Season Booklet.compressed (1)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Garth Greenan Gallery<br />
2017–2018
As a gallery, we spend a great deal of time researching the past. Our 2017–2018<br />
season, however, joyfully looks in all directions. It includes works from as early as<br />
1954 and as recently as 2017. Iconic pieces hang alongside newly discovered, lesserknown<br />
examples by gallery artists, enriching and expanding our understanding of<br />
their work, and embracing the totality of their achievement.<br />
The authenticity, humor, and above all, beauty of these objects are welcome<br />
reminders that, even in uncertain times, art has the power to bring people together.<br />
This is not just a season brochure—it is an invitation to join our gallery in a year<br />
of emotional engagement through looking.<br />
We look forward to seeing you soon.<br />
—Garth Greenan and Bryan Davidson Blue
September 7–October 21, 2017<br />
Rosalyn Drexler: Occupational Hazard<br />
Occupational Hazard is the first presentation of Rosalyn Drexler’s work since her<br />
recent retrospective at the Rose Art Museum, Brandeis University. Ten of the artist’s<br />
bold, psychologically complex paintings will be on view, as well as a selection of rare<br />
works on paper.<br />
The show will focus on Drexler’s work since 1986, a remarkably prolific yet<br />
underappreciated period in the artist’s oeuvre. In these paintings, while favorite<br />
themes from her sixties repertoire persist, her subjects/compositions are more<br />
surreal and open-ended. Frequently, the figures wear masks or face away from<br />
the viewer. For Drexler, masking underlines the interchangeability of her cast<br />
of criminals, businessmen, and politicians, and further dramatizes their menace.<br />
Artists, whether friends (such as Andy Warhol) or not (such as Jean-Michel<br />
Basquiat), and artworks by herself and others, also figure into these paintings,<br />
echoing the intensification during the 1980s of Drexler’s reflexive preoccupation<br />
with the art world. In an homage to Henri Rousseau, Sueño Revista (Rosalyn and<br />
Sherman in a Rousseau) (1989), Drexler inserts herself and her late husband, the<br />
artist Sherman Drexler, into an emulation of The Dream (1910).<br />
One of the most significant works in the exhibition, Portrait of the Artist (1989),<br />
underlines the importance of both painting and writing to Drexler’s creative persona.<br />
It features a masked figure in a painterly frame with brush in hand and a “beanie with<br />
an airplane at the top.” The airplane symbolizes the “traveling mind of a writer,” the<br />
artist explains. In particular, the mask highlights Drexler’s association with theater;<br />
it also points to the hide-and-seek/hide-to-reveal game so fundamental to her work<br />
since the sixties, as well as to her lifelong role-playing as both a woman and an artist.<br />
Its “useful clothes” effect a potent cross-dressing that echoes the artist’s generous<br />
embrace of all kinds of difference, as often revealed in her plays and novels.<br />
Rosalyn Drexler, Glasnost, 1988
September 13–17, 2017<br />
Expo Chicago, Richard Van Buren:<br />
Bennington<br />
For the 2017 edition of Expo Chicago, the gallery will present Bennington, a solo<br />
exhibition of works by Richard Van Buren. Six of the artist’s densely layered abstract<br />
sculptures will be on view, including Strata (1977) and the monumental floor piece<br />
Bennington (1970). The latter consists of multiple brightly colored polyester elements<br />
cast from Mylar sheets buried in a snowbank. It is a seminal work that marks the<br />
beginning of the artist’s career-long fascination with the relationship between natural/<br />
organic forms and man-made/inorganic materials, especially their ability to mimic<br />
each other.<br />
Rather than modeled or constructed, works like Bennington seem to emerge<br />
as residue from two ends of time that seldom conjoin. Folded, twisted, sharp, and<br />
lumpy—the forms are shot through with colors that are simultaneously toxic and<br />
beautiful. In each element, the artist embedded milled glass, plaster, paper, glitter,<br />
and dry pigment. At times, the semi-transparent forms resemble crumpled pieces of<br />
space junk that have been frozen in order to encase other pieces of trash for forensic<br />
