05.01.2019 Views

396846208-IS-GOD-DEITY-LOCUS-OF-NONETERNAL-ACT-OF-ISTAVA-IN-THE-THEOLOGICAL-SYSTEM-OF-ENGINEER-ALI-MIRZA-OF-JHELUM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Page 7 of 20<br />

The First case implies that it is an Eternal Act since God/Deity is not the Locus of Non Eternals.<br />

But this act cannot be Eternal by the very nature of the act and the Verses..<br />

So one has either to accept that God/Deity is a Locus of an Non Eternal Act or this Act is an Attribute.<br />

To take the meaning of an Eternal Attribute of a Word of Non Eternal Meaning is Just an Interpretation.<br />

This is an interpretation even if it is weak. But even a weak interpretation is an Interpretation beyond<br />

doubt.<br />

To accept ‘Istava: as an Eternal Act in its Literal meaning is impossible since this contradicteth the very<br />

Nature of the mentioned above act and the meaning of the Verses.<br />

But this Self Contradicting option implies that it is associated with Deity/God [Since if a word in Past<br />

Arabic Tense is taken in the Meaning of an Eternal Attribute , it is an interpretation and to deny that it is<br />

an interpretation is a Self Contradiction] . So it is not rejected primarily due to its implication stated<br />

above but due to its self contradiction. Secondary it is Absolutely Impossible for a Self Contradicting<br />

thing to be Associated With God/Deity.<br />

How ever if taken in some meaning neither close nor related to its meaning and related meanings it<br />

depend upon the meaning taken whether it is an Attribute or an External Act.<br />

In the second case an interpretation is Necessary, rather the second case is it self a case of<br />

interpretation.<br />

B] It may be Restated as follow:<br />

Either AN Act is Separate from its Agent or it is not.<br />

If it is not then Either it is an Act that is Either Associated with the Agent or in the Agent OR is the Mode<br />

of the Agent.<br />

If the Act is Either in the Agent or is Associated with the Agent then it is an Immanent Act.<br />

If it is just a Mode [H:a:l/ Aspect] of an Agent then it a Modal Act.<br />

The Act of ‘Istiva:’ appears to be the Mode of the Divine Agent. So it is neither separate from God/Deity<br />

nor inseparable from Divine Agent [God/Deity].<br />

However if it is not a Model Act then it is Certainly an Immanent Act, hence inseparable Act of<br />

God/Deity.<br />

If it is a Relative Act even then it is a type of Separate Acts [External Acts]. Since a Relation is Non Eternal<br />

and is Separate from God/Deity.<br />

This is the Reason that those who do believe that neither a Non Eternal Act Immanent is Possible in the<br />

Divine Case nor a Non Eternal Modal Act is Possible for the Divine Agent [God/Deity] try to interpret the<br />

Page 7 of 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!