04.01.2020 Views

utm fk

kutf

kutf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

38 G&A February 2020 | bullet boArd

insufficient gas volume

to run the gun. The other

approach was to use

heavier charges of very

slow propellants. This still

didn’t work because the

slow propellants didn’t burn

fast enough to produce

much more gas impulse to

the gas system. It just blew

a lot of unburned propellant

out the muzzle. They

did not produce any better

performance uniformity and

they fouled the gas system with carbon very rapidly.

The introduction of IMR (now Hodgdon) Trail Boss

propellant finally offered a propellant that filled the case,

produced uniform performance and subsonic velocities.

However, because of the low charge weights, it still didn’t

function a gas-auto firearm. If you have an urge to experiment

with your own subsonic loads, you won’t be able to

beat Trail Boss for performance as a single-shot round or

for a bolt action. Experiment with bullet weights to tune

your load for best performance.

Muzzle velocity uniformity is critical to the accuracy

performance of subsonic ammunition. A 100-fps muzzle

velocity variation, which is not uncommon in subsonic

ammunition, is nominally a 10 percent difference in muzzle

velocity. This would correspond to a 300-fps variation in a

3,000-fps cartridge. This muzzle velocity difference from

the slowest to fastest round results in substantial vertical

stringing on target.

With a subsonic round, vertical stringing can become

quite big at longer ranges. In subsonic ammunition, a 100-

fps muzzle velocity variation will result in a 31/-inch elevation

point of impact (POI) difference at 100 yards and 12

inches at 200 yards — and that’s not considering anything

else but muzzle velocity variation.

terminal Performance Subsonic ammunition has significant

limitations when it comes to terminal performance.

Because of the low velocity, it is difficult to obtain terminal

performance in anything other than a pistol caliber. Rifletype

bullets do not have the large frontal area that hollow

points and other pistol bullets do. Most of the platforms

such as the AR-15/M4/M16, M14 and SR-25 have a fixed

feed ramp configuration and do not

function well with a blunt bullet profile

and large meplat diameter. This puts

severe restrictions on what a bullet

designer can do to try to design a bullet

that will expand at subsonic velocities.

One very interesting aspect of subsonic

terminal performance is that once

a bullet drops below supersonic velocities

the drag on the bullet drops to low

DRAG COEFFICIENT

G7 DRAG COEFFICIENT

MACH NUMBER

HORNADY 190-GR. SUB-X

SUPERSONIC vs. SUBSONIC

VELOCITY LOSS

VELOCITY (FPS)

RANGE (YDS) SUPERSONIC SUBSONIC

0 2,500 1,050

100 2,305 998

200 2,119 956

300 1,942 919

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 1

levels and is, for the most

part, constant. This means a

subsonic projectile will lose

velocity very slowly. If a projectile

can be designed that

expands and has a couple

hundred fps velocity range

over which it expands, it

will give terminal performance

over a range that

is outside the ability to

accurately shoot it.

Look at the G7 drag

coefficient curve in Figure

1. As you can see, the drag of the projectile drops rapidly

after its speed drops below Mach 1. By .9 Mach, 1,005 fps,

nominally the muzzle velocity for a lot of subsonic ammunition,

the drag coefficient has dropped tremendously

and does not get a lot lower. As an example, look at the

retained velocity table in Figure 2 for Hornady’s new .300

Blackout 190-grain Sub-X bullet ($23, hornady.com). The

Sub-X bullet barely loses 130 fps at subsonic velocities in

300 yards. The same bullet at a supersonic muzzle velocity

of 2,500 fps loses 660 fps in 300 yards. The Sub-X bullet

will expand down to about 900 fps. It offers terminal performance

far beyond the effective range of the cartridge.

enter the 300 blackout The 300 Blackout is, for all practical

purposes, the .300 Whisper developed by J.D. Jones of

SSK Industries for use in Thompson/Center Contender

single-shots in the 1990s. It was based on the .221 Fireball

case necked up to 30 caliber and was aimed at efficiently

and reliably producing subsonic velocities with heavy

bullets. The cartridge nominally uses 10 grains of propellant

and provided an excellent round for adapting to the

AR platform for a dedicated, gas automatic, suppressed

firearm for reliable functioning subsonic performance.

With a short barrel, short gas tube and a suppressor, the

.300 Blackout in the AR-15 platform performs reliably. I

have to add at this point that to get truly reliable subsonic

performance from an AR chambered in .300 Blackout,

a suppressor is highly recommended. The very limited

amount of gas available from this cartridge benefits substantially

from a suppressor’s added back pressure to force

more gas back into the system.

The .300 Blackout has been a highly successful cartridge

that has also been responsible for the

current interest in subsonic ammunition,

and the rapid increase in demand for

suppressors. There are other offerings

available for subsonic ammunition. Let’s

take a look at a few.

other Subsonic Ammunition Major

rimfire manufacturers offer subsonic

.22 LR ammunition including Aguila

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!