12.02.2018 Views

WHOQOL-HIV (validação)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Downloaded by [Tulane University] at 08:09 12 January 2015<br />

religion, occupation, marital status, number of<br />

children, <strong>HIV</strong> positive partner, transmission category,<br />

clinical admission history, CD4 lymphocyte<br />

count and viral load, history of psychiatric and/or<br />

psychological treatment, use of psychoactive drugs,<br />

demand for psychiatric and/or psychological treatment.<br />

WHO case definition for AIDS surveillance. This was<br />

created for AIDS surveillance in adolescents and<br />

adults in various countries, especially those with<br />

limited resources for laboratory diagnosis. According<br />

to clinical criteria, a seropositive patient is classified<br />

as asymptomatic <strong>HIV</strong>, symptomatic <strong>HIV</strong> or AIDS<br />

(World Health Organization, 1994). The advantage<br />

of this criterium is the simplicity of its use and its low<br />

cost, as there is no need for serological tests. Its<br />

limitations are low sensitivity, and particularly, low<br />

specificity for tuberculosis, as <strong>HIV</strong>-negative patients<br />

with tuberculosis may be accounted as AIDS cases<br />

due to similar clinical symptoms (World Health<br />

Organization, 1994).<br />

Brazil economic classification criteria. This instrument<br />

classifies subjects into socio-economic groups by<br />

means of information on schooling and possession<br />

of particular ‘comfort items’, such as TV sets,<br />

refrigerators, radios, automobiles and servants. The<br />

number of entities is considered and scored as<br />

points; the sum of points will place the interviewed<br />

person in class A, B, C, D or E (Brazil Economic<br />

Classification Criteria http://www.anep.org.br/codigosguias/CCEB.pdf<br />

accessed: 1 March, 2000).<br />

World Health Organization Quality of Life-<strong>HIV</strong>/AIDS<br />

module (<strong>WHOQOL</strong>-<strong>HIV</strong>). The <strong>WHOQOL</strong>-<strong>HIV</strong> is<br />

composed of six domains (Physical, Psychological,<br />

Level of Independence, Social Relations, Environment,<br />

Spirituality/Religiousness/Personal Beliefs)<br />

and 30 facets. The questionnaire is self-administered<br />

and the patient is asked to focus on his or her<br />

experiences in the past two weeks. Each item is<br />

scored on a Likert-type scale (1 through 5). Additionally,<br />

4 items are dedicated to evaluate general<br />

QOL and general state of health. Standardized<br />

scores (range0-100) may be calculated for each<br />

facet, domain, general QOL and general state of<br />

health. Higher scores indicate better quality of life,<br />

with exceptions in these following facets: pain,<br />

negative feelings, treatment dependency, forgiveness,<br />

spiritual connection/personal spiritual experience,<br />

death/dying, in which the direction of the<br />

scores is inverted (Starace et al., 2002).<br />

Patients required approximately 90 minutes to<br />

respond two QOL instruments (<strong>WHOQOL</strong>-<strong>HIV</strong><br />

and SF-36), BDI and STAI. These instruments<br />

were self-responded.<br />

Quality of life in <strong>HIV</strong>-positive Brazilians 925<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

The reliability and validity of the construct of the<br />

<strong>WHOQOL</strong>-<strong>HIV</strong> domains was evaluated with Cronbach<br />

alpha. The instrument’s structure was examined<br />

evaluating the correlation between each item<br />

and the facet’s total corrected score (the facet’s total<br />

corrected score is obtained by subtracting the score<br />

of the evaluated item from the facet’s total score).<br />

The <strong>WHOQOL</strong>-<strong>HIV</strong>’s capacity to discriminate<br />

disease stages (discriminant validity) was examined<br />

by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), followed by the<br />

Tukey test. The concurrent validity was analysed<br />

between the <strong>WHOQOL</strong>-<strong>HIV</strong> domains and the<br />

General Quality of Life facets (originally a facet of<br />

the <strong>WHOQOL</strong>-100) also using the Pearson correlation<br />

coefficient.<br />

The statistical packets used were SPSS version<br />

10.0, STATA version 7.0 and PEPI version 3.0, with<br />

level of significance a0.05.<br />

Ethics issues<br />

All the individuals invited to participate in the study<br />

completed a letter of consent presenting the objectives<br />

of the study. The Ethics Committee at Hospital<br />

de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) approved the<br />

project.<br />

Results<br />

Sample<br />

A total of 308 patients participated in the study, 222<br />

outpatients and 86 hospitalized. Of these, 131<br />

(42.5%) were asymptomatic, 91 (29.5%) symptomatic<br />

and 86 (27.9%) with AIDS. The majority of<br />

the subjects were male (186, 60.4%) and the mean<br />

age was 34.6 years (98.1), 186 people (60.4%) had<br />

at least 8 years of schooling and 40.9% were married<br />

or lived as such. The largest number were in social<br />

class C, 190 (62.1%), which correspond to middle<br />

class (see Table I). Nearly three-quarters of the<br />

sample had engaged in high-risk sexual activity,<br />

Table I. Sample characteristics (n308).<br />

N %<br />

Male Sex 186 60.4<br />

Married/lives as such 126 40.9<br />

]8 years of schooling 186 60.6<br />

Social class<br />

AB 66 21.6<br />

C 190 62.1<br />

DE 50 16.3<br />

Risk behaviour<br />

Sexual Risk 225 73.1<br />

Sharing needles 66 21.6<br />

Transfusion/haemophilia 49 15.9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!