14.12.2012 Views

The Technology Factor: Nine Keys to Student Achievement and Cost ...

The Technology Factor: Nine Keys to Student Achievement and Cost ...

The Technology Factor: Nine Keys to Student Achievement and Cost ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 Chapter 3: Major Findings<br />

Copying <strong>and</strong> paperwork expenses. Project RED estimates that 1:1<br />

high schools with a properly implemented Learning Management<br />

System (LMS) could cut their copy budgets in half. Labor accounts for<br />

roughly 50% of the <strong>to</strong>tal cost. Assuming the cost of a copy machine is<br />

$100,000 per year for a 1,500-student high school, on a national basis<br />

this equates <strong>to</strong> savings of $739 million a year for high schools alone.<br />

Instructional materials. �e use of instructional materials can be tied<br />

<strong>to</strong> student performance over large sample sizes, so that educa<strong>to</strong>rs can<br />

identify what works for which populations <strong>and</strong> deploy the most<br />

effective materials on a student-by-student basis.<br />

Dropout rate. One broad financial impact of technology is a reduction<br />

in dropout rates. �e huge economic cost of dropouts is well known, 3<br />

but 1:1 schools are cutting the dropout rate <strong>and</strong> impacting state<br />

revenues as well as local costs.<br />

�e greatest financial benefit results from the difference in lifetime tax<br />

revenues between a dropout, a high school graduate, <strong>and</strong> a college<br />

graduate. On average, these additional tax revenues range from<br />

$448,000 (females) <strong>to</strong> $874,000 (males). 4<br />

If 25% of those dropouts graduated from high school <strong>and</strong> 25% of<br />

those graduated from college, the increase in tax revenues would be<br />

$77 billion per year per graduating class. �e aggregate positive<br />

financial impact of all students a�er 40 years of changed schools<br />

would be $77 billion times 40 years or three trillion dollars a year.<br />

Systems cost reductions. Post-survey interviewees o�en report that<br />

another cost issue is the number of duplicate or redundant systems in<br />

districts. While Project RED did not measure this fac<strong>to</strong>r, we believe<br />

that very few districts have one single data entry source. �e cost of<br />

redundant data entry, data cleaning, redundant so�ware packages, <strong>and</strong><br />

associated training <strong>and</strong> support is substantial.<br />

3 Belfield, Clive & Levin, Henry M., 2007.<br />

4 Ibid.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> <strong>Fac<strong>to</strong>r</strong>: <strong>Nine</strong> <strong>Keys</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Student</strong> <strong>Achievement</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Cost</strong>-Effectiveness<br />

Finding 3: 1:1 schools employing key<br />

implementation fac<strong>to</strong>rs outperform all schools<br />

<strong>and</strong> all other 1:1 schools.<br />

A 1:1 student-computer ratio has a higher impact on student outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> financial benefits than other ratios, <strong>and</strong> the key implementation<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>rs (KIFs) increase both benefits.<br />

Evidence supporting the third Project RED hypothesis: Continuous<br />

access <strong>to</strong> a computing device for every student leads <strong>to</strong> increased<br />

academic achievement <strong>and</strong> financial benefits, especially when<br />

technology is properly implemented.<br />

In general, respondents say that schools with a 1:1 student-computer<br />

ratio outperform non-1:1 schools on both academic <strong>and</strong> financial<br />

measures, but Chart 3.3 illustrates a more interesting finding—the<br />

positive impact of the <strong>to</strong>p four KIFs (see Finding 1):<br />

• Intervention classes that use technology in every class period<br />

• Principal leading change management training at least monthly<br />

• Online collaboration among students daily<br />

• Core curriculum using technology at least weekly<br />

In light of the national agenda for education reform, the 31-point<br />

difference in dropout rate reduction, the large reduction in<br />

disciplinary action, <strong>and</strong> the large improvement in high-stakes test<br />

scores are particularly significant.<br />

Finding 3 illustrates that properly implemented 1:1 schools are well<br />

positioned <strong>to</strong> enjoy substantial improvement in the education success<br />

measures (ESMs), as well as positive financial benefits. �ese findings,<br />

while significant, would probably improve if schools were willing <strong>to</strong><br />

re-engineer their academic processes <strong>to</strong> exploit the availability of 1:1<br />

computing, matching the benefits experienced in other segments of<br />

the economy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!