15.12.2012 Views

Activity of Melia volkensii (Meliaceae) Extract Against Southern ...

Activity of Melia volkensii (Meliaceae) Extract Against Southern ...

Activity of Melia volkensii (Meliaceae) Extract Against Southern ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Activity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong> (<strong>Melia</strong>ceae) <strong>Extract</strong><br />

<strong>Against</strong> <strong>Southern</strong> Green Stink Bug<br />

(Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) 1<br />

Paula Levin Mitchell, Jennifer Butler Thielen, 2 Frederick M. Stell, 3<br />

and Howard W. Fescemyer 4<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29733 USA<br />

J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 21(3): 131–141 (July 2004)<br />

ABSTRACT An ethanolic solution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong> (Gürke) fruit (MVextract)<br />

was tested against the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.),<br />

for toxicity and antifeedant effects. Fourth instars were dipped in solutions<br />

ranging from 1 to 50 �g/�l, and mortality was found to be concentration dependent.<br />

At sublethal doses, those molting to adulthood exhibited significantly<br />

greater frequencies <strong>of</strong> developmental abnormalities, including malformations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wings, scutellum, pronotum, legs, and antennae. In no-choice tests,<br />

feeding adults deposited significantly fewer salivary cones on soaked soybeans<br />

dipped in MV-extract than on control seeds. However, no significant differences<br />

in adult feeding behavior were observed when whole pods were treated<br />

with MV-extract. This is the first report <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> a heteropteran crop pest<br />

to MV-extract; growth disruption and antifeedant effects were found to be<br />

similar to those observed for other insects.<br />

KEY WORDS Nezara viridula, antifeedant, toxicity, limonoid<br />

Botanical insecticides derived from plants in the family <strong>Melia</strong>ceae have been<br />

intensively studied in recent years as an alternative to synthetic insecticides.<br />

Azadirachtin and other limonoids from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica A.<br />

Juss., are effective growth regulators and feeding deterrents for a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

insect species (Mordue & Blackwell 1993, Isman 1997). <strong>Extract</strong>s <strong>of</strong> plants in the<br />

related genus <strong>Melia</strong> also show insecticidal and antifeedant activity. Chinaberry<br />

(<strong>Melia</strong> azedarach L.) extracts have been shown to deter feeding by juvenile and<br />

adult elm leaf beetles, Xanthogalleruca luteola (Müller) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)<br />

and reduce survivorship <strong>of</strong> larvae (Valladares et al. 1997). Fruit extracts <strong>of</strong><br />

M. azedarach also are effective against agromyzid leafminers and whiteflies<br />

(Abou-Fakhr Hammad et al. 2000a,b; Banchio et al. 2003). Toosendanin, a limonoid<br />

constituent <strong>of</strong> M. azedarach, has been commercialized in China; it is a<br />

growth inhibitor for Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), an ef-<br />

1 Accepted for publication 1 February 2005.<br />

2 Current address: 109 Guinevere Lane, Greenville, North Carolina 27858-8629.<br />

3 Department <strong>of</strong> the Navy, United States Marine Corps, 1 st Medical Battalion, 1 st Force Service Support<br />

Group, P.O. Box 555657, Camp Pendleton, California 92055-5667.<br />

4 Department <strong>of</strong> Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802.<br />

131


132 J. Agric. Urban Entomol. Vol. 21, No. 3 (2004)<br />

fective repellent against Pieris brassicae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) (Luo et al.<br />

1995, Jimenez et al. 1997), and an oviposition deterrent for Trichoplusia ni (Hübner)<br />

(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Akhtar & Isman 2003).<br />

<strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong> (Gürke), an East African tree, has been less intensively studied.<br />

However, several bioactive triterpenoids and steroids have been isolated from<br />

the root bark (Rogers et al. 1998a,b). Many <strong>of</strong> these compounds also are found in<br />

extracts <strong>of</strong> dried fruit and have insecticidal activity against mosquitoes (Balan<br />

