You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
VOLUME 12,2019
RICE UNDERGRADUATE SCIENCE RESEARCH JOURNAL
CAR T-CELLS
the frontier of
oncology therapies
ALSO IN THIS ISSUE:
+Interconnection of Genetics & Behavior in Drosophilia
+Exploring the Response of PTSD to Psychotherapy
From the
EDITORS
Dear Reader,
Welcome to the twelfth annual edition of Catalyst, Rice’s premier Undergraduate
Science Research Journal. As a peer-edited publication written, edited,
and designed by undergraduate students, we are committed to fostering
interdisciplinary dialogue and championing scientific communication both inside
and outside of Rice. We seek to make science exciting, accessible,
and engaging for all of our readers, whether you be a scientist or a casual
enthusiast. In this year’s publication, you can find articles about fields ranging
from multi-domain artificial intelligence, to stem cell mobility, and post-traumatic
stress disorder.
This year, as an organization, Catalyst has expanded immensely in our goal
of improving scientific literacy and cultivating scientific dialogue across the
community. We have strengthened our connections with schools across Houston
as part of our mentorship and outreach initiative Eureka including incorporating
Catalyst Scientific Communication Section (CS^2). CS^2 was a pilot initiative in
which we brought Eureka students from Energy Institute to Rice’s Undergraduate
Research Symposium to present their AP Research results in the form of a
poster. In addition, the second issue of Catalyst Eureka was released and
distributed to students and teachers in our partner schools, members of the Rice
community, and professionals in the Texas Medical Center to much fanfare. On
Rice’s campus, Catalyst continued to lead at the university-wide level, organizing
the 2nd Annual Catalyst Fall Research Panel to help connect Rice undergraduates
to research opportunities. An improved format and schedule made the event
a huge success as more than 70 people attended. The year also witnessed an
improvement in our blogging platform Discoveries, with pieces on diverse topics,
scientific and otherwise, circulated frequently throughout the year among Rice
undergraduates.
The progress and expansion we have undergone this year would not have
been possible without the support of the Rice community, our partners, our
mentors, and our amazing staff. In particular, we would like to thank the Rice
Center for Civic Leadership, the Rich Endowment, the Program in Writing and
Communication, and the School of Natural Sciences for their continued generous
support of Rice Catalyst’s endeavors. We also want to especially thank Dr. Dan
Wagner, our faculty sponsor who has provided us with invaluable advice and
guidance throughout this entire process.
We are proud of how far Catalyst has come this year and we are excited for our
growth in the years to come. From the entire Catalyst staff, we hope you enjoy
our latest issue as much as we enjoyed making it!
Mahesh Krishna, Activities Chair and Co-President
Sanket Mehta, Editor-in-Chief and Co-President
2018 - 2019
Staff
CO - PRESIDENTS
Mahesh Krishna, Activities Chair
Sanket Mehta, Editor-in-Chief
EDITORS
ATTRACTIONS
Brianna Garcia
Laura Jabr
Sophia Chang
Laurel Chen
Sam Shzu
Sara Ho
Dora Huang
Katherine Cohen
Kelsey Sanders
Meredith Brown
Jackson Savage
Yunee Park
Jenny Wang
SENIOR DESIGNERS
Anna Croyle
Evelyn Syau
Kaitlyn Xiong
DESIGNERS
Minjung Kim
J. Riley Holmes
Nina Kumar
Yvonne Chien
Hoang A. Vu
Sarah Swackhamer
BLOGGERS
Monika Karki
Brianna Garcia
Natalie Gault
Aditya More
Lani DuFresne
FACULTY ADVISOR
Dr. Daniel Wagner
DIRECTOR OF DESIGN
Juliana Wang
EXECUTIVE EDITORS
ATTRACTIONS
BREAKTHROUGHS
CONNECTIONS
DISCOVERIES
TREASURER
Jack Trouvé
OUTREACH DIRECTOR
Shravya Kakulamarri
BLOG DIRECTOR
Nigel Edward
PODCAST EXECUTIVE PRODUCER
Nick Falkenberg
Web Developer
Preetham Bachina
Jenny Wang
Ruchi Gupta
Rachita Pandya
Jacob Kesten
Evelyn Syau
BREAKTHROUGHS
Adelle Jia
Ananya Subramanian
Preetham Bachina
Minjung Kim
Andrew Mu
Yvonne Chien
Sarah Swackhamer
CONNECTIONS
Natalie Gault
DISCOVERIES
Evelyn Syau
Nigel Edward
Abram Qiu
Krithika Kumar
Luke Cantu
Priscilla Li
Samantha Cheng
Jim Zhang
Ksenia Metruck
Preetham Bachina
Nikit Venishetty
Lisa Shi
2 | CATALYST
ATTRACTIONS
table of
CONTENTS
4
6
8
9
10
12
14
16
18
CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY: A Look at the Frontier of Oncology Therapies | Joshua Anil
SPIX’S MACAW: From Big Screen to Endangered List | J. Riley Holmes
VIRAL HATE: Dispelling Viruses’ Bad Rep | Jim Zhang
SUPERINTELLIGENCE: Consequences of an Intelligence Explosion | Josh Engels
The WHERE, WHAT, & WHY of Modern Day Epidemics | Dora Huang
Engineering the SCALE OF LIFE | Hoang A. Vu
RIDING THE OCTO-HIGH: MDMA and Sociality in Octopus Bimaculoids | Kelsey Sanders
IT’S ALL IN YOUR BRAIN: The Neural Network of Chronic Pain | Tammita Phongmekhin
Racing towards the CURE FOR CANCER | Hannah Boyd
BREAKTHROUGHS
19
20
22
24
26
28
29
30
THE MITOCHONDRIA: More than Just the Powerhouse of the Cell | Tasneem Mustafa
FLIES ON THE PRIZE: Exploring the Interconnectedness of Genetics and Behavior in Drosophila
Melanogaster | Sarah Swackhamer
A NEW HOPE FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE: Induced Neural Clearance | Luke Cantu
THE ORIGAMI OF LIFE: Uncovering the Mechanism of Protein Folding and Other Complex
Systems | NamTip Phongmekhin
DOWN TO THE NEURON: Micro-Methods of Measuring the Brain | Adelle Jia
Magnetic Cell Manipulation | Amna Ibrahim
DO YOU HEAR WHAT I HEAR? Hair Cell Regeneration in the Cochlea | Maia Helterbrand
THE HIPPOCAMPUS: Let’s Make Some Memories | Christine Tang
CONNECTIONS
32
MEDICAL MARIJUANA? MORE LIKE MEDICAL MDMA: Party Drugs and PTSD | Aruni Areti &
Jackson Savage
DISCOVERIES
36 PLANT COMMUNICATION: Silent but Not Invisible | Lani DuFresne
37 Dark Matter Mapping | Ksenia Metruck
38 HUMANS: Are We Really Just Crabby People? | Natalie Gault
CATALYST | 3
Cancer Immunotherapy:
A LOOK AT THE FRONTIER OF ONCOLOGY THERAPIES
T
hink back to your childhood visits to
the doctor. Filled with stickers,
measurements, and shots. Lots and lots
of shots. Mumps, measles, meningitis…
the list of immunizations goes on and
on. And while you may have dreaded
those shots, those treatments boosted
your immune system, helping you fight
disease and stay healthy. Well, those
immune-enhancing therapies may not
just be for childhood diseases anymore.
