BV - June 2013 Yr 1 Issue 1

Lord Buddha’s Challenge to Caste System in India
When on this (14 th April 2013) anniversary of Dr.
Babasaheb Ambedkar, we pay tribute to his yeomen services
towards the cause of social justice and bringing to fore the
values of democracy; we also need to think as to how his
dream and vision of annihilation of caste can be taken
further. Where do we stand in this direction six decades after
the Independence and after the formal implementation of
Constitution of India, which gives us the values of Liberty,
Equality and Fraternity?
Caste has been the major marker of Indian, particularly
Hindu, society. While world over the serfs were under the
bondage of feudal lords, we had religiously ordained system
of Varna-Jati (Caste). Many theories of caste prevail, the
racial theory, superior Aryans versus the natives, now stands
debunked. The hypothesis of Morton Klass argues that it
was a way of adjusting of tribal to the system of production,
which generated surplus. This understanding indicates
towards the understanding that caste evolved with the
particular system of production in India. Kosambi looks at
origin of caste as being due to the continuous process of
fusing of tribal into general society. The major contribution
to the understanding of genesis of caste comes from Dr.
Ambedkar as per whom caste-varna came into being due to
ideological-religious factors. According to him caste system
came into being as the result of ideologies of Dharmshatras,
which was part of Brahmanism.
In Indian society the interesting point is that caste is
prevalent not only amongst Hindus, it also prevails in other
religious communities. The difference being that amongst
Hindus, the caste is prescribed in the holy books, while in
other religious communities; it is a social phenomenon, like
Ashraf, Ajlaf and Arzal amongst Muslims and different
denominations amongst Christians and Sikhs. The first
challenge to caste system came from Lord Gautam
Buddha, who talked of Samta, equality. This concept of
Samta, equality became very popular and was accepted by
large number of people till Buddhism was attacked and
wiped out from India in eighth century by those who
wanted to restore the varna-caste. During medieval period
the Bhakti saints in particular talked against and questioned
the system of graded inequality, but their voice though a
powerful articulation of the plight of the low caste, remained
just an expression of pain and sorrow of the poor, and was
strongly opposed by Brahmin clergy.
The rule of Muslim Kings and British did not change the
social structure of the subcontinent, though during British
rule due to the industrialization and introduction of modern
education, the caste system started being questioned,
opposed and socially challenged. The edifice of caste started
loosening up. During the rule of Muslim kings the social
structure remained intact. With the British rule the half way
process of industrialization and modern education came in.
At the same time the caste-varna also continued on the side,
Ram Puniyani
though its legitimacy started being questioned in a more
serious way. In the changed situation starting from Jotirao
Phule the movements for caste abolition found grounding in
society, though they were not able to uproot the
phenomenon of caste in the full measures as the feudal
production system ran side by side with the process of
modernization. The process of secularization, abolition of
the hold of landlord and clergy, remained incomplete and so
the process of caste transformation remained half way
through.
All the struggles started by Dr, Ambedkar aimed for social
justice, social equality and democratic values. He led the
movements like Chavdar Talab, for right to have access to
public drinking water, Kalaram Mandir, right to enter
temples and also the burning of Manusmriti, as symbolic of
the rejection of religiously ordained caste hierarchy. The
resistance to these led to his decision to leave the Hindu
fold, which is dominated by Brahmanical values of Varna.
The social political base to his movements was provided by
the national movement, which was aspiring for throwing
away the British colonial power and also struggling for
democratic values. Here Dr. Ambedkar took off from this
movement, but the national movement was not adequate to
give him total social justice as this movement also had upper
castes in good measure. So here we see the dilemma of
Mahatma Gandhi versus Dr. Ambedkar. Gandhi was not
able to go beyond the limits posed by the participation of all
castes in freedom movement. He kept talking of varna
system in a more refined form while taking up cudgels
against untouchability.
Gandhi also opposed the separate electorate, provided by
communal award of MacDonald in 1932. The Poona pact
between Gandhi and Dr. Ambedkar led to the reserved
Constituency and the provisions of reservations for
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Dr. Ambedkar’s
vision was that reservations and inter-caste marriages will be
steps towards annihilation of caste. Today both these face
serious obstacles on social ground. The rigidity of caste is
increasing and inter-caste marriage is facing serious
obstacles from conservative forces. While freedom
movement led by Gandhi was half way conceding to the
needs of dalits, the other ideology, the one of religious
nationalism was waiting in the wings with the concept of
Hindu Rashtra, Hindu nation. Ambedkar did realize that
acceptance of religious nationalism, formation of Pakistan
on that ground will be a disaster for dalits as it will pave the
way for Hindu Rashtra, the slavery of dalits. Today while
most of the commentators are attacking Gandhi, they need to
focus more attention to the impact of the politics and
ideology of Hindu religious nationalism, which is a major
obstacle to caste abolition today.
The reservations for dalits led to newer caste equations. On
one hand the section of rising middle class stood to oppose
these reservations, tooth and nail. The anti reservation
● Year – 1 ●Issue – 1 ●June 2013 ●Buddhist Voice ●www.buddhistvoice.com 18