21.12.2012 Views

Proceedings – Small Animals - ECVS

Proceedings – Small Animals - ECVS

Proceedings – Small Animals - ECVS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

20th<br />

Annual Scientific Meeting<br />

University Forum UFO, Ghent University, Ghent,<br />

Begium,<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Animals</strong><br />

Edited by: Stephen Baines<br />

July 7<strong>–</strong>9, 2011


Welcome to Ghent, welcome to Belgium<br />

A Warm Welcome to Ghent!<br />

Dear colleagues,<br />

It is a great pleasure for me and for our organising team to welcome you all to Ghent for this<br />

anniversary meeting of the <strong>ECVS</strong>. Yes indeed, time flies and we are already celebrating twenty years of<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong>! What has ever started with a small group of people with interest in veterinary surgery has now<br />

grown into an organisation offering education programmes, certifying specialists, promoting scientific<br />

progress and organising meetings. A large group of people, young and old, from resident to diplomate,<br />

from all over the World, but after all these years: still with a profound interest in veterinary surgery!<br />

We are very happy that we can celebrate this in Belgium.<br />

The Ghent University welcomes you in its brand new “University Forum” (UFO) building located at a<br />

nice 10 minutes walk from the historical centre of the city, where most of the hotels are located. At<br />

the UFO we have a promising scientific program for our small and large animal delegates, combined<br />

with a large commercial exhibition to meet with our sponsors and with your friends and colleagues.<br />

But as there is more than science in men’s (and women’s) life, I invite you to discover our marvellous<br />

city. Ghent is indeed one of the most beautiful historic cities in Europe. It is called “Medieval Manhattan”<br />

and combines an impressive past with a vivid present. Take this walk through history and visit the castle<br />

of the counts, the Cathedral, Belfry, Butchers hall and many more places. Let your beloved ones join<br />

the “partners program team” and they will discover many more hidden secrets of Ghent and Flanders.<br />

Thanks a lot to <strong>ECVS</strong> for all the support, to our sponsors to make all of this financially possible, to all<br />

our colleagues and friends who have worked hard for this meeting and to you all for being here!<br />

May Ghent be an unforgettable experience for you!<br />

Ann Martens<br />

In name of the local organising committee<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 3 information section


information section 4 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Platinum Sponsors<br />

Gold Sponsors<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 5 information section


We would like to thank all our sponsors and exhibitors for their support and presence<br />

during the 20 th Annual Scientific Meeting at the UFO University Forum Ghent University,<br />

Ghent Belgium<br />

• AdMaiora<br />

• AOVET<br />

• Arthrex<br />

• B. Braun Vet Care GmbH<br />

• City of Ghent<br />

• Equus Medic Line<br />

• Erbe<br />

• Dr. Fritz GmbH<br />

• Ghent University<br />

• Istrulife<br />

• J. Story Scientia<br />

• Janssen Animal Health<br />

• Karl Storz GmbH<br />

• KCI<br />

• Kyon AG<br />

• Mon & Tex Spa<br />

• Optomed<br />

• Orthomed (UK) LTd.<br />

• Richard Wolf GmbH<br />

• Royal Canin<br />

• SECUROS Europe GmbH<br />

• Smith and Nephew<br />

• Synthes GmbH<br />

• The Belgian Confederation of the Horse<br />

• Traumavet<br />

• Veterinary Instrumentation Ltd<br />

• Vetin-Aacofarma<br />

• Vétoquinol<br />

• VetZ Veterinär-medizinisches Dienstleistungszentrum GmbH<br />

• VIN Internet Cafe<br />

• Vlaams Paardenloket<br />

information section 6 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Scientific programme outline<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 7 information section


information section 8 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Large animals Programme outline<br />

Thursday July 7<br />

State of the art auditorium at the UFO<br />

Chair: D. Spreng & A. Martens<br />

15.30<strong>–</strong>16.15 P. Broos Pushing the boundaries in severe musculoskeletal trauma -<br />

what is possible?<br />

16.15<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee break<br />

Large animal <strong>–</strong> resident forum auditorium at the UFO<br />

Chair: D. Bolt<br />

16.30<strong>–</strong>16.45 M. Jordana Distal limb desensitization following anesthesia of the digital flexor<br />

Discussant: A. Fürst tendon sheath in horses: a comparison of 4 techniques<br />

16.45<strong>–</strong>17.00 L. Arensburg Aseptic tenosynovitis of the DFTS caused by longitudinal tears of the<br />

Discussant: B. Bladon flexor tendons<br />

17.00<strong>–</strong>17.15 T. Toth Evaluation of 1% hydrogen peroxide cream in the treatment of open<br />

Discussant: D. Archer wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study<br />

17.15<strong>–</strong>17.30 C. Klaus Long term results of surgical correction of a deep bite class II<br />

Discussant: D. Verwilghen malocclusion in 7 horses<br />

17.30<strong>–</strong>17.45 H. Gunnarsdottir Caeco-colic intussusceptions: 10 cases over a 7 month time period<br />

Discussant: A. Rijkenhuizen<br />

17.45<strong>–</strong>18.00 T. Barnett Dynamic videoendoscopic assessment of the upper airway following<br />

Discussant: E. Strand laryngoplasty<br />

18.00<strong>–</strong>18.15 A. Fiske Jackson Evaluation of pre-operative diagnostic methods for digital sheath<br />

Discussant: R. Perrin pathology<br />

18.15<strong>–</strong>18.30 W. Schneeweiss Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus “blind” techniques for intra-<br />

Discussant: C. Lischer synovial injections of the shoulder area in horses: Scapulohumeral<br />

joint, bicipital bursa and infraspinatus bursa<br />

18.30<strong>–</strong>18.45 K. Benredouane Trans-arterial coil embolisation of the internal carotid artery in<br />

Discussant: O. Simon standing horses<br />

18.45<strong>–</strong>19.00 E. Lallemand Autologous nasal chondrocytes and a cellulose-based self-setting<br />

Discussant: P. Clegg hydrogel for the repair of articular cartilage in horses<br />

19.15 Transfer by boat - embarking at the pier „Muinkkaai“<br />

20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Welcome Cocktail at Castle of the Counts<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 9 information section


Large animals Programme outline<br />

Friday July 8<br />

In depth: colic<br />

Chair: L. Vlaminck<br />

08.00<strong>–</strong>08.40 G. van Loon How abdominal ultrasonography has changed our approach in colic<br />

surgery<br />

08.40<strong>–</strong>09.20 M. Mosing Perioperative intensive care of the colic patient <strong>–</strong> latest developments<br />

09.20<strong>–</strong>09.50 D. Archer Evidence for anastomosis technique in colic surgery<br />

09.50<strong>–</strong>10.20 J. Schumacher Surgeries of horses that appear difficult but are not!<br />

10.20<strong>–</strong>10.30 Discussion<br />

10.30<strong>–</strong>11.00 Coffee break<br />

Short communications<br />

Chair: P. Clegg<br />

11.00<strong>–</strong>11.15 S. Brandt Equus caballus papillomavirus 2 as a possible causative agent of<br />

equine genital SCC<br />

11.15<strong>–</strong>11.30 P. Brink Uteropexy of 10 mares by laparoscopically imbricating the mesometrium<br />

11.30<strong>–</strong>11.45 A. Bischofberger The effect of horse age, prosthesis tension, position and number on<br />

the area of the rima glottidis in equine laryngeal specimens<br />

11.45<strong>–</strong>12.00 G. Marañon Modulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1(mcp-1) production by<br />

ischaemia-reperfusion in the intestine of horses<br />

12.00<strong>–</strong>12.15 F. Rossignol Treatment of dorsal displacement of the soft palate by a modified tie<br />

forward procedure using metallic implants<br />

12.15<strong>–</strong>12.30 L. Hunt Comparison of thoracic ultrasound and radiography for the detection<br />

of small volume induced pneumothorax in the horse<br />

12.30<strong>–</strong>12.40 Discussion<br />

12.40<strong>–</strong>14.15 Lunch break<br />

13.15<strong>–</strong>13.45 Information session for our residents and supervisors as well<br />

as programme directors<br />

Short communications<br />

Chair: P. Clegg<br />

14.15<strong>–</strong>14.30 J. Declercq Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage degeneration of the<br />

metacarpal condyle using a 3D scanning system<br />

14.30<strong>–</strong>14.45 F. David Effect of cast immobilisation on equine SDFT lesion propagation<br />

14.45<strong>–</strong>15.00 M. Schramme The effect of intralesional bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem<br />

cells and bone marrow supernatant on collagen fibril size in a surgical<br />

model of equine superficial digital tendonitis<br />

15.00<strong>–</strong>15.30 Coffee break<br />

information section 10 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Large animals Programme outline<br />

Friday July 8<br />

In depth: Interactive surgical case discussion and televoting<br />

Chair: S. May<br />

Panel: A. Martens, D. Archer, J. Auer, H. Wilderjans, M. Schramme<br />

15.30<strong>–</strong>18.00<br />

J. Kümmerle A modified prosthetic capsule technique for treatment of an acute coxofemoral luxation in a pony<br />

B. Bladon A simple case of an incomplete non displaced sagittal fracture of P1<br />

U. Delling Hand-assisted laparoscopic adhesiolysis of extensive small intestinal adhesions in a mare after<br />

breeding injury<br />

G. Bodó Bilateral sinonasal cyst treated through a bone flap with nasal septum resection in a Shetland pony<br />

M. Meulyzer Laparoscopic mesh hernioplasty for correction of a non-strangulating scrotal hernia in a Warmblood<br />

breeding stallion<br />

L. Smith Standing removal of an ectopic, dysplastic, fourth maxillary premolar in a three-year-old<br />

Quarterhorse colt<br />

T. Levet Single transphyseal position screw for carpal valgus deviation: an unusual complication in two foals<br />

F. Rossignol Partial carpal arthrodesis using two 4.5 LCP plates in three horses<br />

18.10<strong>–</strong>19.30 <strong>ECVS</strong> Annual Business Meeting <strong>–</strong> mandatory for <strong>ECVS</strong> Diplomates<br />

18.10<strong>–</strong>18.40 A. Adkins Resident talk <strong>–</strong> how to examine and treat stifle OCD in the horse<br />

20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Belgian get-together at the Monastery Het Pand<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 11 information section


Large animals Programme outline<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Foal and mare<br />

Chair: H. Wilderjans<br />

08.30<strong>–</strong>09.15 J. Schumacher Foal head surgery: nose deviation, cleft palate<br />

09.15<strong>–</strong>09.50 J. Auer Foal physeal fractures<br />

09.50<strong>–</strong>10.20 A. Adkins Limb fractures in foals<br />

10.20<strong>–</strong>10.50 Coffee break<br />

10.50<strong>–</strong>11.15 J. Auer The concept of treatment of angular limb deformities<br />

11.15<strong>–</strong>11.55 A. Adkins Flexural limb deformities in foals and yearlings<br />

11.55<strong>–</strong>12.15 Discussion<br />

12.15<strong>–</strong>14.15 Lunch<br />

Information session for our residents<br />

12.45<strong>–</strong>13.10 J. Pascoe Pitfalls to getting published in Veterinary Surgery<br />

Lunchtime talk<br />

13.20<strong>–</strong>13.40 J. Schumacher How to perform rectovaginal fistula and cervix reconstruction<br />

In depth: orthopaedics supported by Belgian Confederation of the Horse<br />

Chair: M. Schramme<br />

14.15<strong>–</strong>14.40 A. Fürst Should bone cysts be filled?<br />

14.40<strong>–</strong>15.05 B. Bladon Standing orthopaedic surgery<br />

15.05<strong>–</strong>15.35 F. Vandenberghe How has MRI changed our approach to the orthopaedic case:<br />

radiologist‘s point of view<br />

15.35<strong>–</strong>16.00 R. Perrin How has MRI changed our approach to the orthopaedic case:<br />

surgeon‘s point of view<br />

16.00<strong>–</strong>16.30 Discussion<br />

16.30<strong>–</strong>17.00 Coffee break<br />

information section 12 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Large animals<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

Programme outline<br />

Poster session<br />

17.00<strong>–</strong>17.55<br />

Chair: R. Smith<br />

M. Chabrier Computed tomography arthrography (CTA) anatomy of the ovine stifle<br />

S. de la Farge Use of modified transfixation cast technique in horses<br />

D. Dias Standardisation of a technique for facial artery catheter implantation and maintenance in horses<br />

L. Gracia<strong>–</strong>Calvo Standing hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy: case report<br />

C. Hopster-Iversen Influence of mechanical manipulations on the local inflammatory reaction in the equine colon<br />

N. Herteman An anatomic study of the synovial cavities of the stifle in the sheep<br />

C. Lambert An anatomic study of ovine menisci by computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), 3D segmentation<br />

and magnetic resonnance imaging (MRI)<br />

M. Lamberts Comparison of three techniques to inject the synovial cavities of the stifle in the sheep.<br />

C. Méspoulhès Equine laryngeal neurostimulator: development and implantation technique<br />

R. Parker The in vitro effects of antibiotics on the gene expression of equine bone marrow derived<br />

mesenchymal stromal cells<br />

M. Rathmanner Comparison of the local inflammatory response in horses undergoing small intestinal resection with<br />

and without development of post operative ileus<br />

A. Salciccia Evaluation of the effect of general anaesthesia on ultrasonographic images of the small intestine in<br />

horses<br />

C. Vandecatsyne Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the ovine stifle described from images acquired with high-<br />

field magnet (3 Tesla)<br />

State of the art <strong>–</strong> closing session<br />

Chair: B. Bouvy & D. Spreng<br />

18.00<strong>–</strong>19.00 S. May The history of Veterinary Surgery<br />

20 years<br />

J. Auer The history of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>–</strong> the first<br />

20.00 Banquet and awards at the Old Fishmine <strong>–</strong> Disco night<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 13 information section


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

Thursday July 7<br />

Programme outline<br />

State of the art auditorium at the UFO<br />

Chair: D. Spreng & A. Martens<br />

15.30<strong>–</strong>16.15 P. Broos Pushing the boundaries in severe musculoskeletal trauma -<br />

what is possible?<br />

16.15<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee break<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal resident forum auditorium at the UFO<br />

Chair: K. Pratschke<br />

16.30<strong>–</strong>16.45 A. Gutbrod The effects of humeral rotational osteotomy on the canine elbow<br />

Discussant: L. Déjardin joint. An ex vivo study<br />

16.45<strong>–</strong>17.00 M. Benlloch Gonzales Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin staplers in 9 dogs<br />

Discussant: D. Brockman and 9 cats<br />

17.00<strong>–</strong>17.15 P. Nelissen Effect of three anesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal function<br />

Discussant: M. Peeters during laryngoscopy in normal cats<br />

17.15<strong>–</strong>17.30 R. Vallefuoco Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the dog: a descriptive<br />

Discussant: H. Brissot cadaveric study<br />

17.30<strong>–</strong>17.45 P. Buttin Removal of nephroliths by video-assisted nephrotomy: 8 cases<br />

Discussant: J. Ladlow<br />

17.45<strong>–</strong>18.00 N. Medl Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in clean orthopedic<br />

Discussant: V. Lipscomb surgeries in dogs and cats<br />

18.00<strong>–</strong>18.15 N. Barthélémy Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed dogs with medial<br />

Discussant: M. Glyde compartment disease of the elbow<br />

18.15<strong>–</strong>18.30 P. Rochereau Comparison of 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws and<br />

Discussant: D. Damur 4.0 mm partially-threaded cancellous screws in a canine humeral<br />

condylar fracture model<br />

18.30<strong>–</strong>18.45 N. Woodbrigde A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial<br />

Discussant: U. Reif plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) stabilisation using three different<br />

plate types<br />

18.45<strong>–</strong>19.00 G. Hayes Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole for canine sino-<br />

Discussant: R. Burrow nasal aspergillosis<br />

19.15 Transfer by boat - embarking at the pier „Muinkkaai“<br />

20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Welcome Cocktail at the Castle of the Counts<br />

information section 14 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />

Friday July 8<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Shoulder arthroscopy <strong>–</strong> clinical update<br />

Chair: S. Langley<strong>–</strong>Hobbs<br />

08.00<strong>–</strong>08.30 C. Devitt Diagnosis of shoulder<br />

instability<br />

08.30<strong>–</strong>09.00 H. van Bree MRI and arthroscopy for<br />

evaluation of shoulder<br />

joint pathology<br />

09.00<strong>–</strong>09.30 C. Devitt Arthroscopic treatment<br />

of MGHL injury<br />

09.30<strong>–</strong>10.00 B. van Ryssen Caudal glenoid<br />

fragmentation<br />

10.00<strong>–</strong>10.15 Discussion<br />

10.15<strong>–</strong>10.45 Coffee break<br />

Short communications<br />

Chair: M. Balligand<br />

10.45<strong>–</strong>11.00 M. Glyde Biomechanical<br />

comparison of plate,<br />

plate-rod and orthogonal<br />

plate locking constructs<br />

in an ex-vivo canine<br />

tibial fracture gap model<br />

11.00<strong>–</strong>11.15 A. Baroncelli Effect of screw<br />

insertional torque on<br />

mechanical properties of<br />

5 different angular stable<br />

systems<br />

11.15<strong>–</strong>11.30 B. Meij The use of pedicle<br />

screws in canine<br />

lumbosacral disease<br />

11.30<strong>–</strong>11.45 L. Déjardin Effect of articular design<br />

on mediolateral<br />

constraint and stability<br />

of two unlinked canine<br />

total elbow prostheses<br />

11.45<strong>–</strong>12.00 N. Fitzpatrick The effect of configuration<br />

and radiographicpositioning<br />

on measurements of<br />

deformity magnitude in a<br />

dog with a complex antebrachial<br />

growth deformity:<br />

comparison between<br />

radiographic and 3D computer<br />

modellingmeasurements<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical ? <strong>–</strong><br />

Tracheal collapse<br />

Chair: D. Brockman<br />

08.00<strong>–</strong>08.30 A. Moritz Have we learnt anything in<br />

the last 15 years?<br />

Pathophysiology, medical and surgical treatment<br />

08.30<strong>–</strong>08.40 D. Brockman Ringing versus stenting <strong>–</strong><br />

introduction<br />

08.40<strong>–</strong>09.10 R. White Ringing: indications,<br />

limitations, technique<br />

09.10<strong>–</strong>09.40 A. Moritz Stenting: The Giessen<br />

experience<br />

09.40<strong>–</strong>10.00 Discussion<br />

10.00<strong>–</strong>10.45 Coffee break<br />

Short communications<br />

Chair: L. Findji<br />

10.45<strong>–</strong>11.00 J. Milgram Axial pattern flap based<br />

on a cutaneous branch of<br />

the facial artery in cats.<br />

11.00<strong>–</strong>11.15 O. Höglund Ligating the renal artery<br />

in pigs with a new<br />

absorbable device <strong>–</strong><br />

LigaTie ®<br />

11.15<strong>–</strong>11.30 H. Brissot Caudal mediastinal<br />

para-oesophageal<br />

abscesses in 7 dogs. A<br />

retrospective study<br />

11.30<strong>–</strong>11.45 D. Murgia Caudal cervical<br />

intervertebral space<br />

distraction and<br />

stabilization using a<br />

distractable fusion cage<br />

in seven dogs<br />

11.45<strong>–</strong>12.00 T. Cachon Surgical treatment of<br />

sciatic nerve injury:<br />

9 cases<br />

12.00<strong>–</strong>12.15 L. Rancan Changes in circulating<br />

pro-inflammatory<br />

cytokines and nitric oxide<br />

in brachycephalic dogs<br />

12.15<strong>–</strong>12.25 Discussion<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 15 information section


<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />

Friday July 8<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />

12.00<strong>–</strong>12.15 K. Voss Association of articular<br />

mineralisations, cranial<br />

cruciate ligament pathology<br />

and degenerative joint<br />

disease in feline stifle joints<br />

12.15<strong>–</strong>12.30 J. Milgram The role of the antebrachiocarpal<br />

ligaments in the prevention<br />

of hyperex-tension of the<br />

antebrachiocarpal joint<br />

12.30<strong>–</strong>12.45 M. Glyde The effect of screw<br />

number and plate stand-<br />

off distance on the<br />

biomechanical characteristics<br />

of 3.5mm locking<br />

compression plate (LCP)<br />

and 3.5mm string of pearls<br />

(SOP) plate constructs in<br />

a synthetic fracture gap model<br />

12.45<strong>–</strong>13.00 Discussion<br />

13.00<strong>–</strong>14.30 Lunch break<br />

13.15<strong>–</strong>13.45 Information session<br />

for our residents<br />

and supervisors as well<br />

as programme directors<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Motion analysis and rehabilitation<br />

Chair: M. Owen<br />

14.30<strong>–</strong>14.55 M. Balligand Force plate analysis: is it<br />

the gold standard?<br />

14.55<strong>–</strong>15.20 P. Böttcher In vivo three dimensional<br />

motion analysis<br />

15.20<strong>–</strong>15.45 M. Balligand The influence of muscle<br />

forces on the cruciate<br />

deficient stifle joint<br />

15.45<strong>–</strong>16.15 B. Bockstahler Evidence based medicine<br />

in rehabilitation<br />

16.15<strong>–</strong>16.30 Discussion<br />

16.30<strong>–</strong>17.00 Coffee break<br />

12.25<strong>–</strong>14.00 Lunch break<br />

13.15<strong>–</strong>13.45 Information session<br />

for our residents<br />

and supervisors as well<br />

as programme directors<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical ? Pyothorax in dogs<br />

and cats<br />

Chair: J.P Billet<br />

14.00<strong>–</strong>14.30 A. Moritz What have we learnt in the<br />

last 15 years?<br />

14.30<strong>–</strong>15.00 J. Demetriou Is surgery necessary ?<br />

15.00<strong>–</strong>15.15 Conclusions and<br />

discussion<br />

Pancreatitis in dogs and cats<br />

15.15<strong>–</strong>15.40 P. Watson What have we learnt in the<br />

last 15 years?<br />

15.40<strong>–</strong>16.00 R. White Surgical treatment:<br />

Necrosectomies,<br />

pancreatectomies,<br />

drainage, gall bladder<br />

diversion, enteral feeding<br />

16.00<strong>–</strong>16.20 Conclusions and<br />

discussion<br />

16.20<strong>–</strong>17.00 Coffee break<br />

information section 16 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />

Friday July 8<br />

Poster session<br />

Chair: L. Sjöström<br />

17.00<strong>–</strong>18.00<br />

A. Bernardé Retrospective study of complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate<br />

deficient stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010)<br />

B. Böhme Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine condylar fractures by finite element analysis<br />

L. Boland Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: 3 representative cases<br />

N. Fitzpatrick True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth<br />

deformity <strong>–</strong> planning and execution of technique<br />

M. Hamilton Total hip replacement with reinforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the<br />

SOP implant and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal acetabular rim deficiency<br />

L. Piras Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement of frontal plane angulation: A cadaveric<br />

radiographic analysis<br />

U. Segal Latero<strong>–</strong>distal transposition of the tibial crest for patella alta and medial luxation<br />

L. Souchu Morphological comparison of the middle ear between French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs<br />

C. Tan Stabilisation of periarticular fractures and osteotomies with a notched head locking compression<br />

T<strong>–</strong>plate<br />

M. Verset Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the thigh region<br />

B. Walton Owner based metrology instruments for conditions of canine chronic mobility impairment <strong>–</strong> construct<br />

and criterion validity of LOAD, CBPI and HCPI<br />

18.10<strong>–</strong>19.30 <strong>ECVS</strong> Annual Business Meeting <strong>–</strong> mandatory for <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Diplomates<br />

18.10<strong>–</strong>18.40 A. Adkins Resident talk <strong>–</strong> how to examine and treat stifle OCD in the horse<br />

20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Belgian get-together at the Monastery Het Pand<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 17 information section


<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Infection control in surgical practice<br />

Chair: G. Dupré<br />

08.30<strong>–</strong>09.00 S. Weese Surgical infections: Incidence, relevance, risk factors, surveillance<br />

09.00<strong>–</strong>09.30 L. Findji Surgical preparation: current understanding and recommendations<br />

09.30<strong>–</strong>10.00 P. Moissonnier Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis<br />

10.00<strong>–</strong>10.30 Coffee break<br />

10.30<strong>–</strong>11.00 S. Weese Surgical site infection control programme: The Ontario experience<br />

11.00<strong>–</strong>11.30 All Discussion: What should we change in our practices?<br />

11.30<strong>–</strong>12.30 S. Weese Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infection: Animal and public<br />

health consequences<br />

12.30<strong>–</strong>14.00 Lunch break<br />

Information session for our residents<br />

12.45<strong>–</strong>13.10 J. Pascoe Pitfalls to getting published in Veterinary Surgery<br />

information section 18 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />

In depth: Bone healing for surgeons<br />

Chair: L. Dejardin<br />

14.00<strong>–</strong>14.25 O. Gauthier Stimulation of bone<br />

healing <strong>–</strong> latest<br />

developments<br />

14.25<strong>–</strong>14.50 D. Griffon Delayed <strong>–</strong> and non <strong>–</strong><br />

unions<br />

14.50<strong>–</strong>15.15 O. Gauthier Stimulation of bone<br />

healing: commercially<br />

available products<br />

15.15<strong>–</strong>15.40 D. Griffon Stimulation of bone<br />

healing in clinical<br />

practice<br />

15.40<strong>–</strong>16.00 Discussion<br />

16.00<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee Break<br />

In depth: Neurosurgery: lumbosacral disease<br />

Chair: B. Meij<br />

16.30<strong>–</strong>16.55 H. van Bree Diagnostic imaging<br />

techniques <strong>–</strong> an<br />

update: MRI and CT<br />

16.55<strong>–</strong>17.20 C. Falzone Lumbosacral spine:<br />

surgical decision<br />

making<br />

17.20<strong>–</strong>17.45 C. Falzone Lumbosacral spine:<br />

decompression and<br />

stabilisation<br />

17.45<strong>–</strong>17.55 Discussion<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal and large animal combined<br />

State of the art <strong>–</strong> closing session auditorium at the UFO<br />

Chair: B. Bouvy & D. Spreng<br />

18.00<strong>–</strong>19.00 S. May The history of Veterinary Surgery<br />

20 years<br />

In depth: VSSO <strong>–</strong> Reconstructive surgery:<br />

management of skin tumors - supported by KCI<br />

Chair: J. Kirpensteijn<br />

14.00<strong>–</strong>14.25 G. ter Haar Novel reconstructions of<br />

skin on top of the nose<br />

14.25<strong>–</strong>14.50 R. Sivacolundhu Reconstruction of hard<br />

and soft palate defects<br />

14.50<strong>–</strong>15.15 J. Liptak Large skin tumors and<br />

their resection<br />

15.15<strong>–</strong>15.40 S. Boston Mast cell tumors, what is<br />

really new?<br />

15.40<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee break<br />

16.30<strong>–</strong>16.55 A. Vanlander VAC-assisted reconstruction<br />

in human patients<br />

16.55<strong>–</strong>17.20 J. Kirpensteijn Radioactive<br />

microbrachytherapy for<br />

cutaneous lesions<br />

17.20<strong>–</strong>17.50 Round table discussion <strong>–</strong><br />

difficult skin cases<br />

J. Auer The history of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>–</strong> the first<br />

20.00 Banquet and awards at the old Fishmine <strong>–</strong> Disco night<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 19 information section


information section 20 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

Contents<br />

Scientific programme outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />

State of the art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />

Pushing the boundaries in musculoskeletal trauma <strong>–</strong> what is possible in man? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29<br />

Paul L.O. Broos, Prof. Em. Dr.<br />

Resident Forum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33<br />

Effects of humeral rotational osteotomy on contact mechanism of the canine elbow joint: an ex vivo study . . . . . . . . . . . . 35<br />

Gutbrod A, Guerrero TG*<br />

Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin staplers in 9 dogs and 9 cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36<br />

M.Benlloch-Gonzalez, B.Bouvy*, E.Gomes, J.Hernandez, C.Poncet*.<br />

Effect of three an aesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal function during laryngoscopy in normal cat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />

Nelissen P., Aprea F., Corletto F., White RAS*.<br />

Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the dog: A descriptive cadaveric study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />

Vallefuoco R, Jardel N, Tessier A, Moissonnier P.<br />

Nephroliths and video-assisted nephrotomy in 8 cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39<br />

Buttin P., Cachon T.*, Carozzo C*., Maitre P., Arnault A., Fau D., Genevois JP., Viguier E*.<br />

Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in clean orthopaedic surgeries in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40<br />

Medl N 1 , Guerrero TG* 1 , Hölzle L 2 , Montavon PM 1<br />

Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed dogs with medial compartment disease of the elbow . . . . . . . . . . . 41<br />

N. Barthélémy¹, D. Griffon* ² , G. Ragetly², I. Carrera², D. Schaeffer²<br />

Comparison of 4 .0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws and 4 .0 mm partially-threaded screws in a canine<br />

humeral condylar fracture model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42<br />

Rochereau P. 1 , Diop A. 2 , Maurel N. 2 , Gomez Clemente R. 2 , Gabanou P.A .3 , Bernardé A.* 1 .<br />

A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy stabilisation using<br />

three different TPLO plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43<br />

Woodbridge N 3 , Corr S.A. 2 , Grierson J 1 , Arthurs G 1 .<br />

Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole for canine sino-nasal aspergillosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44<br />

G. M. Hayes and J. L. Demetriou*.<br />

Poster session . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47<br />

A retrospective study of complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate deficient<br />

stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49<br />

Bernardé A., Rochereau P., Spengler E.<br />

Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine condylar fractures by finite element analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50<br />

B. Böhme 1 , V. d’Otreppe 2 , J.P. Ponthot 2 and M. Balligand<br />

Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: three representative cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51<br />

Boland L, Gomes E, Payen G, Bouvy B*, Poncet C*<br />

True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth deformity <strong>–</strong><br />

planning and execution of technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52<br />

N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou 1 , K. Ash 1 , V. Wavreille 1 , Z. Szanto 2<br />

Total hip replacement with reiforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the sop implant<br />

and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal acetabular rim deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53<br />

N. Fitzpatrick, M. Bielecki, R Yeadon*, M. Hamilton*<br />

Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement of frontal plane angulation: a cadaveric radiographic analysis . . . . . 54<br />

Piras LA 1 , Peirone B 1 , Fox DB 2<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 21 information section


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

Latero-distal transposition of the tibial crest for patella alta and medial luxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55<br />

Segal U., Shani J*<br />

Morphological comparison of the middle ear between French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56<br />

L.Souchu 1 , T. Chuzel 2 , C. Carozzo* 3 .<br />

Stabilisation of periarticular fractures or osteotomies with an LCP notched head T-plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57<br />

C. J. Tan, K.A. Johnson*.<br />

Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the thigh region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58<br />

M. Verset 1 , T. Cachon* 2 , D. Rémy 2 , C. Carozzo* 2 .<br />

Owner based metrology instruments for conditions of canine chronic mobility impairment - contruct and criterion<br />

validity of LOAD, HCPI and CBPI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59<br />

Walton MB 1 , Innes JF 1 , Lascelles BDX* 2<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Infection control in surgical practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61<br />

Surgical site infections: Incidence, relevance, risk factors and surveillance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63<br />

J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />

Surgical preparation: current understanding and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67<br />

L. Findji*<br />

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73<br />

P. Moissonnier*<br />

Surgical site infection control programme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74<br />

J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />

Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections: animal and public health consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80<br />

J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />

Short communications <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87<br />

Biomechanical comparison of plate, plate-rod and orthogonal plate locking constructs in an ex-vivo canine tibial<br />

fracture gap model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88<br />

Glyde M *1 ., Day R. 2 , Deane B. 1 , Read R 1 . and Hosgood G * 1 .<br />

Effect of screw insertional torque on mechanical properties of 5 different angular stable systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89<br />

A Boero Baroncelli 1 , U Reif 2 , C Bignardi 3 , B Peirone 1 .<br />

The use of pedicle screws in canine lumbosacral disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90<br />

Meij BP*, Smolders LA, Bergknut N, Voorhout G, Grinwis GCM, Hazewinkel HAW*<br />

Effect of articular design on mediolateral constraint and stability of two unlinked canine total elbow prostheses . . . . . . . 91<br />

Guillou RP 1 , Demianiuk RM 1 , Déjardin LM* 2 ,Beckett C 2 , Haut RC<br />

The effect of configuration and radiographic positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude in a dog with<br />

a complex antebrachial growth deformity: comparison between radiographic and 3D computer modelling<br />

measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92<br />

N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou,JF. Isaza Saldarriaga, S. Correa Velez, V. Wavreille, K. Ash, JJ. Ochoa<br />

Association of articular mineralisation, cranial cruciate ligament pathology and degenerative joint disease in<br />

feline stifle joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93<br />

Voss K* 1 , Karli P 2 , Kipfer N 2 , Geyer H 3<br />

The role of the antebrachiocarpal ligaments in the prevention of hyperextension of the antebrachiocarpal joint . . . . . . . . 94<br />

Milgram J*, Milstein T, Meiner Y.<br />

The effect of screw number and plate stand-off distance on the biomechanical characteristics of 3 .5mm locking<br />

compression plate (LCP) and 3 .5mm string of pearls (SOP) plate constructs in a synthetic fracture gap model . . . . . . . 95<br />

Glyde M *1 , Day R 2 . and Hosgood G *1 .<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> shoulder arthroscopy - clinical update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97<br />

Dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99<br />

Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />

MRI and arthroscopy for evaluation of shoulder joint pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101<br />

H. van Bree*, W. Dingemanse, I. Gielen<br />

Stifle arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine rathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104<br />

Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />

Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid cavity: diagnostic findings and results after treatment:<br />

retrospective study of 28 dogs and 1 cat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106<br />

B. Van Ryssen, E. Coppieters, Y. Samoy, D. Van Vynckt, J. Saunders, H. van Bree.<br />

information section 22 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Motion analysis and rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109<br />

Force plate: gold standard? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111<br />

M. Balligand*<br />

In vivo motion analysis 3D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113<br />

P. Böttcher*, J. Rey, G. Oechtering<br />

Muscular forces affecting the outcome of CCL surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115<br />

JM Ramirez Leon 1 , B Böhme 4 , C Vroomen 3 , F Farnir 2 , M Balligand 1<br />

Evidence based medicine in rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118<br />

B. Bockstahler, PD, DVM, CCRP<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Bone healing for surgeons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121<br />

Stimulation of bone healing . Latest developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123<br />

O. Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />

Delayed union and nonunion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127<br />

Dominique J Griffon*<br />

Stimulation of bone healing . Commercially available products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130<br />

O.Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />

Enhancing bone healing in practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131<br />

Dominique J Griffon*<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Neurosurgery: lumbosacral disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135<br />

Lumbosacral disease (LS): an update on diagnostic imaging techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137<br />

I. Gielen, K. Kromhout, H. van Bree*<br />

Lumbosacral spine: surgical decision making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140<br />

Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />

Lumbosacral spine: decompression and stabilisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142<br />

Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />

Short communications <strong>–</strong> soft tissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145<br />

Axial pattern flap based on a cutaneous branch of the facial artery in cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147<br />

Milgram J*, Weiser M, Kelmer E*, Benzioni H<br />

Ligating the renal artery in pigs with a new absorbable device - LigaTie ® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148<br />

O V. Höglund, DVM, K. Olsson, DVM, PhD, R. Hagman, DVM, MSc, PhD, A. Lagerstedt, DVM, PhD.<br />

Caudal mediastinal para-oesophageal abscesses in 7 dogs . A retospective study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149<br />

H. Brissot*, C. Burton*, R. Doyle*.<br />

Caudal cervical intervertebral space distraction and stabilization using a distractable fusion cage in seven dogs . . . . . 150<br />

Murgia D*, Gasparinetti N, Schiesaro R.<br />

Surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151<br />

Cachon T.*, Escriou C, Arnault A., Maitre P., Fau D., Viguier E.*, Genevois JP. Carozzo C*<br />

Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide are increased in brachycephalic dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152<br />

Rancan L, Romussi S, Albertini M, García P, Vara E, Sánchez de la Muela M<br />

In depth - Medical or surgical? - Tracheal collapse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153<br />

Have we learnt anything in the last 15 years? Stenting: The Giessen experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155<br />

A. Moritz, C. Paul de Melo, N. Bauer, M. Schneider,<br />

Tracheal collapse <strong>–</strong> ringing: indications, limitations, technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161<br />

Robert N White*<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical? Pyothorax in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163<br />

Pyothorax <strong>–</strong> have we learnt anything in the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165<br />

G. Wurtinger, C. Peppler*, M. Schneider, A. Moritz,<br />

Pyothorax : Is surgery necessary? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167<br />

Jackie L. Demetriou *<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 23 information section


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical <strong>–</strong>Pancreatitis in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . 171<br />

Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: what have we learnt on the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173<br />

P. Watson, MA,VetMD, CertVR, DSAM, ECVIM, MRCVS<br />

Surgical treatment: necrosectomies, pancreatectomies, and drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177<br />

Robert N White BSc (Hons) BVetMedCertVA DSAS (Soft Tissue) Dipl<strong>ECVS</strong><br />

In depth: VSSO <strong>–</strong> Reconstructive surgery: management of skin tumors . . . . 181<br />

Novel reconstructions of the tip of the nose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182<br />

G. ter Haar*<br />

Use of local and axial pattern flaps for reconstruction of the hard and soft palate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184<br />

Ramesh K Sivacolundhu, BVMS MVS FACVSc<br />

Wide excision of tumors and reconstruction of the resultant defect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186<br />

Julius M. Liptak*<br />

Canine mast cell tumor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187<br />

Sarah Boston*<br />

Closure of large abdominal wall defects using negative pressure therapy: a bridge to definitive closure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191<br />

A.Vanlander MD, F. Berrevoet MD ,PhD<br />

Radioactive microbrachytherapy for head and neck lesions in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192<br />

Kirpensteijn J*, Vente MAD, Nimwegen B, Nijsen JFW<br />

Author index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195<br />

information section 24 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 25 information section


combined session 26 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Large and small animals combined<br />

State of the art<br />

Thursday July 7 <strong>–</strong> 15.30<strong>–</strong>16.15


combined session 28 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Pushing the boundaries in musculoskeletal trauma <strong>–</strong><br />

what is possible in man?<br />

Paul L.O. Broos, Prof. Em. Dr.<br />

Previous director of the department of surgery of the University Hospitals KU Leuven.<br />

Historical approach.<br />

Historically, surgery has always been closely linked<br />

to trauma care. In 2700 B.C, Imhotep taught us how to<br />

immobilize fractured limbs using papyrus rods. In the<br />

Renaissance, Heinz von Gersdorff as well as Ambroise<br />

Paré, were very famous army surgeons and dealt frequently<br />

with trauma.In the 19th century, Jean-Dominique Larrey<br />

reorganized the medical services of Napoleon’s army<br />

and introduced concepts such as triage, evacuation and<br />

debridement. We can go back even further, to the time<br />

of primitive men. Indeed, since the beginning of men’s<br />

inhabitancy of this planet, he has to sustain serious injuries<br />

as a consequence of accidents, nature disasters, attacks by<br />

wild animals and, last but not least, through war. Armed<br />

conflicts have forced men to learn how to deal with wounds,<br />

caused by catapulted rocks, axes or other forms of military<br />

armament. He had to learn how to stop a gush of blood, to<br />

splint broken limbs and to remove foreign objects, in other<br />

words: how to support threatened lives.<br />

In the 21st century, trauma is still a major health problem<br />

in the Western world. Indeed, trauma is responsible for<br />

about one third of all hospital admissions, with 80 % of<br />

all injuries occurring in individuals younger than 45 years<br />

of age. Trauma is the leading cause of death in this age<br />

group and this group accounts for 75 % of total life cost due<br />

to injury. And what’s even more tragic: even in our days as<br />

many as 40 % of trauma deaths are avoidable The care of<br />

multiple injured victims has now become a team approach<br />

with nurses, medical technicians and consulting physicians.<br />

Four posttraumatic periods.<br />

In the posttraumatic period we have to make a distinction<br />

between four periods: the acute or reanimation period<br />

the primary or stabilization period, the secondary or<br />

regeneration period and the tertiary or rehabilitation<br />

period.<br />

The reanimation period and the primary period<br />

have always been considered as the periods for “life<br />

saving surgery”. Trauma patients are presenting with<br />

a combination of problems. Advances in diagnosis and<br />

treatment have been greatly influenced by technology.<br />

Thanks to these advances, a lot of injuries can now be<br />

treated in a non-operative way, for example, endovascular<br />

procedures to stop haemorrhage. Nevertheless, the<br />

experienced trauma surgeons still play a vital role.<br />

The great majority of lesions that have to be operated<br />

in our countries are lesions of the musculoskeletal system.<br />

Adequate treatment will not only improve the quality of<br />

life of trauma victims but will very often be life saving. For<br />

instance, the lack of recognition of haemorrhage in pelvic<br />

fractures or severe fractures of long bones, are notorious<br />

pitfalls and do result in preventable deaths. The role of<br />

the trauma surgeon involves more than haemostatasis.<br />

The surgeon has to remove damaged tissues, to repair the<br />

injured soft tissues and to stabilize fractures.<br />

The reanimation period.<br />

During this period, decompression, or drainage, of body<br />

cavities (tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponde) is<br />

necessary. Haemorrhage has to be localized and stopped.<br />

A typical example where surgical experience is<br />

prerequisite is in cases of complex pelvic injuries that<br />

still constitute common problems. Approximately 10 to<br />

20 % of pelvic fractures are complex injuries with a high<br />

likelihood of other major organ trauma or significant pelvic<br />

haemorrhage. Crush injuries and open pelvic fractures<br />

exhibit mortality rates in excess of 50% with a morbidity<br />

ranging from 30 to 74 %. These pelvic fractures are also<br />

very often associated with intra-abdominal injuries such<br />

as rupture of the bladder and the urethra, injuries of the<br />

rectum and the anus, neurological lesions and last but not<br />

least the pelvic compartment syndrome. Sometimes, an<br />

immediate urgent hemipelvectomy is the only procedure<br />

able to save lives.<br />

The primary stabilization period.<br />

During this period, injuries have to be treated that can<br />

become either life endangering or severely disabling<br />

without prompt treatment. In this period, the focus is on<br />

injuries of the musculoskeletal system especially those<br />

with severe soft tissue damage.<br />

combined session 29 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


“Early total trauma care” or “damage control”<br />

The most important decision now is the choice between<br />

the so-called “early total trauma care ”and“ damage<br />

control”. Until the mid-eighties delayed surgery, especially<br />

regarding the musculoskeletal system, was the rule in<br />

the polytrauma patient. The work of Bone and Bucholz<br />

however clearly demonstrated that delayed fixation of long<br />

bone fractures resulted in an increased risk of developing<br />

adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple<br />

organ failure (MOF). To prevent ARDS and MOF it was<br />

advocated to perform early total trauma care. All injuries<br />

in a polytrauma patient were advised to be treated in the<br />

same operation. This dramatically reduced the occurrence<br />

of ARDS and MOSF. However in the borderline patient the<br />

prolonged surgery can result in profound hypothermia,<br />

acidosis and coagulopathy. This second (iatrogenic) hit can<br />

initiate the cascade of the systemic inflammatory response<br />

syndrome (SIRS) resulting in ARDS and MOSF.<br />

The experience of surgeons dealing with victims of<br />

shoot outs in the drugs war of Colombia or the American<br />

suburbs learned that if only minimal surgery was performed,<br />

stopping the bleeding, preventing further contamination<br />

and minimal lavage and debridement followed by prolonged<br />

resuscitation in the ICU, the likelihood of developing MOSF<br />

decreased significantly. They called this approach “the<br />

damage control approach”.<br />

The “damage control approach” initially was used in<br />

patients with multiple thoraco-abdominal shot wounds.<br />

However it became clear that many polytrauma patient<br />

could benefit from this approach. The basic principles<br />

“stop the bleeding and stop the contamination” nowadays<br />

are not only applicable for thoraco-abdominal lesions, but<br />

also in the treatment of vascular, urologic (shunting) and<br />

musculoskeletal. At the same time the approach did evolve<br />

from a “bail-out” procedure towards a planned and staged<br />

approach to the poytrauma patient.<br />

This choice has to be influenced by the situation of the<br />

patient after initial resuscitation. If the stabilization of the<br />

patient could be obtained easily, then the surgeon has to<br />

choose early total trauma care. If not, damage control has<br />

to be chosen. This control also has to be considered as a<br />

planned approach, which only has one goal: early surgical<br />

hemostasis and control of bacterial contamination. The socalled<br />

orthopaedic damage control may not be forgotten:<br />

debridement and lavage, revascularization, decompression<br />

of the compartments, stabilization of long bones, (usually<br />

by external fixation) and, if necessary, primary amputation.<br />

Prevention of infection.<br />

The most important step in prevention of infection is<br />

early lavage and debridement. “The solution to pollution is<br />

dilution”: initial lavage exposes wounds for inspection and<br />

facilitates debridement. As to the use of antibiotics: in open<br />

fractures with relatively limited soft tissue damage (Type I<br />

and II to Gustilo) , cephalosporin will be sufficient in a clean<br />

environment; in highly contaminated environment ampicillin<br />

will be added. In open factures with severe soft tissue<br />

damage (Gustilo Type III) a combination of Cephalosporin,<br />

ampicillin and aminoglycosides will be given. There is no<br />

advantage to use topical antibiotics or antiseptics.<br />

Stabilization of the fracture.<br />

After resucitation and debridement , the fracture will<br />

be stabilized. The stabilization will also improve the<br />

resistance to infection in facilitating capillary proliferation<br />

and migration of white blood cells.<br />

The choice of the implant depends on the soft tissue<br />

damage, the type of fracture, the infrastructure of the<br />

hospital and surgeon’s experience.<br />

External fixation<br />

In the “damage control” situation very often an external<br />

fixator will be chosen. Early joint motion and rehabilitation<br />

will then often be possible . The technique is relatively easy<br />

and rapidly applied, the stability is sufficient, a reasonable<br />

anatomical reduction is possible and there is minimal<br />

additional soft tissue trauma. On the other hand there are<br />

a lot of disadvantages: the procedure is time consuming<br />

in complex fractures with large wounds, the pins also<br />

fixate musculotendinous units, there is a high incidence<br />

of delayed union and pin tract infection. The device may<br />

also interferewith the soft tissue reconstruction . For these<br />

reasons the fixator is only used in cases of extreme soft<br />

tissue damage (Gustilo Type III b and c) or as a temporary<br />

stabilization before definitive internal fixation. Other<br />

indications are metaphyseal fractures near the joint space<br />

and if bridging of a joint is necessary.<br />

The fixator can also be used for lifting procedures in<br />

cases of large bone defects.<br />

Internal fixation.<br />

Historically, primary internal fixation for open fractures<br />

was considered a contraindication because of an increased<br />

risk of infection. However it has been shown that even<br />

reaming procedures are not associated with a higher<br />

infection risk.<br />

We now know that immediate internal fixation is NOT<br />

associated with a higher infection rate than external<br />

fixation even not in type I-II-III open fractures, if lavage and<br />

debridement have been thorough. Internal fixation is also<br />

associated with better final functional results.<br />

And in closed fractures?<br />

It has been proven that early stabilization of fractures of<br />

long bones, especially of the femoral shaft , in polytrauma<br />

patients saves lives. It improves the peripheral blood<br />

combined session 30 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


flow and reduces blood loss. However, severe shock and<br />

pulmonary contusion are contraindications for the use<br />

of reamed implants as reaming can activate the PMN<br />

Lymphocytes and create fat embolisms resulting in adjacent<br />

lung damage.<br />

Wound closure?<br />

Wounds may only be closed if they are very clean, if all<br />

tissues are viable, and there is no tension on the margins.<br />

If not or in case of doubt, wounds have to be left open. If<br />

possible, delayed closure may be performed within five<br />

days. Then the host is allowed to mount wound defensive<br />

mechanisms and risk of anaerobic infection is reduced.<br />

In case of impending compartment syndrome, the<br />

fasciotomy should not be overlooked.<br />

The regeneration and the rehabilitation period.<br />

During these periods, the interventions are focused on<br />

the improvement of the functional and aesthetical results;<br />

on the improvement of the quality of life.<br />

Definitive wound closure and reconstruction of the soft<br />

tissues will be done now as well as internal fixation of the<br />

fractures. If necessary delayed union will be treated with<br />

secondary fixation and bone grafting.<br />

Attention will be given to physical, psychological and<br />

social rehabilitation.<br />

Conclusions.<br />

In the 21st century the treatment of complex fractures<br />

with soft tissue lesions is much improved. There are<br />

much better implants and better antibiotics but last but<br />

not least, there is an integrated approach to care by a<br />

multidisciplinary team.<br />

combined session 31 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

Resident Forum<br />

Thursday July 7<br />

16.30 <strong>–</strong> 19.00


Effects of humeral rotational osteotomy on contact<br />

mechanism of the canine elbow joint: an ex vivo<br />

study.<br />

Gutbrod A, Guerrero TG*<br />

Department of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.<br />

Introduction<br />

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of<br />

an external rotational osteotomy of the humerus on the<br />

forces acting in the canine elbow joint. Our hypothesis<br />

was that external humeral rotation of 15° would shift the<br />

peak pressure location and the centre of pressure laterally.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Eight canine forelimbs were used. A pressure sensor<br />

was fixed in a subchondral osteotomy distal to the elbow<br />

joint, and each leg was mounted in the testing apparatus.<br />

Measurements were taken in a neutral position and after<br />

15° of external rotation. The distal humerus was rotated<br />

by a mid-diaphyseal humeral osteotomy and stabilized with<br />

an internal fixator. Contact area, peak and mean contact<br />

pressure, peak pressure location, centre of pressure, and<br />

total force were acquired. Data was analyzed using paired<br />

T-tests. Significance was set at p≤0.05.<br />

Results<br />

After 15° of external rotation the peak pressure location<br />

and the centre of pressure were located 37.56 ± 15.9%<br />

(p=0.0001) and 21.5 ± 6.8% (p=0.0001) further laterally.<br />

No statistically significant differences were found between<br />

conditions for the contact area, peak contact pressure,<br />

mean pressure, and total force.<br />

Discussion<br />

The lateral shift of peak pressure and centre of pressure<br />

may be beneficial in dogs with medial compartment disease<br />

of the elbow joint. Being an ex-vivo study, care must be<br />

taken before extrapolating these results to a population of<br />

affected patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate<br />

the clinical effects of this osteotomy.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 35 small animal session


Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin<br />

staplers in 9 dogs and 9 cats<br />

M.Benlloch-Gonzalez, B.Bouvy*, E.Gomes, J.Hernandez, C.Poncet*.<br />

Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France.<br />

Introduction<br />

our purpose was to conduct a prospective study to<br />

report the use of skin staples for intestinal anastomosis<br />

(as described in experimental animals by Coolman) in dogs<br />

and cats clinically affected with intestinal disorder to (1)<br />

evaluate the adaptability of the anastomotic technique<br />

in cats and dogs of any weight, (2) identify the type and<br />

frequency of operative and postoperative complications<br />

associated with the skin stapler technique.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The prospective medical records included: -Preoperative<br />

data: signalment, history, clinical signs, physical findings,<br />

chemistry profile, complete blood count and abdominal<br />

ultrasound findings. -Intraoperative data: site and length<br />

of resection in the gastrointestinal tract, time to perform<br />

the anastomosis, number of staples used, presence of<br />

focal or generalized peritonitis, reasons for enterectomy<br />

and concurrent procedures performed. -Postoperative data:<br />

abdominal ultrasound examination at 3, 15 and 28 days<br />

postoperatively, patient follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months<br />

postoperatively, histopathology reports and complications<br />

(minor, major, short-term and long-term data).<br />

Results<br />

9 dogs and 9 cats met the inclusion criteria. Median<br />

body weight was 3.9 kg (range 2.8<strong>–</strong>5.7 kg) in cats and<br />

19.4 kg (range 6-39 kg) in dogs. Median time to perform<br />

the anastomosis was 4 min 22 s (range, 1 min 30 s <strong>–</strong> 7<br />

min 44 s). Minor complications (emesis [2], diarrhoea [1],<br />

anorexia [1] and hypovolaemic shock [1]) resolved with<br />

medical therapy and dietary manipulation. Two dogs and<br />

two cats died between 1 and 3 days after surgery. Necropsy<br />

in these cases revealed a partial obstructive ileus due to<br />

a stricture at the anastomotic site in the two cats and a<br />

partial dehiscence in one of them. Both cats had a marked<br />

luminal disparity oral and aboral to the site of resection<br />

at the moment of surgery. Increased wall thickness and<br />

steatitis persisted in all cases at the 28 th day ultrasound<br />

examination.<br />

Discussion/conclusion<br />

Too thin or too thick an intestinal wall thickness was<br />

not a limitation for the use of skin staples. Incidence of<br />

complications in this study (strictured anastomosis [11.1%]<br />

and dehiscence [5.5%]) was similar compared to data from<br />

published clinical studies (0-16%). The findings of this<br />

study suggest that bowel anastomosis with skin stapler<br />

is simple, safe in cases without marked luminal disparity<br />

and time efficient.<br />

small animal session 36 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Effect of three an aesthetic induction protocols on<br />

laryngeal function during laryngoscopy in normal cat<br />

Nelissen P., Aprea F., Corletto F., White RAS*.<br />

Dick White Referrals, Six Mile Bottom, UK<br />

Objectives:<br />

To evaluate the effect of 3 anaesthetic induction<br />

protocols on laryngeal motion in normal cats.<br />

Study design<br />

Randomized prospective clinical study.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Thirty-five client-owned cats with no previous history<br />

of respiratory dysfunction were randomly allocated to<br />

receive alfaxalone, propofol, or midazolam and ketamine<br />

to induce anaesthesia, after preanaesthetic medication<br />

with methadone. Video-laryngoscopy was performed<br />

and still images at maximum inspiration and expiration<br />

were used to measure the area and height of the rima<br />

glottidis. The percentage reduction of the glottic gap<br />

and of the normalized glottic gap area (NGGA) were<br />

calculated. Subjective scores for arytenoid movement<br />

were also obtained. Kruskal-Wallis test and ANOVA were<br />

used to compare reduction of normalized and percentage<br />

area. Pearson r-test was used to evaluate the correlation<br />

between subjective scores and objective measures of<br />

movement and between normalized and non-normalized<br />

area reduction.<br />

Results<br />

Reduction in glottis area and NGGA was greater in<br />

patients anaesthetized with midazolam and ketamine,<br />

compared to propofol and alfaxalone (p=0.0235 and<br />

p=0.0268 respectively). Significant correlations were found<br />

between the subjective score and percent reduction of<br />

area (p=0.0173), the subjective score and the reduction in<br />

NGGA (p=0.0023) and between percent reduction of area<br />

and reduction in NGGA (p=0.0006).<br />

Conclusions<br />

Induction of anaesthesia with midazolam and ketamine<br />

after preanaesthetic medication with methadone preserved<br />

arytenoid movement better during laryngoscopy. Subjective<br />

expert assessment supported this finding.<br />

Clinical relevance<br />

Misdiagnosis of laryngeal paralysis during laryngoscopy<br />

in cats can be avoided by using anaesthetic protocols with<br />

the least effect on laryngeal motility.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 37 small animal session


Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the<br />

dog: A descriptive cadaveric study.<br />

Vallefuoco R, Jardel N, Tessier A, Moissonnier P.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> Ecole Nationale Veterinaire d’Alfort, France.<br />

Objective<br />

To assess the feasibility of the oral tympanic bulla<br />

osteotomy and to evaluate the safety in safeguarding the<br />

inner ear, epitympanic recess, and neurovascular structures.<br />

Study Design<br />

Anatomic cadaveric study.<br />

Sample Population<br />

Nine fresh canine cadavers (tympanic bulla, n=17),<br />

different in size and skull conformation (mesocephalic,<br />

dolicocephalic and brachycephalic dogs).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Cadavers were positioned in dorsal recumbency with<br />

the mouth open. The ventral/oral aspect of tympanic bulla<br />

was located through the oropharynx by palpation. An oral<br />

approach to the tympanic bulla was performed under<br />

endoscopic assistance, and a K-wire (1.5-2 mm in diameter)<br />

was inserted into the bulla with a maximum angle of 15°<br />

relative to the plane of the hard palate. The wire was then<br />

introduced as deep as possible in the tympanic bulla. After<br />

anatomical dissection, the wire’s position in the middle<br />

ear and its relationship to the inner ear and neurovascular<br />

structures were evaluated.<br />

Results<br />

In all cases, the wire was placed safely into the most<br />

ventral aspect of tympanic bulla and without damaging<br />

the epitympanic recess. In none of the cases were the<br />

promontory and auditory ossicles damaged. No injury to<br />

the carotid artery and/or hypoglossal nerve was noted. In<br />

mesocephalic and dolicocephalic dogs, the oral approach<br />

to the tympanic bulla was easier than in brachycephalic<br />

dogs in which the tympanic bulla was less prominent and<br />

covered by a more significant oro-buccal musculature.<br />

Discussion/Conclusions<br />

Bulla osteotomy via an oral approach can be performed<br />

without a high risk of neurovascular damage and without<br />

damage to the promontory and auditory ossicles. Due to<br />

the narrow access to the bulla, this technique could be<br />

considered for bacteriological and histological sampling<br />

from middle ear, flushing the bulla, infusion of medication<br />

or drainage of the tympanic cavity in cases of otitis media.<br />

Future studies are required to validate the effectiveness<br />

and usefulness of this technique in clinical cases.<br />

small animal session 38 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Nephroliths and video-assisted nephrotomy in 8<br />

cases<br />

Buttin P., Cachon T.*, Carozzo C*., Maitre P., Arnault A., Fau D., Genevois JP., Viguier E*.<br />

VetAgro-Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon , France<br />

Introduction<br />

Renal and ureteral calculi are unusual clinical findings.<br />

Nevertheless, a recent increase in frequency has<br />

been observed. Medical treatment has limitations and<br />

nephrotomy (particularly bilateral) could have severe<br />

complications.<br />

Objectives<br />

The purpose of this study is to report removal of<br />

ureteral and renal calculi by a video-assisted nephrotomy<br />

(nephroscopy).<br />

Material and methods<br />

Prospective study of 3 dogs and 5 cats that presented<br />

with renal and/or ureteral calculi and were treated by<br />

removal of calculi by nephroscopy. Medical records were<br />

reviewed. Recorded information included breed, age, sex,<br />

clinical signs, complete blood analysis, RX, US, surgical<br />

findings and outcome.<br />

Results<br />

Eight animals were surgically treated from June 2008<br />

to October 2010. All animals were in a critical status<br />

and had renoliths with 3 affected bilaterally (1 dog, 2<br />

cats). Three animals had hydronephrosis and 2 had renal<br />

fibrosis. Nephroscopy was performed in all animals with<br />

3 bilateral procedures during the same anaesthesia. All<br />

animals but case 1had also a cystotomy. One pyelolithotomy<br />

had to be performed in case 2. One bilateral ureterotomy<br />

had to be performed. In all cases SCr and BUN levels,<br />

postoperatively and at follow-up showed a decrease or<br />

at least no worsening of the values. Four animals died of<br />

other complications.<br />

Discussion<br />

In all the cases, apart from one, nephroscopy allowed<br />

removal of renal and/or ureteral calculi with few<br />

complications directly related to the procedure. A<br />

bilateral procedure was performed in 3 cases, without<br />

adverse effect. Nevertheless, when severe renal function<br />

impairment is observed preoperatively, the prognosis is<br />

guarded. Nephroscopy may have several advantages over<br />

nephrotomy and/or ureterotomy.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 39 small animal session


Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in<br />

clean orthopaedic surgeries in dogs and cats<br />

Medl N 1 , Guerrero TG* 1 , Hölzle L 2 , Montavon PM 1<br />

1 <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2 Institute for Veterinary<br />

Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland<br />

Introduction<br />

The objectives of this study were to determine the<br />

frequency of contamination of the suction tip in three<br />

different operating modes, to assess the association of<br />

contamination with time, and to describe of the bacteria<br />

found. The hypotheses were (a) continuous suction would<br />

be inferior to the intermittent mode, (b) a chlorhexidine<br />

bath would further decrease contamination rates, and (c)<br />

the contamination rate would increase with prolonged<br />

surgical time.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Clean surgeries (n=75) were assigned to one of three<br />

groups: (1) continuous suction, (2) intermittent suction or<br />

(3) chlorhexidine-bath intermittent suction. Samples of the<br />

suction tip were taken and submitted for bacterial culture<br />

at 0, 20, 60 minutes and at the end of surgery. A control<br />

suction was operated in every surgery. Samples were taken<br />

at the end of surgery simultaneously with a swab from the<br />

surgical wound. A Fisher´s exact test was used to analyze<br />

data. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.<br />

Results<br />

Aerobic contamination rate of the suction tip was<br />

45.3%, with significantly higher contamination rates<br />

for the continuous suction group (64%) compared to the<br />

intermittent group (24%, P=0.03). The chlorhexidine-bath<br />

was not proven superior. Wound contamination ranged from<br />

4% to 8%. The organisms cultured were identical to those<br />

found in the positive suction tips during the same surgery.<br />

In surgeries lasting longer than 60 minutes contamination<br />

rates doubled. Bacterial culture mainly revealed coagulasenegative<br />

Staphylococci.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Intermittent suction was superior to continuous suction.<br />

Changing the suction tip appears advisable at 60 minutes.<br />

Cultures revealed bacteria that are associated with the<br />

normal air and skin flora.<br />

small animal session 40 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed<br />

dogs with medial compartment disease of the elbow<br />

N. Barthélémy¹, D. Griffon* ² , G. Ragetly², I. Carrera², D. Schaeffer²<br />

¹ Michigan State University,East Lansing,USA;² University of Illinois, Champaign,USA<br />

Objectives<br />

Prospective observational clinical study to report the<br />

short- (six weeks) and long-term (28 months) outcomes in<br />

young large breed dogs affected by medial compartment<br />

disease of the elbow and identify variables affecting the<br />

outcome.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Fifteen large breed dogs under three years of age<br />

were included in the study. Medial compartment disease<br />

was confirmed by radiography, computed tomography,<br />

and arthroscopy. Dogs were treated arthroscopically by<br />

fragment excision or subtotal coronoidectomy, with or<br />

without a proximal ulnar osteotomy. Parameters recorded<br />

at the time of treatment included the type of medial<br />

coronoid disease, radio-ulnar incongruency, degree of<br />

cartilage erosion and surgical treatment performed.<br />

Parameters recorded before, 6 weeks after and at least<br />

23 months after surgery included the radiographic score<br />

of osteoarthritis (OA) and trochlear notch sclerosis ratio<br />

(TNS), muscle circumference, range of motion (ROM) and<br />

the load distribution of the vertical ground reaction forces<br />

between thoracic and pelvic limbs.<br />

Results<br />

The ROM and the OA were inversely correlated at<br />

the time of diagnosis. Dogs diagnosed with radio-ulnar<br />

incongruency had a higher load distribution to the pelvic<br />

limbs at the pre-operative evaluation. No difference in final<br />

outcome was observed between surgical treatments. The<br />

load distributions were not different at six weeks compared<br />

to pre-operatively but the vertical impulse distributions<br />

were improved at the long-term evaluation despite a<br />

decreased ROM and an increased OA score. Radio-ulnar<br />

incongruency or a high degree of cartilage erosion was<br />

associated with a greater improvement at the short- and<br />

long-term evaluations. The TNS correlated with the degree<br />

of cartilage erosion at the time of surgery.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Limb function was improved at the long-term follow up<br />

but not at six weeks after surgery. The final outcome was<br />

not affected by the presence of radio-ulnar incongruency,<br />

the surgical technique, the OA score or the degree of<br />

cartilage erosion. Dogs with radio-ulnar incongruency<br />

were more lame pre-operatively but their improvement<br />

was greater post-operatively.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 41 small animal session


Comparison of 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated<br />

screws and 4.0 mm partially-threaded screws in a<br />

canine humeral condylar fracture model<br />

Rochereau P. 1 , Diop A. 2 , Maurel N. 2 , Gomez Clemente R. 2 , Gabanou P.A .3 , Bernardé A.* 1 .<br />

CHVSM, Saint- Martin Bellevue 1 (France). ENSAM, Laboratoire de Biomécanique et Remodelage Osseux,<br />

Paris (France) 2 . Synthes (France) 3<br />

Introduction<br />

The objective of this biomechanical study was to<br />

compare the inter-fragmentary stability of a condylar<br />

fracture model stabilized either with an AO 4.0 mm shortthreaded<br />

cancellous bone screw (Synthes) or with a 4.0<br />

mm self-drilling, self-tapping short-threaded cannulated<br />

screw (Synthes), inserted in a lag fashion.<br />

Materials & methods<br />

Ten pairs of canine humeri were harvested from dogs<br />

weighting 35kg to 45 kg. A lateral condylar fracture model<br />

was performed as previously described by Vida et al<br />

(2005). The fracture was stabilized using either a 4.0 mm<br />

cancellous screw or a 4.0 mm cannulated screw. Humeri<br />

were placed in a mechanical testing machine (INSTRON.<br />

5565). Stability of the simulated humeral fracture was<br />

assessed by loading the lateral condylar fragment in a<br />

proximal direction. Each construct was tested in a single<br />

ramp of constant load application at 60 mm/min until<br />

contact between the two margins of the gap occurs<br />

or until failure. Anatomic reduction, inter-fragmentary<br />

compression, stiffness, yield point (Y1), ultimate load at<br />

failure (Y2) of the bone-implant constructs and implant<br />

breakage, if any, were recorded. Physiologic loads at walk<br />

(60.1% body weight) and fast trot (131% body weight) were<br />

calculated. The corresponding displacement was assessed<br />

for both implants.<br />

Results<br />

Load at Y1 was 23.6% higher but not statistically<br />

different (P=.06) for the cancellous bone screws compared<br />

to the cannulated screws (738 ± 178 N vs 597 ± 133N,<br />

respectively). At Y1, the stiffness of the cancellous<br />

screw-bone construct (557 ± 148N/mm) was similar and<br />

not statistically different (P>.05) from the stiffness of the<br />

cannulated screw-bone construct (559 ± 142N/mm). At<br />

physiologic loads, no statistically significant differences<br />

were observed between the two implants (P>.05). Ultimate<br />

load at failure (Y2) was significantly higher (P= .01) for<br />

the cancellous bone screws compared to the cannulated<br />

screws (1261 ± 261N vs 1078 ± 231N, respectively). Three<br />

cannulated screws broke at the threaded:non-threaded<br />

junction during mechanical testing. None of the cancellous<br />

bone screws broke during the tests.<br />

Discussion<br />

At physiologic loads, stabilization of a simulated<br />

lateral humeral condylar fracture with a 4.0 mm partiallyshort-threaded<br />

cannulated screw resulted in comparable<br />

mechanical properties to those of a 4.0 mm cancellous<br />

partially-threaded screw. We chose 2 implants with<br />

minimal dimensional differences. At Y1, our results may<br />

indicate that the slight increase of the core diameter of<br />

the cannulated screw may balance the potential decrease<br />

of its mechanical properties due to the cannulation. The<br />

ultimate load at failure was statistically higher for the<br />

cancellous screws compared to the cannulated screws<br />

(P=.01). At Y2, three cannulated screws broke at the nonthreaded/threaded<br />

junction. This area may represent a zone<br />

of weakness because of the decrease of the shaft-to-core<br />

diameter. We choose self-drilling, self-tapping cannulated<br />

screws because their use may limit the number of the<br />

surgical steps, and can be less technically demanding<br />

and time consuming. However, we could not respect the<br />

insertion procedure recommended by Synthes as the<br />

distal threads could not engage the trans-cortex. Further<br />

studies are needed to refine the procedure of insertion of<br />

cannulated screws in the canine humeral condyle.<br />

small animal session 42 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation<br />

following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy<br />

stabilisation using three different TPLO plates<br />

Woodbridge N 3 , Corr S.A. 2 , Grierson J 1 , Arthurs G 1 .<br />

1 The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, England. School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University<br />

of Nottingham, England. Dick White Referrals, Suffolk, England<br />

Introduction<br />

The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospectively<br />

medial to lateral translation of the proximal tibial segment<br />

(tibial plateau) following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy<br />

