02.05.2019 Views

Effects of in-row spacing on growth and yield of irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties in Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe

Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yields vary widely, usually showing a declining trend, due to differences in in-row spacing used,as well as poor varietal selection for specific locations. This study evaluated the growth and yield responses to different in-row spacings of different varieties of Irish potato grown in Eastern highlands of Zimbabwe. The treatments consisted of three varieties, namely BP1, Diamond and Garnet, and three in-row spacings, namely: 10 cm, 30 cm and 50 cm. Inter-row spacing was maintained at 90cm for all treatments. Treatments were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD); 3 × 3 factorial arrangement, replicated 3 times. Measurements taken were on plant height, number of potato tubers plant-1, and weight of marketable potato tubers, and then averaged. All in-row spacing were significantly different at P <0.001 with 10 cm producing the highest mean height (92.29 cm). Of the three varieties (Garnet, Diamond and BP1), BP1 produced the greatest height (76.12 cm). There was significant interaction (P=0.001) between variety and in-row spacing on the mean number of tubers plant-1. BP1 produced superior (P < 0.001) mean weight of tubers (15.14 t ha-1) and potato tubers plant-1 (21.47) in comparison to Garnet and Diamond at 10 cm in-row spacing. In conclusion, the study reported the optimum in-row spacing of 10 cm at which, BP1, among the other tested varieties, showed potential to attain the greatest growth and tuber yield when grown under ideal conditions.

Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yields vary widely, usually showing a declining trend, due to differences in in-row spacing used,as well as poor varietal selection for specific locations. This study evaluated the growth and yield responses to different in-row spacings of different varieties of Irish potato grown in Eastern highlands of
Zimbabwe. The treatments consisted of three varieties, namely BP1, Diamond and Garnet, and three in-row spacings, namely: 10 cm, 30 cm and 50 cm. Inter-row spacing was maintained at 90cm for all treatments. Treatments were arranged in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD); 3 × 3 factorial arrangement, replicated 3 times. Measurements taken were on plant height, number of potato tubers plant-1, and weight of marketable potato tubers, and then averaged. All in-row spacing were significantly different at P <0.001 with 10 cm producing the highest mean height (92.29 cm). Of the three varieties (Garnet, Diamond and BP1), BP1 produced the greatest height (76.12 cm). There was significant interaction (P=0.001) between variety and in-row spacing on the mean number of tubers plant-1. BP1 produced superior (P < 0.001) mean weight of tubers (15.14 t ha-1) and potato tubers plant-1 (21.47) in comparison to Garnet and Diamond at 10 cm in-row spacing. In conclusion, the study reported the optimum in-row spacing of 10 cm at which, BP1, among the other tested varieties, showed potential to attain the greatest growth and tuber yield when grown under ideal conditions.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Int. J. Agr<strong>on</strong>. Agri. R.<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, moisture availability, climatic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>and</strong> altitude.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> variety <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> weight <strong>and</strong><br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> marketable tubers<br />

BP1 produced the highest number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers per plant<br />

at 10 cm <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to Rex<br />

(1990),Irish <strong>potato</strong> produces high marketable tuber<br />

<strong>yield</strong> when the particular variety has been g<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g>n<br />

under its optimal plant populati<strong>on</strong> densities. High<br />

numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers at high plant densities have been<br />

reported (O’Brien <strong>and</strong> Allen, 1992;Allen <strong>and</strong> Wurr,<br />

1992; Wurr et al., 1993; Karafyllidis et al., 1996). The<br />

high numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers at high densities may be<br />

accounted for by the fact that at low density plant<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs,<br />

fewer s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ks are produced perunit area -1 , <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease<br />

as the plant<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g density <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creases (Mangani et al.<br />

2015). Khalafalla (2001) attributed this to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased<br />

number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants unit area -1 <strong>and</strong> more tubers plant -1 .<br />

