />
The second relevant organic compound in sample B3 identified by GC-MS screening showed a<br />
molecular formula C11H12O3 and was assigned to be myristicin (match quality 99 %, CAS 607-<br />
91-0) which is a phenylpropanoide and is described as an essential constituent of nutmeg oil<br />
with a small solubility in water. As described before alternative chemical binding of C11H12O3<br />
may result in different compounds (e.g. carpacin, CAS 23953-63-1; ethyl benzoylacetate, CAS<br />
94-02-0).<br />
30 November 2008 page 59 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
All these organic compounds identified in the soil material along the railway tracks are not pesticides.<br />
They can not be quantified and according to the actual knowledge they may not pose any<br />
hazard to the environment or to man which demand any remediation or mitigation measure.<br />
5.3.6 Results for the water sample of Sheganit spring (SiS)<br />
As the on-site measurement of electrical conductivity had shown a low mineralization of the<br />
spring water was expected which was proven by the laboratory analysis (see Table 3 and Table<br />
8). Among the cations only calcium and magnesium had a relevant concentration. The concentration<br />
of anions amounted only to few milligrams. Hydrogen-carbonate might contribute the<br />
missing fraction in the ion balance but was not analyzed because the sample could not be<br />
transported refrigerated and a subsequent analysis for this parameter would be misleading.<br />
Also the values for ammonium, nitrate and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) might be lower than<br />
they would be after a refrigerated transport.<br />
Table 8: Analysis of water from Syri i Sheganit (sampling 01.09.2008)<br />
Parameter Dimension Concentration<br />
aluminium μg/L 50<br />
cadmium μg/L < 0.3<br />
chromium μg/L < 2<br />
copper μg/L < 5<br />
lead μg/L < 1<br />
mercury μg/L < 0.1<br />
nickel μg/L < 2<br />
zinc μg/L < 5<br />
DOC mg/L 0.8<br />
AOX μg/L 10<br />
DOC concentration and the content of adsorbable organic bound halogens were unobtrusively<br />
low. Heavy metal concentrations lied below the respective limits of detection (Table 8).<br />
The quantitative analysis of chlororganics did not reveal any pesticide concentration above the<br />
limit of quantification of 0.0025 μg/L. The following pesticides were tested: aldrin, o,p-DDT, p,p-<br />
DDT, o,p-DDE, p,p-DDE, o,p-DDD, p,p-DDD, dieldrin, �-endosulfan, �-endosulfan, hexachlorobenzene,<br />
�-hexachlorohexane (HCH), �-HCH, �-HCH (lindane), �-HCH, heptachlore, cisheptachlorepoxid,<br />
trans-heptachlorepoxid, methoxychlor.<br />
The GC-MS screening of the water did not result in any relevant signal for an organic trace<br />
compound particularly no hint for any pesticide was given.<br />
30 November 2008 page 60 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
6 CONCLUSIONS AND RISKS<br />
6.1 Inside the Storehouse<br />
There are two major storehouses at the Bajza Station. Both storehouses are empty, besides the<br />
stored chemicals and waste. Figure 22 and the following list shows an overview of the storehouses<br />
and railway tracks in-between the storehouses.<br />
� Storehouse 1 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not in use.<br />
� Railway Track 1 in operation<br />
� Railway Track 2 in operation<br />
� Storehouse 2 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not used.<br />
o Room 1: empty<br />
o Room 2: empty, dust and debris on the floor. There is a direct access to Room 3.<br />
o Room 3: loaded with chemical material/waste, leather rags<br />
o Room 4: empty.<br />
Some of the wooden gates to the rooms of the storehouses are missing, others malfunction.<br />
The gates have direct access to the loading ramps of the storehouse. The storehouses are in a<br />
poor condition, the roofs of the loading ramps are partially broken, the roof of the storehouse<br />
could be partially leaky. There is no information about the status of structures of the buildings.<br />
The station of Bajza is looking forward to use the storehouses in the future. It is unknown if any<br />
restructuring planning exists.<br />
The supposed hazardous chemical material/waste is only stored in Storehouse 2, Room 3. As a<br />
result of the preliminary site investigation it could be detected that the main parts of the stored<br />
materials are leather waste, e.g. leather rags (shoes production) which are mainly stored loose<br />
but sometimes packed in plastic bags. The hazardous chemical material was dropped on top of<br />
the leather waste in front of the two open gates to the Storehouse Room 3. Figure 34 shows an<br />
overview of the investigated mixture of materials and their position in Room 3. The height of the<br />
material deposited in this room does not exceed 0.70 m.<br />
Some material similar to the waste stored in Room 3 could be found outside the Room 3, close<br />
to the gate to Room 2 as well as at the gate on the left loading ramp.<br />
It is estimated that almost 80 % of the stored material consists of tanned leather remnants,<br />
which remained after cutting out pieces for the production of shoes and other leather goods.<br />
These leather rags pile up to 0.60 m in Room 3. The cuttings are sometimes sacked in woven<br />
polyester bags. Some of the bags are labeled indicating the former content as vegetal tanning<br />
agent (acacia bark). Remnants of torn bags are mixed with the leather cuttings. The mass of the<br />
leather waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 200 t.<br />
30 November 2008 page 61 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
The chemical analyses of the leather waste proved that it had undergone a tanning process with<br />
mineral salts. By a specific microbiological examination of a representative leather sample the<br />
occurrence of anthrax spores can be excluded.<br />
To a less extent (< 20 %) white and a grey powders were found in Room 3. Both powders consist<br />
of small acicular crystals (size < 0.1 mm) and are often cemented due to infiltrated and<br />
evaporated humidity. The grey powder seemed to be a soiled variant of the white powder due to<br />
the contact with the tanned leather and some excremental material (birds, rats etc.). The mass<br />
relation between white and grey powder is estimated to 80 : 20. Most of the substances are<br />
sacked to damaged bags several of which are labeled with Na2SiF6, sodium hexafluorosilicate,<br />
indicating the <strong>Albania</strong>n origin of the material. As a result of the chemical analyses the material<br />
can be seen as sodium hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6) with a degree of purity exceeding 90 %.<br />
The mass of the chemical material/waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 80 t.<br />
In Room 2 with an open access gate to Room 3 dust/debris can be found consisting of plaster<br />
rubbed off the walls and trickled roof material, remnants of stored hazardous chemical substances<br />
and some organic material (animal hair, dried animal excrements, charcoal remnants<br />
etc.) as well as some leather rags were found. The mass of dust in Room 2 is roughly estimated<br />
to be less than 100 kg. The composition of the dust/debris is characterized by the occurrence of<br />
asbestos fibers.<br />
Radioactive material or any remnants of this has not been detected in Storehouse 2 and in the<br />
surrounding of that building.<br />
Inside the Storehouse 2 pesticides are not detected. The only compound with biocide properties<br />
found was sodium hexafluorosilicate.<br />
The detected waste inside the storehouse is hazardous for human beings when it is inhaled,<br />
ingested or in contact with the bare skin. The contact with water should be prevented because<br />
of the acid producing reaction. Therefore the waste should be repacked immediately. Any unauthorized<br />
access to the waste should be inhibiting.<br />
The Terms of References for the Bidding Documents for the repackaging of the chemical waste<br />
in the storehouse, dated 14.11.2008, cover the appropriate handling and protection of the staff<br />
during repackaging the waste and cleaning procedures of the rooms (see the Annex 4).<br />
The main constraints for the occupational protection during the cleaning and the repackaging<br />
procedure are given by the following results:<br />
� The occurrence of sodium hexafluoro silicate (M1 and M2) in Room 3 of Storehouse 2<br />
which is a hazardous chemical substance and classified as toxic particularly when it is<br />
inhaled, ingested or in contact with the bare skin.<br />
� The occurrence of asbestos fibers in the dust/debris (S1) of Room 2 in Storehouse 2 indicates<br />
that an inhalation is dangerous.<br />
30 November 2008 page 62 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
� Although the occurrence of anthrax spores in the leather rags (L) was excluded by a<br />
specific microbiological examination, the repacking of the leather rags should be done<br />
under appropriate protection of the handling personnel for precautionary reasons however.<br />
Particular constraints for the repackaging material are posed by the classification of sodium<br />
hexafluoro silicate (M1 and M2) to UN hazard class 6.1 (UN No. 2674) which has to be complied<br />
by the used material.<br />
With the measures described in the Terms of Reference (see the Annex 4), the today open<br />
stored hazardous waste in the storehouse will be treated for the final disposal.<br />
The repackaging will last approximately 4 weeks. The budget can roughly be estimated with:<br />
� Site preparation 45,000 US$<br />
� Classification 5,000 US$<br />
� Repackaging, Transport and Disposal 260,000 US$<br />
� Out of Pocket expenses 20,000 US$<br />
� total 330,00 US$<br />
6.2 Outside the Storehouse<br />
Close to the Bajza Station storehouses and at the 2 railway tracks east of the storehouses hazardous<br />
material has not been detected so far except the grey-white powder in one railway<br />
wagon (B1) which contains at least remnants of the pesticide tetradifon (UN hazard class 6.1,<br />
UN No 2761). Neither the soil sampling nor the investigations of other conspicuous material<br />
(e.g. B2) give any indication to an unacceptable pollution of the environment. Particularly pesticides<br />
are not found apart from the grey-white powder B1. The B1 material however should be<br />
recollected and disposed in a safe way.<br />
As the hydrogeological conditions of the area are determined by the karstic and the coarse<br />
grained porous aquifer wells - natural karstic or artificial drilled ones - do not exist in the immediate<br />
