Proceedings – Small Animals - ECVS
Proceedings – Small Animals - ECVS
Proceedings – Small Animals - ECVS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
20th<br />
Annual Scientific Meeting<br />
University Forum UFO, Ghent University, Ghent,<br />
Begium,<br />
<strong>Proceedings</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Animals</strong><br />
Edited by: Stephen Baines<br />
July 7<strong>–</strong>9, 2011
Welcome to Ghent, welcome to Belgium<br />
A Warm Welcome to Ghent!<br />
Dear colleagues,<br />
It is a great pleasure for me and for our organising team to welcome you all to Ghent for this<br />
anniversary meeting of the <strong>ECVS</strong>. Yes indeed, time flies and we are already celebrating twenty years of<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong>! What has ever started with a small group of people with interest in veterinary surgery has now<br />
grown into an organisation offering education programmes, certifying specialists, promoting scientific<br />
progress and organising meetings. A large group of people, young and old, from resident to diplomate,<br />
from all over the World, but after all these years: still with a profound interest in veterinary surgery!<br />
We are very happy that we can celebrate this in Belgium.<br />
The Ghent University welcomes you in its brand new “University Forum” (UFO) building located at a<br />
nice 10 minutes walk from the historical centre of the city, where most of the hotels are located. At<br />
the UFO we have a promising scientific program for our small and large animal delegates, combined<br />
with a large commercial exhibition to meet with our sponsors and with your friends and colleagues.<br />
But as there is more than science in men’s (and women’s) life, I invite you to discover our marvellous<br />
city. Ghent is indeed one of the most beautiful historic cities in Europe. It is called “Medieval Manhattan”<br />
and combines an impressive past with a vivid present. Take this walk through history and visit the castle<br />
of the counts, the Cathedral, Belfry, Butchers hall and many more places. Let your beloved ones join<br />
the “partners program team” and they will discover many more hidden secrets of Ghent and Flanders.<br />
Thanks a lot to <strong>ECVS</strong> for all the support, to our sponsors to make all of this financially possible, to all<br />
our colleagues and friends who have worked hard for this meeting and to you all for being here!<br />
May Ghent be an unforgettable experience for you!<br />
Ann Martens<br />
In name of the local organising committee<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 3 information section
information section 4 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Platinum Sponsors<br />
Gold Sponsors<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 5 information section
We would like to thank all our sponsors and exhibitors for their support and presence<br />
during the 20 th Annual Scientific Meeting at the UFO University Forum Ghent University,<br />
Ghent Belgium<br />
• AdMaiora<br />
• AOVET<br />
• Arthrex<br />
• B. Braun Vet Care GmbH<br />
• City of Ghent<br />
• Equus Medic Line<br />
• Erbe<br />
• Dr. Fritz GmbH<br />
• Ghent University<br />
• Istrulife<br />
• J. Story Scientia<br />
• Janssen Animal Health<br />
• Karl Storz GmbH<br />
• KCI<br />
• Kyon AG<br />
• Mon & Tex Spa<br />
• Optomed<br />
• Orthomed (UK) LTd.<br />
• Richard Wolf GmbH<br />
• Royal Canin<br />
• SECUROS Europe GmbH<br />
• Smith and Nephew<br />
• Synthes GmbH<br />
• The Belgian Confederation of the Horse<br />
• Traumavet<br />
• Veterinary Instrumentation Ltd<br />
• Vetin-Aacofarma<br />
• Vétoquinol<br />
• VetZ Veterinär-medizinisches Dienstleistungszentrum GmbH<br />
• VIN Internet Cafe<br />
• Vlaams Paardenloket<br />
information section 6 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Scientific programme outline<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 7 information section
information section 8 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Large animals Programme outline<br />
Thursday July 7<br />
State of the art auditorium at the UFO<br />
Chair: D. Spreng & A. Martens<br />
15.30<strong>–</strong>16.15 P. Broos Pushing the boundaries in severe musculoskeletal trauma -<br />
what is possible?<br />
16.15<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee break<br />
Large animal <strong>–</strong> resident forum auditorium at the UFO<br />
Chair: D. Bolt<br />
16.30<strong>–</strong>16.45 M. Jordana Distal limb desensitization following anesthesia of the digital flexor<br />
Discussant: A. Fürst tendon sheath in horses: a comparison of 4 techniques<br />
16.45<strong>–</strong>17.00 L. Arensburg Aseptic tenosynovitis of the DFTS caused by longitudinal tears of the<br />
Discussant: B. Bladon flexor tendons<br />
17.00<strong>–</strong>17.15 T. Toth Evaluation of 1% hydrogen peroxide cream in the treatment of open<br />
Discussant: D. Archer wounds in healthy horses: a randomized, blinded control study<br />
17.15<strong>–</strong>17.30 C. Klaus Long term results of surgical correction of a deep bite class II<br />
Discussant: D. Verwilghen malocclusion in 7 horses<br />
17.30<strong>–</strong>17.45 H. Gunnarsdottir Caeco-colic intussusceptions: 10 cases over a 7 month time period<br />
Discussant: A. Rijkenhuizen<br />
17.45<strong>–</strong>18.00 T. Barnett Dynamic videoendoscopic assessment of the upper airway following<br />
Discussant: E. Strand laryngoplasty<br />
18.00<strong>–</strong>18.15 A. Fiske Jackson Evaluation of pre-operative diagnostic methods for digital sheath<br />
Discussant: R. Perrin pathology<br />
18.15<strong>–</strong>18.30 W. Schneeweiss Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus “blind” techniques for intra-<br />
Discussant: C. Lischer synovial injections of the shoulder area in horses: Scapulohumeral<br />
joint, bicipital bursa and infraspinatus bursa<br />
18.30<strong>–</strong>18.45 K. Benredouane Trans-arterial coil embolisation of the internal carotid artery in<br />
Discussant: O. Simon standing horses<br />
18.45<strong>–</strong>19.00 E. Lallemand Autologous nasal chondrocytes and a cellulose-based self-setting<br />
Discussant: P. Clegg hydrogel for the repair of articular cartilage in horses<br />
19.15 Transfer by boat - embarking at the pier „Muinkkaai“<br />
20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Welcome Cocktail at Castle of the Counts<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 9 information section
Large animals Programme outline<br />
Friday July 8<br />
In depth: colic<br />
Chair: L. Vlaminck<br />
08.00<strong>–</strong>08.40 G. van Loon How abdominal ultrasonography has changed our approach in colic<br />
surgery<br />
08.40<strong>–</strong>09.20 M. Mosing Perioperative intensive care of the colic patient <strong>–</strong> latest developments<br />
09.20<strong>–</strong>09.50 D. Archer Evidence for anastomosis technique in colic surgery<br />
09.50<strong>–</strong>10.20 J. Schumacher Surgeries of horses that appear difficult but are not!<br />
10.20<strong>–</strong>10.30 Discussion<br />
10.30<strong>–</strong>11.00 Coffee break<br />
Short communications<br />
Chair: P. Clegg<br />
11.00<strong>–</strong>11.15 S. Brandt Equus caballus papillomavirus 2 as a possible causative agent of<br />
equine genital SCC<br />
11.15<strong>–</strong>11.30 P. Brink Uteropexy of 10 mares by laparoscopically imbricating the mesometrium<br />
11.30<strong>–</strong>11.45 A. Bischofberger The effect of horse age, prosthesis tension, position and number on<br />
the area of the rima glottidis in equine laryngeal specimens<br />
11.45<strong>–</strong>12.00 G. Marañon Modulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1(mcp-1) production by<br />
ischaemia-reperfusion in the intestine of horses<br />
12.00<strong>–</strong>12.15 F. Rossignol Treatment of dorsal displacement of the soft palate by a modified tie<br />
forward procedure using metallic implants<br />
12.15<strong>–</strong>12.30 L. Hunt Comparison of thoracic ultrasound and radiography for the detection<br />
of small volume induced pneumothorax in the horse<br />
12.30<strong>–</strong>12.40 Discussion<br />
12.40<strong>–</strong>14.15 Lunch break<br />
13.15<strong>–</strong>13.45 Information session for our residents and supervisors as well<br />
as programme directors<br />
Short communications<br />
Chair: P. Clegg<br />
14.15<strong>–</strong>14.30 J. Declercq Quantitative assessment of articular cartilage degeneration of the<br />
metacarpal condyle using a 3D scanning system<br />
14.30<strong>–</strong>14.45 F. David Effect of cast immobilisation on equine SDFT lesion propagation<br />
14.45<strong>–</strong>15.00 M. Schramme The effect of intralesional bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem<br />
cells and bone marrow supernatant on collagen fibril size in a surgical<br />
model of equine superficial digital tendonitis<br />
15.00<strong>–</strong>15.30 Coffee break<br />
information section 10 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Large animals Programme outline<br />
Friday July 8<br />
In depth: Interactive surgical case discussion and televoting<br />
Chair: S. May<br />
Panel: A. Martens, D. Archer, J. Auer, H. Wilderjans, M. Schramme<br />
15.30<strong>–</strong>18.00<br />
J. Kümmerle A modified prosthetic capsule technique for treatment of an acute coxofemoral luxation in a pony<br />
B. Bladon A simple case of an incomplete non displaced sagittal fracture of P1<br />
U. Delling Hand-assisted laparoscopic adhesiolysis of extensive small intestinal adhesions in a mare after<br />
breeding injury<br />
G. Bodó Bilateral sinonasal cyst treated through a bone flap with nasal septum resection in a Shetland pony<br />
M. Meulyzer Laparoscopic mesh hernioplasty for correction of a non-strangulating scrotal hernia in a Warmblood<br />
breeding stallion<br />
L. Smith Standing removal of an ectopic, dysplastic, fourth maxillary premolar in a three-year-old<br />
Quarterhorse colt<br />
T. Levet Single transphyseal position screw for carpal valgus deviation: an unusual complication in two foals<br />
F. Rossignol Partial carpal arthrodesis using two 4.5 LCP plates in three horses<br />
18.10<strong>–</strong>19.30 <strong>ECVS</strong> Annual Business Meeting <strong>–</strong> mandatory for <strong>ECVS</strong> Diplomates<br />
18.10<strong>–</strong>18.40 A. Adkins Resident talk <strong>–</strong> how to examine and treat stifle OCD in the horse<br />
20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Belgian get-together at the Monastery Het Pand<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 11 information section
Large animals Programme outline<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Foal and mare<br />
Chair: H. Wilderjans<br />
08.30<strong>–</strong>09.15 J. Schumacher Foal head surgery: nose deviation, cleft palate<br />
09.15<strong>–</strong>09.50 J. Auer Foal physeal fractures<br />
09.50<strong>–</strong>10.20 A. Adkins Limb fractures in foals<br />
10.20<strong>–</strong>10.50 Coffee break<br />
10.50<strong>–</strong>11.15 J. Auer The concept of treatment of angular limb deformities<br />
11.15<strong>–</strong>11.55 A. Adkins Flexural limb deformities in foals and yearlings<br />
11.55<strong>–</strong>12.15 Discussion<br />
12.15<strong>–</strong>14.15 Lunch<br />
Information session for our residents<br />
12.45<strong>–</strong>13.10 J. Pascoe Pitfalls to getting published in Veterinary Surgery<br />
Lunchtime talk<br />
13.20<strong>–</strong>13.40 J. Schumacher How to perform rectovaginal fistula and cervix reconstruction<br />
In depth: orthopaedics supported by Belgian Confederation of the Horse<br />
Chair: M. Schramme<br />
14.15<strong>–</strong>14.40 A. Fürst Should bone cysts be filled?<br />
14.40<strong>–</strong>15.05 B. Bladon Standing orthopaedic surgery<br />
15.05<strong>–</strong>15.35 F. Vandenberghe How has MRI changed our approach to the orthopaedic case:<br />
radiologist‘s point of view<br />
15.35<strong>–</strong>16.00 R. Perrin How has MRI changed our approach to the orthopaedic case:<br />
surgeon‘s point of view<br />
16.00<strong>–</strong>16.30 Discussion<br />
16.30<strong>–</strong>17.00 Coffee break<br />
information section 12 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Large animals<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
Programme outline<br />
Poster session<br />
17.00<strong>–</strong>17.55<br />
Chair: R. Smith<br />
M. Chabrier Computed tomography arthrography (CTA) anatomy of the ovine stifle<br />
S. de la Farge Use of modified transfixation cast technique in horses<br />
D. Dias Standardisation of a technique for facial artery catheter implantation and maintenance in horses<br />
L. Gracia<strong>–</strong>Calvo Standing hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy: case report<br />
C. Hopster-Iversen Influence of mechanical manipulations on the local inflammatory reaction in the equine colon<br />
N. Herteman An anatomic study of the synovial cavities of the stifle in the sheep<br />
C. Lambert An anatomic study of ovine menisci by computed tomographic arthrography (CTA), 3D segmentation<br />
and magnetic resonnance imaging (MRI)<br />
M. Lamberts Comparison of three techniques to inject the synovial cavities of the stifle in the sheep.<br />
C. Méspoulhès Equine laryngeal neurostimulator: development and implantation technique<br />
R. Parker The in vitro effects of antibiotics on the gene expression of equine bone marrow derived<br />
mesenchymal stromal cells<br />
M. Rathmanner Comparison of the local inflammatory response in horses undergoing small intestinal resection with<br />
and without development of post operative ileus<br />
A. Salciccia Evaluation of the effect of general anaesthesia on ultrasonographic images of the small intestine in<br />
horses<br />
C. Vandecatsyne Magnetic resonance imaging anatomy of the ovine stifle described from images acquired with high-<br />
field magnet (3 Tesla)<br />
State of the art <strong>–</strong> closing session<br />
Chair: B. Bouvy & D. Spreng<br />
18.00<strong>–</strong>19.00 S. May The history of Veterinary Surgery<br />
20 years<br />
J. Auer The history of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>–</strong> the first<br />
20.00 Banquet and awards at the Old Fishmine <strong>–</strong> Disco night<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 13 information section
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
Thursday July 7<br />
Programme outline<br />
State of the art auditorium at the UFO<br />
Chair: D. Spreng & A. Martens<br />
15.30<strong>–</strong>16.15 P. Broos Pushing the boundaries in severe musculoskeletal trauma -<br />
what is possible?<br />
16.15<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee break<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal resident forum auditorium at the UFO<br />
Chair: K. Pratschke<br />
16.30<strong>–</strong>16.45 A. Gutbrod The effects of humeral rotational osteotomy on the canine elbow<br />
Discussant: L. Déjardin joint. An ex vivo study<br />
16.45<strong>–</strong>17.00 M. Benlloch Gonzales Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin staplers in 9 dogs<br />
Discussant: D. Brockman and 9 cats<br />
17.00<strong>–</strong>17.15 P. Nelissen Effect of three anesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal function<br />
Discussant: M. Peeters during laryngoscopy in normal cats<br />
17.15<strong>–</strong>17.30 R. Vallefuoco Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the dog: a descriptive<br />
Discussant: H. Brissot cadaveric study<br />
17.30<strong>–</strong>17.45 P. Buttin Removal of nephroliths by video-assisted nephrotomy: 8 cases<br />
Discussant: J. Ladlow<br />
17.45<strong>–</strong>18.00 N. Medl Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in clean orthopedic<br />
Discussant: V. Lipscomb surgeries in dogs and cats<br />
18.00<strong>–</strong>18.15 N. Barthélémy Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed dogs with medial<br />
Discussant: M. Glyde compartment disease of the elbow<br />
18.15<strong>–</strong>18.30 P. Rochereau Comparison of 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws and<br />
Discussant: D. Damur 4.0 mm partially-threaded cancellous screws in a canine humeral<br />
condylar fracture model<br />
18.30<strong>–</strong>18.45 N. Woodbrigde A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial<br />
Discussant: U. Reif plateau levelling osteotomy (TPLO) stabilisation using three different<br />
plate types<br />
18.45<strong>–</strong>19.00 G. Hayes Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole for canine sino-<br />
Discussant: R. Burrow nasal aspergillosis<br />
19.15 Transfer by boat - embarking at the pier „Muinkkaai“<br />
20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Welcome Cocktail at the Castle of the Counts<br />
information section 14 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />
Friday July 8<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Shoulder arthroscopy <strong>–</strong> clinical update<br />
Chair: S. Langley<strong>–</strong>Hobbs<br />
08.00<strong>–</strong>08.30 C. Devitt Diagnosis of shoulder<br />
instability<br />
08.30<strong>–</strong>09.00 H. van Bree MRI and arthroscopy for<br />
evaluation of shoulder<br />
joint pathology<br />
09.00<strong>–</strong>09.30 C. Devitt Arthroscopic treatment<br />
of MGHL injury<br />
09.30<strong>–</strong>10.00 B. van Ryssen Caudal glenoid<br />
fragmentation<br />
10.00<strong>–</strong>10.15 Discussion<br />
10.15<strong>–</strong>10.45 Coffee break<br />
Short communications<br />
Chair: M. Balligand<br />
10.45<strong>–</strong>11.00 M. Glyde Biomechanical<br />
comparison of plate,<br />
plate-rod and orthogonal<br />
plate locking constructs<br />
in an ex-vivo canine<br />
tibial fracture gap model<br />
11.00<strong>–</strong>11.15 A. Baroncelli Effect of screw<br />
insertional torque on<br />
mechanical properties of<br />
5 different angular stable<br />
systems<br />
11.15<strong>–</strong>11.30 B. Meij The use of pedicle<br />
screws in canine<br />
lumbosacral disease<br />
11.30<strong>–</strong>11.45 L. Déjardin Effect of articular design<br />
on mediolateral<br />
constraint and stability<br />
of two unlinked canine<br />
total elbow prostheses<br />
11.45<strong>–</strong>12.00 N. Fitzpatrick The effect of configuration<br />
and radiographicpositioning<br />
on measurements of<br />
deformity magnitude in a<br />
dog with a complex antebrachial<br />
growth deformity:<br />
comparison between<br />
radiographic and 3D computer<br />
modellingmeasurements<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical ? <strong>–</strong><br />
Tracheal collapse<br />
Chair: D. Brockman<br />
08.00<strong>–</strong>08.30 A. Moritz Have we learnt anything in<br />
the last 15 years?<br />
Pathophysiology, medical and surgical treatment<br />
08.30<strong>–</strong>08.40 D. Brockman Ringing versus stenting <strong>–</strong><br />
introduction<br />
08.40<strong>–</strong>09.10 R. White Ringing: indications,<br />
limitations, technique<br />
09.10<strong>–</strong>09.40 A. Moritz Stenting: The Giessen<br />
experience<br />
09.40<strong>–</strong>10.00 Discussion<br />
10.00<strong>–</strong>10.45 Coffee break<br />
Short communications<br />
Chair: L. Findji<br />
10.45<strong>–</strong>11.00 J. Milgram Axial pattern flap based<br />
on a cutaneous branch of<br />
the facial artery in cats.<br />
11.00<strong>–</strong>11.15 O. Höglund Ligating the renal artery<br />
in pigs with a new<br />
absorbable device <strong>–</strong><br />
LigaTie ®<br />
11.15<strong>–</strong>11.30 H. Brissot Caudal mediastinal<br />
para-oesophageal<br />
abscesses in 7 dogs. A<br />
retrospective study<br />
11.30<strong>–</strong>11.45 D. Murgia Caudal cervical<br />
intervertebral space<br />
distraction and<br />
stabilization using a<br />
distractable fusion cage<br />
in seven dogs<br />
11.45<strong>–</strong>12.00 T. Cachon Surgical treatment of<br />
sciatic nerve injury:<br />
9 cases<br />
12.00<strong>–</strong>12.15 L. Rancan Changes in circulating<br />
pro-inflammatory<br />
cytokines and nitric oxide<br />
in brachycephalic dogs<br />
12.15<strong>–</strong>12.25 Discussion<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 15 information section
<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />
Friday July 8<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />
12.00<strong>–</strong>12.15 K. Voss Association of articular<br />
mineralisations, cranial<br />
cruciate ligament pathology<br />
and degenerative joint<br />
disease in feline stifle joints<br />
12.15<strong>–</strong>12.30 J. Milgram The role of the antebrachiocarpal<br />
ligaments in the prevention<br />
of hyperex-tension of the<br />
antebrachiocarpal joint<br />
12.30<strong>–</strong>12.45 M. Glyde The effect of screw<br />
number and plate stand-<br />
off distance on the<br />
biomechanical characteristics<br />
of 3.5mm locking<br />
compression plate (LCP)<br />
and 3.5mm string of pearls<br />
(SOP) plate constructs in<br />
a synthetic fracture gap model<br />
12.45<strong>–</strong>13.00 Discussion<br />
13.00<strong>–</strong>14.30 Lunch break<br />
13.15<strong>–</strong>13.45 Information session<br />
for our residents<br />
and supervisors as well<br />
as programme directors<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Motion analysis and rehabilitation<br />
Chair: M. Owen<br />
14.30<strong>–</strong>14.55 M. Balligand Force plate analysis: is it<br />
the gold standard?<br />
14.55<strong>–</strong>15.20 P. Böttcher In vivo three dimensional<br />
motion analysis<br />
15.20<strong>–</strong>15.45 M. Balligand The influence of muscle<br />
forces on the cruciate<br />
deficient stifle joint<br />
15.45<strong>–</strong>16.15 B. Bockstahler Evidence based medicine<br />
in rehabilitation<br />
16.15<strong>–</strong>16.30 Discussion<br />
16.30<strong>–</strong>17.00 Coffee break<br />
12.25<strong>–</strong>14.00 Lunch break<br />
13.15<strong>–</strong>13.45 Information session<br />
for our residents<br />
and supervisors as well<br />
as programme directors<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical ? Pyothorax in dogs<br />
and cats<br />
Chair: J.P Billet<br />
14.00<strong>–</strong>14.30 A. Moritz What have we learnt in the<br />
last 15 years?<br />
14.30<strong>–</strong>15.00 J. Demetriou Is surgery necessary ?<br />
15.00<strong>–</strong>15.15 Conclusions and<br />
discussion<br />
Pancreatitis in dogs and cats<br />
15.15<strong>–</strong>15.40 P. Watson What have we learnt in the<br />
last 15 years?<br />
15.40<strong>–</strong>16.00 R. White Surgical treatment:<br />
Necrosectomies,<br />
pancreatectomies,<br />
drainage, gall bladder<br />
diversion, enteral feeding<br />
16.00<strong>–</strong>16.20 Conclusions and<br />
discussion<br />
16.20<strong>–</strong>17.00 Coffee break<br />
information section 16 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />
Friday July 8<br />
Poster session<br />
Chair: L. Sjöström<br />
17.00<strong>–</strong>18.00<br />
A. Bernardé Retrospective study of complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate<br />
deficient stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010)<br />
B. Böhme Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine condylar fractures by finite element analysis<br />
L. Boland Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: 3 representative cases<br />
N. Fitzpatrick True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth<br />
deformity <strong>–</strong> planning and execution of technique<br />
M. Hamilton Total hip replacement with reinforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the<br />
SOP implant and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal acetabular rim deficiency<br />
L. Piras Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement of frontal plane angulation: A cadaveric<br />
radiographic analysis<br />
U. Segal Latero<strong>–</strong>distal transposition of the tibial crest for patella alta and medial luxation<br />
L. Souchu Morphological comparison of the middle ear between French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs<br />
C. Tan Stabilisation of periarticular fractures and osteotomies with a notched head locking compression<br />
T<strong>–</strong>plate<br />
M. Verset Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the thigh region<br />
B. Walton Owner based metrology instruments for conditions of canine chronic mobility impairment <strong>–</strong> construct<br />
and criterion validity of LOAD, CBPI and HCPI<br />
18.10<strong>–</strong>19.30 <strong>ECVS</strong> Annual Business Meeting <strong>–</strong> mandatory for <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Diplomates<br />
18.10<strong>–</strong>18.40 A. Adkins Resident talk <strong>–</strong> how to examine and treat stifle OCD in the horse<br />
20.00<strong>–</strong>23.00 Belgian get-together at the Monastery Het Pand<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 17 information section
<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Infection control in surgical practice<br />
Chair: G. Dupré<br />
08.30<strong>–</strong>09.00 S. Weese Surgical infections: Incidence, relevance, risk factors, surveillance<br />
09.00<strong>–</strong>09.30 L. Findji Surgical preparation: current understanding and recommendations<br />
09.30<strong>–</strong>10.00 P. Moissonnier Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis<br />
10.00<strong>–</strong>10.30 Coffee break<br />
10.30<strong>–</strong>11.00 S. Weese Surgical site infection control programme: The Ontario experience<br />
11.00<strong>–</strong>11.30 All Discussion: What should we change in our practices?<br />
11.30<strong>–</strong>12.30 S. Weese Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infection: Animal and public<br />
health consequences<br />
12.30<strong>–</strong>14.00 Lunch break<br />
Information session for our residents<br />
12.45<strong>–</strong>13.10 J. Pascoe Pitfalls to getting published in Veterinary Surgery<br />
information section 18 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals Programme outline<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics <strong>–</strong> auditorium at the UFO <strong>Small</strong> animal <strong>–</strong> soft tissues auditorium Plateau<br />
In depth: Bone healing for surgeons<br />
Chair: L. Dejardin<br />
14.00<strong>–</strong>14.25 O. Gauthier Stimulation of bone<br />
healing <strong>–</strong> latest<br />
developments<br />
14.25<strong>–</strong>14.50 D. Griffon Delayed <strong>–</strong> and non <strong>–</strong><br />
unions<br />
14.50<strong>–</strong>15.15 O. Gauthier Stimulation of bone<br />
healing: commercially<br />
available products<br />
15.15<strong>–</strong>15.40 D. Griffon Stimulation of bone<br />
healing in clinical<br />
practice<br />
15.40<strong>–</strong>16.00 Discussion<br />
16.00<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee Break<br />
In depth: Neurosurgery: lumbosacral disease<br />
Chair: B. Meij<br />
16.30<strong>–</strong>16.55 H. van Bree Diagnostic imaging<br />
techniques <strong>–</strong> an<br />
update: MRI and CT<br />
16.55<strong>–</strong>17.20 C. Falzone Lumbosacral spine:<br />
surgical decision<br />
making<br />
17.20<strong>–</strong>17.45 C. Falzone Lumbosacral spine:<br />
decompression and<br />
stabilisation<br />
17.45<strong>–</strong>17.55 Discussion<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal and large animal combined<br />
State of the art <strong>–</strong> closing session auditorium at the UFO<br />
Chair: B. Bouvy & D. Spreng<br />
18.00<strong>–</strong>19.00 S. May The history of Veterinary Surgery<br />
20 years<br />
In depth: VSSO <strong>–</strong> Reconstructive surgery:<br />
management of skin tumors - supported by KCI<br />
Chair: J. Kirpensteijn<br />
14.00<strong>–</strong>14.25 G. ter Haar Novel reconstructions of<br />
skin on top of the nose<br />
14.25<strong>–</strong>14.50 R. Sivacolundhu Reconstruction of hard<br />
and soft palate defects<br />
14.50<strong>–</strong>15.15 J. Liptak Large skin tumors and<br />
their resection<br />
15.15<strong>–</strong>15.40 S. Boston Mast cell tumors, what is<br />
really new?<br />
15.40<strong>–</strong>16.30 Coffee break<br />
16.30<strong>–</strong>16.55 A. Vanlander VAC-assisted reconstruction<br />
in human patients<br />
16.55<strong>–</strong>17.20 J. Kirpensteijn Radioactive<br />
microbrachytherapy for<br />
cutaneous lesions<br />
17.20<strong>–</strong>17.50 Round table discussion <strong>–</strong><br />
difficult skin cases<br />
J. Auer The history of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>–</strong> the first<br />
20.00 Banquet and awards at the old Fishmine <strong>–</strong> Disco night<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 19 information section
information section 20 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
Contents<br />
Scientific programme outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7<br />
State of the art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27<br />
Pushing the boundaries in musculoskeletal trauma <strong>–</strong> what is possible in man? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29<br />
Paul L.O. Broos, Prof. Em. Dr.<br />
Resident Forum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33<br />
Effects of humeral rotational osteotomy on contact mechanism of the canine elbow joint: an ex vivo study . . . . . . . . . . . . 35<br />
Gutbrod A, Guerrero TG*<br />
Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin staplers in 9 dogs and 9 cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36<br />
M.Benlloch-Gonzalez, B.Bouvy*, E.Gomes, J.Hernandez, C.Poncet*.<br />
Effect of three an aesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal function during laryngoscopy in normal cat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37<br />
Nelissen P., Aprea F., Corletto F., White RAS*.<br />
Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the dog: A descriptive cadaveric study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38<br />
Vallefuoco R, Jardel N, Tessier A, Moissonnier P.<br />
Nephroliths and video-assisted nephrotomy in 8 cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39<br />
Buttin P., Cachon T.*, Carozzo C*., Maitre P., Arnault A., Fau D., Genevois JP., Viguier E*.<br />
Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in clean orthopaedic surgeries in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40<br />
Medl N 1 , Guerrero TG* 1 , Hölzle L 2 , Montavon PM 1<br />
Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed dogs with medial compartment disease of the elbow . . . . . . . . . . . 41<br />
N. Barthélémy¹, D. Griffon* ² , G. Ragetly², I. Carrera², D. Schaeffer²<br />
Comparison of 4 .0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws and 4 .0 mm partially-threaded screws in a canine<br />
humeral condylar fracture model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42<br />
Rochereau P. 1 , Diop A. 2 , Maurel N. 2 , Gomez Clemente R. 2 , Gabanou P.A .3 , Bernardé A.* 1 .<br />
A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy stabilisation using<br />
three different TPLO plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43<br />
Woodbridge N 3 , Corr S.A. 2 , Grierson J 1 , Arthurs G 1 .<br />
Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole for canine sino-nasal aspergillosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44<br />
G. M. Hayes and J. L. Demetriou*.<br />
Poster session . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47<br />
A retrospective study of complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate deficient<br />
stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49<br />
Bernardé A., Rochereau P., Spengler E.<br />
Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine condylar fractures by finite element analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50<br />
B. Böhme 1 , V. d’Otreppe 2 , J.P. Ponthot 2 and M. Balligand<br />
Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: three representative cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51<br />
Boland L, Gomes E, Payen G, Bouvy B*, Poncet C*<br />
True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth deformity <strong>–</strong><br />
planning and execution of technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52<br />
N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou 1 , K. Ash 1 , V. Wavreille 1 , Z. Szanto 2<br />
Total hip replacement with reiforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the sop implant<br />
and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal acetabular rim deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53<br />
N. Fitzpatrick, M. Bielecki, R Yeadon*, M. Hamilton*<br />
Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement of frontal plane angulation: a cadaveric radiographic analysis . . . . . 54<br />
Piras LA 1 , Peirone B 1 , Fox DB 2<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 21 information section
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
Latero-distal transposition of the tibial crest for patella alta and medial luxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55<br />
Segal U., Shani J*<br />
Morphological comparison of the middle ear between French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56<br />
L.Souchu 1 , T. Chuzel 2 , C. Carozzo* 3 .<br />
Stabilisation of periarticular fractures or osteotomies with an LCP notched head T-plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57<br />
C. J. Tan, K.A. Johnson*.<br />
Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the thigh region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58<br />
M. Verset 1 , T. Cachon* 2 , D. Rémy 2 , C. Carozzo* 2 .<br />
Owner based metrology instruments for conditions of canine chronic mobility impairment - contruct and criterion<br />
validity of LOAD, HCPI and CBPI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59<br />
Walton MB 1 , Innes JF 1 , Lascelles BDX* 2<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Infection control in surgical practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61<br />
Surgical site infections: Incidence, relevance, risk factors and surveillance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63<br />
J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />
Surgical preparation: current understanding and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67<br />
L. Findji*<br />
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73<br />
P. Moissonnier*<br />
Surgical site infection control programme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74<br />
J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />
Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections: animal and public health consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80<br />
J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />
Short communications <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87<br />
Biomechanical comparison of plate, plate-rod and orthogonal plate locking constructs in an ex-vivo canine tibial<br />
fracture gap model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88<br />
Glyde M *1 ., Day R. 2 , Deane B. 1 , Read R 1 . and Hosgood G * 1 .<br />
Effect of screw insertional torque on mechanical properties of 5 different angular stable systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89<br />
A Boero Baroncelli 1 , U Reif 2 , C Bignardi 3 , B Peirone 1 .<br />
The use of pedicle screws in canine lumbosacral disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90<br />
Meij BP*, Smolders LA, Bergknut N, Voorhout G, Grinwis GCM, Hazewinkel HAW*<br />
Effect of articular design on mediolateral constraint and stability of two unlinked canine total elbow prostheses . . . . . . . 91<br />
Guillou RP 1 , Demianiuk RM 1 , Déjardin LM* 2 ,Beckett C 2 , Haut RC<br />
The effect of configuration and radiographic positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude in a dog with<br />
a complex antebrachial growth deformity: comparison between radiographic and 3D computer modelling<br />
measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92<br />
N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou,JF. Isaza Saldarriaga, S. Correa Velez, V. Wavreille, K. Ash, JJ. Ochoa<br />
Association of articular mineralisation, cranial cruciate ligament pathology and degenerative joint disease in<br />
feline stifle joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93<br />
Voss K* 1 , Karli P 2 , Kipfer N 2 , Geyer H 3<br />
The role of the antebrachiocarpal ligaments in the prevention of hyperextension of the antebrachiocarpal joint . . . . . . . . 94<br />
Milgram J*, Milstein T, Meiner Y.<br />
The effect of screw number and plate stand-off distance on the biomechanical characteristics of 3 .5mm locking<br />
compression plate (LCP) and 3 .5mm string of pearls (SOP) plate constructs in a synthetic fracture gap model . . . . . . . 95<br />
Glyde M *1 , Day R 2 . and Hosgood G *1 .<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> shoulder arthroscopy - clinical update . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97<br />
Dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99<br />
Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />
MRI and arthroscopy for evaluation of shoulder joint pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101<br />
H. van Bree*, W. Dingemanse, I. Gielen<br />
Stifle arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine rathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104<br />
Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />
Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid cavity: diagnostic findings and results after treatment:<br />
retrospective study of 28 dogs and 1 cat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106<br />
B. Van Ryssen, E. Coppieters, Y. Samoy, D. Van Vynckt, J. Saunders, H. van Bree.<br />
information section 22 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Motion analysis and rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109<br />
Force plate: gold standard? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111<br />
M. Balligand*<br />
In vivo motion analysis 3D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113<br />
P. Böttcher*, J. Rey, G. Oechtering<br />
Muscular forces affecting the outcome of CCL surgery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115<br />
JM Ramirez Leon 1 , B Böhme 4 , C Vroomen 3 , F Farnir 2 , M Balligand 1<br />
Evidence based medicine in rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118<br />
B. Bockstahler, PD, DVM, CCRP<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Bone healing for surgeons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121<br />
Stimulation of bone healing . Latest developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123<br />
O. Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />
Delayed union and nonunion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127<br />
Dominique J Griffon*<br />
Stimulation of bone healing . Commercially available products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130<br />
O.Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />
Enhancing bone healing in practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131<br />
Dominique J Griffon*<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Neurosurgery: lumbosacral disease . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135<br />
Lumbosacral disease (LS): an update on diagnostic imaging techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137<br />
I. Gielen, K. Kromhout, H. van Bree*<br />
Lumbosacral spine: surgical decision making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140<br />
Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />
Lumbosacral spine: decompression and stabilisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142<br />
Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />
Short communications <strong>–</strong> soft tissues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145<br />
Axial pattern flap based on a cutaneous branch of the facial artery in cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147<br />
Milgram J*, Weiser M, Kelmer E*, Benzioni H<br />
Ligating the renal artery in pigs with a new absorbable device - LigaTie ® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148<br />
O V. Höglund, DVM, K. Olsson, DVM, PhD, R. Hagman, DVM, MSc, PhD, A. Lagerstedt, DVM, PhD.<br />
Caudal mediastinal para-oesophageal abscesses in 7 dogs . A retospective study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149<br />
H. Brissot*, C. Burton*, R. Doyle*.<br />
Caudal cervical intervertebral space distraction and stabilization using a distractable fusion cage in seven dogs . . . . . 150<br />
Murgia D*, Gasparinetti N, Schiesaro R.<br />
Surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151<br />
Cachon T.*, Escriou C, Arnault A., Maitre P., Fau D., Viguier E.*, Genevois JP. Carozzo C*<br />
Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide are increased in brachycephalic dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152<br />
Rancan L, Romussi S, Albertini M, García P, Vara E, Sánchez de la Muela M<br />
In depth - Medical or surgical? - Tracheal collapse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153<br />
Have we learnt anything in the last 15 years? Stenting: The Giessen experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155<br />
A. Moritz, C. Paul de Melo, N. Bauer, M. Schneider,<br />
Tracheal collapse <strong>–</strong> ringing: indications, limitations, technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161<br />
Robert N White*<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical? Pyothorax in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163<br />
Pyothorax <strong>–</strong> have we learnt anything in the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165<br />
G. Wurtinger, C. Peppler*, M. Schneider, A. Moritz,<br />
Pyothorax : Is surgery necessary? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167<br />
Jackie L. Demetriou *<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 23 information section
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical <strong>–</strong>Pancreatitis in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . 171<br />
Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: what have we learnt on the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173<br />
P. Watson, MA,VetMD, CertVR, DSAM, ECVIM, MRCVS<br />
Surgical treatment: necrosectomies, pancreatectomies, and drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177<br />
Robert N White BSc (Hons) BVetMedCertVA DSAS (Soft Tissue) Dipl<strong>ECVS</strong><br />
In depth: VSSO <strong>–</strong> Reconstructive surgery: management of skin tumors . . . . 181<br />
Novel reconstructions of the tip of the nose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182<br />
G. ter Haar*<br />
Use of local and axial pattern flaps for reconstruction of the hard and soft palate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184<br />
Ramesh K Sivacolundhu, BVMS MVS FACVSc<br />
Wide excision of tumors and reconstruction of the resultant defect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186<br />
Julius M. Liptak*<br />
Canine mast cell tumor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187<br />
Sarah Boston*<br />
Closure of large abdominal wall defects using negative pressure therapy: a bridge to definitive closure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191<br />
A.Vanlander MD, F. Berrevoet MD ,PhD<br />
Radioactive microbrachytherapy for head and neck lesions in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192<br />
Kirpensteijn J*, Vente MAD, Nimwegen B, Nijsen JFW<br />
Author index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195<br />
information section 24 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 25 information section
combined session 26 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Large and small animals combined<br />
State of the art<br />
Thursday July 7 <strong>–</strong> 15.30<strong>–</strong>16.15
combined session 28 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Pushing the boundaries in musculoskeletal trauma <strong>–</strong><br />
what is possible in man?<br />
Paul L.O. Broos, Prof. Em. Dr.<br />
Previous director of the department of surgery of the University Hospitals KU Leuven.<br />
Historical approach.<br />
Historically, surgery has always been closely linked<br />
to trauma care. In 2700 B.C, Imhotep taught us how to<br />
immobilize fractured limbs using papyrus rods. In the<br />
Renaissance, Heinz von Gersdorff as well as Ambroise<br />
Paré, were very famous army surgeons and dealt frequently<br />
with trauma.In the 19th century, Jean-Dominique Larrey<br />
reorganized the medical services of Napoleon’s army<br />
and introduced concepts such as triage, evacuation and<br />
debridement. We can go back even further, to the time<br />
of primitive men. Indeed, since the beginning of men’s<br />
inhabitancy of this planet, he has to sustain serious injuries<br />
as a consequence of accidents, nature disasters, attacks by<br />
wild animals and, last but not least, through war. Armed<br />
conflicts have forced men to learn how to deal with wounds,<br />
caused by catapulted rocks, axes or other forms of military<br />
armament. He had to learn how to stop a gush of blood, to<br />
splint broken limbs and to remove foreign objects, in other<br />
words: how to support threatened lives.<br />
In the 21st century, trauma is still a major health problem<br />
in the Western world. Indeed, trauma is responsible for<br />
about one third of all hospital admissions, with 80 % of<br />
all injuries occurring in individuals younger than 45 years<br />
of age. Trauma is the leading cause of death in this age<br />
group and this group accounts for 75 % of total life cost due<br />
to injury. And what’s even more tragic: even in our days as<br />
many as 40 % of trauma deaths are avoidable The care of<br />
multiple injured victims has now become a team approach<br />
with nurses, medical technicians and consulting physicians.<br />
Four posttraumatic periods.<br />
In the posttraumatic period we have to make a distinction<br />
between four periods: the acute or reanimation period<br />
the primary or stabilization period, the secondary or<br />
regeneration period and the tertiary or rehabilitation<br />
period.<br />
The reanimation period and the primary period<br />
have always been considered as the periods for “life<br />
saving surgery”. Trauma patients are presenting with<br />
a combination of problems. Advances in diagnosis and<br />
treatment have been greatly influenced by technology.<br />
Thanks to these advances, a lot of injuries can now be<br />
treated in a non-operative way, for example, endovascular<br />
procedures to stop haemorrhage. Nevertheless, the<br />
experienced trauma surgeons still play a vital role.<br />
The great majority of lesions that have to be operated<br />
in our countries are lesions of the musculoskeletal system.<br />
Adequate treatment will not only improve the quality of<br />
life of trauma victims but will very often be life saving. For<br />
instance, the lack of recognition of haemorrhage in pelvic<br />
fractures or severe fractures of long bones, are notorious<br />
pitfalls and do result in preventable deaths. The role of<br />
the trauma surgeon involves more than haemostatasis.<br />
The surgeon has to remove damaged tissues, to repair the<br />
injured soft tissues and to stabilize fractures.<br />
The reanimation period.<br />
During this period, decompression, or drainage, of body<br />
cavities (tension pneumothorax, cardiac tamponde) is<br />
necessary. Haemorrhage has to be localized and stopped.<br />
A typical example where surgical experience is<br />
prerequisite is in cases of complex pelvic injuries that<br />
still constitute common problems. Approximately 10 to<br />
20 % of pelvic fractures are complex injuries with a high<br />
likelihood of other major organ trauma or significant pelvic<br />
haemorrhage. Crush injuries and open pelvic fractures<br />
exhibit mortality rates in excess of 50% with a morbidity<br />
ranging from 30 to 74 %. These pelvic fractures are also<br />
very often associated with intra-abdominal injuries such<br />
as rupture of the bladder and the urethra, injuries of the<br />
rectum and the anus, neurological lesions and last but not<br />
least the pelvic compartment syndrome. Sometimes, an<br />
immediate urgent hemipelvectomy is the only procedure<br />
able to save lives.<br />
The primary stabilization period.<br />
During this period, injuries have to be treated that can<br />
become either life endangering or severely disabling<br />
without prompt treatment. In this period, the focus is on<br />
injuries of the musculoskeletal system especially those<br />
with severe soft tissue damage.<br />
combined session 29 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
“Early total trauma care” or “damage control”<br />
The most important decision now is the choice between<br />
the so-called “early total trauma care ”and“ damage<br />
control”. Until the mid-eighties delayed surgery, especially<br />
regarding the musculoskeletal system, was the rule in<br />
the polytrauma patient. The work of Bone and Bucholz<br />
however clearly demonstrated that delayed fixation of long<br />
bone fractures resulted in an increased risk of developing<br />
adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiple<br />
organ failure (MOF). To prevent ARDS and MOF it was<br />
advocated to perform early total trauma care. All injuries<br />
in a polytrauma patient were advised to be treated in the<br />
same operation. This dramatically reduced the occurrence<br />
of ARDS and MOSF. However in the borderline patient the<br />
prolonged surgery can result in profound hypothermia,<br />
acidosis and coagulopathy. This second (iatrogenic) hit can<br />
initiate the cascade of the systemic inflammatory response<br />
syndrome (SIRS) resulting in ARDS and MOSF.<br />
The experience of surgeons dealing with victims of<br />
shoot outs in the drugs war of Colombia or the American<br />
suburbs learned that if only minimal surgery was performed,<br />
stopping the bleeding, preventing further contamination<br />
and minimal lavage and debridement followed by prolonged<br />
resuscitation in the ICU, the likelihood of developing MOSF<br />
decreased significantly. They called this approach “the<br />
damage control approach”.<br />
The “damage control approach” initially was used in<br />
patients with multiple thoraco-abdominal shot wounds.<br />
However it became clear that many polytrauma patient<br />
could benefit from this approach. The basic principles<br />
“stop the bleeding and stop the contamination” nowadays<br />
are not only applicable for thoraco-abdominal lesions, but<br />
also in the treatment of vascular, urologic (shunting) and<br />
musculoskeletal. At the same time the approach did evolve<br />
from a “bail-out” procedure towards a planned and staged<br />
approach to the poytrauma patient.<br />
This choice has to be influenced by the situation of the<br />
patient after initial resuscitation. If the stabilization of the<br />
patient could be obtained easily, then the surgeon has to<br />
choose early total trauma care. If not, damage control has<br />
to be chosen. This control also has to be considered as a<br />
planned approach, which only has one goal: early surgical<br />
hemostasis and control of bacterial contamination. The socalled<br />
orthopaedic damage control may not be forgotten:<br />
debridement and lavage, revascularization, decompression<br />
of the compartments, stabilization of long bones, (usually<br />
by external fixation) and, if necessary, primary amputation.<br />
Prevention of infection.<br />
The most important step in prevention of infection is<br />
early lavage and debridement. “The solution to pollution is<br />
dilution”: initial lavage exposes wounds for inspection and<br />
facilitates debridement. As to the use of antibiotics: in open<br />
fractures with relatively limited soft tissue damage (Type I<br />
and II to Gustilo) , cephalosporin will be sufficient in a clean<br />
environment; in highly contaminated environment ampicillin<br />
will be added. In open factures with severe soft tissue<br />
damage (Gustilo Type III) a combination of Cephalosporin,<br />
ampicillin and aminoglycosides will be given. There is no<br />
advantage to use topical antibiotics or antiseptics.<br />
Stabilization of the fracture.<br />
After resucitation and debridement , the fracture will<br />
be stabilized. The stabilization will also improve the<br />
resistance to infection in facilitating capillary proliferation<br />
and migration of white blood cells.<br />
The choice of the implant depends on the soft tissue<br />
damage, the type of fracture, the infrastructure of the<br />
hospital and surgeon’s experience.<br />
External fixation<br />
In the “damage control” situation very often an external<br />
fixator will be chosen. Early joint motion and rehabilitation<br />
will then often be possible . The technique is relatively easy<br />
and rapidly applied, the stability is sufficient, a reasonable<br />
anatomical reduction is possible and there is minimal<br />
additional soft tissue trauma. On the other hand there are<br />
a lot of disadvantages: the procedure is time consuming<br />
in complex fractures with large wounds, the pins also<br />
fixate musculotendinous units, there is a high incidence<br />
of delayed union and pin tract infection. The device may<br />
also interferewith the soft tissue reconstruction . For these<br />
reasons the fixator is only used in cases of extreme soft<br />
tissue damage (Gustilo Type III b and c) or as a temporary<br />
stabilization before definitive internal fixation. Other<br />
indications are metaphyseal fractures near the joint space<br />
and if bridging of a joint is necessary.<br />
The fixator can also be used for lifting procedures in<br />
cases of large bone defects.<br />
Internal fixation.<br />
Historically, primary internal fixation for open fractures<br />
was considered a contraindication because of an increased<br />
risk of infection. However it has been shown that even<br />
reaming procedures are not associated with a higher<br />
infection risk.<br />
We now know that immediate internal fixation is NOT<br />
associated with a higher infection rate than external<br />
fixation even not in type I-II-III open fractures, if lavage and<br />
debridement have been thorough. Internal fixation is also<br />
associated with better final functional results.<br />
And in closed fractures?<br />
It has been proven that early stabilization of fractures of<br />
long bones, especially of the femoral shaft , in polytrauma<br />
patients saves lives. It improves the peripheral blood<br />
combined session 30 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
flow and reduces blood loss. However, severe shock and<br />
pulmonary contusion are contraindications for the use<br />
of reamed implants as reaming can activate the PMN<br />
Lymphocytes and create fat embolisms resulting in adjacent<br />
lung damage.<br />
Wound closure?<br />
Wounds may only be closed if they are very clean, if all<br />
tissues are viable, and there is no tension on the margins.<br />
If not or in case of doubt, wounds have to be left open. If<br />
possible, delayed closure may be performed within five<br />
days. Then the host is allowed to mount wound defensive<br />
mechanisms and risk of anaerobic infection is reduced.<br />
In case of impending compartment syndrome, the<br />
fasciotomy should not be overlooked.<br />
The regeneration and the rehabilitation period.<br />
During these periods, the interventions are focused on<br />
the improvement of the functional and aesthetical results;<br />
on the improvement of the quality of life.<br />
Definitive wound closure and reconstruction of the soft<br />
tissues will be done now as well as internal fixation of the<br />
fractures. If necessary delayed union will be treated with<br />
secondary fixation and bone grafting.<br />
Attention will be given to physical, psychological and<br />
social rehabilitation.<br />
Conclusions.<br />
In the 21st century the treatment of complex fractures<br />
with soft tissue lesions is much improved. There are<br />
much better implants and better antibiotics but last but<br />
not least, there is an integrated approach to care by a<br />
multidisciplinary team.<br />
combined session 31 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
Resident Forum<br />
Thursday July 7<br />
16.30 <strong>–</strong> 19.00
Effects of humeral rotational osteotomy on contact<br />
mechanism of the canine elbow joint: an ex vivo<br />
study.<br />
Gutbrod A, Guerrero TG*<br />
Department of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.<br />
Introduction<br />
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of<br />
an external rotational osteotomy of the humerus on the<br />
forces acting in the canine elbow joint. Our hypothesis<br />
was that external humeral rotation of 15° would shift the<br />
peak pressure location and the centre of pressure laterally.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Eight canine forelimbs were used. A pressure sensor<br />
was fixed in a subchondral osteotomy distal to the elbow<br />
joint, and each leg was mounted in the testing apparatus.<br />
Measurements were taken in a neutral position and after<br />
15° of external rotation. The distal humerus was rotated<br />
by a mid-diaphyseal humeral osteotomy and stabilized with<br />
an internal fixator. Contact area, peak and mean contact<br />
pressure, peak pressure location, centre of pressure, and<br />
total force were acquired. Data was analyzed using paired<br />
T-tests. Significance was set at p≤0.05.<br />
Results<br />
After 15° of external rotation the peak pressure location<br />
and the centre of pressure were located 37.56 ± 15.9%<br />
(p=0.0001) and 21.5 ± 6.8% (p=0.0001) further laterally.<br />
No statistically significant differences were found between<br />
conditions for the contact area, peak contact pressure,<br />
mean pressure, and total force.<br />
Discussion<br />
The lateral shift of peak pressure and centre of pressure<br />
may be beneficial in dogs with medial compartment disease<br />
of the elbow joint. Being an ex-vivo study, care must be<br />
taken before extrapolating these results to a population of<br />
affected patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate<br />
the clinical effects of this osteotomy.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 35 small animal session
Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin<br />
staplers in 9 dogs and 9 cats<br />
M.Benlloch-Gonzalez, B.Bouvy*, E.Gomes, J.Hernandez, C.Poncet*.<br />
Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis, Arcueil, France.<br />
Introduction<br />
our purpose was to conduct a prospective study to<br />
report the use of skin staples for intestinal anastomosis<br />
(as described in experimental animals by Coolman) in dogs<br />
and cats clinically affected with intestinal disorder to (1)<br />
evaluate the adaptability of the anastomotic technique<br />
in cats and dogs of any weight, (2) identify the type and<br />
frequency of operative and postoperative complications<br />
associated with the skin stapler technique.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The prospective medical records included: -Preoperative<br />
data: signalment, history, clinical signs, physical findings,<br />
chemistry profile, complete blood count and abdominal<br />
ultrasound findings. -Intraoperative data: site and length<br />
of resection in the gastrointestinal tract, time to perform<br />
the anastomosis, number of staples used, presence of<br />
focal or generalized peritonitis, reasons for enterectomy<br />
and concurrent procedures performed. -Postoperative data:<br />
abdominal ultrasound examination at 3, 15 and 28 days<br />
postoperatively, patient follow up at 3, 6 and 12 months<br />
postoperatively, histopathology reports and complications<br />
(minor, major, short-term and long-term data).<br />
Results<br />
9 dogs and 9 cats met the inclusion criteria. Median<br />
body weight was 3.9 kg (range 2.8<strong>–</strong>5.7 kg) in cats and<br />
19.4 kg (range 6-39 kg) in dogs. Median time to perform<br />
the anastomosis was 4 min 22 s (range, 1 min 30 s <strong>–</strong> 7<br />
min 44 s). Minor complications (emesis [2], diarrhoea [1],<br />
anorexia [1] and hypovolaemic shock [1]) resolved with<br />
medical therapy and dietary manipulation. Two dogs and<br />
two cats died between 1 and 3 days after surgery. Necropsy<br />
in these cases revealed a partial obstructive ileus due to<br />
a stricture at the anastomotic site in the two cats and a<br />
partial dehiscence in one of them. Both cats had a marked<br />
luminal disparity oral and aboral to the site of resection<br />
at the moment of surgery. Increased wall thickness and<br />
steatitis persisted in all cases at the 28 th day ultrasound<br />
examination.<br />
Discussion/conclusion<br />
Too thin or too thick an intestinal wall thickness was<br />
not a limitation for the use of skin staples. Incidence of<br />
complications in this study (strictured anastomosis [11.1%]<br />
and dehiscence [5.5%]) was similar compared to data from<br />
published clinical studies (0-16%). The findings of this<br />
study suggest that bowel anastomosis with skin stapler<br />
is simple, safe in cases without marked luminal disparity<br />
and time efficient.<br />
small animal session 36 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Effect of three an aesthetic induction protocols on<br />
laryngeal function during laryngoscopy in normal cat<br />
Nelissen P., Aprea F., Corletto F., White RAS*.<br />
Dick White Referrals, Six Mile Bottom, UK<br />
Objectives:<br />
To evaluate the effect of 3 anaesthetic induction<br />
protocols on laryngeal motion in normal cats.<br />
Study design<br />
Randomized prospective clinical study.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Thirty-five client-owned cats with no previous history<br />
of respiratory dysfunction were randomly allocated to<br />
receive alfaxalone, propofol, or midazolam and ketamine<br />
to induce anaesthesia, after preanaesthetic medication<br />
with methadone. Video-laryngoscopy was performed<br />
and still images at maximum inspiration and expiration<br />
were used to measure the area and height of the rima<br />
glottidis. The percentage reduction of the glottic gap<br />
and of the normalized glottic gap area (NGGA) were<br />
calculated. Subjective scores for arytenoid movement<br />
were also obtained. Kruskal-Wallis test and ANOVA were<br />
used to compare reduction of normalized and percentage<br />
area. Pearson r-test was used to evaluate the correlation<br />
between subjective scores and objective measures of<br />
movement and between normalized and non-normalized<br />
area reduction.<br />
Results<br />
Reduction in glottis area and NGGA was greater in<br />
patients anaesthetized with midazolam and ketamine,<br />
compared to propofol and alfaxalone (p=0.0235 and<br />
p=0.0268 respectively). Significant correlations were found<br />
between the subjective score and percent reduction of<br />
area (p=0.0173), the subjective score and the reduction in<br />
NGGA (p=0.0023) and between percent reduction of area<br />
and reduction in NGGA (p=0.0006).<br />
Conclusions<br />
Induction of anaesthesia with midazolam and ketamine<br />
after preanaesthetic medication with methadone preserved<br />
arytenoid movement better during laryngoscopy. Subjective<br />
expert assessment supported this finding.<br />
Clinical relevance<br />
Misdiagnosis of laryngeal paralysis during laryngoscopy<br />
in cats can be avoided by using anaesthetic protocols with<br />
the least effect on laryngeal motility.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 37 small animal session
Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the<br />
dog: A descriptive cadaveric study.<br />
Vallefuoco R, Jardel N, Tessier A, Moissonnier P.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> Ecole Nationale Veterinaire d’Alfort, France.<br />
Objective<br />
To assess the feasibility of the oral tympanic bulla<br />
osteotomy and to evaluate the safety in safeguarding the<br />
inner ear, epitympanic recess, and neurovascular structures.<br />
Study Design<br />
Anatomic cadaveric study.<br />
Sample Population<br />
Nine fresh canine cadavers (tympanic bulla, n=17),<br />
different in size and skull conformation (mesocephalic,<br />
dolicocephalic and brachycephalic dogs).<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Cadavers were positioned in dorsal recumbency with<br />
the mouth open. The ventral/oral aspect of tympanic bulla<br />
was located through the oropharynx by palpation. An oral<br />
approach to the tympanic bulla was performed under<br />
endoscopic assistance, and a K-wire (1.5-2 mm in diameter)<br />
was inserted into the bulla with a maximum angle of 15°<br />
relative to the plane of the hard palate. The wire was then<br />
introduced as deep as possible in the tympanic bulla. After<br />
anatomical dissection, the wire’s position in the middle<br />
ear and its relationship to the inner ear and neurovascular<br />
structures were evaluated.<br />
Results<br />
In all cases, the wire was placed safely into the most<br />
ventral aspect of tympanic bulla and without damaging<br />
the epitympanic recess. In none of the cases were the<br />
promontory and auditory ossicles damaged. No injury to<br />
the carotid artery and/or hypoglossal nerve was noted. In<br />
mesocephalic and dolicocephalic dogs, the oral approach<br />
to the tympanic bulla was easier than in brachycephalic<br />
dogs in which the tympanic bulla was less prominent and<br />
covered by a more significant oro-buccal musculature.<br />
Discussion/Conclusions<br />
Bulla osteotomy via an oral approach can be performed<br />
without a high risk of neurovascular damage and without<br />
damage to the promontory and auditory ossicles. Due to<br />
the narrow access to the bulla, this technique could be<br />
considered for bacteriological and histological sampling<br />
from middle ear, flushing the bulla, infusion of medication<br />
or drainage of the tympanic cavity in cases of otitis media.<br />
Future studies are required to validate the effectiveness<br />
and usefulness of this technique in clinical cases.<br />
small animal session 38 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Nephroliths and video-assisted nephrotomy in 8<br />
cases<br />
Buttin P., Cachon T.*, Carozzo C*., Maitre P., Arnault A., Fau D., Genevois JP., Viguier E*.<br />
VetAgro-Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon , France<br />
Introduction<br />
Renal and ureteral calculi are unusual clinical findings.<br />
Nevertheless, a recent increase in frequency has<br />
been observed. Medical treatment has limitations and<br />
nephrotomy (particularly bilateral) could have severe<br />
complications.<br />
Objectives<br />
The purpose of this study is to report removal of<br />
ureteral and renal calculi by a video-assisted nephrotomy<br />
(nephroscopy).<br />
Material and methods<br />
Prospective study of 3 dogs and 5 cats that presented<br />
with renal and/or ureteral calculi and were treated by<br />
removal of calculi by nephroscopy. Medical records were<br />
reviewed. Recorded information included breed, age, sex,<br />
clinical signs, complete blood analysis, RX, US, surgical<br />
findings and outcome.<br />
Results<br />
Eight animals were surgically treated from June 2008<br />
to October 2010. All animals were in a critical status<br />
and had renoliths with 3 affected bilaterally (1 dog, 2<br />
cats). Three animals had hydronephrosis and 2 had renal<br />
fibrosis. Nephroscopy was performed in all animals with<br />
3 bilateral procedures during the same anaesthesia. All<br />
animals but case 1had also a cystotomy. One pyelolithotomy<br />
had to be performed in case 2. One bilateral ureterotomy<br />
had to be performed. In all cases SCr and BUN levels,<br />
postoperatively and at follow-up showed a decrease or<br />
at least no worsening of the values. Four animals died of<br />
other complications.<br />
Discussion<br />
In all the cases, apart from one, nephroscopy allowed<br />
removal of renal and/or ureteral calculi with few<br />
complications directly related to the procedure. A<br />
bilateral procedure was performed in 3 cases, without<br />
adverse effect. Nevertheless, when severe renal function<br />
impairment is observed preoperatively, the prognosis is<br />
guarded. Nephroscopy may have several advantages over<br />
nephrotomy and/or ureterotomy.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 39 small animal session
Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in<br />
clean orthopaedic surgeries in dogs and cats<br />
Medl N 1 , Guerrero TG* 1 , Hölzle L 2 , Montavon PM 1<br />
1 <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 2 Institute for Veterinary<br />
Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland<br />
Introduction<br />
The objectives of this study were to determine the<br />
frequency of contamination of the suction tip in three<br />
different operating modes, to assess the association of<br />
contamination with time, and to describe of the bacteria<br />
found. The hypotheses were (a) continuous suction would<br />
be inferior to the intermittent mode, (b) a chlorhexidine<br />
bath would further decrease contamination rates, and (c)<br />
the contamination rate would increase with prolonged<br />
surgical time.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
Clean surgeries (n=75) were assigned to one of three<br />
groups: (1) continuous suction, (2) intermittent suction or<br />
(3) chlorhexidine-bath intermittent suction. Samples of the<br />
suction tip were taken and submitted for bacterial culture<br />
at 0, 20, 60 minutes and at the end of surgery. A control<br />
suction was operated in every surgery. Samples were taken<br />
at the end of surgery simultaneously with a swab from the<br />
surgical wound. A Fisher´s exact test was used to analyze<br />
data. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.<br />
Results<br />
Aerobic contamination rate of the suction tip was<br />
45.3%, with significantly higher contamination rates<br />
for the continuous suction group (64%) compared to the<br />
intermittent group (24%, P=0.03). The chlorhexidine-bath<br />
was not proven superior. Wound contamination ranged from<br />
4% to 8%. The organisms cultured were identical to those<br />
found in the positive suction tips during the same surgery.<br />
In surgeries lasting longer than 60 minutes contamination<br />
rates doubled. Bacterial culture mainly revealed coagulasenegative<br />
Staphylococci.<br />
Conclusions<br />
Intermittent suction was superior to continuous suction.<br />
Changing the suction tip appears advisable at 60 minutes.<br />
Cultures revealed bacteria that are associated with the<br />
normal air and skin flora.<br />
small animal session 40 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed<br />
dogs with medial compartment disease of the elbow<br />
N. Barthélémy¹, D. Griffon* ² , G. Ragetly², I. Carrera², D. Schaeffer²<br />
¹ Michigan State University,East Lansing,USA;² University of Illinois, Champaign,USA<br />
Objectives<br />
Prospective observational clinical study to report the<br />
short- (six weeks) and long-term (28 months) outcomes in<br />
young large breed dogs affected by medial compartment<br />
disease of the elbow and identify variables affecting the<br />
outcome.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Fifteen large breed dogs under three years of age<br />
were included in the study. Medial compartment disease<br />
was confirmed by radiography, computed tomography,<br />
and arthroscopy. Dogs were treated arthroscopically by<br />
fragment excision or subtotal coronoidectomy, with or<br />
without a proximal ulnar osteotomy. Parameters recorded<br />
at the time of treatment included the type of medial<br />
coronoid disease, radio-ulnar incongruency, degree of<br />
cartilage erosion and surgical treatment performed.<br />
Parameters recorded before, 6 weeks after and at least<br />
23 months after surgery included the radiographic score<br />
of osteoarthritis (OA) and trochlear notch sclerosis ratio<br />
(TNS), muscle circumference, range of motion (ROM) and<br />
the load distribution of the vertical ground reaction forces<br />
between thoracic and pelvic limbs.<br />
Results<br />
The ROM and the OA were inversely correlated at<br />
the time of diagnosis. Dogs diagnosed with radio-ulnar<br />
incongruency had a higher load distribution to the pelvic<br />
limbs at the pre-operative evaluation. No difference in final<br />
outcome was observed between surgical treatments. The<br />
load distributions were not different at six weeks compared<br />
to pre-operatively but the vertical impulse distributions<br />
were improved at the long-term evaluation despite a<br />
decreased ROM and an increased OA score. Radio-ulnar<br />
incongruency or a high degree of cartilage erosion was<br />
associated with a greater improvement at the short- and<br />
long-term evaluations. The TNS correlated with the degree<br />
of cartilage erosion at the time of surgery.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Limb function was improved at the long-term follow up<br />
but not at six weeks after surgery. The final outcome was<br />
not affected by the presence of radio-ulnar incongruency,<br />
the surgical technique, the OA score or the degree of<br />
cartilage erosion. Dogs with radio-ulnar incongruency<br />
were more lame pre-operatively but their improvement<br />
was greater post-operatively.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 41 small animal session
Comparison of 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated<br />
screws and 4.0 mm partially-threaded screws in a<br />
canine humeral condylar fracture model<br />
Rochereau P. 1 , Diop A. 2 , Maurel N. 2 , Gomez Clemente R. 2 , Gabanou P.A .3 , Bernardé A.* 1 .<br />
CHVSM, Saint- Martin Bellevue 1 (France). ENSAM, Laboratoire de Biomécanique et Remodelage Osseux,<br />
Paris (France) 2 . Synthes (France) 3<br />
Introduction<br />
The objective of this biomechanical study was to<br />
compare the inter-fragmentary stability of a condylar<br />
fracture model stabilized either with an AO 4.0 mm shortthreaded<br />
cancellous bone screw (Synthes) or with a 4.0<br />
mm self-drilling, self-tapping short-threaded cannulated<br />
screw (Synthes), inserted in a lag fashion.<br />
Materials & methods<br />
Ten pairs of canine humeri were harvested from dogs<br />
weighting 35kg to 45 kg. A lateral condylar fracture model<br />
was performed as previously described by Vida et al<br />
(2005). The fracture was stabilized using either a 4.0 mm<br />
cancellous screw or a 4.0 mm cannulated screw. Humeri<br />
were placed in a mechanical testing machine (INSTRON.<br />
5565). Stability of the simulated humeral fracture was<br />
assessed by loading the lateral condylar fragment in a<br />
proximal direction. Each construct was tested in a single<br />
ramp of constant load application at 60 mm/min until<br />
contact between the two margins of the gap occurs<br />
or until failure. Anatomic reduction, inter-fragmentary<br />
compression, stiffness, yield point (Y1), ultimate load at<br />