1993, Rogers et al. 1998b). The antifeedants volkensin and salannin have been<br />

identified from fruits (Rajab et al. 1988). Fruit extracts <strong>of</strong> M. <strong>volkensii</strong> are highly<br />

active against locusts: in addition to antifeedant effects, nymphal growth is<br />

slowed, motility and gregarization are impaired, sexual maturity is greatly delayed,<br />

and high mortality occurs during molting. Insecticidal activity against<br />

adults has also been reported (Mwangi 1982, Nasseh et al. 1993, Diop & Wilps<br />

1997, Rembold 1997, Kabaru & Mwangi 2002).<br />

The southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera:<br />

Pentatomidae), is distributed worldwide throughout the tropics and subtropics.<br />

Economic damage from this highly polyphagous pest occurs on a variety <strong>of</strong> crops,<br />

including nuts, corn, cotton, grains, tomatoes, and especially pulses (McPherson<br />

& McPherson 2000, Panizzi et al. 2000). <strong>Extract</strong>s and commercial preparations <strong>of</strong><br />

neem reduce feeding by N. viridula on pecan and cowpea (Seymour et al. 1995,<br />

Abudulai et al. 2003a,b); azadirachtin also interferes with nymphal development<br />

and reduces fecundity (Abudulai et al. 2003a, Riba et al. 2003). Research with<br />

extracts from <strong>Melia</strong> spp. has focused primarily on chewing insects; few studies <strong>of</strong><br />

hemipteran pests have been reported. The research reported herein investigated<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> an extract <strong>of</strong> dried M. <strong>volkensii</strong> fruit (MV-extract) on development<br />

and feeding behavior <strong>of</strong> N. viridula.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Insects. Bugs were collected from cowpea fields at the Clemson Research and<br />

Education Center in Charleston, South Carolina, and maintained in a controlled<br />

temperature chamber at 16:8 (L:D) h, 26 ± 1°C, and ambient (38–68%) relative<br />

humidity. Rearing techniques were modified from Jones (1985). Adults were<br />

housed in clear plastic shoe boxes (34.3 × 20.3 × 10.2 cm [4.3 L]) and supplied with<br />

water, pole beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), raw peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.), and<br />

folded index cards for refuge and oviposition sites. Food was replenished weekly.<br />

Nymphs received the same food, but were reared in 946-ml (1-qt) plastic freezer<br />

containers. Bugs from the first laboratory-reared generation were used in all<br />

experiments.<br />

Toxicity testing. MV-extract was purchased from R.W. Mwangi (University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nairobi, Kenya). Details <strong>of</strong> the extraction procedure are given by Mwangi &<br />

Rembold (1988) and Mwangi (1997). The powdered extract was dissolved in 60%<br />

ethanol for application. A 60% ethanol control and five concentrations (1, 5,10,<br />

20, and 50 �g/�l) were tested in a bioassay with three experimental replicates<br />

performed on different days. The range <strong>of</strong> concentrations tested was based on<br />

probit values previously obtained for Lepidoptera (Stell 1997).<br />

Fourth instars were used in all replicates, and all treatments were made 1 d<br />

after the molt. Nymphs were held with featherweight forceps, dipped for 1 sec in<br />

a solution <strong>of</strong> MV-extract, and blotted on absorbent paper. Sample size was 20 per


MITCHELL et al.: Response <strong>of</strong> N. viridula to MV-<strong>Extract</strong><br />

concentration within a replicate. Nymphs receiving the same treatment were<br />

housed communally in the rearing containers described previously and were<br />

checked daily for molts and deaths. Mortality was tabulated only for days 2 and<br />

5 after treatment, but time until death or adult molt was noted for each individual.<br />

All surviving adults were examined for malformations, and males were<br />

preserved.<br />

Surviving adult females were housed individually in 460-ml (16-oz) translucent<br />

plastic drinking cups to measure longevity, fecundity, fertility, and copulatory<br />

activity. Each female was provided with a water wick, fresh food (a peanut<br />

and a pole bean), and a male from the rearing colony. Cages were checked daily<br />

for mortality, eggs, and copulations, and dead males were replaced. Egg masses<br />

were removed, held until hatch and then counted. All stages (dipped nymphs,<br />

surviving adults, and their eggs) were maintained in the controlled environment<br />

