TP_030818
The Tinley Junction 030818
The Tinley Junction 030818
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 | March 8, 2018 | The tinley junction News<br />
tinleyjunction.com<br />
Campaign complaint<br />
dismissed against<br />
Tinley Park PAC<br />
Staff Report<br />
A complaint filed by a Tinley<br />
Park attorney against the<br />
Citizens of Tinley Park PAC<br />
has been dismissed by the Illinois<br />
State Board of Elections.<br />
According to a Final Order<br />
on Complaint dated Feb.<br />
23 shared by the political action<br />
committee’s Facebook<br />
page on Feb. 28, the Board<br />
heard the complaint filed by<br />
Stephen E. Eberhardt during<br />
a closed preliminary hearing<br />
on Feb. 21.<br />
The complaint was filed<br />
pursuant to “An Act to Regulate<br />
Campaign Financing”<br />
and alleged that Citizens of<br />
Tinley Park PAC violated<br />
Illinois Compiled Statutes<br />
regarding the solitication of<br />
anonymous contributions.<br />
“In regard to the allegation<br />
that the Respondent committee<br />
solicted anonymous contributions<br />
on their Facebook<br />
page, while filed in good<br />
faith, the complaint was not<br />
filed on justifiable grounds,<br />
as there is no evidence that<br />
any anonymous contributions<br />
were actually made or<br />
accepted,” the letter stated.<br />
The recommendations<br />
of the Hearing Officer and<br />
the General Counsel were<br />
adopted by the Board, dismissing<br />
the complaint with<br />
no further action required.<br />
The final order is subject to<br />
review under the Administrative<br />
Review Law and Section<br />
9 of the Election Code,<br />
the document concluded.<br />
Village of Tinley Park Plan Commission<br />
SWCCS proposes to build<br />
new parking lot, bus barn<br />
Site plan approval,<br />
variances under<br />
review<br />
Cody Mroczka, Editor<br />
Southwest Chicago<br />
Christian School is requesting<br />
a site plan approval<br />
and variations to construct<br />
a transportation building,<br />
concrete parking lot and<br />
basketball court on its campus<br />
in Tinley Park.<br />
A quorum of six Village of<br />
Tinley Park Plan Commission<br />
received a staff report<br />
from Community Development<br />
Director Paula Wallrich<br />
on March 1 regarding<br />
the proposal for the school<br />
located at 17171 84th Avenue.<br />
Commissioners Ken<br />
Shaw, Eduardo Mani, and<br />
Lucas Engel were absent.<br />
“Some of the nuances of<br />
our code don’t adress the<br />
nuances of schools like buses,”<br />
Wallrich said.<br />
Petitioner Henry Doom<br />
Jr., on behalf of SWCCS,<br />
is requesting a site plan approval<br />
to construct a 2,400<br />
square foot accessory structure<br />
that would require four<br />
variances on the R-3 zoned<br />
property. Those would allow<br />
for an 1,680 square feet<br />
in size, a three foot increase<br />
in the height of the building,<br />
access to water, sewer<br />
or gas services and a variance<br />
to allow for commercial<br />
vehicles to be stored in<br />
the open.<br />
SWCSS, built in 1986,<br />
currently stores eight buses<br />
that run five routes to and<br />
from the campus. Buses<br />
have been historically<br />
stored on the property for<br />
roughly the last decade,<br />
Wallrich said. The proposal<br />
would allow for 11 buses,<br />
including the addition of<br />
spares and athletic/event<br />
buses, to be parked on a<br />
thick, concrete parking lot.<br />
The transportation building<br />
would be big enough<br />
to allow minor repairs and<br />
regular maintenance on one<br />
bus at a time, in addition to<br />
a break room, rest rooms, a<br />
storage room and office. It<br />
would not include a fueling<br />
station.<br />
Wallrich recommended<br />
approval on the condition<br />
of the removal of a cargo<br />
container which are not allowed<br />
on a permanent basis.<br />
Staff will also have to<br />
consider another variance<br />
for an eight-foot chain link<br />
fence that protects the buses<br />
to prevent against vandalization.<br />
Further down the<br />
