23.11.2018 Views

The figurative or metaphorical use of word "word" and "spirit" in Surah 'Annisa

The figurative or metaphorical use of word "word" and "spirit" in Surah 'Annisa

The figurative or metaphorical use of word "word" and "spirit" in Surah 'Annisa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

13<br />

<strong>The</strong> term Spirit must not be taken as a Relative Term as a Term that is not a Relative Term <strong>in</strong> this construction <strong>or</strong> phrase.<br />

Now many th<strong>in</strong>gs are found clear.<br />

SCHOLARS OF ‘AHLUSSUNNAH WAL JAMA:”AH DEOBAND<br />

‘Ahlussunnah <strong>of</strong> Deob<strong>and</strong> do believe that there is a Kala:m ‘An Nafsi [Esoteric Speech] that is the Essential Attribute <strong>of</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Essence <strong>and</strong> is Uncreated, Eternal Either Identical to Div<strong>in</strong>e Essence <strong>or</strong> Associated With Div<strong>in</strong>e Essence].<br />

An other one is ‘Al Lala:m ‘Al Lafz:i: [Exoteric Speech] that is Non Eternal <strong>and</strong> Created <strong>and</strong> neither Associated with Div<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Essence n<strong>or</strong> Identical With Div<strong>in</strong>e Essence.<br />

In this case with the Exception <strong>of</strong> the Eternal Speech rest <strong>of</strong> the Speech(es) are Non Eternal say <strong>in</strong> Tablet <strong>or</strong> <strong>in</strong> Copies <strong>or</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

hhuman M<strong>in</strong>ds etc.<br />

Some may believe <strong>in</strong> three types <strong>of</strong> Speech(es) , 1] Eternal Nafsi 2] Eternal Lafz: 3] Non Eternal Lafz::i.<br />

In such cases if a type Div<strong>in</strong>e Speech <strong>in</strong> Real Mean<strong>in</strong>g is not Eternal then a w<strong>or</strong>d <strong>in</strong> Virtual Mean<strong>in</strong>g cannot be Eternal at all.<br />

EPILOGUE<br />

1] If some one is called ‘’Spirit’’ <strong>or</strong> Spirit <strong>of</strong> God <strong>in</strong> both cases the w<strong>or</strong>d Spirit<br />

is not a Relative term.<br />

2] It is not <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the Athanasian <strong>The</strong>ological mean<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

3] If the w<strong>or</strong>d is <strong>use</strong>d f<strong>or</strong> an Immaterial Substance <strong>or</strong> Immaterial Suppositum<br />

<strong>or</strong> a Substance <strong>or</strong> Suppositum with very small amount <strong>of</strong> matter it may be<br />

<strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> Real /Literal Mean<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

4] If it is <strong>use</strong>d f<strong>or</strong> a Material Substance <strong>or</strong> Mattarial Suppositum it is <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong><br />

Virtual /Non Literal Mean<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

5] In Phrases like Spirit Of God/Deity the Reference to Deity/God doeth not<br />

change the <strong>or</strong>ig<strong>in</strong>al mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the w<strong>or</strong>d.<br />

6] Div<strong>in</strong>e Revelation can also be termed as Spirit s<strong>in</strong>ce they are neither<br />

Matter n<strong>or</strong> Material.<br />

This does shew that as “I:sa: /Iesous [“AS] was ca<strong>use</strong>d <strong>and</strong> effected by A Div<strong>in</strong>e Comm<strong>and</strong>ment <strong>in</strong> Div<strong>in</strong>e Revelation he is<br />

called both SPIRIT OF GOD/DEITY <strong>and</strong> WORD OF DEITY.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Problem Of the W<strong>or</strong>d “ Div<strong>in</strong>e”.<br />

<strong>The</strong> w<strong>or</strong>d Div<strong>in</strong>e doeth not imply any th<strong>in</strong>g other that ‘’Of God/Deity’’.<br />

Page 13 <strong>of</strong> 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!