described above. Values for LC 50 were determined using probit analysis (LeOra<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware 1987). Data for sublethal effects (time until adult molt, malformations,<br />

longevity, copulation frequency, fecundity, and percentage hatch) were analyzed<br />

with t tests, one-way ANOVA or the Kruskal–Wallis test (ProStat 1996). Treatment<br />

means with few surviving adults and consequent small sample sizes (n


134 J. Agric. Urban Entomol. Vol. 21, No. 3 (2004)<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Values for LC 50 determined from 2 and 5 d mortality were significantly different,<br />

based on nonoverlap <strong>of</strong> confidence intervals (Table 1). Immediate lethal<br />

effects were evident at the highest concentration (50 �g/�l). At all levels <strong>of</strong> MVextract,<br />

many nymphs died just before or during the molt to the fifth (final<br />

nymphal) instar as reflected by the considerably lower LC 50 value for 5-d mortality<br />

(9.13 �g/�l). Control mortality during this period was 3%. The normal<br />

duration <strong>of</strong> the fourth instar in N. viridula under these rearing conditions is<br />

6–7 d; thus, only the 5-d mortality measure included ecdysis (nymphs were in<br />

the sixth day after ecdysis to fourth instar when the 5-d mortality was recorded).<br />

Although MV-extract has low acute toxicity, as indicated by the 2-d LC 50<br />

(35.23 �g/�l), the disruption <strong>of</strong> the molting process leads to eventual death. For<br />

larvae <strong>of</strong> Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), the 2-d LC 50 for MV-extract is<br />

50 �g/ml (0.05 �g/�l) dissolved in water (Mwangi & Rembold 1988). Clearly,<br />

continuous exposure to the MV-extract in water is more potent than a single dip<br />

treatment. Nonetheless, the pattern <strong>of</strong> toxicity reported for mosquitoes is similar<br />

to our results for bugs: low concentrations were not immediately lethal, but larvae<br />

failed to reach adulthood and 43% <strong>of</strong> larval deaths were associated with ecdysis.<br />

Topical (ULV) application <strong>of</strong> MV-extract to Schistocerca gregaria (Orthoptera:<br />

Acrididae) in laboratory tests (Wilps et al. 1993) and field trials (Wilps & Nasseh<br />

1994) also resulted in mortality due to the disruption <strong>of</strong> molting.<br />

At sublethal doses, interference with ecdysis was evident in the high percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> malformed individuals (Fig. 1, Table 2). Deformities <strong>of</strong> the wings and<br />

scutellum were the most common result <strong>of</strong> MV-exposure, although malformations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the antennae, pronotum, and legs were also observed and adults <strong>of</strong>ten retained<br />

juvenile color patterns. Hind wings were shortened, thickened, or twisted. Condition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the hemelytra varied from complete absence to short, curled, or simply<br />

failing to close or overlap properly and lie flat against the abdomen. The scutellum<br />

was infrequently curled under, or more commonly curled upwards, sometimes<br />

at an angle >90°. Other scutellar deformities included notching and a lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> symmetry; <strong>of</strong>ten this was accompanied by shortening and discoloration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

pronotum. Legs failed to detach from the exuvium, resulting in missing legs, tarsi,<br />

or tarsal claws or misshapen appendages, and occasionally antennae were missing<br />

or shortened. Deformities <strong>of</strong> the pronotum occurred at MV-extract concentrations<br />

�5 �g/�l; other malformations were observed at all levels tested. Overall,<br />

Table 1. Response <strong>of</strong> N. viridula fourth instar nymphs to MV-extract<br />

applied as 1-s dip, Rock Hill, South Carolina, 1997.<br />

Days after<br />

treatment n Slope ± SE a<br />

LC 50 (95% CL)<br />

(�g/�l) � 2<br />

2 300 1.139 ± 0.317 35.23 (19.42–81.17) 1.88 b<br />

5 300 0.907 ± 0.210 9.13 (3.53–17.19) 1.28 b<br />

a Probit or logit/log10(dose).<br />

b Nonsignificant; P > 0.05.