reference. Viewers both look at and into Bennington.<br />
Van Buren’s understanding of time is what sets him apart from his peers. His<br />
early sculptures are not about the timeless present (Donald Judd and Dan Flavin)<br />
or the body (Eva Hesse), nor do they reference art history—Jackson Pollock’s<br />
poured paintings, for example. Rather, they acknowledge that time shapes matter<br />
into forms that people might not recognize, which, as critic John Yau writes, “is a<br />
rather disquieting perception of infinity.” With his embrace of disparate, seemingly<br />
incommensurable materials, and his invention of new creative processes, Van Buren’s<br />
achievement is more timely than ever.<br />
Richard Van Buren, Bennington VIII, 1970
October 4–8, 2017<br />
Frieze Masters, Nicholas Krushenick:<br />
Inventing Pop Abstraction<br />
For the 2017 edition of Frieze Masters, Spotlight, the gallery will present Inventing<br />
Pop Abstraction, a solo exhibition of works by Nicholas Krushenick. The three<br />
paintings included provide an overview of Krushenick’s work from 1965 to 1967,<br />
a time of intense formal as well as technical innovation for the artist. During this<br />
period, Krushenick developed a distinctive style that straddled Op, Pop, Abstract<br />
Expressionism, Minimalism, and Color Field Painting. Juxtaposing broad black<br />
lines with flat Liquitex colors, the artist created bold, energetic compositions that<br />
combine the graphic clarity of Pop with nonfigurative shapes and forms. Works like<br />
Flying Circus (1965) demonstrate Krushenick’s deliberate caricature of painterly<br />
“drips” or “skeins” into what more closely resemble details from cartoons—“like<br />
close-ups of Superman’s hair follicles,” as critic Robert Rosenblum once wrote.<br />
Krushenick relished his equivocal status: “They don’t know where to place me. Like<br />
I’m out in left field all by myself. And that’s just where I want to stay.”<br />
The presentation will also include a custom vitrine featuring a selection of rare<br />
preparatory drawings. Throughout his career, Krushenick was secretive about his<br />
work as a draftsman, in part because of the unfinished quality and “lack of precision”<br />
in much of the work. Regardless, the drawings provide a unique opportunity for<br />
viewers to understand another aspect of the artist’s process.<br />
In 2015, the Frances Young Tang Teaching Museum and Art Gallery, Skidmore<br />
College, hosted a full-career retrospective of the artist’s work. Frieze Masters will<br />
be the first time, however, that Krushenick’s paintings have been displayed in the<br />
United Kingdom. They were last shown in Europe in 1973.<br />
Nicholas Krushenick, United Color Kit, 1967
October 26–December 16, 2017<br />
Howardena Pindell: Recent Paintings<br />
Howardena Pindell: Recent Paintings, an exhibition of mixed-media paintings and<br />
collages, is the artist’s second with the gallery. Not since 2006, however, has Pindell’s<br />
recent work been displayed in a commercial setting. Eight of the artist’s large-scale<br />
abstract paintings will be on view, as well as a selection of intricately detailed collages,<br />
all created between 2014 and 2017. The exhibition opens in advance of Pindell’s<br />
upcoming retrospective, Howardena Pindell: What Remains to Be Seen at Chicago’s<br />
Museum of Contemporary Art (February 23–May 20, 2018), curated by Naomi<br />
Beckwith and Valerie Cassel-Oliver.<br />
The exhibition offers a detailed view of Pindell’s recent work, covering an<br />
innovative time for the artist in which, after a long hiatus, she reengaged with abstraction.<br />
In paintings such as Nautilus I (2014–2015) and Night Flight (2015–2016), Pindell<br />
continues a metaphorical process first begun in the mid-1970s. She deconstructs/<br />
reconstructs her work, cutting the canvas into complex “maze patterns” and sewing<br />
them back together, then building up the surface in elaborate stages: painting or drawing<br />
onto a sheet of paper, punching out dots from it, dropping them onto her canvas,<br />
and finally squeegeeing acrylic through the “stencil” left in the paper from which she<br />
had punched the dots. Recently, sequins, glitter, foam circles, vinyl text, powder,<br />
string, printed numbers, and even hair have become part of the artist’s labor-intensive,<br />