In a new field of research called
immunotherapy, researchers are
developing preventive and therapeutic
cancer treatments that enhance a
patient’s immune response.
In fact, you may have already received
one of these preventive treatments. If
you grew up in 21st century America,
you most likely received the Gardasil
vaccination as an adolescent. Gardasil
protects against the Human
Papillomavirus (HPV), but it also
protects against the cervical, anal, and
oropharyngeal cancers that HPV can
1
cause.
However, prophylactic vaccines like
Gardasil are only the tip of the
immunotherapy iceberg. Therapeutic
cancer treatments also harness the
power of immunotherapy in order to
improve outcomes for patients already
suffering from cancer. These treatments
are on the cutting edge of cancer
research, and in recent years,
researchers and clinicians have made
significant progress toward developing
and releasing these innovative methods.
According to the National Cancer
Institute, immunotherapy is “a type of
therapy that uses substances to
stimulate or suppress the immune
system to help the body fight cancer,
2
infection, and other diseases.” While
there are several types of cancer
immunotherapies, they generally
destroy cancer cells by specifically
training immune cells to recognize and
eliminate cancerous cells. For instance,
cancer cells often contain many unique
surface proteins. Scientists can often
use these identifying markers to train a
patient’s immune system to recognize
these markers and mount an immune
response. This can allow for a more
targeted approach, as immune cells only
attack malignant cells, while leaving
3
healthy cells alone. In contrast, more
indiscriminate approaches such as
chemotherapy can often harm healthy
cells as well as cancer cells. While
immunotherapy includes many
approaches, a few methods, such as
checkpoint inhibition and CAR-T cell
therapy, have cleared clinical trials and
are currently treating cancer patients.
One of the more notable forms of
immunotherapy is checkpoint-inhibition.
This treatment has recently advanced
out of clinical trials and gained FDA
approval, and the researchers who
By Joshua Anil
While there are several
types of cancer
immunotherapies, they
generally destroy cancer
cells by specifically
training immune cells to
recognize and eliminate
cancerous cells.
discovered its working principle were
awarded the 2018 Nobel Prize in
Medicine. Checkpoint-inhibition
treatments work by inhibiting the
interaction of proteins on the surface of
cancer cells with checkpoint proteins on
immune cells. Receptors on T-cells, a
common type of immune cell,
checkpoint-proteins serve as control
switches for the immune response,
preventing the over-stimulation of the
immune system. Proteins on healthy
cells can bind to these receptors and
deactivate an immune response.
However, cancer cells can also use this
technique to disguise themselves as
harmless. They often express the same
protein as healthy cells, which they then
use to bind to T-cells checkpoint
4
receptors, consequently avoiding attack.
In order to combat this deception,
several drugs use monoclonal
antibodies to interrupt the binding
between the T-cell receptor and the
antigen-presenting cell. Keytruda is a
drug that targets the interaction
between checkpoint protein
programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)
—a receptor on the surface of cytotoxic
T-cells—and its corresponding
programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)
—a protein on the surface of healthy
5
cells and many cancer cells.
4 | CATALYST
Keytruda contains a monoclonal
antibody that binds to PD-1, inhibiting
the checkpoint protein from interacting
with PD-L1, and preventing the cancer
6
from evading an immune response.
There are several other drugs similar to
Keytruda that target other proteins, with
many treatments treating a wide variety
of cancers currently in clinical trials.
However, these treatments do come
with risks, as they induce a general
immune response which may cause a
patient’s immune system to begin
indiscriminately attacking healthy as
well as cancerous tissue.
Another form of immunotherapy, CAR-T
Cell Therapy, takes a much more
targeted route to selectively destroy
cancerous cells. Similar to checkpointinhibition
therapy, this treatment also
takes advantage of T-cell and tumor-cell
protein interaction. However, while
checkpoint-inhibition therapy prevents
cancer cells from pretending to be
normal, CAR-T Cell Therapy programs T-
cells to recognize and destroy cancerous
cells. Checkpoint-inhibition therapy
prevents interaction between cancer cell
surface proteins and T-cells, while CAR-T
Cell Therapy trains T-cells to bind to
unique antigens on the surface of
tumors in order to destroy them.
Doctors remove T-cells from a patient
and then genetically alter those T-cells
through viruses to produce proteins
called chimeric antigen receptors or
CARs, which will target unique antigens
7
on the surface of cancer cells. Scientists
then grow these altered T-cells in a lab
before injecting them back into a
patient, where they can serve as a
targeted and upgraded form of their
own natural immune system. In contrast
to chemotherapy or radiation, which
require a schedule of treatments, only
one infusion of the T-cells is necessary.
Because the edited T-cells replicate with
their synthetic antigens still intact, CAR-T
represents a type of “living drug”: a
renewable treatment which continues to
reproduce. CAR-T is currently only
approved for the treatment of blood
cancers, but its targeted focus and
outcome improvement give it significant
potential for treatment of other cancers
in the future.
Scientists then grow
these altered T-cells in a
lab before injecting them
back into a patient, where
they can serve as a
targeted and upgraded
form of their own natural
immune system.