failure (Y2) of the bone-implant constructs and implant<br />
breakage, if any, were recorded. Physiologic loads at walk<br />
(60.1% body weight) and fast trot (131% body weight) were<br />
calculated. The corresponding displacement was assessed<br />
for both implants.<br />
Results<br />
Load at Y1 was 23.6% higher but not statistically<br />
different (P=.06) for the cancellous bone screws compared<br />
to the cannulated screws (738 ± 178 N vs 597 ± 133N,<br />
respectively). At Y1, the stiffness of the cancellous<br />
screw-bone construct (557 ± 148N/mm) was similar and<br />
not statistically different (P>.05) from the stiffness of the<br />
cannulated screw-bone construct (559 ± 142N/mm). At<br />
physiologic loads, no statistically significant differences<br />
were observed between the two implants (P>.05). Ultimate<br />
load at failure (Y2) was significantly higher (P= .01) for<br />
the cancellous bone screws compared to the cannulated<br />
screws (1261 ± 261N vs 1078 ± 231N, respectively). Three<br />
cannulated screws broke at the threaded:non-threaded<br />
junction during mechanical testing. None of the cancellous<br />
bone screws broke during the tests.<br />
Discussion<br />
At physiologic loads, stabilization of a simulated<br />
lateral humeral condylar fracture with a 4.0 mm partiallyshort-threaded<br />
cannulated screw resulted in comparable<br />
mechanical properties to those of a 4.0 mm cancellous<br />
partially-threaded screw. We chose 2 implants with<br />
minimal dimensional differences. At Y1, our results may<br />
indicate that the slight increase of the core diameter of<br />
the cannulated screw may balance the potential decrease<br />
of its mechanical properties due to the cannulation. The<br />
ultimate load at failure was statistically higher for the<br />
cancellous screws compared to the cannulated screws<br />
(P=.01). At Y2, three cannulated screws broke at the nonthreaded/threaded<br />
junction. This area may represent a zone<br />
of weakness because of the decrease of the shaft-to-core<br />
diameter. We choose self-drilling, self-tapping cannulated<br />
screws because their use may limit the number of the<br />
surgical steps, and can be less technically demanding<br />
and time consuming. However, we could not respect the<br />
insertion procedure recommended by Synthes as the<br />
distal threads could not engage the trans-cortex. Further<br />
studies are needed to refine the procedure of insertion of<br />
cannulated screws in the canine humeral condyle.<br />
small animal session 42 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation<br />
following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy<br />
stabilisation using three different TPLO plates<br />
Woodbridge N 3 , Corr S.A. 2 , Grierson J 1 , Arthurs G 1 .<br />
1 The Royal Veterinary College, Hertfordshire, England. School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University<br />
of Nottingham, England. Dick White Referrals, Suffolk, England<br />
Introduction<br />
The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospectively<br />
medial to lateral translation of the proximal tibial segment<br />
(tibial plateau) following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy<br />
(TPLO), stabilised with three types of plate.<br />
Method<br />
Postoperative radiographs of 79 dogs that had TPLO<br />
surgery, at The Royal Veterinary College London, using<br />
3 different types of plates were reviewed. Two plate<br />
types incorporated non locking screws: Slocum (22<br />
cases) and Orthomed Delta (33 cases) plates and one<br />
plate incorporating locking screws; Synthes TPLO Locking<br />
Compression Plate LCP (24 cases). The radiographs were<br />
reviewed by three Diplomate surgeons who were blinded<br />
to the type of implant used. Medial or lateral translation of<br />
the proximal tibial plateau relative to the tibial diaphysis<br />
was assessed and measured at the lateral tibial cortex at<br />
the osteotomy site.<br />
Results<br />
Mean (+/-SD) lateral translation of the tibial plateau<br />
was significantly greater when using the Synthes TPLO<br />
LCP with locking screws (+2.06mm+/-1.79) compared to<br />
the non locking Slocum plate (0.37mm+/-0.96mm) or the<br />
Orthomed Delta plate (0.02 mm+/-1.06).<br />
Conclusion<br />
Lateral translation of the tibial plateau segment may<br />
occur when using the Synthes TPLO LCP during TPLO<br />
surgery. “Clinical significance: The use of the Synthes TPLO<br />
LCP will maintain a malalignment of the tibial plateau.<br />
Accurate alignment of the tibial plateau must be ensured<br />
prior to application of the Synthes TPLO LCP.”<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 43 small animal session
Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole<br />
for canine sino-nasal aspergillosis.<br />
G. M. Hayes and J. L. Demetriou*.<br />
Queen’s Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge, UK.<br />
Introduction<br />
Sino-nasal aspergillosis is a common cause of chronic<br />
rhinitis in the dog. It is frequently treated by trephination of<br />
the lateral compartment of the frontal sinuses and irrigation<br />
with clotrimazole 1% solution before adding a depot<br />
preparation of clotrimazole 1% cream. The aim of this study<br />
was to determine the persistence of clotrimazole cream in<br />
the canine frontal sinus and to assess the distribution of<br />
clotrimazole solution over the sino-nasal mucosa using this<br />
treatment protocol.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Two canine skulls were used to monitor the persistence<br />
of clotrimazole cream in the lateral compartment of the<br />
frontal sinus at 37ºC. Six canine cadaver heads were used<br />
to determine the distribution of clotrimazole solution around<br />
the frontal sinuses and nasal cavity by adding methylene<br />
blue stain to the irrigation solution before sectioning the<br />
heads sagittally.<br />
Results<br />
Clotrimazole cream persisted in the frontal sinus for a<br />
minimum of 96 hours. The nasal mucosa was completely<br />
stained in 8/12 sides and almost completely (>80%) stained<br />
in the remaining 4/12 sides. Flushing through the lateral<br />
compartment of the frontal sinus resulted in inadequate<br />
staining of the rostral compartment but medicating both<br />
the lateral and rostral compartments resulted in complete<br />
coating of all frontal sinus mucosa in 8/8 sides. Additional<br />
bony septae were present in 2/12 lateral frontal sinuses<br />
and 1/12 had a congenital foramen between the lateral<br />
compartment of the frontal sinus and the cranial cavity.<br />
Conclusions and Clinical Significance<br />
Clotrimazole cream has the potential to be retained in<br />
the frontal sinus for several days. The treatment protocol<br />
is effective at distributing medication to the entire nasal<br />
cavity although the success rate of the procedure could<br />
potentially be improved by medicating both rostral and<br />
lateral compartments of the frontal sinus. Variable frontal<br />
sinus anatomy may influence the safety and efficacy of<br />
topical treatments.<br />
small animal session 44 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 45 small animal session
small animal session 46 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
Poster session<br />
Friday July 8<br />
17.00 <strong>–</strong> 18.00
small animal session 48 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
A retrospective study of complications following<br />
modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate<br />
deficient stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010)<br />
Bernardé A., Rochereau P., Spengler E.<br />
CHVSM, Saint-Martin Bellevue (France).<br />
Objective<br />
To describe the surgical technique, outcome and<br />
complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy<br />
(mTTO) for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL)deficient<br />
stifle joints in dogs.<br />
Study Design<br />
Retrospective clinical study of 66 dogs with CrCL-deficient<br />
stifles (n=72).<br />
Methods<br />
Medical records of dogs that had mTTO over a 3 years period<br />
were reviewed. TTO was modified by caudal completion of<br />
the transverse osteotomies in order to deliberately rupture<br />
the caudal tibial cortices and to favorize the tibial plateau<br />
(TP) rotation. TP was fixed in compression using a standard<br />
unlocked TTO plate or a locking TPLO plate. Whenever<br />
possible, distal tibial tuberosity fracture (DTTF) was avoided<br />
and the tibial cortices at the distalmost cut of the tuberosity<br />
was keep intact. When it inadvertently fractured, the<br />
tuberosity was stabilized with 2 screws, or 1 screw and 1<br />
pin. Complications were recorded and separated into either<br />
major or minor complications based on the need for additional<br />
surgery. In-hospital re-evaluation of limb function and time to<br />
radiographic healing were reviewed. Further follow-up was<br />
obtained by telephone interview of owners. Influence of DTTF,<br />
opposite stifle status, TP plating mode, or DTTF fixation if<br />
any were analyzed using multivariate discriminating analysis<br />
(significance at p≤.05).<br />
Results<br />
Medical records of 66 dogs that had 72 mTTO were<br />
reviewed. Six dogs had bilateral mTTO, 1 in the same time,<br />
5 at 8±2.3 months interval. Sixteen had an extracapsular<br />
stabilization on the opposite side 11±5 months earlier. Mean<br />
age was 5 ±2.3 yrs, mean weight was 43±7.8 Kg and<br />
male/female ratio was 74% at surgery. DTTF occurred<br />
in 23 of 72 (31.9%) mTTO. Complications occurred<br />
in 11 on 72 (15.2%) procedures (6.9% major, 8.3%<br />
minor). All occurred within the 6 postoperative weeks.<br />
Major complications included plate loosening and<br />
subsequent tibial fracture (n=1), and tibial tuberosity<br />
fixation loosening (n=4). Minor complications included<br />
seroma formation (n=2), and incisional trauma (n=4).<br />
All but one major complications were treated with<br />
successful outcomes. All minor complications resolved.<br />
The mean time to documented radiographic healing<br />
was 12.2 weeks. Final in-hospital re-evaluation of limb<br />
function (mean, 13.2 weeks) was recorded for 56 dogs,<br />
showing no (65%), mild (31%), moderate (4%), or severe<br />
(0%) lameness. All but 1 owners interviewed were<br />
satisfied with outcome and 88.7% reported a marked<br />
improvement or a return to pre-injury status. DTTF and<br />
bilateral procedures were associated with a higher risk<br />
of major complications after mTTO. Short length of the<br />
proximal screw into the tibial tuberosity was associated<br />
with a higher risk of complications after DTTF.<br />
Conclusions<br />
mTTO is a procedure comparable with alternate<br />
methods of CrCL repair with expected good to excellent<br />
functional outcome. Major complications, although<br />
uncommon, are related to DTTF especially when<br />
repaired with an insufficient proximal screw purchase<br />
and to bilateral procedures.<br />
Clinical Relevance<br />
mTTO procedure can be successfully used to obtain<br />
the dynamic stability of a CrCL-deficient stifle joint in<br />
dogs.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 49 small animal session
Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine<br />
condylar fractures by finite element analysis<br />
B. Böhme 1 , V. d’Otreppe 2 , J.P. Ponthot 2 and M. Balligand<br />
1 Kleintierklinik Bremen, Bremen, Germany; 2 Aerospace and Mechanical Department- University of Liège,<br />
Belgium, 3 Department of Clinical Science, University of Liège, Belgium.<br />
Condylar humeral fractures are classified as medial,<br />
lateral or bicondylar (Y-T) fractures and are believed to be<br />
associated with minor, indirect trauma, predominantly in<br />
immature dogs. It is believed that these fractures occur in<br />
extension of the elbow by proximal translation of the radius.<br />
The objective of this three-dimensional finite element<br />
analysis was to confirm the pathogenesis of condylar<br />
fractures, to determine the influence of bone positioning<br />
on fracture type and to evaluate the intraosseus stress<br />
distribution before fracturing.<br />
Based on computer tomographic scans (n=6; two right<br />
forelimbs, Beagle, 4 months of age, male, 7-7,5 kg, scans<br />
in -10°,0° and +10° of endo-/exorotation; 1mm sections)<br />
finite element analysis was performed (n=3) to create a<br />
three-dimensional model of the canine elbow. Bone contact,<br />
stress-strain distribution within the distal humerus before<br />
fracture and failure mode as highest intraosseus stress<br />
distribution were reported in 60°, 130° and 150° of flexion-<br />
extension angle (FEA), abduction- adduction angle (AbAdA)<br />
of -20°, 0° and +20° and in -10°, 0° and +10° of radioulnar<br />
endo-/exorotation (RA).<br />
In contrast to the hypothesis that the radial bone would<br />
be the interacting structure, the humeroulnar interaction<br />
is clearly dominant, less often radius and ulna are both<br />
interacting. Abduction/ Adduction of the elbow at the time<br />
of trauma seem to be an important influence on fracture<br />
type. Endo- and exorotation of the radioulnar bones<br />
additionally influences the stress-strain distribution within<br />
the distal humerus.<br />
Condylar fracture pathogenesis is more complex than<br />
described in the literature. They may not only occur in<br />
elbow extension as previously reported. The ulna may<br />
even play a more important role in condylar fracture<br />
pathogenesis then the radius. Additionally fracture type<br />
may be sensitive to bone positioning during trauma. The<br />
suspected fracture type is sensitive to abduction-adduction<br />
as well as radioulnar endo-/exorotation.<br />
small animal session 50 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: three<br />
representative cases.<br />
Boland L, Gomes E, Payen G, Bouvy B*, Poncet C*<br />
CHV Frégis, Arcueil, France<br />
Introduction<br />
Zygomatic salivary gland disease is uncommon in dogs,<br />
and to our knowledge, as few as 17 cases have been<br />
previously reported. The purpose of this report was to<br />
describe three additional cases of zygomatic gland diseases<br />
using the same diagnostic approach and treated with the<br />
same surgical management.<br />
<strong>Animals</strong><br />
Three dogs : a 3-month-old male Basset Hound, a<br />
10-year-old male Staffordshire Terrier, and a 14-year-old<br />
female dalmatian.<br />
Methods<br />
Salivary gland disease were diagnosed by fine-needle<br />
aspiration and magnetic resonance imaging in dogs. They<br />
were treated surgically by a modified lateral orbitotomy and<br />
zygomatic glands were submit on histologic examination.<br />
Results<br />
Pathologic diagnosis were a sialocele, a malignant<br />
mixed salivary tumor, and a sialadenitis. The outcome<br />
was favourable in two cases whereas recurrence of local<br />
disease wartranted euthanasia 3 months following surgery<br />
in the neoplasctic case.<br />
Discussion/conclusion<br />
Less of 20 cases cases of zygomatic gland diseases<br />
have been reported in litterature, and this paper described<br />
3 aditionnal cases : a sialocele, a neoplasia, and a<br />
sialadenitis. In our three cases, diagnosis of zygomatic<br />
gland disease was made with MRI and we considered MRI<br />
as the most valuable complementary exam to diagnose the<br />
zygomatic gland diseases. MRI produced detailed images<br />
of orbital tissues and provided more information about the<br />
extent of pathology than the other imaging techniques,<br />
giving a greater chance to make a correct diagnosis and<br />
allowing appropriate selection of surgical approach. The<br />
modified lateral surgical technique was elected because<br />
this approach provided an optimal exposure, with<br />
preservation of the palpebral nerve.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 51 small animal session
True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel<br />
blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth<br />
deformity <strong>–</strong> planning and execution of technique<br />
N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou 1 , K. Ash 1 , V. Wavreille 1 , Z. Szanto 2<br />
1 Fitzpatrick Referrals, Surrey, UK, 2 Twin Falls Veterinary Clinic, Avenue East. Twin Falls, Idaho, USA<br />
Introduction<br />
Dome osteotomies in literature to date have constituted<br />
cylindrical or crescentic cuts. We aimed to describe the<br />
application of a new dome blade design and trigonometric<br />
principles for execution of true spherical osteotomy (TSO)<br />
in antebrachial growth deformities.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
A dome blade was used to create osteotomies in plastic<br />
bone models, the surfaces of which were laser-scanned<br />
and trigonometric calculations were applied to align the<br />
epicentre (O) of the blade with the midpoint of the model<br />
in frontal and sagittal planes (MPfs). Complex ABGD in<br />
a dog was assessed using CORA methodology applied to<br />
radiographic images and a 3D model reconstructed from<br />
CT scans. Trigonometric formulas for execution of a TSO<br />
were applied.<br />
Results<br />
Blade orientation prevented translation at the osteotomy<br />
site in frontal and sagittal planes after correction of<br />
torsion. Preoperative FPA radiographically was 13o valgus,<br />
whereas FPA on the 3D model was 0o. Postoperative FPA<br />
radiographically was 50 varus.<br />
Discussion/conclusions<br />
Discrepancy between true FPA and that measured<br />
radiographically was attributable to radiographic distortion<br />
due to rotation. The angulation correction axis (ACA) of<br />
a TSO is located at O and therefore separated from the<br />
osteotomy by the sphere radius. To avoid translation of the<br />
bone axes when a TSO is employed to correct a torsional<br />
deformity, the ACA should pass through the CORA on the<br />
midline of MPfs and not any of the CORAs on the bisector<br />
line of the deformity. This constitutes a new rule specifically<br />
pertinent to dome osteotomies.<br />
small animal session 52 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Total hip replacement with reiforced augmentation<br />
of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the sop<br />
implant and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal<br />
acetabular rim deficiency<br />
N. Fitzpatrick, M. Bielecki, R Yeadon*, M. Hamilton*<br />
Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK<br />
Introduction<br />
Our objective was to describe a surgical technique<br />
for reinforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular<br />
rim (RADAR) using a SOP locking plate and<br />
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement, and to<br />
report clinical outcome in seven dogs.<br />
Methods<br />
Medical records of seven dogs with large dorsal<br />
acetabular rim deficits, undergoing total hip replacement<br />
(THR) with RADAR using a SOP plate and PMMA were<br />
evaluated retrospectively. RADAR involved anchorage of<br />
a pre-contoured 2.0 or 2.7 mm SOP plate dorsal to the<br />
acetabulum followed by application of PMMA cement<br />
to cover the pre-prepared acetabulum and the plate.<br />
Cemented acetabular components were used in all cases.<br />
Implant associated complications were recorded. Minimum<br />
six month follow-up was available for all cases.<br />
Results<br />
In all dogs lameness improved at medium-term<br />
reassessment (median 8 months, range 6-11 months).<br />
Complications included transient sciatic neuropraxia in<br />
2/7 dogs, but this resolved by 3 months postoperatively<br />
in both dogs.<br />
Conclusions<br />
RADAR using a SOP TM plate and PMMA cement is viable<br />
and may facilitate placement of acetabular THR component<br />
implantation in dogs with severe DAR insufficiency. All dogs<br />
returned to full function at medium-term reassessment.<br />
In dogs with a paucity of dorsal acetabular rim, RADAR<br />
using SOP/PMMA may facilitate cemented acetabular THR<br />
component implantation.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 53 small animal session
Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement<br />
of frontal plane angulation: a cadaveric radiographic<br />
analysis<br />
Piras LA 1 , Peirone B 1 , Fox DB 2<br />
1 University of Turin, Italy. 2 University of Missouri, USA.<br />
Objectives<br />
The objectives of this study were to quantify the effect of<br />
antebrachial torsion on the miscalculation of radial valgus<br />
measured radiographically and to assess a radiographic<br />
positioning method used to mitigate torsion-associated<br />
artifactual miscalculation of concurrent frontal plane<br />
angulation of the antebrachium.<br />
Methods<br />
A canine cadaver forelimb was used to model different<br />
combinations of valgus and external torsion to study<br />
the effects of torsion on the radiographic calcaultion of<br />
concurrent frontal plane angulation.<br />
Results<br />
Both 0° and 15° torsional iterations possessed mean AV<br />
values between 0° and 5° for every valgus increment. With<br />
torsion of 30° and higher, mean AV values varied widely<br />
and did not fall within the 0°-5° accepted range except for<br />
three TV iterations of the 60° torsional group (valgus 20°,<br />
25° and 30°). Rotationally re-positioning the limb in an<br />
attempt to alleviate the AV discrepancies resulted in the<br />
30° torsional group having acceptable AV values for valgus<br />
values between 0°-20°, the 45° torsional group having<br />
acceptable AV values for TV values between 0°-15°, and<br />
the 60° torsional group having acceptable AV values for<br />
TV values between 0°-10°.<br />
Clinical Significance<br />
Increasing antebrachial torsion interferes with accurate<br />
radiographic measurement of frontal plane deformities.<br />
Specifically, torsion in excess of 15° results in radiographic<br />
artifacts greater than 5° such that accurate surgical<br />
planning appears unreliable.<br />
small animal session 54 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Latero-distal transposition of the tibial crest for<br />
patella alta and medial luxation<br />
Segal U., Shani J*<br />
Knowledge Farm Specialist‘s Referral Center, Beit Berl, Israel<br />
Medial patellar luxation is a medial displacement of the<br />
patella from the trochlear groove. In dogs, medial luxations<br />
account for 75% of all patellar luxation cases, and are<br />
frequently associated with patella alta, i.e., an abnormally<br />
high (proximal) position of the patella in the femoral groove.<br />
The common surgical treatment of medial luxation is<br />
osteotomy of the tibial crest and its lateral transposition.<br />
This is performed in order to correct the mechanical axis,<br />
to neutralize the force created by the medial component<br />
of the quadriceps muscle, and to place the patella in the<br />
correct anatomical alignment. Postoperative complications<br />
in dogs is estimated to be 18<strong>–</strong>29% of cases, with up to<br />
48% involving re-luxation.<br />
We hypothesized that, in cases of medial luxation<br />
involving patella alta, addition of a distal component to the<br />
tibial crest transposition will distally transpose the patella<br />
into the patellar groove thus reducing the recurrence rates<br />
of luxation. We performed the procedure on 12 dogs and<br />
our results reveal that latero-distal transposition of the<br />
tibial crest produced better clinical outcome. This improved<br />
surgical procedure is easily preformed and may become, in<br />
the future, standard treatment of medial patellar luxation<br />
with patella alta.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 55 small animal session
Morphological comparison of the middle ear between<br />
French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs.<br />
L.Souchu 1 , T. Chuzel 2 , C. Carozzo* 3 .<br />
1 Clinique des Perrières, Blois, France; 2 Voxcan, Marcy l’Etoile, France ; 3 Surgery unit, VetAgroSup, Campus<br />
vétérinaire, Marcy l’Etoile, France.<br />
The objective of this study was to compare normal and<br />
pathological morphology of the middle ear of the French<br />
Bulldog with normal morphology of non-brachycephalic<br />
dogs using computed tomography (CT).<br />
CT scans from French Bulldogs (FB) (n=34) with or without<br />
middle ear disease and non-brachycephalic dogs(NBD)<br />
(n=36) without middle ear disease were reviewed. Ratios<br />
between inter-jugular processes distance and height of the<br />
Epi+Mesotympanum (rHem) and external acoustic meatus<br />
(rHeam) , height(rHh), width(rWh) and length(rLh) of the<br />
hypotymanum, percentage of tympanic bulla (TB) protrusion<br />
from the skull (%Hin and %Hout) were calculated from<br />
2D view. Relative position of TB and temporo-mandibular<br />
joint (TMJ) were determined with surface rendering 3D<br />
reconstruction. Data were compared using paired-sample<br />
(independent) t-test with p
Stabilisation of periarticular fractures or osteotomies<br />
with an LCP notched head T-plate.<br />
C. J. Tan, K.A. Johnson*.<br />
University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Sydney, Australia.<br />
Introduction<br />
Fractures or osteotomies involving a small periarticular<br />
bone fragment can prove challenging to stabilise. The<br />
purpose of this study was to describe the use of a locking<br />
compression plate (LCP) notched head T-plate in the<br />
stabilisation of a variety of peri-articular and articular<br />
fractures or osteotomies in small dogs and cats.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Client owned animals that had a periarticular or articular<br />
fracture or osteotomy stabilised with a notched head<br />
locking T plate were reviewed. Intraoperative complications<br />
and plate modification (contouring or cutting) were<br />
recorded. The type and size of screws used was recorded.<br />
Radiographs were reviewed to assess implant position<br />
and, when available, follow up radiographs evaluated for<br />
degree on bone healing.<br />
Results<br />
An LCP notched head T-plate was used in one cat and four<br />
dogs, resulting in a total of 6 surgeries. The mean weight<br />
of the animals was 3.77 +/- 1.42 kg (range 2.37-5.8kg). Of<br />
the 6 surgical procedures, 3 were fractures and 3 were<br />
osteotomies. The median number of screws used was 6<br />
(range 5-7) and a combination of locking and cortex screws<br />
were used in all constructs. The plate was modified in all<br />
cases. Complications encountered during surgery involved<br />
the direction of the locking screws towards the articular<br />
surface. Radiographic union was achieved at 8 weeks in<br />
all 4 cases with follow up radiographs<br />
Conclusions<br />
This study reports the successful use of a locking<br />
notched head T plate in a variety of clinical cases. Further<br />
investigations into the application of this plate are<br />
warranted.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 57 small animal session
Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the<br />
thigh region.<br />
M. Verset 1 , T. Cachon* 2 , D. Rémy 2 , C. Carozzo* 2 .<br />
1 Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, France, 2 VetAgroSup, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, France.<br />
Simple lipomas are the most common adipose tissue<br />
tumours, whereas infiltrative lipomas (IL) are rarely<br />
diagnosed.<br />
A 8-year-old male Labrador Retriever (LR) is presented<br />
for a swelling of the lateral side of the right thigh and a<br />
7-year-old male Beauceron for recurrence of a mass in<br />
the caudal region of the left thigh. A CT exam concludes<br />
to a lipoma or liposarcoma of the thigh with muscular<br />
invasion. Both tumours are resected after blunt and sharp<br />
dissection of the surrounding sound muscles. In the LR,<br />
an approach of the femoral diaphysis and distal femur<br />
by lateral incision allows tumour and infiltrated vastus<br />
lateralis muscle excision. In the Beauceron, approach of<br />
the caudal region of the femur by caudomedial incision<br />
allows tumour and infiltrated semimembranosus muscle<br />
resection. Two Redon’s drains are placed for continuous<br />
suctioning, before layered closure.<br />
Pathology is diagnostic of IL and surgical margins<br />
diagnosed as tumour-free. A CT check-up at 14 weeks<br />
post-op shows no images of tumoral recurrence. Both<br />
dogs are in good condition without any thigh swelling 36<br />
months post-op (Beauceron) and 33 months post-op (LR).<br />
IL cannot be distinguished from the more common<br />
simple lipomas by cytology or small biopsy specimens.<br />
Although considered benign, they are locally aggressive<br />
and commonly invade adjacent tissues. CT is used to better<br />
delineate these tumours but differentiation from normal fat<br />
is a problem. MRI is the gold standard exam for adipose<br />
tissue tumours in humans. Aggressive treatment, including<br />
amputation when local complete resection is impossible,<br />
may be necessary for local control. Complete excision of IL<br />
in the thigh region is often difficult because of the large size<br />
of the tumour, vascular or nervous structures entrapment,<br />
and indistinct margins. Dead space management after<br />
tumour excision is necessary. Complete excision may not<br />
be possible without interfering with normal limb function.<br />
Pathologic analysis of the tumour is essential for definitive<br />
diagnosis and analysis of surgical margins is crucial in so far<br />
as it influences prognosis and may lead to surgical revision.<br />
Handling of infiltrative lipomas, as far as diagnosis and<br />
resection are concerned, may be a real challenge.<br />
small animal session 58 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Owner based metrology instruments for conditions<br />
of canine chronic mobility impairment - contruct and<br />
criterion validity of LOAD, HCPI and CBPI<br />
Walton MB 1 , Innes JF 1 , Lascelles BDX* 2<br />
1 Univeristy of Liverpool, Neston, UK. 2 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA<br />
Background<br />
Owner-based questionnaires are frequently used in<br />
clinical studies to assess pain and function. This study<br />
tests further, and compares, psychometric properties of<br />
three promising instruments: Liverpool Osteoarthritis in<br />
Dogs (LOAD, the helsinki Chronic Pain Index (HCPI) and the<br />
Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI).<br />
Methods<br />
Dogs with conditions causing long-standing mobility<br />
impairment were recruited. Following clinical and<br />
orthopaedic examination of the dogs, their owners were<br />
asked to complete each of the instruments. The dogs then<br />
underwent force-platform analysis. An asymmetry index<br />
for peak vertical force for the lame limb was calculated as<br />
described by Fanchon (2007). Scores for each instrument,<br />
and asymmetry indices were then compared using<br />
Spearma’s Rank Correlation.<br />
Results<br />
There were significant correlations between all<br />
metrology instruments, including all factors of the CBPI.<br />
Spearman’s Rank Correlations (r s ) between the separate<br />
instruments varied from 0.48 (for LOAD against CBPI Pain<br />
Severity Score) to 0.6 (for LOAD against HCPI).<br />
No instrument score correlated significantly with<br />
asymmetry index for peak vertical force, with r s ranging<br />
from 0.01 for HCPI, to -0.34 for the CBPI “Overall” factor.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The significant correlation between instrument scores<br />
suggests that they are all influenced by common factors.<br />
This comparison constitutes a measure of construct<br />
validity. Criterion validity of a metrology instrument is<br />
tested by comparison with a “gold-standard” measure.<br />
Force platform analysis provides an objective measure of<br />
limb function. The poor correlation of any instrument score<br />
with asymmetry index may either suugest poor criterion<br />
valdity, or that direct comparison of total scores with this<br />
objective measure is an imperfect test of this feature.<br />
Further work is necessary to elucidate the reasons for this<br />
lack of correlation.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 59 small animal session
combined session 60 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Infection control in surgical<br />
practice<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
08.30 <strong>–</strong> 12.30
combined session 62 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Surgical site infections: Incidence, relevance, risk<br />
factors and surveillance<br />
J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />
Introduction<br />
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are an inherent risk of<br />
any surgical procedure. By their nature, surgeries involve<br />
compromising the normal protective barriers that the body<br />
uses to prevent infections by the multitude of bacteria that<br />
are present on or in the body, and which are encountered<br />
in daily life. The advancement of veterinary medicine can<br />
result in a paradoxical increase in SSIs, as more aggressive<br />
surgical procedures are performed and procedures are<br />
performed on patients who are alive because of aggressive<br />
medical interventions, but exist in a compromised state.<br />
Definitions<br />
Prior to detailed discussion of SSIs, it is important to<br />
achieve consensus, or at least understanding, or what<br />
constitutes an SSI. Standard definitions must be used to<br />
allow for reasonable comparison of data from different<br />
locations, and to facilitate proper identification of<br />
SSIs. Standard criteria are also needed to differentiate<br />
infection from inflammation, something that is not<br />
always straightforward. US Centers for Disease Control<br />
and Prevention (CDC) has developed standard criteria<br />
for defining SSIs. 1 These classify SSIs into superficial<br />
incisional, deep incisional and organ/space SSI. It is<br />
reasonable to apply these criteria equally to veterinary<br />
medicine and it is critical to use an objective definition<br />
when evaluating SSIs. For example, a superficial surgical<br />
site infection must meet the following criteria:<br />
infection occurs with 30 days of the operation<br />
and<br />
involves only the skin and subcutaneous issues<br />
of the incision<br />
and<br />
patient has at least one of the following:<br />
• purulent drainage from the superficial incision<br />
• organisms that are isolated from a properly<br />
collected culture of fluid or tissue from the<br />
superficial infection<br />
• at least one of the following signs of infection: pain<br />
or tenderness, localized swelling, redness or heat<br />
and superficial incision is deliberately opened by the<br />
surgeon, and is culture-positive or is not cultured<br />
Incidence if SSIs in companion animals<br />
Tremendous efforts are expended in human medicine to<br />
collect and analyse data regarding SSIs, ranging from local<br />
data collection in individual hospitals to formal national<br />
or international surveillance programs. Comparable<br />
surveillance systems are lacking in veterinary medicine.<br />
Various reasons for the relative lack of surveillance exist.<br />
The overall morbidity and mortality associated with SSIs<br />
in veterinary patients may be less than in human patients,<br />
particularly given the greater number of high-risk humans<br />
(e.g. elderly, significant comorbidies) that undergo surgery<br />
and the larger number of highly invasive procedures that<br />
are performed in human medicine. However, other factors<br />
may also be involved, particularly a poorly developed<br />
‘culture’ of infection control in veterinary medicine, smaller<br />
facilities that limit the scope of studies, and the presence<br />
of relatively few individuals with interest and expertise for<br />
performing epidemiological studies.<br />
Despite the limitations, various studies have reported<br />
SSI rates in veterinary surgery, including overall infection<br />
rates and rates for specific surgical procedures. These have<br />
indicated rates of 0 <strong>–</strong> 18%, 2-9 and assessment of overall<br />
SSI rates is hard to do because of the different risks of SSI<br />
that are likely associated with different types of procedures.<br />
Procedure-specific rates have been reported, such as 6.6%<br />
(defined SSI) to 8.4% (inflammation/infection) for TPLO.<br />
Inherent limitations with many of these studies include<br />
relatively small sample sizes, the lack of use of standard<br />
definitions, lack of clear attempts to differentiate infection<br />
from inflammation and reliance on retrospective data from<br />
medical records. The latter limitation may be significant<br />
because a large percentage of infections may never be<br />
documented. This is particularly true for superficial SSIs<br />
that are treated by someone other than the original surgeon,<br />
combined session 63 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011<br />
4, 10
as communication between veterinary hospitals is not<br />
always optimal.<br />
Impact of SSIs<br />
While relatively uncommon (at least for most surgical<br />
procedures), SSIs can have significant impacts on patients,<br />
owners and veterinarians. Severe illness and death are<br />
obvious concerns, but non-fatal SSIs can have tremendous<br />
impacts because of the need for ongoing treatment, revision<br />
surgery and sub-optimal endpoint outcome. Some effects,<br />
such as patient morbidity, patient mortality and increased<br />
treatment costs, are readily quantifiable. Others, such<br />
as client frustration and grief, veterinary frustration,<br />
potential liability, and negative public perceptions may<br />
be very important but difficult to quantify. While the<br />
population impact of post-operative infections in veterinary<br />
medicine may be low because of the low incidence in most<br />
populations (in the absence of an outbreaks), severe or fatal<br />
infections that develop in a small number of patients can<br />
be economically and emotionally draining for clients and<br />
veterinarians, irrespective of their low incidence. Therefore,<br />
even if the incidence of SSIs in veterinary medicine is low,<br />
the impact can be disproportionately large.<br />
Trends in SSIs<br />
Inadequate data are available to provide objective<br />
information about changes in SSI rates. However, anecdotal<br />
information suggests that SSIs may be an increasing<br />
concern, particularly in elective orthopedic procedures,<br />
perhaps largely due to the emergence and dissemination<br />
of multidrug resistant opportunistic pathogens such as<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.<br />
Risk Factors<br />
Risk factors for a variety of surgical procedures have<br />
been extensively evaluated in human medicine and include<br />
patient (diabetes, nicotine use, obesity, immunosuppressive<br />
therapy, malnutrition, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />
aureus (MRSA) colonization, prolonged hospitalization),<br />
procedure (wound classification, surgeon operation<br />
volume), pre-operative (hair removal, patient skin<br />
preparation, surgical team hand/forearm preparation,<br />
antimicrobial prophylaxis), surgical (operating room<br />
environment, duration, surgical instrument management,<br />
surgical attire and drapes, surgical aseptic technique)<br />
and post-operative (incision care, antimicrobial therapy)<br />
factors.11-13<br />
Many of these risk factors are probably applicable to<br />
veterinary medicine, yet the relative importance of each<br />
is unknown as risk factor data in veterinary medicine are<br />
limited. Care must be taken to use human data for guidance,<br />
but not to over-interpret the relevance of human studies<br />
because of the marked differences in patient populations,<br />
operating environments, post-operative care, duration of<br />
hospitalization, incidence of comorbidities, and various<br />
other factors. Large, well-designed risk factor analyses are<br />
required for veterinary procedures, yet these are rare and<br />
are often difficult to perform because of the large samples<br />
sizes that are required and the need for prospective study<br />
and active identification of surgical site infections (rather<br />
than reliance on medical record data).<br />
Surgical classification (clean, clean/contaminated,<br />
contaminated, dirty) has been associated with SSIs in<br />
both general small animal surgery and equine orthopedic<br />
surgery, 3, 14 however one study questioned its usefulness<br />
in small animals. 2 Duration of surgery has also been<br />
associated with increased SSI rates in both horses and<br />
small animals, 2, 3, 14, 15 as has duration of anesthesia in dogs<br />
and cats. 15 Number of people present in the operating room<br />
was also significant in a large study of dogs and cats. 3<br />
Clipping before anesthetic induction was associated with<br />
a higher SSI rate in another. 2 The use of staples versus<br />
suture for skin closure was associated with increased<br />
risk of inflammation/infection in dogs undergoing surgery<br />
for cranial cruciate ligament rupture. 4 Other factors that<br />
have been associated with SSIs in small animals include<br />
presence of a drain, dog size (heavier dogs at higher risk),<br />
gender, increasing body weight, concurrent endocrinopathy<br />
and the use of propofol. 3, 10, 15, 16 Data regarding the role of<br />
2, 4, 10<br />
antimicrobials in SSI prevention have been mixed.<br />
SSI Surveillance<br />
General issues regarding surveillance are discussed<br />
in proceedings notes for a separate presentation.<br />
SSI surveillance requires consideration of the goal of<br />
surveillance, the type of data that are available, the type<br />
of data that can reasonably be collected and how results<br />
will be used.<br />
Monitoring surgical site infection (SSI) rates<br />
One of the more common areas where surveillance<br />
can provide benefits is the area of SSIs. This is a readily<br />
identifiable problem of significant importance in veterinary<br />
practices and, if extrapolation from human medicine is<br />
accurate, an area where surveillance and other infection<br />
control practices can have a significant impact.<br />
Two important pieces of information are needed for<br />
accurate SSI surveillance:<br />
1) Number of infections (numerator)<br />
This requires identification of all SSI cases. To do so, a<br />
standard definition must be used, as is discussed above.<br />
Standard criteria for identification and classification of SSIs<br />
have been developed for human medicine and these are<br />
applicable to veterinary patients. Because inflammation<br />
or suture reaction are more common than infection, 24<br />
differentiating infectious from non-infectious complications<br />
is critical to obtain an accurate estimate of SSI rates.<br />
Consistent use of standard definitions is required to obtain<br />
adequate data.<br />
As discussed above, a large percentage of SSIs do<br />
not become apparent until after the animal has been<br />
discharged and capturing those cases is important.<br />
combined session 64 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Many will presumably be identified at the time of suture<br />
removal or when presented with a clinically apparent<br />
SSI, however, some may be missed if the patient is not<br />
returned to the surgeon, a particular problem with referral<br />
hospitals and emergency clinics. Recent data involving<br />
prospective, active follow-up of surgical cases in one<br />
referral institution indicate that approximately 50% of SSIs<br />
do not end up being reported in the medical record,(Weese<br />
et al, unpublished data) highlighting potential problems<br />
with retrospective, record-based data collection. Good<br />
communication between practices is important. A standard<br />
rule is that every SSI must be reported to someone. If a<br />
veterinarian identifies an SSI in a patient that underwent<br />
surgery elsewhere, this should be reported to the original<br />
surgeon.<br />
Reporting of SSI rates should be done in real time, to<br />
ensure that the data actually get recorded and to facilitate<br />
prompt recognition of problems. Ongoing centralized data<br />
collection is critical, particularly in large practices where<br />
early stages of an outbreak may be missed if multiple<br />
surgeons encounter small numbers of SSIs but fail to realize<br />
the scope of the problem because they do not report data to<br />
a specific individual or communicate amongst themselves.<br />
2) Number of procedures (denominator)<br />
The number of procedures performed is required for<br />
determination of SSI rate. This can be calculated as overall<br />
SSI rate, or, preferably, SSI rates for individual procedures.<br />
This is greatly facilitated by electronic medical record<br />
systems that easily provide information about the number<br />
of specific and total procedures for a given time period.<br />
This should be taken into consideration when evaluating<br />
medical record systems.<br />
Regular (e.g. monthly) monitoring of SSI rates allows for<br />
an understanding of the endemic rates, differences between<br />
procedures and any variations that may occur. Having<br />
a baseline rate is critical for investigation of suspected<br />
SSI outbreaks, since the expected rate must be known to<br />
determine if an outbreak is really present. Baseline rates<br />
are also important to know for assessing the potential<br />
impact of any changes in practices or policies. Individual<br />
surgeon rates can be calculated if there is a means of<br />
collecting surgeon-specific denominators, provided there<br />
is a plan to only report results to the individual surgeon<br />
and ensure confidentiality, as is discussed further below.<br />
Comparing infection rates<br />
omparison of infection rates within and between<br />
facilities can provide useful information but should be<br />
approached with caution because of potential limitations<br />
of data used for comparison and the potential implications.<br />
Confidentially reporting SSI rates back to surgeons<br />
can be part of an effective SSI program by driving an<br />
increased awareness of the issue and leading surgeons<br />
to evaluate potential weaknesses or improvements<br />
in their practices, but broader use of the data can be<br />
fraught with danger. Comparison of SSI rates between<br />
surgeons in a hospital could identify differences in rates<br />
between surgeons and a surgeon with a high infection<br />
rate could be using inadequate or high-risk practices that<br />
are leading to increased infections. However, it could<br />
also be a reflection of the types of surgeries performed,<br />
the degree of post-operative follow-up and diligence<br />
in reporting of SSIs. Surgeon-specific SSI rates should<br />
never be reported or released to anyone but the individual<br />
surgeon. Comparison of data between facilities can also<br />
provide useful information but is accompanied by similar<br />
concerns. If comparisons are to be made, it is essential<br />
that standard definitions and methods be used so that the<br />
data are comparable. In human medicine, inter-hospital<br />
comparisons can be useful in lowering infection risks if<br />
the data collected are clearly defined (e.g. SSIs associated<br />
with a specific surgical procedure) and analysis is controlled<br />
for variations in risk factors between populations. This<br />
specificity of analysis would not commonly be practical<br />
in routine veterinary surveillance programs, particularly<br />
in small hospitals performing limited numbers of specific<br />
procedures, so inter-hospital comparisons are unlikely to<br />
provide much usable information.<br />
References<br />
1. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG.<br />
CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections,<br />
1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical<br />
wound infections. American journal of infection control.<br />
1992;20(5):271-274.<br />
2. Brown D, Conzemius M, Shofer F, Swann H. Epidemiologic<br />
evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and<br />
cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;210(9):1302-1306.<br />
3. Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F, Boerlin P. A prospective<br />
study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and<br />
cats. Veterinary surgery : VS : the official journal of the<br />
American College of Veterinary Surgeons. 2004;33(5):542-<br />
550.<br />
4. Frey TN, Hoelzler MG, Scavelli TD, Fulcher RP, Bastian<br />
RP. Risk factors for surgical site infection-inflammation in<br />
dogs undergoing surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate<br />
ligament: 902 cases (2005-2006). Journal of the American<br />
Veterinary Medical Association. 2010;236(1):88-94.<br />
5. Lambrechts NE, Hurter K, Picard JA, Goldin JP, Thompson<br />
PN. A prospective comparison between stabilized<br />
glutaraldehyde and chlorhexidine gluconate for preoperative<br />
skin antisepsis in dogs. Veterinary surgery. 2004;33(6):636-<br />
643.<br />
6. Weese J, Halling K. Perioperative administration of<br />
antimicrobials associated with elective surgery for cranial<br />
cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 83 cases (2003-2005). J<br />
Am Vet Med Assoc.2006;229(1):92-95.<br />
7. Vasseur PB, Paul HA, Enos LR, Hirsh DC. Infection<br />
rates in clean surgical procedures: a comparison of<br />
ampicillin prophylaxis vs a placebo. J Am Vet Med Assoc.<br />
1985;187(8):825-827.<br />
8. Vasseur PB, Levy J, Dowd E, Eliot J. Surgical wound<br />
infection rates in dogs and cats. Data from a teaching<br />
hospital. Veterinary surgery 1988;17(2):60-64.<br />
9. Casale SA, McCarthy RJ. Complications associated<br />
with lateral fabellotibial suture surgery for cranial<br />
cruciate ligament injury in dogs: 363 cases (1997-2005).<br />
combined session 65 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.<br />
2009;234(2):229-235.<br />
10. Fitzpatrick N, Solano MA. Predictive variables for<br />
complications after TPLO with stifle inspection by<br />
arthrotomy in 1000 consecutive dogs. Veterinary surgery<br />
2010;39(4):460-474.<br />
11. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis<br />
WR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory<br />
Committee. Guidelines for prevention of surgical<br />
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.<br />
1999;20(4):247-278.<br />
12. Barie PS, Eachempati SR. Surgical site infections. Surg Clin<br />
N Am. 2005;85:1115-1135.<br />
13. Muilwijk J, van den Hof S, Wille JC. Associations between<br />
surgical site infection risk and hospital operation volume<br />
and surgeon operation volume among hospitals in the Dutch<br />
nosocomial infection surveillance network. Infection control<br />
and hospital epidemiology 2007;28(5):557-563.<br />
14. MacDonald DG, Morley PS, Bailey JV, Barber SM, Fretz<br />
PB. An examination of the occurrence of surgical wound<br />
infection following equine orthopaedic surgery (1981-1990).<br />
Equine Vet J. 1994;26(4):323-326.<br />
15. Nicholson M, Beal M, Shofer F, Brown DC. Epidemiologic<br />
evaluation of postoperative wound infection in cleancontaminated<br />
wounds: A retrospective study of 239 dogs<br />
and cats. Veterinary surgery 2002;31(6):577-581.<br />
16. Heldmann E, Brown D, Shofer F. The association of<br />
propofol usage with postoperative wound infection rate<br />
in clean wounds: a retrospective study. Veterinary surgery<br />
1999;28(4):256-259.<br />
combined session 66 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Surgical preparation: current understanding and<br />
recommendations<br />
L. Findji*<br />
VRCC, West Mayne, Bramston Way, Essex, United Kingdom<br />
Thanks to the works of visionary scientists and physicists<br />
including Semmelweis, Pasteur, Lister and Halsted, the<br />
basic rules of aseptic surgery were set in the early 20 th<br />
century, a hundred years ago. The preparation of the surgical<br />
team and patient for surgery then became a ritual which has<br />
hardly changed since. As a whole, this ritual has brought<br />
dramatic improvements in post-surgical infection rates,<br />
but most of its parts were adopted on the sole grounds of<br />
intellectual rationales rather than scientific evidence.<br />
Furthermore, it now seems that, in spite of considerable<br />
research and investments made to improve surgical<br />
preparation and environment, surgical teams struggle to<br />
decrease surgical site infection (SSI) rates further. As a<br />
result of the heavy cost of such infections and with the<br />
advent of evidence-based medicine, much of the dogma<br />
of surgical preparation has been questioned. The current<br />
widespread recommendations on surgical preparation are<br />
supported by variable levels of evidence. When considering<br />
the evidence from the human literature, evidence-based<br />
medicine (EBM) principles will be followed and highlevel<br />
evidence will be examined preferably examined,<br />
if not exclusively. As for veterinary literature, sticking<br />
to the strict criticism of the level of evidence applied in<br />
human EBM would not leave any study to examine and<br />
lower levels of evidence need to not be dismissed 1 .<br />
In view of the literature, the following recommendations<br />
can be made. The level of evidence supporting them will<br />
be ranked according to the system used by the Center for<br />
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2 (Table 1).<br />
Rank Implementation of policy Support<br />
Preparation of the patient<br />
IA Strongly recommended High-level evidence (well-designed studies)<br />
• Skin preparation<br />
• Hair removal<br />
In one systematic review of human surgery literature, no<br />
differences in SSI rates were found between patients who<br />
had their hair removed by shaving or depilatory cream and<br />
those who had no hair removed 3 . Shaving was found to be<br />
associated with higher SSI rates than clipping or depilatory<br />
cream 3 . Depilatory creams are widely considered to be<br />
most favourable to reducing SSI risks 4 , although no highlevel<br />
evidence comparing depilatory cream and clipping<br />
exists 3 . Although some studies suggested that removing<br />
hair the day before surgery was associated with more SSIs<br />
compared to removing hair immediately before surgery 4 ,<br />
timing of hair removal was not found to have a significant<br />
effect on SSI rates in a systematic review of the evidence 3 .<br />
In human surgery, hair removal is currently only<br />
recommended when the presence of hair will interfere<br />
with the operation 2, 5 . If hair needs to be removed,<br />
most organisations and authors recommend clipping,<br />
immediately before surgery 2, 5 .<br />
In veterinary surgery, no randomised controlled trial<br />
(RCT) could be found which investigates SSI rates with and<br />
without hair removal. One small study in horses found no<br />
significant difference in postscrub numbers of CFUs between<br />
clipped and unclipped areas of the skin over the carpus and<br />
distal interphalangeal joint 6 . Nonetheless, given the nature<br />
IB Strongly recommended Some scientific evidence and strong theoretical rationale<br />
II Suggested Suggestive scientific evidence or theoretical rationale<br />
NR No recommendations Insufficient evidence, absence of consensus<br />
Table 1: recommendation ranking according to the level of scientific support<br />
combined session 67 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
of the hair coat in most veterinary patients, hair removal<br />
is likely to be required to improve the surgeon’s comfort<br />
during the procedure. In the absence of evidence on its<br />
effect on postoperative infection rates, hair removal should<br />
therefore be considered necessary for practical reasons<br />
rather than for prevention of SSI. In areas with very short<br />
hair, it is unknown whether hair removal is of any benefit.<br />
Similarly, no RCT could be found which compares SSI<br />
after shaving, clipping or application of depilatory cream.<br />
The latter is known to be less effective on coarse animal<br />
hair and to induce skin reactions, especially in cats 7 .<br />
As in human medicine, clipping is believed to be less<br />
traumatic than shaving, which is not recommended.<br />
Lastly, there is evidence than animals clipped before the<br />
induction of anaesthesia are more likely to develop a SSI 8 .<br />
Clipping immediately prior to surgery on the anaesthetised<br />
animal is therefore recommended.<br />
In veterinary surgery, it is recommended to routinely<br />
remove hair from the surgical site by way of clipping,<br />
immediately before surgery, after induction of general<br />
anaesthesia (II).<br />
• Disinfection<br />
Preoperative skin disinfection is recommended on the<br />
basis of theoretical rationale.<br />
A systematic review of evidence5 found only one<br />
quasi-RCT investigating the effect of preoperative<br />
skin disinfection after soap washing compared to<br />
no skin disinfection after soap washing. No SSIs<br />
were found in either case9. There is therefore weak<br />
evidence of the absence of effect of any preoperative<br />
skin disinfection on SSI rates after clean surgeries.<br />
Two systematic reviews of evidence have not been<br />
able to draw firm conclusions as to the optimal<br />
preoperative skin preparation in human surgery5, 10.<br />
One systematic review found evidence of no difference<br />
in SSI rates between preoperative skin preparation<br />
with alcohol-based chlorhexidine spray or iodine-based<br />
scrubbing and painting5. It also found evidence of no<br />
difference between scrubbing and painting compared<br />
to painting only when using an aqueous solution of<br />
povidone-iodine (PVPI)5. Insufficient evidence was<br />
found comparing any other skin preparation protocols5.<br />
Consequently, no definitive recommendations are made<br />
regarding preoperative skin preparation in human<br />
surgery. Most organisations recommend using either<br />
PVPI-based or chlorhexidine based products, either in<br />
aqueous or alcoholic presentations. There is evidence<br />
that alcohol-based antiseptics may be more efficacious<br />
and long-lasting than their aqueous equivalents11, 12.<br />
Other preoperative skin preparation products are available,<br />
for which high-level evidence of efficacy is not available<br />
yet. One of them, iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol<br />
(DuraPrep; 3M), may provide longer-lasting antisepsis as it<br />
forms an antiseptic film on the skin when it dries. It appeared<br />
to reduce SSI rates in one study13, but the study is not of<br />
high quality. Some other low-level evidence tends to confirm<br />
this efficacy12. It has been evaluated in veterinary surgery<br />
and no difference in efficacy, assessed by CFU counts, was<br />
found with PVPI14 and chlorhexidine gluconate15 scrubs.<br />
Another type of skin preparation product mandating<br />
further evaluation through RCTs is cyanoacrylate microbial<br />
sealants, which aims at drying and sealing skin flora under<br />
a breathable film. A systematic review of the evidence<br />
found only one small, underpowered study showing no<br />
difference in SSI rates whether a between film-forming,<br />
liquid cyanoacrylate microbial sealant was used after<br />
conventional PVPI preparation or not16.<br />
In veterinary surgery, a number of studies have<br />
investigated the influence of skin preparation of SSI rates<br />
or CFU numbers 14, 15, 17-20 . All these studies investigated<br />
the influence of skin preparation on CFU counts and<br />
only a few on SSI rates as well. However, there is no<br />
evidence that CFU counts are related to SSI rates. In fact,<br />
2 of these studies found one skin preparation superior<br />
to another in terms of CFU number reductions, but it<br />
did not translate in more postoperative infections 17, 20 .<br />
Overall, as in human surgery there is no good-level evidence<br />
of superiority of any skin preparation protocol over another<br />
in decreasing the risk of SSI.<br />
It is recommended to prepare the skin of the intended<br />
surgical site immediately before surgery using an aqueous<br />
or alcohol-based antiseptic (IB). Chlorhexidine and<br />
povidone-iodine are suitable (IB).<br />
• Mechanical bowel preparation<br />
In human colorectal surgery, there is no evidence<br />
that mechanical bowel preparation reduces SSI rates.<br />
Therefore, it is recommended not to use it routinely 5, 21 .<br />
In veterinary patients, no evidence exists investigating the<br />
influence of bowel preparation on SSI rates after colorectal<br />
surgery. Most recommendations are extrapolated from<br />
human literature 22 .<br />
No recommendation can be made regarding the benefit<br />
of routine mechanical bowel preparation is small animal<br />
colorectal surgery (NR).<br />
• Surgical drapes<br />
• Drape type<br />
There is little evidence investigating the influence<br />
of various types of surgical drapes on SSI rates.<br />
In a systematic review of evidence in human surgery, no<br />
differences were found in SSI rates between disposable<br />
and reusable drapes 5 . However, the wide variety of<br />
commercially-available drapes in terms of material and<br />
design, as well as the fast-paced progress made in their<br />
conception may rapidly render any such studies obsolete.<br />
Only one study examining the effect of the use of different<br />
types of drapes on SSI rates in veterinary surgery was<br />
found. This retrospective study found no differences in<br />
infection rates when reusable cotton muslin or disposable<br />
drapes were used 23 . In the absence of extensive evidence,<br />
combined session 68 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
the theoretical rationale of opting for drapes which have<br />
been shown to be impermeable to liquids and microorganisms,<br />
including viruses, prevails.<br />
No recommendations can be made as to the most<br />
appropriate type of drapes to use to reduce risks of SSI<br />
(NR).<br />
• Incise drapes<br />
In human surgery, two systematic reviews of the<br />
evidence showed that non-iodophor-impregnated adhesive<br />
incise drapes are not associated with reduced SSI rates, but<br />
may actually increase the risk of postoperative infection 5,<br />
24 . No difference in SSI rates was observed between<br />
iodophor-impregnated incise drape and no incise drape 5 .<br />
In veterinary surgery, no RCT evaluated the influence of<br />
adhesive incise drapes on SSI rates. Two studies evaluated<br />
a surrogate outcome: CFU counts. One study found that a<br />
1-minute alcohol scrub followed by the application of a<br />
iodophor-impregnated incise drape was less effective in<br />
decreasing CFU numbers than a conventional 3-minute<br />
PVPI scrub 25 . Another study compared CFU numbers<br />
after clean surgery 26 . No differences in CFU counts in the<br />
wound were found when non-impregnated adhesive incise<br />
drapes were compared to when they were not used 26 . No<br />
RCT investigating the influence of iodophor-impregnated<br />
adhesive incise drapes on SSI in veterinary surgery is<br />
available.<br />
It is recommended not to use adhesive incise drapes<br />
routinely in veterinary surgery (IB). If an adhesive incise<br />
drape is required, a iodophor-impregnated one should be<br />
used (II).<br />
Preparation of the surgical team<br />
• Scrub suits<br />
There is no good-level evidence regarding the influence of<br />
different policies (e.g. restricting the wearing of these scrubs<br />
to the operating suite or not, covering suits with gowns when<br />
out of the operating suite or not, frequency of and products<br />
used for laundering, etc.) regarding scrubs suits on SSI rates.<br />
It is however recommended to change visibly soiled or<br />
contaminated scrubs (IB). No recommendations can be<br />
made regarding restriction of these suits to the operating<br />
suite or to their covering when out of it (NR).<br />
• Theatre shoes<br />
Theatre-dedicated shoes have been shown to be<br />
less contaminated than outdoor shoes 27 . However, it is<br />
generally thought that SSI risk from the floor bacteria<br />
is low. On the other hand, the use of overshoes has<br />
never been shown to decrease SSI rates. Furthermore,<br />
no difference in theatre floor contamination was found<br />
when overshoes were worn compared with outdoor<br />
shoes. Lastly, increased bacterial contamination was<br />
found in the vicinity of the footware changing area<br />
and concerns were raised about contamination of<br />
hands with floor bacteria when overshoes were used.<br />
It is currently not recommended to wear overshoes in order<br />
to prevent SSI (IB). However, similarly to face masks and<br />
caps, the wearing of overshoes contributes to theatre<br />
discipline. It may therefore overall be beneficial, which<br />
leads some organisations to recommending it 5 . Lastly,<br />
overshoes can protect shoes from soiling with blood and<br />
body fluids and their use has been advocated to this effect 2<br />
• Scrubbing<br />
• Hand antisepsis<br />
Protocols of preoperative hand antisepsis can vary<br />
according to the type of solution (aqueous scrubs, alcohol<br />
rubs or alcohol rubs with addition active ingredients),<br />
active compound (alcohol, iodophors, biguanides, phenolic<br />
compounds) and timing used. Furthermore, a difference<br />
is most often made between the first scrub of the day<br />
(referred to as the initial scrub) and subsequent scrubs.<br />
Determination of the optimal protocol therefore involves<br />
considering many variables and proves very difficult.<br />
According to 2 comprehensive literature reviews5, 28,<br />
only one well-design trial investigated the influence of 2<br />
hand antisepsis protocols on SSI2. It showed no difference<br />
between a 75% alcohol rub and aqueous scrubs using<br />
either 4% povidone iodine (PVPI) or 4% chlorhexidine. In<br />
all cases, the duration of scrubbing/rubbing was 5 minutes.<br />
Other studies evaluated the effect of various hand antisepsis<br />
protocols on the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) on<br />
hands at various times after antisepsis. Most studies<br />
showed increased efficacy of chlorhexidine compared with<br />
PVPI. Furthermore, chlorhexidine has several advantages<br />
over PVPI, including a residual effect and preserved<br />
efficacy in presence of organic material and debris.<br />
It is therefore recommended to prefer a chlorhexidinebased<br />
rather than a PVPI-based aqueous scrub (IB).<br />
Some alcohol rubs containing additional active ingredients<br />
were shown to be more effective than aqueous scrubs in<br />
decreasing the number of CFUs on hands. When SSI were<br />
compared, no difference were found 29 . Provided hands are<br />
thoroughly cleaned with soap before the first rub of the day<br />
and when visibly dirty, alcohol rubs containing additional<br />
active ingredients can be considered to be acceptable<br />
alternatives to aqueous scrubs (IB).<br />
The optimal scrubbing and rubbing times are unknown.<br />
Several studies indicated that scrubs lasting 2 minutes or<br />
more are as effective as 10-minute scrubs 2 . A systematic<br />
review found no difference in the number of CFUs on hands<br />
after 2, 3 or 5-minute scrubs 28 . However, when chlorhexidine<br />
aqueous scrubs were used, subsequent scrubs of 30 seconds<br />
were found to be less effective in reducing the number of<br />
CFUs on hands than subsequent scrubs of 3 minutes. One<br />
study found that, following a 1-minute hand wash, 3-minute<br />
rubs were more effective in reducing the number of CFUs<br />
on hands than 5-minute rubs. As a result of the lack of<br />
definitive evidence, current precise guidelines for scrubbing<br />
vary greatly among organisations and authors. Surgical<br />
combined session 69 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
teams can therefore choose between several options 11 .<br />
The first scrub of the day must include a thorough cleaning<br />
of hands, nails and undernails. Hands are then disinfected<br />
with either an aqueous scrub or alcoholic rub with<br />
additional ingredients carried out for 2 to 5 minutes (IB).<br />
Subsequent scrubs can consist of shorter (2-to-3-minute)<br />
scrubs or rubs, provided hands are kept macroscopically<br />
clean (IB).<br />
• Rings, nail polish and nail extensions<br />
Although there is good evidence that the wearing of<br />
finger rings increase the hand microbial load, it seems that<br />
this is no longer the case after regular hand scrubbing or<br />
thorough cleaning 30 . Besides, no evidence exists linking<br />
the wearing of rings with SSI rates 5, 31 . It is however<br />
recommended that scrubbed staff do not wear hand and<br />
arm jewellery 2, 5 (II).<br />
Similarly, there is no evidence indicating that the<br />
wearing of nail polish or nail extensions increases SSI<br />
rates 2, 5, 31 . Low-level evidence of increased bacterial and<br />
fungal colonisation of hands in spite of adequate hand<br />
scrubbing when artificial nails are worn however exists 2 .<br />
No recommendations can be made regarding the wearing<br />
of nail polish and nail extensions (NR). Any type of<br />
manicure favouring perforation of gloves should however<br />
be avoided (II).<br />
• Attire<br />
There are few controlled studies investigating the<br />
influence of surgical attire on SSI. However, there is<br />
evidence of shedding of live micro-organisms from hair,<br />
exposed skin and mucous membranes of operating theatre<br />
personnel. Therefore, there is a strong theoretical rationale<br />
to isolate the patient from the surgical team. Although<br />
it is likely to be of lesser concern in veterinary surgery,<br />
the surgical attire also protects the surgical team from<br />
the patient. Sterile, impervious materials should be used<br />
for the parts of scrubbed personnel which may to come<br />
in contact with the patient or drapes (i.e. hands, arms,<br />
trunk). Microparticule-filtering materials should be used<br />
to cover body areas which are not to come in contact with<br />
the patient but may shed micro-organisms.<br />
• Gloves<br />
The use of sterile gloves to prevent SSI is supported by<br />
a strong theoretical rationale rather than actual scientific<br />
evidence. It is recommended that all scrubbed staff wear<br />
sterile gloves (IB).<br />
A number of options are available regarding surgical<br />
gloving including simple gloving, double-gloving, indicator<br />
gloves, orthopaedic gloves, glove-liners and knitted<br />
gloves. The effect of these different options on SSI rates<br />
has not been appropriately investigated 32 . Most studies<br />
have evaluated the influence of gloving options on the<br />
incidence of inner-glove (glove in contact with the hand,<br />
whether there is another pair on it or not) perforation by<br />
the end of surgery. However, there is no evidence that<br />
glove perforation increases the risk of SSI. It is however<br />
theoretically assumed so 32 . Double-gloving and perforationindicator<br />
systems are more effective than single gloving<br />
in avoiding inner-glove perforation (2% versus 9% in<br />
a meta-analysis on 9,000 gloves). Orthopaedic gloves<br />
(thicker gloves) were found to be as effective as doublegloving<br />
in reducing inner-glove perforation, and may be<br />
less cumbersome 32 . Indicator systems allowed surgeons<br />
to detect significantly more perforations than single<br />
or double-gloving. Except for steel weave gloves, all<br />
additional glove protections (triple gloving, glove liners,<br />
knitted-cloth gloves) reduce the incidence of inner-glove<br />
perforation compared to standard double gloving. They<br />
therefore currently provide the highest level of protection<br />
against inner-glove perforation. There seem to be no<br />
indication that any of these options reduces surgical<br />
dexterity, as they were not found to be associated with<br />
increased rates of outer-glove perforations 32 . No universal<br />
recommendation can be made as to gloving options (NR).<br />
The choice must be made by each surgical team based on<br />
the risk of perforation associated with the type of surgery<br />
(e.g. orthopaedics versus soft tissue) and cost of options.<br />
Double-gloving and orthopaedic gloves reduce the risk of<br />
inner-glove perforation compared to single gloving and can<br />
be used routinely, although no evidence exists to support<br />
that this would decrease SSI rates.<br />
• Masks and caps<br />
The wearing of disposable surgical masks by all personnel<br />
entering the operating theatre is commonplace. However, no<br />
evidence of their efficacy in preventing SSI exists and some<br />
authors have described ways in which they may actually<br />
contribute to the contamination of surgical wounds 33 . A<br />
systematic review of the available evidence found only<br />
3 well-designed studies including 2113 patients. None of<br />
these studies found any difference in SSI rates between<br />
masked and unmasked procedures, but the strength of the<br />
evidence was considered to be weak 33 . One study on 3,088<br />
patient not only found no difference in SSI rates between<br />
operations performed with face masks and those performed<br />
without, but also found that bacterial species cultured<br />
from SSI of both groups were similar, suggesting that<br />
the sources of infection were the same and therefore not<br />
related to the wearing or non-wearing of surgical masks 34 .<br />
Surrogate outcomes (e.g. room bacterial counts,<br />
contamination of plates placed on the operating table,<br />
etc.) were studied, showing that the wearing of face<br />
masks 35, 36 or entire head-gear 37 by unscrubbed theatre<br />
personnel may be unnecessary. These studies were<br />
however made in theatres with forced ventilation, which<br />
was thought to be more important than face masks in<br />
preventing contamination 35, 37 . Their results may therefore<br />
not be applicable in less modern theatres without forced<br />
ventilation. Bacterial counts in an empty theatre appeared<br />
to be unchanged by the wearing of head gear, but were<br />
statistically increased when the room doors were kept open<br />
combined session 70 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
and when people entered the room 36 . Increased traffic in<br />
the operating room was also found to increase the risk of<br />
SSI in veterinary surgery 38 .<br />
Overall, there is no evidence that the wearing of<br />
disposable surgical masks reduce the risk of SSI. It is<br />
unclear whether face masks contribute to the protection<br />
of surgical team members from the patient.<br />
No evidence exists that examines the influence of the<br />
wearing of head caps on SSI rates and SSI outbreaks have<br />
been traced to organisms of the hair or scalp, whether caps<br />