MITCHELL et al.: Response <strong>of</strong> N. viridula to MV-<strong>Extract</strong><br />

Fig. 1. Adult N. viridula showing malformation <strong>of</strong> the scutellum resulting from<br />

exposure to MV-extract (10 �g/�l) during the fourth instar.<br />

66.4% <strong>of</strong> all observed malformations (n � 149) were associated with the wings or<br />

scutellum; 16.1%, 12.8%, and 4.7% involved the pronotum, legs, and antennae,<br />

respectively.<br />

An extract <strong>of</strong> M. <strong>volkensii</strong> also caused malformations and consequently reduced<br />

mobility when applied to desert locust nymphs. In field trials, 58% <strong>of</strong><br />

survivors showed deformities <strong>of</strong> the antennae, legs, wings, and eyes (Wilps &<br />

Nasseh 1994, Diop & Wilps 1997). Wing malformations (e.g., twisting) similar to<br />

those reported here for N. viridula were observed in adult locusts surviving topical<br />

MV treatments (Wilps et al. 1993). Topical application <strong>of</strong> MV-extract to immature<br />

Coranus arenaceus (Walker) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae) delayed<br />

the imaginal molt, but no deformities <strong>of</strong> resultant adults were reported<br />

(Peveling et al. 1994). Scutellar malformations and wing twisting identical to<br />

those noted in our study occurred when N. viridula were exposed to Neemix, a<br />

commercial formulation <strong>of</strong> azadirachtin (Abudulai et al. 2003a).<br />

Other sublethal effects measured (time until adult ecdysis, longevity, reproductive<br />

parameters) did not exhibit significant differences between MV-extract<br />

treatments and controls. Experiments with neem have shown pronounced reductions<br />

in fecundity for heteropterans, including N. viridula and Clavigralla scutellaris<br />

(Westwood) (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) (Abudulai et al. 2003a, Riba<br />

et al. 2003, Mitchell et al. 2004). Sublethal effects <strong>of</strong> MV-extract on fitness in<br />

locusts have also been reported (Wilps et al. 1993, Nasseh et al. 1993). In our<br />

study, the low number <strong>of</strong> adult survivors in several MV-extract treatments interfered<br />

with statistical analysis; nonetheless, a trend was evident for reduced<br />

copulations and decreased fecundity in adults exposed to 1 �g/�l <strong>of</strong> MV-extract as<br />

juveniles (Table 2).<br />

Antifeedant effects <strong>of</strong> MV-extract were clearly apparent when rehydrated soybeans<br />

were provided as the test food (Table 3). Salivary deposits on control seeds<br />

significantly exceeded those on MV-extract treatments, although no effect <strong>of</strong> concentration<br />

was evident with the two extract levels tested. When green soybean<br />

pods were treated, a consistent trend was evident for reduced feeding in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> MV-extract but results were not significant (Table 3). This finding is<br />

135


136 J. Agric. Urban Entomol. Vol. 21, No. 3 (2004)<br />

Table 2. Fitness <strong>of</strong> surviving N. viridula after treatment with MV-extract at various concentrations, Rock Hill,<br />

South Carolina, 1997.<br />

Mean ± SE a<br />

P value df<br />

10 �g/�l b<br />

5 �g/�l b<br />

1 �g/�l b<br />

0 �g/�l b<br />

Variable<br />

17.06 ± 0.79a 17.58 ± 0.88a 19.38 ± 0.93a 17.25 ± 0.85* 0.148 2, 38<br />

16.03 ± 5.00a 56.10 ± 3.09b 85.70 ± 14.30b 84.73 ± 9.71b 0.002 3, 8<br />

33.18 ± 4.33a 36.00 ± 9.38a 22.31 ± 4.67a 16.25 ± 6.97* 0.271 2<br />

0.188 ± 0.06a 0.069 ± 0.03a 0.033 ± 0.02* – 0.087 19<br />

2.27 ± 0.68a 1.08 ± 0.48a 1.14 ± 0.61a 0.50 ± 0.50* 0.200 2<br />

72.50 ± 6.72a 74.70 ± 9.03a 57.93 ± 9.14a – 0.385 2, 32<br />

Days to adult ecdysis c,d<br />

% malformed adults d<br />

Longevity (days) c,e<br />

Copulation frequency c,f<br />

Eggs/female/day e<br />

% hatch d<br />

aMeans in a row followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05); means followed by an asterisk (*) were excluded from statistical analysis because<br />

<strong>of</strong> low numbers <strong>of</strong> surviving adults.<br />

bConcentration (�g/�l) <strong>of</strong> MV-powder in ethanol.<br />

cFemales only.<br />

dOne-way analysis <strong>of</strong> variance.<br />

e Kruskal–Wallis test.<br />

f t-test.


