16.07.2019 Views

July 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 <strong>July</strong> <strong>2019</strong><br />

BUSINESS<br />

www.theasianindependent.co.uk<br />

Pakistan imported medicines worth<br />

Rs 136 cr from India in <strong>2019</strong><br />

Islamabad : Pakistan<br />

imported medicines and vaccines<br />

worth (Pakistani) Rs<br />

136,99,87,000 from India in<br />

<strong>2019</strong>, its Health Ministry has<br />

said. Express News reported<br />

that the imported medicines<br />

included life-saving drugs,<br />

tablets, syrups and vaccines.<br />

According to figures<br />

announced by the Pakistan<br />

Health Ministry in Senate on<br />

Friday, the country imported<br />

drugs and vaccines worth<br />

(Pakistani) Rs 15,43,17,000 in<br />

January; Rs 22,32,47,000 in<br />

February; Rs 19,37,37,000 in<br />

March; Rs 11,10,42,000 in<br />

April; Rs 18,96,47,000 in May<br />

and Rs 4,89,12,000 from India.<br />

Demanding that the senate<br />

be informed about which medicines<br />

and vaccines were being<br />

imported from India, Senator<br />

Abdul Rehman Malik said the<br />

government must curb the<br />

shortage of snake venom serum<br />

and rabies vaccines in Pakistan<br />

by making it mandatory for<br />

local manufacturers to produce<br />

these vaccines in addition to<br />

expensive medical products.<br />

"It's a pity that medicines<br />

are being imported from India<br />

and China when Pakistan is<br />

self-sufficient in medical raw<br />

material. Vaccines made here<br />

would be much more affordable,"<br />

he added.<br />

Allahabad Bank defrauded of Rs<br />

17,775 cr by Bhushan Power & Steel<br />

Mumbai : After Punjab<br />

National Bank, Allahabad Bank<br />

on Saturday said that it has<br />

been defrauded by Bhushan<br />

Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL) to<br />

the tune of Rs 1,774.82 crore.<br />

The bank said in a regulatory<br />

filing that "on the basis of<br />

forensic audit investigation<br />

findings and CBI filing FIR, on<br />

suo moto basis, against the<br />

Company and its Directors,<br />

alleging diversion of funds<br />

from banking system by the<br />

has been observed that the<br />

company has misappropriated<br />

bank funds, manipulated books<br />

of accounts to raise funds from<br />

consortium lender banks. At<br />

present, the case is at the NCLT<br />

which is in advance stage and<br />

the Bank expects good recovery<br />

in the account," the bank<br />

added. The Allahabad Bank<br />

fraud has come to light within a<br />

week of another public sector<br />

bank reporting that it has been<br />

cheated by Bhushan Power.<br />

Bank's borrower namely<br />

Last week, Punjab Nation Bank<br />

Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd Bank to the Reserve Bank of sions amounting to Rs 900.20 reported another fraud worth<br />

(BPSL), a fraud of Rs 1,774.82 India". The state-run bank said crore against the exposure of Rs 3,805.15 crore by Bhushan<br />