(TPLO), stabilised with three types of plate.<br />

Method<br />

Postoperative radiographs of 79 dogs that had TPLO<br />

surgery, at The Royal Veterinary College London, using<br />

3 different types of plates were reviewed. Two plate<br />

types incorporated non locking screws: Slocum (22<br />

cases) and Orthomed Delta (33 cases) plates and one<br />

plate incorporating locking screws; Synthes TPLO Locking<br />

Compression Plate LCP (24 cases). The radiographs were<br />

reviewed by three Diplomate surgeons who were blinded<br />

to the type of implant used. Medial or lateral translation of<br />

the proximal tibial plateau relative to the tibial diaphysis<br />

was assessed and measured at the lateral tibial cortex at<br />

the osteotomy site.<br />

Results<br />

Mean (+/-SD) lateral translation of the tibial plateau<br />

was significantly greater when using the Synthes TPLO<br />

LCP with locking screws (+2.06mm+/-1.79) compared to<br />

the non locking Slocum plate (0.37mm+/-0.96mm) or the<br />

Orthomed Delta plate (0.02 mm+/-1.06).<br />

Conclusion<br />

Lateral translation of the tibial plateau segment may<br />

occur when using the Synthes TPLO LCP during TPLO<br />

surgery. “Clinical significance: The use of the Synthes TPLO<br />

LCP will maintain a malalignment of the tibial plateau.<br />

Accurate alignment of the tibial plateau must be ensured<br />

prior to application of the Synthes TPLO LCP.”<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 43 small animal session


Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole<br />

for canine sino-nasal aspergillosis.<br />

G. M. Hayes and J. L. Demetriou*.<br />

Queen’s Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK.<br />

Introduction<br />

Sino-nasal aspergillosis is a common cause of chronic<br />

rhinitis in the dog. It is frequently treated by trephination of<br />

the lateral compartment of the frontal sinuses and irrigation<br />

with clotrimazole 1% solution before adding a depot<br />

preparation of clotrimazole 1% cream. The aim of this study<br />

was to determine the persistence of clotrimazole cream in<br />

the canine frontal sinus and to assess the distribution of<br />

clotrimazole solution over the sino-nasal mucosa using this<br />

treatment protocol.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Two canine skulls were used to monitor the persistence<br />

of clotrimazole cream in the lateral compartment of the<br />

frontal sinus at 37ºC. Six canine cadaver heads were used<br />

to determine the distribution of clotrimazole solution around<br />

the frontal sinuses and nasal cavity by adding methylene<br />

blue stain to the irrigation solution before sectioning the<br />

heads sagittally.<br />

Results<br />

Clotrimazole cream persisted in the frontal sinus for a<br />

minimum of 96 hours. The nasal mucosa was completely<br />

stained in 8/12 sides and almost completely (>80%) stained<br />

in the remaining 4/12 sides. Flushing through the lateral<br />

compartment of the frontal sinus resulted in inadequate<br />

staining of the rostral compartment but medicating both<br />

the lateral and rostral compartments resulted in complete<br />

coating of all frontal sinus mucosa in 8/8 sides. Additional<br />

bony septae were present in 2/12 lateral frontal sinuses<br />

and 1/12 had a congenital foramen between the lateral<br />

compartment of the frontal sinus and the cranial cavity.<br />

Conclusions and Clinical Significance<br />

Clotrimazole cream has the potential to be retained in<br />

the frontal sinus for several days. The treatment protocol<br />

is effective at distributing medication to the entire nasal<br />

cavity although the success rate of the procedure could<br />

potentially be improved by medicating both rostral and<br />

lateral compartments of the frontal sinus. Variable frontal<br />

sinus anatomy may influence the safety and efficacy of<br />

topical treatments.<br />

small animal session 44 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 45 small animal session


small animal session 46 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

Poster session<br />

Friday July 8<br />

17.00 <strong>–</strong> 18.00


small animal session 48 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


A retrospective study of complications following<br />

modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate<br />

deficient stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010)<br />

Bernardé A., Rochereau P., Spengler E.<br />

CHVSM, Saint-Martin Bellevue (France).<br />

Objective<br />

To describe the surgical technique, outcome and<br />

complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy<br />

(mTTO) for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL)deficient<br />

stifle joints in dogs.<br />

Study Design<br />

Retrospective clinical study of 66 dogs with CrCL-deficient<br />

stifles (n=72).<br />

Methods<br />

Medical records of dogs that had mTTO over a 3 years period<br />

were reviewed. TTO was modified by caudal completion of<br />

the transverse osteotomies in order to deliberately rupture<br />

the caudal tibial cortices and to favorize the tibial plateau<br />

(TP) rotation. TP was fixed in compression using a standard<br />

unlocked TTO plate or a locking TPLO plate. Whenever<br />

possible, distal tibial tuberosity fracture (DTTF) was avoided<br />

and the tibial cortices at the distalmost cut of the tuberosity<br />

was keep intact. When it inadvertently fractured, the<br />

tuberosity was stabilized with 2 screws, or 1 screw and 1<br />

pin. Complications were recorded and separated into either<br />

major or minor complications based on the need for additional<br />

surgery. In-hospital re-evaluation of limb function and time to<br />

radiographic healing were reviewed. Further follow-up was<br />

obtained by telephone interview of owners. Influence of DTTF,<br />

opposite stifle status, TP plating mode, or DTTF fixation if<br />

any were analyzed using multivariate discriminating analysis<br />

(significance at p≤.05).<br />

Results<br />

Medical records of 66 dogs that had 72 mTTO were<br />

reviewed. Six dogs had bilateral mTTO, 1 in the same time,<br />

5 at 8±2.3 months interval. Sixteen had an extracapsular<br />

stabilization on the opposite side 11±5 months earlier. Mean<br />

age was 5 ±2.3 yrs, mean weight was 43±7.8 Kg and<br />

male/female ratio was 74% at surgery. DTTF occurred<br />

in 23 of 72 (31.9%) mTTO. Complications occurred<br />

in 11 on 72 (15.2%) procedures (6.9% major, 8.3%<br />

minor). All occurred within the 6 postoperative weeks.<br />

Major complications included plate loosening and<br />

subsequent tibial fracture (n=1), and tibial tuberosity<br />

fixation loosening (n=4). Minor complications included<br />

seroma formation (n=2), and incisional trauma (n=4).<br />

All but one major complications were treated with<br />

successful outcomes. All minor complications resolved.<br />

The mean time to documented radiographic healing<br />

was 12.2 weeks. Final in-hospital re-evaluation of limb<br />

function (mean, 13.2 weeks) was recorded for 56 dogs,<br />

showing no (65%), mild (31%), moderate (4%), or severe<br />

(0%) lameness. All but 1 owners interviewed were<br />

satisfied with outcome and 88.7% reported a marked<br />

improvement or a return to pre-injury status. DTTF and<br />

bilateral procedures were associated with a higher risk<br />

of major complications after mTTO. Short length of the<br />

proximal screw into the tibial tuberosity was associated<br />

with a higher risk of complications after DTTF.<br />

Conclusions<br />

mTTO is a procedure comparable with alternate<br />

methods of CrCL repair with expected good to excellent<br />

functional outcome. Major complications, although<br />

uncommon, are related to DTTF especially when<br />

repaired with an insufficient proximal screw purchase<br />

and to bilateral procedures.<br />

Clinical Relevance<br />

mTTO procedure can be successfully used to obtain<br />

the dynamic stability of a CrCL-deficient stifle joint in<br />

dogs.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 49 small animal session


Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine<br />

condylar fractures by finite element analysis<br />

B. Böhme 1 , V. d’Otreppe 2 , J.P. Ponthot 2 and M. Balligand<br />

1 Kleintierklinik Bremen, Bremen, Germany; 2 Aerospace and Mechanical Department- University of Liège,<br />

Belgium, 3 Department of Clinical Science, University of Liège, Belgium.<br />

Condylar humeral fractures are classified as medial,<br />

lateral or bicondylar (Y-T) fractures and are believed to be<br />

associated with minor, indirect trauma, predominantly in<br />

immature dogs. It is believed that these fractures occur in<br />

extension of the elbow by proximal translation of the radius.<br />

The objective of this three-dimensional finite element<br />

analysis was to confirm the pathogenesis of condylar<br />

fractures, to determine the influence of bone positioning<br />

on fracture type and to evaluate the intraosseus stress<br />

distribution before fracturing.<br />

Based on computer tomographic scans (n=6; two right<br />

forelimbs, Beagle, 4 months of age, male, 7-7,5 kg, scans<br />

in -10°,0° and +10° of endo-/exorotation; 1mm sections)<br />

finite element analysis was performed (n=3) to create a<br />

three-dimensional model of the canine elbow. Bone contact,<br />

stress-strain distribution within the distal humerus before<br />

fracture and failure mode as highest intraosseus stress<br />

distribution were reported in 60°, 130° and 150° of flexion-<br />

extension angle (FEA), abduction- adduction angle (AbAdA)<br />

of -20°, 0° and +20° and in -10°, 0° and +10° of radioulnar<br />

endo-/exorotation (RA).<br />

In contrast to the hypothesis that the radial bone would<br />

be the interacting structure, the humeroulnar interaction<br />

is clearly dominant, less often radius and ulna are both<br />

interacting. Abduction/ Adduction of the elbow at the time<br />

of trauma seem to be an important influence on fracture<br />

type. Endo- and exorotation of the radioulnar bones<br />

additionally influences the stress-strain distribution within<br />

the distal humerus.<br />

Condylar fracture pathogenesis is more complex than<br />

described in the literature. They may not only occur in<br />

elbow extension as previously reported. The ulna may<br />

even play a more important role in condylar fracture<br />

pathogenesis then the radius. Additionally fracture type<br />

may be sensitive to bone positioning during trauma. The<br />

suspected fracture type is sensitive to abduction-adduction<br />

as well as radioulnar endo-/exorotation.<br />

small animal session 50 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: three<br />

representative cases.<br />

Boland L, Gomes E, Payen G, Bouvy B*, Poncet C*<br />

CHV Frégis, Arcueil, France<br />

Introduction<br />

Zygomatic salivary gland disease is uncommon in dogs,<br />

and to our knowledge, as few as 17 cases have been<br />

previously reported. The purpose of this report was to<br />

describe three additional cases of zygomatic gland diseases<br />

using the same diagnostic approach and treated with the<br />

same surgical management.<br />

<strong>Animals</strong><br />

Three dogs : a 3-month-old male Basset Hound, a<br />

10-year-old male Staffordshire Terrier, and a 14-year-old<br />

female dalmatian.<br />

Methods<br />

Salivary gland disease were diagnosed by fine-needle<br />

aspiration and magnetic resonance imaging in dogs. They<br />

were treated surgically by a modified lateral orbitotomy and<br />

zygomatic glands were submit on histologic examination.<br />

Results<br />

Pathologic diagnosis were a sialocele, a malignant<br />

mixed salivary tumor, and a sialadenitis. The outcome<br />

was favourable in two cases whereas recurrence of local<br />

disease wartranted euthanasia 3 months following surgery<br />

in the neoplasctic case.<br />

Discussion/conclusion<br />

Less of 20 cases cases of zygomatic gland diseases<br />

have been reported in litterature, and this paper described<br />

3 aditionnal cases : a sialocele, a neoplasia, and a<br />

sialadenitis. In our three cases, diagnosis of zygomatic<br />

gland disease was made with MRI and we considered MRI<br />

as the most valuable complementary exam to diagnose the<br />

zygomatic gland diseases. MRI produced detailed images<br />

of orbital tissues and provided more information about the<br />

extent of pathology than the other imaging techniques,<br />

giving a greater chance to make a correct diagnosis and<br />

allowing appropriate selection of surgical approach. The<br />

modified lateral surgical technique was elected because<br />

this approach provided an optimal exposure, with<br />

preservation of the palpebral nerve.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 51 small animal session


True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel<br />

blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth<br />

deformity <strong>–</strong> planning and execution of technique<br />

N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou 1 , K. Ash 1 , V. Wavreille 1 , Z. Szanto 2<br />

1 Fitzpatrick Referrals, Surrey, UK, 2 Twin Falls Veterinary Clinic, Avenue East. Twin Falls, Idaho, USA<br />

Introduction<br />

Dome osteotomies in literature to date have constituted<br />

cylindrical or crescentic cuts. We aimed to describe the<br />

application of a new dome blade design and trigonometric<br />

principles for execution of true spherical osteotomy (TSO)<br />

in antebrachial growth deformities.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

A dome blade was used to create osteotomies in plastic<br />

bone models, the surfaces of which were laser-scanned<br />

and trigonometric calculations were applied to align the<br />

epicentre (O) of the blade with the midpoint of the model<br />

in frontal and sagittal planes (MPfs). Complex ABGD in<br />

a dog was assessed using CORA methodology applied to<br />

radiographic images and a 3D model reconstructed from<br />

CT scans. Trigonometric formulas for execution of a TSO<br />

were applied.<br />

Results<br />

Blade orientation prevented translation at the osteotomy<br />

site in frontal and sagittal planes after correction of<br />

torsion. Preoperative FPA radiographically was 13o valgus,<br />

whereas FPA on the 3D model was 0o. Postoperative FPA<br />

radiographically was 50 varus.<br />

Discussion/conclusions<br />

Discrepancy between true FPA and that measured<br />

radiographically was attributable to radiographic distortion<br />

due to rotation. The angulation correction axis (ACA) of<br />

a TSO is located at O and therefore separated from the<br />

osteotomy by the sphere radius. To avoid translation of the<br />

bone axes when a TSO is employed to correct a torsional<br />

deformity, the ACA should pass through the CORA on the<br />

midline of MPfs and not any of the CORAs on the bisector<br />

line of the deformity. This constitutes a new rule specifically<br />

pertinent to dome osteotomies.<br />

small animal session 52 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Total hip replacement with reiforced augmentation<br />

of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the sop<br />

implant and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal<br />

acetabular rim deficiency<br />

N. Fitzpatrick, M. Bielecki, R Yeadon*, M. Hamilton*<br />

Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK<br />

Introduction<br />

Our objective was to describe a surgical technique<br />

for reinforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular<br />

rim (RADAR) using a SOP locking plate and<br />

polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement, and to<br />

report clinical outcome in seven dogs.<br />

Methods<br />

Medical records of seven dogs with large dorsal<br />

acetabular rim deficits, undergoing total hip replacement<br />

(THR) with RADAR using a SOP plate and PMMA were<br />

evaluated retrospectively. RADAR involved anchorage of<br />

a pre-contoured 2.0 or 2.7 mm SOP plate dorsal to the<br />

acetabulum followed by application of PMMA cement<br />

to cover the pre-prepared acetabulum and the plate.<br />

Cemented acetabular components were used in all cases.<br />

Implant associated complications were recorded. Minimum<br />

six month follow-up was available for all cases.<br />

Results<br />

In all dogs lameness improved at medium-term<br />

reassessment (median 8 months, range 6-11 months).<br />

Complications included transient sciatic neuropraxia in<br />

2/7 dogs, but this resolved by 3 months postoperatively<br />

in both dogs.<br />

Conclusions<br />

RADAR using a SOP TM plate and PMMA cement is viable<br />

and may facilitate placement of acetabular THR component<br />

implantation in dogs with severe DAR insufficiency. All dogs<br />

returned to full function at medium-term reassessment.<br />

In dogs with a paucity of dorsal acetabular rim, RADAR<br />

using SOP/PMMA may facilitate cemented acetabular THR<br />

component implantation.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 53 small animal session


Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement<br />

of frontal plane angulation: a cadaveric radiographic<br />

analysis<br />

Piras LA 1 , Peirone B 1 , Fox DB 2<br />

1 University of Turin, Italy. 2 University of Missouri, USA.<br />

Objectives<br />

The objectives of this study were to quantify the effect of<br />

antebrachial torsion on the miscalculation of radial valgus<br />

measured radiographically and to assess a radiographic<br />

positioning method used to mitigate torsion-associated<br />

artifactual miscalculation of concurrent frontal plane<br />

angulation of the antebrachium.<br />

Methods<br />

A canine cadaver forelimb was used to model different<br />

combinations of valgus and external torsion to study<br />

the effects of torsion on the radiographic calcaultion of<br />

concurrent frontal plane angulation.<br />

Results<br />

Both 0° and 15° torsional iterations possessed mean AV<br />

values between 0° and 5° for every valgus increment. With<br />

torsion of 30° and higher, mean AV values varied widely<br />

and did not fall within the 0°-5° accepted range except for<br />

three TV iterations of the 60° torsional group (valgus 20°,<br />

25° and 30°). Rotationally re-positioning the limb in an<br />

attempt to alleviate the AV discrepancies resulted in the<br />

30° torsional group having acceptable AV values for valgus<br />

values between 0°-20°, the 45° torsional group having<br />

acceptable AV values for TV values between 0°-15°, and<br />

the 60° torsional group having acceptable AV values for<br />

TV values between 0°-10°.<br />

Clinical Significance<br />

Increasing antebrachial torsion interferes with accurate<br />

radiographic measurement of frontal plane deformities.<br />

Specifically, torsion in excess of 15° results in radiographic<br />

artifacts greater than 5° such that accurate surgical<br />

planning appears unreliable.<br />

small animal session 54 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Latero-distal transposition of the tibial crest for<br />

patella alta and medial luxation<br />

Segal U., Shani J*<br />

Knowledge Farm Specialist‘s Referral Center, Beit Berl, Israel<br />

Medial patellar luxation is a medial displacement of the<br />

patella from the trochlear groove. In dogs, medial luxations<br />

account for 75% of all patellar luxation cases, and are<br />

frequently associated with patella alta, i.e., an abnormally<br />

high (proximal) position of the patella in the femoral groove.<br />

The common surgical treatment of medial luxation is<br />

osteotomy of the tibial crest and its lateral transposition.<br />

This is performed in order to correct the mechanical axis,<br />

to neutralize the force created by the medial component<br />

of the quadriceps muscle, and to place the patella in the<br />

correct anatomical alignment. Postoperative complications<br />

in dogs is estimated to be 18<strong>–</strong>29% of cases, with up to<br />

48% involving re-luxation.<br />

We hypothesized that, in cases of medial luxation<br />

involving patella alta, addition of a distal component to the<br />

tibial crest transposition will distally transpose the patella<br />

into the patellar groove thus reducing the recurrence rates<br />

of luxation. We performed the procedure on 12 dogs and<br />

our results reveal that latero-distal transposition of the<br />

tibial crest produced better clinical outcome. This improved<br />

surgical procedure is easily preformed and may become, in<br />

the future, standard treatment of medial patellar luxation<br />

with patella alta.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 55 small animal session


Morphological comparison of the middle ear between<br />

French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs.<br />

L.Souchu 1 , T. Chuzel 2 , C. Carozzo* 3 .<br />

1 Clinique des Perrières, Blois, France; 2 Voxcan, Marcy l’Etoile, France ; 3 Surgery unit, VetAgroSup, Campus<br />

vétérinaire, Marcy l’Etoile, France.<br />

The objective of this study was to compare normal and<br />

pathological morphology of the middle ear of the French<br />

Bulldog with normal morphology of non-brachycephalic<br />

dogs using computed tomography (CT).<br />

CT scans from French Bulldogs (FB) (n=34) with or without<br />

middle ear disease and non-brachycephalic dogs(NBD)<br />

(n=36) without middle ear disease were reviewed. Ratios<br />

between inter-jugular processes distance and height of the<br />

Epi+Mesotympanum (rHem) and external acoustic meatus<br />

(rHeam) , height(rHh), width(rWh) and length(rLh) of the<br />

hypotymanum, percentage of tympanic bulla (TB) protrusion<br />

from the skull (%Hin and %Hout) were calculated from<br />

2D view. Relative position of TB and temporo-mandibular<br />

joint (TMJ) were determined with surface rendering 3D<br />

reconstruction. Data were compared using paired-sample<br />

(independent) t-test with p


Stabilisation of periarticular fractures or osteotomies<br />

with an LCP notched head T-plate.<br />

C. J. Tan, K.A. Johnson*.<br />

University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia.<br />

Introduction<br />

Fractures or osteotomies involving a small periarticular<br />

bone fragment can prove challenging to stabilise. The<br />

purpose of this study was to describe the use of a locking<br />

compression plate (LCP) notched head T-plate in the<br />

stabilisation of a variety of peri-articular and articular<br />

fractures or osteotomies in small dogs and cats.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Client owned animals that had a periarticular or articular<br />

fracture or osteotomy stabilised with a notched head<br />

locking T plate were reviewed. Intraoperative complications<br />

and plate modification (contouring or cutting) were<br />

recorded. The type and size of screws used was recorded.<br />

Radiographs were reviewed to assess implant position<br />

and, when available, follow up radiographs evaluated for<br />

degree on bone healing.<br />

Results<br />

An LCP notched head T-plate was used in one cat and four<br />

dogs, resulting in a total of 6 surgeries. The mean weight<br />

of the animals was 3.77 +/- 1.42 kg (range 2.37-5.8kg). Of<br />

the 6 surgical procedures, 3 were fractures and 3 were<br />

osteotomies. The median number of screws used was 6<br />

(range 5-7) and a combination of locking and cortex screws<br />

were used in all constructs. The plate was modified in all<br />

cases. Complications encountered during surgery involved<br />

the direction of the locking screws towards the articular<br />

surface. Radiographic union was achieved at 8 weeks in<br />

all 4 cases with follow up radiographs<br />

Conclusions<br />

This study reports the successful use of a locking<br />

notched head T plate in a variety of clinical cases. Further<br />

investigations into the application of this plate are<br />

warranted.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 57 small animal session


Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the<br />

thigh region.<br />

M. Verset 1 , T. Cachon* 2 , D. Rémy 2 , C. Carozzo* 2 .<br />

1 Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, France, 2 VetAgroSup, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, France.<br />

Simple lipomas are the most common adipose tissue<br />

tumours, whereas infiltrative lipomas (IL) are rarely<br />

diagnosed.<br />

A 8-year-old male Labrador Retriever (LR) is presented<br />

for a swelling of the lateral side of the right thigh and a<br />

7-year-old male Beauceron for recurrence of a mass in<br />

the caudal region of the left thigh. A CT exam concludes<br />

to a lipoma or liposarcoma of the thigh with muscular<br />

invasion. Both tumours are resected after blunt and sharp<br />

dissection of the surrounding sound muscles. In the LR,<br />

an approach of the femoral diaphysis and distal femur<br />

by lateral incision allows tumour and infiltrated vastus<br />

lateralis muscle excision. In the Beauceron, approach of<br />

the caudal region of the femur by caudomedial incision<br />

allows tumour and infiltrated semimembranosus muscle<br />

resection. Two Redon’s drains are placed for continuous<br />

suctioning, before layered closure.<br />

Pathology is diagnostic of IL and surgical margins<br />

diagnosed as tumour-free. A CT check-up at 14 weeks<br />

post-op shows no images of tumoral recurrence. Both<br />

dogs are in good condition without any thigh swelling 36<br />

months post-op (Beauceron) and 33 months post-op (LR).<br />

IL cannot be distinguished from the more common<br />

simple lipomas by cytology or small biopsy specimens.<br />

Although considered benign, they are locally aggressive<br />

and commonly invade adjacent tissues. CT is used to better<br />

delineate these tumours but differentiation from normal fat<br />

is a problem. MRI is the gold standard exam for adipose<br />

tissue tumours in humans. Aggressive treatment, including<br />

amputation when local complete resection is impossible,<br />

may be necessary for local control. Complete excision of IL<br />

in the thigh region is often difficult because of the large size<br />

of the tumour, vascular or nervous structures entrapment,<br />

and indistinct margins. Dead space management after<br />

tumour excision is necessary. Complete excision may not<br />

be possible without interfering with normal limb function.<br />

Pathologic analysis of the tumour is essential for definitive<br />

diagnosis and analysis of surgical margins is crucial in so far<br />

as it influences prognosis and may lead to surgical revision.<br />

Handling of infiltrative lipomas, as far as diagnosis and<br />

resection are concerned, may be a real challenge.<br />

small animal session 58 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Owner based metrology instruments for conditions<br />

of canine chronic mobility impairment - contruct and<br />

criterion validity of LOAD, HCPI and CBPI<br />

Walton MB 1 , Innes JF 1 , Lascelles BDX* 2<br />

1 Univeristy of Liverpool, Neston, UK. 2 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA<br />

Background<br />

Owner-based questionnaires are frequently used in<br />

clinical studies to assess pain and function. This study<br />

tests further, and compares, psychometric properties of<br />

three promising instruments: Liverpool Osteoarthritis in<br />

Dogs (LOAD, the helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HCPI) and the<br />

Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI).<br />

Methods<br />

Dogs with conditions causing long-standing mobility<br />

impairment were recruited. Following clinical and<br />

orthopaedic examination of the dogs, their owners were<br />

asked to complete each of the instruments. The dogs then<br />

underwent force-platform analysis. An asymmetry index<br />

for peak vertical force for the lame limb was calculated as<br />

described by Fanchon (2007). Scores for each instrument,<br />

and asymmetry indices were then compared using<br />

Spearma’s Rank Correlation.<br />

Results<br />

There were significant correlations between all<br />

metrology instruments, including all factors of the CBPI.<br />

Spearman’s Rank Correlations (r s ) between the separate<br />

instruments varied from 0.48 (for LOAD against CBPI Pain<br />

Severity Score) to 0.6 (for LOAD against HCPI).<br />

No instrument score correlated significantly with<br />

asymmetry index for peak vertical force, with r s ranging<br />

from 0.01 for HCPI, to -0.34 for the CBPI “Overall” factor.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The significant correlation between instrument scores<br />

suggests that they are all influenced by common factors.<br />

This comparison constitutes a measure of construct<br />

validity. Criterion validity of a metrology instrument is<br />

tested by comparison with a “gold-standard” measure.<br />

Force platform analysis provides an objective measure of<br />

limb function. The poor correlation of any instrument score<br />

with asymmetry index may either suugest poor criterion<br />

valdity, or that direct comparison of total scores with this<br />

objective measure is an imperfect test of this feature.<br />

Further work is necessary to elucidate the reasons for this<br />

lack of correlation.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 59 small animal session


combined session 60 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Infection control in surgical<br />

practice<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

08.30 <strong>–</strong> 12.30


combined session 62 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Surgical site infections: Incidence, relevance, risk<br />

factors and surveillance<br />

J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />

Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />

Introduction<br />

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an inherent risk of<br />

any surgical procedure. By their nature, surgeries involve<br />

compromising the normal protective barriers that the body<br />

uses to prevent infections by the multitude of bacteria that<br />

are present on or in the body, and which are encountered<br />

in daily life. The advancement of veterinary medicine can<br />

result in a paradoxical increase in SSIs, as more aggressive<br />

surgical procedures are performed and procedures are<br />

performed on patients who are alive because of aggressive<br />

medical interventions, but exist in a compromised state.<br />

Definitions<br />

Prior to detailed discussion of SSIs, it is important to<br />

achieve consensus, or at least understanding, or what<br />

constitutes an SSI. Standard definitions must be used to<br />

allow for reasonable comparison of data from different<br />

locations, and to facilitate proper identification of<br />

SSIs. Standard criteria are also needed to differentiate<br />

infection from inflammation, something that is not<br />

always straightforward. US Centers for Disease Control<br />

and Prevention (CDC) has developed standard criteria<br />

for defining SSIs. 1 These classify SSIs into superficial<br />

incisional, deep incisional and organ/space SSI. It is<br />

reasonable to apply these criteria equally to veterinary<br />

medicine and it is critical to use an objective definition<br />

when evaluating SSIs. For example, a superficial surgical<br />

site infection must meet the following criteria:<br />

infection occurs with 30 days of the operation<br />

and<br />

involves only the skin and subcutaneous issues<br />

of the incision<br />

and<br />

patient has at least one of the following:<br />

• purulent drainage from the superficial incision<br />

• organisms that are isolated from a properly<br />

collected culture of fluid or tissue from the<br />

superficial infection<br />

• at least one of the following signs of infection: pain<br />

or tenderness, localized swelling, redness or heat<br />

and superficial incision is deliberately opened by the<br />

surgeon, and is culture-positive or is not cultured<br />

Incidence if SSIs in companion animals<br />

Tremendous efforts are expended in human medicine to<br />

collect and analyse data regarding SSIs, ranging from local<br />

data collection in individual hospitals to formal national<br />

or international surveillance programs. Comparable<br />

surveillance systems are lacking in veterinary medicine.<br />

Various reasons for the relative lack of surveillance exist.<br />

The overall morbidity and mortality associated with SSIs<br />

in veterinary patients may be less than in human patients,<br />

particularly given the greater number of high-risk humans<br />

(e.g. elderly, significant comorbidies) that undergo surgery<br />

and the larger number of highly invasive procedures that<br />

are performed in human medicine. However, other factors<br />

may also be involved, particularly a poorly developed<br />

‘culture’ of infection control in veterinary medicine, smaller<br />

facilities that limit the scope of studies, and the presence<br />

of relatively few individuals with interest and expertise for<br />

performing epidemiological studies.<br />

Despite the limitations, various studies have reported<br />

SSI rates in veterinary surgery, including overall infection<br />

rates and rates for specific surgical procedures. These have<br />

indicated rates of 0 <strong>–</strong> 18%, 2-9 and assessment of overall<br />

SSI rates is hard to do because of the different risks of SSI<br />

that are likely associated with different types of procedures.<br />

Procedure-specific rates have been reported, such as 6.6%<br />

(defined SSI) to 8.4% (inflammation/infection) for TPLO.<br />

Inherent limitations with many of these studies include<br />

relatively small sample sizes, the lack of use of standard<br />

definitions, lack of clear attempts to differentiate infection<br />

from inflammation and reliance on retrospective data from<br />

medical records. The latter limitation may be significant<br />

because a large percentage of infections may never be<br />

documented. This is particularly true for superficial SSIs<br />

that are treated by someone other than the original surgeon,<br />

combined session 63 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011<br />

4, 10


as communication between veterinary hospitals is not<br />

always optimal.<br />

Impact of SSIs<br />

While relatively uncommon (at least for most surgical<br />

procedures), SSIs can have significant impacts on patients,<br />

owners and veterinarians. Severe illness and death are<br />

obvious concerns, but non-fatal SSIs can have tremendous<br />

impacts because of the need for ongoing treatment, revision<br />

surgery and sub-optimal endpoint outcome. Some effects,<br />

such as patient morbidity, patient mortality and increased<br />

treatment costs, are readily quantifiable. Others, such<br />

as client frustration and grief, veterinary frustration,<br />

potential liability, and negative public perceptions may<br />

be very important but difficult to quantify. While the<br />

population impact of post-operative infections in veterinary<br />

medicine may be low because of the low incidence in most<br />

populations (in the absence of an outbreaks), severe or fatal<br />

infections that develop in a small number of patients can<br />

be economically and emotionally draining for clients and<br />

veterinarians, irrespective of their low incidence. Therefore,<br />

even if the incidence of SSIs in veterinary medicine is low,<br />

the impact can be disproportionately large.<br />

Trends in SSIs<br />

Inadequate data are available to provide objective<br />

information about changes in SSI rates. However, anecdotal<br />

information suggests that SSIs may be an increasing<br />

concern, particularly in elective orthopedic procedures,<br />

perhaps largely due to the emergence and dissemination<br />

of multidrug resistant opportunistic pathogens such as<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.<br />

Risk Factors<br />

Risk factors for a variety of surgical procedures have<br />

been extensively evaluated in human medicine and include<br />

patient (diabetes, nicotine use, obesity, immunosuppressive<br />

therapy, malnutrition, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />

aureus (MRSA) colonization, prolonged hospitalization),<br />

procedure (wound classification, surgeon operation<br />

volume), pre-operative (hair removal, patient skin<br />

preparation, surgical team hand/forearm preparation,<br />

antimicrobial prophylaxis), surgical (operating room<br />

environment, duration, surgical instrument management,<br />

surgical attire and drapes, surgical aseptic technique)<br />

and post-operative (incision care, antimicrobial therapy)<br />

factors.11-13<br />

Many of these risk factors are probably applicable to<br />

veterinary medicine, yet the relative importance of each<br />

is unknown as risk factor data in veterinary medicine are<br />

limited. Care must be taken to use human data for guidance,<br />

but not to over-interpret the relevance of human studies<br />

because of the marked differences in patient populations,<br />

operating environments, post-operative care, duration of<br />

hospitalization, incidence of comorbidities, and various<br />

other factors. Large, well-designed risk factor analyses are<br />

required for veterinary procedures, yet these are rare and<br />

are often difficult to perform because of the large samples<br />

sizes that are required and the need for prospective study<br />

and active identification of surgical site infections (rather<br />

than reliance on medical record data).<br />

Surgical classification (clean, clean/contaminated,<br />

contaminated, dirty) has been associated with SSIs in<br />

both general small animal surgery and equine orthopedic<br />

surgery, 3, 14 however one study questioned its usefulness<br />

in small animals. 2 Duration of surgery has also been<br />

associated with increased SSI rates in both horses and<br />

small animals, 2, 3, 14, 15 as has duration of anesthesia in dogs<br />

and cats. 15 Number of people present in the operating room<br />

was also significant in a large study of dogs and cats. 3<br />

Clipping before anesthetic induction was associated with<br />

a higher SSI rate in another. 2 The use of staples versus<br />

suture for skin closure was associated with increased<br />

risk of inflammation/infection in dogs undergoing surgery<br />

for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. 4 Other factors that<br />

have been associated with SSIs in small animals include<br />

presence of a drain, dog size (heavier dogs at higher risk),<br />

gender, increasing body weight, concurrent endocrinopathy<br />

and the use of propofol. 3, 10, 15, 16 Data regarding the role of<br />

2, 4, 10<br />

antimicrobials in SSI prevention have been mixed.<br />

SSI Surveillance<br />

General issues regarding surveillance are discussed<br />

in proceedings notes for a separate presentation.<br />

SSI surveillance requires consideration of the goal of<br />

surveillance, the type of data that are available, the type<br />

of data that can reasonably be collected and how results<br />

will be used.<br />

Monitoring surgical site infection (SSI) rates<br />

One of the more common areas where surveillance<br />

can provide benefits is the area of SSIs. This is a readily<br />

identifiable problem of significant importance in veterinary<br />

practices and, if extrapolation from human medicine is<br />

accurate, an area where surveillance and other infection<br />

control practices can have a significant impact.<br />

Two important pieces of information are needed for<br />

accurate SSI surveillance:<br />

1) Number of infections (numerator)<br />

This requires identification of all SSI cases. To do so, a<br />

standard definition must be used, as is discussed above.<br />

Standard criteria for identification and classification of SSIs<br />

have been developed for human medicine and these are<br />

applicable to veterinary patients. Because inflammation<br />

or suture reaction are more common than infection, 24<br />

differentiating infectious from non-infectious complications<br />

is critical to obtain an accurate estimate of SSI rates.<br />

Consistent use of standard definitions is required to obtain<br />

adequate data.<br />

As discussed above, a large percentage of SSIs do<br />

not become apparent until after the animal has been<br />

discharged and capturing those cases is important.<br />

combined session 64 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Many will presumably be identified at the time of suture<br />

removal or when presented with a clinically apparent<br />

SSI, however, some may be missed if the patient is not<br />

returned to the surgeon, a particular problem with referral<br />

hospitals and emergency clinics. Recent data involving<br />

prospective, active follow-up of surgical cases in one<br />

referral institution indicate that approximately 50% of SSIs<br />

do not end up being reported in the medical record,(Weese<br />

et al, unpublished data) highlighting potential problems<br />

with retrospective, record-based data collection. Good<br />

communication between practices is important. A standard<br />

rule is that every SSI must be reported to someone. If a<br />

veterinarian identifies an SSI in a patient that underwent<br />

surgery elsewhere, this should be reported to the original<br />

surgeon.<br />

Reporting of SSI rates should be done in real time, to<br />

ensure that the data actually get recorded and to facilitate<br />

prompt recognition of problems. Ongoing centralized data<br />

collection is critical, particularly in large practices where<br />

early stages of an outbreak may be missed if multiple<br />

surgeons encounter small numbers of SSIs but fail to realize<br />

the scope of the problem because they do not report data to<br />

a specific individual or communicate amongst themselves.<br />

2) Number of procedures (denominator)<br />

The number of procedures performed is required for<br />

determination of SSI rate. This can be calculated as overall<br />

SSI rate, or, preferably, SSI rates for individual procedures.<br />

This is greatly facilitated by electronic medical record<br />

systems that easily provide information about the number<br />

of specific and total procedures for a given time period.<br />

This should be taken into consideration when evaluating<br />

medical record systems.<br />

Regular (e.g. monthly) monitoring of SSI rates allows for<br />

an understanding of the endemic rates, differences between<br />

procedures and any variations that may occur. Having<br />

a baseline rate is critical for investigation of suspected<br />

SSI outbreaks, since the expected rate must be known to<br />

determine if an outbreak is really present. Baseline rates<br />

are also important to know for assessing the potential<br />

impact of any changes in practices or policies. Individual<br />

surgeon rates can be calculated if there is a means of<br />

collecting surgeon-specific denominators, provided there<br />

is a plan to only report results to the individual surgeon<br />

and ensure confidentiality, as is discussed further below.<br />

Comparing infection rates<br />

omparison of infection rates within and between<br />

facilities can provide useful information but should be<br />

approached with caution because of potential limitations<br />

of data used for comparison and the potential implications.<br />

Confidentially reporting SSI rates back to surgeons<br />

can be part of an effective SSI program by driving an<br />

increased awareness of the issue and leading surgeons<br />

to evaluate potential weaknesses or improvements<br />

in their practices, but broader use of the data can be<br />

fraught with danger. Comparison of SSI rates between<br />

surgeons in a hospital could identify differences in rates<br />

between surgeons and a surgeon with a high infection<br />

rate could be using inadequate or high-risk practices that<br />

are leading to increased infections. However, it could<br />

also be a reflection of the types of surgeries performed,<br />

the degree of post-operative follow-up and diligence<br />

in reporting of SSIs. Surgeon-specific SSI rates should<br />

never be reported or released to anyone but the individual<br />

surgeon. Comparison of data between facilities can also<br />

provide useful information but is accompanied by similar<br />

concerns. If comparisons are to be made, it is essential<br />

that standard definitions and methods be used so that the<br />

data are comparable. In human medicine, inter-hospital<br />

comparisons can be useful in lowering infection risks if<br />

the data collected are clearly defined (e.g. SSIs associated<br />

with a specific surgical procedure) and analysis is controlled<br />

for variations in risk factors between populations. This<br />

specificity of analysis would not commonly be practical<br />

in routine veterinary surveillance programs, particularly<br />

in small hospitals performing limited numbers of specific<br />

procedures, so inter-hospital comparisons are unlikely to<br />

provide much usable information.<br />

References<br />

1. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG.<br />

CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections,<br />

1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical<br />

wound infections. American journal of infection control.<br />

1992;20(5):271-274.<br />

2. Brown D, Conzemius M, Shofer F, Swann H. Epidemiologic<br />

evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and<br />

cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;210(9):1302-1306.<br />

3. Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F, Boerlin P. A prospective<br />

study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and<br />

cats. Veterinary surgery : VS : the official journal of the<br />

American College of Veterinary Surgeons. 2004;33(5):542-<br />

550.<br />

4. Frey TN, Hoelzler MG, Scavelli TD, Fulcher RP, Bastian<br />

RP. Risk factors for surgical site infection-inflammation in<br />

dogs undergoing surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate<br />

ligament: 902 cases (2005-2006). Journal of the American<br />

Veterinary Medical Association. 2010;236(1):88-94.<br />

5. Lambrechts NE, Hurter K, Picard JA, Goldin JP, Thompson<br />

PN. A prospective comparison between stabilized<br />

glutaraldehyde and chlorhexidine gluconate for preoperative<br />

skin antisepsis in dogs. Veterinary surgery. 2004;33(6):636-<br />

643.<br />

6. Weese J, Halling K. Perioperative administration of<br />

antimicrobials associated with elective surgery for cranial<br />

cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 83 cases (2003-2005). J<br />

Am Vet Med Assoc.2006;229(1):92-95.<br />

7. Vasseur PB, Paul HA, Enos LR, Hirsh DC. Infection<br />

rates in clean surgical procedures: a comparison of<br />

ampicillin prophylaxis vs a placebo. J Am Vet Med Assoc.<br />

1985;187(8):825-827.<br />

8. Vasseur PB, Levy J, Dowd E, Eliot J. Surgical wound<br />

infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching<br />

hospital. Veterinary surgery 1988;17(2):60-64.<br />

9. Casale SA, McCarthy RJ. Complications associated<br />

with lateral fabellotibial suture surgery for cranial<br />

cruciate ligament injury in dogs: 363 cases (1997-2005).<br />

combined session 65 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.<br />

2009;234(2):229-235.<br />

10. Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive variables for<br />

complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by<br />

arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Veterinary surgery<br />

2010;39(4):460-474.<br />

11. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis<br />

WR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory<br />

Committee. Guidelines for prevention of surgical<br />

site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.<br />

1999;20(4):247-278.<br />

12. Barie PS, Eachempati SR. Surgical site infections. Surg Clin<br />

N Am. 2005;85:1115-1135.<br />

13. Muilwijk J, van den Hof S, Wille JC. Associations between<br />

surgical site infection risk and hospital operation volume<br />

and surgeon operation volume among hospitals in the Dutch<br />

nosocomial infection surveillance network. Infection control<br />

and hospital epidemiology 2007;28(5):557-563.<br />

14. MacDonald DG, Morley PS, Bailey JV, Barber SM, Fretz<br />

PB. An examination of the occurrence of surgical wound<br />

infection following equine orthopaedic surgery (1981-1990).<br />

Equine Vet J. 1994;26(4):323-326.<br />

15. Nicholson M, Beal M, Shofer F, Brown DC. Epidemiologic<br />

evaluation of postoperative wound infection in cleancontaminated<br />

wounds: A retrospective study of 239 dogs<br />

and cats. Veterinary surgery 2002;31(6):577-581.<br />

16. Heldmann E, Brown D, Shofer F. The association of<br />

propofol usage with postoperative wound infection rate<br />

in clean wounds: a retrospective study. Veterinary surgery<br />

1999;28(4):256-259.<br />

combined session 66 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Surgical preparation: current understanding and<br />

recommendations<br />

L. Findji*<br />

VRCC, West Mayne, Bramston Way, Essex, United Kingdom<br />

Thanks to the works of visionary scientists and physicists<br />

including Semmelweis, Pasteur, Lister and Halsted, the<br />

basic rules of aseptic surgery were set in the early 20 th<br />

century, a hundred years ago. The preparation of the surgical<br />

team and patient for surgery then became a ritual which has<br />

hardly changed since. As a whole, this ritual has brought<br />

dramatic improvements in post-surgical infection rates,<br />

but most of its parts were adopted on the sole grounds of<br />

intellectual rationales rather than scientific evidence.<br />

Furthermore, it now seems that, in spite of considerable<br />

research and investments made to improve surgical<br />

preparation and environment, surgical teams struggle to<br />

decrease surgical site infection (SSI) rates further. As a<br />

result of the heavy cost of such infections and with the<br />

advent of evidence-based medicine, much of the dogma<br />

of surgical preparation has been questioned. The current<br />

widespread recommendations on surgical preparation are<br />

supported by variable levels of evidence. When considering<br />

the evidence from the human literature, evidence-based<br />

medicine (EBM) principles will be followed and highlevel<br />

evidence will be examined preferably examined,<br />

if not exclusively. As for veterinary literature, sticking<br />

to the strict criticism of the level of evidence applied in<br />

human EBM would not leave any study to examine and<br />

lower levels of evidence need to not be dismissed 1 .<br />

In view of the literature, the following recommendations<br />

can be made. The level of evidence supporting them will<br />

be ranked according to the system used by the Center for<br />

Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2 (Table 1).<br />

Rank Implementation of policy Support<br />

Preparation of the patient<br />

IA Strongly recommended High-level evidence (well-designed studies)<br />

• Skin preparation<br />

• Hair removal<br />

In one systematic review of human surgery literature, no<br />

differences in SSI rates were found between patients who<br />

had their hair removed by shaving or depilatory cream and<br />

those who had no hair removed 3 . Shaving was found to be<br />

associated with higher SSI rates than clipping or depilatory<br />

cream 3 . Depilatory creams are widely considered to be<br />

most favourable to reducing SSI risks 4 , although no highlevel<br />

evidence comparing depilatory cream and clipping<br />

exists 3 . Although some studies suggested that removing<br />

hair the day before surgery was associated with more SSIs<br />

compared to removing hair immediately before surgery 4 ,<br />

timing of hair removal was not found to have a significant<br />

effect on SSI rates in a systematic review of the evidence 3 .<br />

In human surgery, hair removal is currently only<br />

recommended when the presence of hair will interfere<br />

with the operation 2, 5 . If hair needs to be removed,<br />

most organisations and authors recommend clipping,<br />

immediately before surgery 2, 5 .<br />

In veterinary surgery, no randomised controlled trial<br />

(RCT) could be found which investigates SSI rates with and<br />

without hair removal. One small study in horses found no<br />

significant difference in postscrub numbers of CFUs between<br />

clipped and unclipped areas of the skin over the carpus and<br />

distal interphalangeal joint 6 . Nonetheless, given the nature<br />

IB Strongly recommended Some scientific evidence and strong theoretical rationale<br />

II Suggested Suggestive scientific evidence or theoretical rationale<br />

NR No recommendations Insufficient evidence, absence of consensus<br />

Table 1: recommendation ranking according to the level of scientific support<br />

combined session 67 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


of the hair coat in most veterinary patients, hair removal<br />

is likely to be required to improve the surgeon’s comfort<br />

during the procedure. In the absence of evidence on its<br />

effect on postoperative infection rates, hair removal should<br />

therefore be considered necessary for practical reasons<br />

rather than for prevention of SSI. In areas with very short<br />

hair, it is unknown whether hair removal is of any benefit.<br />

Similarly, no RCT could be found which compares SSI<br />

after shaving, clipping or application of depilatory cream.<br />

The latter is known to be less effective on coarse animal<br />

hair and to induce skin reactions, especially in cats 7 .<br />

As in human medicine, clipping is believed to be less<br />

traumatic than shaving, which is not recommended.<br />

Lastly, there is evidence than animals clipped before the<br />

induction of anaesthesia are more likely to develop a SSI 8 .<br />

Clipping immediately prior to surgery on the anaesthetised<br />

animal is therefore recommended.<br />

In veterinary surgery, it is recommended to routinely<br />

remove hair from the surgical site by way of clipping,<br />

immediately before surgery, after induction of general<br />

anaesthesia (II).<br />

• Disinfection<br />

Preoperative skin disinfection is recommended on the<br />

basis of theoretical rationale.<br />

A systematic review of evidence5 found only one<br />

quasi-RCT investigating the effect of preoperative<br />

skin disinfection after soap washing compared to<br />

no skin disinfection after soap washing. No SSIs<br />

were found in either case9. There is therefore weak<br />

evidence of the absence of effect of any preoperative<br />

skin disinfection on SSI rates after clean surgeries.<br />

Two systematic reviews of evidence have not been<br />

able to draw firm conclusions as to the optimal<br />

preoperative skin preparation in human surgery5, 10.<br />

One systematic review found evidence of no difference<br />

in SSI rates between preoperative skin preparation<br />

with alcohol-based chlorhexidine spray or iodine-based<br />

scrubbing and painting5. It also found evidence of no<br />

difference between scrubbing and painting compared<br />

to painting only when using an aqueous solution of<br />

povidone-iodine (PVPI)5. Insufficient evidence was<br />

found comparing any other skin preparation protocols5.<br />

Consequently, no definitive recommendations are made<br />

regarding preoperative skin preparation in human<br />

surgery. Most organisations recommend using either<br />

PVPI-based or chlorhexidine based products, either in<br />

aqueous or alcoholic presentations. There is evidence<br />

that alcohol-based antiseptics may be more efficacious<br />

and long-lasting than their aqueous equivalents11, 12.<br />

Other preoperative skin preparation products are available,<br />

for which high-level evidence of efficacy is not available<br />

yet. One of them, iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol<br />

(DuraPrep; 3M), may provide longer-lasting antisepsis as it<br />

forms an antiseptic film on the skin when it dries. It appeared<br />

to reduce SSI rates in one study13, but the study is not of<br />

high quality. Some other low-level evidence tends to confirm<br />

this efficacy12. It has been evaluated in veterinary surgery<br />

and no difference in efficacy, assessed by CFU counts, was<br />

found with PVPI14 and chlorhexidine gluconate15 scrubs.<br />

Another type of skin preparation product mandating<br />

further evaluation through RCTs is cyanoacrylate microbial<br />

sealants, which aims at drying and sealing skin flora under<br />

a breathable film. A systematic review of the evidence<br />

found only one small, underpowered study showing no<br />

difference in SSI rates whether a between film-forming,<br />

liquid cyanoacrylate microbial sealant was used after<br />

conventional PVPI preparation or not16.<br />

In veterinary surgery, a number of studies have<br />

investigated the influence of skin preparation of SSI rates<br />

or CFU numbers 14, 15, 17-20 . All these studies investigated<br />

the influence of skin preparation on CFU counts and<br />

only a few on SSI rates as well. However, there is no<br />

evidence that CFU counts are related to SSI rates. In fact,<br />

2 of these studies found one skin preparation superior<br />

to another in terms of CFU number reductions, but it<br />

did not translate in more postoperative infections 17, 20 .<br />

Overall, as in human surgery there is no good-level evidence<br />

of superiority of any skin preparation protocol over another<br />

in decreasing the risk of SSI.<br />

It is recommended to prepare the skin of the intended<br />

surgical site immediately before surgery using an aqueous<br />

or alcohol-based antiseptic (IB). Chlorhexidine and<br />

povidone-iodine are suitable (IB).<br />

• Mechanical bowel preparation<br />

In human colorectal surgery, there is no evidence<br />

that mechanical bowel preparation reduces SSI rates.<br />

Therefore, it is recommended not to use it routinely 5, 21 .<br />

In veterinary patients, no evidence exists investigating the<br />

influence of bowel preparation on SSI rates after colorectal<br />

surgery. Most recommendations are extrapolated from<br />

human literature 22 .<br />

No recommendation can be made regarding the benefit<br />

of routine mechanical bowel preparation is small animal<br />

colorectal surgery (NR).<br />

• Surgical drapes<br />

• Drape type<br />

There is little evidence investigating the influence<br />

of various types of surgical drapes on SSI rates.<br />

In a systematic review of evidence in human surgery, no<br />

differences were found in SSI rates between disposable<br />

and reusable drapes 5 . However, the wide variety of<br />

commercially-available drapes in terms of material and<br />

design, as well as the fast-paced progress made in their<br />

conception may rapidly render any such studies obsolete.<br />

Only one study examining the effect of the use of different<br />

types of drapes on SSI rates in veterinary surgery was<br />

found. This retrospective study found no differences in<br />

infection rates when reusable cotton muslin or disposable<br />

drapes were used 23 . In the absence of extensive evidence,<br />

combined session 68 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


the theoretical rationale of opting for drapes which have<br />

been shown to be impermeable to liquids and microorganisms,<br />

including viruses, prevails.<br />

No recommendations can be made as to the most<br />

appropriate type of drapes to use to reduce risks of SSI<br />

(NR).<br />

• Incise drapes<br />

In human surgery, two systematic reviews of the<br />

evidence showed that non-iodophor-impregnated adhesive<br />

incise drapes are not associated with reduced SSI rates, but<br />

may actually increase the risk of postoperative infection 5,<br />

24 . No difference in SSI rates was observed between<br />

iodophor-impregnated incise drape and no incise drape 5 .<br />

In veterinary surgery, no RCT evaluated the influence of<br />

adhesive incise drapes on SSI rates. Two studies evaluated<br />

a surrogate outcome: CFU counts. One study found that a<br />

1-minute alcohol scrub followed by the application of a<br />

iodophor-impregnated incise drape was less effective in<br />

decreasing CFU numbers than a conventional 3-minute<br />

PVPI scrub 25 . Another study compared CFU numbers<br />

after clean surgery 26 . No differences in CFU counts in the<br />

wound were found when non-impregnated adhesive incise<br />

drapes were compared to when they were not used 26 . No<br />

RCT investigating the influence of iodophor-impregnated<br />

adhesive incise drapes on SSI in veterinary surgery is<br />

available.<br />

It is recommended not to use adhesive incise drapes<br />

routinely in veterinary surgery (IB). If an adhesive incise<br />

drape is required, a iodophor-impregnated one should be<br />

used (II).<br />

Preparation of the surgical team<br />

• Scrub suits<br />

There is no good-level evidence regarding the influence of<br />

different policies (e.g. restricting the wearing of these scrubs<br />

to the operating suite or not, covering suits with gowns when<br />

out of the operating suite or not, frequency of and products<br />

used for laundering, etc.) regarding scrubs suits on SSI rates.<br />

It is however recommended to change visibly soiled or<br />

contaminated scrubs (IB). No recommendations can be<br />

made regarding restriction of these suits to the operating<br />

suite or to their covering when out of it (NR).<br />

• Theatre shoes<br />

Theatre-dedicated shoes have been shown to be<br />

less contaminated than outdoor shoes 27 . However, it is<br />

generally thought that SSI risk from the floor bacteria<br />

is low. On the other hand, the use of overshoes has<br />

never been shown to decrease SSI rates. Furthermore,<br />

no difference in theatre floor contamination was found<br />

when overshoes were worn compared with outdoor<br />

shoes. Lastly, increased bacterial contamination was<br />

found in the vicinity of the footware changing area<br />

and concerns were raised about contamination of<br />

hands with floor bacteria when overshoes were used.<br />

It is currently not recommended to wear overshoes in order<br />

to prevent SSI (IB). However, similarly to face masks and<br />

caps, the wearing of overshoes contributes to theatre<br />

discipline. It may therefore overall be beneficial, which<br />

leads some organisations to recommending it 5 . Lastly,<br />

overshoes can protect shoes from soiling with blood and<br />

body fluids and their use has been advocated to this effect 2<br />

• Scrubbing<br />

• Hand antisepsis<br />

Protocols of preoperative hand antisepsis can vary<br />

according to the type of solution (aqueous scrubs, alcohol<br />

rubs or alcohol rubs with addition active ingredients),<br />

active compound (alcohol, iodophors, biguanides, phenolic<br />

compounds) and timing used. Furthermore, a difference<br />

is most often made between the first scrub of the day<br />

(referred to as the initial scrub) and subsequent scrubs.<br />

Determination of the optimal protocol therefore involves<br />

considering many variables and proves very difficult.<br />

According to 2 comprehensive literature reviews5, 28,<br />

only one well-design trial investigated the influence of 2<br />

hand antisepsis protocols on SSI2. It showed no difference<br />

between a 75% alcohol rub and aqueous scrubs using<br />

either 4% povidone iodine (PVPI) or 4% chlorhexidine. In<br />

all cases, the duration of scrubbing/rubbing was 5 minutes.<br />

Other studies evaluated the effect of various hand antisepsis<br />

protocols on the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) on<br />

hands at various times after antisepsis. Most studies<br />

showed increased efficacy of chlorhexidine compared with<br />

PVPI. Furthermore, chlorhexidine has several advantages<br />

over PVPI, including a residual effect and preserved<br />

efficacy in presence of organic material and debris.<br />

It is therefore recommended to prefer a chlorhexidinebased<br />

rather than a PVPI-based aqueous scrub (IB).<br />

Some alcohol rubs containing additional active ingredients<br />

were shown to be more effective than aqueous scrubs in<br />

decreasing the number of CFUs on hands. When SSI were<br />

compared, no difference were found 29 . Provided hands are<br />

thoroughly cleaned with soap before the first rub of the day<br />

and when visibly dirty, alcohol rubs containing additional<br />

active ingredients can be considered to be acceptable<br />

alternatives to aqueous scrubs (IB).<br />

The optimal scrubbing and rubbing times are unknown.<br />

Several studies indicated that scrubs lasting 2 minutes or<br />

more are as effective as 10-minute scrubs 2 . A systematic<br />

review found no difference in the number of CFUs on hands<br />

after 2, 3 or 5-minute scrubs 28 . However, when chlorhexidine<br />

aqueous scrubs were used, subsequent scrubs of 30 seconds<br />

were found to be less effective in reducing the number of<br />

CFUs on hands than subsequent scrubs of 3 minutes. One<br />

study found that, following a 1-minute hand wash, 3-minute<br />

rubs were more effective in reducing the number of CFUs<br />

on hands than 5-minute rubs. As a result of the lack of<br />

definitive evidence, current precise guidelines for scrubbing<br />

vary greatly among organisations and authors. Surgical<br />

combined session 69 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


teams can therefore choose between several options 11 .<br />

The first scrub of the day must include a thorough cleaning<br />

of hands, nails and undernails. Hands are then disinfected<br />

with either an aqueous scrub or alcoholic rub with<br />

additional ingredients carried out for 2 to 5 minutes (IB).<br />

Subsequent scrubs can consist of shorter (2-to-3-minute)<br />

scrubs or rubs, provided hands are kept macroscopically<br />

clean (IB).<br />

• Rings, nail polish and nail extensions<br />

Although there is good evidence that the wearing of<br />

finger rings increase the hand microbial load, it seems that<br />

this is no longer the case after regular hand scrubbing or<br />

thorough cleaning 30 . Besides, no evidence exists linking<br />

the wearing of rings with SSI rates 5, 31 . It is however<br />

recommended that scrubbed staff do not wear hand and<br />

arm jewellery 2, 5 (II).<br />

Similarly, there is no evidence indicating that the<br />

wearing of nail polish or nail extensions increases SSI<br />

rates 2, 5, 31 . Low-level evidence of increased bacterial and<br />

fungal colonisation of hands in spite of adequate hand<br />

scrubbing when artificial nails are worn however exists 2 .<br />

No recommendations can be made regarding the wearing<br />

of nail polish and nail extensions (NR). Any type of<br />

manicure favouring perforation of gloves should however<br />

be avoided (II).<br />

• Attire<br />

There are few controlled studies investigating the<br />

influence of surgical attire on SSI. However, there is<br />

evidence of shedding of live micro-organisms from hair,<br />

exposed skin and mucous membranes of operating theatre<br />

personnel. Therefore, there is a strong theoretical rationale<br />

to isolate the patient from the surgical team. Although<br />

it is likely to be of lesser concern in veterinary surgery,<br />

the surgical attire also protects the surgical team from<br />

the patient. Sterile, impervious materials should be used<br />

for the parts of scrubbed personnel which may to come<br />

in contact with the patient or drapes (i.e. hands, arms,<br />

trunk). Microparticule-filtering materials should be used<br />

to cover body areas which are not to come in contact with<br />

the patient but may shed micro-organisms.<br />

• Gloves<br />

The use of sterile gloves to prevent SSI is supported by<br />

a strong theoretical rationale rather than actual scientific<br />

evidence. It is recommended that all scrubbed staff wear<br />

sterile gloves (IB).<br />

A number of options are available regarding surgical<br />

gloving including simple gloving, double-gloving, indicator<br />

gloves, orthopaedic gloves, glove-liners and knitted<br />

gloves. The effect of these different options on SSI rates<br />

has not been appropriately investigated 32 . Most studies<br />

have evaluated the influence of gloving options on the<br />

incidence of inner-glove (glove in contact with the hand,<br />

whether there is another pair on it or not) perforation by<br />

the end of surgery. However, there is no evidence that<br />

glove perforation increases the risk of SSI. It is however<br />

theoretically assumed so 32 . Double-gloving and perforationindicator<br />

systems are more effective than single gloving<br />

in avoiding inner-glove perforation (2% versus 9% in<br />

a meta-analysis on 9,000 gloves). Orthopaedic gloves<br />

(thicker gloves) were found to be as effective as doublegloving<br />

in reducing inner-glove perforation, and may be<br />

less cumbersome 32 . Indicator systems allowed surgeons<br />

to detect significantly more perforations than single<br />

or double-gloving. Except for steel weave gloves, all<br />

additional glove protections (triple gloving, glove liners,<br />

knitted-cloth gloves) reduce the incidence of inner-glove<br />

perforation compared to standard double gloving. They<br />

therefore currently provide the highest level of protection<br />

against inner-glove perforation. There seem to be no<br />

indication that any of these options reduces surgical<br />

dexterity, as they were not found to be associated with<br />

increased rates of outer-glove perforations 32 . No universal<br />

recommendation can be made as to gloving options (NR).<br />

The choice must be made by each surgical team based on<br />

the risk of perforation associated with the type of surgery<br />

(e.g. orthopaedics versus soft tissue) and cost of options.<br />

Double-gloving and orthopaedic gloves reduce the risk of<br />

inner-glove perforation compared to single gloving and can<br />

be used routinely, although no evidence exists to support<br />

that this would decrease SSI rates.<br />

• Masks and caps<br />

The wearing of disposable surgical masks by all personnel<br />

entering the operating theatre is commonplace. However, no<br />

evidence of their efficacy in preventing SSI exists and some<br />

authors have described ways in which they may actually<br />

contribute to the contamination of surgical wounds 33 . A<br />

systematic review of the available evidence found only<br />

3 well-designed studies including 2113 patients. None of<br />

these studies found any difference in SSI rates between<br />

masked and unmasked procedures, but the strength of the<br />

evidence was considered to be weak 33 . One study on 3,088<br />

patient not only found no difference in SSI rates between<br />

operations performed with face masks and those performed<br />

without, but also found that bacterial species cultured<br />

from SSI of both groups were similar, suggesting that<br />

the sources of infection were the same and therefore not<br />

related to the wearing or non-wearing of surgical masks 34 .<br />

Surrogate outcomes (e.g. room bacterial counts,<br />

contamination of plates placed on the operating table,<br />

etc.) were studied, showing that the wearing of face<br />

masks 35, 36 or entire head-gear 37 by unscrubbed theatre<br />

personnel may be unnecessary. These studies were<br />

however made in theatres with forced ventilation, which<br />

was thought to be more important than face masks in<br />

preventing contamination 35, 37 . Their results may therefore<br />

not be applicable in less modern theatres without forced<br />

ventilation. Bacterial counts in an empty theatre appeared<br />

to be unchanged by the wearing of head gear, but were<br />

statistically increased when the room doors were kept open<br />

combined session 70 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


and when people entered the room 36 . Increased traffic in<br />

the operating room was also found to increase the risk of<br />

SSI in veterinary surgery 38 .<br />

Overall, there is no evidence that the wearing of<br />

disposable surgical masks reduce the risk of SSI. It is<br />

unclear whether face masks contribute to the protection<br />

of surgical team members from the patient.<br />

No evidence exists that examines the influence of the<br />

wearing of head caps on SSI rates and SSI outbreaks have<br />

been traced to organisms of the hair or scalp, whether caps<br />

were worn or not 2, 11 .<br />

Like other pieces of the surgical attire, face masks<br />

and head caps contribute to theatre discipline and may<br />

therefore be beneficial in other ways than reducing SSI<br />

rates.<br />

It is recommended that scrubbed personnel wear<br />

disposable face masks and head caps during surgery (IB).<br />

No recommendations can be made based on the available<br />

evidence as to whether unscrubbed personnel should wear<br />

face masks and head caps or not (NR).<br />

• Gowns<br />

There are no well-designed studies examining whether<br />

the wearing of sterile gowns by the surgical team minimises<br />

the risk of SSI. There is however a strong theoretical<br />

rationale to use impervious sterile gowns.Two RCTs found<br />

no difference in SSI rates when disposable or reusable<br />

sterile gowns and drapes were used5. It is recommended<br />

that all scrubbed personnel wear sterile, impervious gowns<br />

(IB).Either reusable or disposable gowns can be used (IB).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The interpretation of the scientific literature regarding<br />

surgical preparation is hindered by several factors, all the<br />

more for veterinary surgeons. First of all, the investigation<br />

of certain aspects of surgical preparation is hampered by<br />

ethical considerations (e.g. SSI rates with or without use<br />

of surgical gloves) and a number of recommendations will<br />

remain based on theoretical rationales. Second, many<br />

studies do not measure SSI rates as an endpoint and<br />

no evidence exists supporting the relation between the<br />

measured surrogate outcome and SSI. For instance, most<br />

studies on hand preparation measure the number of colonyforming<br />

units (CFUs) on the surface of hands rather than<br />

the rate of SSI. However, there is no evidence showing that<br />

SSI rates are related to the number of CFUs on the hands<br />

of members of the surgical team. The relevance of such<br />

studies relies solely on assumed theoretical grounds. Third,<br />

many human studies are conducted within a subspecialty<br />

of surgery (e.g. urologic, colorectal, cardiothoracic), which<br />

provides data that cannot be generalised to all types of<br />

surgery. Lastly, the extrapolation to veterinary medicine of a<br />

significant part of the evidence provided by the literature in<br />

human medicine is not possible as the anatomy, physiology,<br />

microbiology and often surgical conditions are quite<br />

different in human and veterinary surgeries. Unfortunately,<br />

very little, if any, high-level evidence is available in the<br />

veterinary literature and much of the knowledge specific<br />

to veterinary surgery is based on rather weak evidence.<br />

The risk of developing a SSI is largely determined by<br />

3 factors: the type and amount of wound contamination<br />

during the procedure, the condition of the wound at the<br />

end of the operation and the host susceptibility of the<br />

patient. Surgical preparation, together with the class of<br />

surgery and surgical technique, influences the former. The<br />

fact that many alterations in surgical preparation appear<br />

to have no effect on SSI rates could mean either that they<br />

really have no effect, or that surgical preparation no longer<br />

is the limiting factor in the development of SSI. The effect<br />

of these alterations could therefore be masked by other<br />

factors such as the condition of the wound, mainly a result<br />

of surgical technique, and host susceptibility. This would in<br />

turn mean that the key to decreasing current SSI rates is<br />

to be searched in surgical technique and host biology and<br />

support (which includes sensible antimicrobial prophylaxis),<br />

rather than further escalation in surgical asepsis.<br />

References<br />

1. Cockcroft PD, Holmes MA. Introduction. In: Cockcroft PD,<br />

Holmes MA(eds): Handbook of evidence-based veterinary<br />

medicine. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003;1-21.<br />

2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR.<br />

Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999.<br />

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital<br />

Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect<br />

Control. 1999;27: 97-132; quiz 133-134; discussion 196.<br />

3. 3anner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K. Preoperative hair<br />

removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane<br />

Database Syst Rev. 2006, updated 2008;3: CD004122.<br />

4. Dohmen PM, Konertz W. A review of current strategies to<br />

reduce intraoperative bacterial contamination of surgical<br />

wounds. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2007;2: Doc38.<br />

5. (NICE) NIfHaCE. Surgical site infection. Prevention and<br />

treatment of surgical site infection. London: RCOG Press,<br />

2008.<br />

6. Hague BA, Honnas CM, Simpson RB, Peloso JG. Evaluation<br />

of skin bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation<br />

of clipped and nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses.<br />

Veterinary Surgery. 1997;26: 121-125.<br />

7. Shmon C. Assessment and preparation of the surgical<br />

patient and the operating team. In: Slatter DH(ed): Textbook<br />

of small animal surgery. Philadelphia, Pa. ; London: W. B.<br />

Saunders, 2003;162-178.<br />

8. Brown DC, Conzemius MG, Shofer F, Swann H.<br />

Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections<br />

in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;210: 1302-<br />

1306.<br />

9. Kalantar-Hormozi AJ, Davami B. No need for preoperative<br />

antiseptics in elective outpatient plastic surgical operations:<br />

a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116: 529-<br />

531.<br />

10. Edwards PS, Lipp A, Holmes A. Preoperative skin<br />

antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after<br />

clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, updated<br />

2008: CD003949.<br />

11. Reichman DE, Greenberg JA. Reducing surgical site<br />

infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2: 212-221.<br />

combined session 71 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


12. Hemani ML, Lepor H. Skin preparation for the prevention<br />

of surgical site infection: which agent is best? Rev Urol.<br />

2009;11: 190-195.<br />

13. Swenson BR, Hedrick TL, Metzger R, Bonatti H, Pruett TL,<br />

Sawyer RG. Effects of preoperative skin preparation on<br />

postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of<br />

3 skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.<br />

2009;30: 964-971.<br />

14. Rochat MC, Mann FA, Berg JN. Evaluation of a one-step<br />

surgical preparation technique in dogs. Journal of the<br />

American Veterinary Medical Association. 1993;203: 392-<br />

395.<br />

15. Gibson KL, Donald AW, Hariharan H, McCarville C.<br />

Comparison of two pre-surgical skin preparation techniques.<br />

Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 1997;61: 154-156.<br />

16. Lipp A, Phillips C, Harris P, Dowie I. Cyanoacrylate microbial<br />

sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery. Cochrane<br />

Database Syst Rev. 2010: CD008062.<br />

17. Desrochers A, St-Jean G, Anderson DE, Rogers DP,<br />

Chengappa MM. Comparative evaluation of two surgical<br />

scrub preparations in cattle. Veterinary Surgery. 1996;25:<br />

336-341.<br />

18. Osuna DJ, DeYoung DJ, Walker RL. Comparison of three<br />

skin preparation techniques in the dog. Part 1: Experimental<br />

trial. Veterinary Surgery. 1990;19: 14-19.<br />

19. Osuna DJ, DeYoung DJ, Walker RL. Comparison of three<br />

skin preparation techniques. Part 2: Clinical trail in 100<br />

dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 1990;19: 20-23.<br />

20. Stubbs WP, Bellah JR, Vermaas-Hekman D, Purich B,<br />

Kubilis PS. Chlorhexidine gluconate versus chloroxylenol for<br />

preoperative skin preparation in dogs. Veterinary Surgery.<br />

1996;25: 487-494.<br />

21. Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Fenech DS, McLeod RS, Best<br />

