17.12.2018 Views

NEDIC Conference Journal 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

spaces to be physically active for Canadians<br />

regardless of their geographic or social location.<br />

2. Canadian Curriculum<br />

It would be very good news, indeed, if we could<br />

report that the curriculum in Canadian schools has<br />

been responsive toward addressing social conscience<br />

and helping students navigate the information age<br />

with a critical stance. Instead, we find that the<br />

Canadian curriculum has been slow to respond in<br />

critical ways. The curriculum has changed little; it<br />

reflects many aspects of the same dominant culture,<br />

class, gender and heteronormativity that has existed<br />

for centuries (See for example [6], [7], [10]).<br />

Herein lies a call to action. We need to update<br />

curriculum policies such as physical education<br />

curricula that reflect long-standing traditions of<br />

military, sport, and the gender binary without<br />

recognition of the natural diversity of bodies, and<br />

different ways to be active, irrespective of ability.<br />

Rather than examining new media for its visual<br />

techniques, which the curriculum presently<br />

promotes, there is a very real need to examine<br />

media in critical ways. One issue might be<br />

considerations surrounding the media diet of<br />

Canadian children. Other issues might include the<br />

commercialization of children’s online spaces.<br />

Canadian students in a wired world need media<br />

studies [11] to understand how sources mediate the<br />

information that students may take for granted as<br />

“truth.” Students need to learn how to ask key<br />

questions to evaluate information and respond<br />

through a more critical lens.<br />

Emergent, ubiquitous technology (new media)<br />

can either perpetuate unhelpful stereotypes, or it<br />

can be used to challenge media representations. The<br />

school curriculum has gaps or is absent in addressing<br />

issues related to the harm perpetuated by media<br />

stereotypes. Talking about these mediated messages<br />

supports the prevention of eating disorders. Body<br />

image and self-esteem curriculum requires a critical<br />

stance. One way to respond to curriculum gaps is to<br />

teach students how to recognize body positive<br />

messages, resist “ideal body” messages, and<br />

construct their own new media to promote the<br />

acceptance of body diversity.<br />

2.1 New literacies, new pedagogies<br />

Students need to participate in selecting,<br />

viewing, and responding to media in ways that allow<br />

them to be more informed and participating citizens.<br />

For this to happen, students need to learn how to<br />

question what is happening in their world and<br />

become critical, reflective kinds of learners. Today’s<br />

issues and politics have significant life or death<br />

implications for certain populations. Globally, there<br />

are shifting changes in populations due to wars and<br />

climate change. Faced with the aftermath of<br />

colonialization, finding peace and reconciliation are<br />

important challenges. There is a growing disparity of<br />

life outcomes for the wealthy and the poor. These<br />

are only some of the challenges facing global<br />

citizens. In order to understand, students will need<br />

to examine why the outcomes of life are different for<br />

different groups and how injustice plays a role in<br />

unequal treatment.<br />

The New London Group designed a pedagogy of<br />

multiple literacies for this new digital era. One<br />

aspect of this pedagogy is the need for overt<br />

instruction on equity concepts [12]. Students need to<br />

understand a meta language that supports the<br />

interrogation and critique of media texts including<br />

negative terms such as oppression, prejudice,<br />

stigma, and discrimination. They also need the words<br />

that will help them to design the future such as<br />

voice, advocacy, fairness and reconciliation.<br />

Sometimes this process involves seeing media<br />

through an historical lens, such as understanding the<br />

impact of the deregulation of children’s television. In<br />

other words, students need to examine issues that<br />

they have previously accepted and taken for<br />

granted, such as explanations about colonialism and<br />

difficult truths about its legacies such as residential<br />

schools. Students also need the skills to examine<br />

advertising that directs them to look a certain way or<br />

media that privileges certain body types. Parents and<br />

teachers can help them to “name” the issues.<br />

2.2 Keeping the “critical” in critical<br />

media literacy<br />

Schools teach media literacy but the curriculum<br />

couches these lessons in neutral tones. For example,<br />

the ministry of education in Ontario says that critical<br />

literacy includes asking students to consider whose<br />

views are represented and whose are omitted [13].<br />

This is promoted without also teaching the broader<br />

social context that there has been a dominant<br />

(white, male, European) influence in school texts<br />

that has presented a mostly singular view of the<br />

world for centuries. Luke describes this as<br />

sidestepping the analysis of social, cultural and<br />

economic power relations [14]. An epistemological<br />

stance of neutrality in education does not<br />

acknowledge the complexity of life and a diversity of<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!