core has been reported by the that it has already made provi-<br />

Allahabad Bank in BPSL. "It Power & Steel Ltd to the RBI.<br />

Trump decides not to impose<br />

quotas on uranium imports<br />

Washington, US President Donald<br />

Trump announced that he would not<br />

impose quotas on uranium imports despite<br />

Department of Commerce’s findings that<br />

foreign uranium poses a threat to national<br />

security.<br />

“At this time, I do not concur with the<br />

Secretary’s finding that uranium imports<br />

threaten to impair the national security of<br />

the US as defined under section 232 of the<br />

Act,” Trump said in a presidential memorandum<br />

released late Friday, referring to<br />

the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the<br />

Xinhua news agency reported.<br />

The announcement marked a division<br />

from the previous position of the US<br />

President, who has slapped tariffs on<br />

imported steel and aluminum products and<br />

threatened to levy auto tariffs citing<br />

Section 232 investigation.<br />

“Although I agree that the Secretary’s<br />

findings raise significant concerns regarding<br />

the impact of uranium imports on the<br />

national security with respect to domestic<br />

mining, I find that a fuller analysis of<br />

national security considerations with<br />

respect to the entire nuclear fuel supply<br />

chain is necessary at this time,” Trump<br />

said. The US currently imports approximately<br />

93 per cent of its commercial uranium,<br />

compared to 85.8 per cent in 2009.<br />

According to data from the US Energy<br />

Information Administration, the majority<br />

of imported uranium comes from Canada,<br />

Australia, Russia and Kazakhstan.<br />

In its report submitted to the President<br />

in April, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross<br />

said foreign state-owned companies “distorted<br />

global prices” and made it more difficult<br />

for domestic mines to compete.<br />

Trump demanded that a working group<br />

develop recommendations for reviving and<br />

expanding domestic nuclear fuel production<br />

within 90 days.<br />

The Trump administration has repeatedly<br />

invoked the previously seldom-used<br />

Section 232, drawing strong opposition<br />

from domestic and international business<br />

community. The investigation in foreign<br />

uranium is not initiated by the Trump<br />

administration by itself, but was requested<br />

by two US uranium mining companies, Ur-<br />

Energy Inc. and Energy Fuels Inc.<br />

American nuclear power plants, however,<br />

opposed restricting the imports of uranium,<br />

fearing that they would face a higher<br />

cost if quotas went into effect, especially<br />

when their market share has already been<br />

encroached by shale gas and wind energy<br />

companies. Some viewed the petition for<br />

Section 232 investigation as protectionist,<br />

saying that it is merely aimed at saving an<br />

industry that has been struggling over the<br />

past few years.<br />

IGE says Gangwal limited his<br />

financial risks in IndiGo<br />

New Delhi : InterGlobe Enterprises (IGE), a promoter of<br />

IndiGo, said on Sunday that Rakesh Gangwal has always limited<br />

his financial risk in the airline and also alleged that he pushed<br />

for selling the business at difficult times.<br />

In a bid to counter co-promoter Gangwal's recent allegations<br />

of "collapsing" corporate governance in the company, IGE,<br />

which is owned by Rahul Bhatia, has so far issued three statements<br />

in the past week. "Rahul Bhatia invited Gangwal, an<br />

industry professional, to join as an investor as the two had known<br />

each other for a long time. The understanding with Gangwal was<br />

that the IGE Group and Gangwal would hold just about equal<br />

equity. Gangwal wanted to limit his financial risk to no more<br />

than Rs 15 crore," IGE said in a statement isued on Sunday.<br />

"The IGE Group would have invested more equity, but given<br />

that Gangwal did not have the appetite to invest more, IndiGo's<br />

paid up equity capital was pegged at Rs 30 crore, the minimum<br />

required by regulations. Rakesh Gangwal Group (the RG Group)<br />

-- described as investor in the shareholders agreement -- acquired<br />

from IGE 149,950 equity shares (which represented about 50 per<br />

cent of the equity) at par value in May 2016," the statement said.<br />

It further said that during the intitial phase of IndiGo in 2005<br />

when conversation with Airbus for acquisition of aircraft was<br />

underway and Airbus wanted both IGE and Gangwal to give a<br />

joint undertaking of support to IndiGo, IGE and Gangwal undertook<br />

to invest in IndiGo an amount of "not less than" $50 million<br />

(which then converted to about Rs 200 crore). They further<br />

undertook to maintain that investment until the delivery of the<br />

last aircraft, the statement said. "Gangwal was not going to take<br />

any further financial risk or obligation, IGE singly (though the<br />

undertaking to Airbus was joint) took the obligation to further<br />

invest up to Rs 110 crore in IndiGo, so that, taken together with<br />

the then existing investment of Rs 99 crore, the conditions placed<br />

by Airbus could be met."<br />

It further said: "Even more significantly, during the turbulent<br />

period of a fledgling airline, it was left to the IGE Group, as a<br />

responsible founder, to fend for IndiGo. Gangwal was missing in<br />

action at that time and there were stages where he wanted to derisk<br />

and pushed for the business to be sold."<br />

IGE said that even as the aggregate financial exposure of IGE,<br />

Kapil Bhatia and Rahul Bhatia was well over Rs 1,100 crore<br />

owing to the bank guarantees and personal loans they forwarded<br />

to the airline, Gangwal was in safe harbour with an equity exposure<br />

of less than Rs 15 crore, with no personal loans or guarantees<br />

or any other financial obligations for IndiGo.<br />

"This was a risk ratio of almost 80:1 between the IGE Group<br />

and Gangwal. The personal guarantees of Kapil Bhatia and<br />

Rahul Bhatia continued to be in force until the end of financial<br />

year 2012 as by that time IndiGo had an adequate balance sheet<br />

to support itself," the statement said. In its previous statement,<br />

IGE had said that Gangwal's allegations about lack of corporate<br />

governance were "much ado about nothing".

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!