Practice in General Surgery C. Preoperative bowel<br />

preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal<br />

surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the<br />

Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Can J<br />

Surg. 2010;53: 385-395.<br />

22. Aronson L. Rectum and anus. In: Slatter DH(ed): Textbook<br />

of small animal surgery. Philadelphia, Pa. ; London: W. B.<br />

Saunders, 2003;682-708.<br />

23. Billings L, Vasseur PB, Fancher C, Miller M, Nearenberg<br />

D. Wound infection rates in dogs and cats after use of<br />

cotton muslin or disposable impermeable fabric as barrier<br />

material: 720 cases (1983-1989). Journal of the American<br />

Veterinary Medical Association. 1990;197: 889-892.<br />

24. Webster J, Alghamdi AA. Use of plastic adhesive drapes<br />

during surgery for preventing surgical site infection.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, updated 2009:<br />

CD006353.<br />

25. Osuna DJ, DeYoung DJ, Walker RL. Comparison of<br />

an antimicrobial adhesive drape and povidone-iodine<br />

preoperative skin preparation in dogs. Veterinary Surgery.<br />

1992;21: 458-462.<br />

26. Owen LJ, Gines JA, Knowles TG, Holt PE. Efficacy<br />

of adhesive incise drapes in preventing bacterial<br />

contamination of clean canine surgical wounds. Veterinary<br />

Surgery. 2009;38: 732-737.<br />

27. Amirfeyz R, Tasker A, Ali S, Bowker K, Blom A. Theatre<br />

shoes - a link in the common pathway of postoperative<br />

wound infection? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89: 605-608.<br />

28. Tanner J, Swarbrook S, Stuart J. Surgical hand antisepsis to<br />

reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.<br />

2008, updated 2009: CD004288.<br />

29. Parienti JJ, Thibon P, Heller R, Le Roux Y, von Theobald<br />

P, Bensadoun H, et al. Hand-rubbing with an aqueous<br />

alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing<br />

and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized<br />

equivalence study. JAMA. 2002;288: 722-727.<br />

30. Al-Allak A, Sarasin S, Key S, Morris-Stiff G. Wedding rings<br />

are not a significant source of bacterial contamination<br />

following surgical scrubbing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:<br />

133-135.<br />

31. Arrowsmith VA, Maunder JA, Taylor R. Removal of nail<br />

polish and finger rings to prevent surgical infection.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, updated 2010:<br />

CD003325.<br />

32. anner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical<br />

cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, updated<br />

2009;3: CD003087.<br />

33. Lipp A, Edwards P. Disposable surgical face masks for<br />

preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002, updated 2010:<br />

CD002929.<br />

34. Tunevall TG. Postoperative wound infections and surgical<br />

face masks: a controlled study. World J Surg. 1991;15:<br />

383-388.<br />

35. Mitchell NJ, Hunt S. Surgical face masks in modern<br />

operating rooms: a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp<br />

Infect. 1991;18: 239-242.<br />

36. Ritter MA, Eitzen H, French ML, Hart JB. The operating<br />

room environment as affected by people and the surgical<br />

face mask. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;111: 147-150.<br />

37. Humphreys H, Russell AJ, Marshall RJ, V.E. R, Reeves DS.<br />

THe effect of surgical theatre head-gear on air bacterial<br />

counts. J Hosp Infect. 1991;19: 175-180.<br />

38. Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F, Boerlin P. A prospective<br />

study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and<br />

cats. Vet Surg. 2004;33: 542-550.<br />

combined session 72 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis<br />

P. Moissonnier*<br />

Ecole Veterinaire Maisons Alfort, France<br />

combined session 73 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Surgical site infection control programme<br />

J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />

Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />

Introduction<br />

Infection control has been an overlooked and<br />

underappreciated field in veterinary medicine, particularly<br />

in small animal practice. The concept of ‘biosecurity’ is<br />

one that is well developed in some sectors of food animal<br />

veterinary medicine, however this differs from ‘infection<br />

control’. Biosecurity involves implementation of measures<br />

to prevent entrance and dissemination of infectious agents<br />

into defined groups of animals. This is not applicable to<br />

small animal practice because, inherently, small animal<br />

clinics ‘invite’ animals with infectious diseases into their<br />

facility. Therefore, the focus is on limiting the impact of<br />

infectious diseases that will enter the clinic. This is the<br />

practice of infection control, which attempts to control<br />

the impact of the inevitable entrance of infectious agents<br />

into a facility. Further, while we often discuss prevention<br />

of infections, absolute prevention of infections is not<br />

a realistic goal. Rather, infection control programs are<br />

designed to reduce the risk and incidence of infections.<br />

While infection control has often been ignored, there is<br />

increasing interest about this field in small animal practice.<br />

There are many possible reasons for this, but factors<br />

such as increased awareness of infectious disease by<br />

the general public, increased information about hospitalassociated<br />

(nosocomial) infection in human hospitals,<br />

occupational health and liability concerns about zoonotic<br />

infections and emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens<br />

highlight the need for a more organized approach to<br />

infection prevention and control.<br />

General principles of Infection Control<br />

In general terms, 3 basic areas must be considered when<br />

infection control is approached. These include decreasing<br />

exposure to pathogens, decreasing susceptibility of the host<br />

and increasing resistance. These categories are relevant<br />

for both animal diseases and zoonoses.<br />

The combination of these factors indicates the likelihood<br />

of disease. A crude representation of the risk of SSI<br />

development can be illustrated as: 1<br />

SSI risk = Microbial concentration and virulence X Tissue<br />

Injury X Foreign Material X Antimicrobial Resistance<br />

General immunity X Local Immunity X Periopeative<br />

Antimicrobials<br />

Decreasing Exposure<br />

Decreasing exposure is the most important aspect of<br />

disease control in most situations. If a pathogen is unable to<br />

encounter an individual, disease will not occur. Depending<br />

on the pathogen, preventing exposure may be easy, difficult<br />

or impossible. Clinically normal animals and people may<br />

harbour a variety of primary and opportunistic pathogens,<br />

and even clinical evaluation cannot rule out the possibility<br />

that an animal is carrying a relevant infectious agent.<br />

Examples of specific aspects to consider are discussed<br />

below.<br />

Decreasing susceptibility<br />

The pathophysiology of disease is multifactorial and in<br />

most cases, simple exposure of an infectious agent to an<br />

animal does not necessarily mean that disease will result.<br />

The susceptibility of the individual to an infectious agent<br />

plays an important role. While difficult to quantify, certain<br />

situations may result in increased susceptibility to disease.<br />

Many factors causing increased susceptibility are not<br />

preventable, but some are and efforts should be undertaken<br />

to address these issues. Identifying factors that increase<br />

susceptibility may be difficult and our understanding of this<br />

area is currently limited.<br />

Decreasing susceptibility is more difficult to achieve<br />

in a hospital setting. Surgical factors relating to patient<br />

susceptibility include tissue injury (pre-, intra- and post-op),<br />

tissue dessication, control of hemostasis, surgical time, and<br />

removal of blood and debris. Judicious use of antimicrobials<br />

and immunosuppressive agents, provision of a good quality<br />

diet, provision of adequate pain control, avoidance of<br />

dietary changes, ensuring adequate nutritional intake and<br />

limiting use of invasive devises should also be considered.<br />

For hospital personnel, an important aspect of decreasing<br />

susceptibility is being aware of hospital personnel that are<br />

more susceptible to disease. This would include people that<br />

are immunosuppressed (disease- or treatment-induced),<br />

being treated with antimicrobials, have open wounds or<br />

who are pregnant. Good communication between hospital<br />

combined session 74 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


personnel, physicians and hospital administrators is<br />

important to lessen the risk of zoonotic infection.<br />

Increasing resistance<br />

Vaccination is the main technique employed to increase<br />

resistance of animals or humans to infection. However, no<br />

vaccines are 100% effective and vaccination should be<br />

considered a 3 rd line of defense after decreasing exposure<br />

and decreasing susceptibility. Vaccination has little impact<br />

on SSI prevention, beyond trying to optimize overall health<br />

and decrease the risk of comorbidities.<br />

Infection Control Program<br />

An infection control program is a structured program of<br />

policies and practices that are designed to reduce the risk of<br />

infection of patients, clinical personnel and owners. Every<br />

veterinary clinic, regardless of size and type, should<br />

have at least a basic infection control program. This<br />

may range from a written collection of basic infection<br />

control practices to a formal infection control manual with<br />

specific training, monitoring, surveillance and compliance<br />

programs. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case, which may<br />

lead to unnecessary patient morbidity and mortality, and<br />

exposure of veterinarians, staff and owners to zoonotic<br />

pathogens. The increasingly litigious nature of society could<br />

be one of the driving forces towards improved infection<br />

control in veterinary clinics. While the potential liability<br />

consequences of morbidity and mortality in individual pets<br />

is currently limited, the potential consequences of zoonotic<br />

diseases in owners and staff are high and require careful<br />

consideration. Improved infection control is also a necessity<br />

as veterinary medicine evolves. Advances in veterinary<br />

medicine mean that animals are living longer and there<br />

are more animals at higher risk for infection because of<br />

immunosuppression and more invasive treatments.<br />

Selected Considerations in Infection Control<br />

Surveillance<br />

Surveillance is a key component of any infection control<br />

program. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<br />

(CDC) defines surveillance as ‘the ongoing, systematic<br />

collection, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of<br />

data regarding a health-related event…”. Surveillance<br />

can be an important part of an overall infection control<br />

program by providing a basis for logical infection control<br />

decisions, evaluating effectiveness of infection control<br />

practices, evaluating compliance with infection control<br />

procedures and stimulating efficient and economic use of<br />

resources. 2 However, it can also be inefficient, unrewarding<br />

and sometimes misleading, if improperly performed.<br />

There are various types of surveillance that can be<br />

considered, all with advantages and disadvantages. Active<br />

surveillance involves gathering data specifically for<br />

infection control purposes. As a result, it can be expensive<br />

and time consuming but usually provides the highest quality<br />

data. One exampls of this would be collection of MRSP<br />

screening swabs from patients upon prior to surgery as<br />

part of MRSP outbreak investigation. Active follow-up<br />

of surgical cases, beyond that normally performed (e.g.<br />

calling owners 30d after surgery rather than just relying<br />

on routine recheck appointments) is another example.<br />

Active surveillance is rarely needed (at least as a routine<br />

tool) in most veterinary clinics and is typically reserved<br />

for large facilities with increased infection control threats<br />

and personnel available to direct such testing, or during<br />

outbreak investigation.<br />

In contrast, passive surveillance is a practical, easy<br />

and cost-effective surveillance tool that can be easily<br />

performed in any clinic. It involves the use of data that are<br />

already available. This would include information about the<br />

number of surgical site infections collected through normal<br />

recheck visits or other standard reporting mechanisms,<br />

or culture results from various infections. The quality of<br />

passive surveillance data, however, can be limited by poor<br />

or incomplete record keeping. Facilitating easy access to<br />

passively acquired data (e.g. being able to accurately and<br />

easily generate a report of SSI cases or culture results) is<br />

critical to effective use of passive surveillance.<br />

Another form of surveillance that is easy to perform and<br />

potentially very useful is syndromic surveillance. This<br />

involves identification of syndromes (i.e. diarrhea, coughing)<br />

instead of specific diagnoses. All clinic personnel can be<br />

made aware of certain syndromes that indicate either<br />

the need for isolation or for further investigation, such<br />

as diarrhea, fever of unknown origin, acute neurological<br />

disease, wound infections and acute respiratory tract<br />

disease. Protocols to deal with these animals upon arrival<br />

should be developed. The role of lay staff (ie front office<br />

stall) is critical as these people are the ones that are most<br />

able to identify such cases before they enter the clinic and<br />

ensure that they are properly handled. Identification and<br />

proper handling of these cases can greatly decrease the<br />

chance of nosocomial or zoonotic transmission.<br />

Environmental surveillance<br />

Environmental surveillance is often overused and misused.<br />

The hospital environment is not sterile, and contamination<br />

of various sites with numerous opportunistic pathogens<br />

is fully expected. Non-targeted environmental culturing<br />

is a poor use of time and resources, and can result in<br />

useless or even misleading information. Environmental<br />

surveillance should be limited to circumstances where<br />

there is a plausible role of the environment in infection,<br />

when a structured sampling program can be created and<br />

there is a pre-determined plan to act of the results. This<br />

is rarely present.<br />

Another type of environmental surveillance, and one that<br />

is potentially more rewarding, is assessment of cleaning<br />

practices with the use of environmental marking. This<br />

involves application of invisible dyes to environmental<br />

surfaces in a manner such that they would be removed<br />

combined session 75 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


using normal cleaning practices. A structured program of<br />

‘contaminating’ surfaces followed by evaluation of those<br />

surfaces after a time during which cleaning should have<br />

been performed, can be used to assess the efficacy of<br />

cleaning and to act as an educational tool to personnel<br />

involved in cleaning. This type of method is cost-effective,<br />

easy to perform and can be useful, as long as it is<br />

approached in a non-confrontation manner designed to<br />

educate and improve, not assign blame.<br />

Handling of infectious cases<br />

Once an infectious or potentially infectious animal has<br />

been identified, it is important that established protocols<br />

are available and followed. <strong>Animals</strong> that are infectious or<br />

of uncertain risk should be housed in an isolation area. The<br />

isolation area should be properly identified, have restricted<br />

access, be away from areas of normal traffic flow and<br />

should never be used for storage. Isolation areas should<br />

have dedicated equipment (thermometers, stethoscopes)<br />

that is not used on different animals. Education of<br />

personnel regarding the reasons behind protocols and their<br />

importance is useful to increase compliance.<br />

Personal protective equipment<br />

All personnel in a veterinary hospital should wear<br />

personal protective equipment. This acts as a barrier<br />

between patients (as well as specimens and the patient<br />

environment) and the person’s body or clothing. Adequate<br />

personal protective equipment will reduce the risk of<br />

contamination of clothing or skin, and be able to be quickly<br />

and easily changed when contaminated. Lab coats, scrubs<br />

and gowns are examples of commonly used items, and<br />

these should be worn whenever there will be contact<br />

with animals or the animals’ environment. Even if obvious<br />

contamination is not present, they should be changed<br />

regularly because contamination can occur in the absence<br />

of obvious soiling. Protective clothing should not be worn<br />

home because of the risk of transmission of pathogens to<br />

personal pets and family members.<br />

Scrubs, in particular, may be misused and if personal<br />

protective equipment is worn home, not changed during<br />

the day and difficult to change after contamination, it is<br />

being used suboptimally.<br />

Enhanced precautions, which may consist of gloves,<br />

gowns, masks, face shields, protective footwear and other<br />

items, may be required when handling certain animals or<br />

specimens. Protocols should be in place to ensure that all<br />

clinic personnel are aware of their responsibilities.<br />

Clinic design and function<br />

Animal flow within the clinic should be evaluated,<br />

and considered as part of clinic design or renovation. It<br />

is important to limit potential direct and indirect animal<br />

contact. Sick animals should be kept away from healthy<br />

animals, especially high-risk animals. With the increase<br />

in multidrug resistant staphylococcal infection and<br />

colonization in some populations, particularly dermatology<br />

patients, consideration must be given to ways to separate<br />

patients at high risk for infection (e.g. surgical patients)<br />

from patients at high risk for shedding an impact SSI<br />

pathogen (e.g. dogs with pyoderma).<br />

Operating Room Design and Function<br />

Veterinary operating facilities are highly variable and<br />

there are few true standards. Operating rooms should be<br />

of adequate size for proper movement of personnel and<br />

equipment, with limited risk of inadvertent contamination.<br />

Laminar airflow is preferred but impractical for the vast<br />

majority of facilities, and its true role in infection prevention<br />

in veterinary situations is unknown. However, consideration<br />

and evaluation of ventilation is required to ensure that<br />

there is not improper airflow that could result in increased<br />

airborne (and subsequently patient and equipment)<br />

contamination.<br />

Operating rooms must be sole use. They should not be<br />

used as storage areas and should not be allowed to become<br />

cluttered with items. Sinks should not be present within the<br />

OR, or if they are present, they should not be used when a<br />

patient is in the room or when opened surgical items are<br />

present in the room.<br />

Patient preparation<br />

Patient preparation is an important aspect of surgical<br />

asepsis. The relative impact of patient preparation has been<br />

inadequately investigated, and specific details regarding<br />

surgical preparation are provided elsewhere. However, it<br />

is apparent that there are issues with compliance with<br />

standard practices, including the method of preparation<br />

and the time dedicated to this important area. Recent<br />

observation data has indicated marked variation in the<br />

time and quality of patient preparation in general small<br />

animal practices, with very short scrub times and improper<br />

scrub methods identified in some cases (Anderson et al,<br />

unpublished data)<br />

Pre-operative management of the surgical site may be an<br />

important factor but there has been minimal investigation of<br />

this area in veterinary medicine. The goal of pre-operative<br />

surgical site management is to eliminate potential<br />

pathogens while not creating a physical environment that<br />

is more conducive to bacterial colonization or infection<br />

post-operatively. Bathing of the patient pre-operatively is<br />

reasonable if there is significant contamination of the hair<br />

coat 3 and if the patient’s coat can be dried by the time of<br />

surgery.<br />

Additionally, while attention has been focused more on<br />

ensuring that surgical sites receive ‘adequate’ attention,<br />

the goals of patient preparation need to be considered.<br />

In essence, the goal of surgical scrubbing of patients is<br />

to reduce bacterial counts, reduce debris, facilitate later<br />

antisepsis steps and (a fact that is often overlooked) to<br />

do so in as atraumatic a fashion as possible. As such,<br />

minimizing skin damage during clipping and scrubbing<br />

combined session 76 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


is essential, but often overlooked. Skin damage from<br />

excessive attempts to clip all remaining pieces of hair or<br />

from forceful scrubbing of the surgical site may predispose<br />

to infection rather than reduce the risk. While objective<br />

data are lacking, there is anecdotal evidence that excessive<br />

preparation may be a factor in outbreaks of SSIs. Some<br />

indirect research data may also be present, such as a study<br />

that reported dogs that were clipped prior to anesthetic<br />

induction had higher SSI rates than those clipped after. 4<br />

While the true reason for this could not be determined, it<br />

is certainly plausible that clipping a conscious animal was<br />

associated with a greater likelihood of skin trauma and<br />

subsequent increased SSI risk. Clipping should be done<br />

outside of the operating environment. There is currently<br />

no information regarding optimal methods of cleaning<br />

and disinfecting clippers. Repeated use of clipper blades<br />

without sterilization not surprisingly results in higher levels<br />

of bacterial contamination of blades 5 however the clinical<br />

relevance of this is unclear because the surgical site would<br />

be cleaned and disinfected after clipping. Regular cleaning<br />

and disinfection are probably useful. Clippers should be<br />

thoroughly cleaned and disinfected after every use on an<br />

animal with a potentially transmissible infection (e.g. an<br />

animal with diarrhea), on an area where the skin is broken<br />

(especially if there is evidence of skin infection), or on any<br />

area where the skin or hair is significantly contaminated<br />

with feces, urine, blood or other body fluids. Only cleaned/<br />

disinfected clippers should be used when clipping around<br />

areas with broken skin, to avoid increasing contamination<br />

of the abnormal area.<br />

Surgeon preparation<br />

Surgeon preparation, including surgical scrubbing and<br />

donning of surgical protective items, is an important area.<br />

Detailed discussion of surgical preparation is provided<br />

elsewhere in these conference proceedings.<br />

Compliance with standard recommendations is a concern.<br />

Observational data indicate that the quality of preparation<br />

practices can vary greatly between veterinarians, with<br />

some individuals used clearly inadequate practices. While<br />

a true standard of care has not been defined and the<br />

relative impact of poor practices has not been quantified,<br />

it is clear that there is significant room for improvement<br />

in compliance with typical practices amongst some<br />

veterinarians. Recently, application of alcohol-chlorhexidine<br />

combinations has been evaluated as a replacement for<br />

surgical scrubbing and been shown to be more effective<br />

than standard surgical scrub methods. 6, 7 This method is less<br />

time consuming and is associated with less skin irritation<br />

compared to repeated surgical scrubbing. Similarly,<br />

application of chlorhexidine (without alcohol) resulted in<br />

similar reduction in hand bacterial counts compared to<br />

surgical scrubbing in a veterinary hospital. 8 Regardless<br />

of the method used, a thorough handwash with careful<br />

cleaning under the fingernails must be performed at the<br />

beginning of each day. 9 Long (> 1/4”) and artificial nails are<br />

prohibited in many human healthcare facilities and some<br />

veterinary hospitals because they can harbor pathogenic<br />

bacteria 10 and be associated with surgical glove tears.<br />

Post-operative care<br />

Post-operative care of the incision site may be an<br />

important factor. The incision site is a highly susceptible<br />

site for opportunistic infection from the patient’s own<br />

microflora, from the environment or from hospital<br />

personnel. Contact with the surgical incision, particularly<br />

with bare hands, should be avoided. Covering or bandaging<br />

wounds for a minimum of 24 to 48 h post-operatively has<br />

been recommended in humans and horses 11, 12 and is a<br />

reasonable recommendation in small animals in most<br />

situations. Bandage changes should be performed using<br />

aseptic technique. 12 Animal owners or handlers should<br />

be educated on proper incision management and signs of<br />

SSI. There is no objective information regarding the need<br />

to cover incision beyond 48 hours in veterinary or human<br />

medicine, and arguments can be made for both sides.<br />

Prevention of surgical site licking or trauma by the patient<br />

is important as licking or scratching can damage healing<br />

incision site or associated skin and create a more hospitable<br />

site for bacterial growth. It can also result in the deposition<br />

of opportunistic pathogens. If surgical sites are bandaged,<br />

they surgical site should be inspected at least once daily to<br />

detect early signs of inflammation or infection.<br />

Cleaning and disinfection<br />

Cleaning and disinfection are key parts of the infection<br />

control process. It is important to understand why certain<br />

cleaners/disinfectants are being used. Improper use of<br />

disinfectants is widespread. Some products facilitate<br />

removal of debris (detergents, abrasives) while others are<br />

intended to kill microorganisms (disinfectants). Not all<br />

disinfectants are able to kill all pathogenic microorganisms,<br />

and there are differences in spectrum of activity, efficacy<br />

in organic debris, kill time, toxicity and environmental<br />

impact. Cleaning protocols should be reviewed to ensure<br />

that a relevant and acceptable level of disinfection is being<br />

achieved. Ability to kill specific microorganisms, human<br />

safety issues, cost and potential damage to surfaces<br />

must be considered when choosing a disinfectant. During<br />

outbreaks, changes in disinfection protocols may be<br />

required to ensure that the relevant organisms are killed.<br />

Periodic cleaning with certain disinfectants may also be<br />

useful. For example, clostridial spores are resistant to<br />

most disinfectants, can accumulate in the environment<br />

and can cause outbreaks in veterinary clinics. Unlike most<br />

disinfectants, bleach can kill spores and periodic cleaning<br />

with bleach may be useful. Non-enveloped viruses such<br />

as parvovirus are also difficult to kill and many routine<br />

disinfection protocols are inadequate to control this<br />

important group of pathogens. Fortunately, typical SSI<br />

pathogens are relatively susceptible to most commonly<br />

used disinfectants.<br />

combined session 77 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Disinfection and sterilization of medical equipment<br />

Disinfection of medical equipment is also an important<br />

factor. All medical equipment should be designated as<br />

requiring cleaning, low-level disinfection, high-level<br />

disinfection or sterilization. Use of improper disinfection<br />

techniques for certain items of medical equipment has<br />

been identified in a number of human hospitals, particularly<br />

among items such as endoscopes that cannot undergo<br />

autoclave sterilization. “Cold-sterile” solutions are common<br />

in veterinary clinics, yet they are often improperly used<br />

and maintained. Bacterial contamination of cold-sterile<br />

solutions is common. 13 Problems include inadequate<br />

contact time, improper dilution and infrequent replacement<br />

of solution.<br />

Complete sterilization of surgical instruments and any<br />

items that might come in contact with the surgical field<br />

is a crucial procedure. Poor sterilization or inappropriate<br />

handling of instruments after sterilization can result in<br />

contamination of sterile tissues during surgery. Steam<br />

sterilization (i.e. autoclaving) is most commonly used in<br />

veterinary clinics. Quality control testing of autoclaves<br />

should be performed regularly and documented. Sterility<br />

indicator strips should be placed in every surgical pack.<br />

External autoclave indicator tape is not a reliable indicator<br />

of the sterility of a pack’s internal contents. Biological<br />

sterility indicators should be used periodically. These<br />

indicators contain bacterial spores, which are the most<br />

resistant form of bacteria. After being autoclaved, the<br />

indicator is submitted for testing to ensure that all of the<br />

spores have been killed by the sterilization process. In<br />

human healthcare facilities it is recommended that these<br />

indicators are used daily, or at least weekly. Weekly<br />

or bi-weekly use is likely adequate in most veterinary<br />

clinics, depending on how heavily the autoclave is used. A<br />

biological sterility indicator should also be used in the next<br />

cycle anytime the autoclave has been moved, repaired, or if<br />

there has been any other indication of sterilization failure.<br />

Flash sterilization should not be used unless absolutely<br />

necessary for emergencies only. Flash sterilization should<br />

never be used for surgical implants.<br />

Hand hygiene<br />

One of the most important facets of any infection<br />

control program is hand hygiene. Human hands are a<br />

major, if not the most important, source of infection in<br />

hospitals. Handwashing has been shown to decrease the<br />

transmission of disease in hospitals and in the community.<br />

A quick rinse under water, however, does not constitute<br />

proper hand hygiene. A 15-second scrub with a bactericidal<br />

soap is recommended, but rarely followed. Further, if taps<br />

are touched following handwashing, hands may become<br />

contaminated. Automatic taps can prevent this; otherwise<br />

a paper towel should be used to prevent direct contact with<br />

the taps when they are turned off. Alcohol-based hand<br />

disinfectants can be very useful, are now widely available<br />

in virtually all human hospitals and are increasingly being<br />

used at veterinary clinics. Superior elimination of hand<br />

contaminants on veterinary personnel compared to hand<br />

washing with antibacterial soap has been reported. 14<br />

These products are quick and easy to use, and because<br />

they include emollients, they are easier on the hands than<br />

frequent hand washing. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers<br />

should be available at multiple sites in clinics and should<br />

be used between every animal contact. If there is gross<br />

soiling of hands or suspected contamination with an<br />

alcohol resistant organism (i.e. non enveloped viruses,<br />

bacterial spores), handwashing should be performed. Nonalcohol<br />

based hand sanitizers are also available yet their<br />

role in healthcare situations is currently unclear. There is<br />

little evidence suggesting superiority over alcohol-based<br />

products at this time.<br />

Development of infection control protocols<br />

Every clinic should have a formal infection control<br />

program. This may involve a complex program with detailed<br />

policies and dedicated full-time personnel in large specialty<br />

hospitals, but typically only requires a modest effort with<br />

little to no additional resources, training and time. The<br />

size and scope of the infection control program needs to<br />

be tailored to the needs and resources of the individual<br />

veterinary hospital. However, some common components<br />

should be present in all hospitals:<br />

1) A written infection control manual: Written resources<br />

are critical. If something is not written down, there may be<br />

a loss of consistency as people modify practices, knowingly<br />

or otherwise. A central written resource allows people to<br />

quickly and easily determine the required practices for both<br />

routine (i.e. cleaning and disinfection) and uncommon (i.e.<br />

rabies exposure) events. Written documentation is also<br />

critical to demonstrate that an infection control program is<br />

in place, should there be issues regarding professional or<br />

legal liability. The adage “if it’s not written down, it doesn’t<br />

exist” is important to remember.<br />

2) Documented training of all personnel: All personnel<br />

working in a clinic, from owners to temporary kennel staff,<br />

must be trained on infection control practices. This is not<br />

only required for optimal patient care. It is also critical for<br />

protection of the clinic because failure to properly train<br />

and document training of individuals about how to protect<br />

themselves, particularly lay personnel who would not be<br />

expected to know anything about zoonotic diseases or<br />

infection control, could expose the clinic to significant<br />

liability risks.<br />

3) A designated central contact person/resource: This<br />

‘infection control practitioner’ (ICP) can be a veterinarian or<br />

technician, and should be in charge of developing protocols,<br />

ensure protocols are being followed, act as a resource<br />

for infection control questions, ensure proper training of<br />

combined session 78 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


new staff and direct any surveillance activities. This is not<br />

necessarily a cumbersome or time-consuming job, as the<br />

day-to-day responsibilities are typically minimal. The main<br />

effort involves establishing the program, and available<br />

resources can facilitate this.<br />

4) “Buy-in” from clinic management: An infection control<br />

program is bound to fail if people in charge of the clinic<br />

do not support it. Failure of senior personnel to follow<br />

protocols, to support the general concept and to facilitate<br />

with compliance of all personnel will ultimately result in<br />

failure of the program. In some clinics, a proper infection<br />

control program requires a substantial ‘culture shift’ in<br />

attitudes, and this can only be achieved if there is proper<br />

support.<br />

5) An ability to adapt: An infection control program<br />

cannot remain static. Changes in disease risks, emergence<br />

of new diseases, changes in clinic design and operation and<br />

improvement in the general knowledge of infection control<br />

will result in the need for an evolving program. This should<br />

not require extensive and frequent program modification,<br />

but the program needs to be designed so that it can respond<br />

to any changes.<br />

Implementation of infection control protocols<br />

One of the greatest obstacles to infection control is<br />

compliance. Many infection control practices are inherently<br />

cumbersome, and may conflict with other demands in a<br />

busy practice. For this reason, education of all personnel<br />

is required to facilitate compliance. If people understand<br />

the reasons for protocols, they are much more likely<br />

to comply. It is critical for owners and managers to be<br />

committed to the infection control program. Few things<br />

will adversely affect compliance more than staff observing<br />

senior personnel flaunting protocols. Senior personnel must<br />

have a commitment, demonstrate that by their actions,<br />

and be willing to enforce compliance among all staff.<br />

A combined ‘carrot and stick’ approach is often useful.<br />

Periodic education is useful to help maintain interest and<br />

compliance. Reporting infection control data from the<br />

practice is also useful.<br />

References<br />

1. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Principles and practice of<br />

infectious diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2005.<br />

2. Haley RW, Quade D, Freeman HE, Bennett JV. The SENIC<br />

Project. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection<br />

control (SENIC Project). Summary of study design. Am J<br />

Epidemiol. May 1 1980;111(5):472-485.<br />

3. Stick JA. Preparation of the surgical patient, the surgery<br />

facility, and the operating team. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds.<br />

Equine Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier;<br />

2006:123-140.<br />

4. Brown D, Conzemius M, Shofer F, Swann H. Epidemiologic<br />

evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and<br />

cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. May 1 1997;210(9):1302-1306.<br />

5. Masterson TM, Rodeheaver GT, Morgan RF, Edlich RF.<br />

Bacteriologic evaluation of electric clippers for surgical hair<br />

removal. Am J Surg. Sep 1 1984;148(3):301-302.<br />

6. Mulberrry G, Snyder AT, Heilman J, Pyrek J, Stahl J.<br />

Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine<br />

gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub for antimicrobial efficacy.<br />

American journal of infection control. Dec 1 2001;29(6):377-<br />

382.<br />

7. Hobson DW, Woller W, Anderson L, Guthery E. Development<br />

and evaluation of a new alcohol-based surgical hand scrub<br />

formulation with persistent antimicrobial characteristics<br />

and brushless application. Am J Infect Control. Oct 1<br />

1998;26(5):507-512.<br />

8. Corder K, Knowles T, Holt P. Factors affecting bacterial<br />

counts during preparation of the hands for aseptic surgery.<br />

Vet Rec. Jun 30 2007;160(26):897-901.<br />

9. Larson EL. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand<br />

antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. Aug<br />

1 1995;23(4):251-269.<br />

10. Pottinger J, Burns S, Manske C. Bacterial carriage<br />

by artificial versus natural nails. Am J Infect Control.<br />

1989;17:340-344.<br />

11. Waguespack RW, Burba DJ, Moore RM. Surgical site<br />

infection and the use of antimicrobials. In: Auer JA, Stick<br />

JA, eds. Equine surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders<br />

Elsevier; 2006:70-87.<br />

12. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis<br />

WR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory<br />

Committee. Guidelines for prevention of surgical<br />

site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.<br />

1999;20(4):247-278.<br />

13. Murphy CP, Weese JS, Reid-Smith RJ, McEwen SA. The<br />

prevalence of bacterial contamination of surgical cold<br />

sterile solutions from community companion animal<br />

veterinary practices in southern Ontario. Can Vet J. Jun 1<br />

2010;51(6):634-636.<br />

14. Traub-Dargatz J, Weese J, Rousseau J, Dunowska M,<br />

Morley P, Dargatz D. Pilot study to evaluate 3 hygiene<br />

protocols on the reduction of bacterial load on the hands<br />

of veterinary staff performing routine equine physical<br />

examinations. Can Vet J. Jul 1 2006;47(7):671-676.<br />

combined session 79 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections:<br />

animal and public health consequences<br />

J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />

Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />

Introduction<br />

Despite being inherently susceptible to virtually every<br />

known antimicrobial class, staphylococci are notorious<br />

for antimicrobial resistance. From the first introduction<br />

of antimicrobials, staphylococci have demonstrated an<br />

impressive ability to become resistant. Penicillin-resistance<br />

was identified shortly after penicillin became widely used.<br />

New drug development outpaced resistance initially,<br />

but the ability of staphylococci to become resistant was<br />

repeatedly demonstrated as the introduction of new drugs<br />

was typically followed (sometimes rapidly) by emergence<br />

of resistance. Included in this pattern was resistance<br />

to methicillin, which emerged not long after the use of<br />

methicillin began in 1959. While resistance to methicillin<br />

itself is not a major concern, methicillin-resistance is<br />

caused by production of an altered penicillin binding<br />

protein (PBP2a) that has a poor affinity for beta-lactam<br />

antimicrobials and confers resistance not just to methicillin,<br />

but to virtually all beta-lactams; penicillins, cephalosporins<br />

and carbapenems. In addition to broad beta-lactam<br />

resistance, methicillin-resistant staphylococci are often<br />

resistant to a wide range of other antimicrobials, severely<br />

limiting treatment options. While methicillin-resistance<br />

was first noted as a problem in humans, it has emerged as<br />

a pressing issue in companion animals, and there have been<br />

striking recent changes in the epidemiology of methicillinresistant<br />

staphylococcal infection and colonization in dogs<br />

and cats.<br />

There is often confusion associated with staphylococci,<br />

particularly methicillin-resistant staphylococci. It is critical<br />

to remember that all staph are not created alike. The<br />

clinical relevance, prevalence of colonization, incidence<br />

of disease and potential for interspecies transmission<br />

vary greatly between different staphylococcal species.<br />

Inadequate identification practices, variable and sometimes<br />

improper susceptibility testing methodology, and variable<br />

reporting of results can lead to confusion and possibly<br />

suboptimal patient care. A critical aspect of dealing with<br />

staphylococci is knowing (with confidence) the species that<br />

is involved. There are two main groups of staphylococci;<br />

coagulase positive and coagulase negative. Coagulase<br />

positive species (e.g. S. aureus, S. pseudintermedius,<br />

S. schleiferi coagulans) are the most virulent and of<br />

greatest clinical relevance. Differentiation of these, or at a<br />

minimum, differentiation of S. aureus from other coagulase<br />

positive staphylococci is needed for both interpretation<br />

of zoonotic risks and the use of proper antimicrobial<br />

susceptibility testing methodology (since there are different<br />

recommendation for S. aureus and S. pseudintermedius).<br />

Coagulase negative staphylococci tend to be of limited<br />

virulence and after often considered together as a single<br />

group, although there is some evidence of variation in<br />

virulence and clinical relevance.<br />

Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus<br />

pseudintermedius (MRSP)<br />

MRSP appears to have emerged and disseminated<br />

internationally in companion animals at a truly amazing<br />

rate, with rapid development of a very high level of drug<br />

resistance. MRSP infections are being identified virtually<br />

everywhere that people are looking, and the increase in<br />

incidence of disease, while not objectively studied, seems<br />

to be dramatic, particularly among dogs with pyoderma<br />

and in surgical site infections. It has been called a serious<br />

emerging problem in small animal veterinary medicine and<br />

one that requires urgent action to control its spread. 1 Highly<br />

antimicrobial resistant strains are commonly encountered,<br />

and there may be few viable treatment options. Curiously,<br />

while MRSP appears to only have emerged as a problem<br />

recently, MRSP strains from dogs and cats are typically<br />

much more resistant than MRSA strains which have<br />

presumably been around much longer.<br />

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the most common<br />

pathogenic Staphylococcus in dogs and a common<br />

commensal that can be found in or on a large percentage<br />

of healthy dogs, and a smaller percentage of cats. As with<br />

methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP), MRSP<br />

can be found in or on healthy dogs and cats. Carriage rates<br />

of 0-17% in dogs and 0-1.2% in healthy cats have been<br />

reported,2-6 and it appears that the rate of colonization<br />

is increasing in many regions. Risk factors for MRSP<br />

colonization have not been adequately investigated,<br />

but there is some evidence that routine antimicrobial<br />

combined session 80 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


administration may be an important driving force for MRSP<br />

colonization in dogs.<br />

MRSP is an opportunistic pathogen and colonization<br />

does not necessarily lead to disease. Indeed, it is likely<br />

that the vast majority of colonized animals never develop<br />

a clinical infection. The risk of infection in MRSP carriers<br />

has not been reported, but it is reasonable to assume<br />

that MRSP carriers are at some increased risk of MRSP<br />

infection, at least in certain situations (e.g. after surgery).<br />

Limited study of risk factors for infection has been<br />

performed but antimicrobial administration, hospitalization<br />

or surgery within 30 days prior to the onset of infection were<br />

associated with MRSP versus MSSP infection in one study. 7<br />

Skin, ear and other soft tissue infections predominate. 7-10<br />

Very high rates of MRSP infection are now being identified<br />

among canine pyoderma patients. Likely the 2 nd most<br />

common presentation of MRSP infections is surgical<br />

site infections (SSIs), and the prevalence of MRSP SSIs<br />

is anecdotally increasing rapidly in many regions. Little<br />

comparative study has been performed, but elective<br />

orthopedic procedures, particularly TPLO, appear to be<br />

over-represented. This is of significant concern because<br />

of the morbidity and even mortality that can be associated<br />

with these infections. As highly drug resistant MRSP are<br />

being encountered more often, amputation is sometimes<br />

required to in response to uncontrollable SSI from elective<br />

orthopedic procedures, something that is of tremendous<br />

concern.<br />

There is no indication that MRSP infections are inherently<br />

more serious than infections caused by methicillinsusceptible<br />

strains, however they could ultimately be<br />

associated with increased morbidity and mortality because<br />

of failure of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy and<br />

limited treatment options. This concern is heightened by<br />

the continued emergence of resistance, as antimicrobials<br />

that were commonly effective a short time ago (e.g.<br />

chloramphenicol, doxycycline, trimethoprim-sulfa) are now<br />

often ineffective.<br />

Public Health Issues<br />

Despite the fact that exposure to S. pseudintermedius must<br />

be very common in pet owners (given the high prevalence of<br />

colonization in pets), human S. pseudintermedius infections<br />

are rarely reported and colonization rates in veterinary<br />

personnel and pet owners are rather low (1-4%),6, 11<br />

suggesting poor host adaptation to humans. Methicillinresistance<br />

simply confers antimicrobial resistance, not<br />

inherently increased virulence, and there is no evidence<br />

that MRSP is more likely to cause an infection than<br />

MSSP. Accordingly, the low incidence of MSSP infections<br />

in humans should indicate a correspondingly low risk of<br />

MRSP infection. Transmission of MRSP between dogs<br />

and people is likely based on reports of indistinguishable<br />

isolates from people and dogs12, 13 and isolation of MRSP<br />

from a small percentage of owners of dogs with MRSP<br />

pyoderma.14 However, there is currently limited public<br />

health concern regarding MRSP. However, the limited<br />

but increasing number of reports of MRSP infection in<br />

humans15, 16 should not be dismissed. Given the highly<br />

drug resistant nature (and associated treatment difficulty)<br />

of MRSP, while the risk may be very low, the consequences<br />

of infection could be high, so care should be taken to use<br />

good infection control practices around infected animals<br />

in households and veterinary clinics.<br />

The potential for under-reporting of MRSP must also<br />

be considered if human diagnostic laboratories are not<br />

adequately differentiating MRSP from the much more<br />

common coagulase positive Staphylococcus MRSA.17<br />

Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa)<br />

MRSA tends to receive a higher profile than MRSP<br />

because of its huge impact in human medicine and its<br />

earlier apparent emergence in companion animals (relative<br />

to MRSP), however it is a much less common cause of<br />

infection in dogs and cats. Despite the importance of<br />

this pathogen, the animal health implications of MRSA<br />

are nowhere near as large in dogs and cats compared to<br />

MRSP. Regardless, attention must be paid to this organism<br />

because of the potential for serious and difficult-to-treat<br />

infections and the potentially greater zoonotic implications.<br />

It is assumed that the emergence of MRSA in companion<br />

animals is directly related to MRSA in humans. As MRSA<br />

expanded in humans in the general population in the 1990s<br />

and 2000s, exposure of pets was inevitable. Humans are<br />

thought to be the ultimate source of infection for a large<br />

percentage, if not the vast majority, of infections in pets,<br />

and changes in the epidemiology of MRSA in humans<br />

can be reflected in changes in trends in pets. Virtually all<br />

MRSA isolates from pets are recognized human epidemic<br />

clones and identification of other strains in dogs and cats is<br />

rare. 18-22 Sequence type 398 MRSA, a livestock-associated<br />

strain of particular concern in Europe, has been found in a<br />

limited number of dogs, 23-25 however dogs were more likely<br />

infected by people that were exposed to livestock.<br />

First reported in the 1990s, MRSA infection and<br />

colonization have now been identified in dogs, cats and<br />

other companion animals across the world. Staphylococcus<br />

aureus can be isolated from the nares, perineum or intestinal<br />

tract of 12-14% of healthy dogs and 4.3-20% of healthy<br />

cats,3, 6, 26 and not surprisingly, MRSA can also be found in<br />

healthy individuals. Reported colonization rates are variable<br />

but tend to be 0-3.3% in healthy dogs and 0-6% in healthy<br />

cats.26-31 Higher rates can be encountered periodically in<br />

animals in veterinary facilities.32, 33 However, most MRSA<br />

cases are not associated with veterinary hospitals. Higher<br />

rates can also be found in specific dog populations such as<br />

households where another pet has an MRSA infection,34 or<br />

during outbreaks in breeding or rescue kennels.20, 25 Being<br />

owned by a human healthcare worker and participation in<br />

hospital visitation programs have been identified as risk<br />

factors for MRSA colonization in dogs, and are logical<br />

based on the increased likelihood of exposure to colonized<br />

combined session 81 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


people.18, 35 Contact with children has also been identified<br />

as a risk factor.18 While these, and potentially other, risk<br />

factors should be considered, MRSA can be identified in<br />

any animal and absence of known risk factors should not<br />

lead to excluding MRSA from consideration.<br />

As with MRSP, most animals that are colonized with<br />

MRSA have no signs of infection and may never develop<br />

a clinical infection, but opportunistic infections can<br />

develop. S. aureus produces a similar range of disease<br />

as S. pseudintermedius. The main difference between<br />

S. pseudintermedius and S. aureus (and therefore<br />

between MRSP and MRSA) is the incidence of disease,<br />

not disease location or severity. Clinically, MRSA<br />

infections are indistinguishable from those caused by<br />

methicillin-susceptible strains or other coagulase positive<br />

staphylococci, predominantly skin and ear infections, with<br />

smaller numbers of other opportunistic infections.3, 19,<br />

21, 22, 36-40 It is possible that infections more commonly<br />

associated with human-contact (e.g. wound and surgical<br />

site infections contaminated by hands of owners or<br />

veterinary personnel) are more likely to be caused by S.<br />

aureus (including MRSA) but objective data are lacking.<br />

Public Health Issues<br />

Significant attention has been given to public health<br />

concerns regarding pets and MRSA. Given the importance<br />

of MRSA in human medicine, it is perhaps not surprising<br />

that serious concern has accompanied identification of<br />

MRSA in pets. However, as knowledge regarding MRSA<br />

advances, it is becoming evident that while interspecies<br />

transmission of MRSA certainly does occur in households,<br />

human-to-animal transmission is probably most common.<br />

The role of pets in human MRSA infection is completely<br />

unclear. It is likely that pets play at best a very limited role<br />

in human MRSA infection, however zoonotic infections<br />

certainly cannot be dismissed and in some situations an<br />

infected or colonized animal could pose a reasonable risk<br />

to humans.<br />

Colonization of people in contact with infected or<br />

colonized dogs and cats (often with demonstration of<br />

the same strain in humans and animals) has been widely<br />

reported. 19, 22, 35, 41-44 Pets have been implicated as sources<br />

of infection for humans in households, 41, 43 however<br />

conclusions are often overstated. Virtually all studies have<br />

involved concurrent testing of people and pets. While<br />

finding the same MRSA strain in both groups strongly<br />

supports interspecies transmission, it cannot determine the<br />

direction of transmission. Further, since the MRSA strains<br />

found in pets are human epidemic clones, and because<br />

the average pet has little contact with other people or<br />

animals, it is most likely that a human household member<br />

would bring MRSA into the home, with the potential for<br />

subsequent dissemination to other humans and animals.<br />

This assessment should not be taken as an indication that<br />

there is no risk from pets, since regardless of how a pet is<br />

ultimately infected, it could still transmit MRSA to humans.<br />

Numerous studies of MRSA colonization in veterinary<br />

personnel have been performed, reporting colonization<br />

rates of up to 18% in small animal veterinary personnel. 45-48<br />

It cannot be determined with certainty that these<br />

colonization rates reflect acquisition of MRSA from animals<br />

however identification of higher rates than present in the<br />

general population (1.5-3%), 49, 50 and the lack of other<br />

explanations as to why veterinary personnel would be at<br />

higher risk than others provide support of occupational<br />

origin. Whether this constitutes a significant health risk for<br />

veterinary personnel is unclear. There are limited reports<br />

of MRSA infection in veterinary personnel that have<br />

worked with infected or colonization animals, 51, 52 along<br />

with numerous anecdotal reports. Further, the high rates<br />

of colonization could increase the risk of infection in some<br />

situations such as if colonized veterinary personnel undergo<br />

surgery or are admitted to hospital. Another concern is<br />

the potential for veterinary clinics to act as reservoirs of<br />

MRSA, resulting in infection or colonization of patients<br />

and potentially subsequent exposure of patients’ families.<br />

The true role of pets in human MRSA infections is<br />

impossible to determine at this point. Considering the<br />

epidemic of community-associated MRSA infections in<br />

people and endemic MRSA in human healthcare facilities,<br />

pets certainly play a minor role overall in human infections.<br />

Yet, with the scope of this problem, a minor role from a<br />

population standpoint could still represent a relevant source<br />

of infection. The potential role of pets in human MRSA<br />

infections should be considered, but in a balanced manner.<br />

Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus schleiferi<br />

(MRSS)<br />

Staphylococcus schleiferi consists of two subspecies,<br />

the coagulase positive S. schleiferi subsp coagulans and<br />

coagulase negative S. schleiferi subsp schleiferi. These<br />

are less common causes of infection compared with S.<br />

pseudintermedius and S. aureus, but a large percentage<br />

of diagnostic laboratories do not attempt to different<br />

S. schleiferi coagulans from S. pseudintermedius or S.<br />

schleiferi schleiferi from other coagulase negative species<br />

so there are limitations in understanding of the role of these<br />

species in disease. Staphylococcus schleiferi coagulans can<br />

be isolated in 0.8-4% of healthy dogs and 0-2% of healthy<br />

cats.3, 6, 26 Colonization with methicillin-resistant S.<br />

schleiferi (MRSS) has been identified in 0-2% of dogs3, 4, 6<br />

and MRSS infections are being increasingly reported.36, 53,<br />

54 S. schleiferi coagulans is most commonly implicated in<br />

pyoderma and otitis externa in dogs, but other opportunistic<br />

infections such as urinary tract infection and pneumonia<br />

have been reported.3, 36, 55-59 Less in known about S.<br />

schleiferi schleiferi, but it is likely present in or on a small<br />

percentage of healthy dogs and cats. It has been implicated<br />

as a cause of pyoderma and otitis,36, 56, 58 and methicillinresistant<br />

infections, while poorly characterized, presumably<br />

do the same.<br />

combined session 82 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Public health concerns are currently limited. Human<br />

S. schleiferi coagulans infections are extremely rare.<br />

In one case, a dog with otitis was thought to be the<br />

source of S. schleiferi coagulans endocarditis in an<br />

immunocompromised person,60 but it was not possible to<br />

confirm that the dog was the source. While Staphylococcus<br />

schleiferi schleiferi periodically causes human infections,<br />

it is probably a human commensal species so pets are<br />

unlikely to be the source.<br />

Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (MR-CoNS)<br />

MR-CoNS are common commensals and generally<br />

of limited virulence. MR-CoNS infections may be<br />

overdiagnosed because MR-CoNS can be isolated as<br />

contaminants from various superficial body sites. In human<br />

medicine, MR-CoNS are primarily a concern in hospitalized<br />

individuals.61 The situation may be similar in dogs can cats,<br />

with most CoNS being of minimal pathogenicity and mainly<br />

of relevance in highly compromised patients. While CoNS<br />

are generally considered as a group, it is possible that there<br />

are differences between CoNS species. This mainly relates<br />

to three organisms; S. schleiferi subspecies schleiferi, S.<br />

epidermidis and S. felis. Staphylococcus schleiferi schleiferi<br />

and S. epidermidis have been implicated as a cause of<br />

pyoderma and otitis,36, 56, 58, 62 and may be inherently<br />

more pathogenic in skin and ear infections than other CoNS.<br />

A primary role of S. felis in urinary tract infections in cats<br />

has also been suggested.63 These species may, therefore,<br />

be relevant pathogens in community-associated disease,<br />

unlike most other CoNS. As with other staphylococci,<br />

methicillin-resistant strains are inherently no more<br />

pathogenic than methicillin-susceptible strains, and the<br />

implications of colonization with MR-CoNS are typically<br />

inconsequential.<br />

Coagulase negative staphylococci, including MR-CoNS<br />

are common in both animals and humans. While many of<br />

the same CoNS species can cause disease both people<br />

and pets, it is unlikely that animals are relevant sources<br />

of human infection.<br />

References<br />

1. Gronlund-Andersson U, Finn M, Kadlec K, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; an emerging<br />

companion animal health problem. Paper presented<br />

at: ASM-ESCMID conference on methicillin-resistant<br />

staphylococci in animals2009; London, UK.<br />

2. Epstein CR, Yam WC, Peiris JS, Epstein RJ. Methicillinresistant<br />

commensal staphylococci in healthy dogs<br />

as a potential zoonotic reservoir for communityacquired<br />

antibiotic resistance. Infect Genet Evol. Mar 1<br />

2009;9(2):283-285.<br />

3. Griffeth GC, Morris DO, Abraham JL, Shofer FS, Rankin<br />

SC. Screening for skin carriage of methicillin-resistant<br />

coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus<br />

schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skin. Vet<br />

Dermatol. Jun 1 2008;19(3):142-149.<br />

4. Hanselman BA, Kruth S, Weese JS. Methicillin-resistant<br />

staphylococcal colonization in dogs entering a veterinary<br />

teaching hospital. Vet Microbiol. Jun 22 2007;126:277-281.<br />

5. Vengust M, Anderson M, Rousseau J, Weese J. Methicillinresistant<br />

staphylococcal colonization in clinically normal<br />

dogs and horses in the community. Lett Appl Microbiol. Dec<br />

1 2006;43(6):602-606.<br />

6. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS.<br />

Coagulase positive staphylococcal colonization of people<br />

and their household pets. Can Vet J. 2009;50(9):954-958.<br />

7. Weese JS, Frank LA, Reynolds LM, Bemis DA. Retrospective<br />

study of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible<br />

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius infections in dogs. Paper<br />

presented at: ASM-ESCMID conference on methicillinresistant<br />

staphylococci in animals2009; London, UK.<br />

8. Loeffler A, Linek M, Moodley A, et al. First report of<br />

multiresistant, mecA-positive Staphylococcus intermedius<br />

in Europe: 12 cases from a veterinary dermatology referral<br />

clinic in Germany. Vet Dermatol. Dec 1 2007;18(6):412-421.<br />

9. Kadlec K, Schwarz S, Perreten V, et al. Molecular analysis<br />

of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius<br />

of feline origin from different European countries and North<br />

America. J Antimicrob Chemother. Jun 9 2010.<br />

10. 1Perreten V, Kadlec K, Schwarz S, et al. Clonal spread of<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in<br />

Europe and North America: an international multicentre<br />

study. J Antimicrob Chemother. Mar 25 2010;65:1145-1154.<br />

11. Talan DA, Staatz D, Staatz A, Overturf GD. Frequency of<br />

Staphylococcus intermedius as human nasopharyngeal<br />

flora. J Clin Microbiol. Oct 1 1989;27(10):2393.<br />

12. Sasaki T, Kikuchi K, Tanaka Y, Takahashi N, Kamata<br />

S, Hiramatsu K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />

pseudintermedius in a veterinary teaching hospital. J Clin<br />

Microbiol. Apr 1 2007;45(4):1118-1125.<br />

13. van Duijkeren E, Houwers DJ, Schoormans A, et al.<br />

Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />

intermedius between humans and animals. Veterinary<br />

Microbiology. Apr 1 2008;128(1-2):213-215.<br />

14. Frank LA, Kania SA, Kirzeder EM, Eberlein LC, Bemis DA.<br />

Risk of colonization or gene transfer to owners of dogs with<br />

meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet<br />

Dermatol. Oct 1 2009;20(5-6):496-501.<br />

15. Stegmann R, Burnens A, Maranta CA, Perreten V.<br />

Human infection associated with methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71. Journal of<br />

Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Jul 1 2010:1-2.<br />

16. Van Hoovels L, Vankeerberghen A, Boel A, Van Vaerenbergh<br />

K, De Beenhouwer H. First case of Staphylococcus<br />

pseudintermedius infection in a human. J Clin Microbiol.<br />

Dec 1 2006;44(12):4609-4612.<br />

17. Pottumarthy S, Schapiro J, Prentice J, et al. Clinical isolates<br />

of Staphylococcus intermedius masquerading as methicillinresistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 1<br />

2004;42(12):5881-5884.<br />

18. Lefebvre SL, Reid-Smith RJ, Waltner-Toews D, Weese<br />

JS. Incidence of acquisition of methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, and other<br />

health-care-associated pathogens by dogs that participate<br />

in animal-assisted interventions. J Am Vet Med Assoc. Jun<br />

1 2009;234(11):1404-1417.<br />

19. Leonard F, Abbott Y, Rossney A, Quinn P, O’Mahony R,<br />

Markey B. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />

isolated from a veterinary surgeon and five dogs in one<br />

practice. Vet Rec. Feb 4 2006;158(5):155-159.<br />

20. Loeffler A, Pfeiffer D, Lindsay J, Soares-Magalhaes R,<br />

Lloyd D. Lack of transmission of methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) between apparently healthy<br />

dogs in a rescue kennel. Vet Microbiol. Aug 8 2009.<br />

combined session 83 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


21. O’Mahony R, Abbott Y, Leonard F, et al. Methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from animals<br />

and veterinary personnel in Ireland. Vet Microbiol. Aug 30<br />

2005;109(3-4):285-296.<br />

22. Weese J, Dick H, Willey B, et al. Suspected transmission<br />

of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between<br />

domestic pets and humans in veterinary clinics and in the<br />

household. Vet Microbiol. Jun 15 2006;115(1-3):148-155.<br />

23. Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C. Methicillinresistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and<br />

animals, Central Europe. Emerging Infect Dis. Feb 1<br />

2007;13(2):255-258.<br />

24. Nienhoff U, Kadlec, Chaberny I, et al. Transmission of<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains<br />

between humans and dogs: two case reports. J Antimicrob<br />

Chemother. Jul 16 2009;64:660-662.<br />

25. Floras A, Lawn K, Slavic D, Golding GR, Mulvey MR, Weese<br />

JS. Sequence type 398 meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />

aureus infection and colonisation in dogs. Vet Rec. Jun 26<br />

2010;166(26):826-827.<br />

26. Abraham J, Morris D, Griffeth G, Shofer F, Rankin S.<br />

Surveillance of healthy cats and cats with inflammatory<br />

skin disease for colonization of the skin by methicillinresistant<br />

coagulase-positive staphylococci and<br />

Staphylococcus schleiferi ssp. schleiferi. Vet Dermatol. Aug<br />

1 2007;18(4):252-259.<br />

27. Kottler S, Middleton JR, Perry J, Weese JS, Cohn LA.<br />

Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-<br />

Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in Three<br />

Populations. J Vet Intern Med. Nov 30 2009;24:132-139.<br />

28. Baptiste K, Williams K, Willams N, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />

staphylococci in companion animals. Emerg Infect<br />

Dis. Dec 1 2005;11(12):1942-1944.<br />

29. Loeffler A, Pfeiffer DU, Lindsay JA, Magalhães RJS, Lloyd<br />

DH. Prevalence of and risk factors for MRSA carriage in<br />

companion animals: a survey of dogs, cats and horses.<br />

Epidemiology and infection. Oct 14 2010:1-10.<br />

30. Hanselman, Kruth, Weese. Methicillin-resistant<br />

staphylococcal colonization in dogs entering a veterinary<br />

teaching hospital. Vet Microbiol. Jun 22 2007;126:277-281.<br />

31. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS.<br />

Coagulase positive staphylococcal colonization of humans<br />

and their household pets. Can Vet J. Sep 1 2009;50(9):954-<br />

958.<br />

32. Loeffler A, Boag A, Sung J, et al. Prevalence of methicillinresistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus among staff and pets in<br />

a small animal referral hospital in the UK. J Antimicrob<br />

Chemother. Oct 1 2005;56(4):692-697.<br />

33. Weese JS, Faires M, Rousseau J, Bersenas AM, Mathews<br />

KA. Cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />

colonization in a small animal intensive care unit. J Am Vet<br />

Med Assoc. Nov 1 2007;231(9):1361-1364.<br />

34. Faires MC, Tater KC, Weese JS. An investigation of<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization<br />

in people and pets in the same household with an infected<br />

person or infected pet. J Am Vet Med Assoc. Sep 1<br />

2009;235(5):540-543.<br />

35. Boost M, O’donoghue M, Siu K. Characterisation of<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates<br />

from dogs and their owners. Clin Microbiol Infect. Jul 1<br />

2007;13(7):731-733.<br />

36. Morris D, Rook K, Shofer F, Rankin S. Screening of<br />

Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus intermedius,<br />

and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolates obtained from<br />

small companion animals for antimicrobial resistance:<br />

a retrospective review of 749 isolates (2003-04). Vet<br />

Dermatol. Oct 1 2006;17(5):332-337.<br />

37. Owen MR, Moores AP, Coe RJ. Management of<br />

MRSA septic arthritis in a dog using a gentamicinimpregnated<br />

collagen sponge. J <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract. Dec 1<br />

2004;45(12):609-612.<br />

38. Rankin S, Roberts S, O’Shea K, Maloney D, Lorenzo M,<br />

Benson C. Panton valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin positive<br />

MRSA strains isolated from companion animals. Vet<br />

Microbiol. Jun 15 2005;108(1-2):145-148.<br />

39. Morris D, Mauldin E, O’Shea K, Shofer F, Rankin S.<br />

Clinical, microbiological, and molecular characterization of<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections of<br />

cats. Am J Vet Res. Aug 1 2006;67(8):1421-1425.<br />

40. Faires M, Weese JS. Risk factors for methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus infection in small animals. ASM<br />

Conference on Antimicrobial Resistance in Zoonotic and<br />

Foodborne Pathogens. Copenhagen, Denmark2008.<br />

41. Manian FA. Asymptomatic nasal carriage of mupirocinresistant,<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />

(MRSA) in a pet dog associated with MRSA infection in<br />

household contacts. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 15 2003;36(2):e26-<br />

28.<br />

42. van Duijkeren E, Wolfhagen MJ, Heck ME, Wannet WJ.<br />

Transmission of a Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive,<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain<br />

between humans and a dog. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 1<br />

2005;43(12):6209-6211.<br />

43. Sing A, Tuschak C, Hörmansdorfer S. Methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus in a family and its pet cat. N Engl J<br />

Med. Mar 13 2008;358(11):1200-1201.<br />

44. Vitale C, Gross T, Weese J. Methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus in cat and owner. Emerging Infect<br />

Dis. Dec 1 2006;12(12):1998-2000.<br />

45. Anderson ME, Lefebvre SL, Weese JS. Evaluation of<br />

prevalence and risk factors for methicillin-resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel<br />

attending an international equine veterinary conference. Vet<br />

Microbiol. Dec 4 2007;129:410-417.<br />

46. Burstiner LC, Faires M, Weese JS. Methicillin-Resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Personnel<br />

Attending a Veterinary Surgery Conference. Vet Surg. Feb 1<br />

2010;39(2):150-157.<br />

47. Hanselman B, Kruth S, Rousseau J, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary<br />

personnel. Emerg Infect Dis. Dec 1 2006;12(12):1933-1938.<br />

48. Wulf M, van Nes A, Eikelenboom-Boskamp A, et al.<br />

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary<br />

doctors and students, the Netherlands. Emerging Infect Dis.<br />

Dec 1 2006;12(12):1939-1941.<br />

49. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS.<br />

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in<br />

schoolteachers in Ontario. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol.<br />

