09.04.2019 Views

Optimum Nutrition Spring 2019 PREVIEW

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ALL ABOUT<br />

Study authors have found insufficient evidence to make it illegal to sell energy drinks to<br />

children, yet would welcome voluntary action including exclusion zones. James Billot writes<br />

D<br />

espite several supermarkets<br />

imposing their own bans<br />

on selling energy drinks to<br />

under-16s, the Science and Technology<br />

Committee’s Energy Drinks and Children<br />

Report, published in December last year,<br />

concluded that there wasn’t enough<br />

“quantitative evidence” to warrant making<br />

their sale to children illegal, potentially<br />

halting any government plans for<br />

legislation.<br />

The report advised that it was currently<br />

unclear whether energy drinks were<br />

more harmful than other soft drinks.<br />

Yet, despite this, it welcomed any<br />

voluntary action — including exclusion<br />

zones — taken by schools, retailers and<br />

local communities that could reduce the<br />

consumption of energy drinks by children.<br />

It also recognised that despite its main<br />

findings, that “it might be legitimate” for<br />

the experiences of teachers and other<br />

groups (“qualitative evidence”) to lead to<br />

a statutory ban. 1<br />

As a result, the government faces the<br />

decision as to whether it should act now,<br />

or wait for further evidence.<br />

According to the report, children in<br />

the UK are the largest consumers of<br />

energy drinks in Europe. Between 2012<br />

and 2017, the market ballooned by 19<br />

per cent and globally it is predicted by<br />

business analysts to increase by 3.7 per<br />

cent year-on-year over the next five years.<br />

But in spite of this rise, there has been<br />

no long-term research into the effects of<br />

energy drinks. Although warnings have<br />

come from sources such as the European<br />

Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the<br />

World Health Organization (WHO), so<br />

far only one country in the EU, Lithuania,<br />

has banned the sale of energy drinks to<br />

minors.<br />

Main issues<br />

The NHS defines energy drinks as soft<br />

drinks with high levels of caffeine, taurine<br />

(an amino acid) and vitamins. They also<br />

contain high levels of sugar: while a 330<br />

ml can of Coca-Cola has 32 mg of caffeine<br />

and 35 g of sugar per can, a 473 ml can<br />

of Red Bull has 151 mg of caffeine and<br />

52 g of sugar. However, it is their high<br />

caffeine content that the NHS, EFSA and<br />

WHO links to a number of health and<br />

behavioural problems.<br />

“The main issues are the level of<br />

sleep deprivation, hyperactivity and bad<br />

behaviour in the classroom,” says Kawther<br />

Hunt, a registered nutritionist at charity<br />

group Action on Sugar. “But there is also<br />

a link between risky behaviour and energy<br />

drink consumption, which can include<br />

under-age alcohol consumption and drug<br />

use.”<br />

Whilst risky behaviour in children such<br />

as drinking alcohol and smoking was<br />

found by the committee to be associated<br />

with drinking energy drinks, there was<br />

no evidence that one actually caused<br />

the other. The committee also could not<br />

confirm that children’s drinking habits<br />

were significantly different for energy<br />

drinks over other caffeinated drinks such<br />

as tea or coffee. That is not to suggest<br />

there is parity between the two: while a<br />

250 ml cup of coffee contains 95 mg of<br />

caffeine, a 550 ml can of Relentless Origin<br />

44 OPTIMUM NUTRITION | SPRING <strong>2019</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!