were worn or not 2, 11 .<br />
Like other pieces of the surgical attire, face masks<br />
and head caps contribute to theatre discipline and may<br />
therefore be beneficial in other ways than reducing SSI<br />
rates.<br />
It is recommended that scrubbed personnel wear<br />
disposable face masks and head caps during surgery (IB).<br />
No recommendations can be made based on the available<br />
evidence as to whether unscrubbed personnel should wear<br />
face masks and head caps or not (NR).<br />
• Gowns<br />
There are no well-designed studies examining whether<br />
the wearing of sterile gowns by the surgical team minimises<br />
the risk of SSI. There is however a strong theoretical<br />
rationale to use impervious sterile gowns.Two RCTs found<br />
no difference in SSI rates when disposable or reusable<br />
sterile gowns and drapes were used5. It is recommended<br />
that all scrubbed personnel wear sterile, impervious gowns<br />
(IB).Either reusable or disposable gowns can be used (IB).<br />
Conclusion<br />
The interpretation of the scientific literature regarding<br />
surgical preparation is hindered by several factors, all the<br />
more for veterinary surgeons. First of all, the investigation<br />
of certain aspects of surgical preparation is hampered by<br />
ethical considerations (e.g. SSI rates with or without use<br />
of surgical gloves) and a number of recommendations will<br />
remain based on theoretical rationales. Second, many<br />
studies do not measure SSI rates as an endpoint and<br />
no evidence exists supporting the relation between the<br />
measured surrogate outcome and SSI. For instance, most<br />
studies on hand preparation measure the number of colonyforming<br />
units (CFUs) on the surface of hands rather than<br />
the rate of SSI. However, there is no evidence showing that<br />
SSI rates are related to the number of CFUs on the hands<br />
of members of the surgical team. The relevance of such<br />
studies relies solely on assumed theoretical grounds. Third,<br />
many human studies are conducted within a subspecialty<br />
of surgery (e.g. urologic, colorectal, cardiothoracic), which<br />
provides data that cannot be generalised to all types of<br />
surgery. Lastly, the extrapolation to veterinary medicine of a<br />
significant part of the evidence provided by the literature in<br />
human medicine is not possible as the anatomy, physiology,<br />
microbiology and often surgical conditions are quite<br />
different in human and veterinary surgeries. Unfortunately,<br />
very little, if any, high-level evidence is available in the<br />
veterinary literature and much of the knowledge specific<br />
to veterinary surgery is based on rather weak evidence.<br />
The risk of developing a SSI is largely determined by<br />
3 factors: the type and amount of wound contamination<br />
during the procedure, the condition of the wound at the<br />
end of the operation and the host susceptibility of the<br />
patient. Surgical preparation, together with the class of<br />
surgery and surgical technique, influences the former. The<br />
fact that many alterations in surgical preparation appear<br />
to have no effect on SSI rates could mean either that they<br />
really have no effect, or that surgical preparation no longer<br />
is the limiting factor in the development of SSI. The effect<br />
of these alterations could therefore be masked by other<br />
factors such as the condition of the wound, mainly a result<br />
of surgical technique, and host susceptibility. This would in<br />
turn mean that the key to decreasing current SSI rates is<br />
to be searched in surgical technique and host biology and<br />
support (which includes sensible antimicrobial prophylaxis),<br />
rather than further escalation in surgical asepsis.<br />
References<br />
1. Cockcroft PD, Holmes MA. Introduction. In: Cockcroft PD,<br />
Holmes MA(eds): Handbook of evidence-based veterinary<br />
medicine. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003;1-21.<br />
2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR.<br />
Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999.<br />
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital<br />
Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect<br />
Control. 1999;27: 97-132; quiz 133-134; discussion 196.<br />
3. 3anner J, Woodings D, Moncaster K. Preoperative hair<br />
removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane<br />
Database Syst Rev. 2006, updated 2008;3: CD004122.<br />
4. Dohmen PM, Konertz W. A review of current strategies to<br />
reduce intraoperative bacterial contamination of surgical<br />
wounds. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2007;2: Doc38.<br />
5. (NICE) NIfHaCE. Surgical site infection. Prevention and<br />
treatment of surgical site infection. London: RCOG Press,<br />
2008.<br />
6. Hague BA, Honnas CM, Simpson RB, Peloso JG. Evaluation<br />
of skin bacterial flora before and after aseptic preparation<br />
of clipped and nonclipped arthrocentesis sites in horses.<br />
Veterinary Surgery. 1997;26: 121-125.<br />
7. Shmon C. Assessment and preparation of the surgical<br />
patient and the operating team. In: Slatter DH(ed): Textbook<br />
of small animal surgery. Philadelphia, Pa. ; London: W. B.<br />
Saunders, 2003;162-178.<br />
8. Brown DC, Conzemius MG, Shofer F, Swann H.<br />
Epidemiologic evaluation of postoperative wound infections<br />
in dogs and cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997;210: 1302-<br />
1306.<br />
9. Kalantar-Hormozi AJ, Davami B. No need for preoperative<br />
antiseptics in elective outpatient plastic surgical operations:<br />
a prospective study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116: 529-<br />
531.<br />
10. Edwards PS, Lipp A, Holmes A. Preoperative skin<br />
antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after<br />
clean surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, updated<br />
2008: CD003949.<br />
11. Reichman DE, Greenberg JA. Reducing surgical site<br />
infections: a review. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2: 212-221.<br />
combined session 71 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
12. Hemani ML, Lepor H. Skin preparation for the prevention<br />
of surgical site infection: which agent is best? Rev Urol.<br />
2009;11: 190-195.<br />
13. Swenson BR, Hedrick TL, Metzger R, Bonatti H, Pruett TL,<br />
Sawyer RG. Effects of preoperative skin preparation on<br />
postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of<br />
3 skin preparation protocols. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.<br />
2009;30: 964-971.<br />
14. Rochat MC, Mann FA, Berg JN. Evaluation of a one-step<br />
surgical preparation technique in dogs. Journal of the<br />
American Veterinary Medical Association. 1993;203: 392-<br />
395.<br />
15. Gibson KL, Donald AW, Hariharan H, McCarville C.<br />
Comparison of two pre-surgical skin preparation techniques.<br />
Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 1997;61: 154-156.<br />
16. Lipp A, Phillips C, Harris P, Dowie I. Cyanoacrylate microbial<br />
sealants for skin preparation prior to surgery. Cochrane<br />
Database Syst Rev. 2010: CD008062.<br />
17. Desrochers A, St-Jean G, Anderson DE, Rogers DP,<br />
Chengappa MM. Comparative evaluation of two surgical<br />
scrub preparations in cattle. Veterinary Surgery. 1996;25:<br />
336-341.<br />
18. Osuna DJ, DeYoung DJ, Walker RL. Comparison of three<br />
skin preparation techniques in the dog. Part 1: Experimental<br />
trial. Veterinary Surgery. 1990;19: 14-19.<br />
19. Osuna DJ, DeYoung DJ, Walker RL. Comparison of three<br />
skin preparation techniques. Part 2: Clinical trail in 100<br />
dogs. Veterinary Surgery. 1990;19: 20-23.<br />
20. Stubbs WP, Bellah JR, Vermaas-Hekman D, Purich B,<br />
Kubilis PS. Chlorhexidine gluconate versus chloroxylenol for<br />
preoperative skin preparation in dogs. Veterinary Surgery.<br />
1996;25: 487-494.<br />
21. Eskicioglu C, Forbes SS, Fenech DS, McLeod RS, Best<br />
Practice in General Surgery C. Preoperative bowel<br />
preparation for patients undergoing elective colorectal<br />
surgery: a clinical practice guideline endorsed by the<br />
Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Can J<br />
Surg. 2010;53: 385-395.<br />
22. Aronson L. Rectum and anus. In: Slatter DH(ed): Textbook<br />
of small animal surgery. Philadelphia, Pa. ; London: W. B.<br />
Saunders, 2003;682-708.<br />
23. Billings L, Vasseur PB, Fancher C, Miller M, Nearenberg<br />
D. Wound infection rates in dogs and cats after use of<br />
cotton muslin or disposable impermeable fabric as barrier<br />
material: 720 cases (1983-1989). Journal of the American<br />
Veterinary Medical Association. 1990;197: 889-892.<br />
24. Webster J, Alghamdi AA. Use of plastic adhesive drapes<br />
during surgery for preventing surgical site infection.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, updated 2009:<br />
CD006353.<br />
25. Osuna DJ, DeYoung DJ, Walker RL. Comparison of<br />
an antimicrobial adhesive drape and povidone-iodine<br />
preoperative skin preparation in dogs. Veterinary Surgery.<br />
1992;21: 458-462.<br />
26. Owen LJ, Gines JA, Knowles TG, Holt PE. Efficacy<br />
of adhesive incise drapes in preventing bacterial<br />
contamination of clean canine surgical wounds. Veterinary<br />
Surgery. 2009;38: 732-737.<br />
27. Amirfeyz R, Tasker A, Ali S, Bowker K, Blom A. Theatre<br />
shoes - a link in the common pathway of postoperative<br />
wound infection? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89: 605-608.<br />
28. Tanner J, Swarbrook S, Stuart J. Surgical hand antisepsis to<br />
reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.<br />
2008, updated 2009: CD004288.<br />
29. Parienti JJ, Thibon P, Heller R, Le Roux Y, von Theobald<br />
P, Bensadoun H, et al. Hand-rubbing with an aqueous<br />
alcoholic solution vs traditional surgical hand-scrubbing<br />
and 30-day surgical site infection rates: a randomized<br />
equivalence study. JAMA. 2002;288: 722-727.<br />
30. Al-Allak A, Sarasin S, Key S, Morris-Stiff G. Wedding rings<br />
are not a significant source of bacterial contamination<br />
following surgical scrubbing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:<br />
133-135.<br />
31. Arrowsmith VA, Maunder JA, Taylor R. Removal of nail<br />
polish and finger rings to prevent surgical infection.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, updated 2010:<br />
CD003325.<br />
32. anner J, Parkinson H. Double gloving to reduce surgical<br />
cross-infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, updated<br />
2009;3: CD003087.<br />
33. Lipp A, Edwards P. Disposable surgical face masks for<br />
preventing surgical wound infection in clean surgery.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002, updated 2010:<br />
CD002929.<br />
34. Tunevall TG. Postoperative wound infections and surgical<br />
face masks: a controlled study. World J Surg. 1991;15:<br />
383-388.<br />
35. Mitchell NJ, Hunt S. Surgical face masks in modern<br />
operating rooms: a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp<br />
Infect. 1991;18: 239-242.<br />
36. Ritter MA, Eitzen H, French ML, Hart JB. The operating<br />
room environment as affected by people and the surgical<br />
face mask. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;111: 147-150.<br />
37. Humphreys H, Russell AJ, Marshall RJ, V.E. R, Reeves DS.<br />
THe effect of surgical theatre head-gear on air bacterial<br />
counts. J Hosp Infect. 1991;19: 175-180.<br />
38. Eugster S, Schawalder P, Gaschen F, Boerlin P. A prospective<br />
study of postoperative surgical site infections in dogs and<br />
cats. Vet Surg. 2004;33: 542-550.<br />
combined session 72 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis<br />
P. Moissonnier*<br />
Ecole Veterinaire Maisons Alfort, France<br />
combined session 73 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Surgical site infection control programme<br />
J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />
Introduction<br />
Infection control has been an overlooked and<br />
underappreciated field in veterinary medicine, particularly<br />
in small animal practice. The concept of ‘biosecurity’ is<br />
one that is well developed in some sectors of food animal<br />
veterinary medicine, however this differs from ‘infection<br />
control’. Biosecurity involves implementation of measures<br />
to prevent entrance and dissemination of infectious agents<br />
into defined groups of animals. This is not applicable to<br />
small animal practice because, inherently, small animal<br />
clinics ‘invite’ animals with infectious diseases into their<br />
facility. Therefore, the focus is on limiting the impact of<br />
infectious diseases that will enter the clinic. This is the<br />
practice of infection control, which attempts to control<br />
the impact of the inevitable entrance of infectious agents<br />
into a facility. Further, while we often discuss prevention<br />
of infections, absolute prevention of infections is not<br />
a realistic goal. Rather, infection control programs are<br />
designed to reduce the risk and incidence of infections.<br />
While infection control has often been ignored, there is<br />
increasing interest about this field in small animal practice.<br />
There are many possible reasons for this, but factors<br />
such as increased awareness of infectious disease by<br />
the general public, increased information about hospitalassociated<br />
(nosocomial) infection in human hospitals,<br />
occupational health and liability concerns about zoonotic<br />
infections and emergence of multidrug resistant pathogens<br />
highlight the need for a more organized approach to<br />
infection prevention and control.<br />
General principles of Infection Control<br />
In general terms, 3 basic areas must be considered when<br />
infection control is approached. These include decreasing<br />
exposure to pathogens, decreasing susceptibility of the host<br />
and increasing resistance. These categories are relevant<br />
for both animal diseases and zoonoses.<br />
The combination of these factors indicates the likelihood<br />
of disease. A crude representation of the risk of SSI<br />
development can be illustrated as: 1<br />
SSI risk = Microbial concentration and virulence X Tissue<br />
Injury X Foreign Material X Antimicrobial Resistance<br />
General immunity X Local Immunity X Periopeative<br />
Antimicrobials<br />
Decreasing Exposure<br />
Decreasing exposure is the most important aspect of<br />
disease control in most situations. If a pathogen is unable to<br />
encounter an individual, disease will not occur. Depending<br />
on the pathogen, preventing exposure may be easy, difficult<br />
or impossible. Clinically normal animals and people may<br />
harbour a variety of primary and opportunistic pathogens,<br />
and even clinical evaluation cannot rule out the possibility<br />
that an animal is carrying a relevant infectious agent.<br />
Examples of specific aspects to consider are discussed<br />
below.<br />
Decreasing susceptibility<br />
The pathophysiology of disease is multifactorial and in<br />
most cases, simple exposure of an infectious agent to an<br />
animal does not necessarily mean that disease will result.<br />
The susceptibility of the individual to an infectious agent<br />
plays an important role. While difficult to quantify, certain<br />
situations may result in increased susceptibility to disease.<br />
Many factors causing increased susceptibility are not<br />
preventable, but some are and efforts should be undertaken<br />
to address these issues. Identifying factors that increase<br />
susceptibility may be difficult and our understanding of this<br />
area is currently limited.<br />
Decreasing susceptibility is more difficult to achieve<br />
in a hospital setting. Surgical factors relating to patient<br />
susceptibility include tissue injury (pre-, intra- and post-op),<br />
tissue dessication, control of hemostasis, surgical time, and<br />
removal of blood and debris. Judicious use of antimicrobials<br />
and immunosuppressive agents, provision of a good quality<br />
diet, provision of adequate pain control, avoidance of<br />
dietary changes, ensuring adequate nutritional intake and<br />
limiting use of invasive devises should also be considered.<br />
For hospital personnel, an important aspect of decreasing<br />
susceptibility is being aware of hospital personnel that are<br />
more susceptible to disease. This would include people that<br />
are immunosuppressed (disease- or treatment-induced),<br />
being treated with antimicrobials, have open wounds or<br />
who are pregnant. Good communication between hospital<br />
combined session 74 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
personnel, physicians and hospital administrators is<br />
important to lessen the risk of zoonotic infection.<br />
Increasing resistance<br />
Vaccination is the main technique employed to increase<br />
resistance of animals or humans to infection. However, no<br />
vaccines are 100% effective and vaccination should be<br />
considered a 3 rd line of defense after decreasing exposure<br />
and decreasing susceptibility. Vaccination has little impact<br />
on SSI prevention, beyond trying to optimize overall health<br />
and decrease the risk of comorbidities.<br />
Infection Control Program<br />
An infection control program is a structured program of<br />
policies and practices that are designed to reduce the risk of<br />
infection of patients, clinical personnel and owners. Every<br />
veterinary clinic, regardless of size and type, should<br />
have at least a basic infection control program. This<br />
may range from a written collection of basic infection<br />
control practices to a formal infection control manual with<br />
specific training, monitoring, surveillance and compliance<br />
programs. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case, which may<br />
lead to unnecessary patient morbidity and mortality, and<br />
exposure of veterinarians, staff and owners to zoonotic<br />
pathogens. The increasingly litigious nature of society could<br />
be one of the driving forces towards improved infection<br />
control in veterinary clinics. While the potential liability<br />
consequences of morbidity and mortality in individual pets<br />
is currently limited, the potential consequences of zoonotic<br />
diseases in owners and staff are high and require careful<br />
consideration. Improved infection control is also a necessity<br />
as veterinary medicine evolves. Advances in veterinary<br />
medicine mean that animals are living longer and there<br />
are more animals at higher risk for infection because of<br />
immunosuppression and more invasive treatments.<br />
Selected Considerations in Infection Control<br />
Surveillance<br />
Surveillance is a key component of any infection control<br />
program. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<br />
(CDC) defines surveillance as ‘the ongoing, systematic<br />
collection, analysis, interpretation and dissemination of<br />
data regarding a health-related event…”. Surveillance<br />
can be an important part of an overall infection control<br />
program by providing a basis for logical infection control<br />
decisions, evaluating effectiveness of infection control<br />
practices, evaluating compliance with infection control<br />
procedures and stimulating efficient and economic use of<br />
resources. 2 However, it can also be inefficient, unrewarding<br />
and sometimes misleading, if improperly performed.<br />
There are various types of surveillance that can be<br />
considered, all with advantages and disadvantages. Active<br />
surveillance involves gathering data specifically for<br />
infection control purposes. As a result, it can be expensive<br />
and time consuming but usually provides the highest quality<br />
data. One exampls of this would be collection of MRSP<br />
screening swabs from patients upon prior to surgery as<br />
part of MRSP outbreak investigation. Active follow-up<br />
of surgical cases, beyond that normally performed (e.g.<br />
calling owners 30d after surgery rather than just relying<br />
on routine recheck appointments) is another example.<br />
Active surveillance is rarely needed (at least as a routine<br />
tool) in most veterinary clinics and is typically reserved<br />
for large facilities with increased infection control threats<br />
and personnel available to direct such testing, or during<br />
outbreak investigation.<br />
In contrast, passive surveillance is a practical, easy<br />
and cost-effective surveillance tool that can be easily<br />
performed in any clinic. It involves the use of data that are<br />
already available. This would include information about the<br />
number of surgical site infections collected through normal<br />
recheck visits or other standard reporting mechanisms,<br />
or culture results from various infections. The quality of<br />
passive surveillance data, however, can be limited by poor<br />
or incomplete record keeping. Facilitating easy access to<br />
passively acquired data (e.g. being able to accurately and<br />
easily generate a report of SSI cases or culture results) is<br />
critical to effective use of passive surveillance.<br />
Another form of surveillance that is easy to perform and<br />
potentially very useful is syndromic surveillance. This<br />
involves identification of syndromes (i.e. diarrhea, coughing)<br />
instead of specific diagnoses. All clinic personnel can be<br />
made aware of certain syndromes that indicate either<br />
the need for isolation or for further investigation, such<br />
as diarrhea, fever of unknown origin, acute neurological<br />
disease, wound infections and acute respiratory tract<br />
disease. Protocols to deal with these animals upon arrival<br />
should be developed. The role of lay staff (ie front office<br />
stall) is critical as these people are the ones that are most<br />
able to identify such cases before they enter the clinic and<br />
ensure that they are properly handled. Identification and<br />
proper handling of these cases can greatly decrease the<br />
chance of nosocomial or zoonotic transmission.<br />
Environmental surveillance<br />
Environmental surveillance is often overused and misused.<br />
The hospital environment is not sterile, and contamination<br />
of various sites with numerous opportunistic pathogens<br />
is fully expected. Non-targeted environmental culturing<br />
is a poor use of time and resources, and can result in<br />
useless or even misleading information. Environmental<br />
surveillance should be limited to circumstances where<br />
there is a plausible role of the environment in infection,<br />
when a structured sampling program can be created and<br />
there is a pre-determined plan to act of the results. This<br />
is rarely present.<br />
Another type of environmental surveillance, and one that<br />
is potentially more rewarding, is assessment of cleaning<br />
practices with the use of environmental marking. This<br />
involves application of invisible dyes to environmental<br />
surfaces in a manner such that they would be removed<br />
combined session 75 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
using normal cleaning practices. A structured program of<br />
‘contaminating’ surfaces followed by evaluation of those<br />
surfaces after a time during which cleaning should have<br />
been performed, can be used to assess the efficacy of<br />
cleaning and to act as an educational tool to personnel<br />
involved in cleaning. This type of method is cost-effective,<br />
easy to perform and can be useful, as long as it is<br />
approached in a non-confrontation manner designed to<br />
educate and improve, not assign blame.<br />
Handling of infectious cases<br />
Once an infectious or potentially infectious animal has<br />
been identified, it is important that established protocols<br />
are available and followed. <strong>Animals</strong> that are infectious or<br />
of uncertain risk should be housed in an isolation area. The<br />
isolation area should be properly identified, have restricted<br />
access, be away from areas of normal traffic flow and<br />
should never be used for storage. Isolation areas should<br />
have dedicated equipment (thermometers, stethoscopes)<br />
that is not used on different animals. Education of<br />
personnel regarding the reasons behind protocols and their<br />
importance is useful to increase compliance.<br />
Personal protective equipment<br />
All personnel in a veterinary hospital should wear<br />
personal protective equipment. This acts as a barrier<br />
between patients (as well as specimens and the patient<br />
environment) and the person’s body or clothing. Adequate<br />
personal protective equipment will reduce the risk of<br />
contamination of clothing or skin, and be able to be quickly<br />
and easily changed when contaminated. Lab coats, scrubs<br />
and gowns are examples of commonly used items, and<br />
these should be worn whenever there will be contact<br />
with animals or the animals’ environment. Even if obvious<br />
contamination is not present, they should be changed<br />
regularly because contamination can occur in the absence<br />
of obvious soiling. Protective clothing should not be worn<br />
home because of the risk of transmission of pathogens to<br />
personal pets and family members.<br />
Scrubs, in particular, may be misused and if personal<br />
protective equipment is worn home, not changed during<br />
the day and difficult to change after contamination, it is<br />
being used suboptimally.<br />
Enhanced precautions, which may consist of gloves,<br />
gowns, masks, face shields, protective footwear and other<br />
items, may be required when handling certain animals or<br />
specimens. Protocols should be in place to ensure that all<br />
clinic personnel are aware of their responsibilities.<br />
Clinic design and function<br />
Animal flow within the clinic should be evaluated,<br />
and considered as part of clinic design or renovation. It<br />
is important to limit potential direct and indirect animal<br />
contact. Sick animals should be kept away from healthy<br />
animals, especially high-risk animals. With the increase<br />
in multidrug resistant staphylococcal infection and<br />
colonization in some populations, particularly dermatology<br />
patients, consideration must be given to ways to separate<br />
patients at high risk for infection (e.g. surgical patients)<br />
from patients at high risk for shedding an impact SSI<br />
pathogen (e.g. dogs with pyoderma).<br />
Operating Room Design and Function<br />
Veterinary operating facilities are highly variable and<br />
there are few true standards. Operating rooms should be<br />
of adequate size for proper movement of personnel and<br />
equipment, with limited risk of inadvertent contamination.<br />
Laminar airflow is preferred but impractical for the vast<br />
majority of facilities, and its true role in infection prevention<br />
in veterinary situations is unknown. However, consideration<br />
and evaluation of ventilation is required to ensure that<br />
there is not improper airflow that could result in increased<br />
airborne (and subsequently patient and equipment)<br />
contamination.<br />
Operating rooms must be sole use. They should not be<br />
used as storage areas and should not be allowed to become<br />
cluttered with items. Sinks should not be present within the<br />
OR, or if they are present, they should not be used when a<br />
patient is in the room or when opened surgical items are<br />
present in the room.<br />
Patient preparation<br />
Patient preparation is an important aspect of surgical<br />
asepsis. The relative impact of patient preparation has been<br />
inadequately investigated, and specific details regarding<br />
surgical preparation are provided elsewhere. However, it<br />
is apparent that there are issues with compliance with<br />
standard practices, including the method of preparation<br />
and the time dedicated to this important area. Recent<br />
observation data has indicated marked variation in the<br />
time and quality of patient preparation in general small<br />
animal practices, with very short scrub times and improper<br />
scrub methods identified in some cases (Anderson et al,<br />
unpublished data)<br />
Pre-operative management of the surgical site may be an<br />
important factor but there has been minimal investigation of<br />
this area in veterinary medicine. The goal of pre-operative<br />
surgical site management is to eliminate potential<br />
pathogens while not creating a physical environment that<br />
is more conducive to bacterial colonization or infection<br />
post-operatively. Bathing of the patient pre-operatively is<br />
reasonable if there is significant contamination of the hair<br />
coat 3 and if the patient’s coat can be dried by the time of<br />
surgery.<br />
Additionally, while attention has been focused more on<br />
ensuring that surgical sites receive ‘adequate’ attention,<br />
the goals of patient preparation need to be considered.<br />
In essence, the goal of surgical scrubbing of patients is<br />
to reduce bacterial counts, reduce debris, facilitate later<br />
antisepsis steps and (a fact that is often overlooked) to<br />
do so in as atraumatic a fashion as possible. As such,<br />
minimizing skin damage during clipping and scrubbing<br />
combined session 76 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
is essential, but often overlooked. Skin damage from<br />
excessive attempts to clip all remaining pieces of hair or<br />
from forceful scrubbing of the surgical site may predispose<br />
to infection rather than reduce the risk. While objective<br />
data are lacking, there is anecdotal evidence that excessive<br />
preparation may be a factor in outbreaks of SSIs. Some<br />
indirect research data may also be present, such as a study<br />
that reported dogs that were clipped prior to anesthetic<br />
induction had higher SSI rates than those clipped after. 4<br />
While the true reason for this could not be determined, it<br />
is certainly plausible that clipping a conscious animal was<br />
associated with a greater likelihood of skin trauma and<br />
subsequent increased SSI risk. Clipping should be done<br />
outside of the operating environment. There is currently<br />
no information regarding optimal methods of cleaning<br />
and disinfecting clippers. Repeated use of clipper blades<br />
without sterilization not surprisingly results in higher levels<br />
of bacterial contamination of blades 5 however the clinical<br />
relevance of this is unclear because the surgical site would<br />
be cleaned and disinfected after clipping. Regular cleaning<br />
and disinfection are probably useful. Clippers should be<br />
thoroughly cleaned and disinfected after every use on an<br />
animal with a potentially transmissible infection (e.g. an<br />
animal with diarrhea), on an area where the skin is broken<br />
(especially if there is evidence of skin infection), or on any<br />
area where the skin or hair is significantly contaminated<br />
with feces, urine, blood or other body fluids. Only cleaned/<br />
disinfected clippers should be used when clipping around<br />
areas with broken skin, to avoid increasing contamination<br />
of the abnormal area.<br />
Surgeon preparation<br />
Surgeon preparation, including surgical scrubbing and<br />
donning of surgical protective items, is an important area.<br />
Detailed discussion of surgical preparation is provided<br />
elsewhere in these conference proceedings.<br />
Compliance with standard recommendations is a concern.<br />
Observational data indicate that the quality of preparation<br />
practices can vary greatly between veterinarians, with<br />
some individuals used clearly inadequate practices. While<br />
a true standard of care has not been defined and the<br />
relative impact of poor practices has not been quantified,<br />
it is clear that there is significant room for improvement<br />
in compliance with typical practices amongst some<br />
veterinarians. Recently, application of alcohol-chlorhexidine<br />
combinations has been evaluated as a replacement for<br />
surgical scrubbing and been shown to be more effective<br />
than standard surgical scrub methods. 6, 7 This method is less<br />
time consuming and is associated with less skin irritation<br />
compared to repeated surgical scrubbing. Similarly,<br />
application of chlorhexidine (without alcohol) resulted in<br />
similar reduction in hand bacterial counts compared to<br />
surgical scrubbing in a veterinary hospital. 8 Regardless<br />
of the method used, a thorough handwash with careful<br />
cleaning under the fingernails must be performed at the<br />
beginning of each day. 9 Long (> 1/4”) and artificial nails are<br />
prohibited in many human healthcare facilities and some<br />
veterinary hospitals because they can harbor pathogenic<br />
bacteria 10 and be associated with surgical glove tears.<br />
Post-operative care<br />
Post-operative care of the incision site may be an<br />
important factor. The incision site is a highly susceptible<br />
site for opportunistic infection from the patient’s own<br />
microflora, from the environment or from hospital<br />
personnel. Contact with the surgical incision, particularly<br />
with bare hands, should be avoided. Covering or bandaging<br />
wounds for a minimum of 24 to 48 h post-operatively has<br />
been recommended in humans and horses 11, 12 and is a<br />
reasonable recommendation in small animals in most<br />
situations. Bandage changes should be performed using<br />
aseptic technique. 12 Animal owners or handlers should<br />
be educated on proper incision management and signs of<br />
SSI. There is no objective information regarding the need<br />
to cover incision beyond 48 hours in veterinary or human<br />
medicine, and arguments can be made for both sides.<br />
Prevention of surgical site licking or trauma by the patient<br />
is important as licking or scratching can damage healing<br />
incision site or associated skin and create a more hospitable<br />
site for bacterial growth. It can also result in the deposition<br />
of opportunistic pathogens. If surgical sites are bandaged,<br />
they surgical site should be inspected at least once daily to<br />
detect early signs of inflammation or infection.<br />
Cleaning and disinfection<br />
Cleaning and disinfection are key parts of the infection<br />
control process. It is important to understand why certain<br />
cleaners/disinfectants are being used. Improper use of<br />
disinfectants is widespread. Some products facilitate<br />
removal of debris (detergents, abrasives) while others are<br />
intended to kill microorganisms (disinfectants). Not all<br />
disinfectants are able to kill all pathogenic microorganisms,<br />
and there are differences in spectrum of activity, efficacy<br />
in organic debris, kill time, toxicity and environmental<br />
impact. Cleaning protocols should be reviewed to ensure<br />
that a relevant and acceptable level of disinfection is being<br />
achieved. Ability to kill specific microorganisms, human<br />
safety issues, cost and potential damage to surfaces<br />
must be considered when choosing a disinfectant. During<br />
outbreaks, changes in disinfection protocols may be<br />
required to ensure that the relevant organisms are killed.<br />
Periodic cleaning with certain disinfectants may also be<br />
useful. For example, clostridial spores are resistant to<br />
most disinfectants, can accumulate in the environment<br />
and can cause outbreaks in veterinary clinics. Unlike most<br />
disinfectants, bleach can kill spores and periodic cleaning<br />
with bleach may be useful. Non-enveloped viruses such<br />
as parvovirus are also difficult to kill and many routine<br />
disinfection protocols are inadequate to control this<br />
important group of pathogens. Fortunately, typical SSI<br />
pathogens are relatively susceptible to most commonly<br />
used disinfectants.<br />
combined session 77 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Disinfection and sterilization of medical equipment<br />
Disinfection of medical equipment is also an important<br />
factor. All medical equipment should be designated as<br />
requiring cleaning, low-level disinfection, high-level<br />
disinfection or sterilization. Use of improper disinfection<br />
techniques for certain items of medical equipment has<br />
been identified in a number of human hospitals, particularly<br />
among items such as endoscopes that cannot undergo<br />
autoclave sterilization. “Cold-sterile” solutions are common<br />
in veterinary clinics, yet they are often improperly used<br />
and maintained. Bacterial contamination of cold-sterile<br />
solutions is common. 13 Problems include inadequate<br />
contact time, improper dilution and infrequent replacement<br />
of solution.<br />
Complete sterilization of surgical instruments and any<br />
items that might come in contact with the surgical field<br />
is a crucial procedure. Poor sterilization or inappropriate<br />
handling of instruments after sterilization can result in<br />
contamination of sterile tissues during surgery. Steam<br />
sterilization (i.e. autoclaving) is most commonly used in<br />
veterinary clinics. Quality control testing of autoclaves<br />
should be performed regularly and documented. Sterility<br />
indicator strips should be placed in every surgical pack.<br />
External autoclave indicator tape is not a reliable indicator<br />
of the sterility of a pack’s internal contents. Biological<br />
sterility indicators should be used periodically. These<br />
indicators contain bacterial spores, which are the most<br />
resistant form of bacteria. After being autoclaved, the<br />
indicator is submitted for testing to ensure that all of the<br />
spores have been killed by the sterilization process. In<br />
human healthcare facilities it is recommended that these<br />
indicators are used daily, or at least weekly. Weekly<br />
or bi-weekly use is likely adequate in most veterinary<br />
clinics, depending on how heavily the autoclave is used. A<br />
biological sterility indicator should also be used in the next<br />
cycle anytime the autoclave has been moved, repaired, or if<br />
there has been any other indication of sterilization failure.<br />
Flash sterilization should not be used unless absolutely<br />
necessary for emergencies only. Flash sterilization should<br />
never be used for surgical implants.<br />
Hand hygiene<br />
One of the most important facets of any infection<br />
control program is hand hygiene. Human hands are a<br />
major, if not the most important, source of infection in<br />
hospitals. Handwashing has been shown to decrease the<br />
transmission of disease in hospitals and in the community.<br />
A quick rinse under water, however, does not constitute<br />
proper hand hygiene. A 15-second scrub with a bactericidal<br />
soap is recommended, but rarely followed. Further, if taps<br />
are touched following handwashing, hands may become<br />
contaminated. Automatic taps can prevent this; otherwise<br />
a paper towel should be used to prevent direct contact with<br />
the taps when they are turned off. Alcohol-based hand<br />
disinfectants can be very useful, are now widely available<br />
in virtually all human hospitals and are increasingly being<br />
used at veterinary clinics. Superior elimination of hand<br />
contaminants on veterinary personnel compared to hand<br />
washing with antibacterial soap has been reported. 14<br />
These products are quick and easy to use, and because<br />
they include emollients, they are easier on the hands than<br />
frequent hand washing. Alcohol-based hand sanitizers<br />
should be available at multiple sites in clinics and should<br />
be used between every animal contact. If there is gross<br />
soiling of hands or suspected contamination with an<br />
alcohol resistant organism (i.e. non enveloped viruses,<br />
bacterial spores), handwashing should be performed. Nonalcohol<br />
based hand sanitizers are also available yet their<br />
role in healthcare situations is currently unclear. There is<br />
little evidence suggesting superiority over alcohol-based<br />
products at this time.<br />
Development of infection control protocols<br />
Every clinic should have a formal infection control<br />
program. This may involve a complex program with detailed<br />
policies and dedicated full-time personnel in large specialty<br />
hospitals, but typically only requires a modest effort with<br />
little to no additional resources, training and time. The<br />
size and scope of the infection control program needs to<br />
be tailored to the needs and resources of the individual<br />
veterinary hospital. However, some common components<br />
should be present in all hospitals:<br />
1) A written infection control manual: Written resources<br />
are critical. If something is not written down, there may be<br />
a loss of consistency as people modify practices, knowingly<br />
or otherwise. A central written resource allows people to<br />
quickly and easily determine the required practices for both<br />
routine (i.e. cleaning and disinfection) and uncommon (i.e.<br />
rabies exposure) events. Written documentation is also<br />
critical to demonstrate that an infection control program is<br />
in place, should there be issues regarding professional or<br />
legal liability. The adage “if it’s not written down, it doesn’t<br />
exist” is important to remember.<br />
2) Documented training of all personnel: All personnel<br />
working in a clinic, from owners to temporary kennel staff,<br />
must be trained on infection control practices. This is not<br />
only required for optimal patient care. It is also critical for<br />
protection of the clinic because failure to properly train<br />
and document training of individuals about how to protect<br />
themselves, particularly lay personnel who would not be<br />
expected to know anything about zoonotic diseases or<br />
infection control, could expose the clinic to significant<br />
liability risks.<br />
3) A designated central contact person/resource: This<br />
‘infection control practitioner’ (ICP) can be a veterinarian or<br />
technician, and should be in charge of developing protocols,<br />
ensure protocols are being followed, act as a resource<br />
for infection control questions, ensure proper training of<br />
combined session 78 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
new staff and direct any surveillance activities. This is not<br />
necessarily a cumbersome or time-consuming job, as the<br />
day-to-day responsibilities are typically minimal. The main<br />
effort involves establishing the program, and available<br />
resources can facilitate this.<br />
4) “Buy-in” from clinic management: An infection control<br />
program is bound to fail if people in charge of the clinic<br />
do not support it. Failure of senior personnel to follow<br />
protocols, to support the general concept and to facilitate<br />
with compliance of all personnel will ultimately result in<br />
failure of the program. In some clinics, a proper infection<br />
control program requires a substantial ‘culture shift’ in<br />
attitudes, and this can only be achieved if there is proper<br />
support.<br />
5) An ability to adapt: An infection control program<br />
cannot remain static. Changes in disease risks, emergence<br />
of new diseases, changes in clinic design and operation and<br />
improvement in the general knowledge of infection control<br />
will result in the need for an evolving program. This should<br />
not require extensive and frequent program modification,<br />
but the program needs to be designed so that it can respond<br />
to any changes.<br />
Implementation of infection control protocols<br />
One of the greatest obstacles to infection control is<br />
compliance. Many infection control practices are inherently<br />
cumbersome, and may conflict with other demands in a<br />
busy practice. For this reason, education of all personnel<br />
is required to facilitate compliance. If people understand<br />
the reasons for protocols, they are much more likely<br />
to comply. It is critical for owners and managers to be<br />
committed to the infection control program. Few things<br />
will adversely affect compliance more than staff observing<br />
senior personnel flaunting protocols. Senior personnel must<br />
have a commitment, demonstrate that by their actions,<br />
and be willing to enforce compliance among all staff.<br />
A combined ‘carrot and stick’ approach is often useful.<br />
Periodic education is useful to help maintain interest and<br />
compliance. Reporting infection control data from the<br />
practice is also useful.<br />
References<br />
1. Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R. Principles and practice of<br />
infectious diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2005.<br />
2. Haley RW, Quade D, Freeman HE, Bennett JV. The SENIC<br />
Project. Study on the efficacy of nosocomial infection<br />
control (SENIC Project). Summary of study design. Am J<br />
Epidemiol. May 1 1980;111(5):472-485.<br />
3. Stick JA. Preparation of the surgical patient, the surgery<br />
facility, and the operating team. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, eds.<br />
Equine Surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders Elsevier;<br />
2006:123-140.<br />
4. Brown D, Conzemius M, Shofer F, Swann H. Epidemiologic<br />
evaluation of postoperative wound infections in dogs and<br />
cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc. May 1 1997;210(9):1302-1306.<br />
5. Masterson TM, Rodeheaver GT, Morgan RF, Edlich RF.<br />
Bacteriologic evaluation of electric clippers for surgical hair<br />
removal. Am J Surg. Sep 1 1984;148(3):301-302.<br />
6. Mulberrry G, Snyder AT, Heilman J, Pyrek J, Stahl J.<br />
Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine<br />
gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub for antimicrobial efficacy.<br />
American journal of infection control. Dec 1 2001;29(6):377-<br />
382.<br />
7. Hobson DW, Woller W, Anderson L, Guthery E. Development<br />
and evaluation of a new alcohol-based surgical hand scrub<br />
formulation with persistent antimicrobial characteristics<br />
and brushless application. Am J Infect Control. Oct 1<br />
1998;26(5):507-512.<br />
8. Corder K, Knowles T, Holt P. Factors affecting bacterial<br />
counts during preparation of the hands for aseptic surgery.<br />
Vet Rec. Jun 30 2007;160(26):897-901.<br />
9. Larson EL. APIC guideline for handwashing and hand<br />
antisepsis in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. Aug<br />
1 1995;23(4):251-269.<br />
10. Pottinger J, Burns S, Manske C. Bacterial carriage<br />
by artificial versus natural nails. Am J Infect Control.<br />
1989;17:340-344.<br />
11. Waguespack RW, Burba DJ, Moore RM. Surgical site<br />
infection and the use of antimicrobials. In: Auer JA, Stick<br />
JA, eds. Equine surgery. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders<br />
Elsevier; 2006:70-87.<br />
12. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis<br />
WR, The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory<br />
Committee. Guidelines for prevention of surgical<br />
site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol.<br />
1999;20(4):247-278.<br />
13. Murphy CP, Weese JS, Reid-Smith RJ, McEwen SA. The<br />
prevalence of bacterial contamination of surgical cold<br />
sterile solutions from community companion animal<br />
veterinary practices in southern Ontario. Can Vet J. Jun 1<br />
2010;51(6):634-636.<br />
14. Traub-Dargatz J, Weese J, Rousseau J, Dunowska M,<br />
Morley P, Dargatz D. Pilot study to evaluate 3 hygiene<br />
protocols on the reduction of bacterial load on the hands<br />
of veterinary staff performing routine equine physical<br />
examinations. Can Vet J. Jul 1 2006;47(7):671-676.<br />
combined session 79 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections:<br />
animal and public health consequences<br />
J Scott Weese DVM DVSc DipACVIM<br />
Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada<br />
Introduction<br />
Despite being inherently susceptible to virtually every<br />
known antimicrobial class, staphylococci are notorious<br />
for antimicrobial resistance. From the first introduction<br />
of antimicrobials, staphylococci have demonstrated an<br />
impressive ability to become resistant. Penicillin-resistance<br />
was identified shortly after penicillin became widely used.<br />
New drug development outpaced resistance initially,<br />
but the ability of staphylococci to become resistant was<br />
repeatedly demonstrated as the introduction of new drugs<br />
was typically followed (sometimes rapidly) by emergence<br />
of resistance. Included in this pattern was resistance<br />
to methicillin, which emerged not long after the use of<br />
methicillin began in 1959. While resistance to methicillin<br />
itself is not a major concern, methicillin-resistance is<br />
caused by production of an altered penicillin binding<br />
protein (PBP2a) that has a poor affinity for beta-lactam<br />
antimicrobials and confers resistance not just to methicillin,<br />
but to virtually all beta-lactams; penicillins, cephalosporins<br />
and carbapenems. In addition to broad beta-lactam<br />
resistance, methicillin-resistant staphylococci are often<br />
resistant to a wide range of other antimicrobials, severely<br />
limiting treatment options. While methicillin-resistance<br />
was first noted as a problem in humans, it has emerged as<br />
a pressing issue in companion animals, and there have been<br />
striking recent changes in the epidemiology of methicillinresistant<br />
staphylococcal infection and colonization in dogs<br />
and cats.<br />
There is often confusion associated with staphylococci,<br />
particularly methicillin-resistant staphylococci. It is critical<br />
to remember that all staph are not created alike. The<br />
clinical relevance, prevalence of colonization, incidence<br />
of disease and potential for interspecies transmission<br />
vary greatly between different staphylococcal species.<br />
Inadequate identification practices, variable and sometimes<br />
improper susceptibility testing methodology, and variable<br />
reporting of results can lead to confusion and possibly<br />
suboptimal patient care. A critical aspect of dealing with<br />
staphylococci is knowing (with confidence) the species that<br />
is involved. There are two main groups of staphylococci;<br />
coagulase positive and coagulase negative. Coagulase<br />
positive species (e.g. S. aureus, S. pseudintermedius,<br />
S. schleiferi coagulans) are the most virulent and of<br />
greatest clinical relevance. Differentiation of these, or at a<br />
minimum, differentiation of S. aureus from other coagulase<br />
positive staphylococci is needed for both interpretation<br />
of zoonotic risks and the use of proper antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility testing methodology (since there are different<br />
recommendation for S. aureus and S. pseudintermedius).<br />
Coagulase negative staphylococci tend to be of limited<br />
virulence and after often considered together as a single<br />
group, although there is some evidence of variation in<br />
virulence and clinical relevance.<br />
Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus<br />
pseudintermedius (MRSP)<br />
MRSP appears to have emerged and disseminated<br />
internationally in companion animals at a truly amazing<br />
rate, with rapid development of a very high level of drug<br />
resistance. MRSP infections are being identified virtually<br />
everywhere that people are looking, and the increase in<br />
incidence of disease, while not objectively studied, seems<br />
to be dramatic, particularly among dogs with pyoderma<br />
and in surgical site infections. It has been called a serious<br />
emerging problem in small animal veterinary medicine and<br />
one that requires urgent action to control its spread. 1 Highly<br />
antimicrobial resistant strains are commonly encountered,<br />
and there may be few viable treatment options. Curiously,<br />
while MRSP appears to only have emerged as a problem<br />
recently, MRSP strains from dogs and cats are typically<br />
much more resistant than MRSA strains which have<br />
presumably been around much longer.<br />
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius is the most common<br />
pathogenic Staphylococcus in dogs and a common<br />
commensal that can be found in or on a large percentage<br />
of healthy dogs, and a smaller percentage of cats. As with<br />
methicillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP), MRSP<br />
can be found in or on healthy dogs and cats. Carriage rates<br />
of 0-17% in dogs and 0-1.2% in healthy cats have been<br />
reported,2-6 and it appears that the rate of colonization<br />
is increasing in many regions. Risk factors for MRSP<br />
colonization have not been adequately investigated,<br />
but there is some evidence that routine antimicrobial<br />
combined session 80 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
administration may be an important driving force for MRSP<br />
colonization in dogs.<br />
MRSP is an opportunistic pathogen and colonization<br />
does not necessarily lead to disease. Indeed, it is likely<br />
that the vast majority of colonized animals never develop<br />
a clinical infection. The risk of infection in MRSP carriers<br />
has not been reported, but it is reasonable to assume<br />
that MRSP carriers are at some increased risk of MRSP<br />
infection, at least in certain situations (e.g. after surgery).<br />
Limited study of risk factors for infection has been<br />
performed but antimicrobial administration, hospitalization<br />
or surgery within 30 days prior to the onset of infection were<br />
associated with MRSP versus MSSP infection in one study. 7<br />
Skin, ear and other soft tissue infections predominate. 7-10<br />
Very high rates of MRSP infection are now being identified<br />
among canine pyoderma patients. Likely the 2 nd most<br />
common presentation of MRSP infections is surgical<br />
site infections (SSIs), and the prevalence of MRSP SSIs<br />
is anecdotally increasing rapidly in many regions. Little<br />
comparative study has been performed, but elective<br />
orthopedic procedures, particularly TPLO, appear to be<br />
over-represented. This is of significant concern because<br />
of the morbidity and even mortality that can be associated<br />
with these infections. As highly drug resistant MRSP are<br />
being encountered more often, amputation is sometimes<br />
required to in response to uncontrollable SSI from elective<br />
orthopedic procedures, something that is of tremendous<br />
concern.<br />
There is no indication that MRSP infections are inherently<br />
more serious than infections caused by methicillinsusceptible<br />
strains, however they could ultimately be<br />
associated with increased morbidity and mortality because<br />
of failure of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy and<br />
limited treatment options. This concern is heightened by<br />
the continued emergence of resistance, as antimicrobials<br />
that were commonly effective a short time ago (e.g.<br />
chloramphenicol, doxycycline, trimethoprim-sulfa) are now<br />
often ineffective.<br />
Public Health Issues<br />
Despite the fact that exposure to S. pseudintermedius must<br />
be very common in pet owners (given the high prevalence of<br />
colonization in pets), human S. pseudintermedius infections<br />
are rarely reported and colonization rates in veterinary<br />
personnel and pet owners are rather low (1-4%),6, 11<br />
suggesting poor host adaptation to humans. Methicillinresistance<br />
simply confers antimicrobial resistance, not<br />
inherently increased virulence, and there is no evidence<br />
that MRSP is more likely to cause an infection than<br />
MSSP. Accordingly, the low incidence of MSSP infections<br />
in humans should indicate a correspondingly low risk of<br />
MRSP infection. Transmission of MRSP between dogs<br />
and people is likely based on reports of indistinguishable<br />
isolates from people and dogs12, 13 and isolation of MRSP<br />
from a small percentage of owners of dogs with MRSP<br />
pyoderma.14 However, there is currently limited public<br />
health concern regarding MRSP. However, the limited<br />
but increasing number of reports of MRSP infection in<br />
humans15, 16 should not be dismissed. Given the highly<br />
drug resistant nature (and associated treatment difficulty)<br />
of MRSP, while the risk may be very low, the consequences<br />
of infection could be high, so care should be taken to use<br />
good infection control practices around infected animals<br />
in households and veterinary clinics.<br />
The potential for under-reporting of MRSP must also<br />
be considered if human diagnostic laboratories are not<br />
adequately differentiating MRSP from the much more<br />
common coagulase positive Staphylococcus MRSA.17<br />
Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa)<br />
MRSA tends to receive a higher profile than MRSP<br />
because of its huge impact in human medicine and its<br />
earlier apparent emergence in companion animals (relative<br />
to MRSP), however it is a much less common cause of<br />
infection in dogs and cats. Despite the importance of<br />
this pathogen, the animal health implications of MRSA<br />
are nowhere near as large in dogs and cats compared to<br />
MRSP. Regardless, attention must be paid to this organism<br />
because of the potential for serious and difficult-to-treat<br />
infections and the potentially greater zoonotic implications.<br />
It is assumed that the emergence of MRSA in companion<br />
animals is directly related to MRSA in humans. As MRSA<br />
expanded in humans in the general population in the 1990s<br />
and 2000s, exposure of pets was inevitable. Humans are<br />
thought to be the ultimate source of infection for a large<br />
percentage, if not the vast majority, of infections in pets,<br />
and changes in the epidemiology of MRSA in humans<br />
can be reflected in changes in trends in pets. Virtually all<br />
MRSA isolates from pets are recognized human epidemic<br />
clones and identification of other strains in dogs and cats is<br />
rare. 18-22 Sequence type 398 MRSA, a livestock-associated<br />
strain of particular concern in Europe, has been found in a<br />
limited number of dogs, 23-25 however dogs were more likely<br />
infected by people that were exposed to livestock.<br />
First reported in the 1990s, MRSA infection and<br />
colonization have now been identified in dogs, cats and<br />
other companion animals across the world. Staphylococcus<br />
aureus can be isolated from the nares, perineum or intestinal<br />
tract of 12-14% of healthy dogs and 4.3-20% of healthy<br />
cats,3, 6, 26 and not surprisingly, MRSA can also be found in<br />
healthy individuals. Reported colonization rates are variable<br />
but tend to be 0-3.3% in healthy dogs and 0-6% in healthy<br />
cats.26-31 Higher rates can be encountered periodically in<br />
animals in veterinary facilities.32, 33 However, most MRSA<br />
cases are not associated with veterinary hospitals. Higher<br />
rates can also be found in specific dog populations such as<br />
households where another pet has an MRSA infection,34 or<br />
during outbreaks in breeding or rescue kennels.20, 25 Being<br />
owned by a human healthcare worker and participation in<br />
hospital visitation programs have been identified as risk<br />
factors for MRSA colonization in dogs, and are logical<br />
based on the increased likelihood of exposure to colonized<br />
combined session 81 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
people.18, 35 Contact with children has also been identified<br />
as a risk factor.18 While these, and potentially other, risk<br />
factors should be considered, MRSA can be identified in<br />
any animal and absence of known risk factors should not<br />
lead to excluding MRSA from consideration.<br />
As with MRSP, most animals that are colonized with<br />
MRSA have no signs of infection and may never develop<br />
a clinical infection, but opportunistic infections can<br />
develop. S. aureus produces a similar range of disease<br />
as S. pseudintermedius. The main difference between<br />
S. pseudintermedius and S. aureus (and therefore<br />
between MRSP and MRSA) is the incidence of disease,<br />
not disease location or severity. Clinically, MRSA<br />
infections are indistinguishable from those caused by<br />
methicillin-susceptible strains or other coagulase positive<br />
staphylococci, predominantly skin and ear infections, with<br />
smaller numbers of other opportunistic infections.3, 19,<br />
21, 22, 36-40 It is possible that infections more commonly<br />
associated with human-contact (e.g. wound and surgical<br />
site infections contaminated by hands of owners or<br />
veterinary personnel) are more likely to be caused by S.<br />
aureus (including MRSA) but objective data are lacking.<br />
Public Health Issues<br />
Significant attention has been given to public health<br />
concerns regarding pets and MRSA. Given the importance<br />
of MRSA in human medicine, it is perhaps not surprising<br />
that serious concern has accompanied identification of<br />
MRSA in pets. However, as knowledge regarding MRSA<br />
advances, it is becoming evident that while interspecies<br />
transmission of MRSA certainly does occur in households,<br />
human-to-animal transmission is probably most common.<br />
The role of pets in human MRSA infection is completely<br />
unclear. It is likely that pets play at best a very limited role<br />
in human MRSA infection, however zoonotic infections<br />
certainly cannot be dismissed and in some situations an<br />
infected or colonized animal could pose a reasonable risk<br />
to humans.<br />
Colonization of people in contact with infected or<br />
colonized dogs and cats (often with demonstration of<br />
the same strain in humans and animals) has been widely<br />
reported. 19, 22, 35, 41-44 Pets have been implicated as sources<br />
of infection for humans in households, 41, 43 however<br />
conclusions are often overstated. Virtually all studies have<br />
involved concurrent testing of people and pets. While<br />
finding the same MRSA strain in both groups strongly<br />
supports interspecies transmission, it cannot determine the<br />
direction of transmission. Further, since the MRSA strains<br />
found in pets are human epidemic clones, and because<br />
the average pet has little contact with other people or<br />
animals, it is most likely that a human household member<br />
would bring MRSA into the home, with the potential for<br />
subsequent dissemination to other humans and animals.<br />
This assessment should not be taken as an indication that<br />
there is no risk from pets, since regardless of how a pet is<br />
ultimately infected, it could still transmit MRSA to humans.<br />
Numerous studies of MRSA colonization in veterinary<br />
personnel have been performed, reporting colonization<br />
rates of up to 18% in small animal veterinary personnel. 45-48<br />
It cannot be determined with certainty that these<br />
colonization rates reflect acquisition of MRSA from animals<br />
however identification of higher rates than present in the<br />
general population (1.5-3%), 49, 50 and the lack of other<br />
explanations as to why veterinary personnel would be at<br />
higher risk than others provide support of occupational<br />
origin. Whether this constitutes a significant health risk for<br />
veterinary personnel is unclear. There are limited reports<br />
of MRSA infection in veterinary personnel that have<br />
worked with infected or colonization animals, 51, 52 along<br />
with numerous anecdotal reports. Further, the high rates<br />
of colonization could increase the risk of infection in some<br />
situations such as if colonized veterinary personnel undergo<br />
surgery or are admitted to hospital. Another concern is<br />
the potential for veterinary clinics to act as reservoirs of<br />
MRSA, resulting in infection or colonization of patients<br />
and potentially subsequent exposure of patients’ families.<br />
The true role of pets in human MRSA infections is<br />
impossible to determine at this point. Considering the<br />
epidemic of community-associated MRSA infections in<br />
people and endemic MRSA in human healthcare facilities,<br />
pets certainly play a minor role overall in human infections.<br />
Yet, with the scope of this problem, a minor role from a<br />
population standpoint could still represent a relevant source<br />
of infection. The potential role of pets in human MRSA<br />
infections should be considered, but in a balanced manner.<br />
Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus schleiferi<br />
(MRSS)<br />
Staphylococcus schleiferi consists of two subspecies,<br />
the coagulase positive S. schleiferi subsp coagulans and<br />
coagulase negative S. schleiferi subsp schleiferi. These<br />
are less common causes of infection compared with S.<br />
pseudintermedius and S. aureus, but a large percentage<br />
of diagnostic laboratories do not attempt to different<br />
S. schleiferi coagulans from S. pseudintermedius or S.<br />
schleiferi schleiferi from other coagulase negative species<br />
so there are limitations in understanding of the role of these<br />
species in disease. Staphylococcus schleiferi coagulans can<br />
be isolated in 0.8-4% of healthy dogs and 0-2% of healthy<br />
cats.3, 6, 26 Colonization with methicillin-resistant S.<br />
schleiferi (MRSS) has been identified in 0-2% of dogs3, 4, 6<br />
and MRSS infections are being increasingly reported.36, 53,<br />
54 S. schleiferi coagulans is most commonly implicated in<br />
pyoderma and otitis externa in dogs, but other opportunistic<br />
infections such as urinary tract infection and pneumonia<br />
have been reported.3, 36, 55-59 Less in known about S.<br />
schleiferi schleiferi, but it is likely present in or on a small<br />
percentage of healthy dogs and cats. It has been implicated<br />
as a cause of pyoderma and otitis,36, 56, 58 and methicillinresistant<br />
infections, while poorly characterized, presumably<br />
do the same.<br />
combined session 82 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Public health concerns are currently limited. Human<br />
S. schleiferi coagulans infections are extremely rare.<br />
In one case, a dog with otitis was thought to be the<br />
source of S. schleiferi coagulans endocarditis in an<br />
immunocompromised person,60 but it was not possible to<br />
confirm that the dog was the source. While Staphylococcus<br />
schleiferi schleiferi periodically causes human infections,<br />
it is probably a human commensal species so pets are<br />
unlikely to be the source.<br />
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (MR-CoNS)<br />
MR-CoNS are common commensals and generally<br />
of limited virulence. MR-CoNS infections may be<br />
overdiagnosed because MR-CoNS can be isolated as<br />
contaminants from various superficial body sites. In human<br />
medicine, MR-CoNS are primarily a concern in hospitalized<br />
individuals.61 The situation may be similar in dogs can cats,<br />
with most CoNS being of minimal pathogenicity and mainly<br />
of relevance in highly compromised patients. While CoNS<br />
are generally considered as a group, it is possible that there<br />
are differences between CoNS species. This mainly relates<br />
to three organisms; S. schleiferi subspecies schleiferi, S.<br />
epidermidis and S. felis. Staphylococcus schleiferi schleiferi<br />
and S. epidermidis have been implicated as a cause of<br />
pyoderma and otitis,36, 56, 58, 62 and may be inherently<br />
more pathogenic in skin and ear infections than other CoNS.<br />
A primary role of S. felis in urinary tract infections in cats<br />
has also been suggested.63 These species may, therefore,<br />
be relevant pathogens in community-associated disease,<br />
unlike most other CoNS. As with other staphylococci,<br />
methicillin-resistant strains are inherently no more<br />
pathogenic than methicillin-susceptible strains, and the<br />
implications of colonization with MR-CoNS are typically<br />
inconsequential.<br />
Coagulase negative staphylococci, including MR-CoNS<br />
are common in both animals and humans. While many of<br />
the same CoNS species can cause disease both people<br />
and pets, it is unlikely that animals are relevant sources<br />
of human infection.<br />
References<br />
1. Gronlund-Andersson U, Finn M, Kadlec K, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius; an emerging<br />
companion animal health problem. Paper presented<br />
at: ASM-ESCMID conference on methicillin-resistant<br />
staphylococci in animals2009; London, UK.<br />
2. Epstein CR, Yam WC, Peiris JS, Epstein RJ. Methicillinresistant<br />
commensal staphylococci in healthy dogs<br />
as a potential zoonotic reservoir for communityacquired<br />
antibiotic resistance. Infect Genet Evol. Mar 1<br />
2009;9(2):283-285.<br />
3. Griffeth GC, Morris DO, Abraham JL, Shofer FS, Rankin<br />
SC. Screening for skin carriage of methicillin-resistant<br />
coagulase-positive staphylococci and Staphylococcus<br />
schleiferi in dogs with healthy and inflamed skin. Vet<br />
Dermatol. Jun 1 2008;19(3):142-149.<br />
4. Hanselman BA, Kruth S, Weese JS. Methicillin-resistant<br />
staphylococcal colonization in dogs entering a veterinary<br />
teaching hospital. Vet Microbiol. Jun 22 2007;126:277-281.<br />
5. Vengust M, Anderson M, Rousseau J, Weese J. Methicillinresistant<br />
staphylococcal colonization in clinically normal<br />
dogs and horses in the community. Lett Appl Microbiol. Dec<br />
1 2006;43(6):602-606.<br />
6. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS.<br />
Coagulase positive staphylococcal colonization of people<br />
and their household pets. Can Vet J. 2009;50(9):954-958.<br />
7. Weese JS, Frank LA, Reynolds LM, Bemis DA. Retrospective<br />
study of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible<br />
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius infections in dogs. Paper<br />
presented at: ASM-ESCMID conference on methicillinresistant<br />
staphylococci in animals2009; London, UK.<br />
8. Loeffler A, Linek M, Moodley A, et al. First report of<br />
multiresistant, mecA-positive Staphylococcus intermedius<br />
in Europe: 12 cases from a veterinary dermatology referral<br />
clinic in Germany. Vet Dermatol. Dec 1 2007;18(6):412-421.<br />
9. Kadlec K, Schwarz S, Perreten V, et al. Molecular analysis<br />
of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius<br />
of feline origin from different European countries and North<br />
America. J Antimicrob Chemother. Jun 9 2010.<br />
10. 1Perreten V, Kadlec K, Schwarz S, et al. Clonal spread of<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in<br />
Europe and North America: an international multicentre<br />
study. J Antimicrob Chemother. Mar 25 2010;65:1145-1154.<br />
11. Talan DA, Staatz D, Staatz A, Overturf GD. Frequency of<br />
Staphylococcus intermedius as human nasopharyngeal<br />
flora. J Clin Microbiol. Oct 1 1989;27(10):2393.<br />
12. Sasaki T, Kikuchi K, Tanaka Y, Takahashi N, Kamata<br />
S, Hiramatsu K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />
pseudintermedius in a veterinary teaching hospital. J Clin<br />
Microbiol. Apr 1 2007;45(4):1118-1125.<br />
13. van Duijkeren E, Houwers DJ, Schoormans A, et al.<br />
Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />
intermedius between humans and animals. Veterinary<br />
Microbiology. Apr 1 2008;128(1-2):213-215.<br />
14. Frank LA, Kania SA, Kirzeder EM, Eberlein LC, Bemis DA.<br />
Risk of colonization or gene transfer to owners of dogs with<br />
meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Vet<br />
Dermatol. Oct 1 2009;20(5-6):496-501.<br />
15. Stegmann R, Burnens A, Maranta CA, Perreten V.<br />
Human infection associated with methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ST71. Journal of<br />
Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Jul 1 2010:1-2.<br />
16. Van Hoovels L, Vankeerberghen A, Boel A, Van Vaerenbergh<br />
K, De Beenhouwer H. First case of Staphylococcus<br />
pseudintermedius infection in a human. J Clin Microbiol.<br />
Dec 1 2006;44(12):4609-4612.<br />
17. Pottumarthy S, Schapiro J, Prentice J, et al. Clinical isolates<br />
of Staphylococcus intermedius masquerading as methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 1<br />
2004;42(12):5881-5884.<br />
18. Lefebvre SL, Reid-Smith RJ, Waltner-Toews D, Weese<br />
JS. Incidence of acquisition of methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium difficile, and other<br />
health-care-associated pathogens by dogs that participate<br />
in animal-assisted interventions. J Am Vet Med Assoc. Jun<br />
1 2009;234(11):1404-1417.<br />
19. Leonard F, Abbott Y, Rossney A, Quinn P, O’Mahony R,<br />
Markey B. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />
isolated from a veterinary surgeon and five dogs in one<br />
practice. Vet Rec. Feb 4 2006;158(5):155-159.<br />
20. Loeffler A, Pfeiffer D, Lindsay J, Soares-Magalhaes R,<br />
Lloyd D. Lack of transmission of methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) between apparently healthy<br />
dogs in a rescue kennel. Vet Microbiol. Aug 8 2009.<br />
combined session 83 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
21. O’Mahony R, Abbott Y, Leonard F, et al. Methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from animals<br />
and veterinary personnel in Ireland. Vet Microbiol. Aug 30<br />
2005;109(3-4):285-296.<br />
22. Weese J, Dick H, Willey B, et al. Suspected transmission<br />
of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus between<br />
domestic pets and humans in veterinary clinics and in the<br />
household. Vet Microbiol. Jun 15 2006;115(1-3):148-155.<br />
23. Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C. Methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and<br />
animals, Central Europe. Emerging Infect Dis. Feb 1<br />
2007;13(2):255-258.<br />
24. Nienhoff U, Kadlec, Chaberny I, et al. Transmission of<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains<br />
between humans and dogs: two case reports. J Antimicrob<br />
Chemother. Jul 16 2009;64:660-662.<br />
25. Floras A, Lawn K, Slavic D, Golding GR, Mulvey MR, Weese<br />
JS. Sequence type 398 meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus<br />
aureus infection and colonisation in dogs. Vet Rec. Jun 26<br />
2010;166(26):826-827.<br />
26. Abraham J, Morris D, Griffeth G, Shofer F, Rankin S.<br />
Surveillance of healthy cats and cats with inflammatory<br />
skin disease for colonization of the skin by methicillinresistant<br />
coagulase-positive staphylococci and<br />
Staphylococcus schleiferi ssp. schleiferi. Vet Dermatol. Aug<br />
1 2007;18(4):252-259.<br />
27. Kottler S, Middleton JR, Perry J, Weese JS, Cohn LA.<br />
Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-<br />
Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in Three<br />
Populations. J Vet Intern Med. Nov 30 2009;24:132-139.<br />
28. Baptiste K, Williams K, Willams N, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />
staphylococci in companion animals. Emerg Infect<br />
Dis. Dec 1 2005;11(12):1942-1944.<br />