vicinity of the Bajza Station. Thus the possible investigation of groundwater in the near<br />
field of the Station is excluded unless new boreholes and wells are constructed.<br />
At the moment the investigation of groundwater quality relies on the karstic wells at the Shkodar<br />
Lake shore line (e.g. Syri i Sheganit). Until now the water sampling and analysis has not revealed<br />
any conspicuous result or any adverse impact of the Bajza site on the local groundwater<br />
in a greater distance. Further monitoring of water quality can affirm this finding and is recommended.<br />
30 November 2008 page 63 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
6.3 General conclusions<br />
Apart from the storehouses and the operation of the Bajza freight station several other activities<br />
in the immediate vicinity or in the wider surroundings may pose a hazard to environment. Following<br />
practices have to be mentioned:<br />
� the supposed diesel fuel storage southwest of the Bajza station (Kuquqi Hill)<br />
� disperse waste disposal and waste burning in Bajza village and single homesteads in<br />
the Bajza karst plain<br />
� infiltration of untreated waste water to the underground at the same places<br />
� abandoned petrol stations in the surroundings of Bajza village.<br />
For achieving a concluding regional environmental impact assessment the further investigation<br />
of the referred activities and an evaluation of their potential impact on the environment will be<br />
necessary and can not be ignored even for further environmental assessment of the Bajza station.<br />
Further investigations on the above mentioned topics will contribute to several goals in a sustainable<br />
development of the Shkodar Lake region, which are among others:<br />
� Support for the preservation of the wildlife habitat at a Ramsar site.<br />
� Module to the protection of the regional water resources and the development of an integrated<br />
water resources management.<br />
� Enhancement for initiatives which try to mitigate potential environmental hazards by solid<br />
and liquid waste as well as waste water impact on the water resources of Lake Shkodar.<br />
The achievement of these goals can be assumed as middle- to long-term tasks. A further strategic<br />
environmental planning has to be seen beside the immediate rehabilitation of hazards by<br />
waste storage at the Bajza Station. Recommendations for short- to long-term activities concerning<br />
environmental hazards in the surroundings of the Bajza station are given in the following<br />
chapter.<br />
7 ACTION PLAN<br />
The following action is recommended in rank of priority:<br />
Short term action<br />
1. As seen during the site visitation and sampling process, the storehouses are situated<br />
in the restricted station area but there is an open access to all rooms. As consequence<br />
children can play in the dust and loose goats can enter the Storehouses.<br />
It can be assumed that the asbestos fibers can be found in Storehouse 1, too. It<br />
30 November 2008 page 64 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
should be advised that the open gates to the storehouses must be closed immediately<br />
in order to confine the access to authorized personnel only.<br />
2. The repackaging and final disposal of the hazardous materials inside Storehouse 2<br />
is described in the Terms of References for the Repackaging as well as the collecting<br />
of the loose residual pesticide material in the railway wagons out side the storehouse.<br />
The repackaging should be started as soon as possible.<br />
Long term action<br />
3. Before a rehabilitation of the storehouses there should be an investigation for hazardous<br />
construction material.<br />
4. Groundwater: In order to evaluate the local groundwater quality at the Bajza site<br />
monitoring wells should be installed (1 in the groundwater upstream and two in the<br />
groundwater downstream of the railway tracks 3 an 4). To affirm the results on<br />
groundwater quality a groundwater monitoring program can be recommended.<br />
5. Soil: It can be assumed that 37 different active organic ingredients of pesticides<br />
were stored temporarily in rail wagons at the Bajza site. In the soil pesticides have<br />
not been found so far. In case the groundwater monitoring does not affirm these<br />
findings an extended soil sampling and investigation program for the railway<br />
tracks can be recommended.<br />
8 LITERATURE<br />
AGS (ALBANIAN GEOLOGICAL SERVICE, 2002): Geology of <strong>Albania</strong>, Tirana<br />
BEDOUKIAN RESEARCH (2008): Bisabolene – BRI#828, www.bedoukian.com<br />
BG CHEMIE (BERUFSGENOSSENSCHAFT DER CHEMISCHEN INDUSTRIE, 1995): Diphenyl-2ethylhexylphosphat,<br />
Kurzfassung Toxikologische Bewertungen, Nr. 194,<br />
www.bgchemie.de<br />
COMPENDIUM OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION OF ALBANIA (2004): Compendium of Environmental<br />
Legislation of <strong>Albania</strong> , March 2004, p. 279<br />
EC (EUROPEAN COMMUNITY, 2002): Commission Decision of 23 January 2002 amending Commission<br />
Decision 1999/217/EC as regards the register of flavouring substances used in or<br />
on foodstuffs, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 49 Volume 45<br />
EFTIMI, R. & TAFILAJ, I. et al., (1985): Hydrogeological Map of <strong>Albania</strong>, 1 : 200,000, sheet Koplik<br />
Tirana<br />
HANEKE, K.E.; CARSON, B.L. (2001): Sodium Hexafluorosilicate [CASRN 16893-85-9] and<br />
Fluorosilicic Acid [CASRN 16961-83-4] - Review of toxicological literature, Raleigh, North<br />
Carolina<br />
30 November 2008 page 65 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
HAXHIU, P. & UÇI, A. (1995): The complex geophysical-hydrochemical study of karstic springs at<br />
Bajza field, Scutari region, <strong>Albania</strong>.- in: Beck, B.F.; Pearson, F.M. (eds.): Karst Geohazards.-<br />
Proceedings of the 5th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering<br />
and environmental impacts of Karst, Gatlinburg, Tennessee.- Balkema, Rotterdam,<br />
117-123.<br />
IHM (Institute of Hydrometeorology, 1984): Climate of <strong>Albania</strong>, Tirana.<br />
IHM (Institute of Hydrometeorology, 1984): Hydrology of <strong>Albania</strong>; Tirana<br />
INSTAT (2001): Population of <strong>Albania</strong>.- Shkoder.<br />
IPCS (INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY, 1986): Tetradifon, Environmental<br />
Health Criteria, 67, Geneva<br />
IPCS (INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY, 1997): Tetradifon, International Occupational<br />
Safety and Health Information Centre , Data sheet ICSC: 0747, www.ilo.org<br />
KALAJA, F.&RUDI, N. (1996): The characteristics of karst area of Shkodra.- in: The water a big<br />
national richness.- (in <strong>Albania</strong>n) Tirana.<br />
KÜHN –BIRETT (2008): Natriumhexafluorosilikat, Merkblätter Gefährliche Arbeitsstoffe, N 037,<br />
ecomed Verlag, Landsberg, FRG<br />
MEÇO,S.&ALIAJ, S. (2000): Geology of <strong>Albania</strong>, Stuttgart.<br />
SAP FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA (2007): LAKE Global Environment Facility (GEF), World Bank<br />
(WB): LAKE SKADAR/SHKODRA INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT<br />
PROJECT: THE STRATEGIC ACTION PLAN (SAP) FOR SKADAR/SHKODRA LAKE,<br />
ALBANIA & MONTENEGRO, Ministry of Tourism and Environment of Montenegro (MoTE)<br />
and Ministry of Environment, Forests and Water Administration of <strong>Albania</strong> (MEFWA), Tirana<br />
SCHUBERT, R.; FABER, K.; SPAHRKÄS, H.;EITEL, K.; SCHADE, F.; TRÄUBEL, H.; HARMENING,G.<br />
(1978): Leder.- in: Ullmanns Encyklopädie der technischen Chemie.- 4. Auflage, Bd. 16,<br />
109-177.<br />
TOMLIN, C.D.S. (1997): The pesticide manual.- 11 th edition, British Crop Protection Council,<br />
Farnham, UK, 1606 p..<br />
WORLD BANK (IBRD) (2006): Lake Shkoder Transboundary Diagnostics Analysis, <strong>Albania</strong> &<br />
Montenegro; Final Report: Main Document 9P6515<br />
<strong>MonTec</strong> GmbH<br />
Duisburg, Germany 30 November 2008<br />
Dr. Bernd Vels Nikolaus Lindert<br />
Managing Director Project Manager<br />
30 November 2008 page 66 of 66
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 1: List of Samples<br />
short<br />
Nr.<br />
name<br />
description location<br />
material colour analytical procedure<br />
1 M1 material 1 SH 2, R 3 powder white XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS, density<br />
analysis<br />
2 M2 material 2 SH 2, R 3 powder grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
3 L leather SH 2, R 3 leather brown microbiology, HM after water<br />
extraction, GC-MS<br />
4 S1 dust 1 SH 2, R 2 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, asbestos, GC-MS<br />
5 S2 dust 2 SH 2, R 1 + 4 solid grey XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
6 B1 railway-waggon 1 cf. Fig. 38 powder greywhite XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
7 B2 railway-waggon 2 cf. Fig. 38 mudstone? red XRF, TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
8 B3 railway 3, soil cf. Fig. 38 W soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
9 B4 railway 4, soil cf. Fig. 38 E soil greybrown TOC, EOX, GC-MS<br />
10 SiS water Syri i Sheganit water chloroorganic pesticides, GC-MS, Ca,<br />
Mg, Na, K, Cl, SO4, NO3, NH4, DOC,<br />
HM, AOX,<br />
AOX – adsorbable organic halogens (water)<br />
DOC – dissolved organic carbon<br />
EOX – extractable organic halogens (solids)<br />
GC-MS – screening test with gas chromatography and<br />
mass-selective detection after extraction with solvents of different polarity (methanol, hexane)<br />
HM – heavy metals (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Hg, Ni, Zn)<br />
TOC – total organic carbon<br />
R - room<br />
SH - storehouse<br />
XRF – X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy<br />
30 November 2008 page 1 of 1
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 1<br />
short name M1<br />
description material 1<br />
location Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
material powder<br />
colour white<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 0.09 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
XRF Na [g/kg] 262,5 XRF, mp<br />
Mg [g/kg] 0,2 XRF, mp<br />
Al [g/kg] 5,2 XRF, mp<br />
Si [g/kg] 143,5 XRF, mp<br />
P [g/kg] 0,1 XRF, mp<br />
S [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Cl [g/kg] 0,3 XRF, cm<br />
K [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />
Ca [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />
Ti [g/kg] 0,04 XRF, mp<br />
V [g/kg] 0,004 XRF, cm<br />
