SEN minutes • November 2008 - Dog Kennel Hill Primary School
SEN minutes • November 2008 - Dog Kennel Hill Primary School
SEN minutes • November 2008 - Dog Kennel Hill Primary School
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Minutes: Special Educational Needs Working Party of the Governing Body of <strong>Dog</strong><br />
<strong>Kennel</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>School</strong>, held at 62 Oakhurst Grove on Monday 3 <strong>November</strong> <strong>2008</strong> at 6:30<br />
PRE<strong>SEN</strong>T<br />
Peter Bibby (Convenor)<br />
Marion Cranmer Eileen Wray<br />
Gillian Reeve Linda Ewers<br />
Heather Hewitt Derek Summerfield<br />
Apologies Robyn Harrison on maternity leave<br />
1. Appointment of minute taker<br />
The Convenor volunteered to take <strong>minutes</strong><br />
2. Minutes of meeting 17 June<br />
Noted<br />
3. <strong>SEN</strong> Policy<br />
Eileen circulated the amended policy which has been discussed by staff. Under annual<br />
review on page 7 wording: the Convenor of the <strong>SEN</strong> working party should be changed<br />
to: the Convenor or another member of the <strong>SEN</strong> working party. Agreed to recommend<br />
adoption by Governors at meeting on 10 <strong>November</strong>.<br />
Marion suggested that we add an appendix setting out the detailed procedure and<br />
timetable for the conduct of annual reviews. This should take account of the statutory<br />
requirements set out in the Education (Special Educational Needs) Regulations 2001<br />
which are published in the back of the Special Educational Needs Code of Practice.<br />
Agreed that Eileen should draft an Appendix for consultation as a matter of<br />
urgency.<br />
4. Common Assessment Framework<br />
Eileen circulated the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) form. In order for babies,<br />
children and young people to receive support and assistance beyond that which is<br />
normally provided, a Common Assessment Framework form must be completed. This<br />
will then be entered on to a national computerised database.<br />
1
Where the school seeks outside assistance for a child with Special Educational Needs,<br />
a Common Assessment Framework form must be logged on the national database.<br />
Completion of the Common Assessment Framework requires an in depth interview with<br />
parents or carers which might take two hours. Some parents may be unwilling to<br />
cooperate with such an intrusion. For example, one answer box calls for information<br />
about the family with respect to; illness, bereavement, violence, parental substance<br />
misuse, criminality, anti-social behaviour; culture, size and composition of household;<br />
absent parents, relationship breakdown; physical disability and mental health; abusive<br />
behaviour. The Common Assessment Framework is a barrier to accessing services<br />
which may delay help for some children.<br />
The completed form may contain personal information which should not be made<br />
available to all teachers and other staff. We agreed to store the Common<br />
Assessment Framework forms separately from the children’s general files and<br />
separately from the children’s <strong>SEN</strong> files. We agreed to discuss the handling of<br />
this information with other schools and with Southwark.<br />
5. Budget Monitoring<br />
When Southwark cut the funding to children with statements and replaced it with social<br />
deprivation funding, the authority undertook to monitor schools’ special educational<br />
needs spending. The monitoring appears complex. Southwark have indicated that<br />
schools should give approximate figures to save time.<br />
Southwark have decided to postpone their <strong>SEN</strong> Self Evaluation proposals until 2009-<br />
2010.<br />
6. Individual children annual reviews<br />
Gillian attended review of NC. Teacher from Highshore attended, but had only been told<br />
that morning. We think that Highshore had not passed on the date and time. Peter had<br />
received copy of written complaint from parents that NC had received only 15 hours of<br />
LSA time instead of the 25 that is specified on her statement. NC had become unwilling<br />
to work with the teaching assistant.<br />
Peter mentioned that there had been complaints from teachers and parents about<br />
organisation and preparation for annual reviews this term with respect to MM and AS.<br />
In March a similar complaint was made by parents of JH.<br />
Two children have attended a short part of their annual review recently. We agreed to<br />
encourage attendance of older children at annual reviews where it would be<br />
appropriate and beneficial to them.<br />
2
We discussed DM who is chronologically year 1, but at present in our nursery. He will<br />
move to reception in January.<br />
We also discussed a child with autism, who has no meaningful speech and is physically<br />
wild. He is in our reception class having transferred from Bessemer. Originally we<br />
started him half time, but such a practice is likely to be unlawful.<br />
We also discussed a nine year old child who has learning and behavioural difficulties<br />
and is at present at Summerhouse two days a week. Progress with securing a<br />
statement of special educational needs is delayed by non-attendance at a medical.<br />
Support for his brother is held up by the difficulty in completing the Common<br />
Assessment Framework form.<br />
7. <strong>SEN</strong>CO Post<br />
During Robyn Harrison’s Maternity leave, Eileen has taken over all the <strong>SEN</strong>CO work.<br />
The Common Assessment Framework forms have increased the work of the <strong>SEN</strong>CO<br />
as has Southwark’s budget monitoring.<br />
Robyn has expressed interested in doing the <strong>SEN</strong>CO job on her return from maternity<br />
leave.<br />
After discussion. We agreed to ask teaching staff whether anyone would be<br />
interested in doing some <strong>SEN</strong>CO work, for example a day a week.<br />
The job was divided between Robyn and Eileen on infant/junior lines. This may not be<br />
the best division because knowledge of the children, their parents and the professionals<br />
in the infant years would be of benefit in the junior years. There are other ways of<br />
dividing the work.<br />
8. Date of next meeting<br />
We did not fix date of next meeting<br />
3