31.10.2017 Views

Training Material Development Guide

The Guide addresses core improvement by teaching how to develop content for training. The Training Material Development Guide outlines clear expectations in the sequence of building content. The format engages improvement from what is assessed in engaging employees using a Communication and Measuring Learning technology.

The Guide addresses core improvement by teaching how to develop content for training. The Training Material Development Guide outlines clear expectations in the sequence of building content. The format engages improvement from what is assessed in engaging employees using a Communication and Measuring Learning technology.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Enabling the strategic alignment<br />

between training and performance with<br />

Table of contents.…………..…….………............................................................................................................1<br />

Prefaces and Purpose of the <strong>Guide</strong>……..............................................................................................................2 1<br />

Coordination.....................................................................................................................................................4 1.1<br />

Pre-<strong>Training</strong> Planning…..................................................................................................................................5 1.2<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Logistics Checklist…..............................................................................................................................6<br />

Needs Assessment...........................................................................................................................................7 2.1<br />

Assessing Needs .............................................................................................................................................8 2.2<br />

Adult Learners............................................................…………………………………………..……………..9 3<br />

Design...................................................................................…………………………………………….…15 3.1<br />

Course Design Process...................................................................................................................................15 3.2<br />

Learning Outcomes..........................................................................................................................................17 4<br />

<strong>Development</strong>..................................................................................................................................................21 4.1<br />

Developing <strong>Material</strong>.......................................................................................................................................21 4.2<br />

Developing Presentations………………………………………….................................................................26 5<br />

Delivery..........................................................................................................................................................27 5.1<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Methods...........................................................................................................................................27 5.2<br />

Effective Communication Skills……………………………………………………....................................31 5.6<br />

Evaluation.........................................................................................................................................................35 6<br />

Forms of Evaluation.......................................................................................................................................35 6.1<br />

Process Evaluation…….................................................................................................................................37 6.2<br />

Reference…………………………..................................................................................................................40 7<br />

EmployeeTalk Acknowledgment............................................ ......................................................................41 7.1<br />

Note about the author........................................................................................................................................43.8<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Prefaces and Purpose of the <strong>Guide</strong><br />

A strong succession planning program identifies and fosters the next generation of leaders through mentoring,<br />

training and stretch assignments. This would include Communication, Employee Engagement, and Measuring<br />

Learning working together. Employee Engagement is at the centerpiece. It is ongoing and not just a once a<br />

year activity. It requires a focus on what is critical now. The results from a yearly employee engagement<br />

survey, for example, can leave us wondering “Now that I have identified some strengths and opportunity, what<br />

do I do now?” Better outcomes are met when we create training activities in relation to employee engagement.<br />

This guide documents the process and good practice in developing training material, piloting and testing it. It<br />

is designed to help those (the course organizers) to plan and conduct a course. The guide aims to demonstrate<br />

different ways to engage using a Communication and Learning Measurement Technology to deliver and<br />

confirm outcomes. The (ET), EmployeeTalk platform is showcased in these processes and good practices and<br />

outlines an approach to meet Succession Planning objectives from employee engagement.<br />

Dashboards<br />

For better independent development planning each employee should be set up with their own personal<br />

dashboard. Their personal dashboards are for login in EmployeeTalk to sign off on onboarding tasks and<br />

Employee Handbook, view Yearly Performance Reviews, engage Personal Assessments, and Collaborative<br />

Assessments; such as 360° Feedback Reviews, Stretch Assignment Tasks, and, Manager Tips. This platform<br />

creates more accountability to skill improvement and provides a place to support a personalized training<br />

approach.<br />

ET uniquely pinpoints the individual profiles of employees learning style and behavior. This supports the<br />

quality in the activity of training. The transparent activities empower managers to assist their team in Skill<br />

<strong>Development</strong>, Independent <strong>Development</strong> Planning, and Succession Planning in the organization. Course<br />

design is initially inspired from employees, managers, leads, and, training team’s observations and it’s based<br />

on the corporate learning strategy which is developed from the following key elements:<br />

• Specific Business Objectives – What are the specific financial and/or human capital goals your<br />

company is trying to meet? Your business objectives should provide the framework for your strategy.<br />

• Audience – What are the roles that have a direct impact on each of these goals? <strong>Training</strong> should<br />

focus on the employees in these roles. The stakeholder audience could be an internal one or external<br />

one such as customers, vendors, or patients.<br />

• Delivery Method – How will training be delivered? This includes identifying the type of content<br />

needed, the medium through which it is delivered and how learning will be measured.<br />

• Performance Support – How will performance be supported? How will outcomes be confirmed?<br />

<strong>Training</strong> must be applied and reinforced to be effective and should continually evolve to meet<br />

changing needs.<br />

The guide includes information on the main steps and stages in the sequence of designing a training course all<br />

the way to evaluation for feedback into further development. It is worth mentioning here that the design and<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

development process of training material is anything but linear. In fact, it will be important to utilize today’s<br />

training techniques such as Micro Learning, Just in Time <strong>Training</strong>, Mobile Design with an online Library<br />

(LMS), and, of course, Online Dashboards for the employees in EmployeeTalk. <strong>Training</strong> will be very iterative<br />

but some content can be a challenge and difficult to capture in a document such as in how this guide outlines.<br />

Design processes are always divided into steps and phases in order to make sure that checks and tests are<br />

carried out at the appropriate time to avoid any lengthy and costly time-consuming modifications at the end.<br />

There are 4 key overarching principles to any design process – the 4Cs:<br />

1. Clarity: Working groups and design teams need to take their time at the onset of any course design<br />

process to achieve and agree on the clarity of several issues including:<br />

a. Purpose of the course<br />

e. process plan<br />

b. target group<br />

f. responsibilities<br />

c. aims and objectives<br />

d. learning outcomes<br />

g. piloting and testing<br />

h. evaluation<br />

The more this is given time and attention the better and smoother the process that follows will run. If<br />

there is any disagreement on the fundamentals, it is going to affect almost every aspect of the design<br />

and development process and will result in a constant insurmountable obstacle. It’s also important not<br />

to leave anything to assumptions of any kind.<br />

2. Capacity: Assessing the required capacity of the design and development team, those who will be<br />

involved in the administration and logistics of piloting and running the courses and the overall<br />

management team is also fundamental. <strong>Training</strong> courses are different and each requires a set of skills<br />

and expertise unique from another depending on the context it runs in. Making sure that the right<br />

team is put together and given adequate resources is another fundamental principle in training design<br />

and development. Time should also be taken in assembling the appropriate capacity package whether<br />

human resources and expertise or material and non-tangible.<br />

3. Consistency: Once an approach is agreed upon, the consistency maintains the quality of the design<br />

process. When there is clarity on aims and objectives and the design team moves into the details of<br />

methods and training approach and techniques, it’s important to stay consistent with what the training<br />

is trying to achieve and stay focused on the main purpose. Design and development processes get<br />

derailed by losing focus or trying to follow fads and gimmicks in training that might not be suitable to<br />

the purpose of the course. It’s also important that the design team sticks with the process from<br />

beginning to the end. This would include follow-through and the confirming of understanding<br />

through learning measures. This last part representing collaboration with teams. If training team<br />

members have to be substituted, it’s important that there is enough overlap/hand over period so new<br />

members can join in, bringing in fresh and new ideas without disrupting an on-going process<br />

especially when it’s farther down the line.<br />

4. Commitment: Lack of commitment is largely what makes or breaks any design and development<br />

process. Commitment is not just from the design team but of all stakeholders involved in terms of<br />

supporting the design team efforts financially, technologically, administratively, logistically, etc. The<br />

best design efforts falter and cannot be sustained when there is lack of commitment.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

1. Coordination<br />

Coordinating a training course requires a variety of steps, tasks, and skills. Although a lot of training<br />

coordination takes place during the design phase, coordination is very important during all phases of the<br />

training process. Coordination begins at the time training is proposed and continues even after it is delivered<br />

and the participants leave. The various roles a training coordinator leads include; communication manager,<br />

materials producer, employee engagement specialist, problem-solver, and even entertainment director. In<br />

short, coordinating training requires the endless management of many details and people. This section covers<br />

pre-training planning and checklists to be taken into account early on in the process. A collaborative training<br />

approach centralizes lesson access too. The preplanning objective is to capture lessons and training critical to<br />

the individual department success and ensure learning goals are driven by business goals for reuse and<br />

accessibility. Consider using a preliminary approach to engage potential training needs, a litmus test to ensure<br />

that the department goals align with the organization’s goals. The material development phase is driven by<br />

observation utilizing scorecards from the manager’s perspective and checklist from the team’s. This is done to<br />

get the unit manager to start thinking about training when none is planned. These general questions can be<br />

launched online virtually as an assessment within EmployeeTalk (ET) with the intent to follow up face to face<br />

with conversation. When managers are engaged on the material topic in person, ask if there is anything else.<br />

Remember this exercise is to get leaders thinking about their training needs. We are in the material inception<br />

stage so face to face is a must. These <strong>Material</strong> Inception questions are also provided transparently:<br />

When considering training and succession planning needs, what is your most critical objective today to meet<br />

business goals?<br />

I can list in the space provided these critical objectives, the first being most critical? Yes or No<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

You can share what the current obstacles are preventing the success of this critical objective? Yes or No<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

You can share what is currently in place to support those critical objectives? Yes or No<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

You can share what is needed from the training team to support those objectives? Yes or No<br />

1.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

In follow up face to face<br />

By implementing this training action, we would solve this objective and business goal? Yes or No<br />

The actual training is created from a detailed Checklist 3 exampled under design part 3.1 in this guide. This too<br />

can be engaged online virtually with EmployeeTalk so leaders can respond when their available giving them<br />

time to think about needed content and context.<br />

1.1 Pre-<strong>Training</strong> Planning:<br />

One of the first and most important steps in pre-training planning is to identify and agree on roles and<br />

responsibilities before posts are even filled. Terms of reference should also be drawn for the following set<br />

of roles:<br />

MANAGEMENT MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT TRAINING<br />

Program Manager Curriculum Developer <strong>Training</strong> Facilitators<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Coordinator Content Specialist <strong>Training</strong> Co-Facilitators<br />

Administrative Assistant Curriculum Writer Manager – <strong>Training</strong> Assistant<br />

Curriculum Editor<br />

Facilitator – Train the Trainer<br />

Graphic Designer<br />

Videographer<br />

Programmer/IT<br />

For clarity of responsibilities the Program Manager is usually and typically The Unit Manager and in a case of<br />

a project that has a strong training component the Unit Manager is also the Program Manager and Content<br />

Specialist. The <strong>Training</strong> Coordinator, on the other hand, could be someone from the internal training team or<br />

someone in the counter-part department or the organization targeted by the training and/or a regionally based<br />

leader where the training is planned. These two can be different from the Lead <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

Specialist (also known as Curriculum Developer), who in some cases could be a hired consultant. The<br />

Administrative Assistant, Graphic Designer, Videographer and, Programmer/IT is self-explanatory terms and<br />

is someone who reports to the <strong>Training</strong> Coordinator and is responsible for the details of training admin and<br />

logistics.<br />

1.2 <strong>Training</strong> Logistics Checklist:<br />

The following checklist will be referred to time and time again throughout the design and development<br />

process. It’s important to consider it as early as possible since some of the decisions made at this stage<br />

will have fundamental implications on the material design and content. Reflecting back on the iterative<br />

nature of the design process some of the information in the following checklist should come from the<br />

training needs assessment, which is covered in the following section.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

WHAT YOU NEED TO<br />

KNOW<br />

<strong>Training</strong> schedule/ structure<br />

Optimal number of training<br />

days<br />

Spread of training over one<br />

or more weeks<br />

Best days of the week<br />

Best time of the day<br />

Length of each session<br />

WHERE TO FIND<br />

THE ANSWER<br />

HOW TO FIND THE<br />

ANSWER (STEPS)<br />

TEAM NOTES<br />

1.3 Coordination<br />

This particular checklist is for training needed delivered outside the office or regionally delivered.<br />

TRAINING LOCATION 1 2 3<br />

Access<br />

Comfort<br />

<strong>Training</strong> facility<br />

Accommodation<br />

Supplies on-site<br />

Food and drink<br />

ADVERTISING<br />

Lead time for advertising<br />

Information for nomination and enrolment<br />

Direct invitations<br />

Other advertising ideas<br />

REGISTRATION<br />

Check off on – EmployeeTalk LMS (track)<br />

And online by email<br />

By post (internal social network)<br />

Other ways of registration<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2. Needs Assessment<br />