Cr [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Mn [g/kg] 0,0 XRF, mp<br />
Fe [g/kg] 0,3 XRF, mp<br />
Co [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0,02 XRF, cm<br />
Cu [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
Zn [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
Y [g/kg] 0,001 XRF, cm<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0,02 XRF, cm<br />
Nb [g/kg] 0,001 XRF, cm<br />
Ba [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0,004 XRF, cm<br />
U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />
DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
30 November 2008 page 1 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 2<br />
short name M2<br />
description material 2<br />
location Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
material powder<br />
colour grey<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 2.0 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
XRF Na [g/kg] 248,8 XRF, mp<br />
Mg [g/kg] 2,6 XRF, mp<br />
Al [g/kg] 8,3 XRF, mp<br />
Si [g/kg] 152,1 XRF, mp<br />
P [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />
S [g/kg] 7,3 XRF, cm<br />
Cl [g/kg] 3,1 XRF, cm<br />
K [g/kg] 1,5 XRF, mp<br />
Ca [g/kg] 11,5 XRF, mp<br />
Ti [g/kg] 0,2 XRF, mp<br />
V [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
Cr [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />
Mn [g/kg] 0,1 XRF, mp<br />
Fe [g/kg] 3,0 XRF, mp<br />
Co [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0,04 XRF, cm<br />
Cu [g/kg] 0,02 XRF, cm<br />
Zn [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0,07 XRF, cm<br />
Y [g/kg] 0,002 XRF, cm<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0,03 XRF, cm<br />
Nb [g/kg] 0,002 XRF, cm<br />
Ba [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />
DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
30 November 2008 page 2 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 3<br />
short name L<br />
description leather<br />
location Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
material leather<br />
colour brown<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
S4 Al [mg/L] 2.06 EN ISO 11885 0.01<br />
Cr [mg/L] 1.48 EN ISO 11885 0.002<br />
Hg [μg/L] 1.60 EN ISO 1483 0.1<br />
Ni [μg/L] 19.00 EN ISO 11885 2<br />
Remarks: after elution with demineralised water DIN 38414 - S4<br />
solid to liquid ratio 1 : 10<br />
GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />
Octicizer positive GC-MS, hexane 1241-94-7<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />
Octicizer positive GC-MS, methanol 1241-94-7<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
Octicizer - 2-ethyl-hexyl-diphenyl-phosphate<br />
Microbiology Bacillus anthracis negative cultivation<br />
Bacillus anthracis negative PCR<br />
Remarks: PCR - limit of detection: 20 spores/g<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
PCR - Polymerase chain reaction<br />
30 November 2008 page 3 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 4<br />
short name S1<br />
description dust 1<br />
location Storehouse 2, Room 2<br />
material solid<br />
colour grey<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 3.0 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
XRF Na [g/kg] 7,3 XRF, mp<br />
Mg [g/kg] 16,5 XRF, mp<br />
Al [g/kg] 49,7 XRF, mp<br />
Si [g/kg] 220,4 XRF, mp<br />
P [g/kg] 1,6 XRF, mp<br />
S [g/kg] 7,533 XRF, cm<br />
Cl [g/kg] 0,224 XRF, cm<br />
K [g/kg] 8,1 XRF, mp<br />
Ca [g/kg] 224,3 XRF, mp<br />
Ti [g/kg] 2,1 XRF, mp<br />
V [g/kg] 0,095 XRF, cm<br />
Cr [g/kg] 0,33 XRF, cm<br />
Mn [g/kg] 0,5 XRF, mp<br />
Fe [g/kg] 35,3 XRF, mp<br />
Co [g/kg] 0,009 XRF, cm<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0,115 XRF, cm<br />
Cu [g/kg] 0,056 XRF, cm<br />
Zn [g/kg] 0,23 XRF, cm<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0,035 XRF, cm<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0,358 XRF, cm<br />
Y [g/kg] 0,01 XRF, cm<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0,095 XRF, cm<br />
Nb [g/kg] 0,004 XRF, cm<br />
Ba [g/kg] 0,38 XRF, cm<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0,046 XRF, cm<br />
U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />
PAH positive GC-MS, hexane<br />
DDP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />
DEP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
PAH positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
PAH - several single compounds<br />
asbestos asbestos positive REM/EDXA<br />
type of asbestos chrysotile FT-IR<br />
cm - compression moulding<br />
FT-IR - Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
mp - melting procedure<br />
REM/ EDXA - Raster Electron Microscopy / Energy Dispersive X-Ray Analysis<br />
30 November 2008 page 4 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 5<br />
short name S2<br />
description dust 2<br />
location Storehouse 2, R 1 + 4<br />
material solid<br />
colour grey<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 3.1 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
XRF Na [g/kg] 10,9 XRF, mp<br />
Mg [g/kg] 25,0 XRF, mp<br />
Al [g/kg] 54,6 XRF, mp<br />
Si [g/kg] 224,2 XRF, mp<br />
P [g/kg] 1,0 XRF, mp<br />
S [g/kg] 15,447 XRF, cm<br />
Cl [g/kg] 0,331 XRF, cm<br />
K [g/kg] 9,5 XRF, mp<br />
Ca [g/kg] 162,1 XRF, mp<br />
Ti [g/kg] 2,8 XRF, mp<br />
V [g/kg] 0,134 XRF, cm<br />
Cr [g/kg] 0,683 XRF, cm<br />
Mn [g/kg] 0,9 XRF, mp<br />
Fe [g/kg] 74,0 XRF, mp<br />
Co [g/kg] 0,032 XRF, cm<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0,212 XRF, cm<br />
Cu [g/kg] 0,085 XRF, cm<br />
Zn [g/kg] 0,907 XRF, cm<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0,038 XRF, cm<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0,212 XRF, cm<br />
Y [g/kg] 0,012 XRF, cm<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0,079 XRF, cm<br />
Nb [g/kg] 0,006 XRF, cm<br />
Ba [g/kg] 0,611 XRF, cm<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0,052 XRF, cm<br />
U [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, hexane 117-81-7<br />
PAH positive GC-MS, hexane<br />
DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />
DEP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
PAH positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
phenol positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
PAH - several single compounds<br />
cm - compression moulding<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
mp - melting procedure<br />
30 November 2008 page 5 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 6<br />
short name B1<br />
description railway-waggon 1<br />
location cf. Fig. 38<br />
material powder<br />
colour greywhite<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 40.4 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] 22 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
XRF Na [g/kg] 2,5 XRF, mp<br />
Mg [g/kg] 3,6 XRF, mp<br />
Al [g/kg] 19,0 XRF, mp<br />
Si [g/kg] 135,8 XRF, mp<br />
P [g/kg] 4,8 XRF, mp<br />
S [g/kg] 8,9 XRF, cm<br />
Cl [g/kg] 1,3 XRF, cm<br />
K [g/kg] 3,4 XRF, mp<br />
Ca [g/kg] 49,5 XRF, mp<br />
Ti [g/kg] 0,8 XRF, mp<br />
V [g/kg] 0,20 XRF, cm<br />
Cr [g/kg] 0,33 XRF, cm<br />
Mn [g/kg] 1,2 XRF, mp<br />
Fe [g/kg] 54,4 XRF, mp<br />
Co [g/kg] 0,03 XRF, cm<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0,09 XRF, cm<br />
Cu [g/kg] 0,20 XRF, cm<br />
Zn [g/kg] 1,12 XRF, cm<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0,14 XRF, cm<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0,14 XRF, cm<br />
Y [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0,05 XRF, cm<br />
Nb [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Ba [g/kg] 0,25 XRF, cm<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0,06 XRF, cm<br />
U [g/kg] 0,008 XRF, cm<br />
GC-MS DBP positive GC-MS, hexane 84-74-2<br />
Tetradifon positive GC-MS, hexane 116-29-0<br />
DEHP positive GC-MS, methanol 117-81-7<br />
Tetradifon positive GC-MS, methanol 116-29-0<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
Tetradifon - 4-chlorphenyl-2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone<br />
cm - compression moulding<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
mp - melting procedure<br />
30 November 2008 page 6 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 7<br />
short name B2<br />
description railway-waggon 2<br />
location cf. Fig. 38<br />
material mudstone?<br />
colour red<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 0.34 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
XRF Na [g/kg] 0.1 XRF, mp<br />
Mg [g/kg] 1,6 XRF, mp<br />
Al [g/kg] 356,3 XRF, mp<br />
Si [g/kg] 12,9 XRF, mp<br />
P [g/kg] 0,4 XRF, mp<br />
S [g/kg] 0,031 XRF, cm<br />
Cl [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
K [g/kg] 0,5 XRF, mp<br />
Ca [g/kg] 1,4 XRF, mp<br />
Ti [g/kg] 23,62 XRF, mp<br />
V [g/kg] 1,06 XRF, cm<br />
Cr [g/kg] 2,046 XRF, cm<br />
Mn [g/kg] 1,3 XRF, mp<br />
Fe [g/kg] 172,6 XRF, mp<br />
Co [g/kg] 0,08 XRF, cm<br />
Ni [g/kg] 0,834 XRF, cm<br />
Cu [g/kg] < 0,005 XRF, cm<br />
Zn [g/kg] 0,265 XRF, cm<br />
Rb [g/kg] 0,007 XRF, cm<br />
Sr [g/kg] 0,071 XRF, cm<br />
Y [g/kg] 0,085 XRF, cm<br />
Zr [g/kg] 0,613 XRF, cm<br />
Nb [g/kg] 0,042 XRF, cm<br />
Ba [g/kg] 0,443 XRF, cm<br />
Pb [g/kg] 0,089 XRF, cm<br />
U [g/kg] 0,002 XRF, cm<br />
GC-MS Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, hexane<br />
Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
cm - compression moulding<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
mp - melting procedure<br />
30 November 2008 page 7 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 8<br />
short name B3<br />
description railway 3, soil<br />
location cf. Fig. 38 W<br />
material soil<br />
colour greybrown<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 7.7 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
GC-MS Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, hexane<br />
bisabolene positive GC-MS, methanol 495-61-4<br />
myristicin positive GC-MS, methanol 607-91-0<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
bisabolene - C15H24<br />
myristicin - C11H12O3<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
30 November 2008 page 8 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 9<br />
short name B4<br />
description railway 4, soil<br />
location cf. Fig. 38 E<br />
material soil<br />
colour greybrown<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ CAS-RN<br />
TOC [%] 6.2 DIN ISO 10694 0.1<br />
EOX [mg/kg] < 1 DIN 38414 S17 1<br />
GC-MS Hydrocarbons positive GC-MS, hexane<br />
DBP positive GC-MS, methanol 84-74-2<br />
DEP positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
PAH positive GC-MS, methanol<br />
Remarks: GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