Immunotherapy is pushing the
boundaries of cancer care. By using a
patient’s own immune system as a
weapon against cancer, researchers are
looking at cancer treatment in an
entirely new light—and achieving
promising results. In addition to the
checkpoint inhibition and CAR-T
treatments mentioned in this article,
researchers are also developing and
testing several other techniques like
Adoptive T-cell therapy and multiantigen
therapeutic vaccines. Medical
8
research is a time-consuming process,
and there were surely be many
unforeseen roadblocks along the way;
however, this new immunological
approach to cancer care places us on
the path to the hopeful day where
cancer treatment may be no more than
a simple shot at your local drugstore.
WORKS CITED
[1] National Cancer Institute.
https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictio
naries/cancer-terms/def/immunotherapy.
(accessed Oct. 5, 2018).
[2] Guo C. et al. Adv Can Res. 2013, 119,
421-475.
[3] American Cancer Society.
https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatme
nts-and-side-effects/treatmenttypes/immunotherapy/immunecheckpoint-inhibitors.html.
(accessed Oct.
18, 2018).
[4] Dine J. et al. Asia-Pacific J. Onc. Nursing
2017, 4, 127-135.
[5] Raedler LA. Am. Health & Drug Benefits.
2015, 8, 96-100.
[6] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
https://www.dana-farber.org/cellulartherapies-program/car-t-cell-therapy/.
(accessed Oct. 18, 2018).
[7] Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
https://www.dana-farber.org/cellulartherapies-program/car-t-cell-therapy/.
(accessed Oct. 18, 2018).
[8] University of Washington Cancer
Vaccine Institute.
https://depts.washington.edu/tumorvac/re
search. (accessed Dec. 27, 2018).
Icons made by Smashicon, Freepik, and
prettycons from Flaticon
Images from Wikimedia Commons
DESIGNED BY
Minjung Kim
EDITED BY
Sophia Chang
CATALYST | 5
SPIX’S MACAW
FROM BIG SCREEN TO ENDANGERED LIST
BY J. RILEY HOLMES
In 2011, the animated movie Rio captivated
audiences with the story of Blu, a Spix’s
macaw destined to mate with the last wild
female of his species. However, a new study
from BirdLife International listed the Spix’s
macaw as one of eight bird species recently
confirmed as extinct in the wild. 1
Little is known about the lives of Spix’s
macaws, as limited evidence exists in
scientific literature. First discovered in 1819,
Johann Baptist Ritter von Spix, a notable
German biologist, documented the “Little
Blue Macaw” in Bahia, Brazil. 3 Even after
its discovery, Spix’s macaw was considered
particularly rare, hardly seen by the local
population. In fact, Spix’s macaw was thought
to be extinct until 1986, when ecological
surveyors located three macaws near the São
Francisco river region. 2
In 1988, the International Union for
Conservation of Nature (IUCN) changed
the macaw’s status from “extinct” to
“threatened”. 2 The IUCN Red List assesses
the status of endangered plant and animal
species. To classify probability of extinction,
the IUCN studies geographic range and
population decline rate of a certain
species. After intensive regional
surveys, data about the number of
individuals or area their territory
occupies indicates probability of
extinction in the wild. The Red
List also factors in artificiallysupported
populations
and individuals held
in captivity. After
analysis, the IUCN
classifies the
species into
one of
several categories, ranging from “least
concern” to “extinct”. 4
In 1994, Spix’s macaw was classified as
“critically endangered”, indicating rapid
population decline and a high
probability of extinction. 2
Less than fifty individuals,
captive and wild,
constituted Spix’s
macaw population. 4
Conservation efforts
were already
underway—
in 1995, a captive
individual was
reintroduced to the
wild. A couple of weeks
later, however, the
individual disappeared,
and researchers suspected
collision with a nearby
powerline. 2
Afterward, the only known remaining Spix’s
macaws existed in captive populations,
thought to be the offspring of the wild birds
spotted in 1986. 3 However, since not all
potential habitats were surveyed, the
IUCN could not officially declare
Spix’s macaw as Extinct in the Wild.
A rare sighting in 2016 raised hopes.
In Bahia, Brazil—the macaw’s native
region—a local farmer spotted a
blue bird flying over the forest along
the riverbank. The Society for the
Conservation of Birds in Brazil (SAVE
Brazil) later confirmed the sighting of
a Spix’s macaw. 5 However, hope of
a wild Spix’s macaw population was
fleeting. Given the large presence of
conservation groups in the area, many
believe the bird was just an escapee
from captivity. 1
In September 2018, a new study investigated
the Red List status of 51 “Critically
Endangered” bird species. Conducted
over eight years, this robust reassessment
analyzed previous survey records and
quantified the intensity of threats. The
study suggests five birds, including Spix’s
macaw, should be reclassified as “Extinct
90% of
bird extinctions in
recent centuries have
been species native to
islands.
in the Wild”. Another Brazilian parrot, the
Glaucous macaw, also spearheaded this list
as last sighted in 1998. The New Caledonian
Lorikeet and Pernambuco Pygmy Owl were
last sighted in 1987 and 1994, respectively.
Three species were also recommended
for reclassification as “Extinct”,
including the Cryptic Treehunter
and Alagoas Foliage-Gleaner.
A native Hawaiian bird, the
Poo-uli, has neither been
spotted in the wild nor
held in captivity since
2004. 1
Of the eight bird species
primed for extinction, five
are native to the South
American continent, and
four from Brazil specifically. 1
Dr. Stuart Butchart, BirdLife
International’s Chief Scientist,
highlights the concerning trend among
the study’s results. In recent centuries, 90%
of bird extinctions occur within species native
to islands. However, a “growing wave of
extinctions sweep[s] across the continents”. 1
The suspected cause of these extinctions?
Habitat loss.
When mainland extinctions outpace island
ones, conservationists must consider
the effect of human developments on
natural environments. Construction of the
Sobradinho hydroelectric dam in the 1970s
wiped out forests near Bahia, Spix’s macaw’s
native territory. 2 Birds in other regions of
Brazil and South America also experience
the effects of deforestation. Unsustainable
logging and agriculture directly contributes
to the population decline of these birds. 1
Given high deforestation rates among
these countries, this correlation is not
surprising. While habitat loss presents the
most prominent threat, illegal trade also
encourages trapping and smuggling of
rare birds, consequently decimating wild
populations. 3
Though these statistics seem dismal,
conservationists remain optimistic for the
Little Blue Macaw. Sixty to eighty Spix’s
macaws still live in captivity, and on-site
6 | CATALYST
Pernambuco Pygmy Owl
Pernambuco
Alagoas Foliage Gleaner
Alagoas
Cryptic Treehunter
Alagoas
Spix’s Macaw
Bahia
Glaucous Macaw
Southern Brazil
Four Birds
listed in Birdlife
International’s
Study are native to
Brazil.
conservation activities promote their
survival. 1 In partnership with the Brazilian
government, the Association for the
Conservation of Threatened Parrots (ACTP)
aims to reintroduce Spix’s macaw into the
wild by 2021. 3 Various breeding programs
aim to increase Spix’s macaw’s base
population for a sustainable reintroduction.