Similar results were reported by Nels<strong>on</strong> (1967).<br />

There was significant effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both variety <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> the weights <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Irish <strong>potato</strong> plants. The<br />

highest weight <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the marketable tubers was produced<br />

by BP1. Also, the highest mean weight was obta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed at<br />

an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 cm. The results agree with<br />

Strange <strong>and</strong> Blackmore (2013) whose f<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate that BP1 is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the most productive early<br />

matur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Irish <strong>potato</strong> <strong>varieties</strong>. However, the<br />

nar<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g>est <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>potato</strong> plant spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> the study by<br />

Love <strong>and</strong> Thomps<strong>on</strong>-Johns (1999) was 8 cm, which<br />

had the highest total <strong>yield</strong>, as determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed by tuber<br />

weight. The effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> density <strong>on</strong> average tuber size,<br />

which is a functi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tuber weight found <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />

study, are not c<strong>on</strong>sistent with the results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Lynch <strong>and</strong><br />

Rowberry (1977) who found average tuber size to<br />

decrease with <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g plant density. This<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong> could be because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the different<br />

<strong>varieties</strong> used, differences <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> varietal characteristics,<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>mental <strong>and</strong> agr<strong>on</strong>omic practices. Results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Lynch <strong>and</strong> Rowberry (1977) were based <strong>on</strong> various <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>and</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

The study revealed effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 cm, 30 cm <strong>and</strong> 50 cm<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> g<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g>th <strong>and</strong> tuber <strong>yield</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> BP1,<br />

Diam<strong>on</strong>d <strong>and</strong> Garnet Irish <strong>potato</strong> <strong>varieties</strong>. There was<br />

significant <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>teracti<strong>on</strong> between variety <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>on</strong> the mean number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers plant -1 . BP1<br />

portrayed superior performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> g<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g>th (height)<br />

<strong>and</strong> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers per plant -1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> comparis<strong>on</strong> to<br />

Garnet <strong>and</strong> Diam<strong>on</strong>d at 10 cm <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g> spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. All <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g’s were significantly different, with 10 cm<br />

produc<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g the highest mean height <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the three <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gs.BP1 also produced the greatest mean weight<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers <strong>and</strong> <strong>potato</strong> tubers per plant. Wider <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g’s produced less <strong>and</strong> less number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers<br />

plant -1 . This entails that high numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tubers are<br />

produced at high plant densities. The study<br />

recommends use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>the g<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>BP1 at an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10 cm for optimum g<str<strong>on</strong>g>row</str<strong>on</strong>g>th <strong>and</strong> marketable<br />

tuber <strong>yield</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> highl<strong>and</strong>s.<br />

References<br />

Allen EJ, Wurr DCE. 1992. Plant density. In the<br />

<strong>potato</strong> crop, Ed. P Harris. L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>: Chapman <strong>and</strong><br />

Hall. Pp. 292–333.<br />

Barry PB, Storey TS, Hogan R.2000.Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

plant populati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> set size <strong>on</strong> <strong>yield</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

crop <strong>potato</strong> variety. Irish Journal <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Agricultural<br />

Research29, 49–60.<br />

Brady NC.2004. The nature <strong>and</strong> properties <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>potato</strong>es. New York, NY: Macmillan Publish<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<br />

Company.<br />

Endale G, Gebremedh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> W. 2001. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Effects</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

spatial arrangement <strong>on</strong> tuber <strong>yield</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <strong>potato</strong><br />

cultivars. African Crop Science Journal 9, 67-76.<br />

Food Agricultural Organizati<strong>on</strong> (FAO).2005.<br />

FAOSTAT Database. Food <strong>and</strong> Agriculture<br />

Organizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the United Nati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Gebre E, Woldegiorgis G. 2001. Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spatial<br />

arrangement <strong>on</strong> tuber <strong>yield</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <strong>potato</strong> cultivars,<br />

Ethiopian Agricultural Research Organizati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Holetta Research Center. African Crop Science<br />

Journal 9(1), 67–76.<br />

Mvumiet al.<br />

Page 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!