No other relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
PAH - several single compounds<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
30 November 2008 page 9 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 2: List of Results for each Sample<br />
Nr. 10<br />
short name SiS<br />
description water<br />
location Syri i Sheganit<br />
material water<br />
colour colourless<br />
Parameter Dimension Result Method LOQ<br />
el. conductivity μS/cm 267 EN 27888<br />
pH-value - 7,79 DIN 38404-5<br />
sodium mg/L 2 EN ISO 14911 2<br />
potassium mg/L < 1 EN ISO 14911 1<br />
calcium mg/L 44 EN ISO 14911 1<br />
magnesium mg/L 7.2 EN ISO 14911 0.1<br />
ammonium mg/L 0.07 EN ISO 14911 0.05<br />
chloride mg/L 3 DIN EN ISO 1034-1 1<br />
sulphate mg/L 5 DIN EN ISO 1034-1 1<br />
nitrate mg/L 3.2 DIN EN ISO 1034-1 0.5<br />
aluminium μg/L 50 EN ISO 11885 10<br />
cadmium μg/L < 0.3 EN ISO 5961 0.3<br />
chromium μg/L < 2 EN ISO 11885 2<br />
copper μg/L < 5 EN ISO 11885 5<br />
lead μg/L < 1 DIN 38406 Teil 6 1<br />
mercury μg/L < 0.1 EN ISO 1483 0.1<br />
nickel μg/L < 2 EN ISO 11885 2<br />
zinc μg/L < 5 EN ISO 11885 5<br />
DOC mg/L 0.8 DIN EN 1484 0.5<br />
AOX μg/L 10 EN ISO 9562 5<br />
Remarks: conductivity - field measurement<br />
pH-value - laboratory measurement<br />
chlororganic Hexachlorbenzol (HCB) [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />
pesticides Aldrin [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
o,p-DDD [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
p,p-DDD [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
o,p-DDE [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
p,p-DDE [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
o,p-DDT [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
p,p-DDT [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
Dieldrin [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
alpha-Endosulfan [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
beta-Endosulfan [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
Endrin [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
alpha-HCH [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />
beta-HCH [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />
gamma-HCH (Lindan) [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />
delta-HCH [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN 38407 F2 0.0025<br />
Heptachlor [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
cis-Heptachlorepoxid [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
trans-Heptachlorepoxid [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
Methoxychlor [μg/L] < 0.0025 DIN EN ISO 11369 F12 0.0025<br />
GC-MS GC-MS screening: qualitative analytical determination<br />
Remarks: No relevant peaks in the GC-MS screening<br />
LOQ - limit of quantification<br />
30 November 2008 page 10 of 10
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 3: List of presumable pesticides in the "pesticide train"<br />
Presumable organic pesticides in the "pesticide train" 1992<br />
which are included in the GS-MS screening by an entry in one of the used spectra libraries<br />
Nr.<br />
common name<br />
active ingredient<br />
chemical name<br />
CAS-RN synonym<br />
1 2,4-D 2,4-dichlorophenoxy acetic acid 94-75-7<br />
2 2,4,5-T (2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy)acetic acid 93-76-5<br />
3 Ametryn N-ethyl-N-isopropyl-6-methylthio-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamime 834-12-8<br />
4 Azocyclotin tri(cyclohexyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yltin 41083-11-8<br />
5 Bromuron N-(4-bromphenyl)-N,N-dimethylurea 3408-97-7<br />
6 Bronopol 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol 52-51-7<br />
7 Camphechlor chlorinated camphenes 8001-35-2 Toxaphene<br />
8 Carbaryl 1-naphthyl-carbamate 63-25-2<br />
9 Carbendazim methyl benzimidazol-2-ylcarbamate 10605-21-7<br />
10 Chlorfenvinphos 2-chloro-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)vinyl diethyl phosphate 470-90-6<br />
11 Chlorpropham isoprppyl 3 -chlorocarbanilate 101-21-3 CIPC<br />
12 Dazomet 3,5-dimethyl-1,3,5-thiadiazinane-2-thione 533-74-4<br />
13 Dichlorvos 2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 62-73-7<br />
14 Dicofol 2,2,2-trichloro-1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl)ethanol 115-32-2<br />
15 DNOC 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol 534-52-1<br />
16 Fenazox Azoxybenzene 495-48-7<br />
17 Lindan 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachlorocyclohexane 608-73-1 �-HCH<br />
18 Methoxychlor 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis(4-methoxyphenyl)ethane 72-43-5<br />
19 Metiram zinc ammoniate ethylenebis(dithiocarbamate) 9006-42-2<br />
20 Maleic Hydrazide 6-hydroxy-2H-pyridazin-3-one 123-33-1<br />
21 Naled 1,2-dibromo-2,2-dichloroethyl dimethyl phosphate 300-76-5<br />
22 Nitrofen 2,4-dichlorophenyl 4-nitrophenyl ether 1836-75-5<br />
23 Parathion-methyl O,O-dimethyl O-4 Nitrophenyl phosphorothioate 298-00-0<br />
24 Prometryn N,N-di-isopropyl-6-methylthio-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine 7287-19-6<br />
25 Propham isopropyl phenylcarbamate 122-42-9<br />
26 Simazin 6-chloro-N,N-diethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine 122-34-9<br />
27 Tetradifon 4-chlorophenyl 2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone 116-29-0<br />
28 Thiram tetramethylthiuram disulfide 137-26-8<br />
29 Trichlorfon dimethyl 2,2,2-trichloro-1-hydroxyethylphosphonate 52-68-6<br />
Presumable organic pesticides in the "pesticide train" 1992<br />
which are not included in the GS-MS screening by an entry in one of the used spectra libraries<br />
Nr.<br />
common name<br />
active ingredient<br />
chemical name<br />
CAS-RN synonym<br />
30 Chinomethionat S,S-(6-methylquinoxaline-2,3-diyl) dithiocarbonate 2439-01-2<br />
31 Lenacil 3-cyclohexyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydrocyclopentapyrimidine-2,4(3H)-dione 2164-08-1<br />
32 Metham sodium<br />
Methylmercury<br />
methyldithiocarbamic acid 144-54-7<br />
33 toluenesulphamide 102280-93-3<br />
34 PMA phenylmercury acetate 62-38-4<br />
35 Proximpham O-(N-phenylcarbamoyl)-propanonoxim 2828-42-4<br />
36 Trichlordinitrobenzene 1,3,4-trichloro-2,6-dinitrobenzene 2678-21-9<br />
37 Zineb zinc ethylenebis(ithiocarbamate) 12122-67-7<br />
30 November 2008 page 1 of 1
<strong>Albania</strong>: Services for Environmental Consultancy - Bajza Hot-Spot <strong>MonTec</strong><br />
Annex 4<br />
Terms of References for the Bidding Documents<br />
for the repackaging of the chemical waste in the<br />
storehouse
Terms of References<br />
for<br />
Repackaging, Treatment und Disposal of Hazardous<br />
Chemicals at Bajza Railway Station - Bajza Hot-Spot -<br />
<strong>Albania</strong><br />
Table of Contents Page<br />
1 BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................... 2<br />
2 SCOPE OF WORK........................................................................................................... 4<br />
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STOREHOUSE AND THE CHEMICAL WASTE .......... 4<br />
3.1 Storehouse........................................................................................................................... 4<br />
3.2 Chemical Waste / Waste in the Storehouse 2...................................................................... 6<br />
3.3 Pesticides outside the Storehouse in an abandoned wagon................................................. 9<br />
4 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORKS............................................................................... 10<br />
4.1 Public Safety & Site Security - Fencing ........................................................................... 10<br />
4.1.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 10<br />
4.1.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11<br />
4.2 Working Program and Site Preparation ............................................................................ 11<br />
4.2.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 11<br />
4.2.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 11<br />
4.3 Classification and Repackaging of Waste......................................................................... 12<br />
4.3.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 12<br />
4.3.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 13<br />
4.4 Collecting of leftovers of pesticides in abandoned wagons at track 4 .............................. 13<br />
4.4.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 13<br />
4.4.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 14<br />
4.5 Transportation and Trans-frontier Shipment of Waste ..................................................... 14<br />
4.5.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 14<br />
4.5.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 14<br />
4.6 Final Disposal of the Waste .............................................................................................. 15<br />
4.6.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 15<br />
4.6.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 15<br />
4.7 Site Cleaning Up and Take-over by the Contracting Authority........................................ 15<br />
4.7.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 15<br />
4.7.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 15<br />
5 THE CONTRACTORS KEY PERSONNEL............................................................... 16<br />
5.1 General experience............................................................................................................ 16<br />
5.2 Key Personnel ................................................................................................................... 16<br />
6 ENVIRONMENT AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY.................... 17<br />
6.1 Occupational Health and Safety........................................................................................ 17<br />
6.1.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 17<br />
6.1.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 17<br />
6.2 Protection of the Environment .......................................................................................... 17<br />
6.2.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 17<br />
6.2.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 17<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 1 of 20
6.3 Emergency Preparedness and Response ........................................................................... 18<br />