The following four central questions must be answered before you begin designing a training course.<br />

• Audience: Who is the target audience for a proposed training?<br />

• Current roles: What do members of this target audience presently do in their roles?<br />

• Knowledge gaps: What gaps exist between what these providers know how to do, and what they need<br />

to know to carry out their roles successfully?<br />

• Outcome: Will training help fill this gap?<br />

These questions form the foundation of a training needs assessment. Both general organizational assessments<br />

and personal assessments highlight a broad array of training opportunity in a company. When we target<br />

expectation it helps us to understand unknown obstacles to execution (the gaps). Gap assessments are targeted<br />

and focused in these two areas. Both of these gap assessments are commonly used in Succession Planning<br />

activities. Here are some example methods, techniques, and, tools to resource and engage using<br />

EmployeeTalk:<br />

Organizational Gap Assessments Resources<br />

Culture assessment<br />

Yearly employee engagement survey<br />

Targeted Pulse communications<br />

Retention assessments<br />

Quality assessments<br />

Transformation communications<br />

Work Balance assessment<br />

Personal Gap Assessment Resources<br />

Self-assessment<br />

Performance Review<br />

360° Feedback Review<br />

Roll Perception – self-evaluation<br />

Self-assertiveness assessment<br />

Listening assessment<br />

Learning style –self-assessment<br />

The Undercover Boss method is an example of an exercise using EmployeeTalk which can identify both<br />

organizational and personal training gap needs online.<br />

• Undercover Boss<br />

engages in an Undercover Boss like approach<br />

online without being undercover and engages specific aspects of the business with a much larger<br />

audience than the TV show. Get to know your people. Follow-through on great ideas and training<br />

opportunity face to face from feedback. The great reveal is driven by the Task Reporting System in<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

ET. It confirms better outcomes by enabling leaders to track, task, and, coach team with lessenoriented<br />

follow-through actions or stretch assignments from feedback. This face to face is initiated<br />

through email or a phone text and then authentically delivered.<br />

• Stakeholder Product <strong>Training</strong> is yet another area which can be a focus beyond the organizational or<br />

personal gap assessment. Engage employees whose role and use of tools and equipment directly<br />

affect quality. Use the opportunity to educate and engage on product experience leaning on team<br />

expertise for feedback. For example, a product is outside a Nurse’s personal performance yet the<br />

products they use can still affect performance in the perspective of quality- hence a different gap<br />

focus. Another product training area to consider engaging is Sales. People can benefit from product<br />

knowledge. In this concept, customers could be engaged in their experience. This is where internal<br />

training becomes an external opportunity.<br />

For a risk concept-oriented example, a curriculum developer or trainer must first understand what Workers<br />

Comp, Risk Manager or Safety Control Management Personnel presently do in their jobs and how training<br />

could change the nature of their work. As a result, they will be better able to determine what knowledge and<br />

skills are needed. However, it is important to keep in mind that training is only part of a solution to meet<br />

professional needs which are identified in a needs assessment. Other changes - in addition to training - may be<br />

needed in order to completely fill a learning gap.<br />

In addition; adult learners’ particular learning needs are important considerations when designing training.<br />

Understanding those needs is part of the needs assessment phase.<br />

2.1 Assessing Needs<br />

The first step in building a training course from inception is identifying the needs of target participants.<br />

There is a variety of methods for conducting a needs assessment. An in-depth Key Informant Survey can<br />

also be used in EmployeeTalk and driven transparently or anonymously, given the context of the questions<br />

- political or neutral. This can provide further details and insights into needs and overall course design<br />

approach and material focus.<br />

A Need: A “need” refers to the gap between what is and what could or should be within a particular<br />

context, leading to strategies aimed at eliminating the gap between what is and should or could be. This is<br />

best communicated when leaders focus communication on the expectation and inform, educate, and,<br />

identify potential obstacles. The obstacles viewed as gaps can be addressed in the training<br />

Anytime leaders are communicating “the maybe” it is because some expectations are not well known. The<br />

positive in these statements is that “maybe” is the communication of potential possibility.<br />

Needs Assessment: Program-based needs assessment is:<br />

a. A systematic inquiry for the purposes of identifying priorities and making decisions, and<br />

b. Allocating finite resources in a manner consistent with identified program goals and<br />

objectives. Needs assessment includes:<br />

• Identifying and analyzing expressed and unexpressed needs.<br />

• A plan to develop strategies that address such needs.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

The following key questions need to be posed in any needs assessment:<br />

• What do the participants need to know and do as a result of this training?<br />

• What do we need to know about the course participants and the population they serve?<br />

Key tasks in any needs assessment will include, but not limited to, the following:<br />

Determine the target population<br />

• Identify what type of professionals the course is designed for.<br />

Determine the participants’ needs 1 these items below identify other methods, techniques, and, tools to<br />

capture this information.<br />

•<br />

•<br />

ET = EmployeeTalk<br />

IP – In Person<br />

• Draw from your past experience with similar groups (IP)<br />

• Information from informal discussions among professionals in the network (IP)<br />

• Conduct surveys (data and correlations) (ET)<br />

• Conduct focus groups (ET and IP)<br />

• Work with an advisory panel (ET and IP)<br />

• Observe participants (ET and IP)<br />

• Interview participants (ET and IP)<br />

• Learn about critical incidents (ET and IP)<br />

• Corporate Book club feedback (IP)<br />

• Committee Team feedback (ET and IP)<br />

• Determine what emerging data should be distributed (ET and IP)<br />

1 See for example:<br />

• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dialog-measure-communication-eric-bruggeman-etiv/?trk=mp-reader-card<br />

• www.e-trainingmanuals.com.au<br />

• http://www.go2itech.org/HTML/TT06/toolkit/assessment/needs.html<br />

Understand the participants’ characteristics<br />

• Experience<br />

• Cultural background<br />

• Education<br />

• Location<br />

• Mind set/Motivation<br />

• Constraints (location, job demands, etc.)<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2.2 Adult Learners<br />

It is radically different to design training courses and material for adults than any other group. Adult<br />

learning follows certain principles listed below and adapted from: Malcolm S. Knowles, Elwood E. Holton<br />

III, & Richard A. Swanson, (2005) The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and<br />

Human Resource <strong>Development</strong>, Burlington, MA: Elsevier.<br />

1. Adults are often concerned that participating in a group can be political and will make them look<br />

weak, either professionally or personally.<br />

• When there is a political environment and early contribution is critical to design then<br />

consider some anonymous engagement in EmployeeTalk. These dialogs can be<br />

general questions targeting key roles in policy and procedure, best practices or<br />

solution requests based on a call for innovation.<br />

• Design training workshops, educational exercises, and discussion sessions that help<br />

people feel safe enough to ask questions and be confident that they will be respected.<br />

For example, following-up on a town hall meeting anonymously in ET can address<br />

gaps in training, needed presentation skills, or identify where information failed to<br />

reach target audiences.<br />

• Don’t ask people to take risks too early in a workshop or course (for example,<br />

engaging in a role-play exercise) unless they already know each other well.<br />

• Provide opportunities and allow time for people to establish themselves in the group.<br />

2. Adults bring a great deal of experience and knowledge to any learning situation.<br />

• Show respect for participants’ experience by asking them to share ideas, opinions,<br />

and knowledge. Verbally recognize that they may be a good resource for reaching<br />

your teaching goals.<br />

• A needs assessment can tell you more about the individuals in the group. Or, if you<br />

already know the participants, you may realize that a particular individual can<br />

provide helpful input before, during, or after your session(s) - see point 5 below.<br />

3. Adults are decision-makers and self-directed learners.<br />

• Do not seek to make people obey you. Adults will do what they need to do.<br />

• Be the “guide on the side” rather than the “sage on the stage”.<br />

• Listen to what they want and need and be flexible in your planning. Seek feedback<br />

from the group. Change your approach if your agenda or methods are not working.<br />

4. Adults are motivated by information or tasks that they find meaningful. 2<br />

• Conduct some type of needs assessment so that you are aware of what people want<br />

(and need) to learn, how much they already know, and the kinds of “generative<br />

themes” that might affect their attention span.<br />

• Generative themes are concerns/issues that are most important in a person’s life.<br />

• Generative themes may enhance or challenge a person’s ability to learn.<br />

• They could include such things as the fear of losing a job, the health of a loved one,<br />

the desire for a promotion, the need for a change, the pending birth of a child,<br />

problems in a relationship, or new possibilities for growth and development.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Motivation can come in the form of engaging gamification techniques in training using a multitude of<br />

challenges which align with personal and business goals. Each motivating challenge built around information<br />

or a task, for example can use its own set of gamification techniques, such as contests and prizes, badges,<br />

partner and group challenges. In the words of Peter Drucker, “What gets measured gets managed.” A<br />

meaningful goal should not rely on any forces outside of your control, for instance, getting promoted. Your<br />

goal should reflect only what’s controllable on your end. So your goal in the desire to be promoted shouldn’t<br />

be defined as ‘get promoted.’ It should sound something like, ‘invest 40 hours towards getting promoted.’<br />

The effort in this supports independent development planning and succession planning. Another way to<br />

support this for your team is to use the Task Reporting System in ET to delegate activities or actions to support<br />

growth, where perhaps after delivering an action there is a Level Up outcome for a leader (like Lead-name<br />

added to a title). Goals should be quantifiable too. For another training example, don’t set a goal to become<br />

thin. What does “thin” even mean? Be careful of subjectivity. ET has gone to great lengths towards ensuring<br />

leaders clearly define and focus their initiatives. Set a goal to lose X pounds in your Wellness Program or aim<br />

for a specific body fat percentage. Answering (3) checklist questions daily can help change behavior and keep<br />

you on track. Consider gamification in course development and support the strategic alignment between<br />

training and performance. Here are a few examples of rewards I’ve used in the past to support motivation:<br />

• Kindle – and, an invite to be part of the company book club<br />

• Day off with pay – encourage work balance and family<br />

• Book – representing a growth focus or business opportunity which can be strengthened<br />

• Moleskine notebook – to enhance or encourage communication<br />

• Red Bull or energy drink – to infuse energy and focus into people to support business<br />

• Specialized coffee (beans for Coffee Roasters) – Same concept<br />

• New headphones – if it supports the wellness fitness activities<br />

• Gift Cards – support local business and the community. Many businesses will provide special<br />

discounts to support employee excellence because it means more business for them.<br />

Adult learning activity examples:<br />

• Breakout puzzle room is a team-building exercise to develop better comradery between people;<br />

Diversity with Diversity, Department with Department, Baby boomers with Millennials, and Unit with<br />

Unit, for example. It can pit 3 to 6 player teams against each other to solve a puzzle to unlock a room<br />

and achieve the best time. The team building exercise is wide open for problem-solving scenarios.<br />

Conflict resolution, Research, and Collaboration are just example pieces of your puzzle.<br />

• Recognition Program is a variety of engagement and assessment activities which come together in<br />

ET to make research methods in evaluating recognition work well. Review set-up methods for this to<br />

ensure the right ones are selected for you. (here)<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2 See some example actions, exercises and suggested readings for adults in 40 core competencies:<br />

• https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/58874373/innovatevirtual-targeted-<br />

5. Adults have many responsibilities and can be impatient when their time is wasted.<br />

• Be thoughtful and kind.<br />

• Begin and end your session on time.<br />

• Understand who is in the audience and why they are participating.<br />

In the offset of training, an excellent way to ensure everyone has an opportunity to contribute is to use a<br />

Virtual Meeting Link in EmployeeTalk. Raise your hand if you ever sat in a meeting – hearing content and<br />

wondered doesn’t everyone already know this? What’s even more frustrating is attending a meeting where the<br />

agenda was not shared beforehand. In this type of meeting conclusions and recommendations are not easily<br />

obtained. More time is often needed to think of ideas or solutions so a follow-up meeting is usually required.<br />

Productivity is important to us. The VML enables leaders to engage a meeting agenda before the meeting<br />

takes place. This captures contribution from people on their schedule, anytime and anywhere such as from<br />

other shifts and locations. It also captures feedback from participants who are unable to attend the actual<br />

meeting also improving productivity. The anonymous feedback assists the presenter in the development and<br />

the research of information to reach better meeting outcomes and discussions for when the meetings actually<br />

take place. This is an approach that engages impatience. The additional contribution will help you:<br />

