Martin County Currents_February 2018
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 Voices<br />
<strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Currents</strong><br />
<strong>February</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />
Editorial: One important lesson from Lake Point<br />
If you are outraged or celebrating<br />
the verdict in Lake Point's case<br />
against Maggy Hurchalla, remember<br />
that the jury listened to both sides.<br />
Whether or not the ruling holds on appeal,<br />
a multitude of lessons still can be<br />
learned.<br />
One in particular, however, may be<br />
overlooked, and that is the vital role that<br />
the county attorney contributes to our<br />
quality of life by keep litigation costs low<br />
in order to spend tax money elsewhere.<br />
<strong>County</strong> Attorney Sarah Woods accounts<br />
directly to the Board of <strong>County</strong><br />
Commissioners. Only they can hire or<br />
fire her.<br />
Woods has demonstrated repeatedly<br />
during numerous commission meetings<br />
that when advising the commissioners,<br />
even when she knows they may want to<br />
take a different course, even though she<br />
knows her job could be at stake, she<br />
sticks to the law.<br />
Had she been county attorney in<br />
2012, we doubt seriously the county<br />
would have so easily continued down the<br />
path that led to the Lake Point lawsuit in<br />
the first place.<br />
But she became county attorney in<br />
2016 and inherited the Lake Point case<br />
after the county had already spent in<br />
excess of $5 million of tax money defending<br />
themselves. She presented the<br />
cold, hard facts to the commissioners<br />
that led to a settlement, getting <strong>Martin</strong><br />
Commissioners not<br />
'victims' of Lake Point<br />
<strong>County</strong> taxpayers out from under a ruling<br />
for a possible $66 million judgment<br />
for damages.<br />
After Lake Point's settlement with the<br />
South Florida Water Management District,<br />
however, that damages claim was<br />
reduced to $22 million. Lake Point settled<br />
for a mere – by comparison – $12<br />
million cash payout from <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong>.<br />
Seeing the results now of Lake<br />
Point's winning case against Hurchalla,<br />
it's clear that Woods and the four commissioners<br />
who agreed with her advice<br />
to settle the Lake Point lawsuit, including<br />
Ed Fielding, saved <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
taxpayers at least $10 million – plus the<br />
millions going to outside litigators to defend<br />
the county's untenable position.<br />
Do not think for one second that it was<br />
easy advice to give at the time. <strong>Martin</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong> had been waging war against Lake<br />
Point for nearly five years. Reputations –<br />
and future elections – were at stake.<br />
One commissioner wanted to go all<br />
the way to prove in a court of law that<br />
Lake Point had been wronged, and another<br />
commissioner wanted to go to<br />
court to prove that the county had been<br />
right. Either direction would result in<br />
costing taxpayers millions of dollars.<br />
After careful research, Woods concluded<br />
that <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> would be illadvised<br />
to continue in court, likely for<br />
years, and would be acting more responsibly<br />
to taxpayers by agreeing to accept<br />
Letters to the Editor:<br />
Nearly every day I find myself shaking<br />
my head at the number of good people<br />
who have been swayed by the online<br />
emails that portray <strong>County</strong> Commissioners<br />
Ed Fielding, Sarah Heard and former<br />
commissioner Anne Scott as “victims.”<br />
They are not victims. In fact, it is just the<br />
other way around. They duped and victimized<br />
<strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> taxpayers for four<br />
years, pretending they were looking out<br />
for the environment, when in fact they<br />
actually were looking out for themselves.<br />
Now that they might be held accountable<br />
by both the court and the voters<br />
for their unscrupulous conduct, lack<br />
of transparency and fiscal irresponsibility<br />
that cost taxpayers millions of dollars,<br />
an extremist group has launched a<br />
finely choreographed assault on every<br />
person not in their camp, including the<br />
Circuit Court, the State Attorney's office,<br />
the <strong>County</strong> Commission majority, and<br />
even the 15 or so fellow citizens who<br />
served as Grand Jurors.<br />
Remember, it was the Grand Jury<br />
who wrote the criminal indictments<br />
served on Mr. Fielding, Ms. Scott, on<br />
most recently against Ms. Heard. Their<br />
conduct already was scrutinized by a<br />
civil court, and they were found to be<br />
flagrantly violating the law, which resulted<br />
in <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> taxpayers having<br />
to pay the Lake Point rock mine<br />
more than $500,000 in sanctions for<br />
commissioners who did not follow the<br />
state's public records laws. Now a Circuit<br />
Court jury has awarded Lake Point<br />
more than $4 million in damages in its<br />
case against Maggy Hurchalla.<br />
I applaud Commissioners Ed Ciampi,<br />
Harold Jenkins and Doug Smith for ending<br />
the taxpayer bloodbath by settling<br />
the Lake Point case before it went to<br />
court before a judge who had already<br />
urged <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> to settle the case.<br />
The settlement also stopped the flow of<br />
funds to outside attorneys, which had<br />
topped $5 million, and ended the funding<br />
of Ms. Heard's and Mr. Fielding's private<br />
attorneys. This taxpayer is grateful for that.<br />
James Brown<br />
Hobe Sound<br />
A witch hunt? It's<br />
likely not<br />
Picture a scenario where legitimate requests<br />
for public records were made (in<br />
this case, Commissioners’ emails). The<br />
records were not produced. A duly appointed<br />
arbitrator concluded that this<br />
lack of production was a little fishy, a<br />
State Attorney and, later, a Circuit Court<br />