6.3.1 Specifications................................................................................................................. 18<br />
6.3.2 Performance Criteria ...................................................................................................... 18<br />
7 REPORTING .................................................................................................................. 18<br />
7.1 Daily Reporting................................................................................................................. 18<br />
7.2 Weekly Reporting .............................................................................................................18<br />
7.3 Final Report ...................................................................................................................... 18<br />
8 FACILITIES TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT MANAGER.................... 19<br />
8.1 Specifications.................................................................................................................... 19<br />
8.2 Performance Criteria.........................................................................................................19<br />
9 ANCILLARY CONDITIONS........................................................................................ 19<br />
9.1 Duration of assignment ..................................................................................................... 19<br />
9.2 Duty station....................................................................................................................... 19<br />
9.3 Submission of application................................................................................................. 19<br />
Table of Figures Page<br />
Figure 1: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks.............................................................. 5<br />
Figure 2: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3 ................................................................................. 7<br />
Figure 3: Leftover of pesticides in an abandoned railway wagon on track 4 .................................. 9<br />
Figure 4: Overview of the abandoned wagons on the tracks and the location of the wagon<br />
with the leftover of the pesticides .................................................................................. 10<br />
Annex: Price Schedule<br />
1 BACKGROUND<br />
Environmental issues have not been amongst the top national priorities in the Western<br />
Balkans. Understandably, priorities to date have focused on the reforms needed to<br />
strengthen security, to rebuild the economy and to improve general living conditions.<br />
As a result, much-needed investment in environmental infrastructure such as wastewater<br />
treatment, air-pollution abatement and monitoring, and industrial and communal waste<br />
management are still waiting their turn. Clearly, this is a situation that raises humanitarian,<br />
social, economic and environmental concerns.<br />
In addition, a number of industrial towns and regions face a complex challenge of past<br />
industrial development and pollution legacy and the need to generate economic growth for<br />
the future. The environmental situation in these hot spots is a direct cause of poor health<br />
and related poverty and presents a major barrier to future investments and related economic<br />
opportunities for the local population. On one hand they face the requirements for<br />
environmental clean up and on the other hand they are struggling with problems of poverty,<br />
lack of infrastructure and services and lack of prospects for the young generations.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 2 of 20
UNEP commissioned studies in 2000 1 and 2006 2 revealed that many of these closed<br />
industrial sites pose serious risks to human health and the surrounding environment.<br />
Many of these environmental hotspots identified by the Ministry of Environment, Forestry<br />
and Water Management pose risks not only to the environment in <strong>Albania</strong> but to the whole<br />
Balkan region. Such trans-boundary impacts include increased mercury residues in the sea<br />
and the sea-biota close to the Vlora PVC plant, ground and surface water contamination by<br />
arsenic and chromium around the mining tailing areas and their eventual discharge to<br />
Adriatic sea or to trans-boundary lakes like Ohrid and Shkoder. In addition,<br />
mismanagement of outdated pesticides and other chemicals in watershed areas such as<br />
trans-boundary Shkoder lake and Lunja river in Lushnja poses serious risks of<br />
contaminating internationally important wetlands and lakes.<br />
Bajza is the last railway station in <strong>Albania</strong> before the frontier with Montenegro, so its acts<br />
as a customs control point. There is no passenger traffic, but two freight trains pass through<br />
daily with approximately 10,000 t of freight being handled each month. The station is<br />
located at the shore of trans-boundary Shkoder (Skadar) Lake – the largest lake on the<br />
Balkan Peninsula that both <strong>Albania</strong> and Montenegro have officially designated as a crossborder<br />
protected area of Shkoder/Skader Lake together with Buna/Bojana River. In<br />
addition, with the designation of the <strong>Albania</strong>n part of the Shkoder (Skader) Lake and Buna<br />
(Bojana) River as a Ramsar site the entire lake is now included in the Ramsar list.<br />
During the early 1990s hazardous chemical waste (old pesticides) was exported to <strong>Albania</strong><br />
by train. Most of the hazardous waste could be shipped back, but part of the load was<br />
discharged at the platforms and/or is still stored at Bajza station. Still there are<br />
chemicals/materials stored in one of the storehouses of the station and no record about the<br />
contents and their origin exists.<br />
That poses a variety of potential health risks to human beings and various impacts to the<br />
environment, e.g.:<br />
� Risks to human beings from toxic and carcinogenic substances<br />
� Damages to the soil and groundwater resources<br />
� Risks entailed by the clean-up activities themselves, e.g. additional release of<br />
contaminants.<br />
The umbrella program “Strengthening capacities in the Western Balkan countries to<br />
address environmental hot spots through an integrated approach” aims to:<br />
� Strengthen regional co-operation in the Western Balkan to solve problems of cross<br />
border contamination due to industrial and mining activities, and<br />
� Increase capacity of the national and local governments in the Western Balkan to<br />
implement environmental policies and sustainable development in accordance with<br />
EU standards.<br />
1 In 2000 UNEP had carried out “Post-Conflict Environmental Assessment <strong>Albania</strong>” with the support<br />
from the Dutch government. The rapid assessment identified five “environmental hotspot” that require<br />
urgent attention in order to halt dangerous risks to human health and the surrounding environment and<br />
four other sites that have serious environmental problems.<br />
2 In 2006 UNEP has also updated the “Mining Desk Assessment” as a part of the ADA supported<br />
program “Improving regional cooperation for risk management from pollution hotspots as well as transboundary<br />
management of shared natural resources”.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 3 of 20
In order to achieve the overall objectives set by the regional program, <strong>Albania</strong> will aim to<br />
achieve the following outputs that are translated from the regional program component<br />
outputs:<br />
1. Full clean up and site assessment/remediation of stockpile of toxic or harmful<br />
chemicals at Bajza railway station, Shkoder, enabling the local government and<br />
Bajza railway station to fully utilize the rehabilitated storehouse and improve<br />
sustainable development in the area;<br />
2. Strengthen the mechanisms of good governance and policy integration at central<br />
and local level;<br />
3. Strengthen and mobilize the national capacity for policy development, integration,<br />
implementation and evaluation at the national and regional level.<br />
The stored chemicals were investigated, balanced and identified by an international<br />
consultancy team in September 2008 in the framework of a preliminary site assessment.<br />
2 SCOPE OF WORK<br />
The scope of work will cover all activities related to the<br />
1. Preparation of a clean and safe working place in the storehouse,<br />
2. safe repackaging of the hazardous chemicals and waste in the storehouse and some<br />
leftover pesticides in an abandoned wagon outside using packages which allow a<br />
3. safe transport of the waste material to a final disposal.<br />
The activities of the Contractor will be technically supervised by the Contracting Authority<br />
or its representative (the Project Manager).<br />
3 DESCRIPTION OF THE STOREHOUSE AND THE CHEMICAL<br />
WASTE<br />
3.1 Storehouse<br />
There are two major storehouses at the Bajza Station. Both storehouses are empty, besides<br />
the stored chemicals and waste. Figure 1 and the following list shows an overview of the<br />
storehouses and railway tracks with the definition of object denotation used in this project.<br />
� Storehouse 1 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not in<br />
use. There is a truck access to the left ramp and train access to the right ramp.<br />
� Railway Track 1 in operation<br />
� Railway Track 2 in operation<br />
� Storehouse 2 with loading ramps left and right, the storehouse is empty and not<br />
used. There is a truck access to the left ramp and train access to the right ramp.<br />
o Room 1: empty<br />
o Room 2: empty, dust and debris on the floor. There is a direct access to<br />
Room 3.<br />
o Room 3: loaded with chemical material/waste, leather rags<br />
o Room 4: empty<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 4 of 20
The wooden gates to the rooms in the storehouses are 2.35 m wide and 2.85 m high. Some<br />
doors are missing, others malfunction. The gates have direct access to the loading ramps of<br />
the storehouse.<br />
Figure 1: Overview of the storehouses and railway tracks<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 5 of 20
The storehouses are in a poor condition, the roofs of the loading ramps are partially broken,<br />
the roof of the storehouse could be partially leaky.<br />
There is no information about the status of structures of the buildings.<br />
The usage of fork-lifts seems to be possible. The Contractor is responsible for the usage of<br />
