28.03.2018 Views

issue 10

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

editor@cradleyenquirer.com<br />

CradleyEnquirer.com<br />

editor@cradleyenquirer.com<br />

Online News & Topics for Cradley,Storridge & Mathon<br />

asking the questions you want asked and seeking the answers you deserve<br />

Issue<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

28th March 2018<br />

in this <strong>issue</strong><br />

Page 2<br />

Page 3<br />

Maclean and free speech<br />

Community Tree<br />

Page 4<br />

Page 5<br />

Page 6<br />

Grumpy George<br />

A PC Plan<br />

What is going on in our PC?<br />

Page 7&8 Rights and wrongs the Clerk<br />

Page9 Pragmatic?<br />

Page<strong>10</strong> Worth <strong>10</strong>00 words<br />

Page11 Notices<br />

Page12 Quicky Questions<br />

Page13 Useful information<br />

ENQUIRER VIEWINGS<br />

Issue 1 23rd Feb 1394<br />

Issue 5 18th Feb 3115<br />

Issue 6 27th Feb 1284<br />

Issue 7 3rd Mar 1615<br />

From The Editor<br />

The Enquirer has received some<br />

accusations that it is overly biased against<br />

the Parish Council and in particular<br />

councillors who hold offices of the council.<br />

This was even stated at the PC meeting on<br />

13th March in a statement, not minuted<br />

and not discussed but, more on that in Issue 11<br />

All we can say is to those who think so: they should<br />

read our strap line contained in our logo and<br />

acquaint themselves with our stated Ethos which<br />

hasn’t changed since the day we started.<br />

To the Parish Council and anyone else who’s<br />

ambitions challenge or threaten the rights of the<br />

community we say that we will continue to lift the<br />

rocks that you hide under and illuminate the<br />

shadows within which you hide. The verdict on your<br />

anti-community agendas will be made by the<br />

community.<br />

The simple solution to make the Enquirer go away is<br />

to DO IT RIGHT!<br />

Very simple, but this somehow eludes some.<br />

Issue 8<br />

<strong>10</strong>th Mar<br />

731<br />

Issue 9 18th Mar 331<br />

THE ENQUIRER,<br />

A NEW DAWN FOR OPEN<br />

COMMUNICATION IN<br />

CRADLEY, STORRIDGE AND<br />

MATHON<br />

So, let us have your news and views on anything in<br />

Cradley, Storridge and Mathon, no matter how<br />

controversial (just remember our conditions). Just<br />

email us or click on the contact button in the menu.<br />

We don’t require your name, address, blood type and<br />

a letter from your Mom to put your opinions forward<br />

and we will not require you have your name<br />

broadcast with your opinion or question<br />

This is YOUR community.