Nov 1 2008;19(6):405-408.<br />

50. Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SK, et al. Changes<br />

in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus<br />

aureus in the United States, 2001-2004. J Infect Dis. May 1<br />

2008;197(9):1226-1234.<br />

51. Weese J, Archambault M, Willey B, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse<br />

personnel, 2000-2002. Emerging Infect Dis. Mar 1<br />

2005;11(3):430-435.<br />

52. Weese J, Caldwell F, Willey B, et al. An outbreak of<br />

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections<br />

resulting from horse to human transmission in a veterinary<br />

hospital. Vet Microbiol. Apr 16 2006;114(1-2):160-164.<br />

53. Jones R, Kania S, Rohrbach B, Frank L, Bemis D. Prevalence<br />

of oxacillin- and multidrug-resistant staphylococci in clinical<br />

samples from dogs: 1,772 samples (2001-2005). J Am Vet<br />

Med Assoc. Jan 15 2007;230(2):221-227.<br />

combined session 84 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


54. Kania S, Williamson N, Frank L, Wilkes R, Jones R, Bemis<br />

D. Methicillin resistance of staphylococci isolated from<br />

the skin of dogs with pyoderma. Am J Vet Res. Sep 1<br />

2004;65(9):1265-1268.<br />

55. Bes M, Guérin-Faublée V, Freney J, Etienne J. Isolation<br />

of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans<br />

from two cases of canine pyoderma. Vet Rec. Apr 13<br />

2002;150(15):487-488.<br />

56. Frank L, Kania S, Hnilica K, Wilkes R, Bemis D. Isolation of<br />

Staphylococcus schleiferi from dogs with pyoderma. J Am<br />

Vet Med Assoc. Feb 15 2003;222(4):451-454.<br />

57. Igimi S, Takahashi E, Mitsuoka T. Staphylococcus schleiferi<br />

subsp. coagulans subsp. nov., isolated from the external<br />

auditory meatus of dogs with external ear otitis. Int J Syst<br />

Bacteriol. Oct 1 1990;40(4):409-411.<br />

58. May ER, Hnilica KA, Frank LA, Jones RD, Bemis DA.<br />

Isolation of Staphylococcus schleiferi from healthy dogs<br />

and dogs with otitis, pyoderma, or both. J Am Vet Med<br />

Assoc. Sep 15 2005;227(6):928-931.<br />

59. Rich M, Roberts L, Jones M, Young V. Staphylococcus<br />

schleiferi subspecies coagulans in companion animals. Vet<br />

Rec. Jul 21 2007;161(3):107.<br />

60. Kumar D, Cawley JJ, Irizarry-Alvarado JM, Alvarez A,<br />

Alvarez S. Case of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies<br />

coagulans endocarditis and metastatic infection in an<br />

immune compromised host. Transplant infectious disease<br />

: an official journal of the Transplantation Society. Dec 1<br />

2007;9(4):336-338.<br />

61. Archer GL, Climo MW. Staphylococcus epidermidis and<br />

other coagulase negative staphylococci. In: Mandell<br />

GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and practice of<br />

infectious diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier;<br />

2005:2352-2360.<br />

62. Penna B, Varges R, Medeiros L, Martins GM, Martins<br />

RR, Lilenbaum W. Species distribution and antimicrobial<br />

susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from canine otitis<br />

externa. Vet Dermatol. Jun 1 2010;21(3):292-296.<br />

63. Litster A, Moss SM, Honnery M, Rees B, Trott DJ.<br />

Prevalence of bacterial species in cats with clinical signs of<br />

lower urinary tract disease: recognition of Staphylococcus<br />

felis as a possible feline urinary tract pathogen. Vet<br />

Microbiol. Mar 31 2007;121(1-2):182-188.<br />

combined session 85 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


small animal session 86 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

Short communications <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics<br />

Friday July 8<br />

10.45 <strong>–</strong> 13.00


Biomechanical comparison of plate, plate-rod and<br />

orthogonal plate locking constructs in an ex-vivo<br />

canine tibial fracture gap model.<br />

Glyde M *1 ., Day R. 2 , Deane B. 1 , Read R 1 . and Hosgood G * 1 .<br />

1 Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Perth, Australia. 2 Department of Medical<br />

Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.<br />

Introduction<br />

The purpose of this research was to compare the<br />

biomechanical characteristics of medial plate, plate-rod<br />

and orthogonal plate locking constructs in a canine ex-vivo<br />

comminuted tibial fracture gap model.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Tibial pairs from six Greyhounds euthanased for reasons<br />

unrelated to this study were separated into two groups.<br />

Group MPU had a Synthes® 10 hole 3.5mm LCP (locking<br />

compression plate) applied to the medial tibia with 4<br />

unicortical screws per fracture fragment. Group MPB had<br />

identical plate application excepting 2 bicortical screws<br />

per fracture fragment. MPU and MPB constructs were<br />

non-destructively tested in two-plane four-point bending,<br />

axial compression and torsion (Instron 5566 and 8874).<br />

Following testing Group MPU had a 2.4mm Steinmann IM<br />

(intramedullary) pin added to create a plate-rod construct<br />

(Group PR). IM pin diameter was 30-40% of the mean<br />

medullary diameter at the narrowest point. Group MPB<br />

received a cranial 10 hole 2.7mm LCP with 2 bicortical<br />

screws per fracture fragment creating an orthogonal<br />

plate construct (Group OP). Groups PR and OP were nondestructively<br />

tested using the same protocols as for groups<br />

MPU and MPB. Subsequently Groups PR and OP were<br />

loaded to failure in axial compression.<br />

Results<br />

MPU and MPB construct stiffness was not significantly<br />

different (p>0.05) in any test mode. PR construct stiffness<br />

was significantly greater than MPU stiffness in lateromedial<br />

bending (140%, p


Effect of screw insertional torque on mechanical<br />

properties of 5 different angular stable systems<br />

A Boero Baroncelli 1 , U Reif 2 , C Bignardi 3 , B Peirone 1 .<br />

1 Department of Animal Pathology, University of Turin (Italy), 2 Tierklinik Dr. Reif, Böbingen (Germany), 3<br />

Department of Mechanics, Politecnico di Torino (Italy)<br />

Introduction<br />

The purpose of this study was to compare the screw push<br />

out strength and resistance to cantilever bending of five<br />

different angular stable systems. Our first hypothesis was<br />

that there is a significant difference between the systems<br />

regarding push out strength and cantilever bending.<br />

Furthermore, our second hypothesis was that screws<br />

insertion torque has an influence on push out strength and<br />

cantilever bending properties of the locking mechanism.<br />

Material and Methods<br />

Five different 3.5 mm implant systems were evaluated.<br />

The Synthes LCP, the Traumavet Fixin, the Securos PAX, the<br />

Orthomed SOP, and the Veterinary Instrumentation locking<br />

system. Screws were then inserted using a variable torque<br />

limiting device which was set to 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 Nm.<br />

To evaluate the push out strength, the constructs were<br />

mounted in a custom made device. A force was applied at<br />

the level of the screw tip acting along the long axis of the<br />

screw at a constant displacement rate of 1 mm/min. For<br />

cantilever bending a load was applied perpendicular to the<br />

long axis of the screw at a constant displacement rate of 1<br />

mm/min. Statistical analysis of the push out strength and<br />

cantilever bending stiffness were performed using analysis<br />

of variance ANOVA (p-value 0,001).<br />

Results<br />

A statistically significant influence of the insertional<br />

torque on push out strength was seen in the Securos<br />

( p = 0.00001) and the Traumavet ( p = 0.00001) system.<br />

A statistically significant influence of the insertional torque<br />

on bending stiffness was only seen in the Securos system<br />

(p = 0.00098).<br />

Conclusions<br />

For the Orthomed, Synthes and Veterinary Instrumentation<br />

systems insertional torque did not influence push out<br />

strength nor cantilever bending stiffness. When using<br />

the Traumavet and Securos angular stable systems, the<br />

minimum acceptable insertion torque should be 2,5 Nm, in<br />

order to obtain correct screw-plate coupling. In the Securos<br />

system insertional torque positively influence the push out<br />

strength and cantilever bending stiffness values.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 89 small animal orthopaedic session


The use of pedicle screws in canine lumbosacral<br />

disease.<br />

Meij BP*, Smolders LA, Bergknut N, Voorhout G, Grinwis GCM, Hazewinkel HAW*<br />

Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion <strong>Animals</strong>, Utrecht, The Netherlands.<br />

Introductio<br />

The use of the pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSRF) has been<br />

tested biomechanically in a canine cadaver study. The aim<br />

of the present study was to assess the pedicle screws in<br />

the canine lumbosacral junction (LSJ) ex vivo in an imaging<br />

study and to evaluate the use of PSRF in vivo in 6 dogs<br />

with lumbosacral disease.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Ex vivo study: PSRF of the LSJ was performed in six<br />

canine cadaveric lumbosacral spinal specimens using<br />

predefined guidelines and was evaluated with radiography,<br />

computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In<br />

vivo study: 3 Greyhound dogs diagnosed with degenerative<br />

lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) and 3 dogs diagnosed<br />

with lumbosacral discospondylitis underwent dorsal<br />

laminectomy and partial discectomy combined with PSRF<br />

of the LSJ. Curettage of the endplates with insertion of<br />

an autologous cancellous bone graft was performed to<br />

promote spinal fusion. During the 18-month follow-up,<br />

the dogs were monitored by means of clinical evaluation,<br />

diagnostic imaging, and force plate analysis (for the dogs<br />

with DLSS). Post-mortem imaging and histopathological<br />

investigations were performed on the 3 LSJs from the dogs<br />

diagnosed with DLSS (euthanized for reasons unrelated<br />

to PSRF).<br />

Results<br />

Ex vivo study: Sixteen of 24 inserted screws had an<br />

acceptable placement. In vivo study: Fourteen of 16<br />

inserted screws had an acceptable placement. Clinical<br />

signs of low back pain resolved at 4 weeks after surgery<br />

in all 6 dogs. Force plate analysis revealed a trend toward<br />

improved pelvic limb function relative to the preoperative<br />

function for the dogs with DLSS. Diagnostic imaging and<br />

histopathology showed no bony spinal fusion of the LSJ<br />

in the dogs with DLSS<br />

Conclusions<br />

PSRF can be successfully applied to the LSJ of large<br />

breed dogs for DLSS and discospondylitis. Improvements<br />

to the surgical technique to induce spinal fusion and<br />

assessment in a larger sample size are required.<br />

Clinical Relevance: PSRF may become a valuable addition<br />

in the surgical treatment arsenal for dogs with DLSS and<br />

lumbosacal discospondylitis.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 90 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Effect of articular design on mediolateral constraint<br />

and stability of two unlinked canine total elbow<br />

prostheses<br />

Guillou RP 1 , Demianiuk RM 1 , Déjardin LM* 2 ,Beckett C 2 , Haut RC<br />

1 College of Veterinary Medicine and 2 Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratories, College of Osteopathic<br />

Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA<br />

introduction<br />

Short and long term stability of the unlinked, semiconstrained<br />

IOWA and TATE prostheses is influenced<br />

by their articular congruity. While a less congruent<br />

design spares bone/implant interfaces from deleterious<br />

stresses, it may impair prosthetic stability. To optimize<br />

osteointegration, a low congruity TATE-2 profile was<br />

recently released; however optimal prosthesis constraint<br />

is unknown. Our purpose was to compare IOWA and TATE<br />

behavior under mediolateral translation. We hypothesized<br />

that constraint and stability would be greatest in IOWA and<br />

lowest in TATE-2 profiles.<br />

Materials and Method<br />

Four prostheses per group were tested in mediolateral<br />

translation. Loading conditions mimicked those of a trotting<br />

40kg dog in mid-stance. Stiffness (a reflection of prosthetic<br />

constraint) and maximum resistive force (an indication of<br />

prosthetic intrinsic stability) were statistically analyzed<br />

(p


The effect of configuration and radiographic<br />

positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude<br />

in a dog with a complex antebrachial growth<br />

deformity: comparison between radiographic and 3D<br />

computer modelling measurements<br />

N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou,JF. Isaza Saldarriaga, S. Correa Velez, V. Wavreille, K. Ash, JJ. Ochoa<br />

Fitzpatrick Referrals, Surrey, UK.<br />

Introduction<br />

Our aim was to establish the mathematical relationship<br />

between radiographically measured torsion and frontal<br />

plane antebrachial growth deformities (ABGD) and to<br />

compare with those derived from a 3D computer model.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Direct digital radiographs and CT scans of the forelimbs<br />

of a 23kg dog with bilateral ABGD were acquired. 3D<br />

reconstructions were created from the CT scans and<br />

parametric surfaces exported to SolidWorks 2009. The<br />

lateral distal radial angle (LDRA) and distal caudal radial<br />

angle (DCRA) were measured on both. A transverse cut<br />

of the radius was performed at the intersection point<br />

of the anatomical axes and the frontal plane deformity<br />

was measured following: 1) rotation of the distal radial<br />

segment, 2) alteration of the procurvatum angle, 3) rotation<br />

of the limb around the humeral axis with: (a) unchanged<br />

procurvatum, (b) procurvatum 20 0 , (c) procurvatum 0 o , (d)<br />

procurvatum equal valgus angle, 4) rotation of the limb<br />

around the transcondylar axis. Valgus angle measurements<br />

were correlated using curve estimation regression analysis.<br />

Results<br />

Radiographically measured values were: valgus 8.83 o ;<br />

LDRA 89.81 o ; procurvatum 10.38 o ; and DCRA 86.3 o and the<br />

same deformities measured on the 3D model were: 29 o ;<br />

100.4 o ; 19.39 o ; and 96.6 o . Radial torsion and procurvatum<br />

did not affect measurements of valgus on the 3D model.<br />

Discussion/conclusion<br />

Radiographic measurements of frontal plane deformity<br />

differed significantly from measurements on the 3D<br />

model and the model was more accurate for pre-operative<br />

planning. Rotation around the humeral axis had a significant<br />

and predictable effect on the measurements of valgus<br />

deformity.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 92 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Association of articular mineralisation, cranial<br />

cruciate ligament pathology and degenerative joint<br />

disease in feline stifle joints<br />

Voss K* 1 , Karli P 2 , Kipfer N 2 , Geyer H 3<br />

1 University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 2 Clinic for <strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery and 3 Department<br />

of Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Switzerland.<br />

Introduction<br />

The clinical significance of mineralisation in the stifle<br />

joint of cats is unknown despite published associations with<br />

cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) and degenerative<br />

joint disease (DJD).<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Presence and size of mineralisations were noted from<br />

lateral stifle radiographs of 25 cats with CCLR and an<br />

age-matched group of 25 cats without CCLR that had been<br />

euthanised for reasons unrelated to this study. Size of<br />

mineralisations was classified as small, medium or large,<br />

and the prevalence was recorded. In the second part of<br />

the study, stifle joints of cat cadavers were processed<br />

for microscopic evaluation. Degenerative changes of the<br />

cruciate ligaments, menisci, articular cartilage, and joint<br />

capsule were graded on a scale from 0 to 3. Comparison of<br />

stifles without, with small, and with large mineralisations<br />

was made.<br />

Results<br />

Mean age of both groups was 8.6 years. Prevalence of<br />

articular mineralisations was 0.76 in stifles with CCLR,<br />

and 0.64 in stifles without CCLR. Mineralisations in stifle<br />

joints without CCLR were predominantly small, whereas<br />

mineralisations in stifle joints with CCLR were medium or<br />

large. <strong>Small</strong> mineralisations tended to be calcifications<br />

located in the cranial horn of the medial meniscus. Larger<br />

mineralisations were ossifications commonly located in the<br />

cranial meniscal attachments, the joint capsule, and the fat<br />

pad. DJD scores of all intra-articular structures increased<br />

from stifles with no mineralisations to those with large<br />

mineralisations.<br />

Discussion/conclusion<br />

Mineralisations in feline stifle joints were found to<br />

differ in size, microscopic appearance, and location. Larger<br />

mineralisations were mostly located cranial to the medial<br />

meniscus and were associated with DJD and CCLR.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 93 small animal orthopaedic session


The role of the antebrachiocarpal ligaments<br />

in the prevention of hyperextension of the<br />

antebrachiocarpal joint<br />

Milgram J*, Milstein T, Meiner Y.<br />

Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel<br />

Introduction<br />

A normal antebrachiocarpal joint is crucial to canine<br />

locomotion, however, very little is known about how<br />

pathological changes affecting individual structures<br />

influences the normal kinematics of this joint. The aim of<br />

this study was to evaluate the role of the medial collateral<br />

ligament, lateral collateral ligament and the palmar carpal<br />

ligaments in the prevention of carpal hyperextension.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Twenty four forelimbs were collected from 12 healthy<br />

mixed breed dogs of medium build. Each specimen was<br />

radiographed to ensure the carpal joint was free of<br />

abnormalities and assigned to 1 of 6 groups. The groups<br />

were defined by the order in which the ligaments stabilising<br />

the antebrachiocarpal joint were cut. The antebrachium,<br />

carpus and proximal metacarpal bones were stripped of<br />

all muscle tissue, preserving the carpal joint capsule. The<br />

specimens were prepared for biomechanical testing and<br />

placed into a custom made joint testing machine. The<br />

manus was loaded using a system of weights and pulleys<br />

resulting in the extension of the carpus. The extension was<br />

measured using a single motion tracking sensor fixed to the<br />

metacarpal bones. All specimens were tested with all the<br />

ligaments intact, and after cutting each of the ligaments<br />

in the order defined by the group.<br />

Results<br />

Cutting each of the ligaments resulted in a significant<br />

change in the angle of extension of the carpus when<br />

compared to the extension of the carpus with the ligaments<br />

intact. Cutting the palmar AC ligaments resulted in the<br />

largest change in the extension angle and this difference<br />

was significantly larger than that seen after cutting the<br />

medial and lateral collateral ligaments.<br />

Discussion<br />

Each of the AC ligaments tested contribute to the<br />

prevention of hyperextension of the AC joint. Improved<br />

understanding of the function of the AC ligaments<br />

may result in improved techniques for the treatment of<br />

hyperextension injury.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 94 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


The effect of screw number and plate stand-off<br />

distance on the biomechanical characteristics of<br />

3.5mm locking compression plate (LCP) and 3.5mm<br />

string of pearls (SOP) plate constructs in a synthetic<br />

fracture gap model.<br />

Glyde M *1 , Day R 2 . and Hosgood G *1 .<br />

1 Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Perth, Australia. 2 Department of Medical<br />

Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.<br />

Introduction<br />

The purpose of this research was to compare the effect of<br />

stand-off distance and screw number on the biomechanical<br />

characteristics of 3.5mm LCP and 3.5mm SOP plate<br />

constructs in a synthetic fracture gap model.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Stiffness of Synthes®10-hole 3.5mm LCP and<br />

Orthomed® 10-hole 3.5mm SOP constructs were evaluated<br />

in a synthetic diaphyseal bridge-plating model under axial<br />

compression in load control to a peak load of 120N and<br />

bi-planar four-point bending in displacement control with<br />

a peak bending moment of 6Nm (Instron 5566 and 8874,<br />

Bluehill v2.5.391 software sampling at 10hz). For 4-point<br />

bending the implant was on the construct tension side<br />

when load was applied parallel to the screw axis (tension<br />

bending) and subsequently rotated 90 degrees with<br />

applied load perpendicular to the screw axis (perpendicular<br />

bending). The central two screw holes were left vacant<br />

over the 10mm fracture gap. For each plate type construct<br />

variables included standoff distance (1 or 5mm) and<br />

screw number (2,3 or 4 per fracture fragment) creating 12<br />

treatment groups.<br />

Results<br />

There was no significant effect (p>0.05) of increasing<br />

screw number per fragment on SOP construct stiffness<br />

at 1mm or 5mm standoff with the exception in tension<br />

bending that 4 screws were stiffer (p0.05) on LCP constructs at 1mm with the exception<br />

in perpendicular bending that 4 screws were stiffer<br />

(p


combined session 96 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> shoulder arthroscopy -<br />

clinical update<br />

Friday July 8<br />

08.00 <strong>–</strong> 10.15


small animal orthopaedic session 98 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy technique,<br />

normal anatomy, & appearance of routine pathology<br />

Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />

Veterinary Referral Center of Colorado, Englewood, Colorado, USA<br />

Most descriptions of shoulder arthroscopy techniques<br />

position dogs in lateral recumbency with the affected limb<br />

up allowing for consistent establishment of lateral optical<br />

portal and caudolateral or craniolateral instrument. Dorsal<br />

recumbent positioning with distal traction of the limb is<br />

an alternate position allowing for additional assess to the<br />

joint via the craniomedial portal.1,2The main advantage<br />

of dorsal recumbent positioning is the view afforded via<br />

the craniomedial portal. This allows for the surgeon to<br />

change the optic port from the standard lateral portal to<br />

the craniomedial portal to provide an improved view of<br />

lateral intraarticular structures. The main disadvantage<br />

of dorsal recumbent positioning is accommodating for<br />

the inverted anatomy. While the anatomy is identical, it<br />

is inverted making some familiar structures completely<br />

unrecognizable to the naïve eye.<br />

To perform dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy,<br />

patients are positioned with the aid of a vacuum-positioning<br />

bag to maintain dorsiflexion of the cervical spine and axial<br />

alignment. The limb is aseptically prepared in hanging leg<br />

prep and draped in a standard fashion. Distal traction on the<br />

limb is provided by an adjustable block and tackle secured<br />

in an aseptically to a sturdy ceiling anchor. Distention of<br />

the joint is necessary for consistent portal placement. A<br />

spinal needle is inserted into the joint at the depression<br />

between the cranial border of the acromion and dorsal<br />

border of the greater tubercle. Proper placement into the<br />

joint is confirmed by aspiration of synovial fluid. The joint<br />

is distended with 10 mL of sterile distension fluid (i.e.,<br />

LRS, NaCl). Care is required to prevent over distention and<br />

rupture of the joint capsule. The author prefers to leave<br />

the spinal needle in place as an egress portal. The optical<br />

portal is established at the lateral location immediately<br />

caudal and slightly distal to the acromion. This location<br />

can vary dependent on the morphology of the acromion. A<br />

stab incision made and the sheath with a blunt obturator<br />

is advanced into the joint in a controlled manner. A distinct<br />

pop is felt as the articular space is entered. As the obturator<br />

is removed, the sheath is stabilized to prevent inadvertent<br />

displacement from the joint. Rapid egress of distention fluid<br />

should occur as the obturator is removed from the sheath.<br />

Working portals are established dependent on the<br />

region of interest. The location of the caudolateral<br />

portal is approximately 1 cm caudal and 1-2 cm distal<br />

to the lateral portal. Needle-localization of working<br />

portals facilitates proper orientation of working portals<br />

to identified pathology. The general location of the caudal<br />

lateral portal is determined by digital pressure in the<br />

region and observing the deflection of the joint capsule.<br />

Next, a nitinol needle (or a spinal needle) is inserted in the<br />

proposed location and the needle is observed within the<br />

joint. A stab incision is made at the needle puncture site<br />

and the cannulated obturator and cannula is inserted over<br />

the nitinol needle. The cannulated obturator is removed<br />

leaving the cannula in place as the working portal.<br />

Craniomedial portal can be established in lateral or<br />

dorsal recumbency; however, this location is difficult to<br />

utilize effectively in lateral recumbent positioning. Needlelocalization<br />

and creation from an outside-in technique<br />

is possible, however, the author prefers an inside-out<br />

technique. The craniomedial portal is established in<br />

a triangular region bordered by the synovium covered<br />

coracobrachialis tendon dorsally, subscapularis tendon<br />

caudally, and the biceps tendon. The arthroscope tip is<br />

driven to the triangular region and held securely against<br />

the joint capsule while the arthroscope is removed from<br />

the sheath. A switching stick is placed into the sheath and<br />

advanced through the joint capsule and skin at the site of the<br />

craniomedial portal from inside out. The arthroscope sheath<br />

was removed leaving the SS spanning across the joint from<br />

the lateral portal to the newly formed craniomedial portal.<br />

The arthroscope sheath or working cannula is advanced<br />

over the SS to establish the craniomedial portal. Viewing<br />

via the craniomedial perspective is especially useful in dogs<br />

with suspected shoulder instability. OCD flaps displaced<br />

into the medial scapular recess can be more readily<br />

accessed with this portal.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 99 small animal orthopaedic session


References<br />

1. Devitt CM, Neely MR, Vanvechten BJ. Relationship<br />

of physical examination test of shoulder instability to<br />

arthroscopic findings in dogs. Veterinary surgery : VS :<br />

the official journal of the American College of Veterinary<br />

Surgeons 2007;36:661-668.<br />

2. Cook JL, Cook CR. Bilateral shoulder and elbow arthroscopy<br />

in dogs with forelimb lameness: diagnostic findings and<br />

treatment outcomes. Veterinary surgery : VS 2009;38:224-<br />

232.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 100 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


MRI and arthroscopy for evaluation of shoulder joint<br />

pathology<br />

H. van Bree*, W. Dingemanse, I. Gielen<br />

Department of Medical Imaging & <strong>Small</strong> Animal Orthopaedics, Veterinary Faculty, Ghent University<br />

The canine shoulder is a complex joint, with numerous<br />

passive and active soft tissue stabilizing components.<br />

It is a ball-and-socket joint, which allows movement in<br />

essentially every direction. In the dog and cat, however,<br />

most of the motion takes place in a direct cranial-to-caudal<br />

plane, resulting mainly in extension and flexion of the joint.<br />

The medial and lateral glenohumeral ligaments are not<br />

really ligaments, but rather thickenings of the respective<br />

surfaces of the joint capsule. They are rather weak, so it<br />

is the strength of the heavy musculature surrounding the<br />

shoulder joint that maintains its integrity.<br />

Shoulder lameness, although a common condition in the<br />

dog, can be difficult to localise, and determining the specific<br />

cause is often challenging. Even when the lameness has<br />

been localized to the shoulder, identifying the precise cause<br />

can be frustrating.<br />

Some of the indications for imaging of the shoulder<br />

joint are:<br />

• Any lameness associated with a shoulder problem:<br />

i.e. pain on manipulation of the joint itself or any of<br />

the structures in the shoulder area.<br />

• Swelling or deformity of the shoulder region.<br />

• Atrophy of the adjacent shoulder muscles.<br />

Possible imaging techniques<br />

Scintigraphy can be used to localise lameness<br />

originating in the shoulder region and to evaluate the<br />

significance of equivocal radiological findings.<br />

Plain radiography: standard radiographs provide<br />

only limited diagnostic information, and frequently there<br />

is a poor correlation between the radiological findings<br />

and clinical signs. There may be extensive changes due<br />

to degenerative joint disease (DJD) present, with no<br />

lameness but as an incidental finding in older dogs. The<br />

radiological assessment of the shoulder joint should include<br />

evaluation of alignment, subchondral bone, joint space,<br />

and adjacent periarticular soft tissues. Many of the joint<br />

tissues <strong>–</strong> such as cartilage, synovial membrane, fibrous<br />

capsule, and collagenous structures <strong>–</strong> are not visible on<br />

plain radiographs and therefore can only be evaluated<br />

indirectly, by (for example) calcification within tendons<br />

and irregularities at their attachments. Arthrography and/<br />

or ultrasound can be helpful in visualizing some of these<br />

structures.<br />

Arthrography of the shoulder joint is the most common<br />

arthrographic procedure used in small animal orthopaedics.<br />

It is a useful and simple technique for imaging various<br />

shoulder problems in the dog. Several bursae around<br />

the scapulohumeral joint can be visualised. The bicipital<br />

tendon sheath and subscapular recess are always visible,<br />

whereas the infraspinatous bursa is only occasionally<br />

seen. Arthrography can outline the articular cartilage,<br />

synovial membrane, biceps tendon and associated<br />

synovial sheath (but cannot identify smaller lesions<br />

within the biceps tendon), various bursae, a cartilage<br />

flap in shoulder osteochondrosis (OCD) and radiolucent<br />

joint mice. In cases of shoulder OCD, positive-contrast<br />

arthrography helps to assess <strong>–</strong> with an accuracy of 80%<br />

<strong>–</strong> whether a non-mineralized cartilage flap is present, and<br />

this finding helps to determine whether a dog should be<br />

treated conservatively or surgically. In cases of bicipital<br />

pathology, positive contrast arthrography may demonstrate<br />

changes in the contour of the bicipital groove and tendon,<br />

incomplete filling of the synovial sheath, filling defects and<br />

irregularities. It can also aid decision making in cases of<br />

caudal glenoid fragmentation. With the use of positive<br />

arthrography, impingement of the joint capsule can be<br />

demonstrated, and the fragment is visible as a filling defect.<br />

Ultrasonography (US) can be used in the shoulder joint<br />

to diagnose muscle and tendon injury and to evaluate OC<br />

lesions. A high-frequency linear transducer is used for this<br />

examination, and the dog may have to be anaesthetised if<br />

joint manipulation is painful. The humeral head is visible as<br />

a hyperechoic convex curvilinear line with a strong acoustic<br />

shadow, and the cartilage as an anechoic layer covered<br />

by the joint capsule, the tendons of the infraspinatus and<br />

teres minor muscle and the acromial part of the deltoid<br />

muscle. For the evaluation of the bicipital tendon sheath,<br />

cross-sectional images at the level of the bicipital groove<br />

and longitudinal images at the level of the attachment on<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 101 small animal orthopaedic session


the supraglenoid tubercle are taken. Results of a recent<br />

study in shoulder OCD <strong>–</strong> comparing ultrasound with<br />

radiography, arthrography and arthroscopy <strong>–</strong> suggest that<br />

all radiologically diagnosed subchondral lesions in the<br />

humeral head can be visualised by the use of ultrasound<br />

as a concave deviation of the hyperechoic subchondral<br />

bone line with a variable length according to the extent of<br />

the lesion. The results also suggest that the presence of a<br />

second hyperechoic line at the bottom of the subchondral<br />

defect seen on US is a pathognomonic sign for the presence<br />

of a flap. It was suggested that US might present an<br />

alternative to positive contrast arthrography. With the<br />

use of ultrasound, bicipital lesions and supraspinatus<br />

tendinopathy can be identified. This technique is highly<br />

operator-dependant and requires experience.<br />

Computed tomography (CT): The use of CT can be<br />

justified in some conditions, especially in situations where<br />

one wants to avoid superimposition of bony structures<br />

when evaluating the extent of processes, or to determine<br />

the source of calcifications or fragments seen on plain film<br />

radiographs. New bone formation in the bicipital groove<br />

can be easily seen. Also, CT may be useful in cases with<br />

suspect demineralisation, as this technique can detect<br />

loss of bone content at an earlier stage than conventional<br />

radiography can. Also, arthro-CT can be performed to<br />

check the integrity of the biceps tendon. In the case of<br />

soft tissue involvement of the shoulder region, IV contrast<br />

can be applied with a dose of 200 mg I/kg bodyweight. CT<br />

guided biopsies of neoplastic processes in the shoulder<br />

region can be performed.<br />

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide a<br />

more complete look at important canine soft tissue shoulder<br />

structures. MRI is a non-invasive diagnostic modality that<br />

provides a high-contrast, multi-planar depiction of joint<br />

associated anatomy. Superior soft tissue image resolution,<br />

along with the ability to image in multiple planes, has<br />

made MR imaging the diagnostic modality of choice for<br />

joint pathology in human orthopaedics. MRI relies on<br />

interactions between an external magnetic field, radio<br />

waves and hydrogen nuclei in the body. The tissue contrast<br />

seen with MRI is due to the differences in the magnetic<br />

properties of each tissue.<br />

MRI protocols and studies<br />

Several protocols for MR imaging of the shoulder have<br />

been proposed applying different sequences and planes<br />

<strong>–</strong> but essentially T1 (sometimes with contrast), T2 and<br />

STIR (short tau inversion recovery) images are always<br />

necessary (Figure 1). Depending on which structures one<br />

wants to visualise, images in the sagittal, transverse and<br />

dorsal plane are obtained. Protocols have been proposed<br />

with the limb in both flexion and extension. To visualise the<br />

joint capsule and glenohumeral ligaments, positioning of<br />

the shoulder in extension using intra-articular contrast has<br />

been described. The major periarticular anatomic structures<br />

of the normal canine shoulder can consistently be identified,<br />

but evaluation of the glenohumeral structures remains<br />

difficult. Cortical bone is visible on MRI as a signal void; but,<br />

to evaluate new bone formation, CT still is the modality of<br />

choice. Visualisation of canine articular cartilage remains a<br />

controversial issue. Even with high-field MRI, the resolution<br />

is not good enough to depict the thin canine cartilage.<br />

Figure 1: A STIR image of an inflamed shoulder joint clearly<br />

showing the massive joint effusion.<br />

Data on the use of low-field MRI in shoulder problems<br />

in dogs are scarce. The protocol used in our department<br />

is to start with a STIR sequence, imaging both elbows<br />

in extension in the dorsal plane to rule out brachial<br />

plexus pathology. Then, both shoulder joints are imaged<br />

in extension separately, using a T1 (plane and after<br />

intravenous application of a paramagnetic contrast agent,<br />

if indicated) sequence. Then, a T2 sequence is performed.<br />

Both sequences are obtained in sagittal and transverse<br />

planes.<br />

MRI has been evaluated for detecting OC lesions in<br />

the canine humeral head and was found to be useful in<br />

assessing the extent and severity of subchondral bone<br />

lesions. Although articular cartilage discontinuity could be<br />

detected, loose flaps were not always demonstrated and<br />

articular cartilage could not be distinguished from synovial<br />

fluid. In this study, MR arthrography proved to be ineffective<br />

in visualising canine articular cartilage.<br />

In one study, where surgical exploration for shoulder pain<br />

had been performed in 21 dogs, a high level of agreement<br />

and concordance between MRI and surgical findings has<br />

been found. However, this study was somewhat limited,<br />

because the radiologists were not blinded but were aware<br />

of the case data. Still, this study demonstrated the potential<br />

of MRI in the field of canine shoulder lameness.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 102 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Another study established that MRI was a good imaging<br />

technique for detection of supraspinatus tendinopathy,<br />

where impingement or displacement of the biceps tendon<br />

by the enlarged supraspinatus tendon was often observed<br />

on imaging, contributing to development of clinical signs.<br />

One should be aware of artefacts produced by<br />

identification “chips” when imaging the shoulder region<br />

and the “magic angle” artefact when evaluating tendon<br />

integrity using a T1 sequence.<br />

Additional reading<br />

• Agnello KA, Puchalski SM, Wisner ER, Schulz KS, Kapatkin<br />

AS. Effect of positioning, scan plane, and arthrography<br />

on visibility of periarticular canine shoulder soft tissue<br />

structures on magnetic resonance images. Vet Radiol<br />

Ultrasound. 2008 Nov-Dec;49(6):529-39.<br />

• Fransson BA, Gavin PR, Lahmers KK. Supraspinatus<br />

tendinosis associated with biceps brachii tendon<br />

displacement in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Nov<br />

1;227(9):1429-33, 1416.<br />

• Gielen & van Bree, Chapter 38 <strong>–</strong> CT of the shoulder joint.<br />

In Schwarz T, Saunders J, editors: Veterinary computed<br />

tomography, Oxford, 2011, Wiley-Blackwell.<br />

• Janach KJ, Breit SM, Künzel WW. Assessment of the<br />

geometry of the cubital (elbow) joint of dogs by use<br />

of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res. 2006<br />

Feb;67(2):211-8.<br />

• Kramer M, Gerwing M, Sheppard C, Schimke E.<br />

Ultrasonography for the diagnosisof diseases of the tendon<br />

and tendon sheath of the biceps brachii muscle. VetSurg.<br />

2001 Jan-Feb;30(1):64-71.<br />

• Lafuente MP, Fransson BA, Lincoln JD, Martinez SA, Gavin<br />

PR, Lahmers KK, GayJM. Surgical treatment of mineralized<br />

and nonmineralized supraspinatustendinopathy in twentyfour<br />

dogs. Vet Surg. 2009 Apr;38(3):380-7.<br />

• Long CD, Nyland TG. Ultrasonographic evaluation of<br />

the canine shoulder. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1999 Jul-<br />

Aug;40(4):372-9.<br />

• Murphy SE, Ballegeer EA, Forrest LJ, Schaefer SL. Magnetic<br />

resonance imaging findings in dogs with confirmed shoulder<br />

pathology. Vet Surg. 2008 Oct;37(7):631-8.<br />

• Schaefer SL, Forrest LJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of<br />

the canine shoulder: an anatomic study. Vet Surg. 2006<br />

Dec;35(8):721-8.<br />

• Schaefer SL, Baumel CA, Gerbig JR, Forrest LJ. Direct<br />

magnetic resonance arthrography of the canine shoulder.<br />

Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(4):391-6. Sidaway<br />

BK, McLaughlin RM, Elder SH, Boyle CR, Silverman EB.<br />

Role of the tendons of the biceps brachii and infraspinatus<br />

muscles and the medial glenohumeral ligament in the<br />

maintenance of passive shoulder joint stability in dogs. Am<br />

J Vet Res. 2004 Sep;65(9):1216-22.<br />

• Vandevelde B, Van Ryssen B, Saunders JH, Kramer M, Van<br />

Bree H. Comparison of the ultrasonographic appearance<br />

of osteochondrosislesions in the canine shoulder with<br />

radiography, arthrography, and arthroscopy. Vet Radiol<br />

Ultrasound. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(2):174-84.<br />

• van Bree H, Van Ryssen B, Degryse H, Ramon F. Magnetic<br />

resonance arthrography of the scapulohumeral joint in dogs,<br />

using gadopentetate dimeglumine. Am J Vet Res. 1995<br />

Mar;56(3):286-8.<br />

• van Bree H. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of<br />

positive-contrast arthrography and arthrotomy in evaluation<br />

of osteochondrosis lesions in the scapulohumeral joint in<br />

dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Jul 1;203(1):84-8.<br />

• van Bree H, Degryse H, Van Ryssen B, Ramon F, Desmidt M.<br />

Pathologic correlations with magnetic resonance images of<br />

osteochondrosis lesions in canine shoulders. J Am Vet Med<br />

Assoc. 1993 Apr 1;202(7):1099-105.<br />

• van Bree H. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of<br />

positive-contrast arthrography and arthrotomy in evaluation<br />

of osteochondrosis lesions in the scapulohumeral joint in<br />

dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Jul 1;203(1):84-8.<br />

• van Bree H & Gielen I. The shoulder joint and scapula.<br />

BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal<br />

Imaging, 2006, Chapter 7, p 86-102. Edited by F.J. Barr and<br />

R.M. Kirberger.<br />

• Xia, Y. Resolution ‘scaling law’ in MRI of articular cartilage.<br />

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007, 15, 363-365.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 103 small animal orthopaedic session


Stifle arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, &<br />

appearance of routine rathology<br />

Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />

Veterinary Referral Center of Colorado, Englewood, CO, USA<br />

Patient Positioning<br />

While often an overlooked part of the procedure, proper<br />

patient positioning allows for consistent arthroscopic<br />

access without difficulty. It is important to position the<br />

patient in such a fashion to support the limb without the<br />

aid of an assistant. The author prefers to position dogs in<br />

dorsal recumbency, secured in a vacuum bag. The affected<br />

limb is placed in a self-retaining retractor to hold the limb<br />

in an upright position. The limb is aseptically prepared and<br />

draped. An adhesive iodine impregnated drape is applied<br />

over the surgical site to prevent wicking of arthroscopic<br />

distention fluid.<br />

Portal Placement<br />

Classically, Whitney described placement of the portal<br />

at the level of Gurdey’s tubercle. This location is effective,<br />

however requires extensive shaving of the infra-patellar<br />

fat pad to visualize the intra-articular structures. The<br />

optic portal has been described in the lateral parapatellar<br />

location and the working portal in the medial parapatellar<br />

location. The author prefers to place both the optic<br />

and working portals slightly higher allowing for rapid<br />

visualization of intra-articular structures of interest.<br />

Additionally, a suprapatellar egress portal is unnecessary<br />

with the use of an arthroscopic fluid pump. Frequently,<br />

the working portal and optic portal can be exchanged to<br />

improve visualization or working angle of a given structure.<br />

Briefly, the locations of the portals are infused with local<br />

anesthetic. Intra-articular injection of lidocaine or bupivicane<br />

is discouraged due to potential chondrocytotoxicity.<br />

Carbocaine, however, is an acceptable as an intra-articular<br />

local anesthetic. The author prefers to establish the medial<br />

infrapatellar portal as the optic with the stifle in moderate<br />

flexion, nearly equidistant from the distal pole of the patella<br />

and the tibial plateau due to the volume of the infrapatellar<br />

fat pad. In doing so, visualization of the intraarticular<br />

structures can occur readily in contrast to my experience<br />

utilizing a lateral optic portal. Close attention to a lateral<br />

radiograph of the stifle will facilitate localization of the<br />

portal in a tangent to the tibial plateau. A stab incision is<br />

made in the location of the portal into the joint capsule.<br />

The arthroscopic sheath with obturator is advanced into the<br />

joint. As the joint is entered, the arthroscopic sheath with<br />

obturator is advanced into the suprapatellar recess. Infusion<br />

of distention fluid is started, and the scope is assembled.<br />

Intra-articular Assessment<br />

Complete evaluation and photodocumentation of the<br />

stifle is performed sequentially through all compartments<br />

of the stifle joint. Begin by moving from the suprapatellar<br />

recess to the femoral trochlea. The angle of view is<br />

rotated as the scope is retracted to evaluate the articular<br />

surface of the patella. As the distal pole of the patella<br />

is reached, the view is directed to the medial and<br />

lateral femoral compartments evaluating for synovial<br />

proliferation and osteophytosis. The insertion of the long<br />

digital extensor (LDE) will come into view as the stifle is<br />

flexed while maintaining the position of the scope in the<br />

lateral infrapatellar location. As the LDE is visualized, the<br />

arthroscopic view is directed at the location of the lateral<br />

infrapatellar portal location. The portal is established with<br />

a #11 scalpel blade. Care is taken to maintain visualization<br />

of the blade to avoid iatrogenic damage to intraarticular<br />

structures. An arthroscopic shaver is introduced into the<br />

joint to resect the fat pad and synovium as needed to allow<br />

complete visualization and evaluation of intra-articular<br />

structures. A probe is inserted into the working portal<br />

and compents of the cranial cruciate are evaluated. The<br />

craniomedial and caudolateral bands are described based<br />

on their respective anatomic origin on the femur. The<br />

craniomedial band is most often injured in a partial tear<br />

and is tight in all ranges of motion. The caudolateral band<br />

is tighter in flexion as the two components wrap around<br />

each other during the screw-home mechanism. Evaluation<br />

with a probe is important to determine the competence of<br />

the ligament. An arthroscopic shaver is used to debride<br />

the torn CCL. The cutting face of the shaver is rotated to<br />

allow fray ligamentous ends to be pulled into the shaver,<br />

as the suction level is actuated. Efficiency of shaving is<br />

vastly improved as the area being shaved is stabilized by<br />

shaving toward the osseous attachment of the ligament.<br />

Once the CCL is debrided, evaluation of the meniscus is<br />

performed. While viewing the medial meniscus, a probe<br />

is inserted into the working portal. The stifle is placed in<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 104 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


drawer by an assistant or retracting device. The femoral<br />

and tibial surfaces are palpated to detect early incomplete<br />

tears. The peripheral attachment is evaluated by direct<br />

palpation and attempting to displace the caudal pole<br />

cranially. The lateral meniscus is evaluated, by driving the<br />

scope view to the lateral compartment and placing a varus<br />

stress on the limb. Careful probing of the femoral and tibial<br />

surfaces is important to avoid overlooking stable tears of<br />

the lateral meniscus.<br />

Meniscal exposure can be improved by insertion of a<br />

retraction device such as a modified Hohmann retractor<br />

or chondral pick. Alternatively, a self-retaining external<br />

retractor can be inserted into the distal femur and proximal<br />

tibia. The author prefers using a reverse bend chondral<br />

pick inserted through a lateral parapatellar portal. The<br />

pick is advanced into the joint and placed at the caudal<br />

tibial plateau within the intercondylar notch. Retraction<br />

is provided in a similar manner to a Hohmann retractor,<br />

however the smaller instrument has a less impact on the<br />

visual field. Meniscal injuries are removed by use of multiple<br />

instruments including a hook knife, push knife, joint punch<br />

and arthroscopic shaver blades. Meniscal resection should<br />

be accomplished without any iatrogenic damage to the<br />

cartilage. Radiofrequency energy sources are discouraged<br />

due to the extraordinary risk of chondrolysis. Meniscal<br />

release at one time enjoyed widespread application and use<br />

to prevent meniscal tearing. A meniscal release, however is<br />

a procedure that is not without consequence to the cartilage<br />

surface making its use a source of debate. If a meniscal<br />

release is decidedly appropriate, ensuring complete release<br />

is of utmost importance. A caudal meniscotibial release is<br />

performed by applying drawer to the stifle and visualizing<br />

the caudal meniscotibial attachment. A hook blade is<br />

advanced under the meniscotibial ligament and retracted<br />

cutting the ligament completely. If the caudal pole of the<br />

medial meniscus does not retract caudally as drawer is<br />

applied, the ligament is not transected completely. A<br />

midbody release can be performed in a similar fashion with<br />

needle localization of the region of transetion, however its<br />

use is discouraged by the author due to risk of iatrogenic<br />

cartilage injury and medial collateral ligament injury.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 105 small animal orthopaedic session


Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid<br />

cavity: diagnostic findings and results after treatment:<br />

retrospective study of 28 dogs and 1 cat.<br />

B. Van Ryssen, E. Coppieters, Y. Samoy, D. Van Vynckt, J. Saunders, H. van Bree.<br />

University of Ghent, Salisburylaan, Merelbeke, Belgium<br />

Introduction<br />

Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid cavity<br />

are commonly regarded as subclinical lesions. The origin of<br />

these lesions is not always clear(1). In the last decade an<br />

accessory caudal glenoid ossification was described as a<br />

possible cause of lameness in dogs (2, 3). To obtain a correct<br />

treatment decision, it is important to consider a calcified<br />

body in the differential diagnosis of shoulder lameness and<br />

to attribute lameness to it by a thorough diagnostic workup<br />

to exclude other (shoulder) problems. This retrospective<br />

study of 29 cases is intended to describe the signalment of<br />

clinically affected dogs, to describe the radiographic and<br />

arthroscopic findings and the results after conservative or<br />

arthroscopic treatment.<br />

Material and methods<br />

In a retrospective study the files of 29 cases gathered<br />

over 10 years were analyzed. Follow-up was performed by<br />

a telephone questionnaire and a clinical and radiographic<br />

examination.<br />

The files contained the signalment, history and clinical<br />

findings of 28 dogs and one cat. Diagnosis was based on<br />

plain radiographs, ultrasound and arthrogaphy. Shoulder<br />

arthroscopy was performed via a lateral approach with<br />

a 2.7 mm arthroscope (R. Wolf). During arthroscopic<br />

inspection the presence of a loose body was noted as<br />

well as the presence of cartilage lesions of the glenoid<br />

cavity and humeral head and lesions of the biceps tendon<br />

and glenohumeral ligaments. Subsequently, arthroscopic<br />

treatment was performed by removal via a caudal portal.<br />

Results<br />

Signalment:<br />

Different large breeds were affected of which seven<br />

were mixed breeds. The age varied between 2.5 and 11<br />

years, with a mean age of 6 years.<br />

History:<br />

Acute onset was noted in 50% of the cases, but related<br />

trauma was only reported in two dogs. Duration of<br />

lameness varied between 1 and 9 months. Conservative<br />

treatment with rest and NSAID‘s was not or only temporary<br />

efficacious.<br />

Radiographic findings<br />

Bilateral lesions were found in 50% of the dogs. In<br />

the lame shoulders, a solitary glenoid calcified body was<br />

found 28 dogs and 1 cat. Two dogs had an additional<br />

partial rupture of the biceps tendon. The size and shape<br />

of the fragments that caused lameness was varying: in<br />

15 joints the fragments were small (1-2 mm), 9 fragments<br />

were between 2.5 and 5 mm, and 5 were larger than 8<br />

mm. The fragments in the controlateral shoulder were<br />

also variable: some were smaller, while others were larger<br />

than those found in the lame shoulder. The shape of the<br />

calcifications was variable: round, granular (small) irregular<br />

shape, semi round with a gliding surface opposite to the<br />

humeral head. Large calcified bodies were located close<br />

to the humeral head while smaller ones were often closer<br />

to the glenoid cavity.<br />

Mixed breed, 2.5 y<br />

Schapendoes, 11 y<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 106 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Mixed breed, 5 y<br />

Cat, 7 y<br />

Osteoarthritis in the clinically affected joints was absent<br />

in 4 joints, light in 12 joints, moderate in 10 joints and<br />

severe in 3 joints.<br />

Arthroscopy<br />

All calcified bodies were visible as separate fragments<br />

more or less connected with the caudal rim of the glenoid<br />

cavity. Cartilage erosions of the humeral head varied from<br />

discrete to severe and were seen in 50% of the joints.<br />

Arthroscopic removal of the fragments was realized in<br />

one or several pieces using grasping forceps of 2-3.5 mm<br />

diameter. Control radiographs confirmed the complete<br />

removal of the fragment.<br />

Results after treatment<br />

The majority of the dogs recovered between 1 week and<br />

2 months. A residual lameness was noted in 60% of the<br />

dogs, after long or heavy exercise. Five dogs did not improve<br />

after treatment: all dogs had grade 2 tot 3 arthrosis and<br />

small or medium sized calcifications.<br />

Four joints were treated for a large fragment (+/_ 1 cm),<br />

3 had degree 1 and one degree 2 of OA. Results were<br />

very good.<br />

Two joints with concomitant biceps rupture had a slow<br />

recovery.<br />

Two were treated conservatively, both had bilateral<br />

medium sized fragments (5-7 mm) and responded well to<br />

a prolonged treatment.<br />

All non-clinical controlateral joints were treated<br />

conservatively and did not need a surgical treatment.<br />

A limited radiographic postoperative follow-up in 4 cases<br />

revealed the development of a ‚new‘ fragment in 2 / 4 joints.<br />

Arthrosis had progressed minimally in all cases. In case of<br />

new fragment development, one dog showed occasional<br />

mild lameness, the other had become more severely lame<br />

a few weeks before the control examination (4 years after<br />

treatment).<br />

Discussion<br />

Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid cavity<br />

are a well known yet infrequent finding in the canine<br />

shoulder. Often it is classified as a clinically insignificant<br />

lesion, although is has been described as a possible<br />

cause of shoulder lameness(1-3). In the authors‘ hospital,<br />

the disorder was diagnosed 29 times over a period of ten<br />

years. This confirms that calcified bodies at the caudal<br />

rim of the glenoid cavity should always be included in the<br />

differential diagnosis for shoulder lameness, despite the<br />

relatively low frequency.<br />

In this series of 29 cases mainly large breed dogs were<br />

affected with the exception of a small dachshound and<br />

a cat. All animals were adults, in contrast to what was<br />

written in a study of 9 nine dogs which had an age of<br />

8 months to two years(3). In this series all dogs were<br />

older than 2 years with a mean of six years suggesting<br />

that the presence of these calcifications do not have a<br />

developmental cause.<br />

Bilateral calcifications were seen in 50% of the cases.<br />

In the four dogs that were 3 years or younger, it was<br />

always a unilateral problem. In young dogs, joint problems<br />

are often - but not necessarily - bilateral when there is<br />

a developmental cause. The term ununited ossification<br />

center of the glenoid as well as accessory caudal glenoid<br />

ossification center suggest that the problem would mainly<br />

arise in young dogs. The age of the dogs in this series argue<br />

against this hypothesis.<br />

Another cause could be a traumatic fragmentation of<br />

the caudal part of the glenoid cavity. However, in only one<br />

case radiography suggested a fragmentation of the caudal<br />

rim, but arthroscopic inspection demonstrated it as an<br />

additional fragment.<br />

In only 50% of the dogs lameness had an acute onset<br />

while only for two dogs the onset was related to a trauma.<br />

The cause of the calcified bodies remains unclear, but<br />

may be explained by an increased stress on that particular<br />

location, either because of traction on the insertion of the<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 107 small animal orthopaedic session


joint capsule or pressure exerted by the caudal part of<br />

the humeral head. Possibly a high activity predisposes to<br />

the development of these calcifications, but an individual<br />

predisposition might also be present.<br />

Since the calcified bodies are not always the cause of<br />

lameness(1), diagnosis should be based on the localization<br />

of pain in the shoulder and the exclusion of other shoulder<br />

problems and other frontlimb problems. It was also the<br />

experience of the authors that subclinical lesions may be<br />

clearly visible on radiographs while the cause of lameness<br />

was located elsewere.<br />

The radiographic appearance of the calcified bodies<br />

ranged from a small particle to a large half rounded body.<br />

The size and shape of the fragment was not related to the<br />

severity of the clinical signs. Most fragments were smaller<br />

than 3 mm x 2 mm, the largest was 11 mm x 6 mm. The<br />

size of the fragment was not correlated to the degree of<br />

osteoarthritis.<br />

Each calcification was removed successfully via<br />

arthroscopy. Arthroscopic treatment was technically more<br />

demanding than the removal of an OCD flap because of<br />

the location and - in some cases - the size of the fragment.<br />

Lipping of the glenoid cavity, as often is found in chronic<br />

osteoarthritis of the shoulder, should not be confused with<br />

this problem. In that case there is no separate fragment<br />

and arthroscopic removal is difficult. Removal will not<br />

lead to improvement of the dog (personal experience of<br />

the authors).<br />

Results after treatment were very good in most cases.<br />

Only when chronic arthrosis was present, the dogs did<br />

not improve. In those cases, the calcified body could be<br />

considered as a secondary sign of osteoarthritis and not<br />

as the primary problem. When lameness can be confined<br />

to this calcification and other shoulder problems can be<br />

excluded, arthroscopic removal is rewording.<br />

Only a limited number of dogs were available for<br />

clinical and radiographic follow-up. One dog showed a<br />

moderate lameness 4 years after treatment. In this dog,<br />

a similar fragment had developed as was removed at<br />

the first presentation. In one other dog a new calcified<br />

body had developed. This dog showed occasional light<br />

lameness after heavy exercise. Two other dogs were sound<br />

3 years after treatment and radiographs showed a minor<br />

progression of osteoarthritis.<br />

References<br />

1. Dennis R KR, Wrigly RH, Barr PJ. Handbook of small Animal<br />

Radiological Differential Diagnosis. 1ed. 2001;WB Saunders<br />

Company, Philadelphia, London:37-41.<br />

2. Van Ryssen B. Shoulder arthroscopy: a review of 47 cases<br />

(2002-2004): findings and current case management. .<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong> 14th annual scientific meeting of the British<br />

Vet Orthop Assoc. 2003;Bath, UK (42).<br />

3. Olivieri M PA, Marcellin-Little DJ, Borghetti P, Vezzoni A.<br />

Accessory caudal glenoid ossification centre as possible<br />

cause of lameness in nine dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traum.<br />

2004(3):131-5.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 108 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Motion analysis and<br />

rehabilitation<br />

Friday July 8<br />

14.30 <strong>–</strong> 16.30


small animal orthopaedic session 110 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Force plate: gold standard?<br />

M. Balligand*<br />

Department of Clinical Sciences, SA Surgery, University of Liège, Belgium.<br />

The use of a force plate has become a standard procedure<br />

in the quantitative evaluation of locomotion in dogs.<br />

Many recent publications report ground action forces in<br />

various situations, from normal to pathological, and among<br />

different breeds of dogs. Recorded values are strongly<br />

influenced by parameters like velocity and acceleration,<br />

body weight, body size, limb length. In order to interpret<br />

differences between those values and be able to compare<br />

data, the clinician must apply specific normalization<br />

techniques.<br />

The purpose of this lecture is to review those<br />

normalization technique and the ways data from force plate<br />

analysis should be used in order to make fully appreciate<br />

its potentialities when its position is disputed especially<br />

by pressure mats.<br />

Needless to say, force plate gait analysis, like any other<br />

quantification method, is affected by several limitations,<br />

mainly technical. Those must be thoroughly understood<br />

by anyone using the system in order to fully profit of its<br />

performances. Some of them can be avoided by using<br />

concomitantly two or more force plates or an instrumented<br />

treadmill but this has an important impact on the overall<br />

cost of the system. Furthermore, ground actions forces<br />

reflect acceleration of the body mass of the dog, i.e. body<br />

and limbs, making of a comprehensive analysis of the<br />

locomotion a particularly complex task. Nevertheless, an<br />

excellent reason to use a force plate and consider it as a<br />

possible gold standard when evaluating gait is the fact that<br />

a force plate has proved to be able to diagnose locomotion<br />

anomalies which could pass undetected during visual<br />

subjective evaluation, even by experienced examiners.<br />

Each step of a front or a hind limb generates a unique<br />

pattern of characteristic forces applied by the ground on<br />

the foot during stance phase. The relevant questions for<br />

a clinician are therefore: are the recorded forces (vertical,<br />

horizontal fore-aft, horizontal transversal) normal or not?<br />

are the recorded durations of breaking and propelling<br />

phases during stance phase normal or not ? To answer<br />

those questions, the normal values of these force and<br />

time related parameters must be known. Yet patients<br />

are generally not evaluated before becoming lame. So<br />

the normal status of a particular patient is (almost) never<br />

known. Furthermore, comparing a diseased limb to its<br />

normal contra-lateral is unfortunately not valid as the<br />

dysfunction of one limb modifies the function, hence the<br />

recorded parameters, of the other limbs. The solution is<br />

therefore to compare the values of a patient with reference<br />

values of normal individuals after applying normalization<br />

techniques accounting for differences in body mass, body<br />

dimensions and absolute velocity (at which the dog passes<br />

on the force plate). So it is necessary to :1. normalize<br />

the recorded forces by the standing body weight (SBW)<br />

(Forces/SBW),2. normalize the absolute speed by the<br />

(functional) limb length (h), calculating a relative speed<br />

(Vrel=V/(gh)1/2 where “v” is the mean stride velocity, “h”<br />

is the functional limb length and “g” is the gravitational<br />

acceleration (9.81 m/sec 2); as a matter of fact, v rel= the<br />

square root of V2/gh” which is called the Froude number<br />

and is equal to the ratio of the kinetic energy (1/2mv2) and<br />

potential energy (mgh). Movement under gravity generally<br />

involves potential energy being converted to kinetic energy<br />

and vice versa. Therefore, dynamically similar movement<br />

is possible only if the systems in question have the same<br />

ratio of kinetic energy to potential energy. Two movements<br />

are dynamically similar if one could be made identical to<br />

the other by uniform change in the scales of length, time<br />

and force. One dog should not be compared to another one<br />

having a different Fround number;3. normalize the absolute<br />

values of stride period (duration of the stride in seconds<br />

(T)) and stride length (in cms) by the functional limb length,<br />

calculating a relative stride period (Trel=T/(h/g)1/2 where<br />

“h” is the functional limb length and “g” the gravitational<br />

acceleration= a constant) and a relative stride length (stride<br />

length/functional limb length).The stride length being<br />

defined as the distance between two successive foot strikes<br />

of the same foot, its record generally necessitates the use<br />

of several force plates (except for small breed individuals).<br />

If the effect of the body weight( or body mass) on the<br />

recorded forces is easy to apprehend (the gravitation force<br />

exerted by the earth on the body is directly proportional to<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 111 small animal orthopaedic session


the body mass), the effect of speed may be less evident<br />

to fully perceive, although it is considerable. The vertical<br />

force required to support an animal against gravity is<br />

controlled by the duration of the stance phase, when the<br />

foot is in contact with the ground; when the speed goes<br />

up, the stance phase shortens and the shorter the duration<br />

of the stance phase the bigger the force. Yet, for a similar<br />

absolute speed between two dogs, a condition which<br />

would appear a good condition for comparison, a larger<br />

dog has a longer (functional) limb length, hence a lower<br />

relative speed (see formula above) because the limbs are<br />

moving slower underneath the trunk; on the contrary, a<br />

smaller dog has a shorter (functional) limb length hence a<br />

higher relative speed. Comparisons at the same absolute<br />

speed deliver useful informations only if the animals are<br />

precisely the same size (same functional limb length). If the<br />

sizes between two dogs differ, comparisons can only be<br />

made at similar relative speeds (to be calculated). In the<br />

same way, the simple normalization of the forces by the<br />

body weight is of little practical value unless comparisons<br />

between individuals are made at similar relative speeds.<br />

Considering that each passage on the force plate<br />

potentially delivers a large number of numerical<br />

informations, force and time wise, another crucial question<br />

is whether the difference between normal and abnormal<br />

gaits can be detected, based on only one versus several<br />

parameters and in this latter case, what would be the<br />

minimal combination of parameters able to distinguish<br />

normal from abnormal gait? Available informations in the<br />

recent literature are not always consistent. Although results<br />

of different studies suggest that a multivariate approach<br />

is superior to the univariate one, for some authors, the<br />

combination of peak vertical forces and the falling slope<br />

(unloading speed of the foot) is the combination of choice to<br />

distinguish between healthy and affected dogs when others<br />

recommend the combination of the peak vertical force and<br />

the rising slope (loading speed of the foot).<br />

Finally, yet another way of detecting lameness in dogs<br />

based on ground actions forces is the calculation for each<br />

gait variable of (a)symmetry indices ((XR-XL/(XR+XL)/2)<br />

X100). In healthy individuals, trot is a symmetric gait in<br />

which the body is alternatively supported by one pair of<br />

diagonal limbs followed by the other pair. Although perfect<br />

right-to-left symmetry is generally not observed (there are<br />

physiological differences between sides), a threshold(cutoff<br />

point)can be determined to differentiate healthy from<br />

lame dogs.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Unlike pressure mats or pressure walkways, force<br />

plates are capable of recording vertical and horizontal<br />

action forces exerted by the feet on the ground during<br />

stance phase. The use of several (2 to 4) force plates<br />

in the same walking corridor allowing simultaneous<br />

recordings of different limbs together in action or their use<br />

in combination with instrumented treadmills makes the<br />

recording processes more informative, easier and quicker,<br />

yet much more expansive. Normalization techniques allow<br />

data comparison when the normal status of a diseased<br />

animal is unknown. Despite those advantages, available<br />

informations on the possible contribution of horizontal<br />

forces measurements in lameness detection or treatment<br />

evaluation are, up to now, scarce. The present situation<br />

likely makes the pressure walkway a serious competitor in<br />

the race for “gold standard method” status in locomotion<br />

quantitative valuation.<br />

References<br />

• Besançon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR, Ritter MJ.<br />

Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds<br />

between force platform and pressure walkway<br />

measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003;<br />

3, 153-157<br />

• Evans RB, Gordon W, Conzemius N. The effect of velocity on<br />

ground reaction forces in dogs with lameness attributable<br />

to tearing of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res<br />

2003; 64(12): 1479-81<br />

• Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Ye K, et al. Comparaison of<br />

stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate<br />

analysis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60:814-819<br />

• Evans R, Horstman Ch, Conzemius M. Accuracy and<br />

Optimization of force Platform Gait Analysis in Labradors<br />

with Cranial cruciate disease Evaluated at walking Gait. Vet<br />

Surg 2005; 34, 445-449<br />

• Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN, Todhunter RJ. Comparison of<br />

trotting gaits of Labradors Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J<br />

vet res 2000; 61: 832-838<br />

• Mölsa SH, Hielm-Björkman AK, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM.<br />

Force Plateform Analysis in Clinically healthy Rottweilers:<br />

Comparison with Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg 2010;<br />

39:701-707.<br />

• McNeillAlexander R. Elastic mechanisms in animal<br />

movement. Cambridge University Press, 1988<br />

• Conzemius N. Limitations of force platform gait<br />

analysis. ESVOT-VOS 3d World Vet Ortho Congres<br />

<strong>Proceedings</strong>,2010,87-88.<br />

• Viguier E, Maître P, Colin A, Poujol L, Wittman C, Le Quang.<br />

ESVOT-VOS 3d World Vet Ortho Congres <strong>Proceedings</strong>,2010,<br />

184-185.<br />

• Fanchon L, Grandjean D. Accuracy of asymmetry in dices of<br />

ground reaction forces for diagnosis of hind limb lameness I<br />

dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68:1089-1094.<br />

• Quinn MM, Keuler NS, LU Y, Faria MLE, Muir P, Markel MD.<br />

Evaluation of Agreement Between Numerical Rating Scales,<br />

Visaul Analogue Scoring Scales, and Force Plate gait<br />

Analysis in Dogs. Vet Surg 2007;36:360-367.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 112 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