Thirty-three Spix’s macaws have been bred
at the Al Wabra Wildlife Conservation and
Preservation Organization in the recent
decade. 6 The Brazilian Spix’s breeding
program and the ACTP’s German facilities
partner to regularly exchange offspring
to broaden genetic diversity
within the captive species,
as inbreeding can lead to
harmful genetic defects.
ACTP also collaborates
with universities and
research facilities to
explore possibilities
for artificial
insemination. 3
extinction
remains a prevalent
and frightening
possibility for this
species.
The ACTP also aims
to develop a suitable
and supportive habitat
for the reintroduction
of Spix’s macaw. After
intensive search efforts for
the optimal location, Concordia
Farm was purchased in Bahia, Brazil. The
Farm includes the land constituting Spix’s
macaw’s last wild habitat. 3 The land provides
a protective area for the reintroduction of the
Spix’s macaw, permitting further population
growth without external threats. Likewise,
education programs raise awareness and
teach the local population about the bird’s
importance. 3
Rio gave Spix’s macaw Hollywood fame, but
the challenge these birds face is anything
but fiction. As BirdLife’s study confirmed
in 2018, extinction remains a prevalent
and frightening possibility for this species.
Thankfully, multiple conservation practices
help reduce the Spix’s macaw chances for
extinction. Many other rainforest birds,
however, do not have this opportunity.
Unsustainable human activities, like
deforestation, abolish their habitats
and destroy their ecosystems.
As human influence continues
to expand, populations
must consider their
effect on local native
species. Greater
biodiversity influences
natural sustainability
and ecological balance.
Each species plays an
important role in its
ecosystem, as well as within
a society’s economic and
cultural identities. A society
that increases public ecological
awareness, codifies its conservation
efforts, and limits environmental destruction
can dramatically reduce a species’ chances of
extinction.
Works Cited
[1] Dale, A.; Spix’s Macaw heads list of first bird
extinctions confirmed this decade. BirdLife
International [Online]. 2018. https://www.birdlife.
org/worldwide/news/spixs-macaw-heads-list-firstbird-extinctions-set-be-confirmed-decade.
(Oct. 5,
2018).
[2] BirdLife International 2018. Cyanopsitta
spixii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
[Online]. 2018. https://www.iucnredlist.org/
species/22685533/93078343. (Oct. 5, 2018).
[3] Spix’s Macaw - ACTP. https://www.act-parrots.
org/spixs-macaw/?lang=en. (Oct. 5, 2018).
[4] Dublin, H.; IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Encyclopedia Britannica [Online]. 2009. https://
www.britannica.com/topic/IUCN-Red-List-of-
Threatened-Species. (Oct. 5, 2018).
[5] Hurrell, S.; Spix’s Macaw Reappears in Brazil.
BirdLife International [Online]. 2016. https://www.
birdlife.org/americas/news/spix%E2%80%99smacaw-reappears-brazil.
(Oct. 5, 2018).
[6] Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation. http://awwp.
alwabra.com/?p=1054. (Oct. 5, 2018).
Design By J. Riley Holmes
Edited By Katherine Cohen
Images Courtesy of David Riaño Cortés and WIkipedia
Commons
Vectors Courtesy of Georgiana lonescu from The Noun
Project
CATALYST | 7
VIRAL HATE
By Jim Zhang
Dispelling Viruses' Bad Rep
iruses have been found to exist
alongside life since its very inception.
VThese small packets of genetic material
have no means to reproduce on their
own, but instead hijack the cells of specific
organisms to replicate using their molecular
machinery. This hijacking frequently results
in diseases, which are responsible for
anything from one’s annual encounter with
the cold and flu, to the development of
certain cancers.
Because of their capacity for harm, viruses
are looked upon in a profoundly negative
light. This label is not unreasonable: viruses
have been responsible for countless deaths
throughout history. However,
not all viruses are pathogenic.
Studies have
shown that
viruses, through their
infection, play a role in
driving evolution and
Their primary objective is to
replicate and reproduce,
not necessarily harm their
hosts. Studies have
shown that viruses,
through their infection,
play a role in driving
evolution and moderating
the biosphere. 1 Their means
of doing so arise with the
various possible outcomes of
viral infection: hosts are killed immediately,
later, or never, as some viruses effectively lie
dormant within or across lifespans.
moderating the
biosphere.
In terms of evolution, certain infections
allows for viral genomes to be inherited
with the host’s offspring. Over time, this
occurrence can have profound impacts on
a species’ development across generations.
Specifically in humans, viruses are
responsible for over 8% of our genome. 2 This
8% encodes for countless critical proteins
responsible for how humans presently
function on a biochemical basis. For
example, within pregnant mothers, a protein
known as Hemo is produced by both embryo
and parent. Hemo comes from one of many
virally-originated genes, activating during
pregnancy to, as research suggests, assist
with embryonic development. Selection
has favored for its preservation, ensuring
continued survival of the viral genome
as it is duplicated and inherited across
generations. 1
The viral contribution to evolution cannot
be denied, demonstrating that they are
more than just simple agents of disease.
However, the sheer extent and range of this
evolutionary role remains uncertain. How
can viruses spread through mechanisms
other than infection? Recent studies have
shown that up to 800 million viruses are
“rained down” upon each square meter
of the planet’s surface. These viruses are
mostly found within the oceans. 3 There,
viruses assist in moderating the ecosystems
of the seas. Near the water’s surface,
there is an immense diversity of various
microscopic species. Each of these
species performs a niche, or purpose,
forming relationships not unlike
that of macroscopic terrestrial
ecosystems. Here, viruses act
as highly specific predators,
infecting strains of bacteria,
algae, and plankton to regulate
their populations and release
their sequestered nutrients back
for further use. Some estimates
show that, within the oceans, up to
1023 viral infections occur per second,
eliminating up to 20-40% of all bacterial cells
per day. 4
As moderators, viruses have also been
shown to assist with controlling algal
blooms, an issue becoming ever-prevalent
with increasing agricultural run-off. In many
cases, virus populations were found to
quickly eliminate overgrowing algae through
infection. 5 In doing so, these viruses prevent
the hypoxic dead zones and toxins algal
blooms would otherwise release, proving
vital for surrounding marine ecosystems.
