04.05.2020 Views

theGIST Issue 12

Spring 2020 | Science in the Spotlight

Spring 2020 | Science in the Spotlight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Science in the Spotlight

long been a source of such stories,

including Greyfriars Bobby and

Hachiko as well as books which

delve deeper into the psychology

and science of grieving in dogs.

Marc Berkoff, Professor Emeritus of

Evolutionary Biology at the University

of Colorado Boulder and author

of the book Canine

Confidential: Why Dogs Do What

They Do, stated that dogs don't understand

the concept of loss or

death but do recognize that a companion

is missing. In response, they

show behavioural changes such as

a lack of appetite, sleeping more

than usual, or withdrawing from

people and other pets – a collection

of symptoms that sounds

rather familiar. Even if dogs do not

comprehend the metaphysical implications

of the death, their

change in behaviour implies at

least a minimal understanding of

loss.

All of these examples describe behaviour

that can be interpreted as

grieving or mourning; but what are

the definitions of these terms? The

Cambridge Dictionary defines both

grieving and mourning as "to feel or

express great sadness, especially

because of someone's death". Furthermore,

Barbara J. King, an emeritus

professor of anthropology and

author of How Animals Grieve (a

book I highly recommend for those

interested in this subject), defines

grief and mourning as "significant

deviations from usual routines displayed

by survivors after the death

of a significant companion animal".

In her terms, there's no distinction

between grieving and mourning as

both result in a change of behaviour.

However, it is known that grieving

and feeling grief are intricately related.

Therefore, if we assert that

animals can mourn, can it be stated

that grieving animals actually feel

grief? Since the empirical definition

of mourning limits itself to objective

observations but the act of feeling

grief is impossible to measure. On a

more scientific basis, a study in baboons

observed a large increase in

the concentration of stress hormones

in their blood after losing a

close companion or child. This

proves that baboons feel stress as a

result of these losses [8].

It is difficult to ascertain whether

it's grief or curiosity that drives an

elephant to touch a dead body or if

a dog that "grieves" its companion

does so out of a sense of loss or

because he simply misses the act

of playing with his companion.

Presently, there are few studies that

focus on the feeling of grief in animals

due to the challenge of studying

animal emotions. Several problems

arise when investigating this topic:

the inability of animals to communicate

their feelings, the possibility

of anthropomorphising (attributing

human characteristics to animals)

their behaviour, and the variety of

mourning behaviour found across

the animal kingdom.

Among other reasons, a fear of

anthropomorphising has led scientists

to be reluctant to describe the

behaviour of any animal towards

one of their dead as "grieving". Perhaps

this is because we fear we are

projecting highly complex human

emotions onto animals or perhaps

because animals don't comprehend

the loss of a companion. Nonetheless,

the increasing number of observations

and anecdotal reports

prompt the scientific (and non-scientific)

community to begin to reconsider

grieving as an exclusively

human experience. Although humans

experience grief in a more

visible way (according to ourselves),

it might be that animals also experience

grief, but in a simpler form. As

Barbara King suggests, perhaps the

only thing that differentiates human

and animal grief is "[Homo Sapiens]

unique ability to fully anticipate the

inevitability of death (…) and to express

our losses in a thousand glorious

or ragged ways".

www.the-GIST.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!