In vivo motion analysis 3D<br />

P. Böttcher*, J. Rey, G. Oechtering<br />

Department of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany<br />

Traditional motion analysis involves attaching small<br />

retroflective markers on the skin surface of aninmals<br />

and recording the path of those markers in 3D with at<br />

least two video cameras. Precision and accuracy of<br />

those systems in tracking the 3D path of the markers is<br />

very high and data collection and processing is straight<br />

forward as most of the software packages available on<br />

the marked allow for automatic marker tracking. This is<br />

why video cinematography is the de facto gold standard<br />

in motion analysis. The theory behind skin mounted<br />

marker is that they represent distinct bony landmarks.<br />

However, due to the physiological motion between skin<br />

and underlying skeleton, skin based motion tracking<br />

is limited to “macroscopic” motion analysis, basically<br />

flexion and extension, acceleration and deceleration as<br />

well as evaluation of synchronicity. Even in humans with<br />

much less skin elasticity than most of our animals and<br />

sophisticated cluster based marker configurations, skin<br />

mounted markers are not accurate enough to allow precise<br />

estimation of 3D joint motion.1,2 Especially abduction and<br />

adduction, external and internal rotation as well as relative<br />

translation of the opposing joint surfaces are prone to<br />

errors, questioning the usefulness of skin marker based<br />

analysis of 3D joint kinematics in dogs.<br />

To allow for precise estimation of 3D joint kinematics<br />

several technical aspects have to be considered: (1) tracking<br />

of bone motion instead of skin motion, (2) short exposure<br />

time (shutter 1/2000 sec) to reduce image blurring, (3) high<br />

frequency data acquisition (≥ 250 Hz) to make sure not to<br />

miss fast movements, e.g. cranial drawer in stifles with<br />

cranial cruciate ligament rupture, and (4) high accuracy and<br />

precision (≤ 1mm of translation and ≤ 1 deg of rotation) as<br />

joint kinematics are a microscopic biomechanical system.<br />

Today only biplanar fluoroscopic kinematography using<br />

special hardware fulfils all these requirements. Standard<br />

C-arms only allow for long exposure time and small image<br />

sampling rates and therefore are not suitable for our<br />

purpose. But they can easily be “upgraded” by attaching<br />

a high speed video camera instead of the standard video<br />

camera provided by the manufacture.3 When using<br />

an uniplanar setup to reduce cost and x-ray exposure<br />

translation along the optical axis (out of plane motion; most<br />

of the time medio-lateraly) and in consequence internal/<br />

external rotation as well as abduction/adduction are of<br />

suboptimal resolution.4<br />

The system we are currently using is a biplanar system<br />

with two high-power x-ray tubes and two 40 cm image<br />

intensifiers (fig. 1) combined with digital high speed video<br />

cameras for image acquisition. A third camera acquires a<br />

live stream of the dog while walking on the treadmill. This<br />

video clip is used to define start and end of stance phase.<br />

All cameras are synchronised at 500 fps and a shutter of<br />

1/2000 sec. Using custom made 2D-3D image registration<br />

software, which is primarily based on the work of Tasman<br />

and his group we can track the 3D kinematics of the canine<br />

stifle with a precision of 0.3 mm without any attached<br />

or implanted markers. Bead based tracking, using small<br />

spherical tantalum beads, which are “injected” into the<br />

bones allows for even more accurate tracking in the range<br />

of ≤ 0.1 mm.5<br />

Application of our hard- and software to dogs with<br />

naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture<br />

has changed our understanding of 3D stifle kinematic<br />

dramatically. First of all, stifle instability following CCL<br />

rupture is not a pathological movement of the tibia, it is<br />

the femur which becomes instable, luxating caudally on<br />

heel strike. Moreover, as already suggested by Tashman<br />

et al.6 CCL rupture does not lead to increased internal<br />

rotation of the tibia, while walking. Even more controversial<br />

is the situation following TPLO. We observed significant<br />

internal rotation of the femur at heel strike, which is almost<br />

absent when performing a TTA. However, following both<br />

procedures, cranio-caudal stability is restored. Animations<br />

of stifles following TPLO and TTA compared to normal stifles<br />

can be downloaded at www.fluokin.de.<br />

Fluoroscopic kinematography is not limited to the stifle.<br />

We are currently performing a study investigating 3D<br />

kinematics of the canine elbow with and without elbow<br />

dysplasia. When the local anatomy becomes more complex<br />

such as in the elbow, implantation of tantalum markers<br />

becomes necessary. This makes the investigation more<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 113 small animal orthopaedic session


complex as we need the animal under full anaesthesia<br />

before any clinically driven invasive procedure. Implanting<br />

the markers is comparable to multiple bone marrow<br />

aspiration procedures. The tantalum markers produce no<br />

adverse reaction and stay in the body for the rest of the life<br />

of the animal.7 Big advantage when using tantalum markers<br />

is their good contrast in the fluoroscopic images because<br />

of their high x-ray absorption coefficient. This makes<br />

identification of the markers and subsequent automatic<br />

tracking a straight forward procedure. Freely distributed<br />

software, based o a collection of Matlab routines, for bead<br />

based tracking in 3D motion analysis is available at www.<br />

xromm.org. But even for those studies in which implantation<br />

of markers is not possible XROMM provides software<br />

tools for manual 2D-3D-registration, so called scientific<br />

rotoscoping, which gives very good results. 8<br />

Future application of fluoroscopic kinematography in<br />

veterinary small animal medicine will extend to shoulder<br />

and hip kinematics, to neurology, evaluating spine<br />

kinematics or to the menisci. But even pure “soft tissue”<br />

kinematics, such as the motion of hard valves, soft palate<br />

or tongue can be investigated using implanted markers. Of<br />

course, animals other than dogs can be investigated using<br />

fluoroscopy, too. In consequence we are currently setting<br />

up the first biplanar fluoroscopic motion analysis system<br />

designed for small animals such as rats, small reptiles and<br />

birds, up to horses and cows - including humans (www.<br />

fluokin.de). Once established this unique installation will<br />

allow for basic as well as clinical research using both<br />

marker less and marker based fluoroscopic motion tracking<br />

at high speed among all “species”<br />

Fig 1: Biplanar fluoroscopic setup at the Institut für Spezielle<br />

Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller Universität,<br />

Jena, Germany (Prof. Fischer)<br />

Bibliography<br />

1. Benoit D, Ramsey D, Lamontagne M, et al: Effect of skin<br />

movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and<br />

cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 24:152-164,<br />

2006.<br />

2. Garling EH, Kaptein BL, Mertens B, et al: Soft-tissue<br />

artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and<br />

skin-mounted markers. J Biomech 40 Suppl 1:S18-24, 2007.<br />

3. Snelderwaard P, De Groot JH, Deban SM: Digital video<br />

combined with conventional radiography creates an<br />

excellent high-speed X-ray video system. J Biomech<br />

35:1007-1009, 2002.<br />

4. Böttcher P, Ludewig E, Oechtering G: Uniplanar fluoroscopic<br />

cinematography for in-vivo analysis of canine knee<br />

kinematics: estimation of accuracy, <strong>Proceedings</strong>, 14th<br />

ESVOT Congress, Munich, Germany, 10-14 September,<br />

2008.<br />

5. Brainerd EL, Baier DB, Gatesy SM, et al: X-ray<br />

reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision,<br />

accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics<br />

research. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 313:262-279,<br />

2010.<br />

6. Tashman S, Anderst W: In-vivo measurement of dynamic<br />

joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and<br />

CT: application to canine ACL deficiency. J Biomech Eng<br />

125:238-245, 2003.<br />

7. Aronson AS, Jonsson N, Alberius P: Tantalum markers in<br />

radiography. An assessment of tissue reactions. Skeletal<br />

Radiol 14:207-211, 1985.<br />

8. Gatesy SM, Baier DB, Jenkins FA, et al: Scientific<br />

rotoscoping: a morphology-based method of 3-D motion<br />

analysis and visualization. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol<br />

313:244-261, 2010.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 114 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Muscular forces affecting the outcome of CCL<br />

surgery.<br />

JM Ramirez Leon 1 , B Böhme 4 , C Vroomen 3 , F Farnir 2 , M Balligand 1<br />

1 Department of Clinical Sciences, SA Surgery, 2 Department of Animal Productions, Biostatistics, 3 Department<br />

of Constructions, Materials and Structures Mechanics, University of Liège, Belgium, 4 Kleintierklinik, Bremen,<br />

Germany<br />

Introduction<br />

Surgical treatments, attempting to passively or<br />

dynamically stabilize the affected stifle joints, are carried<br />

out in the vast majority of cranial cruciate ligament<br />

ruptures (CCLR) in dogs. Indications exist that unstable<br />

joints following CCLR could benefit from augmentation<br />

of Quadriceps muscle performance, whether the joints<br />

are surgically treated or not. The objective of the present<br />

study is to evaluate the effect of the force developed by<br />

the Quadriceps muscle on the stability of the stifle affected<br />

by CCLR.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

Six hind limbs were harvested from fresh cadavers,<br />

weighing between 19 and 33 kilos. The dogs had been<br />

euthanized for reasons unrelated to this study. Pelvic<br />

limbs were collected by disarticulation of the coxofemoral<br />

joint. All muscles were dissected out, leaving intact the<br />

collateral and capsular ligaments of the stifle and hock<br />

joints. <strong>Small</strong> radio-opaque markers (segments of Kirschner<br />

wire) were implanted in the distal femur and proximal<br />

tibia. The specimens were radiographed to control the<br />

absence of osteoarthritis and allow calculation of the<br />

tibial plateau angle (TPA); they were wrapped in isotonic<br />

saline soaked abdominal sponges and stored in sealed<br />

plastic bags at -20°. Thawing occured at room temperature<br />

during the night preceding the tests. The day of the tests,<br />

a medial mini-arthrotomy of the stifle was performed and<br />

the infrapatellar fat pad was completely dissected out,<br />

exposing the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) which was<br />

left intact at this moment. The joints were closed with a<br />

2/0 nylon interrupted suture. The Quadriceps muscle and<br />

the Gastrocnemius muscles/ Achilles tendon unit were<br />

replaced by tension bands, each of them instrumented<br />

with a strain gage (Sensy, 150 DN) and a turn-buckle to<br />

adjust the tension in the cables. The strain gages were<br />

conditioned in a full Wheatstone bridge by an amplifier<br />

(Hottinger Baldwijn Messtechnik, type MBC). Signals<br />

registered by the sensors were treated via a data logger<br />

(HP 3497 A) and an acquisition software (Scan Win).The<br />

limbs were placed in a press (Instron 3366, 10 KN) in a<br />

neutral position, between protraction (breaking phase)<br />

and retraction (propelling phase) a position close to the<br />

position of a hind limb at the time of peak vertical force<br />

during stance phase. The proximal femurs were securely<br />

fixed to a custom-made aluminum stirrup connected to the<br />

horizontal bar of the press via three pairs of screws and<br />

a 2.5 mm transfixing pin. The press was piloted in force<br />

during the loading phase and piloted in displacement<br />

during the relaxation phase. Loading was done at 30% of<br />

body weight at a loading rate of 2.5 mm per second until<br />

a plateau was reached; the target load was maintained<br />

during 60 seconds, allowing measurements of joint angles<br />

(stifle and hock) with a goniometer, recording of the force<br />

values and taking radiographs of the stifle. Relaxation was<br />

finally allowed until the initial position of the horizontal<br />

bar was resumed. A small pre-tension (between 2 and<br />

5 N) was systematically put into the Quadriceps tension<br />

band and the Gastrocnemius/ Achilles tension band in<br />

order to prevent any slack in the system and to obtain<br />

physiological joints angles when at peak load, ranging<br />

from 130° to 138°and 130° to 136° for the stifle and hock<br />

joint respectively. The hip joint angle was always fixed at<br />

a predetermined value (68° to 71°), corresponding to the<br />

mean value observed in physiological conditions at peak<br />

vertical load and reported in the literature. Measures<br />

were repeated two to three times, at an interval of 2 to 3<br />

minutes. In a second step, the CCL was transected with a<br />

scalpel blade, when unloaded, via the medial arthrotomy<br />

initially performed, which was again closed with a 2/0<br />

nylon single non interrupted suture. Measures were then<br />

repeated again two to three times at the same 30% of BW<br />

load, bringing no changes to the pretension initially placed<br />

in Quadriceps and the Gastrocnemius/Achilles bands (2 to<br />

5 N). Upon loading, cranial displacement of the tibia was<br />

documented by films and radiographs and from the load vs<br />

time charts delivered by the Instron press. In a third step,<br />

different pre-tensions were applied, from 1 to 9 kilograms<br />

depending on the specimen, to the Quadriceps band,<br />

before loading, the foot being hold in its original position<br />

on the ground thanks to a custom-made shoe preventing<br />

its cranial displacement when tightening the turn-buckle of<br />

the Quadriceps band. The loading processes were carried<br />

out like previously described and filmed again. In a fourth<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 115 small animal orthopaedic session


step, advancement of the tibial tuberosity was performed<br />

using a Modified Maquet Technique (MMT) procedure, first<br />

with an advancement calculated with the common tangent<br />

method to orthogonalize the tibial plateau and the patellar<br />

ligament, and then with half of this advancement but with<br />

different pre-tension being applied to the Quadriceps band.<br />

No attempt was made to keep nor the stifle nor the hock<br />

angles at specific values, once the CCL had been transected.<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

A multinomial logistic model with cumulative logits was<br />

used to assess the effect of pre-load in the quadriceps<br />

(PLQ) and tibial plateau angle (TPA) on the occurrence<br />

of a cranial drawer sign (CDS). <strong>Animals</strong> were classified<br />

into 3 categories with respect to CDS (absent, variable,<br />

present) and optimal parameters were fitted using<br />

GENMOD procedure of SAS. As a by-product, the used<br />

model also allowed to predict PLQ to be applied to have<br />

a given probability to avoid CDS. The effect of PLQ and<br />

similarly the small pre-load systematically applied in<br />

the Gastrocnemius/Achilles tension band(PLGA) on the<br />

Ultimate Load in Quadriceps (ULQ) was also investigated<br />

by fitting a linear model using PLQ and PLGA as covariates<br />

and CDS as a fixed effect. The same linear model was fitted<br />

for the Ultimate Load in the Gastrocnemius/Achilles tension<br />

band(ULGA). When testing the effect of CDS status on the<br />

hock angle (HA) and on ULGA, a one-way Anova was used,<br />

after classifying the CCLR individuals into 2 groups (group<br />

1: no CDS, group 2: CDS or variable CDS).<br />

Results<br />

Preload (PLQ) was found to have a significant effect<br />

(p=0.032) on the occurrence of CDS, with higher levels<br />

of preload leading to lower prevalence of CDS. TPA was<br />

also significantly (p=0.0016) associated to CDS, with<br />

higher values of TPA more likely to cause CDS. The results<br />

show that CDS has a significant effect (p=0.0078), with<br />

individuals suffering from CDS characterized by higher<br />

ultimate tensions (ULQ) than others. No significant relation<br />

could be demonstrated between PLQ and ULQ (p=0.0949),<br />

while a significant effect could be shown for PLGA on<br />

ULQ (with the 2 traits negatively correlated).HA were<br />

found significantly (p


especially when the stifle is more extended (high flexion<br />

angle) could limit or even eliminate the drawer sign. When<br />

ACLR is treated by advancement of the tibial tuberosity,<br />

pre-tension in the Quadriceps can help the procedure to<br />

deliver its stabilizing effect or possibly compensate for an<br />

insufficient advancement. It must be emphasized though<br />

that our model is still a very simplified anatomical model not<br />

taking into account the effect of cocontraction especially<br />

of the Hamstrings muscles.<br />

Bibliography<br />

• Ragetly ChA, Griffon DJ, Mostafa AA, Thomas JE, Hsiao-<br />

Wecksler ET. Inverse Dynamics Analysis of the Pelvic Limbs<br />

in Labrador Retrievers With and Without Cranial Cruciate<br />

Ligament Disease. Vet Surg, 2010, 39 (513-522)<br />

• Hoffmann DE, Kowaleski MP, Johnson KA, Evans RB,<br />

Boudrieau RJ. Ex vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of the<br />

Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Stifle with<br />

Varying Angles of Stifle Joint flexion and Axial Loads after<br />

Tibial Tuberosity Advancement. Vet Surg, 2011, 40 (311-320)<br />

• Kipfer NM, Damur DM, Guerrero T, et al. Effect of tibial<br />

tuberosity advancement on femorotibial shear in cranial<br />

cruciate ligament deficient-stifles: an in vitro study. Vet<br />

Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2008, 21 (385-390).<br />

• Dennler R, Kipfer NM, Tepic S, et al. Inclination of the<br />

patellar ligament in relation to flexion angles in stifle joints<br />

of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res,<br />

2006, 67 (1849-1854).<br />

• Etchepareborde S, Brunel L, Bollen G, Balligand M.<br />

Preliminary experience of a modified Maquet technique<br />

for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Vet<br />

Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2011, 24.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 117 small animal orthopaedic session


Evidence based medicine in rehabilitation<br />

B. Bockstahler, PD, DVM, CCRP<br />

Clinic for Surgery and Ophthalmology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria<br />

During the past decade, veterinary physical therapy<br />

and rehabilitation has gained popularity. ,Veterinarians<br />

have started focusing on several goals as the treatment<br />

of pain and subsequent compensatory mechanisms, the<br />

improvement of the joint function and a quicker return to<br />

function after surgery. To reach these goals the veterinarian,<br />

working in the field of physical therapy, must have a<br />

profound knowledge related not only to physical therapeutic<br />

modalities (like electrotherapy), but also to the etiology and<br />

pathophysiology of musculoskeletal disorders, conservative<br />

and surgical treatments and finally the biomechanics of<br />

the musculoskeletal system. Because of the complexity of<br />

musculoskeletal diseases, neither the pathophysiological<br />

processes related to orthopedic disorders nor the impact<br />

of physical therapeutic interventions like therapeutic<br />

exercises can be understood without a profound knowledge<br />

of the dog’s biomechanics<br />

This can only be addressed with objective and<br />

reproducible data on the dogs’ kinetics, kinematics and<br />

muscle functions.<br />

In contrast to human medicine where extensive<br />

biomechanical research has been performed and a lot of<br />

studies prove the efficacy of physiotherapeutic methods<br />

such studies are rare in veterinary medicine. This lack on<br />

high quality studies has brought the veterinary physical<br />

therapy in a zone between charlatanism and evidenced<br />

based medicine.<br />

The veterinary community is thus currently discussing<br />

two main questions:<br />

• Are the methods of physical therapy effective (e.g.<br />

for pain control or accelerated rehabilitation after<br />

surgery?<br />

• How can we increase our biomechanical and<br />

pathophysiological knowledge to improve our<br />

treatment options?<br />

Scientists all around the world are working on these<br />

topics, and in the field of veterinary physical therapy the<br />

first important steps have been done. For example, Monk et<br />

al.1 showed that early physiotherapy intervention prevents<br />

muscle atrophy, contributes to muscle mass and strength,<br />

and increases the stifle range of motion (ROM) after TPLO.<br />

Such studies using clinical outcome measurements (e.g.<br />

ROM) provide us with important information, but their input<br />

could be improved if modern motion analysis methods were<br />

implemented. This biomechanical research thus relies on<br />

both in vivo and in vitro methods.<br />

A common in vivo method to evaluate the influence of<br />

therapeutically interventions is the measurement of ground<br />

reaction forces (GRF). For this purpose different systems<br />

are available e.g. single force plates, pressure walkways or<br />

force plates integrated in treadmills. Each of these systems<br />

has its own advantages and disadvantages; nevertheless<br />

they can be used relatively easy to evaluate treatment<br />

outcomes. In the field of veterinary physical therapy<br />

GRF has been used relatively frequently; for example<br />

Marsolais et al2 showed that ground reaction forces of<br />

dogs after surgery for CCL rupture which underwent post<br />

operative rehabilitation (massage, swimming, passive<br />

range of motion exercises) improved compared to an<br />

exercises-restricted group. In a recent paper, Mueller et<br />

al.3 described the benefits of therapeutic ultrasound in<br />

the treatment of avulsion of the gastrocnemius muscle.<br />

Some promising results have been published for the use of<br />

extracorporeal shockwave therapy as a treatment modality<br />

in the osteoarthritic patient4,5. Important results presented<br />

by Mlacnik et al.6 showed that a combination of a weight<br />

management program with physical therapy leads to a<br />

better weight loss and improvement of existing lameness<br />

than a sole dietary program.<br />

Such kinetic measurements are helpful tools, but they<br />

only describe the forces resulting during stance; they do not<br />

provide us with information regarding the joint movements.<br />

To enable the visualization of the temporal and spatial<br />

characteristics of locomotion kinematic measurements<br />

should be used. A lot of studies have been performed to<br />

investigate the joints kinematics of sound and diseased<br />

animals. Also in the field of veterinary physical therapy first<br />

encourage steps have been taken. Marsolais7 compared<br />

coxofemoral, stifle and tarsal joint range of motion (ROM)<br />

and angular velocities during swimming and walking of<br />

healthy dogs with those of dogs after surgical treatment of<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 118 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


a ruptured CCL. The authors showed that swimming leads<br />

to an increased ROM of the stifle compared to walking<br />

on normal ground. Because the ROM is considered as<br />

an important factor in the return to function, the authors<br />

concluded that swimming can contribute to a successful<br />

rehabilitation. Also some kinds of therapeutic exercises<br />

have been investigated to evaluate their impact on joint<br />

mobility. Richards et al.8 showed that during stair up<br />

ambulation, dogs show an increased flexion of stifle and<br />

the hock and an increased and earlier extension of the stifle<br />

compared to normal walk. Going the stairs down results<br />

in an increased flexion of all joints of the hind legs and a<br />

decreased extension of the hip joint. Holler et al.9 found<br />

in dogs crossing obstacles, a higher flexion of the hock<br />

and stifle as well an increased extension of the stifle joint<br />

compared to normal walk. During incline (11%) they found<br />

an increased flexion of the hip and decreased extension of<br />

the stifle, going decline (11%) the hock was less extended<br />

than during level walking and the hip was less flexed.<br />

This kinematic research gives a valuable insight into the<br />

joint mechanics and the value of therapeutic exercises, but<br />

the studies have failed to take into account the muscle<br />

function. The measurement of the muscle activity using<br />

needle or surface electromyography during motion<br />

is difficult. Nevertheless, some work has been done:<br />

Bockstahler et al.10 investigated the activity pattern of the<br />

quadriceps muscle in dogs and Lauer at al.11 investigated<br />

the hamstrings and the quadriceps during walking inclines/<br />

declines. The activity of the hamstring muscle group if<br />

walking at a 5% incline is significantly increased in the<br />

beginning and in the end of the stance phase compared<br />

to a 5% decline. In contrast, the activity of the gluteal<br />

and quadriceps muscle groups was not affected when<br />

treadmill inclination was changed. The aforementioned<br />

studies are promising but our knowledge regarding the<br />

canine muscle function is still sparse. As a result, our<br />

pathophysiologic knowledge of some orthopedic diseases<br />

remains insufficient and we are thus unable to determine<br />

the optimal therapy.<br />

The scientific works quoted in this abstract show that<br />

veterinary physical therapy contributes to an accelerated<br />

rehabilitation after surgery and improves the quality of life<br />

of dogs suffering from chronic musculoskeletal disorders.<br />

However, the two questions mentioned above cannot be<br />

fully answered. as it is difficult to piece together the puzzle<br />

of external forces, morphometric data and clinical signs.<br />

One way to solve the problem could be to combine in<br />

vitro and in vivo methods. In vivo methods, describe the<br />

movement of the living organism but they are sometimes<br />

limited by ethical and methodological considerations. In<br />

contrast in vitro methods provide information about the<br />

biomechanics of a joint, without considering the influence<br />

of surrounding soft tissues such as muscles and tendons.<br />

With the help of mathematical methods it is possible to<br />

derive theoretical models, which can be used to assess for<br />

instance intraarticular forces. The combination of in vitro<br />

and in vivo methods permits the design of anatomically<br />

realistic two- and three dimensional models, which can<br />

provide significant insights into how the neuromuscular and<br />

musculoskeletal systems interact to produce movement.<br />

Researches based on a sound anatomic, biomechanic and<br />

physiologic, clinical and surgical knowledge are necessary<br />

to allow the physical therapists to respond fully to the<br />

physiological and clinical needs of our patients.<br />

Referenses<br />

1. Monk ML, Preston CA, McGowan CM: Effects of early<br />

intensive postoperative physiotherapy on limb function after<br />

tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with deficiency of<br />

the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67:529-<br />

536<br />

2. Marsolais GS, Dvorak G, Conzemius MG: Effects of<br />

postoperative rehabilitation on limb function after cranial<br />

cruciate ligament repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;<br />

220:1325<strong>–</strong>1330<br />

3. Mueller MC, Gradner G, Hittmair KM, et al:. Conservative<br />

treatment of partial gastrocnemius muscle avulsions in<br />

dogs using therapeutic ultrasound -- A force plate study.<br />

V.C.O.T 2009;22: 243-248<br />

4. Dahlberg J, Fitch G, Evans RB, McClure SR, et al: The<br />

evaluation of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in naturally<br />

occurring osteoarthritis of the stifle joint in dogs. V.C.O.T<br />

2005; 18: 147-52<br />

5. Mueller M, Bockstahler B, Skalicky M, et al: Effects of<br />

radial shockwave therapy on the limb function of dogs with<br />

hip osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2007;160:762-765<br />

6. Mlacnik E, Bockstahler B, Müller M, et al: Effects of<br />

caloric restriction and a moderate or intense physiotherapy<br />

program for treatment of lameness in overweight dogs with<br />

osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;229: 1756-1760<br />

7. Marsolais GS, McLean S, Derrick T, et al: Kinematic<br />

analysis of the hind limb during swimming and walking<br />

in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically corrected<br />

cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Vet Med Assoc<br />

2003;222:739<strong>–</strong>743<br />

8. Richards J, Holler P, Bockstahler B, et al: A comparison of<br />

human and canine kinematics during level walking , stair<br />

ascent , and stair descent. Wien Tierarztl Monat 2010;<br />

97:92 - 100<br />

9. Holler P, Brazda V, Dal-Bianco B, et al: Kinematic motion<br />

analysis of the joints of the fore- and hind limbs of<br />

dogs during walking exercise regimens. Am J Vet Res<br />

2010;71:734-740<br />

10. Bockstahler B, Gesky R, Mueller M, et al.: Correlation of<br />

surface electromyography of the vastus lateralis muscle in<br />

dogs at a walk with joint kinematics and ground reaction<br />

forces. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 754-61.<br />

11. Lauer SK, Hillman RB, Li L, et al: Effects of treadmill<br />

inclination on electromyographic activity and hind limb<br />

kinematics in healthy hounds at a walk. Am J Vet Res<br />

2009;70:658-66<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 119 small animal orthopaedic session


small animal orthopaedic session 120 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Bone healing for surgeons<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

14.00 <strong>–</strong> 16.00


small animal orthopaedic session 122 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Stimulation of bone healing. Latest developments<br />

O. Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />

<strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery Department, ONIRIS College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Sciences and Engineering,<br />

Nantes, France.<br />

Development of synthetic bone graft substitutes<br />

Despite the benefits that minimally invasive<br />

osteosynthesis and surgery have brought to fracture<br />

and bone healing, there are still many circumstances<br />

where achieving bone healing may prove challenging.<br />

Autologous bone grafts are still considered the gold<br />

standard in bone repair and regeneration because of their<br />

osteogenicity, osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity. But<br />

in human medicine, some instances clearly demonstrated<br />

the advantages of synthetic bone substitutes over<br />

autografts which are no longer recommended as they<br />

are time consuming in the OR, expansive in terms of<br />

hospitalization, induce morbidity and chronic pain, are<br />

available in limited quantity and can be associated with<br />

unpredictable outcomes. The harvesting procedure requires<br />

a second surgical site, with which complications have<br />

been reported, and the quantity of bone graft is limited.<br />

In addition, autologous bone grafts may be too rapidly<br />

resorbable as they can be degraded before bone healing has<br />

been completed. Allogenic and xenogenic bone substitutes<br />

have also been proposed and are still used in some clinical<br />

applications. But viral transmission and a lack availability<br />

of native bone have led to the development of synthetic<br />

bone substitution biomaterials whose use dramatically<br />

increased in the last 15 years, because of their reliable<br />

manufacturing process and the possibility of combining<br />

them with bioactive molecules, therapeutic agents and<br />

cells for tissue engineering, cell-therapy and gene-therapy<br />

applications.<br />

The ideal bone graft substitute must combine several<br />

biological properties in order to favorably compare with<br />

an autologous graft: biocompatibility, osteoconduction,<br />

osteoinductivity (ostegenicity), bioactivity (interactions<br />

with the implantation site environment that can result<br />

in biodegradability, ionic release and exchange). Ideally,<br />

bone substitutes should be able to repair large defects,<br />

provide mechanical resistance and be resorbed to allow<br />

osteogenesis as the bone tissue is remodeled. Consequently<br />

the facility to release bioactive molecules incorporated in<br />

the synthetic graft can make such biomaterials potential<br />

drug delivery systems.<br />

Calcium phosphate ceramics<br />

Among ceramic-based bone graft substitutes, most of<br />

them are calcium (Ca) composites: Ca sulfates (plaster of<br />

Paris), Ca phosphates, Ca carbonates (coral), Ca silicates<br />

(Bioglass), Ca pyrophosphates … Calcium phosphate (CaP)<br />

bone substitutes are currently used for bone substitution<br />

in many different clinical situations such as repair of<br />

bone defects, bone augmentation in spinal arthrodesis,<br />

periodontal treatment, or as coatings for metallic implants.<br />

CaP ceramics are the principal raw materials used for<br />

bone substitutes and are available as granules or blocks.<br />

Among these biomaterials, biphasic calcium phosphate<br />

(BCP) ceramics have been used successfully in human<br />

surgery thanks partly to their chemical composition which<br />

closely resembles that of bone mineral and comprises<br />

a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta tricalcium<br />

phosphate ß(TCP). These ceramics are biocompatible<br />

i.e. do not induce any adverse local tissue reaction,<br />

immunogenicity or systematic toxicity; osteoconductive,<br />

i.e. act as a scaffold for new bone formation requiring the<br />

presence of porosity and bioactive, i.e. degradable through<br />

a chemical and cellular process. Certain CaP biomaterials,<br />

such as HA,ß-TCP and BCP ceramics, have recently been<br />

shown to induce bone formation ectopically in different<br />

animal models and have consequently been qualified as<br />

osteoinductive. Macroporosity of CaP blocks facilitates<br />

invasion of cells and diffusion of biological growth factors<br />

into the implant, therefore inducing the osteogenic<br />

process within the inner surface of pores to achieve bone<br />

coalescence.<br />

The microarchitecture and particularly the size of the<br />

particles and the size and distribution of the pores are<br />

critical factors influencing biodegradability, fluid and<br />

cell penetration and the delivery modalities of bioactive<br />

molecules. CaP composites’ potential as drug delivery<br />

systems is a consequence of their bioactivity and<br />

biodegradability, by incorporation and subsequent release<br />

of active molecules or therapeutic agents, but also because<br />

Ca and P ions are important factors in many biochemical<br />

reactions in the body (enzymatic co-factors …). These<br />

chemical interactions together with specific architectural<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 123 small animal orthopaedic session


features lead to consider CaP ceramics as intrinsically<br />

‘osteoinductive’.<br />

Improvements in CaP biotechnology and new therapeutic<br />

approaches such as percutaneous or minimally-invasive<br />

techniques have allowed the development of injectable<br />

CaP biomaterials for bone replacement and particularly selfsetting<br />

CaP cements. Cementation of vertebrae or filling of<br />

bone cysts have already been documented. Two different<br />

strategies have been proposed for the development of<br />

injectable biomaterials: calcium phosphate cements (CPCs)<br />

and injectable ceramics. The setting of bone cements<br />

provides primary mechanical strength to compensate for<br />

a lack of initial or induced macroporosity. Self-setting<br />

CPCs were actually developed first, and many are already<br />

commercially available. They are based on a mixture of CaP<br />

mineral compounds that react together to provide a material<br />

that hardens in situ after injection, through a very mild<br />

exothermic reaction. These CPCs have variable setting and<br />

hardening times in situ depending on their formulations but<br />

a few of them are ready-to-use forms. After hardening, most<br />

cements provide dense biomaterials with irregular porosity,<br />

whereas various studies have shown that macropores are<br />

necessary for bone osteoconduction. Incorporating different<br />

kinds of polymers into CaP cements has recently been<br />

proposed to confer on them an induced macroporosity and<br />

accelerated their colonisation and remodeling.<br />

In human orthopaedics, numerous clinical indications<br />

have been investigated with injectable ceramic-based<br />

Ca cements, including bone void filling and fracture<br />

management:<br />

• For screw augmentation or bone void filler around<br />

metallic implants.<br />

• In calcaneal fractures and distal radial fractures<br />

where the use of CaP bone cements are associated<br />

with decreased pain, faster recovery and a higher<br />

range of joint motion. The level of evidence remains<br />

insufficient to recommend the use of CaP cements<br />

for trochanteric fracture augmentation and femoral<br />

neck fracture management;<br />

• Tibial plateau fractures are indications of choice<br />

for CaP cements in human surgery: they can<br />

provide immediate mechanical strength compared<br />

to autografts and a faster rehabilitation. A recent<br />

multicenter study led to strong recommendations:<br />

‘the use of autologous bone graft is no longer<br />

recommended and CaP cements can replace<br />

autologous bone graft for such an indication’.<br />

In human surgery, the association of CaP bone cements<br />

with bioactive molecules has been investigated for three<br />

major clinical purposes in the bone environment: the local<br />

delivery of antibiotics, the promotion of osteointegration<br />

or bone augmentation by the release of growth factors or<br />

cytokines, and the prevention of further bone resorption<br />

by the incorporation and subsequent in vivo release of<br />

antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates. Such<br />

applications have not yet been reported in veterinary<br />

literature except for a few isolated clinical reports mostly<br />

using BMPs on collagen sponges as the vehicle as opposed<br />

to CaP composites.<br />

Organic matrix and bioactive molecules<br />

Osteoinduction can be accomplished by devitalized<br />

demineralised bone matrix (DBM) due to the presence<br />

of preserved active protein factors that could stimulate<br />

bone formation, mostly identified as BMPs and TGF-�.<br />

DBM is an allogenic approach that is broadly applied in<br />

orthopaedic surgery and appeared as a viable alternative to<br />

autologous bone graft. Canine DBM is now currently used<br />

in veterinary orthopaedics. DBM does not confer primary<br />

mechanical strength to the grafted tissue but can promote<br />

angiogenesis, osteoblastic differentiation and subsequent<br />

extra cellular matrix production through the local release<br />

of these soluble factors. The extracellular matrix in DBM<br />

is mostly collagenic and can support osteoconduction if the<br />

grafted matrix is not degraded too rapidly.<br />

Similarly, the association of an organic matrix with<br />

selected growth factors tends to confer on the resulting<br />

biomaterial osteoinductive properties. The combination<br />

of BMPs and collagen sponges reproduces the concept of<br />

DBM without the risk of immunogenicity from an allogenic<br />

matrix. Such a combination has been successfully used for<br />

bone union induction in both human and veterinary clinical<br />

situations but still have some limitations. According to a<br />

recent review in human literature, it seems that “the use<br />

of BMP for spinal fusion is unlikely to be cost-effective”<br />

and the induced biological effects, due to the local release<br />

of supraphysiological doses of BMP can result in either<br />

deleterious ectopic bone formation, particularly in spinal<br />

fusion surgery, or in the unexpected absence of bone<br />

formation in the treatment of non-unions.<br />

Tissue engineering for bone graft substitutes<br />

Bone tissue engineering usually associates matrix<br />

structures or scaffolds, osteoinductive or growth factors<br />

and osteogenic cells. The potential use of stem cells<br />

for cell therapy have provoked great interest and also<br />

controversy over the past 10 years in all the fields of<br />

regenerative medicine. In bone marrow two major and<br />

distinct stem cell types are found: the hematopoietic<br />

stem cells, producing blood cells and marrow stroma<br />

fibroblasts, and mesenchymal stem cells that have the<br />

capacity to differentiate into all connective tissue types,<br />

including bone, cartilage, fat, fibrous tissue, muscle<br />

and hematopoietic stroma. The high plasticity of MSC<br />

differentiation suggested their potential use to augment,<br />

replace or repair diseased or damaged tissues. MSCs have<br />

also demonstrated immunomodulatory properties with antiinflammatory<br />

and antiproliferative effects that have been<br />

investigated in some cancer treatments. MSCs can also<br />

be easily transduced with exogenous genes via plasmidic<br />

or viral infection that facilitates their investigation in<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 124 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


gene therapy strategies. Stem cells can be of various<br />

origins: MSCs from bone marrow (less than 0.01%), MSCs<br />

from adipose tissue (approximately 1%), MSCs from the<br />

embryonic chorion, circulating blood, synovium and other<br />

differentiated tissues. As associated growth factors, BMPs<br />

and angiogenic factors as VEGF have been thoroughly<br />

investigated. Concerning the associated cells, many clinical<br />

studies have now demonstrated the advantages of fresh<br />

harvested total bone marrow whereas many fundamental<br />

and animal studies focused on MSCs selected from bone<br />

marrow or adipose tissue and cultivated in vitro before<br />

being re-implanted. Unfortunately, despite promising<br />

results in pre-clinical animal models, such cell-based<br />

therapies have very limited clinical impact to date.<br />

Many surgeons have already experienced the efficacy<br />

of adding CaP bone graft substitutes to autologous blood,<br />

but only a few mechanisms of action have been proposed<br />

to explain it. In recent years, several studies went back<br />

to this relatively simple situation while proposing new<br />

mechanisms of action and biological explanations. The<br />

combination of autologous blood and CaP microparticles<br />

could bring interesting textural and biological features to<br />

the resulting composite that would avoid dispersion of<br />

the particles into the surrounding tissues. Moreover, this<br />

combination provides a moldable composite biomaterial<br />

with interconnected open porosity allowing free circulation<br />

of fluids and cells. A recent study has shown that the<br />

resulting composite exhibits osteogenic and osteoinductive<br />

properties. The size of the microparticles and the number<br />

of particles loaded into the blood clot are critical points. To<br />

some extent, an inflammatory reaction is required to initiate<br />

cell attraction and proliferation. Such an inflammatory<br />

reaction is part of the normal resorption-substitution<br />

process of CaP bone biomaterials, especially when used<br />

in particulate or granular forms. Osteogenic properties of<br />

blood clot associated to BCP particles may mostly result<br />

from the presence of monoculear cells, including osteoclast<br />

progenitors present within peripheral blood monocytic cells.<br />

Plasma clot/BCP microparticles composite may provide<br />

monocytes a favourable environment for osteoclastic<br />

differentiation, together with the production of proangiogenic<br />

and chemoattractant factors, and subsequent<br />

new bone apposition.<br />

Selected references<br />

1. Bajammal SS, Zlowodzki M, Lelwica A, Tornetta P 3rd,<br />

Einhorn TA, Buckley R, Leighton R, Russell TA, Larsson S,<br />

Bhandari M. The use of calcium phosphate bone cement in<br />

fracture treatment. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J<br />

Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1186-96.<br />

2. Balaguer T, Boukhechba F, Clavé A, Bouvet-Gerbettaz<br />

S, Trojani C, Michiels JF, Laugier JP, Bouler JM, Carle<br />

GF, Scimeca JC, Rochet N. Biphasic calcium phosphate<br />

microparticles for bone formation: benefits of combination<br />

with blood clot. Tissue Eng Part A 2010;16:3495-505.<br />

3. Bobyn JD, McKenzie K, Karabasz D, Krygier JJ, Tanzer<br />

M. Locally delivered bisphosphonate for enhancement of<br />

bone formation and implant fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am<br />

2009;91 Suppl 6:23-31.<br />

4. Espitalier F, Vinatier C, Lerouxel E, Guicheux J, Pilet P,<br />

Moreau F, Daculsi G, Weiss P, Malard O. A comparison<br />

between bone reconstruction following the use of<br />

mesenchymal stem cells and total bone marrow in<br />

association with calcium phosphate scaffold in irradiated<br />

bone. Biomaterials 2009;30:763-9.<br />

5. Fellah BH, Gauthier O, Weiss P, Chappard D, Layrolle P.<br />

Osteogenicity of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics and<br />

bone autograft in a goat model. Biomaterials 2008;29:1177-<br />

1188.<br />

6. Field JR, McGee M, Stanley R, Ruthenbeck G,<br />

Papadimitrakis T, Zannettino A, Gronthos S, Itescu S. The<br />

efficacy of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells for the<br />

repair of an ovine tibial segmental defect. Vet Comp Orthop<br />

Traumatol 2011;24:113-21.<br />

7. Garrison KR, Donell S, Ryder J, Shemilt I, Mugford<br />

M, Harvey I, Song F. Clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness<br />

of bone morphogenetic proteins in the nonhealing<br />

of fractures and spinal fusion: a systematic review.<br />

Health Technol Assess 2007;11:1-150.<br />

8. Garrison KR, Shemilt I, Donell S, Ryder JJ, Mugford M,<br />

Harvey I, Song F, Alt V. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)<br />

for fracture healing in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev<br />

2010;(6):CD006950.<br />

9. Gauthier O, Bouler J-M, Aguado E, Pilet P and Daculsi<br />

G. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics:<br />

Influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity<br />

percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 1998;19:133-<br />

139.<br />

10. Gauthier O, Bouler JM, Weiss P, Bosco J, Aguado E and<br />

Daculsi G. Short-term effects of mineral particle sizes on<br />

cellular degradation activity after implantation of injectable<br />

calcium-phosphate biomaterials and the consequences for<br />

bone substitution. Bone 1999;25:71S-74S.<br />

11. Hoffer MJ, Griffon DJ, Schaeffer DJ, Johnson AL, Thomas<br />

MW. Clinical applications of demineralized bone matrix: a<br />

retrospective and case-matched study of seventy-five dogs.<br />

Vet Surg 2008;37:639-47.<br />

12. Han D, Sun X, Zhang X, Tang T, Dai K. Ectopic osteogenesis<br />

by ex vivo gene therapy using beta tricalcium phosphate as<br />

a carrier. Connect Tissue Res. 2008;49:343-50.<br />

13. Innes JF, Myint P. Demineralised bone matrix in veterinary<br />

orthopaedics: a review. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol<br />

2010;23:393-9.<br />

14. Jurgens WJ, Oedayrajsingh-Varma MJ, Helder MN,<br />

Zandiehdoulabi B, Schouten TE, Kuik DJ, Ritt MJ, van<br />

Milligen FJ. Effect of tissue-harvesting site on yield of stem<br />

cells derived from adipose tissue: implications for cellbased<br />

therapies. Cell Tissue Res 2008;332:415-26.<br />

15. Kraus KH, Kirker-Head C. Mesenchymal stem cells and bone<br />

regeneration. Vet Surg 2006;35:232-42.<br />

16. Mouline CC, Quincey D, Laugier JP, Carle GF, Bouler JM,<br />

Rochet N, Scimeca JC. Osteoclastic differentiation of<br />

mouse and human monocytes in a plasma clot/biphasic<br />

calcium phosphate microparticles composite. Eur Cell Mater<br />

2010;20:379-92.<br />

17. Pioletti D, Gauthier O, Stadelmann VA, Bujoli B, Guicheux<br />

J, Zambelli PY, Bouler JM. Orthopedic implant used as drug<br />

delivery system: Clinical situation and state of the research.<br />

Current Drug Delivery 2008;5:59-63.<br />

18. Rabillard M, Grand JG, Dalibert E, Fellah B, Gauthier O,<br />

Niebauer GW. Effects of autologous platelet rich plasma gel<br />

and calcium phosphate biomaterials on bone healing in an<br />

ulnar ostectomy model in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol<br />

2009;22:460-466.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 125 small animal orthopaedic session


19. Russell TA, Leighton RK; Alpha-BSM Tibial Plateau Fracture<br />

Study Group. Comparison of autogenous bone graft<br />

and endothermic calcium phosphate cement for defect<br />

augmentation in tibial plateau fractures. A multicenter,<br />

prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am<br />

2008;90:2057-61.<br />

20. Spector DI, Keating JH, Boudrieau RJ. Immediate<br />

mandibular reconstruction of a 5 cm defect using<br />

rhBMP-2 after partial mandibulectomy in a dog. Vet Surg<br />

2007;36:752-9.<br />

21. Stadelmann VA, Gauthier O, Terrier A, Bouler JM and<br />

Pioletti DP. Implants delivery bisphosphonate locally<br />

increase periprosthetic bone density in an osteoporotic<br />

sheep model. A pilot study. Eur Cells Mater 2008;16:10-16.<br />

22. Tshamala M, van Bree H. Osteoinductive properties of the<br />

bone marrow-myth or reality. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol.<br />

2006;19:133-41.<br />

23. Viateau V, Guillemin G, Bousson V, Oudina K, Hannouche D,<br />

Sedel L, Logeart-Avramoglou D, Petite H. Long-bone criticalsize<br />

defects treated with tissue-engineered grafts: a study<br />

on sheep. J Orthop Res 2007;25:741-9<br />

24. Wong DA, Kumar A, Jatana S, Ghiselli G, Wong K.<br />

Neurologic impairment from ectopic bone in the lumbar<br />

canal: a potential complication of off-label PLIF/TLIF<br />

use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Spine J<br />

2008;8:1011-8.<br />

25. Yuan H, Fernandes H, Habibovic P, de Boer J, Barradas<br />

AM, de Ruiter A, Walsh WR, van Blitterswijk CA, de Bruijn<br />

JD. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative<br />

to autologous bone grafting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A<br />

2010;107:13614-9.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 126 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Delayed union and nonunion<br />

Dominique J Griffon*<br />

Western University of Health Sciences Michigan, USA<br />

Delayed union and nonunion of long bone fractures can<br />

lead to continued cycling of the implant, eventually leading<br />

to implant failure and inability for the bone to resume its<br />

normal roles.<br />

A delayed union is diagnosed when fracture healing<br />

is incomplete despite an adequate interval of time for<br />

complete healing of the fracture. In this situation, fracture<br />

healing is progressing, but at a much lower rate than<br />

expected for the given fracture configuration, type of<br />

fixation and age of the animal.<br />

A nonunion occurs when all healing repair processes<br />

have stopped, but osseous continuity has not been restored.<br />

This definition clinically implies a lack of progression<br />

of healing on serial radiographs. There is a fine line of<br />

distinction between delayed union and nonunion where<br />

an exact distinction cannot be made. Non-unions are<br />

sometimes defined as an absence of healing 6months after<br />

repair of the bone.<br />

Three main types of nonunion have been described based<br />

on the underlying cause:<br />

Vascular nonunions: These nonunions are capable of<br />

biologic repair and are classified according to the amount<br />

of callus present.<br />

• Hypertrophic (biologically active) usually have<br />

abundant hypervascular callus and are seen in an<br />

unstable fracture. They are often referred to as<br />

elephant foot and are often caused by implant<br />

failure, premature removal or excessive activity<br />

(Figure 1).<br />

• Mildly Hypertrophic (biologically active)<br />

usually have inadequate callus and mild sclerosis<br />

of the medullary cavity at the fracture site. They are<br />

often seen in association with rotational instability.<br />

• Oligotrophic (biologically active) have no<br />

visible callus, and the ends of the bone segments<br />

are sealed at the fracture site. Rounding of the<br />

ends of the long bone of the fracture is also seen.<br />

Unlike avascular nonunions, oligotrophic nonunions<br />

have fibrous tissue and blood vessels between the<br />

fragment edges and are still capable of a biologic<br />

response. Oligotrophic nonunions are usually<br />

seen when there is significant displacement of the<br />

fracture fragments.<br />

Avascular nonunions: These nonunions are less<br />

common and are associated with a disruption of the blood<br />

supply.<br />

Dystrophic: a secondary fragment has healed, but the<br />

main fragments are still unhealed and devoid of callous.<br />

It is usually characterized by poor vascularity to one or<br />

both sides of the fracture. A fracture gap is evident<br />

radiographically, and the fracture ends are rounded with<br />

sclerosis of the bone edges. This type of union is more<br />

common in geriatric patients.<br />

Necrotic: occurs in highly comminuted fractures in<br />

poorly vascularized areas (in horses, the cannon bone).<br />

In these cases, the major fragments eventually die or<br />

sequestra without becoming incorporated into the callus.<br />

These often occur with highly comminuted fractures,<br />

with disruption of the blood supply and severe soft tissue<br />

damage. Even though the fragments are anatomically<br />

reduced with no fracture gap after repair, the fragments<br />

are avascular and do not heal.<br />

Defect: result from loss of fragments at the time of injury<br />

or through resorption of a fragment. This causes a critical<br />

size defect that the callus cannot bridge.<br />

Atrophic nonunions: can be a result from the previous<br />

three types that progress through significant bone<br />

resorption and osteoporosis. These are characterized by<br />

loss of vascularity, resorption and rounding of fragment<br />

ends and osteoporosis (Figure 2).<br />

Etiology <strong>–</strong><br />

Understanding the underlying cause of delayed and non<br />

unions is a pre-requisite to establishing an appropriate<br />

treatment plan.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 127 small animal orthopaedic session


Local Factors<br />

1. Infection: This can occur from an open fracture or<br />

intraoperative contamination. Drainage, periosteal<br />

new bone formation and lucency around the<br />

implants are typical signs associated with infection.<br />

2. Inadequate immobilization. These are usually<br />

technical errors and involve the use of inappropriate<br />

implants for the fracture configuration (eg, pins<br />

in highly comminuted fractures, short plates or<br />

too short a glide hole in a lag screw placement).<br />

Insufficient immobilization exceeds the ability to<br />

form a bony bridge between fracture fragments in<br />

spite of excessive callus formation. Stress shielding<br />

leads to osteopenia and delayed formation of bone<br />

in the fracture gap.<br />

3. Lesions of adjacent soft-tissues: This issue<br />

has made minimally invasive fracture techniques<br />

popular. A large amount of soft tissue damage with<br />

an injury will delay fracture healing by disruption of<br />

peripheral blood supply.<br />

4. Osseous distraction: Experimental models of<br />

non-unions are based on the creation of a segmental<br />

bone defect 1.5 times the diaphyseal diameter<br />

(skeletally mature dog).<br />

5. Loss of bone stock: This factor was associated<br />

with the removal of avascular bone fragments<br />

during traditional open fracture management. The<br />

biological approach now recommended for the<br />

management of complex fractures decreases the<br />

likelihood of this complication.<br />

Host Factors<br />

These factors would include malnutrition, generalized<br />

metabolic or endocrine abnormalities, acute or chronic<br />

disease states, as well as concurrent treatments.<br />

The most common site for non-union in small<br />

animals is the distal radius in small breeds.<br />

Vascularity has been found decreased in this specific<br />

location and in these dogs, compared to larger breeds.<br />

These fractures are also frequently misconceived by<br />

veterinarians as simple fractures in light-weight animals,<br />

and treated with external coaptation. If both the radius and<br />

ulna are fractured, this management will inevitably lead to<br />

atrophic non-unions, with a high risk of cast sores and soft<br />

tissue injuries that may warrant amputation.<br />

Diagnosis<br />

<strong>Animals</strong> with delayed union or nonunion of fractures have<br />

persistent lameness with various degrees of instability. In<br />

cases of infected delayed union and nonunion, one or more<br />

draining fistulas can be seen. The true assessment of<br />

bone healing is obtained by serial radiographs (3 to<br />

6 weeks apart) using at least two views.<br />

The radiographic signs of delayed union include<br />

formation of periosteal and endosteal bridging callus with<br />

an open medullary cavity at the fracture site. Thus, changes<br />

indicative of bony union are present but are progressing at<br />

a slower pace than expected.<br />

The radiographic signs of nonunion include:<br />

• sclerosis of bone ends at the fracture site (evidence<br />

of sealing of the medullary cavity)<br />

• no bony progress or change over a 3-month period<br />

• progressive bowing at the fracture site<br />

• bone atrophy<br />

• excess callus around the fracture site with<br />

radiolucent lines in the callus itself<br />

Research focusing on new modalities for early diagnosis<br />

of delayed healing include focus on serum/urine markers<br />

of bone metabolism and nuclear scintigraphy.<br />

Management<br />

The management of delayed unions and nonunions is<br />

based on an understanding of the underlying cause:<br />

Noninfected delayed unions<br />

In the absence of infection, the decision making process<br />

is based on the assessment of implant stability and<br />

biological factors. Marked osteoporosis in the presence of a<br />

rigid implant may be a sign a stress shielding. Encouraging<br />

use of the limb may be enough to stimulate bone healing.<br />

Conversely, destabilization of the implant (for an external<br />

fixator for example) or replacement with an appropriately<br />

sized implant may be indicated. In other cases, additional<br />

external fixation or coaptation may be necessary. In these<br />

cases, increased callus typically suggests that fracture<br />

instability is present, justifying enforced rest. Adjunct<br />

fixation mau also be indicated.<br />

If a loose implant or malalignment is present, surgical<br />

revision is required. Loose implants can be removed,<br />

replaced or tightened, and cancellous bone graft can be<br />

placed around the fracture site.<br />

Noninfected Nonunions<br />

Viable nonunions are treated according to the type<br />

of nonunion; cases of hypertrophic nonunion should<br />

respond to rigid fixation. Usually, internal fixation is<br />

used, and just enough callus is removed to allow proper<br />

placement of the plate. In cases of mildly hypertrophic<br />

or oligotrophic nonunion, the ends of the fragment at the<br />

fracture can be sealed by endosteal callus. In these cases,<br />

opening of the medullary cavity followed by bone grafting<br />

and rigid fixation improve the chances of union.<br />

Nonviable nonunions are treated by removal of all<br />

necrotic and avascular bone, in conjunction with opening<br />

of the medullary cavity and bone grafting, followed by rigid<br />

fixation. A limited en bloc ostectomy and compression plate<br />

fixation is a viable option in cases of biologically inactive<br />

non-unions, as long as shortening of the limb does not<br />

exceed 20% of the original length of the bone.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 128 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Selected references<br />

• Blaeser LL, Gallagher JG, Boudrieau RJ: Treatment of<br />

biologically inactive nonunions by a limited en bloc<br />

ostectomy and compression plate fixation: A review of 17<br />

cases. Vet Surg 2003;32:91-100.<br />

• Cabenela ME: Open cancellous bone grafting of infected<br />

bone defect. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15:427-440.<br />

• Kesemenli CC, Subasi M. Arslan H, Necmioglu S.Kapukaya<br />

A: Treatment of humeral diaphyseal nonunions by<br />

interlocked nailing and autologous bone grafting. Acta<br />

Orthop Belg 2002;68(5):471-475.<br />

• Muir P: Distal antebrachial fractures in toy-breed dogs.<br />

Comp on Cont Ed for the Pract Vet 1997;19(2):137-145.<br />

• Robins GM, Eaton-Wells R, Johnson K: Customized<br />

hook plates for metaphyseal fractures, nonunions and<br />

osteotomies in the dog and cat. Vet Comp Ortho Traum<br />

19893;6(1):56-61.<br />

• Zhang B, Huang FG, Yang ZM: Application of autogenous<br />

bone grafting with vascular anastomosis in treatment of<br />

nonunion of fracture and bone defect. Zhongguo Xiu Fu<br />

Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2002;16(3):185-187.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 129 small animal orthopaedic session


Stimulation of bone healing. Commercially available<br />

products.<br />

O.Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />

<strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery Department, ONIRIS College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Sciences and Engineering,<br />

Nantes, France.<br />

Many bone grafts substitutes are currently available<br />

on both human and veterinary orthopaedics, and several<br />

aspects must be considered before choosing one of them for<br />

a specific clinical application. Many of them demonstrated<br />

interesting properties during their development process<br />

that can differ from their final clinical use. Most of them<br />

can be qualified as osteoinductive materials, but the clinical<br />

interest of osteoinductivity remains controversial (why<br />

and how osteoinductivity could be useful for a bone graft<br />

substitute? How to reproduce it? What kind of currently<br />

available biomaterials can be qualified as ‘osteoinductive’?<br />

Is it clinically relevant?).<br />

Biological performances of bone graft substitutes can<br />

be related to many different factors such as:<br />

• Biological origin versus synthetic origin<br />

• Chemical composition: mineralised (Ca phosphates,<br />

Ca sulfates, Ca silicates, …) versus demineralised<br />

ou non-mineralised matrix; resorbability and<br />

biodegradability profile<br />

• Available form: granular form (what is the size<br />

of the particles?), massive form (can the block fit<br />

to the surgical site?); injectable paste or cement<br />

(what are the setting or hardening properties?) Is<br />

it ready-to-use or not (if not that implies that it may<br />

be prepared in the operating room)?<br />

• The porous architecture: what kind of porosity<br />

(micro and or macroporosity, interconnected, open,<br />

induced porosity?), what is the mean size of the<br />

pores, what is the percentage of porosity?<br />

• The recommended indications<br />

• The expected in vivo efficacy: what kind of biological<br />

properties can be expected (osteoconductivity,<br />

bioactivity, osteogenicity (if osteoprogenitor cells<br />

are present), osteoinductivity (does the biomaterial<br />

contain and release any growth factor?).<br />

This presentation will review most of the bone graft<br />

substitutes that are available on both human and veterinary<br />

markets. It will present their respective characteristics and<br />

biological properties and try to define their potential benefit<br />

for the veterinary patient.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 130 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Enhancing bone healing in practice<br />

Dominique J Griffon*<br />

Western University of Health Sciences Michigan, USA<br />

The management of fractures and bone defects is aimed<br />

at restoring the ability of bone to support physiological<br />

biomechanical loads prior to fatigue failure of surgical<br />

implants. Stimulating bone production may be applied to<br />

the management of fractures, nonunions, and osteomyelitis.<br />

Other orthopedic indications include limb lengthening,<br />

reconstructive procedures following tumor resection,<br />

arthrodeses, and osteointegration of joint replacement<br />

prostheses. The clinical use of these techniques actually<br />

extends beyond the field of orthopaedics to include<br />

periodontal, maxillofacial and neurosurgery. Much<br />

progress has been made simultaneously with our improved<br />

understanding of bone healing, leading to the elaboration<br />

of techniques targeting various factors involved in bone<br />

regeneration (Figure 1). In that context, clinicians dispose<br />

of a wide array of strategies to create a biomechanical and<br />

biological environment favourable to bone formation. The<br />

purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of<br />

the current trends in small animal orthopaedics, and their<br />

practical application in clinical cases.<br />

BONE REGENERATION<br />

Grafting techniques:<br />

Cells, Growth factors,<br />

Support<br />

Dynamisation, D.O.<br />

Surgical Stabilisation<br />

FRACTURE MOVEMENT<br />

FRACTURE MOVEMENT<br />

ANGIOGENESIS<br />

Healthy soft tissue bed<br />

Biological fixation<br />

Grafting techniques<br />

Figure 1: Diagram derived from Marsh and Li’s triad of<br />

interrelationships in the regenerative repair of fractures (Marsh<br />

& Li 1999). D.O.: Distraction osteogenesis. Support: gap filler<br />

and network for osteoprogenitor cells.<br />

The biomechanical environment was one of the first<br />

factors to be identified for its influence on bone healing,<br />

promoting the development of fracture fixation techniques.<br />

The concept of rigid internal fixation was first developed by<br />

AO to improve early return to function. Early weight bearing<br />

promotes biomechanical stimulation of bone healing and<br />

prevents disuse osteoporosis. Fracture fixation progressed<br />

toward semi-rigid fixation, encouraging callus formation<br />

and rapid gain of biomechanical strength within the fracture<br />

site. Semi rigid fixation is one of the most commonly applied<br />

strategies to accelerate normal bone healing in clinical<br />

cases. For example, this approach served as a rationale<br />

behind “elastic plating” of long bone fractures in immature<br />

patients. Other examples of biomechanical modifications to<br />

encourage bone formation include distraction osteogenesis<br />

and axial dynamization of long bone fractures.<br />

If the biomechanical environment dictates the type of<br />

bone repair, adequate blood supply is a prerequisite to<br />

bone healing. Promoting angiogenesis and preserving the<br />

vasculature surrounding the fracture site have become<br />

the center fold for encouraging bone healing in private<br />

practice. The concept of “biological fracture fixation”<br />

emphasizes the role of soft tissue integrity in fracture<br />

healing. In this context, surgical approach is minimized or<br />

eliminated, manipulation of fragments is avoided and the<br />

fracture hematoma is preserved. Consequently, implant<br />

designs have been modified to preserve extraosseous blood<br />

supply to the fractured bone. This approach is especially<br />

relevant to the management of comminuted fractures of<br />

the long bones, and is often combined with semi-rigid<br />

fixation. Plates have evolved toward a locking mechanism,<br />

eliminating the need for frictional contact between the<br />

plate and underlying cortex. The number of screws per bone<br />

segment is limited and the profile of these implants allow<br />

percutaneous placement. External fixators are designed<br />

to simplify frames and limit the number of pins required<br />

to achieve immobilization. Ring fixators limit soft tissue<br />

trauma through the use of tensioned wires. Closed external<br />

fixation is most relevant to the management of long bone<br />

fractures of the distal limbs. New instrumentation has been<br />

designed to improve interlocking nail fixation of the tibia,<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 131 small animal orthopaedic session


femur or humerus through percutaneous placement. Closed<br />

reduction and percutaneous fracture fixation techniques<br />

are therefore expanding in human as well as veterinary<br />

orthopaedics. Biophysical alternatives to enhance<br />

fracture repair involve the use of low-intensity pulsed<br />

ultrasonography, electrical stimulation and extracorporeal<br />

shock-waves (orthotripsy). Although their mechanisms<br />

of action remain somewhat unclear, these techniques<br />

have been used in man to obtain healing of non-unions,<br />

accelerate normal fracture healing and increase healing<br />

rates in patients considered at risk for non-union, such as<br />

diabetics. Some experimental data is available concerning<br />

the effects of these techniques in dogs and their clinical<br />

use is emerging in veterinary orthopedics.<br />

Bone grafting remains one of the most traditional<br />

methods to stimulate bone formation. Fresh autogenous<br />

grafts are still considered a “golden standard” to which<br />

other osteoproductive agents are compared, and remain<br />

the most common type of grafts in private practices<br />

worldwide. Indeed, autogenous bone is the most effective<br />

material in promoting rapid healing; compared with<br />

other materials, it provides viable cells while avoiding<br />

immune reactions and disease transmission. One of the<br />

shortcomings of autogenous cancellous graft consists of its<br />

lack of biomechanical strength, which precludes its use as a<br />

structural graft. Although complications have been reported<br />

after harvesting of autograft in dogs, their incidence has not<br />

been determined. In humans, the morbidity rate associated<br />

with the collection of augenous bone approaches 25%,<br />

with major complications occuring in 3 to 4 % of patients.<br />

Complications include pain, sepsis, stress fractures, intraoperative<br />

blood loss, increased surgical time and limited<br />

supply. Concerns with limited availability and associated<br />

complications have prompted the search for bone graft<br />

substitutes. One strategy is to identify a single purified<br />

molecule, which could ultimately be confirmed as the<br />

agent of choice for clinical promotion of bone healing<br />

and regeneration, for example, bone morphogenic protein<br />

(BMP). More than 13 BMPs have been identified. Synthetic<br />

agents do not carry any risk of disease but do not contain the<br />

optimal mixture of growth factors naturally present in bonederived<br />

products. Although rh-BMP2 has recently been<br />

clinically applied in dogs, the cost of these preparations<br />

remains prohibitive for the veterinary market.Another<br />

strategy is to identify an optimal mixture of bone growth<br />

agents, either concocted from purified agents, or generated<br />

biologically as the product of a tissue or a cultured cell, such<br />

as demineralized bone matrix. Demineralized bone matrix<br />

(DBM) is the most common source of partially purified boneinducing<br />

factors used in human patients. Demineralized<br />

bone matrix provides osteoconduction with the collagen<br />

network naturally present in bone, and osteoinduction by<br />

the inherent BMPs liberated during demineralization. The<br />

processing of commercial canine DBM allograft including<br />

removal of the periosteum, cartilage, and bone marrow,<br />

and freezing have been shown to reduce immune reactions.<br />

Frozen canine DBM has been commercialized in the United<br />

States in 1 and 3cc units since 1996 and is now available<br />

as a freeze dried product. We have previously published a<br />

retrospective and case-match study in which healing rate<br />

and complications were similar in dogs with fractures,<br />

arthrodesis and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy grafted<br />

with DBM (and cancellous allograft chips) compared<br />

to autogenous cancellous graft. We have since used<br />

demineralized bone matrix instead of autogenous grafts in<br />

any procedure with normal bone regenerative properties.<br />

The main limitations of DBM consist in its origin (risk of<br />

disease transmission) and lack of injectability. Numerous<br />

synthetic agents have become commercially available for<br />

clinical application in small animals. The majority consist of<br />

osteoconductive materials. The majority of these products<br />

cost a price similar to that of DBM but does not provide<br />

osteoinductivity. Other limitations vary with products, but<br />

include brittleness, slow resorption of a radio-opaque<br />

material (affecting the assessment of bone healing) or<br />

excessive degradation rate. Calcium sulfate agents can<br />

however be impregnated with antibiotics, acting as<br />

adjuncts for local therapy of infected bone defects.<br />

The wide therapeutic range now offered may pose a<br />

dilemma for clinicians: while it provides more freedom to<br />

optimize treatment modality for individual cases, it also<br />

complicates the decision-making process for orthopedic<br />

surgeons. A rational attitude towards solving this issue<br />

should be based on an assessment of the factors affecting<br />

bone healing (Figure 1). Understanding which factor(s)<br />

are deficient in a given patient determines the criteria for<br />

selecting a therapeutic strategy. The most popular strategy<br />

to stimulate healing of complex fractures in practice<br />

focuses on preserving surrounding soft tissues, while<br />

providing a biomechanical environment enhancing indirect<br />

bone healing. Bone grafting has become more relevant<br />

to the management of arthrodeses or complications of<br />

bone healing (large bone defects, non-unions, malunions,<br />

delayed unions), especially when the treatment requires<br />

surgical exposure of the lesion. Future research efforts<br />

may lead to the development of injectable agents that<br />

may further accelerate the healing of fractures treated<br />

percutaneously or allow minimally invasive treatment of<br />

delayed healing.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 132 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Selected references:<br />

• De Long WG Jr, Einhorn TA, Koval K, et al. Bone grafts and<br />

bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A<br />

critical analysis. J.Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 649<strong>–</strong>658.<br />

• Drosos GI, Kazakos KI, Kouzoumpasis P, et al.Safety and<br />

efficacy of commercially available demineralised bone<br />

matrix preparations: a critical reviewof clinical studies.<br />

Injury 2007; 38 Suppl 4:S13<strong>–</strong>21.<br />

• Ferguson JF: Fracture of the humerus after cancellous bone<br />

graft harvesting in a dog. J <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract 37:232-234,<br />

1996.<br />

• Griffon DJ: Fracture healing, in Johnson AJ, Houlton JE,<br />

Vannini R (eds): AO principles of fracture management<br />

in the dog and cat. Clavadelerstrasse, Switzerland, AO<br />

Publishing, 2005, pp73-97.<br />

• Ham K, Griffon DJ, Seddighi M, Johnson AL. Clinical<br />

application of tobramycin impregnated calcium sulfate<br />

beads in six dogs (2002-2004). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc<br />

2008, 44(6):320-326.<br />

• Hoffer M, Griffon D, Schaeffer D, Johnson AL, Thomas<br />

M. Clinical Applications of Demineralized Bone Matrix:A<br />

Retrospective and Case-Matched Study of 75 Dogs.<br />

Veterinary Surgery 2008;37(7):639-647<br />

• Hudson CC, Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Minimally invasive plate<br />

osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and<br />

cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009;22: 175<strong>–</strong>182.<br />

• Kraus KH, Kirker-Head C. Mesenchymal stem cells and bone<br />

regeneration. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 232<strong>–</strong>242.<br />

• Patterson TE, Kumagai K, Griffith L, et al. Cellular strategies<br />

for enhancement of fracture repair. JBone Joint Surg Am<br />

2008; 90: 111<strong>–</strong>119.<br />

• Pozzi A, Lewis D. Surgical approaches for minimally<br />

invasive plate osteosynthesis in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop<br />

Traumatol 2009; 22: 316<strong>–</strong>320.<br />

• Ragetly GR, Griffon DJ: The rationale behind novel bone<br />

grafting techniques in small animals. Vet Comp Orthop<br />

Traumatol 2011;24(1):1-8.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 133 small animal orthopaedic session


<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Neurosurgery: lumbosacral<br />

disease<br />

Saturday July 9<br />

16.30 <strong>–</strong> 17.45


small animal orthopaedic session 136 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Lumbosacral disease (LS): an update on diagnostic<br />

imaging techniques<br />

I. Gielen, K. Kromhout, H. van Bree*<br />

Department of Medical Imaging & <strong>Small</strong> Animal Orthopaedics, Veterinary Faculty, Ghent University<br />