Viruses have settled into incredibly diverse
ecological niches, maintaining a global
presence in their host organisms, marine
environments, and even the air we breathe.
Viruses frequently find themselves swept
into the air, either in dust or with the sea
foam, allowing easy travel through the
planet’s airstreams to circulate the globe.
This forms what has been referred to as
the planet’s “virosphere.” 1 The virosphere
allows otherwise-foreign genetic material to
cascade down to various ecosystems, with
one study noting it essentially “provides a
seed bank that should allow ecosystems to
rapidly adapt to environmental changes.” 3 In
other words, these viral showers introduce
potential new genes to be integrated into
new host species, potentially impacting how
said species will evolve.
Each of these studies and phenomena
demonstrate that viruses overall possess
an immense ability to not only spread
across ecosystems, but also moderate
their immediate and future populations
through infection and potentiallybeneficial
introduction of genetic material.
Researchers, recognizing these abilities, have
called for further research into the complex
roles viruses play in ecology. 6 The overall
impact of viruses across the evolutionary
ages is, for the most part, still unknown.
However, the potential these infectious
agents possess in influencing both the
planet’s immediate and long term future
demonstrates that viruses are much more
than simple, pathogenic particles. They
serve not only as drivers of evolution, but
moderators of ecosystems - much more than
simple agents of disease.
Works Cited
[1] Robbins, J. Trillions Upon Trillions of
Viruses Fall From the Sky Each Day. The
New York Times, Apr. 13, 2018. https://www.
nytimes.com/2018/04/13/science/virosphereevolution.html
(accessed Dec 13, 2018).
[2] Griffiths, D. J. Genome Biol. 2001, 2,
REVIEWS1017.
[3] Reche, I. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1154-1162.
[4] JOUR. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 628.
[5] Lehahn, Y. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 2041-2046.
[6] Weitz, J. S. et al. Unveiling the Viral
Ecology of Earth. Nautilus, Jun. 2017. http://
alliance.nautil.us/article/219/unveiling-theviral-ecology-of-earth
(accessed Dec. 13,
2018).
Design by Anna Croyle
Edited by Jackson Savage
8 | CATALYST
Superintelligence:
Consequences of an Intelligence Explosion
By Josh Engels
Artificial intelligence is slowly becoming
more prevalent in modern life. While
field-specialized artificial intelligences
are becoming more and more
common, each only reaches superiority
in one area, so their “takeover” remains
slow and controlled. Currently, no one yet
questions the superiority of the biological
mind as a whole, with its problem solving,
planning, and creativity unmatched by any
computer today. However, with the fast pace
of technological advancement, the balance
may soon tip in favor of the novel idea of
superintelligence, and perhaps sooner than
many think.
“Superintelligence” is the name for a
hypothetical intelligence that is superior
to humans in every field .1 It is an entirely
different idea from the current domainspecific
AIs. When such an entity arises, it
will by definition be better than humans
at everything, including the specific but
important skill of programming artificial
intelligences. The superintelligence could
therefore autonomously program an
even smarter AI, continuously replicating
this procedure, leading to an intelligence
explosion termed the “singularity” .2 We must
be extraordinarily careful in starting such an
explosion, for while the potential benefits
from an incredibly smart superintelligence
are extraordinary, so are the dangers.
In fact, the dangers are so extreme that
humanity could go extinct by accident.
Superintelligence does not have to be
programmed with evil intent in order for it
to have dire effects .6 The key issue is that an
AI may not have the same “obvious” ethics
governing its behavior as humans do.6
Consider an artificial intelligence created with
the goal of optimizing the creation of paper
clips, programmed by a team in a corporate
setting trying to get a leg up on competitors.
If this program achieves superintelligence by
editing its own code, it might determine that
the best way to optimize paper clips would
be to mass produce nanomachines and turn
the whole world into a giant computer. 7
It might happen in mere minutes; hence
the “explosion” moniker in the singularity
definition. It is tempting to think that a
superintelligence might develop a sense
of morality, and therefore not kill all life on
Earth, but there is no fundamental reason
for an intelligence to want to change its
goals unless it is programmed to do so. We
will have to ensure it has human ideas of
morality very carefully when programming it.
There are a couple feasible ways of
accomplishing this important goal. The
first is to emulate an entire human brain
and build a superintelligence from there,
knowing that human brains have human
values. In fact, we may already have the
necessary hardware; one estimate puts the
necessary number of computations per
second to simulate a brain at 1014, and our
best supercomputers are already faster than
this. 2 The road block is software: the human
brain is incredibly intricate, so mapping all
connections in order to create a simulation
is a very difficult problem. Thus, instead of
copying a human brain directly, multiple
projects are currently underway to model
human thought processes like reasoning,
reflection, and adaptation. 10 These projects
have an eventual goal of simulating an entire
human brain. 10
If we are successful
in the creation
of a friendly
superintelligence,
most of our
problems could be
instantly solved.
The alternative is to construct a
superintelligence from scratch and try
to assign it human values. For reasons
outlined in the paper clip example, this
approach is dangerous, but perhaps easier
to implement, making it a high priority
research area. Eliezer Yudkowsky, a
researcher working on how to prevent the
rise of superintelligence coinciding with the
downfall of humanity, has termed such a
superintelligence that would have humanity’s
best interests in mind a “Friendly AI”.8 He
is a part of MIRI, the Machine Intelligence
Research Institute, which ensures that the
creation of a superintelligence will have a
positive impact on humanity. 9 They conduct
research into how to create systems that we
can understand and prove are safe using
decision theory. 9 Instead of using a semi
random process akin to evolution with an
outcome we cannot directly control, they
seek to understand the theory behind the
way minds work. 9 Only then can we be sure
to create a Friendly AI.