MITCHELL et al.: Response <strong>of</strong> N. viridula to MV-<strong>Extract</strong><br />

Table 3. Antifeedant effects on N. viridula adults <strong>of</strong> MV-extract applied to soybean pods and soaked seeds, Rock<br />

Hill, South Carolina, 1997.<br />

No. cones or punctures (mean ± SE) a<br />

P value b<br />

H b<br />

20 �g/�l c<br />

5 �g/�l c<br />

0 �g/�l c<br />

Location N<br />

Soaked seed 37 11.00 ± 2.28a 3.18 ± 0.71b 2.78 ± 1.01b 10.63 0.05).<br />

bKruskal–Wallis test; df � 2 for all analyses.<br />

cConcentration <strong>of</strong> MV-powder (�g/�l) in ethanol.<br />

137


138 J. Agric. Urban Entomol. Vol. 21, No. 3 (2004)<br />

unexpected, because MV-extract has been shown to be a potent antifeedant when<br />

applied to wheat seedlings fed to desert locusts (Mwangi 1982) or applied to<br />

cabbage leaf disks in choice assays using several species <strong>of</strong> Lepidoptera and the<br />

Mexican bean beetle, Epilachna varivestis Mulsant (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)<br />

(Akhtar & Isman 2004). Furthermore, extracts from the closely related neem tree<br />

significantly reduce feeding by piercing-sucking insects, including N. viridula<br />

(Seymour et al. 1995, Abudulai et al. 2003a, Mitchell et al. 2004). <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong><br />

does not contain azadirachtin, the primary antifeedant component <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />

neem formulations (Rembold 1997). However, the limonoid compound salannin,<br />

which is known to be an active antifeedant, does occur in MV-extract (Rajab et al.<br />

1988). Salannin is also found in M. azedarach and in methanolic and hexane<br />

extracts <strong>of</strong> neem. These neem extracts deter feeding by C. scutellaris on green<br />

bean pods (Mitchell et al. 2004); salannin in MV-extract would be expected to<br />

have a similar effect on N. viridula behavior. One possible explanation is that the<br />

longer (48-h) exposure in the pod experiments resulted in desensitization. Although<br />

such loss <strong>of</strong> activity following repeated or continuous short-term exposure<br />

has been shown for several antifeedants, including azadirachtin and toosendanin,<br />

the effect is considerably more pronounced for pure compounds than for mixtures<br />

or crude extracts (Isman 2002). Long-term exposure to M. <strong>volkensii</strong> extract does<br />

induce habituation; when larval T. ni were reared through several instars on<br />

cabbage foliage treated with an extract <strong>of</strong> M. <strong>volkensii</strong>, deterrence was significantly<br />

reduced (Akhtar et al. 2003). Another possibility is that the soybean pods<br />

may have lacked adequate coverage, as no surfactant or spreading agent was<br />

added to our test solutions. However, addition <strong>of</strong> surfactant (0.5% Tween-20) did<br />

not alter the performance <strong>of</strong> M. azedarach extract on cucurbit leaflets; feeding<br />

punctures by leafminers were reduced equivalently by all solutions <strong>of</strong> extract<br />

tested (Banchio et al. 2003). Nonetheless, our results indicate that MV-extract<br />

has no significant deterrent effect when applied to soybean pods as an ethanol<br />

dip. It is the pods, not the seeds within, that must be effectively protected inthe<br />

field. A formulation <strong>of</strong> M. <strong>volkensii</strong> applied as a field spray would need to include<br />

a surfactant or spreader to ensure effective coverage.<br />

Recent comparisons <strong>of</strong> M. <strong>volkensii</strong> seed extract to a variety <strong>of</strong> purified allelochemical<br />

compounds (Akhtar & Isman 2004) showed the crude MV-extract to be<br />

the most effective growth inhibitor for all lepidopteran larvae tested (and more<br />

potent than the pure limonoid toosendanin). Furthermore, MV-extract was a<br />

powerful antifeedant for Mexican bean beetle and several species <strong>of</strong> Lepidoptera<br />