• Learn what questions they have about the subject.<br />

• Don’t cover material they already know unless there is a good reason for it.<br />

• Recognize that your subject is only one of many that participants may be interested<br />

in learning more about. The following are more specific tips and style in adult<br />

learning:<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

ADULTS LEARN BEST WHEN<br />

They feel valued and respected for the experiences and<br />

perspectives they bring to the training situation.<br />

The learning experience is active rather than passive.<br />

The learning experience actually fills their immediate<br />

needs.<br />

They accept responsibility for their own learning.<br />

Their learning is self-directed and meaningful to them<br />

Their learning experience addresses ideas, feelings, and<br />

actions.<br />

New material relates to what participants already know.<br />

The learning environment is conducive to learning.<br />

Learning is applied immediately.<br />

Learning is reinforced.<br />

Learning occurs in small groups.<br />

The trainer values participants’ contributions as both<br />

learners and teachers.<br />

MATCHING ADULT LEARNING NEEDS<br />

WITH APPROPRIATE METHODS<br />

Elicit participants’ experiences and perspectives<br />

through a variety of stimulating activities.<br />

Actively engage participants in their learning<br />

experience through discussion and a variety of<br />

activities.<br />

Identify participants’ needs; develop training<br />

concepts and learning objectives to these identified<br />

needs.<br />

Make sure that training content and skills are<br />

directly relevant to participants’ experiences so that<br />

they will want to learn.<br />

Involve participants in deciding on the content and<br />

skills that will be covered during the training.<br />

Use multiple training methods that address<br />

knowledge, attitudes, and skills.<br />

Use training methods that enable participants to<br />

establish this relationship and integrate new<br />

material.<br />

Take measures to ensure that the physical and<br />

social environment (training space) is safe,<br />

comfortable, and enjoyable.<br />

Provide opportunities for participants to apply the<br />

new information and skills they have learned.<br />

Use training methods that allow participants to<br />

practice new skills and receive prompt, reinforcing<br />

feedback<br />

Use training methods that encourage participants to<br />

explore feelings, attitudes, and skills with other<br />

learners.<br />

Encourage participants to share their expertise and<br />

experiences with others in the training.<br />

This particular Learning Style self- assessment is delivered from EmployeeTalk where the respondents provide<br />

feedback. It highlights what personally is a good leaning practice for them. Here they can value what is<br />

important too. This data can be referenced by the training team when individual training is needed.<br />

LEARNING STYLES<br />

Learn best with abstract concepts and lectures<br />

Learn best while observing others<br />

Learn best from exercises<br />

Learn best through visual means<br />

CONSIDER USING<br />

Case studies and discussions about theories and research<br />

Demonstrations and videos<br />

Role-playing and other experiential activities<br />

Videos, images, and slides<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

These are responses captured in EmployeeTalk to personalize training approaches. One size training fits all is<br />

a concept of the past. If we do not make it personal participation can be lacking or unenthusiastic. It is<br />

important to recognize that people learn differently and that there are several learning styles to engage.<br />

<strong>Training</strong> courses that recognize different types of learners and caters to their needs succeed a lot more in<br />

achieving their objectives than the ones that try to funnel all participants through a rigid narrow way of single<br />

or uni-learning mode.<br />

Tracking and documenting participants and participation is important too. The EmployeeTalk system can be<br />

used to set up a transparent LMS or (Learning Management System. Or, anonymous Dashboard based on<br />

preference for tracking learning style results. It’s important to be able to refer to the individual team results<br />

anytime when developing training. Real-time tracking and analytics are important for both those receiving the<br />

training and those providing it. Dashboards that illustrate results visually allow employees to see the<br />

connections between the training they receive and their performance. EmployeeTalk captures averages for<br />

each question asked. Those questions are compiled together to create an overall engagement score which can<br />

be compared over time. And for their managers and other decision-makers, they also show the connections<br />

between system performance, user engagement, and business goals, which helps to quantify the investment in<br />

their training programs. ET can support analytics and the strategic alignment between training and<br />

performance using specific approaches:<br />

• Targeted Report is a selection of dashboards individually created in ET to display targeted results<br />

from employees, departments or managers. In fact, its flexibility enables leaders to compile a final<br />

visual on whatever is being targeted where the opportunity and strengths are well defined.<br />

• Analytics is based on average so every response counts as opposed to targeting a percent score.<br />

• Onboarding Dashboard also called an Independent <strong>Development</strong> Planning Dashboard – evaluates an<br />

employee’s potential. Managers with direct reports can easily manage their employee’s individual<br />

development better. Each employee is set up with their own personal ET Dashboard platform to log<br />

into. The manager and the employee can communicate and collaborate better online together by<br />

focusing on development virtually. Here there is transparency in the scoring for employees. This can<br />

improve the quality of a manager’s time management with their team member. The employee takes<br />

ownership in their Dashboard to ensure their training and development is up to date. The manager<br />

adds critical to know content, expectation, or questions for the employee to answer during their<br />

process or work. (checklist) This provides a visual of opportunity. A manager can review their team<br />

results and know where they should focus on in their individual development. When the same sets of<br />

questions are being asked over time they can be compared to represent growth. <strong>Development</strong> can<br />

include critical processes or procedures. It can also include job descriptions, both with knowledge<br />

checks. This is also where a 360°, personal assessments or a yearly performance review could be<br />

launched and tracked. This is where personal actions can be tasked by the manager and then tracked<br />

into results. This build of information in one place makes for a very good review of performance and<br />

employee commitment.<br />

Generally, there are four modes of learning and people could be one or another or even switch between<br />

different modes depending on the subject matter:<br />

• Doer: Likes to be actively involved in the learning process, wants to know how he or<br />

she will apply learning in the real world, likes information presented clearly and<br />

concisely.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Feeler: People-oriented, expressive, focuses on feelings and emotions, thrives in<br />

open, unstructured learning environment.<br />

• Thinker: Relies on logic and reason, likes to share ideas and concepts, analyses and<br />

evaluates, enjoys Individual work.<br />

• Observer: Likes to watch and listen, tends to be reserved, will take his or her time<br />

before participating, and thrives on learning through discovery<br />

As a leader, you may be challenged in understanding your team’s personality. You may not be aware of how to<br />

reach your team best in training or engaging face to face. This above is an example of a single pulse question<br />

to engage that understanding with EmployeeTalk. This is also a transparent pulse.<br />

3. Design<br />

Designing a training course is like mapping out a road trip or creating a journey. A training design is basically<br />

an outline of all the “what, where, who, when and how” details of the training for use by coordinators,<br />

curriculum developers, and trainers. There are six primary components of a training design:<br />

1. Learning Outcomes: What will participants be able to do as a result of completing the training?<br />

2. <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong>s: What materials need to be developed and what will the materials include?<br />

3. Trainers & Content Experts: Who will facilitate the training and act as content experts to review<br />

materials?<br />

4. <strong>Training</strong> Methods: What methods will be used so that participants meet the learning objectives and<br />

learn the content most effectively?<br />

5. Logistics: Where and when will the training take place? Who will be invited and how will they be<br />

notified? Will a per diem be paid to participants? Etc. Will there be continuing education credit?<br />

6. Confirmation: What is the question/s that needs to be answered at the end, what is the true take away<br />

to understand?<br />

Optimally, the results of a needs assessment inform these six training design components. For example, if we<br />

know the gap between what a target audience knows and what it needs to know, we can write learning<br />

outcome statements that precisely meet their job-related needs. Needs assessment will also help determine who<br />

will be needed as content experts for the training and whether a course should be a brown bagger two, three, or<br />

five days long.<br />

3.1 Course Design Process<br />

Course design refers to the planning and structuring of a course to achieve specific instructional goals. The<br />

course design process includes the following activities:<br />

• Identifying appropriate goals<br />

• Choosing content that’s consistent with the goals<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Selecting ways to achieve the goals<br />

• Assessing participant learning in relation to the goals<br />

As part of the design process, instructors should also consider:<br />

• Their own teaching style<br />

• The learning styles of the participants<br />

• The role of the course in the overall training effort<br />

Before training begins<br />

Most design decisions must be made before the first session of the course. These decisions<br />

relate to these basic areas:<br />

• The content to include<br />

• The delivery methods to use<br />

• The time allocated for each of the goals<br />

• The tools for assessing participant learning<br />

During the training session<br />

As you conduct the training, we will learn more about the participants and their needs. Doing<br />

the learning style self-assessment in ET first though will offset this a great deal however we<br />

still need to be prepared just in case. The information we discover will require adjustments in<br />

the course design. For example, after working with the group, we may decide to:<br />

• Change the time allocation for a particular topic<br />

• Change the type of activity associated with a particular topic, for instance, from an<br />

individual to a group activity or vice versa<br />

At the conclusion of the session<br />

The information we gather at the conclusion of a training session will help us assess the<br />

effectiveness of the current training and help improve future training sessions. To evaluate the<br />

course:<br />

• Use appropriate evaluation tools and our own perceptions<br />

• Obviously, a follow-up in ET on training effectiveness is a must do survey whenever<br />

training is provided.<br />

Going into further detail of curriculum design, the following checklist and questions are used as guidance:<br />

A checklist will often include Just-in-time applicability. In today’s fast-paced business environment where<br />

employees manage multiple roles, workers want and need training that can be easily accessed and quickly<br />

engaged the moment it’s needed on the job. Employees today have little patience for training that they cannot<br />

immediately apply to their work. What they need is (JITT) just-in-time training. JITT relies on a feedback loop<br />

between web-based learning materials and the classroom or meeting (Novak et al., 1999). Leaders capable of<br />

combining JITT with Micro-learning content allow employees to focus on training that is relevant to the task at<br />

hand and as a result, is immediately applicable. For this reason, there is an emphasis on observation for<br />

managers in JITT (checklists and scorecards). JITT allows employees to quickly improve their performance,<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

which can lead to greater financial rewards and recognition in the workplace for them and – when training<br />

goals are aligned with business goals a better bottom line for the company.<br />

Better communication in JITT is a no-brainer when considering quality for example. It is directly tied to<br />

communication and can affect the retention of Staff or Customers. Leaders today should take advantage of<br />

portable computers for observations, as in handhelds to capture information in real time – this can include<br />

phones’. Quality leaders should be capturing data that is easy to review and delegate out. In healthcare, it<br />

could be the COO or Nurse leaders rounding. In Retail, it could be the District Manager evaluating their stores<br />

and employee performance. It can be a Manager in the restaurant engaging their customer in their order. The<br />

need and ability in JITT require us to take information in but quickly be able to delegate it out to address<br />

opportunity now. Complete this training worksheet to help you begin designing your training. If multiple<br />

experts need engaged use EmployeeTalk to engage them. Use a handheld if you are engaging team experts in<br />

their office or on the floor.<br />

3EmployeeTalk Checklist<br />

1. I have a general theme or topic:<br />

In general, what knowledge and skill areas will be the focus of the training?<br />

2. I can list the goals and objectives:<br />

What do we want participants to learn during the training? (What will they leave knowing<br />

more about or what new skills will they have acquired?)<br />

3. I can list the essential questions:<br />

What central questions do we want participants answering as the training unfolds?<br />

4. Can you provide a summary of participant activities:<br />

How will participants accomplish curriculum objectives and answer the questions in numbers<br />

2 and 3 above? (e.g. small group discussions and projects, lectures, role-playing.)<br />

5. I know what Resources I need:<br />

What resources might the trainer use to help participants accomplish curriculum objectives?<br />

(e.g. current research, guest speakers, discussions, encouragement)<br />

6. I know the assessment activities:<br />

How will we determine if participants a) have reached curriculum objectives identified in<br />

number 2 above; and b) can answer the questions in number 3.<br />

7. I have an idea for the evaluation of the training and the training process:<br />

How will we evaluate the quality and usefulness of the training as well as its implementation?<br />

These results will enable you to compile a good approach in your design.<br />

3.2 Learning Outcomes<br />

Learning objectives are central to designing a training course. They must reflect the needs assessment<br />

results and work in harmony with training methods and design. A learning outcome is a statement of what<br />

a learner is expected to know, understand, or be able to do as a result of a learning process. There are<br />

several ways of developing appropriate learning outcomes/objectives.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Beginning a learning objective with a strong verb can help guide the development of training because it<br />

focuses attention on what participants are supposed to be able to DO after they complete training.<br />