It is difficult to determine exactly when
superintelligence will be developed; AI
researchers have historically been overly
optimistic about when smarter than human
intelligence will arise. 3 However, past
overconfidence has taught researchers the
significant difference between specific and
general artificial intelligence, so we should
pay attention to the fact that the median
response from experts attending the AGI-09
conference to the question “when will there
be a 50% chance of a superintelligence” was
20453, and that the response to the same
question about a 90% chance was 2100. The
consensus of those working on the problem
is that the creation of a superintelligence is
not one of science fiction.
With so many dangers and complications,
why even try to create a superintelligence
anyways? More so than any other technology
in the past, superintelligence will alter the
face of our society. If we are successful in the
creation of a friendly superintelligence, most
of our problems could be instantly solved.
With a being almost infinitely smarter than
us acting with our best interests at its heart
and nanotechnology at its back, poverty and
death will be a thought of the past. 6
WORKS CITED
https://nickbostrom.com/superintelligence.
html
http://consc.net/papers/singularity.pdf
https://sethbaum.com/ac/2011_AI-Experts.
https://nickbostrom.com/papers/survey.pdf
https://wiki.opencog.org/w/AGI_Projects
https://nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html
https://80000hours.org/articles/high-impactcareers/
http://intelligence.org/files/AIPosNegFactor.
https://intelligence.org/research/
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08602.pdf
DESIGN BY Nina Kumar
EDITED BY Dora Huang
CATALYST | 9
AUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAU
CAUTION CAUT
The
Where
What
&Why
I
I had a little
bird,
Its name was Enza,
I opened the
window,
And in-flu-enza. 1
n 1918, children would sing this rhyme
while skipping rope, not knowing it’s
connection to the Spanish Flu, one
of the most deadly pandemics in world
history. 1,2 An epidemic is defined as the
sudden increase in the number of localized
cases of a certain disease, as seen in the
case of the bubonic plague, smallpox,
HIV/AIDS, and most recently with Ebola.
Pandemics, like that of the Spanish Flu, refer
to an epidemic that has spread all over the
world, affecting a large number of people at
a time. 3
In modern day, AIDS and Ebola are some
of the most dangerous and prevalent
epidemics that exist in the world and have
not yet been cured. In order to garner a
better understanding of epidemics and
how they appear and return, it is important
to analyze the impact that epidemics
historically have on society through the way
public health organizations have shifted in
the face of major disease outbreaks such as
Ebola and HIV/AIDS.
Most epidemics arise in the equatorial
region. This is due to the fact that tropical
regions are a hot zone for breeding
pathogens, especially those that are
transmitted through insects. The extreme
weather and heavy rains serve as a breeding
ground for mosquito-borne diseases.
Deforestation and the compounding
effects of climate change can also cause
the outbreak of disease by increasing the
likelihood of exposed pools of stagnant
and infected waters. 4 In comparison
with temperate regions, there is a higher
proportion of long-lasting immunity in
the temperate zones than in the tropic
regions. This can also be attributed to the
lack of health safety in many countries that
occupy the tropical region. Additionally,
animal reservoirs are more common in
underdeveloped countries in the tropics.
Therefore, animal-transmitted diseases are
also more common in the tropics than in
temperate regions. However, temperate
regions are more susceptible to diseases
that arise from domesticated animals, such
as influenza A, measles, and smallpox.
Most temperate diseases “are acute rather
than slow, chronic, or latent,” therefore the
host dies quickly, decreasing the radius of
infection among the population. As a result,
these acute diseases exhaust the population
of susceptible victims before it reaches the
state of being an epidemic. 5 Ultimately,
humans actively proliferate diseases by
engaging in unfavorable exchange with the
external environment. Through interacting
with invasive microorganisms that result in
unfavorable autoimmune reactions, humans
easily pass contagions along to each other. 6
Essentially, the tropics are a hotbed for
epidemic outbreak because of the climate
conditions, the human activities and
development in the region, and the types
of diseases that persist there. In examining
epidemics that arise from the tropical
regions and evolved into a worldwide crisis,
it is important to analyze the two most
It is important to
analyze the two
most modern cases:
the AIDS epidemic
and the Ebola
outbreak.
modern cases: the AIDS epidemic and the
Ebola outbreak.
The 1990s was known for its weird fashion
and technological breakthroughs but also
for the AIDS epidemic that targeted young
adults, especially members of the LGBTQ+
community. Originating in the West Africa
region, AIDS is defined as the most severe
phase of the human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV). HIV reduces the number of T
cells that help the immune system fight
infection, making a person more susceptible
to other infections or cancers. Over time,
HIV can destroy so many of these cells that
the body is completely vulnerable and even
the most benign illness can cause severe
damage. 7 This virus is contracted through
certain bodily fluids, and is most often
spread through sex or sharing needles. 8 The
current medicine that is used to treat HIV
Is antiretroviral therapy, which can greatly
prolong lifespan if taken every day. This is
not a cure, but it allows people diagnosed
with HIV to live nearly as long as people who
do not have it. 7
10 | CATALYST
TION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION
of
Modern
Day
AUTION CAUT
Epidemics
By dora huang
The 2014 Ebola outbreak shattered news
headlines worldwide as it violently ravaged
the West African population. Many do not
realize that there is not just one Ebola virus,
but rather five, with four of the strains
causing severe illness in humans. Ebola
is the result of virulent transmission from
animal to animal, and later from animal to
human. Non-human primates are thought
to be the source of human infection,
however they are not the original source
(likely to be bats). 9 The largest outbreak
occurred in the West African region between
March 2014 and June 2016, but there have
been consistent small outbreaks since
then. Transmission occurs when bodily
fluids come into contact—whether it be
blood, secretions, or organs of an infected
person—which is why it is incredibly difficult
for doctors or researchers to study the
disease without getting infected themselves.
currently there
is no vaccine
or treatment
available for ebola
virus disease
Currently there is no vaccine or treatment
available for Ebola virus disease (EVD),
making it a present and imminent threat in
health and medicine. 9 In a report from the
World Health Organization (WHO) in October
2018, there is a total of 162 EVD cases in
seven different health zones. 10 Although EVD
is a lesser threat to well-developed nations,
as they simply instate policy to restrict travel
to and from the infected regions, it remains
a real threat to these underfunded and
unprotected regions of West Africa.
Ultimately, scientists continue to research
various ways to curtail modern day
epidemics. However, it also the duty of
the public to protect one another from
epidemics through receiving the appropriate
vaccinations and practicing general health
safety. Examining the modern AIDS and
Ebola epidemics and the ways medicine has
responded allows us to better understand
epidemic transmission. In the future,
researchers can adopt a more worldly
view on curing epidemics, combining new
technologies with public health services to
minimize mortality and risk for all people.