(Akhtar & Isman 2004). These authors emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> using a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> test species and bioassay procedures, because <strong>of</strong> interspecific differences<br />

in sensitivity and breadth <strong>of</strong> diet; e.g., generalists and specialists may<br />

respond differently to allelochemicals. Our results with the generalist N. viridula<br />

are not directly comparable to the consumption-based bioassays used for<br />

the beetle and moth larvae, but the concentrations we found effective as dips<br />

(5–9 �g/�l) are similar to their reported DC 50 values. Despite the different mode<br />

<strong>of</strong> feeding in N. viridula, MV-extract is an effective feeding deterrent when applied<br />

to seeds, as well as a growth disruptor and slow-acting contact insecticide.<br />

<strong>Extract</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the fruit and seed from M. <strong>volkensii</strong> have shown promising activity<br />

against a variety <strong>of</strong> insect orders, and should be tested further against other<br />

hemipteran crop pests.


MITCHELL et al.: Response <strong>of</strong> N. viridula to MV-<strong>Extract</strong><br />

Acknowledgment<br />

The authors thank Richard W. Mwangi for his encouragement in pursuing research on<br />

MV-extract, Erik Ness for bug photographs, and William C. Olson for critically reviewing<br />

the manuscript. H.W.F. and F.M.S. thank Clemson University and its Department <strong>of</strong> Entomology<br />

(Clemson, South Carolina) for their support at the time this research was performed.<br />

Funding for this study was provided by the South Carolina Soybean Board (grant<br />

#96-0586) to H.W.F. and P.L.M.<br />

References Cited<br />

Abou-Fakhr Hammad, E. M., N. M. Nemer & N. S. Kawar. 2000a. Efficacy <strong>of</strong> chinaberry<br />

tree (<strong>Melia</strong>ceae) aqueous extracts and certain insecticides against the pea leafminer<br />

(Diptera: Agromyzidae). J. Agric. Sci. 134: 413–420.<br />

Abou-Fakhr Hammad, E. M., N. M. Nemer, Z. K. Hawi & L. T. Hanna. 2000b.<br />

Responses <strong>of</strong> the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, to the chinaberry tree (<strong>Melia</strong><br />

azedarach (L.) and its extracts. Ann. Appl. Biol. 137: 79–88.<br />

Abudulai, M., B. M. Shepard & P. L. Mitchell. 2003a. Antifeedant and toxic effects <strong>of</strong> a<br />

neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss)-based formulation Neemix� against Nezara viridula<br />

(L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 38: 398–408.<br />

Abudulai, M., B. M. Shepard & A. B. Salifu. 2003b. Field evaluation <strong>of</strong> a neem<br />

(Azadirachta indica A. Juss)-based formulation Neemix� against Nezara viridula (L.)<br />

(Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in cowpea. Intern. J. Pest Mng. 49: 109–113.<br />

Akhtar, Y. & M. B. Isman. 2003. Larval exposure to oviposition deterrents alters subsequent<br />

oviposition behavior in generalist, Trichoplusia ni, and specialist, Plutella xylostella<br />

moths. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 1853–1870.<br />

Akhtar, Y. & M. B. Isman. 2004. Comparative growth inhibitory and antifeedant effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> plant extracts and pure allelochemicals on four phytophagous insect species. J. Appl.<br />

Entomol. 128: 32–38.<br />

Akhtar, Y., C. H. Rankin & M. B. Isman. 2003. Decreased response to feeding deterrents<br />

following prolonged exposure in the larvae <strong>of</strong> a generalist herbivore, Trichoplusia ni<br />

(Leptidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Ins. Behav. 16: 811–831.<br />

Balan, K. 1993. Das wachstum der gelbfiebermücke (Aedes aegyptii) hemmende naturst<strong>of</strong>fe<br />

aus <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>: isolierung and charakterisierung eines neuen sekundärmetaboliten.<br />

