05.08.2020 Views

[Catalyst 2019]

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

explain that were prominent changes

in both Openness and Neuroticism in

comparison to the baseline personality

traits that come up with long-term followup

traits that follow the MDMA-assisted

psychotherapy.

Based on the LTFU questionnaire for use

in LTFU evaluations of MDMA-assisted

psychotherapy, CAPS and IES-R scores at

LTFU for the 16 study completers from

Study 2 were not statistically different

from their 2-month (short-term) mean

scores (Table 3) illustrating similar

explanation and effects toward the

study. Throughout this study, all subjects

reported a benefit from participation in

the study (median = 5, range = 3), with

at least some benefit persisting (median

= 5, range = 3) for longer than a year

post-treatment. Moreover, the 16 LTFU

CAPS completers reported some sort of

degree of benefit (median = 5 (maximum

score possible); range = 3)4. These results

illustrate that there was no clear difference

between the CAPS completers and noncompleters

in terms of the degree of and

persistence of their benefits from the

MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. Even more

striking, all participants answered “Yes”

to the question, “Do you believe more

MDMA sessions would have been helpful”

for further treatment of PTSD. Within this

study, participants stated that there was

either no change or some improvement

in their cognitive function, memory,

and concentration: 7/19 participants

reported no change, while 13 reported

improvements in these areas and none

indicated inhibition or worsened effects.

Overall, participants described the

experimental treatment as being helpful,

sometimes dramatically so (“The therapy

made it possible for me to live”), but also

as being difficult at times (“one of the

toughest things I have ever done”). Several

participants described it as a step in an

“ongoing process” rather than simply a

completed cure. 4

Discussion

The first study concluded that persistent

changes in both Neuroticism and

Openness occurred post MDMA

treatment. Patients experienced

symptom relief for up to 45.5 months

post-treatment. These results allude to

MDMA’s potential to fundamentally alter

personality traits beyond the scope of

PTSD treatment, and result in long-term

changes. The study also determined that

Openness is a key indicator linked to PTSD

symptoms, and those with MDMA assisted

psychotherapy experienced greater

changes in Openness. 3 However, some

scholars argue that personality traits, by

definition, are stable over a lifetime. The

present study and other studies suggest

that certain facets to personality are able

to be manipulated and can be relevant in

reducing PTSD symptoms. 3

The recipients of MDMA-assisted

psychotherapy characterized their

experience as cleansing. They reported

being able to explore new territory within

their mind, leading to increased Openness

and a new perspective on their trauma.

The study did not address the biochemical

aspect of MDMA, instead, the researchers

suggest that MDMA primes a susceptibility

to increased Openness in its recipients,

thus enhancing therapy’s effectiveness.

Individuals with the most change in

Openness also experienced a greater

reduction in PTSD symptoms.

The authors of this paper speculate that

both environmental factors, including

significant trauma and profound

experiences, and epigenetic factors

influence underlying personality aspects.

The question of how MDMA-assisted

psychotherapy can result in long-term

personality changes remains a debated

subject. Further research is required to

investigate what processes can manipulate

personality traits as well as to further

define what facets are encompassed in

personality. 3

Three limitations are outlined in the first

study. The trial was run as a double-blind

trial, however, many participants and

therapists correctly identified their case.

Shifts in expectations towards therapy

may have resulted from this occurrence,

as is suggested by the initial decrease

in Openness but not Neuroticism in the

placebo group3. Second, the findings of

this study rely on subjective reports by the

participants; this limitation is shared by

almost all clinical diagnoses and studies

of PTSD. Last, the sample size was limited,

but clear trends existed within this group. 3

The second study has evidence within the

LTFU study that alludes to the clinically

meaningful benefit from MDMA-assisted

psychotherapy to PTSD patients. When

looking at the final data, one must note

that 3 of the 19 subjects did not complete

the CAPS and IES-R. However, they did

complete the LTFU Questionnaire and

reported nearly the same degree of

benefit and persistence of benefit as those

who had completed the CAPS. These

results illustrate that up to 89% (17/19)

of those who received MDMA had longterm

improvement in PTSD symptoms4.

Overall, the LTFU questionnaire illustrated

some critical points: there is an clear

absence of risk for substance abuse and

neurocognitive decline when juxtaposed

with the clear improvement of symptoms

and other perceived benefits. 4

The paper claims that the data from

the LTFU Questionnaire supports the

hypothesis that MDMA can be utilized

in a clinical setting with limited risk that

participants will subsequently seek

self-administered “street ecstasy,” or

become addicted to the drug. 4 However,

this treatment must be implemented

with several precautions: MDMA being

administered in a therapeutic setting and

close follow-up of patients are essential

elements of the treatment and must be

included with clinical monitoring and

therapeutic support when MDMA is

TABLE 2

TABLE 1

34 | CATALYST

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!