13.07.2020 Views

Dutton - Medical Malpractice in SA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

56

Medical Malpractice in South African Law

pregnancy. 163 She must be advised by a medical practitioner 164 or a registered

midwife or registered nurse 165 to consult with her parents, guardian, family

members or friends before the pregnancy is terminated. Should the minor choose

not to consult as advised, the termination of the pregnancy shall not be denied

for that reason. Section 6 of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act provides

that a woman who requests a termination of pregnancy from a medical

practitioner or a registered midwife or registered nurse shall be informed of her

rights under the Act by such person. 166

The constitutionality of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act was

unsuccessfully challenged in Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health

(Reproductive Health Alliance as Amicus Curiae). 167 In dealing with the issue of

informed consent in terms of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act,

the Court held that although ‘informed consent’ is not defined in the Act,

the concept rests on the three independent legs of knowledge, appreciation

and consent. 168 In respect of ‘knowledge’ the Court held that the Choice on

Termination of Pregnancy Act requires that the woman has full knowledge ‘of

the nature and extent of the harm or risk’; ‘appreciation’ implies more than

mere knowledge — the woman must also comprehend and understand the

nature and extent of the harm or risk and, that the ‘consent’ must be comprehensive

in that it must ‘extend to the entire transaction inclusive of its consequences.’

The Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act does not specifically

provide that the child requesting termination of pregnancy must be sufficiently

mature and have the mental capacity to provide informed consent. However,

as appears from Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health (Reproductive

Health Alliance as Amicus Curiae), 169 inherent in the concept of ‘informed

consent’ is the notion that ‘valid consent can only be given by someone with

the intellectual and emotional capacity for the required knowledge, appreciation

and consent.’ 170

163

In terms of s 129(1) of the Children’s Act, the provisions of that section, (which deal with the

consent to medical treatment and surgical operation by children) are subject to s 5(2) of the

Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act.

164

Section 1 of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act defines a ‘medical practitioner’

as a person registered as such under the Medical, Dental and Supplementary Health Service

Professions Act, 56 of 1974.

165

Section 1 of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act defines a ‘registered midwife’ and a

‘registered nurse’ as a person registered as such under the Nursing Act, 33 of 2005, and who

has in addition undergone prescribed training in terms of this Act.

166

See also s 5(3) of the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act.

167

2005 (1) SA 509 (T).

168

At 515. The Court referred with approval to Van Wyk v Lewis 1924 AD 438 at 451; Castell v De

Greef 1994 (4) SA 408 (C) at 425; C v Minister Correctional Services 1996 (4) SA 292 (T) at 300.

169

2005 (1) SA 509 (T).

170

Christian Lawyers Association v Minister of Health (Reproductive Health Alliance as Amicus Curiae)

2005 (1) SA 509 (T) at 516.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!