Ph.D. Thesis, Fakultät für Chemie und Phamazie der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität,<br />

München, Germany.<br />

Banchio, E., G. Valladares, M. Defago & S. Palacios. 2003. Effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> azedarach<br />

(<strong>Melia</strong>ceae) fruit extracts on the leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae):<br />

Assessment in laboratory and field experiments. Ann. Appl. Biol. 143: 187–<br />

193.<br />

Bowling, C. C. 1979. The stylet sheath as an indicator <strong>of</strong> feeding activity <strong>of</strong> the rice stink<br />

bug, Oebalus pugnax. J. Econ. Entomol. 72: 259–260.<br />

Bowling, C. C. 1980. The stylet sheath as an indicator <strong>of</strong> feeding activity by the southern<br />

green stink bug on soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 73: 1–3.<br />

Diop, B. & H. Wilps. 1997. Field trials with neem oil and <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong> extracts on<br />

Schistocerca gregaria. pp. 201–207 In: Krall, S., R. Peveling and D. Ba Diallo [Eds.] New<br />

strategies in locust control. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland. 521 pp.<br />

Fehr, W. R., C. E. Caviness, D. T. Burmwood & J. S. Pennington. 1971. Stage <strong>of</strong><br />

development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.). Merrill Crop Sci. 11: 929–931.<br />

Isman, M. B. 1997. Neem insecticides. Pesticide Outlook 8: 32–38.<br />

Isman, M. B. 2002. Insect antifeedants. Pesticide Outlook 13: 152–157.<br />

139


140 J. Agric. Urban Entomol. Vol. 21, No. 3 (2004)<br />

Jimenez, A., R. Mata, R. Pereda-Miranda, J. Calderon, M. B. Isman, R. Nicol &J.T.<br />

Arnason. 1997. Insecticidal limonoids from Swietenia humilis and Cedrela salvadorensis.<br />

J. Chemical Ecol. 23: 1225–1234.<br />

Jones, W. A. 1985. Nezara viridula. pp. 339–343 In Singh, S. P. and R. F. Moore [Eds.]<br />

Handbook <strong>of</strong> insect rearing, Vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 488 pp.<br />

Kabaru, J. M. & R. W. Mwangi. 2002. Effect <strong>of</strong> post-treatment temperature on the insecticidal<br />

activity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong> (Gurke) fruit extract against the African migratory<br />

locust Locusta migratoria (Reiche & Fairmaire). Afr. J. Sci. Technol. 3: 20–33.<br />

LeOra S<strong>of</strong>tware. 1987. POLO-PC, a user’s guide to probit or logit analysis. LeOra S<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />

Berkeley, California.<br />

Luo, L.-E., J. J. A. van Loon & L. M. Schoonhoven. 1995. Behavioural and sensory<br />

responses to some neem compounds by Pieris brassicae larvae. Physiol. Entomol. 20:<br />

134–140.<br />

McPherson, J. E. & R. M. McPherson. 2000. Stink bugs <strong>of</strong> economic importance in<br />

America north <strong>of</strong> Mexico. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 253 pp.<br />

Mitchell, P. L., R. Gupta, A. K. Singh & P. Kumar. 2004. Behavioral and developmental<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> neem extracts on Clavigralla scutellaris (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae)<br />

and its egg parasitoid, Gryon fulviventre (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). J. Econ. Entomol.<br />

97: 916–923.<br />

Mordue, A. J. & A. Blackwell. 1993. Azadirachtin: An update. J. Insect. Physiol. 39:<br />

903–924.<br />

Mwangi, R. W. 1982. Locust antifeedant activity in fruits <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>. Ent. Exp.<br />

Appl. 32: 277–280.<br />

Mwangi, R. W. 1997. Studies <strong>of</strong> insecticidal activity in extract fractions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>.<br />

Discov. Innov. 9: 19–24.<br />

Mwangi, R. W. & H. Rembold. 1988. Growth-inhibiting and larval effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong><br />

extracts on Aedes aegypti larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46: 103–108.<br />