WORKS CITED
[1] Office of Public Health Scientific Services.
Principles of Epidemiology in Public Health
Practice, Third Edition. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention [Online], May 18,
2012. https://www.cdc.gov/ophss/csels/
dsepd/ss1978/lesson1/section11.html
(accessed Nov. 2, 2018).
[2] Laino, C. Africa, the infectious continent.
NBC News [Online], November 4, 1999.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3072106/ns/
us_news-only/t/africa-infectious-continent/
(accessed Nov. 2, 2018).
[3] Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. What are HIV and AIDS? HIV.
gov [Online], May 15, 2017. https://www.hiv.
gov/hiv-basics/overview/about-hiv-and-aids/
what-are-hiv-and-aids (accessed Nov. 2,
2018).
[4] U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. The Basics of HIV Prevention.
AIDSinfo [Online], October 30, 2018. https://
aidsinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv-aids/factsheets/20/48/the-basics-of-hiv-prevention
(accessed Nov. 2, 2018).
[5] Georgetown University Health Policy
Institute. Issue Brief. [Online] 2003, 2.
https://hpi.georgetown.edu/agingsociety/
pubhtml/HIV/HIV.html (accessed Jan. 31,
2019).
[6] Public Health England. Ebola: overview,
history, origins and transmission. GOV.
UK [Online], December 15, 2017. https://
www.gov.uk/government/publications/
ebola-origins-reservoirs-transmission-andguidelines/ebola-overview-history-originsand-transmission
(accessed Nov. 2, 2018).
[7] Heymann, David L et al. Lancelot. 2015.
385(9980), 1884-1901.
[8] Carney, Timothy J et al. Amer. J. Pub.
Health. 2015. 1, 1740-1744.
[9] Disease Outbreak News. Ebola virus
disease – Democratic Republic of the Congo.
World Health Organization [Online], October
4, 2018. http://www.who.int/csr/don/04-
october-2018-ebola-drc/en/ (accessed Nov.
2, 2018).
[10] U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services. Ebola containment strategy
succeeding in Liberia. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention [Online], Feb 20,
2015. https://www.cdc.gov/ophss/csels/
dsepd/ss1978/lesson1/section11.html
(accessed Jan. 31, 2019).
DESIGN BY Yvonne Chien
EDITED BY Kelsey Sanders
CATALYST | 11
Engineering The
SCALE
OF LIFE
By Hoang A. Vu
We continued
to develop our
microscopic
capacities
and can now
engineer
living
organisms that
can directly
impact our
daily lives.
The product of 4.5 billion years of
Earth existence is not simply a
linear sum of its 8.7 million living
species. Instead, those living species
are made up of complicated, interlinked
building blocks, each occupying a distinct
region on the hierarchical scale of life. 1,2
Despite persisting controversy about the
blurry distinction between living/non-living
entities, the scale of life is generally accepted
to start with atoms and molecules as the
smallest units. These microscopic units build
up subsequent levels - organelles, cells,
tissues, organs, organisms, populations,
communities, ecosystems and biomes -
ultimately forming the biosphere - Earth.
A higher level is more than the sum of
smaller levels, with emergent properties
defining each higher order. This collective
and growing relationship yields a vast
variety of lifeforms with mind-boggling
complexity. 3 Around the middle of this scale
of life—somewhere between the size of
miniscule atoms and massive biospheres—
lies one group of natural tinkerers. During
its relatively short time of existence, this
200,000-year-old species has interfered with
life at every level.
Now, picture the human race as a single
child: curious and naughty, but extremely
capable.
To ensure its survival, the child first meddled
with organisms its size on the scale of life. A
major turning point for the human race was
the transition from hunting and gathering
to farming during the Neolithic revolution
around 10,000 BCE. 4 This revolution signifies
humanity’s transition from simply interacting
with other organisms to actively engineering
them, examining, manipulating and even
creating entirely new varieties and breeds
of animals and plants. As humans gradually
improved, they fostered the ability to
engineer entire populations – a higher step
in the hierarchy of life. This could be shown,
for example, through the way human, over
the course of fourteen thousand years,
managed to domesticate wolves into docile
dogs as we know them today. 5
As the child became more excited to explore
the higher levels of this hierarchy, humans
began engineering whole ecosystems.
Starting with urbanization in the Uruk period
(4300-3100 BCE), humans began cutting
down trees, building dams and depleting
multiple sources of natural resources. 6 They
were altering, sometimes permanently, the
way many living organisms interacted with
their ecosystems.
The human narrative became more
fascinating and nuanced when the child
(after thousands of years of development)
realized it could meddle with things orders
of magnitude smaller than its size.
In early 1960s, the advent of tissue
engineering revolutionized human attempts
in manipulating nature; synthetic skin as
treatment for burn victims was among the
first application of the field. 7 Ever since
then, scientists have progressed from
recreating skin tissues to fabricating entire
artificial organs. Among the most recent
developments in the field, for example,
researchers such as Uygun B. and colleagues
from Harvard Medical School have
demonstrated application of decellularized
liver matrix to reengineer transplantable
liver graft. Despite many underlying
problems, these experiments show early
promise in solving the pressing shortage of
organ donations in the near future. 8
One step further down the scale, as
biomedical engineering shifted its focus
from tissue level to cellular and subcellular
levels, significant progress has been made
to add yet another tool into humankind’s
arsenal. Scientists can now engineer living
cells to manufacture desired products,
including biological substitutes such as
new bones. 9 This is made possible after the
development of cell culture technology,
which allows for the ability to grow living
cells under laboratory environment.
As time passes, the child improved at seeing
and manipulating incomprehensibly small
living things.
Lower on the scale of life, macromolecules
such as protein or DNA have become
prime targets for human to engineer new
properties to natural species. Genetic
engineering is one prime example where
genetic information is modified to produce
synthetic compounds. With the discovery
of DNA (by JD Watson and FHC Crick) and
subsequently recombinant DNA techniques
in 1972,10 scientists have come a long way
in the field of genetic engineering. From
the first genetically engineered, antibioticresistant
bacteria 1972, 10 we continued
to develop our microscopic capacities
and can now engineer living organisms
that can directly impact our daily lives.