Maclean Memorial<br />

Work is continuing in the community<br />

to set in place the work to get the<br />

monument in Rectory Lane cleaned in<br />

time for the Armistice clelbration later<br />

this year. Mike Hames has now got<br />

confirmation from the Maclean family<br />

that they are happy for the cleaning to<br />

take place and that two members of<br />

the family have now expressed their<br />

wishes to attend the service. British<br />

Legion members who have been<br />

contacted have given their support.<br />

We will keep you posted in each <strong>issue</strong><br />

Spot the contradiction ( no prize we are afraid)<br />

WE FULLY SUPPORT<br />

FREEDOM<br />

OF SPEECH<br />

As stated, we are<br />

always open to ALL<br />

opinions and will give<br />

whatever space needed<br />

to those who wish to<br />

have their say<br />

but only if you<br />

agree with us<br />

It’s been a busy week since the last Issue and the<br />

Enquirer is steaming ahead in popularity.<br />

We are informed that the CMS Newsletter has decided<br />

to pull our advert taken out with them and paid for in<br />

full, because of editorial decision.(they say)<br />

A clandestine ,self appointed editor seems to be<br />

roaming the Parish removing our small notices<br />

regarding the Enquirer and how to contact us.<br />

We view these sort of actions as slightly childish and<br />

confirmation that the Enquirer is doing its job of<br />

highlighting things that have no place in our<br />

community.<br />

We, fully support freedom of speech but unlike our<br />

friend here inclusive of those who don’t agree with<br />

our viewpoint


Community<br />

at Work<br />

Well done to the ‘Tree Planters’ of<br />

Storridge<br />

who on 24th March planted a Pin Oak<br />

at Crumpton Hill Storridge donated<br />

by Cradley & Storridge PC


Meet George the Enquirer’s<br />

very own Grumpy Old Man<br />

(subtitled: a view from God’s waiting room)<br />

TV! now we have hundreds of programmes to<br />

watch. Yippee loads more rubbish!<br />

All the adverts are now colluded to occur at the<br />

same time(they slipped that in while no one was<br />

watching-pun intended!) thereby removing my one<br />

enjoyable pastime- channel hopping or advert<br />

dodging as I used to call it.<br />

Join George in posing<br />

those questions and<br />

making observations on<br />

life that only someone<br />

with some miles under<br />

their belts have to<br />

worry about.<br />

Email the Enquirer with<br />

your “grumps” for<br />

publication<br />

Ahaa! I hear you cry! go to BBC where there are<br />

no adverts……WRONG! BBC is infested with<br />

adverts for, well, the BBC, which of course<br />

coincide with the adverts on all the other<br />

channels. Even going to the ultimate insult of<br />

advertising the very programme I was watching<br />

Add to this an increase in the amount of<br />

advertising time per programme and the moronic<br />

Americanisation of repeating the end of the<br />

previous pre-advert section of the programme at<br />

the start of the next I get less actual programme<br />

to enjoy and more adverts, which I don’t.<br />

Programme producers: I know I must be a<br />

candidate for senility but even I can recall what I<br />

watched a couple of minutes previously so stop<br />

insulting my intelligence and padding out your<br />

programmes to cover up cost cutting.<br />

Grumpy George<br />

And another thing………<br />

Why is it that in the much broadcast camera in the car,<br />

camera at the scene of the crash, people falling down etc.<br />

show it is felt that the occurrence is shown 3,4,5 or even 6<br />

times?<br />

I got it the first time and perhaps a slow motion replay<br />

might be interesting, but come on!