What is lumbosacral (LS) disease?<br />

Pathological conditions of the ligaments, bony structures<br />

and the intervertebral disc may narrow the diameter of the<br />

spinal canal and the intervertebral foramina, which affect<br />

the spinal roots enclosed with the remnant epidural space.<br />

This may lead to a clinical neurological dysfunction known<br />

as the cauda equina syndrome. The L7-S1 disc is the largest<br />

disc and may undergo a fibrinoid degeneration (Hansen<br />

type II disc degeneration) which usually occurs in large<br />

breeds. Lumbosacral disease (cauda equina syndrome or<br />

LS syndrome) is characterised by narrowing of the vertebral<br />

canal and/or the intervertebral foramina in the lumbosacral<br />

area, with compression of the nerve roots that form the<br />

cauda equina and includes affections of any component<br />

of the LS joint (cauda equina compression):<br />

• Degeneration of the intervertebral disc between<br />

the last lumbar vertebra and the sacrum (LS disc):<br />

• bulging (protrusion).<br />

• rupture (extrusion).<br />

• Instability and misalignment between the last<br />

lumbar vertebra and the sacrum.<br />

• Proliferations of bony or soft tissues around the<br />

LS-joint.<br />

• Lumbosacral osteochondrosis (OCD) of the end plate<br />

of either the sacrum or L7 vertebra.<br />

• Abnormalities in the shape of the vertebrae as a<br />

congenital problem.<br />

While some dogs might have only one type of these<br />

diseases, many dogs will have a combination of several<br />

of these problems. Lumbosacral disease commonly affects<br />

middle aged or older large breed dogs. The precise nature of<br />

these problems depends on which nerves are compressed,<br />

and the severity and duration of compression. Working and<br />

sporting breeds of dogs, particularly German Shepherd<br />

Dogs, are predisposed. Instability is believed to play a<br />

major role in LS disease in dogs and humans.<br />

How is LS disease diagnosed?<br />

A detailed and thorough clinical examination is essential,<br />

as the symptoms can be very similar to those seen with<br />

other diseases, including hip dysplasia and other lower back<br />

problems. Clinical suspicion of lumbosacral disease can<br />

be confirmed with diagnostic imaging, but even the most<br />

advanced diagnostic imaging techniques may not always<br />

provide a definitive answer.<br />

Possible imaging techniques?<br />

Plain radiography:<br />

Lateral and ventrodorsal radiographs are the initial steps<br />

in evaluating lumbosacral disease. Survey radiography is<br />

only diagnostic in conditions that involve bony destruction<br />

or displacement (including discospondylitis, osseous<br />

neoplasia, traumatic fracture and subluxation, sacral<br />

endplate osteochondrosis and idiopathic lumbosacral<br />

stenosis), or it can identify predisposing factors to<br />

degenerative LS stenosis such as OCD and transitional<br />

vertebrae. Indirect evidence of degenerative lumbosacral<br />

stenosis (e.g. spondylosis deformans, disc space narrowing,<br />

vacuum phenomenon indicating disc rupture, end plate<br />

sclerosis and transitional vertebrae) is frequently present<br />

on survey radiographs. These findings suggest, but do not<br />

confirm, the diagnosis and they may occur in clinically<br />

normal dogs. Spondylosis may be a benign radiographic<br />

change and is often present in asymptomatic dogs. However,<br />

(non-bridging) lumbosacral spondylosis in the presence of<br />

the cauda equina syndrome is considered to be highly<br />

suggestive of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. Dogs<br />

with type II disk disease may have radiographic changes<br />

associated with spondylosis that are more apparent<br />

than those in other dogs. When survey radiographs are<br />

suggestive for lumbosacral instability, this can be confirmed<br />

by stressed views including flexion and extension views.<br />

The greatest limitation of survey radiography is that,<br />

although degenerative changes involving adjacent bony<br />

structures are visible on radiographs, the cauda equina<br />

itself cannot be visualized and evaluation of the exact<br />

neural compression is impossible.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 137 small animal orthopaedic session


Contrast radiography:<br />

Because clinical signs of lumbosacral disease are usually<br />

the result of soft tissue compression of the cauda equina,<br />

contrast radiography may help to give a definitive diagnosis.<br />

Myelography involves the injection of contrast medium<br />

into the subarachnoid space and allows evaluation of the<br />

spinal cord cranial to the LS region and thus may help rule<br />

out other diseases. However, it may be of limited value in<br />

the evaluation of the cauda equina in large dogs, whose<br />

dural sac usually ends before the LS junction. Stressed<br />

views (flexion and extension) improve the diagnostic<br />

sensitivity of myelography. A normal myelographic study<br />

does not rule out LS disease.<br />

Epidurography, discography and also intraosseous<br />

venography are probably unreliable techniques. Results<br />

are therefore confusing and both false positive and false<br />

negative conclusions can be reached.<br />

Epidurography involves the injection of contrast medium<br />

into the epidural space and is performed in patients<br />

under general anaesthesia and usually does not require<br />

fluoroscopy. Epidurography is easier to perform than<br />

myelography and has less morbidity but is not very reliable.<br />

Epidurographic findings include elevation of the epidural<br />

space, total obstruction to cranial flow of contrast medium,<br />

concomitant filling of the epidural space and vertebral<br />

venous sinuses as well as extravasation of contrast<br />

material into adjacent soft tissue adjacent to the injection<br />

site. The disadvantage is that filling of the epidural space<br />

may be incomplete, because this space is poorly defined<br />

and irregular. Flexed and extended views of the LS joint<br />

during epidurography may accentuate a compressive lesion.<br />

Discography involves the injection of contrast medium<br />

into the intervertebral disc. Normally, it is difficult or<br />

impossible to inject a small amount of contrast medium into<br />

the nucleus pulposis. When contrast medium can easily be<br />

injected into the disc, and lateral and ventrodorsal views<br />

show extensive spreading of contrast medium within the<br />

disc, this is indirect evidence for a Hansen type II disc<br />

degeneration. Discography is not often performed, as it<br />

can damage a normal intervertebral disc.<br />

Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance<br />

Imaging (MRI):<br />

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance<br />

imaging (MRI) are probably the diagnostic procedures of<br />

choice. Their main advantage is that they make it possible<br />

to evaluate structures that cannot be visualised completely<br />

with conventional radiography, such as the lateral recesses,<br />

intervertebral foramen and articular processes. These two<br />

imaging techniques avoid superposition of the surrounding<br />

bony structures, which is a major disadvantage of<br />

radiography. Both techniques require general anaesthesia,<br />

although the examination time during MRI is much longer<br />

than that during CT.<br />

CT is especially useful in patients with cauda equina<br />

syndrome in which radiographic findings are negative<br />

and in patients that demonstrate a profound unilateral<br />

lameness due to spinal nerve root compression. CT provides<br />

bone detail superior to that seen with MRI, and soft tissue<br />

contrast superior to that of conventional radiography.<br />

Specific CT findings suggestive of degenerative lumbosacral<br />

stenosis are obliteration of the spinal canal by disc<br />

protrusion (central or unilaterally left or right), dorsal<br />

displacement of the dorsal sac and spinal nerve roots,<br />

swelling of the spinal nerve roots and hypodense spots<br />

(vacuum phenomenon) in the intervertebral disc indicating<br />

disc rupture. In addition, CT allows assessment of the<br />

articular facets, pedicles and the intervertebral foramina<br />

(Figure 1). It allows visualisation of individual nerve roots<br />

because of the contrast provided by the epidural fat. It may<br />

rule out diseases producing similar symptoms, like nerve<br />

root tumours or discospondylitis. The use of intravenous<br />

contrast is always indicated. The images should be read in<br />

both a bone and a soft tissue window. Another advantage<br />

of CT versus MRI is a greater ability to discriminate<br />

between bone and calcified soft tissue structures versus<br />

gas opacities. Reconstructions in the dorsal and sagittal<br />

plane can be very useful, and a positional CT protocol that<br />

includes flexion and extension scans of L7-S1 can be used<br />

for quantifying dynamic changes in dogs with LS disease.<br />

Facet subluxation may be visible using a bone window or<br />

3D reconstructions. In a study evaluating canine LS stenosis<br />

using intravenous contrast-enhanced CT, the positive<br />

predictive values for compressive soft tissues involving<br />

the dorsal canal, ventral canal and lateral recesses were<br />

83%, 100%, and 81%, respectively.<br />

Figure 1: Transverse CT image of the lumbosacral intervertebral<br />

disk space in a dog with spondylosis deformans. The<br />

degenerative changes and spurs at the level of the left and<br />

right intervertebral foramina, causing compression on the<br />

nerve roots, can be appreciated.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 138 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Advantages of MRI versus CT and radiography include:<br />

greater soft tissue contrast; excellent visualization of nerve<br />

roots, intervertebral discs, and ligaments; detection of disc<br />

degeneration (Figure 2); lack of ionizing radiation; and ability<br />

to acquire images in multiple planes. A disadvantage is the<br />

prolonged examination time requiring long anaesthesia.<br />

Here as well, the use of contrast medium (paramagnetic)<br />

may be indicated to better delineate the process.<br />

Figure 2: Sagittal T2-weighted, MR image, showing<br />

lumbosacral compression. The intervertebral disc between L7<br />

and is protruding into the vertebral canal, compressing the<br />

nerves, as they pass through. Loss of signal intensity in the<br />

L7-sacral disc indicates disc degeneration.<br />

MRI studies concluded that the predominant feature of<br />

the degenerative cases was disc-associated disease. The<br />

technique demonstrates this fact clearly, suggesting a<br />

sequence of disc degeneration and dehydration followed<br />

by nuclear fragmentation and then disc protrusion (Hansen<br />

type II). MRI is also sensitive for defining other disease<br />

processes, such as neoplastic disease, that might confound<br />

the diagnosis.<br />

However, in one study, no correlation was found between<br />

severity of the clinical signs and the severity of cauda<br />

equine compression as assessed by MRI. In humans, it<br />

has been proposed that MRI may lead to over-diagnosis<br />

of disc disease, because many people without back pain<br />

have disc bulges or protrusions on MR imaging. The<br />

results of one comparative study to assess the extent of<br />

agreement among CT, MRI, and surgical findings in dogs<br />

with degenerative LS stenosis indicate that there is a high<br />

degree of agreement between CT and MRI findings but<br />

that the degree of agreement between diagnostic imaging<br />

findings and surgical findings is lower.<br />

Inconsistency between disc abnormalities and clinical<br />

signs must be considered, and the diagnosis should always<br />

be based on clinical examination in addition to diagnostic<br />

imaging.<br />

The relevance of measuring the lumbosacral step and the<br />

lumbosacral canal ratio is still controversial and should be<br />

investigated further.<br />

Additional reading<br />

• Barthez PY, Morgan JP, Lipsitz D (1994) Discography and<br />

epidurography for evaluation of the lumbosacral junction<br />

in dogs with cauda equina syndrome. Veterinary Radiology<br />

and Ultrasound 35, 152-157.<br />

• De Risio L, Thomas WB, Sharp NJ (2000) Degenerative<br />

lumbosacral stenosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America<br />

<strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 30, 111-132.<br />

• Jones JC, Cartee RE, Bartels JE. (1995) Computed<br />

tomographic anatomy of the canine lumbosacral spine. Vet<br />

Radiol Ultrasound 36, 91-99.<br />

• Jones JC, Shires PK, Inzana KD, et al. (1999). Evaluation of<br />

canine lumbosacral stenosis using intravenous contrast-<br />

enhanced computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 40,<br />

108-114.<br />

• Jones JC, Davies SE, Werre SR, et al. (2008) Effects of body<br />

position and clinical signs on L7-S1 intervertebral foraminal<br />

area and lumbosacral angle in dogs with lumbosacral<br />

disease as measured via computed tomography. Am J Vet<br />

Res 69, 1446<strong>–</strong>1454.<br />

• Lang J, Häni H, Schawalder P (1992) A sacral lesion<br />

resembling osteochondrosis in the German Shepherd Dog.<br />

Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 33, 69-76.<br />

• Levine GJ, Levine JM, Walker MA, et al. (2006) Evaluation<br />

of the association between spondylosis deformans and<br />

clinical signs of intervertebral disk disease in dogs: 172<br />

cases (1999<strong>–</strong>2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 228, 96<strong>–</strong>100.<br />

• Morgan JP, Bahr A, Franti CE, Bailey CS (1993) Lumbosacral<br />

transitional vertebrae as a predisposing cause of cauda<br />

equina syndrome in German shepherd dogs: 161 cases<br />

(1987-1990). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical<br />

Association 202, 1877-1882.<br />

• Morgan JP, Bailey CS (1990) Cauda equina syndrome in<br />

the dog: Radiographic evaluation. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal<br />

Practice 31, 69-77.<br />

• Ramirez O, 3rd, Thrall DE. (1998) A review of imaging<br />

techniques for canine cauda equina syndrome. Vet Radiol<br />

Ultrasound 39, 283-296.<br />

• Schmid V, Lang J (1993) Measurements on the lumbosacral<br />

junction in normal dogs and those with cauda equina<br />

compression. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 34, 437-442.<br />

• Selcer BA, Chambers JN, Schwensen K, Mahaffey MB<br />

(1988) Epidurography as a Diagnostic Aid in canine<br />

Lumbosacral Compressive Disease. Veterinary and<br />

Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 97-103.<br />

• Suwankong N, Voorhout G, Hazewinkel H, Meij B (2006)<br />

Agreement between computed tomography, magnetic<br />

resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with<br />

degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc<br />

229, 1924<strong>–</strong>1929.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 139 small animal orthopaedic session


Lumbosacral spine: surgical decision making<br />

Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />

Higham Gobion, Herts, United Kingdom<br />

Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) is a<br />

relatively common disorder affecting the L7-S1 joint,<br />

mainly in large breed and middle-aged to older dogs.<br />

Labrador retrievers, Border Collies and German Shepherd<br />

Dogs seem overrepresented, with a male to female<br />

ratio of approximately 2:1. DLSS is characterized by<br />

different degenerative changes that can occur alone or in<br />

combination, such as spondylosis, disc protrusion, vertebral<br />

instability, ligament hypertrophy etc.; those changes<br />

contribute in differing degrees to determine vertebral canal<br />

and/or foraminal stenosis and subsequent compression/<br />

damage/ impingement of the conus medullaris and/or the<br />

cauda equina nerve roots. DLSS is sometimes wrongly<br />

used interchangebly with the term “cauda equina syndrome<br />

(CES)”: the latter describes sensory and/or motor neural<br />

dysfunction that results from compression, inflammation<br />

or destruction of the cauda equina nerve roots; therefore,<br />

any disease affecting the caudal lumbar and sacral<br />

vertebrae (less commonly the coccygeal vertebrae) can<br />

potentially lead to CES. On the basis of this statement,<br />

DLSS represents only one of the causes of CES.<br />

Diagnosis and treatment options are still a matter of<br />

debate and therefore controversy exists in the veterinary<br />

world. Correct clinical understanding and localization of the<br />

neurological problem is a critical first step in establishing<br />

a diagnostic protocol; moreover, most of the diseases that<br />

may mimic a lumbosacral (L-S) disorder such as orthopedic<br />

diseases (e.g., arthritis, hip dysplasia, and cranial cruciate<br />

ligament disease) need to be ruled out.<br />

Several diagnostic tools have been described in the<br />

past to diagnose DLSS, such as electromyography (EMG),<br />

x-ray, myelography, epidurography and discography;<br />

however, nowadays computed tomography (CT) and<br />

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seem to represent the<br />

best imaging modality to investigate the L-S area. The<br />

main goals of CT and MRI should be firstly to show the<br />

degenerative changes and neural structure compression/<br />

damage in order to reach the correct diagnosis and<br />

secondly, though just as importantly, to guide the clinician<br />

towards the correct therapeutic decision. Finally, it is<br />

important to emphasise that CT and MRI should always<br />

be interpreted in light of the clinical findings, as clinically<br />

normal patients may show abnormal CT or MRI findings.<br />

Conservative treatment (i.e., restricted exercise and<br />

pain management) has been reported as an alternative to<br />

surgery, even though little data are available to definitively<br />

establish this modality and its effectiveness. In one study,<br />

injection of methylprednisolone sodium acetate into the<br />

lumbosacral epidural space resulted in clinical improvement<br />

in about 80% and complete resolution of signs in more<br />

than half of the affected dogs; nevertheless, further<br />

investigations are necessary to definitely establish the real<br />

efficacy of this therapeutic method.<br />

Surgical therapy represents so far the treatment of choice<br />

in the vast majority of patients affected by DLSS, especially<br />

in case of failure of conservative management, severe pain,<br />

and moderate to severe neurologic deficits. Quite a wide<br />

variety of surgical procedures have been reported to treat<br />

DLSS: dorsal decompression, discectomy, facetectomy,<br />

foraminotomy, and fixation-fusion. As previously stated, the<br />

choice should be based on the clinical and imaging findings.<br />

Survey radiography is useful to rule out other causes of<br />

CES (e.g., vertebral neoplasms and discospondylitis, Fig.<br />

1), concurrent abnormalities which include osteochondrosis<br />

(OCD) of the sacral end plate and transitional vertebrae<br />

(LSTV), but it is particularly essential (though controversy<br />

still exists) to assess for possible underlying instability<br />

of the LS junction, mainly by evaluating stress x-rays<br />

(extension and flexion). Instability/subluxation of the L-S<br />

articulation needs to be surgically addressed by dorsal<br />

stabilization techniques whenever it is clinically and/or<br />

radiographically suspected. Instability of L-S joint may<br />

occasionally be the only evident finding or it may represent<br />

a single part of a more complex DLSS, so further crosssectional<br />

imaging is necessary. CT, thanks to its bone<br />

resolution, may be complementary to radiography, to better<br />

define LSTV and OCD lesions for example; both these<br />

conditions predispose the L-S joint to degenerative changes<br />

and usually lead to DLSS earlier in a dog’s life. CT also<br />

shows spondylosis, narrowed vertebral canal, thickened<br />

articular processes, and osteophyte formation of articular<br />

processes and subsequent narrowing of the intervertebral<br />

foramina. Thorough evaluation of the foramina is mandatory<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 140 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


in CES patients, and it may require a MRI scan. The latter,<br />

thanks to its superiority in soft tissue resolution and due<br />

to the possibility of acquiring images on multiple spatial<br />

planes, is commonly very helpful for assessing the foramen<br />

and the nerve root through the foramen itself (Fig. 2). In<br />

the situation of a pure foraminal stenosis, for example<br />

resulting from a lateralized disc protrusion, fibrous tissue<br />

and/or osteophyte formation, facetectomy or foraminotomy<br />

are the treatment of choice. Facetectomy is rarely used as<br />

the only decompressive procedure and it is more commonly<br />

associated with dorsal laminectomy instead. However,<br />

this association is more likely to weaken/destabilize the<br />

L-S joint, so foraminotomy is preferred to facetectomy.<br />

Degeneration and protrusion of L7-S1 intervertebral disc is<br />

definitely the most common finding in DLSS: when present<br />

it usually causes compression and dorsal displacement of<br />

the cauda equina nerve roots and/or the conus medullaris.<br />

Decompression via a dorsal laminectomy and partial<br />

discectomy, is the first recommended treatment to relieve<br />

the compression, especially when it is along the midline.<br />

In case of lumbosacral OCD, it is also possible to remove<br />

the bone fragment and to debride the nerve roots from the<br />

newly-formed fibrous tissue, via the same dorsal approach.<br />

Hypertrophy of the interarcuate ligament not uncommonly<br />

contributes to determine lumbosacral stenosis and<br />

compression of the neural structures: removal of the<br />

interarcuate ligament is generally performed as part of<br />

the dorsal laminectomy.<br />

Note that all the decompressive procedures, especially<br />

when perfomed together (e.g., dorsal laminectomy and<br />

facetectomy) and/or in heavy and particularly active<br />

dogs, might enhance or predispose to L-S instability and<br />

subluxation; additional dorsal stabilization should then be<br />

considered to prevent dramatic consequences.<br />

Fig. 1: Radiographic appearance of severe L7-S1<br />

dyscospondylitis<br />

Fig. 2: Transvrese T2 WI: unilateral foraminal stenosis<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 141 small animal orthopaedic session


Lumbosacral spine: decompression and stabilisation<br />

Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />

Higham Gobion, Herts, United Kingdom<br />

Once the correct diagnosis has been made, compression<br />

of the neural structures and/or instability of the L-S region<br />

should be surgically addressed using the most appropriate<br />

techniques.<br />

Dorsal laminectomy and discectomy<br />

Laminectomy at the lumbosacral junction classically<br />

consists of removal of the spinous processes and then<br />

dorsal lamina of L7 and S1: more recently a technique<br />

(possibly less destabilizing) consisting of removal of<br />

just the S1 lamina has been reported, with encouraging<br />

preliminary results. The articular facet joints should<br />

be preserved in order to prevent post-operative spinal<br />

instability. Dorsal laminectomy allows good visualisation<br />

of the cauda equina, L7-S1 dorsal annulus, articular<br />

processes and surrounding tissues (Fig. 3). Meticulous<br />

positioning of the patient is quite important, as different<br />

positions can modify the L-S anatomy: for example, pulling<br />

the back legs forward may widen the interarcuate space<br />

and the dorsal annulus, facilitating the visualization of the<br />

neural structures and relieving the compression in this<br />

region; however, subsequent flexion of the L-S joint might<br />

predispose to subluxation and should therefore be avoided<br />

if L-S instability is radiographically suspected or should<br />

otherwise be kept in mind when stabilization is perfomed.<br />

Discectomy (also referred to partial discectomy or dorsal<br />

fenestration) is usually performed in association with<br />

dorsal laminectomy, as it may provide additional benefit<br />

in all those patients in which the protruded intervertebral<br />

disc causes significant cauda equina compression. The<br />

nerve roots are gently retracted to each side in turn, to<br />

allow for adequate discectomy but also to visualise/asses<br />

the underlying structures, such as the L7 nerve root in its<br />

lateral recess and as it enters the intervertebral foramen.<br />

Finally, when other degenerative changes are present in<br />

association with a bulging disc (e.g. juxtafacet cysts, OCD,<br />

etc.), they may be properly visualized and then removed via<br />

a dorsal laminectomy.<br />

Prognosis is generally good following dorsal laminectomy,<br />

with a long term improvement being approximately 80%;<br />

the severity and duration of the clinical signs (e.g. urinary<br />

and/or faecal incontinence > 8 weeks) have a negative<br />

prognostic value, therefore surgery should be encouraged<br />

at an earlier stage.<br />

Foraminotomy and Facetectomy<br />

Compression/entrapment of the nerve root either due<br />

to soft tissue or bony enlargement at the level of the<br />

intervertebral foramina may occur and decompression can<br />

be achieved by partial removal of the pedicle cranial to the<br />

neuroforamen or via facetectomy. The latter is generally<br />

no longer recommended if bilateral decompression is<br />

necessary or if it is combined with other decompressive<br />

surgery such as a dorsal laminectomy, as spinal instability<br />

may be a serious post operative complication. Alternatively,<br />

stabilisation should be considered.<br />

Three different surgical techniques have been described<br />

to performing a foraminotomy. These include an endoscopicassisted,<br />

a lateral and a transiliac approach.<br />

1) An arthroscope placed in a caudal L7 dorsal<br />

laminectomy defect has been experimentally used in<br />

normal dogs to achieve widening of the neuroforamen:<br />

the technique allowed a reasonably good enlargement of<br />

the L-S foramina and no major/long-term complications<br />

have been observed; however, a 12 week post-op CT exam,<br />

showed that some reduction of the foraminal enlargement<br />

occurs due to soft tissue and/or new enchondral bone<br />

formation, though there was no association between<br />

foraminal area and clinical signs.<br />

2) A lateral approach was reported unilaterally or<br />

bilaterally, alone or in combination with dorsal laminectomy,<br />

with good surgical exposure/ decompression of the nerve<br />

root and a very good outcome.<br />

3) A cadaveric study has demonstrated the accessibility<br />

to the lumbosacral area via a transiliac approach: this<br />

approach allows a lateral exposure of the L7<strong>–</strong>S1 disk and<br />

foramen and could be used to perform a lateral corpectomy<br />

and foraminotomy, though further studies are necessary<br />

to evaluate the clinical efficacy and consequences of a<br />

transiliac approach in dogs with signs of lumbosacral<br />

disease.<br />

small animal orthopaedic session 142 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Dorsal Fusion-Fixation<br />

Theoretically, everytime a spinal instability is suspected,<br />

whether as a primary component of the CES or as a<br />

secondary post-operative complication, stabilization<br />

of the L-S joint should be performed. Considering the<br />

possible ventral displacement or telescoping of the<br />

sacrum relative to L7, a distraction-fusion technique has<br />

also been advocated as the sole technique for treatment<br />

of some cases of lumbosacral disc disease. However,<br />

clear indications for stabilisation are lacking. Generally<br />

speaking, distraction should widen both the collapsed<br />

intervertebral space and the neural foramina: in the case<br />

of facet subluxation, this must be reduced prior to fixation<br />

by either a meticulous positioning, by using a laminectomy<br />

spreader or by using towel clamps.<br />

Several techniques have been reported including cross<br />

pin fixation, transarticular screw fixation, pedicle screws<br />

with a bone cement bridge and pedicle screw-rod fixation;<br />

an external fixator might also represent an alternative<br />

choice.<br />

The transarticular screws technique is a good<br />

consideration in relatively heavy dogs (preferably < 25<br />

kg), showing only mild clinical and imaging findings<br />

suggestive of instability. The screws are ideally inserted<br />

at an angle between 30° and 45° from the sagittal plane,<br />

in a cranio-caudal and medio-lateral direction. Fusion is<br />

promoted by removing the articular cartilage from the<br />

facet joints and by packing them with cancellous bone,<br />

collected from the wing of the ilium or from the previously<br />

removed spinous process. Pedicle screws (usually cortical<br />

3.5 - depending on the dog’s size) can be inserted on L7<br />

and S1 and can be joined by using either bone cement<br />

(Polymethylmethacrylate-PMMA) or rods. Cement is usually<br />

malleable and suits different anatomical variations and/<br />

or different pathological situations, in large breed dogs<br />

also (Fig. 4). Rods seem a valid alternative and also seem<br />

to effectively stabilize the lumbosacral spine, but further<br />

studies are necessary in vivo.<br />

The main complication is implant failure, regardless of<br />

the surgical technique performed. The choice among the<br />

different techniques varies according to many factors (e.g.,<br />

clinical signs, underlying radiographic-CT-MRI findings,<br />

breed, weight, etc.) however, the surgeon’s preference<br />

is crucial.<br />

Fig. 3: L7-S1 Dorsal Laminectomy; note the cauda equina nerve<br />

roots retracted to one side and the underlying disc protrusion<br />

Fig. 4: L7-S1 Dorsal Fusion-Fixation using cortical screws and<br />

PMMA<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 143 small animal orthopaedic session


small animal soft tissue session 144 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />

Short communications <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />

Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 10.45 <strong>–</strong> 12.15


small animal soft tissue session 146 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Axial pattern flap based on a cutaneous branch of the<br />

facial artery in cats.<br />

Milgram J*, Weiser M, Kelmer E*, Benzioni H<br />

Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel<br />

Introduction<br />

The anatomy of the facial artery of the cat has been<br />

described, however, the cutaneous branches of the facial<br />

artery and the viability of a flap based on the cutaneous<br />

branches of this artery have not been described in the cat.<br />

The objectives of this study were to describe the anatomy<br />

of the facial artery, including its cutaneous portion, and<br />

to define the anatomic boundaries of an axial pattern flap<br />

based on a branch of this artery.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

The common carotid artery was identified, cannulated<br />

and infused with methylene blue to assist in the<br />

identification of the facial artery, which was subsequently<br />

cannulated and selectively infused with methylene blue.<br />

The main trunk of the artery and its branches were then<br />

dissected. The extent of blue coloration of the skin was<br />

evaluated on the contralateral side of the same specimens<br />

after infusing methylene blue into the facial artery. In 4<br />

specimens the flap was raised along previously defined<br />

borders and adequacy of perfusion was evaluated.<br />

Results<br />

The area of skin perfused by the facial artery extended<br />

from the lower eyelid dorsally, to the angularis oris cranially,<br />

and the wing of the atlas caudally. Borders of the skin flap<br />

were defined on the basis of the anatomical dissection and<br />

skin coloration after selective infusion of the facial artery<br />

with methylene blue. A skin flap of 6cm x 3.4cm, based on<br />

the first caudally directed cutaneous branch of the facial<br />

artery was shown to be well perfused.<br />

Discussion<br />

A caudally directed cutaneous artery which branches off<br />

the facial artery opposite to the angularis oris artery and<br />

continuing to the horizontal ear canal has been described<br />

in dogs. A cutaneous artery analogous to this artery has<br />

not been described in the cat. We were able to identify<br />

this artery as the first branch of the cutaneous part of the<br />

facial artery and were able to follow it to the caudal aspect<br />

of the wing of the atlas. This cutaneous artery is located<br />

more ventrally and extends further caudally than in dogs. It<br />

supplies a highly vascularised angiosome that can be used<br />

as an axial pattern flap for reconstruction of skin lesions of<br />

the face and was present in all of the specimens examined<br />

in this study.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 147 small animal soft tissue session


Ligating the renal artery in pigs with a new<br />

absorbable device - LigaTie ®<br />

O V. Höglund, DVM, K. Olsson, DVM, PhD, R. Hagman, DVM, MSc, PhD, A. Lagerstedt, DVM, PhD.<br />

Department of Clinical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden<br />

Introduction<br />

An absorbable device with a self-locking loop was<br />

constructed for ligation purposes. It was designed for<br />

surgery with details enabling complete haemostasis (zero<br />

loop-diameter) and an enhanced tissue grip. The aim of this<br />

study was to test the efficiency of the device in ligating<br />

an artery, achiving a tight tissue grip and a complete<br />

haemostasis.<br />

Materials and methods<br />

The device (LigaTie ® ) was manufactured by injection<br />

moulding of a blend of absorbable polymers well tolerated<br />

by the tissue. The device was used for ligation of the<br />

renal arteries in three anaesthetized pigs. The vessel<br />

was cut between the kidney and the device. The artery<br />

with the attached device was inspected for haemostasis<br />

for a minimum of five minutes. The ability of the device<br />

to withstand a ligature slip-off was tested with a<br />

dynamometer.<br />

Results<br />

Six renal arteries were ligated with the device. The<br />

device was tightened and secured with one hand. Complete<br />

haemostasis of all arteries was obtained and verified for<br />

a minimum of five minutes. The devices were securely<br />

locked into the tissue, i.e. no sliding along the vessels<br />

was observed.<br />

Discussion/Conclusion<br />

This test showed that effective haemostasis and secure<br />

ligatures of the renal arteries can be achieved with this<br />

device. The device functioned as planned and may facilitate<br />

an easier and safer ligation of blood vessels.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 148 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Caudal mediastinal para-oesophageal abscesses in 7<br />

dogs. A retospective study<br />

H. Brissot*, C. Burton*, R. Doyle*.<br />

Davies, Veterinary Specialists, Higham Gobion, UK.<br />

Objective<br />

To determine the clinical, imaging and surgical findings<br />

of caudal mediastinal para-esophageal abscesses (CMPA)<br />

and the outcome of surgical treatment in client owned dogs.<br />

Study design<br />

Case series<br />

<strong>Animals</strong><br />

Seven dogs with a CMPA.<br />

Methods<br />

Medical records between April 2005 and January 2010<br />

were reviewed. Retrieved data were signalment, history,<br />

clinical findings, diagnostic investigations, surgical<br />

findings, surgical procedures performed and post-operative<br />

recovery. Long-term follow-up information was obtained<br />

via telephone conversation with the owners and referring<br />

veterinarians<br />

Results<br />

All dogs had exploratory surgery with either a median<br />

sternotomy (5 dogs) or lateral thoracotomy (2 dogs). The<br />

abscesses were identified, opened and drained surgically. In<br />

5 cases omentalization of the abscess cavity was performed<br />

via a limited diaphragmatic incision. Foreign material was<br />

not identified within any of the abscesses. All dogs were<br />

discharged from the hospital. All dogs were alive and free<br />

of any clinical disorders 6 months after the surgery (range<br />

from 9 to 39 months).<br />

Clinical Significance<br />

These new data identifies CMPA as a new clinical<br />

entity that should be suspected in cases of regurgitation<br />

and pyrexia with a mass or enlargement of the caudal<br />

mediastinum.<br />

Trans-diaphragmatic omentalization of thoracic<br />

abscesses could be done successfully without postoperative<br />

complication and is suitable for the management<br />

of CMPA.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 149 small animal soft tissue session


Caudal cervical intervertebral space distraction and<br />

stabilization using a distractable fusion cage in seven<br />

dogs<br />

Murgia D*, Gasparinetti N, Schiesaro R.<br />

Diagnostica Piccoli Animali, Zugliano, Italy<br />

Introduction<br />

Goal of this retrospective study was evaluate the clinical<br />

and radiological<br />

results of the treatment of dynamic disc associated<br />

caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy (CCSM) using a<br />

purpose-designed distractable intervertebral fusion cage<br />

in seven dogs.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Seven Dobermann Pinschers with neurological signs<br />

compatible with disc associated dynamic CCSM were<br />

selected. Lateral survey radiographs of the cervical spine<br />

were taken and suspected diagnosis confirmed by MRI<br />

imaging. Affected intervertebral (iv) disc spaces (C5-C6,<br />

C6-C7 or both) were approached ventrally, distracted and<br />

fenestrated.Thereafter a partial ventral slot was created.<br />

The cage was pressed into the slot; tightening the screw the<br />

wings opened 1-2 mm in cranio-caudal direction allowing<br />

vertebral distraction and stabilization. Lastly,<br />

cancellous bone allograft was packed in the surgical site.<br />

Clinical/radiological follow-up<br />

evaluations were planned at four weeks, three-six and<br />

twelve months postoperative. In five dogs MRI follow-up<br />

was performed.<br />

Results<br />

Postoperative radiographic evaluation showed good<br />

implants placement. No deterioration of the neurological<br />

status was clinically observed. At follow-up, radiographs<br />

revealed a slight ventral migration of ca. 2-3 mm of the<br />

cages, iv disc spaces collapse and new bone formation<br />

between the vertebrae adjacent the cages. All dogs<br />

showed an improvement of the neurological status and<br />

MRI exhibited in most of the cases resolution of spinal<br />

cord compression.<br />

Discussion<br />

Expansion of the wings and the toothed outer walls<br />

prevent dislocation of the cage. Nevertheless we observed<br />

a mild ventral migration and iv space collapse that were<br />

clinically irrelevant. If compared to other cervical spine<br />

distraction-stabilization techniques, the method used is<br />

less invasive, does not carry the risk of vertebral canal<br />

violation and can be used to distract and stabilize more iv<br />

spaces simultaneously. The titanium alloy of the implant<br />

results to be biocompatible and allows postoperative MRI<br />

evaluations of patients. Due to the lack of postoperative<br />

neurological deterioration, all dogs had short hospital stays.<br />

The described technique achieves good long-term results<br />

in CCSM affected dogs. Anyway further clinical cases and<br />

long-term follow-up visits over twelve months are needed<br />

to support these findings.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 150 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury<br />

Cachon T.*, Escriou C, Arnault A., Maitre P., Fau D., Viguier E.*, Genevois JP. Carozzo C*<br />

VetAgro-Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon , France<br />

Introduction<br />

Sciatic nerve injury are most frequently secondary to<br />

traumatic events. If neurapraxia lesion do not required<br />

surgical treatement in most of the cases, more severe injury<br />

such as axonotmesis or neurotmesis do require surgical<br />

exploration and treatment.<br />

Objectives<br />

The purpose of this study is to report the surgical<br />

treatment and outcome of traumatic sciatic nerve injury<br />

in 9 cases.<br />

Material and method<br />

Dogs surgicaly treated for sciatic nerve injury were<br />

included in this study. Medical records were reviewed<br />

and included signalment, duration of the clinical signs,<br />

neurological examination, results of diagnosis imaging,<br />

surgical finding, complications and follow-up.<br />

Results<br />

Of 9 dogs surgically treated, 5 resulted from hunting<br />

wounds. Surgical treatment was neurolysis alone in 2 cases<br />

and neurorraphy in 7 cases. Clinical improvement occured<br />

in 6 cases and there was no improvement in 3 cases. Two<br />

of the 3 dogs that did not recovered had a proximal lesion.<br />

Discussion<br />

Recovery after surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury<br />

could be long, and incomplete. Nevertheless provided the<br />

use of proper surgical technique and high level of post<br />

operative care, improvement could be expected. A guarded<br />

prognostic should be give to the owner when the lesion<br />

is proximal.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 151 small animal soft tissue session


Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and nitric<br />

oxide are increased in brachycephalic dogs<br />

Rancan L, Romussi S, Albertini M, García P, Vara E, Sánchez de la Muela M<br />

Dogpital SL (Madrid);D. of Medicine and Surgery (F.Veterinary, UCM, Madrid), D of Clinical Veterinary Science<br />

(F. Veterinary, Milan);D of Animal Pathology (F. Veterinary, Milan); D of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (F.<br />

Medicine, UCM, Madrid)<br />

An upper respiratory tract disease known<br />

as brachycephalic airways obstruction syndrome<br />

(BAOS) has been described in brachycephalic dogs. Signs<br />

of obstruction of the upper aerial ducts are consequence<br />

of anatomical and functional disturbances. Hypoxia also<br />

may increase fatigability of upper airway dilator muscle,<br />

and soft tissue in a manner that has the potential to<br />

worsen disease. inflammation as well as oxidative and<br />

nitrosative stress resulted from the repeated hypoxia<br />

and re-oxygenations could be implicated in the injury<br />

to these tissues. The aims of the present study was (a)<br />

to investigate proinflammatory mediators levels in dogs<br />

suffering from BAOS in order to analyse a posible role for<br />

these mediators in the brachycephalic syndrome, (b) to<br />

study the relationship between proinflammatory mediators<br />

levels and the severity of the clinical signs.<br />

Blood was collected from 17 brachycephalic dogs<br />

(BD) and ten control dogs (CD). BD were divided into 3<br />

groups depending on clinical examination (Group 1 no<br />

symptomatic, Group 2 moderately symptomatic and Group<br />

3 severely symptomatic). Comparison between results<br />

observed in BD requiring medical or surgical treatment was<br />

also performed. Proinflamatory cytokines, IL-1ß, TNF-a, IL-6<br />

and IL-17 plasma levels were measured by ELISA kits. NO<br />

levels were determinated by Griess’s test.<br />

The plasma concentrations of TNFa, ad IL-17, were<br />

significantly higher in BD compared to CD (p


<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />

In depth - Medical or surgical? -<br />

Tracheal collapse<br />

Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 08.00 <strong>–</strong> 10.00


small animal soft tissue session 154 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Have we learnt anything in the last 15 years?<br />

Stenting: The Giessen experience<br />

A. Moritz, C. Paul de Melo, N. Bauer, M. Schneider,<br />

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany<br />

Introduction<br />

Collapsing trachea is a common disorder in middle-aged<br />

toy and miniature dogs. Two forms are described: the<br />

more common dorsoventral collapse and the rare lateral<br />

collapse. The collapse usually involves the cervical region,<br />

but also thoracic areas of the trachea. Affected breeds are<br />

Yorkshire-Terriers in first place; others are e.g. Miniature<br />

Poodle, Pomeranian, Chihuahua, and Maltese.<br />

Related to the pathophysiology of the disease it can<br />

be stated that there may be a failure of chondrogenesis<br />

or simple degeneration of hyaline cartilage with primary<br />

genetic influences. Lack of chondroitin sulfate and/or<br />

decreased glycoproteins within the cartilage matrix results<br />

in a reduction in bound water. Because of that, the rings<br />

lose their ability to remain firm and thus subsequently<br />

collapse. To date however, its aetiology, and most effective<br />

management are still controversial.<br />

Clinical signs<br />

Dogs with tracheal collapse show chronic intermittent<br />

coughing. The cough may vary between harsh or dry,<br />

often described as a “goose honk” sound. Coincidental<br />

chronic mitral valvular heart disease occurs and must<br />

be differentiated from heart failure and/or significant<br />

left atrial enlargement due to this condition. Excitement,<br />

manipulation of the tracheal, during water or eating intake<br />

trigger affected dogs starting to cough.<br />

Physical examination usually reveals a normal to<br />

overweighed dog. Depending on the severity of dyspnea<br />

the mucous membranes are normal colored up to cyanotic.<br />

The upper airway obstruction is combined with stridor. The<br />

stridor sound varies according to the anatomical localization<br />

of the obstruction including everted laryngeal saccules,<br />

laryngeal collapse and cervical/thoracic tracheal collapse.<br />

Varying degrees of inspiratory or expiratory dyspnea<br />

occur. Hyperthermia may result because of the respiratory<br />

distress. Cough can be triggered when palpating or pressing<br />

the trachea. In some dogs mild dorsoventral compression<br />

can lead to respiration arrest.<br />

Hepatomegaly is a common finding in dogs with tracheal<br />

collapse. Several causes for this clinical observation are<br />

possible, including hepatic congestion because of chronic<br />

right heart failure induced by a high airway resistance and<br />

steroid hepatopathy, as well as hepatic lipidosis in obese<br />

patients. In our study we described 26 dogs with tracheal<br />

collapse. Liver parameters where tested before and after<br />

stent implantation. To assess liver function gall bladder<br />

contraction was stimulated by intramuscular injection of<br />

a synthetic cholecystokinin analogue (ceruletide). Twelve<br />

healthy Beagle dogs and 30 dogs of various breeds<br />

investigated previously without evidence of hepatic,<br />

gastrointestinal, or respiratory diseases served as control.<br />

Amelioration of liver variables was assessed after stent<br />

implantation. Twelve of 26 (46%) dogs had increased serum<br />

activity of 2 or more liver enzymes. Serum basal bile acid<br />

concentrations were high in 24 of 26 dogs. Twenty- and<br />

40-minute stimulated bile acids were significantly higher in<br />

dogs with tracheal collapse (64.2 +130.0/243.0 mmol/L and<br />

82.6 +164.0/257.1 mmol/L) compared to the control dogs<br />

(7.0 6 3.6 mmol/L and 6.4 6 3.5 mmol/L). All twelve dogs<br />

reevaluated after a median of 58 days (48<strong>–</strong>219 days) had a<br />

normal breathing pattern and significantly decreased 20 and<br />

40 minutes stimulated bile acids (50.0 +92.7/232.8 mmol/L,<br />

52.8 +97.6/234.3 mmol/L; p = 0043), whereas plasma liver<br />

enzyme activities were not significantly influenced. There<br />

was a significant hepatic dysfunction in the majority of dogs<br />

with a tracheal collapse. Liver function should be routinely<br />

assessed in dogs with severe respiratory disease.<br />

Diagnosis<br />

Radiography is a reasonable screening test for dogs<br />

with tracheal collapse but underdiagnosis of the frequency<br />

and underestimation of the degree of tracheal collapse in<br />

comparison with fluoroscopy are documented.<br />

Endoscopy is considered to be the gold standard<br />

in the diagnosis of tracheal collapse and reveals a<br />

decreased dorsoventral diameter of the trachea with a<br />

pendulous dorsal tracheal membrane. The tracheal mucous<br />

membranes are hyperemic but usually show no exsudate.<br />

Occasionally catarrhal to purulent exsudate may be seen.<br />

Conservative treatment<br />

Dogs which are burdened with the anatomical change<br />

of the trachea may stay for a long time without clinical<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 155 small animal soft tissue session


signs. Secondary factors such as cardiomegaly, heart<br />

failure, lung oedema, respiratory tract Infection, and<br />

obstruction of the upper airways, inhalation of irritants,<br />

adipositas or hyperadrenocortizisme may be the reason to<br />

develop clinical signs. Diagnostic procedures and medical<br />

treatment are initiated to recognize and eliminate these<br />

factors. Symptomatic therapy includes weight reduction,<br />

recommendation of a harness instead of a collar, elimination<br />

of irritants, nebulization/ inhaltation of bronchodilatators<br />

respectively saline fluids, administration of xanthine<br />

bronchodilators such as theophylline, aminophylline or<br />

propentofylline, antiinfectiva (if indicated) as well as<br />

steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy. Antitussiva such as<br />

dihydrocodein should be administered with caution, Lomotil<br />

(diphenoxylate hydrochloride and atropine sulfate) which is<br />

used in UK with good success is only with special authority<br />

permission available in Germany. If these secondary<br />

factors initiating clinical signs are not treated or cannot<br />

be eliminated, hypertrophy of the subepithelial glands,<br />

reduction of the ciliated epithelium, squamous metaplasia<br />

or polyp formation are the consequences. Mentioned<br />

chronic changes are followed by cough, increased mucus<br />

production and decreased mucociliar clearance ending up<br />

in a vicious circle. In a retrospective study, 71 of 100 dogs<br />

with tracheal collapse were reported to respond to medical<br />

therapy and management of secondary initiating causes.<br />

Surgical techniques<br />

Various surgical techniques for correcting tracheal<br />

collapse have been described, including plication of the<br />

dorsal tracheal membrane, tracheal ring chondrotomy,<br />

and intra- and extra-luminal stabilization using mainly<br />

polypropylene prosthetic devices. Stabilization of the<br />

trachea with intraluminal endoprostheses (stents) is of<br />

increasing importance. Several types of self-expanding<br />

elastic stents have been used.<br />

The Giessen experience<br />

In our place we treated so fare 71 client-owned dogs<br />

referred our <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic at the Justus-Liebig-<br />

University Giessen between August 1996 and Mai 2011.<br />

The main inclusion criterion for stent implantation was<br />

evidence of a marked reduction of the dogs’ quality of life<br />

due to persistence of one or more severe clinical signs<br />

such as dyspnoea, cyanosis, severe paroxysmal coughing,<br />

and syncope due to hypoxemia despite conservative<br />

management. All dogs received medication for at least<br />

3 weeks before stent implantation. Medical treatment<br />

included administration of xanthine bronchodilators such<br />

as theophylline, aminophylline (10 mg/kg PO q12h) or<br />

propentofylline (3 mg/kg PO q12h) as well as steroidal<br />

anti-inflammatory therapy (prednisolone, 0.25-0.5 mg/kg PO<br />

q12h). Specific therapy was used for underlying diseases<br />

considered to affect the respiratory tract (e.g., left heart<br />

failure due to mitral valve insufficiency, infection of the<br />

respiratory tract). Patients with only mild clinical signs<br />

and dogs in which with the majority of clinical signs were<br />

caused by diseases other than severe tracheal collapse<br />

were excluded from the study.<br />

The diagnosis of tracheal collapse was established<br />

by physical examination, radiography and endoscopy.<br />

Dogs were pre-medicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg/<br />

kg IV) before radiography to avoid excitement-associated<br />

dyspnoea. A ruler with 1 cm radio-opaque calibration marks<br />

was placed beneath the patients to provide a measurement<br />

of the tracheal length and diameter without an additional<br />

correction for magnification error. Endoscopic examination<br />

was performed with a rigid fiberoptic bronchoscope of 600.0<br />

mm length and 5 mm diameter or a flexible videoscope<br />

600.0 mm length and 5,3 mm diameter. Endoscopy<br />

performed in general anaesthesia included evaluation of<br />

the larynx, the dorsal tracheal membrane along its entire<br />

length as well as the left and right mainstem bronchi.<br />

Using the criteria of Tangner and Hobson, 8 a configuration<br />

of the tracheal rings and dorsal membrane inducing a<br />

reduction of the tracheal lumen by 25% was regarded as<br />

grade 1 tracheal collapse. A 50% reduction was regarded<br />

as grade 2, a 75% reduction as grade 3, and a complete<br />

reduction (100%) as grade 4 tracheal collapse, respectively.<br />

If asymmetry of the tracheal cartilage rings was present<br />

in addition to flattening of the dorsal membrane, it was<br />

described as a deformation of the trachea. The location of<br />

the collapsed tracheal segments in the cervical, thoracal<br />

or entire trachea was noted.<br />

Implantation procedure<br />

Before stent implantation, the diameter of the stent<br />

required for intraluminal stabilization was estimated<br />

according to the tracheal diameter measured on the<br />

lateral [l/l] radiographs 1 cm distal the larynx: Stent size<br />

≈ (tracheal diameter [l/l] * 4 / 3.14). Example: trachea<br />

diameter 8 mm * 4 =32 / 3,14 = 10,2 <strong>–</strong>> selected stent:<br />

10-12 mm nominal diameter. The selected implanted<br />

(nominal) length of the stent was at least 20 mm shorter<br />

than the tracheal length measured on the lateral thoracic<br />

radiographs to keep a minimum distance of 10 mm between<br />

the implanted endoprosthesis and larynx or carina. The<br />

uncovered stent endoprosthesis consisted of the stent<br />

and a delivery catheter (Figure 1). The endoprosthesis<br />

was longitudinally stretched on the inner shaft to a smalldiameter<br />

configuration, spontaneously springing back to<br />

its original diameter after deployment. The annular space<br />

between the “inner shaft” and the “outer catheter” system<br />

was filled with contrast medium (the new Uniflex TM stent<br />

(Boston Scientific) with 0.9% saline) for easy deployment<br />

of the endoprosthesis. Furthermore, the central lumen of<br />

the inner shaft was flushed with saline injected through<br />

the proximal Luer connector to minimize resistance<br />

when inserted over a guide wire. The implantation of the<br />

self-expanding stent was performed by the authors in<br />

anesthetized dogs placed in left lateral recumbency<br />

small animal soft tissue session 156 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


immediately after endoscopy. Insertion, placement,<br />

and deployment of the stent were performed under<br />

fluoroscopy (Figure 2). After positioning the implant,<br />

the T-connector and, the rolling membrane covering the<br />

stent was pulled back on the outer catheter resulting in<br />

a deployment of the stent from the distal tip towards<br />

the proximal marker. Immediately after implantation, the<br />

delivery system was removed and the location of the stent<br />

was documented by endoscopy and thoracic radiography<br />

in lateral (Figure 3) and dorsoventral projection.<br />

Figure 1.: Construction of the EASY-WALLSTENT<br />

endoprosthesis (Boston Scientific, 890077E/07.99/05)<br />

composed of the stent and a delivery catheter. The figure is<br />

taken from the manufacturers´ instructions. 1=central lumen<br />

for guide wire passage; 2=streamlined tip (radio-opaque),<br />

3=“outer catheter”, 4=radio-opaque markers: 4a=distal,<br />

4b=distal expected shortening, 4c=proximal expected<br />

shortening, 4d=proximal, 5= WALLSTENT, 6=holder,7=“inner<br />

shaft”, 8=sliding T-connector, 9=stainless steel, 10 = radioopaque<br />

markers, showing the approximate final position of<br />

the stent during placement proximal, 11= Luer connector on<br />

the central lumen, 12=Luer connector and stopcock of the<br />

“inner shaft”.<br />

Figure 2. Lateral chest fluoroscopic view demonstrating the<br />

placement of the Wallstent. The stent is inserted on a<br />

delivery catheter with radio-opaque marker bands showing<br />

the expected final position of the stent (black arrows).<br />

Deployment of the stent is performed gradually (white arrow)<br />

while repositioning the delivery catheter.<br />

Figure 3. Lateral thoracic radiograph showing the location of the<br />

stent immediately after implantation<br />

Management after stent implantation included housing<br />

the dogs in small kennels for 3 days to keep them at rest.<br />

They received cough suppressant (dihydrocodein, 1 mg/<br />

kg PO q6h) and if tracheitis was present broad spectrum<br />

antibiotics for 7 days. In the event of concurrent bronchial<br />

collapse, longterm treatment with a xanthine bronchodilator<br />

(theophylline, 10 mg/kg PO q12h) was recommended to the<br />

owners. Nebulization with saline solution (Emser Sole ,<br />

15 min q12h) were administered if fluid accumulation was<br />

diagnosed endoscopically. Clinical re-evaluation included<br />

physical examination, radiography, and endoscopy. The<br />

length and the diameter of the stent were measured on<br />

thoracic radiographs in lateral and dorsoventral projection<br />

and compared with results obtained immediately after stent<br />

implantation. Tracheoscopy was done as described above to<br />

assess the stents´ location and integration in the tracheal<br />

mucosa.<br />

Results<br />

The Yorkshire Terrier was the most frequently represented<br />

breed. In the dogs considered for stent implantation no<br />

improvement in clinical sings such as dyspnoea, severe<br />

paroxysmal coughing, marked exercise intolerance, cyanosis<br />

and exercise-associated syncope was achieved despite<br />

various conservative treatments. Physical examination<br />

findings potentially consistent with tracheal collapse<br />

included tracheal stridor, marked dyspnoea and spontaneous<br />

paroxysmal coughing. At the time of physical examination,<br />

cyanosis and severe exercise intolerance were present in few<br />

dogs were as in the majority of dogs paroxysmal coughing<br />

could be elicited by tracheal palpation. Almost exclusively,<br />

dogs showed a combination of several clinical signs.<br />

Furthermore, obesity and hepatomegaly were relatively<br />

consistent findings. In approximately half of the patients<br />

endoscopy identified a severe tracheal collapse (grade<br />

4). In the majority of patients implantation of the (EASY-)<br />

WallstentTM (now called Uniflex TM, Boston Scientific) led<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 157 small animal soft tissue session


to immediate improvement of clinical signs (i.e., dyspnea<br />

and cyanosis) seen in most dogs during anesthesia vanished<br />

immediately after deployment of the endoprosthesis.<br />

Dogs presented with severe exercise intolerance, physical<br />

activity increased markedly within 3 days. Mild to moderate<br />

dry cough due to initial irritation of the tracheal mucosa,<br />

was common in most patients in the first few days and up to<br />

3 weeks after implantation of the endoprosthesis. Coughing<br />

did not affect the animals´ clinical condition and responded<br />

well to symptomatic treatment with dihydrocodein.<br />

According to the owners reports regarding the long-term<br />

outcome about 25-30% of the dogs were asymptomatic<br />

after stent implantation. In 65-70% the insertion of the<br />

stent resulted in marked improvement of clinical signs and<br />

exercise tolerance, but some coughing still was present.<br />

The severity of the cough was reported to be markedly<br />

reduced after stent implantation. It was subjectively<br />

assessed to be mild and occurred occasionally after<br />

excitement in the majority of these patients. Except for the<br />

remaining cough, all dogs were free of clinical complaints<br />

including severe dyspnea, cyanosis, and syncope due to<br />

hypoxemia. A few dogs (< 5 %) remained symptomatic<br />

despite therapy. These dogs were presented with severe<br />

bronchial collapse or clinical signs were associated with<br />

left heart failure.<br />

A shortening of the endoprosthesis with a simultaneous<br />

increase in the diameter of the stent was present in the<br />

majority of patients. The median percentage of shortening<br />

was 27.3 % determined at a median of 175 days after<br />

stentimplantation. Shortening of the stent did not result<br />

in clinical signs in most of the patients. Some dogs were<br />

treated with a second stent because of recurrence of<br />

tracheal collapse mostly cranial to the first implanted stent.<br />

Tracheoscopic follow-up examination disclosed that<br />

in all animals most parts of the stent were covered with<br />

tracheal epithelium and several small blood vessels. The<br />

stent could be seen shining through the tissue. In about<br />

50% of the dogs bare metallic struts were visible especially<br />

at the lateral parts of the trachea. In these areas, the<br />

trachea did not touch the endoprosthesis due to a slight<br />

deformation of the tracheal rings. The gaps between the<br />

trachea and the stent (so-called “pockets”) were filled<br />

with mucus plugs. Symptomatic treatment of these dogs<br />

included administration of broad spectrum antibiotics for 10<br />

days and mucolytics for 21 days. Furthermore, nebulization<br />

with saline solution was recommended in episodes were<br />

coughing was present. Long-term endoscopic follow-up<br />

disclosed that “pocket”-formation can resolve within an<br />

interval up to 2 years. In some dogs parts of the stent<br />

were overgrown by excessive connective tissue similar to<br />

“granuloma formation” reported in experimental studies<br />

in rabbits and dogs after the implantation of metallic<br />

stents. This finding was primarily evident at the ends of<br />

the endoprosthesis. Severe, circular granuloma formation<br />

was apparent in 3 dogs resulting in an annular reduction<br />

of the tracheal lumen of 50% to 75%. “Granuloma<br />

formation” induced a recurrence of clinical signs<br />

including severe paroxysmal coughing, dyspnea, cyanosis,<br />

exercise intolerance, and syncope due to hypoxemia.<br />

All dogs responded well to conservative treatment with<br />

corticosteroids (prednisolone 1 mg/kg PO q12h) for 2 weeks.<br />

Discussion<br />

The results of our study demonstrate that Wallstents TM<br />

respectively the UNIFLEX TM stent can be used to treat<br />

tracheal collapse in dogs because they are available in<br />

a suitable size range and placement is technically easy<br />

via fluoroscopy. The maximal diameter of this stent type<br />

is 22.0 mm and the use of Wallstents for stabilization of<br />

the canine trachea is restricted to small to medium-sized<br />

dogs The initial survival rate of more than 91.7% was<br />

comparable with the survival rates of 96% and 94%<br />

respectively reported for surgical procedures. In contrast<br />

to surgical methods of extraluminal stabilization of the<br />

trachea, however, the intraluminal implantation of stents<br />

is much less traumatic, comparatively quick and technically<br />

easy to perform. With experience, the implantation of the<br />

stent could be performed within 20 minutes. Furthermore,<br />

intraluminal stabilization of the trachea could be performed<br />

along the entire length of the trachea whereas surgical<br />

placement of extraluminal stents is considered to be<br />

unrewarding in patients with a collapse of the thoracic<br />

portion of the trachea. It should be noted however that<br />

once expanded within the trachea Wallstents could not be<br />

removed or hardly repositioned. In 1 of the 2 dogs dying<br />

within the immediate period after stent implantation, death<br />

was caused by incorrect placement of the endoprosthesis<br />

inducing laryngeal spasm due to irritation of the larynx.<br />

Another severe adverse-effect reported in dogs after<br />

experimental implantation of stents was migration of the<br />

implant due to choice of too small an endoprosthesis. 16,17<br />

Tracheal length measured on thoracic radiographs in lateral<br />

projection ranged in our study from 68.0 to 175.0 mm and<br />

the calculated stent diameter ranged from 8.9 to 15.3<br />

mm. These data underline the importance of assessing<br />

individual tracheal measurements before implantation of<br />

the endoprosthesis.<br />

The most severe adverse effects induced by the stent<br />

included emphysema and pneumomediastinum resulting<br />

in the death of 1 dog. Another dog developed mild<br />

pneumomediastinum without concurrent clinical signs.<br />

A probable cause of the development of emphysema and<br />

pneumomediastinum was that the metal struts at the<br />

distal and proximal ends of the stent were slightly sharp.<br />

In contrast to surgical procedures, intensive care was<br />

not required after stent implantation. Clinical follow-up<br />

examinations in our patients showed that 25 - 30 % of<br />

the dogs re-evaluated within a median interval of 58 days<br />

after stent implantation were asymptomatic, 60 - 75%<br />

showed marked improvement of clinical signs and exercise<br />

tolerance, and 5% remained unimproved. Endoscopic<br />

small animal soft tissue session 158 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


follow-up examinations disclosed that the Wallstents<br />

were almost completely covered with tracheal epithelium<br />

within a median interval of 2 monthes after implantation.<br />

The most important drawback of the adaptive property of<br />

elastic stents however was a progressive shortening and<br />

concurrent increase in the diameter of the endoprosthesis<br />

in 83% of our patients. This finding was associated with a<br />

recurrence of clinical signs due to severe tracheal collapse<br />

cranial to the stent in about 10% of the dogs. Intraluminal<br />

stabilization of the entire trachea should be considered<br />

even in cases with a tracheal collapse restricted to the<br />

cervical or thoracal part of the trachea to prevent recurrence<br />

of clinical signs due to shortening of the stent. Another<br />

adverse effect of stent implantation was the formation<br />

of steroid-responsive granulomas. It occurred primarily at<br />

the ends of the stent and may have been induced by the<br />

mechanical effects of the endoprosthesis rather than by<br />

any toxic effects of the metal. A fracture of the implanted<br />

stent was seen only in one patient and could be managed<br />

by intra-stent-implantation.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In our experience intraluminal stabilization of the trachea<br />

with stents is an effective method of managing patients<br />

with severe tracheal collapse. It is a minimally-invasive,<br />

comparatively easy and brief alternative to surgery. Further<br />

studies are needed to assess if different types of stents<br />

(e.g. VET STENT-Trachea, Infiniti Medical) will end up with<br />

comparable good success and minimized side effects.<br />

References<br />

1. White RAS, Williams JN . Tracheal collapse in the dog - is<br />

there really a role for surgery?<br />

A survey of 100 cases. Journal Of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice<br />

1994;35:191-196.<br />

2. Herrtage ME, White RAS. Management of tracheal<br />

collapse. In: Bonagura JD, ed. Kirk´s current veterinary<br />

therapy XIII. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company;<br />

2000:796-801.<br />

3. Buback JL, Boothe HW, Hobson HP . Surgical treatment of<br />

tracheal collapse in dogs: 90 cases (1983-1993). J<br />

Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:380-384.<br />

4. Ayres SA, Holmberg DL . Surgical treatment of tracheal<br />

collapse using pliable total ring prostheses: results in<br />

one experimental and 4 clinical cases. Can Vet J<br />

1999;40:787-791.<br />

5. Hobson HP . Total ring prosthesis for the surgical correction<br />

of collapsed trachea. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1976;12:822.<br />

6. White RN . Unilateral arytenoid lateralisation and<br />

extraluminal polypropylene ring prostheses for correction of<br />

tracheal collapse in the dog. J <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract<br />

1995;36:151-158.<br />

7. Coyne BE, Fingland RB, Kennedy GA, Debowes RM . Clinical<br />

and pathologic effects of a modified technique<br />

for application of spiral prostheses to the cervical trachea<br />

of dogs. Vet Surg 1993;22:269-275.<br />

8. Tangner CH, Hobson HP . A retrospective study of 20<br />

surgically managed cases of collapsed trachea.<br />

Vet Surg 1982;11:146-149.<br />

9. Leonard HC, Wright JJ . An intraluminal prosthetic dilatator<br />

for tracheal collapse in the dog.<br />

J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1978;14:464-468.<br />

10. Johnson LR, Krahwinkel DJ, McKiernan BC . Surgical<br />

management of atypical lateral tracheal collapse in a dog<br />

[published erratum appears in J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994<br />

Feb 1;204(3):426].<br />

J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:1693-1696.<br />

11. Jerram R, Fossum TW . Tracheal collapse in dogs. Comp<br />

Cont Ed 1997;19:1040-1060.<br />

12. Rauber K, Franke C, Rau WS . Self-expanding stainless<br />

steel endotracheal stents: an animal study. Cardiovasc<br />

Intervent Radiol 1989;21:272-276.<br />

13. Rauber K, Weimar B, Hofmann M et al . Klinische<br />

Erfahrungen mit Gianturco-Z-stents bei endotrachealen<br />

und bronchialen Stenosen. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr<br />

Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1992;156:41-46.<br />

14. Rousseau H, Dahan M, Lauque D . Self expandable<br />

prostheses in the tracheobronchal tree.<br />

Radiology 1993;188:199-203.<br />

15. Rauber K, Syed-Ali S, Hofman M . Endotracheal placement<br />

of ballon-expanded stents: an experimental study<br />

in rabbits. Radiology 1997;202:281-283.<br />

16. Radlinsky MA, Fossum TW, Walker MA . Evaluation of the<br />

Palmaz Stent in the trachea and mainstem bronchi<br />

of normal dogs. Vet Surg 1997;26:99-107.<br />

17. Rauber, K. Selbstexpandierende tubuläre perkutan und<br />

peroral einführbare Prothesen aus Edelstahldraht<br />

und der Memory-Legierung NiTi. Experimentelle Studie und<br />

erste klinische Erfahrungen. 134-163.<br />

1991.<br />

18. Schiller AG . Treatment of the tracheal collapse in dogs.<br />

JAVMA, 1964;145:669-671.<br />

19. Moritz A, Schneider M, Rauber K, Schimke E . Tracheal<br />

collapse in dogs, first evaluation of Wallstent(R)<br />

implantation. Tieraerztl Umschau 1999;54:299-306.<br />

20. Radlinsky MA, Fossum TW . Tracheal collapse in a young<br />

boxer. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000;36:313-316.<br />

21. Gellasch KL, Da Costa GT, McAnulty JF, Bjorling DE . Use of<br />

intraluminal nitinol stents in the treatment of<br />

tracheal collapse in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc<br />

2002;221:1719-23, 1714.<br />

22. Moritz, A; Schneider, M; Bauer, N.: Management of<br />

advanced tracheal collapse in dogs using intraluminal<br />

self-expanding biliary wallstents ; JVIM, 2004, 18, 1, 31-42.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 159 small animal soft tissue session


small animal soft tissue session 160 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Tracheal collapse <strong>–</strong> ringing: indications, limitations,<br />

technique<br />

Robert N White*<br />

Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, West Midlands UK<br />

The aetiology of tracheal collapse remains unknown.<br />

The condition is characterised by progressive weakening<br />

of the tracheal cartilage rings making them less able<br />

to resist changing intraluminal pressures resulting in<br />

dorsoventral collapse of the trachea. The reported average<br />

age at presentation is stated to be 7½ years (Padrid and<br />

Amis 1992), although personal experience suggests that<br />

cases might present at an earlier age in the UK. A juvenile<br />

presentation, within the first six months of life, has led<br />

some workers to believe that the underlying cause of the<br />

disease has a congenital origin (Done 1978, Bojrab and<br />

Renegar 1981, White and Williams 1994). The disease<br />

is progressive although the rate of progression varies<br />

between individuals (Hedlund 1987, Ettinger and Ticer<br />

1989, Padrid and Amis 1992).<br />

The severity of tracheal collapse has been graded<br />

endoscopically by Tangner and Hobson (1982) into<br />

four categories. Grade I is that in which the lumen has<br />

been reduced by approximately 25 per cent, grade II by<br />

approximately 50 per cent, grade III by approximately 75 per<br />

cent and in grade IV the lumen is essentially obliterated. It is<br />

well recognised that the collapse is dynamic in nature and,<br />

therefore, it is essential that the conditions under which the<br />

tracheal endoscopy are performed should be standardised.<br />

It is recommended that individuals are anaesthetised to a<br />

sufficient depth to abolish the cough reflex in response to<br />

the presence of the endoscope within the tracheal lumen<br />

(White 1995). The range of degrees of collapse that can be<br />

seen within each individual along the length of the trachea<br />

suggests that the site of grading should also be clearly<br />

stated when collapse grading is performed (White 1995).<br />

In general, the most severely affected area is situated at<br />

the level of the thoracic inlet.<br />

There remains considerable debate concerning the<br />

management of dogs suffering from tracheal collapse.<br />

Some reports suggest that the condition should be managed<br />

medically (Ettinger and Ticer 1989, Padrid and Amis 1992,<br />

White and Williams 1994) whilst others consider that the<br />

condition can be treated effectively with surgery. Medical<br />

management is palliative and aims to control the clinical<br />

signs. It may improve the quality of life of mildly affected<br />

individuals, but since the condition is a chronic progressive<br />

disorder this improvement may not last into the longer term.<br />

A variety of surgical procedures have been described for the<br />

relief of tracheal collapse including tracheal chondrotomy,<br />

dorsal membrane plication, intraluminal support prostheses<br />

(stenting), and external support devices such as total ring<br />

and spiral ring prostheses. Of these, intraluminal stenting<br />

and external ring prostheses are most extensively reported.<br />

Laryngeal paralysis/paresis has been documented as<br />

a concurrent finding is some individuals suffering from<br />

tracheal collapse. Although some workers suggest a<br />

prevalence of 30 per cent (Tangner and Hobson 1982),<br />

experiences in the UK would suggest that this appears to<br />

be an extreme finding which does not concur with the more<br />

general observation of an occasional case suffering from<br />

both conditions (White and Williams 1994, White 1995). It is<br />

worth noting that a number of individuals will demonstrate<br />

poor bilateral abductor function of the arytenoid cartilages<br />

at the time of evaluation endoscopy (White 1995). In fact,<br />

Nelissen and White (2010) recently described diagnosis<br />

and treatment of combined presumed laryngeal paralysis<br />

and larynegal collapse in six small breed dogs of which<br />

three also showed evidence of tracheal collapse. Personnal<br />

observations suggest that the laryngeal mucosa in these<br />

individuals is often hyperaemic and oedematous preventing<br />

normal arytenoid cartilage movement. Moreover, in many<br />

individuals the structural changes to the cartilage of the<br />

tracheal rings appears to be present to a greater or lesser<br />

degree within the cartilages of the larynx. The epiglottic<br />

cartilage appears to be prone to these changes and often<br />

takes on a shape that is significantly different from ‘normal’.<br />

The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear.<br />

Iatrogenic laryngeal paralysis (unilateral or bilateral) is<br />

considered a serious complication following the surgical<br />

placement of external support devices around the trachea.<br />

The paralysis occurs as a result of damage to the recurrent<br />

laryngeal nerves during the placement of the devices. It is<br />

assumed that this paralysis is either a result of neuropraxia<br />

during the mobilisation of the nerve in the tracheal<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 161 small animal soft tissue session


adventitia or a result of long term contact of the nerve<br />

with the prosthetic device. It is likely, therefore, that in<br />

some individuals the condition will not spontaneously<br />

resolve. It remains the author’s preferred technique to<br />

always perform a unilateral arytenoid laryngoplasty<br />

(tieback) when undertaking ring prostheses repair of<br />

tracheal collapse in toy breed dogs (White 1995).<br />

Follow-up data are lacking in the majority of reports<br />

concerning the management of dogs with tracheal collapse.<br />

There are two reports available describing the long term<br />

outcomes in dogs with collapsed trachea treated with<br />

surgical placement of polypropylene C-shaped stents<br />

(White 1995, Buback and others 1996). The results for ring<br />

placement alone suggest the procedure has a ‘success<br />

rate’ (dog free of clinical signs into long term) of 22.4<br />

per cent at worst and 66.7 per cent at best. The ‘success<br />

rate’ for ring placement in combination with arytenoid<br />

laryngoplasty was considered to be 75 per cent. Comparison<br />

between studies proves difficult since the inclusion criteria<br />

and patient selection criteria were different for the two<br />

investigations. The combination procedure has now been<br />

performed on well over 100 cases and, although it would<br />

be unfair to suggest that rigid long term data is available<br />

for all these cases, the author remains comfortable with<br />

the procedure as a means of treating dogs with grade II-IV<br />

collapsed trachea that are not controlled with conservative<br />

and/or medical management. Perioperative death remains<br />

low (approximately 2-3 per cent) and is most commonly<br />

associated with what is presumed to be an avascular<br />

necrosis of the tracheal mucosa. Case selection has also<br />

changed in that many surgeries are now carried out on<br />

individuals that ten years ago would have been excluded<br />

because they were considered to either be too severely<br />

affected or to have serious concurrent disease.<br />

References<br />

• Bojrab MJ and Renegar WR (1981) The trachea. In:<br />

Pathophysiology in <strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery. Ed Bojrab. Lea &<br />

Febiger, Philadelphia. Pp 359-368<br />

• Buback JL, Boothe HW and Hobson HP (1996) Surgical<br />

treatment of tracheal collapse in dogs: 90 cases (1983-<br />

1993). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical<br />

Association 208, 380-384<br />

• Done SH (1978) Canine tracheal collapse <strong>–</strong> aetiology,<br />

pathology, diagnosis and treatment. Veterinary Annual 18<br />

255-260<br />

• Ettinger SJ and Ticer JW (1989) Disease of the trachea. In:<br />

Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Ed Ettinger. WB<br />

Saunders, Philadelphia. pp 795-815<br />

• Hedlund CS (1987) Surgical disease of the trachea.<br />

Veterinary Clinics of North America: <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice<br />

17, 301-332<br />

• Johnson L (2000) Tracheal collapse. Diagnosis and medical<br />

and surgical treatment. Veterinary Clinics of North America:<br />

<strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 30, 1253-1266<br />

• Nelissen P and White RAS (2010) Ayrtenoid lateralization<br />

for management of combined laryngeal dysfunction in small<br />

dogs. <strong>Proceedings</strong> of the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting<br />

of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons, Helsinki,<br />

Finland. pp 113-116<br />

• Padrid P and Amis TC (1992) Chronic tracheobronchial<br />

disease in the dog. Veterinary Clinics of North America:<br />

<strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 22, 1203-1229<br />

• Tangner CH and Hobson HP (1982) A retrospective study<br />

of 20 surgically managed cases of collapsed trachea.<br />

Veterinary Surgery 11, 146-149<br />

• White RAS and Williams JM (1994) Tracheal collapse in<br />

the dog <strong>–</strong> Is there really a role for surgery? A survey of 100<br />

cases. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 35, 191-196<br />

• White RN (1995) Unilateral arytenoid lateralisation and<br />

extra-luminal polypropylene ring prostheses fro correction<br />

of tracheal collapse in the dog. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal<br />

Practice 36, 151-1<br />

small animal soft tissue session 162 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical?<br />

Pyothorax in dogs and cats<br />

Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 14.00 <strong>–</strong> 15.15


Pyothorax <strong>–</strong> have we learnt anything in the last 15<br />

years?<br />

G. Wurtinger, C. Peppler*, M. Schneider, A. Moritz,<br />

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany<br />

The etiology of pyothorax in dogs and in cats is often not<br />

found (1) (2) (3). Penetrating bite wounds seem to be less<br />

important than described in the past (2) (4). Aspirated and<br />

orally contaminated plant material is considered to be the<br />

most common route of infection in dogs. A high prevalence<br />

in haunting and sporting dogs supports this theory (5), yet it<br />

is also discussed controversially. In cats bacterial isolates in<br />

most cases are similar to the oropharyngeal flora. Aspiration<br />

of the bacteria and following pleuropneumonia seems to<br />

be the most likely mechanism of developing a pyothorax<br />

(4). Dyspnoea and Tachypnoea are the most common<br />

clinical signs in dogs and in cats followed by lethargy and<br />

pyrexia (1). Possible diagnostic procedures include thoracic<br />

radiographs, thoracic ultrasound and computed tomography<br />

of the thoracic cavity. Thoracic radiographs reveal mostly<br />

bilateral effusion (1). Ultrasonographic examination is<br />

useful to detect septated fluid and pleural masses (1), but<br />

differentiation between transudative and exudative pleural<br />

effusion is not possible (6). Computed tomography in human<br />

medicine is described to detect and characterize pleural<br />

masses, but it can be difficult to differentiate between<br />

loculated fluid and masses (7) (6). A recently published<br />

study showed that computed tomography even detects<br />

more pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities than surgical<br />

exploration of the thorax (10). We think, diagnostic imaging<br />

including computed tomography should regularly be used<br />

in dogs and cats to decide, whether surgical intervention<br />

should be performed or not.<br />

Cytological fluid examination often shows coccoid, rods<br />

as well as filamentous bacteria, indicating Nocardia or<br />

Actinomyces (8). Cultural evidence of filamentous bacteria<br />

seen in the cytological examination is positive only in about<br />

one third of cases (8). Obligate anaerobic bacteria and<br />

mixtures of anaerobic and aerobic isolates are frequently<br />

isolated in bacteriologic culture (9). Nonenteric organisms,<br />

especially Pasteurella spp are frequently isolated in cats,<br />

whereas in dogs enteric organisms are more commonly<br />

isolated (9).<br />

Anti-infective drugs recommended for initial treatment<br />

are ß-lactam antibiotics or metronidazol for the gram<br />

positive and the anaerobic bacteria. In dogs a second<br />

antimicrobial agent (quinolone) should be included for<br />

the enteric organisms. In cats a potentiated ß-lactam is<br />

sufficient to treat the gram positive bacteria and Pasteurella<br />

spp (9).<br />

Therapeutical approach (conservative and surgical) is<br />

discussed controversially in literature. In dogs surgical<br />

treatment is more frequently necessary compared to cats<br />

because of potential foreign material. On the other hand in<br />

many cases foreign material could not be found even after<br />

surgical exploration and pathohistological examination (3).<br />

At least after conservative therapy has failed, thoracotomy<br />

should be recommended (4) (2). Conservative therapy<br />

usually includes drainage of the thorax with indwelling<br />

thoracostomy tubes and lavaged with warm, sterile<br />

crystalloids (11) (1) (9). Current literature recommends large<br />

thoracostomy tubes that have to be placed either surgically<br />

with a forceps or over a trocar in complete anesthesia (8)<br />

(12). In human medicine newer studies described the use<br />

of small bore wire guided drains. Efficacy was even better<br />

than with larger drains in one study and placing and use<br />

was much less painful (13). Valtolina and Adamantos<br />

described in 2009 the use of small-bore wire-guided chest<br />

drains in cats and dogs as an effective alternative to larger<br />

drains for management of pleural space disease including<br />

pyothorax (14).<br />

In our clinic a modified seldinger technique is used to<br />

insert small thorax drains (6 or 8 french in dogs, 6 french in<br />

cats). In most cases a single catheter is placed. Therefore<br />

we retrospectively viewed cats with pyothorax from 2006<br />

to 2010 to evaluate the complications of the catheter use<br />

and the outcome. After catheter placement in mild sedation<br />

the thorax was initially lavaged at least twice daily with<br />

warmed sterile crystalloid infusion solution. 16 cats were<br />

treated with the catheter technique during the mentioned<br />

period. Especially domestic short hair cats (n=13) were<br />

represented. The median age was 5 years (range 1 to<br />

12 years) with no sex predisposition. The median weight<br />

was 3.75 kg (range 2.4 to 6.5 kg). Thoracic effusion in all<br />

cases was located on both sides. Cytologically, filamentous<br />

bacteria were evident in 11 cases. In no case Nocardia<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 165 small animal soft tissue session


or Actinomyces could be cultured in bacteriological<br />

examination.<br />

There were no major complications evident due to<br />

catheter placement and handling. In two cats drainage<br />

was initially not effective. One cat underwent thoracotomy;<br />

the other cat got a second catheter on the other side of<br />

the thorax and was treated with streptokinase. Complete<br />

failure of the drainage did not occur. Two further cats<br />

got a second drain. Lavage of the thorax was performed<br />

over 8 days (median, range 6 to 20 days). Of the 16 cats,<br />

one cat underwent thoracotomy, 4 cats died and 11 cats<br />

were discharged. 9 of these 11 cats were still alive at the<br />

endpoint of the study.<br />

We recommend the use of small (6 french) catheters,<br />

inserted via modified seldinger technique for conservative<br />

treatment of feline pyothorax. Our results and data from<br />

human medicine suggest that small catheters could be a<br />

good technique for conservative treatment in dogs, too.<br />

References<br />

1. Demetriou J. L., Foale R. D., Ladlow J., McGrotty Y.,<br />

Faulkner J. Canine and feline pyothorax: a retrospective<br />

study of 50 cases in the UK and Ireland. Journal of <strong>Small</strong><br />

Animal Practice 43. 2002, S. 388-394.<br />

2. Waddell L. S., Brady C. A., Drobatz K. J. Risk factors,<br />

prognostic indicators, and outcome of pyothorax in cats:<br />

80 cases (1986-1999). Journal of the American Veterinary<br />

Medical Association 221. 2002, S. 819-824.<br />

3. Rooney M. B., Monnet E. Medical and surgical treatment<br />

of pyothorax in dogs: 26 cases (1991-2001). Journal of the<br />

American Veterinary Medical Association 221. 2002, S.<br />

86-92.<br />

4. Barrs V. R., Allan G. S., Beatty J. A., Malik R. Feline<br />

Pyothorax: a retrospective study of 27 cases in Australia.<br />

Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 7. 2005, S. 211-222.<br />

5. Doyle J. L., Kuipers von Lande R. G., Worth A. J. Intrathoracic<br />

pyogranulomatous disease in four working dogs.<br />

New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57(6). 2009, S. 346-351.<br />

6. Heffner J. E., Klein J. S., Hampson C. Diagnostic Utility and<br />

Clinical Application of Imaging for Pleural Space Infections.<br />

Chest 137. 2010, S. 467-479.<br />

7. Kurian J., Levin T. L., Han B. K., Taragin B. H., Weinstein<br />

S. Comparison of Ultrasound and CT in the Evaluation of<br />

Pneumonia Complicated by Parapneumonic Effusion in<br />

Children. American Journal of Roentgenology 193. 2009, S.<br />

1648-1654.<br />

8. Swinbourne F., Baines E. A., Baines S. J., Halfacree Z.<br />

J. Computed tomographic findings in canine pyothorax<br />

and correlation with findings at exploratory thoracotomy.<br />

Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 52. 2011, S. 203-208.<br />

9. Boothe H. W., Howe L. M., Boothe D. M., Reynolds L. A.,<br />

Carpenter M. Evaluation of outcomes in dogs treated for<br />

pyothorax: 46 cases (1983-2001). Journal of the American<br />

Veterinary Medical Association 236. 2010, S. 657-663.<br />

10. Walker A. L., Jang S. S., Hirsh D. C. Bacteria associated<br />

with pyothorax of dogs and cats: 98 cases (1989-1998).<br />

Journal of the American Veterinary Medicalal Association<br />

216. 2000, S. 359-363.<br />

11. Barrs V. R., Beatty J. A. Feline Pyothorax - new insights into<br />

an old problem: Part 2. Treatment recommendations and<br />

prophylaxis. The Veterinary Journal 179. 2009, S. 171-178.<br />

12. Ottenjann M., Lübke-Becker A., Linzmann H., Brunnberg<br />

L., Kohn B. Pyothorax in 26 cats:Clinical signs, laboratory<br />

results and therapy (2000-2007). Berliner und Münchner<br />

Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 121. 2008, S. 365-373.<br />

13. Rahman N. M., Maskell N. A., Davies C. W. H., Hedley E. L.,<br />

Nunn A. J., Gleeson F. V., Davies R. J. O. The Relationship<br />

Between Chest Tube Size and Clinical Outcome in Pleural<br />

Infection. Chest 137. 2010, S. 536-543.<br />

14. Valtolina C., Adamantos S. Evaluation of small-bore<br />

wire-guided chest drains for management of pleural space<br />

disease. Journal o <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 50. 2009, S.<br />

290-297.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 166 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Pyothorax : Is surgery necessary?<br />

Jackie L. Demetriou *<br />

University of Cambridge, UK.<br />

Pyothorax is the accumulation of exudate in the thoracic<br />

cavity. In the human literature the term empyema is used<br />

to describe the same condition in man and is a frequent<br />

clinical problem in paediatric and elderly patients. In<br />

veterinary patients, pyothorax is an uncommon condition<br />

with the most likely causes being migrating foreign bodies<br />

in dogs and extension from pulmonary infection in cats,<br />

although in the majority of clinical cases an underlying<br />

cause is frequently not identified. Reaching a diagnosis is<br />

usually uncomplicated, however the treatment and timing<br />

of treatment of this condition is somewhat controversial.<br />

An accepted principle directs clinicians to drain the thoracic<br />

cavity early and completely. The question that remains<br />

unanswered in relation to treatment is: should medical<br />

management be the primary goal or should surgery be the<br />

first line of treatment for pyothorax in dogs and cats? To<br />

help answer this question evidence will be considered from<br />

both the human and veterinary literature.<br />

Levels of evidence for primary research questions<br />

have been published (University of Oxford Centre of<br />

Evidence Based Medicine) which can be used to evaluate<br />

and scrutinise available data on pyothorax and place<br />

information into appropriate context. In the veterinary<br />

literature all studies relating to pyothorax are graded at<br />

level III-V (retrospective comparative studies; case series<br />

or expert opinion). There are no randomised controlled<br />

trials or prospective comparative studies (levels I and II).<br />

Due to the complex nature of the disease and the broad<br />

clinical spectrum that is presented, controlled clinical<br />

trials are difficult to perform. Additionally, a suitable in<br />

vivo model is lacking. There are 6 studies in the veterinary<br />

literature reviewing pyothorax cases including treatment,<br />

which involve numbers >10, in the past 15 years; 2 feline<br />

studies (Waddell and others 2002, Barrs and others 2005);<br />

3 canine studies (Rooney and Monnet 2002, Johnson and<br />

Martin 2007, Boothe and others 2010) and 1 combined<br />

canine / feline cases (Demetriou and others 2002) . Of these<br />

studies, 2 concluded that surgical treatment is associated<br />

with better outcome than nonsurgical (Rooney and Monnet<br />

2002, Waddell and others 2002) although the latter study<br />

included untreated cases in the nonsurgical group. This<br />

conclusion was not supported by the remaining 3 studies<br />

(where medical management was deemed to be successful)<br />

and therefore definitive conclusions cannot be drawn.<br />

Success of medical management using thoracostomy tubes<br />

is reported in these studies as 25% (Rooney and Monnet,<br />

2002), 73% (Waddell and others, 2002),), 90% (Demetriou<br />

and others, 2002), 95% (Barrs and others, 2005), 100%<br />

(Johnson and Martin, 2007) and 77% (Boothe and others,<br />

2010). It is not entirely clear why medical management was<br />

not successful in the study by Rooney and Monnet (2002)<br />

however the presence of Actinomyces spp was suggested<br />

to be a reason for warranting surgical management due<br />

to its association with the presence of plant material (e.g.<br />

grass awns). All dogs in this study (8) where Actinomyces<br />

spp was isolated responded well to en bloc resection of<br />

affected tissue. Interestingly 3/6 studies reported that<br />

the majority of deaths occurred early on (within 48 hours)<br />

of presentation and start of treatment in the hospital.<br />

One study (Boothe, 2010) found that pleural lavage and<br />

the addition of heparin were two factors that positively<br />

influenced short-term survival rate in medical management.<br />

There have been no reports in the veterinary literature of<br />

the use of fibrinolytics (e.g. urokinase) as part of routine<br />

medical management of this condition.<br />

Due to the paucity of evidence based data in the<br />

veterinary literature, can we therefore learn anything from<br />

studies in human cases of empyema? Before examining the<br />

human literature it is worth mentioning that comparisons<br />

and correlations with veterinary species must be performed<br />

with caution. The majority of human cases represent a<br />

progression from a “simple” parapneumonic effusion.<br />

This aetiology is therefore perhaps more like the proposed<br />

aetiology in feline cases and therefore the pathophysiology<br />

between canine, feline and human cases appear to differ.<br />

This may affect the success of treatment modalities.<br />

Additionally, many human cases of empyema are treated<br />

at the fibropurulent stage. It may be the case that many<br />

veterinary cases are identified at the later organisational<br />

stage although this is not confirmed in the literature as no<br />

studies have attempted to grade the degree of pyothorax<br />

in the veterinary literature.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 167 small animal soft tissue session


There are 3 randomised prospective trials (1 adult and 2<br />

paediatric) examining the difference between early surgery<br />

using video assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) versus medical<br />

management using thoracostomy tubes +/- fibrinolytic<br />

therapy (Wait and others 1997, Sonnappa and others<br />

2006, St. Peter and others 2009). One study found a higher<br />

primary treatment success in the surgical group and surgical<br />

patients also had shorter drainage period and hospital stay<br />

(Wait and others 1997). The robustness of this trial has been<br />

questioned as numbers were small and had an unusually<br />

high clinical medical failure rate (55%) which explains the<br />

results. The 2 paediatric trials (UK and US), conducted<br />

almost simultaneously, both examined early VATS versus<br />

thoracostomy tube placement plus urokinase treatment<br />

(Sonnappa and others 2006, St. Peter and others 2009).<br />

Results were homogenous and concluded no difference in<br />

outcome between the 2 groups. Primary thoracostomy tube<br />

placement was recommended therefore based on cost and<br />

no advantage in the surgical group. With two prospective<br />

clinical trials demonstrating congruence the strongest level<br />

1 evidence is provided and the authors recommended a<br />

treatment algorithm:<br />

EMPYEMA<br />

Chest tube with fibrinolytics<br />

Drainage decreased without clinical improvement<br />

Ultrasound or CT<br />

Persistant pleural No pleural<br />

space disease space disease<br />

VATS Continue with antibiotics<br />

“Failure” of medical management is difficult to define.<br />

Should medical failure be defined as a set period after<br />

insertion of drainage when clinical improvement has not<br />

occurred or should it be defined as persistence of pleural<br />

space disease after drainage has decreased to the point<br />

of meeting chest tube removal criteria? The difficulty in<br />

deciding which cases would respond better to early surgery<br />

is impeded as different institutions and surgeons have<br />

varying criteria on which the decision for surgery are based.<br />

As an example our study demonstrated that cases were<br />

selected for surgery where a pulmonary or mediastinal<br />

mass / FB were identified by diagnostic imaging or where<br />

complications arose subsequent to medical management<br />

(Demetriou and others 2002). Other studies reported<br />

specific time periods of drainage after which surgery was<br />

selected if effusions persisted (e.g. 3-7 days). It is the<br />

author’s experience that successful medical management<br />

can still be achieved with prolonged drainage times.<br />

Can the need for surgery earlier in the course of the<br />

disease be predicted on the basis of advanced imaging? This<br />

question has not been fully answered yet in the veterinary<br />

literature however a recent study (Swinbourne and others<br />

2011) showed that CT and surgical findings are similar in<br />

most cases of canine pyothorax although how accurately it<br />

can guide treatment is not clear. Identification of a foreign<br />

body may be predictive. A recent prospective human<br />

study in the UK evaluated the role of CT in empyema and<br />

concluded that although more abnormalities were detected,<br />

the additional information did not alter management and<br />

is therefore unable to predict clinical outcome (Jaffe and<br />

others 2008). According to the British Thoracic Society<br />

guidelines CT is deemed unnecessary for most cases but<br />

has a role in complicated cases e.g. failure to aspirate<br />

fluid and failure of medical management (Balfour-Lynn and<br />

others 2005, Davies and others 2010). These guidelines<br />

also state that a lung abscess coexisting with empyema<br />

should not normally be surgically drained, which questions<br />

the decision for surgery based on identification of a focal<br />

disease process. Ultrasound is routinely used to guide chest<br />

tube placement in addition to drainage in people and there<br />

is an argument that as ultrasound is cost effective and<br />

non-invasive it should be adopted routinely with veterinary<br />

patients in order to improve accuracy of drain placement. In<br />

conclusion more evidence is required to inform the debate<br />

whether for example early surgery is superior to drainage<br />

and at which point surgery should be contemplated. If<br />

medical management is initiated it would be logical to<br />

put forward the argument that in cases of patients with<br />

persisting sepsis in association with persistent pleural<br />

collection, despite chest tube drainage and antibiotics<br />

then early discussion with a surgeon should be prompted.<br />

Cases of Actinomyces, commonly associated with foreign<br />

bodies may also prompt early surgery.<br />

Is thoracoscopic surgery preferable to open thoracotomy?<br />

This again is a question that cannot be answered in the<br />

veterinary literature. From personnel communication<br />

VATS has been used successfully in dogs and cats with<br />

pyothorax to aid chest drain placement and debridement<br />

/ decortication. Certainly, in other procedures, minimally<br />

invasive surgery is associated with reduced morbidity and<br />

improved clinical recovery compared with open techniques,<br />

however evidence directly relating to thoracoscopy and<br />

pyothorax is lacking. In the human literature there are a<br />

few studies (case series / retrospective) directly comparing<br />

VATS with open surgery that suggest VATS has the same<br />

small animal soft tissue session 168 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


ate of success as open thoracotomy but offers substantial<br />

advantages over thoracotomy in terms of resolution of<br />

the disease, hospital stay and cosmesis (Chambers and<br />

others 2010). Conversion rates vary with reports (0-86%).<br />

A prospective and randomized study is required to confirm<br />

these findings to show that this relatively new form of<br />

treatment is more effective and safer that the existing<br />

operative techniques.<br />

Does pulmonary decortication have a niche in the<br />

management of pyothorax in animals? The aims of<br />

decortication are to eliminate infection and achieve<br />

expansion of the underlying lung to improve lung function.<br />

Decortication carries with it a risk of mortalitily, substantial<br />

blood and air loss and increased surgical times. However,<br />

there is to date, little evidence to guide surgical decisionmaking,<br />

as the effectiveness of decortication in achieving<br />

lung re-expansion has never been fully evaluated.<br />

Additionally, the premise that adequate re-expansion via<br />

effective intrinsic fibrinolysis cannot be achieved has never<br />

been challenged. A recent article in “press” however has<br />

attempted to address this question and concluded that<br />

debridement alone without decortication can achieve lung<br />

re-expansion in patients with empyema (Kho and others<br />

2010). Thus the benefit of decortication in relation to its<br />

risks has to be questioned.<br />

References<br />

• Waddell, L.S, Brady, C.A., & Drobatz, K.J. (2002). Risk<br />

factors, prognostic indicators, and outcome of pyothorax<br />

in cats: 80 cases (1986-1999). Journal of the American<br />

Veterinary Medicine Association, 15, 819-824<br />

• Barrs, V.R., Allan, G.S., Beatty, J.A. & Malik, R. (2005).<br />

Feline pyothorax: a retrospective study of 27 cases in<br />

Australia. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 7,<br />

211-222<br />

• Rooney, M.B. & Monnet, E. (2002) Medical and surgical<br />

treatment of pyothorax in dogs: 26 cases (1991-2001).<br />

Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association<br />

221, 86-92<br />

• Johnson, M.S. & Martin, M.W.S. (2007) Successful medical<br />

treatment of 15 dogs with pyothorax. Journal of <strong>Small</strong><br />

Animal Practice, 48, 12-16<br />

• Boothe, H.W., Howe, L.M., Boothe, D.M., Reynolds, L.A. &<br />

Carpenter, M. (2010). Journal of the American Veterinary<br />

Medicine Association, 236, 657-663<br />

• Demetriou, J.L., Foale, R.D., Ladlow, JJ., McGrotty,<br />

Y., Faulkner, J. & Kirby, B.M. (2002) Canine and feline<br />

pyothorax: a retrospective study of 50 cases in the UK and<br />

Ireland. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice, 43, 388-394<br />

• Wait, M.A., Sharma, S., Hohn, J. & Dal Nogare, A. (1997) A<br />

randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest, 111, 1548-<br />

1551<br />

• Sonnappa, S., Cohen, G., Owens, C.M., van Doorn, C.,<br />

Cairns, J., Stanojevic, S., Elliott, M.J. & Jaffe, A. (2006).<br />

Comparison of urokinase and Video-assisted thoracoscopic<br />

surgery for treatment of childhood empyema. American<br />

Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 174,<br />

221-227<br />

• St. Peter, S.D., Tsao, K., Harrison, C., Jackson, M.A., Spilde,<br />

T.L., Keckler, S.J., Sharp, S.W., Andrews, W.S., Holcomb III,<br />

G.W. & Ostlie, D.J. (2009) Thoracoscopic decortications vs<br />

thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children: a<br />

prospective randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Surgery,<br />

44, 106-111<br />

• Balfour-Lynn, I.M., Abrahamson, E., Cohen, G., Hartley, J.,<br />

King, S., Parikh, D., Spencer, D., Thomson, A.H. & Urquhart,<br />

D. (2005). BTS guidelines for the management of pleural<br />

infection in children. Thorax, 60, (Suppl 1 )i1-i21<br />

• Davies, H.E., Davies, R.J.O. & Davies, C.W.H. (2010)<br />

Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic<br />

Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax, 65, (Suppl<br />

2) ii41-ii53<br />

• Swinbourne, R., Baines, E.A., Baines, S.J. & Halfacree, Z.J.<br />

(2011) Computed tomographic findings in canine pyothorax<br />

an correlation with findings at exploratory thoracotomy.<br />

Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice, 52, 203-208<br />

• Jaffe, A., Calder, A.D., Owens, C.M., Stanojevic, S. &<br />

Sonnappa, S. (2008) Role of routine computed tomography<br />

in paediatric pleural empyema, Thorax, 63, 897-902<br />

• Chambers, A., Routledge, T., Dunning, J. & Scarci, M. (2010)<br />

Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical decortications<br />

superior to open surgery in the management of adults with<br />

primary empyema? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic<br />

Surgery, 11, 171-177<br />

• Kho, P., Karunanantham, J., Leung. M. & Lim, E. (2010)<br />

Debridement alone without decortications can achieve lung<br />

re-expansion in patients with empyema: an observational<br />

study. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (in<br />

press).<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 169 small animal soft tissue session


small animal soft tissue session 170 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />

In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical <strong>–</strong><br />

Pancreatitis in dogs and cats<br />

Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 15.15 <strong>–</strong> 16.20


Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: what have we learnt on<br />

the last 15 years?<br />

P. Watson, MA,VetMD, CertVR, DSAM, ECVIM, MRCVS<br />

Queen's Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom<br />

Pancreatitis remains a very challenging disease in small<br />

animals, both to diagnose and treat. It is almost equally<br />

challenging in humans. There are no specific treatments<br />

for the disease and therapy remains supportive. It is<br />

frustrating for the surgeon because there are very few<br />

(no?) effective surgical treatments and in fact early<br />

surgical intervention may have a negative impact. In<br />

humans, necrosectomy may help some cases <strong>–</strong> but only if<br />

delayed. Studies have suggested that early necrosectomy<br />

is associated with increased mortality compared with<br />

necrosectomies delayed for a month 1 . Even with infected<br />

pancreatic necrosis, surgery does not appear to reduce<br />

the mortality over medical management 2 . This is largely<br />

because early mortality is due to SIRS and organ failure<br />

and surgery appears to have little impact on this. There are<br />

no comparable studies in dogs.<br />

Mortality from severe acute pancreatitis is up to 20%<br />

in humans 3 . The reported mortality from all cases of acute<br />

pancreatitis (not just severe) has reduced from 12% to 4%<br />

in one centre in the US 4 and from 7.4 to 1.9% in Japan 5<br />

over the last 10 years and the reduction in mortality has<br />

been attributed largely to early aggressive fluid therapy<br />

reducing the risk and impact of SIRS 4;6 . The true mortality<br />

in dogs and cats is unknown but is likely similar. Chronic<br />

pancreatitis is a common disease in humans and dogs<br />

and is a significant cause of ongoing pain and morbidity,<br />

resulting in total pancreatectomy in some individuals to<br />

control the clinical signs.<br />

However, there is hope on the horizon. Recent advances<br />

in genetics and immunology have increased understanding<br />

of causes in humans and very recent work in dogs suggests<br />

new aetiologies and potential treatments. Recent work on<br />

early feeding has also changed the paradigm for nutrition<br />

in pancreatitis in both humans and dogs. This lecture aims<br />

to focus on advances in a few key areas relating to causes<br />

and treatment.<br />

An update on prevalence and causes of pancreatitis<br />

in dogs and cats<br />

Acute pancreatitis is neutrophilic inflammation, necrosis<br />

and oedema of a previously ‘normal’ pancreas. It may<br />

present clinically as a mild or severe disease and there is<br />

normalisation of pancreatic function and structure when the<br />

episode resolves. Relapsing acute pancreatitis describes<br />

repeated bouts of acute, self-resolving inflammation.<br />

This is not the same as chronic pancreatitis! Chronic<br />

pancreatitis (CP) is defined as a continuing inflammatory<br />

disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic<br />

parenchyma leading to progressive or permanent<br />

impairment of exocrine or endocrine function or both. The<br />

difference from true acute pancreatitis is thus histological<br />

and not clinical. As in other organs, true ‘acute’ pancreatitis<br />

is potentially reversible if the animal recovers with no<br />

permanent histological changes in the pancreas whereas<br />

chronic disease is not. The gold standard for diagnosis of<br />

both acute and chronic pancreatitis is histology but this is<br />

rarely indicated or performed in dogs or cats. Non-invasive<br />

diagnosis in small animals with the currently available<br />

diagnostic imaging and blood tests is not 100% sensitive<br />

and specific even in acute disease and their sensitivity is<br />

relatively low for chronic disease 7 .<br />

Traditionally, it has been assumed that cats most<br />

commonly suffer from CP whereas dogs suffer most from<br />

acute pancreatitis. However, the early literature published<br />

on canine pancreatic disease in the 1960’s and 1970’s<br />

recognized it as a common disease of clinical significance.<br />

It was noted that a high proportion of cases of exocrine<br />

pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in dogs were caused by CP, and<br />

also that it might be responsible for up to 30% or more of<br />

cases of diabetes mellitus (DM). More recent pathological<br />

and clinical studies in both dogs 8, 7;9 and cats 10 have<br />

reconfirmed CP as a common and clinically relevant disease<br />

in both dogs and cats. It is frequently under-recognised<br />

because of difficulty in obtaining a non-invasive diagnosis.<br />

None of the currently available blood tests, including cPLI,<br />

have a high sensitivity for diagnosis and transcutaneous<br />

ultrasound is also not sensitive.<br />

In dogs, the post-mortem prevalence of CP is up to 34%,<br />

particularly in susceptible breeds, and even in studies<br />

of fatal acute pancreatitis, acute-on-chronic disease<br />

accounts for 40% of cases 11 . This is an important point:<br />

nearly half of all dogs which present for the first time<br />

acutely actually already have significant underlying chronic<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 173 small animal soft tissue session


disease which increases their risk both of extrahepatic<br />

biliary obstruction and of long term sequelae. In cats, an<br />

even higher post-mortem prevalence of CP of 60% has<br />

been reported 10 . It must be noted that post-mortem studies<br />

tend to overestimate the prevalence of chronic diseases,<br />

which leave permanent architectural changes in the organ,<br />

whereas the prevalence of acute, totally reversible diseases<br />

will be underestimated, unless the animal dies during the<br />

episode. Nevertheless, it is clear that there are many more<br />

cases of CP in veterinary practice than currently recognized,<br />

and that a number of these are clinically relevant.<br />

The true prevalence of acute pancreatitis in dogs and<br />

cats remains unknown as the only published studies are<br />

either post mortem studies (which over estimate chronic<br />

disease, for the reasons given above) or only report fatal<br />

acute pancreatitis 11 , so the prevalence of resolved cases<br />

is unknown.<br />

The causes of acute and chronic pancreatitis likely overlap<br />

and are usually unknown in dogs. However, differences<br />

in pathological appearance suggest different causes in<br />

different breeds which we are just beginning to elucidate 9 .<br />

The histological appearance in terriers, and preponderance<br />

of acute disease, are suggestive of premature enzyme<br />

activation within the pancreas as a result of hereditary<br />

pancreatic enzyme mutations as seen in hereditary<br />

pancreatitis in humans. However, the only breed in which<br />

genetic studies have thus far been reported is the miniature<br />

schnauzer in which trypsinogen mutations were NOT<br />

found although some dogs had variants of the pancreatic<br />

secretory trypsin inhibitor gene of unclear significance 12;13 .<br />

Our studies of chronic pancreatitis showed increase<br />

prevalences and breed-specific histopathologies in Cavalier<br />

King Charles Spaniels (CKCS), Cocker Spaniels, Collies<br />

and Boxers in the UK 9 . An independent large study of EPI<br />

in the UK found an increased prevalence in older CKCS,<br />

supporting this breed association 14 . Chronic pancreatitis<br />

is extremely common in CKCS and we believe it may be<br />

due to an underlying systemic fibrotic disease which we<br />

are currently investigating.<br />

The particular form of chronic pancreatitis recognized<br />

in English Cocker Spaniels in the UK is thought to be an<br />

autoimmune 15 . As in human autoimmune pancreatitis, it<br />

typically affects middle-aged to older dogs, with a higher<br />

prevalence in males, and at least 50% of affected dogs<br />

subsequently develop DM, EPI, or both. Anecdotally,<br />

blue roans are most affected. Dogs also often have<br />

other concurrent autoimmune disease, particularly<br />

keratoconjunctivitis sicca and anal sacculitis may also be<br />

associated. There is often a mass-like lesion on ultrasound,<br />

and biopsies show a typical perilobular diffuse fibrotic<br />

and lymphocytic disease centred on perilobular ducts and<br />

vessels, with loss of large ducts and hyperplasia of smaller<br />

ducts. Immunohistochemistry shows a preponderance of<br />

duct and vein-centred CD3+ lymphocytes (i.e.; T-cells). The<br />

human disease is believed to be a duct-centred immune<br />

reaction and responds to steroid therapy, including a<br />

reduction in insulin requirement in some diabetics. There<br />

are not yet any controlled trials evaluating the use of<br />

immunosuppressive drugs in English Cocker Spaniels with<br />

chronic pancreatitis but there is now enough circumstantial<br />

evidence to justify their use in this particular breed.<br />

An update on feeding in acute pancreatitis<br />

There have been a number of recent studies and metaanalyses<br />

of studies of nutrition in human acute pancreatitis<br />

which have lead to recent changes in advice for ‘best<br />

practice’ for feeding these cases. There is enough evidence<br />

for early feed in humans now to justify commencement of<br />

a very large prospective randomised clinical trial of early<br />

feeding (less than 24 hours) compared with delayed feeding<br />

(3-4 days) in predicted severe acute pancreatitis 16 .<br />

Ten to twenty years ago, it was considered that early<br />

enteral nutrition was contra-indicated because it was<br />

likely to result in cholecystokinin and secretin release with<br />

consequent release of pancreatic enzymes and worsening<br />

of pancreatitis and associated pain. Total parenteral<br />

nutrition (TPN) seemed a more logical route early in the<br />

disease process, with jejunal tube feeding later in the<br />

disease aiming to bypass the areas of pancreatic enzyme<br />

stimulation. However, recent studies have suggested that<br />

early enteral nutrition is preferable to TPN and current best<br />

practice in human medicine is outlined below 17 . A recently<br />

published open-label prospective pilot study of enteral<br />

nutrition in dogs with pancreatitis showed a good outcome<br />

for dogs fed enterally proximal to the pylorus and justifies<br />

future larger prospective studies 18 . Note particularly that<br />

early enteral nutrition is PARTICULARLY indicated in severe<br />

disease, which is perhaps unexpected and often counter<br />

to our current practice in dogs.<br />

• A negative nitrogen balance is common in acute<br />

pancreatitis and is associated with a 10 fold<br />

increase in mortality 17<br />

• Iv feeding of glucose, protein or lipids do not<br />

stimulate pancreatic secretions.<br />

• Intrajejunal infusion of elemental diets in humans 17<br />

and experimental canine models 19 of pancreatitis<br />

does not stimulate pancreatic enzyme release<br />

significantly<br />

• Early ORAL feeding after acute pancreatitis in man<br />

IS associated with increased pain, whereas jejunal<br />

feeding is not 20 .<br />

• THIS IS IMPORTANT: EARLY INTRAJEJUNAL<br />

FEEDING IS PREFERRED OVER TPN IN PATIENTS<br />

WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS: PARTICULARLY<br />

SEVERE DISEASE. Results of meta-analysis show<br />

that intra-jejunal feeding after 48 hours significantly<br />

small animal soft tissue session 174 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


educed incidences of infections, reduced surgical<br />

interventions and reduced length of hospital stay<br />

and cost over TPN. 17 . These findings have also<br />

been replicated in dogs with experimental acute<br />

pancreatitis 21 but not yet in clinical pancreatitis<br />

in dogs, although the experiences from early<br />

enteral feeding in other GI diseases in this species<br />

such as parvo virus enteritis 22 suggests the<br />

recommendations may be similar. Most recently,<br />

it has been suggested that feeding may even been<br />

given safely intra-gastrically in humans with acute<br />

pancreatitis, although more studies are needed to<br />

confirm this 17 .<br />

• Type of diet used: in humans, elemental diets have<br />

been used in most cases and usually by continuous<br />

infusion 17 . No studies have really assessed whether<br />

less elemental diets would also work. Recent<br />

studies looking at ‘immune-modulating’ micronutrients<br />

in the diets such as glutamine, fibre,<br />

arginine, omega-3 fatty acids and probiotic bacteria<br />

have been encouraging 17;23, but again more studies<br />

are needed before definite conclusions can be<br />

drawn. No similar studies have been undertaken<br />

in dogs and cats.<br />

• In MILD acute pancreatitis in man, current best<br />

practice is to withhold food in many cases for a<br />

little longer. Fluids, electrolytes and analgesics<br />

are delivered for 2-5 days and then a diet rich<br />

in carbohydrate and moderate in fat and protein<br />

is commenced with discharge on a normal diet<br />

within 4-7 days 17 . Again, there are no specific<br />

recommendations for mild acute disease in dogs<br />

and cats.<br />

• IN CATS: current anecdotal recommendations<br />

are to feed immediately in mild, moderate and<br />

severe pancreatitis, preferably via a jejunostomy<br />

tube, although again it has been suggested that<br />

gastrostromy tubes with multiple low volume feeds<br />

should also be safe. There is just one case report of<br />

using an endoscopically placed J-tube in a cat with<br />

acute pancreatitis 24 . The emphasis on early feeding<br />

in cats comes from the risk of hepatic lipidosis.<br />

References<br />

1. Wittau M, Scheele J, Golz I, Henne-Bruns D, Isenmann<br />

R. Changing role of surgery in necrotizing pancreatitis:<br />

a single-center experience. Hepatogastroenterology<br />

2010;57:1300-1304.<br />

2. Garg PK, Sharma M, Madan K, Sahni P, Banerjee D, Goyal<br />

R. Primary conservative treatment results in mortality<br />

comparable to surgery in patients with infected pancreatic<br />

necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:1089-94.<br />

3. Al M, I. Severe acute pancreatitis: pathogenetic aspects<br />

and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:675-<br />

84.<br />

4. Wall I, Badalov N, Baradarian R, Iswara K, Li JJ, Tenner S.<br />

Decreased mortality in acute pancreatitis related to early<br />

aggressive hydration. Pancreas 2011;40:547-50.<br />

5. Satoh K, Shimosegawa T, Masamune A, Hirota M, Kikuta<br />

K, Kihara Y, Kuriyama S, Tsuji I, Satoh A, Hamada S.<br />

Nationwide epidemiological survey of acute pancreatitis in<br />

Japan. Pancreas 2011;40:503-7.<br />

6. Warndorf MG, Kurtzman JT, Bartel MJ, Cox M, Mackenzie<br />

T, Robinson S, Burchard PR, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. Early<br />

Fluid Resuscitation Reduces Morbidity Among Patients<br />

With Acute Pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011.<br />

7. Watson PJ, Archer J, Roulois AJA, Scase TJ, Herrtage<br />

ME. An observational study of 14 cases of canine chronic<br />

pancreatitis. Veterinary Record 2010;167:968-76.<br />

8. Newman S, Steiner J, Woosley K, Barton L, Ruaux C,<br />

Williams D. Localization of pancreatic inflammation and<br />

necrosis in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:488-93.<br />

9. Watson PJ, Roulois A, Scase T, Johnston PEJ, Thomson H,<br />

Herrtage ME. Prevalence and breed distribution of chronic<br />

pancreatitis at post mortem in first opinion dogs. J <strong>Small</strong><br />

Anim Pract 2007;609-18.<br />

10. De Cock HE, Forman MA, Farver TB, Marks SL. Prevalence<br />

and histopathologic characteristics of pancreatitis in cats.<br />

Vet Pathol 2007;44:39-49.<br />

11. Hess RS, Kass PH, Shofer FS, Van Winkle TJ, Washabau<br />

RJ. Evaluation of risk factors for fatal acute pancreatitis in<br />

dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:46-51.<br />

12. Bishop MA, Steiner JM, Moore LE, Williams DA. Evaluation<br />

of the cationic trypsinogen gene for potential mutations<br />

in miniature schnauzers with pancreatitis. Can J Vet Res<br />

2004;68:315-18.<br />

13. Bishop MA, Xenoulis PG, Levinski MD, Suchodolski JS,<br />

Steiner JM. Identification of variants of the SPINK1<br />

gene and their association with pancreatitis in Miniature<br />

Schnauzers. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:527-33.<br />

14. Batchelor DJ, Noble PJ, Cripps PJ, Taylor RH, McLean<br />

L, Leibl MA, German AJ. Breed associations for canine<br />

exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. J Vet Intern Med<br />

2007;21:207-14.<br />

15. Watson, P. J, Roulois, A. J. A, Scase, T., holloway, A., and<br />

Herrtage, M. E. Characterization of chronic pancreatitis<br />

in English cocker spaniels. Journal of Veterinary Internal<br />

Medicine In press. 2011.<br />

Ref Type: Abstract<br />

16. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van BS, Ahmed AU, Besselink<br />

MG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Brink MA,<br />

Dejong CH, van Geenen EJ, van GH, Heisterkamp J, Houdijk<br />

AP, Jansen JM, Karsten TM, Manusama ER, Nieuwenhuijs<br />

VB, van RB, Schaapherder AF, van der Schelling GP, Spanier<br />

MB, Tan A, Vecht J, Weusten BL, Witteman BJ, Akkermans<br />

LM, Gooszen HG. Pancreatitis, very early compared with<br />

normal start of enteral feeding (PYTHON trial): design and<br />

rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial. Trials<br />

2011;12:73.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 175 small animal soft tissue session


17. Meier RF, Beglinger C. Nutrition in pancreatic diseases.<br />

Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:507-29.<br />

18. Mansfield CS, James FE, Steiner JM, Suchodolski<br />

JS, Robertson ID, Hosgood G. A Pilot Study to Assess<br />

Tolerability of Early Enteral Nutrition via Esophagostomy<br />

Tube Feeding in Dogs with Severe Acute Pancreatitis. J Vet<br />

Intern Med 2011;25:419-25.<br />

19. Qin HL, Su ZD, Hu LG, Ding ZX, Lin QT. Effect of parenteral<br />

and early intrajejunal nutrition on pancreatic digestive<br />

enzyme synthesis, storage and discharge in dog models of<br />

acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:1123-28.<br />

20. Chebli JM, Gaburri PD, De Souza AF, Junior EV, Gaburri AK,<br />

Felga GE, De Paula EA, Forn CG, De Almeida GV, De Castro<br />

NF. Oral refeeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis:<br />

prevalence and risk factors of relapsing abdominal pain. J<br />

Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:1385-89.<br />

21. Qin HL, Su ZD, Hu LG, Ding ZX, Lin QT. Effect of early<br />

intrajejunal nutrition on pancreatic pathological features<br />

and gut barrier function in dogs with acute pancreatitis. Clin<br />

Nutr 2002;21:469-73.<br />

22. Mohr AJ, Leisewitz AL, Jacobson LS, Steiner JM, Ruaux<br />

CG, Williams DA. Effect of early enteral nutrition on<br />

intestinal permeability, intestinal protein loss, and outcome<br />

in dogs with severe parvoviral enteritis. J Vet Intern Med<br />

2003;17:791-98.<br />

23. Pearce CB, Sadek SA, Walters AM, Goggin PM, Somers SS,<br />

Toh SK, Johns T, Duncan HD. A double-blind, randomised,<br />

controlled trial to study the effects of an enteral feed<br />

supplemented with glutamine, arginine, and omega-3 fatty<br />

acid in predicted acute severe pancreatitis. JOP 2006;7:361-<br />

71.<br />

24. Jennings M, Center SA, Barr SC, Brandes D. Successful<br />

treatment of feline pancreatitis using an endoscopically<br />

placed gastrojejunostomy tube. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc<br />

2001;37:145-52.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 176 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Surgical treatment: necrosectomies,<br />

pancreatectomies, and drainage<br />

Robert N White BSc (Hons) BVetMedCertVA DSAS (Soft Tissue) Dipl<strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, Shirley, Solihull, United Kingdom<br />

Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory disease of<br />

the exocrine pancreas that ranges from mild self-limiting<br />

disease to severe progressive disease involving peripancreatic<br />

tissues and other remote organs. Cats and<br />

dogs with pancreatitis typically present with numerous<br />

clinical signs the commonest of which are abdominal pain,<br />

lethargy, vomiting, and anorexia (Hill and Van Winkle 1993,<br />

Thompson and others 2009, Son and others 2010).<br />

In man, definitionsfor pancreatitis wereproposed by the<br />

International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis (The Atlanta<br />

Symposium) in 1992 (Table 1)<br />

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a mild, self-limiting disease<br />

in the majority of affected humans. However, 10-20% of<br />

human patients develop a more severe form of the disease<br />

characterized by sepsis and multiple organ failure (MOF),<br />

with mortality rates approaching 30% (Holm and others<br />

2003). Considerable efforts have been directed toward<br />

early identification of patients at risk for developing severe<br />

AP. Several methods of severity determination have been<br />

developed in humans, and include clinical scoring systems,<br />

serum markers, and evaluation of contrast-enhanced<br />

computed tomography (CECT). The two most common<br />

causes of AP in humans are gallstones and alcohol abuse,<br />

Table 1<br />

together accounting for up to 80% of cases (Gullo and<br />

others 2002).<br />

AP is a common disease in dogs with reported mortality<br />

rates ranging from 27 to 42%, although most dogs that<br />

have mild disease recover within a few days (Cook and<br />

others 1993, Ruaux 1998). In dogs there are no reports as<br />

to the prevalence of mild acute pancreatitis (Thompson and<br />

others 2009). Although there are no studies evaluating the<br />

cause of death in dogs with AP, most dogs that develop<br />

systemic complications, such as respiratory distress, acute<br />

kidney failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation,<br />

are considered to have a guarded to poor prognosis.<br />

Although pancreatic infection is rarely documented in dogs,<br />

the extent of pancreatic necrosis may be an important<br />

contributing prognostic factor of severity, similar to<br />

what has been shown in humans (Ruaux 2000). Despite<br />

aetiological difference between human and small animal<br />

AP, the pathophysiology of AP is similar. The initial event<br />

in AP is the intracellular activation of trypsinogen to<br />

trypsin, resulting in pancreatic cell destruction. Trypsin is<br />

also capable of activating all other pancreatic zymogens,<br />

causing further injury and auto-digestion of the gland.<br />

Because of these similarities, novel concepts used in<br />

Acute pancreatitis (AP) Acute inflammatory process of the pancreas with variable involvement of other regional tissues or<br />

remote organ systems<br />

Severe AP Association with multiple organ failure (MOF) and/or local complications, such as necrosis, abscess,<br />

or pseudocyst<br />

Acute fluid collection Occurs in the course of AP, located in or near the pancreas, always lacking a wall of granulation or<br />

fibrous tissue; bacteria variably present; occurs in 30-50% of severe AP; most acute fluid collections<br />

regress, but some progress to pseudocyst or abscess<br />

Pancreatic necrosis Diffuse or focal area(s) of non-viable pancreatic parenchyma, typically associated with peri-pancreatic<br />

fat necrosis, diagnosed by CT scan with intravenous contrast enhancement<br />

Acute pseudocyst Collection of pancreatic juice enclosed by a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue, which arises as a<br />

consequence of AP, pancreatic trauma, or chronic pancreatic; formation requires 4 or more weeks<br />

from onset of AP<br />

Pancreatic abscess Circumscribed intra-abdominal collection of pus usually in or near the pancreas, containing little or<br />

no pancreatic necrosis, arises as a consequence of AP or pancreatic trauma<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 177 small animal soft tissue session


humans regarding severity assessment and therapy may<br />

be applicable to dogs and cats.<br />

Cats have different embryological development and<br />

anatomy of the pancreas from other species, including<br />

dogs. The pancreatic duct is derived from the ventral<br />

anlage and is the main functional pancreatic duct in cats,<br />

but it is of minor importance, and may be absent in dogs.<br />

In cats the accessory pancreatic duct generally does not<br />

persist, with 80% of cats having only one pancreatic<br />

duct. The accessory pancreatic duct enters the duodenum<br />

through the minor duodenal papilla. The pancreatic duct<br />

enters through the major duodenal papilla. In cats this is<br />

the main, and frequently the only, pancreatic duct opening<br />

into the duodenum, contiguously with the bile duct. It is<br />

implied that this single opening of the pancreatic duct (that<br />

is contiguous with the opening of the common bile duct)<br />

is the reason for an association between pancreatitis and<br />

extrabiliary tract obstruction in the species (Warman and<br />

Harvey 2007, Son and others 2010).<br />

The most appropriate therapy for acute necrotizing<br />

pancreatitis remains controversial. Historically, in humans,<br />

surgical intervention following medical stabilization was<br />

commonly performed to confirm the diagnosis and to treat<br />

acute pancreatic necrosis. In recent years, there has been a<br />

decreased emphasis on early surgical intervention because<br />

improved non-invasive imaging, therapeutic techniques,<br />

and intensive care have become more readily available.<br />

Surgical intervention in humans<br />

In humans, the precise indications for surgery in patients<br />

with pancreatitis have evolved in recent years. Whereas<br />

early aggressive debridement was used commonly for all<br />

patients with pancreatic necrosis in the past, now most<br />

pancreatic surgeons have adopted a more conservative<br />

algorithm of selective and delayed pancreatic debridement<br />

(Büchler and others 2000, Clancy and Ashley 2002).<br />

Reported indications for surgical intervention in acute<br />

necrotizing pancreatitis in man (Clancy and Ashley 2007)<br />

are,<br />

• Diagnostic uncertainty<br />

• Intra-abdominal catastrophe unrelated to necrotizing<br />

pancreatitis such as perforated viscus<br />

• Infected necrosis documented by FNA or<br />

extraluminal gas on CT scan<br />

• Severe sterile necrosis<br />

• Symptomatic organized pancreatic necrosis<br />

In man, surgical therapy for acute pancreatitis<br />

may address either the aetiology of pancreatitis or<br />

its complications. Surgery may also be indicated in<br />

the management of pancreatic abscessation and the<br />

management of certain cases of pancreatic pseudocyst.<br />

Operations addressing aetiology generally are limited to<br />

interventions to eliminate cholelithiasis and thus eliminate<br />

gallstone pancreatitis. Operations performed to specifically<br />

manage the complications of pancreatitis including the<br />

following.<br />

Resection<br />

Pancreatic resection for acute pancreatitis is primarily of<br />

historical interest only and is not recommended currently.<br />

In the 1960s and 1970s partial and total pancreatectomy<br />

for pancreatitis was performed on the basis that remaining<br />

diseased pancreas could be a source of persistent<br />

inflammation. Operative mortality was as high as 60%.<br />

Pancreatic debridement<br />

All techniques of pancreatic debridement are based on<br />

two principles; 1) wide removal of devitalized and necrotic<br />

tissue with thorough exploration and unroofing of all<br />

collections of solid and liquid debris, and, 2) the assurance<br />

of postoperative removal of the products of ongoing local<br />

inflammation and infection that persist after debridement.<br />

Techniques include debridement with closure over drains,<br />

debridement with open packing, and debridement with<br />

closure over irrigation drains and postoperative lavage are<br />

the three methods reported commonly.<br />

Pancreatic pseudocysts<br />

A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic<br />

secretions and cellular debris enclosed within a fibrous<br />

sac that lacks an epithelial wall. Pseudocyst formation is<br />

a common complication of acute pancreatitis in humans<br />

occurring in up to 54% of pancreatitis patients (Clancy<br />

and Ashley 2007). The principle indications for treating<br />

pancreatic pseudocysts in man are to relieve symptoms<br />

and to prevent complications of the pseudocyst. Treatment<br />

approaches for pancreatic pseudocyst in man are listed<br />

(Table 2) as follows (Clancy and Ashley 2007).<br />

Approaches Examples<br />

Open surgical Cystogastrostomy<br />

Cystoduodenostomy<br />

Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy<br />

Distal pancreatectomy +/- splenectomy<br />

External drainage<br />

Laparoscopic Cystogastrostomy<br />

Cystoduodenostomy<br />

Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy<br />

Distal pancreatectomy +/- splenectomy<br />

External drainage<br />

Radiologic Percutaneous drainage<br />

Percutaneous transgastric drainage<br />

Endoscopic Transpapillary pancreatic duct stent<br />

Transgastric stent<br />

Transduodenal stent<br />

small animal soft tissue session 178 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


In recent years there has been a proliferation of reports<br />

describing minimally invasive approaches in necrotizing<br />

pancreatitis. It appears that advances in minimally invasive<br />

technology hold promise as adjuncts to open procedures in<br />

the future, particularly as a means of delaying surgery to<br />

facilitate debridement when the necrotic pancreas becomes<br />

more organized (Pamoukian and Gagner 2001).<br />

Surgical intervention in dogs and cats<br />

The previous perception that surgical management is<br />

unwarranted in acute pancreatitis has been questioned<br />

recently (Thompson and others 2009). There are no<br />

established specific guidelines for surgical intervention<br />

in dogs and cats, but in dogs accepted criteria include<br />

evidence of infection, local complications (abscessation or<br />

biliary obstruction), diagnostic confirmation (of neoplastic<br />

versus non-neoplastic disease), persistent distant organ<br />

complications, and failure to respond to aggressive medical<br />

management (Thompson and others 2009).<br />

There is similar confusion with regards to the<br />

management of chronic pancreatitis and its associated<br />

conditions including pancreatic pseudocysts and pancreatic<br />

abscessation. Pancreatic pseudocysts, and their treatment,<br />

have only rarely reported in dogs and cats (Bellenger<br />

and others 1989, Smith and Biller 1998, VanEnkevort<br />

and others 1999, Marchevsky and others 2000, Jerram<br />

and others 2004). Reported surgical managements<br />

include cystogastrostomy (Bellenger and others 1989),<br />

cystoduodenostomy and omentalization (Marchevsky and<br />

others 2000), omentalization (Jerram and others 2004),<br />

ultrasonographic-guided drainage (Smith and Biller 1998),<br />

and open external drainage (VanEnkevort and others 1999).<br />

The surgical management of pancreatic abscessation<br />

involves pancreatic necrosectomy and omentalization in<br />

conjunction with either closed or open peritoneal drainage<br />

for suspected septic peritonitis (Salisbury and others 1988,<br />

Johnson and Mann 2006, Anderson and others 2008). In<br />

a recent retrospective review of 36 dogs diagnosed with<br />

pancreatic abscessation despite surgical intervention 71%<br />

of the dogs died or were euthanized prior to discharge from<br />

the hospital (Anderson and others 2006).<br />

The role of minimally invasive approach for the surgical<br />

management of pancreatitis and its associated conditions<br />

remains to be defined in the dog and cat.<br />

References<br />

• Anderson JR, Cornell KK, Parnell NK and Salisbury SK<br />

(2008) Pancreatic abscess in 36 dogs: a retrospective<br />

analysis of prognostic indicators. Journal of the American<br />

Animal Hospital Association44, 171-179<br />

• Bellenger CR, Ilkiw JE and Malik R (1989) Cystogastrostomy<br />

in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst/abscess in two<br />

dogs.Veterinary Record125, 181-184<br />

• Bradley EL (1992) A clinically based classification system<br />

for acute pancreatitis; summary of the International<br />

Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September<br />

11 through 13. Archives of Surgery128, 586-590<br />

• Büchler MW, Gloor B, Müller CA, Friess H, Seiler CA and<br />

Uhl W (2000) Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment<br />

strategy according to infection. Annals of Surgery232,<br />

619-626<br />

• Clancy TE and Ashley SW (2002) Current management of<br />

necrotizing pancreatitis.Advances in Surgery36, 103-121<br />

• Clancy TE and Ashley SW (2007) Management of acute<br />

pancreatitis. In: Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, 11th<br />

Edition. MJ Zinner and SW Ashley (eds). McGraw Hill<br />

Medical, New York. pp 939-982<br />

• Cook AK, Breitschwerdt EB, Levine JF, Bunch SE and Linn<br />

LO (1993) Risk factors associated with acute pancreatitis<br />

in dogs: 101 cases (1985-1990). Journal of the American<br />

Veterinary Medical Association203, 673-679<br />

• Gullo L, Migliori M, Pezzilli R, Olál A, Farkas G, Levy P,<br />

Arvanitakis C, Lankisch P and Beger H (2002) An update<br />

on recurrent acute pancreatitis: data from five European<br />

countries. American Journal of Gastroenterology97, 1959-<br />

1962<br />

• Hill RC and Van Winkle T (1993) Acute necrotizing<br />

pancreatitis and acute suppurativepancreatitis in the cat.A<br />

retrospective study of 40 cases (1976-1989).Journal of<br />

Veterinary Internal Medicine7, 25-33<br />

• Holm JL, Chan DL and Rozanski EA (2003) Acute<br />

pancreatitis in dogs.Journal of Veterinary Emergency and<br />

Critical Care13, 201-213<br />

• Jerram RM, Warman CG, Davies ES, Robson MC and<br />

Walker AM (2004) Successful treatment of a pancreatic<br />

pseudocyst by omentalisation in a dog. New Zealand<br />

Veterinary Journal52, 197-201<br />

• Johnson MD and Mann FA (2006) Treatment fro pancreatic<br />

abscesses via omentalization with abdominal closure<br />

versus open peritoneal drainage in dogs: 15 cases<br />

(1994-2004). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical<br />

Association228, 397-402<br />

• Marchevsky AM, Yovich JC and Wyatt KM (2000) Pancreatic<br />

pseudocyst causing extrahepatic biliary obstruction in a<br />

dog. Australian Veterinary Journal78, 99-101<br />

• Pamoukian VN and Gagner M (2001) Laparoscopic<br />

necrosectomy for acute necrotizing pancreatitis.Journal of<br />

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery8, 221-223<br />

• Ruaux CG and Atwell R (1998) General practice attitudes<br />

to the treatment of spontaneous canine acute pancreatitis.<br />

Australian Veterinary Practice28, 67-73<br />

• Ruaux CG (2000) Pathophysiology of organ failure in severe<br />

acute pancreatitis in dogs.Compendium of Continuing<br />

Education for the Practicing Veterinarian22, 531-542<br />

• Salisbury SK, Lantz GC, Nelson RW and Kazacos EA (1988)<br />

Pancreatic abscess in dogs: six cases (1978-1986). Journal<br />

of the American Veterinary Medical Association193, 1104-<br />

1108<br />

• Smith SA and Biller DS (1998) Resolution of<br />

a pancreatic pseudocyst in a dog following<br />

percutaneousultrasonographic-guided drainage.Journal of<br />

the American Animal Hospital Association34, 515-522<br />

• Son TT, Thompson L, Serrano S and Seshadri (2010)<br />

Surgical intervention in the management of severe acute<br />

pancreatitis in cats: 8 cases (2003-2007). Journal of<br />

Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care20, 426-435<br />

• Thompson LJ, Seshadri R, and Raffe MR (2009)<br />

Characteristics and outcomes in surgical management of<br />

severe acute pancreatitis: 37 dogs (2001-2007). Journal of<br />

Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care19, 165-173<br />

• VanEnkevort BA, O’Brien RT and Young KM (1999)<br />

Pancreatic pseudocysts in 4 dogs and 2 cats:<br />

ultrasonographic and clinicopathologic findings. Journal of<br />

Veterinary Internal Medicine13, 309-313<br />

• Warman S and Harvey A (2007) Feline pancreatitis: current<br />

concepts and treatment guidelines. In Practice29 470-477.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 179 small animal soft tissue session


small animal soft tissue session 180 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />

In depth: VSSO <strong>–</strong> Reconstructive<br />

surgery: management of skin tumors<br />

Saturday July 9 <strong>–</strong> 14.00 <strong>–</strong> 17.50


Novel reconstructions of the tip of the nose<br />

G. ter Haar*<br />

Utrecht University, The Netherlands<br />

Crescentic Nasojugal Flap<br />

The bridge of the nose in dogs and cats can be very<br />

difficult to reconstruct due to the limited availability of<br />

free local tissues. In addition to free skin grafts, many skin<br />

flaps have been described in the veterinary literature that<br />

allow primary closure of cutaneous lesions involving the<br />

facial and nasal region. Local skin flaps would be preferable<br />

however for closure of nasal defects because they match<br />

the hair length, direction and color of the recipient site and<br />

would have a more cosmetic result. So far, practical and<br />

cosmetically satisfactory techniques with local skin flaps<br />

for closure of rostral nasal dorsum defects in dogs and cats<br />

have not been reported.<br />

Recently, a crescentic nasojugal flap (CNJF) for nasal<br />

tip reconstruction after tumor removal in human patients<br />

was described. The donor skin is harvested from the lateral<br />

side of the nose and the cheek or the perialar region.<br />

A crescentic perialar skin excision is made to enable<br />

advancement of the skin of the cheek. A second, triangular<br />

excision is made on the contralateral side of the defect to<br />

prevent a dog-ear upon closure of the defect. Upon closure,<br />

the sutures are placed in the alar and alar-labial groove,<br />

yielding the excellent cosmetic appearance of the flap in<br />

people. The feasibility of the CNJF in dogs was studied<br />

by performing the technique unilaterally and bilaterally<br />

on canine cadavers. The applicability of the CNJF for<br />

reconstruction of the rostral nasal area in a dog with a<br />

large rostral nasal defect as a result of granulomatous<br />

inflammation involving the nasal plane and the nasal<br />

dorsum was subsequently demonstrated.<br />

A mixed-breed cadaver was positioned in sternal<br />

recumbency and the nasal and labial regions were clipped.<br />

The defect, the skin that was going to be excised, and the<br />

surgical lines were drawn onto the nose. At the rostral part<br />

of the round shaped defect at the tip of the nose, a line<br />

was drawn along the border of the tip of the nose and was<br />

continued laterally in an arch shape to meet the alar groove.<br />

To avoid dog-ears upon closure, a triangle was formed<br />

around the distal part of the crescent-shaped line, which<br />

was going to be excised. The flap area was automatically<br />

outlined by the caudal part of the triangle and the medial<br />

part of the defect. To avoid a second dog-ear upon closure,<br />

two converging lines were drawn on the contralateral side<br />

of the nose with the broadest part meeting the caudolateral<br />

part of the defect. The defect, the cone-shaped area and<br />

the triangular figure were excised. The flap area was<br />

undermined to facilitate advancement to the tip of the nose<br />

using stay sutures (absorbable monofilament 2-0). The flap<br />

was attached to the underlying tissue in the site of defect<br />

using absorbable monofilament 3-0 interrupted sutures.<br />

The same suture material was used to close the edges<br />

of the former cone-shaped area and the triangular area.<br />

The skin was closed using non-absorbable monofilament<br />

4-0 interrupted sutures. This flap could also successfully<br />

be performed bilaterally and can be adjusted to assist in<br />

reconstruction of the nasal plane as demonstrated in a<br />

patient.<br />

Modified lateral rhinotomy for removal of nasal septum<br />

squamous cell carcinoma in the dog<br />

In January 2003, a 9-year-old intact male Labrador<br />

retriever dog weighing 41.3 kg was referred to the<br />

Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion <strong>Animals</strong>,<br />