29. Loeffler A, Pfeiffer DU, Lindsay JA, Magalhães RJS, Lloyd<br />
DH. Prevalence of and risk factors for MRSA carriage in<br />
companion animals: a survey of dogs, cats and horses.<br />
Epidemiology and infection. Oct 14 2010:1-10.<br />
30. Hanselman, Kruth, Weese. Methicillin-resistant<br />
staphylococcal colonization in dogs entering a veterinary<br />
teaching hospital. Vet Microbiol. Jun 22 2007;126:277-281.<br />
31. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS.<br />
Coagulase positive staphylococcal colonization of humans<br />
and their household pets. Can Vet J. Sep 1 2009;50(9):954-<br />
958.<br />
32. Loeffler A, Boag A, Sung J, et al. Prevalence of methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus among staff and pets in<br />
a small animal referral hospital in the UK. J Antimicrob<br />
Chemother. Oct 1 2005;56(4):692-697.<br />
33. Weese JS, Faires M, Rousseau J, Bersenas AM, Mathews<br />
KA. Cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />
colonization in a small animal intensive care unit. J Am Vet<br />
Med Assoc. Nov 1 2007;231(9):1361-1364.<br />
34. Faires MC, Tater KC, Weese JS. An investigation of<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization<br />
in people and pets in the same household with an infected<br />
person or infected pet. J Am Vet Med Assoc. Sep 1<br />
2009;235(5):540-543.<br />
35. Boost M, O’donoghue M, Siu K. Characterisation of<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates<br />
from dogs and their owners. Clin Microbiol Infect. Jul 1<br />
2007;13(7):731-733.<br />
36. Morris D, Rook K, Shofer F, Rankin S. Screening of<br />
Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus intermedius,<br />
and Staphylococcus schleiferi isolates obtained from<br />
small companion animals for antimicrobial resistance:<br />
a retrospective review of 749 isolates (2003-04). Vet<br />
Dermatol. Oct 1 2006;17(5):332-337.<br />
37. Owen MR, Moores AP, Coe RJ. Management of<br />
MRSA septic arthritis in a dog using a gentamicinimpregnated<br />
collagen sponge. J <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract. Dec 1<br />
2004;45(12):609-612.<br />
38. Rankin S, Roberts S, O’Shea K, Maloney D, Lorenzo M,<br />
Benson C. Panton valentine leukocidin (PVL) toxin positive<br />
MRSA strains isolated from companion animals. Vet<br />
Microbiol. Jun 15 2005;108(1-2):145-148.<br />
39. Morris D, Mauldin E, O’Shea K, Shofer F, Rankin S.<br />
Clinical, microbiological, and molecular characterization of<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections of<br />
cats. Am J Vet Res. Aug 1 2006;67(8):1421-1425.<br />
40. Faires M, Weese JS. Risk factors for methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus infection in small animals. ASM<br />
Conference on Antimicrobial Resistance in Zoonotic and<br />
Foodborne Pathogens. Copenhagen, Denmark2008.<br />
41. Manian FA. Asymptomatic nasal carriage of mupirocinresistant,<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus<br />
(MRSA) in a pet dog associated with MRSA infection in<br />
household contacts. Clin Infect Dis. Jan 15 2003;36(2):e26-<br />
28.<br />
42. van Duijkeren E, Wolfhagen MJ, Heck ME, Wannet WJ.<br />
Transmission of a Panton-Valentine leucocidin-positive,<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain<br />
between humans and a dog. J Clin Microbiol. Dec 1<br />
2005;43(12):6209-6211.<br />
43. Sing A, Tuschak C, Hörmansdorfer S. Methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus in a family and its pet cat. N Engl J<br />
Med. Mar 13 2008;358(11):1200-1201.<br />
44. Vitale C, Gross T, Weese J. Methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus in cat and owner. Emerging Infect<br />
Dis. Dec 1 2006;12(12):1998-2000.<br />
45. Anderson ME, Lefebvre SL, Weese JS. Evaluation of<br />
prevalence and risk factors for methicillin-resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel<br />
attending an international equine veterinary conference. Vet<br />
Microbiol. Dec 4 2007;129:410-417.<br />
46. Burstiner LC, Faires M, Weese JS. Methicillin-Resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Personnel<br />
Attending a Veterinary Surgery Conference. Vet Surg. Feb 1<br />
2010;39(2):150-157.<br />
47. Hanselman B, Kruth S, Rousseau J, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary<br />
personnel. Emerg Infect Dis. Dec 1 2006;12(12):1933-1938.<br />
48. Wulf M, van Nes A, Eikelenboom-Boskamp A, et al.<br />
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary<br />
doctors and students, the Netherlands. Emerging Infect Dis.<br />
Dec 1 2006;12(12):1939-1941.<br />
49. Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Weese JS.<br />
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in<br />
schoolteachers in Ontario. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol.<br />
Nov 1 2008;19(6):405-408.<br />
50. Gorwitz RJ, Kruszon-Moran D, McAllister SK, et al. Changes<br />
in the prevalence of nasal colonization with Staphylococcus<br />
aureus in the United States, 2001-2004. J Infect Dis. May 1<br />
2008;197(9):1226-1234.<br />
51. Weese J, Archambault M, Willey B, et al. Methicillinresistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse<br />
personnel, 2000-2002. Emerging Infect Dis. Mar 1<br />
2005;11(3):430-435.<br />
52. Weese J, Caldwell F, Willey B, et al. An outbreak of<br />
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections<br />
resulting from horse to human transmission in a veterinary<br />
hospital. Vet Microbiol. Apr 16 2006;114(1-2):160-164.<br />
53. Jones R, Kania S, Rohrbach B, Frank L, Bemis D. Prevalence<br />
of oxacillin- and multidrug-resistant staphylococci in clinical<br />
samples from dogs: 1,772 samples (2001-2005). J Am Vet<br />
Med Assoc. Jan 15 2007;230(2):221-227.<br />
combined session 84 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
54. Kania S, Williamson N, Frank L, Wilkes R, Jones R, Bemis<br />
D. Methicillin resistance of staphylococci isolated from<br />
the skin of dogs with pyoderma. Am J Vet Res. Sep 1<br />
2004;65(9):1265-1268.<br />
55. Bes M, Guérin-Faublée V, Freney J, Etienne J. Isolation<br />
of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies coagulans<br />
from two cases of canine pyoderma. Vet Rec. Apr 13<br />
2002;150(15):487-488.<br />
56. Frank L, Kania S, Hnilica K, Wilkes R, Bemis D. Isolation of<br />
Staphylococcus schleiferi from dogs with pyoderma. J Am<br />
Vet Med Assoc. Feb 15 2003;222(4):451-454.<br />
57. Igimi S, Takahashi E, Mitsuoka T. Staphylococcus schleiferi<br />
subsp. coagulans subsp. nov., isolated from the external<br />
auditory meatus of dogs with external ear otitis. Int J Syst<br />
Bacteriol. Oct 1 1990;40(4):409-411.<br />
58. May ER, Hnilica KA, Frank LA, Jones RD, Bemis DA.<br />
Isolation of Staphylococcus schleiferi from healthy dogs<br />
and dogs with otitis, pyoderma, or both. J Am Vet Med<br />
Assoc. Sep 15 2005;227(6):928-931.<br />
59. Rich M, Roberts L, Jones M, Young V. Staphylococcus<br />
schleiferi subspecies coagulans in companion animals. Vet<br />
Rec. Jul 21 2007;161(3):107.<br />
60. Kumar D, Cawley JJ, Irizarry-Alvarado JM, Alvarez A,<br />
Alvarez S. Case of Staphylococcus schleiferi subspecies<br />
coagulans endocarditis and metastatic infection in an<br />
immune compromised host. Transplant infectious disease<br />
: an official journal of the Transplantation Society. Dec 1<br />
2007;9(4):336-338.<br />
61. Archer GL, Climo MW. Staphylococcus epidermidis and<br />
other coagulase negative staphylococci. In: Mandell<br />
GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Principles and practice of<br />
infectious diseases. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier;<br />
2005:2352-2360.<br />
62. Penna B, Varges R, Medeiros L, Martins GM, Martins<br />
RR, Lilenbaum W. Species distribution and antimicrobial<br />
susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from canine otitis<br />
externa. Vet Dermatol. Jun 1 2010;21(3):292-296.<br />
63. Litster A, Moss SM, Honnery M, Rees B, Trott DJ.<br />
Prevalence of bacterial species in cats with clinical signs of<br />
lower urinary tract disease: recognition of Staphylococcus<br />
felis as a possible feline urinary tract pathogen. Vet<br />
Microbiol. Mar 31 2007;121(1-2):182-188.<br />
combined session 85 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
small animal session 86 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
Short communications <strong>–</strong> orthopaedics<br />
Friday July 8<br />
10.45 <strong>–</strong> 13.00
Biomechanical comparison of plate, plate-rod and<br />
orthogonal plate locking constructs in an ex-vivo<br />
canine tibial fracture gap model.<br />
Glyde M *1 ., Day R. 2 , Deane B. 1 , Read R 1 . and Hosgood G * 1 .<br />
1 Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Perth, Australia. 2 Department of Medical<br />
Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.<br />
Introduction<br />
The purpose of this research was to compare the<br />
biomechanical characteristics of medial plate, plate-rod<br />
and orthogonal plate locking constructs in a canine ex-vivo<br />
comminuted tibial fracture gap model.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Tibial pairs from six Greyhounds euthanased for reasons<br />
unrelated to this study were separated into two groups.<br />
Group MPU had a Synthes® 10 hole 3.5mm LCP (locking<br />
compression plate) applied to the medial tibia with 4<br />
unicortical screws per fracture fragment. Group MPB had<br />
identical plate application excepting 2 bicortical screws<br />
per fracture fragment. MPU and MPB constructs were<br />
non-destructively tested in two-plane four-point bending,<br />
axial compression and torsion (Instron 5566 and 8874).<br />
Following testing Group MPU had a 2.4mm Steinmann IM<br />
(intramedullary) pin added to create a plate-rod construct<br />
(Group PR). IM pin diameter was 30-40% of the mean<br />
medullary diameter at the narrowest point. Group MPB<br />
received a cranial 10 hole 2.7mm LCP with 2 bicortical<br />
screws per fracture fragment creating an orthogonal<br />
plate construct (Group OP). Groups PR and OP were nondestructively<br />
tested using the same protocols as for groups<br />
MPU and MPB. Subsequently Groups PR and OP were<br />
loaded to failure in axial compression.<br />
Results<br />
MPU and MPB construct stiffness was not significantly<br />
different (p>0.05) in any test mode. PR construct stiffness<br />
was significantly greater than MPU stiffness in lateromedial<br />
bending (140%, p
Effect of screw insertional torque on mechanical<br />
properties of 5 different angular stable systems<br />
A Boero Baroncelli 1 , U Reif 2 , C Bignardi 3 , B Peirone 1 .<br />
1 Department of Animal Pathology, University of Turin (Italy), 2 Tierklinik Dr. Reif, Böbingen (Germany), 3<br />
Department of Mechanics, Politecnico di Torino (Italy)<br />
Introduction<br />
The purpose of this study was to compare the screw push<br />
out strength and resistance to cantilever bending of five<br />
different angular stable systems. Our first hypothesis was<br />
that there is a significant difference between the systems<br />
regarding push out strength and cantilever bending.<br />
Furthermore, our second hypothesis was that screws<br />
insertion torque has an influence on push out strength and<br />
cantilever bending properties of the locking mechanism.<br />
Material and Methods<br />
Five different 3.5 mm implant systems were evaluated.<br />
The Synthes LCP, the Traumavet Fixin, the Securos PAX, the<br />
Orthomed SOP, and the Veterinary Instrumentation locking<br />
system. Screws were then inserted using a variable torque<br />
limiting device which was set to 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 Nm.<br />
To evaluate the push out strength, the constructs were<br />
mounted in a custom made device. A force was applied at<br />
the level of the screw tip acting along the long axis of the<br />
screw at a constant displacement rate of 1 mm/min. For<br />
cantilever bending a load was applied perpendicular to the<br />
long axis of the screw at a constant displacement rate of 1<br />
mm/min. Statistical analysis of the push out strength and<br />
cantilever bending stiffness were performed using analysis<br />
of variance ANOVA (p-value 0,001).<br />
Results<br />
A statistically significant influence of the insertional<br />
torque on push out strength was seen in the Securos<br />
( p = 0.00001) and the Traumavet ( p = 0.00001) system.<br />
A statistically significant influence of the insertional torque<br />
on bending stiffness was only seen in the Securos system<br />
(p = 0.00098).<br />
Conclusions<br />
For the Orthomed, Synthes and Veterinary Instrumentation<br />
systems insertional torque did not influence push out<br />
strength nor cantilever bending stiffness. When using<br />
the Traumavet and Securos angular stable systems, the<br />
minimum acceptable insertion torque should be 2,5 Nm, in<br />
order to obtain correct screw-plate coupling. In the Securos<br />
system insertional torque positively influence the push out<br />
strength and cantilever bending stiffness values.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 89 small animal orthopaedic session
The use of pedicle screws in canine lumbosacral<br />
disease.<br />
Meij BP*, Smolders LA, Bergknut N, Voorhout G, Grinwis GCM, Hazewinkel HAW*<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion <strong>Animals</strong>, Utrecht, The Netherlands.<br />
Introductio<br />
The use of the pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSRF) has been<br />
tested biomechanically in a canine cadaver study. The aim<br />
of the present study was to assess the pedicle screws in<br />
the canine lumbosacral junction (LSJ) ex vivo in an imaging<br />
study and to evaluate the use of PSRF in vivo in 6 dogs<br />
with lumbosacral disease.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Ex vivo study: PSRF of the LSJ was performed in six<br />
canine cadaveric lumbosacral spinal specimens using<br />
predefined guidelines and was evaluated with radiography,<br />
computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. In<br />
vivo study: 3 Greyhound dogs diagnosed with degenerative<br />
lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) and 3 dogs diagnosed<br />
with lumbosacral discospondylitis underwent dorsal<br />
laminectomy and partial discectomy combined with PSRF<br />
of the LSJ. Curettage of the endplates with insertion of<br />
an autologous cancellous bone graft was performed to<br />
promote spinal fusion. During the 18-month follow-up,<br />
the dogs were monitored by means of clinical evaluation,<br />
diagnostic imaging, and force plate analysis (for the dogs<br />
with DLSS). Post-mortem imaging and histopathological<br />
investigations were performed on the 3 LSJs from the dogs<br />
diagnosed with DLSS (euthanized for reasons unrelated<br />
to PSRF).<br />
Results<br />
Ex vivo study: Sixteen of 24 inserted screws had an<br />
acceptable placement. In vivo study: Fourteen of 16<br />
inserted screws had an acceptable placement. Clinical<br />
signs of low back pain resolved at 4 weeks after surgery<br />
in all 6 dogs. Force plate analysis revealed a trend toward<br />
improved pelvic limb function relative to the preoperative<br />
function for the dogs with DLSS. Diagnostic imaging and<br />
histopathology showed no bony spinal fusion of the LSJ<br />
in the dogs with DLSS<br />
Conclusions<br />
PSRF can be successfully applied to the LSJ of large<br />
breed dogs for DLSS and discospondylitis. Improvements<br />
to the surgical technique to induce spinal fusion and<br />
assessment in a larger sample size are required.<br />
Clinical Relevance: PSRF may become a valuable addition<br />
in the surgical treatment arsenal for dogs with DLSS and<br />
lumbosacal discospondylitis.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 90 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Effect of articular design on mediolateral constraint<br />
and stability of two unlinked canine total elbow<br />
prostheses<br />
Guillou RP 1 , Demianiuk RM 1 , Déjardin LM* 2 ,Beckett C 2 , Haut RC<br />
1 College of Veterinary Medicine and 2 Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratories, College of Osteopathic<br />
Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA<br />
introduction<br />
Short and long term stability of the unlinked, semiconstrained<br />
IOWA and TATE prostheses is influenced<br />
by their articular congruity. While a less congruent<br />
design spares bone/implant interfaces from deleterious<br />
stresses, it may impair prosthetic stability. To optimize<br />
osteointegration, a low congruity TATE-2 profile was<br />
recently released; however optimal prosthesis constraint<br />
is unknown. Our purpose was to compare IOWA and TATE<br />
behavior under mediolateral translation. We hypothesized<br />
that constraint and stability would be greatest in IOWA and<br />
lowest in TATE-2 profiles.<br />
Materials and Method<br />
Four prostheses per group were tested in mediolateral<br />
translation. Loading conditions mimicked those of a trotting<br />
40kg dog in mid-stance. Stiffness (a reflection of prosthetic<br />
constraint) and maximum resistive force (an indication of<br />
prosthetic intrinsic stability) were statistically analyzed<br />
(p
The effect of configuration and radiographic<br />
positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude<br />
in a dog with a complex antebrachial growth<br />
deformity: comparison between radiographic and 3D<br />
computer modelling measurements<br />
N. Fitzpatrick, C. Nikolaou,JF. Isaza Saldarriaga, S. Correa Velez, V. Wavreille, K. Ash, JJ. Ochoa<br />
Fitzpatrick Referrals, Surrey, UK.<br />
Introduction<br />
Our aim was to establish the mathematical relationship<br />
between radiographically measured torsion and frontal<br />
plane antebrachial growth deformities (ABGD) and to<br />
compare with those derived from a 3D computer model.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Direct digital radiographs and CT scans of the forelimbs<br />
of a 23kg dog with bilateral ABGD were acquired. 3D<br />
reconstructions were created from the CT scans and<br />
parametric surfaces exported to SolidWorks 2009. The<br />
lateral distal radial angle (LDRA) and distal caudal radial<br />
angle (DCRA) were measured on both. A transverse cut<br />
of the radius was performed at the intersection point<br />
of the anatomical axes and the frontal plane deformity<br />
was measured following: 1) rotation of the distal radial<br />
segment, 2) alteration of the procurvatum angle, 3) rotation<br />
of the limb around the humeral axis with: (a) unchanged<br />
procurvatum, (b) procurvatum 20 0 , (c) procurvatum 0 o , (d)<br />
procurvatum equal valgus angle, 4) rotation of the limb<br />
around the transcondylar axis. Valgus angle measurements<br />
were correlated using curve estimation regression analysis.<br />
Results<br />
Radiographically measured values were: valgus 8.83 o ;<br />
LDRA 89.81 o ; procurvatum 10.38 o ; and DCRA 86.3 o and the<br />
same deformities measured on the 3D model were: 29 o ;<br />
100.4 o ; 19.39 o ; and 96.6 o . Radial torsion and procurvatum<br />
did not affect measurements of valgus on the 3D model.<br />
Discussion/conclusion<br />
Radiographic measurements of frontal plane deformity<br />
differed significantly from measurements on the 3D<br />
model and the model was more accurate for pre-operative<br />
planning. Rotation around the humeral axis had a significant<br />
and predictable effect on the measurements of valgus<br />
deformity.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 92 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Association of articular mineralisation, cranial<br />
cruciate ligament pathology and degenerative joint<br />
disease in feline stifle joints<br />
Voss K* 1 , Karli P 2 , Kipfer N 2 , Geyer H 3<br />
1 University Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Sydney, Australia, 2 Clinic for <strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery and 3 Department<br />
of Anatomy, Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Switzerland.<br />
Introduction<br />
The clinical significance of mineralisation in the stifle<br />
joint of cats is unknown despite published associations with<br />
cranial cruciate ligament rupture (CCLR) and degenerative<br />
joint disease (DJD).<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Presence and size of mineralisations were noted from<br />
lateral stifle radiographs of 25 cats with CCLR and an<br />
age-matched group of 25 cats without CCLR that had been<br />
euthanised for reasons unrelated to this study. Size of<br />
mineralisations was classified as small, medium or large,<br />
and the prevalence was recorded. In the second part of<br />
the study, stifle joints of cat cadavers were processed<br />
for microscopic evaluation. Degenerative changes of the<br />
cruciate ligaments, menisci, articular cartilage, and joint<br />
capsule were graded on a scale from 0 to 3. Comparison of<br />
stifles without, with small, and with large mineralisations<br />
was made.<br />
Results<br />
Mean age of both groups was 8.6 years. Prevalence of<br />
articular mineralisations was 0.76 in stifles with CCLR,<br />
and 0.64 in stifles without CCLR. Mineralisations in stifle<br />
joints without CCLR were predominantly small, whereas<br />
mineralisations in stifle joints with CCLR were medium or<br />
large. <strong>Small</strong> mineralisations tended to be calcifications<br />
located in the cranial horn of the medial meniscus. Larger<br />
mineralisations were ossifications commonly located in the<br />
cranial meniscal attachments, the joint capsule, and the fat<br />
pad. DJD scores of all intra-articular structures increased<br />
from stifles with no mineralisations to those with large<br />
mineralisations.<br />
Discussion/conclusion<br />
Mineralisations in feline stifle joints were found to<br />
differ in size, microscopic appearance, and location. Larger<br />
mineralisations were mostly located cranial to the medial<br />
meniscus and were associated with DJD and CCLR.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 93 small animal orthopaedic session
The role of the antebrachiocarpal ligaments<br />
in the prevention of hyperextension of the<br />
antebrachiocarpal joint<br />
Milgram J*, Milstein T, Meiner Y.<br />
Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel<br />
Introduction<br />
A normal antebrachiocarpal joint is crucial to canine<br />
locomotion, however, very little is known about how<br />
pathological changes affecting individual structures<br />
influences the normal kinematics of this joint. The aim of<br />
this study was to evaluate the role of the medial collateral<br />
ligament, lateral collateral ligament and the palmar carpal<br />
ligaments in the prevention of carpal hyperextension.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Twenty four forelimbs were collected from 12 healthy<br />
mixed breed dogs of medium build. Each specimen was<br />
radiographed to ensure the carpal joint was free of<br />
abnormalities and assigned to 1 of 6 groups. The groups<br />
were defined by the order in which the ligaments stabilising<br />
the antebrachiocarpal joint were cut. The antebrachium,<br />
carpus and proximal metacarpal bones were stripped of<br />
all muscle tissue, preserving the carpal joint capsule. The<br />
specimens were prepared for biomechanical testing and<br />
placed into a custom made joint testing machine. The<br />
manus was loaded using a system of weights and pulleys<br />
resulting in the extension of the carpus. The extension was<br />
measured using a single motion tracking sensor fixed to the<br />
metacarpal bones. All specimens were tested with all the<br />
ligaments intact, and after cutting each of the ligaments<br />
in the order defined by the group.<br />
Results<br />
Cutting each of the ligaments resulted in a significant<br />
change in the angle of extension of the carpus when<br />
compared to the extension of the carpus with the ligaments<br />
intact. Cutting the palmar AC ligaments resulted in the<br />
largest change in the extension angle and this difference<br />
was significantly larger than that seen after cutting the<br />
medial and lateral collateral ligaments.<br />
Discussion<br />
Each of the AC ligaments tested contribute to the<br />
prevention of hyperextension of the AC joint. Improved<br />
understanding of the function of the AC ligaments<br />
may result in improved techniques for the treatment of<br />
hyperextension injury.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 94 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
The effect of screw number and plate stand-off<br />
distance on the biomechanical characteristics of<br />
3.5mm locking compression plate (LCP) and 3.5mm<br />
string of pearls (SOP) plate constructs in a synthetic<br />
fracture gap model.<br />
Glyde M *1 , Day R 2 . and Hosgood G *1 .<br />
1 Murdoch University, School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Perth, Australia. 2 Department of Medical<br />
Physics, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia.<br />
Introduction<br />
The purpose of this research was to compare the effect of<br />
stand-off distance and screw number on the biomechanical<br />
characteristics of 3.5mm LCP and 3.5mm SOP plate<br />
constructs in a synthetic fracture gap model.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Stiffness of Synthes®10-hole 3.5mm LCP and<br />
Orthomed® 10-hole 3.5mm SOP constructs were evaluated<br />
in a synthetic diaphyseal bridge-plating model under axial<br />
compression in load control to a peak load of 120N and<br />
bi-planar four-point bending in displacement control with<br />
a peak bending moment of 6Nm (Instron 5566 and 8874,<br />
Bluehill v2.5.391 software sampling at 10hz). For 4-point<br />
bending the implant was on the construct tension side<br />
when load was applied parallel to the screw axis (tension<br />
bending) and subsequently rotated 90 degrees with<br />
applied load perpendicular to the screw axis (perpendicular<br />
bending). The central two screw holes were left vacant<br />
over the 10mm fracture gap. For each plate type construct<br />
variables included standoff distance (1 or 5mm) and<br />
screw number (2,3 or 4 per fracture fragment) creating 12<br />
treatment groups.<br />
Results<br />
There was no significant effect (p>0.05) of increasing<br />
screw number per fragment on SOP construct stiffness<br />
at 1mm or 5mm standoff with the exception in tension<br />
bending that 4 screws were stiffer (p0.05) on LCP constructs at 1mm with the exception<br />
in perpendicular bending that 4 screws were stiffer<br />
(p
combined session 96 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> shoulder arthroscopy -<br />
clinical update<br />
Friday July 8<br />
08.00 <strong>–</strong> 10.15
small animal orthopaedic session 98 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy technique,<br />
normal anatomy, & appearance of routine pathology<br />
Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />
Veterinary Referral Center of Colorado, Englewood, Colorado, USA<br />
Most descriptions of shoulder arthroscopy techniques<br />
position dogs in lateral recumbency with the affected limb<br />
up allowing for consistent establishment of lateral optical<br />
portal and caudolateral or craniolateral instrument. Dorsal<br />
recumbent positioning with distal traction of the limb is<br />
an alternate position allowing for additional assess to the<br />
joint via the craniomedial portal.1,2The main advantage<br />
of dorsal recumbent positioning is the view afforded via<br />
the craniomedial portal. This allows for the surgeon to<br />
change the optic port from the standard lateral portal to<br />
the craniomedial portal to provide an improved view of<br />
lateral intraarticular structures. The main disadvantage<br />
of dorsal recumbent positioning is accommodating for<br />
the inverted anatomy. While the anatomy is identical, it<br />
is inverted making some familiar structures completely<br />
unrecognizable to the naïve eye.<br />
To perform dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy,<br />
patients are positioned with the aid of a vacuum-positioning<br />
bag to maintain dorsiflexion of the cervical spine and axial<br />
alignment. The limb is aseptically prepared in hanging leg<br />
prep and draped in a standard fashion. Distal traction on the<br />
limb is provided by an adjustable block and tackle secured<br />
in an aseptically to a sturdy ceiling anchor. Distention of<br />
the joint is necessary for consistent portal placement. A<br />
spinal needle is inserted into the joint at the depression<br />
between the cranial border of the acromion and dorsal<br />
border of the greater tubercle. Proper placement into the<br />
joint is confirmed by aspiration of synovial fluid. The joint<br />
is distended with 10 mL of sterile distension fluid (i.e.,<br />
LRS, NaCl). Care is required to prevent over distention and<br />
rupture of the joint capsule. The author prefers to leave<br />
the spinal needle in place as an egress portal. The optical<br />
portal is established at the lateral location immediately<br />
caudal and slightly distal to the acromion. This location<br />
can vary dependent on the morphology of the acromion. A<br />
stab incision made and the sheath with a blunt obturator<br />
is advanced into the joint in a controlled manner. A distinct<br />
pop is felt as the articular space is entered. As the obturator<br />
is removed, the sheath is stabilized to prevent inadvertent<br />
displacement from the joint. Rapid egress of distention fluid<br />
should occur as the obturator is removed from the sheath.<br />
Working portals are established dependent on the<br />
region of interest. The location of the caudolateral<br />
portal is approximately 1 cm caudal and 1-2 cm distal<br />
to the lateral portal. Needle-localization of working<br />
portals facilitates proper orientation of working portals<br />
to identified pathology. The general location of the caudal<br />
lateral portal is determined by digital pressure in the<br />
region and observing the deflection of the joint capsule.<br />
Next, a nitinol needle (or a spinal needle) is inserted in the<br />
proposed location and the needle is observed within the<br />
joint. A stab incision is made at the needle puncture site<br />
and the cannulated obturator and cannula is inserted over<br />
the nitinol needle. The cannulated obturator is removed<br />
leaving the cannula in place as the working portal.<br />
Craniomedial portal can be established in lateral or<br />
dorsal recumbency; however, this location is difficult to<br />
utilize effectively in lateral recumbent positioning. Needlelocalization<br />
and creation from an outside-in technique<br />
is possible, however, the author prefers an inside-out<br />
technique. The craniomedial portal is established in<br />
a triangular region bordered by the synovium covered<br />
coracobrachialis tendon dorsally, subscapularis tendon<br />
caudally, and the biceps tendon. The arthroscope tip is<br />
driven to the triangular region and held securely against<br />
the joint capsule while the arthroscope is removed from<br />
the sheath. A switching stick is placed into the sheath and<br />
advanced through the joint capsule and skin at the site of the<br />
craniomedial portal from inside out. The arthroscope sheath<br />
was removed leaving the SS spanning across the joint from<br />
the lateral portal to the newly formed craniomedial portal.<br />
The arthroscope sheath or working cannula is advanced<br />
over the SS to establish the craniomedial portal. Viewing<br />
via the craniomedial perspective is especially useful in dogs<br />
with suspected shoulder instability. OCD flaps displaced<br />
into the medial scapular recess can be more readily<br />
accessed with this portal.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 99 small animal orthopaedic session
References<br />
1. Devitt CM, Neely MR, Vanvechten BJ. Relationship<br />
of physical examination test of shoulder instability to<br />
arthroscopic findings in dogs. Veterinary surgery : VS :<br />
the official journal of the American College of Veterinary<br />
Surgeons 2007;36:661-668.<br />
2. Cook JL, Cook CR. Bilateral shoulder and elbow arthroscopy<br />
in dogs with forelimb lameness: diagnostic findings and<br />
treatment outcomes. Veterinary surgery : VS 2009;38:224-<br />
232.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 100 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
MRI and arthroscopy for evaluation of shoulder joint<br />
pathology<br />
H. van Bree*, W. Dingemanse, I. Gielen<br />
Department of Medical Imaging & <strong>Small</strong> Animal Orthopaedics, Veterinary Faculty, Ghent University<br />
The canine shoulder is a complex joint, with numerous<br />
passive and active soft tissue stabilizing components.<br />
It is a ball-and-socket joint, which allows movement in<br />
essentially every direction. In the dog and cat, however,<br />
most of the motion takes place in a direct cranial-to-caudal<br />
plane, resulting mainly in extension and flexion of the joint.<br />
The medial and lateral glenohumeral ligaments are not<br />
really ligaments, but rather thickenings of the respective<br />
surfaces of the joint capsule. They are rather weak, so it<br />
is the strength of the heavy musculature surrounding the<br />
shoulder joint that maintains its integrity.<br />
Shoulder lameness, although a common condition in the<br />
dog, can be difficult to localise, and determining the specific<br />
cause is often challenging. Even when the lameness has<br />
been localized to the shoulder, identifying the precise cause<br />
can be frustrating.<br />
Some of the indications for imaging of the shoulder<br />
joint are:<br />
• Any lameness associated with a shoulder problem:<br />
i.e. pain on manipulation of the joint itself or any of<br />
the structures in the shoulder area.<br />
• Swelling or deformity of the shoulder region.<br />
• Atrophy of the adjacent shoulder muscles.<br />
Possible imaging techniques<br />
Scintigraphy can be used to localise lameness<br />
originating in the shoulder region and to evaluate the<br />
significance of equivocal radiological findings.<br />
Plain radiography: standard radiographs provide<br />
only limited diagnostic information, and frequently there<br />
is a poor correlation between the radiological findings<br />
and clinical signs. There may be extensive changes due<br />
to degenerative joint disease (DJD) present, with no<br />
lameness but as an incidental finding in older dogs. The<br />
radiological assessment of the shoulder joint should include<br />
evaluation of alignment, subchondral bone, joint space,<br />
and adjacent periarticular soft tissues. Many of the joint<br />
tissues <strong>–</strong> such as cartilage, synovial membrane, fibrous<br />
capsule, and collagenous structures <strong>–</strong> are not visible on<br />
plain radiographs and therefore can only be evaluated<br />
indirectly, by (for example) calcification within tendons<br />
and irregularities at their attachments. Arthrography and/<br />
or ultrasound can be helpful in visualizing some of these<br />
structures.<br />
Arthrography of the shoulder joint is the most common<br />
arthrographic procedure used in small animal orthopaedics.<br />
It is a useful and simple technique for imaging various<br />
shoulder problems in the dog. Several bursae around<br />
the scapulohumeral joint can be visualised. The bicipital<br />
tendon sheath and subscapular recess are always visible,<br />
whereas the infraspinatous bursa is only occasionally<br />
seen. Arthrography can outline the articular cartilage,<br />
synovial membrane, biceps tendon and associated<br />
synovial sheath (but cannot identify smaller lesions<br />
within the biceps tendon), various bursae, a cartilage<br />
flap in shoulder osteochondrosis (OCD) and radiolucent<br />
joint mice. In cases of shoulder OCD, positive-contrast<br />
arthrography helps to assess <strong>–</strong> with an accuracy of 80%<br />
<strong>–</strong> whether a non-mineralized cartilage flap is present, and<br />
this finding helps to determine whether a dog should be<br />
treated conservatively or surgically. In cases of bicipital<br />
pathology, positive contrast arthrography may demonstrate<br />
changes in the contour of the bicipital groove and tendon,<br />
incomplete filling of the synovial sheath, filling defects and<br />
irregularities. It can also aid decision making in cases of<br />
caudal glenoid fragmentation. With the use of positive<br />
arthrography, impingement of the joint capsule can be<br />
demonstrated, and the fragment is visible as a filling defect.<br />
Ultrasonography (US) can be used in the shoulder joint<br />
to diagnose muscle and tendon injury and to evaluate OC<br />
lesions. A high-frequency linear transducer is used for this<br />
examination, and the dog may have to be anaesthetised if<br />
joint manipulation is painful. The humeral head is visible as<br />
a hyperechoic convex curvilinear line with a strong acoustic<br />
shadow, and the cartilage as an anechoic layer covered<br />
by the joint capsule, the tendons of the infraspinatus and<br />
teres minor muscle and the acromial part of the deltoid<br />
muscle. For the evaluation of the bicipital tendon sheath,<br />
cross-sectional images at the level of the bicipital groove<br />
and longitudinal images at the level of the attachment on<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 101 small animal orthopaedic session
the supraglenoid tubercle are taken. Results of a recent<br />
study in shoulder OCD <strong>–</strong> comparing ultrasound with<br />
radiography, arthrography and arthroscopy <strong>–</strong> suggest that<br />
all radiologically diagnosed subchondral lesions in the<br />
humeral head can be visualised by the use of ultrasound<br />
as a concave deviation of the hyperechoic subchondral<br />
bone line with a variable length according to the extent of<br />
the lesion. The results also suggest that the presence of a<br />
second hyperechoic line at the bottom of the subchondral<br />
defect seen on US is a pathognomonic sign for the presence<br />
of a flap. It was suggested that US might present an<br />
alternative to positive contrast arthrography. With the<br />
use of ultrasound, bicipital lesions and supraspinatus<br />
tendinopathy can be identified. This technique is highly<br />
operator-dependant and requires experience.<br />
Computed tomography (CT): The use of CT can be<br />
justified in some conditions, especially in situations where<br />
one wants to avoid superimposition of bony structures<br />
when evaluating the extent of processes, or to determine<br />
the source of calcifications or fragments seen on plain film<br />
radiographs. New bone formation in the bicipital groove<br />
can be easily seen. Also, CT may be useful in cases with<br />
suspect demineralisation, as this technique can detect<br />
loss of bone content at an earlier stage than conventional<br />
radiography can. Also, arthro-CT can be performed to<br />
check the integrity of the biceps tendon. In the case of<br />
soft tissue involvement of the shoulder region, IV contrast<br />
can be applied with a dose of 200 mg I/kg bodyweight. CT<br />
guided biopsies of neoplastic processes in the shoulder<br />
region can be performed.<br />
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide a<br />
more complete look at important canine soft tissue shoulder<br />
structures. MRI is a non-invasive diagnostic modality that<br />
provides a high-contrast, multi-planar depiction of joint<br />
associated anatomy. Superior soft tissue image resolution,<br />
along with the ability to image in multiple planes, has<br />
made MR imaging the diagnostic modality of choice for<br />
joint pathology in human orthopaedics. MRI relies on<br />
interactions between an external magnetic field, radio<br />
waves and hydrogen nuclei in the body. The tissue contrast<br />
seen with MRI is due to the differences in the magnetic<br />
properties of each tissue.<br />
MRI protocols and studies<br />
Several protocols for MR imaging of the shoulder have<br />
been proposed applying different sequences and planes<br />
<strong>–</strong> but essentially T1 (sometimes with contrast), T2 and<br />
STIR (short tau inversion recovery) images are always<br />
necessary (Figure 1). Depending on which structures one<br />
wants to visualise, images in the sagittal, transverse and<br />
dorsal plane are obtained. Protocols have been proposed<br />
with the limb in both flexion and extension. To visualise the<br />
joint capsule and glenohumeral ligaments, positioning of<br />
the shoulder in extension using intra-articular contrast has<br />
been described. The major periarticular anatomic structures<br />
of the normal canine shoulder can consistently be identified,<br />
but evaluation of the glenohumeral structures remains<br />
difficult. Cortical bone is visible on MRI as a signal void; but,<br />
to evaluate new bone formation, CT still is the modality of<br />
choice. Visualisation of canine articular cartilage remains a<br />
controversial issue. Even with high-field MRI, the resolution<br />
is not good enough to depict the thin canine cartilage.<br />
Figure 1: A STIR image of an inflamed shoulder joint clearly<br />
showing the massive joint effusion.<br />
Data on the use of low-field MRI in shoulder problems<br />
in dogs are scarce. The protocol used in our department<br />
is to start with a STIR sequence, imaging both elbows<br />
in extension in the dorsal plane to rule out brachial<br />
plexus pathology. Then, both shoulder joints are imaged<br />
in extension separately, using a T1 (plane and after<br />
intravenous application of a paramagnetic contrast agent,<br />
if indicated) sequence. Then, a T2 sequence is performed.<br />
Both sequences are obtained in sagittal and transverse<br />
planes.<br />
MRI has been evaluated for detecting OC lesions in<br />
the canine humeral head and was found to be useful in<br />
assessing the extent and severity of subchondral bone<br />
lesions. Although articular cartilage discontinuity could be<br />
detected, loose flaps were not always demonstrated and<br />
articular cartilage could not be distinguished from synovial<br />
fluid. In this study, MR arthrography proved to be ineffective<br />
in visualising canine articular cartilage.<br />
In one study, where surgical exploration for shoulder pain<br />
had been performed in 21 dogs, a high level of agreement<br />
and concordance between MRI and surgical findings has<br />
been found. However, this study was somewhat limited,<br />
because the radiologists were not blinded but were aware<br />
of the case data. Still, this study demonstrated the potential<br />
of MRI in the field of canine shoulder lameness.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 102 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Another study established that MRI was a good imaging<br />
technique for detection of supraspinatus tendinopathy,<br />
where impingement or displacement of the biceps tendon<br />
by the enlarged supraspinatus tendon was often observed<br />
on imaging, contributing to development of clinical signs.<br />
One should be aware of artefacts produced by<br />
identification “chips” when imaging the shoulder region<br />
and the “magic angle” artefact when evaluating tendon<br />
integrity using a T1 sequence.<br />
Additional reading<br />
• Agnello KA, Puchalski SM, Wisner ER, Schulz KS, Kapatkin<br />
AS. Effect of positioning, scan plane, and arthrography<br />
on visibility of periarticular canine shoulder soft tissue<br />
structures on magnetic resonance images. Vet Radiol<br />
Ultrasound. 2008 Nov-Dec;49(6):529-39.<br />
• Fransson BA, Gavin PR, Lahmers KK. Supraspinatus<br />
tendinosis associated with biceps brachii tendon<br />
displacement in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Nov<br />
1;227(9):1429-33, 1416.<br />
• Gielen & van Bree, Chapter 38 <strong>–</strong> CT of the shoulder joint.<br />
In Schwarz T, Saunders J, editors: Veterinary computed<br />
tomography, Oxford, 2011, Wiley-Blackwell.<br />
• Janach KJ, Breit SM, Künzel WW. Assessment of the<br />
geometry of the cubital (elbow) joint of dogs by use<br />
of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res. 2006<br />
Feb;67(2):211-8.<br />
• Kramer M, Gerwing M, Sheppard C, Schimke E.<br />
Ultrasonography for the diagnosisof diseases of the tendon<br />
and tendon sheath of the biceps brachii muscle. VetSurg.<br />
2001 Jan-Feb;30(1):64-71.<br />
• Lafuente MP, Fransson BA, Lincoln JD, Martinez SA, Gavin<br />
PR, Lahmers KK, GayJM. Surgical treatment of mineralized<br />
and nonmineralized supraspinatustendinopathy in twentyfour<br />
dogs. Vet Surg. 2009 Apr;38(3):380-7.<br />
• Long CD, Nyland TG. Ultrasonographic evaluation of<br />
the canine shoulder. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 1999 Jul-<br />
Aug;40(4):372-9.<br />
• Murphy SE, Ballegeer EA, Forrest LJ, Schaefer SL. Magnetic<br />
resonance imaging findings in dogs with confirmed shoulder<br />
pathology. Vet Surg. 2008 Oct;37(7):631-8.<br />
• Schaefer SL, Forrest LJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of<br />
the canine shoulder: an anatomic study. Vet Surg. 2006<br />
Dec;35(8):721-8.<br />
• Schaefer SL, Baumel CA, Gerbig JR, Forrest LJ. Direct<br />
magnetic resonance arthrography of the canine shoulder.<br />
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2010 Jul-Aug;51(4):391-6. Sidaway<br />
BK, McLaughlin RM, Elder SH, Boyle CR, Silverman EB.<br />
Role of the tendons of the biceps brachii and infraspinatus<br />
muscles and the medial glenohumeral ligament in the<br />
maintenance of passive shoulder joint stability in dogs. Am<br />
J Vet Res. 2004 Sep;65(9):1216-22.<br />
• Vandevelde B, Van Ryssen B, Saunders JH, Kramer M, Van<br />
Bree H. Comparison of the ultrasonographic appearance<br />
of osteochondrosislesions in the canine shoulder with<br />
radiography, arthrography, and arthroscopy. Vet Radiol<br />
Ultrasound. 2006 Mar-Apr;47(2):174-84.<br />
• van Bree H, Van Ryssen B, Degryse H, Ramon F. Magnetic<br />
resonance arthrography of the scapulohumeral joint in dogs,<br />
using gadopentetate dimeglumine. Am J Vet Res. 1995<br />
Mar;56(3):286-8.<br />
• van Bree H. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of<br />
positive-contrast arthrography and arthrotomy in evaluation<br />
of osteochondrosis lesions in the scapulohumeral joint in<br />
dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Jul 1;203(1):84-8.<br />
• van Bree H, Degryse H, Van Ryssen B, Ramon F, Desmidt M.<br />
Pathologic correlations with magnetic resonance images of<br />
osteochondrosis lesions in canine shoulders. J Am Vet Med<br />
Assoc. 1993 Apr 1;202(7):1099-105.<br />
• van Bree H. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of<br />
positive-contrast arthrography and arthrotomy in evaluation<br />
of osteochondrosis lesions in the scapulohumeral joint in<br />
dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Jul 1;203(1):84-8.<br />
• van Bree H & Gielen I. The shoulder joint and scapula.<br />
BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Musculoskeletal<br />
Imaging, 2006, Chapter 7, p 86-102. Edited by F.J. Barr and<br />
R.M. Kirberger.<br />
• Xia, Y. Resolution ‘scaling law’ in MRI of articular cartilage.<br />
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2007, 15, 363-365.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 103 small animal orthopaedic session
Stifle arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, &<br />
appearance of routine rathology<br />
Chad Devitt, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS<br />
Veterinary Referral Center of Colorado, Englewood, CO, USA<br />
Patient Positioning<br />
While often an overlooked part of the procedure, proper<br />
patient positioning allows for consistent arthroscopic<br />
access without difficulty. It is important to position the<br />
patient in such a fashion to support the limb without the<br />
aid of an assistant. The author prefers to position dogs in<br />
dorsal recumbency, secured in a vacuum bag. The affected<br />
limb is placed in a self-retaining retractor to hold the limb<br />
in an upright position. The limb is aseptically prepared and<br />
draped. An adhesive iodine impregnated drape is applied<br />
over the surgical site to prevent wicking of arthroscopic<br />
distention fluid.<br />
Portal Placement<br />
Classically, Whitney described placement of the portal<br />
at the level of Gurdey’s tubercle. This location is effective,<br />
however requires extensive shaving of the infra-patellar<br />
fat pad to visualize the intra-articular structures. The<br />
optic portal has been described in the lateral parapatellar<br />
location and the working portal in the medial parapatellar<br />
location. The author prefers to place both the optic<br />
and working portals slightly higher allowing for rapid<br />
visualization of intra-articular structures of interest.<br />
Additionally, a suprapatellar egress portal is unnecessary<br />
with the use of an arthroscopic fluid pump. Frequently,<br />
the working portal and optic portal can be exchanged to<br />
improve visualization or working angle of a given structure.<br />
Briefly, the locations of the portals are infused with local<br />
anesthetic. Intra-articular injection of lidocaine or bupivicane<br />
is discouraged due to potential chondrocytotoxicity.<br />
Carbocaine, however, is an acceptable as an intra-articular<br />
local anesthetic. The author prefers to establish the medial<br />
infrapatellar portal as the optic with the stifle in moderate<br />
flexion, nearly equidistant from the distal pole of the patella<br />
and the tibial plateau due to the volume of the infrapatellar<br />
fat pad. In doing so, visualization of the intraarticular<br />
structures can occur readily in contrast to my experience<br />
utilizing a lateral optic portal. Close attention to a lateral<br />
radiograph of the stifle will facilitate localization of the<br />
portal in a tangent to the tibial plateau. A stab incision is<br />
made in the location of the portal into the joint capsule.<br />
The arthroscopic sheath with obturator is advanced into the<br />
joint. As the joint is entered, the arthroscopic sheath with<br />
obturator is advanced into the suprapatellar recess. Infusion<br />
of distention fluid is started, and the scope is assembled.<br />
Intra-articular Assessment<br />
Complete evaluation and photodocumentation of the<br />
stifle is performed sequentially through all compartments<br />
of the stifle joint. Begin by moving from the suprapatellar<br />
recess to the femoral trochlea. The angle of view is<br />
rotated as the scope is retracted to evaluate the articular<br />
surface of the patella. As the distal pole of the patella<br />
is reached, the view is directed to the medial and<br />
lateral femoral compartments evaluating for synovial<br />
proliferation and osteophytosis. The insertion of the long<br />
digital extensor (LDE) will come into view as the stifle is<br />
flexed while maintaining the position of the scope in the<br />
lateral infrapatellar location. As the LDE is visualized, the<br />
arthroscopic view is directed at the location of the lateral<br />
infrapatellar portal location. The portal is established with<br />
a #11 scalpel blade. Care is taken to maintain visualization<br />
of the blade to avoid iatrogenic damage to intraarticular<br />
structures. An arthroscopic shaver is introduced into the<br />
joint to resect the fat pad and synovium as needed to allow<br />
complete visualization and evaluation of intra-articular<br />
structures. A probe is inserted into the working portal<br />
and compents of the cranial cruciate are evaluated. The<br />
craniomedial and caudolateral bands are described based<br />
on their respective anatomic origin on the femur. The<br />
craniomedial band is most often injured in a partial tear<br />
and is tight in all ranges of motion. The caudolateral band<br />
is tighter in flexion as the two components wrap around<br />
each other during the screw-home mechanism. Evaluation<br />
with a probe is important to determine the competence of<br />
the ligament. An arthroscopic shaver is used to debride<br />
the torn CCL. The cutting face of the shaver is rotated to<br />
allow fray ligamentous ends to be pulled into the shaver,<br />
as the suction level is actuated. Efficiency of shaving is<br />
vastly improved as the area being shaved is stabilized by<br />
shaving toward the osseous attachment of the ligament.<br />
Once the CCL is debrided, evaluation of the meniscus is<br />
performed. While viewing the medial meniscus, a probe<br />
is inserted into the working portal. The stifle is placed in<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 104 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
drawer by an assistant or retracting device. The femoral<br />
and tibial surfaces are palpated to detect early incomplete<br />
tears. The peripheral attachment is evaluated by direct<br />
palpation and attempting to displace the caudal pole<br />
cranially. The lateral meniscus is evaluated, by driving the<br />
scope view to the lateral compartment and placing a varus<br />
stress on the limb. Careful probing of the femoral and tibial<br />
surfaces is important to avoid overlooking stable tears of<br />
the lateral meniscus.<br />
Meniscal exposure can be improved by insertion of a<br />
retraction device such as a modified Hohmann retractor<br />
or chondral pick. Alternatively, a self-retaining external<br />
retractor can be inserted into the distal femur and proximal<br />
tibia. The author prefers using a reverse bend chondral<br />
pick inserted through a lateral parapatellar portal. The<br />
pick is advanced into the joint and placed at the caudal<br />
tibial plateau within the intercondylar notch. Retraction<br />
is provided in a similar manner to a Hohmann retractor,<br />
however the smaller instrument has a less impact on the<br />
visual field. Meniscal injuries are removed by use of multiple<br />
instruments including a hook knife, push knife, joint punch<br />
and arthroscopic shaver blades. Meniscal resection should<br />
be accomplished without any iatrogenic damage to the<br />
cartilage. Radiofrequency energy sources are discouraged<br />
due to the extraordinary risk of chondrolysis. Meniscal<br />
release at one time enjoyed widespread application and use<br />
to prevent meniscal tearing. A meniscal release, however is<br />
a procedure that is not without consequence to the cartilage<br />
surface making its use a source of debate. If a meniscal<br />
release is decidedly appropriate, ensuring complete release<br />
is of utmost importance. A caudal meniscotibial release is<br />
performed by applying drawer to the stifle and visualizing<br />
the caudal meniscotibial attachment. A hook blade is<br />
advanced under the meniscotibial ligament and retracted<br />
cutting the ligament completely. If the caudal pole of the<br />
medial meniscus does not retract caudally as drawer is<br />
applied, the ligament is not transected completely. A<br />
midbody release can be performed in a similar fashion with<br />
needle localization of the region of transetion, however its<br />
use is discouraged by the author due to risk of iatrogenic<br />
cartilage injury and medial collateral ligament injury.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 105 small animal orthopaedic session
Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid<br />
cavity: diagnostic findings and results after treatment:<br />
retrospective study of 28 dogs and 1 cat.<br />
B. Van Ryssen, E. Coppieters, Y. Samoy, D. Van Vynckt, J. Saunders, H. van Bree.<br />
University of Ghent, Salisburylaan, Merelbeke, Belgium<br />
Introduction<br />
Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid cavity<br />
are commonly regarded as subclinical lesions. The origin of<br />
these lesions is not always clear(1). In the last decade an<br />
accessory caudal glenoid ossification was described as a<br />
possible cause of lameness in dogs (2, 3). To obtain a correct<br />
treatment decision, it is important to consider a calcified<br />
body in the differential diagnosis of shoulder lameness and<br />
to attribute lameness to it by a thorough diagnostic workup<br />
to exclude other (shoulder) problems. This retrospective<br />
study of 29 cases is intended to describe the signalment of<br />
clinically affected dogs, to describe the radiographic and<br />
arthroscopic findings and the results after conservative or<br />
arthroscopic treatment.<br />
Material and methods<br />
In a retrospective study the files of 29 cases gathered<br />
over 10 years were analyzed. Follow-up was performed by<br />
a telephone questionnaire and a clinical and radiographic<br />
examination.<br />
The files contained the signalment, history and clinical<br />
findings of 28 dogs and one cat. Diagnosis was based on<br />
plain radiographs, ultrasound and arthrogaphy. Shoulder<br />
arthroscopy was performed via a lateral approach with<br />
a 2.7 mm arthroscope (R. Wolf). During arthroscopic<br />
inspection the presence of a loose body was noted as<br />
well as the presence of cartilage lesions of the glenoid<br />
cavity and humeral head and lesions of the biceps tendon<br />
and glenohumeral ligaments. Subsequently, arthroscopic<br />
treatment was performed by removal via a caudal portal.<br />
Results<br />
Signalment:<br />
Different large breeds were affected of which seven<br />
were mixed breeds. The age varied between 2.5 and 11<br />
years, with a mean age of 6 years.<br />
History:<br />
Acute onset was noted in 50% of the cases, but related<br />
trauma was only reported in two dogs. Duration of<br />
lameness varied between 1 and 9 months. Conservative<br />
treatment with rest and NSAID‘s was not or only temporary<br />
efficacious.<br />
Radiographic findings<br />
Bilateral lesions were found in 50% of the dogs. In<br />
the lame shoulders, a solitary glenoid calcified body was<br />
found 28 dogs and 1 cat. Two dogs had an additional<br />
partial rupture of the biceps tendon. The size and shape<br />
of the fragments that caused lameness was varying: in<br />
15 joints the fragments were small (1-2 mm), 9 fragments<br />
were between 2.5 and 5 mm, and 5 were larger than 8<br />
mm. The fragments in the controlateral shoulder were<br />
also variable: some were smaller, while others were larger<br />
than those found in the lame shoulder. The shape of the<br />
calcifications was variable: round, granular (small) irregular<br />
shape, semi round with a gliding surface opposite to the<br />
humeral head. Large calcified bodies were located close<br />
to the humeral head while smaller ones were often closer<br />
to the glenoid cavity.<br />
Mixed breed, 2.5 y<br />
Schapendoes, 11 y<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 106 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Mixed breed, 5 y<br />
Cat, 7 y<br />
Osteoarthritis in the clinically affected joints was absent<br />
in 4 joints, light in 12 joints, moderate in 10 joints and<br />
severe in 3 joints.<br />
Arthroscopy<br />
All calcified bodies were visible as separate fragments<br />
more or less connected with the caudal rim of the glenoid<br />
cavity. Cartilage erosions of the humeral head varied from<br />
discrete to severe and were seen in 50% of the joints.<br />
Arthroscopic removal of the fragments was realized in<br />
one or several pieces using grasping forceps of 2-3.5 mm<br />
diameter. Control radiographs confirmed the complete<br />
removal of the fragment.<br />
Results after treatment<br />
The majority of the dogs recovered between 1 week and<br />
2 months. A residual lameness was noted in 60% of the<br />
dogs, after long or heavy exercise. Five dogs did not improve<br />
after treatment: all dogs had grade 2 tot 3 arthrosis and<br />
small or medium sized calcifications.<br />
Four joints were treated for a large fragment (+/_ 1 cm),<br />
3 had degree 1 and one degree 2 of OA. Results were<br />
very good.<br />
Two joints with concomitant biceps rupture had a slow<br />
recovery.<br />
Two were treated conservatively, both had bilateral<br />
medium sized fragments (5-7 mm) and responded well to<br />
a prolonged treatment.<br />
All non-clinical controlateral joints were treated<br />
conservatively and did not need a surgical treatment.<br />
A limited radiographic postoperative follow-up in 4 cases<br />
revealed the development of a ‚new‘ fragment in 2 / 4 joints.<br />
Arthrosis had progressed minimally in all cases. In case of<br />
new fragment development, one dog showed occasional<br />
mild lameness, the other had become more severely lame<br />
a few weeks before the control examination (4 years after<br />
treatment).<br />
Discussion<br />
Calcified bodies at the caudal rim of the glenoid cavity<br />
are a well known yet infrequent finding in the canine<br />
shoulder. Often it is classified as a clinically insignificant<br />
lesion, although is has been described as a possible<br />
cause of shoulder lameness(1-3). In the authors‘ hospital,<br />
the disorder was diagnosed 29 times over a period of ten<br />
years. This confirms that calcified bodies at the caudal<br />
rim of the glenoid cavity should always be included in the<br />
differential diagnosis for shoulder lameness, despite the<br />
relatively low frequency.<br />
In this series of 29 cases mainly large breed dogs were<br />
affected with the exception of a small dachshound and<br />
a cat. All animals were adults, in contrast to what was<br />
written in a study of 9 nine dogs which had an age of<br />
8 months to two years(3). In this series all dogs were<br />
older than 2 years with a mean of six years suggesting<br />
that the presence of these calcifications do not have a<br />
developmental cause.<br />
Bilateral calcifications were seen in 50% of the cases.<br />
In the four dogs that were 3 years or younger, it was<br />
always a unilateral problem. In young dogs, joint problems<br />
are often - but not necessarily - bilateral when there is<br />
a developmental cause. The term ununited ossification<br />
center of the glenoid as well as accessory caudal glenoid<br />
ossification center suggest that the problem would mainly<br />
arise in young dogs. The age of the dogs in this series argue<br />
against this hypothesis.<br />
Another cause could be a traumatic fragmentation of<br />
the caudal part of the glenoid cavity. However, in only one<br />
case radiography suggested a fragmentation of the caudal<br />
rim, but arthroscopic inspection demonstrated it as an<br />
additional fragment.<br />
In only 50% of the dogs lameness had an acute onset<br />
while only for two dogs the onset was related to a trauma.<br />
The cause of the calcified bodies remains unclear, but<br />
may be explained by an increased stress on that particular<br />
location, either because of traction on the insertion of the<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 107 small animal orthopaedic session
joint capsule or pressure exerted by the caudal part of<br />
the humeral head. Possibly a high activity predisposes to<br />
the development of these calcifications, but an individual<br />
predisposition might also be present.<br />
Since the calcified bodies are not always the cause of<br />
lameness(1), diagnosis should be based on the localization<br />
of pain in the shoulder and the exclusion of other shoulder<br />
problems and other frontlimb problems. It was also the<br />
experience of the authors that subclinical lesions may be<br />
clearly visible on radiographs while the cause of lameness<br />
was located elsewere.<br />
The radiographic appearance of the calcified bodies<br />
ranged from a small particle to a large half rounded body.<br />
The size and shape of the fragment was not related to the<br />
severity of the clinical signs. Most fragments were smaller<br />
than 3 mm x 2 mm, the largest was 11 mm x 6 mm. The<br />
size of the fragment was not correlated to the degree of<br />
osteoarthritis.<br />
Each calcification was removed successfully via<br />
arthroscopy. Arthroscopic treatment was technically more<br />
demanding than the removal of an OCD flap because of<br />
the location and - in some cases - the size of the fragment.<br />
Lipping of the glenoid cavity, as often is found in chronic<br />
osteoarthritis of the shoulder, should not be confused with<br />
this problem. In that case there is no separate fragment<br />
and arthroscopic removal is difficult. Removal will not<br />
lead to improvement of the dog (personal experience of<br />
the authors).<br />
Results after treatment were very good in most cases.<br />
Only when chronic arthrosis was present, the dogs did<br />
not improve. In those cases, the calcified body could be<br />
considered as a secondary sign of osteoarthritis and not<br />
as the primary problem. When lameness can be confined<br />
to this calcification and other shoulder problems can be<br />
excluded, arthroscopic removal is rewording.<br />
Only a limited number of dogs were available for<br />
clinical and radiographic follow-up. One dog showed a<br />
moderate lameness 4 years after treatment. In this dog,<br />
a similar fragment had developed as was removed at<br />
the first presentation. In one other dog a new calcified<br />
body had developed. This dog showed occasional light<br />
lameness after heavy exercise. Two other dogs were sound<br />
3 years after treatment and radiographs showed a minor<br />
progression of osteoarthritis.<br />
References<br />
1. Dennis R KR, Wrigly RH, Barr PJ. Handbook of small Animal<br />
Radiological Differential Diagnosis. 1ed. 2001;WB Saunders<br />
Company, Philadelphia, London:37-41.<br />
2. Van Ryssen B. Shoulder arthroscopy: a review of 47 cases<br />
(2002-2004): findings and current case management. .<br />
<strong>Proceedings</strong> 14th annual scientific meeting of the British<br />
Vet Orthop Assoc. 2003;Bath, UK (42).<br />
3. Olivieri M PA, Marcellin-Little DJ, Borghetti P, Vezzoni A.<br />
Accessory caudal glenoid ossification centre as possible<br />
cause of lameness in nine dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traum.<br />
2004(3):131-5.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 108 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Motion analysis and<br />
rehabilitation<br />
Friday July 8<br />
14.30 <strong>–</strong> 16.30
small animal orthopaedic session 110 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Force plate: gold standard?<br />
M. Balligand*<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences, SA Surgery, University of Liège, Belgium.<br />
The use of a force plate has become a standard procedure<br />
in the quantitative evaluation of locomotion in dogs.<br />
Many recent publications report ground action forces in<br />
various situations, from normal to pathological, and among<br />
different breeds of dogs. Recorded values are strongly<br />
influenced by parameters like velocity and acceleration,<br />
body weight, body size, limb length. In order to interpret<br />
differences between those values and be able to compare<br />
data, the clinician must apply specific normalization<br />
techniques.<br />
The purpose of this lecture is to review those<br />
normalization technique and the ways data from force plate<br />
analysis should be used in order to make fully appreciate<br />
its potentialities when its position is disputed especially<br />
by pressure mats.<br />
Needless to say, force plate gait analysis, like any other<br />
quantification method, is affected by several limitations,<br />
mainly technical. Those must be thoroughly understood<br />
by anyone using the system in order to fully profit of its<br />
performances. Some of them can be avoided by using<br />
concomitantly two or more force plates or an instrumented<br />
treadmill but this has an important impact on the overall<br />
cost of the system. Furthermore, ground actions forces<br />
reflect acceleration of the body mass of the dog, i.e. body<br />
and limbs, making of a comprehensive analysis of the<br />
locomotion a particularly complex task. Nevertheless, an<br />
excellent reason to use a force plate and consider it as a<br />
possible gold standard when evaluating gait is the fact that<br />
a force plate has proved to be able to diagnose locomotion<br />
anomalies which could pass undetected during visual<br />
subjective evaluation, even by experienced examiners.<br />
Each step of a front or a hind limb generates a unique<br />
pattern of characteristic forces applied by the ground on<br />
the foot during stance phase. The relevant questions for<br />
a clinician are therefore: are the recorded forces (vertical,<br />
horizontal fore-aft, horizontal transversal) normal or not?<br />
are the recorded durations of breaking and propelling<br />
phases during stance phase normal or not ? To answer<br />
those questions, the normal values of these force and<br />
time related parameters must be known. Yet patients<br />
are generally not evaluated before becoming lame. So<br />
the normal status of a particular patient is (almost) never<br />
known. Furthermore, comparing a diseased limb to its<br />
normal contra-lateral is unfortunately not valid as the<br />
dysfunction of one limb modifies the function, hence the<br />
recorded parameters, of the other limbs. The solution is<br />
therefore to compare the values of a patient with reference<br />
values of normal individuals after applying normalization<br />
techniques accounting for differences in body mass, body<br />
dimensions and absolute velocity (at which the dog passes<br />
on the force plate). So it is necessary to :1. normalize<br />
the recorded forces by the standing body weight (SBW)<br />
(Forces/SBW),2. normalize the absolute speed by the<br />
(functional) limb length (h), calculating a relative speed<br />
(Vrel=V/(gh)1/2 where “v” is the mean stride velocity, “h”<br />
is the functional limb length and “g” is the gravitational<br />
acceleration (9.81 m/sec 2); as a matter of fact, v rel= the<br />
square root of V2/gh” which is called the Froude number<br />
and is equal to the ratio of the kinetic energy (1/2mv2) and<br />
potential energy (mgh). Movement under gravity generally<br />
involves potential energy being converted to kinetic energy<br />
and vice versa. Therefore, dynamically similar movement<br />
is possible only if the systems in question have the same<br />
ratio of kinetic energy to potential energy. Two movements<br />
are dynamically similar if one could be made identical to<br />
the other by uniform change in the scales of length, time<br />
and force. One dog should not be compared to another one<br />
having a different Fround number;3. normalize the absolute<br />
values of stride period (duration of the stride in seconds<br />
(T)) and stride length (in cms) by the functional limb length,<br />
calculating a relative stride period (Trel=T/(h/g)1/2 where<br />
“h” is the functional limb length and “g” the gravitational<br />
acceleration= a constant) and a relative stride length (stride<br />
length/functional limb length).The stride length being<br />
defined as the distance between two successive foot strikes<br />
of the same foot, its record generally necessitates the use<br />
of several force plates (except for small breed individuals).<br />
If the effect of the body weight( or body mass) on the<br />
recorded forces is easy to apprehend (the gravitation force<br />
exerted by the earth on the body is directly proportional to<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 111 small animal orthopaedic session
the body mass), the effect of speed may be less evident<br />
to fully perceive, although it is considerable. The vertical<br />
force required to support an animal against gravity is<br />
controlled by the duration of the stance phase, when the<br />
foot is in contact with the ground; when the speed goes<br />
up, the stance phase shortens and the shorter the duration<br />
of the stance phase the bigger the force. Yet, for a similar<br />
absolute speed between two dogs, a condition which<br />
would appear a good condition for comparison, a larger<br />
dog has a longer (functional) limb length, hence a lower<br />
relative speed (see formula above) because the limbs are<br />
moving slower underneath the trunk; on the contrary, a<br />
smaller dog has a shorter (functional) limb length hence a<br />
higher relative speed. Comparisons at the same absolute<br />
speed deliver useful informations only if the animals are<br />
precisely the same size (same functional limb length). If the<br />
sizes between two dogs differ, comparisons can only be<br />
made at similar relative speeds (to be calculated). In the<br />
same way, the simple normalization of the forces by the<br />
body weight is of little practical value unless comparisons<br />
between individuals are made at similar relative speeds.<br />
Considering that each passage on the force plate<br />
potentially delivers a large number of numerical<br />
informations, force and time wise, another crucial question<br />
is whether the difference between normal and abnormal<br />
gaits can be detected, based on only one versus several<br />
parameters and in this latter case, what would be the<br />
minimal combination of parameters able to distinguish<br />
normal from abnormal gait? Available informations in the<br />
recent literature are not always consistent. Although results<br />
of different studies suggest that a multivariate approach<br />
is superior to the univariate one, for some authors, the<br />
combination of peak vertical forces and the falling slope<br />
(unloading speed of the foot) is the combination of choice to<br />
distinguish between healthy and affected dogs when others<br />
recommend the combination of the peak vertical force and<br />
the rising slope (loading speed of the foot).<br />
Finally, yet another way of detecting lameness in dogs<br />
based on ground actions forces is the calculation for each<br />
gait variable of (a)symmetry indices ((XR-XL/(XR+XL)/2)<br />
X100). In healthy individuals, trot is a symmetric gait in<br />
which the body is alternatively supported by one pair of<br />
diagonal limbs followed by the other pair. Although perfect<br />
right-to-left symmetry is generally not observed (there are<br />
physiological differences between sides), a threshold(cutoff<br />
point)can be determined to differentiate healthy from<br />
lame dogs.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Unlike pressure mats or pressure walkways, force<br />
plates are capable of recording vertical and horizontal<br />
action forces exerted by the feet on the ground during<br />
stance phase. The use of several (2 to 4) force plates<br />
in the same walking corridor allowing simultaneous<br />
recordings of different limbs together in action or their use<br />
in combination with instrumented treadmills makes the<br />
recording processes more informative, easier and quicker,<br />
yet much more expansive. Normalization techniques allow<br />
data comparison when the normal status of a diseased<br />
animal is unknown. Despite those advantages, available<br />
informations on the possible contribution of horizontal<br />
forces measurements in lameness detection or treatment<br />
evaluation are, up to now, scarce. The present situation<br />