process-oriented approach to painting. As always, her constructed canvases are<br />
installed unstretched, held to the wall merely by the strength of a few finishing nails.<br />
Currently, major paintings by Pindell are included in the Brooklyn Museum’s<br />
We Wanted a Revolution: Black Radical Women, 1965–1985 (2017–2018), Magnetic<br />
Fields: Expanding American Abstraction (2017–2018) at the Kemper Museum of<br />
Contemporary Art, Kansas City, and Soul of a Nation: Art in the Age of Black Power<br />
(2017–2018) at the Tate Modern. Her work will also figure prominently in Lynne<br />
Cooke’s Outliers and American Vanguard Art, opening at the National Gallery of Art,<br />
Washington, D.C., in January 2018.<br />
Howardena Pindell, Songlines: Cosmos, 2017
December 6–10, 2017<br />
Art Basel: Miami Beach, Another Aspect of Pop:<br />
D’Arcangelo, Drexler, Krushenick<br />
For the 2017 edition of Art Basel: Miami Beach, the gallery will present an exhibition<br />
of five signature works by three gallery artists: Allan D’Arcangelo, Rosalyn Drexler, and<br />
Nicholas Krushenick. Throughout their careers, the trio exhibited together widely—<br />
first during the late 1950s in New York’s Tenth Street artists’ cooperatives (March,<br />
Brata, and Reuben)—and later at the Fischbach and Kornblee galleries. Most notably,<br />
however, their paintings appeared in countless historic group exhibitions, many of<br />
which problematized the characterization of their work as Pop.<br />
The presentation will include two paintings by Allan D’Arcangelo—The Rheingold<br />
Girls (1963) and Untitled #2 (1965). The Rheingold Girls is the first in a series of four<br />
works by the artist portraying women and girls with blank, featureless faces—almost<br />
like paper dolls. Each year saw the coronation of a new “Miss Rheingold,” as well as<br />
the publication of a calendar. Politically involved throughout his career, D’Arcangelo in<br />
this work deliberately comments on the inequality and commodification of women<br />
in American society.<br />
Also featured will be two paintings by Rosalyn Drexler—The Lesson (1962)<br />
and Candy and Mel (Two Hearts Beat as One) (1966)—both quintessential examples<br />
of the artist’s early work. They expose not only the underside of the American Dream<br />
but also a vision of America as the violent and self-violated world of white males. In<br />
The Lesson, the artist celebrates what she describes as the “concentration of men at<br />
work.” The painting also seems to embody a Nietzschean view of the machine as an<br />
attribute of the masculine conquest for power.<br />
Finally, the presentation will include Nicholas Krushenick’s Son of King Kong<br />
(1965), one of the artist’s most iconic works. In the painting, two bulbous orangeand-blue-striped<br />
shapes, like the heads of giant snakes, approach each other from<br />
above and below on a horizontally bisected background of diagonal red and yellow<br />
stripes. Whether they will kiss, bite, or explode when they meet is unclear. The<br />
gregariousness and overt sexuality of this painting is a pointed critique of “art for<br />
art’s sake” and its high earnestness and lack of humor.<br />
Allan D’Arcangelo, The Rheingold Girls, 1963
January 11–February 17, 2018<br />
Victoria Gitman: Taktisch<br />
Victoria Gitman: Taktisch, an exhibition of paintings and drawings, is the artist’s first<br />
since her recent retrospective at the Pérez Art Museum Miami. Eight of Gitman’s<br />
astonishingly naturalistic paintings will be on view, in addition to a selection of<br />
drawings, all created between 2016 and 2017.<br />
The exhibition focuses on Gitman’s recent paintings—meticulously rendered<br />
abstractions based on the supple fur surfaces of vintage handbags. Gitman works<br />
in oils, hair by hair, creating surfaces that are delicately painted from close, direct<br />
observation. Many of the paintings feature abstract patterns evocative of early<br />
and mid-twentieth-century stylistic traditions. Evoking modernist compositional<br />
techniques, Gitman’s new works are resolutely frontal, their imagery extending<br />
edge-to-edge. Each composition is tightly cropped, further intensifying both the<br />
haptic quality and the inherent sensuousness of the artist’s chosen subjects.<br />