Utrecht University for longstanding pruritis. During the<br />

history taking at the dermatology receiving, the owner<br />

reported right-sided epistaxis and sneezing of 8 weeks<br />

duration as additional problems, for which the dog was<br />

internally referred to the ENT section. No abnormalities<br />

were noted on physical examination of this dog, with<br />

the exception of a slightly raised, ulcerated mass, only<br />

visible on lifting the right nostril in the right nasal<br />

vestibule, originating from the nasal septum of more than<br />

1 cm in diameter and unclear caudal borders. The right<br />

submandibular lymph node was not enlarged, but a FNAB<br />

was taken and considered to be reactive lymphoid tissue.<br />

Thoracic and nasal radiographs and a complete blood<br />

count and serum biochemical examination were normal.<br />

On rhinoscopy it was demonstrated that the tumor was<br />

well circumscribed and extended caudally for 1.5 cm and<br />

was confined to the nasal septum. A histological biopsy<br />

was taken from the cranial middle part of the tumour,<br />

and a histological diagnosis of a well-differentiated<br />

squamous cell carcinoma was made. Deforming surgery<br />

small animal soft tissue session 182 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


was absolutely unacceptable to the owner; a modified<br />

lateral rhinotomy procedure was therefore proposed and<br />

carried out as described below.<br />

As described by Pavletic, it is possible to elevate the<br />

central planum as a dorsally based flap, thereby preserving<br />

this tissue while gaining access to the cranial nasal septum.<br />

To get full access to the entire tumor, this approach was<br />

combined with a lateral rhinotomy, as described by Hedlund<br />

in analogy with the technique used in humans for surgical<br />

removal of nasal septum squamous cell carcinoma. The<br />

surgeon directs the incision dorsocaudally from the angle<br />

of the rhinarium toward the nasomaxillary notch between<br />

the dorsal and ventral parietal cartilage, transecting the<br />

accessory cartilage. Using this technique the tumour could<br />

be resected (full-thickness resection of nasal septum)<br />

with wide-enough margins. The lateral rhinotomy incision<br />

was closed in three layers (nasal mucosa, cartilage or<br />

subcutaneous tissue, and skin). The nasal septum flap<br />

was resutured into position using a simple interrupted<br />

suture pattern.<br />

No complications were encountered during surgery or<br />

the immediate postoperative period. Except for a slight<br />

ventral deviation of the dorsal cranial bridge of the nose,<br />

as a result of the loss of most of the cranial cartilaginous<br />

septum, the cosmetic appearance was excellent. Pathology<br />

demonstrated fully excised well-differentiated SCC, this<br />

dog was still free of symptoms 7 years after surgery.<br />

SCC of the nasal septum is an uncommon disease in<br />

dogs, but when diagnosed in an early stage, this tumour can<br />

be removed completely using the described modified lateral<br />

rhinotomy technique with a good long-term prognosis and<br />

excellent cosmesis.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 183 small animal soft tissue session


Use of local and axial pattern flaps for reconstruction<br />

of the hard and soft palate<br />

Ramesh K Sivacolundhu, BVMS MVS FACVSc<br />

AMC, New York, N.Y., USA<br />

Abstract<br />

There are numerous conditions which may result in<br />

defects of the hard and soft palate. Reconstruction of these<br />

defects may be difficult due to anatomical limitations and<br />

limited tissue availability. The majority of palate defects,<br />

even when large, may be closed using local and/or axial<br />

pattern flaps, while other more advanced techniques such<br />

as free tissue transfer, muscle flaps and prosthetic implants<br />

are required in a smaller number of cases.<br />

Introduction<br />

Defects in the hard and soft palate may result from<br />

congenital abnormalities, resection of neoplasms,<br />

traumatic injuries, severe peridontal disease, tooth<br />

removals, severe chronic infections, and secondary to<br />

surgical and radiation therapy (1-5). Reconstruction of these<br />

defects can be challenging. The area concerned presents<br />

a number of anatomical limitations, with difficulties in<br />

exposure and access to affected areas, and limited tissue<br />

available for reconstruction of defects. In addition, the<br />

repair must withstand mechanical stresses induced during<br />

mastication and deglutition (1).<br />

Reconstruction of palate defects requires a detailed<br />

knowledge of the local anatomy, and an understanding<br />

of the various options available to the surgeon. This may<br />

be particularly important in cases of large defects, or<br />

when radiation or previous surgeries have compromised<br />

local tissue (1). There are a number of general principles<br />

described by Harvey (1987) (3)and Luskin (2000) (4) that<br />

should be followed when considering surgery on a patient<br />

with a palate defect:<br />

Make flaps large compared with the size of the defect<br />

to minimize tension.<br />

Preserve the vascular supply to flaps by elevating<br />

adequate underlying connective tissue. For hard palate<br />

epithelium this means elevating the mucoperiosteum<br />

as one layer and avoiding the palatine artery, which<br />

penetrates the palatine bone approximately 1 cm medial<br />

to the carnassial tooth, and then runs caudally and rostrally<br />

parallel to the midline.<br />

Suture tissues to freshly incised epithelium. A flap<br />

sutured to an intact epithelial surface will not heal.<br />

Incisions should be made with a scalpel blade rather than<br />

scissors to minimize crushing injuries.<br />

Avoid the use of electrosurgery or cauterization to control<br />

bleeding.<br />

Where possible, arrange suture lines so they are situated<br />

over connective tissue rather than over the defect, thereby<br />

preventing drying and contamination of the connective<br />

tissue side of the flap and decreasing the risk of dehiscence.<br />

Suture tissue gently and with large bites of tissue to<br />

minimize tension and interference with blood supply at<br />

the wound edges.<br />

Suture materials used are usually 3/0, 4/0 or 5/0<br />

absorbable suture material, depending on the size of<br />

the animal, type of repair being performed, and type of<br />

tissue being sutured (hard palate mucosa, soft palate<br />

mucosa or buccal mucosa). This author generally prefers<br />

the use of polydioxanone although other absorbable and<br />

nonabsorbable suture materials have also been utilized. If<br />

knots are left on the epithelial surface, they will usually<br />

slough in three to four weeks regardless of the type of<br />

suture material used (3).<br />

There are several reports of management of palate defects<br />

in dogs and cats, with a variety of techniques described.<br />

Techniques that have been used for reconstruction or<br />

management of palate defects include local flaps (3,5-8),<br />

axial pattern flaps (1,9), distant tissue with use of a rostral<br />

tongue flap (10), free tissue transfer with microvascular<br />

anastomosis (2), temporal muscle flaps (11,12) and<br />

prosthetic appliances (13,14).<br />

References<br />

• Bryant KJ, Moore K, McAnulty JF: Angularis oris axial<br />

pattern buccal flap for reconstruction of recurrent fistulae of<br />

the palate. Vet Surg 32:113-119, 2003.<br />

• Degner DA, Lanz OI, Walshaw R: Myoperitoneal<br />

microvascular free flaps in dogs: an anatomical study and a<br />

clinical case report. Vet Surg 25:463-470, 1996.<br />

• Harvey CE: Palate defects in dogs and cats. Compend<br />

Contin Educ Pract Vet 9:404-418, 1987.<br />

• Luskin IR: Reconstruction of oral defects using mucogingival<br />

pedicle flaps. Clin Tech <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract 15:251-259, 2000.<br />

• Sager M, Nefen S: Use of buccal mucosal flaps for the<br />

correction of congenital soft palate defects in three dogs.<br />

Vet Surg 27:358-363, 1998.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 184 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


• Griffiths LG, Sullivan M: Bilateral overlapping mucosal<br />

single-pedicle flaps for correction of soft palate defects. J<br />

Am Anim Hosp Assoc 37:183-186, 2001.<br />

• Howard DR, Davis DG, Merkley DF, et al: Mucoperiosteal<br />

flap technique for cleft palate repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med<br />

Assoc 165:352-354, 1974.<br />

• Knight G: Surgical closure of the cleft palate. Vet Rec<br />

70:680-681, 1958.<br />

• Dundas JM, Fowler JD, Shmon CL, et al: Modification<br />

of the superficial cervical axial pattern skin flap for oral<br />

reconstruction. Vet Surg 34:206-213, 2005.<br />

• Robertson JJ, Dean PW: Repair of a traumatically induced<br />

oronasal fistula in a cat with a rostral tongue flap. Vet Surg<br />

16:164-166, 1987.<br />

• Cheung L: An animal model for maxillary reconstruction<br />

using a temporalis muscle flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg<br />

54:1439-1445, 1996.<br />

• Fahie MA, Smith BJ, Ballard JB, et al: Regional peripheral<br />

vascular supply based on the superficial temporal artery in<br />

dogs and cats. Anat Histol Embryol 27:205-208, 1998.<br />

• Coles BH, Underwood LC: Repair of the traumatic oronasal<br />

fistula in the cat with a prosthetic acrylic implant. Vet Rec<br />

122:359-360, 1988.<br />

• Hobson HP, Heller RA, Wilson JB: Use of a removable<br />

maxillary appliance to correct a palatal defect in a dog. Vet<br />

Med <strong>Small</strong> Anim Clin 66:1085-1087, 1971.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 185 small animal soft tissue session


Wide excision of tumors and reconstruction of the<br />

resultant defect<br />

Julius M. Liptak*<br />

Alta Vista Animal Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada<br />

Wide resections are considered curative-intent surgeries<br />

as the intention is to resect both macroscopic and<br />

microscopic disease, including biopsy tracts, and thus<br />

prevent local tumor recurrence and improve overall survival<br />

times. Wide excision is recommended in the management<br />

of the majority of solid tumors because the first surgery<br />

provides the best chance for a cure.<br />

For wide excision of tumors, a margin of normal appearing<br />

tissue should be excised en bloc with the gross tumor to<br />

account for microscopic extension of the tumor. Surgical<br />

margins should be determined on the basis of tumor type,<br />

tumor grade if appropriate (e.g., mast cell tumor), biologic<br />

behavior, anatomic location, and the barrier provided by<br />

surrounding tissues. Precise guidelines to what constitutes<br />

appropriate tumor margins have not been defined for most<br />

tumor types. The majority of surgeons use predetermined<br />

distances depending on tumor type; however, there is<br />

evidence that tumor size also influences the extent of<br />

microscopic tumor extension, with larger tumors of the<br />

same histologic type having greater microscopic extension<br />

and hence requiring larger margins than smaller tumors.<br />

Margins are three-dimensional and hence lateral and<br />

deep margins must be considered when planning surgical<br />

resections of tumors. Lateral margins are determined by<br />

tumor type and biologic behavior. For example, 1 cm lateral<br />

margins are recommended for benign tumors and most<br />

malignant carcinomas, whereas 3 cm lateral margins are<br />

required for soft tissue sarcomas. For mast cell tumors,<br />

lateral margins are also determined by histologic grade as 1<br />

cm lateral margins are sufficient for grade I mast cell tumors<br />

and 2 cm lateral margins for grade II mast cell tumors.<br />

Deep margins are determined by natural tissue barriers as<br />

1 to 3 cm deep margins are often not possible in regions<br />

such as the extremities (limbs and head) and trunk. Fat,<br />

subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and parenchymal tissue do<br />

not provide a barrier to tumor invasion and are not adequate<br />

for deep margins. Connective tissues, such as muscle<br />

fascia and bone, are resistant to neoplastic invasion and<br />

provide a good natural tissue barrier. Hence, deep margins<br />

should include a minimum of one fascial plane, while two<br />

fascial planes are recommended for surgical resection of<br />

injection site sarcomas. Lateral and deep margins should<br />

be greater if the tumor is invasive, recurrent, or inflamed.<br />

Tumors, particularly soft tissue sarcomas, should never<br />

be shelled out because they are often surrounded by a<br />

pseudocapsule of compressed, viable neoplastic cells and<br />

not healthy, reactive host cells.<br />

Primary closure of the resultant defect is preferred if<br />

possible. If the wound edges can be closed but tension<br />

is high, then tension-relieving techniques should be<br />

employed depending on the degree of tension. If the wound<br />

edges cannot be apposed, then the defect needs to be<br />

reconstructed. There are many different reconstructive<br />

options, ranging from subdermal plexus flaps (i.e.,<br />

transposition and advancement flaps), flank fold flaps,<br />

axial pattern flaps (i.e., thoracodorsal, caudal superficial<br />

epigastric, caudal auricular, facial, tail and scrotal axial<br />

pattern flaps), skin grafts, and indirect flaps.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 186 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Canine mast cell tumor<br />

Sarah Boston*<br />

University of Guelph, Dept. of Clinical Studies, Ontario Vet. College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada..<br />

Initial work up of a mast cell tumor (MCT) will involve<br />

diagnosis by FNA and staging. The initial staging performed<br />

will depend on the index of suspicion that the mass is a<br />

grade II or III MCT and clinician’s preference. Cytology is<br />

generally diagnostic for MCT. However, an incisional biopsy<br />

to determine grade is recommended in some cases. The<br />

histological grade may be important to determine in some<br />

cases, where the surgical approach may be altered by the<br />

grade of the tumor.<br />

The World Health Organization (WHO) classification<br />

scheme for canine mast cell tumours divides them into<br />

four stages according to the clinical presentation . Stage<br />

I <strong>–</strong> One tumour confined to the dermis without regional<br />

lymph node involvement (Ia <strong>–</strong> Without systemic signs,<br />

Ib <strong>–</strong> With systemic signs); Stage II <strong>–</strong> One tumour confined<br />

to the dermis with regional lymph node involvement (IIa <strong>–</strong><br />

Without systemic signs, IIb <strong>–</strong> With systemic signs); Stage<br />

III <strong>–</strong> Multiple dermal tumours or one large infiltrating<br />

tumour with or without regional lymph node involvement<br />

(IIIa <strong>–</strong> Without systemic signs, IIIb <strong>–</strong> With systemic signs);<br />

and Stage IV <strong>–</strong> Any tumour with distant metastasis or a<br />

recurrence with meta- stasis (including blood and/or bone<br />

marrow involvement). Locoregional staging and evaluation<br />

for visceral metastasis (to spleen and liver) are the areas<br />

that are most important to evaluate when staging canine<br />

patients with MCT.<br />

Lymph node staging will involve palpation, FNA for<br />

cytology and biopsy for histopathology in some cases. One<br />

pit fall with cytological evaluation of the lymph nodes is<br />

that it can be difficult to differentiate between neoplastic<br />

mast cells and normal mast cells that are at the site<br />

due to chemotaxis. Krick et al attempted to define the<br />

cytological staging of lymph nodes to create consistency<br />

in the literature. In that study they defined:<br />

Normal <strong>–</strong> No mast cells seen<br />

Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia - Reactive node +/- rare<br />

individual mast cells<br />

Possible metastasis <strong>–</strong> 2-3 mast cell aggregates of 2-3<br />

cells<br />

Probably metastasis - >3 foci of mast cell aggregates of<br />

2-3 cells and/or 2-5 aggregates of >3 mast cells<br />

Certain metastasis - Effacement of lymphoid tissue<br />

by mast cells and/or presence of aggregated, poorly<br />

differentiated MC with pleomorphism, anisocytosis,<br />

anisokaryosis, and/or decreased or variable granulation,<br />

and or >5 aggregates of >3 MC<br />

Although this definition is helpful and may lead to<br />

the ability to predict prognosis in future studies, it still<br />

creates a clinical problem of what to do with cases that<br />

are determined to have possible or probably metastasis.<br />

In Krick’s study, 152 dogs with MCT had lymph node<br />

evaluation. 63.8% of dogs were considered stage I and<br />

36.2% were considered stage II. In that study, stage II dogs<br />

had a shorter survival time and dogs with grade III MCT<br />

were more likely to have stage II disease. In cases with<br />

enlarged locoregional lymph nodes with questionable or<br />

certain metastasis, removal of the affected lymph node at<br />

the time of surgery for histopathology and cytoreduction<br />

is recommended.<br />

Abdominal ultrasound is also recommended for staging<br />

MCT in dogs, with ultrasound-guided FNA of the spleen<br />

and liver if they appear abnormal. This can also raise<br />

questions of true metastasis versus normal mast cells.<br />

Recently Stefanello et al evaluated 52 dogs with MCT that<br />

had ultrasound guided aspirates of the liver and spleen.<br />

10/52 (19%) dogs had abnormalities of the spleen or liver<br />

on cytology and all 10 of these cases had abnormalities<br />

noted on ultrasound. An additional 21/42 dogs with normal<br />

cytology had abnormalities on ultrasound. Although it is<br />

somewhat controversial, this study suggests that cytology<br />

should be performed in cases with ultrasound abnormalities<br />

of the liver or spleen. This study also found that dogs<br />

with cytological evidence of visceral metastasis had a<br />

significantly shorter survival time than dogs with normal<br />

cytology. (34 days vs 733 days)<br />

Thoracic radiographs are often taken as part of a work<br />

up for mast cell tumors. However, this is a low yield test.<br />

A recent retrospective study evaluating the prevalence of<br />

gross lung metastasis on three view thoracic radiographs<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 187 small animal soft tissue session


in 115 dogs with mast cell tumors yielded 1/115 (0.87%)<br />

dog that was positive for gross metastasis. (Fung & Boston,<br />

unpublished data) Three-view thoracic radiographs can be<br />

considered as part of a base line database for older dogs, in<br />

cases with respiratory signs and in cases with high grade<br />

tumors with metastasis to other sites.<br />

Staging with bone marrow aspirate or biopsy has also<br />

been shown to be a relatively low yield test. However, some<br />

would argue that it is worthwhile because the prognosis is<br />

significantly altered with a positive bone marrow. Endicott<br />

et al evaluated the bone marrow of 157 dogs with MCT. In<br />

that study, they found that 2.8% of cases were positive at<br />

initial evalation, with 4.5% positive overall. 3/18 dogs were<br />

positive after recurrence or progression of clinical signs,<br />

suggesting that bone marrow is not indicated for routine<br />

staging, but may be considered in cases with progressive<br />

disease or when indicated based on CBC. Another study<br />

by Marconato et al evaluated the prognosis in 14 dogs<br />

that were positive on bone marrow evaluation. The MST<br />

in these cases was 43 days and most cases had concurrent<br />

metastasis to the lymph nodes or visceral metastasis, with<br />

3 cases that had evidence of pulmonary metastasis.<br />

Although dogs with multiple mast cell tumor are<br />

classified as Stage III, recent evidence suggests that these<br />

are separate events, with mast cells developing de novo in<br />

dogs that are predisposed to mast cell tumors, rather than<br />

metastatic events. Stage III is likely a misnomer for the<br />

predicted behavior of dogs with multiple mast cell tumors.<br />

The survival time of dogs with multiple mast cell tumors<br />

was not found to be significantly different than dogs with<br />

solitary mast cell tumors. This suggests that for dogs with<br />

multiple mast cell tumors, each tumor should be treated as<br />

a separate event. (Murphy et al 2006; Mullin et al 2006)<br />

Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for canine<br />

mast cell tumors. The completeness of surgical excision<br />

has been shown to have a significant effect on prognosis<br />

of mast cell tumors. (Mullins et al 2006; Murphy et al<br />

2004). Although the dogma has been that malignant tumors<br />

should be removed with 3cm margins and one fascial plane<br />

deep, this has recently been critically evaluated. Simpson<br />

et al prospectively evaluated margins of grade I and II<br />

MCT of 1, 2 and 3cm. A total of 23 MCT were evaluated<br />

in this study. They found that the grade I MCT were all<br />

completely excised at all margins, suggesting that 1cm may<br />

be adequate for low grade tumors. For the grade II tumors,<br />

75% were considered clean at 1cm margin and 100% were<br />

considered clear at 2cm margins. A follow up of this study<br />

by Fulcher et al evaluated the margins of grade I and II<br />

MCT that were excised using 2cm lateral margins. They<br />

had 16 dogs with 23 MCT in this study. 4/23 were grade I<br />

MCT and all of these had clean margins. 19 of the tumors<br />

were grade II and 2 of these were considered to have dirty<br />

margins. In light of the fact that 10% of the margins were<br />

considered dirty for grade II MCT that were cut with 2cm<br />

margins, this recommendation should be considered with<br />

caution. The author continues to use 3cm lateral margins<br />

for grade II and III MCT when this is possible.<br />

Seguin et al evaluated the outcome of dogs with grade<br />

II MCT that were treated with surgery alone. 55 dogs<br />

with 60 tumors were evaluated retrospectively. Only one<br />

case had dirty histological margins. 3 cases (5%) recurred<br />

locally and the same number developed metastasis. 6<br />

cases (11%) developed a MCT at another site. 84% of<br />

cases were free of MCT for the duration of follow up<br />

(median follow up 540 days). The authors of this paper<br />

concluded that additional therapy may not be necessary for<br />

grade II MCT with complete excision and no evidence of<br />

metastasis. Seguin later evaluated the recurrence, outcome<br />

and proliferation indices in cases of MCT after incomplete<br />

excision. 28 dogs were evaluated with 30 MCT. 7 (23.3%)<br />

of the cases recurred locally and this was found to be a<br />

negative prognostic indicator for survival. Ki-67 and PCNA<br />

were also found to be prognostic for local recurrence.<br />

Predicting the behavior of grade I and grade III is<br />

straightforward. However, the common grade II MCT<br />

continues to be difficult to predict behavior. Indices of<br />

proliferation have been assessed to try to determine<br />

between “good” and “bad” grade II MCT. Mitotic index<br />

(MI) appears to be the most straightforward and promising<br />

method of separating out the good and bad grade II MCT.<br />

Recently, Romansik et al evaluated the MI for 148 MCT<br />

and found that MI correlated with tumor grade. As well<br />

the median survival time for dogs with a MI of 0-5 was 70<br />

months, and was significantly longer than dog with a MI<br />

of >5 (MST of 2 months). Similarly, a new two-tier grading<br />

scheme has been recently proposed by Kiupel et al. This<br />

scheme attempts to separate the mast cells into highgrade<br />

or low grade. High grade tumors were those with:<br />

at least 7 mitotic figures in 10 high-power fields (hpf); at<br />

least 3 multinucleated (3 or more nuclei) cells in 10 hpf; at<br />

least 3 bizarre nuclei in 10 hpf; karyomegaly. Fields with<br />

the highest mitotic activity or with the highest degree<br />

of anisokaryosis were selected to assess the different<br />

parameters. According to the novel grading system, highgrade<br />

MCTs were significantly associated with shorter<br />

time to metastasis or new tumor development, and with<br />

shorter survival time. The median survival time was less<br />

than 4 months for high-grade MCTs but more than 2 years<br />

for low-grade MCTs. This new grading scheme may help<br />

to guide therapy and predict behavior of mast cell tumors<br />

in the future.<br />

Although a complete excision of a mast cell tumor should<br />

always be the goal of surgical treatment. This is not always<br />

feasible or achieved. Dogs with an incompletely excised<br />

mast cell tumor will continue to require local control of their<br />

disease. If possible, a staging recut should be performed<br />

using 2-3 cm margins around the previous excision scar<br />

small animal soft tissue session 188 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


and one fascial plane deep. If this is not feasible, radiation<br />

therapy to the site is recommended.<br />

For tumors where complete excision is not feasible due<br />

to the extent of disease, the approach will depend on the<br />

owners treatment goals and on full staging. In these cases,<br />

full staging including an incisional biopsy to determine the<br />

tumor grade is reocommended preoperatively. In cases<br />

where palliation is the goal, pretreatment with either<br />

chemotherapy or corticosteroids can be considered prior<br />

to cytoreductive surgery. However, caution should be<br />

exercised in using corticosteroids to shrink mast cell tumors<br />

if a curative intent surgery is to be performed. A recent<br />

article by Gilson et al evaluated the use of neoadjuvant<br />

prednisone in cases of MCT that were treated with surgery.<br />

This study was a combined retrospective and prospective<br />

study. Dogs received 0.5-2.2mg/kg, with no control group,<br />

a median of 9 days prior to surgery. The overall objective<br />

response rate was 70% and prospectively the maximal<br />

diameter reduction was 42.5% and the reduction in tumor<br />

volume was 80%. The authors concluded that neoadjuvant<br />

prednisone useful for inducting reduction of MCTs and may<br />

facilitate resection when adequate surgical margins cannot<br />

be confidently attained because of mass location or size or<br />

both. However, despite the fact that 89% of the cases in this<br />

study had histologically complete margins, the overall local<br />

recurrent rate was 23.8% and the local recurrence rate for<br />

cases with “complete” excision was 17.6%. This suggests<br />

that pretreatment with corticosteroids may decrease the<br />

tumor size and facilitate resection, but that there may be<br />

islands of malignant mast cells that are left in the periphery<br />

that may be left behind after resection. Pretreatment<br />

corticosteroids is appropriate in some situations, such as<br />

when a curative intent surgery is not possible, when the<br />

intent is palliation and cytoreduction, or when cytoreduction<br />

followed by radiation is part of the treatment plan.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 189 small animal soft tissue session


References<br />

• Cytological lymph node evaluation in dogs with mast cell<br />

tumours: association with grade and survival. E. L. Krick, A.<br />

P. Billings, F. S. Shofer, S. Watanabe, and K. U. Sorenmo.<br />

VeterinaryandComparativeOncology,7, 2, 130<strong>–</strong>138; 2009<br />

• Ultrasound-Guided Cytology of Spleen and Liver: A<br />

Prognostic Tool in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumor. D.<br />

Stefanello, P. Valenti, S. Faverzani, V. Bronzo, V. Fiorbianco,<br />

N. Pinto da Cunha, S. Romussi, M. Cantatore, and M.<br />

Caniatti. J Vet Intern Med 2009;23:1051<strong>–</strong>1057.<br />

• Clinicopathological findings and results of bone marrow<br />

aspiration in dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours: 157<br />

cases (1999<strong>–</strong>2002). M. M. Endicott, S. C. Charney, J. A.<br />

McKnight, A. S. Loar, A. M. Barger and P. J. Bergman.<br />

Veterinary and Comparative Oncology, 5 (1)31<strong>–</strong>37.<br />

• Clinicopathological Features and Outcome for Dogs<br />

with Mast CellTumors and Bone Marrow InvolvementL.<br />

Marconato, G. Bettini, C. Giacoboni, G. Romanelli, A. Cesari,<br />

A. Zatelli, and E. Zini. J Vet Intern Med 2008;22:1001<strong>–</strong>1007.<br />

• Evaluation of prognostic factors associated with outcome<br />

in dogs with multiple cutaneous mast cell tumors treated<br />

with surgery with and without adjuvant treatment: 54 cases<br />

(1998<strong>–</strong>2004)Marie N. Mullins, DVM, MS, DACVIM; William<br />

S. Dernell, DVM, MS, DACVS; Stephen J. Withrow, DVM,<br />

DACVS, DACVIM; Eugene J. Ehrhart, DVM, PhD, DACVP;<br />

Douglas H. Thamm, VMD, DACVIM; Susan E. Lana, DVM,<br />

MS, DACVIM. JAVMA, Vol 228(1), 2006 (91-95)<br />

• Effects of stage and number of tumours on prognosis of<br />

dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours. S. Murphy, A. H.<br />

Sparkes, A. S. Blunden, M. J. Brearley, K. C. Smith. Vet Rec<br />

2006;158:287-291<br />

• Evaluation of surgical margins required for complete<br />

excision of cutaneous mast cell tumors in dogsAmelia M.<br />

Simpson, DVM; Lori L. Ludwig, VMD, MS, DACVS; Shelley<br />

J. Newman, DVM, DVSc, DACVP; Philip J. Bergman, DVM,<br />

PhD, DACVIM; Heidi A. Hottinger, DVM, DACVS; Amiya K.<br />

Patnaik, DVM, MS. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:236<strong>–</strong>240<br />

• Evaluation of a two-centimeter lateral surgical margin for<br />

excision of grade I and grade II cutaneous mast cell tumors<br />

in dogsRyan P. Fulcher, DVM; Lori L. Ludwig, VMD, MS,<br />

DACVS; Philip J. Bergman, DVM, PhD, DACVIM; Shelley J.<br />

Newman, DVM, DVSc, DACVP; Amelia M. Simpson, DVM,<br />

DACVS; Amiya K. Patnaik, DVM, MS. JAmVetMedAssoc<br />

2006;228:210<strong>–</strong>215<br />

• Relationships between the histological grade of cutaneous<br />

mast cell tumours in dogs, their survival and the efficacy of<br />

surgical resection S. Murphy, A. H. Sparkes, K. C. Smith, A.<br />

S. Blunden, M. J. Brearly. Vet Rec 2004;154:743-746.<br />

• Clinical outcome of dogs with grade-II mast cell tumors<br />

treated with surgery alone: 55 cases (1996<strong>–</strong>1999)Bernard<br />

Séguin, DVM, MS, DACVS; Nicole F. Leibman, DVM, MS,<br />

DACVIM; Victoria S. Bregazzi, DVM, MS, DACVIM; Gregory<br />

K. Ogilvie, DVM, DACVIM; Barbara E. Powers, DVM, PhD,<br />

DACVP; William S. Dernell, DVM, MS, DACVS; Martin J.<br />

Fettman, DVM, PhD, DACVP; Stephen J. Withrow, DVM,<br />

DACVS, DACVIM. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:1120<strong>–</strong><br />

1123.<br />

• Recurrence Rate, Clinical Outcome, and Cellular<br />

Proliferation Indices as Prognostic Indicators after<br />

Incomplete Surgical Excision of Cutaneous Grade II Mast<br />

Cell Tumors: 28 Dogs (1994<strong>–</strong>2002)Bernard Se'guin, M.<br />

Faulkner Besancon, Jennifer L. McCallan, Loralei L. Dewe,<br />

Matthew C. Tenwolde, Emily K. Wong, and Michael S. Kent.<br />

J Vet Intern Med 2006;20:933<strong>–</strong>940.<br />

• Proposal of a 2-tier histologic grading system for canine<br />

cutaneous mast cell tumors to more accurately predict<br />

biological behavior. Kiupel M, Webster JD, Bailey KL, Best<br />

S, DeLay J, Detrisac CJ, Fitzgerald SD, Gamble D, Ginn PE,<br />

Goldschmidt MH, Hendrick MJ, Howerth EW, Janovitz EB,<br />

Langohr I et al. Vet Pathol. 2011 Jan;48(1):147-55.<br />

• Evaluation of neoadjuvant prednisone administration and<br />

surgical excision in treatment of cutaneous mast cell tumors<br />

in dogs. Rebecca M. Stanclift, DVM, and Stephen D. Gilson,<br />

DVM, DACVSJ. Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:53<strong>–</strong>62).<br />

small animal soft tissue session 190 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Closure of large abdominal wall defects using<br />

negative pressure therapy: a bridge to definitive<br />

closure.<br />

A.Vanlander MD, F. Berrevoet MD ,PhD<br />

Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent Belgium<br />

Benign abdominal wall tumors, lipomas, hemangiomas<br />

and fibromas are quite common in humans. Malignant<br />

tumors of the abdominal wall are less common.<br />

The malignant soft-tissue tumors of the abdominal wall<br />

consist of desmoid tumors and non-desmoid soft-tissue<br />

sarcomas. These neoplasms tend to invade adjacent<br />

musculo aponeurotic and bony structures. Extirpation with<br />

the full-thickness of the abdominal wall is required except<br />

for small, superficial lesions. A wide-margin resection offers<br />

the best assurance of local control. Adjuvant radiotherapy<br />

can be given when the margin of resection is limited. The<br />

effective radiation dose can be difficult to administer, due<br />

to the sensitivity of the underlying structures.<br />

The goals of the reconstruction are to restore the<br />

abdominal wall defects and to restore the structural and<br />

functional continuity of the musculofascial system. It is<br />

imperative to provide stable and durable wound coverage.<br />

A good knowledge of the anatomy and assessment<br />

of which structures are present, absent or distorted is<br />

indicated. Tissue selection for the reconstruction of the<br />

abdominal wall can be synthetic meshes, autologue tissue,<br />

regional flaps and free tissue transfer.<br />

However large tissue defects can often not be closed<br />

primarily and required, in the past, wound dressings.<br />

Causing increased rates of morbidity and a longer hospital<br />

stay.<br />

Negative pressure therapy will optimize the blood flow,<br />

decrease local oedema and remove excessive fluid from<br />

the wound bed, thereby supplying the wound with oxygen<br />

and nutrition to promote accelerated healing . The clinical<br />

application is the increase in cell division and the formation<br />

of granulation tissue. It allows preparation of the wound<br />

for further definitive reconstructive surgery or protection of<br />

vital structures to make adjuvant radiation therapy possible.<br />

In a RCT of Joseph et al. published in 2000, after six<br />

weeks , various chronic wounds treated with Negative<br />

Pressure Therapy had a significantly greater percent<br />

reduction in wound volume and depth than wounds treated<br />

with wet gauzes.<br />

NPT significantly increases the rate of re-epithelialisation<br />

in skin grafts compared to Opsite dressing ( Genecov 1998).<br />

Seven of the ten donor sites treated with NPT were noted<br />

to reepithelialise faster than the Opsite-treated donor sites.<br />

When no reconstructive surgery is possible because<br />

of adjuvant radiation therapy, negative pressure therapy<br />

is a nice alternative and healing of these wounds can be<br />

achieved by formation of granulation tissue and covering<br />

of the defect.<br />

When dealing with a significant loss of tissue , negative<br />

pressure therapy can be utilized to enhance wound healing<br />

by promoting granulation tissue formation and new<br />

blood vessels in <strong>–</strong>growth. Skin grafts or vascularized flap<br />

placement can then be used to secondarily close the wound.<br />

The black foam, polyurethane ether (PU), has large<br />

pores of 400-600 mm and is hydrophobic. It is ideal for the<br />

stimulation of granulation tissue and wound contraction.<br />

The white foam, polyvinylalcohol (PVA),has a pore size of<br />

250 mm. It is denser and hydrophilic. It is ideal to use in<br />

exsudative wounds. It requires , because of its density,a<br />

higher negative pressure.<br />

In a systematic review by Ubbink at al.(BJS 2008;95:685-<br />

692), there is little evidence to support the routinely use of<br />

negative pressure therapy for local wound care, however<br />

the clinical impression seems to be favorable. There is no<br />

evidence of more rapid wound healing when using negative<br />

pressure therapy. Is this review there are no data on cost,<br />

quality of life or adverse effects , such as pain.<br />

It is important to understand the indications for when<br />

and how to use negative pressure therapy.<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 191 small animal soft tissue session


Radioactive microbrachytherapy for head and neck<br />

lesions in dogs and cats<br />

Kirpensteijn J*, Vente MAD, Nimwegen B, Nijsen JFW<br />

University of Utrecht, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dep.Clinical Sciences of Companion <strong>Animals</strong>, Utrecht,<br />

Netherlands<br />

Introduction<br />

The worldwide annual incidence of head and neck<br />

cancer in man approximates 500,000 cases, making it<br />

the sixth most common malignancy. Surgical resection,<br />

chemotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy<br />

are the currently used treatment modalities, and are<br />

especially effective if the malignancies are detected in<br />

an early phase of disease, which is the case in 1/3 of<br />

all patients with head and neck cancer. However, even if<br />

a high portion of patients with stage I/II disease can be<br />

effectively treated, 10-30% of patients will develop new<br />

primaries in the same region. If this happens, curative<br />

intervention is not an option any more. For this category<br />

of patients as well as those who present with advanced<br />

disease, which is the vast majority, currently no curative<br />

therapies are available. Novel, effective treatment options<br />

are therefore urgently needed. Naturally occurring tumors<br />

in companion animals share many clinical and molecular<br />

similarities to human cancers that are difficult to replicate<br />

in other model systems. Cancers in these animals develop<br />

in the context of an intact immune system, where tumor,<br />

host and tumor microenvironment are syngeneic. To<br />

accelerate the translational to the human medical arena,<br />

veterinary companion animal patients (canine and feline)<br />

with spontaneous malignancies were treated in an early<br />

stage of the development of these novel and dedicated<br />

particulated systems. Head and neck cancers are common<br />

in the dog and the cat<br />

Microbrachytherapy<br />

A potentially effective treatment option for patients<br />

with head and neck malignancies of limited size for<br />

whom no treatment options are available, could consist<br />

of directly intratumorally injected microspheres loaded<br />

with the combined beta-gamma emitting radioisotope<br />

holmium-166 (166Ho). Next to gamma scintigraphy, both<br />

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray computed<br />

tomography (CT) are able to visualize the biodistribution<br />

of particles loaded with 166Ho in vivo. If the tumors are<br />

somewhat larger and the afferent vasculature is as well,<br />

166Ho microspheres may be delivered to the tumorous<br />

tissue using the intra-arterial transcatheter approach,<br />

in a similar fashion as the 166Ho poly(L-lactic acid)<br />

microspheres developed by our group which are currently<br />

tested in patients with metastatic liver cancer.<br />

This concept, the direct intratumoral injection of 166Ho-<br />

AcAc microspheres, has already been investigated in renal<br />

cell carcinoma-bearing mice and, more relevant, also in<br />

a series of veterinary patients, i.e., dogs and cats with<br />

spontaneous malignancies. It was found that extremely<br />

high tumor absorbed doses could be attained (in excess<br />

of 30 times the dose that can be achieved in external<br />

beam radiotherapy) with no associated side effects.<br />

The described results on radioactive holmium loaded<br />

microspheres show that the radioembolization and the<br />

intratumoral injection techniques are very promising for<br />

treatment of unresectable head and neck tumors.<br />

Veterinary patients<br />

Microspheres were administered directly into the tumors<br />

of 8 veterinary patients with spontaneous head and neck<br />

tumors; 5 cats with an oral squamous cell carcinoma and<br />

3 dogs with a squamous cell carcinoma in tongue and neck<br />

(n=1 and n=1, respectively) and one with a fibrosarcoma in<br />

the mandible were treated by intratumoral injections with<br />

166Ho microspheres.<br />

Results<br />

The injections of the radioactive microspheres were<br />

technically successfully performed. Generally, the<br />

treatment was well tolerated by the animals and the<br />

clinical condition of 6/8 animals improved markedly. In<br />

the majority of patients, partial response was achieved,<br />

which frequently led to downstaging to surgical resection.<br />

However in three of the cats with oral squamous cell<br />

carcinoma, outcome was complete remission. In only two<br />

animals progressive disease was observed. Toxicity was<br />

absent in most animals. In one patient a skin defect was<br />

observed. Most biochemical and hematological parameters<br />

normalized after treatment. The life of the majority of<br />

animals was extended whilst associated with a good<br />

quality of life. For the small lesions (1-15g; n=6), treatment<br />

often was curative whereas treatment of large lesions<br />

(95-150g) resulted in downstaging to surgical resection.<br />

small animal soft tissue session 192 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 193 small animal soft tissue session


Author index<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

Balligand, M .<br />

• Force plate: gold standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111<br />

• Muscular forces affecting the outcome of CCL surgery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115<br />

Barthélémy, N .<br />

• Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed dogs with medial compartment disease of the elbow .41<br />

Benlloch-Gonzalez, M .<br />

• Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin staplers in 9 dogs and 9 cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36<br />

Bernardé, A .<br />

• A retrospective study of complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate<br />

deficient stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49<br />

Bockstahler, B .<br />

• Evidence based medicine in rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .118<br />

Boero Baroncelli, A .<br />

• Effect of screw insertional torque on mechanical properties of 5 different angular stable systems . . . . . . . .89<br />

Böhme, B .<br />

• Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine condylar fractures by finite element analysis . . . . . . . . . . .50<br />

Boland, L .<br />

• Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: 3 representative cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51<br />

Boston, S .<br />

• Canine mast cell tumor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .187<br />

Böttcher, P .<br />

• In vivo motion analysis 3D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113<br />

Brissot, H .<br />

• Caudal mediastinal para-oesophageal abscesses in 7 dogs. A retospective study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .149<br />

Broos, P .L .O .<br />

• Pushing the boundaries in musculoskeletal trauma <strong>–</strong> what is possible in man? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29<br />

Buttin, P .<br />

• Nephroliths and video-assisted nephrotomy in 8 cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39<br />

Cachon, T .<br />

• Surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .151<br />

Déjardin, LM .<br />

• Effect of articular design on mediolateral constraint and stability of two unlinked canine total elbow<br />

prostheses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91<br />

Demetriou, J .L .<br />

• Pyothorax : Is surgery necessary? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .167<br />

Devitt, C .<br />

• Dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine pathology . . .99<br />

• Stifle arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine rathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .104<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 195 information section


F<br />

G<br />

H<br />

K<br />

L<br />

Falzone, C .<br />

• Lumbosacral spine: decompression and stabilisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .142<br />

• Lumbosacral spine: surgical decision making. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .140<br />

Findji, L:<br />

• Surgical preparation: current understanding and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67<br />

Fitzpatrick, N .<br />

• The effect of configuration and radiographic positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude<br />

in a dog with a complex antebrachial growth deformity: comparison between radiographic and 3D<br />

computer modelling measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92<br />

• True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth<br />

deformity <strong>–</strong> planning and execution of technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52<br />

Gauthier, O .<br />

• Stimulation of bone healing. Commercially available products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130<br />

• Stimulation of bone healing. Latest developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123<br />

Glyde, M .<br />

• Biomechanical comparison of plate, plate-rod and orthogonal plate locking constructs in an ex-vivo<br />

canine tibial fracture gap model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88<br />

• The effect of screw number and plate stand-off distance on the biomechanical characteristics<br />

of 3.5mm locking compression plate (LCP) and 3.5mm string of pearls (SOP) plate constructs in a<br />

synthetic fracture gap model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95<br />

Griffon, D .J .<br />

• Delayed union and nonunion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .127<br />

• Enhancing bone healing in practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131<br />

Gutbrod, A .<br />

• ects of humeral rotational osteotomy on contact mechanism of the canine elbow joint: an ex vivo study. . . .35<br />

Hamilton, M .<br />

• Total hip replacement with reiforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the sop<br />

implant and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal acetabular rim deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53<br />

Hayes, G .M .<br />

• Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole for canine sino-nasal aspergillosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44<br />

Höglund, O .V .<br />

• Ligating the renal artery in pigs with a new absorbable device - LigaTie® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .148<br />

Kirpensteijn, J .<br />

• Radioactive microbrachytherapy for head and neck lesions in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192<br />

Liptak, J .M .<br />

• Wide excision of tumors and reconstruction of the resultant defect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .186<br />

information section 196 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


M<br />

N<br />

P<br />

R<br />

S<br />

T<br />

Medl, N .<br />

• Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in clean orthopaedic surgeries in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . .40<br />

Meij, B .P .<br />

• The use of pedicle screws in canine lumbosacral disease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90<br />

Milgram, J .<br />

• Axial pattern flap based on a cutaneous branch of the facial artery in cats.<br />

• Milgram J*, Weiser M, Kelmer E*, Benzioni H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147<br />

• The role of the antebrachiocarpal ligaments in the prevention of hyperextension of the<br />

antebrachiocarpal joint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94<br />

Moissonnier, P .<br />

• Perioperative antimicrobial propylaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73<br />

Moritz, A .<br />

• Have we learnt anything in the last 15 years?<br />

Stenting: The Giessen experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155<br />

• Pyothorax - have we learnt anything in the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .165<br />

Murgia, D .<br />

• Caudal cervical intervertebral space distraction and stabilization using a distractable fusion cage in<br />

seven dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .150<br />

Nellissen, P .<br />

• Effect of three an aesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal function during laryngoscopy in normal cats . .37<br />

Piras, LA .<br />

• Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement of frontal plane angulation: a cadaveric<br />

radiographic analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54<br />

Rancan, L .<br />

• Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide are increased in brachycephalic dogs . . . . . . . . . . .152<br />

Rochereau, P .<br />

• Comparison of 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws and 4.0 mm partially-threaded screws in<br />

a canine humeral condylar fracture model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42<br />

Segal, U .<br />

• Latero-distal transposition of the tibial crest for patella alta and medial luxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55<br />

Sivacolundhu, R .K .<br />

• Use of local and axial pattern flaps for reconstruction of the hard and soft palate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184<br />

Souchu, L .<br />

• Morphological comparison of the middle ear between French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs. . . . . .56<br />

Tan, C .J .<br />

• Stabilisation of periarticular fractures or osteotomies with an LCP notched head T-plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57<br />

ter Haar, G .<br />

• Novel reconstructions of the tip of the nose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .182<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 197 information section


V<br />

W<br />

Valander, A .<br />

• Closure of large abdominal wall defects using negative pressure therapy: a bridge to definitive closure. . .191<br />

Vallefuoco, R .<br />

• Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the dog: A descriptive cadaveric study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38<br />

van Bree, H .<br />

• Lumbosacral disease (LS): an update on diagnostic imaging techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137<br />

• MRI and arthroscopy for evaluation of shoulder joint pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101<br />

Verset, M .<br />

• Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the thigh region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58<br />

Voss, K .<br />

• Association of articular mineralisation, cranial cruciate ligament pathology and degenerative joint<br />

disease in feline stifle joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93<br />

Walton, M .B .<br />

• Owner based metrology instruments for conditions of canine chronic mobility impairment - contruct<br />

and criterion validity of LOAD, HCPI and CBPI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59<br />

Watson, P .<br />

• Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: what have we learnt on the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .173<br />

Weese, J .S .<br />

• Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections: animal and public health consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80<br />

• Surgical site infection control programme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74<br />

• Surgical site infections: Incidence, relevance, risk factors and surveillance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63<br />

White, R .N .<br />

• Surgical treatment: necrosectomies, pancreatectomies, and drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .177<br />

• Tracheal collapse - ringing: indications, limitations, technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .161<br />

Woodbridge, N .<br />

• A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy<br />

stabilisation using three different TPLO plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43<br />

information section 198 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Speakers<br />

Adkins Angus<br />

BVSc, FACVSc<br />

P.O. Box 462<br />

Scone<br />

New South Wales 1337<br />

Australia<br />

Archer Debra C<br />

DVM <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Liverpool<br />

Faculty of Vet. Science<br />

Division of Equine Studies<br />

Leahurst, Chester High Road<br />

Neston CH64 7TE South Wirral<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Arensburg Liat DVM<br />

Dierenklienik de Morette<br />

Edingsesteenweg 237<br />

1730 Asse<br />

Belgium<br />

Auer Jörg<br />

Prof. Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong>/ACVS<br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of<br />

Zürich<br />

Equine Department<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />

8057 Zürich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Balligand Marc<br />

Prof.DVM,DVSc, CSAO, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Université de Liège<br />

Professor of SA Surgery<br />

Dept. of <strong>Small</strong> Animal surgery<br />

Bat. B44, Blv. de Colonster 20<br />

Sart, Tilman<br />

4000 Liège<br />

Belgium<br />

Barnett Tim Mr<br />

University of Edinburgh<br />

Lagre Animal Clinic<br />

Royal (Dick) School of Vet.<br />

StudiesEaster Bush<br />

EH25 9 RG Roslin, Midlothian<br />

Scotland/ United Kingdom<br />

Barthelemy Nicolas Dr.<br />

1630 Epley Road<br />

48895 Williamston MI<br />

USA<br />

Benlloch Gonzalez Manuel<br />

DVM<br />

Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis<br />

43 Avenue Aristide Briand<br />

94110 Arcueil<br />

France<br />

Benredouane Kossay<br />

DVM<br />

12 Chemin des Côtes<br />

69210 Lentilly<br />

France<br />

Bernardé Antoine<br />

Dr.vét. <strong>ECVS</strong>, MS<br />

Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire St.<br />

Martin<br />

Head Surgical Unit<br />

275 Route Impériale<br />

74370 St. Martin Bellevue<br />

France<br />

Bischofberger Andrea Dr.<br />

Biomedical Research and Clinical<br />

Training Unit<br />

Uni. Vet. Teaching Hospital Camden<br />

University of Sydney<br />

410 Werombi Road<br />

Camden 2570<br />

NSW Australia<br />

Bladon Bruce<br />

BVM&S CertEP DESTS MRCVS <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

O'Gorman Slater Main and Partners<br />

Donnington Grove Veterinary Surgery<br />

Oxford Road<br />

Newbury, Berkshire RG14 2J<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Boaro Baroncelli Alessandro DVM<br />

Via Nazzario Sauro 13<br />

12051 Alba (CN)<br />

Italy<br />

Bockstahler Barbara<br />

Dr.med.vet.<br />

Department of Surgery and<br />

Ophtalmology,<br />

School of Veterinary Medicine<br />

University Vienna<br />

Veterinärplatz 1<br />

1210 Vienna<br />

Austria<br />

Böhme Beatrice<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Kleintierklinik Bremen<br />

Schwachhauser Ring 86<br />

28209 Bremen<br />

Germany<br />

Boland Laetitia DMV<br />

Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis<br />

43 Avenue Aristide Briand<br />

94110 Arcueil<br />

France<br />

Boston Sarah Dr.<br />

University of Guelph<br />

Department of Clinical Studies<br />

Ontario Veterinary College<br />

Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1<br />

Canada<br />

Böttcher Peter<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Leipzig<br />

Department of <strong>Small</strong> Animal<br />

Medicine<br />

An den Tierkliniken 23<br />

04103 Leipzig<br />

Germany<br />

Brandt Sabine Dr.<br />

University of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Equine Biotechnology Unit<br />

Equine Clinic<br />

Veterinärplatz 1<br />

1210 Vienna<br />

Austria<br />

Brink Palle<br />

DVM, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Jägersro<br />

212 37 Malmö<br />

Sweden<br />

Brissot Hervé<br />

DMV, D<strong>ECVS</strong>, MRCVS, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Davies Vetspecialists<br />

Manor Farm Buisiness Park<br />

SG5 3HR Higham Gobion<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Broos Paul Dr.<br />

Alfons Stesselstraat 23<br />

3012 Leuven Wilsele<br />

Belgium<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 199 addresses


Buttin Philippe DVM<br />

Chemin de la Chaux<br />

69210 Lentilly<br />

France<br />

Cachon Thibaut<br />

Dr. vét. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

VetAgro Sup<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal Campus vétérinaire de<br />

Lyon<br />

1, Avenue de Bourgelat<br />

B.P. 83<br />

69280 Marcy l'Etoile<br />

France<br />

Chabrier Marion<br />

Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />

Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />

rue de Bruxelles<br />

5000 Bruxelles<br />

Belgium<br />

De la Farge Sophie<br />

Clinique de Grosbois<br />

Domaine de Grosbois<br />

94470 Boissy Saint Leger<br />

France<br />

Declercq Jeroen<br />

DVM <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Ghent<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,<br />

Department of surgery and<br />

anaesthesia<br />

Salisburylaan 133<br />

9820 Merelbeke<br />

Belgium<br />

Déjardin Loïc M.<br />

DVM, MS, ACVS/<strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Michigan State University<br />

College of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Department of <strong>Small</strong> Clinical<br />

Sciences<br />

East Lansing, MI 48824-1314<br />

USA<br />

Demetriou Jackie L.<br />

BvetMed. CertSAS, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Cambridge<br />

Queen's Veterinary School Hospital<br />

Department of Vet. Medicine<br />

Madingley Road<br />

Cambridge, CB3 0ES<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Devitt Chad M<br />

DVM MS ACVS<br />

Veterinary Referral Center of<br />

Colorado<br />

3550 S Jason Street<br />

Englewood, CO 80110<br />

USA<br />

Dias Deborah Ms<br />

Rua 7 de setembro, 2496<br />

Sao Carlos-SP<br />

13560-181<br />

Brazil<br />

Falzone Cristian<br />

DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />

Higham Gobion<br />

Herts SG5 3HR<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Findji Laurent<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

VRCC 1 West Mayne<br />

Bramston Way<br />

Southfields, Laindon<br />

Essex SS15 6TP<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Fiske-Jackson Andrew DBV<br />

The Royal Veterinary College<br />

University of London<strong>–</strong>Equine Referral<br />

Hospital<br />

Hawkshead Lane<br />

North Mymms<br />

Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TE<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Fitzpatrick Noel<br />

Univ, MVB, CSAO, CVR<br />

Fitzpatrick Referrals<br />

Halfway Lane, Eashing<br />

Godalming<br />

GU7 2QQ Surrey<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Fürst Anton<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />

Large Animal Clinic<br />

Dept. of Veterinary Surgery<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />

8057 Zürich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Gauthier Olivier<br />

Prof.Dr.vet.PhD<br />

Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />

Nantes<br />

Laboratoire de Chirurgie<br />

Route de Gachet<br />

B.P. 40706<br />

44307 Nantes Cedex 3<br />

France<br />

Glyde Mark<br />

BVSc(Hons) MACVSc, MVS <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

MRCVS,<br />

Murdoch University<br />

School of Veterinary and Biomedical<br />

Sciences<br />

South Street<br />

6150 Murdoch<br />

Australia<br />

Gracia Calvo Luis Alfonso Dr.<br />

C/ Juan Manuel<br />

Rozas 31 1B<br />

10004 Càceres<br />

Spain<br />

Griffon Dominique J.<br />

DVM, MS, PhD, <strong>ECVS</strong>/ACVS<br />

Western University of Health<br />

Sciences<br />

College of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Associate Dean for Research<br />

309 E. 2nd Street<br />

Pomona 91766-1854 CA<br />

USA<br />

Gunnarsdottir Helga<br />

DVM, PhD<br />

University of Ghent<br />

Dept. of Large Animal Surgery<br />

Salisburylaan 133<br />

9820 Merkelbeke<br />

Belgium<br />

Gutbrod Andreas DVM<br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zürich<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />

8057 Zürich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Hamilton Michael H.<br />

BVM&S CertSAS MRCVS <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

11 Houlton Court, Surrey<br />

Bagshot GU19 5QQ<br />

United Kingdom<br />

addresses 200 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Hayes Graham Michael<br />

BVMS<br />

Univesity of Cambridge<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />

Dept. of Clinical Veterinary Medicine<br />

Madingley Road<br />

Cambridge CB3 0ES<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Herteman Nicolas<br />

Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />

Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />

rue de Bruxelles<br />

5000 Bruxelles<br />

Belgium<br />

Höglund Odd DVM<br />

Department of Clinical Sciences<br />

Box 7054<br />

750 07 Uppsala<br />

Sweden<br />

Hopster-Iversen Charlotte Dr.<br />

Klinik für Pferde<br />

Tierärzliche Hochschule Hannover<br />

Bünteweg 9<br />

30559 Hannover<br />

Germany<br />

Hunt Luanne<br />

BSc BVM&S ACVIM MRCVS<br />

Clyde Veterinary Group Equine<br />

Hospital New Lanark Market<br />

Lanark ML11 9SZ<br />

Scotland/ United Kingdom<br />

Jordana-Garcia Mireia DVM<br />

University of Ghent<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Dep. of Surgery and Anesthesiology<br />

Salisburylaan 133<br />

9820 Merelbeke<br />

Belgium<br />

Kirpensteijn Jolle Prof.<br />

DVM MS ACVS/<strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Utrecht<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Dep. Clinical Sciences<br />

Yalelaan 8/ PO Box 80.154<br />

3508 TD Utrecht<br />

Netherlands<br />

Klaus Christoph DVM<br />

Free University Berlin<br />

Equine Clinic<br />

Oertzenweg 19b<br />

14163 Berlin<br />

Germany<br />

Kümmerle Jan M.<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />

Equine Department<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />

8057 Zürich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Lallemand Elodie DVM<br />

Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />

Nantes<br />

Equine Clinic<br />

Route de Gachet<br />

BP 40706<br />

44307 Nantes Cedex 3<br />

France<br />

Lambert Claire<br />

Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />

Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />

rue de Bruxelles<br />

5000 Bruxelles<br />

Belgium<br />

Lamberts Matthieu<br />

Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />

Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />

rue de Bruxelles<br />

5000 Bruxelles<br />

Belgium<br />

Liptak Julius M.<br />

BVSc MVet MACVSc FACVSc ACVS/<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Alta Vista Animal Hospital<br />

2616 Bank Street<br />

Ottawa<br />

Ontario K1T 1M9<br />

Canada<br />

Marañon Gonzalo<br />

DVM, PhD<br />

Horsespital SL<br />

c/ Recaudacion 4<br />

Villanueva del Pardillo<br />

28229 Madrid<br />

Spain<br />

May Stephen A.<br />

Prof. DVR DEO <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

The Royal Veterinary College<br />

University of London<br />

Equine Referral Hospital<br />

Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms<br />

Hatfield AL9 7TA Hertfordshire<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Medl Nikola<br />

Dr.med.vet.<br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />

8057 Zürich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Meij Björn<br />

DVM, PhD, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Utrecht University<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Dep.Clinical Sciences of Companion<br />

<strong>Animals</strong><br />

Yalelaan 8/ PO Box 80.154<br />

3508 TD Utrecht<br />

Netherlands<br />

Mespoulhès-Rivière Céline Isabelle<br />

DVM <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

35, Rue Alphonse Daudet<br />

91210 Draveil<br />

France<br />

Milgram Joshua<br />

BVSc <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem<br />

Koret School of Veterinary Medicine<br />

P.O. Box 12<br />

Rehovot<br />

Israel<br />

Moissonnier Pierre<br />

Prof. MS, AEU Microsurgery, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort<br />

<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />

7 Avenue du Général de Gaulle<br />

94704 Maisons-Alfort Cedex<br />

France<br />

Moritz Andreas Dr.<br />

Klinik für Kleintiere<br />

Klinik Pathophysiologie & Klinik<br />

Laboratoriumsdiagnostik<br />

Justus-Liebig, Frankfurterstrasse 126<br />

35392 Giessen<br />

Germany<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 201 addresses


Mosing Martina Dr.<br />

Vetsuisse-Faculty University of Zürich<br />

Equine Department, Section<br />

Anaesthesiology<br />

Winterthurerstr. 260<br />

8057 Zürich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Murgia Daniela<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

DPA, Diagnostica piccoli animali Srl<br />

Via Caldierino 14<br />

36030 Zugliano (Vicenza)<br />

Italy<br />

Nelissen Pieter DVM MRCVS<br />

East Lodge<br />

Bury Road<br />

Kentford, Newmarked CB8 7UA<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Parker Russell Alexander BVMS<br />

University of Edinburgh<br />

Large Animal Hospital<br />

Royal (Dick) School of Vet. Studies<br />

Easter Bush Vet. Centre, Roslin<br />

Midlothian EH25 9RG<br />

Scotland/ United Kingdom<br />

Perrin Roland<br />

Dr.vét. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Clinque Vétérinaire<br />

Desbrosse/Perrin/Launois<br />

18 rue des Champs, La Brosse<br />

78470 St. Lambert des Bois<br />

France<br />

Piras Lisa Adele DVM<br />

Universita degli Studi di Torino<br />

Dept. di patologia animale<br />

Via Leonardo da Vinci 44<br />

10095 Grugliasco (Torino)<br />

Italy<br />

Rancan Lisa<br />

Dogspital SL, c/ Recaudacion 4<br />

Villanueva del Pardillo<br />

28229 Madrid<br />

Spain<br />

Rathmanner Magdalena DVM<br />

Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover<br />

Klinik für Pferde<br />

Bünteweg 9<br />

30559 Hannover<br />

Germany<br />

Rochereau Philippe Dr. vét.<br />

Clinique VETREF<br />

Rue James Watt<br />

49070 Angers-Beaucouze<br />

France<br />

Rossignol Fabrice<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Clinique Equine de Grosbois<br />

Domaine de Grosbois<br />

94470 Boissy-St-Léger<br />

France<br />

Salciccia Alexandra<br />

Dr.med.vet.<br />

Equine Clinic<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />

University of Liège<br />

20, boulevard de Colonster, B41<br />

4000 Liège<br />

Belgium<br />

Schneeweiss Wilfried<br />

Dr.med.vet.<br />

27 Orpen Rise<br />

Stillorgan<br />

Dublin<br />

Ireland<br />

Schramme Michael C.<br />

DVM, CertEO,MRCVS,<strong>ECVS</strong><br />

North Carolina State University<br />

College of Veterinary Medicine<br />

4700 Hillsborough Street<br />

Raleigh, NC 27606<br />

USA<br />

Schumacher James<br />

DVM MS ACVS<br />

University of Tennessee<br />

Dept. of Large Animal Clinical<br />

Sciences<br />

2407 River Drive<br />

Knoxville<br />

Tennessee 37996-4545<br />

USA<br />

Segal Uri Dr.<br />

Knowledge Farm<br />

HaYasmin 6<br />

99797 Karmey Yosef<br />

Israel<br />

Sivacolundh Ramesh Dr.<br />

AMC<br />

510E 62nd Street<br />

New York, N.Y.<br />

USA<br />

Souchu Lawrence<br />

Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />

Nantes<br />

Laboratoire de Chirurgie<br />

Route de Gachet<br />

B.P. 40706<br />

44307 Nantes Cedex 3<br />

France<br />

Tan Christopher Mr.<br />

University Vet. Teaching Hospital<br />

Sydney<br />

The University of Sydney<br />

65 Parramatta Road<br />

Camperdown NSW 2006<br />

Australia<br />

Ter Haar Gert<br />

DVM Cert EP, RNVA <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Utrecht<br />

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Dep. Clinical Sciences of Companion<br />

<strong>Animals</strong><br />

Yalelaan 8/ PO Box 80.154<br />

3508 TD Utrecht<br />

Netherlands<br />

Tóth Tamàs DVM<br />

Swedish University of Agricultural<br />

Science<br />

Equine Clinic<br />

Ulls väg 12 Box 7040<br />

750 07 Uppsala<br />

Sweden<br />

Van Lander Aude E.J.<br />

Dept. of General and Hepatobiliairy<br />

Surgery<br />

University Hospital Ghent<br />

De Pintelaan 185<br />

9000 Ghent<br />

Belgium<br />

Van Loon Gunther Prof. Dr.<br />

Department of large Animal Internal<br />

Medicine, Ghent University<br />

Salisbuylaan 133<br />

9820 Merelbeke<br />

Belgium<br />

addresses 202 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011


Van Ryssen Bernadette<br />

Prof. Dr.<br />

University of Ghent<br />

Salisburylaan 133<br />

9820 Merelbeke<br />

Belgium<br />

Vallefuoco Rosario DVM<br />

9 rue Eugene Renault<br />

94700 Maisons-Alfort<br />

France<br />

Van Bree Henri<br />

Prof.Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

University of Ghent<br />

College of Veterinary Medicine<br />

Dept. Medical Imaging<br />

Salisburylaan 133<br />

9820 Merelbeke<br />

Belgium<br />

Vandecatsyne Charles<br />

Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />

Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />

rue de Bruxelles<br />

5000 Bruxelles<br />

Belgium<br />

Vandenberghe Filip Dr.<br />

Dierenkliniek De Bosdreef<br />

Spelonckvaart 46 B<br />

9180 Moerbeke-Waas<br />

Belgium<br />

Verset Michaël<br />

Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />

Toulouse<br />

College of Veterinary Medicine<br />

23 chemin des Capelles<br />

31076 Toulouse Cedex 3<br />

France<br />

Voss Katja<br />

Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

11 Napoleon Street<br />

Rozelle 2039<br />

Sydney, NSW<br />

Australia<br />

Walton Ben Mr.<br />

<strong>Small</strong> Animal Teaching Hospital<br />

Uni. of Liverpool<br />

Leahurst, Chester High Road<br />

CH64 7TE Neston<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Watson Penny<br />

MA VetMD CertVR DSAM ECVIM<br />

MRCVS<br />

Queen's Veterinary School Hospital<br />

University of Cambridge<br />

Madingley Road<br />

Cambridge CB3 0ES<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Weese Scott<br />

Dept of Pathobiology<br />

University of Guelph<br />

Guelph<br />

Ontario N1G2W1<br />

Canada<br />

White Robert N.<br />

BSc,BVetMed,CertVA,MRCVS, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral<br />

Service<br />

Highlands Road<br />

Shirley<br />

Solihull<br />

West Midlands, B90 4NH<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Woodbridge Nicolas<br />

Dick White Referrals<br />

Six Mile Bottom<br />

London Road<br />

CB8 0UH Suffolk<br />

United Kingdom<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 203 addresses


21st Annual Scientific Meeting<br />

Pre Announcement<br />

Hotel Rey Juan Carlos I and<br />

Palau de Congressos de Catalunya,<br />

Barcelona, Spain <strong>–</strong> July 5 <strong>–</strong> 7, 2012<br />

please visit our home page <strong>–</strong> www.ecvs.org<br />

Deadline for submission of abstracts is<br />

November 15, 2011<br />

Preliminary Programmes will be available<br />

by beginning of 2012 on our website.<br />

For further information please contact:<br />

European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Equine Department<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH- 8057 Zürich, Switzerland<br />

Phone: +41-44-635 8408 / Fax: +41-44-313 0384<br />

email: ecvs@vetclinics.uzh.ch<br />

www.ecvs.org


layout: Eva<strong>–</strong>Linda Skytting, Monika Gutscher<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> office Zürich, Switzerland


Call for papers and abstract submission documents and forms can be downloaded from the <strong>ECVS</strong> web site:<br />

www.ecvs.org<br />

Deadline for abstract submission is November 15.<br />

Please note that printed programmes will be given at the meeting in Nantes <strong>–</strong> however from the web site you will be able<br />

to receive all information pertaining to the Annual Meeting as soon as they are available.<br />

Visit our home page!<br />

<strong>ECVS</strong> Office Address<br />

European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>ECVS</strong><br />

Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />

Winterthurerstrasse 260,<br />

CH- 8057 Zurich<br />

Switzerland<br />

Phone: +41-44-635 8408 / Fax: +41-44-313 0384<br />

email: ecvs@vetclinics.uzh.ch<br />

www.ecvs.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!