29.09.2017 Views

September Newsletter

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES CREATE REVENUE FOR IOWANS<br />

Catalysts for Iowa’s Economic Growth<br />

If you read, viewed or listened to the news last week, you are no<br />

doubt aware that Apple is building a massive new data center in<br />

Waukee.<br />

As with many economic development deals, some gave it an “A”<br />

and some gave it an “F.”<br />

For starters, this deal doesn’t cost Waukee or its taxpayers a<br />

single penny. The “investment” by Waukee is foregoing only a<br />

portion of a massive increase in its tax base. The proposed<br />

Apple site is currently used as farmland, and is taxed as such,<br />

bringing in less than $100,000 annually. Once Apple purchases<br />

the site, Waukee will yield $3.75 million annually in property<br />

taxes from the same land. That’s $74.9 million in new property<br />

taxes during the abatement period. And in the first year after<br />

the abatement, the city will get $13.2 million or more per year<br />

— assuming no increase in valuation.<br />

On top of the local property taxes, Apple will contribute up to<br />

$100 million toward a “public improvement fund” for Waukee.<br />

The first project is to be a public youth sports complex.<br />

The net cost for all of this for Waukee? Zero. It is literally all<br />

upside. Giving up a portion of tax that would not have been paid<br />

in order to get a chunk of taxes that would not have been paid is<br />

a pretty easy decision.<br />

So what about Iowa? The state’s role is to be the catalyst for<br />

economic growth. Growth doesn’t “just happen.” Gov. Kim<br />

Reynolds, Iowa Economic Development Authority director Debi<br />

Durham and local leaders such as Jay Byers at the Greater Des<br />

Moines Partnership have been pursuing Apple for nearly two<br />

years. It started with Iowa letting Apple leaders know we<br />

wanted their business — and reminding them their competition<br />

is already here. The decision to award $19.65 million in state<br />

incentives is not easy. It never is. It’s the taxpayers’ money. And<br />

unlike Waukee’s “all upside” proposition, for the state it’s a<br />

strategic investment.<br />

Gov. Reynolds had to examine what the return on investment<br />

would be for all Iowa taxpayers. It’s not just about 50 high-quality<br />

jobs. It’s about spurring economic activity through a<br />

capital-intensive project to create more jobs, more investment,<br />

more business and consumer spending, and more overall<br />

growth. The growth the project generates needs to be able to<br />

pay the taxpayers back with a demonstrated return on the<br />

taxpayers' investment. The governor knew that the project was<br />

guaranteed to generate no less than $19.65 million in sales and<br />

use tax — so the taxpayers are made whole just in the construction<br />

phase of the data centers.<br />

What’s more, the governor knew that at least another $1.1<br />

million in new tax revenue would come back to the state<br />

annually once the data center is operational, as highlighted in<br />

the revenue estimates from U.S. Chamber of Commerce<br />

Technology Engagement Center study just completed in May.<br />

Together, taxpayers will see a return on investment to the<br />

general fund of $10-20 million over the same period that<br />

Waukee taxpayers would gain $74.9 million in property taxes,<br />

not including the additional tax on materials, real estate<br />

transfer fees and other correlated business growth from the<br />

project. The detractors of the deal have exclaimed, “We could<br />

have gotten a better deal. More for less. Why should we use<br />

any incentives?” The substantial return on investment shown<br />

here clearly answers these questions.<br />

Others lament, “If we just had low taxes, we wouldn’t need<br />

these incentives. The deals will just come to us.” If that was the<br />

case, then why didn’t South Dakota with no income tax get the<br />

deal? Why not Kansas (which was considered)? Because having<br />

low taxes doesn’t mean you don’t have to compete to win deals<br />

with great returns like the Apple project.<br />

Smart incentives that have a demonstrated return on investment<br />

are a critical part of Iowa’s economic growth.<br />

Do you have news ?<br />

Would you like to see the latest and greatest news<br />

from your business in Chamber @WORK? Submit<br />

your news to the Dubuque Area Chamber at<br />

office@dubuquechamber.com and include the word<br />

“newsletter” in the subject line.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!