likely makes the pressure walkway a serious competitor in<br />
the race for “gold standard method” status in locomotion<br />
quantitative valuation.<br />
References<br />
• Besançon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR, Ritter MJ.<br />
Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds<br />
between force platform and pressure walkway<br />
measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003;<br />
3, 153-157<br />
• Evans RB, Gordon W, Conzemius N. The effect of velocity on<br />
ground reaction forces in dogs with lameness attributable<br />
to tearing of the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res<br />
2003; 64(12): 1479-81<br />
• Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Ye K, et al. Comparaison of<br />
stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate<br />
analysis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60:814-819<br />
• Evans R, Horstman Ch, Conzemius M. Accuracy and<br />
Optimization of force Platform Gait Analysis in Labradors<br />
with Cranial cruciate disease Evaluated at walking Gait. Vet<br />
Surg 2005; 34, 445-449<br />
• Bertram JE, Lee DV, Case HN, Todhunter RJ. Comparison of<br />
trotting gaits of Labradors Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J<br />
vet res 2000; 61: 832-838<br />
• Mölsa SH, Hielm-Björkman AK, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM.<br />
Force Plateform Analysis in Clinically healthy Rottweilers:<br />
Comparison with Labrador retrievers. Vet Surg 2010;<br />
39:701-707.<br />
• McNeillAlexander R. Elastic mechanisms in animal<br />
movement. Cambridge University Press, 1988<br />
• Conzemius N. Limitations of force platform gait<br />
analysis. ESVOT-VOS 3d World Vet Ortho Congres<br />
<strong>Proceedings</strong>,2010,87-88.<br />
• Viguier E, Maître P, Colin A, Poujol L, Wittman C, Le Quang.<br />
ESVOT-VOS 3d World Vet Ortho Congres <strong>Proceedings</strong>,2010,<br />
184-185.<br />
• Fanchon L, Grandjean D. Accuracy of asymmetry in dices of<br />
ground reaction forces for diagnosis of hind limb lameness I<br />
dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68:1089-1094.<br />
• Quinn MM, Keuler NS, LU Y, Faria MLE, Muir P, Markel MD.<br />
Evaluation of Agreement Between Numerical Rating Scales,<br />
Visaul Analogue Scoring Scales, and Force Plate gait<br />
Analysis in Dogs. Vet Surg 2007;36:360-367.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 112 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
In vivo motion analysis 3D<br />
P. Böttcher*, J. Rey, G. Oechtering<br />
Department of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany<br />
Traditional motion analysis involves attaching small<br />
retroflective markers on the skin surface of aninmals<br />
and recording the path of those markers in 3D with at<br />
least two video cameras. Precision and accuracy of<br />
those systems in tracking the 3D path of the markers is<br />
very high and data collection and processing is straight<br />
forward as most of the software packages available on<br />
the marked allow for automatic marker tracking. This is<br />
why video cinematography is the de facto gold standard<br />
in motion analysis. The theory behind skin mounted<br />
marker is that they represent distinct bony landmarks.<br />
However, due to the physiological motion between skin<br />
and underlying skeleton, skin based motion tracking<br />
is limited to “macroscopic” motion analysis, basically<br />
flexion and extension, acceleration and deceleration as<br />
well as evaluation of synchronicity. Even in humans with<br />
much less skin elasticity than most of our animals and<br />
sophisticated cluster based marker configurations, skin<br />
mounted markers are not accurate enough to allow precise<br />
estimation of 3D joint motion.1,2 Especially abduction and<br />
adduction, external and internal rotation as well as relative<br />
translation of the opposing joint surfaces are prone to<br />
errors, questioning the usefulness of skin marker based<br />
analysis of 3D joint kinematics in dogs.<br />
To allow for precise estimation of 3D joint kinematics<br />
several technical aspects have to be considered: (1) tracking<br />
of bone motion instead of skin motion, (2) short exposure<br />
time (shutter 1/2000 sec) to reduce image blurring, (3) high<br />
frequency data acquisition (≥ 250 Hz) to make sure not to<br />
miss fast movements, e.g. cranial drawer in stifles with<br />
cranial cruciate ligament rupture, and (4) high accuracy and<br />
precision (≤ 1mm of translation and ≤ 1 deg of rotation) as<br />
joint kinematics are a microscopic biomechanical system.<br />
Today only biplanar fluoroscopic kinematography using<br />
special hardware fulfils all these requirements. Standard<br />
C-arms only allow for long exposure time and small image<br />
sampling rates and therefore are not suitable for our<br />
purpose. But they can easily be “upgraded” by attaching<br />
a high speed video camera instead of the standard video<br />
camera provided by the manufacture.3 When using<br />
an uniplanar setup to reduce cost and x-ray exposure<br />
translation along the optical axis (out of plane motion; most<br />
of the time medio-lateraly) and in consequence internal/<br />
external rotation as well as abduction/adduction are of<br />
suboptimal resolution.4<br />
The system we are currently using is a biplanar system<br />
with two high-power x-ray tubes and two 40 cm image<br />
intensifiers (fig. 1) combined with digital high speed video<br />
cameras for image acquisition. A third camera acquires a<br />
live stream of the dog while walking on the treadmill. This<br />
video clip is used to define start and end of stance phase.<br />
All cameras are synchronised at 500 fps and a shutter of<br />
1/2000 sec. Using custom made 2D-3D image registration<br />
software, which is primarily based on the work of Tasman<br />
and his group we can track the 3D kinematics of the canine<br />
stifle with a precision of 0.3 mm without any attached<br />
or implanted markers. Bead based tracking, using small<br />
spherical tantalum beads, which are “injected” into the<br />
bones allows for even more accurate tracking in the range<br />
of ≤ 0.1 mm.5<br />
Application of our hard- and software to dogs with<br />
naturally occurring cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) rupture<br />
has changed our understanding of 3D stifle kinematic<br />
dramatically. First of all, stifle instability following CCL<br />
rupture is not a pathological movement of the tibia, it is<br />
the femur which becomes instable, luxating caudally on<br />
heel strike. Moreover, as already suggested by Tashman<br />
et al.6 CCL rupture does not lead to increased internal<br />
rotation of the tibia, while walking. Even more controversial<br />
is the situation following TPLO. We observed significant<br />
internal rotation of the femur at heel strike, which is almost<br />
absent when performing a TTA. However, following both<br />
procedures, cranio-caudal stability is restored. Animations<br />
of stifles following TPLO and TTA compared to normal stifles<br />
can be downloaded at www.fluokin.de.<br />
Fluoroscopic kinematography is not limited to the stifle.<br />
We are currently performing a study investigating 3D<br />
kinematics of the canine elbow with and without elbow<br />
dysplasia. When the local anatomy becomes more complex<br />
such as in the elbow, implantation of tantalum markers<br />
becomes necessary. This makes the investigation more<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 113 small animal orthopaedic session
complex as we need the animal under full anaesthesia<br />
before any clinically driven invasive procedure. Implanting<br />
the markers is comparable to multiple bone marrow<br />
aspiration procedures. The tantalum markers produce no<br />
adverse reaction and stay in the body for the rest of the life<br />
of the animal.7 Big advantage when using tantalum markers<br />
is their good contrast in the fluoroscopic images because<br />
of their high x-ray absorption coefficient. This makes<br />
identification of the markers and subsequent automatic<br />
tracking a straight forward procedure. Freely distributed<br />
software, based o a collection of Matlab routines, for bead<br />
based tracking in 3D motion analysis is available at www.<br />
xromm.org. But even for those studies in which implantation<br />
of markers is not possible XROMM provides software<br />
tools for manual 2D-3D-registration, so called scientific<br />
rotoscoping, which gives very good results. 8<br />
Future application of fluoroscopic kinematography in<br />
veterinary small animal medicine will extend to shoulder<br />
and hip kinematics, to neurology, evaluating spine<br />
kinematics or to the menisci. But even pure “soft tissue”<br />
kinematics, such as the motion of hard valves, soft palate<br />
or tongue can be investigated using implanted markers. Of<br />
course, animals other than dogs can be investigated using<br />
fluoroscopy, too. In consequence we are currently setting<br />
up the first biplanar fluoroscopic motion analysis system<br />
designed for small animals such as rats, small reptiles and<br />
birds, up to horses and cows - including humans (www.<br />
fluokin.de). Once established this unique installation will<br />
allow for basic as well as clinical research using both<br />
marker less and marker based fluoroscopic motion tracking<br />
at high speed among all “species”<br />
Fig 1: Biplanar fluoroscopic setup at the Institut für Spezielle<br />
Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller Universität,<br />
Jena, Germany (Prof. Fischer)<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. Benoit D, Ramsey D, Lamontagne M, et al: Effect of skin<br />
movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and<br />
cutting motions measured in vivo. Gait Posture 24:152-164,<br />
2006.<br />
2. Garling EH, Kaptein BL, Mertens B, et al: Soft-tissue<br />
artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and<br />
skin-mounted markers. J Biomech 40 Suppl 1:S18-24, 2007.<br />
3. Snelderwaard P, De Groot JH, Deban SM: Digital video<br />
combined with conventional radiography creates an<br />
excellent high-speed X-ray video system. J Biomech<br />
35:1007-1009, 2002.<br />
4. Böttcher P, Ludewig E, Oechtering G: Uniplanar fluoroscopic<br />
cinematography for in-vivo analysis of canine knee<br />
kinematics: estimation of accuracy, <strong>Proceedings</strong>, 14th<br />
ESVOT Congress, Munich, Germany, 10-14 September,<br />
2008.<br />
5. Brainerd EL, Baier DB, Gatesy SM, et al: X-ray<br />
reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision,<br />
accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics<br />
research. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol 313:262-279,<br />
2010.<br />
6. Tashman S, Anderst W: In-vivo measurement of dynamic<br />
joint motion using high speed biplane radiography and<br />
CT: application to canine ACL deficiency. J Biomech Eng<br />
125:238-245, 2003.<br />
7. Aronson AS, Jonsson N, Alberius P: Tantalum markers in<br />
radiography. An assessment of tissue reactions. Skeletal<br />
Radiol 14:207-211, 1985.<br />
8. Gatesy SM, Baier DB, Jenkins FA, et al: Scientific<br />
rotoscoping: a morphology-based method of 3-D motion<br />
analysis and visualization. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol<br />
313:244-261, 2010.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 114 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Muscular forces affecting the outcome of CCL<br />
surgery.<br />
JM Ramirez Leon 1 , B Böhme 4 , C Vroomen 3 , F Farnir 2 , M Balligand 1<br />
1 Department of Clinical Sciences, SA Surgery, 2 Department of Animal Productions, Biostatistics, 3 Department<br />
of Constructions, Materials and Structures Mechanics, University of Liège, Belgium, 4 Kleintierklinik, Bremen,<br />
Germany<br />
Introduction<br />
Surgical treatments, attempting to passively or<br />
dynamically stabilize the affected stifle joints, are carried<br />
out in the vast majority of cranial cruciate ligament<br />
ruptures (CCLR) in dogs. Indications exist that unstable<br />
joints following CCLR could benefit from augmentation<br />
of Quadriceps muscle performance, whether the joints<br />
are surgically treated or not. The objective of the present<br />
study is to evaluate the effect of the force developed by<br />
the Quadriceps muscle on the stability of the stifle affected<br />
by CCLR.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
Six hind limbs were harvested from fresh cadavers,<br />
weighing between 19 and 33 kilos. The dogs had been<br />
euthanized for reasons unrelated to this study. Pelvic<br />
limbs were collected by disarticulation of the coxofemoral<br />
joint. All muscles were dissected out, leaving intact the<br />
collateral and capsular ligaments of the stifle and hock<br />
joints. <strong>Small</strong> radio-opaque markers (segments of Kirschner<br />
wire) were implanted in the distal femur and proximal<br />
tibia. The specimens were radiographed to control the<br />
absence of osteoarthritis and allow calculation of the<br />
tibial plateau angle (TPA); they were wrapped in isotonic<br />
saline soaked abdominal sponges and stored in sealed<br />
plastic bags at -20°. Thawing occured at room temperature<br />
during the night preceding the tests. The day of the tests,<br />
a medial mini-arthrotomy of the stifle was performed and<br />
the infrapatellar fat pad was completely dissected out,<br />
exposing the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL) which was<br />
left intact at this moment. The joints were closed with a<br />
2/0 nylon interrupted suture. The Quadriceps muscle and<br />
the Gastrocnemius muscles/ Achilles tendon unit were<br />
replaced by tension bands, each of them instrumented<br />
with a strain gage (Sensy, 150 DN) and a turn-buckle to<br />
adjust the tension in the cables. The strain gages were<br />
conditioned in a full Wheatstone bridge by an amplifier<br />
(Hottinger Baldwijn Messtechnik, type MBC). Signals<br />
registered by the sensors were treated via a data logger<br />
(HP 3497 A) and an acquisition software (Scan Win).The<br />
limbs were placed in a press (Instron 3366, 10 KN) in a<br />
neutral position, between protraction (breaking phase)<br />
and retraction (propelling phase) a position close to the<br />
position of a hind limb at the time of peak vertical force<br />
during stance phase. The proximal femurs were securely<br />
fixed to a custom-made aluminum stirrup connected to the<br />
horizontal bar of the press via three pairs of screws and<br />
a 2.5 mm transfixing pin. The press was piloted in force<br />
during the loading phase and piloted in displacement<br />
during the relaxation phase. Loading was done at 30% of<br />
body weight at a loading rate of 2.5 mm per second until<br />
a plateau was reached; the target load was maintained<br />
during 60 seconds, allowing measurements of joint angles<br />
(stifle and hock) with a goniometer, recording of the force<br />
values and taking radiographs of the stifle. Relaxation was<br />
finally allowed until the initial position of the horizontal<br />
bar was resumed. A small pre-tension (between 2 and<br />
5 N) was systematically put into the Quadriceps tension<br />
band and the Gastrocnemius/ Achilles tension band in<br />
order to prevent any slack in the system and to obtain<br />
physiological joints angles when at peak load, ranging<br />
from 130° to 138°and 130° to 136° for the stifle and hock<br />
joint respectively. The hip joint angle was always fixed at<br />
a predetermined value (68° to 71°), corresponding to the<br />
mean value observed in physiological conditions at peak<br />
vertical load and reported in the literature. Measures<br />
were repeated two to three times, at an interval of 2 to 3<br />
minutes. In a second step, the CCL was transected with a<br />
scalpel blade, when unloaded, via the medial arthrotomy<br />
initially performed, which was again closed with a 2/0<br />
nylon single non interrupted suture. Measures were then<br />
repeated again two to three times at the same 30% of BW<br />
load, bringing no changes to the pretension initially placed<br />
in Quadriceps and the Gastrocnemius/Achilles bands (2 to<br />
5 N). Upon loading, cranial displacement of the tibia was<br />
documented by films and radiographs and from the load vs<br />
time charts delivered by the Instron press. In a third step,<br />
different pre-tensions were applied, from 1 to 9 kilograms<br />
depending on the specimen, to the Quadriceps band,<br />
before loading, the foot being hold in its original position<br />
on the ground thanks to a custom-made shoe preventing<br />
its cranial displacement when tightening the turn-buckle of<br />
the Quadriceps band. The loading processes were carried<br />
out like previously described and filmed again. In a fourth<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 115 small animal orthopaedic session
step, advancement of the tibial tuberosity was performed<br />
using a Modified Maquet Technique (MMT) procedure, first<br />
with an advancement calculated with the common tangent<br />
method to orthogonalize the tibial plateau and the patellar<br />
ligament, and then with half of this advancement but with<br />
different pre-tension being applied to the Quadriceps band.<br />
No attempt was made to keep nor the stifle nor the hock<br />
angles at specific values, once the CCL had been transected.<br />
Statistical analysis<br />
A multinomial logistic model with cumulative logits was<br />
used to assess the effect of pre-load in the quadriceps<br />
(PLQ) and tibial plateau angle (TPA) on the occurrence<br />
of a cranial drawer sign (CDS). <strong>Animals</strong> were classified<br />
into 3 categories with respect to CDS (absent, variable,<br />
present) and optimal parameters were fitted using<br />
GENMOD procedure of SAS. As a by-product, the used<br />
model also allowed to predict PLQ to be applied to have<br />
a given probability to avoid CDS. The effect of PLQ and<br />
similarly the small pre-load systematically applied in<br />
the Gastrocnemius/Achilles tension band(PLGA) on the<br />
Ultimate Load in Quadriceps (ULQ) was also investigated<br />
by fitting a linear model using PLQ and PLGA as covariates<br />
and CDS as a fixed effect. The same linear model was fitted<br />
for the Ultimate Load in the Gastrocnemius/Achilles tension<br />
band(ULGA). When testing the effect of CDS status on the<br />
hock angle (HA) and on ULGA, a one-way Anova was used,<br />
after classifying the CCLR individuals into 2 groups (group<br />
1: no CDS, group 2: CDS or variable CDS).<br />
Results<br />
Preload (PLQ) was found to have a significant effect<br />
(p=0.032) on the occurrence of CDS, with higher levels<br />
of preload leading to lower prevalence of CDS. TPA was<br />
also significantly (p=0.0016) associated to CDS, with<br />
higher values of TPA more likely to cause CDS. The results<br />
show that CDS has a significant effect (p=0.0078), with<br />
individuals suffering from CDS characterized by higher<br />
ultimate tensions (ULQ) than others. No significant relation<br />
could be demonstrated between PLQ and ULQ (p=0.0949),<br />
while a significant effect could be shown for PLGA on<br />
ULQ (with the 2 traits negatively correlated).HA were<br />
found significantly (p
especially when the stifle is more extended (high flexion<br />
angle) could limit or even eliminate the drawer sign. When<br />
ACLR is treated by advancement of the tibial tuberosity,<br />
pre-tension in the Quadriceps can help the procedure to<br />
deliver its stabilizing effect or possibly compensate for an<br />
insufficient advancement. It must be emphasized though<br />
that our model is still a very simplified anatomical model not<br />
taking into account the effect of cocontraction especially<br />
of the Hamstrings muscles.<br />
Bibliography<br />
• Ragetly ChA, Griffon DJ, Mostafa AA, Thomas JE, Hsiao-<br />
Wecksler ET. Inverse Dynamics Analysis of the Pelvic Limbs<br />
in Labrador Retrievers With and Without Cranial Cruciate<br />
Ligament Disease. Vet Surg, 2010, 39 (513-522)<br />
• Hoffmann DE, Kowaleski MP, Johnson KA, Evans RB,<br />
Boudrieau RJ. Ex vivo Biomechanical Evaluation of the<br />
Canine Cranial Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Stifle with<br />
Varying Angles of Stifle Joint flexion and Axial Loads after<br />
Tibial Tuberosity Advancement. Vet Surg, 2011, 40 (311-320)<br />
• Kipfer NM, Damur DM, Guerrero T, et al. Effect of tibial<br />
tuberosity advancement on femorotibial shear in cranial<br />
cruciate ligament deficient-stifles: an in vitro study. Vet<br />
Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2008, 21 (385-390).<br />
• Dennler R, Kipfer NM, Tepic S, et al. Inclination of the<br />
patellar ligament in relation to flexion angles in stifle joints<br />
of dogs without degenerative joint disease. Am J Vet Res,<br />
2006, 67 (1849-1854).<br />
• Etchepareborde S, Brunel L, Bollen G, Balligand M.<br />
Preliminary experience of a modified Maquet technique<br />
for repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Vet<br />
Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2011, 24.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 117 small animal orthopaedic session
Evidence based medicine in rehabilitation<br />
B. Bockstahler, PD, DVM, CCRP<br />
Clinic for Surgery and Ophthalmology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria<br />
During the past decade, veterinary physical therapy<br />
and rehabilitation has gained popularity. ,Veterinarians<br />
have started focusing on several goals as the treatment<br />
of pain and subsequent compensatory mechanisms, the<br />
improvement of the joint function and a quicker return to<br />
function after surgery. To reach these goals the veterinarian,<br />
working in the field of physical therapy, must have a<br />
profound knowledge related not only to physical therapeutic<br />
modalities (like electrotherapy), but also to the etiology and<br />
pathophysiology of musculoskeletal disorders, conservative<br />
and surgical treatments and finally the biomechanics of<br />
the musculoskeletal system. Because of the complexity of<br />
musculoskeletal diseases, neither the pathophysiological<br />
processes related to orthopedic disorders nor the impact<br />
of physical therapeutic interventions like therapeutic<br />
exercises can be understood without a profound knowledge<br />
of the dog’s biomechanics<br />
This can only be addressed with objective and<br />
reproducible data on the dogs’ kinetics, kinematics and<br />
muscle functions.<br />
In contrast to human medicine where extensive<br />
biomechanical research has been performed and a lot of<br />
studies prove the efficacy of physiotherapeutic methods<br />
such studies are rare in veterinary medicine. This lack on<br />
high quality studies has brought the veterinary physical<br />
therapy in a zone between charlatanism and evidenced<br />
based medicine.<br />
The veterinary community is thus currently discussing<br />
two main questions:<br />
• Are the methods of physical therapy effective (e.g.<br />
for pain control or accelerated rehabilitation after<br />
surgery?<br />
• How can we increase our biomechanical and<br />
pathophysiological knowledge to improve our<br />
treatment options?<br />
Scientists all around the world are working on these<br />
topics, and in the field of veterinary physical therapy the<br />
first important steps have been done. For example, Monk et<br />
al.1 showed that early physiotherapy intervention prevents<br />
muscle atrophy, contributes to muscle mass and strength,<br />
and increases the stifle range of motion (ROM) after TPLO.<br />
Such studies using clinical outcome measurements (e.g.<br />
ROM) provide us with important information, but their input<br />
could be improved if modern motion analysis methods were<br />
implemented. This biomechanical research thus relies on<br />
both in vivo and in vitro methods.<br />
A common in vivo method to evaluate the influence of<br />
therapeutically interventions is the measurement of ground<br />
reaction forces (GRF). For this purpose different systems<br />
are available e.g. single force plates, pressure walkways or<br />
force plates integrated in treadmills. Each of these systems<br />
has its own advantages and disadvantages; nevertheless<br />
they can be used relatively easy to evaluate treatment<br />
outcomes. In the field of veterinary physical therapy<br />
GRF has been used relatively frequently; for example<br />
Marsolais et al2 showed that ground reaction forces of<br />
dogs after surgery for CCL rupture which underwent post<br />
operative rehabilitation (massage, swimming, passive<br />
range of motion exercises) improved compared to an<br />
exercises-restricted group. In a recent paper, Mueller et<br />
al.3 described the benefits of therapeutic ultrasound in<br />
the treatment of avulsion of the gastrocnemius muscle.<br />
Some promising results have been published for the use of<br />
extracorporeal shockwave therapy as a treatment modality<br />
in the osteoarthritic patient4,5. Important results presented<br />
by Mlacnik et al.6 showed that a combination of a weight<br />
management program with physical therapy leads to a<br />
better weight loss and improvement of existing lameness<br />
than a sole dietary program.<br />
Such kinetic measurements are helpful tools, but they<br />
only describe the forces resulting during stance; they do not<br />
provide us with information regarding the joint movements.<br />
To enable the visualization of the temporal and spatial<br />
characteristics of locomotion kinematic measurements<br />
should be used. A lot of studies have been performed to<br />
investigate the joints kinematics of sound and diseased<br />
animals. Also in the field of veterinary physical therapy first<br />
encourage steps have been taken. Marsolais7 compared<br />
coxofemoral, stifle and tarsal joint range of motion (ROM)<br />
and angular velocities during swimming and walking of<br />
healthy dogs with those of dogs after surgical treatment of<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 118 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
a ruptured CCL. The authors showed that swimming leads<br />
to an increased ROM of the stifle compared to walking<br />
on normal ground. Because the ROM is considered as<br />
an important factor in the return to function, the authors<br />
concluded that swimming can contribute to a successful<br />
rehabilitation. Also some kinds of therapeutic exercises<br />
have been investigated to evaluate their impact on joint<br />
mobility. Richards et al.8 showed that during stair up<br />
ambulation, dogs show an increased flexion of stifle and<br />
the hock and an increased and earlier extension of the stifle<br />
compared to normal walk. Going the stairs down results<br />
in an increased flexion of all joints of the hind legs and a<br />
decreased extension of the hip joint. Holler et al.9 found<br />
in dogs crossing obstacles, a higher flexion of the hock<br />
and stifle as well an increased extension of the stifle joint<br />
compared to normal walk. During incline (11%) they found<br />
an increased flexion of the hip and decreased extension of<br />
the stifle, going decline (11%) the hock was less extended<br />
than during level walking and the hip was less flexed.<br />
This kinematic research gives a valuable insight into the<br />
joint mechanics and the value of therapeutic exercises, but<br />
the studies have failed to take into account the muscle<br />
function. The measurement of the muscle activity using<br />
needle or surface electromyography during motion<br />
is difficult. Nevertheless, some work has been done:<br />
Bockstahler et al.10 investigated the activity pattern of the<br />
quadriceps muscle in dogs and Lauer at al.11 investigated<br />
the hamstrings and the quadriceps during walking inclines/<br />
declines. The activity of the hamstring muscle group if<br />
walking at a 5% incline is significantly increased in the<br />
beginning and in the end of the stance phase compared<br />
to a 5% decline. In contrast, the activity of the gluteal<br />
and quadriceps muscle groups was not affected when<br />
treadmill inclination was changed. The aforementioned<br />
studies are promising but our knowledge regarding the<br />
canine muscle function is still sparse. As a result, our<br />
pathophysiologic knowledge of some orthopedic diseases<br />
remains insufficient and we are thus unable to determine<br />
the optimal therapy.<br />
The scientific works quoted in this abstract show that<br />
veterinary physical therapy contributes to an accelerated<br />
rehabilitation after surgery and improves the quality of life<br />
of dogs suffering from chronic musculoskeletal disorders.<br />
However, the two questions mentioned above cannot be<br />
fully answered. as it is difficult to piece together the puzzle<br />
of external forces, morphometric data and clinical signs.<br />
One way to solve the problem could be to combine in<br />
vitro and in vivo methods. In vivo methods, describe the<br />
movement of the living organism but they are sometimes<br />
limited by ethical and methodological considerations. In<br />
contrast in vitro methods provide information about the<br />
biomechanics of a joint, without considering the influence<br />
of surrounding soft tissues such as muscles and tendons.<br />
With the help of mathematical methods it is possible to<br />
derive theoretical models, which can be used to assess for<br />
instance intraarticular forces. The combination of in vitro<br />
and in vivo methods permits the design of anatomically<br />
realistic two- and three dimensional models, which can<br />
provide significant insights into how the neuromuscular and<br />
musculoskeletal systems interact to produce movement.<br />
Researches based on a sound anatomic, biomechanic and<br />
physiologic, clinical and surgical knowledge are necessary<br />
to allow the physical therapists to respond fully to the<br />
physiological and clinical needs of our patients.<br />
Referenses<br />
1. Monk ML, Preston CA, McGowan CM: Effects of early<br />
intensive postoperative physiotherapy on limb function after<br />
tibial plateau leveling osteotomy in dogs with deficiency of<br />
the cranial cruciate ligament. Am J Vet Res. 2006;67:529-<br />
536<br />
2. Marsolais GS, Dvorak G, Conzemius MG: Effects of<br />
postoperative rehabilitation on limb function after cranial<br />
cruciate ligament repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;<br />
220:1325<strong>–</strong>1330<br />
3. Mueller MC, Gradner G, Hittmair KM, et al:. Conservative<br />
treatment of partial gastrocnemius muscle avulsions in<br />
dogs using therapeutic ultrasound -- A force plate study.<br />
V.C.O.T 2009;22: 243-248<br />
4. Dahlberg J, Fitch G, Evans RB, McClure SR, et al: The<br />
evaluation of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in naturally<br />
occurring osteoarthritis of the stifle joint in dogs. V.C.O.T<br />
2005; 18: 147-52<br />
5. Mueller M, Bockstahler B, Skalicky M, et al: Effects of<br />
radial shockwave therapy on the limb function of dogs with<br />
hip osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2007;160:762-765<br />
6. Mlacnik E, Bockstahler B, Müller M, et al: Effects of<br />
caloric restriction and a moderate or intense physiotherapy<br />
program for treatment of lameness in overweight dogs with<br />
osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2006;229: 1756-1760<br />
7. Marsolais GS, McLean S, Derrick T, et al: Kinematic<br />
analysis of the hind limb during swimming and walking<br />
in healthy dogs and dogs with surgically corrected<br />
cranial cruciate ligament rupture. J Am Vet Med Assoc<br />
2003;222:739<strong>–</strong>743<br />
8. Richards J, Holler P, Bockstahler B, et al: A comparison of<br />
human and canine kinematics during level walking , stair<br />
ascent , and stair descent. Wien Tierarztl Monat 2010;<br />
97:92 - 100<br />
9. Holler P, Brazda V, Dal-Bianco B, et al: Kinematic motion<br />
analysis of the joints of the fore- and hind limbs of<br />
dogs during walking exercise regimens. Am J Vet Res<br />
2010;71:734-740<br />
10. Bockstahler B, Gesky R, Mueller M, et al.: Correlation of<br />
surface electromyography of the vastus lateralis muscle in<br />
dogs at a walk with joint kinematics and ground reaction<br />
forces. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 754-61.<br />
11. Lauer SK, Hillman RB, Li L, et al: Effects of treadmill<br />
inclination on electromyographic activity and hind limb<br />
kinematics in healthy hounds at a walk. Am J Vet Res<br />
2009;70:658-66<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 119 small animal orthopaedic session
small animal orthopaedic session 120 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Bone healing for surgeons<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
14.00 <strong>–</strong> 16.00
small animal orthopaedic session 122 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Stimulation of bone healing. Latest developments<br />
O. Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />
<strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery Department, ONIRIS College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Sciences and Engineering,<br />
Nantes, France.<br />
Development of synthetic bone graft substitutes<br />
Despite the benefits that minimally invasive<br />
osteosynthesis and surgery have brought to fracture<br />
and bone healing, there are still many circumstances<br />
where achieving bone healing may prove challenging.<br />
Autologous bone grafts are still considered the gold<br />
standard in bone repair and regeneration because of their<br />
osteogenicity, osteoinductivity and osteoconductivity. But<br />
in human medicine, some instances clearly demonstrated<br />
the advantages of synthetic bone substitutes over<br />
autografts which are no longer recommended as they<br />
are time consuming in the OR, expansive in terms of<br />
hospitalization, induce morbidity and chronic pain, are<br />
available in limited quantity and can be associated with<br />
unpredictable outcomes. The harvesting procedure requires<br />
a second surgical site, with which complications have<br />
been reported, and the quantity of bone graft is limited.<br />
In addition, autologous bone grafts may be too rapidly<br />
resorbable as they can be degraded before bone healing has<br />
been completed. Allogenic and xenogenic bone substitutes<br />
have also been proposed and are still used in some clinical<br />
applications. But viral transmission and a lack availability<br />
of native bone have led to the development of synthetic<br />
bone substitution biomaterials whose use dramatically<br />
increased in the last 15 years, because of their reliable<br />
manufacturing process and the possibility of combining<br />
them with bioactive molecules, therapeutic agents and<br />
cells for tissue engineering, cell-therapy and gene-therapy<br />
applications.<br />
The ideal bone graft substitute must combine several<br />
biological properties in order to favorably compare with<br />
an autologous graft: biocompatibility, osteoconduction,<br />
osteoinductivity (ostegenicity), bioactivity (interactions<br />
with the implantation site environment that can result<br />
in biodegradability, ionic release and exchange). Ideally,<br />
bone substitutes should be able to repair large defects,<br />
provide mechanical resistance and be resorbed to allow<br />
osteogenesis as the bone tissue is remodeled. Consequently<br />
the facility to release bioactive molecules incorporated in<br />
the synthetic graft can make such biomaterials potential<br />
drug delivery systems.<br />
Calcium phosphate ceramics<br />
Among ceramic-based bone graft substitutes, most of<br />
them are calcium (Ca) composites: Ca sulfates (plaster of<br />
Paris), Ca phosphates, Ca carbonates (coral), Ca silicates<br />
(Bioglass), Ca pyrophosphates … Calcium phosphate (CaP)<br />
bone substitutes are currently used for bone substitution<br />
in many different clinical situations such as repair of<br />
bone defects, bone augmentation in spinal arthrodesis,<br />
periodontal treatment, or as coatings for metallic implants.<br />
CaP ceramics are the principal raw materials used for<br />
bone substitutes and are available as granules or blocks.<br />
Among these biomaterials, biphasic calcium phosphate<br />
(BCP) ceramics have been used successfully in human<br />
surgery thanks partly to their chemical composition which<br />
closely resembles that of bone mineral and comprises<br />
a mixture of hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta tricalcium<br />
phosphate ß(TCP). These ceramics are biocompatible<br />
i.e. do not induce any adverse local tissue reaction,<br />
immunogenicity or systematic toxicity; osteoconductive,<br />
i.e. act as a scaffold for new bone formation requiring the<br />
presence of porosity and bioactive, i.e. degradable through<br />
a chemical and cellular process. Certain CaP biomaterials,<br />
such as HA,ß-TCP and BCP ceramics, have recently been<br />
shown to induce bone formation ectopically in different<br />
animal models and have consequently been qualified as<br />
osteoinductive. Macroporosity of CaP blocks facilitates<br />
invasion of cells and diffusion of biological growth factors<br />
into the implant, therefore inducing the osteogenic<br />
process within the inner surface of pores to achieve bone<br />
coalescence.<br />
The microarchitecture and particularly the size of the<br />
particles and the size and distribution of the pores are<br />
critical factors influencing biodegradability, fluid and<br />
cell penetration and the delivery modalities of bioactive<br />
molecules. CaP composites’ potential as drug delivery<br />
systems is a consequence of their bioactivity and<br />
biodegradability, by incorporation and subsequent release<br />
of active molecules or therapeutic agents, but also because<br />
Ca and P ions are important factors in many biochemical<br />
reactions in the body (enzymatic co-factors …). These<br />
chemical interactions together with specific architectural<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 123 small animal orthopaedic session
features lead to consider CaP ceramics as intrinsically<br />
‘osteoinductive’.<br />
Improvements in CaP biotechnology and new therapeutic<br />
approaches such as percutaneous or minimally-invasive<br />
techniques have allowed the development of injectable<br />
CaP biomaterials for bone replacement and particularly selfsetting<br />
CaP cements. Cementation of vertebrae or filling of<br />
bone cysts have already been documented. Two different<br />
strategies have been proposed for the development of<br />
injectable biomaterials: calcium phosphate cements (CPCs)<br />
and injectable ceramics. The setting of bone cements<br />
provides primary mechanical strength to compensate for<br />
a lack of initial or induced macroporosity. Self-setting<br />
CPCs were actually developed first, and many are already<br />
commercially available. They are based on a mixture of CaP<br />
mineral compounds that react together to provide a material<br />
that hardens in situ after injection, through a very mild<br />
exothermic reaction. These CPCs have variable setting and<br />
hardening times in situ depending on their formulations but<br />
a few of them are ready-to-use forms. After hardening, most<br />
cements provide dense biomaterials with irregular porosity,<br />
whereas various studies have shown that macropores are<br />
necessary for bone osteoconduction. Incorporating different<br />
kinds of polymers into CaP cements has recently been<br />
proposed to confer on them an induced macroporosity and<br />
accelerated their colonisation and remodeling.<br />
In human orthopaedics, numerous clinical indications<br />
have been investigated with injectable ceramic-based<br />
Ca cements, including bone void filling and fracture<br />
management:<br />
• For screw augmentation or bone void filler around<br />
metallic implants.<br />
• In calcaneal fractures and distal radial fractures<br />
where the use of CaP bone cements are associated<br />
with decreased pain, faster recovery and a higher<br />
range of joint motion. The level of evidence remains<br />
insufficient to recommend the use of CaP cements<br />
for trochanteric fracture augmentation and femoral<br />
neck fracture management;<br />
• Tibial plateau fractures are indications of choice<br />
for CaP cements in human surgery: they can<br />
provide immediate mechanical strength compared<br />
to autografts and a faster rehabilitation. A recent<br />
multicenter study led to strong recommendations:<br />
‘the use of autologous bone graft is no longer<br />
recommended and CaP cements can replace<br />
autologous bone graft for such an indication’.<br />
In human surgery, the association of CaP bone cements<br />
with bioactive molecules has been investigated for three<br />
major clinical purposes in the bone environment: the local<br />
delivery of antibiotics, the promotion of osteointegration<br />
or bone augmentation by the release of growth factors or<br />
cytokines, and the prevention of further bone resorption<br />
by the incorporation and subsequent in vivo release of<br />
antiresorptive agents such as bisphosphonates. Such<br />
applications have not yet been reported in veterinary<br />
literature except for a few isolated clinical reports mostly<br />
using BMPs on collagen sponges as the vehicle as opposed<br />
to CaP composites.<br />
Organic matrix and bioactive molecules<br />
Osteoinduction can be accomplished by devitalized<br />
demineralised bone matrix (DBM) due to the presence<br />
of preserved active protein factors that could stimulate<br />
bone formation, mostly identified as BMPs and TGF-�.<br />
DBM is an allogenic approach that is broadly applied in<br />
orthopaedic surgery and appeared as a viable alternative to<br />
autologous bone graft. Canine DBM is now currently used<br />
in veterinary orthopaedics. DBM does not confer primary<br />
mechanical strength to the grafted tissue but can promote<br />
angiogenesis, osteoblastic differentiation and subsequent<br />
extra cellular matrix production through the local release<br />
of these soluble factors. The extracellular matrix in DBM<br />
is mostly collagenic and can support osteoconduction if the<br />
grafted matrix is not degraded too rapidly.<br />
Similarly, the association of an organic matrix with<br />
selected growth factors tends to confer on the resulting<br />
biomaterial osteoinductive properties. The combination<br />
of BMPs and collagen sponges reproduces the concept of<br />
DBM without the risk of immunogenicity from an allogenic<br />
matrix. Such a combination has been successfully used for<br />
bone union induction in both human and veterinary clinical<br />
situations but still have some limitations. According to a<br />
recent review in human literature, it seems that “the use<br />
of BMP for spinal fusion is unlikely to be cost-effective”<br />
and the induced biological effects, due to the local release<br />
of supraphysiological doses of BMP can result in either<br />
deleterious ectopic bone formation, particularly in spinal<br />
fusion surgery, or in the unexpected absence of bone<br />
formation in the treatment of non-unions.<br />
Tissue engineering for bone graft substitutes<br />
Bone tissue engineering usually associates matrix<br />
structures or scaffolds, osteoinductive or growth factors<br />
and osteogenic cells. The potential use of stem cells<br />
for cell therapy have provoked great interest and also<br />
controversy over the past 10 years in all the fields of<br />
regenerative medicine. In bone marrow two major and<br />
distinct stem cell types are found: the hematopoietic<br />
stem cells, producing blood cells and marrow stroma<br />
fibroblasts, and mesenchymal stem cells that have the<br />
capacity to differentiate into all connective tissue types,<br />
including bone, cartilage, fat, fibrous tissue, muscle<br />
and hematopoietic stroma. The high plasticity of MSC<br />
differentiation suggested their potential use to augment,<br />
replace or repair diseased or damaged tissues. MSCs have<br />
also demonstrated immunomodulatory properties with antiinflammatory<br />
and antiproliferative effects that have been<br />
investigated in some cancer treatments. MSCs can also<br />
be easily transduced with exogenous genes via plasmidic<br />
or viral infection that facilitates their investigation in<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 124 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
gene therapy strategies. Stem cells can be of various<br />
origins: MSCs from bone marrow (less than 0.01%), MSCs<br />
from adipose tissue (approximately 1%), MSCs from the<br />
embryonic chorion, circulating blood, synovium and other<br />
differentiated tissues. As associated growth factors, BMPs<br />
and angiogenic factors as VEGF have been thoroughly<br />
investigated. Concerning the associated cells, many clinical<br />
studies have now demonstrated the advantages of fresh<br />
harvested total bone marrow whereas many fundamental<br />
and animal studies focused on MSCs selected from bone<br />
marrow or adipose tissue and cultivated in vitro before<br />
being re-implanted. Unfortunately, despite promising<br />
results in pre-clinical animal models, such cell-based<br />
therapies have very limited clinical impact to date.<br />
Many surgeons have already experienced the efficacy<br />
of adding CaP bone graft substitutes to autologous blood,<br />
but only a few mechanisms of action have been proposed<br />
to explain it. In recent years, several studies went back<br />
to this relatively simple situation while proposing new<br />
mechanisms of action and biological explanations. The<br />
combination of autologous blood and CaP microparticles<br />
could bring interesting textural and biological features to<br />
the resulting composite that would avoid dispersion of<br />
the particles into the surrounding tissues. Moreover, this<br />
combination provides a moldable composite biomaterial<br />
with interconnected open porosity allowing free circulation<br />
of fluids and cells. A recent study has shown that the<br />
resulting composite exhibits osteogenic and osteoinductive<br />
properties. The size of the microparticles and the number<br />
of particles loaded into the blood clot are critical points. To<br />
some extent, an inflammatory reaction is required to initiate<br />
cell attraction and proliferation. Such an inflammatory<br />
reaction is part of the normal resorption-substitution<br />
process of CaP bone biomaterials, especially when used<br />
in particulate or granular forms. Osteogenic properties of<br />
blood clot associated to BCP particles may mostly result<br />
from the presence of monoculear cells, including osteoclast<br />
progenitors present within peripheral blood monocytic cells.<br />
Plasma clot/BCP microparticles composite may provide<br />
monocytes a favourable environment for osteoclastic<br />
differentiation, together with the production of proangiogenic<br />
and chemoattractant factors, and subsequent<br />
new bone apposition.<br />
Selected references<br />
1. Bajammal SS, Zlowodzki M, Lelwica A, Tornetta P 3rd,<br />
Einhorn TA, Buckley R, Leighton R, Russell TA, Larsson S,<br />
Bhandari M. The use of calcium phosphate bone cement in<br />
fracture treatment. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J<br />
Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1186-96.<br />
2. Balaguer T, Boukhechba F, Clavé A, Bouvet-Gerbettaz<br />
S, Trojani C, Michiels JF, Laugier JP, Bouler JM, Carle<br />
GF, Scimeca JC, Rochet N. Biphasic calcium phosphate<br />
microparticles for bone formation: benefits of combination<br />
with blood clot. Tissue Eng Part A 2010;16:3495-505.<br />
3. Bobyn JD, McKenzie K, Karabasz D, Krygier JJ, Tanzer<br />
M. Locally delivered bisphosphonate for enhancement of<br />
bone formation and implant fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am<br />
2009;91 Suppl 6:23-31.<br />
4. Espitalier F, Vinatier C, Lerouxel E, Guicheux J, Pilet P,<br />
Moreau F, Daculsi G, Weiss P, Malard O. A comparison<br />
between bone reconstruction following the use of<br />
mesenchymal stem cells and total bone marrow in<br />
association with calcium phosphate scaffold in irradiated<br />
bone. Biomaterials 2009;30:763-9.<br />
5. Fellah BH, Gauthier O, Weiss P, Chappard D, Layrolle P.<br />
Osteogenicity of biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics and<br />
bone autograft in a goat model. Biomaterials 2008;29:1177-<br />
1188.<br />
6. Field JR, McGee M, Stanley R, Ruthenbeck G,<br />
Papadimitrakis T, Zannettino A, Gronthos S, Itescu S. The<br />
efficacy of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells for the<br />
repair of an ovine tibial segmental defect. Vet Comp Orthop<br />
Traumatol 2011;24:113-21.<br />
7. Garrison KR, Donell S, Ryder J, Shemilt I, Mugford<br />
M, Harvey I, Song F. Clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness<br />
of bone morphogenetic proteins in the nonhealing<br />
of fractures and spinal fusion: a systematic review.<br />
Health Technol Assess 2007;11:1-150.<br />
8. Garrison KR, Shemilt I, Donell S, Ryder JJ, Mugford M,<br />
Harvey I, Song F, Alt V. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)<br />
for fracture healing in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev<br />
2010;(6):CD006950.<br />
9. Gauthier O, Bouler J-M, Aguado E, Pilet P and Daculsi<br />
G. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics:<br />
Influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity<br />
percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials 1998;19:133-<br />
139.<br />
10. Gauthier O, Bouler JM, Weiss P, Bosco J, Aguado E and<br />
Daculsi G. Short-term effects of mineral particle sizes on<br />
cellular degradation activity after implantation of injectable<br />
calcium-phosphate biomaterials and the consequences for<br />
bone substitution. Bone 1999;25:71S-74S.<br />
11. Hoffer MJ, Griffon DJ, Schaeffer DJ, Johnson AL, Thomas<br />
MW. Clinical applications of demineralized bone matrix: a<br />
retrospective and case-matched study of seventy-five dogs.<br />
Vet Surg 2008;37:639-47.<br />
12. Han D, Sun X, Zhang X, Tang T, Dai K. Ectopic osteogenesis<br />
by ex vivo gene therapy using beta tricalcium phosphate as<br />
a carrier. Connect Tissue Res. 2008;49:343-50.<br />
13. Innes JF, Myint P. Demineralised bone matrix in veterinary<br />
orthopaedics: a review. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol<br />
2010;23:393-9.<br />
14. Jurgens WJ, Oedayrajsingh-Varma MJ, Helder MN,<br />
Zandiehdoulabi B, Schouten TE, Kuik DJ, Ritt MJ, van<br />
Milligen FJ. Effect of tissue-harvesting site on yield of stem<br />
cells derived from adipose tissue: implications for cellbased<br />
therapies. Cell Tissue Res 2008;332:415-26.<br />
15. Kraus KH, Kirker-Head C. Mesenchymal stem cells and bone<br />
regeneration. Vet Surg 2006;35:232-42.<br />
16. Mouline CC, Quincey D, Laugier JP, Carle GF, Bouler JM,<br />
Rochet N, Scimeca JC. Osteoclastic differentiation of<br />
mouse and human monocytes in a plasma clot/biphasic<br />
calcium phosphate microparticles composite. Eur Cell Mater<br />
2010;20:379-92.<br />
17. Pioletti D, Gauthier O, Stadelmann VA, Bujoli B, Guicheux<br />
J, Zambelli PY, Bouler JM. Orthopedic implant used as drug<br />
delivery system: Clinical situation and state of the research.<br />
Current Drug Delivery 2008;5:59-63.<br />
18. Rabillard M, Grand JG, Dalibert E, Fellah B, Gauthier O,<br />
Niebauer GW. Effects of autologous platelet rich plasma gel<br />
and calcium phosphate biomaterials on bone healing in an<br />
ulnar ostectomy model in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol<br />
2009;22:460-466.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 125 small animal orthopaedic session
19. Russell TA, Leighton RK; Alpha-BSM Tibial Plateau Fracture<br />
Study Group. Comparison of autogenous bone graft<br />
and endothermic calcium phosphate cement for defect<br />
augmentation in tibial plateau fractures. A multicenter,<br />
prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am<br />
2008;90:2057-61.<br />
20. Spector DI, Keating JH, Boudrieau RJ. Immediate<br />
mandibular reconstruction of a 5 cm defect using<br />
rhBMP-2 after partial mandibulectomy in a dog. Vet Surg<br />
2007;36:752-9.<br />
21. Stadelmann VA, Gauthier O, Terrier A, Bouler JM and<br />
Pioletti DP. Implants delivery bisphosphonate locally<br />
increase periprosthetic bone density in an osteoporotic<br />
sheep model. A pilot study. Eur Cells Mater 2008;16:10-16.<br />
22. Tshamala M, van Bree H. Osteoinductive properties of the<br />
bone marrow-myth or reality. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol.<br />
2006;19:133-41.<br />
23. Viateau V, Guillemin G, Bousson V, Oudina K, Hannouche D,<br />
Sedel L, Logeart-Avramoglou D, Petite H. Long-bone criticalsize<br />
defects treated with tissue-engineered grafts: a study<br />
on sheep. J Orthop Res 2007;25:741-9<br />
24. Wong DA, Kumar A, Jatana S, Ghiselli G, Wong K.<br />
Neurologic impairment from ectopic bone in the lumbar<br />
canal: a potential complication of off-label PLIF/TLIF<br />
use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2). Spine J<br />
2008;8:1011-8.<br />
25. Yuan H, Fernandes H, Habibovic P, de Boer J, Barradas<br />
AM, de Ruiter A, Walsh WR, van Blitterswijk CA, de Bruijn<br />
JD. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative<br />
to autologous bone grafting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A<br />
2010;107:13614-9.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 126 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Delayed union and nonunion<br />
Dominique J Griffon*<br />
Western University of Health Sciences Michigan, USA<br />
Delayed union and nonunion of long bone fractures can<br />
lead to continued cycling of the implant, eventually leading<br />
to implant failure and inability for the bone to resume its<br />
normal roles.<br />
A delayed union is diagnosed when fracture healing<br />
is incomplete despite an adequate interval of time for<br />
complete healing of the fracture. In this situation, fracture<br />
healing is progressing, but at a much lower rate than<br />
expected for the given fracture configuration, type of<br />
fixation and age of the animal.<br />
A nonunion occurs when all healing repair processes<br />
have stopped, but osseous continuity has not been restored.<br />
This definition clinically implies a lack of progression<br />
of healing on serial radiographs. There is a fine line of<br />
distinction between delayed union and nonunion where<br />
an exact distinction cannot be made. Non-unions are<br />
sometimes defined as an absence of healing 6months after<br />
repair of the bone.<br />
Three main types of nonunion have been described based<br />
on the underlying cause:<br />
Vascular nonunions: These nonunions are capable of<br />
biologic repair and are classified according to the amount<br />
of callus present.<br />
• Hypertrophic (biologically active) usually have<br />
abundant hypervascular callus and are seen in an<br />
unstable fracture. They are often referred to as<br />
elephant foot and are often caused by implant<br />
failure, premature removal or excessive activity<br />
(Figure 1).<br />
• Mildly Hypertrophic (biologically active)<br />
usually have inadequate callus and mild sclerosis<br />
of the medullary cavity at the fracture site. They are<br />
often seen in association with rotational instability.<br />
• Oligotrophic (biologically active) have no<br />
visible callus, and the ends of the bone segments<br />
are sealed at the fracture site. Rounding of the<br />
ends of the long bone of the fracture is also seen.<br />
Unlike avascular nonunions, oligotrophic nonunions<br />
have fibrous tissue and blood vessels between the<br />
fragment edges and are still capable of a biologic<br />
response. Oligotrophic nonunions are usually<br />
seen when there is significant displacement of the<br />
fracture fragments.<br />
Avascular nonunions: These nonunions are less<br />
common and are associated with a disruption of the blood<br />
supply.<br />
Dystrophic: a secondary fragment has healed, but the<br />
main fragments are still unhealed and devoid of callous.<br />
It is usually characterized by poor vascularity to one or<br />
both sides of the fracture. A fracture gap is evident<br />
radiographically, and the fracture ends are rounded with<br />
sclerosis of the bone edges. This type of union is more<br />
common in geriatric patients.<br />
Necrotic: occurs in highly comminuted fractures in<br />
poorly vascularized areas (in horses, the cannon bone).<br />
In these cases, the major fragments eventually die or<br />
sequestra without becoming incorporated into the callus.<br />
These often occur with highly comminuted fractures,<br />
with disruption of the blood supply and severe soft tissue<br />
damage. Even though the fragments are anatomically<br />
reduced with no fracture gap after repair, the fragments<br />
are avascular and do not heal.<br />
Defect: result from loss of fragments at the time of injury<br />
or through resorption of a fragment. This causes a critical<br />
size defect that the callus cannot bridge.<br />
Atrophic nonunions: can be a result from the previous<br />
three types that progress through significant bone<br />
resorption and osteoporosis. These are characterized by<br />
loss of vascularity, resorption and rounding of fragment<br />
ends and osteoporosis (Figure 2).<br />
Etiology <strong>–</strong><br />
Understanding the underlying cause of delayed and non<br />
unions is a pre-requisite to establishing an appropriate<br />
treatment plan.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 127 small animal orthopaedic session
Local Factors<br />
1. Infection: This can occur from an open fracture or<br />
intraoperative contamination. Drainage, periosteal<br />
new bone formation and lucency around the<br />
implants are typical signs associated with infection.<br />
2. Inadequate immobilization. These are usually<br />
technical errors and involve the use of inappropriate<br />
implants for the fracture configuration (eg, pins<br />
in highly comminuted fractures, short plates or<br />
too short a glide hole in a lag screw placement).<br />
Insufficient immobilization exceeds the ability to<br />
form a bony bridge between fracture fragments in<br />
spite of excessive callus formation. Stress shielding<br />
leads to osteopenia and delayed formation of bone<br />
in the fracture gap.<br />
3. Lesions of adjacent soft-tissues: This issue<br />
has made minimally invasive fracture techniques<br />
popular. A large amount of soft tissue damage with<br />
an injury will delay fracture healing by disruption of<br />
peripheral blood supply.<br />
4. Osseous distraction: Experimental models of<br />
non-unions are based on the creation of a segmental<br />
bone defect 1.5 times the diaphyseal diameter<br />
(skeletally mature dog).<br />
5. Loss of bone stock: This factor was associated<br />
with the removal of avascular bone fragments<br />
during traditional open fracture management. The<br />
biological approach now recommended for the<br />
management of complex fractures decreases the<br />
likelihood of this complication.<br />
Host Factors<br />
These factors would include malnutrition, generalized<br />
metabolic or endocrine abnormalities, acute or chronic<br />
disease states, as well as concurrent treatments.<br />
The most common site for non-union in small<br />
animals is the distal radius in small breeds.<br />
Vascularity has been found decreased in this specific<br />
location and in these dogs, compared to larger breeds.<br />
These fractures are also frequently misconceived by<br />
veterinarians as simple fractures in light-weight animals,<br />
and treated with external coaptation. If both the radius and<br />
ulna are fractured, this management will inevitably lead to<br />
atrophic non-unions, with a high risk of cast sores and soft<br />
tissue injuries that may warrant amputation.<br />
Diagnosis<br />
<strong>Animals</strong> with delayed union or nonunion of fractures have<br />
persistent lameness with various degrees of instability. In<br />
cases of infected delayed union and nonunion, one or more<br />
draining fistulas can be seen. The true assessment of<br />
bone healing is obtained by serial radiographs (3 to<br />
6 weeks apart) using at least two views.<br />
The radiographic signs of delayed union include<br />
formation of periosteal and endosteal bridging callus with<br />
an open medullary cavity at the fracture site. Thus, changes<br />
indicative of bony union are present but are progressing at<br />
a slower pace than expected.<br />
The radiographic signs of nonunion include:<br />
• sclerosis of bone ends at the fracture site (evidence<br />
of sealing of the medullary cavity)<br />
• no bony progress or change over a 3-month period<br />
• progressive bowing at the fracture site<br />
• bone atrophy<br />
• excess callus around the fracture site with<br />
radiolucent lines in the callus itself<br />
Research focusing on new modalities for early diagnosis<br />
of delayed healing include focus on serum/urine markers<br />
of bone metabolism and nuclear scintigraphy.<br />
Management<br />
The management of delayed unions and nonunions is<br />
based on an understanding of the underlying cause:<br />
Noninfected delayed unions<br />
In the absence of infection, the decision making process<br />
is based on the assessment of implant stability and<br />
biological factors. Marked osteoporosis in the presence of a<br />
rigid implant may be a sign a stress shielding. Encouraging<br />
use of the limb may be enough to stimulate bone healing.<br />
Conversely, destabilization of the implant (for an external<br />
fixator for example) or replacement with an appropriately<br />
sized implant may be indicated. In other cases, additional<br />
external fixation or coaptation may be necessary. In these<br />
cases, increased callus typically suggests that fracture<br />
instability is present, justifying enforced rest. Adjunct<br />
fixation mau also be indicated.<br />
If a loose implant or malalignment is present, surgical<br />
revision is required. Loose implants can be removed,<br />
replaced or tightened, and cancellous bone graft can be<br />
placed around the fracture site.<br />
Noninfected Nonunions<br />
Viable nonunions are treated according to the type<br />
of nonunion; cases of hypertrophic nonunion should<br />
respond to rigid fixation. Usually, internal fixation is<br />
used, and just enough callus is removed to allow proper<br />
placement of the plate. In cases of mildly hypertrophic<br />
or oligotrophic nonunion, the ends of the fragment at the<br />
fracture can be sealed by endosteal callus. In these cases,<br />
opening of the medullary cavity followed by bone grafting<br />
and rigid fixation improve the chances of union.<br />
Nonviable nonunions are treated by removal of all<br />
necrotic and avascular bone, in conjunction with opening<br />
of the medullary cavity and bone grafting, followed by rigid<br />
fixation. A limited en bloc ostectomy and compression plate<br />
fixation is a viable option in cases of biologically inactive<br />
non-unions, as long as shortening of the limb does not<br />
exceed 20% of the original length of the bone.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 128 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Selected references<br />
• Blaeser LL, Gallagher JG, Boudrieau RJ: Treatment of<br />
biologically inactive nonunions by a limited en bloc<br />
ostectomy and compression plate fixation: A review of 17<br />
cases. Vet Surg 2003;32:91-100.<br />
• Cabenela ME: Open cancellous bone grafting of infected<br />
bone defect. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15:427-440.<br />
• Kesemenli CC, Subasi M. Arslan H, Necmioglu S.Kapukaya<br />
A: Treatment of humeral diaphyseal nonunions by<br />
interlocked nailing and autologous bone grafting. Acta<br />
Orthop Belg 2002;68(5):471-475.<br />
• Muir P: Distal antebrachial fractures in toy-breed dogs.<br />
Comp on Cont Ed for the Pract Vet 1997;19(2):137-145.<br />
• Robins GM, Eaton-Wells R, Johnson K: Customized<br />
hook plates for metaphyseal fractures, nonunions and<br />
osteotomies in the dog and cat. Vet Comp Ortho Traum<br />
19893;6(1):56-61.<br />
• Zhang B, Huang FG, Yang ZM: Application of autogenous<br />
bone grafting with vascular anastomosis in treatment of<br />
nonunion of fracture and bone defect. Zhongguo Xiu Fu<br />
Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2002;16(3):185-187.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 129 small animal orthopaedic session
Stimulation of bone healing. Commercially available<br />
products.<br />
O.Gauthier, DVM, PhD Prof.<br />
<strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery Department, ONIRIS College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Sciences and Engineering,<br />
Nantes, France.<br />
Many bone grafts substitutes are currently available<br />
on both human and veterinary orthopaedics, and several<br />
aspects must be considered before choosing one of them for<br />
a specific clinical application. Many of them demonstrated<br />
interesting properties during their development process<br />
that can differ from their final clinical use. Most of them<br />
can be qualified as osteoinductive materials, but the clinical<br />
interest of osteoinductivity remains controversial (why<br />
and how osteoinductivity could be useful for a bone graft<br />
substitute? How to reproduce it? What kind of currently<br />
available biomaterials can be qualified as ‘osteoinductive’?<br />
Is it clinically relevant?).<br />
Biological performances of bone graft substitutes can<br />
be related to many different factors such as:<br />
• Biological origin versus synthetic origin<br />
• Chemical composition: mineralised (Ca phosphates,<br />
Ca sulfates, Ca silicates, …) versus demineralised<br />
ou non-mineralised matrix; resorbability and<br />
biodegradability profile<br />
• Available form: granular form (what is the size<br />
of the particles?), massive form (can the block fit<br />
to the surgical site?); injectable paste or cement<br />
(what are the setting or hardening properties?) Is<br />
it ready-to-use or not (if not that implies that it may<br />
be prepared in the operating room)?<br />
• The porous architecture: what kind of porosity<br />
(micro and or macroporosity, interconnected, open,<br />
induced porosity?), what is the mean size of the<br />
pores, what is the percentage of porosity?<br />
• The recommended indications<br />
• The expected in vivo efficacy: what kind of biological<br />
properties can be expected (osteoconductivity,<br />
bioactivity, osteogenicity (if osteoprogenitor cells<br />
are present), osteoinductivity (does the biomaterial<br />
contain and release any growth factor?).<br />
This presentation will review most of the bone graft<br />
substitutes that are available on both human and veterinary<br />
markets. It will present their respective characteristics and<br />
biological properties and try to define their potential benefit<br />
for the veterinary patient.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 130 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Enhancing bone healing in practice<br />
Dominique J Griffon*<br />
Western University of Health Sciences Michigan, USA<br />
The management of fractures and bone defects is aimed<br />
at restoring the ability of bone to support physiological<br />
biomechanical loads prior to fatigue failure of surgical<br />
implants. Stimulating bone production may be applied to<br />
the management of fractures, nonunions, and osteomyelitis.<br />
Other orthopedic indications include limb lengthening,<br />
reconstructive procedures following tumor resection,<br />
arthrodeses, and osteointegration of joint replacement<br />
prostheses. The clinical use of these techniques actually<br />
extends beyond the field of orthopaedics to include<br />
periodontal, maxillofacial and neurosurgery. Much<br />
progress has been made simultaneously with our improved<br />
understanding of bone healing, leading to the elaboration<br />
of techniques targeting various factors involved in bone<br />
regeneration (Figure 1). In that context, clinicians dispose<br />
of a wide array of strategies to create a biomechanical and<br />
biological environment favourable to bone formation. The<br />
purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of<br />
the current trends in small animal orthopaedics, and their<br />
practical application in clinical cases.<br />
BONE REGENERATION<br />
Grafting techniques:<br />
Cells, Growth factors,<br />
Support<br />
Dynamisation, D.O.<br />
Surgical Stabilisation<br />
FRACTURE MOVEMENT<br />
FRACTURE MOVEMENT<br />
ANGIOGENESIS<br />
Healthy soft tissue bed<br />
Biological fixation<br />
Grafting techniques<br />
Figure 1: Diagram derived from Marsh and Li’s triad of<br />
interrelationships in the regenerative repair of fractures (Marsh<br />
& Li 1999). D.O.: Distraction osteogenesis. Support: gap filler<br />
and network for osteoprogenitor cells.<br />
The biomechanical environment was one of the first<br />
factors to be identified for its influence on bone healing,<br />
promoting the development of fracture fixation techniques.<br />
The concept of rigid internal fixation was first developed by<br />
AO to improve early return to function. Early weight bearing<br />
promotes biomechanical stimulation of bone healing and<br />
prevents disuse osteoporosis. Fracture fixation progressed<br />
toward semi-rigid fixation, encouraging callus formation<br />
and rapid gain of biomechanical strength within the fracture<br />
site. Semi rigid fixation is one of the most commonly applied<br />
strategies to accelerate normal bone healing in clinical<br />
cases. For example, this approach served as a rationale<br />
behind “elastic plating” of long bone fractures in immature<br />
patients. Other examples of biomechanical modifications to<br />
encourage bone formation include distraction osteogenesis<br />
and axial dynamization of long bone fractures.<br />
If the biomechanical environment dictates the type of<br />
bone repair, adequate blood supply is a prerequisite to<br />
bone healing. Promoting angiogenesis and preserving the<br />
vasculature surrounding the fracture site have become<br />
the center fold for encouraging bone healing in private<br />
practice. The concept of “biological fracture fixation”<br />
emphasizes the role of soft tissue integrity in fracture<br />
healing. In this context, surgical approach is minimized or<br />
eliminated, manipulation of fragments is avoided and the<br />
fracture hematoma is preserved. Consequently, implant<br />
designs have been modified to preserve extraosseous blood<br />
supply to the fractured bone. This approach is especially<br />
relevant to the management of comminuted fractures of<br />
the long bones, and is often combined with semi-rigid<br />
fixation. Plates have evolved toward a locking mechanism,<br />
eliminating the need for frictional contact between the<br />
plate and underlying cortex. The number of screws per bone<br />
segment is limited and the profile of these implants allow<br />
percutaneous placement. External fixators are designed<br />
to simplify frames and limit the number of pins required<br />
to achieve immobilization. Ring fixators limit soft tissue<br />
trauma through the use of tensioned wires. Closed external<br />
fixation is most relevant to the management of long bone<br />
fractures of the distal limbs. New instrumentation has been<br />
designed to improve interlocking nail fixation of the tibia,<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 131 small animal orthopaedic session
femur or humerus through percutaneous placement. Closed<br />
reduction and percutaneous fracture fixation techniques<br />
are therefore expanding in human as well as veterinary<br />
orthopaedics. Biophysical alternatives to enhance<br />
fracture repair involve the use of low-intensity pulsed<br />
ultrasonography, electrical stimulation and extracorporeal<br />
shock-waves (orthotripsy). Although their mechanisms<br />
of action remain somewhat unclear, these techniques<br />
have been used in man to obtain healing of non-unions,<br />
accelerate normal fracture healing and increase healing<br />
rates in patients considered at risk for non-union, such as<br />
diabetics. Some experimental data is available concerning<br />
the effects of these techniques in dogs and their clinical<br />
use is emerging in veterinary orthopedics.<br />
Bone grafting remains one of the most traditional<br />
methods to stimulate bone formation. Fresh autogenous<br />
grafts are still considered a “golden standard” to which<br />
other osteoproductive agents are compared, and remain<br />
the most common type of grafts in private practices<br />
worldwide. Indeed, autogenous bone is the most effective<br />
material in promoting rapid healing; compared with<br />
other materials, it provides viable cells while avoiding<br />
immune reactions and disease transmission. One of the<br />
shortcomings of autogenous cancellous graft consists of its<br />
lack of biomechanical strength, which precludes its use as a<br />
structural graft. Although complications have been reported<br />
after harvesting of autograft in dogs, their incidence has not<br />
been determined. In humans, the morbidity rate associated<br />
with the collection of augenous bone approaches 25%,<br />
with major complications occuring in 3 to 4 % of patients.<br />
Complications include pain, sepsis, stress fractures, intraoperative<br />
blood loss, increased surgical time and limited<br />
supply. Concerns with limited availability and associated<br />
complications have prompted the search for bone graft<br />
substitutes. One strategy is to identify a single purified<br />
molecule, which could ultimately be confirmed as the<br />
agent of choice for clinical promotion of bone healing<br />
and regeneration, for example, bone morphogenic protein<br />
(BMP). More than 13 BMPs have been identified. Synthetic<br />
agents do not carry any risk of disease but do not contain the<br />
optimal mixture of growth factors naturally present in bonederived<br />
products. Although rh-BMP2 has recently been<br />
clinically applied in dogs, the cost of these preparations<br />
remains prohibitive for the veterinary market.Another<br />
strategy is to identify an optimal mixture of bone growth<br />
agents, either concocted from purified agents, or generated<br />
biologically as the product of a tissue or a cultured cell, such<br />
as demineralized bone matrix. Demineralized bone matrix<br />
(DBM) is the most common source of partially purified boneinducing<br />
factors used in human patients. Demineralized<br />
bone matrix provides osteoconduction with the collagen<br />
network naturally present in bone, and osteoinduction by<br />
the inherent BMPs liberated during demineralization. The<br />
processing of commercial canine DBM allograft including<br />
removal of the periosteum, cartilage, and bone marrow,<br />
and freezing have been shown to reduce immune reactions.<br />
