26.07.2019 Views

YSM Issue 91.3

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

materials science<br />

FEATURE<br />

tigue. Auxetic and stress-resistant structures<br />

found in nature, like the muscular<br />

grip of eagles and the locking joints in<br />

fleas’ feet, showed a specific hinge structure<br />

similar to a tessellation of heart patterns,<br />

which inspired the researchers to<br />

develop their own s-hinge.<br />

The s-hinge’s main new properties are<br />

increased elastic deformation, or a structure’s<br />

ability to return to its original shape<br />

after being put under stress, and tunable<br />

Poisson ratios, a measure of how much a<br />

material expands perpendicular to an applied<br />

force. Auxetic materials are defined<br />

by having negative Poisson ratios, which<br />

is why they become thicker when they are<br />

stretched and thinner when compressed.<br />

The s-hinge’s tunable Poisson ratios<br />

allows it to switch between a negative<br />

and a positive Poisson value. Essentially,<br />

the s-hinge structure can go from being<br />

a regular material to being an auxetic<br />

material, which makes it especially flexible<br />

and resistant to damage from stress.<br />

This property is particularly important<br />

for future practical applications, where<br />

a material’s performance depends on its<br />

resistance to repeated stress.<br />

To make their new design, the researchers<br />

created a computerized simulation on<br />

ABAQUS software and modeled different<br />

aspects of auxetic materials’ behavior under<br />

applied stresses. Designing accurate<br />

simulations is important to materials science;<br />

if successful, they allow future researchers<br />

to build off the original design<br />

idea. This study’s simulation compared<br />

the properties of the common honeycomb<br />

design to those of the new s-hinge<br />

design. After running simulations, the<br />

researchers 3D printed both an s-hinge<br />

and a honeycomb auxetic structure and<br />

experimentally tested them according to<br />

the simulation. During 3D printing, another<br />

advantage of the s-hinge design was<br />

made apparent: structures like the honeycomb<br />

are vulnerable to defects in the 3D<br />

printing process that the s-hinge design<br />

avoids, such as rounded corners or badly<br />

connected edges.<br />

Following examples of smooth hinge<br />

geometry in nature, such as the Venus<br />

flytrap, the researchers improved that<br />

s-hinge’s stress distribution by designing<br />

the hinge to bear stress throughout its entire<br />

length, not disproportionately in the<br />

corners. The s-hinge structure distributes<br />

stress by replacing the straight edges of<br />

the honeycomb with carefully designed<br />

arcs that are both flexible and capable of<br />

being made on a 3D printer.<br />

Next, the researchers compared their<br />

predictions from the simulation to their<br />

experimental results from the physical 3D<br />

printed models. They found that the simulation-predicted<br />

results matched their<br />

experimental data. This suggested not<br />

only that the s-hinge design was durable<br />

and successful, but also that the modeling<br />

simulation was reliable and could be used<br />

to design new auxetic material structures.<br />

In the experimental conditions, the researchers<br />

proved that the s-hinge was far<br />

better at distributing stress and recovering<br />

from damage compared to the honeycomb<br />

THE NEW DESIGN, NAMED<br />

THE S-HINGE, MAKES<br />

MATERIALS BETTER ABLE<br />

TO OVERCOME THE STRESS<br />

FROM APPLIED FORCES.<br />

model. The s-hinge’s increased flexibility<br />

will allow materials that were formerly<br />

too weak or fragile to be used for auxetic<br />

structures, such as glass and ceramic,<br />

which will ultimately expand auxetics’<br />

range. In particular, the s-hinge design<br />

outperformed the honeycomb in a repeated<br />

cyclability test in which forces were<br />

applied periodically. This cyclical stress<br />

imitates what the structures would have to<br />

withstand in practical applications.<br />

The honeycomb and s-hinge’s different<br />

responses to stress stem from the two<br />

categories of how a material can react<br />

to applied force: plastic deformation or<br />

elastic deformation. Elastic deformation,<br />

as previously described, is the amount of<br />

force a material can withstand before irreparable<br />

damage is created. Plastic deformation,<br />

on the other hand, happens<br />

when the force applied surpasses the<br />

threshold for irreparable damage. When<br />

the force is removed, the structure will<br />

have permanent damage and be unable<br />

to recover completely. Compared to the<br />

honeycomb, the s-hinge was more durable<br />

because it has a higher range of elastic<br />

deformation.<br />

To exhibit further the s-hinge’s ability<br />

to recover from strain, the researchers<br />

altered a 3D printed Batman logo.<br />

They adjusted the angles of the arcs to<br />

turn the previously positive Poisson ratio<br />

into a negative one, which changed<br />

the amount of stress the material could<br />

withstand from that of a normal material<br />

to that of a stronger, auxetic material.<br />

The researchers envision this property<br />

extending new possibilities to materials<br />

science, such as designing structures to<br />

change shape when they are compressed.<br />

Inspired by the s-hinge’s resistance to<br />

stress, the researchers also designed a<br />

latching mechanism based off the general<br />

s-hinge design. The latch works to<br />

gather and save the structure’s elastic<br />

energy, or the potential energy created<br />

when the material is under stress. Similar<br />

ways of latching or storing elastic<br />

energy are very common in nature, and<br />

they are used in a variety of ways. The<br />

Venus flytrap is a common example, as<br />

are muscle structures of birds of prey.<br />

Their tendons can pull their talons shut<br />

with extreme force, and because of their<br />

latching properties, the birds do not<br />

have to repeatedly contract their muscles<br />

in order to hold their grip.<br />

The talons of birds of prey catch our<br />

interest because they can exert force<br />

without having to continually reapply<br />

it. But most natural structures function<br />

by reapplying force cyclically, and the<br />

researchers designed the materials with<br />

this in mind. Like an eagle’s talons, the<br />

s-hinge was modeled to distribute stress<br />

more efficiently, and its tunable Poisson<br />

ratio allowed the hinge’s structure<br />

to change, becoming stronger as force<br />

is applied. Additionally, the accuracy<br />

of the researchers’ computer modeling<br />

simulation will make designing future<br />

auxetic materials far easier. Ultimately,<br />

the researchers envision designing a new<br />

class of smart materials, capable of reacting<br />

with a Venus flytrap’s adaptability,<br />

that could lead to a new field of material<br />

robotics. Robots built with ‘smart materials’<br />

could store energy without a continual<br />

application of force, and release<br />

that energy in reaction to many different<br />

kinds of stimuli. Perhaps a material like<br />

that used in T’Challa’s suit isn’t as far out<br />

of reach as we think.<br />

www.yalescientific.org<br />

October 2018<br />

Yale Scientific Magazine<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!