The following are just a few examples of standard verbs used to start a learning outcome or objective<br />

statement:<br />

FACT ANALYSIS UNDERSTANDING APPLICATION ATTITUDE<br />

Define Solve Discuss Compute Show sensitivity<br />

List Categorize Identify Operate Accept responsibility<br />

Recall Distinguish Express Apply Be willing to assist<br />

Name Appraise Describe Demonstrate Respect opinions<br />

Repeat Differentiate Translate Perform Demonstrate commitment<br />

Recognize Classify Convert Use Spontaneous<br />

Record Compare Explain Illustrate Assertive<br />

State Critique Restate Interpret Appreciate<br />

Label Contrast Estimate Practice<br />

There are specific reasons why learning outcomes and objectives should be well thought through and<br />

clearly stated from the outset and before any design activities take place. These are:<br />

• Identifying outcomes is an effective way to review curriculum and content. This<br />

leads to a more balanced and well-sequenced curriculum.<br />

• It helps design appropriate assessment and evaluation tools that accurately reflect the<br />

curriculum.<br />

• By reviewing the needs assessment, trainers know what participants know and need,<br />

and the learning outcomes help inform everyone as to what new materials or skills<br />

they are intended to learn.<br />

• Trainers are able to evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching. Have the outcomes<br />

been achieved?<br />

• An instructional shift from teaching to learning is facilitated. The focus is on the<br />

learner rather than the trainer.<br />

• Participants will know exactly what they are expected to learn, thus avoiding<br />

ambiguity.<br />

• If you build participant learning assessments into the training, participants will know<br />

exactly how their learning will be assessed.<br />

Participants begin to take more responsibility for their own learning when they know what they are<br />

expected to do and what standard they are expected to achieve. At the stage of writing learning<br />

outcomes and objectives, the following questions need to be considered for confirmation:<br />

• What information or content do we want participants to learn from the training?<br />

• What do we want them to do with that information?<br />

• What skills or competencies do we want them to gain, develop, expand, or improve?<br />

• What kind of higher-level thinking do we want them to engage in?<br />

• How do we expect participants to demonstrate what they have learned and how well<br />

they have learned it?<br />

• At the very minimum, what should participants know and be able to do when they<br />

finish the training?<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• How do we think they will be able to use the information and skills that they develop?<br />

• If someone asks the participants what they learned from your training, how would we<br />

like them to answer?<br />

There are four major steps to any training design process:<br />

STEP 1: It is much better to sketch out the whole curriculum before going into the specifics. Think<br />

about the big picture:<br />

• What is the major aim of the training?<br />

• What is it trying to achieve?<br />

• What does the outcome look like?<br />

WRITE a goal or aim statement. This should be a broad, general statement, such as; participants will<br />

be able to understand the importance of accident risk reduction alongside preparedness and response.<br />

STEP 2: CONSIDER the overall scope of training. Specify the major topics or sections of the<br />

training by brainstorming (with others) and making a list.<br />

• What sort of things do we want the participants to learn?<br />

At this level, the outcome statements will be quite broad referring to such areas that cover the whole<br />

subject. For example, it is anticipated that participants who successfully complete the training will be<br />

able to:<br />

1. Establish a common understanding of the employees on which lie the foundations of<br />

accident risk reduction (ARR).<br />

2. Develop a better understanding of preparedness, response, and recovery as integral to<br />

accident risk reduction.<br />

3. Illustrate the role of different stakeholders in ARR, the integrated nature between the<br />

sectors in ARR, and the importance of coordination between stakeholders.<br />

4. Introduce and discuss the already put in place mechanisms for reducing accidents and<br />

risk management, focused on regionally.<br />

5. Build a network among the participants by sharing the experience, existing know-how<br />

and team building.<br />

STEP 3: The next step is to IDENTIFY specifics. Brainstorm and create a list. This is where we will<br />

write clear, precise statements detailing what the participants will actually be doing.<br />

• What specific, detailed knowledge, information, or skills do we expect participants to<br />

learn from the training? (the takeaway)<br />

• What cross-cutting issues need to be included and which ones to be prioritized<br />

(gender, environment, etc.)?<br />

For example, it is anticipated that participants who successfully complete the training will be able to:<br />

1. Acquire the conceptual basis to appreciate the complexities of vulnerability, risk and<br />

accident risk management.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2. Develop a better ability to engage with and relate to accident professionals from various<br />

disciplines in a field situation.<br />

3. Increased ability to use tools and mechanisms to analyze hazards, vulnerability, and<br />

capacities and acquire basic skills in risk identification and assessment.<br />

4. Identify strategies for building an accident risk reduction capacity.<br />

5. Ability to advocate and promote ARR for team buy-in.<br />

STEP 4: THINK about how participants can demonstrate their learning, i.e., exactly what they should<br />

be able to do. Brainstorm and generate a list of ideas for how participants can demonstrate what, how<br />

much, and how well they have learned.<br />

Conclusion or confirmation:<br />

<strong>Training</strong> effectiveness is critical to measure. This can include a grade for the information and content or the<br />

presenter. EmployeeTalk accomplishes this and increases a leader’s reach by engaging measures in an online<br />

pulse to inform and encourage feedback. Why, because time with people is a critical resource. It’s important<br />

to maximize the opportunity when meeting people face to face. The concept we’re trying to create, teach or<br />

develop can be often lost when we tell someone something without being lesson-oriented or following<br />

through. People learn through repetition and rehearsal. Part of that is giving people real task-oriented actions<br />

to follow-through with. This is why the Task Reporting System built-into EmployeeTalk is so incredibly<br />

valuable in connecting communication, engagement, and, training. The Task Reporting System confirms<br />

results by enabling leaders to track, task, and, coach managers and team with lessen-oriented follow-through<br />

actions from feedback. This is initiated through email or a phone text and then authentically delivered face to<br />

face.<br />

<strong>Development</strong><br />

If the design phase of training is like creating a blueprint for a new car, the development phase is the actual<br />

Wrench-Nut-and-Bolts construction. We know what we want to build and how we want to build it. Now we<br />

must take the right materials and build a solid machine. Just as with a car, we should consider how occupants<br />

would use and navigate through training structure. Developing training involves writing materials, creating<br />

learning exercises, and working with content experts and trainers. It is the most time-consuming phase of<br />

training; draft materials may go through multiple revisions, involving several people, before they are ready for<br />

training use. As we progress through this development phase, we need to make sure the training materials and<br />

exercises match the learning outcomes we identified in the design phase, which is based on the needs<br />

assessment. All subsequent training phases should reflect these outcomes.<br />

3.3 Developing <strong>Material</strong><br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

When good content is matched with an appropriate design, even the most complex documents become<br />

appealing, credible, and easy to read. In fact, studies have shown that using the right design elements can<br />

have a positive impact on how well readers understand the material.<br />

Curriculum and material development usually include the following:<br />

A. Background and descriptive information.<br />

1. Basis of the curricula (why it was developed)<br />

2. Target audience<br />

3. Relevant information explaining the material and supporting its use in a different setting<br />

4. Copyright and contact information<br />

5. Resources support the content, (e.g. citations, web links, prototype materials, tools, and<br />

guidelines)<br />

B. Directions on how to use the curricula.<br />

1. Guidance on using adult learning principles<br />

2. Specific tips to improve learning<br />

3. Outcome and competency statements<br />

4. Suggestions on adapting the curricula and supporting materials for a different target<br />

audience or for a different context<br />

C. Course planning forms and checklists.<br />

1. <strong>Material</strong>s, equipment, and facility specifications<br />

2. Unit or module overviews with key messages<br />

3. Scope and sequence guidelines, (e.g. sample course outline or agenda with timeframe)<br />

D. Guidance on tailoring each particular workshop so it matches the needs or wants of<br />

participants, or fits a program’s needs.<br />

1. Topic-specific materials and questions to help trainers gather needs assessment data that<br />

helps determine what participants want or need to learn; and what skills they wish or<br />

need to develop:<br />

2. <strong>Material</strong>s may include from (ET and IP):<br />

• Questionnaires or discussion questions for gathering information from potential<br />

participants and/or their supervisors before the training<br />

• Questionnaires to be collected at the beginning of a training session<br />

• Suggested questions that trainers can ask at the beginning of the training<br />

• Exercises that help participants think about their own learning objectives<br />

• Pre-tests or activities to determine what participants already know; or what they<br />

want to learn<br />

3. Suggestions for revising the training so it better addresses the needs of the group<br />

4. Optional sessions, when relevant<br />

E. Specific, measurable, and realistic learning objectives.<br />

1. Learning objectives explaining what participants should know or be able to do as a result<br />

of the training or learning activity.<br />

2. Objectives should be specific. They should state specific knowledge, attitudes, or skills<br />

that a participant should be able to demonstrate.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

3. Objectives should be measurable. It should be possible by observation, testing, problemsolving<br />

exercises, or some other means of evaluation to determine whether participants<br />

have achieved the anticipated learning objective. (ET Scorecard)<br />

4. Objectives should be achievable and realistic. Learning objectives describe expectations<br />

of knowledge, attitude, or behavior change that are realistic given the instruction<br />

conditions (e.g. training time and size of the group).<br />

F. Clear and complete course content. This is an area in which using a virtual meeting link<br />

online in EmployeeTalk would capture this information. The VML is helpful to the experts<br />

you are engaging because it will support productivity time restraints. When engaging through<br />

the system, be sure to define your “target” training well and the “focus”. This will alleviate<br />

ambiguity and subjectivity in response.<br />

1. Course outline including content, learning activities, directions, and timeframes<br />

2. Easily understandable presentation notes with support materials for each session (e.g.<br />

PowerPoint, overheads, participant worksheets, and handouts)<br />

3. Include important teaching points for the trainer to introduce, discuss, or address<br />

4. Active learning exercises (e.g. role plays, group discussions, case studies, brainstorming,<br />

and skills practice) providing opportunities for participants to clarify, question, apply and<br />

consolidate new knowledge<br />

5. Participant handouts and other course material easily understood by participants<br />

6. Accurate and appropriate technical content<br />

7. Ordered content with information moving from basic to specialized, and from simple to<br />

complex<br />

8. Suggestions for presenting the material<br />

9. Participant opportunities for building on what they’ve previously learned<br />

G. Integrated evaluation plan/tools.<br />

1. Methodology and tools for assessing participants’ learning and progress, (i.e. evaluation)<br />

2. Detail the needs in effective training. The particular approach in the method, technique,<br />

or tool, using EmployeeTalk will be determined by the need or what the outcome should<br />

look like. Evaluation instrument(s) should measure:<br />

• Process - to get immediate feedback on the workshop experience, (e.g. content<br />

usefulness and quality; trainer/ facilitator’s helpfulness and applicable<br />

experience; adequacy of the handouts or other materials, facilities, workshop<br />

registration/preparation, etc.)<br />

• Outcome - to measure participants’ immediate changes in knowledge, attitude,<br />

or behavior based upon exposure to the training session or course, (e.g., pre- and<br />

post-training questionnaires, tests, or, knowledge checks in ET. And, using openended<br />

questions, interviews, exercises when face to face)<br />

• Impact - to measure longer-term training outcomes, (e.g. guidelines for<br />

conducting follow-up interviews, site-visit procedures, and suggestions of<br />

markers for measuring longer-term outcomes). Utilizing the same questions over<br />

time in an Employees Dashboard can allow for a comparison over time to ensure<br />

progress is moving in the right direction.<br />

3. Evaluation questions linked to specific learning objectives.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

4. Participants’ suggestions for improving future workshops of this type<br />

5. Trainer/facilitator self-evaluation form.<br />

6. Observer form for giving feedback to trainer/facilitator.<br />

Once we have developed a course document’s basic content, the publication development process<br />

generally proceeds in two stages:<br />

7. The draft stage—all design team members have input on all aspects of the project:<br />

Planning, Content <strong>Development</strong>, Draft Layout and a Preliminary Review.<br />

8. The final stage—the final layout incorporates the final text and images; the materials are<br />

sent to the printer: Final Layout, Final Review, Printing, and After Printing <strong>Development</strong><br />