Frozen canine DBM has been commercialized in the United<br />
States in 1 and 3cc units since 1996 and is now available<br />
as a freeze dried product. We have previously published a<br />
retrospective and case-match study in which healing rate<br />
and complications were similar in dogs with fractures,<br />
arthrodesis and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy grafted<br />
with DBM (and cancellous allograft chips) compared<br />
to autogenous cancellous graft. We have since used<br />
demineralized bone matrix instead of autogenous grafts in<br />
any procedure with normal bone regenerative properties.<br />
The main limitations of DBM consist in its origin (risk of<br />
disease transmission) and lack of injectability. Numerous<br />
synthetic agents have become commercially available for<br />
clinical application in small animals. The majority consist of<br />
osteoconductive materials. The majority of these products<br />
cost a price similar to that of DBM but does not provide<br />
osteoinductivity. Other limitations vary with products, but<br />
include brittleness, slow resorption of a radio-opaque<br />
material (affecting the assessment of bone healing) or<br />
excessive degradation rate. Calcium sulfate agents can<br />
however be impregnated with antibiotics, acting as<br />
adjuncts for local therapy of infected bone defects.<br />
The wide therapeutic range now offered may pose a<br />
dilemma for clinicians: while it provides more freedom to<br />
optimize treatment modality for individual cases, it also<br />
complicates the decision-making process for orthopedic<br />
surgeons. A rational attitude towards solving this issue<br />
should be based on an assessment of the factors affecting<br />
bone healing (Figure 1). Understanding which factor(s)<br />
are deficient in a given patient determines the criteria for<br />
selecting a therapeutic strategy. The most popular strategy<br />
to stimulate healing of complex fractures in practice<br />
focuses on preserving surrounding soft tissues, while<br />
providing a biomechanical environment enhancing indirect<br />
bone healing. Bone grafting has become more relevant<br />
to the management of arthrodeses or complications of<br />
bone healing (large bone defects, non-unions, malunions,<br />
delayed unions), especially when the treatment requires<br />
surgical exposure of the lesion. Future research efforts<br />
may lead to the development of injectable agents that<br />
may further accelerate the healing of fractures treated<br />
percutaneously or allow minimally invasive treatment of<br />
delayed healing.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 132 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Selected references:<br />
• De Long WG Jr, Einhorn TA, Koval K, et al. Bone grafts and<br />
bone graft substitutes in orthopaedic trauma surgery. A<br />
critical analysis. J.Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 649<strong>–</strong>658.<br />
• Drosos GI, Kazakos KI, Kouzoumpasis P, et al.Safety and<br />
efficacy of commercially available demineralised bone<br />
matrix preparations: a critical reviewof clinical studies.<br />
Injury 2007; 38 Suppl 4:S13<strong>–</strong>21.<br />
• Ferguson JF: Fracture of the humerus after cancellous bone<br />
graft harvesting in a dog. J <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract 37:232-234,<br />
1996.<br />
• Griffon DJ: Fracture healing, in Johnson AJ, Houlton JE,<br />
Vannini R (eds): AO principles of fracture management<br />
in the dog and cat. Clavadelerstrasse, Switzerland, AO<br />
Publishing, 2005, pp73-97.<br />
• Ham K, Griffon DJ, Seddighi M, Johnson AL. Clinical<br />
application of tobramycin impregnated calcium sulfate<br />
beads in six dogs (2002-2004). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc<br />
2008, 44(6):320-326.<br />
• Hoffer M, Griffon D, Schaeffer D, Johnson AL, Thomas<br />
M. Clinical Applications of Demineralized Bone Matrix:A<br />
Retrospective and Case-Matched Study of 75 Dogs.<br />
Veterinary Surgery 2008;37(7):639-647<br />
• Hudson CC, Pozzi A, Lewis DD. Minimally invasive plate<br />
osteosynthesis: applications and techniques in dogs and<br />
cats. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009;22: 175<strong>–</strong>182.<br />
• Kraus KH, Kirker-Head C. Mesenchymal stem cells and bone<br />
regeneration. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 232<strong>–</strong>242.<br />
• Patterson TE, Kumagai K, Griffith L, et al. Cellular strategies<br />
for enhancement of fracture repair. JBone Joint Surg Am<br />
2008; 90: 111<strong>–</strong>119.<br />
• Pozzi A, Lewis D. Surgical approaches for minimally<br />
invasive plate osteosynthesis in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop<br />
Traumatol 2009; 22: 316<strong>–</strong>320.<br />
• Ragetly GR, Griffon DJ: The rationale behind novel bone<br />
grafting techniques in small animals. Vet Comp Orthop<br />
Traumatol 2011;24(1):1-8.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 133 small animal orthopaedic session
<strong>Small</strong> animals<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Neurosurgery: lumbosacral<br />
disease<br />
Saturday July 9<br />
16.30 <strong>–</strong> 17.45
small animal orthopaedic session 136 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Lumbosacral disease (LS): an update on diagnostic<br />
imaging techniques<br />
I. Gielen, K. Kromhout, H. van Bree*<br />
Department of Medical Imaging & <strong>Small</strong> Animal Orthopaedics, Veterinary Faculty, Ghent University<br />
What is lumbosacral (LS) disease?<br />
Pathological conditions of the ligaments, bony structures<br />
and the intervertebral disc may narrow the diameter of the<br />
spinal canal and the intervertebral foramina, which affect<br />
the spinal roots enclosed with the remnant epidural space.<br />
This may lead to a clinical neurological dysfunction known<br />
as the cauda equina syndrome. The L7-S1 disc is the largest<br />
disc and may undergo a fibrinoid degeneration (Hansen<br />
type II disc degeneration) which usually occurs in large<br />
breeds. Lumbosacral disease (cauda equina syndrome or<br />
LS syndrome) is characterised by narrowing of the vertebral<br />
canal and/or the intervertebral foramina in the lumbosacral<br />
area, with compression of the nerve roots that form the<br />
cauda equina and includes affections of any component<br />
of the LS joint (cauda equina compression):<br />
• Degeneration of the intervertebral disc between<br />
the last lumbar vertebra and the sacrum (LS disc):<br />
• bulging (protrusion).<br />
• rupture (extrusion).<br />
• Instability and misalignment between the last<br />
lumbar vertebra and the sacrum.<br />
• Proliferations of bony or soft tissues around the<br />
LS-joint.<br />
• Lumbosacral osteochondrosis (OCD) of the end plate<br />
of either the sacrum or L7 vertebra.<br />
• Abnormalities in the shape of the vertebrae as a<br />
congenital problem.<br />
While some dogs might have only one type of these<br />
diseases, many dogs will have a combination of several<br />
of these problems. Lumbosacral disease commonly affects<br />
middle aged or older large breed dogs. The precise nature of<br />
these problems depends on which nerves are compressed,<br />
and the severity and duration of compression. Working and<br />
sporting breeds of dogs, particularly German Shepherd<br />
Dogs, are predisposed. Instability is believed to play a<br />
major role in LS disease in dogs and humans.<br />
How is LS disease diagnosed?<br />
A detailed and thorough clinical examination is essential,<br />
as the symptoms can be very similar to those seen with<br />
other diseases, including hip dysplasia and other lower back<br />
problems. Clinical suspicion of lumbosacral disease can<br />
be confirmed with diagnostic imaging, but even the most<br />
advanced diagnostic imaging techniques may not always<br />
provide a definitive answer.<br />
Possible imaging techniques?<br />
Plain radiography:<br />
Lateral and ventrodorsal radiographs are the initial steps<br />
in evaluating lumbosacral disease. Survey radiography is<br />
only diagnostic in conditions that involve bony destruction<br />
or displacement (including discospondylitis, osseous<br />
neoplasia, traumatic fracture and subluxation, sacral<br />
endplate osteochondrosis and idiopathic lumbosacral<br />
stenosis), or it can identify predisposing factors to<br />
degenerative LS stenosis such as OCD and transitional<br />
vertebrae. Indirect evidence of degenerative lumbosacral<br />
stenosis (e.g. spondylosis deformans, disc space narrowing,<br />
vacuum phenomenon indicating disc rupture, end plate<br />
sclerosis and transitional vertebrae) is frequently present<br />
on survey radiographs. These findings suggest, but do not<br />
confirm, the diagnosis and they may occur in clinically<br />
normal dogs. Spondylosis may be a benign radiographic<br />
change and is often present in asymptomatic dogs. However,<br />
(non-bridging) lumbosacral spondylosis in the presence of<br />
the cauda equina syndrome is considered to be highly<br />
suggestive of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. Dogs<br />
with type II disk disease may have radiographic changes<br />
associated with spondylosis that are more apparent<br />
than those in other dogs. When survey radiographs are<br />
suggestive for lumbosacral instability, this can be confirmed<br />
by stressed views including flexion and extension views.<br />
The greatest limitation of survey radiography is that,<br />
although degenerative changes involving adjacent bony<br />
structures are visible on radiographs, the cauda equina<br />
itself cannot be visualized and evaluation of the exact<br />
neural compression is impossible.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 137 small animal orthopaedic session
Contrast radiography:<br />
Because clinical signs of lumbosacral disease are usually<br />
the result of soft tissue compression of the cauda equina,<br />
contrast radiography may help to give a definitive diagnosis.<br />
Myelography involves the injection of contrast medium<br />
into the subarachnoid space and allows evaluation of the<br />
spinal cord cranial to the LS region and thus may help rule<br />
out other diseases. However, it may be of limited value in<br />
the evaluation of the cauda equina in large dogs, whose<br />
dural sac usually ends before the LS junction. Stressed<br />
views (flexion and extension) improve the diagnostic<br />
sensitivity of myelography. A normal myelographic study<br />
does not rule out LS disease.<br />
Epidurography, discography and also intraosseous<br />
venography are probably unreliable techniques. Results<br />
are therefore confusing and both false positive and false<br />
negative conclusions can be reached.<br />
Epidurography involves the injection of contrast medium<br />
into the epidural space and is performed in patients<br />
under general anaesthesia and usually does not require<br />
fluoroscopy. Epidurography is easier to perform than<br />
myelography and has less morbidity but is not very reliable.<br />
Epidurographic findings include elevation of the epidural<br />
space, total obstruction to cranial flow of contrast medium,<br />
concomitant filling of the epidural space and vertebral<br />
venous sinuses as well as extravasation of contrast<br />
material into adjacent soft tissue adjacent to the injection<br />
site. The disadvantage is that filling of the epidural space<br />
may be incomplete, because this space is poorly defined<br />
and irregular. Flexed and extended views of the LS joint<br />
during epidurography may accentuate a compressive lesion.<br />
Discography involves the injection of contrast medium<br />
into the intervertebral disc. Normally, it is difficult or<br />
impossible to inject a small amount of contrast medium into<br />
the nucleus pulposis. When contrast medium can easily be<br />
injected into the disc, and lateral and ventrodorsal views<br />
show extensive spreading of contrast medium within the<br />
disc, this is indirect evidence for a Hansen type II disc<br />
degeneration. Discography is not often performed, as it<br />
can damage a normal intervertebral disc.<br />
Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance<br />
Imaging (MRI):<br />
Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance<br />
imaging (MRI) are probably the diagnostic procedures of<br />
choice. Their main advantage is that they make it possible<br />
to evaluate structures that cannot be visualised completely<br />
with conventional radiography, such as the lateral recesses,<br />
intervertebral foramen and articular processes. These two<br />
imaging techniques avoid superposition of the surrounding<br />
bony structures, which is a major disadvantage of<br />
radiography. Both techniques require general anaesthesia,<br />
although the examination time during MRI is much longer<br />
than that during CT.<br />
CT is especially useful in patients with cauda equina<br />
syndrome in which radiographic findings are negative<br />
and in patients that demonstrate a profound unilateral<br />
lameness due to spinal nerve root compression. CT provides<br />
bone detail superior to that seen with MRI, and soft tissue<br />
contrast superior to that of conventional radiography.<br />
Specific CT findings suggestive of degenerative lumbosacral<br />
stenosis are obliteration of the spinal canal by disc<br />
protrusion (central or unilaterally left or right), dorsal<br />
displacement of the dorsal sac and spinal nerve roots,<br />
swelling of the spinal nerve roots and hypodense spots<br />
(vacuum phenomenon) in the intervertebral disc indicating<br />
disc rupture. In addition, CT allows assessment of the<br />
articular facets, pedicles and the intervertebral foramina<br />
(Figure 1). It allows visualisation of individual nerve roots<br />
because of the contrast provided by the epidural fat. It may<br />
rule out diseases producing similar symptoms, like nerve<br />
root tumours or discospondylitis. The use of intravenous<br />
contrast is always indicated. The images should be read in<br />
both a bone and a soft tissue window. Another advantage<br />
of CT versus MRI is a greater ability to discriminate<br />
between bone and calcified soft tissue structures versus<br />
gas opacities. Reconstructions in the dorsal and sagittal<br />
plane can be very useful, and a positional CT protocol that<br />
includes flexion and extension scans of L7-S1 can be used<br />
for quantifying dynamic changes in dogs with LS disease.<br />
Facet subluxation may be visible using a bone window or<br />
3D reconstructions. In a study evaluating canine LS stenosis<br />
using intravenous contrast-enhanced CT, the positive<br />
predictive values for compressive soft tissues involving<br />
the dorsal canal, ventral canal and lateral recesses were<br />
83%, 100%, and 81%, respectively.<br />
Figure 1: Transverse CT image of the lumbosacral intervertebral<br />
disk space in a dog with spondylosis deformans. The<br />
degenerative changes and spurs at the level of the left and<br />
right intervertebral foramina, causing compression on the<br />
nerve roots, can be appreciated.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 138 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Advantages of MRI versus CT and radiography include:<br />
greater soft tissue contrast; excellent visualization of nerve<br />
roots, intervertebral discs, and ligaments; detection of disc<br />
degeneration (Figure 2); lack of ionizing radiation; and ability<br />
to acquire images in multiple planes. A disadvantage is the<br />
prolonged examination time requiring long anaesthesia.<br />
Here as well, the use of contrast medium (paramagnetic)<br />
may be indicated to better delineate the process.<br />
Figure 2: Sagittal T2-weighted, MR image, showing<br />
lumbosacral compression. The intervertebral disc between L7<br />
and is protruding into the vertebral canal, compressing the<br />
nerves, as they pass through. Loss of signal intensity in the<br />
L7-sacral disc indicates disc degeneration.<br />
MRI studies concluded that the predominant feature of<br />
the degenerative cases was disc-associated disease. The<br />
technique demonstrates this fact clearly, suggesting a<br />
sequence of disc degeneration and dehydration followed<br />
by nuclear fragmentation and then disc protrusion (Hansen<br />
type II). MRI is also sensitive for defining other disease<br />
processes, such as neoplastic disease, that might confound<br />
the diagnosis.<br />
However, in one study, no correlation was found between<br />
severity of the clinical signs and the severity of cauda<br />
equine compression as assessed by MRI. In humans, it<br />
has been proposed that MRI may lead to over-diagnosis<br />
of disc disease, because many people without back pain<br />
have disc bulges or protrusions on MR imaging. The<br />
results of one comparative study to assess the extent of<br />
agreement among CT, MRI, and surgical findings in dogs<br />
with degenerative LS stenosis indicate that there is a high<br />
degree of agreement between CT and MRI findings but<br />
that the degree of agreement between diagnostic imaging<br />
findings and surgical findings is lower.<br />
Inconsistency between disc abnormalities and clinical<br />
signs must be considered, and the diagnosis should always<br />
be based on clinical examination in addition to diagnostic<br />
imaging.<br />
The relevance of measuring the lumbosacral step and the<br />
lumbosacral canal ratio is still controversial and should be<br />
investigated further.<br />
Additional reading<br />
• Barthez PY, Morgan JP, Lipsitz D (1994) Discography and<br />
epidurography for evaluation of the lumbosacral junction<br />
in dogs with cauda equina syndrome. Veterinary Radiology<br />
and Ultrasound 35, 152-157.<br />
• De Risio L, Thomas WB, Sharp NJ (2000) Degenerative<br />
lumbosacral stenosis. Veterinary Clinics of North America<br />
<strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 30, 111-132.<br />
• Jones JC, Cartee RE, Bartels JE. (1995) Computed<br />
tomographic anatomy of the canine lumbosacral spine. Vet<br />
Radiol Ultrasound 36, 91-99.<br />
• Jones JC, Shires PK, Inzana KD, et al. (1999). Evaluation of<br />
canine lumbosacral stenosis using intravenous contrast-<br />
enhanced computed tomography. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 40,<br />
108-114.<br />
• Jones JC, Davies SE, Werre SR, et al. (2008) Effects of body<br />
position and clinical signs on L7-S1 intervertebral foraminal<br />
area and lumbosacral angle in dogs with lumbosacral<br />
disease as measured via computed tomography. Am J Vet<br />
Res 69, 1446<strong>–</strong>1454.<br />
• Lang J, Häni H, Schawalder P (1992) A sacral lesion<br />
resembling osteochondrosis in the German Shepherd Dog.<br />
Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound 33, 69-76.<br />
• Levine GJ, Levine JM, Walker MA, et al. (2006) Evaluation<br />
of the association between spondylosis deformans and<br />
clinical signs of intervertebral disk disease in dogs: 172<br />
cases (1999<strong>–</strong>2000). J Am Vet Med Assoc 228, 96<strong>–</strong>100.<br />
• Morgan JP, Bahr A, Franti CE, Bailey CS (1993) Lumbosacral<br />
transitional vertebrae as a predisposing cause of cauda<br />
equina syndrome in German shepherd dogs: 161 cases<br />
(1987-1990). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical<br />
Association 202, 1877-1882.<br />
• Morgan JP, Bailey CS (1990) Cauda equina syndrome in<br />
the dog: Radiographic evaluation. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal<br />
Practice 31, 69-77.<br />
• Ramirez O, 3rd, Thrall DE. (1998) A review of imaging<br />
techniques for canine cauda equina syndrome. Vet Radiol<br />
Ultrasound 39, 283-296.<br />
• Schmid V, Lang J (1993) Measurements on the lumbosacral<br />
junction in normal dogs and those with cauda equina<br />
compression. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 34, 437-442.<br />
• Selcer BA, Chambers JN, Schwensen K, Mahaffey MB<br />
(1988) Epidurography as a Diagnostic Aid in canine<br />
Lumbosacral Compressive Disease. Veterinary and<br />
Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2, 97-103.<br />
• Suwankong N, Voorhout G, Hazewinkel H, Meij B (2006)<br />
Agreement between computed tomography, magnetic<br />
resonance imaging, and surgical findings in dogs with<br />
degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc<br />
229, 1924<strong>–</strong>1929.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 139 small animal orthopaedic session
Lumbosacral spine: surgical decision making<br />
Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />
Higham Gobion, Herts, United Kingdom<br />
Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) is a<br />
relatively common disorder affecting the L7-S1 joint,<br />
mainly in large breed and middle-aged to older dogs.<br />
Labrador retrievers, Border Collies and German Shepherd<br />
Dogs seem overrepresented, with a male to female<br />
ratio of approximately 2:1. DLSS is characterized by<br />
different degenerative changes that can occur alone or in<br />
combination, such as spondylosis, disc protrusion, vertebral<br />
instability, ligament hypertrophy etc.; those changes<br />
contribute in differing degrees to determine vertebral canal<br />
and/or foraminal stenosis and subsequent compression/<br />
damage/ impingement of the conus medullaris and/or the<br />
cauda equina nerve roots. DLSS is sometimes wrongly<br />
used interchangebly with the term “cauda equina syndrome<br />
(CES)”: the latter describes sensory and/or motor neural<br />
dysfunction that results from compression, inflammation<br />
or destruction of the cauda equina nerve roots; therefore,<br />
any disease affecting the caudal lumbar and sacral<br />
vertebrae (less commonly the coccygeal vertebrae) can<br />
potentially lead to CES. On the basis of this statement,<br />
DLSS represents only one of the causes of CES.<br />
Diagnosis and treatment options are still a matter of<br />
debate and therefore controversy exists in the veterinary<br />
world. Correct clinical understanding and localization of the<br />
neurological problem is a critical first step in establishing<br />
a diagnostic protocol; moreover, most of the diseases that<br />
may mimic a lumbosacral (L-S) disorder such as orthopedic<br />
diseases (e.g., arthritis, hip dysplasia, and cranial cruciate<br />
ligament disease) need to be ruled out.<br />
Several diagnostic tools have been described in the<br />
past to diagnose DLSS, such as electromyography (EMG),<br />
x-ray, myelography, epidurography and discography;<br />
however, nowadays computed tomography (CT) and<br />
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) seem to represent the<br />
best imaging modality to investigate the L-S area. The<br />
main goals of CT and MRI should be firstly to show the<br />
degenerative changes and neural structure compression/<br />
damage in order to reach the correct diagnosis and<br />
secondly, though just as importantly, to guide the clinician<br />
towards the correct therapeutic decision. Finally, it is<br />
important to emphasise that CT and MRI should always<br />
be interpreted in light of the clinical findings, as clinically<br />
normal patients may show abnormal CT or MRI findings.<br />
Conservative treatment (i.e., restricted exercise and<br />
pain management) has been reported as an alternative to<br />
surgery, even though little data are available to definitively<br />
establish this modality and its effectiveness. In one study,<br />
injection of methylprednisolone sodium acetate into the<br />
lumbosacral epidural space resulted in clinical improvement<br />
in about 80% and complete resolution of signs in more<br />
than half of the affected dogs; nevertheless, further<br />
investigations are necessary to definitely establish the real<br />
efficacy of this therapeutic method.<br />
Surgical therapy represents so far the treatment of choice<br />
in the vast majority of patients affected by DLSS, especially<br />
in case of failure of conservative management, severe pain,<br />
and moderate to severe neurologic deficits. Quite a wide<br />
variety of surgical procedures have been reported to treat<br />
DLSS: dorsal decompression, discectomy, facetectomy,<br />
foraminotomy, and fixation-fusion. As previously stated, the<br />
choice should be based on the clinical and imaging findings.<br />
Survey radiography is useful to rule out other causes of<br />
CES (e.g., vertebral neoplasms and discospondylitis, Fig.<br />
1), concurrent abnormalities which include osteochondrosis<br />
(OCD) of the sacral end plate and transitional vertebrae<br />
(LSTV), but it is particularly essential (though controversy<br />
still exists) to assess for possible underlying instability<br />
of the LS junction, mainly by evaluating stress x-rays<br />
(extension and flexion). Instability/subluxation of the L-S<br />
articulation needs to be surgically addressed by dorsal<br />
stabilization techniques whenever it is clinically and/or<br />
radiographically suspected. Instability of L-S joint may<br />
occasionally be the only evident finding or it may represent<br />
a single part of a more complex DLSS, so further crosssectional<br />
imaging is necessary. CT, thanks to its bone<br />
resolution, may be complementary to radiography, to better<br />
define LSTV and OCD lesions for example; both these<br />
conditions predispose the L-S joint to degenerative changes<br />
and usually lead to DLSS earlier in a dog’s life. CT also<br />
shows spondylosis, narrowed vertebral canal, thickened<br />
articular processes, and osteophyte formation of articular<br />
processes and subsequent narrowing of the intervertebral<br />
foramina. Thorough evaluation of the foramina is mandatory<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 140 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
in CES patients, and it may require a MRI scan. The latter,<br />
thanks to its superiority in soft tissue resolution and due<br />
to the possibility of acquiring images on multiple spatial<br />
planes, is commonly very helpful for assessing the foramen<br />
and the nerve root through the foramen itself (Fig. 2). In<br />
the situation of a pure foraminal stenosis, for example<br />
resulting from a lateralized disc protrusion, fibrous tissue<br />
and/or osteophyte formation, facetectomy or foraminotomy<br />
are the treatment of choice. Facetectomy is rarely used as<br />
the only decompressive procedure and it is more commonly<br />
associated with dorsal laminectomy instead. However,<br />
this association is more likely to weaken/destabilize the<br />
L-S joint, so foraminotomy is preferred to facetectomy.<br />
Degeneration and protrusion of L7-S1 intervertebral disc is<br />
definitely the most common finding in DLSS: when present<br />
it usually causes compression and dorsal displacement of<br />
the cauda equina nerve roots and/or the conus medullaris.<br />
Decompression via a dorsal laminectomy and partial<br />
discectomy, is the first recommended treatment to relieve<br />
the compression, especially when it is along the midline.<br />
In case of lumbosacral OCD, it is also possible to remove<br />
the bone fragment and to debride the nerve roots from the<br />
newly-formed fibrous tissue, via the same dorsal approach.<br />
Hypertrophy of the interarcuate ligament not uncommonly<br />
contributes to determine lumbosacral stenosis and<br />
compression of the neural structures: removal of the<br />
interarcuate ligament is generally performed as part of<br />
the dorsal laminectomy.<br />
Note that all the decompressive procedures, especially<br />
when perfomed together (e.g., dorsal laminectomy and<br />
facetectomy) and/or in heavy and particularly active<br />
dogs, might enhance or predispose to L-S instability and<br />
subluxation; additional dorsal stabilization should then be<br />
considered to prevent dramatic consequences.<br />
Fig. 1: Radiographic appearance of severe L7-S1<br />
dyscospondylitis<br />
Fig. 2: Transvrese T2 WI: unilateral foraminal stenosis<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 141 small animal orthopaedic session
Lumbosacral spine: decompression and stabilisation<br />
Christian Falzone, DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />
Higham Gobion, Herts, United Kingdom<br />
Once the correct diagnosis has been made, compression<br />
of the neural structures and/or instability of the L-S region<br />
should be surgically addressed using the most appropriate<br />
techniques.<br />
Dorsal laminectomy and discectomy<br />
Laminectomy at the lumbosacral junction classically<br />
consists of removal of the spinous processes and then<br />
dorsal lamina of L7 and S1: more recently a technique<br />
(possibly less destabilizing) consisting of removal of<br />
just the S1 lamina has been reported, with encouraging<br />
preliminary results. The articular facet joints should<br />
be preserved in order to prevent post-operative spinal<br />
instability. Dorsal laminectomy allows good visualisation<br />
of the cauda equina, L7-S1 dorsal annulus, articular<br />
processes and surrounding tissues (Fig. 3). Meticulous<br />
positioning of the patient is quite important, as different<br />
positions can modify the L-S anatomy: for example, pulling<br />
the back legs forward may widen the interarcuate space<br />
and the dorsal annulus, facilitating the visualization of the<br />
neural structures and relieving the compression in this<br />
region; however, subsequent flexion of the L-S joint might<br />
predispose to subluxation and should therefore be avoided<br />
if L-S instability is radiographically suspected or should<br />
otherwise be kept in mind when stabilization is perfomed.<br />
Discectomy (also referred to partial discectomy or dorsal<br />
fenestration) is usually performed in association with<br />
dorsal laminectomy, as it may provide additional benefit<br />
in all those patients in which the protruded intervertebral<br />
disc causes significant cauda equina compression. The<br />
nerve roots are gently retracted to each side in turn, to<br />
allow for adequate discectomy but also to visualise/asses<br />
the underlying structures, such as the L7 nerve root in its<br />
lateral recess and as it enters the intervertebral foramen.<br />
Finally, when other degenerative changes are present in<br />
association with a bulging disc (e.g. juxtafacet cysts, OCD,<br />
etc.), they may be properly visualized and then removed via<br />
a dorsal laminectomy.<br />
Prognosis is generally good following dorsal laminectomy,<br />
with a long term improvement being approximately 80%;<br />
the severity and duration of the clinical signs (e.g. urinary<br />
and/or faecal incontinence > 8 weeks) have a negative<br />
prognostic value, therefore surgery should be encouraged<br />
at an earlier stage.<br />
Foraminotomy and Facetectomy<br />
Compression/entrapment of the nerve root either due<br />
to soft tissue or bony enlargement at the level of the<br />
intervertebral foramina may occur and decompression can<br />
be achieved by partial removal of the pedicle cranial to the<br />
neuroforamen or via facetectomy. The latter is generally<br />
no longer recommended if bilateral decompression is<br />
necessary or if it is combined with other decompressive<br />
surgery such as a dorsal laminectomy, as spinal instability<br />
may be a serious post operative complication. Alternatively,<br />
stabilisation should be considered.<br />
Three different surgical techniques have been described<br />
to performing a foraminotomy. These include an endoscopicassisted,<br />
a lateral and a transiliac approach.<br />
1) An arthroscope placed in a caudal L7 dorsal<br />
laminectomy defect has been experimentally used in<br />
normal dogs to achieve widening of the neuroforamen:<br />
the technique allowed a reasonably good enlargement of<br />
the L-S foramina and no major/long-term complications<br />
have been observed; however, a 12 week post-op CT exam,<br />
showed that some reduction of the foraminal enlargement<br />
occurs due to soft tissue and/or new enchondral bone<br />
formation, though there was no association between<br />
foraminal area and clinical signs.<br />
2) A lateral approach was reported unilaterally or<br />
bilaterally, alone or in combination with dorsal laminectomy,<br />
with good surgical exposure/ decompression of the nerve<br />
root and a very good outcome.<br />
3) A cadaveric study has demonstrated the accessibility<br />
to the lumbosacral area via a transiliac approach: this<br />
approach allows a lateral exposure of the L7<strong>–</strong>S1 disk and<br />
foramen and could be used to perform a lateral corpectomy<br />
and foraminotomy, though further studies are necessary<br />
to evaluate the clinical efficacy and consequences of a<br />
transiliac approach in dogs with signs of lumbosacral<br />
disease.<br />
small animal orthopaedic session 142 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Dorsal Fusion-Fixation<br />
Theoretically, everytime a spinal instability is suspected,<br />
whether as a primary component of the CES or as a<br />
secondary post-operative complication, stabilization<br />
of the L-S joint should be performed. Considering the<br />
possible ventral displacement or telescoping of the<br />
sacrum relative to L7, a distraction-fusion technique has<br />
also been advocated as the sole technique for treatment<br />
of some cases of lumbosacral disc disease. However,<br />
clear indications for stabilisation are lacking. Generally<br />
speaking, distraction should widen both the collapsed<br />
intervertebral space and the neural foramina: in the case<br />
of facet subluxation, this must be reduced prior to fixation<br />
by either a meticulous positioning, by using a laminectomy<br />
spreader or by using towel clamps.<br />
Several techniques have been reported including cross<br />
pin fixation, transarticular screw fixation, pedicle screws<br />
with a bone cement bridge and pedicle screw-rod fixation;<br />
an external fixator might also represent an alternative<br />
choice.<br />
The transarticular screws technique is a good<br />
consideration in relatively heavy dogs (preferably < 25<br />
kg), showing only mild clinical and imaging findings<br />
suggestive of instability. The screws are ideally inserted<br />
at an angle between 30° and 45° from the sagittal plane,<br />
in a cranio-caudal and medio-lateral direction. Fusion is<br />
promoted by removing the articular cartilage from the<br />
facet joints and by packing them with cancellous bone,<br />
collected from the wing of the ilium or from the previously<br />
removed spinous process. Pedicle screws (usually cortical<br />
3.5 - depending on the dog’s size) can be inserted on L7<br />
and S1 and can be joined by using either bone cement<br />
(Polymethylmethacrylate-PMMA) or rods. Cement is usually<br />
malleable and suits different anatomical variations and/<br />
or different pathological situations, in large breed dogs<br />
also (Fig. 4). Rods seem a valid alternative and also seem<br />
to effectively stabilize the lumbosacral spine, but further<br />
studies are necessary in vivo.<br />
The main complication is implant failure, regardless of<br />
the surgical technique performed. The choice among the<br />
different techniques varies according to many factors (e.g.,<br />
clinical signs, underlying radiographic-CT-MRI findings,<br />
breed, weight, etc.) however, the surgeon’s preference<br />
is crucial.<br />
Fig. 3: L7-S1 Dorsal Laminectomy; note the cauda equina nerve<br />
roots retracted to one side and the underlying disc protrusion<br />
Fig. 4: L7-S1 Dorsal Fusion-Fixation using cortical screws and<br />
PMMA<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 143 small animal orthopaedic session
small animal soft tissue session 144 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />
Short communications <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />
Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 10.45 <strong>–</strong> 12.15
small animal soft tissue session 146 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Axial pattern flap based on a cutaneous branch of the<br />
facial artery in cats.<br />
Milgram J*, Weiser M, Kelmer E*, Benzioni H<br />
Koret School of Veterinary Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel<br />
Introduction<br />
The anatomy of the facial artery of the cat has been<br />
described, however, the cutaneous branches of the facial<br />
artery and the viability of a flap based on the cutaneous<br />
branches of this artery have not been described in the cat.<br />
The objectives of this study were to describe the anatomy<br />
of the facial artery, including its cutaneous portion, and<br />
to define the anatomic boundaries of an axial pattern flap<br />
based on a branch of this artery.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
The common carotid artery was identified, cannulated<br />
and infused with methylene blue to assist in the<br />
identification of the facial artery, which was subsequently<br />
cannulated and selectively infused with methylene blue.<br />
The main trunk of the artery and its branches were then<br />
dissected. The extent of blue coloration of the skin was<br />
evaluated on the contralateral side of the same specimens<br />
after infusing methylene blue into the facial artery. In 4<br />
specimens the flap was raised along previously defined<br />
borders and adequacy of perfusion was evaluated.<br />
Results<br />
The area of skin perfused by the facial artery extended<br />
from the lower eyelid dorsally, to the angularis oris cranially,<br />
and the wing of the atlas caudally. Borders of the skin flap<br />
were defined on the basis of the anatomical dissection and<br />
skin coloration after selective infusion of the facial artery<br />
with methylene blue. A skin flap of 6cm x 3.4cm, based on<br />
the first caudally directed cutaneous branch of the facial<br />
artery was shown to be well perfused.<br />
Discussion<br />
A caudally directed cutaneous artery which branches off<br />
the facial artery opposite to the angularis oris artery and<br />
continuing to the horizontal ear canal has been described<br />
in dogs. A cutaneous artery analogous to this artery has<br />
not been described in the cat. We were able to identify<br />
this artery as the first branch of the cutaneous part of the<br />
facial artery and were able to follow it to the caudal aspect<br />
of the wing of the atlas. This cutaneous artery is located<br />
more ventrally and extends further caudally than in dogs. It<br />
supplies a highly vascularised angiosome that can be used<br />
as an axial pattern flap for reconstruction of skin lesions of<br />
the face and was present in all of the specimens examined<br />
in this study.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 147 small animal soft tissue session
Ligating the renal artery in pigs with a new<br />
absorbable device - LigaTie ®<br />
O V. Höglund, DVM, K. Olsson, DVM, PhD, R. Hagman, DVM, MSc, PhD, A. Lagerstedt, DVM, PhD.<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden<br />
Introduction<br />
An absorbable device with a self-locking loop was<br />
constructed for ligation purposes. It was designed for<br />
surgery with details enabling complete haemostasis (zero<br />
loop-diameter) and an enhanced tissue grip. The aim of this<br />
study was to test the efficiency of the device in ligating<br />
an artery, achiving a tight tissue grip and a complete<br />
haemostasis.<br />
Materials and methods<br />
The device (LigaTie ® ) was manufactured by injection<br />
moulding of a blend of absorbable polymers well tolerated<br />
by the tissue. The device was used for ligation of the<br />
renal arteries in three anaesthetized pigs. The vessel<br />
was cut between the kidney and the device. The artery<br />
with the attached device was inspected for haemostasis<br />
for a minimum of five minutes. The ability of the device<br />
to withstand a ligature slip-off was tested with a<br />
dynamometer.<br />
Results<br />
Six renal arteries were ligated with the device. The<br />
device was tightened and secured with one hand. Complete<br />
haemostasis of all arteries was obtained and verified for<br />
a minimum of five minutes. The devices were securely<br />
locked into the tissue, i.e. no sliding along the vessels<br />
was observed.<br />
Discussion/Conclusion<br />
This test showed that effective haemostasis and secure<br />
ligatures of the renal arteries can be achieved with this<br />
device. The device functioned as planned and may facilitate<br />
an easier and safer ligation of blood vessels.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 148 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Caudal mediastinal para-oesophageal abscesses in 7<br />
dogs. A retospective study<br />
H. Brissot*, C. Burton*, R. Doyle*.<br />
Davies, Veterinary Specialists, Higham Gobion, UK.<br />
Objective<br />
To determine the clinical, imaging and surgical findings<br />
of caudal mediastinal para-esophageal abscesses (CMPA)<br />
and the outcome of surgical treatment in client owned dogs.<br />
Study design<br />
Case series<br />
<strong>Animals</strong><br />
Seven dogs with a CMPA.<br />
Methods<br />
Medical records between April 2005 and January 2010<br />
were reviewed. Retrieved data were signalment, history,<br />
clinical findings, diagnostic investigations, surgical<br />
findings, surgical procedures performed and post-operative<br />
recovery. Long-term follow-up information was obtained<br />
via telephone conversation with the owners and referring<br />
veterinarians<br />
Results<br />
All dogs had exploratory surgery with either a median<br />
sternotomy (5 dogs) or lateral thoracotomy (2 dogs). The<br />
abscesses were identified, opened and drained surgically. In<br />
5 cases omentalization of the abscess cavity was performed<br />
via a limited diaphragmatic incision. Foreign material was<br />
not identified within any of the abscesses. All dogs were<br />
discharged from the hospital. All dogs were alive and free<br />
of any clinical disorders 6 months after the surgery (range<br />
from 9 to 39 months).<br />
Clinical Significance<br />
These new data identifies CMPA as a new clinical<br />
entity that should be suspected in cases of regurgitation<br />
and pyrexia with a mass or enlargement of the caudal<br />
mediastinum.<br />
Trans-diaphragmatic omentalization of thoracic<br />
abscesses could be done successfully without postoperative<br />
complication and is suitable for the management<br />
of CMPA.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 149 small animal soft tissue session
Caudal cervical intervertebral space distraction and<br />
stabilization using a distractable fusion cage in seven<br />
dogs<br />
Murgia D*, Gasparinetti N, Schiesaro R.<br />
Diagnostica Piccoli Animali, Zugliano, Italy<br />
Introduction<br />
Goal of this retrospective study was evaluate the clinical<br />
and radiological<br />
results of the treatment of dynamic disc associated<br />
caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy (CCSM) using a<br />
purpose-designed distractable intervertebral fusion cage<br />
in seven dogs.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Seven Dobermann Pinschers with neurological signs<br />
compatible with disc associated dynamic CCSM were<br />
selected. Lateral survey radiographs of the cervical spine<br />
were taken and suspected diagnosis confirmed by MRI<br />
imaging. Affected intervertebral (iv) disc spaces (C5-C6,<br />
C6-C7 or both) were approached ventrally, distracted and<br />
fenestrated.Thereafter a partial ventral slot was created.<br />
The cage was pressed into the slot; tightening the screw the<br />
wings opened 1-2 mm in cranio-caudal direction allowing<br />
vertebral distraction and stabilization. Lastly,<br />
cancellous bone allograft was packed in the surgical site.<br />
Clinical/radiological follow-up<br />
evaluations were planned at four weeks, three-six and<br />
twelve months postoperative. In five dogs MRI follow-up<br />
was performed.<br />
Results<br />
Postoperative radiographic evaluation showed good<br />
implants placement. No deterioration of the neurological<br />
status was clinically observed. At follow-up, radiographs<br />
revealed a slight ventral migration of ca. 2-3 mm of the<br />
cages, iv disc spaces collapse and new bone formation<br />
between the vertebrae adjacent the cages. All dogs<br />
showed an improvement of the neurological status and<br />
MRI exhibited in most of the cases resolution of spinal<br />
cord compression.<br />
Discussion<br />
Expansion of the wings and the toothed outer walls<br />
prevent dislocation of the cage. Nevertheless we observed<br />
a mild ventral migration and iv space collapse that were<br />
clinically irrelevant. If compared to other cervical spine<br />
distraction-stabilization techniques, the method used is<br />
less invasive, does not carry the risk of vertebral canal<br />
violation and can be used to distract and stabilize more iv<br />
spaces simultaneously. The titanium alloy of the implant<br />
results to be biocompatible and allows postoperative MRI<br />
evaluations of patients. Due to the lack of postoperative<br />
neurological deterioration, all dogs had short hospital stays.<br />
The described technique achieves good long-term results<br />
in CCSM affected dogs. Anyway further clinical cases and<br />
long-term follow-up visits over twelve months are needed<br />
to support these findings.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 150 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury<br />
Cachon T.*, Escriou C, Arnault A., Maitre P., Fau D., Viguier E.*, Genevois JP. Carozzo C*<br />
VetAgro-Sup Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon , France<br />
Introduction<br />
Sciatic nerve injury are most frequently secondary to<br />
traumatic events. If neurapraxia lesion do not required<br />
surgical treatement in most of the cases, more severe injury<br />
such as axonotmesis or neurotmesis do require surgical<br />
exploration and treatment.<br />
Objectives<br />
The purpose of this study is to report the surgical<br />
treatment and outcome of traumatic sciatic nerve injury<br />
in 9 cases.<br />
Material and method<br />
Dogs surgicaly treated for sciatic nerve injury were<br />
included in this study. Medical records were reviewed<br />
and included signalment, duration of the clinical signs,<br />
neurological examination, results of diagnosis imaging,<br />
surgical finding, complications and follow-up.<br />
Results<br />
Of 9 dogs surgically treated, 5 resulted from hunting<br />
wounds. Surgical treatment was neurolysis alone in 2 cases<br />
and neurorraphy in 7 cases. Clinical improvement occured<br />
in 6 cases and there was no improvement in 3 cases. Two<br />
of the 3 dogs that did not recovered had a proximal lesion.<br />
Discussion<br />
Recovery after surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury<br />
could be long, and incomplete. Nevertheless provided the<br />
use of proper surgical technique and high level of post<br />
operative care, improvement could be expected. A guarded<br />
prognostic should be give to the owner when the lesion<br />
is proximal.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 151 small animal soft tissue session
Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and nitric<br />
oxide are increased in brachycephalic dogs<br />
Rancan L, Romussi S, Albertini M, García P, Vara E, Sánchez de la Muela M<br />
Dogpital SL (Madrid);D. of Medicine and Surgery (F.Veterinary, UCM, Madrid), D of Clinical Veterinary Science<br />
(F. Veterinary, Milan);D of Animal Pathology (F. Veterinary, Milan); D of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (F.<br />
Medicine, UCM, Madrid)<br />
An upper respiratory tract disease known<br />
as brachycephalic airways obstruction syndrome<br />
(BAOS) has been described in brachycephalic dogs. Signs<br />
of obstruction of the upper aerial ducts are consequence<br />
of anatomical and functional disturbances. Hypoxia also<br />
may increase fatigability of upper airway dilator muscle,<br />
and soft tissue in a manner that has the potential to<br />
worsen disease. inflammation as well as oxidative and<br />
nitrosative stress resulted from the repeated hypoxia<br />
and re-oxygenations could be implicated in the injury<br />
to these tissues. The aims of the present study was (a)<br />
to investigate proinflammatory mediators levels in dogs<br />
suffering from BAOS in order to analyse a posible role for<br />
these mediators in the brachycephalic syndrome, (b) to<br />
study the relationship between proinflammatory mediators<br />
levels and the severity of the clinical signs.<br />
Blood was collected from 17 brachycephalic dogs<br />
(BD) and ten control dogs (CD). BD were divided into 3<br />
groups depending on clinical examination (Group 1 no<br />
symptomatic, Group 2 moderately symptomatic and Group<br />
3 severely symptomatic). Comparison between results<br />
observed in BD requiring medical or surgical treatment was<br />
also performed. Proinflamatory cytokines, IL-1ß, TNF-a, IL-6<br />
and IL-17 plasma levels were measured by ELISA kits. NO<br />
levels were determinated by Griess’s test.<br />
The plasma concentrations of TNFa, ad IL-17, were<br />
significantly higher in BD compared to CD (p
<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />
In depth - Medical or surgical? -<br />
Tracheal collapse<br />
Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 08.00 <strong>–</strong> 10.00
small animal soft tissue session 154 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Have we learnt anything in the last 15 years?<br />
Stenting: The Giessen experience<br />
A. Moritz, C. Paul de Melo, N. Bauer, M. Schneider,<br />
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany<br />
Introduction<br />
Collapsing trachea is a common disorder in middle-aged<br />
toy and miniature dogs. Two forms are described: the<br />
more common dorsoventral collapse and the rare lateral<br />
collapse. The collapse usually involves the cervical region,<br />
but also thoracic areas of the trachea. Affected breeds are<br />
Yorkshire-Terriers in first place; others are e.g. Miniature<br />
Poodle, Pomeranian, Chihuahua, and Maltese.<br />
Related to the pathophysiology of the disease it can<br />
be stated that there may be a failure of chondrogenesis<br />
or simple degeneration of hyaline cartilage with primary<br />
genetic influences. Lack of chondroitin sulfate and/or<br />
decreased glycoproteins within the cartilage matrix results<br />
in a reduction in bound water. Because of that, the rings<br />
lose their ability to remain firm and thus subsequently<br />
collapse. To date however, its aetiology, and most effective<br />
management are still controversial.<br />
Clinical signs<br />
Dogs with tracheal collapse show chronic intermittent<br />
coughing. The cough may vary between harsh or dry,<br />
often described as a “goose honk” sound. Coincidental<br />
chronic mitral valvular heart disease occurs and must<br />
be differentiated from heart failure and/or significant<br />
left atrial enlargement due to this condition. Excitement,<br />
manipulation of the tracheal, during water or eating intake<br />
trigger affected dogs starting to cough.<br />
Physical examination usually reveals a normal to<br />
overweighed dog. Depending on the severity of dyspnea<br />
the mucous membranes are normal colored up to cyanotic.<br />
The upper airway obstruction is combined with stridor. The<br />
stridor sound varies according to the anatomical localization<br />
of the obstruction including everted laryngeal saccules,<br />
laryngeal collapse and cervical/thoracic tracheal collapse.<br />
Varying degrees of inspiratory or expiratory dyspnea<br />
occur. Hyperthermia may result because of the respiratory<br />
distress. Cough can be triggered when palpating or pressing<br />
the trachea. In some dogs mild dorsoventral compression<br />
can lead to respiration arrest.<br />
Hepatomegaly is a common finding in dogs with tracheal<br />
collapse. Several causes for this clinical observation are<br />
possible, including hepatic congestion because of chronic<br />
right heart failure induced by a high airway resistance and<br />
steroid hepatopathy, as well as hepatic lipidosis in obese<br />
patients. In our study we described 26 dogs with tracheal<br />
collapse. Liver parameters where tested before and after<br />
stent implantation. To assess liver function gall bladder<br />
contraction was stimulated by intramuscular injection of<br />
a synthetic cholecystokinin analogue (ceruletide). Twelve<br />
healthy Beagle dogs and 30 dogs of various breeds<br />
investigated previously without evidence of hepatic,<br />
gastrointestinal, or respiratory diseases served as control.<br />
Amelioration of liver variables was assessed after stent<br />
implantation. Twelve of 26 (46%) dogs had increased serum<br />
activity of 2 or more liver enzymes. Serum basal bile acid<br />
concentrations were high in 24 of 26 dogs. Twenty- and<br />
40-minute stimulated bile acids were significantly higher in<br />
dogs with tracheal collapse (64.2 +130.0/243.0 mmol/L and<br />
82.6 +164.0/257.1 mmol/L) compared to the control dogs<br />
(7.0 6 3.6 mmol/L and 6.4 6 3.5 mmol/L). All twelve dogs<br />
reevaluated after a median of 58 days (48<strong>–</strong>219 days) had a<br />
normal breathing pattern and significantly decreased 20 and<br />
40 minutes stimulated bile acids (50.0 +92.7/232.8 mmol/L,<br />
52.8 +97.6/234.3 mmol/L; p = 0043), whereas plasma liver<br />
enzyme activities were not significantly influenced. There<br />
was a significant hepatic dysfunction in the majority of dogs<br />
with a tracheal collapse. Liver function should be routinely<br />
assessed in dogs with severe respiratory disease.<br />
Diagnosis<br />
Radiography is a reasonable screening test for dogs<br />
with tracheal collapse but underdiagnosis of the frequency<br />
and underestimation of the degree of tracheal collapse in<br />
comparison with fluoroscopy are documented.<br />
Endoscopy is considered to be the gold standard<br />
in the diagnosis of tracheal collapse and reveals a<br />
decreased dorsoventral diameter of the trachea with a<br />
pendulous dorsal tracheal membrane. The tracheal mucous<br />
membranes are hyperemic but usually show no exsudate.<br />
Occasionally catarrhal to purulent exsudate may be seen.<br />
Conservative treatment<br />
Dogs which are burdened with the anatomical change<br />
of the trachea may stay for a long time without clinical<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 155 small animal soft tissue session
signs. Secondary factors such as cardiomegaly, heart<br />
failure, lung oedema, respiratory tract Infection, and<br />
obstruction of the upper airways, inhalation of irritants,<br />
adipositas or hyperadrenocortizisme may be the reason to<br />
develop clinical signs. Diagnostic procedures and medical<br />
treatment are initiated to recognize and eliminate these<br />
factors. Symptomatic therapy includes weight reduction,<br />
recommendation of a harness instead of a collar, elimination<br />
of irritants, nebulization/ inhaltation of bronchodilatators<br />
respectively saline fluids, administration of xanthine<br />
bronchodilators such as theophylline, aminophylline or<br />
propentofylline, antiinfectiva (if indicated) as well as<br />
steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy. Antitussiva such as<br />
dihydrocodein should be administered with caution, Lomotil<br />
(diphenoxylate hydrochloride and atropine sulfate) which is<br />
used in UK with good success is only with special authority<br />
permission available in Germany. If these secondary<br />
factors initiating clinical signs are not treated or cannot<br />
be eliminated, hypertrophy of the subepithelial glands,<br />
reduction of the ciliated epithelium, squamous metaplasia<br />
or polyp formation are the consequences. Mentioned<br />
chronic changes are followed by cough, increased mucus<br />
production and decreased mucociliar clearance ending up<br />
in a vicious circle. In a retrospective study, 71 of 100 dogs<br />
with tracheal collapse were reported to respond to medical<br />
therapy and management of secondary initiating causes.<br />
Surgical techniques<br />
Various surgical techniques for correcting tracheal<br />
collapse have been described, including plication of the<br />
dorsal tracheal membrane, tracheal ring chondrotomy,<br />
and intra- and extra-luminal stabilization using mainly<br />
polypropylene prosthetic devices. Stabilization of the<br />
trachea with intraluminal endoprostheses (stents) is of<br />
increasing importance. Several types of self-expanding<br />
elastic stents have been used.<br />
The Giessen experience<br />
In our place we treated so fare 71 client-owned dogs<br />
referred our <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic at the Justus-Liebig-<br />
University Giessen between August 1996 and Mai 2011.<br />
The main inclusion criterion for stent implantation was<br />
evidence of a marked reduction of the dogs’ quality of life<br />
due to persistence of one or more severe clinical signs<br />
such as dyspnoea, cyanosis, severe paroxysmal coughing,<br />
and syncope due to hypoxemia despite conservative<br />
management. All dogs received medication for at least<br />
3 weeks before stent implantation. Medical treatment<br />
included administration of xanthine bronchodilators such<br />
as theophylline, aminophylline (10 mg/kg PO q12h) or<br />
propentofylline (3 mg/kg PO q12h) as well as steroidal<br />
anti-inflammatory therapy (prednisolone, 0.25-0.5 mg/kg PO<br />
q12h). Specific therapy was used for underlying diseases<br />
considered to affect the respiratory tract (e.g., left heart<br />
failure due to mitral valve insufficiency, infection of the<br />
respiratory tract). Patients with only mild clinical signs<br />
and dogs in which with the majority of clinical signs were<br />
caused by diseases other than severe tracheal collapse<br />
were excluded from the study.<br />
The diagnosis of tracheal collapse was established<br />
by physical examination, radiography and endoscopy.<br />
Dogs were pre-medicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg/<br />
kg IV) before radiography to avoid excitement-associated<br />
dyspnoea. A ruler with 1 cm radio-opaque calibration marks<br />
was placed beneath the patients to provide a measurement<br />
of the tracheal length and diameter without an additional<br />
correction for magnification error. Endoscopic examination<br />
was performed with a rigid fiberoptic bronchoscope of 600.0<br />
mm length and 5 mm diameter or a flexible videoscope<br />
600.0 mm length and 5,3 mm diameter. Endoscopy<br />
performed in general anaesthesia included evaluation of<br />
the larynx, the dorsal tracheal membrane along its entire<br />
length as well as the left and right mainstem bronchi.<br />
Using the criteria of Tangner and Hobson, 8 a configuration<br />
of the tracheal rings and dorsal membrane inducing a<br />
reduction of the tracheal lumen by 25% was regarded as<br />
grade 1 tracheal collapse. A 50% reduction was regarded<br />
as grade 2, a 75% reduction as grade 3, and a complete<br />
reduction (100%) as grade 4 tracheal collapse, respectively.<br />
If asymmetry of the tracheal cartilage rings was present<br />
in addition to flattening of the dorsal membrane, it was<br />
described as a deformation of the trachea. The location of<br />
the collapsed tracheal segments in the cervical, thoracal<br />
or entire trachea was noted.<br />
Implantation procedure<br />
Before stent implantation, the diameter of the stent<br />
required for intraluminal stabilization was estimated<br />
according to the tracheal diameter measured on the<br />
lateral [l/l] radiographs 1 cm distal the larynx: Stent size<br />
≈ (tracheal diameter [l/l] * 4 / 3.14). Example: trachea<br />
diameter 8 mm * 4 =32 / 3,14 = 10,2 <strong>–</strong>> selected stent:<br />
10-12 mm nominal diameter. The selected implanted<br />
(nominal) length of the stent was at least 20 mm shorter<br />
than the tracheal length measured on the lateral thoracic<br />
radiographs to keep a minimum distance of 10 mm between<br />
the implanted endoprosthesis and larynx or carina. The<br />
uncovered stent endoprosthesis consisted of the stent<br />
and a delivery catheter (Figure 1). The endoprosthesis<br />
was longitudinally stretched on the inner shaft to a smalldiameter<br />
configuration, spontaneously springing back to<br />
its original diameter after deployment. The annular space<br />
between the “inner shaft” and the “outer catheter” system<br />
was filled with contrast medium (the new Uniflex TM stent<br />
(Boston Scientific) with 0.9% saline) for easy deployment<br />
of the endoprosthesis. Furthermore, the central lumen of<br />
the inner shaft was flushed with saline injected through<br />
the proximal Luer connector to minimize resistance<br />
when inserted over a guide wire. The implantation of the<br />
self-expanding stent was performed by the authors in<br />
anesthetized dogs placed in left lateral recumbency<br />
small animal soft tissue session 156 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
immediately after endoscopy. Insertion, placement,<br />
and deployment of the stent were performed under<br />
fluoroscopy (Figure 2). After positioning the implant,<br />
the T-connector and, the rolling membrane covering the<br />
stent was pulled back on the outer catheter resulting in<br />
a deployment of the stent from the distal tip towards<br />
the proximal marker. Immediately after implantation, the<br />
delivery system was removed and the location of the stent<br />
was documented by endoscopy and thoracic radiography<br />
in lateral (Figure 3) and dorsoventral projection.<br />
Figure 1.: Construction of the EASY-WALLSTENT<br />
endoprosthesis (Boston Scientific, 890077E/07.99/05)<br />
composed of the stent and a delivery catheter. The figure is<br />
taken from the manufacturers´ instructions. 1=central lumen<br />
for guide wire passage; 2=streamlined tip (radio-opaque),<br />
3=“outer catheter”, 4=radio-opaque markers: 4a=distal,<br />
4b=distal expected shortening, 4c=proximal expected<br />
shortening, 4d=proximal, 5= WALLSTENT, 6=holder,7=“inner<br />
shaft”, 8=sliding T-connector, 9=stainless steel, 10 = radioopaque<br />
markers, showing the approximate final position of<br />
the stent during placement proximal, 11= Luer connector on<br />
the central lumen, 12=Luer connector and stopcock of the<br />
“inner shaft”.<br />
Figure 2. Lateral chest fluoroscopic view demonstrating the<br />
placement of the Wallstent. The stent is inserted on a<br />
delivery catheter with radio-opaque marker bands showing<br />
the expected final position of the stent (black arrows).<br />
Deployment of the stent is performed gradually (white arrow)<br />
while repositioning the delivery catheter.<br />
Figure 3. Lateral thoracic radiograph showing the location of the<br />
stent immediately after implantation<br />
Management after stent implantation included housing<br />
the dogs in small kennels for 3 days to keep them at rest.<br />
They received cough suppressant (dihydrocodein, 1 mg/<br />
kg PO q6h) and if tracheitis was present broad spectrum<br />
antibiotics for 7 days. In the event of concurrent bronchial<br />
collapse, longterm treatment with a xanthine bronchodilator<br />
(theophylline, 10 mg/kg PO q12h) was recommended to the<br />
owners. Nebulization with saline solution (Emser Sole ,<br />
15 min q12h) were administered if fluid accumulation was<br />
diagnosed endoscopically. Clinical re-evaluation included<br />
physical examination, radiography, and endoscopy. The<br />
length and the diameter of the stent were measured on<br />
thoracic radiographs in lateral and dorsoventral projection<br />
and compared with results obtained immediately after stent<br />
implantation. Tracheoscopy was done as described above to<br />
assess the stents´ location and integration in the tracheal<br />
mucosa.<br />
Results<br />
The Yorkshire Terrier was the most frequently represented<br />
breed. In the dogs considered for stent implantation no<br />
improvement in clinical sings such as dyspnoea, severe<br />
paroxysmal coughing, marked exercise intolerance, cyanosis<br />
and exercise-associated syncope was achieved despite<br />
various conservative treatments. Physical examination<br />
findings potentially consistent with tracheal collapse<br />
included tracheal stridor, marked dyspnoea and spontaneous<br />
paroxysmal coughing. At the time of physical examination,<br />
cyanosis and severe exercise intolerance were present in few<br />
dogs were as in the majority of dogs paroxysmal coughing<br />
could be elicited by tracheal palpation. Almost exclusively,<br />
dogs showed a combination of several clinical signs.<br />
Furthermore, obesity and hepatomegaly were relatively<br />
consistent findings. In approximately half of the patients<br />
endoscopy identified a severe tracheal collapse (grade<br />
4). In the majority of patients implantation of the (EASY-)<br />
WallstentTM (now called Uniflex TM, Boston Scientific) led<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 157 small animal soft tissue session
to immediate improvement of clinical signs (i.e., dyspnea<br />
and cyanosis) seen in most dogs during anesthesia vanished<br />
immediately after deployment of the endoprosthesis.<br />
Dogs presented with severe exercise intolerance, physical<br />
activity increased markedly within 3 days. Mild to moderate<br />
dry cough due to initial irritation of the tracheal mucosa,<br />
was common in most patients in the first few days and up to<br />
3 weeks after implantation of the endoprosthesis. Coughing<br />
did not affect the animals´ clinical condition and responded<br />
well to symptomatic treatment with dihydrocodein.<br />
According to the owners reports regarding the long-term<br />
outcome about 25-30% of the dogs were asymptomatic<br />
after stent implantation. In 65-70% the insertion of the<br />
stent resulted in marked improvement of clinical signs and<br />
exercise tolerance, but some coughing still was present.<br />
The severity of the cough was reported to be markedly<br />
reduced after stent implantation. It was subjectively<br />
assessed to be mild and occurred occasionally after<br />
excitement in the majority of these patients. Except for the<br />
remaining cough, all dogs were free of clinical complaints<br />
including severe dyspnea, cyanosis, and syncope due to<br />
hypoxemia. A few dogs (< 5 %) remained symptomatic<br />
despite therapy. These dogs were presented with severe<br />
bronchial collapse or clinical signs were associated with<br />
left heart failure.<br />
A shortening of the endoprosthesis with a simultaneous<br />
increase in the diameter of the stent was present in the<br />
majority of patients. The median percentage of shortening<br />
was 27.3 % determined at a median of 175 days after<br />
stentimplantation. Shortening of the stent did not result<br />
in clinical signs in most of the patients. Some dogs were<br />
treated with a second stent because of recurrence of<br />
tracheal collapse mostly cranial to the first implanted stent.<br />
Tracheoscopic follow-up examination disclosed that<br />
in all animals most parts of the stent were covered with<br />
tracheal epithelium and several small blood vessels. The<br />
stent could be seen shining through the tissue. In about<br />
50% of the dogs bare metallic struts were visible especially<br />
at the lateral parts of the trachea. In these areas, the<br />
trachea did not touch the endoprosthesis due to a slight<br />
deformation of the tracheal rings. The gaps between the<br />
trachea and the stent (so-called “pockets”) were filled<br />
with mucus plugs. Symptomatic treatment of these dogs<br />
included administration of broad spectrum antibiotics for 10<br />
days and mucolytics for 21 days. Furthermore, nebulization<br />
with saline solution was recommended in episodes were<br />
coughing was present. Long-term endoscopic follow-up<br />
disclosed that “pocket”-formation can resolve within an<br />
interval up to 2 years. In some dogs parts of the stent<br />
were overgrown by excessive connective tissue similar to<br />
“granuloma formation” reported in experimental studies<br />
in rabbits and dogs after the implantation of metallic<br />
stents. This finding was primarily evident at the ends of<br />
the endoprosthesis. Severe, circular granuloma formation<br />
was apparent in 3 dogs resulting in an annular reduction<br />
of the tracheal lumen of 50% to 75%. “Granuloma<br />
formation” induced a recurrence of clinical signs<br />
including severe paroxysmal coughing, dyspnea, cyanosis,<br />
exercise intolerance, and syncope due to hypoxemia.<br />
All dogs responded well to conservative treatment with<br />
corticosteroids (prednisolone 1 mg/kg PO q12h) for 2 weeks.<br />
Discussion<br />
The results of our study demonstrate that Wallstents TM<br />
respectively the UNIFLEX TM stent can be used to treat<br />
tracheal collapse in dogs because they are available in<br />
a suitable size range and placement is technically easy<br />
via fluoroscopy. The maximal diameter of this stent type<br />
is 22.0 mm and the use of Wallstents for stabilization of<br />
the canine trachea is restricted to small to medium-sized<br />
dogs The initial survival rate of more than 91.7% was<br />
comparable with the survival rates of 96% and 94%<br />
respectively reported for surgical procedures. In contrast<br />
to surgical methods of extraluminal stabilization of the<br />
trachea, however, the intraluminal implantation of stents<br />
is much less traumatic, comparatively quick and technically<br />
easy to perform. With experience, the implantation of the<br />
stent could be performed within 20 minutes. Furthermore,<br />
intraluminal stabilization of the trachea could be performed<br />
along the entire length of the trachea whereas surgical<br />
placement of extraluminal stents is considered to be<br />
unrewarding in patients with a collapse of the thoracic<br />
portion of the trachea. It should be noted however that<br />
once expanded within the trachea Wallstents could not be<br />
removed or hardly repositioned. In 1 of the 2 dogs dying<br />
within the immediate period after stent implantation, death<br />
was caused by incorrect placement of the endoprosthesis<br />
inducing laryngeal spasm due to irritation of the larynx.<br />
Another severe adverse-effect reported in dogs after<br />
experimental implantation of stents was migration of the<br />
implant due to choice of too small an endoprosthesis. 16,17<br />
Tracheal length measured on thoracic radiographs in lateral<br />
projection ranged in our study from 68.0 to 175.0 mm and<br />
the calculated stent diameter ranged from 8.9 to 15.3<br />
mm. These data underline the importance of assessing<br />
individual tracheal measurements before implantation of<br />
the endoprosthesis.<br />
The most severe adverse effects induced by the stent<br />
included emphysema and pneumomediastinum resulting<br />
in the death of 1 dog. Another dog developed mild<br />
pneumomediastinum without concurrent clinical signs.<br />
A probable cause of the development of emphysema and<br />
pneumomediastinum was that the metal struts at the<br />
distal and proximal ends of the stent were slightly sharp.<br />
In contrast to surgical procedures, intensive care was<br />
not required after stent implantation. Clinical follow-up<br />
examinations in our patients showed that 25 - 30 % of<br />
the dogs re-evaluated within a median interval of 58 days<br />
after stent implantation were asymptomatic, 60 - 75%<br />
showed marked improvement of clinical signs and exercise<br />
tolerance, and 5% remained unimproved. Endoscopic<br />
small animal soft tissue session 158 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
follow-up examinations disclosed that the Wallstents<br />
were almost completely covered with tracheal epithelium<br />
within a median interval of 2 monthes after implantation.<br />
The most important drawback of the adaptive property of<br />
elastic stents however was a progressive shortening and<br />
concurrent increase in the diameter of the endoprosthesis<br />
in 83% of our patients. This finding was associated with a<br />
recurrence of clinical signs due to severe tracheal collapse<br />
cranial to the stent in about 10% of the dogs. Intraluminal<br />
stabilization of the entire trachea should be considered<br />
even in cases with a tracheal collapse restricted to the<br />
cervical or thoracal part of the trachea to prevent recurrence<br />
of clinical signs due to shortening of the stent. Another<br />
adverse effect of stent implantation was the formation<br />
of steroid-responsive granulomas. It occurred primarily at<br />
the ends of the stent and may have been induced by the<br />
mechanical effects of the endoprosthesis rather than by<br />
any toxic effects of the metal. A fracture of the implanted<br />
stent was seen only in one patient and could be managed<br />
by intra-stent-implantation.<br />
Conclusion<br />
In our experience intraluminal stabilization of the trachea<br />
with stents is an effective method of managing patients<br />
with severe tracheal collapse. It is a minimally-invasive,<br />
comparatively easy and brief alternative to surgery. Further<br />
studies are needed to assess if different types of stents<br />
(e.g. VET STENT-Trachea, Infiniti Medical) will end up with<br />
comparable good success and minimized side effects.<br />
References<br />
1. White RAS, Williams JN . Tracheal collapse in the dog - is<br />
there really a role for surgery?<br />
A survey of 100 cases. Journal Of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice<br />
1994;35:191-196.<br />
2. Herrtage ME, White RAS. Management of tracheal<br />
collapse. In: Bonagura JD, ed. Kirk´s current veterinary<br />
therapy XIII. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company;<br />
2000:796-801.<br />
3. Buback JL, Boothe HW, Hobson HP . Surgical treatment of<br />
tracheal collapse in dogs: 90 cases (1983-1993). J<br />
Am Vet Med Assoc 1996;208:380-384.<br />
4. Ayres SA, Holmberg DL . Surgical treatment of tracheal<br />
collapse using pliable total ring prostheses: results in<br />
one experimental and 4 clinical cases. Can Vet J<br />
1999;40:787-791.<br />
5. Hobson HP . Total ring prosthesis for the surgical correction<br />
of collapsed trachea. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1976;12:822.<br />
6. White RN . Unilateral arytenoid lateralisation and<br />
extraluminal polypropylene ring prostheses for correction of<br />
tracheal collapse in the dog. J <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract<br />
1995;36:151-158.<br />
7. Coyne BE, Fingland RB, Kennedy GA, Debowes RM . Clinical<br />
and pathologic effects of a modified technique<br />
for application of spiral prostheses to the cervical trachea<br />
of dogs. Vet Surg 1993;22:269-275.<br />
8. Tangner CH, Hobson HP . A retrospective study of 20<br />
surgically managed cases of collapsed trachea.<br />
Vet Surg 1982;11:146-149.<br />
9. Leonard HC, Wright JJ . An intraluminal prosthetic dilatator<br />
for tracheal collapse in the dog.<br />
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1978;14:464-468.<br />
10. Johnson LR, Krahwinkel DJ, McKiernan BC . Surgical<br />