machinery on site.<br />
The station of Bajza is looking forward to use the storehouses in the future. It is unknown if<br />
any restructuring planning exists.<br />
3.2 Chemical Waste / Waste in the Storehouse 2<br />
The supposed hazardous chemical material/waste is only stored in Storehouse 2, Room 3.<br />
As a result of the preliminary site investigation, it could be detected, that the main parts of<br />
the stored materials are leather waste, e.g. leather rags (shoes production) which are mainly<br />
stored loose but sometimes packed in plastic bags. The supposed hazardous chemical<br />
material was dropped on top of the leather waste in front of the two open gates to the<br />
Storehouse Room 3. Figure 2 shows an overview of the investigated mixture of materials<br />
and their position in Room 3.<br />
The height of the material deposited in this room does not exceed 0.70 m.<br />
Some material similar to the waste stored in Room 3 could be found outside the Room 3,<br />
close to the gate to Room 2 as well as at the gate on the left loading ramp. The removal and<br />
repackaging of these marginal deposits or leftovers are also part of the contract.<br />
It is estimated that almost 80 % of the stored material consists of tanned leather remnants,<br />
which remained after cutting out pieces for the production of shoes and other leather goods.<br />
These leather rags pile up to 0.60 m in Room 3. The cuttings are sometimes sacked in<br />
woven polyester bags. Some of the bags are labelled indicating the former content as<br />
vegetal tanning agent (acacia bark). Remnants of torn bags are mixed with the leather<br />
cuttings.<br />
The mass of the leather waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 200 t.<br />
The chemical analyses of the leather waste proved that it had undergone a tanning process<br />
with mineral salts. Residues of the mineral tanning agents like chromium or aluminum may<br />
be leached by seepage water after a final deposition in a landfill. An additional treatment<br />
with vegetal tanning agents can not be excluded. By a specific microbiological examination<br />
of a representative leather sample the occurrence of anthrax spores can be excluded. For<br />
precautionary reasons however, the repacking of the leather rags should be done under<br />
appropriate protection of the handling personnel. Hazardous substances in the leather waste<br />
may be present subordinately as a disperse distribution of the stored chemical<br />
material/waste and trickled roof material may occur.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 6 of 20
Figure 2: Overview of Storehouse 2, Room 3<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 7 of 20
To a less extent (< 20 %) white and a grey powders were found in Room 3. Both powders<br />
consist of small acicular crystals (size < 0.1 mm) and are often cemented due to infiltrated<br />
and evaporated humidity. The grey powder seemed to be a soiled variant of the white<br />
powder due to the contact with the tanned leather and some excremental material (birds,<br />
rats etc.). The mass relation between white and grey powder is estimated to 80 : 20. Most of<br />
the substances are sacked to damaged bags several of which are labeled with Na2SiF6,<br />
sodium hexafluorosilicate, indicating the <strong>Albania</strong>n origin of the material.<br />
The mass of the chemical material/waste in Room 3 is estimated to be approximately 80 t.<br />
As a result of the chemical analyses the chemical material/waste can be seen as sodium<br />
hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6) with a degree of purity exceeding 90 %.<br />
EG-Number: 240-934-8<br />
CAS-Number: 16893-85-9<br />
Kühn/Birett Nr.: N 037<br />
This inorganic fluorine compound is a hazardous chemical substance which is classified as<br />
toxic particularly when it is inhaled, ingested or in contact with the bare skin during<br />
working processes. Repackaging requires appropriate protection of the concerned<br />
personnel.<br />
Packaging UN and IBC Portable tanks 3<br />
1 UN No. 2674<br />
2 Name and description SODIUM<br />
FLUOROSILICATE<br />
3 Class or division 6.1<br />
4 Subsidiary risk<br />
5 UN packing group III<br />
6 Special provisions<br />
7 Limited quantities 5 kg<br />
8 Packing and IBC's - Packing instruction P002, IBC08, LP02<br />
9 Packing and IBC's - Special provisions B3<br />
10 Portable tanks - Portable tank instruction<br />
11 Portable tanks - Portable tank special provisions<br />
In Room 2 with an open access gate to Room 3 dust/debris can be found consisting of<br />
plaster rubbed off the walls and trickled roof material, remnants of stored hazardous<br />
chemical substances and some organic material (animal hair, dried animal excrements,<br />
charcoal remnants etc.) as well as some leather rags were found. The mass of dust in Room<br />
2 is roughly estimated to be less than 100 kg.<br />
The composition of the dust/debris is characterized by the occurrence of asbestos fibers<br />
and remnants of the hazardous chemical substances as described above which requires also<br />
an appropriate handling and protection of the staff during cleaning procedure of the Room<br />
2.<br />
3<br />
Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS, Model Regulations Twelfth<br />
revised edition, UNITED NATIONS ,<br />
http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/unrec/English/Recommend.pdf<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 8 of 20
Radioactive material or any remnants of this has not been detected in Storehouse 2 and in<br />
the surrounding of that building.<br />
3.3 Pesticides outside the Storehouse in an abandoned wagon<br />
In all the abandoned railway wagons on track 3 and track 4 the floor was made of wood<br />
that had been torn out and only the basic steel girder construction is visible. At one point at<br />
track 4 a grey-white powder, identified as leftover of pesticides was found in a wagon, see<br />
figure 3.<br />
Figure 3: Leftover of pesticides in an abandoned railway wagon on track 4<br />
The material could be identified as (DEHP, DBP) and a pesticide, tetradifon. The common<br />
name tetradifon stands for 4-chlorphenyl 2,4,5-trichlorphenyl sulfone (C12H6Cl4O2S, CAS<br />
116-29-0) which is an acaricide agent. It is classified as a harmful substance which can be<br />
toxic to aquatic organisms and it pose also a risk if it is inhaled as particle from dust. The<br />
mass can be estimated with approximately 10 kg.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 9 of 20
Figure 4: Overview of the abandoned wagons on the tracks and the location of the wagon<br />
with the leftover of the pesticides<br />
4 DESCRIPTION OF THE WORKS<br />
4.1 Public Safety & Site Security - Fencing<br />
4.1.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall estimate how much space he will need in order to carry out the works<br />
in a safe manner. He shall take possession of the site as it appears at the time of the site<br />
visit.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 10 of 20
The Contractor shall establish a fence around the required working site in order to carry out<br />
the work without interference from unauthorized visitors.<br />
4.1.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall as the first works activity install a fence in order to prevent<br />
unauthorized entrance to the site during the works period. The Contractor shall furthermore<br />
install an information board at the gate of the fence in <strong>Albania</strong>n and English language and<br />
ensure that the fence is adequately signed and marked indicating the restricted access for<br />
authorized personnel only.<br />
The fence shall be provided with a number of emergency exit points (see paragraph 6.3<br />
below).<br />
4.2 Working Program and Site Preparation<br />
4.2.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall include a preliminary program in his bid. The preliminary program<br />
shall describe the general methods, arrangements, order, and timing for all works activities.<br />
The preliminary program shall be consolidated, detailed at the commencement of the work<br />
and consulted with the ordering party.<br />
The Contractor shall prepare on basis of the preliminary program a final work program to<br />
be approved by the Contracting Authority or his representative (the Project Manager).<br />
The required working zones and the foreseen temporary storage area have to been cleaned<br />
(decontaminated) according to the process of activities and the occupational safety<br />
regulations.<br />
4.2.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall in his bid describe how he intends to prepare and manage the site.<br />
The preliminary program shall therefore include a site map (scale 1: 200) showing the<br />
fenced site, and describe the following issues (list is not exhaustive):<br />
Site Plan:<br />
1. Entrance facilities and sluice arrangements, signposts<br />
2. Safety zones<br />
3. Internal roads and parking, illumination<br />
4. Staff, office and laboratory facilities<br />
5. Existing buildings and structures<br />
6. Working zones (clean/contaminated)<br />
7. De-contamination facilities for personnel<br />
Working methodology:<br />
8. Contaminated building materials and debris, grabbing and separation the waste<br />
material, repackaging, temporary storage areas, treatment, transport and final<br />
disposal<br />
Management Plans:<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 11 of 20
9. Repackaging, logistics and cleaning activities, see also paragraph 4.3 below<br />
10. Occupational Health and Safety Planning, see also paragraph 6.1, below<br />
11. Protection of the Environment, see also paragraph 6.2 below<br />
12. Emergency Preparedness and Response Planning, see also paragraph 6.3 below<br />
Time Schedule:<br />
13. Overall time schedule<br />
The preliminary program shall describe what kind of packing material the Contractor will<br />
provide and how long the repacked material can be temporally stored in the foreseen area.<br />
The preliminary program shall furthermore take care about the provision of water supply,<br />
electricity and telecommunication which is in the responsibility of the contractor. The<br />
station can provide water supply and electricity considering the temporary local<br />
breakdowns. The program should describe how he will dispose of waste water and solid<br />
waste from staff, office and laboratory facilities.<br />
The final working program has to fulfill the above mentioned criteria.<br />
The Contractor must ensure that the occupational safety requirements are at all times met<br />