1. Draft Stage<br />

Step 1<br />

Planning meeting<br />

PLANNING<br />

Description<br />

It’s important to start this process out on the right foot. Begin by<br />

having the project lead arrange a meeting with the key project,<br />

editorial, and graphics staff to discuss:<br />

• goals and priorities<br />

• audience • dissemination plans<br />

• translation plans<br />

• timeline<br />

• budget/printing options<br />

The project team should bring sample designs if they have a<br />

particular style in mind<br />

CONTENT DEVELOPMENT<br />

Step 2 Description Est. Timeline Date Due Staff Lead<br />

Draft text Author(s) plans and prepares the draft text.<br />

If multiple authors provide material, the<br />

project lead must compile text.<br />

Word processing Support person cleans up text per accepted<br />

style manual.<br />

Editing<br />

An editor usually ensures that the<br />

document is well organized, clear and<br />

cohesive, and that it fulfills readers’ needs.<br />

This fresh set of eyes is very helpful to<br />

those involved in creating the document.<br />

Reviewer input Project lead obtains programmatic input<br />

from relevant reviewers, internally and/or<br />

externally.<br />

Incorporate<br />

reviewer input<br />

Project lead incorporates reviewer input. If<br />

the input is substantial, project lead may<br />

want to work with the editor to incorporate<br />

changes.<br />

Proof-reading Prior to finalizing text, project lead<br />

arranges for proofing by a designated proof<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

reader. Using someone unfamiliar with the<br />

document is usually best.<br />

DRAFT LAYOUT AND PRELIMINARY REVIEW<br />

Step 3 Description Est. Timeline Date Due Staff Lead<br />

Preliminary<br />

design concepts<br />

Graphics lead drafts one or more designs<br />

for the team to review. The project lead<br />

provides graphics staff with the draft text<br />

and any images or supporting graphics.<br />

Brief meeting Graphics and project the lead/s review the<br />

preliminary designs and discuss<br />

refinements if needed. The writer is often<br />

at these meetings. Everyone is clear on the<br />

time the printer needs to complete the<br />

project.<br />

Photo selection,<br />

illustration<br />

Initial layout<br />

Team review of<br />

designs and<br />

initial layout<br />

Discussion<br />

Revisions<br />

Finalize specs<br />

If needed, the graphics team searches for<br />

new photos or creates illustrations. Project<br />

lead must obtain permission for using<br />

proprietary images.<br />

Graphics team flows in the initial text and<br />

places the graphic elements.<br />

The project team may review and comment<br />

on all design aspects and consider how the<br />

text reads in layout form. We recommend<br />

having all relevant team members and<br />

reviewers provide input at this time.<br />

Project lead and graphics staff should meet<br />

to discuss refinements.<br />

If text changes are needed, project lead<br />

consults with graphics to determine how<br />

changes should be incorporated (for<br />

example, into a new Word file vs. existing<br />

design files). If significant layout changes<br />

are needed, the team must return to the<br />

“Preliminary Design Concepts” stage.<br />

Project lead and graphics staff finalize<br />

printing specifications. This is the “last<br />

call” for decisions about the size, number<br />

of colors, binding, etc.<br />

2. Final Stage<br />

FINAL LAYOUT AND FINAL REVIEW DRAFT<br />

Step 1 Description Est. Timeline Date Due Staff Lead<br />

Text finalized Project lead finalizes content. He or she<br />

has incorporated into the “Final”:<br />

• All team input.<br />

• All sections and images.<br />

Design<br />

The project lead gives the final text to the<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

refinement and<br />

layout of final<br />

text<br />

Final team<br />

review<br />

Final revisions<br />

graphics lead in electronic form. This also<br />

is the “last call” for images. Using your<br />

own staff in imaging processes, people or<br />

work can be a valuable tool in keeping<br />

attention.<br />

Project lead (and relevant staff if needed)<br />

confirms that the final version is<br />

acceptable. Only typos can be corrected at<br />

this time.<br />

Project lead goes through final revisions.<br />

Only minor changes, if any, can be made at<br />

this point. Significant revisions will result<br />

in serious delays.<br />

PRINTING<br />

Step 2 Description Est. Timeline Date Due Staff Lead<br />

Files preparation<br />

for printer<br />

Graphics staff packages files for the printer<br />

(after adjusting the resolution of images,<br />

performing final color corrections, etc.).<br />

Printer proofs Graphics staff and project lead review<br />

proofs from the printer.<br />

Press check Press check by graphics staff or project<br />

lead is recommended for most jobs.<br />

AFTER PRINTING<br />

Step 3 Description Est. Timeline Date Due Staff Lead<br />

Boxes arrive<br />

from printer<br />

Project lead ensures that a plan is in place<br />

for moving boxes to an acceptable storage<br />

place; or has a plan for distributing the<br />

Incorporate<br />

changes into<br />

Word file<br />

Celebration!<br />

materials.<br />

If the original Word file might be used for<br />

other purposes, the project lead ensures the<br />

incorporation of changes made during final<br />

layout review.<br />

Be sure to take time to celebrate your<br />

accomplishment!<br />

3.4 Developing Presentation Standards<br />

Developing presentations is an extremely individual activity and each trainer/facilitator will have their<br />

own style and preference. But in designing coherent courses, it’s important to adhere to a common style<br />

and format. Personal style and approach show more in delivery. It is disorienting for participants to view<br />

presentations with different format and style every time a new trainer comes on. There are guidelines for<br />

developing presentations which trainers can adhere to without compromising their individuality.<br />

1. Begin with a greeting and a few friendly words. “Good afternoon and it’s a pleasure<br />

taking part in this course. I would like to begin by asking you a question.”<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

2. State a question that grabs their imagination. “Like me, you have all seen your share of<br />

accidents. Do you ever wonder what we could do to reduce risk and the occurrence of<br />

accidents and not just develop better response?”<br />

3. Give your name and a brief credential. “As many of you know, my name is _________,<br />

and I’m a ______ at ______. I have spent a number of years working<br />

on___________________.” (Write it out for people to see.)<br />

4. Follow with a promise of rewards for listening “This afternoon I would like to explain<br />

what I have recently learned about how we can each do more to develop adequate risk<br />

reduction mechanisms in__________. I will take about 30 minutes to tell you about the<br />

OSHA guidelines for _______. I will then ask you to share with me your own concerns<br />

about implementing these guidelines at _____.”<br />

5. Let people know when you will take questions and comments. “Please feel free to<br />

interrupt me at any time with questions or comments.” Or “I would like to go through the<br />

presentation first in full and then have the following Q&A time, so please note down any<br />

questions or comments as we go along”.<br />

6. Explain topic by answering three questions: What? How? Why? (or you could structure<br />

the body of the presentation around Past, Present, and Future)<br />

7. Describe the benefits of audience concern. “We are the people who can make a difference<br />

for our organization. In order to make an even bigger difference than we do now, I have<br />

a favor to ask you. Would you please … (for example, read this handout, talk to your<br />

colleagues, participate in a working group, tell me what else you need to know in order to<br />

improve our practice, implement a new policy, etc.).”<br />

8. Conclude with a positive, hopeful note of encouragement. “Life is short and precious. It’s<br />

not often that we get a chance to implement a program that will improve the safety of<br />

others and make our own organization a better and safer place to work. By fully<br />

implementing the procedures for mitigation and risk reduction, we take an important step<br />

in making our departments safer. Thank you.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

4. Delivery<br />

The delivery phase of training is when the coordination, assessment of learning needs, design, and<br />

development phases come together. Successful training delivery depends on:<br />

• Accurate identification of participants’ training needs<br />

• A carefully crafted training plan<br />

• Well-managed training details<br />

• Thorough and relevant materials<br />

• Prepared trainers, ready to present a compelling learning experience<br />

While the other steps of the training process focus heavily on creating the content of the training, the<br />

delivery or implementation phase is concerned with teaching the content and participant learning. Now<br />

that you have built your car, you want to take people for a ride to experience what you have created.<br />

4.1 <strong>Training</strong> Methods<br />

Engaging employees on training requires us to be respectful of their time. A very easy way to deliver<br />

training is through Micro-learning. This is the delivery of training, in short, bite-sized pieces – a musthave<br />

consideration for the future of corporate learning. Micro-learning accommodates dwindling attention<br />

spans and improves retention. Micro-learning is ideally suited for mobile devices and can be delivered on<br />

demand. The approach can be as simple as a pulse check question from ET which would share certain<br />

expectation targeted within one of the areas of communication i.e. Increasing Information, <strong>Development</strong><br />

and <strong>Training</strong>, Process or Procedure, and, People Commitment and then focused on a specific role that an<br />

employee plays.<br />

With the need today for information now, Micro-learning is how these kinds of employees want to learn.<br />

Breaking up training content into short lessons of 5-10 minutes allows them to improve on an ongoing<br />

basis without impacting their regular job duties. Content is adopted according to their roles and can also<br />

be adjusted to competency levels, directing them either to repeat lessons unsuccessfully completed or to<br />

review information to reinforce what they already know. If you are unsure what a Micro-learning app<br />

might look like here are some examples:<br />

1. TED-Ed – wants to celebrate the ideas of people around the world. Everything they do is with only<br />

one goal: supporting learning. I like being able to choose a lesson topic and find a suitable video in the<br />

library. It’s very helpful with finding resources and helping to explain something.<br />

2. Chegg’s Flashcards+ – is a free flashcard maker designed to help students learn things more quickly.<br />

It’s an easy way to learn terminology and vocabulary without the hassle of paper flashcards.<br />

3. Venngage – Infographics contains a bunch of information in one large and appealing image. The<br />

information is limited to only the most important facts. Nowadays, posters and infographics are often<br />

used to spread awareness, but you can also use them to teach a lesson. Venngage has a large library of<br />

free and premium templates where you can choose from to start. This makes it possible for anyone to<br />

make an infographic.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

4. Explain everything – Make short 5 minute lessons with Explain Everything. EE helps to bring<br />

presentations to a whole new level. There’s nothing wrong with PowerPoint, but presenting a subject<br />

can be more interactive and way cooler! EE is an interactive screen casting whiteboard. This means<br />

that you can make a presentation, and record everything you are drawing and saying. Ideal for Microlearning!<br />

Record everything you do within the app (even yourself) to create high quality, creative,<br />

and meaningful content for others to learn from. You can make easily explainer and instruction videos<br />

and send it to your team.<br />

Many of these micro-learning apps are free or cost very little. We encourage organizations to empower<br />

and inform their team when delivering content, specifically when asking questions and requesting<br />

feedback. Why, because there is responsibility in providing an opinion. It is interesting how some<br />

respondents will refrain from providing that feedback because they're afraid their answer, idea or solution<br />

might be viewed negatively. Employees should not be so anxious (about their performance, lack of clarity<br />

about expectations and/or direction) that they can't think, let alone innovate.<br />