The title of the exhibition is a neologism introduced by Vienna School art<br />
historian Aloïs Riegl to describe a kind of close-up perception or “visual touching.”<br />
Taktisch can at once signify “tactile,” “tangible,” “palpable,” or “textural,” as well as<br />
“tactical.” It implies an intimate exchange with art objects, an intermingling of the<br />
experiences of seeing, feeling, and knowing through sensory perception.<br />
Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1972, Victoria Gitman immigrated to the<br />
United States in 1987. In 1996, she graduated from Florida International University<br />
with a BFA in painting. She has had solo exhibitions at Daniel Weinberg Gallery<br />
(2004, 2006, 2009, Los Angeles), David Nolan Gallery (2006, 2011, New York), and<br />
Tomio Koyama Gallery (2014, Tokyo). In 2005, the Bass Museum of Art, Miami,<br />
mounted On Display, Gitman’s first museum exhibition. Three years later, Looking<br />
Closely, a solo exhibition of paintings and drawings, opened at the Las Vegas<br />
Art Museum.<br />
Victoria Gitman, Untitled, 2016
February 27–April 7, 2018<br />
Paul Feeley: The Other Side<br />
The Other Side, an exhibition of paintings, watercolors, and drawings, is Paul Feeley’s<br />
third with the gallery. Nine of the artist’s brightly colored abstractions will be on view,<br />
as well as a selection of related watercolors and drawings.<br />
The exhibition provides a detailed view of Feeley’s work from 1954 to 1959—<br />
the period during which he created what he considered his earliest “professional”<br />
paintings. In fall 1955, Feeley had his first solo exhibition at New York’s Tibor de Nagy<br />
Gallery. Works on display dealt primarily, as art critic Lawrence Campbell wrote, “with<br />
struggling complexes, blobs elbowing each other and being rained on.” One painting<br />
in the exhibition, Red Blotch (1954), stood out as something distinctly different.<br />
What was the “strange red blob” surrounded by verdant green? And what about the<br />
silhouetted black forms along the painting’s lower edge? With its inherent quietude<br />
and interlocking colors, Red Blotch set the tenor for the artist’s mature pictorial<br />
sensibility—one that balanced Dionysian extravagance with Apollonian restraint.<br />
The Apollonian character of the paintings created for Feeley’s follow-up<br />
show in 1958 would have been hard to miss. Begun in 1956 and loosely titled<br />
after islands of the Cyclades, the series, completed in 1959, explores the terrain<br />
of organic abstraction through the most reductive of means. Muted reds and<br />
yellows, or yellows and blues, with occasional passages of bright orange and pink,<br />
distinguish the somatic nature of Tenos (1956), Sterope (1957), Syphos (1958),<br />
and Melos (1958), as well as contemporaneous works such as Kilroy, The Other<br />
Side, and Between the In and the Out, all 1957. The critic Dore Ashton, covering the<br />
show for the New York Times, observed the paintings’ “erotic sinuousness—great<br />
curving bottomless shapes like chemists’ retorts, or slithering, wasp-waisted forms<br />
embedded in blue ether,” and their “obscure symbolism.” To Feeley, a shape was a<br />
living thing, a vehicle for an abstract thought-complex, a carrier of the awesome<br />
feelings he felt before the “terror of the unknowable.”<br />
Paul Feeley, Red Blotch, 1954
March 8–11, 2018<br />
The Independent, Jaune Quick-to-See Smith:<br />
I See Red<br />
For the 2018 edition of The Independent, New York, the gallery will present I See<br />
Red, a solo exhibition of works by Jaune Quick-to-See Smith. The three paintings<br />
in the exhibition provide an overview of the artist’s work between 1989 and 1993,<br />
an important period in the artist’s practice. During that time, Smith began her<br />
famous series “I See Red,” further extending and elaborating her assertion of red<br />
as a signature of Native American identity. The saturated red of paintings such as<br />
Gifts of Red Cloth (1989) and The Red Mean (1992) performs simultaneous acts of<br />
affirmation and resistance, as in her earlier self-portraits.<br />
In a manner similar to the one that she uses in The Red Mean, Smith deploys<br />
a complex mix of image and text across the canvas of I See Red: Snowman. In sharp<br />
contrast to the painted red ground, the center portion of the snowman is collaged<br />