according to national and international regulations. Proof for decontamination of the<br />
different rooms and areas and compliance to occupational safety requirements are air<br />
quality measurements i.e. for asbestos fibers.<br />
4.3 Classification and Repackaging of Waste<br />
4.3.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall as part of his offer identify and provide all personnel, equipment,<br />
tools, repacking materials etc. required for the classification and repackaging operation.<br />
The Contractor shall repackage the waste in order to ensure safe transport to the temporary<br />
storage on-site and furthermore to a final disposal destination. The Contractor must<br />
calculate that all amounts of waste shall be repackaged, as the existing packaging has<br />
deteriorated in time. Empty and emptied packaging materials shall be disposed as well.<br />
The Contractor shall classify the waste for the appropriate repackaging, temporary storage<br />
and final disposal. The Contractor shall therefore develop a classification procedure to be<br />
approved by the Contracting Authority or his representative (the Project Manager).<br />
The waste is - as described above - located inside Room 3 of Storehouse 2. The Contractor<br />
shall take into consideration, that the buildings are contaminated by the waste stored in<br />
them.<br />
Room 2 of Storehouse 2 has an open access gate to Room 3. The room has enough space<br />
for repacking, decontamination and storing of the repacked material. The Contractor shall<br />
take into consideration, that the buildings are contaminated by the waste stored in them (see<br />
also Paragraph 3.2 above).<br />
The rooms shall be decontaminated and sealed at the end of the site works as part of this<br />
tender.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 12 of 20
In case of the needs out the working program the Contractor must establish designated<br />
storage areas for repackaged materials waiting for latter transport to a final disposal.<br />
4.3.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall as part of his offer submit a waste classification strategy.<br />
The Contractor shall at the latest 6 (six) weeks after agreement and minimum 2 (two)<br />
weeks before the repackaging activities start submitting his classification procedure to the<br />
Project Manager for approval. The procedure shall describe in detail the waste classes, the<br />
sampling and analyses procedures, and repackaging and disposal.<br />
The Contractor shall deliver all packaging materials necessary. All containers used for<br />
repackaging shall be UN certified and comply with the ADR of 2005 4. The containers used<br />
for repackaging shall be selected in a way to avoid any additional repackaging for a safe<br />
transport to the disposal facility/-ies.<br />
The Contractor shall specify as a part of his offer the type and amount of containers he will<br />
use for repackaging of the different classes of waste. All empty original packaging material<br />
- if it is possible to separate - shall also be repacked in adequate containers to the final<br />
disposal site.<br />
Each container shall be registered with respect to its contents and weight and every single<br />
container shall be labeled according to the relevant regulations, using the correspondent<br />
UN/ADR identification codes. The registry shall be available on site for the Project<br />
Manager at all times. The net weight of the hazardous waste including old packaging<br />
material but excluding new packaging material shall be the basis of the payment per ton in<br />
the Bill of Quantity.<br />
All repackaging activities shall be performed inside the fenced area in designated zones, i.e.<br />
inside the Storehouse 2. If the repackaging is planned to take place outside the storage<br />
buildings, the Contractor shall describe in his offer how he will ensure that no secondary<br />
contamination of the soil and surface- and/or ground water can take place. In case there is a<br />
need the Contractor shall present design criteria for all temporary storage activities in his<br />
program.<br />
4.4 Collecting of leftovers of pesticides in abandoned wagons at track 4<br />
4.4.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall collect and repackage the leftovers of pesticides in the abandoned<br />
wagon at railway track 4 in order to ensure safe transport to the temporary storage on-site<br />
and furthermore to a final disposal destination.<br />
The Contractor shall classify the waste for the appropriate repackaging, temporary storage<br />
and final disposal. The Contractor shall therefore develop a classification procedure to be<br />
approved by the Contracting Authority or his representative (the Project Manager).<br />
4<br />
European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR). <strong>Albania</strong> has<br />
acceded the Agreement on January 26 th , 2005.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 13 of 20
4.4.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall as part of his offer submit a waste classification strategy.<br />
The Contractor shall at the latest 6 (six) weeks after agreement and minimum 2 (two)<br />
weeks before the repackaging activities start submitting his classification procedure to the<br />
Project Manager for approval. The procedure shall describe in detail the waste classes, the<br />
sampling and analyses procedures, and repackaging and final disposal.<br />
The Contractor shall deliver all packaging materials necessary. All containers used for<br />
repackaging shall be UN certified and comply with the ADR of 2005 5. The containers used<br />
for repackaging shall be selected in a way to avoid any additional repackaging for a safe<br />
transport to the disposal facility/-ies.<br />
The Contractor shall specify as a part of his offer the type and amount of containers he will<br />
use for repackaging of the waste.<br />
Each container shall be registered with respect to its contents and weight and every single<br />
container shall be labeled according to the relevant regulations, using the correspondent<br />
UN/ADR identification codes. The registry shall be available on site for the Project<br />
Manager at all times. The net weight of the hazardous waste excluding new packaging<br />
material shall be the basis of the payment per ton in the Bill of Quantity.<br />
The Contractor shall describe in his offer how he will ensure that no secondary<br />
contamination of the soil and surface- and/or ground water can take place during the<br />
collection process.<br />
4.5 Transportation and Trans-frontier Shipment of Waste<br />
4.5.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor is responsible for the loading and transport of the repackaged waste to the<br />
final disposal destination(s). The waste may be transported by road, rail and/or ship and in<br />
accordance with the national and international legislation and rules for transport of<br />
dangerous goods. The net weight of the hazardous waste including old packaging material<br />
but excluding new packaging material shall be the basis of the payment per ton in the Bill<br />
of Quantity.<br />
4.5.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall be aware of the regulation in force in <strong>Albania</strong> and in other<br />
countries of transport. He shall apply the necessary procedures for transboundary<br />
transport of dangerous materials, and respect designated routes and needed<br />
documentation.<br />
The Contractor shall in his time schedule allocate sufficient time for the necessary<br />
processing of applications of international and national transportation of dangerous<br />
goods.<br />
5<br />
European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR). <strong>Albania</strong> has<br />
acceded the Agreement on January 26 th , 2005.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 14 of 20
The Contractor shall after consultation with the appropriate national and international<br />
authorities describe the route of transportation from the site to the final disposal<br />
destination(s). The route planning with copies of the approved transport documentation<br />
shall be submitted to the Project Manager at least one week before the transport shall<br />
begin.<br />
4.6 Final Disposal of the Waste<br />
4.6.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall destruct and/or neutralise the waste with appropriate method(s) at a<br />
facility inside the European Union. The net weight of the hazardous waste including old<br />
packaging material but excluding new packaging material shall be the basis of the payment<br />
per ton in the Bill of Quantity.<br />
4.6.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall in his offer propose destruction/neutralisation procedures and methods<br />
for the proposed classes of waste. Regardless EU policies on waste recycling, the<br />
Contractor shall assume that all waste must be final disposed of in accordance with<br />
international and national legislation in the disposal country in question.<br />
The Contractor shall in his offer document the compliance of the final disposal method(s)<br />
with the relevant national legislation.<br />
4.7 Site Cleaning Up and Take-over by the Contracting Authority<br />
4.7.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall ensure that the sites used for proceedings of this contract and at least<br />
the Rooms 2 and 3 of Storehouse 2 as well as the marginal materials on the loading ramps<br />
are decontaminated and cleaned up from the waste stored. There is no need for a<br />
rehabilitation of neither the building itself nor possible hazardous materials eg. asbestos<br />
fibers of the building itself.<br />
Fencing and other items imported to the site by the Contractor has to be removed<br />
completely after the work.<br />
4.7.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall clean up walls and floors in the buildings in order to ensure that all<br />
chemical and leather waste are removed from the Site. No particular cleaning procedures of<br />
buildings and building materials are foreseen.<br />
The Contractor shall remove any solid waste from the outside ramps, tracks and drainage<br />
pits around Room 3 of Storehouse 2.<br />
The Contractor shall seal the building at least the Rooms 2 and 3 of Storehouse 2 including<br />
all doors. The Project Manager shall final inspect and approve the buildings before sealing.<br />
Photo documentation of the interior of the buildings at the time of sealing shall be handed<br />
over to the Project Manager. A written documentation of the proceedings of this contract<br />