There are a huge array and variety of training methods like this each with its advantages and<br />

disadvantages. In designing a course, a healthy mix of a few methods provides variety, overcomes<br />

monotony and boredom and energizes participants. But the mix is not an end in itself. <strong>Training</strong> methods<br />

need to be carefully selected to match the purpose and learning outcomes of each session. The following is<br />

a summary to guide such a selection:<br />

METHOD<br />

Lecture<br />

Lecture-Forum (with<br />

question cards or<br />

question/answer<br />

period)<br />

Panel<br />

Panel forum<br />

Debate<br />

Presentation<br />

Presentation with<br />

Listening Teams<br />

(participants are<br />

given listening<br />

assignment before<br />

presentation<br />

question speaker<br />

afterward)<br />

Presentation with<br />

Reaction Panel<br />

(small group listens<br />

POSSIBLE<br />

ADVANTAGES<br />

DISADVANTAGES<br />

INFORMATIONAL<br />

Conveys large sum of<br />

information; fast; efficient<br />

forum allows exploration<br />

of content in more detail.<br />

Adds different points of<br />

view to content.<br />

Provides different points of<br />

view; thought-provoking.<br />

Keeps participants<br />

interested and involved.<br />

Resources can be<br />

discovered and shared.<br />

Learning can be observed.<br />

Lots of information; fast;<br />

new points of view; a more<br />

organized question and<br />

answer format; reaction<br />

panel can speak.<br />

The audience is largely<br />

passive.<br />

The audience is largely<br />

passive with exception<br />

of expanding panel;<br />

expanding panel not<br />

practical with groups<br />

larger than 20.<br />

The audience is largely<br />

passive.<br />

The learning points can<br />

be confusing or lost. A<br />

few participants may<br />

dominate the discussion.<br />

Time control is more<br />

difficult. Audience is<br />

largely passive; reaction<br />

panel may not represent<br />

all views of the group.<br />

Trainer orally presents<br />

new information to the<br />

group.<br />

COMMENTS<br />

The trainer should be an<br />

interesting speaker, able<br />

to self-limit and stick to<br />

time, be able to facilitate<br />

questions effectively.<br />

The leader must express<br />

a solid set of ground<br />

rules and have skills to<br />

enforce them.<br />

Same as for panel.<br />

The trainer should<br />

structure listening<br />

assignment with a clear<br />

purpose; must select<br />

panelists from a crosssection<br />

of the group.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

and forms panel<br />

following<br />

presentation)<br />

Group Discussion<br />

(of given topic)<br />

Buzz Groups (short,<br />

time-limited<br />

discussion on given<br />

subject)<br />

Brainstorming<br />

Keeps participants<br />

interested and involved.<br />

Resources can be<br />

discovered and shared.<br />

Learning can be observed.<br />

Participants are active;<br />

allows a chance to hear<br />

other points of view;<br />

quieter people can express<br />

viewpoints and ideas.<br />

Can get all participants<br />

involved in collecting a lot<br />

of information. Quickly<br />

generate ideas. Good for<br />

problem-solving; quick<br />

change of pace; filler;<br />

allows all to participate;<br />

validates ideas of the<br />

group.<br />

The learning points can<br />

be confusing or lost. A<br />

few participants may<br />

dominate the discussion.<br />

Time control is more<br />

difficult. Inexperienced<br />

leader may be unable to<br />

use format for attitudinal<br />

purposes.<br />

The problem/issue must<br />

be clearly defined. Time<br />

control is more difficult.<br />

Need a clear trigger<br />

questions and<br />

evaluation/discussion<br />

afterward; somewhat<br />

over-used method;<br />

requires careful<br />

facilitation.<br />

The trainer divides a<br />

large group into small<br />

groups; groups of 4–6<br />

are most effective. A<br />

small group has a short<br />

time to discuss a topic or<br />

solve a problem The<br />

trainer should be able to<br />

give clear instructions<br />

and keep discussion on<br />

target. Main function is<br />

judging when to cut off<br />

the discussion.<br />

For idea generation and<br />

creative group thinking;<br />

all participants present<br />

many ideas as rapidly as<br />

possible on a problem or<br />

issue. The group<br />

organizes then list into<br />

categories for further<br />

discussion. Do not<br />

evaluate, criticize, omit,<br />

or discuss contributions<br />

until all are written;<br />

record in contributor’s<br />

own words; use another<br />

person to record if<br />

possible.<br />

Social and collaborative learning – People learn more, are more engaged and retain knowledge longer<br />

when they are able to collaborate. Smart training facilitates collaboration and creates communities and<br />

comradery within the workplace such as engagement among employees – with each other, their managers,<br />

and the company. In ET there can be collaboration with customers, vendors, and, patients as well, which<br />

also present learning opportunities. Be careful of open social media sites where unfiltered communication<br />

can get out of hand. ET enables leaders the flexibility to filter collaborative information such as feedback<br />

before it is shared which could be otherwise damaging to culture and business. Sharing comments on<br />

progress and the giving and receiving of critical feedback is best-accomplished face to face.<br />

METHOD<br />

Task Groups<br />

Committee Teams<br />

ADVANTAGES<br />

POSSIBLE<br />

DISADVANTAGES<br />

ATTITUDINAL<br />

Sustained interaction Time-consuming;<br />

allows quieter people to requires a great degree<br />

express themselves; of self-direction and<br />

validates participants. group maturity.<br />

COMMENTS<br />

Keep groups small and<br />

diverse with sustained<br />

interaction and clear<br />

purpose.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Standardize Online Committees to maximize time, effort and, collaboration. ET supports committee<br />

teams to share agendas virtually online for more inclusion and feedback. Measure meeting efficiency<br />

after meetings for continual improvement. Capture more data from both inside and outside the<br />

committee team. Task and delegate actions and assignments from feedback. Track action and<br />

assignment success. The committee process is outlined by ET and available by request. It is<br />

important to have this standardized.<br />

METHOD<br />

Role-Play<br />

Mini-Role-Play<br />

“Movie” (role-play<br />

assisted by feedback,<br />

“more__, or less __”)<br />

Simulation games<br />

Gamification<br />

Case study Mini-case<br />

study (problem<br />

situations for small<br />

groups to analyze)<br />

Critical incident (small<br />

section of case stating<br />

most critical or<br />

dramatic moment)<br />

POSSIBLE<br />

ADVANTAGES<br />

DISADVANTAGES<br />

BEHAVIOURAL<br />

Helps retention. Allows<br />

participants to practice<br />

new skills in a controlled<br />

environment. Participants<br />

are actively involved.<br />

Observers can impact<br />

attitude and behavior.<br />

Useful in rehearsing new<br />

skills, behaviors.<br />

Intense involvement;<br />

practice skills in problem<br />

solving and decisionmaking.<br />

Requires active<br />

participant involvement.<br />

Can simulate<br />

performance required<br />

after training. Learning<br />

can be observed.<br />

Opportunity to apply new<br />

knowledge; requires<br />

judgment; good<br />

assessment tool;<br />

participants active; a<br />

chance to practice skills.<br />

Requires preparation<br />

time. May be difficult to<br />

tailor to all situations.<br />

Needs sufficient class<br />

time for exercise<br />

completion and feedback<br />

Requires maturity and<br />

willingness of groups;<br />

requires the trainer to<br />

have excellent<br />

facilitation skills.<br />

(Same as for roleplay,<br />

intensive and timeconsuming.)<br />

Competitive; requires a<br />

game and possibly a<br />

consultant to help<br />

facilitate; timeconsuming.<br />

Information must be<br />

precise and kept up-todate.<br />

Needs sufficient<br />

class time for<br />

participants to complete<br />

the case. Participants can<br />

become too interested in<br />

the case content. Case<br />

study must be relevant to<br />

learner’s needs and daily<br />

concerns.<br />

COMMENTS<br />

Participants act out<br />

problem-solving<br />

situations similar to<br />

those they will encounter<br />

in their workplace. The<br />

trainer needs skill and<br />

understanding— must<br />

get people into roles,<br />

give directions, and<br />

establish a climate of<br />

trust. The trainer needs<br />

insight into how an<br />

activity may pose a<br />

threat to some<br />

individuals; ability to<br />

help group process & debrief.<br />

Use in well-formed<br />

group. Can be structured<br />

into dyad, triad, and<br />

fishbowl.<br />

A package game requires<br />

prep time for the leader<br />

to learn the rules and<br />

directions.<br />

Participants are given<br />

information about a<br />

situation and directed to<br />

come to a decision or<br />

solve a problem<br />

concerning the situation.<br />

Trainer needs to have<br />

knowledge and skills to<br />

“solve” the problem;<br />

may need to design own<br />

studies; compare<br />

approaches of several<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Demonstration<br />

Demonstration with<br />

practice (by<br />

participants)<br />

Skills practice lab<br />

(small participant<br />

groups practice<br />

together).<br />

Aids comprehension and<br />

retention. Stimulates<br />

participants’ interest. Can<br />

give participants model to<br />

follow. Allows for<br />

optional modeling of<br />

desired behavior/skill;<br />

can be active; good for<br />

learning simple skills.<br />

Different points of view<br />

and feedback; participant<br />

active; good for<br />

translating information<br />

into skills.<br />

Must be accurate and<br />

relevant to participants.<br />

Written examples can<br />

require lengthy<br />

preparation time. The<br />

trainer demonstrations<br />

may be difficult for all<br />

participants to see well.<br />

The method is more<br />

effective if participants<br />

are active; feedback<br />

must follow immediately<br />

after practice.<br />

The group should have<br />

enough knowledge or<br />

insight to coach one<br />

another.<br />

groups and reinforce best<br />

solutions.<br />

Participants are shown<br />

the correct steps for<br />

completing a task or are<br />

shown an example of a<br />

correctly completed task.<br />

Requires skill to model<br />

desired behavior; break<br />

procedure down into<br />

simple steps; ability to<br />

provide feedback.<br />

Act as a resource to<br />

groups.<br />

METHOD<br />

Group discussion<br />

with decision-making<br />

regarding a new<br />

action<br />

Individual or group<br />

planning session with<br />

report<br />

POSSIBLE<br />

ADVANTAGES<br />

DISADVANTAGES<br />

PLANNING<br />

Validates maturity and<br />

needs of group members;<br />

members have the best<br />

insight into their Requires mature group<br />

problems and needs on that can self-direct and<br />

the job; group leaves the stay on task; timeconsuming.<br />

session with practical,<br />

constructive and mutual<br />

goals; groups get ideas<br />

from one another...<br />

COMMENTS<br />

Leader serves as<br />

resource once directions<br />

are given.<br />

4.2 Effective Communication Skills<br />

Good communication skills are essential when training adults. There is an abundance of resources<br />

available to provide helpful information on how to communicate most effectively with participants. These<br />

tools help develop training messages, provide facilitation tips, and offer ways to improve presentation<br />

skills for personal growth as a trainer.<br />

During the inception stage, communication impacts future training events. Much of this can be captured<br />

virtually; these are the conversations online. They include not only asking the right question but asking the<br />

right person/people. Good communication is keeping it simple. It is a focus on what you want to<br />

accomplish in asking the question. With good communication come excellent listening skills as well.<br />

Online communicating may consist of delivering:<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Pulse Engagement Dialog which is a focused and proactive communication online in ET which will<br />

anonymously or transparently measure expectation in 3-10 questions aligned to meet the desired<br />

outcome. A good rule of thumb here is that we never ask what we’re not in a position to solve.<br />

• This dialog is created by asking ourselves, “What do we want to accomplish?”<br />

• Measure expectation and streamline processes by asking for targeted feedback.<br />

• Take actions to results by delegating them through ET to follow-up face to face.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

example – Employee Retention Check is a popular pulse to assess and learn Risks to turnover<br />

example – Assertiveness Pulse Communication, assertiveness assessment using (4) questions<br />

• Policy, Procedure, and, Addendums are other key communication areas. These need to be more than<br />

verbal or written statements. Knowledge checks should be added in 1-5 questions to ensure<br />

understanding. The questions confirm execution, and that critical information is leaned.<br />

• <strong>Training</strong> Effectiveness is a follow-up communication measuring the delivery of training events with<br />

knowledge checks. In ET use 1-5 questions focused on key takeaways critical in understanding from<br />

the training. This area approach can also be used for measuring the trainer.<br />

• Suggestion Box is a hyperlink for an open portal communication created in ET to engage a targeted<br />

focus online for answers, solutions and, an outcome which can support change specifically in needed<br />

training or development. A requested suggestion is a call for contribution and collaboration.<br />

• Tips are ‘Did You Know’ yes & no questions engaged from ET for the daily or weekly sharing of<br />

knowledge and expectation. They include an actual request for improvement or follow-through<br />

action. Tap the expertise of your organization and share knowledge. This Micro Learning is driven by<br />

managers for their direct reports. It helps them manage their team’s individual knowledge better and<br />

engage them on critical development. The idea of this activity is to influence creativity and<br />

innovation from personally sharing knowledge, best practices or recapping on procedures. It enables<br />

leaders to develop better observational behavior over time.<br />

The following are effective communication guidelines that run through the whole course and are not<br />

limited to one type of training method or another. There are three important things a facilitator can do to<br />

help create an effective learning atmosphere for course participants.<br />

1. A good facilitator supports the group of participants by building an atmosphere of trust and<br />

modeling a positive attitude. An accepting and non-threatening atmosphere encourages the<br />

expression of ideas, questions, beliefs, and attitudes by all participants. Below are some ways to<br />

build trust among the group and influence positives.<br />

• Assure that confidentiality will be maintained. Establish a group rule on the first day that<br />

everyone’s confidentiality must and will be protected so that people can talk freely without<br />

fear that their comments will be shared outside the course.<br />

• Provide constructive and supportive feedback. People are valued when their opinion is<br />

asked. Let participants know when they’ve contributed something useful and interesting to<br />

the group. For example, you might say, “That’s a very good example of the concept we are<br />

discussing.”<br />

• Model a positive attitude. Participants in more cases than not get tired as the course<br />

progresses and need some encouragement. Call upon the person appointed as the energizer.<br />

