YSM Issue 91.3
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
materials science<br />
FEATURE<br />
tigue. Auxetic and stress-resistant structures<br />
found in nature, like the muscular<br />
grip of eagles and the locking joints in<br />
fleas’ feet, showed a specific hinge structure<br />
similar to a tessellation of heart patterns,<br />
which inspired the researchers to<br />
develop their own s-hinge.<br />
The s-hinge’s main new properties are<br />
increased elastic deformation, or a structure’s<br />
ability to return to its original shape<br />
after being put under stress, and tunable<br />
Poisson ratios, a measure of how much a<br />
material expands perpendicular to an applied<br />
force. Auxetic materials are defined<br />
by having negative Poisson ratios, which<br />
is why they become thicker when they are<br />
stretched and thinner when compressed.<br />
The s-hinge’s tunable Poisson ratios<br />
allows it to switch between a negative<br />
and a positive Poisson value. Essentially,<br />
the s-hinge structure can go from being<br />
a regular material to being an auxetic<br />
material, which makes it especially flexible<br />
and resistant to damage from stress.<br />
This property is particularly important<br />
for future practical applications, where<br />
a material’s performance depends on its<br />
resistance to repeated stress.<br />
To make their new design, the researchers<br />
created a computerized simulation on<br />
ABAQUS software and modeled different<br />
aspects of auxetic materials’ behavior under<br />
applied stresses. Designing accurate<br />
simulations is important to materials science;<br />
if successful, they allow future researchers<br />
to build off the original design<br />
idea. This study’s simulation compared<br />
the properties of the common honeycomb<br />
design to those of the new s-hinge<br />
design. After running simulations, the<br />
researchers 3D printed both an s-hinge<br />
and a honeycomb auxetic structure and<br />
experimentally tested them according to<br />
the simulation. During 3D printing, another<br />
advantage of the s-hinge design was<br />
made apparent: structures like the honeycomb<br />
are vulnerable to defects in the 3D<br />
printing process that the s-hinge design<br />
avoids, such as rounded corners or badly<br />
connected edges.<br />
Following examples of smooth hinge<br />
geometry in nature, such as the Venus<br />
flytrap, the researchers improved that<br />
s-hinge’s stress distribution by designing<br />
the hinge to bear stress throughout its entire<br />
length, not disproportionately in the<br />
corners. The s-hinge structure distributes<br />
stress by replacing the straight edges of<br />
the honeycomb with carefully designed<br />
arcs that are both flexible and capable of<br />
being made on a 3D printer.<br />
Next, the researchers compared their<br />
predictions from the simulation to their<br />
experimental results from the physical 3D<br />
printed models. They found that the simulation-predicted<br />
results matched their<br />
experimental data. This suggested not<br />
only that the s-hinge design was durable<br />
and successful, but also that the modeling<br />
simulation was reliable and could be used<br />
to design new auxetic material structures.<br />
In the experimental conditions, the researchers<br />
proved that the s-hinge was far<br />
better at distributing stress and recovering<br />
from damage compared to the honeycomb<br />
THE NEW DESIGN, NAMED<br />
THE S-HINGE, MAKES<br />
MATERIALS BETTER ABLE<br />
TO OVERCOME THE STRESS<br />
FROM APPLIED FORCES.<br />
model. The s-hinge’s increased flexibility<br />
will allow materials that were formerly<br />
too weak or fragile to be used for auxetic<br />
structures, such as glass and ceramic,<br />
which will ultimately expand auxetics’<br />
range. In particular, the s-hinge design<br />
outperformed the honeycomb in a repeated<br />
cyclability test in which forces were<br />
applied periodically. This cyclical stress<br />
imitates what the structures would have to<br />
withstand in practical applications.<br />
The honeycomb and s-hinge’s different<br />
responses to stress stem from the two<br />
categories of how a material can react<br />
to applied force: plastic deformation or<br />
elastic deformation. Elastic deformation,<br />
as previously described, is the amount of<br />
force a material can withstand before irreparable<br />
damage is created. Plastic deformation,<br />
on the other hand, happens<br />
when the force applied surpasses the<br />
threshold for irreparable damage. When<br />
the force is removed, the structure will<br />
have permanent damage and be unable<br />
to recover completely. Compared to the<br />
honeycomb, the s-hinge was more durable<br />
because it has a higher range of elastic<br />
deformation.<br />
To exhibit further the s-hinge’s ability<br />
to recover from strain, the researchers<br />
altered a 3D printed Batman logo.<br />
They adjusted the angles of the arcs to<br />
turn the previously positive Poisson ratio<br />
into a negative one, which changed<br />
the amount of stress the material could<br />
withstand from that of a normal material<br />
to that of a stronger, auxetic material.<br />
The researchers envision this property<br />
extending new possibilities to materials<br />
science, such as designing structures to<br />
change shape when they are compressed.<br />
Inspired by the s-hinge’s resistance to<br />
stress, the researchers also designed a<br />
latching mechanism based off the general<br />
s-hinge design. The latch works to<br />
gather and save the structure’s elastic<br />
energy, or the potential energy created<br />
when the material is under stress. Similar<br />
ways of latching or storing elastic<br />
energy are very common in nature, and<br />
they are used in a variety of ways. The<br />
Venus flytrap is a common example, as<br />
are muscle structures of birds of prey.<br />
Their tendons can pull their talons shut<br />
with extreme force, and because of their<br />
latching properties, the birds do not<br />
have to repeatedly contract their muscles<br />
in order to hold their grip.<br />
The talons of birds of prey catch our<br />
interest because they can exert force<br />
without having to continually reapply<br />
it. But most natural structures function<br />
by reapplying force cyclically, and the<br />
researchers designed the materials with<br />
this in mind. Like an eagle’s talons, the<br />
s-hinge was modeled to distribute stress<br />
more efficiently, and its tunable Poisson<br />
ratio allowed the hinge’s structure<br />
to change, becoming stronger as force<br />
is applied. Additionally, the accuracy<br />
of the researchers’ computer modeling<br />
simulation will make designing future<br />
auxetic materials far easier. Ultimately,<br />
the researchers envision designing a new<br />
class of smart materials, capable of reacting<br />
with a Venus flytrap’s adaptability,<br />
that could lead to a new field of material<br />
robotics. Robots built with ‘smart materials’<br />
could store energy without a continual<br />
application of force, and release<br />
that energy in reaction to many different<br />
kinds of stimuli. Perhaps a material like<br />
that used in T’Challa’s suit isn’t as far out<br />
of reach as we think.<br />
www.yalescientific.org<br />
October 2018<br />
Yale Scientific Magazine<br />
31