19.12.2012 Views

SEN minutes • November 2008 - Dog Kennel Hill Primary School

SEN minutes • November 2008 - Dog Kennel Hill Primary School

SEN minutes • November 2008 - Dog Kennel Hill Primary School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Minutes: Special Educational Needs Working Party of the Governing Body of <strong>Dog</strong><br />

<strong>Kennel</strong> <strong>Hill</strong> <strong>School</strong>, held at 62 Oakhurst Grove on Monday 3 <strong>November</strong> <strong>2008</strong> at 6:30<br />

PRE<strong>SEN</strong>T<br />

Peter Bibby (Convenor)<br />

Marion Cranmer Eileen Wray<br />

Gillian Reeve Linda Ewers<br />

Heather Hewitt Derek Summerfield<br />

Apologies Robyn Harrison on maternity leave<br />

1. Appointment of minute taker<br />

The Convenor volunteered to take <strong>minutes</strong><br />

2. Minutes of meeting 17 June<br />

Noted<br />

3. <strong>SEN</strong> Policy<br />

Eileen circulated the amended policy which has been discussed by staff. Under annual<br />

review on page 7 wording: the Convenor of the <strong>SEN</strong> working party should be changed<br />

to: the Convenor or another member of the <strong>SEN</strong> working party. Agreed to recommend<br />

adoption by Governors at meeting on 10 <strong>November</strong>.<br />

Marion suggested that we add an appendix setting out the detailed procedure and<br />

timetable for the conduct of annual reviews. This should take account of the statutory<br />

requirements set out in the Education (Special Educational Needs) Regulations 2001<br />

which are published in the back of the Special Educational Needs Code of Practice.<br />

Agreed that Eileen should draft an Appendix for consultation as a matter of<br />

urgency.<br />

4. Common Assessment Framework<br />

Eileen circulated the Common Assessment Framework (CAF) form. In order for babies,<br />

children and young people to receive support and assistance beyond that which is<br />

normally provided, a Common Assessment Framework form must be completed. This<br />

will then be entered on to a national computerised database.<br />

1


Where the school seeks outside assistance for a child with Special Educational Needs,<br />

a Common Assessment Framework form must be logged on the national database.<br />

Completion of the Common Assessment Framework requires an in depth interview with<br />

parents or carers which might take two hours. Some parents may be unwilling to<br />

cooperate with such an intrusion. For example, one answer box calls for information<br />

about the family with respect to; illness, bereavement, violence, parental substance<br />

misuse, criminality, anti-social behaviour; culture, size and composition of household;<br />

absent parents, relationship breakdown; physical disability and mental health; abusive<br />

behaviour. The Common Assessment Framework is a barrier to accessing services<br />

which may delay help for some children.<br />

The completed form may contain personal information which should not be made<br />

available to all teachers and other staff. We agreed to store the Common<br />

Assessment Framework forms separately from the children’s general files and<br />

separately from the children’s <strong>SEN</strong> files. We agreed to discuss the handling of<br />

this information with other schools and with Southwark.<br />

5. Budget Monitoring<br />

When Southwark cut the funding to children with statements and replaced it with social<br />

deprivation funding, the authority undertook to monitor schools’ special educational<br />

needs spending. The monitoring appears complex. Southwark have indicated that<br />

schools should give approximate figures to save time.<br />

Southwark have decided to postpone their <strong>SEN</strong> Self Evaluation proposals until 2009-<br />

2010.<br />

6. Individual children annual reviews<br />

Gillian attended review of NC. Teacher from Highshore attended, but had only been told<br />

that morning. We think that Highshore had not passed on the date and time. Peter had<br />

received copy of written complaint from parents that NC had received only 15 hours of<br />

LSA time instead of the 25 that is specified on her statement. NC had become unwilling<br />

to work with the teaching assistant.<br />

Peter mentioned that there had been complaints from teachers and parents about<br />

organisation and preparation for annual reviews this term with respect to MM and AS.<br />

In March a similar complaint was made by parents of JH.<br />

Two children have attended a short part of their annual review recently. We agreed to<br />

encourage attendance of older children at annual reviews where it would be<br />

appropriate and beneficial to them.<br />

2


We discussed DM who is chronologically year 1, but at present in our nursery. He will<br />

move to reception in January.<br />

We also discussed a child with autism, who has no meaningful speech and is physically<br />

wild. He is in our reception class having transferred from Bessemer. Originally we<br />

started him half time, but such a practice is likely to be unlawful.<br />

We also discussed a nine year old child who has learning and behavioural difficulties<br />

and is at present at Summerhouse two days a week. Progress with securing a<br />

statement of special educational needs is delayed by non-attendance at a medical.<br />

Support for his brother is held up by the difficulty in completing the Common<br />

Assessment Framework form.<br />

7. <strong>SEN</strong>CO Post<br />

During Robyn Harrison’s Maternity leave, Eileen has taken over all the <strong>SEN</strong>CO work.<br />

The Common Assessment Framework forms have increased the work of the <strong>SEN</strong>CO<br />

as has Southwark’s budget monitoring.<br />

Robyn has expressed interested in doing the <strong>SEN</strong>CO job on her return from maternity<br />

leave.<br />

After discussion. We agreed to ask teaching staff whether anyone would be<br />

interested in doing some <strong>SEN</strong>CO work, for example a day a week.<br />

The job was divided between Robyn and Eileen on infant/junior lines. This may not be<br />

the best division because knowledge of the children, their parents and the professionals<br />

in the infant years would be of benefit in the junior years. There are other ways of<br />

dividing the work.<br />

8. Date of next meeting<br />

We did not fix date of next meeting<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!