line, some additional landscaping<br />
measures could be<br />
requested by the Village in<br />
accordance with its zoning<br />
ordinance.<br />
The Commission is expected<br />
to vote on the two<br />
proposals a the next meeting<br />
on March 15.<br />
Village of Tinley Park Committees<br />
Liability, worker’s comp insurance options to be reviewed<br />
Raffle prizes could<br />
violate code<br />
Cody Mroczka, Editor<br />
Expenditures, economics<br />
and ethics filled the agendas<br />
of three Village of Tinley<br />
Park committee meetings<br />
held on Feb. 27.<br />
Board of Trustees members,<br />
Michael Mangin,<br />
Cynthia Berg and Michael<br />
Pannitto, chairs of the Finance,<br />
Economic Development<br />
and Marketing, and<br />
Administrative and Legal<br />
Committees, respectively,<br />
along with staff discussed<br />
several items of importance<br />
that will be brought before<br />
the entire Board at upcoming<br />
meetings in March.<br />
The Village intends to<br />
notify the Intergovernmental<br />
Risk Management Association<br />
(IRMA) of its intent<br />
to explore other options<br />
for liability and worker’s<br />
compensation insurance<br />
for employees. According<br />
to IRMA’s by-laws, a municipality<br />
must provide nine<br />
months notice of the intent<br />
to withdraw from the intergovernmental<br />
risk pool<br />
in order for the Village to<br />
receive its’ reserve total of<br />
$868,000.<br />
Village Manager David<br />
Neimeyer said staff requested<br />
120 to 150 days to<br />
review options, and could<br />
still end up choosing IRMA<br />
as the best option, revoking<br />
the withdrawal notice.<br />
He said the Village would<br />
also explore the possibility<br />
of hiring a third-party<br />
consultant to help in the review<br />
and bidding process.<br />
The Village has been with<br />
IRMA since 1998 and Neimeyer<br />
also noted several<br />
West and northwest suburbs<br />
were considering the possibility<br />
of founding a larger<br />
alternative risk pool as opposed<br />
to IRMA. The item is<br />
expected to be introduced at<br />
the March 20 Board meeting<br />
for a vote.<br />
The Economic Development<br />
and Marketing<br />
Committee approved the<br />
designation of two Tinley<br />
Park commercial areas in<br />
the hope the properties can<br />
qualify for Cook County<br />
Class 7 tax incentives to<br />
spur economic development.<br />
Projects that qualify<br />
under Class 7 incentives can<br />
be over or under $2 million<br />
and receive a reduced assessment<br />
level of 10 percent<br />
of fair market value for a period<br />
of 10 years, as opposed<br />
to the regular commercial<br />
assessment rate of 25 percent.<br />
Properties must meet<br />
mice eligibility requirements<br />
and in Tinley Park,<br />
Bremen and Rich townships<br />
as well as the Duncan Drive<br />
Industrial Park are special<br />
designated areas.<br />
The two properties recommended<br />
for designation<br />
under the tax incentives are<br />
located at 159th Street and<br />
Harlem Avenue and 183rd<br />
Street and LaGrange Avenue.<br />
Economic Development<br />
Manager Patrick Hoban<br />
said the former is suffering<br />
from multiple retail vacancies,<br />
including the former<br />
Kmart, Aldi, Applebees and<br />
a large portion of Brixmor<br />
Shopping Center, while<br />
the latter is suffering from<br />
its close proximity to Will<br />
County when developers<br />
find out the property taxes<br />
are 60 percent higher on<br />
Cook County land adjacent<br />
to Will County. The Board<br />
is expected to discuss the<br />
approval of designated areas<br />
at the March 6 meeting.<br />
Additionally, the committee<br />
approved merging<br />
the Main Street Committee<br />
and Economic Development<br />
and Marketing Committee<br />
together as the former<br />
hasn’t met in over a<br />
year and Berg felt the two<br />
overlapped in several key<br />
areas and goals. The move<br />
will still need approval<br />
from the full Board, but if<br />
accepted, the new commit-<br />
Please see Village, 10