with black and white commercial text and advertising images. The words “simply<br />
red” are applied over the painted surface where we expect to see a smiling mouth<br />
of stones. The surrounding phrases “Bitter Medicine” and “Seeking Respect”<br />
complicate and refute the possibility of “simply red,” as the artist transforms the<br />
statements into difficult questions. By altering the characteristics from snow white<br />
to red, Smith reframes the context of the casual use of banal mass media labels<br />
and exposes the contingent subject position of the viewer from one who labels to<br />
one who is labeled. The artist visualizes the effect of unequal power and prejudice<br />
as she asserts the role of a Native American viewer bombarded by the incessant<br />
appropriation and misuse of indigenous imagery for commercial profit. By reframing<br />
a dominant cultural metaphor—white innocence—Smith’s “I See Red” series<br />
activates a specific aesthetic and political critique within the larger discourse of<br />
race that might otherwise go unquestioned.<br />
Jaune Quick-to-See Smith, Target, 1992
April 12–May 19, 2018<br />
Jaune Quick-to-See Smith: Making Medicine<br />
Making Medicine, a solo show of recent paintings and drawings by Jaune Quick-to-<br />
See Smith, marks the artist’s premiere exhibition with the gallery. Nine of the artist’s<br />
thickly impastoed, mixed-media paintings will be on view, as well as a selection of<br />
related watercolors and drawings. A fully illustrated catalogue will accompany the<br />
show, with an essay by Lucy Lippard.<br />
Works in the exhibition depict Smith’s passionate concerns about climate<br />
change, the survival of our environment, and the economic fallout from government<br />
and corporate decisions made in recent decades. Many of the paintings also comment<br />
on everyday Native American life and its paradoxical relationship to American<br />
consumerism. In Sissy and the Plutocrats (2012), for example, a female Sisyphus<br />
pushes her shopping cart up a mountain that is laden with elegant foodstuffs. Here,<br />
Smith explores the widening gap between rich and poor using her signature mix of<br />
pointed humor and cleverly constructed symbolism.<br />
Born in 1940 in St. Ignatius, Montana, Jaune Quick-to-See Smith is an enrolled<br />
Salish member of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Nation. In 1980, she earned<br />
an MFA from the University of New Mexico. Over the past forty years, Smith has had<br />
more than 100 solo exhibitions, curated over 30 exhibitions, and given more than<br />
200 lectures at museums and conferences internationally. The artist has also completed<br />
several collaborative public works including the floor design in the Great Hall<br />
of the new Denver Airport, a site-specific sculpture piece in Yerba Buena Park of San<br />
Francisco, and a mile-long sidewalk “history trail” in West Seattle.<br />
Smith’s work is included in numerous museum collections, including the<br />
Brooklyn Museum; the Metropolitan Museum of Art; the Museum for Ethnology,<br />
Berlin; the Museum for World Cultures, Frankfurt; the Museum of Modern Art; the<br />
Smithsonian Museum of American Art; the Victoria and Albert Museum; the Walker<br />
Art Center; the Whitney Museum of American Art.<br />
Jaune Quick-to-See Smith, Trade Canoe for the North Pole, 2017
May 24–June 30, 2018<br />
Alexis Smith: Hello Hollywood<br />
Alexis Smith: Hello Hollywood, an exhibition of collages, is the first presentation<br />
of the artist’s vintage work in a New York gallery in more than 25 years. Five of the<br />
artist’s meticulously crafted, mixed-media narrative collages will be on view, as well<br />
as the monumental installations Hello Hollywood (1980) and Isadora (1980–1981).<br />
Composed of thirteen distinct elements, the exhibition summarizes Smith’s<br />
search during the 1970s for an American voice through the writings of early<br />
twentieth-century authors. Architecturally scaled wall paintings enhance the mood<br />
of many of the collages, including power lines, palm trees, and an ocean liner’s<br />
smokestack. Isadora, taken from John Dos Passos’ The Big Money, chronicles<br />
Isadora Duncan’s loss of innocence and dramatic death by strangulation—<br />
