Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Page 6 of 20<br />
In general an Infinitive form of the word in ‘:Arabic has two meanings 1] Grammatical Infinitive Meaning.<br />
2] Attributive Meaning.<br />
Twp take the verb in past tense in any one of the Two meaning is an interpretation.<br />
Some Indian Arabists have made a distinction between the two meanings of the single word for by using<br />
‘Al before the Mas:dar form of the word for Infinitive and with out ‘Al for the Attributive Meaning. But<br />
this law is violated since it is coined to solve the confusions. This law cannot be appliedto Holy Arabic<br />
Scriptures say Sacred Qur’a:n and Holy Bukh:a:ri: etc.<br />
Preliminary Four<br />
If some one discard the Real Meaning then the close Virtual meaning has no preference over the distant<br />
Virtual Meaning or an Independent Virtual Meaning if any.<br />
Preliminary Five<br />
Any thing that is Gh:airulla is Makh:lu:q and any thing that is Makh:lu:q [Creation/Creature] is<br />
Gh:airullah. That is any thing that is Separate [Alias] from God/Deity is Creaton of God/Deity.<br />
Similarly any thing that is a Creation/Creature of God/Deity is Gh:airullah.<br />
It is Kufr to believe that a Gh:arullah is Gh:air Makh:lu:q . Similarly it is equally Kufr to believe that any<br />
Gh:air Makh:lu:q is Gh:airullah.<br />
If Engineer of Jhelum denies any one of the two or denies both of the two then he immediately becomes<br />
a Heretic and Even a Non Muslim. [Note If- then Condition].<br />
Sixth Preliminary<br />
A] If the Act Of ‘Istiva:’ i.e ‘Istava: is Non Eternal then it must be Separate from God/Deity.<br />
But the Act of ‘Istiva:’ is an Immanent Act. An Immanent Act is one That either Occureth in its Agent<br />
[Fa:’:il] or is associated with its Agent immediately in its occurrence. So it can neither be Non Immanent<br />
Act nor be an External/Exterior Act. It can not be External since it is an Immanent Act , and It cannot be<br />
Eternal since it is an Act and Not an Attribute, and since the verses explicitly imply its Non Eternity.<br />
So this implies an interpretation. But if some one insists in taking the Literal Meaning of the Verb in Past<br />
Arabic Tense then it becomes Necessary to discard the Principle “It is Absolutely Impossible for any Non<br />
Eternal to be Associated [Qa:’im] with Deity/God [Divine Essence]”.<br />
So there is only two cases Logically Possible to Think.<br />
1] Either the Act of ‘Istiva:’ is in the Literal Meaning in these Verses.<br />
2] Or It is not. If it is not then any meaning taken is either Metaphorical or Figurative.<br />
Page 6 of 20
Change language