Nasseh, O., H. Wilps, H. Rembold & S. Krall. 1993. Biologically active compounds in<br />

<strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>: larval growth inhibitor and phase modulator against the desert locust<br />

Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) (Orth., Cyrtacanthacrinae). J. Appl. Entomol. 116: 1–11.<br />

Panizzi, A. R., J. E. McPherson, D. G. James, M. Javahery & R. M. McPherson. 2000.<br />

Stink bugs (Pentatomidae). pp. 421–474 In C. W. Schaefer & A. R. Panizzi (Eds.),<br />

Heteroptera <strong>of</strong> economic importance. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 828 pp.<br />

Peveling, R., J. Weyrich & P. Müller. 1994. Side-effects <strong>of</strong> botanicals, insect growth<br />

regulators and entomopathogenic fungi on epigeal non-target arthropods in locust control.<br />

pp. 147–181 In: Krall, S. & H. Wilps [Eds.] New Trends in Locust Control. TZ-<br />

Verlagsgesselschaft, Rossdorf, Germany, 181 pp.<br />

ProStat. 1996. User’s Handbook. Poly S<strong>of</strong>tware International, Salt Lake City, Utah.<br />

Rajab, M. S., M. D. Bentley, A. R. Alford & M. J. Mendel. 1988. A new limonoid insect<br />

antifeedant from the fruit <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>. J. Nat. Prod. 51: 168–171.<br />

Rembold, H. 1997. <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>: a natural insecticide against desert locusts. pp. 185–<br />

191 In: Krall, S., R. Peveling & D. Ba Diallo [Eds.] New Strategies in Locust Control.<br />

Birkhäuser Verlag. Basel, Switzerland. 521 pp.<br />

Riba, M., J. Marti & A. Sans. 2003. Influence <strong>of</strong> azadirachtin on development and reproduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> Nezara viridula L. (Het., Pentatomidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 127: 37–41.<br />

Rogers, L. L., L. Zeng, J. F. Kozlowski, H. Shimada, F. Q. Alali, H. A. Johnson &<br />

J. L. McLaughlin. 1998a. New bioactive triterpenoids from <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong>. J. Nat.<br />

Prod. 61: 64–70.<br />

Rogers, L. L., L. Zeng & J. L. McLaughlin. 1998b. New bioactive steroids from <strong>Melia</strong><br />

<strong>volkensii</strong>. J. Org. Chem. 63: 3781–3785.<br />

Seymour, J., G. Bowman & M. Crouch. 1995. Effects <strong>of</strong> neem seed extract on feeding<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> Nezara viridula L. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on pecan nuts. J. Aust.<br />

Entomol. Soc. 34: 221–223.


MITCHELL et al.: Response <strong>of</strong> N. viridula to MV-<strong>Extract</strong><br />

Simmons, A. M. & K. V. Yeargan. 1988. Feeding frequency and feeding duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />

green stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) on soybean. J. Econ. Entomol. 81: 812–815.<br />

Stell, F. M. 1997. Toxicity <strong>of</strong> MV-extract to some insect pests <strong>of</strong> cotton, soybean and tomato.<br />

MS thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, 33 pp.<br />

Valladares, G., M. T. Defago, S. Palacios & M. C. Carpinella. 1997. Laboratory evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> azedarach (<strong>Melia</strong>ceae) extracts against the elm leaf beetle (Coleoptera:<br />

Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 747–750.<br />

Wilps, H. & O. Nasseh. 1994. Field tests with botanicals, mycocides, and chitin synthesis<br />

inhibitors. pp. 51–79 In Krall, S. & H. Wilps [Eds.], New trends in locust control.<br />

TZ-Verlagsgesselschaft, Rossdorf, Germany, 181 pp.<br />

Wilps, H., O. Nasseh, H. Rembold & S. Krall. 1993. The effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>Melia</strong> <strong>volkensii</strong> extracts<br />

on mortality and fitness <strong>of</strong> adult Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal) (Orth., Cyrtacanthacrinae):<br />

investigations conducted under natural conditions in S. gregaria recession<br />

areas in the southern Tamesna desert (Republic <strong>of</strong> Niger). J. Appl. Entomol. 116: 12–19.<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!