management of atypical lateral tracheal collapse in a dog<br />
[published erratum appears in J Am Vet Med Assoc 1994<br />
Feb 1;204(3):426].<br />
J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993;203:1693-1696.<br />
11. Jerram R, Fossum TW . Tracheal collapse in dogs. Comp<br />
Cont Ed 1997;19:1040-1060.<br />
12. Rauber K, Franke C, Rau WS . Self-expanding stainless<br />
steel endotracheal stents: an animal study. Cardiovasc<br />
Intervent Radiol 1989;21:272-276.<br />
13. Rauber K, Weimar B, Hofmann M et al . Klinische<br />
Erfahrungen mit Gianturco-Z-stents bei endotrachealen<br />
und bronchialen Stenosen. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr<br />
Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1992;156:41-46.<br />
14. Rousseau H, Dahan M, Lauque D . Self expandable<br />
prostheses in the tracheobronchal tree.<br />
Radiology 1993;188:199-203.<br />
15. Rauber K, Syed-Ali S, Hofman M . Endotracheal placement<br />
of ballon-expanded stents: an experimental study<br />
in rabbits. Radiology 1997;202:281-283.<br />
16. Radlinsky MA, Fossum TW, Walker MA . Evaluation of the<br />
Palmaz Stent in the trachea and mainstem bronchi<br />
of normal dogs. Vet Surg 1997;26:99-107.<br />
17. Rauber, K. Selbstexpandierende tubuläre perkutan und<br />
peroral einführbare Prothesen aus Edelstahldraht<br />
und der Memory-Legierung NiTi. Experimentelle Studie und<br />
erste klinische Erfahrungen. 134-163.<br />
1991.<br />
18. Schiller AG . Treatment of the tracheal collapse in dogs.<br />
JAVMA, 1964;145:669-671.<br />
19. Moritz A, Schneider M, Rauber K, Schimke E . Tracheal<br />
collapse in dogs, first evaluation of Wallstent(R)<br />
implantation. Tieraerztl Umschau 1999;54:299-306.<br />
20. Radlinsky MA, Fossum TW . Tracheal collapse in a young<br />
boxer. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2000;36:313-316.<br />
21. Gellasch KL, Da Costa GT, McAnulty JF, Bjorling DE . Use of<br />
intraluminal nitinol stents in the treatment of<br />
tracheal collapse in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc<br />
2002;221:1719-23, 1714.<br />
22. Moritz, A; Schneider, M; Bauer, N.: Management of<br />
advanced tracheal collapse in dogs using intraluminal<br />
self-expanding biliary wallstents ; JVIM, 2004, 18, 1, 31-42.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 159 small animal soft tissue session
small animal soft tissue session 160 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Tracheal collapse <strong>–</strong> ringing: indications, limitations,<br />
technique<br />
Robert N White*<br />
Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, West Midlands UK<br />
The aetiology of tracheal collapse remains unknown.<br />
The condition is characterised by progressive weakening<br />
of the tracheal cartilage rings making them less able<br />
to resist changing intraluminal pressures resulting in<br />
dorsoventral collapse of the trachea. The reported average<br />
age at presentation is stated to be 7½ years (Padrid and<br />
Amis 1992), although personal experience suggests that<br />
cases might present at an earlier age in the UK. A juvenile<br />
presentation, within the first six months of life, has led<br />
some workers to believe that the underlying cause of the<br />
disease has a congenital origin (Done 1978, Bojrab and<br />
Renegar 1981, White and Williams 1994). The disease<br />
is progressive although the rate of progression varies<br />
between individuals (Hedlund 1987, Ettinger and Ticer<br />
1989, Padrid and Amis 1992).<br />
The severity of tracheal collapse has been graded<br />
endoscopically by Tangner and Hobson (1982) into<br />
four categories. Grade I is that in which the lumen has<br />
been reduced by approximately 25 per cent, grade II by<br />
approximately 50 per cent, grade III by approximately 75 per<br />
cent and in grade IV the lumen is essentially obliterated. It is<br />
well recognised that the collapse is dynamic in nature and,<br />
therefore, it is essential that the conditions under which the<br />
tracheal endoscopy are performed should be standardised.<br />
It is recommended that individuals are anaesthetised to a<br />
sufficient depth to abolish the cough reflex in response to<br />
the presence of the endoscope within the tracheal lumen<br />
(White 1995). The range of degrees of collapse that can be<br />
seen within each individual along the length of the trachea<br />
suggests that the site of grading should also be clearly<br />
stated when collapse grading is performed (White 1995).<br />
In general, the most severely affected area is situated at<br />
the level of the thoracic inlet.<br />
There remains considerable debate concerning the<br />
management of dogs suffering from tracheal collapse.<br />
Some reports suggest that the condition should be managed<br />
medically (Ettinger and Ticer 1989, Padrid and Amis 1992,<br />
White and Williams 1994) whilst others consider that the<br />
condition can be treated effectively with surgery. Medical<br />
management is palliative and aims to control the clinical<br />
signs. It may improve the quality of life of mildly affected<br />
individuals, but since the condition is a chronic progressive<br />
disorder this improvement may not last into the longer term.<br />
A variety of surgical procedures have been described for the<br />
relief of tracheal collapse including tracheal chondrotomy,<br />
dorsal membrane plication, intraluminal support prostheses<br />
(stenting), and external support devices such as total ring<br />
and spiral ring prostheses. Of these, intraluminal stenting<br />
and external ring prostheses are most extensively reported.<br />
Laryngeal paralysis/paresis has been documented as<br />
a concurrent finding is some individuals suffering from<br />
tracheal collapse. Although some workers suggest a<br />
prevalence of 30 per cent (Tangner and Hobson 1982),<br />
experiences in the UK would suggest that this appears to<br />
be an extreme finding which does not concur with the more<br />
general observation of an occasional case suffering from<br />
both conditions (White and Williams 1994, White 1995). It is<br />
worth noting that a number of individuals will demonstrate<br />
poor bilateral abductor function of the arytenoid cartilages<br />
at the time of evaluation endoscopy (White 1995). In fact,<br />
Nelissen and White (2010) recently described diagnosis<br />
and treatment of combined presumed laryngeal paralysis<br />
and larynegal collapse in six small breed dogs of which<br />
three also showed evidence of tracheal collapse. Personnal<br />
observations suggest that the laryngeal mucosa in these<br />
individuals is often hyperaemic and oedematous preventing<br />
normal arytenoid cartilage movement. Moreover, in many<br />
individuals the structural changes to the cartilage of the<br />
tracheal rings appears to be present to a greater or lesser<br />
degree within the cartilages of the larynx. The epiglottic<br />
cartilage appears to be prone to these changes and often<br />
takes on a shape that is significantly different from ‘normal’.<br />
The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear.<br />
Iatrogenic laryngeal paralysis (unilateral or bilateral) is<br />
considered a serious complication following the surgical<br />
placement of external support devices around the trachea.<br />
The paralysis occurs as a result of damage to the recurrent<br />
laryngeal nerves during the placement of the devices. It is<br />
assumed that this paralysis is either a result of neuropraxia<br />
during the mobilisation of the nerve in the tracheal<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 161 small animal soft tissue session
adventitia or a result of long term contact of the nerve<br />
with the prosthetic device. It is likely, therefore, that in<br />
some individuals the condition will not spontaneously<br />
resolve. It remains the author’s preferred technique to<br />
always perform a unilateral arytenoid laryngoplasty<br />
(tieback) when undertaking ring prostheses repair of<br />
tracheal collapse in toy breed dogs (White 1995).<br />
Follow-up data are lacking in the majority of reports<br />
concerning the management of dogs with tracheal collapse.<br />
There are two reports available describing the long term<br />
outcomes in dogs with collapsed trachea treated with<br />
surgical placement of polypropylene C-shaped stents<br />
(White 1995, Buback and others 1996). The results for ring<br />
placement alone suggest the procedure has a ‘success<br />
rate’ (dog free of clinical signs into long term) of 22.4<br />
per cent at worst and 66.7 per cent at best. The ‘success<br />
rate’ for ring placement in combination with arytenoid<br />
laryngoplasty was considered to be 75 per cent. Comparison<br />
between studies proves difficult since the inclusion criteria<br />
and patient selection criteria were different for the two<br />
investigations. The combination procedure has now been<br />
performed on well over 100 cases and, although it would<br />
be unfair to suggest that rigid long term data is available<br />
for all these cases, the author remains comfortable with<br />
the procedure as a means of treating dogs with grade II-IV<br />
collapsed trachea that are not controlled with conservative<br />
and/or medical management. Perioperative death remains<br />
low (approximately 2-3 per cent) and is most commonly<br />
associated with what is presumed to be an avascular<br />
necrosis of the tracheal mucosa. Case selection has also<br />
changed in that many surgeries are now carried out on<br />
individuals that ten years ago would have been excluded<br />
because they were considered to either be too severely<br />
affected or to have serious concurrent disease.<br />
References<br />
• Bojrab MJ and Renegar WR (1981) The trachea. In:<br />
Pathophysiology in <strong>Small</strong> Animal Surgery. Ed Bojrab. Lea &<br />
Febiger, Philadelphia. Pp 359-368<br />
• Buback JL, Boothe HW and Hobson HP (1996) Surgical<br />
treatment of tracheal collapse in dogs: 90 cases (1983-<br />
1993). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical<br />
Association 208, 380-384<br />
• Done SH (1978) Canine tracheal collapse <strong>–</strong> aetiology,<br />
pathology, diagnosis and treatment. Veterinary Annual 18<br />
255-260<br />
• Ettinger SJ and Ticer JW (1989) Disease of the trachea. In:<br />
Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine. Ed Ettinger. WB<br />
Saunders, Philadelphia. pp 795-815<br />
• Hedlund CS (1987) Surgical disease of the trachea.<br />
Veterinary Clinics of North America: <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice<br />
17, 301-332<br />
• Johnson L (2000) Tracheal collapse. Diagnosis and medical<br />
and surgical treatment. Veterinary Clinics of North America:<br />
<strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 30, 1253-1266<br />
• Nelissen P and White RAS (2010) Ayrtenoid lateralization<br />
for management of combined laryngeal dysfunction in small<br />
dogs. <strong>Proceedings</strong> of the 19th Annual Scientific Meeting<br />
of the European College of Veterinary Surgeons, Helsinki,<br />
Finland. pp 113-116<br />
• Padrid P and Amis TC (1992) Chronic tracheobronchial<br />
disease in the dog. Veterinary Clinics of North America:<br />
<strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 22, 1203-1229<br />
• Tangner CH and Hobson HP (1982) A retrospective study<br />
of 20 surgically managed cases of collapsed trachea.<br />
Veterinary Surgery 11, 146-149<br />
• White RAS and Williams JM (1994) Tracheal collapse in<br />
the dog <strong>–</strong> Is there really a role for surgery? A survey of 100<br />
cases. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 35, 191-196<br />
• White RN (1995) Unilateral arytenoid lateralisation and<br />
extra-luminal polypropylene ring prostheses fro correction<br />
of tracheal collapse in the dog. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal<br />
Practice 36, 151-1<br />
small animal soft tissue session 162 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical?<br />
Pyothorax in dogs and cats<br />
Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 14.00 <strong>–</strong> 15.15
Pyothorax <strong>–</strong> have we learnt anything in the last 15<br />
years?<br />
G. Wurtinger, C. Peppler*, M. Schneider, A. Moritz,<br />
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, <strong>Small</strong> Animal Clinic, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Germany<br />
The etiology of pyothorax in dogs and in cats is often not<br />
found (1) (2) (3). Penetrating bite wounds seem to be less<br />
important than described in the past (2) (4). Aspirated and<br />
orally contaminated plant material is considered to be the<br />
most common route of infection in dogs. A high prevalence<br />
in haunting and sporting dogs supports this theory (5), yet it<br />
is also discussed controversially. In cats bacterial isolates in<br />
most cases are similar to the oropharyngeal flora. Aspiration<br />
of the bacteria and following pleuropneumonia seems to<br />
be the most likely mechanism of developing a pyothorax<br />
(4). Dyspnoea and Tachypnoea are the most common<br />
clinical signs in dogs and in cats followed by lethargy and<br />
pyrexia (1). Possible diagnostic procedures include thoracic<br />
radiographs, thoracic ultrasound and computed tomography<br />
of the thoracic cavity. Thoracic radiographs reveal mostly<br />
bilateral effusion (1). Ultrasonographic examination is<br />
useful to detect septated fluid and pleural masses (1), but<br />
differentiation between transudative and exudative pleural<br />
effusion is not possible (6). Computed tomography in human<br />
medicine is described to detect and characterize pleural<br />
masses, but it can be difficult to differentiate between<br />
loculated fluid and masses (7) (6). A recently published<br />
study showed that computed tomography even detects<br />
more pulmonary parenchymal abnormalities than surgical<br />
exploration of the thorax (10). We think, diagnostic imaging<br />
including computed tomography should regularly be used<br />
in dogs and cats to decide, whether surgical intervention<br />
should be performed or not.<br />
Cytological fluid examination often shows coccoid, rods<br />
as well as filamentous bacteria, indicating Nocardia or<br />
Actinomyces (8). Cultural evidence of filamentous bacteria<br />
seen in the cytological examination is positive only in about<br />
one third of cases (8). Obligate anaerobic bacteria and<br />
mixtures of anaerobic and aerobic isolates are frequently<br />
isolated in bacteriologic culture (9). Nonenteric organisms,<br />
especially Pasteurella spp are frequently isolated in cats,<br />
whereas in dogs enteric organisms are more commonly<br />
isolated (9).<br />
Anti-infective drugs recommended for initial treatment<br />
are ß-lactam antibiotics or metronidazol for the gram<br />
positive and the anaerobic bacteria. In dogs a second<br />
antimicrobial agent (quinolone) should be included for<br />
the enteric organisms. In cats a potentiated ß-lactam is<br />
sufficient to treat the gram positive bacteria and Pasteurella<br />
spp (9).<br />
Therapeutical approach (conservative and surgical) is<br />
discussed controversially in literature. In dogs surgical<br />
treatment is more frequently necessary compared to cats<br />
because of potential foreign material. On the other hand in<br />
many cases foreign material could not be found even after<br />
surgical exploration and pathohistological examination (3).<br />
At least after conservative therapy has failed, thoracotomy<br />
should be recommended (4) (2). Conservative therapy<br />
usually includes drainage of the thorax with indwelling<br />
thoracostomy tubes and lavaged with warm, sterile<br />
crystalloids (11) (1) (9). Current literature recommends large<br />
thoracostomy tubes that have to be placed either surgically<br />
with a forceps or over a trocar in complete anesthesia (8)<br />
(12). In human medicine newer studies described the use<br />
of small bore wire guided drains. Efficacy was even better<br />
than with larger drains in one study and placing and use<br />
was much less painful (13). Valtolina and Adamantos<br />
described in 2009 the use of small-bore wire-guided chest<br />
drains in cats and dogs as an effective alternative to larger<br />
drains for management of pleural space disease including<br />
pyothorax (14).<br />
In our clinic a modified seldinger technique is used to<br />
insert small thorax drains (6 or 8 french in dogs, 6 french in<br />
cats). In most cases a single catheter is placed. Therefore<br />
we retrospectively viewed cats with pyothorax from 2006<br />
to 2010 to evaluate the complications of the catheter use<br />
and the outcome. After catheter placement in mild sedation<br />
the thorax was initially lavaged at least twice daily with<br />
warmed sterile crystalloid infusion solution. 16 cats were<br />
treated with the catheter technique during the mentioned<br />
period. Especially domestic short hair cats (n=13) were<br />
represented. The median age was 5 years (range 1 to<br />
12 years) with no sex predisposition. The median weight<br />
was 3.75 kg (range 2.4 to 6.5 kg). Thoracic effusion in all<br />
cases was located on both sides. Cytologically, filamentous<br />
bacteria were evident in 11 cases. In no case Nocardia<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 165 small animal soft tissue session
or Actinomyces could be cultured in bacteriological<br />
examination.<br />
There were no major complications evident due to<br />
catheter placement and handling. In two cats drainage<br />
was initially not effective. One cat underwent thoracotomy;<br />
the other cat got a second catheter on the other side of<br />
the thorax and was treated with streptokinase. Complete<br />
failure of the drainage did not occur. Two further cats<br />
got a second drain. Lavage of the thorax was performed<br />
over 8 days (median, range 6 to 20 days). Of the 16 cats,<br />
one cat underwent thoracotomy, 4 cats died and 11 cats<br />
were discharged. 9 of these 11 cats were still alive at the<br />
endpoint of the study.<br />
We recommend the use of small (6 french) catheters,<br />
inserted via modified seldinger technique for conservative<br />
treatment of feline pyothorax. Our results and data from<br />
human medicine suggest that small catheters could be a<br />
good technique for conservative treatment in dogs, too.<br />
References<br />
1. Demetriou J. L., Foale R. D., Ladlow J., McGrotty Y.,<br />
Faulkner J. Canine and feline pyothorax: a retrospective<br />
study of 50 cases in the UK and Ireland. Journal of <strong>Small</strong><br />
Animal Practice 43. 2002, S. 388-394.<br />
2. Waddell L. S., Brady C. A., Drobatz K. J. Risk factors,<br />
prognostic indicators, and outcome of pyothorax in cats:<br />
80 cases (1986-1999). Journal of the American Veterinary<br />
Medical Association 221. 2002, S. 819-824.<br />
3. Rooney M. B., Monnet E. Medical and surgical treatment<br />
of pyothorax in dogs: 26 cases (1991-2001). Journal of the<br />
American Veterinary Medical Association 221. 2002, S.<br />
86-92.<br />
4. Barrs V. R., Allan G. S., Beatty J. A., Malik R. Feline<br />
Pyothorax: a retrospective study of 27 cases in Australia.<br />
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery 7. 2005, S. 211-222.<br />
5. Doyle J. L., Kuipers von Lande R. G., Worth A. J. Intrathoracic<br />
pyogranulomatous disease in four working dogs.<br />
New Zealand Veterinary Journal 57(6). 2009, S. 346-351.<br />
6. Heffner J. E., Klein J. S., Hampson C. Diagnostic Utility and<br />
Clinical Application of Imaging for Pleural Space Infections.<br />
Chest 137. 2010, S. 467-479.<br />
7. Kurian J., Levin T. L., Han B. K., Taragin B. H., Weinstein<br />
S. Comparison of Ultrasound and CT in the Evaluation of<br />
Pneumonia Complicated by Parapneumonic Effusion in<br />
Children. American Journal of Roentgenology 193. 2009, S.<br />
1648-1654.<br />
8. Swinbourne F., Baines E. A., Baines S. J., Halfacree Z.<br />
J. Computed tomographic findings in canine pyothorax<br />
and correlation with findings at exploratory thoracotomy.<br />
Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 52. 2011, S. 203-208.<br />
9. Boothe H. W., Howe L. M., Boothe D. M., Reynolds L. A.,<br />
Carpenter M. Evaluation of outcomes in dogs treated for<br />
pyothorax: 46 cases (1983-2001). Journal of the American<br />
Veterinary Medical Association 236. 2010, S. 657-663.<br />
10. Walker A. L., Jang S. S., Hirsh D. C. Bacteria associated<br />
with pyothorax of dogs and cats: 98 cases (1989-1998).<br />
Journal of the American Veterinary Medicalal Association<br />
216. 2000, S. 359-363.<br />
11. Barrs V. R., Beatty J. A. Feline Pyothorax - new insights into<br />
an old problem: Part 2. Treatment recommendations and<br />
prophylaxis. The Veterinary Journal 179. 2009, S. 171-178.<br />
12. Ottenjann M., Lübke-Becker A., Linzmann H., Brunnberg<br />
L., Kohn B. Pyothorax in 26 cats:Clinical signs, laboratory<br />
results and therapy (2000-2007). Berliner und Münchner<br />
Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 121. 2008, S. 365-373.<br />
13. Rahman N. M., Maskell N. A., Davies C. W. H., Hedley E. L.,<br />
Nunn A. J., Gleeson F. V., Davies R. J. O. The Relationship<br />
Between Chest Tube Size and Clinical Outcome in Pleural<br />
Infection. Chest 137. 2010, S. 536-543.<br />
14. Valtolina C., Adamantos S. Evaluation of small-bore<br />
wire-guided chest drains for management of pleural space<br />
disease. Journal o <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice 50. 2009, S.<br />
290-297.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 166 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Pyothorax : Is surgery necessary?<br />
Jackie L. Demetriou *<br />
University of Cambridge, UK.<br />
Pyothorax is the accumulation of exudate in the thoracic<br />
cavity. In the human literature the term empyema is used<br />
to describe the same condition in man and is a frequent<br />
clinical problem in paediatric and elderly patients. In<br />
veterinary patients, pyothorax is an uncommon condition<br />
with the most likely causes being migrating foreign bodies<br />
in dogs and extension from pulmonary infection in cats,<br />
although in the majority of clinical cases an underlying<br />
cause is frequently not identified. Reaching a diagnosis is<br />
usually uncomplicated, however the treatment and timing<br />
of treatment of this condition is somewhat controversial.<br />
An accepted principle directs clinicians to drain the thoracic<br />
cavity early and completely. The question that remains<br />
unanswered in relation to treatment is: should medical<br />
management be the primary goal or should surgery be the<br />
first line of treatment for pyothorax in dogs and cats? To<br />
help answer this question evidence will be considered from<br />
both the human and veterinary literature.<br />
Levels of evidence for primary research questions<br />
have been published (University of Oxford Centre of<br />
Evidence Based Medicine) which can be used to evaluate<br />
and scrutinise available data on pyothorax and place<br />
information into appropriate context. In the veterinary<br />
literature all studies relating to pyothorax are graded at<br />
level III-V (retrospective comparative studies; case series<br />
or expert opinion). There are no randomised controlled<br />
trials or prospective comparative studies (levels I and II).<br />
Due to the complex nature of the disease and the broad<br />
clinical spectrum that is presented, controlled clinical<br />
trials are difficult to perform. Additionally, a suitable in<br />
vivo model is lacking. There are 6 studies in the veterinary<br />
literature reviewing pyothorax cases including treatment,<br />
which involve numbers >10, in the past 15 years; 2 feline<br />
studies (Waddell and others 2002, Barrs and others 2005);<br />
3 canine studies (Rooney and Monnet 2002, Johnson and<br />
Martin 2007, Boothe and others 2010) and 1 combined<br />
canine / feline cases (Demetriou and others 2002) . Of these<br />
studies, 2 concluded that surgical treatment is associated<br />
with better outcome than nonsurgical (Rooney and Monnet<br />
2002, Waddell and others 2002) although the latter study<br />
included untreated cases in the nonsurgical group. This<br />
conclusion was not supported by the remaining 3 studies<br />
(where medical management was deemed to be successful)<br />
and therefore definitive conclusions cannot be drawn.<br />
Success of medical management using thoracostomy tubes<br />
is reported in these studies as 25% (Rooney and Monnet,<br />
2002), 73% (Waddell and others, 2002),), 90% (Demetriou<br />
and others, 2002), 95% (Barrs and others, 2005), 100%<br />
(Johnson and Martin, 2007) and 77% (Boothe and others,<br />
2010). It is not entirely clear why medical management was<br />
not successful in the study by Rooney and Monnet (2002)<br />
however the presence of Actinomyces spp was suggested<br />
to be a reason for warranting surgical management due<br />
to its association with the presence of plant material (e.g.<br />
grass awns). All dogs in this study (8) where Actinomyces<br />
spp was isolated responded well to en bloc resection of<br />
affected tissue. Interestingly 3/6 studies reported that<br />
the majority of deaths occurred early on (within 48 hours)<br />
of presentation and start of treatment in the hospital.<br />
One study (Boothe, 2010) found that pleural lavage and<br />
the addition of heparin were two factors that positively<br />
influenced short-term survival rate in medical management.<br />
There have been no reports in the veterinary literature of<br />
the use of fibrinolytics (e.g. urokinase) as part of routine<br />
medical management of this condition.<br />
Due to the paucity of evidence based data in the<br />
veterinary literature, can we therefore learn anything from<br />
studies in human cases of empyema? Before examining the<br />
human literature it is worth mentioning that comparisons<br />
and correlations with veterinary species must be performed<br />
with caution. The majority of human cases represent a<br />
progression from a “simple” parapneumonic effusion.<br />
This aetiology is therefore perhaps more like the proposed<br />
aetiology in feline cases and therefore the pathophysiology<br />
between canine, feline and human cases appear to differ.<br />
This may affect the success of treatment modalities.<br />
Additionally, many human cases of empyema are treated<br />
at the fibropurulent stage. It may be the case that many<br />
veterinary cases are identified at the later organisational<br />
stage although this is not confirmed in the literature as no<br />
studies have attempted to grade the degree of pyothorax<br />
in the veterinary literature.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 167 small animal soft tissue session
There are 3 randomised prospective trials (1 adult and 2<br />
paediatric) examining the difference between early surgery<br />
using video assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) versus medical<br />
management using thoracostomy tubes +/- fibrinolytic<br />
therapy (Wait and others 1997, Sonnappa and others<br />
2006, St. Peter and others 2009). One study found a higher<br />
primary treatment success in the surgical group and surgical<br />
patients also had shorter drainage period and hospital stay<br />
(Wait and others 1997). The robustness of this trial has been<br />
questioned as numbers were small and had an unusually<br />
high clinical medical failure rate (55%) which explains the<br />
results. The 2 paediatric trials (UK and US), conducted<br />
almost simultaneously, both examined early VATS versus<br />
thoracostomy tube placement plus urokinase treatment<br />
(Sonnappa and others 2006, St. Peter and others 2009).<br />
Results were homogenous and concluded no difference in<br />
outcome between the 2 groups. Primary thoracostomy tube<br />
placement was recommended therefore based on cost and<br />
no advantage in the surgical group. With two prospective<br />
clinical trials demonstrating congruence the strongest level<br />
1 evidence is provided and the authors recommended a<br />
treatment algorithm:<br />
EMPYEMA<br />
Chest tube with fibrinolytics<br />
Drainage decreased without clinical improvement<br />
Ultrasound or CT<br />
Persistant pleural No pleural<br />
space disease space disease<br />
VATS Continue with antibiotics<br />
“Failure” of medical management is difficult to define.<br />
Should medical failure be defined as a set period after<br />
insertion of drainage when clinical improvement has not<br />
occurred or should it be defined as persistence of pleural<br />
space disease after drainage has decreased to the point<br />
of meeting chest tube removal criteria? The difficulty in<br />
deciding which cases would respond better to early surgery<br />
is impeded as different institutions and surgeons have<br />
varying criteria on which the decision for surgery are based.<br />
As an example our study demonstrated that cases were<br />
selected for surgery where a pulmonary or mediastinal<br />
mass / FB were identified by diagnostic imaging or where<br />
complications arose subsequent to medical management<br />
(Demetriou and others 2002). Other studies reported<br />
specific time periods of drainage after which surgery was<br />
selected if effusions persisted (e.g. 3-7 days). It is the<br />
author’s experience that successful medical management<br />
can still be achieved with prolonged drainage times.<br />
Can the need for surgery earlier in the course of the<br />
disease be predicted on the basis of advanced imaging? This<br />
question has not been fully answered yet in the veterinary<br />
literature however a recent study (Swinbourne and others<br />
2011) showed that CT and surgical findings are similar in<br />
most cases of canine pyothorax although how accurately it<br />
can guide treatment is not clear. Identification of a foreign<br />
body may be predictive. A recent prospective human<br />
study in the UK evaluated the role of CT in empyema and<br />
concluded that although more abnormalities were detected,<br />
the additional information did not alter management and<br />
is therefore unable to predict clinical outcome (Jaffe and<br />
others 2008). According to the British Thoracic Society<br />
guidelines CT is deemed unnecessary for most cases but<br />
has a role in complicated cases e.g. failure to aspirate<br />
fluid and failure of medical management (Balfour-Lynn and<br />
others 2005, Davies and others 2010). These guidelines<br />
also state that a lung abscess coexisting with empyema<br />
should not normally be surgically drained, which questions<br />
the decision for surgery based on identification of a focal<br />
disease process. Ultrasound is routinely used to guide chest<br />
tube placement in addition to drainage in people and there<br />
is an argument that as ultrasound is cost effective and<br />
non-invasive it should be adopted routinely with veterinary<br />
patients in order to improve accuracy of drain placement. In<br />
conclusion more evidence is required to inform the debate<br />
whether for example early surgery is superior to drainage<br />
and at which point surgery should be contemplated. If<br />
medical management is initiated it would be logical to<br />
put forward the argument that in cases of patients with<br />
persisting sepsis in association with persistent pleural<br />
collection, despite chest tube drainage and antibiotics<br />
then early discussion with a surgeon should be prompted.<br />
Cases of Actinomyces, commonly associated with foreign<br />
bodies may also prompt early surgery.<br />
Is thoracoscopic surgery preferable to open thoracotomy?<br />
This again is a question that cannot be answered in the<br />
veterinary literature. From personnel communication<br />
VATS has been used successfully in dogs and cats with<br />
pyothorax to aid chest drain placement and debridement<br />
/ decortication. Certainly, in other procedures, minimally<br />
invasive surgery is associated with reduced morbidity and<br />
improved clinical recovery compared with open techniques,<br />
however evidence directly relating to thoracoscopy and<br />
pyothorax is lacking. In the human literature there are a<br />
few studies (case series / retrospective) directly comparing<br />
VATS with open surgery that suggest VATS has the same<br />
small animal soft tissue session 168 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
ate of success as open thoracotomy but offers substantial<br />
advantages over thoracotomy in terms of resolution of<br />
the disease, hospital stay and cosmesis (Chambers and<br />
others 2010). Conversion rates vary with reports (0-86%).<br />
A prospective and randomized study is required to confirm<br />
these findings to show that this relatively new form of<br />
treatment is more effective and safer that the existing<br />
operative techniques.<br />
Does pulmonary decortication have a niche in the<br />
management of pyothorax in animals? The aims of<br />
decortication are to eliminate infection and achieve<br />
expansion of the underlying lung to improve lung function.<br />
Decortication carries with it a risk of mortalitily, substantial<br />
blood and air loss and increased surgical times. However,<br />
there is to date, little evidence to guide surgical decisionmaking,<br />
as the effectiveness of decortication in achieving<br />
lung re-expansion has never been fully evaluated.<br />
Additionally, the premise that adequate re-expansion via<br />
effective intrinsic fibrinolysis cannot be achieved has never<br />
been challenged. A recent article in “press” however has<br />
attempted to address this question and concluded that<br />
debridement alone without decortication can achieve lung<br />
re-expansion in patients with empyema (Kho and others<br />
2010). Thus the benefit of decortication in relation to its<br />
risks has to be questioned.<br />
References<br />
• Waddell, L.S, Brady, C.A., & Drobatz, K.J. (2002). Risk<br />
factors, prognostic indicators, and outcome of pyothorax<br />
in cats: 80 cases (1986-1999). Journal of the American<br />
Veterinary Medicine Association, 15, 819-824<br />
• Barrs, V.R., Allan, G.S., Beatty, J.A. & Malik, R. (2005).<br />
Feline pyothorax: a retrospective study of 27 cases in<br />
Australia. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 7,<br />
211-222<br />
• Rooney, M.B. & Monnet, E. (2002) Medical and surgical<br />
treatment of pyothorax in dogs: 26 cases (1991-2001).<br />
Journal of the American Veterinary Medicine Association<br />
221, 86-92<br />
• Johnson, M.S. & Martin, M.W.S. (2007) Successful medical<br />
treatment of 15 dogs with pyothorax. Journal of <strong>Small</strong><br />
Animal Practice, 48, 12-16<br />
• Boothe, H.W., Howe, L.M., Boothe, D.M., Reynolds, L.A. &<br />
Carpenter, M. (2010). Journal of the American Veterinary<br />
Medicine Association, 236, 657-663<br />
• Demetriou, J.L., Foale, R.D., Ladlow, JJ., McGrotty,<br />
Y., Faulkner, J. & Kirby, B.M. (2002) Canine and feline<br />
pyothorax: a retrospective study of 50 cases in the UK and<br />
Ireland. Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice, 43, 388-394<br />
• Wait, M.A., Sharma, S., Hohn, J. & Dal Nogare, A. (1997) A<br />
randomized trial of empyema therapy. Chest, 111, 1548-<br />
1551<br />
• Sonnappa, S., Cohen, G., Owens, C.M., van Doorn, C.,<br />
Cairns, J., Stanojevic, S., Elliott, M.J. & Jaffe, A. (2006).<br />
Comparison of urokinase and Video-assisted thoracoscopic<br />
surgery for treatment of childhood empyema. American<br />
Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 174,<br />
221-227<br />
• St. Peter, S.D., Tsao, K., Harrison, C., Jackson, M.A., Spilde,<br />
T.L., Keckler, S.J., Sharp, S.W., Andrews, W.S., Holcomb III,<br />
G.W. & Ostlie, D.J. (2009) Thoracoscopic decortications vs<br />
thoracostomy with fibrinolysis for empyema in children: a<br />
prospective randomized trial. Journal of Pediatric Surgery,<br />
44, 106-111<br />
• Balfour-Lynn, I.M., Abrahamson, E., Cohen, G., Hartley, J.,<br />
King, S., Parikh, D., Spencer, D., Thomson, A.H. & Urquhart,<br />
D. (2005). BTS guidelines for the management of pleural<br />
infection in children. Thorax, 60, (Suppl 1 )i1-i21<br />
• Davies, H.E., Davies, R.J.O. & Davies, C.W.H. (2010)<br />
Management of pleural infection in adults: British Thoracic<br />
Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax, 65, (Suppl<br />
2) ii41-ii53<br />
• Swinbourne, R., Baines, E.A., Baines, S.J. & Halfacree, Z.J.<br />
(2011) Computed tomographic findings in canine pyothorax<br />
an correlation with findings at exploratory thoracotomy.<br />
Journal of <strong>Small</strong> Animal Practice, 52, 203-208<br />
• Jaffe, A., Calder, A.D., Owens, C.M., Stanojevic, S. &<br />
Sonnappa, S. (2008) Role of routine computed tomography<br />
in paediatric pleural empyema, Thorax, 63, 897-902<br />
• Chambers, A., Routledge, T., Dunning, J. & Scarci, M. (2010)<br />
Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical decortications<br />
superior to open surgery in the management of adults with<br />
primary empyema? Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic<br />
Surgery, 11, 171-177<br />
• Kho, P., Karunanantham, J., Leung. M. & Lim, E. (2010)<br />
Debridement alone without decortications can achieve lung<br />
re-expansion in patients with empyema: an observational<br />
study. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (in<br />
press).<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 169 small animal soft tissue session
small animal soft tissue session 170 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />
In depth <strong>–</strong> Medical or surgical <strong>–</strong><br />
Pancreatitis in dogs and cats<br />
Friday July 8 <strong>–</strong> 15.15 <strong>–</strong> 16.20
Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: what have we learnt on<br />
the last 15 years?<br />
P. Watson, MA,VetMD, CertVR, DSAM, ECVIM, MRCVS<br />
Queen's Veterinary School Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom<br />
Pancreatitis remains a very challenging disease in small<br />
animals, both to diagnose and treat. It is almost equally<br />
challenging in humans. There are no specific treatments<br />
for the disease and therapy remains supportive. It is<br />
frustrating for the surgeon because there are very few<br />
(no?) effective surgical treatments and in fact early<br />
surgical intervention may have a negative impact. In<br />
humans, necrosectomy may help some cases <strong>–</strong> but only if<br />
delayed. Studies have suggested that early necrosectomy<br />
is associated with increased mortality compared with<br />
necrosectomies delayed for a month 1 . Even with infected<br />
pancreatic necrosis, surgery does not appear to reduce<br />
the mortality over medical management 2 . This is largely<br />
because early mortality is due to SIRS and organ failure<br />
and surgery appears to have little impact on this. There are<br />
no comparable studies in dogs.<br />
Mortality from severe acute pancreatitis is up to 20%<br />
in humans 3 . The reported mortality from all cases of acute<br />
pancreatitis (not just severe) has reduced from 12% to 4%<br />
in one centre in the US 4 and from 7.4 to 1.9% in Japan 5<br />
over the last 10 years and the reduction in mortality has<br />
been attributed largely to early aggressive fluid therapy<br />
reducing the risk and impact of SIRS 4;6 . The true mortality<br />
in dogs and cats is unknown but is likely similar. Chronic<br />
pancreatitis is a common disease in humans and dogs<br />
and is a significant cause of ongoing pain and morbidity,<br />
resulting in total pancreatectomy in some individuals to<br />
control the clinical signs.<br />
However, there is hope on the horizon. Recent advances<br />
in genetics and immunology have increased understanding<br />
of causes in humans and very recent work in dogs suggests<br />
new aetiologies and potential treatments. Recent work on<br />
early feeding has also changed the paradigm for nutrition<br />
in pancreatitis in both humans and dogs. This lecture aims<br />
to focus on advances in a few key areas relating to causes<br />
and treatment.<br />
An update on prevalence and causes of pancreatitis<br />
in dogs and cats<br />
Acute pancreatitis is neutrophilic inflammation, necrosis<br />
and oedema of a previously ‘normal’ pancreas. It may<br />
present clinically as a mild or severe disease and there is<br />
normalisation of pancreatic function and structure when the<br />
episode resolves. Relapsing acute pancreatitis describes<br />
repeated bouts of acute, self-resolving inflammation.<br />
This is not the same as chronic pancreatitis! Chronic<br />
pancreatitis (CP) is defined as a continuing inflammatory<br />
disease characterized by the destruction of pancreatic<br />
parenchyma leading to progressive or permanent<br />
impairment of exocrine or endocrine function or both. The<br />
difference from true acute pancreatitis is thus histological<br />
and not clinical. As in other organs, true ‘acute’ pancreatitis<br />
is potentially reversible if the animal recovers with no<br />
permanent histological changes in the pancreas whereas<br />
chronic disease is not. The gold standard for diagnosis of<br />
both acute and chronic pancreatitis is histology but this is<br />
rarely indicated or performed in dogs or cats. Non-invasive<br />
diagnosis in small animals with the currently available<br />
diagnostic imaging and blood tests is not 100% sensitive<br />
and specific even in acute disease and their sensitivity is<br />
relatively low for chronic disease 7 .<br />
Traditionally, it has been assumed that cats most<br />
commonly suffer from CP whereas dogs suffer most from<br />
acute pancreatitis. However, the early literature published<br />
on canine pancreatic disease in the 1960’s and 1970’s<br />
recognized it as a common disease of clinical significance.<br />
It was noted that a high proportion of cases of exocrine<br />
pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in dogs were caused by CP, and<br />
also that it might be responsible for up to 30% or more of<br />
cases of diabetes mellitus (DM). More recent pathological<br />
and clinical studies in both dogs 8, 7;9 and cats 10 have<br />
reconfirmed CP as a common and clinically relevant disease<br />
in both dogs and cats. It is frequently under-recognised<br />
because of difficulty in obtaining a non-invasive diagnosis.<br />
None of the currently available blood tests, including cPLI,<br />
have a high sensitivity for diagnosis and transcutaneous<br />
ultrasound is also not sensitive.<br />
In dogs, the post-mortem prevalence of CP is up to 34%,<br />
particularly in susceptible breeds, and even in studies<br />
of fatal acute pancreatitis, acute-on-chronic disease<br />
accounts for 40% of cases 11 . This is an important point:<br />
nearly half of all dogs which present for the first time<br />
acutely actually already have significant underlying chronic<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 173 small animal soft tissue session
disease which increases their risk both of extrahepatic<br />
biliary obstruction and of long term sequelae. In cats, an<br />
even higher post-mortem prevalence of CP of 60% has<br />
been reported 10 . It must be noted that post-mortem studies<br />
tend to overestimate the prevalence of chronic diseases,<br />
which leave permanent architectural changes in the organ,<br />
whereas the prevalence of acute, totally reversible diseases<br />
will be underestimated, unless the animal dies during the<br />
episode. Nevertheless, it is clear that there are many more<br />
cases of CP in veterinary practice than currently recognized,<br />
and that a number of these are clinically relevant.<br />
The true prevalence of acute pancreatitis in dogs and<br />
cats remains unknown as the only published studies are<br />
either post mortem studies (which over estimate chronic<br />
disease, for the reasons given above) or only report fatal<br />
acute pancreatitis 11 , so the prevalence of resolved cases<br />
is unknown.<br />
The causes of acute and chronic pancreatitis likely overlap<br />
and are usually unknown in dogs. However, differences<br />
in pathological appearance suggest different causes in<br />
different breeds which we are just beginning to elucidate 9 .<br />
The histological appearance in terriers, and preponderance<br />
of acute disease, are suggestive of premature enzyme<br />
activation within the pancreas as a result of hereditary<br />
pancreatic enzyme mutations as seen in hereditary<br />
pancreatitis in humans. However, the only breed in which<br />
genetic studies have thus far been reported is the miniature<br />
schnauzer in which trypsinogen mutations were NOT<br />
found although some dogs had variants of the pancreatic<br />
secretory trypsin inhibitor gene of unclear significance 12;13 .<br />
Our studies of chronic pancreatitis showed increase<br />
prevalences and breed-specific histopathologies in Cavalier<br />
King Charles Spaniels (CKCS), Cocker Spaniels, Collies<br />
and Boxers in the UK 9 . An independent large study of EPI<br />
in the UK found an increased prevalence in older CKCS,<br />
supporting this breed association 14 . Chronic pancreatitis<br />
is extremely common in CKCS and we believe it may be<br />
due to an underlying systemic fibrotic disease which we<br />
are currently investigating.<br />
The particular form of chronic pancreatitis recognized<br />
in English Cocker Spaniels in the UK is thought to be an<br />
autoimmune 15 . As in human autoimmune pancreatitis, it<br />
typically affects middle-aged to older dogs, with a higher<br />
prevalence in males, and at least 50% of affected dogs<br />
subsequently develop DM, EPI, or both. Anecdotally,<br />
blue roans are most affected. Dogs also often have<br />
other concurrent autoimmune disease, particularly<br />
keratoconjunctivitis sicca and anal sacculitis may also be<br />
associated. There is often a mass-like lesion on ultrasound,<br />
and biopsies show a typical perilobular diffuse fibrotic<br />
and lymphocytic disease centred on perilobular ducts and<br />
vessels, with loss of large ducts and hyperplasia of smaller<br />
ducts. Immunohistochemistry shows a preponderance of<br />
duct and vein-centred CD3+ lymphocytes (i.e.; T-cells). The<br />
human disease is believed to be a duct-centred immune<br />
reaction and responds to steroid therapy, including a<br />
reduction in insulin requirement in some diabetics. There<br />
are not yet any controlled trials evaluating the use of<br />
immunosuppressive drugs in English Cocker Spaniels with<br />
chronic pancreatitis but there is now enough circumstantial<br />
evidence to justify their use in this particular breed.<br />
An update on feeding in acute pancreatitis<br />
There have been a number of recent studies and metaanalyses<br />
of studies of nutrition in human acute pancreatitis<br />
which have lead to recent changes in advice for ‘best<br />
practice’ for feeding these cases. There is enough evidence<br />
for early feed in humans now to justify commencement of<br />
a very large prospective randomised clinical trial of early<br />
feeding (less than 24 hours) compared with delayed feeding<br />
(3-4 days) in predicted severe acute pancreatitis 16 .<br />
Ten to twenty years ago, it was considered that early<br />
enteral nutrition was contra-indicated because it was<br />
likely to result in cholecystokinin and secretin release with<br />
consequent release of pancreatic enzymes and worsening<br />
of pancreatitis and associated pain. Total parenteral<br />
nutrition (TPN) seemed a more logical route early in the<br />
disease process, with jejunal tube feeding later in the<br />
disease aiming to bypass the areas of pancreatic enzyme<br />
stimulation. However, recent studies have suggested that<br />
early enteral nutrition is preferable to TPN and current best<br />
practice in human medicine is outlined below 17 . A recently<br />
published open-label prospective pilot study of enteral<br />
nutrition in dogs with pancreatitis showed a good outcome<br />
for dogs fed enterally proximal to the pylorus and justifies<br />
future larger prospective studies 18 . Note particularly that<br />
early enteral nutrition is PARTICULARLY indicated in severe<br />
disease, which is perhaps unexpected and often counter<br />
to our current practice in dogs.<br />
• A negative nitrogen balance is common in acute<br />
pancreatitis and is associated with a 10 fold<br />
increase in mortality 17<br />
• Iv feeding of glucose, protein or lipids do not<br />
stimulate pancreatic secretions.<br />
• Intrajejunal infusion of elemental diets in humans 17<br />
and experimental canine models 19 of pancreatitis<br />
does not stimulate pancreatic enzyme release<br />
significantly<br />
• Early ORAL feeding after acute pancreatitis in man<br />
IS associated with increased pain, whereas jejunal<br />
feeding is not 20 .<br />
• THIS IS IMPORTANT: EARLY INTRAJEJUNAL<br />
FEEDING IS PREFERRED OVER TPN IN PATIENTS<br />
WITH ACUTE PANCREATITIS: PARTICULARLY<br />
SEVERE DISEASE. Results of meta-analysis show<br />
that intra-jejunal feeding after 48 hours significantly<br />
small animal soft tissue session 174 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
educed incidences of infections, reduced surgical<br />
interventions and reduced length of hospital stay<br />
and cost over TPN. 17 . These findings have also<br />
been replicated in dogs with experimental acute<br />
pancreatitis 21 but not yet in clinical pancreatitis<br />
in dogs, although the experiences from early<br />
enteral feeding in other GI diseases in this species<br />
such as parvo virus enteritis 22 suggests the<br />
recommendations may be similar. Most recently,<br />
it has been suggested that feeding may even been<br />
given safely intra-gastrically in humans with acute<br />
pancreatitis, although more studies are needed to<br />
confirm this 17 .<br />
• Type of diet used: in humans, elemental diets have<br />
been used in most cases and usually by continuous<br />
infusion 17 . No studies have really assessed whether<br />
less elemental diets would also work. Recent<br />
studies looking at ‘immune-modulating’ micronutrients<br />
in the diets such as glutamine, fibre,<br />
arginine, omega-3 fatty acids and probiotic bacteria<br />
have been encouraging 17;23, but again more studies<br />
are needed before definite conclusions can be<br />
drawn. No similar studies have been undertaken<br />
in dogs and cats.<br />
• In MILD acute pancreatitis in man, current best<br />
practice is to withhold food in many cases for a<br />
little longer. Fluids, electrolytes and analgesics<br />
are delivered for 2-5 days and then a diet rich<br />
in carbohydrate and moderate in fat and protein<br />
is commenced with discharge on a normal diet<br />
within 4-7 days 17 . Again, there are no specific<br />
recommendations for mild acute disease in dogs<br />
and cats.<br />
• IN CATS: current anecdotal recommendations<br />
are to feed immediately in mild, moderate and<br />
severe pancreatitis, preferably via a jejunostomy<br />
tube, although again it has been suggested that<br />
gastrostromy tubes with multiple low volume feeds<br />
should also be safe. There is just one case report of<br />
using an endoscopically placed J-tube in a cat with<br />
acute pancreatitis 24 . The emphasis on early feeding<br />
in cats comes from the risk of hepatic lipidosis.<br />
References<br />
1. Wittau M, Scheele J, Golz I, Henne-Bruns D, Isenmann<br />
R. Changing role of surgery in necrotizing pancreatitis:<br />
a single-center experience. Hepatogastroenterology<br />
2010;57:1300-1304.<br />
2. Garg PK, Sharma M, Madan K, Sahni P, Banerjee D, Goyal<br />
R. Primary conservative treatment results in mortality<br />
comparable to surgery in patients with infected pancreatic<br />
necrosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:1089-94.<br />
3. Al M, I. Severe acute pancreatitis: pathogenetic aspects<br />
and prognostic factors. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:675-<br />
84.<br />
4. Wall I, Badalov N, Baradarian R, Iswara K, Li JJ, Tenner S.<br />
Decreased mortality in acute pancreatitis related to early<br />
aggressive hydration. Pancreas 2011;40:547-50.<br />
5. Satoh K, Shimosegawa T, Masamune A, Hirota M, Kikuta<br />
K, Kihara Y, Kuriyama S, Tsuji I, Satoh A, Hamada S.<br />
Nationwide epidemiological survey of acute pancreatitis in<br />
Japan. Pancreas 2011;40:503-7.<br />
6. Warndorf MG, Kurtzman JT, Bartel MJ, Cox M, Mackenzie<br />
T, Robinson S, Burchard PR, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. Early<br />
Fluid Resuscitation Reduces Morbidity Among Patients<br />
With Acute Pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011.<br />
7. Watson PJ, Archer J, Roulois AJA, Scase TJ, Herrtage<br />
ME. An observational study of 14 cases of canine chronic<br />
pancreatitis. Veterinary Record 2010;167:968-76.<br />
8. Newman S, Steiner J, Woosley K, Barton L, Ruaux C,<br />
Williams D. Localization of pancreatic inflammation and<br />
necrosis in dogs. J Vet Intern Med 2004;18:488-93.<br />
9. Watson PJ, Roulois A, Scase T, Johnston PEJ, Thomson H,<br />
Herrtage ME. Prevalence and breed distribution of chronic<br />
pancreatitis at post mortem in first opinion dogs. J <strong>Small</strong><br />
Anim Pract 2007;609-18.<br />
10. De Cock HE, Forman MA, Farver TB, Marks SL. Prevalence<br />
and histopathologic characteristics of pancreatitis in cats.<br />
Vet Pathol 2007;44:39-49.<br />
11. Hess RS, Kass PH, Shofer FS, Van Winkle TJ, Washabau<br />
RJ. Evaluation of risk factors for fatal acute pancreatitis in<br />
dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;214:46-51.<br />
12. Bishop MA, Steiner JM, Moore LE, Williams DA. Evaluation<br />
of the cationic trypsinogen gene for potential mutations<br />
in miniature schnauzers with pancreatitis. Can J Vet Res<br />
2004;68:315-18.<br />
13. Bishop MA, Xenoulis PG, Levinski MD, Suchodolski JS,<br />
Steiner JM. Identification of variants of the SPINK1<br />
gene and their association with pancreatitis in Miniature<br />
Schnauzers. Am J Vet Res 2010;71:527-33.<br />
14. Batchelor DJ, Noble PJ, Cripps PJ, Taylor RH, McLean<br />
L, Leibl MA, German AJ. Breed associations for canine<br />
exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. J Vet Intern Med<br />
2007;21:207-14.<br />
15. Watson, P. J, Roulois, A. J. A, Scase, T., holloway, A., and<br />
Herrtage, M. E. Characterization of chronic pancreatitis<br />
in English cocker spaniels. Journal of Veterinary Internal<br />
Medicine In press. 2011.<br />
Ref Type: Abstract<br />
16. Bakker OJ, van Santvoort HC, van BS, Ahmed AU, Besselink<br />
MG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Brink MA,<br />
Dejong CH, van Geenen EJ, van GH, Heisterkamp J, Houdijk<br />
AP, Jansen JM, Karsten TM, Manusama ER, Nieuwenhuijs<br />
VB, van RB, Schaapherder AF, van der Schelling GP, Spanier<br />
MB, Tan A, Vecht J, Weusten BL, Witteman BJ, Akkermans<br />
LM, Gooszen HG. Pancreatitis, very early compared with<br />
normal start of enteral feeding (PYTHON trial): design and<br />
rationale of a randomised controlled multicenter trial. Trials<br />
2011;12:73.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 175 small animal soft tissue session
17. Meier RF, Beglinger C. Nutrition in pancreatic diseases.<br />
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:507-29.<br />
18. Mansfield CS, James FE, Steiner JM, Suchodolski<br />
JS, Robertson ID, Hosgood G. A Pilot Study to Assess<br />
Tolerability of Early Enteral Nutrition via Esophagostomy<br />
Tube Feeding in Dogs with Severe Acute Pancreatitis. J Vet<br />
Intern Med 2011;25:419-25.<br />
19. Qin HL, Su ZD, Hu LG, Ding ZX, Lin QT. Effect of parenteral<br />
and early intrajejunal nutrition on pancreatic digestive<br />
enzyme synthesis, storage and discharge in dog models of<br />
acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:1123-28.<br />
20. Chebli JM, Gaburri PD, De Souza AF, Junior EV, Gaburri AK,<br />
Felga GE, De Paula EA, Forn CG, De Almeida GV, De Castro<br />
NF. Oral refeeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis:<br />
prevalence and risk factors of relapsing abdominal pain. J<br />
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;20:1385-89.<br />
21. Qin HL, Su ZD, Hu LG, Ding ZX, Lin QT. Effect of early<br />
intrajejunal nutrition on pancreatic pathological features<br />
and gut barrier function in dogs with acute pancreatitis. Clin<br />
Nutr 2002;21:469-73.<br />
22. Mohr AJ, Leisewitz AL, Jacobson LS, Steiner JM, Ruaux<br />
CG, Williams DA. Effect of early enteral nutrition on<br />
intestinal permeability, intestinal protein loss, and outcome<br />
in dogs with severe parvoviral enteritis. J Vet Intern Med<br />
2003;17:791-98.<br />
23. Pearce CB, Sadek SA, Walters AM, Goggin PM, Somers SS,<br />
Toh SK, Johns T, Duncan HD. A double-blind, randomised,<br />
controlled trial to study the effects of an enteral feed<br />
supplemented with glutamine, arginine, and omega-3 fatty<br />
acid in predicted acute severe pancreatitis. JOP 2006;7:361-<br />
71.<br />
24. Jennings M, Center SA, Barr SC, Brandes D. Successful<br />
treatment of feline pancreatitis using an endoscopically<br />
placed gastrojejunostomy tube. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc<br />
2001;37:145-52.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 176 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Surgical treatment: necrosectomies,<br />
pancreatectomies, and drainage<br />
Robert N White BSc (Hons) BVetMedCertVA DSAS (Soft Tissue) Dipl<strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral Service, Shirley, Solihull, United Kingdom<br />
Acute pancreatitis is an acute inflammatory disease of<br />
the exocrine pancreas that ranges from mild self-limiting<br />
disease to severe progressive disease involving peripancreatic<br />
tissues and other remote organs. Cats and<br />
dogs with pancreatitis typically present with numerous<br />
clinical signs the commonest of which are abdominal pain,<br />
lethargy, vomiting, and anorexia (Hill and Van Winkle 1993,<br />
Thompson and others 2009, Son and others 2010).<br />
In man, definitionsfor pancreatitis wereproposed by the<br />
International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis (The Atlanta<br />
Symposium) in 1992 (Table 1)<br />
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a mild, self-limiting disease<br />
in the majority of affected humans. However, 10-20% of<br />
human patients develop a more severe form of the disease<br />
characterized by sepsis and multiple organ failure (MOF),<br />
with mortality rates approaching 30% (Holm and others<br />
2003). Considerable efforts have been directed toward<br />
early identification of patients at risk for developing severe<br />
AP. Several methods of severity determination have been<br />
developed in humans, and include clinical scoring systems,<br />
serum markers, and evaluation of contrast-enhanced<br />
computed tomography (CECT). The two most common<br />
causes of AP in humans are gallstones and alcohol abuse,<br />
Table 1<br />
together accounting for up to 80% of cases (Gullo and<br />
others 2002).<br />
AP is a common disease in dogs with reported mortality<br />
rates ranging from 27 to 42%, although most dogs that<br />
have mild disease recover within a few days (Cook and<br />
others 1993, Ruaux 1998). In dogs there are no reports as<br />
to the prevalence of mild acute pancreatitis (Thompson and<br />
others 2009). Although there are no studies evaluating the<br />
cause of death in dogs with AP, most dogs that develop<br />
systemic complications, such as respiratory distress, acute<br />
kidney failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation,<br />
are considered to have a guarded to poor prognosis.<br />
Although pancreatic infection is rarely documented in dogs,<br />
the extent of pancreatic necrosis may be an important<br />
contributing prognostic factor of severity, similar to<br />
what has been shown in humans (Ruaux 2000). Despite<br />
aetiological difference between human and small animal<br />
AP, the pathophysiology of AP is similar. The initial event<br />
in AP is the intracellular activation of trypsinogen to<br />
trypsin, resulting in pancreatic cell destruction. Trypsin is<br />
also capable of activating all other pancreatic zymogens,<br />
causing further injury and auto-digestion of the gland.<br />
Because of these similarities, novel concepts used in<br />
Acute pancreatitis (AP) Acute inflammatory process of the pancreas with variable involvement of other regional tissues or<br />
remote organ systems<br />
Severe AP Association with multiple organ failure (MOF) and/or local complications, such as necrosis, abscess,<br />
or pseudocyst<br />
Acute fluid collection Occurs in the course of AP, located in or near the pancreas, always lacking a wall of granulation or<br />
fibrous tissue; bacteria variably present; occurs in 30-50% of severe AP; most acute fluid collections<br />
regress, but some progress to pseudocyst or abscess<br />
Pancreatic necrosis Diffuse or focal area(s) of non-viable pancreatic parenchyma, typically associated with peri-pancreatic<br />
fat necrosis, diagnosed by CT scan with intravenous contrast enhancement<br />
Acute pseudocyst Collection of pancreatic juice enclosed by a wall of fibrous or granulation tissue, which arises as a<br />
consequence of AP, pancreatic trauma, or chronic pancreatic; formation requires 4 or more weeks<br />
from onset of AP<br />
Pancreatic abscess Circumscribed intra-abdominal collection of pus usually in or near the pancreas, containing little or<br />
no pancreatic necrosis, arises as a consequence of AP or pancreatic trauma<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 177 small animal soft tissue session
humans regarding severity assessment and therapy may<br />
be applicable to dogs and cats.<br />
Cats have different embryological development and<br />
anatomy of the pancreas from other species, including<br />
dogs. The pancreatic duct is derived from the ventral<br />
anlage and is the main functional pancreatic duct in cats,<br />
but it is of minor importance, and may be absent in dogs.<br />
In cats the accessory pancreatic duct generally does not<br />
persist, with 80% of cats having only one pancreatic<br />
duct. The accessory pancreatic duct enters the duodenum<br />
through the minor duodenal papilla. The pancreatic duct<br />
enters through the major duodenal papilla. In cats this is<br />
the main, and frequently the only, pancreatic duct opening<br />
into the duodenum, contiguously with the bile duct. It is<br />
implied that this single opening of the pancreatic duct (that<br />
is contiguous with the opening of the common bile duct)<br />
is the reason for an association between pancreatitis and<br />
extrabiliary tract obstruction in the species (Warman and<br />
Harvey 2007, Son and others 2010).<br />
The most appropriate therapy for acute necrotizing<br />
pancreatitis remains controversial. Historically, in humans,<br />
surgical intervention following medical stabilization was<br />
commonly performed to confirm the diagnosis and to treat<br />
acute pancreatic necrosis. In recent years, there has been a<br />
decreased emphasis on early surgical intervention because<br />
improved non-invasive imaging, therapeutic techniques,<br />
and intensive care have become more readily available.<br />
Surgical intervention in humans<br />
In humans, the precise indications for surgery in patients<br />
with pancreatitis have evolved in recent years. Whereas<br />
early aggressive debridement was used commonly for all<br />
patients with pancreatic necrosis in the past, now most<br />
pancreatic surgeons have adopted a more conservative<br />
algorithm of selective and delayed pancreatic debridement<br />
(Büchler and others 2000, Clancy and Ashley 2002).<br />
Reported indications for surgical intervention in acute<br />
necrotizing pancreatitis in man (Clancy and Ashley 2007)<br />
are,<br />
• Diagnostic uncertainty<br />
• Intra-abdominal catastrophe unrelated to necrotizing<br />
pancreatitis such as perforated viscus<br />
• Infected necrosis documented by FNA or<br />
extraluminal gas on CT scan<br />
• Severe sterile necrosis<br />
• Symptomatic organized pancreatic necrosis<br />
In man, surgical therapy for acute pancreatitis<br />
may address either the aetiology of pancreatitis or<br />
its complications. Surgery may also be indicated in<br />
the management of pancreatic abscessation and the<br />
management of certain cases of pancreatic pseudocyst.<br />
Operations addressing aetiology generally are limited to<br />
interventions to eliminate cholelithiasis and thus eliminate<br />
gallstone pancreatitis. Operations performed to specifically<br />
manage the complications of pancreatitis including the<br />
following.<br />
Resection<br />
Pancreatic resection for acute pancreatitis is primarily of<br />
historical interest only and is not recommended currently.<br />
In the 1960s and 1970s partial and total pancreatectomy<br />
for pancreatitis was performed on the basis that remaining<br />
diseased pancreas could be a source of persistent<br />
inflammation. Operative mortality was as high as 60%.<br />
Pancreatic debridement<br />
All techniques of pancreatic debridement are based on<br />
two principles; 1) wide removal of devitalized and necrotic<br />
tissue with thorough exploration and unroofing of all<br />
collections of solid and liquid debris, and, 2) the assurance<br />
of postoperative removal of the products of ongoing local<br />
inflammation and infection that persist after debridement.<br />
Techniques include debridement with closure over drains,<br />
debridement with open packing, and debridement with<br />
closure over irrigation drains and postoperative lavage are<br />
the three methods reported commonly.<br />
Pancreatic pseudocysts<br />
A pancreatic pseudocyst is a collection of pancreatic<br />
secretions and cellular debris enclosed within a fibrous<br />
sac that lacks an epithelial wall. Pseudocyst formation is<br />
a common complication of acute pancreatitis in humans<br />
occurring in up to 54% of pancreatitis patients (Clancy<br />
and Ashley 2007). The principle indications for treating<br />
pancreatic pseudocysts in man are to relieve symptoms<br />
and to prevent complications of the pseudocyst. Treatment<br />
approaches for pancreatic pseudocyst in man are listed<br />
(Table 2) as follows (Clancy and Ashley 2007).<br />
Approaches Examples<br />
Open surgical Cystogastrostomy<br />
Cystoduodenostomy<br />
Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy<br />
Distal pancreatectomy +/- splenectomy<br />
External drainage<br />
Laparoscopic Cystogastrostomy<br />
Cystoduodenostomy<br />
Roux-en-Y cystojejunostomy<br />
Distal pancreatectomy +/- splenectomy<br />
External drainage<br />
Radiologic Percutaneous drainage<br />
Percutaneous transgastric drainage<br />
Endoscopic Transpapillary pancreatic duct stent<br />
Transgastric stent<br />
Transduodenal stent<br />
small animal soft tissue session 178 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
In recent years there has been a proliferation of reports<br />
describing minimally invasive approaches in necrotizing<br />
pancreatitis. It appears that advances in minimally invasive<br />
technology hold promise as adjuncts to open procedures in<br />
the future, particularly as a means of delaying surgery to<br />
facilitate debridement when the necrotic pancreas becomes<br />
more organized (Pamoukian and Gagner 2001).<br />
Surgical intervention in dogs and cats<br />
The previous perception that surgical management is<br />
unwarranted in acute pancreatitis has been questioned<br />
recently (Thompson and others 2009). There are no<br />
established specific guidelines for surgical intervention<br />
in dogs and cats, but in dogs accepted criteria include<br />
evidence of infection, local complications (abscessation or<br />
biliary obstruction), diagnostic confirmation (of neoplastic<br />
versus non-neoplastic disease), persistent distant organ<br />
complications, and failure to respond to aggressive medical<br />
management (Thompson and others 2009).<br />
There is similar confusion with regards to the<br />
management of chronic pancreatitis and its associated<br />
conditions including pancreatic pseudocysts and pancreatic<br />
abscessation. Pancreatic pseudocysts, and their treatment,<br />
have only rarely reported in dogs and cats (Bellenger<br />
and others 1989, Smith and Biller 1998, VanEnkevort<br />
and others 1999, Marchevsky and others 2000, Jerram<br />
and others 2004). Reported surgical managements<br />
include cystogastrostomy (Bellenger and others 1989),<br />
cystoduodenostomy and omentalization (Marchevsky and<br />
others 2000), omentalization (Jerram and others 2004),<br />
ultrasonographic-guided drainage (Smith and Biller 1998),<br />
and open external drainage (VanEnkevort and others 1999).<br />
The surgical management of pancreatic abscessation<br />
involves pancreatic necrosectomy and omentalization in<br />
conjunction with either closed or open peritoneal drainage<br />
for suspected septic peritonitis (Salisbury and others 1988,<br />
Johnson and Mann 2006, Anderson and others 2008). In<br />
a recent retrospective review of 36 dogs diagnosed with<br />
pancreatic abscessation despite surgical intervention 71%<br />
of the dogs died or were euthanized prior to discharge from<br />
the hospital (Anderson and others 2006).<br />
The role of minimally invasive approach for the surgical<br />
management of pancreatitis and its associated conditions<br />
remains to be defined in the dog and cat.<br />
References<br />
• Anderson JR, Cornell KK, Parnell NK and Salisbury SK<br />
(2008) Pancreatic abscess in 36 dogs: a retrospective<br />
analysis of prognostic indicators. Journal of the American<br />
Animal Hospital Association44, 171-179<br />
• Bellenger CR, Ilkiw JE and Malik R (1989) Cystogastrostomy<br />
in the treatment of pancreatic pseudocyst/abscess in two<br />
dogs.Veterinary Record125, 181-184<br />
• Bradley EL (1992) A clinically based classification system<br />
for acute pancreatitis; summary of the International<br />
Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September<br />
11 through 13. Archives of Surgery128, 586-590<br />
• Büchler MW, Gloor B, Müller CA, Friess H, Seiler CA and<br />
Uhl W (2000) Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: treatment<br />
strategy according to infection. Annals of Surgery232,<br />
619-626<br />
• Clancy TE and Ashley SW (2002) Current management of<br />
necrotizing pancreatitis.Advances in Surgery36, 103-121<br />
• Clancy TE and Ashley SW (2007) Management of acute<br />
pancreatitis. In: Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, 11th<br />
Edition. MJ Zinner and SW Ashley (eds). McGraw Hill<br />
Medical, New York. pp 939-982<br />
• Cook AK, Breitschwerdt EB, Levine JF, Bunch SE and Linn<br />
LO (1993) Risk factors associated with acute pancreatitis<br />
in dogs: 101 cases (1985-1990). Journal of the American<br />
Veterinary Medical Association203, 673-679<br />
• Gullo L, Migliori M, Pezzilli R, Olál A, Farkas G, Levy P,<br />
Arvanitakis C, Lankisch P and Beger H (2002) An update<br />
on recurrent acute pancreatitis: data from five European<br />
countries. American Journal of Gastroenterology97, 1959-<br />
1962<br />
• Hill RC and Van Winkle T (1993) Acute necrotizing<br />
pancreatitis and acute suppurativepancreatitis in the cat.A<br />
retrospective study of 40 cases (1976-1989).Journal of<br />
Veterinary Internal Medicine7, 25-33<br />
• Holm JL, Chan DL and Rozanski EA (2003) Acute<br />
pancreatitis in dogs.Journal of Veterinary Emergency and<br />
Critical Care13, 201-213<br />
• Jerram RM, Warman CG, Davies ES, Robson MC and<br />
Walker AM (2004) Successful treatment of a pancreatic<br />
pseudocyst by omentalisation in a dog. New Zealand<br />
Veterinary Journal52, 197-201<br />
• Johnson MD and Mann FA (2006) Treatment fro pancreatic<br />
abscesses via omentalization with abdominal closure<br />
versus open peritoneal drainage in dogs: 15 cases<br />
(1994-2004). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical<br />
Association228, 397-402<br />
• Marchevsky AM, Yovich JC and Wyatt KM (2000) Pancreatic<br />
pseudocyst causing extrahepatic biliary obstruction in a<br />
dog. Australian Veterinary Journal78, 99-101<br />
• Pamoukian VN and Gagner M (2001) Laparoscopic<br />
necrosectomy for acute necrotizing pancreatitis.Journal of<br />
Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery8, 221-223<br />
• Ruaux CG and Atwell R (1998) General practice attitudes<br />
to the treatment of spontaneous canine acute pancreatitis.<br />
Australian Veterinary Practice28, 67-73<br />
• Ruaux CG (2000) Pathophysiology of organ failure in severe<br />
acute pancreatitis in dogs.Compendium of Continuing<br />
Education for the Practicing Veterinarian22, 531-542<br />
• Salisbury SK, Lantz GC, Nelson RW and Kazacos EA (1988)<br />
Pancreatic abscess in dogs: six cases (1978-1986). Journal<br />
of the American Veterinary Medical Association193, 1104-<br />
1108<br />
• Smith SA and Biller DS (1998) Resolution of<br />
a pancreatic pseudocyst in a dog following<br />
percutaneousultrasonographic-guided drainage.Journal of<br />
the American Animal Hospital Association34, 515-522<br />
• Son TT, Thompson L, Serrano S and Seshadri (2010)<br />
Surgical intervention in the management of severe acute<br />
pancreatitis in cats: 8 cases (2003-2007). Journal of<br />
Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care20, 426-435<br />
• Thompson LJ, Seshadri R, and Raffe MR (2009)<br />
Characteristics and outcomes in surgical management of<br />
severe acute pancreatitis: 37 dogs (2001-2007). Journal of<br />
Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care19, 165-173<br />
• VanEnkevort BA, O’Brien RT and Young KM (1999)<br />
Pancreatic pseudocysts in 4 dogs and 2 cats:<br />
ultrasonographic and clinicopathologic findings. Journal of<br />
Veterinary Internal Medicine13, 309-313<br />
• Warman S and Harvey A (2007) Feline pancreatitis: current<br />
concepts and treatment guidelines. In Practice29 470-477.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 179 small animal soft tissue session
small animal soft tissue session 180 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>Small</strong> animals <strong>–</strong> soft tissues<br />
In depth: VSSO <strong>–</strong> Reconstructive<br />
surgery: management of skin tumors<br />
Saturday July 9 <strong>–</strong> 14.00 <strong>–</strong> 17.50
Novel reconstructions of the tip of the nose<br />
G. ter Haar*<br />
Utrecht University, The Netherlands<br />
Crescentic Nasojugal Flap<br />
The bridge of the nose in dogs and cats can be very<br />
difficult to reconstruct due to the limited availability of<br />
free local tissues. In addition to free skin grafts, many skin<br />
flaps have been described in the veterinary literature that<br />
allow primary closure of cutaneous lesions involving the<br />
facial and nasal region. Local skin flaps would be preferable<br />
however for closure of nasal defects because they match<br />
the hair length, direction and color of the recipient site and<br />
would have a more cosmetic result. So far, practical and<br />
cosmetically satisfactory techniques with local skin flaps<br />