A GUIDE TO<br />

A<br />

PARISH COUNCIL<br />

RE-PRINTED<br />

BECAUSE SOME<br />

STILL DON’T<br />

GET IT<br />

<br />

Working groups<br />

& committees<br />

Formed by council to<br />

work on specific items<br />

under consideration or<br />

to have delegated<br />

powers of decision<br />

making and spending<br />

Finance: Set budgets<br />

and precepts<br />

Employment: Set &<br />

monitor employee<br />

matters<br />

Planning: Investigate<br />

and advise on planning<br />

matters<br />

Communications<br />

Group: Investigate &<br />

advise on<br />

Communications<br />

NDP Group: oversees<br />

the implementation<br />

and effectiveness of<br />

the NDP<br />

etc. etc.<br />

<br />

Parish Council<br />

Elected members bound<br />

by their code of<br />

conduct and statutory<br />

obligations to carry out<br />

duties and decisions on<br />

behalf of the community<br />

Instruct<br />

Inform<br />

and<br />

Recommend<br />

Instruct<br />

Liase<br />

Elect<br />

Other Bodies<br />

<br />

<br />

Parish Chairman<br />

Is elected by the Council<br />

from within their ranks to<br />

Chair meetings of the<br />

council. The Chair carries<br />

the power of a casting<br />

vote in votes by the<br />

council<br />

Inform & Advise<br />

Parish Clerk<br />

Employed by the council<br />

to be their officer to<br />

implement Parish<br />

Council decisions, advise<br />

on procedure and legal<br />

matters and if the<br />

finance officer, to keep<br />

and monitor the PC<br />

accounts and ensure that<br />

budgets are met. Also to<br />

minute meetings and<br />

prepare agendas and<br />

information for<br />

councillors to be kept<br />

informed<br />

Inform<br />

THE PARISH COUNCIL ARE AT THE CENTRE OF THIS UNIVERSE<br />

NOT THE CLERK NOR THE CHAIR AND DEFINITELY NOT<br />

OUTSIDE BODIES<br />

Request<br />

Provide Information<br />

Information<br />

Hereford<br />

Association<br />

of Local<br />

Councils<br />

HALC<br />

subscription<br />

paid advisory<br />

body


WHAT IS GOING ON IN OUR PARISH COUNCIL?<br />

Yet another meeting and yet more of the same chaos and total lack of any leadership or<br />

direction.<br />

This Parish Council seems to be putting down its foundations firmly on a bed of sand destined<br />

to be washed away at the first bit of wet weather. It has lost its way under misguided and<br />

erroneous attempts at leadership and decision making, completely devoid of councillors<br />

informed input. We have purposely repeated last <strong>issue</strong>’s map of what a Parish Council make up<br />

should be.<br />

The last meeting received a grovelling apology from councillor Harries over his “mistake” in not<br />

contacting Mr Lowder, who you will recall was to be replaced in the agenda and the minutes in<br />

his duties as clock winder. Total lack of communication or regard for peoples feelings or reactions<br />

to such uncivilised methods seems to be the order of the day for the chair and vice<br />

chair.<br />

Mr Harries made an excellent “fall on my sword for my leader” apology in a cover up that<br />

Richard Nixon would have been proud.<br />

This matter should never have arisen to be apologised for in the first place and appears to be<br />

an echo of the arrogant attitude that has crept into those attempting to mould the<br />

COMMUNITY’S Parish Council to their will or master plan.<br />

This has got to stop now!! Decisions made by the council affect the PEOPLE of the community<br />

They are people to be served NOT RULE BOOKS to be followed<br />

GET YOUR PRIORITIES SORTED OUT:<br />

WORK FOR THE COMMUNITY FIRST. RULES AND REGULATIONS SECOND<br />

WHAT HAS CRADLEY PARISH<br />

COUNCIL DONE FOR THE<br />

COMMUNITY SINCE<br />

JAN 2018?<br />

List on the last page


Rights and Wrongs<br />

Going back to last month’s report on the Chairman’s totally unethical, unnecessary and<br />

unprofessional conduct at the 13th March meeting where, he made accusations against Parish<br />

Councillors in public, without allowing them a right of reply or presentation of defence.(and<br />

still has not)<br />

We are informed that a formal complaint to Herefordshire Council’s Monitoring Officer over<br />

his conduct, which contravened so many points in the code of conduct , is in preparation<br />

and should have been made by the time you read this.<br />

Those who attended the meeting were met by the chair opening the meeting and reading out in<br />

full the Clerk’s resignation letter. In it, unfounded accusations were made against councillors in<br />

connection with the pressures put upon her. THESE ACCUSATIONS SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN<br />

MADE IN PUBLIC WITHOUT THE COUNCILLORS HAVING THE RIGHT OF REPLY.<br />

All that should have been sated was that she had resigned.<br />

As it was read out in public then the Enquirer has investigated the accusations and will analyse<br />

them here so no one can be in the dark as to the real reason the clerk resigned and not the<br />

implications and accusations brought up in the Chairman’s PERSONAL STATEMENT THAT<br />

FOLLOWED ( we will analyse his statement in Issue 11)<br />

THE CLERK STATED: That she had phone calls that challenged her on several <strong>issue</strong>s which she<br />

found to be aggressive and confrontational, and the experience felt hostile upsetting and<br />

stressful<br />

ENQUIRER STATES: The background to this is the firm instructions from the chair that ALL PC<br />

business was to be sent to Helen and that councillors could not make any decisions and<br />