This is an additional role that is assigned to a team member. Beyond the role, it is important<br />

that we maintain our own positive attitude. Address any difficult moments during the course<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

with honesty and constructive comments. If you do not have an answer let the person know<br />

you will have to research that and get back to them – and do get back to them. For a difficult<br />

moment example, “This topic brings up difficult feelings for many; by exploring our own<br />

feelings, we can better help our patients to do the same.”<br />

2. Ensure that the entire course content is covered. It is important to stay on schedule and help<br />

participants see how each session follows logically from the one before<br />

.<br />

• If participants deviate from the topic, offer to address their comments during a break.<br />

• Write additional topics identified by participants on flip chart paper as a reminder of topics to<br />

cover if there is time remaining at the end of the session. Keep this list visible to participants<br />

throughout the workshop.<br />

• Each session’s lesson plan includes key summary points. Referring to these key points, and<br />

reviewing them at the end of a session, will help you know if you have covered all of the<br />

main content of your lesson plan.<br />

3. Model effective facilitation skills. Try to remember these basic facilitation strategies throughout<br />

the course:<br />

• Ask open-ended questions. For example, you might say, “What did you learn from the role<br />

play?” instead of “Did you learn how to ______________ during the role play?”<br />

• Listen carefully to the communication and for any feelings that may accompany it.<br />

• Rephrase participants’ communications accurately for clarity, when necessary, and without<br />

judgment.<br />

• Respect every participant’s feelings, perspectives, and contributions.<br />

• Adhere to the time schedule.<br />

• Focus on developing skills, not just knowledge.<br />

• Make the learning process active.<br />

• Make the course material clear by speaking slowly and using language that is understood by<br />

all participants.<br />

4.3 Other ways to deliver content.<br />

Mobile responsive design is accessible anywhere, anytime and is another key component of any smart<br />

training. Mobile design extends the value of Micro-learning by making it available anywhere and at any<br />

time. Mobile design is also necessary to support JITT and allows for learning across multiple contexts,<br />

through both social and content interactions. This not only makes training immediately relevant but also<br />

more engaging for workers, especially when they are able to access it at a time that works best for them.<br />

What is critical in ensuring outcomes from delivery is follow-up with people on training face to face. ET<br />

is unique in its build of an Advisory Team of leaders for example, where actions can be delegated.<br />

Leaders can task and coach people with lessen-oriented follow-through actions that answer feedback<br />

privately through email or phone texts where the action is then authentically delivered face to face. With<br />

mobile reach, the designation of being at a desk won’t prohibit me as a leader from receiving an action<br />

critical to business success. These lesson-oriented actions may at times be uncomfortable communication<br />

tasks. However, from coaching, the leader will have confidence in delivering a needed message.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Task Reporting System/Advisory Team allows<br />

follow-up action to be coached in ET and<br />

develop leader-competencies. The actions<br />

delegated from a leader, coach or consultant<br />

can outline a good way to approach and<br />

engage tough or sensitive communications<br />

needed to be had.<br />

Example Task Visual – Source ET<br />

Coaching and mentoring in EmployeeTalk will not only allow your employees to collaborate with each<br />

other more easily but they will also alert your managers to issues early giving them the ability to engage<br />

those workers that need coaching and mentoring. Knowing the strengths of our team allow for good<br />

succession planning and specifically enabling us to align mentors.<br />

• Reach-out Recognition in dialog with ET we enable survey respondents to recognize themselves<br />

from anonymity for their idea or solution when answering a question. They can also write in a<br />

secondary space and recognize a person for excellence in the question being asked. These two fields<br />

can be tasked into action for follow-up face to face conversations. In real time this follow-up<br />

communication behavior by managers is often witnessed. When leaders are observed openly listening<br />

to ideas and solutions it increases participation and trust. Following these kinds of approaches will<br />

create a new positive behavior.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

5. Evaluation<br />

<strong>Training</strong> evaluation should take place throughout each phase of the training process, not as the last step. For<br />

example, after conducting a needs assessment, ask the design team and key informants if the needs identified<br />

are accurate. Have other trainers review written materials before finalizing and printing them for training.<br />

This kind of “formative” or process evaluation helps ensure that we have developed the training with great<br />

thought and analysis at each step. The most obvious and frequent kind of evaluation occurs immediately after<br />

training; participants complete a course evaluation form following the training but before leaving the site.<br />

Evaluation can also take place at the end of each day of training through quick “How did it go?” discussions,<br />

or even in organized focus groups with participants during the evening. Longer-term, follow-up evaluations<br />

conducted three months to a year or more after training are also a possibility. These evaluations measure how<br />

participants use their newly acquired information and skills in their professional roles. An employee’s<br />

evaluation begins in the onboarding process.<br />

• Onboarding is an area where new hire evaluation is important. It literally is the first step for training<br />

for employees. In ET it is a place to release and share the Employee Handbook for anytime review and<br />

sign off. It includes job descriptions. This can also include team dashboards for sharing critical<br />

processes or procedures.<br />

5.1 Forms of Evaluation<br />

These methods of formative evaluation are often used during the training delivery phase. The process<br />

allows trainers to determine how they need to adapt their training plans and delivery so that a training<br />

session or program will be most effective for participants.<br />

1. Pre- and Post-Knowledge Test:<br />

Before you begin the content of the training, ask students to complete a knowledge-based<br />

questionnaire that asks them what they already know about the training topic.<br />

• Pass out the exact same questionnaire at the end of the training to gauge how their<br />

answers have changed from before the training began.<br />

• Keep the questions brief, no more than 10 or 12.<br />

• Focus questions on the learning objectives. (Note: This questionnaire can also be<br />

administered during the needs analysis. You want to determine what participants<br />

already know and therefore, what you can leave out of the training or spend less and<br />

more time on).<br />

2. Trainer Assessment:<br />

During breaks, the trainer(s) should assess the progress of the training. If there is more than one<br />

trainer, each trainer should provide honest and helpful feedback to each other.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Are students engaged?<br />

• Was there possible confusion on any portion of the session so far?<br />

• Is more time needed for a particular portion of the session?<br />

• Are the trainers going too fast or do they need to pick up the pace?<br />

• Are participants interacting as a group enough?<br />

3. Participant Check-in:<br />

Ask participants briefly how things are going. Find a convenient time to either hand out a half-slip of<br />

paper and ask four or five questions or ask them verbally and get feedback from the group:<br />

• What have you learned so far in this training session that you didn’t know before?<br />

• What would you like to know more about that was addressed so far?<br />

• How is the pace of the session so far? Too Fast, Too Slow, Just Right?<br />

• What did you like best about the morning (or afternoon) session?<br />

• How can the trainers make the remainder of the session most effective for you?<br />

4. Post-training participant feedback: Suggested questions:<br />

• What has gone well so far in this training?<br />

• What have you learned that is new?<br />

• What was presented that you already knew?<br />

• What would you like to know more about?<br />

• What can the trainer(s) do differently to make the training more effective?<br />

• What can you as participants do to make it more effective?<br />

There is a wide set of evaluation forms covering almost every aspect of the training. <strong>Training</strong> design teams<br />

need to decide on which ones are relevant and effective for their particular course. Overdoing it on the<br />

evaluation, tires participants. Evaluating each session, at the end of each day, and at the end of the training<br />

becomes a time-consuming activity. There needs to be a balance and a variety of the methods used too. At the<br />

end of each session, the evaluation could be informal, verbal and in a plenary. Use a handheld with ET to<br />

capture data and centralize it reducing paper. At the end of each day, the evaluation could be done in a more<br />

structured way with participants breaking into small working groups and developing 4-5 key learning or<br />

feedback points for the trainers. The evaluation at the end of the course needs to take a far more structured and<br />

time to achieve its aim. It could be divided into a reflection exercise involving the whole group and facilitated<br />

by one or more trainer in addition to the pre-designed formal evaluation form. Although a preliminary<br />

evaluation would take place before training begins some unknown variables to training success may need to be<br />

discovered. This is why these evaluations are important too.<br />

The following is just a list of the types of evaluation that could take place in any training course:<br />

• Daily Evaluation Form<br />

• <strong>Training</strong> Evaluation Form: Skills, Attitude, Comfort<br />

• <strong>Training</strong> Evaluation and Learning Self-Assessment<br />

• Post-<strong>Training</strong> Summary Evaluation<br />

• <strong>Training</strong> Observation Instrument<br />

• Expert Observer Rating Tool<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

5.2 Process Evaluation<br />

• Group Activity Observation Form<br />

• Evaluation using Focus Groups: Topic <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Trainer Attributes: Competencies Self-Assessment<br />

• Instructional Design & <strong>Material</strong>s Evaluation Form<br />

Process Evaluation (or Formative Evaluation) - occurs while the training is being designed, developed, and<br />

delivered. It allows trainers to determine what needs to change in their training plans and delivery so that a<br />

training session or program will be most effective for participants.<br />

By evaluating team’s process and progress as each stage is completed in the training creation process we<br />

can be sure we have addressed all the issues and taken the necessary steps that go into a successful<br />

training. Every step along the way needs to be appraised and evaluated before moving on to the next one.<br />

This covers evaluating progress in the Needs Assessment, Design, and <strong>Development</strong> stages of training<br />

development.<br />

Process Evaluation – Needs Assessment<br />

Needs assessment (also called a needs analysis), it usually isn’t thought of as a step in the evaluation<br />

process. But in fact, curriculum design, development, delivery, and evaluation all circle back to the<br />

information we obtained during the needs assessment process. The evaluation conducted at the very end of<br />

training will shed light on whether or not the training adequately addressed the gaps in knowledge and<br />

skills identified during the needs assessment process.<br />

Once the needs assessment process is completed, we need to consider its results and assess what worked,<br />

did not work, and where we need to go back and attempt to get additional information. This can be done<br />

by using the following simple checklist:<br />

• Were the appropriate people involved in identifying the needs of the target<br />

population?<br />

• Was a comprehensive analysis conducted, or were the results too narrow?<br />

• Would additional methods provide more useful input, (e.g. a focus group or a<br />

questionnaire)?<br />

• Would the repeat of a previously used method, but with more participants and<br />

information provide more useful input?<br />

• Are more interviews needed to identify the needs of underrepresented participants?<br />

o Refer to your dashboard to review individual learning styles<br />

Process Evaluation – <strong>Training</strong> Design<br />

The journey of creating training is made up of many important pieces - coordination, ideas, steps, people,<br />

and resources. The design phase is when all these pieces come together. When finished, we will have a<br />

blueprint of what the training will look like. We get a glimpse of the bigger picture: audience; their<br />

identified needs; curriculum learning objectives, outline, and instructional methods; trainers and other<br />

resources; etc.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Content experts should review the training design before the curriculum developers begin development.<br />

They should be a part of the on-going development process. Content experts can be content professionals,<br />

former trainers of the content, managers, and/or members of the targeted student population.<br />

Once training design is completed, the design team needs to stand back and assess the hard work and<br />

progress so far posing the following questions:<br />

<strong>Training</strong>-Model Focus: Have training designers:<br />

• Clearly identified participants’ knowledge and skills gaps?<br />

• Prepared the course or session by using a sequential planning model?<br />

• Examined learning tasks for the sequence: easy to more difficult, simple to complex?<br />

• Honored the fact that adult learners are subjects of their own lives, in the training<br />

design?<br />

• Clearly defined content - skills, knowledge, and attitudes - that satisfy the learning<br />

objectives of the intended audience?<br />

• Designed achievement-based objectives that can be readily evaluated?<br />

• Created training comprehensive enough without being overwhelming?<br />

• Created a time frame that allows the accomplishment of learning tasks?<br />

• Planned a wide variety of teaching and learning techniques?<br />

• Arranged for good trainers with the background and instructional skills to present an<br />

effective learning experience? (Train the trainer events)<br />

• Identified good resources and materials?<br />

Structure Focus: Have training designers:<br />

• Made sure the size of the group would promote optimal learning?<br />

• Selected a site that lends itself to small-group work?<br />

• Designed a warm-up exercise related to the topic and appropriate for the group?<br />

• Created ways to teach the content through small group activities?<br />

• Designed a time frame that allows for the accomplishment of all learning tasks?<br />

