07.11.2017 Views

Tribologytransactions

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Design of Spur Gears Using Profile Modification 743<br />

Downloaded by [Manipal University], [sachidananda H K] at 21:24 26 May 2015<br />

lower in a 25 pressure angle compared to a 20 pressure angle.<br />

This analysis holds for changing of s max from point C to point D<br />

similar to point B and point C. The behavior of altered toothsum<br />

gearing performs in the same way as discussed above for<br />

changing of points from point C to point D.<br />

Morphological Investigation<br />

Generally, to ensure long-term transmission reliability in<br />

automotive vehicles the gear designer must consider requirements<br />

such as high static strength, bending fatigue, and rolling<br />

contact fatigue (William and Richard (30)). In particular, rolling<br />

contact fatigue cracks are one of the most important problems<br />

for gears (Aslantas and Tasgetiren (16); Vera and Ivana (29)).<br />

Under rolling contact, various surface damage (pitting, spalling,<br />

and cracking) occurs and cracks develop in the gear tooth surface,<br />

thus leading to loss of serviceability of the gear (Anders<br />

and Soren (13); Singh, et al. (28)). Both macro- and microcracks<br />

lead to surface damage, and subsurface cracks generate heavy<br />

surface damage like pitting. In most material failures, tensile<br />

stresses appear to be the common mode and the material surface<br />

is stretched or pulled apart, thus leading to microscopic surface<br />

cracking and macroscopic-scale pitting or spalling (Dimitrov,<br />

et al. (17); Michele and Giuseppe (23)).<br />

In a meshing gear pair LPSTC to the HPSTC only one pair of<br />

gear tooth in contact and the normal force is higher for this<br />

region. Below the LPSTC and above the HPSTC there is more<br />

than one pair in contact (Marco, et al. (22)). Hence, in the present<br />

investigation point B (LPSTC) and point D (HPSTC) on the<br />

pinion are the critical points of contact that are considered in<br />

gears for rolling type of failure. In this context, 96, 100, and 104<br />

tooth-sum gears were selected for experimentation and are subjected<br />

to fatigue loading. The surfaces at point B (LPSTC) and<br />

point D (HPSTC) on the tested pinion tooth surface were<br />

selected and specimens were prepared for morphological investigations.<br />

SEM micrographs of these surfaces are shown in Fig. 3.<br />

In the experimental results, it is observed that pitting failures<br />

occur roughly between the initial point of a single-tooth contact<br />

(point B) and pitch point C and from pitch point C to the final<br />

point of the single-tooth contact (point D) because these are the<br />

points of highest load when the contact ratio is greater than 1.2<br />

and less than 2.<br />

Figures 3a and 3b show SEM micrographs of the pinion tooth<br />

surface at points B and D for a tooth-sum of 96. The sum of the<br />

profile shift coefficient is 2.27 mm and in this case both gear and<br />

pinion wer generated with equal amounts of profile shift and the<br />

maximum contact stress at point B 1 is 189.48 MPa. This is the initial<br />

point of the single-tooth contact. Microcracks are observed<br />

at point B (Fig. 3a, higher magnification) and multiple macrocracks<br />

are observed at point D (Fig. 3a, higher magnification). It<br />

is found that the crack intensity and number of cracks are greater<br />

at point D compared to point B. This is due to s max at D. From<br />

these micrographs it can be seen that the surface deterioration at<br />

the region of point D is greater compared to that at point B. In<br />

driving and driven members the sliding direction and rolling are<br />

opposite each other (as observed in all SEM micrographs) and<br />

cracks grow opposite to the direction of sliding.<br />

Figures 3c and 3d show SEM micrographs of 100 tooth-sum<br />

pinion teeth surfaces at points B and D. From Figs. 3c and 3d it<br />

is seen that the surface damage is more severe at point B (Fig. 3c,<br />

lower magnification) compared to point D (Fig. 3d, higher magnification).<br />

However, plastic deformation is observed on the surface<br />

in both points of contacts. This is due to the kinematic<br />

characteristics of the gear teeth contact and teeth lubricating<br />

conditions (Joze and Gorazd (21)). It can be stated that the more<br />

aggressive the contact conditions and a thin lubricating specific<br />

film thickness lead to plastic deformation and a feather edge<br />

forms due to plastic flow of material (Fig. 3c; Errichelo (18)).<br />

Scuffing (scoring) is a form of gear tooth surface damage that<br />

occurs due to the absence or breakdown of a lubricant film<br />

between the contacting surfaces of the mating gears (Vera and<br />

Ivana (29); Sheng and Ahmet (27)). Figures 3e and 3f show the<br />

micrographs of 104 tooth-sum pinion teeth surfaces at points B<br />

and D. It can be seen from Table 3 that the contact stress is at<br />

point B and remains the same at point D because of the two-pair<br />

mesh. Though the maximum contact stress value in this case is<br />

lower than in the above two cases, the contact ratio in this case is<br />

2.07, which is higher. This leads to a shorter path of contact and<br />

the product of contact stress and sliding velocity is the highest<br />

for this case of gearing compared to all other cases. Therefore,<br />

the lubricant between meshing surfaces is subjected to squeezing<br />

and breakdown of the lubricant film. This indicates a severe scoring<br />

effect. The extreme pressure and high sliding velocity caused<br />

ploughing of the material. In addition, dry sliding wear at the<br />

point of contact generates high friction and material removal<br />

from the surface acts as three-body wear and creates ploughing<br />

of the material, as shown in Figs. 3e and 3f. However, the cases<br />

of gearing with positive values of tooth number alterations are<br />

marginally scored compared to standard gearing. Surface examinations<br />

carried out by considering SEM microphotographs<br />

revealed better surface integrity for the cases of negative number<br />

of tooth alterations.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The analyses of maximum contact stress in altered tooth-sum<br />

gearing for a tooth-sum of 100 when altered by §4% have been<br />

studied. The magnitude of s max and morphological studies have<br />

been done for point B and point D. From the computational,<br />

experimental, and morphological analysis, the following conclusions<br />

are drawn:<br />

Better performance is obtained for negative alteration in<br />

tooth-sum gears compared to standard gearing. This is<br />

because the contact stress induced for negative alteration in<br />

tooth-sums of 96, 97, 98, and 99 is lower compared to the<br />

standard tooth-sum of 100. For positive alteration in toothsum<br />

the contact stress at points B 1 and B 2 is higher; in turn,<br />

standard gears perform better under these conditions for a<br />

25 pressure angle. Similarly, the analysis holds for a 20 <br />

pressure angle.<br />

It is proved that by a profile modification technique it is<br />

possible to trace the point of switchover of s max . In addition,<br />

it has design flexibility in gear design with respect to<br />

the range of contact ratio.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!