08.01.2020 Views

The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index 2019

Measuring competitiveness comprehensively: Sweden & Scandinavia tops, Germany #15, UK 17, US 34, China 37 in the Global Sustainable COmpetitiveness Index 2019

Measuring competitiveness comprehensively:
Sweden & Scandinavia tops, Germany #15, UK 17, US 34, China 37 in the Global Sustainable COmpetitiveness Index 2019

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Resource Intensity

Table of

Contents

Resource Management World Map

The Resource Management Sub-Index is composed of indicators scored relative

to population (e.g. GHG per capita) as well as relative to economic output (e.g.

energy consumption per GDP). Indicators measured against population (per

capita) clearly favour countries with low resource and raw material consumption

(i.e. less developed countries), while indicators scored relative to GDP measure

economic efficiency.

The resource intensity map shows that the resource intensity of less developed

countries seems to be – generally speaking - lower than that of higher developed

economies. However, indicators are measured both against economic output

(GNI/GDP) and against per-capita performance. While the per-capita intensity

is naturally lower in less developed economies, the per-output performance in

efficient developed countries is lower than in the developing countries.

The resource intensity ranking is topped by Kenya, followed by Togo and Ethiopia

– mainly due to low resource consumption. However, also highly developed

economies achieve high rankings – Sweden (5), Luxembourg (6) and the UK (8)

are all ranked within the top ten. However, the World’s economic powerhouses

are ranked significantly lower – Germany on 77, Japan on 96, the US on 102, and

China on 160. The low rankings indicate a distinctive potential for improving

sustainable competitiveness through reducing resource intensity and resource

management – i.e. reducing costs, at the end of the day.

The main implications of higher or lower resource management capabilities are

related to stability and sustained economic growth: should global prices for raw

materials and energy rise significantly in the future (as trends and the majority of

available research suggests), the countries in the lower ranks will face substantial

higher costs and challenges to maintain their growth compared to countries with

higher efficiency and intensity scores.

The Resource Intensity World Map. Dark areas indicate low, light areas indicate high resource Intensity.

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!