• Planned for participants’ safety?<br />

• Set up processes and structures - small groups, breaks - to assure inclusion?<br />

• Built-in brainstorming or associative processes that discourage judging or editing?<br />

• Planned quiet, reflective time for participants to think about what they are learning<br />

and how they might apply new knowledge and skills?<br />

• Ensure dialog questions are available to answer anonymously in EmployeeTalk, for<br />

neutrality and time to respond?<br />

• Created closure tasks that include evaluation and end the training on a positive,<br />

hopeful tone?<br />

Communication Focus: Have training designers:<br />

• Been in dialog with participants prior to the course?<br />

• Built-in open questions to stimulate dialog throughout the training?<br />

• Instructed trainers to avoid monologues by designing for dialog?<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

• Designed for optimal engagement of all, using small group work, learning tasks,<br />

affirming responses, echoing?<br />

• Set up an online EmployeeTalk dialog to maximize contribution and improve time<br />

management?<br />

• Created an opportunity for small groups to examine their own group and task<br />

maintenance together?<br />

Process Evaluation Focus – <strong>Training</strong> <strong>Development</strong><br />

As the material is being developed, content experts should be on-hand to conduct reviews and<br />

offer suggestions. Some agenda can be shared through the EmployeeTalk VML to maximize<br />

time and increase contribution. Once the course is complete, a beta or pilot test is an excellent<br />

way to identify problem areas and holes in the curriculum. Like the evaluation of the training<br />

design, using content experts, possible trainers, and members of the target population is<br />

recommended.<br />

• Did we have adequate input from content experts?<br />

• Did we conduct a review and/or pilot training with a good representation of<br />

stakeholders?<br />

• Was there good inclusion of input using EmployeeTalk online both transparently and<br />

anonymously?<br />

• Did we have enough/too much time allotted for each portion of the training?<br />

• What content areas need more examples, statistics, case studies, etc.?<br />

• Is there a blend of participant and instructor talk?<br />

• Is there adequate time given to class discussion, teacher explanation/lecture,<br />

question-answer periods, group activity, and individual exercises?<br />

• What should the trainers work on regarding classroom presence, style, and overall<br />

teaching effectiveness?<br />

• Does the course actually meet the stated learning objectives? Do the learning<br />

objectives need to be modified?<br />

• Have we built-in adequate evaluation to assess the curriculum, the process, and<br />

participant learning and application?<br />

Finally, it is important to reiterate that like engagement, training and training design is an on-going, rather than<br />

a linear process. Questions posed above aimed at evaluating one experience should inform the following<br />

training course or future pilots if more than one is required. Regular check in with the project team, structured<br />

evaluation of each process and constant feedback loop maintain a high quality of the training material and its<br />

delivery in terms of relevance and overall impact on participants’ future practice.<br />

A constant feedback loop supports many business challenges. It’s better to be proactive as a leader rather than<br />

reactive considering that statement. Ongoing pulse checks are huge in determining focal points in the<br />

organization for training. The methods, techniques, and, tools to engage with using EmployeeTalk enable<br />

assessing, evaluating, and, capturing information that helps meet the strategic alignment between training and<br />

performance. Some of these constant loop approaches are:<br />

• Proactive Pulse allows engaging on what is critical now towards avoiding risk, the obstacles to<br />

execution and, drive new solution ideas and innovation.<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

example – Engage online on Exit Interview to assess future Risks of turnover<br />

example – Assessing Safety, (9) question points engaged proactively for collaboration<br />

• A Checklist is a tool to engage the team with a set of questions in ET (usually yes and no). Questions<br />

are outlined to evaluate a process and point out strengths and opportunities. These queries will<br />

identify training areas which can then be engaged to meet business outcomes better.<br />

• Receipt <strong>Training</strong> uses a hyperlink on the customer receipts. They can go online and engage (4)<br />

questions to review product or service satisfaction. It targets (4) critical areas to identify training<br />

needs and focusses.<br />

• Q1. Environment<br />

• Q2. Resources<br />

• Q3. Execution<br />

• Q4. Quality<br />

• Transformation Education is a change technique dialog in ET to engage before, during and, after a<br />

change to ensure objectives are on track and being met. Identify training focal points to stress.<br />

• A Scorecard is a tool used to engage a set of questions (usually a 1-10 Rating). It captures statistics<br />

around the measure of achievement or progress toward a particular goal. It is commonly used in ET to<br />

prioritize training needs or a developmental focus. It is a manager’s, what’s critical now assessment.<br />

6. References<br />

EmployeeTalk Technology and Innovate Virtual resource training guide (2017)<br />

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/58874373/innovatevirtual-targeted-communication<br />

Novak et al., 1999<br />

Center for Instructional <strong>Development</strong> and Research, University of Washington (2004) Course Design.<br />

http://depts.washington.edu/cidrweb/CourseDesign.html<br />

Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, University of Western Australia,<br />

http://www.catl.osds.uwa.edu.au/obe/outcomes,<br />

I-TECH <strong>Training</strong> Tool Kit (2004). I-TECH and Center for Health Education and Research (CHER),<br />

Seattle, USA.<br />

JHPIEGO’s <strong>Training</strong> Works! (2003) http://www.reproline.jhu.edu/english/6read/6training/Tngworks/<br />

Mo Hamza PhD is a Director at the Global Climate Adaptation Partner<br />

Kirkpatrick, D. (1994) Evaluating <strong>Training</strong> Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler, San<br />

Francisco, USA<br />

Lawson, K. (1998) The Trainer’s Handbook. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, USA.<br />

Knowles, M. Holton, E, and Swanson, R. (2005) The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult<br />

Education and Human Resource <strong>Development</strong>. Elsevier, Burlington, MA, USA.<br />

Michele Burns, Program for Appropriate Technology and Health (PATH), http://www.path.org/<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

Renate, M and Caine, G. (1994) Making Connections: Teaching and the Human Brain. Addison<br />

Wesley Publishing Company.<br />

Romiszowski, A. (1981) The How and Why of Performance Objectives. From Designing Instructional<br />

Systems. Kogan, London.<br />

6.1 EmployeeTalk Acknowledgment<br />

Most Coms, Human Resources, <strong>Training</strong> and Educational leadership professionals agree that investing in<br />

engagement, communication, and the continued training and development of employees is necessary.<br />

Brandon Hall’s 2016 Learning Technology Study suggests that companies introducing learning<br />

technologies into their training programs will enjoy a very positive impact on their bottom line. The study<br />

showed that 40 percent of the companies that implemented learning technologies saw increased revenues,<br />

more than half saw increases in productivity and employee engagement, and 16 percent experienced lower<br />

turnover. This is important to note because 73% of actively disengaged employees are looking for new<br />

jobs according to Gallup. No company can afford to replace 73% of their workforce if they leave? The<br />

ET vision is to infuse learning technology with more communication flexibility to supplement and<br />

accomplish what can impact the bottom line.<br />

The EmployeeTalk platform streamlines engagement by empowering leaders to target and collaborate on<br />

what is critical now. It is through the self-administration of pulse check engagement that we improve the<br />

decisions that we must make. More and more leaders today recognize what impact communication and<br />

learning technologies play in helping meet business goals. According to Metairie’s Analysis of the 2016<br />

Global Learning Technology Investment, global investments in learning technologies have more than<br />

quadrupled from $1.64 billion in 2013 to $7.33 billion in 2016. But, is the return on investment in some of<br />

these expensive technologies really paying off because when we flip the statistics, 60% of the companies<br />

that implemented learning technologies didn’t highlight an increase in revenues or the points above?<br />

Consideration must be made for an affordable learning technology, one that combines the aspects of<br />

communication, engagement, and, measuring learning capabilities into a simple to use technology such as<br />

what EmployeeTalk provides. Many leaders today are unaware of the long-term costs that can be<br />

associated with some Learning Technology Platforms. Proctor & Gamble for one had discovered they<br />

were paying out $10,000 a month for storage using SharePoint. This forced a directive to clear content.<br />

Do your research and know the expense and value behind the technology you use. For example, the<br />

expense and return on investment in ET are best represented when considering that replacing a<br />

professional, such as a Nurse or Director can cost an organization ten to twenty times what it costs to have<br />

EmployeeTalk. And, not to mention the value broad use which is afforded an administrator in using the<br />

ET platform. This is very important to point out because, despite the leaders’ belief in the performanceboosting<br />

effects of learning technology, the Brandon Hall study also found that many companies are not<br />

satisfied with their current learning technologies, and 48 percent of them plan on exploring new or<br />

different learning technologies in the next 12 months. The study further found that 42 percent want<br />

learning technologies that create a stronger link between learning and individual or organizational<br />

performance, and 39 percent want the ability to better measure their employees’ learning! This spells out<br />

the need to have more assistive or supplemental technology to streamline engagement and training towards<br />

ensuring outcomes are actually met.<br />

These statistics also highlight the importance of flexibility and affordability in a platform to serve an everchanging<br />

environment, a platform where a small business or rural hospital of 50 employees can utilize it in<br />

its growth, or enable a large organization of over 5000 employees to utilize it to improve their bottom line,<br />

specifically by supplementing expensive learning technologies. My point is that a smart learning system<br />

should actually be able to evolve with the company. This underscores the need for a communication and<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

training technology that aligns learning goals with corporate goals. To that end, we recommend<br />

companies begin their use of ET by first developing a Corporate <strong>Training</strong> Strategy with their Business<br />

Goals in mind. It starts by targeting what is critical now. In fact, to be critical and support strategy<br />

requires assessing the entire operation from top to bottom, looking at ways to streamline work processes<br />

and improve workflow. The goal here is to identify the obstacles which can prevent execution from taking<br />

place.<br />

6.2 Developing a training strategy that drives business results<br />

The greatest return on investment (ROI) for corporate training happens when learning goals are driven by<br />

business goals. These can include financial capital goals such as improving sales and profitability and<br />

human capital goals such as in productivity, recruiting the best talent, and of course increasing employee<br />

engagement. Developing a training strategy that meets these goals requires a strategic alignment between<br />

the training you provide and specific business objectives. ET meets engagement needs and confirms what<br />

leaders are trying to accomplish. The communication and learning platform is geared to engage in a<br />

variety of communication methods, techniques and, tools designed to capture information and<br />

measures. It can integrate communication with other processes, activities or initiatives and increase<br />

impact on strategy execution, create early wins in high impact places and, engage and strengthen<br />

leadership communication competencies. Develop courses and connect the learning objectives – the skills<br />

and information you need your people to have – with the business objectives they need to meet.<br />

6.3 Develop a corporate learning strategy that identifies the following key elements:<br />

• Specific Business Objectives – What are the specific financial and/or human capital goals your<br />

company is trying to meet? Your business objectives should provide the framework for your strategy.<br />

• Audience – What are the roles that have a direct impact on each of these goals? <strong>Training</strong> should<br />

focus on the employees in these roles.<br />

• Delivery Method – How will training be delivered? This includes identifying the type of content<br />

needed, the medium through which it is delivered and how learning will be measured.<br />

• Performance Support – How will performance be supported? How will outcomes be confirmed?<br />

<strong>Training</strong> must be applied and reinforced to be effective and should continually evolve to meet<br />

changing needs.<br />

6.4 Engaging in the ET Platform<br />

Once you’ve identified your business objectives and connected them with learning objectives, it’s<br />

time to start thinking about how you will deliver your training and confirm effectiveness. To help<br />

achieve this challenge consider simplifying your training approach and break down the focal areas<br />

into four categories of employee communications and engagement: Chart the<br />

critical types of communications in:<br />

i DT PP PC<br />

1. Increasing Information i<br />

2. <strong>Development</strong> and <strong>Training</strong> DT<br />

3. Process or Procedure PP<br />

4. People Commitment PC<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together


<strong>Training</strong> <strong>Material</strong> <strong>Development</strong> <strong>Guide</strong><br />

7. Note about the author<br />

Eric Bruggeman is a founder for the EmployeeTalk Communication and Learning Measurement Technology<br />

where he is responsible for Product Implementations, and <strong>Training</strong> and Learning Activities. An Individual<br />

Consultant and Speaker of Communication and Engagement; his primary areas of professional expertise and<br />

research work are: Management Assessment, Collaboration Designs, and, Innovating Virtually.<br />

Eric@employeeTalk.us<br />

The activities of communication, engagement, and, measuring learning working together

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!