APUEA Magazine-no.6 September 2019
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>APUEA</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> | No.6 / <strong>September</strong> <strong>2019</strong><br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
Target the high cost of electricity by tying on-site solar<br />
directly with the electrolyzer. In the base scenario,<br />
electricity is purchased at grid rates 90% of the time; the<br />
remaining 10% of the time, output is ramped up to capture<br />
low-cost excess wind and solar. However, utility solar<br />
prices have dropped considerably over the year to below<br />
$0.04/kWh, although not necessarily for Japan. While<br />
obtaining electricity supply from co-located solar does<br />
reduce electricity costs by eliminating grid electricity<br />
purchases, it makes the system ineligible to participate in<br />
grid services, reducing revenues.<br />
Change the fuel mix to target the higher-value transportation<br />
fuel segment. The competitive price for hydrogen<br />
as a fuel in Japan is $8/kg, while the competitiv price fore<br />
3.<br />
hydrogen as a feedstock is $1.40/kg. This could be an<br />
effective near-term strategy, as it could take considerable<br />
time to decarbonize industrial processes, whereas Japan<br />
has a large heavy-duty vehicle fleet with a turnover rate of<br />
less than 15 years.<br />
Wait until electrolyzer prices drop. Current electrolyzer<br />
costs are around $2,000/kW, but are forecasted to reach<br />
$1,000/kW after 2030 as volumes increase and<br />
performance improves. Because the electrolyzer itself is<br />
the largest component of system costs, the impact on<br />
economics is considerable.<br />
On-site Solar Generation, Investment & Lifetime Revenue Comparison<br />
Net present value ($)<br />
$40,000,000<br />
$30,000,000<br />
$20,000,000<br />
$10,000,000<br />
ROI: -44%{<br />
Feedstock revenue<br />
Fuel revenue<br />
Frequency regulation revenue<br />
Hydrogen storage cost<br />
Electricity cost<br />
Electrolyzer cost<br />
$0<br />
Total cost<br />
Grid services<br />
revenue<br />
Transportation<br />
fuel revenue<br />
Industry<br />
feedstock<br />
revenue<br />
Total revenue<br />
Product Mix Optimization, Investment & Lifetime Revenue Comparison<br />
Net present value ($)<br />
$40,000,000<br />
$30,000,000<br />
ROI: 9.3% {<br />
Feedstock revenue<br />
$20,000,000<br />
$10,000,000<br />
Fuel revenue<br />
Frequency regulation revenue<br />
Hydrogen storage cost<br />
Electricity cost<br />
Electrolyzer cost<br />
$0<br />
Total cost<br />
Grid services<br />
revenue<br />
Transportation<br />
fuel revenue<br />
Industry<br />
feedstock<br />
revenue<br />
Total revenue<br />
10