shall be handed over.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 15 of 20
5 THE CONTRACTORS KEY PERSONNEL<br />
5.1 General experience<br />
All waste located at the Site is regarded dangerous to humans. There may furthermore be a<br />
risk of decomposition of some chemical material when being heated. The Contractor shall<br />
therefore include staff in his team which has considerable experience with repackaging of<br />
hazardous materials including chemical waste i.e. the sodium hexafluoro silicate (Na2SiF6),<br />
pesticides and asbestos fibers.<br />
5.2 Key Personnel<br />
The following Profiles are regarded as necessary expertise for a professional works<br />
implementation:<br />
Profile General Experience Specific Experience<br />
General Manager Degree/Diploma in<br />
Engineering or related natural<br />
Site Manager<br />
(full time on Site)<br />
Safety Expert<br />
(full time on Site)<br />
Repackaging personnel<br />
(number according to<br />
Contractors work schedule)<br />
sciences. Fluent in English.<br />
Degree/Diploma. in Chemistry<br />
and/or Chemical engineering.<br />
More that 10 years of<br />
experience with hazardous<br />
waste management and<br />
disposal. Fluent in English.<br />
Knowledge of <strong>Albania</strong>n is an<br />
advantage.<br />
Degree/Diploma in<br />
Engineering or related natural<br />
sciences. Fluent in English.<br />
Knowledge of <strong>Albania</strong>n is an<br />
advantage.<br />
More than 10 years of<br />
experience with hazardous<br />
waste management and disposal<br />
Experience as a site manager<br />
from at least 3 similar project<br />
and/or more than 10 years of<br />
experience from hazardous<br />
waste management and disposal<br />
in chemical industry.<br />
Experience with risk<br />
management, environmental<br />
protection measures and<br />
occupational health and safety<br />
issues in relation to hazardous<br />
waste are essential.<br />
not assessed not assessed<br />
More than 10 years of<br />
experience in emergency<br />
preparedness and response<br />
planning and management,<br />
preferably from the chemical<br />
industry. Alternatively<br />
experience from the oil and gas<br />
industry and/or from National<br />
Emergency Management is<br />
acceptable.<br />
An English/<strong>Albania</strong>n interpreter shall be on site at all times of ongoing works. The<br />
Contractor shall prepare the repackaging personnel for the works implementation and<br />
ensure appropriate instructions are given in the working methods.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 16 of 20
The instructions shall include introduction and training in the foreseen specific methods<br />
and procedures, the use of personal protection equipment and all safety procedures to be<br />
applied as part of the works activities.<br />
6 ENVIRONMENT AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY<br />
6.1 Occupational Health and Safety<br />
6.1.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall be responsible for all occupational health and safety issues related to<br />
the works, including repackaging, transport and final disposal of the waste.<br />
All repackaging personnel shall - prior to starting the works - be given instruction and<br />
training in procedures where special risks are involved. The repackaging personnel shall be<br />
instructed in the rules established, and the Contractor shall ensure that the procedures in<br />
case of incidents and accidents are understood. Only when the personnel have received the<br />
instructions and have signed that they understand the purpose and content the work, they<br />
may start work.<br />
All workers shall be submitted to an initial medical check, focused on the specific risks of<br />
the works execution. The medical check shall be repeated upon termination of the works.<br />
All instructions shall be presented orally and written in <strong>Albania</strong>n language.<br />
6.1.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall in a separate management plan describe how he will ensure<br />
occupational health and safety of all activities and all personnel working on the Site. The<br />
Contractor shall describe type and usage of personal protection equipment and the<br />
procedures for clean and contaminated working zones.<br />
6.2 Protection of the Environment<br />
6.2.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall be responsible for all environmental protection issues related to the<br />
works, including repackaging, removal, transport and temporary disposal. He shall ensure<br />
that no additional contamination will take place and that all activities are screened for<br />
environmental impacts before start of the activity.<br />
Where environmental impacts are likely, the Contractor shall propose environmental<br />
protection measures to be implemented.<br />
6.2.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall in a separate management plan describe how he will ensure that no<br />
additional environmental impacts will occur, and how he will ensure for all the working<br />
activities that adequate environmental protection measures are installed.<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 17 of 20
6.3 Emergency Preparedness and Response<br />
6.3.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall be responsible for the implementation of an emergency preparedness<br />
and response organization ensuring the appropriate preparedness for acting in situations<br />
with sudden and acute danger.<br />
6.3.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall describe in a separate management plan his Emergency Preparedness<br />
and Response Plan. The Plan shall be based on an analyses of the 3 worst scenarios (e.g.<br />
fires in accordance with the requirements for sodium hexafluoro silicate, contamination of<br />
staff, collapse of roof structures) and include a description of the organization and the<br />
procedures on how to respond to the dangers that may occur in these scenarios.<br />
The Contractor shall identify all local, regional and national authorities involved in<br />
Emergency Response activities and establish an agreed plan with clear descriptions of tasks<br />
and responsibilities.<br />
The Contractor shall train his personnel in Emergency Response.<br />
7 REPORTING<br />
7.1 Daily Reporting<br />
The Contractor shall establish daily reporting of his works activities. The daily reporting<br />
shall comprise:<br />
� Establishing and maintaining registry of all personnel and visitors to the site (at<br />
entrance gate)<br />
� Establishing and maintaining logbook of repackaging, collection, transportation and<br />
disposal activities, and of all incidents and accidents at the site and the response<br />
given.<br />
Both registry and logbook shall be available for the Project Manager at all time.<br />
7.2 Weekly Reporting<br />
The Contractor shall prepare a weekly report for the site meetings to be handed over to the<br />
Project Manager at the latest the day before the site meeting summarizing the entries in the<br />
above-mentioned daily reports. The weekly reports shall furthermore include a plan for the<br />
coming week’s activities and an updated time schedule.<br />
The weekly reports shall be submitted to the Project Manager every Monday before 12.00<br />
am.<br />
7.3 Final Report<br />
The Contractor shall elaborate a final report describing the completed work. The final<br />
report shall justify the take-over of the Site and the official finalization of the work.<br />
The final report may fall in three sections:<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 18 of 20
1. Final Report for the take-over of Bajza Site<br />
2. Report for the repackaging, temporary storage and classification of the waste<br />
3. Report describing the completion conditions at the site including an assessment of<br />
risks and hazards.<br />
The latter report shall provide background for further activities at the site, e.g. rehabilitation<br />
of the storage buildings.<br />
8 FACILITIES TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE PROJECT MANAGER<br />
8.1 Specifications<br />
The Contractor shall provide office facilities, transportation and H&S equipment for the<br />
sole use of the Project Manager on site.<br />
8.2 Performance Criteria<br />
The Contractor shall make separate office space (for 1 person) available for the supervisory<br />
staff at the Site. The office shall be equipped with telecommunication (email connection),<br />
fax/copy/printer access and office furniture.<br />
The Contractor shall provide all necessary H&S equipment for the Project Manager in<br />
order for the Project Manager to inspect all parts of the works.<br />
9 ANCILLARY CONDITIONS<br />
9.1 Duration of assignment<br />
Duration of assignment: 4 weeks, starting from ……….<br />
9.2 Duty station<br />
Duty station: Bajza Railway station<br />
9.3 Submission of application<br />
Closing date for the submission of application: …………….<br />
Name of Office: <strong>UNDP</strong> <strong>Albania</strong><br />
Office address: Rr. Deshmoret e 4 shurtit, Villa 35, Tirana<br />
Telephone: +355 4 2276600/2233122<br />
Fax: +355 4 2232075<br />
e-mail: registry.al@undp.org<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 19 of 20
Annex<br />
Price Schedule<br />
…<br />
The price schedule must provide a detailed cost breakdown. Provide if necessary separate<br />
figures for each functional grouping or category.<br />
Estimates for cost-reimbursable items, if any, such as travel and out of pocket expenses<br />
should be listed separately.<br />
The format shown in the following should be used in preparing the price schedule. The<br />
format includes specific expenditures, which may or may not be required or applicable but<br />
are indicated to serve as examples.<br />
The amount of repackaging is estimated, the final payment is according to the actual<br />
repackaged amount.<br />
…<br />
Description of activity Estimated<br />
Amount<br />
US$ per t Total US$<br />
1 Site preparation - lump sum<br />
2 Classification - -<br />
2.1 Classification - lump sum<br />
2.2 Analyses please specify<br />
3 Repacking, Transport and final Disposal - -<br />
3.1 Dust and debris, existing packages - lump sum<br />
3.2 Repackaging of chemical waste 80 t<br />
3.3 Repackaging of leather waste 200 t<br />
3.4 Collecting of pesticides in wagon - lump sum<br />
4 Site Cleaning Up and Take-over - lump sum<br />
5 Out of Pocket expenses<br />
5.1 Travel<br />
5.2 Per diem allowances<br />
5.3 Communications<br />
5.4 Reports and Reproductions<br />
5.5 Equipment and other items<br />
ToR Repackaging Bajza Page 20 of 20