infamously, the dancer’s scarf got caught in the wheel of a friend’s Bugatti.<br />
The somewhat sparer Hello Hollywood enshrines the roadside advertisements<br />
for Burma Shave that dotted America’s landscape until about fifty years ago. Each of<br />
the five wood-framed parallelograms contains one line of a ditty presented much like<br />
the sequential signs that characterized the Burma Shave advertisements. Installed<br />
over three contiguous walls on top of two rows of palm trees of decreasing height and<br />
proximity, Smith plays on the steadily receding perspective experienced in driving.<br />
A bale of hay reinforces the rural setting of this kind of commercial “literature,” while<br />
infusing the space with the evocatively rich aroma of dried grass—far from the stale<br />
smell of the city.<br />
In many of Smith’s works, the city of Los Angeles appears as part of the subject.<br />
The artist exploits the universal allure and fascination around Hollywood as a<br />
place where dreams are made, where imagination, hope, and illusion are realized.<br />
According to Smith, this is an extension of the story of the West, that a move west<br />
equals a better life. It is the quintessential American transformation myth, the<br />
American Dream.<br />
Alexis Smith, Masculine/Feminine, 1978
July 12–August 10, 2018<br />
Three Gallery Artists<br />
Three Gallery Artists, a group exhibition of paintings and sculptures, features a<br />
selection of work by Mark Greenwold, Ralph Humphrey, and Roy McMakin.<br />
Mark Greenwold’s meticulously detailed gouache paintings from 1988 are<br />
multifaceted explorations of the issues and complexities of life. A self-proclaimed<br />
“emotional cubist,” the artist revels in the blurred and fragmented narratives that his<br />
paintings create. In works such as The House (1988) the artist asks us not to look at<br />
the inside of his life, but at our own, warts and all. Greenwold’s famously laborious<br />
process mirrors the psychological intensity of his paintings. The artist works under<br />
magnification, like a jeweler, employing the tiniest of brushes. He builds up the<br />
surfaces stroke by stroke. The result is a kind of delirious realism in which everything<br />
portrayed, however realistic, is actually composed of thousands upon thousands of<br />
beautiful abstractions.<br />
Equally complex are Ralph Humphrey’s “Conveyance” paintings, a singularly<br />
important, emotionally fraught body of work, created between 1974 and 1977. The<br />
paintings—hulking masses of casein and modeling paste in blacks, blues, and<br />
purples—often loosely resemble actual objects, like packages or containers. But,<br />
what do they contain? Ostensibly, they are vessels for Humphrey’s emotions, life<br />
experiences, and ideas about painting. Their textured surfaces simultaneously<br />
attract and repel, even as their dimensionality literally forces viewers into the<br />
objects’ space. Their actual content is perhaps not so easily read.<br />
Roy McMakin’s aptly titled series of sculptures, “The Middle,” refers not only to<br />
McMakin being the middle of three children, but also to the unifying strategy that<br />
tempered his approach to working with each piece. The works have all been carefully<br />
trisected, resulting in a group of objects that exhibit total disability. As Richard Klein<br />
explains, “It might seem counterintuitive that radically altering something could act<br />
to preserve it, but what’s being preserved in this case is not each piece of furniture’s<br />
outward form, but rather its emotional reality in the context of a human life.”<br />
Mark Greenwold, The House, 1988
Allan D’Arcangelo<br />
Rosalyn Drexler<br />
Paul Feeley<br />
Victoria Gitman<br />
Art Green<br />
Mark Greenwold<br />
Ralph Humphrey<br />
Nicholas Krushenick<br />
Al Loving<br />
Roy McMakin<br />
Gladys Nilsson<br />
Howardena Pindell<br />
Norbert Prangenberg<br />
Alexis Smith<br />
Jaune Quick-to-See Smith<br />
Richard Van Buren
© 2017 Garth Greenan Gallery<br />
Edited by Garth Greenan and Bryan Davidson Blue<br />
Copyedited by Michael Lacoy<br />
Designed by Judith Hudson<br />
Photography by Christopher Burke Studio<br />
Printed in the United States by Meridian Printing
Garth Greenan Gallery<br />
545 West 20th Street<br />
New York, New York 10011<br />
212.929.1351<br />
www.garthgreenan.com