EVERYTHING HAD TO BE SENT TO THE CLERK WHO WOULD DEAL WITH IT. As far as the Enquirer<br />

can ascertain the councillors were doing just that. Perhaps her perception of aggression and<br />

hostility was based on the frustration of the elected councillors to get answers to their<br />

questions (as is their right and duty)<br />

THE CLERK STATED: That she arranged a meeting which she did, but then questions the<br />

councillor present for recording the meeting without explanation . Again she complains of an<br />

unpleasant atmosphere and the recording intimidating.<br />

ENQUIRER STATES: The councillor had a perfect right to record the meeting without explanation<br />

and a fully qualified Clerk should have known this. The Clerk never questioned the recording of<br />

the meeting until her resignation list. With past history of meetings not being minuted and<br />

decisions “lost” or altered we can understand his desire for accuracy of the meeting.<br />

THE CLERK STATED: That “the meeting did not achieve anything productive”<br />

ENQUIRER STATES: The Clerk must have attended a different meeting. The meeting was held on<br />

9th March. On 12th March the councillor emailed his suggestions for a way forward to resolve<br />

perceived and actual problems. This was sent to the chair,vice chair and clerk on 12th March.<br />

The councillor received no re-action or acknowledgement of his suggestions from any of the<br />

other parties at the meeting


Low and behold! the chair emails all of the council to suggest that there should be a plan<br />

produced to put together a schedule of tasks and prioritising to get the pc back on track.<br />

Another miracle occurs when the clerk who’s resignation was announced on 13th March posts a<br />

roadmap on the PC website for suggested works for the pc to carry out dated the 16th March.<br />

The Enquirer is still looking into the origins of this as it bears a great resemblance to another<br />

councillors work.<br />

Nothing was accredited to the councillor who suggested after the meeting “where nothing was<br />

achieved”this very action as a result of that meeting. DUPLICITOUS IN THE EXTREME.<br />

THE CLERK STATED: that she contracted to do <strong>10</strong> hours work per week and often exceeded this<br />

for no financial reward<br />

THE ENQUIRER STATES: If that is indeed the case then she should have met with the members of<br />

the employment group, and the chair to have the terms of her contract negotiated to a more<br />

equitable one reflecting the works she had to carry out. The fault is with those who interviewed<br />

her, estimated her work requirements and laid out the contract without making allowance for<br />

councillors being told that they must take everything to the clerk without exception and the<br />

clerk must do everything!<br />

Having looked at the Clerk’s complaints in full (and the other side) we can conclude that the<br />

fault does not lie with the Parish Councillors but with the terms and conditions in the Clerk’s<br />

contract. Perhaps she should not have put complete faith in those that “sold her the pup”<br />

It is not, as the chair puts it in his statement “to the shame of Cradley and of the council “ but<br />

mis-management and incompetence by those who attempted to control the clerk alone and<br />

fully specify her workload which she deemed unacceptable.<br />

MORE ABOUT THAT IN THE NEXT ISSUE OF THE ENQUIRER (it really does get better)<br />

Chaos: complete disorder and confusion


PRAGMATIC:<br />

dealing with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is<br />

based on practical rather than theoretical considerations.<br />

Over several <strong>issue</strong>s the Enquirer has pointed out that the PC had sacrificed the<br />

basis for its existence ( service to the community) on the alter of rabid<br />

implementation of rules and regulations.<br />

The existing thinking being forced down councillors throats is that nothing<br />

could be done on the council without the correct rules being in place, followed<br />

and strictly adhered to with no variation or initiative allowed<br />

As with the committee designing a horse the result is similar. Chaos! and not<br />

what you first envisaged. Not because of the rules themselves, something we<br />

all live with in a society (which could not exist without them) but, their<br />

mindless application with no regard for practical implications or the amount<br />

of work produced for little practical return.<br />

As already state by the Enquirer the PC is elected for the good of the<br />

community first and foremost not to be led by the rule book to the exclusion<br />

of delivering services to that very community.<br />

And lo! another miracle comes to pass. The very person who was the biggest<br />

proponent of the immovable rule book above all, now pleads for councillors to<br />