for closure of rostral nasal dorsum defects in dogs and cats<br />
have not been reported.<br />
Recently, a crescentic nasojugal flap (CNJF) for nasal<br />
tip reconstruction after tumor removal in human patients<br />
was described. The donor skin is harvested from the lateral<br />
side of the nose and the cheek or the perialar region.<br />
A crescentic perialar skin excision is made to enable<br />
advancement of the skin of the cheek. A second, triangular<br />
excision is made on the contralateral side of the defect to<br />
prevent a dog-ear upon closure of the defect. Upon closure,<br />
the sutures are placed in the alar and alar-labial groove,<br />
yielding the excellent cosmetic appearance of the flap in<br />
people. The feasibility of the CNJF in dogs was studied<br />
by performing the technique unilaterally and bilaterally<br />
on canine cadavers. The applicability of the CNJF for<br />
reconstruction of the rostral nasal area in a dog with a<br />
large rostral nasal defect as a result of granulomatous<br />
inflammation involving the nasal plane and the nasal<br />
dorsum was subsequently demonstrated.<br />
A mixed-breed cadaver was positioned in sternal<br />
recumbency and the nasal and labial regions were clipped.<br />
The defect, the skin that was going to be excised, and the<br />
surgical lines were drawn onto the nose. At the rostral part<br />
of the round shaped defect at the tip of the nose, a line<br />
was drawn along the border of the tip of the nose and was<br />
continued laterally in an arch shape to meet the alar groove.<br />
To avoid dog-ears upon closure, a triangle was formed<br />
around the distal part of the crescent-shaped line, which<br />
was going to be excised. The flap area was automatically<br />
outlined by the caudal part of the triangle and the medial<br />
part of the defect. To avoid a second dog-ear upon closure,<br />
two converging lines were drawn on the contralateral side<br />
of the nose with the broadest part meeting the caudolateral<br />
part of the defect. The defect, the cone-shaped area and<br />
the triangular figure were excised. The flap area was<br />
undermined to facilitate advancement to the tip of the nose<br />
using stay sutures (absorbable monofilament 2-0). The flap<br />
was attached to the underlying tissue in the site of defect<br />
using absorbable monofilament 3-0 interrupted sutures.<br />
The same suture material was used to close the edges<br />
of the former cone-shaped area and the triangular area.<br />
The skin was closed using non-absorbable monofilament<br />
4-0 interrupted sutures. This flap could also successfully<br />
be performed bilaterally and can be adjusted to assist in<br />
reconstruction of the nasal plane as demonstrated in a<br />
patient.<br />
Modified lateral rhinotomy for removal of nasal septum<br />
squamous cell carcinoma in the dog<br />
In January 2003, a 9-year-old intact male Labrador<br />
retriever dog weighing 41.3 kg was referred to the<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion <strong>Animals</strong>,<br />
Utrecht University for longstanding pruritis. During the<br />
history taking at the dermatology receiving, the owner<br />
reported right-sided epistaxis and sneezing of 8 weeks<br />
duration as additional problems, for which the dog was<br />
internally referred to the ENT section. No abnormalities<br />
were noted on physical examination of this dog, with<br />
the exception of a slightly raised, ulcerated mass, only<br />
visible on lifting the right nostril in the right nasal<br />
vestibule, originating from the nasal septum of more than<br />
1 cm in diameter and unclear caudal borders. The right<br />
submandibular lymph node was not enlarged, but a FNAB<br />
was taken and considered to be reactive lymphoid tissue.<br />
Thoracic and nasal radiographs and a complete blood<br />
count and serum biochemical examination were normal.<br />
On rhinoscopy it was demonstrated that the tumor was<br />
well circumscribed and extended caudally for 1.5 cm and<br />
was confined to the nasal septum. A histological biopsy<br />
was taken from the cranial middle part of the tumour,<br />
and a histological diagnosis of a well-differentiated<br />
squamous cell carcinoma was made. Deforming surgery<br />
small animal soft tissue session 182 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
was absolutely unacceptable to the owner; a modified<br />
lateral rhinotomy procedure was therefore proposed and<br />
carried out as described below.<br />
As described by Pavletic, it is possible to elevate the<br />
central planum as a dorsally based flap, thereby preserving<br />
this tissue while gaining access to the cranial nasal septum.<br />
To get full access to the entire tumor, this approach was<br />
combined with a lateral rhinotomy, as described by Hedlund<br />
in analogy with the technique used in humans for surgical<br />
removal of nasal septum squamous cell carcinoma. The<br />
surgeon directs the incision dorsocaudally from the angle<br />
of the rhinarium toward the nasomaxillary notch between<br />
the dorsal and ventral parietal cartilage, transecting the<br />
accessory cartilage. Using this technique the tumour could<br />
be resected (full-thickness resection of nasal septum)<br />
with wide-enough margins. The lateral rhinotomy incision<br />
was closed in three layers (nasal mucosa, cartilage or<br />
subcutaneous tissue, and skin). The nasal septum flap<br />
was resutured into position using a simple interrupted<br />
suture pattern.<br />
No complications were encountered during surgery or<br />
the immediate postoperative period. Except for a slight<br />
ventral deviation of the dorsal cranial bridge of the nose,<br />
as a result of the loss of most of the cranial cartilaginous<br />
septum, the cosmetic appearance was excellent. Pathology<br />
demonstrated fully excised well-differentiated SCC, this<br />
dog was still free of symptoms 7 years after surgery.<br />
SCC of the nasal septum is an uncommon disease in<br />
dogs, but when diagnosed in an early stage, this tumour can<br />
be removed completely using the described modified lateral<br />
rhinotomy technique with a good long-term prognosis and<br />
excellent cosmesis.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 183 small animal soft tissue session
Use of local and axial pattern flaps for reconstruction<br />
of the hard and soft palate<br />
Ramesh K Sivacolundhu, BVMS MVS FACVSc<br />
AMC, New York, N.Y., USA<br />
Abstract<br />
There are numerous conditions which may result in<br />
defects of the hard and soft palate. Reconstruction of these<br />
defects may be difficult due to anatomical limitations and<br />
limited tissue availability. The majority of palate defects,<br />
even when large, may be closed using local and/or axial<br />
pattern flaps, while other more advanced techniques such<br />
as free tissue transfer, muscle flaps and prosthetic implants<br />
are required in a smaller number of cases.<br />
Introduction<br />
Defects in the hard and soft palate may result from<br />
congenital abnormalities, resection of neoplasms,<br />
traumatic injuries, severe peridontal disease, tooth<br />
removals, severe chronic infections, and secondary to<br />
surgical and radiation therapy (1-5). Reconstruction of these<br />
defects can be challenging. The area concerned presents<br />
a number of anatomical limitations, with difficulties in<br />
exposure and access to affected areas, and limited tissue<br />
available for reconstruction of defects. In addition, the<br />
repair must withstand mechanical stresses induced during<br />
mastication and deglutition (1).<br />
Reconstruction of palate defects requires a detailed<br />
knowledge of the local anatomy, and an understanding<br />
of the various options available to the surgeon. This may<br />
be particularly important in cases of large defects, or<br />
when radiation or previous surgeries have compromised<br />
local tissue (1). There are a number of general principles<br />
described by Harvey (1987) (3)and Luskin (2000) (4) that<br />
should be followed when considering surgery on a patient<br />
with a palate defect:<br />
Make flaps large compared with the size of the defect<br />
to minimize tension.<br />
Preserve the vascular supply to flaps by elevating<br />
adequate underlying connective tissue. For hard palate<br />
epithelium this means elevating the mucoperiosteum<br />
as one layer and avoiding the palatine artery, which<br />
penetrates the palatine bone approximately 1 cm medial<br />
to the carnassial tooth, and then runs caudally and rostrally<br />
parallel to the midline.<br />
Suture tissues to freshly incised epithelium. A flap<br />
sutured to an intact epithelial surface will not heal.<br />
Incisions should be made with a scalpel blade rather than<br />
scissors to minimize crushing injuries.<br />
Avoid the use of electrosurgery or cauterization to control<br />
bleeding.<br />
Where possible, arrange suture lines so they are situated<br />
over connective tissue rather than over the defect, thereby<br />
preventing drying and contamination of the connective<br />
tissue side of the flap and decreasing the risk of dehiscence.<br />
Suture tissue gently and with large bites of tissue to<br />
minimize tension and interference with blood supply at<br />
the wound edges.<br />
Suture materials used are usually 3/0, 4/0 or 5/0<br />
absorbable suture material, depending on the size of<br />
the animal, type of repair being performed, and type of<br />
tissue being sutured (hard palate mucosa, soft palate<br />
mucosa or buccal mucosa). This author generally prefers<br />
the use of polydioxanone although other absorbable and<br />
nonabsorbable suture materials have also been utilized. If<br />
knots are left on the epithelial surface, they will usually<br />
slough in three to four weeks regardless of the type of<br />
suture material used (3).<br />
There are several reports of management of palate defects<br />
in dogs and cats, with a variety of techniques described.<br />
Techniques that have been used for reconstruction or<br />
management of palate defects include local flaps (3,5-8),<br />
axial pattern flaps (1,9), distant tissue with use of a rostral<br />
tongue flap (10), free tissue transfer with microvascular<br />
anastomosis (2), temporal muscle flaps (11,12) and<br />
prosthetic appliances (13,14).<br />
References<br />
• Bryant KJ, Moore K, McAnulty JF: Angularis oris axial<br />
pattern buccal flap for reconstruction of recurrent fistulae of<br />
the palate. Vet Surg 32:113-119, 2003.<br />
• Degner DA, Lanz OI, Walshaw R: Myoperitoneal<br />
microvascular free flaps in dogs: an anatomical study and a<br />
clinical case report. Vet Surg 25:463-470, 1996.<br />
• Harvey CE: Palate defects in dogs and cats. Compend<br />
Contin Educ Pract Vet 9:404-418, 1987.<br />
• Luskin IR: Reconstruction of oral defects using mucogingival<br />
pedicle flaps. Clin Tech <strong>Small</strong> Anim Pract 15:251-259, 2000.<br />
• Sager M, Nefen S: Use of buccal mucosal flaps for the<br />
correction of congenital soft palate defects in three dogs.<br />
Vet Surg 27:358-363, 1998.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 184 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
• Griffiths LG, Sullivan M: Bilateral overlapping mucosal<br />
single-pedicle flaps for correction of soft palate defects. J<br />
Am Anim Hosp Assoc 37:183-186, 2001.<br />
• Howard DR, Davis DG, Merkley DF, et al: Mucoperiosteal<br />
flap technique for cleft palate repair in dogs. J Am Vet Med<br />
Assoc 165:352-354, 1974.<br />
• Knight G: Surgical closure of the cleft palate. Vet Rec<br />
70:680-681, 1958.<br />
• Dundas JM, Fowler JD, Shmon CL, et al: Modification<br />
of the superficial cervical axial pattern skin flap for oral<br />
reconstruction. Vet Surg 34:206-213, 2005.<br />
• Robertson JJ, Dean PW: Repair of a traumatically induced<br />
oronasal fistula in a cat with a rostral tongue flap. Vet Surg<br />
16:164-166, 1987.<br />
• Cheung L: An animal model for maxillary reconstruction<br />
using a temporalis muscle flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg<br />
54:1439-1445, 1996.<br />
• Fahie MA, Smith BJ, Ballard JB, et al: Regional peripheral<br />
vascular supply based on the superficial temporal artery in<br />
dogs and cats. Anat Histol Embryol 27:205-208, 1998.<br />
• Coles BH, Underwood LC: Repair of the traumatic oronasal<br />
fistula in the cat with a prosthetic acrylic implant. Vet Rec<br />
122:359-360, 1988.<br />
• Hobson HP, Heller RA, Wilson JB: Use of a removable<br />
maxillary appliance to correct a palatal defect in a dog. Vet<br />
Med <strong>Small</strong> Anim Clin 66:1085-1087, 1971.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 185 small animal soft tissue session
Wide excision of tumors and reconstruction of the<br />
resultant defect<br />
Julius M. Liptak*<br />
Alta Vista Animal Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada<br />
Wide resections are considered curative-intent surgeries<br />
as the intention is to resect both macroscopic and<br />
microscopic disease, including biopsy tracts, and thus<br />
prevent local tumor recurrence and improve overall survival<br />
times. Wide excision is recommended in the management<br />
of the majority of solid tumors because the first surgery<br />
provides the best chance for a cure.<br />
For wide excision of tumors, a margin of normal appearing<br />
tissue should be excised en bloc with the gross tumor to<br />
account for microscopic extension of the tumor. Surgical<br />
margins should be determined on the basis of tumor type,<br />
tumor grade if appropriate (e.g., mast cell tumor), biologic<br />
behavior, anatomic location, and the barrier provided by<br />
surrounding tissues. Precise guidelines to what constitutes<br />
appropriate tumor margins have not been defined for most<br />
tumor types. The majority of surgeons use predetermined<br />
distances depending on tumor type; however, there is<br />
evidence that tumor size also influences the extent of<br />
microscopic tumor extension, with larger tumors of the<br />
same histologic type having greater microscopic extension<br />
and hence requiring larger margins than smaller tumors.<br />
Margins are three-dimensional and hence lateral and<br />
deep margins must be considered when planning surgical<br />
resections of tumors. Lateral margins are determined by<br />
tumor type and biologic behavior. For example, 1 cm lateral<br />
margins are recommended for benign tumors and most<br />
malignant carcinomas, whereas 3 cm lateral margins are<br />
required for soft tissue sarcomas. For mast cell tumors,<br />
lateral margins are also determined by histologic grade as 1<br />
cm lateral margins are sufficient for grade I mast cell tumors<br />
and 2 cm lateral margins for grade II mast cell tumors.<br />
Deep margins are determined by natural tissue barriers as<br />
1 to 3 cm deep margins are often not possible in regions<br />
such as the extremities (limbs and head) and trunk. Fat,<br />
subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and parenchymal tissue do<br />
not provide a barrier to tumor invasion and are not adequate<br />
for deep margins. Connective tissues, such as muscle<br />
fascia and bone, are resistant to neoplastic invasion and<br />
provide a good natural tissue barrier. Hence, deep margins<br />
should include a minimum of one fascial plane, while two<br />
fascial planes are recommended for surgical resection of<br />
injection site sarcomas. Lateral and deep margins should<br />
be greater if the tumor is invasive, recurrent, or inflamed.<br />
Tumors, particularly soft tissue sarcomas, should never<br />
be shelled out because they are often surrounded by a<br />
pseudocapsule of compressed, viable neoplastic cells and<br />
not healthy, reactive host cells.<br />
Primary closure of the resultant defect is preferred if<br />
possible. If the wound edges can be closed but tension<br />
is high, then tension-relieving techniques should be<br />
employed depending on the degree of tension. If the wound<br />
edges cannot be apposed, then the defect needs to be<br />
reconstructed. There are many different reconstructive<br />
options, ranging from subdermal plexus flaps (i.e.,<br />
transposition and advancement flaps), flank fold flaps,<br />
axial pattern flaps (i.e., thoracodorsal, caudal superficial<br />
epigastric, caudal auricular, facial, tail and scrotal axial<br />
pattern flaps), skin grafts, and indirect flaps.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 186 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Canine mast cell tumor<br />
Sarah Boston*<br />
University of Guelph, Dept. of Clinical Studies, Ontario Vet. College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada..<br />
Initial work up of a mast cell tumor (MCT) will involve<br />
diagnosis by FNA and staging. The initial staging performed<br />
will depend on the index of suspicion that the mass is a<br />
grade II or III MCT and clinician’s preference. Cytology is<br />
generally diagnostic for MCT. However, an incisional biopsy<br />
to determine grade is recommended in some cases. The<br />
histological grade may be important to determine in some<br />
cases, where the surgical approach may be altered by the<br />
grade of the tumor.<br />
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification<br />
scheme for canine mast cell tumours divides them into<br />
four stages according to the clinical presentation . Stage<br />
I <strong>–</strong> One tumour confined to the dermis without regional<br />
lymph node involvement (Ia <strong>–</strong> Without systemic signs,<br />
Ib <strong>–</strong> With systemic signs); Stage II <strong>–</strong> One tumour confined<br />
to the dermis with regional lymph node involvement (IIa <strong>–</strong><br />
Without systemic signs, IIb <strong>–</strong> With systemic signs); Stage<br />
III <strong>–</strong> Multiple dermal tumours or one large infiltrating<br />
tumour with or without regional lymph node involvement<br />
(IIIa <strong>–</strong> Without systemic signs, IIIb <strong>–</strong> With systemic signs);<br />
and Stage IV <strong>–</strong> Any tumour with distant metastasis or a<br />
recurrence with meta- stasis (including blood and/or bone<br />
marrow involvement). Locoregional staging and evaluation<br />
for visceral metastasis (to spleen and liver) are the areas<br />
that are most important to evaluate when staging canine<br />
patients with MCT.<br />
Lymph node staging will involve palpation, FNA for<br />
cytology and biopsy for histopathology in some cases. One<br />
pit fall with cytological evaluation of the lymph nodes is<br />
that it can be difficult to differentiate between neoplastic<br />
mast cells and normal mast cells that are at the site<br />
due to chemotaxis. Krick et al attempted to define the<br />
cytological staging of lymph nodes to create consistency<br />
in the literature. In that study they defined:<br />
Normal <strong>–</strong> No mast cells seen<br />
Reactive lymphoid hyperplasia - Reactive node +/- rare<br />
individual mast cells<br />
Possible metastasis <strong>–</strong> 2-3 mast cell aggregates of 2-3<br />
cells<br />
Probably metastasis - >3 foci of mast cell aggregates of<br />
2-3 cells and/or 2-5 aggregates of >3 mast cells<br />
Certain metastasis - Effacement of lymphoid tissue<br />
by mast cells and/or presence of aggregated, poorly<br />
differentiated MC with pleomorphism, anisocytosis,<br />
anisokaryosis, and/or decreased or variable granulation,<br />
and or >5 aggregates of >3 MC<br />
Although this definition is helpful and may lead to<br />
the ability to predict prognosis in future studies, it still<br />
creates a clinical problem of what to do with cases that<br />
are determined to have possible or probably metastasis.<br />
In Krick’s study, 152 dogs with MCT had lymph node<br />
evaluation. 63.8% of dogs were considered stage I and<br />
36.2% were considered stage II. In that study, stage II dogs<br />
had a shorter survival time and dogs with grade III MCT<br />
were more likely to have stage II disease. In cases with<br />
enlarged locoregional lymph nodes with questionable or<br />
certain metastasis, removal of the affected lymph node at<br />
the time of surgery for histopathology and cytoreduction<br />
is recommended.<br />
Abdominal ultrasound is also recommended for staging<br />
MCT in dogs, with ultrasound-guided FNA of the spleen<br />
and liver if they appear abnormal. This can also raise<br />
questions of true metastasis versus normal mast cells.<br />
Recently Stefanello et al evaluated 52 dogs with MCT that<br />
had ultrasound guided aspirates of the liver and spleen.<br />
10/52 (19%) dogs had abnormalities of the spleen or liver<br />
on cytology and all 10 of these cases had abnormalities<br />
noted on ultrasound. An additional 21/42 dogs with normal<br />
cytology had abnormalities on ultrasound. Although it is<br />
somewhat controversial, this study suggests that cytology<br />
should be performed in cases with ultrasound abnormalities<br />
of the liver or spleen. This study also found that dogs<br />
with cytological evidence of visceral metastasis had a<br />
significantly shorter survival time than dogs with normal<br />
cytology. (34 days vs 733 days)<br />
Thoracic radiographs are often taken as part of a work<br />
up for mast cell tumors. However, this is a low yield test.<br />
A recent retrospective study evaluating the prevalence of<br />
gross lung metastasis on three view thoracic radiographs<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 187 small animal soft tissue session
in 115 dogs with mast cell tumors yielded 1/115 (0.87%)<br />
dog that was positive for gross metastasis. (Fung & Boston,<br />
unpublished data) Three-view thoracic radiographs can be<br />
considered as part of a base line database for older dogs, in<br />
cases with respiratory signs and in cases with high grade<br />
tumors with metastasis to other sites.<br />
Staging with bone marrow aspirate or biopsy has also<br />
been shown to be a relatively low yield test. However, some<br />
would argue that it is worthwhile because the prognosis is<br />
significantly altered with a positive bone marrow. Endicott<br />
et al evaluated the bone marrow of 157 dogs with MCT. In<br />
that study, they found that 2.8% of cases were positive at<br />
initial evalation, with 4.5% positive overall. 3/18 dogs were<br />
positive after recurrence or progression of clinical signs,<br />
suggesting that bone marrow is not indicated for routine<br />
staging, but may be considered in cases with progressive<br />
disease or when indicated based on CBC. Another study<br />
by Marconato et al evaluated the prognosis in 14 dogs<br />
that were positive on bone marrow evaluation. The MST<br />
in these cases was 43 days and most cases had concurrent<br />
metastasis to the lymph nodes or visceral metastasis, with<br />
3 cases that had evidence of pulmonary metastasis.<br />
Although dogs with multiple mast cell tumor are<br />
classified as Stage III, recent evidence suggests that these<br />
are separate events, with mast cells developing de novo in<br />
dogs that are predisposed to mast cell tumors, rather than<br />
metastatic events. Stage III is likely a misnomer for the<br />
predicted behavior of dogs with multiple mast cell tumors.<br />
The survival time of dogs with multiple mast cell tumors<br />
was not found to be significantly different than dogs with<br />
solitary mast cell tumors. This suggests that for dogs with<br />
multiple mast cell tumors, each tumor should be treated as<br />
a separate event. (Murphy et al 2006; Mullin et al 2006)<br />
Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for canine<br />
mast cell tumors. The completeness of surgical excision<br />
has been shown to have a significant effect on prognosis<br />
of mast cell tumors. (Mullins et al 2006; Murphy et al<br />
2004). Although the dogma has been that malignant tumors<br />
should be removed with 3cm margins and one fascial plane<br />
deep, this has recently been critically evaluated. Simpson<br />
et al prospectively evaluated margins of grade I and II<br />
MCT of 1, 2 and 3cm. A total of 23 MCT were evaluated<br />
in this study. They found that the grade I MCT were all<br />
completely excised at all margins, suggesting that 1cm may<br />
be adequate for low grade tumors. For the grade II tumors,<br />
75% were considered clean at 1cm margin and 100% were<br />
considered clear at 2cm margins. A follow up of this study<br />
by Fulcher et al evaluated the margins of grade I and II<br />
MCT that were excised using 2cm lateral margins. They<br />
had 16 dogs with 23 MCT in this study. 4/23 were grade I<br />
MCT and all of these had clean margins. 19 of the tumors<br />
were grade II and 2 of these were considered to have dirty<br />
margins. In light of the fact that 10% of the margins were<br />
considered dirty for grade II MCT that were cut with 2cm<br />
margins, this recommendation should be considered with<br />
caution. The author continues to use 3cm lateral margins<br />
for grade II and III MCT when this is possible.<br />
Seguin et al evaluated the outcome of dogs with grade<br />
II MCT that were treated with surgery alone. 55 dogs<br />
with 60 tumors were evaluated retrospectively. Only one<br />
case had dirty histological margins. 3 cases (5%) recurred<br />
locally and the same number developed metastasis. 6<br />
cases (11%) developed a MCT at another site. 84% of<br />
cases were free of MCT for the duration of follow up<br />
(median follow up 540 days). The authors of this paper<br />
concluded that additional therapy may not be necessary for<br />
grade II MCT with complete excision and no evidence of<br />
metastasis. Seguin later evaluated the recurrence, outcome<br />
and proliferation indices in cases of MCT after incomplete<br />
excision. 28 dogs were evaluated with 30 MCT. 7 (23.3%)<br />
of the cases recurred locally and this was found to be a<br />
negative prognostic indicator for survival. Ki-67 and PCNA<br />
were also found to be prognostic for local recurrence.<br />
Predicting the behavior of grade I and grade III is<br />
straightforward. However, the common grade II MCT<br />
continues to be difficult to predict behavior. Indices of<br />
proliferation have been assessed to try to determine<br />
between “good” and “bad” grade II MCT. Mitotic index<br />
(MI) appears to be the most straightforward and promising<br />
method of separating out the good and bad grade II MCT.<br />
Recently, Romansik et al evaluated the MI for 148 MCT<br />
and found that MI correlated with tumor grade. As well<br />
the median survival time for dogs with a MI of 0-5 was 70<br />
months, and was significantly longer than dog with a MI<br />
of >5 (MST of 2 months). Similarly, a new two-tier grading<br />
scheme has been recently proposed by Kiupel et al. This<br />
scheme attempts to separate the mast cells into highgrade<br />
or low grade. High grade tumors were those with:<br />
at least 7 mitotic figures in 10 high-power fields (hpf); at<br />
least 3 multinucleated (3 or more nuclei) cells in 10 hpf; at<br />
least 3 bizarre nuclei in 10 hpf; karyomegaly. Fields with<br />
the highest mitotic activity or with the highest degree<br />
of anisokaryosis were selected to assess the different<br />
parameters. According to the novel grading system, highgrade<br />
MCTs were significantly associated with shorter<br />
time to metastasis or new tumor development, and with<br />
shorter survival time. The median survival time was less<br />
than 4 months for high-grade MCTs but more than 2 years<br />
for low-grade MCTs. This new grading scheme may help<br />
to guide therapy and predict behavior of mast cell tumors<br />
in the future.<br />
Although a complete excision of a mast cell tumor should<br />
always be the goal of surgical treatment. This is not always<br />
feasible or achieved. Dogs with an incompletely excised<br />
mast cell tumor will continue to require local control of their<br />
disease. If possible, a staging recut should be performed<br />
using 2-3 cm margins around the previous excision scar<br />
small animal soft tissue session 188 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
and one fascial plane deep. If this is not feasible, radiation<br />
therapy to the site is recommended.<br />
For tumors where complete excision is not feasible due<br />
to the extent of disease, the approach will depend on the<br />
owners treatment goals and on full staging. In these cases,<br />
full staging including an incisional biopsy to determine the<br />
tumor grade is reocommended preoperatively. In cases<br />
where palliation is the goal, pretreatment with either<br />
chemotherapy or corticosteroids can be considered prior<br />
to cytoreductive surgery. However, caution should be<br />
exercised in using corticosteroids to shrink mast cell tumors<br />
if a curative intent surgery is to be performed. A recent<br />
article by Gilson et al evaluated the use of neoadjuvant<br />
prednisone in cases of MCT that were treated with surgery.<br />
This study was a combined retrospective and prospective<br />
study. Dogs received 0.5-2.2mg/kg, with no control group,<br />
a median of 9 days prior to surgery. The overall objective<br />
response rate was 70% and prospectively the maximal<br />
diameter reduction was 42.5% and the reduction in tumor<br />
volume was 80%. The authors concluded that neoadjuvant<br />
prednisone useful for inducting reduction of MCTs and may<br />
facilitate resection when adequate surgical margins cannot<br />
be confidently attained because of mass location or size or<br />
both. However, despite the fact that 89% of the cases in this<br />
study had histologically complete margins, the overall local<br />
recurrent rate was 23.8% and the local recurrence rate for<br />
cases with “complete” excision was 17.6%. This suggests<br />
that pretreatment with corticosteroids may decrease the<br />
tumor size and facilitate resection, but that there may be<br />
islands of malignant mast cells that are left in the periphery<br />
that may be left behind after resection. Pretreatment<br />
corticosteroids is appropriate in some situations, such as<br />
when a curative intent surgery is not possible, when the<br />
intent is palliation and cytoreduction, or when cytoreduction<br />
followed by radiation is part of the treatment plan.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 189 small animal soft tissue session
References<br />
• Cytological lymph node evaluation in dogs with mast cell<br />
tumours: association with grade and survival. E. L. Krick, A.<br />
P. Billings, F. S. Shofer, S. Watanabe, and K. U. Sorenmo.<br />
VeterinaryandComparativeOncology,7, 2, 130<strong>–</strong>138; 2009<br />
• Ultrasound-Guided Cytology of Spleen and Liver: A<br />
Prognostic Tool in Canine Cutaneous Mast Cell Tumor. D.<br />
Stefanello, P. Valenti, S. Faverzani, V. Bronzo, V. Fiorbianco,<br />
N. Pinto da Cunha, S. Romussi, M. Cantatore, and M.<br />
Caniatti. J Vet Intern Med 2009;23:1051<strong>–</strong>1057.<br />
• Clinicopathological findings and results of bone marrow<br />
aspiration in dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours: 157<br />
cases (1999<strong>–</strong>2002). M. M. Endicott, S. C. Charney, J. A.<br />
McKnight, A. S. Loar, A. M. Barger and P. J. Bergman.<br />
Veterinary and Comparative Oncology, 5 (1)31<strong>–</strong>37.<br />
• Clinicopathological Features and Outcome for Dogs<br />
with Mast CellTumors and Bone Marrow InvolvementL.<br />
Marconato, G. Bettini, C. Giacoboni, G. Romanelli, A. Cesari,<br />
A. Zatelli, and E. Zini. J Vet Intern Med 2008;22:1001<strong>–</strong>1007.<br />
• Evaluation of prognostic factors associated with outcome<br />
in dogs with multiple cutaneous mast cell tumors treated<br />
with surgery with and without adjuvant treatment: 54 cases<br />
(1998<strong>–</strong>2004)Marie N. Mullins, DVM, MS, DACVIM; William<br />
S. Dernell, DVM, MS, DACVS; Stephen J. Withrow, DVM,<br />
DACVS, DACVIM; Eugene J. Ehrhart, DVM, PhD, DACVP;<br />
Douglas H. Thamm, VMD, DACVIM; Susan E. Lana, DVM,<br />
MS, DACVIM. JAVMA, Vol 228(1), 2006 (91-95)<br />
• Effects of stage and number of tumours on prognosis of<br />
dogs with cutaneous mast cell tumours. S. Murphy, A. H.<br />
Sparkes, A. S. Blunden, M. J. Brearley, K. C. Smith. Vet Rec<br />
2006;158:287-291<br />
• Evaluation of surgical margins required for complete<br />
excision of cutaneous mast cell tumors in dogsAmelia M.<br />
Simpson, DVM; Lori L. Ludwig, VMD, MS, DACVS; Shelley<br />
J. Newman, DVM, DVSc, DACVP; Philip J. Bergman, DVM,<br />
PhD, DACVIM; Heidi A. Hottinger, DVM, DACVS; Amiya K.<br />
Patnaik, DVM, MS. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004;224:236<strong>–</strong>240<br />
• Evaluation of a two-centimeter lateral surgical margin for<br />
excision of grade I and grade II cutaneous mast cell tumors<br />
in dogsRyan P. Fulcher, DVM; Lori L. Ludwig, VMD, MS,<br />
DACVS; Philip J. Bergman, DVM, PhD, DACVIM; Shelley J.<br />
Newman, DVM, DVSc, DACVP; Amelia M. Simpson, DVM,<br />
DACVS; Amiya K. Patnaik, DVM, MS. JAmVetMedAssoc<br />
2006;228:210<strong>–</strong>215<br />
• Relationships between the histological grade of cutaneous<br />
mast cell tumours in dogs, their survival and the efficacy of<br />
surgical resection S. Murphy, A. H. Sparkes, K. C. Smith, A.<br />
S. Blunden, M. J. Brearly. Vet Rec 2004;154:743-746.<br />
• Clinical outcome of dogs with grade-II mast cell tumors<br />
treated with surgery alone: 55 cases (1996<strong>–</strong>1999)Bernard<br />
Séguin, DVM, MS, DACVS; Nicole F. Leibman, DVM, MS,<br />
DACVIM; Victoria S. Bregazzi, DVM, MS, DACVIM; Gregory<br />
K. Ogilvie, DVM, DACVIM; Barbara E. Powers, DVM, PhD,<br />
DACVP; William S. Dernell, DVM, MS, DACVS; Martin J.<br />
Fettman, DVM, PhD, DACVP; Stephen J. Withrow, DVM,<br />
DACVS, DACVIM. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:1120<strong>–</strong><br />
1123.<br />
• Recurrence Rate, Clinical Outcome, and Cellular<br />
Proliferation Indices as Prognostic Indicators after<br />
Incomplete Surgical Excision of Cutaneous Grade II Mast<br />
Cell Tumors: 28 Dogs (1994<strong>–</strong>2002)Bernard Se'guin, M.<br />
Faulkner Besancon, Jennifer L. McCallan, Loralei L. Dewe,<br />
Matthew C. Tenwolde, Emily K. Wong, and Michael S. Kent.<br />
J Vet Intern Med 2006;20:933<strong>–</strong>940.<br />
• Proposal of a 2-tier histologic grading system for canine<br />
cutaneous mast cell tumors to more accurately predict<br />
biological behavior. Kiupel M, Webster JD, Bailey KL, Best<br />
S, DeLay J, Detrisac CJ, Fitzgerald SD, Gamble D, Ginn PE,<br />
Goldschmidt MH, Hendrick MJ, Howerth EW, Janovitz EB,<br />
Langohr I et al. Vet Pathol. 2011 Jan;48(1):147-55.<br />
• Evaluation of neoadjuvant prednisone administration and<br />
surgical excision in treatment of cutaneous mast cell tumors<br />
in dogs. Rebecca M. Stanclift, DVM, and Stephen D. Gilson,<br />
DVM, DACVSJ. Am Vet Med Assoc 2008;232:53<strong>–</strong>62).<br />
small animal soft tissue session 190 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Closure of large abdominal wall defects using<br />
negative pressure therapy: a bridge to definitive<br />
closure.<br />
A.Vanlander MD, F. Berrevoet MD ,PhD<br />
Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent Belgium<br />
Benign abdominal wall tumors, lipomas, hemangiomas<br />
and fibromas are quite common in humans. Malignant<br />
tumors of the abdominal wall are less common.<br />
The malignant soft-tissue tumors of the abdominal wall<br />
consist of desmoid tumors and non-desmoid soft-tissue<br />
sarcomas. These neoplasms tend to invade adjacent<br />
musculo aponeurotic and bony structures. Extirpation with<br />
the full-thickness of the abdominal wall is required except<br />
for small, superficial lesions. A wide-margin resection offers<br />
the best assurance of local control. Adjuvant radiotherapy<br />
can be given when the margin of resection is limited. The<br />
effective radiation dose can be difficult to administer, due<br />
to the sensitivity of the underlying structures.<br />
The goals of the reconstruction are to restore the<br />
abdominal wall defects and to restore the structural and<br />
functional continuity of the musculofascial system. It is<br />
imperative to provide stable and durable wound coverage.<br />
A good knowledge of the anatomy and assessment<br />
of which structures are present, absent or distorted is<br />
indicated. Tissue selection for the reconstruction of the<br />
abdominal wall can be synthetic meshes, autologue tissue,<br />
regional flaps and free tissue transfer.<br />
However large tissue defects can often not be closed<br />
primarily and required, in the past, wound dressings.<br />
Causing increased rates of morbidity and a longer hospital<br />
stay.<br />
Negative pressure therapy will optimize the blood flow,<br />
decrease local oedema and remove excessive fluid from<br />
the wound bed, thereby supplying the wound with oxygen<br />
and nutrition to promote accelerated healing . The clinical<br />
application is the increase in cell division and the formation<br />
of granulation tissue. It allows preparation of the wound<br />
for further definitive reconstructive surgery or protection of<br />
vital structures to make adjuvant radiation therapy possible.<br />
In a RCT of Joseph et al. published in 2000, after six<br />
weeks , various chronic wounds treated with Negative<br />
Pressure Therapy had a significantly greater percent<br />
reduction in wound volume and depth than wounds treated<br />
with wet gauzes.<br />
NPT significantly increases the rate of re-epithelialisation<br />
in skin grafts compared to Opsite dressing ( Genecov 1998).<br />
Seven of the ten donor sites treated with NPT were noted<br />
to reepithelialise faster than the Opsite-treated donor sites.<br />
When no reconstructive surgery is possible because<br />
of adjuvant radiation therapy, negative pressure therapy<br />
is a nice alternative and healing of these wounds can be<br />
achieved by formation of granulation tissue and covering<br />
of the defect.<br />
When dealing with a significant loss of tissue , negative<br />
pressure therapy can be utilized to enhance wound healing<br />
by promoting granulation tissue formation and new<br />
blood vessels in <strong>–</strong>growth. Skin grafts or vascularized flap<br />
placement can then be used to secondarily close the wound.<br />
The black foam, polyurethane ether (PU), has large<br />
pores of 400-600 mm and is hydrophobic. It is ideal for the<br />
stimulation of granulation tissue and wound contraction.<br />
The white foam, polyvinylalcohol (PVA),has a pore size of<br />
250 mm. It is denser and hydrophilic. It is ideal to use in<br />
exsudative wounds. It requires , because of its density,a<br />
higher negative pressure.<br />
In a systematic review by Ubbink at al.(BJS 2008;95:685-<br />
692), there is little evidence to support the routinely use of<br />
negative pressure therapy for local wound care, however<br />
the clinical impression seems to be favorable. There is no<br />
evidence of more rapid wound healing when using negative<br />
pressure therapy. Is this review there are no data on cost,<br />
quality of life or adverse effects , such as pain.<br />
It is important to understand the indications for when<br />
and how to use negative pressure therapy.<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 191 small animal soft tissue session
Radioactive microbrachytherapy for head and neck<br />
lesions in dogs and cats<br />
Kirpensteijn J*, Vente MAD, Nimwegen B, Nijsen JFW<br />
University of Utrecht, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dep.Clinical Sciences of Companion <strong>Animals</strong>, Utrecht,<br />
Netherlands<br />
Introduction<br />
The worldwide annual incidence of head and neck<br />
cancer in man approximates 500,000 cases, making it<br />
the sixth most common malignancy. Surgical resection,<br />
chemotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy<br />
are the currently used treatment modalities, and are<br />
especially effective if the malignancies are detected in<br />
an early phase of disease, which is the case in 1/3 of<br />
all patients with head and neck cancer. However, even if<br />
a high portion of patients with stage I/II disease can be<br />
effectively treated, 10-30% of patients will develop new<br />
primaries in the same region. If this happens, curative<br />
intervention is not an option any more. For this category<br />
of patients as well as those who present with advanced<br />
disease, which is the vast majority, currently no curative<br />
therapies are available. Novel, effective treatment options<br />
are therefore urgently needed. Naturally occurring tumors<br />
in companion animals share many clinical and molecular<br />
similarities to human cancers that are difficult to replicate<br />
in other model systems. Cancers in these animals develop<br />
in the context of an intact immune system, where tumor,<br />
host and tumor microenvironment are syngeneic. To<br />
accelerate the translational to the human medical arena,<br />
veterinary companion animal patients (canine and feline)<br />
with spontaneous malignancies were treated in an early<br />
stage of the development of these novel and dedicated<br />
particulated systems. Head and neck cancers are common<br />
in the dog and the cat<br />
Microbrachytherapy<br />
A potentially effective treatment option for patients<br />
with head and neck malignancies of limited size for<br />
whom no treatment options are available, could consist<br />
of directly intratumorally injected microspheres loaded<br />
with the combined beta-gamma emitting radioisotope<br />
holmium-166 (166Ho). Next to gamma scintigraphy, both<br />
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray computed<br />
tomography (CT) are able to visualize the biodistribution<br />
of particles loaded with 166Ho in vivo. If the tumors are<br />
somewhat larger and the afferent vasculature is as well,<br />
166Ho microspheres may be delivered to the tumorous<br />
tissue using the intra-arterial transcatheter approach,<br />
in a similar fashion as the 166Ho poly(L-lactic acid)<br />
microspheres developed by our group which are currently<br />
tested in patients with metastatic liver cancer.<br />
This concept, the direct intratumoral injection of 166Ho-<br />
AcAc microspheres, has already been investigated in renal<br />
cell carcinoma-bearing mice and, more relevant, also in<br />
a series of veterinary patients, i.e., dogs and cats with<br />
spontaneous malignancies. It was found that extremely<br />
high tumor absorbed doses could be attained (in excess<br />
of 30 times the dose that can be achieved in external<br />
beam radiotherapy) with no associated side effects.<br />
The described results on radioactive holmium loaded<br />
microspheres show that the radioembolization and the<br />
intratumoral injection techniques are very promising for<br />
treatment of unresectable head and neck tumors.<br />
Veterinary patients<br />
Microspheres were administered directly into the tumors<br />
of 8 veterinary patients with spontaneous head and neck<br />
tumors; 5 cats with an oral squamous cell carcinoma and<br />
3 dogs with a squamous cell carcinoma in tongue and neck<br />
(n=1 and n=1, respectively) and one with a fibrosarcoma in<br />
the mandible were treated by intratumoral injections with<br />
166Ho microspheres.<br />
Results<br />
The injections of the radioactive microspheres were<br />
technically successfully performed. Generally, the<br />
treatment was well tolerated by the animals and the<br />
clinical condition of 6/8 animals improved markedly. In<br />
the majority of patients, partial response was achieved,<br />
which frequently led to downstaging to surgical resection.<br />
However in three of the cats with oral squamous cell<br />
carcinoma, outcome was complete remission. In only two<br />
animals progressive disease was observed. Toxicity was<br />
absent in most animals. In one patient a skin defect was<br />
observed. Most biochemical and hematological parameters<br />
normalized after treatment. The life of the majority of<br />
animals was extended whilst associated with a good<br />
quality of life. For the small lesions (1-15g; n=6), treatment<br />
often was curative whereas treatment of large lesions<br />
(95-150g) resulted in downstaging to surgical resection.<br />
small animal soft tissue session 192 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 193 small animal soft tissue session
Author index<br />
B<br />
C<br />
D<br />
Balligand, M .<br />
• Force plate: gold standard. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .111<br />
• Muscular forces affecting the outcome of CCL surgery. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .115<br />
Barthélémy, N .<br />
• Short- and long-term outcomes in young large breed dogs with medial compartment disease of the elbow .41<br />
Benlloch-Gonzalez, M .<br />
• Prospective clinical study of enterectomy with skin staplers in 9 dogs and 9 cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .36<br />
Bernardé, A .<br />
• A retrospective study of complications following modified triple tibial osteotomy for cranial cruciate<br />
deficient stifles in dogs: 72 cases (2008-2010) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49<br />
Bockstahler, B .<br />
• Evidence based medicine in rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .118<br />
Boero Baroncelli, A .<br />
• Effect of screw insertional torque on mechanical properties of 5 different angular stable systems . . . . . . . .89<br />
Böhme, B .<br />
• Considerations on the pathophysiology of canine condylar fractures by finite element analysis . . . . . . . . . . .50<br />
Boland, L .<br />
• Zygomatic salivary gland diseases in the dog: 3 representative cases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .51<br />
Boston, S .<br />
• Canine mast cell tumor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .187<br />
Böttcher, P .<br />
• In vivo motion analysis 3D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113<br />
Brissot, H .<br />
• Caudal mediastinal para-oesophageal abscesses in 7 dogs. A retospective study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .149<br />
Broos, P .L .O .<br />
• Pushing the boundaries in musculoskeletal trauma <strong>–</strong> what is possible in man? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29<br />
Buttin, P .<br />
• Nephroliths and video-assisted nephrotomy in 8 cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .39<br />
Cachon, T .<br />
• Surgical treatment of sciatic nerve injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .151<br />
Déjardin, LM .<br />
• Effect of articular design on mediolateral constraint and stability of two unlinked canine total elbow<br />
prostheses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91<br />
Demetriou, J .L .<br />
• Pyothorax : Is surgery necessary? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .167<br />
Devitt, C .<br />
• Dorsal recumbent shoulder arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine pathology . . .99<br />
• Stifle arthroscopy technique, normal anatomy, & appearance of routine rathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .104<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 195 information section
F<br />
G<br />
H<br />
K<br />
L<br />
Falzone, C .<br />
• Lumbosacral spine: decompression and stabilisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .142<br />
• Lumbosacral spine: surgical decision making. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .140<br />
Findji, L:<br />
• Surgical preparation: current understanding and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67<br />
Fitzpatrick, N .<br />
• The effect of configuration and radiographic positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude<br />
in a dog with a complex antebrachial growth deformity: comparison between radiographic and 3D<br />
computer modelling measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .92<br />
• True spherical dome osteotomy using a novel blade design in a dog with an antebrachial growth<br />
deformity <strong>–</strong> planning and execution of technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .52<br />
Gauthier, O .<br />
• Stimulation of bone healing. Commercially available products. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .130<br />
• Stimulation of bone healing. Latest developments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .123<br />
Glyde, M .<br />
• Biomechanical comparison of plate, plate-rod and orthogonal plate locking constructs in an ex-vivo<br />
canine tibial fracture gap model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88<br />
• The effect of screw number and plate stand-off distance on the biomechanical characteristics<br />
of 3.5mm locking compression plate (LCP) and 3.5mm string of pearls (SOP) plate constructs in a<br />
synthetic fracture gap model. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95<br />
Griffon, D .J .<br />
• Delayed union and nonunion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .127<br />
• Enhancing bone healing in practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .131<br />
Gutbrod, A .<br />
• ects of humeral rotational osteotomy on contact mechanism of the canine elbow joint: an ex vivo study. . . .35<br />
Hamilton, M .<br />
• Total hip replacement with reiforced augmentation of the dorsal acetabular rim (radar) using the sop<br />
implant and bone cement in seven dogs with dorsal acetabular rim deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .53<br />
Hayes, G .M .<br />
• Distribution and persistence of topical clotrimazole for canine sino-nasal aspergillosis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .44<br />
Höglund, O .V .<br />
• Ligating the renal artery in pigs with a new absorbable device - LigaTie® . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .148<br />
Kirpensteijn, J .<br />
• Radioactive microbrachytherapy for head and neck lesions in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .192<br />
Liptak, J .M .<br />
• Wide excision of tumors and reconstruction of the resultant defect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .186<br />
information section 196 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
M<br />
N<br />
P<br />
R<br />
S<br />
T<br />
Medl, N .<br />
• Intraoperative contamination of the suction tip in clean orthopaedic surgeries in dogs and cats . . . . . . . . . .40<br />
Meij, B .P .<br />
• The use of pedicle screws in canine lumbosacral disease. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90<br />
Milgram, J .<br />
• Axial pattern flap based on a cutaneous branch of the facial artery in cats.<br />
• Milgram J*, Weiser M, Kelmer E*, Benzioni H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147<br />
• The role of the antebrachiocarpal ligaments in the prevention of hyperextension of the<br />
antebrachiocarpal joint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .94<br />
Moissonnier, P .<br />
• Perioperative antimicrobial propylaxis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .73<br />
Moritz, A .<br />
• Have we learnt anything in the last 15 years?<br />
Stenting: The Giessen experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .155<br />
• Pyothorax - have we learnt anything in the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .165<br />
Murgia, D .<br />
• Caudal cervical intervertebral space distraction and stabilization using a distractable fusion cage in<br />
seven dogs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .150<br />
Nellissen, P .<br />
• Effect of three an aesthetic induction protocols on laryngeal function during laryngoscopy in normal cats . .37<br />
Piras, LA .<br />
• Effects of antebrachial torsion on the measurement of frontal plane angulation: a cadaveric<br />
radiographic analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54<br />
Rancan, L .<br />
• Circulating proinflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide are increased in brachycephalic dogs . . . . . . . . . . .152<br />
Rochereau, P .<br />
• Comparison of 4.0 mm partially-threaded cannulated screws and 4.0 mm partially-threaded screws in<br />
a canine humeral condylar fracture model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42<br />
Segal, U .<br />
• Latero-distal transposition of the tibial crest for patella alta and medial luxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55<br />
Sivacolundhu, R .K .<br />
• Use of local and axial pattern flaps for reconstruction of the hard and soft palate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .184<br />
Souchu, L .<br />
• Morphological comparison of the middle ear between French bulldogs and non-brachycephalic dogs. . . . . .56<br />
Tan, C .J .<br />
• Stabilisation of periarticular fractures or osteotomies with an LCP notched head T-plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .57<br />
ter Haar, G .<br />
• Novel reconstructions of the tip of the nose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .182<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 197 information section
V<br />
W<br />
Valander, A .<br />
• Closure of large abdominal wall defects using negative pressure therapy: a bridge to definitive closure. . .191<br />
Vallefuoco, R .<br />
• Tympanic bulla osteotomy via oral approach in the dog: A descriptive cadaveric study. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38<br />
van Bree, H .<br />
• Lumbosacral disease (LS): an update on diagnostic imaging techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .137<br />
• MRI and arthroscopy for evaluation of shoulder joint pathology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101<br />
Verset, M .<br />
• Two cases of dogs with infiltrative lipomas of the thigh region . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58<br />
Voss, K .<br />
• Association of articular mineralisation, cranial cruciate ligament pathology and degenerative joint<br />
disease in feline stifle joints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .93<br />
Walton, M .B .<br />
• Owner based metrology instruments for conditions of canine chronic mobility impairment - contruct<br />
and criterion validity of LOAD, HCPI and CBPI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59<br />
Watson, P .<br />
• Pancreatitis in dogs and cats: what have we learnt on the last 15 years? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .173<br />
Weese, J .S .<br />
• Methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections: animal and public health consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80<br />
• Surgical site infection control programme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74<br />
• Surgical site infections: Incidence, relevance, risk factors and surveillance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63<br />
White, R .N .<br />
• Surgical treatment: necrosectomies, pancreatectomies, and drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .177<br />
• Tracheal collapse - ringing: indications, limitations, technique . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .161<br />
Woodbridge, N .<br />
• A retrospective study of tibial plateau translation following tibial plateau levelling osteotomy<br />
stabilisation using three different TPLO plates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .43<br />
information section 198 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Speakers<br />
Adkins Angus<br />
BVSc, FACVSc<br />
P.O. Box 462<br />
Scone<br />
New South Wales 1337<br />
Australia<br />
Archer Debra C<br />
DVM <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Liverpool<br />
Faculty of Vet. Science<br />
Division of Equine Studies<br />
Leahurst, Chester High Road<br />
Neston CH64 7TE South Wirral<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Arensburg Liat DVM<br />
Dierenklienik de Morette<br />
Edingsesteenweg 237<br />
1730 Asse<br />
Belgium<br />
Auer Jörg<br />
Prof. Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong>/ACVS<br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of<br />
Zürich<br />
Equine Department<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />
8057 Zürich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Balligand Marc<br />
Prof.DVM,DVSc, CSAO, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Université de Liège<br />
Professor of SA Surgery<br />
Dept. of <strong>Small</strong> Animal surgery<br />
Bat. B44, Blv. de Colonster 20<br />
Sart, Tilman<br />
4000 Liège<br />
Belgium<br />
Barnett Tim Mr<br />
University of Edinburgh<br />
Lagre Animal Clinic<br />
Royal (Dick) School of Vet.<br />
StudiesEaster Bush<br />
EH25 9 RG Roslin, Midlothian<br />
Scotland/ United Kingdom<br />
Barthelemy Nicolas Dr.<br />
1630 Epley Road<br />
48895 Williamston MI<br />
USA<br />
Benlloch Gonzalez Manuel<br />
DVM<br />
Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis<br />
43 Avenue Aristide Briand<br />
94110 Arcueil<br />
France<br />
Benredouane Kossay<br />
DVM<br />
12 Chemin des Côtes<br />
69210 Lentilly<br />
France<br />
Bernardé Antoine<br />
Dr.vét. <strong>ECVS</strong>, MS<br />
Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire St.<br />
Martin<br />
Head Surgical Unit<br />
275 Route Impériale<br />
74370 St. Martin Bellevue<br />
France<br />
Bischofberger Andrea Dr.<br />
Biomedical Research and Clinical<br />
Training Unit<br />
Uni. Vet. Teaching Hospital Camden<br />
University of Sydney<br />
410 Werombi Road<br />
Camden 2570<br />
NSW Australia<br />
Bladon Bruce<br />
BVM&S CertEP DESTS MRCVS <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
O'Gorman Slater Main and Partners<br />
Donnington Grove Veterinary Surgery<br />
Oxford Road<br />
Newbury, Berkshire RG14 2J<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Boaro Baroncelli Alessandro DVM<br />
Via Nazzario Sauro 13<br />
12051 Alba (CN)<br />
Italy<br />
Bockstahler Barbara<br />
Dr.med.vet.<br />
Department of Surgery and<br />
Ophtalmology,<br />
School of Veterinary Medicine<br />
University Vienna<br />
Veterinärplatz 1<br />
1210 Vienna<br />
Austria<br />
Böhme Beatrice<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Kleintierklinik Bremen<br />
Schwachhauser Ring 86<br />
28209 Bremen<br />
Germany<br />
Boland Laetitia DMV<br />
Centre Hospitalier Vétérinaire Frégis<br />
43 Avenue Aristide Briand<br />
94110 Arcueil<br />
France<br />
Boston Sarah Dr.<br />
University of Guelph<br />
Department of Clinical Studies<br />
Ontario Veterinary College<br />
Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1<br />
Canada<br />
Böttcher Peter<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Leipzig<br />
Department of <strong>Small</strong> Animal<br />
Medicine<br />
An den Tierkliniken 23<br />
04103 Leipzig<br />
Germany<br />
Brandt Sabine Dr.<br />
University of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Equine Biotechnology Unit<br />
Equine Clinic<br />
Veterinärplatz 1<br />
1210 Vienna<br />
Austria<br />
Brink Palle<br />
DVM, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Jägersro<br />
212 37 Malmö<br />
Sweden<br />
Brissot Hervé<br />
DMV, D<strong>ECVS</strong>, MRCVS, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Davies Vetspecialists<br />
Manor Farm Buisiness Park<br />
SG5 3HR Higham Gobion<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Broos Paul Dr.<br />
Alfons Stesselstraat 23<br />
3012 Leuven Wilsele<br />
Belgium<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 199 addresses
Buttin Philippe DVM<br />
Chemin de la Chaux<br />
69210 Lentilly<br />
France<br />
Cachon Thibaut<br />
Dr. vét. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
VetAgro Sup<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal Campus vétérinaire de<br />
Lyon<br />
1, Avenue de Bourgelat<br />
B.P. 83<br />
69280 Marcy l'Etoile<br />
France<br />
Chabrier Marion<br />
Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />
Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />
rue de Bruxelles<br />
5000 Bruxelles<br />
Belgium<br />
De la Farge Sophie<br />
Clinique de Grosbois<br />
Domaine de Grosbois<br />
94470 Boissy Saint Leger<br />
France<br />
Declercq Jeroen<br />
DVM <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Ghent<br />
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,<br />
Department of surgery and<br />
anaesthesia<br />
Salisburylaan 133<br />
9820 Merelbeke<br />
Belgium<br />
Déjardin Loïc M.<br />
DVM, MS, ACVS/<strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Michigan State University<br />
College of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Department of <strong>Small</strong> Clinical<br />
Sciences<br />
East Lansing, MI 48824-1314<br />
USA<br />
Demetriou Jackie L.<br />
BvetMed. CertSAS, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Cambridge<br />
Queen's Veterinary School Hospital<br />
Department of Vet. Medicine<br />
Madingley Road<br />
Cambridge, CB3 0ES<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Devitt Chad M<br />
DVM MS ACVS<br />
Veterinary Referral Center of<br />
Colorado<br />
3550 S Jason Street<br />
Englewood, CO 80110<br />
USA<br />
Dias Deborah Ms<br />
Rua 7 de setembro, 2496<br />
Sao Carlos-SP<br />
13560-181<br />
Brazil<br />
Falzone Cristian<br />
DVM, Dipl ECVN<br />
Higham Gobion<br />
Herts SG5 3HR<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Findji Laurent<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
VRCC 1 West Mayne<br />
Bramston Way<br />
Southfields, Laindon<br />
Essex SS15 6TP<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Fiske-Jackson Andrew DBV<br />
The Royal Veterinary College<br />
University of London<strong>–</strong>Equine Referral<br />
Hospital<br />
Hawkshead Lane<br />
North Mymms<br />
Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TE<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Fitzpatrick Noel<br />
Univ, MVB, CSAO, CVR<br />
Fitzpatrick Referrals<br />
Halfway Lane, Eashing<br />
Godalming<br />
GU7 2QQ Surrey<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Fürst Anton<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />
Large Animal Clinic<br />
Dept. of Veterinary Surgery<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />
8057 Zürich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Gauthier Olivier<br />
Prof.Dr.vet.PhD<br />
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />
Nantes<br />
Laboratoire de Chirurgie<br />
Route de Gachet<br />
B.P. 40706<br />
44307 Nantes Cedex 3<br />
France<br />
Glyde Mark<br />
BVSc(Hons) MACVSc, MVS <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
MRCVS,<br />
Murdoch University<br />
School of Veterinary and Biomedical<br />
Sciences<br />
South Street<br />
6150 Murdoch<br />
Australia<br />
Gracia Calvo Luis Alfonso Dr.<br />
C/ Juan Manuel<br />
Rozas 31 1B<br />
10004 Càceres<br />
Spain<br />
Griffon Dominique J.<br />
DVM, MS, PhD, <strong>ECVS</strong>/ACVS<br />
Western University of Health<br />
Sciences<br />
College of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Associate Dean for Research<br />
309 E. 2nd Street<br />
Pomona 91766-1854 CA<br />
USA<br />
Gunnarsdottir Helga<br />
DVM, PhD<br />
University of Ghent<br />
Dept. of Large Animal Surgery<br />
Salisburylaan 133<br />
9820 Merkelbeke<br />
Belgium<br />
Gutbrod Andreas DVM<br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zürich<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />
8057 Zürich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Hamilton Michael H.<br />
BVM&S CertSAS MRCVS <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
11 Houlton Court, Surrey<br />
Bagshot GU19 5QQ<br />
United Kingdom<br />
addresses 200 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Hayes Graham Michael<br />
BVMS<br />
Univesity of Cambridge<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />
Dept. of Clinical Veterinary Medicine<br />
Madingley Road<br />
Cambridge CB3 0ES<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Herteman Nicolas<br />
Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />
Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />
rue de Bruxelles<br />
5000 Bruxelles<br />
Belgium<br />
Höglund Odd DVM<br />
Department of Clinical Sciences<br />
Box 7054<br />
750 07 Uppsala<br />
Sweden<br />
Hopster-Iversen Charlotte Dr.<br />
Klinik für Pferde<br />
Tierärzliche Hochschule Hannover<br />
Bünteweg 9<br />
30559 Hannover<br />
Germany<br />
Hunt Luanne<br />
BSc BVM&S ACVIM MRCVS<br />
Clyde Veterinary Group Equine<br />
Hospital New Lanark Market<br />
Lanark ML11 9SZ<br />
Scotland/ United Kingdom<br />
Jordana-Garcia Mireia DVM<br />
University of Ghent<br />
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Dep. of Surgery and Anesthesiology<br />
Salisburylaan 133<br />
9820 Merelbeke<br />
Belgium<br />
Kirpensteijn Jolle Prof.<br />
DVM MS ACVS/<strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Utrecht<br />
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Dep. Clinical Sciences<br />
Yalelaan 8/ PO Box 80.154<br />
3508 TD Utrecht<br />
Netherlands<br />
Klaus Christoph DVM<br />
Free University Berlin<br />
Equine Clinic<br />
Oertzenweg 19b<br />
14163 Berlin<br />
Germany<br />
Kümmerle Jan M.<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />
Equine Department<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />
8057 Zürich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Lallemand Elodie DVM<br />
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />
Nantes<br />
Equine Clinic<br />
Route de Gachet<br />
BP 40706<br />
44307 Nantes Cedex 3<br />
France<br />
Lambert Claire<br />
Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />
Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />
rue de Bruxelles<br />
5000 Bruxelles<br />
Belgium<br />
Lamberts Matthieu<br />
Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />
Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />
rue de Bruxelles<br />
5000 Bruxelles<br />
Belgium<br />
Liptak Julius M.<br />
BVSc MVet MACVSc FACVSc ACVS/<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Alta Vista Animal Hospital<br />
2616 Bank Street<br />
Ottawa<br />
Ontario K1T 1M9<br />
Canada<br />
Marañon Gonzalo<br />
DVM, PhD<br />
Horsespital SL<br />
c/ Recaudacion 4<br />
Villanueva del Pardillo<br />
28229 Madrid<br />
Spain<br />
May Stephen A.<br />
Prof. DVR DEO <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
The Royal Veterinary College<br />
University of London<br />
Equine Referral Hospital<br />
Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms<br />
Hatfield AL9 7TA Hertfordshire<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Medl Nikola<br />
Dr.med.vet.<br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260<br />
8057 Zürich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Meij Björn<br />
DVM, PhD, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Utrecht University<br />
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Dep.Clinical Sciences of Companion<br />
<strong>Animals</strong><br />
Yalelaan 8/ PO Box 80.154<br />
3508 TD Utrecht<br />
Netherlands<br />
Mespoulhès-Rivière Céline Isabelle<br />
DVM <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
35, Rue Alphonse Daudet<br />
91210 Draveil<br />
France<br />
Milgram Joshua<br />
BVSc <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem<br />
Koret School of Veterinary Medicine<br />
P.O. Box 12<br />
Rehovot<br />
Israel<br />
Moissonnier Pierre<br />
Prof. MS, AEU Microsurgery, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort<br />
<strong>Small</strong> animal surgery clinic<br />
7 Avenue du Général de Gaulle<br />
94704 Maisons-Alfort Cedex<br />
France<br />
Moritz Andreas Dr.<br />
Klinik für Kleintiere<br />
Klinik Pathophysiologie & Klinik<br />
Laboratoriumsdiagnostik<br />
Justus-Liebig, Frankfurterstrasse 126<br />
35392 Giessen<br />
Germany<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 201 addresses
Mosing Martina Dr.<br />
Vetsuisse-Faculty University of Zürich<br />
Equine Department, Section<br />
Anaesthesiology<br />
Winterthurerstr. 260<br />
8057 Zürich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Murgia Daniela<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
DPA, Diagnostica piccoli animali Srl<br />
Via Caldierino 14<br />
36030 Zugliano (Vicenza)<br />
Italy<br />
Nelissen Pieter DVM MRCVS<br />
East Lodge<br />
Bury Road<br />
Kentford, Newmarked CB8 7UA<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Parker Russell Alexander BVMS<br />
University of Edinburgh<br />
Large Animal Hospital<br />
Royal (Dick) School of Vet. Studies<br />
Easter Bush Vet. Centre, Roslin<br />
Midlothian EH25 9RG<br />
Scotland/ United Kingdom<br />
Perrin Roland<br />
Dr.vét. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Clinque Vétérinaire<br />
Desbrosse/Perrin/Launois<br />
18 rue des Champs, La Brosse<br />
78470 St. Lambert des Bois<br />
France<br />
Piras Lisa Adele DVM<br />
Universita degli Studi di Torino<br />
Dept. di patologia animale<br />
Via Leonardo da Vinci 44<br />
10095 Grugliasco (Torino)<br />
Italy<br />
Rancan Lisa<br />
Dogspital SL, c/ Recaudacion 4<br />
Villanueva del Pardillo<br />
28229 Madrid<br />
Spain<br />
Rathmanner Magdalena DVM<br />
Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover<br />
Klinik für Pferde<br />
Bünteweg 9<br />
30559 Hannover<br />
Germany<br />
Rochereau Philippe Dr. vét.<br />
Clinique VETREF<br />
Rue James Watt<br />
49070 Angers-Beaucouze<br />
France<br />
Rossignol Fabrice<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Clinique Equine de Grosbois<br />
Domaine de Grosbois<br />
94470 Boissy-St-Léger<br />
France<br />
Salciccia Alexandra<br />
Dr.med.vet.<br />
Equine Clinic<br />
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />
University of Liège<br />
20, boulevard de Colonster, B41<br />
4000 Liège<br />
Belgium<br />
Schneeweiss Wilfried<br />
Dr.med.vet.<br />
27 Orpen Rise<br />
Stillorgan<br />
Dublin<br />
Ireland<br />
Schramme Michael C.<br />
DVM, CertEO,MRCVS,<strong>ECVS</strong><br />
North Carolina State University<br />
College of Veterinary Medicine<br />
4700 Hillsborough Street<br />
Raleigh, NC 27606<br />
USA<br />
Schumacher James<br />
DVM MS ACVS<br />
University of Tennessee<br />
Dept. of Large Animal Clinical<br />
Sciences<br />
2407 River Drive<br />
Knoxville<br />
Tennessee 37996-4545<br />
USA<br />
Segal Uri Dr.<br />
Knowledge Farm<br />
HaYasmin 6<br />
99797 Karmey Yosef<br />
Israel<br />
Sivacolundh Ramesh Dr.<br />
AMC<br />
510E 62nd Street<br />
New York, N.Y.<br />
USA<br />
Souchu Lawrence<br />
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />
Nantes<br />
Laboratoire de Chirurgie<br />
Route de Gachet<br />
B.P. 40706<br />
44307 Nantes Cedex 3<br />
France<br />
Tan Christopher Mr.<br />
University Vet. Teaching Hospital<br />
Sydney<br />
The University of Sydney<br />
65 Parramatta Road<br />
Camperdown NSW 2006<br />
Australia<br />
Ter Haar Gert<br />
DVM Cert EP, RNVA <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Utrecht<br />
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Dep. Clinical Sciences of Companion<br />
<strong>Animals</strong><br />
Yalelaan 8/ PO Box 80.154<br />
3508 TD Utrecht<br />
Netherlands<br />
Tóth Tamàs DVM<br />
Swedish University of Agricultural<br />
Science<br />
Equine Clinic<br />
Ulls väg 12 Box 7040<br />
750 07 Uppsala<br />
Sweden<br />
Van Lander Aude E.J.<br />
Dept. of General and Hepatobiliairy<br />
Surgery<br />
University Hospital Ghent<br />
De Pintelaan 185<br />
9000 Ghent<br />
Belgium<br />
Van Loon Gunther Prof. Dr.<br />
Department of large Animal Internal<br />
Medicine, Ghent University<br />
Salisbuylaan 133<br />
9820 Merelbeke<br />
Belgium<br />
addresses 202 <strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011
Van Ryssen Bernadette<br />
Prof. Dr.<br />
University of Ghent<br />
Salisburylaan 133<br />
9820 Merelbeke<br />
Belgium<br />
Vallefuoco Rosario DVM<br />
9 rue Eugene Renault<br />
94700 Maisons-Alfort<br />
France<br />
Van Bree Henri<br />
Prof.Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
University of Ghent<br />
College of Veterinary Medicine<br />
Dept. Medical Imaging<br />
Salisburylaan 133<br />
9820 Merelbeke<br />
Belgium<br />
Vandecatsyne Charles<br />
Veterinary Research Unit (IVRU)<br />
Facutly of Science, FUNDP Namur<br />
rue de Bruxelles<br />
5000 Bruxelles<br />
Belgium<br />
Vandenberghe Filip Dr.<br />
Dierenkliniek De Bosdreef<br />
Spelonckvaart 46 B<br />
9180 Moerbeke-Waas<br />
Belgium<br />
Verset Michaël<br />
Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de<br />
Toulouse<br />
College of Veterinary Medicine<br />
23 chemin des Capelles<br />
31076 Toulouse Cedex 3<br />
France<br />
Voss Katja<br />
Dr.med.vet. <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
11 Napoleon Street<br />
Rozelle 2039<br />
Sydney, NSW<br />
Australia<br />
Walton Ben Mr.<br />
<strong>Small</strong> Animal Teaching Hospital<br />
Uni. of Liverpool<br />
Leahurst, Chester High Road<br />
CH64 7TE Neston<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Watson Penny<br />
MA VetMD CertVR DSAM ECVIM<br />
MRCVS<br />
Queen's Veterinary School Hospital<br />
University of Cambridge<br />
Madingley Road<br />
Cambridge CB3 0ES<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Weese Scott<br />
Dept of Pathobiology<br />
University of Guelph<br />
Guelph<br />
Ontario N1G2W1<br />
Canada<br />
White Robert N.<br />
BSc,BVetMed,CertVA,MRCVS, <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Willows Veterinary Centre & Referral<br />
Service<br />
Highlands Road<br />
Shirley<br />
Solihull<br />
West Midlands, B90 4NH<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Woodbridge Nicolas<br />
Dick White Referrals<br />
Six Mile Bottom<br />
London Road<br />
CB8 0UH Suffolk<br />
United Kingdom<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> proceedings 2011 203 addresses
21st Annual Scientific Meeting<br />
Pre Announcement<br />
Hotel Rey Juan Carlos I and<br />
Palau de Congressos de Catalunya,<br />
Barcelona, Spain <strong>–</strong> July 5 <strong>–</strong> 7, 2012<br />
please visit our home page <strong>–</strong> www.ecvs.org<br />
Deadline for submission of abstracts is<br />
November 15, 2011<br />
Preliminary Programmes will be available<br />
by beginning of 2012 on our website.<br />
For further information please contact:<br />
European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich, Equine Department<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260, CH- 8057 Zürich, Switzerland<br />
Phone: +41-44-635 8408 / Fax: +41-44-313 0384<br />
email: ecvs@vetclinics.uzh.ch<br />
www.ecvs.org
layout: Eva<strong>–</strong>Linda Skytting, Monika Gutscher<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> office Zürich, Switzerland
Call for papers and abstract submission documents and forms can be downloaded from the <strong>ECVS</strong> web site:<br />
www.ecvs.org<br />
Deadline for abstract submission is November 15.<br />
Please note that printed programmes will be given at the meeting in Nantes <strong>–</strong> however from the web site you will be able<br />
to receive all information pertaining to the Annual Meeting as soon as they are available.<br />
Visit our home page!<br />
<strong>ECVS</strong> Office Address<br />
European College of Veterinary Surgeons <strong>ECVS</strong><br />
Vetsuisse Faculty University of Zurich<br />
Winterthurerstrasse 260,<br />
CH- 8057 Zurich<br />
Switzerland<br />
Phone: +41-44-635 8408 / Fax: +41-44-313 0384<br />
email: ecvs@vetclinics.uzh.ch<br />
www.ecvs.org