IPPro The Internet Issue 140
In this issue Matthew Bassiur, head of IP enforcement at Alibaba, gives an update of the e-commerce company’s enforcement efforts.
In this issue Matthew Bassiur, head of IP enforcement at Alibaba, gives an update of the e-commerce company’s enforcement efforts.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
O Canada<br />
Grant Lynds, president of the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada<br />
provides an overview of upcoming changes to Canada’s trademark law<br />
and how brands should adapt their strategies<br />
Ben Wodecki reports<br />
What are the biggest changes coming to Canada’s trademark law?<br />
How will these changes affect Canadian companies?<br />
<strong>The</strong> biggest change we have on our horizon is the implementation<br />
of our legislation to implement three treaties, the Singapore Treaty<br />
on the Law of Trademarks, the Nice Agreement Concerning the<br />
International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes<br />
of the Registration of Marks, and the Protocol Relating to the Madrid<br />
Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks. <strong>The</strong><br />
significant change is the implementation of Madrid Protocol into<br />
Canada. We’re a little bit later to the party than most people but we’ll<br />
get there and the current forecast is that the agreement will be in<br />
force by 2019.<br />
Products Act. We’re still working within the domain or the regime<br />
of that legislation, which is still fairly recent in trying to see if it has<br />
provisions that are effective in tackling counterfeits.<br />
To date, there have been very few seizures under the provisions of that<br />
legislation. Much of the commentary is focused on Canada having a<br />
less than robust regime under that legislation for intercepting and<br />
detaining counterfeit goods that come into Canada.<br />
What is the biggest problem area for Canada in terms of counterfeits?<br />
We’re looking at the US Trade Representative’s Special 301 Report,<br />
which brought some concerns to Canada over in-transit goods—<br />
essentially goods being shipped through Canada, not with a final<br />
destination of Canada, that come from another country and go<br />
through Canada and then onward to the US or other countries.<br />
Canadian companies are going to be more aware that they have the<br />
opportunity to use the Madrid Protocol should they choose to file<br />
outside of Canada, and that there’s a more cost effective and leaner<br />
route to engage trademark systems outside Canada and vice versa.<br />
<strong>The</strong> companies outside Canada that are looking to file inside Canada,<br />
will see that being inside Canada gives them a more cost-effective<br />
route to consider filing via the Madrid Protocol.<br />
Do the new laws hold any provisions aimed at tackling counterfeits?<br />
Our main anti-counterfeiting measures are still rooted in legislation<br />
that came into force fairly recently in 2015, the Combating Counterfeit<br />
That is not something that the Canadian government has the ability<br />
to detain and inspect under our Request for Assistance programme,<br />
but that is what the US government has commented on. I know<br />
that hasn’t changed and my only question there is whether or not is<br />
whether the US will continue to comment on that in its 2018 report.<br />
How should brands adapt their strategies to prepare for these<br />
legislative changes?<br />
Once the new legislation to implement the treaties comes into<br />
force, the definition of a trademark will be broader than the current<br />
definition. While some of the types of trademarks are already<br />
13 <strong>IPPro</strong> <strong>The</strong> <strong>Internet</strong> www.ipprotheinternet.com