be pragmatic in their actions and work commitments.<br />

Fake news couldn’t make that up either<br />

What isn’t forth coming is how councillors are expected to be pragmatic when so<br />

many requirements have been passed at council meetings (backed by clerk and<br />

chair). Perhaps they will be enlightened and especially those councillors who<br />

have always taken a pragmatic view in getting work done in council ( along with<br />

every previous council before this one) at the next PC meeting in April<br />

Not surprising that some councillors are wary of the enlightened “pragmatic<br />

approach” suggested because they don’t trust that they won’t be censured by the<br />

rule aficionados


I WAS STANDING<br />

FOR ELECTION<br />

I’M HERE TO GUIDE YOU<br />

I PROPOSE THAT ALL ITEMS ON THE AGENDA<br />

WITH A VOWEL IN THEM BE MOVED TO<br />

THE CONFIDENTIAL SECTION<br />

I WOULD AMEND<br />

THAT TO INCLUDE<br />

CONSONANTS<br />

Meeting of the “nothing to hide” committee


THIS EVENT HAD TO BE POSTPONED DUE TO<br />

THAT NASTY WHITE STUFF<br />

NOW RE-SCHEDULED AT CRADLEY VILLAGE<br />

HALL<br />

Check out<br />

cradleydiary.com<br />

for events around the villages<br />

Help us to help you<br />

Please fill in our Questionnaire<br />

THIS LOOKS LIKE AN<br />

EXCELLENT<br />

COMMUNITY INITIATIVE<br />

GET INVOLVED<br />

Available from:<br />

Cradley Butchers and Stores<br />

Cradley Village Hall<br />

CMS Newsletter<br />

online:<br />

cradleyvillagehall.org.uk/question.htm<br />

It’s your Village Hall, get<br />

involved let them know<br />

what you want there


WHERE IS THE MONEY WHICH<br />

SHOULD HAVE BEEN SPENT ON<br />

THE LENGTHSMAN’S WAGES ?<br />

HE HASN’T BEEN ALLOWED TO<br />

WORK SINCE OCTOBER 2017<br />

WHEN WILL THE MOLES BE<br />

DEALT WITH AT CHAPEL LANE<br />

PLAYGROUND?<br />

WHEN WILL THE POTHOLES BE FILLED?<br />

WHEN WILL THE GRASS BE CUT<br />

AT THE PLAY AREAS?<br />

WHEN WILL THE COUNCIL<br />

PUBLISH THEIR BUDGET<br />

AND PRECEPT<br />

CALCULATIONS FOR<br />

VIEWING BY THE PUBLIC?<br />

WHY IS THE LENGTHSMAN<br />

NOT BACK AT WORK?<br />

WHEN WILL THE COUNCIL<br />

KEEP TO ITS OBLIGATION ON<br />

OPENNESS, HONESTY AND<br />

TRANSPARENCY AND<br />

PRINCIPLES CLEARLY LAID<br />

DOWN IN THE LOCALISM<br />

ACT?<br />

HAVE THE FINANCE GROUP<br />

ALLOWED IN THE PRECEPT<br />

CALCULATIONS FOR THE<br />

ELECTION COSTS DUE IN 2019?


SOME USEFUL CONTACTS, NUMBERS, EMAILS & WEB SITES<br />

editor@cradleyenquirer.com<br />

cradleyparishcouncil.gov.uk<br />

clerk@cradleyparishcouncil.gov.uk<br />

cradleydiary.com<br />

storridgevillagehall.org.uk<br />

cradleyvillagehall.org.uk<br />

PC website not<br />

working correctly<br />

until further notice<br />

Next Issue:<br />

The great Teddy out the Pram<br />

scandal<br />

And a lesson in history<br />

TODAY’S ANSWER<br />

Nothing, Diddly squat, Zilch, Nada, Nowt, Zero<br />

Damn All, Sweet Fanny Adams…… A Big Fat 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!