Judge subpoenaed these records from<br />
different sources (commissioners’ personal<br />
computers, the county’s servers<br />
Lake Point's settlement offer to end<br />
their case now.<br />
<strong>County</strong> employees reported that they<br />
heard the verbal assault Woods suffered<br />
behind closed doors by a screaming<br />
Commissioner Sarah Heard, who maintained<br />
then – and still maintains today –<br />
that the county did not breach any contract<br />
pertaining to Lake Point. Hers was<br />
the sole vote to continue litigation.<br />
In addition to ending the lawsuit, a<br />
settlement would mean that the county<br />
would no longer be paying Heard's personal<br />
attorney fees to defend her against<br />
the state's criminal misdemeanors that<br />
allege she violated state public records<br />
laws in the Lake Point case.<br />
Just a few weeks later, after the<br />
county commission had approved the<br />
steps to seek a proposal from lending institutions<br />
for the $12 million they did<br />
not have in the budget, Senior Assistant<br />
<strong>County</strong> Attorney Krista Storey was subjected<br />
to the same behind-closed-doors<br />
screaming tirade that Heard had<br />
launched against Woods previously, according<br />
to county employees.<br />
Storey had discovered during a January<br />
county commission meeting that<br />
Heard had refused – and was still refusing<br />
– to sign a document required by<br />
lending institutions verifying that no<br />
Sunshine Laws had been violated by the<br />
commissioner pertaining to that loan.<br />
No lending institution would loan<br />
<strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> $12 million without the<br />
sworn affidavit from each commissioner,<br />
according to the county's financial<br />
consultant, which Storey reported to<br />
the commission board.<br />
When asked the consequences of<br />
Heard's refusal, Storey responded that<br />
<strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> likely would miss the<br />
deadline to pay Lake Point, as the<br />
county would have to search for other<br />
lending institutions with higher interest<br />
rates due to their perceived risk of a future<br />
lawsuit.<br />
In addition, if <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> missed<br />
the legal deadline for paying Lake Point,<br />
the county would lose its $3 million deposit<br />
already paid on top of paying the<br />
higher interest rate and on top of the<br />
$12 million settlement. The board adjourned<br />
briefly, and after Heard's tirade,<br />
Storey presented Heard's signed document<br />
that satisfied the consultant.<br />
Krista Storey, like Sarah Woods, is an<br />
unsung <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> hero, saving taxpayers<br />
millions in this one case alone.<br />
The scary fact is that they both are set to<br />
retire soon.<br />
In their upcoming search, commissioners<br />
should remember one lesson<br />
from Lake Point: Find a county attorney<br />
like either Sarah Woods or Krista Storey<br />
willing to stand up for the truth – even if<br />
it's not what the commissioners want to<br />
hear – willing to say, “Don't go down<br />
this path.” ■<br />
and Yahoo servers). The records were<br />
produced in response to these subpoenas.<br />
The records were reviewed by a<br />
Grand Jury (that’s people just like you<br />
and me, folks). The Grand Jury criminally<br />
indicted two sitting commissioners<br />
and one former commissioner for violating<br />
public records laws, and those indicted<br />
were arrested. Makes sense.<br />
Then, from the dais during a January<br />
<strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> Commission meeting,<br />
one of the indicted and arrested Commissioners<br />
reveals, miraculously, that –<br />
contrary to the findings of the legal<br />
process outlined above – the indicted<br />
parties are pure as the driven snow and<br />
are victims of a “witch hunt.”<br />
According to her, the entire scenario<br />
is the vile creation of three sitting Commissioners<br />
who were bought and paid<br />
for with campaign contributions. (So I<br />
guess it really wasn’t their fault.)<br />
This in spite of the fact that two of the<br />
so-called offending Commissioners<br />
weren’t even on the commission when<br />
the underlying project was before them,<br />
and the other cast the same vote of approval<br />
as the indicted Commissioners.<br />
Mysteriously, none of those three Commissioners<br />
has been indicted for, accused<br />
of, or even implicated in<br />
connection with any violation of the law.<br />
Beware of the perpetrator who casts<br />
him/herself as the “victim.” A false narrative,<br />
once created, is easy for folks to<br />
repeat it until it becomes, somehow, acceptable.<br />
In the words of Daniel Patrick<br />
Moynihan, "Everyone is entitled to his<br />
own opinion, but not to his own facts.”<br />
Witch hunt? Maybe not.<br />
Dave Keiper<br />
Stuart<br />
Not time for new<br />
school board building<br />
At its December Board of Directors meeting,<br />
the <strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> Taxpayers Association<br />
voted to express its opinion on a<br />
new Administration Building for the<br />
School District. We believe that until and<br />
unless all schools are brought up to standard,<br />
i.e. Jensen Beach Elementary and<br />
others, and capacity is in place at all levels<br />
of our school, that it is premature to<br />
discuss building new facilities for the<br />
School administration. Student education<br />
and safety is, has always been and will always<br />
remain the top priority and only<br />
reason to even have a school administration<br />
building. We suggest that if there is a<br />
real space need that the School Board<br />
look at existing office space for lease or<br />
possible lease purchase. We also suggest<br />
that the School District look at sharing<br />
space with the <strong>County</strong>, eliminating duplication,<br />
and saving taxpayer dollars best<br />
spent on classrooms. Thank you!<br />
Thomas G. Kenny, III, President<br />
<strong>Martin</strong> <strong>County</strong> Taxpayers Association