These techniques are now well-applied,
such as in the application of recombinant
Adeno-associated virus (rAAV) that can be
programmed to target different organs for
gene delivery, or development of complex
synthetic DNA-based assays used in
infection detection and differentiation. 11,15
With the ongoing descent in scale that
human can manipulate, one of the most
groundbreaking lab instruments in
recent years was the scanning tunneling
microscope (STM). Humans are now
capable of manipulating atoms – the
smallest currently acknowledged level in
12 | CATALYST
the scale of life. Ever since Don Eigler’s
use of the STM to spell out the word “IBM”
with 35 xenon atoms, nanotechnology has
progressed drastically, promising nearfuture
applications. 12 One such application
arrived recently, when the same Eigler’s
group managed to construct an electrical
switch with a single atom as its moving
part, opening the gate to a brand-new
microscopic world. 12
At some point in time, the child delighted
in finding out that the way the scale of life
was set up allows it to manipulate elements
at the bottom of the scale to create rippling
effects at the biosphere’s level.
With the expanding toolbox, humans have
become extremely ambitious. Attempts are
now made at various levels to even engineer
a biosphere by controlling things at a lower
level in the hierarchical biosystem. At the
68th International Astronautical Congress,
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk spoke about his
plans for interplanetary travel and how he
firmly believed in humanity’s future as an
interplanetary species. 13 While at this point
in time, this claim sounds unrealistically
audacious, current efforts have shown early
potential in terraforming other planets.
As part of the international Genetically
Engineered Machine competition, a team
from Stanford and Brown University have
been engineering space-compatible bacteria
to acquire potentially useful functions, such
as produce cement-like material for building
or sugar for feeding other microbes. 14 There
is a long way before such a vision of planet
colonization can become a concrete plan,
but humankind might be further along than
anyone could have previously realized.
Regardless of the all-consuming ambitions,
human kind is still very much like a clueless
child – albeit alarmingly a well-equipped and
adaptive one. It is trying to wield whatever
tools available to solve its problems, trying
its best to avoid going down any irreversible
path. But at the end of it all, what it knows
is only a small fraction of the vast unknown,
and there is no external force to guide
it towards the correct path but its selfimposed
ethical rules. This emphasizes the
ever-important needs for proper regulations
and respect towards common standard
scientific protocols.
Works Cited
[1] Dodd et al. “Evidence for Early Life
in Earth’s Oldest Hydrothermal Vent
Precipitates.” Nature 543, no. 7643 (March
2017): 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/
nature21377
[2] “How Many Species on Earth?
About 8.7 Million, New Estimate Says.”
ScienceDaily. Accessed October 30,
2018. https://www.sciencedaily.com/
releases/2011/08/110823180459.htm.
[3] Novikoff, A. B. “THE CONCEPT OF
INTEGRATIVE LEVELS AND BIOLOGY.”
Science 101, no. 2618 (March 2, 1945):
209–15. https://doi.org/10.1126/
science.101.2618.209.
[4] Editors, History com. “Neolithic
Revolution.” HISTORY. Accessed January 31,
2019. https://www.history.com/topics/prehistory/neolithic-revolution.
[5] “How Animal Domestication Works.”
HowStuffWorks, April 14, 2008. https://
animals.howstuffworks.com/animal-facts/
animal-domestication.htm.
[6] “Urbanization.” Ancient History
Encyclopedia. Accessed October 10, 2018.
https://www.ancient.eu/urbanization/.
[7] Berthiaume et al. “Tissue Engineering
and Regenerative Medicine: History,
Progress, and Challenges.” Annual Review
of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
2 (2011): 403–30. https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev-chembioeng-061010-114257
[8] Mazza et al. “Liver Tissue Engineering:
From Implantable Tissue to Whole Organ
Engineering.” Hepatology Communications
2, no. 2 (December 21, 2017): 131–41.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1136.
[9] Nerem, R. M. “Cellular Engineering.”
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 19, no. 5
(1991): 529–45.
[10] “Biotechnology Timeline: Humans
Have Manipulated Genes since the ‘Dawn
of Civilization.’” Genetic Literacy Project,
July 18, 2017. https://geneticliteracyproject.
org/2017/07/18/biotechnology-timelinehumans-manipulating-genes-since-dawncivilization/.
[11] Naso et al. “Adeno-Associated Virus
(AAV) as a Vector for Gene Therapy.”
Biodrugs 31, no. 4 (2017): 317–34. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0234-5.
[12] Ganapati, Priya. “20 Years of Moving
Atoms, One by One.” Wired, September
30, 2009. https://www.wired.com/2009/09/
gallery-atomic-science/.
[13] Musk, Elon. “Making Humans a Multi-
Planetary Species.” New Space 5, no. 2 (June
1, 2017): 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/
space.2017.29009.emu.
[14] “Team: Stanford-Brown - 2017.
Igem.Org.” Accessed October 30, 2018.
http://2017.igem.org/Team:Stanford-Brown.
[15] Crannell et al.. “Multiplexed
Recombinase Polymerase Amplification
Assay To Detect Intestinal Protozoa.”
Analytical Chemistry 88, no. 3 (February 2,
2016): 1610–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
analchem.5b03267.
Design By Hoang A. Vu
Edited By Katherine Cohen
CATALYST | 13
riding the
MDMA and sociality
Octopuses are generally regarded as
the most solitary species among
cephalopods.¹ As such, Octopus
bimaculoides normally would not
want to be anyone’s friend. This
octopus species, commonly called the
two-spot octopus, lives along the coasts of
southern California.² Laboratory studies of
octopus temperament indicate that early
in life, O. bimaculoides is highly mobile
and aggressive, even toward members of
its own species, likely in order to increase
dispersal.³ Mature octopuses follow a
strict hierarchy based on size when they
compete for quality dens; the octopuses
can visually recognize their relative status
compared to other individuals, and avoid
dangerous physical encounters with larger
conspecifics. 4 Though O. bimaculoides is
typically a solitary species, the octopuses
suspend the avoidant behavior associated
with maturity while mating. 5 Such stark
shifts in behavior during mating periods
reflect the organism’s reproductive strategy
as both anisogamous (the eggs is much
larger than the sperm) and semelparous
(the organism dies after a single bout of
reproduction).
Noting these behavioral changes and
their underlying neural mechanisms, Eric
Edsinger and Gül Dölen—researchers
at the Woods Hole Marine Biological
Laboratory and Johns Hopkins University
respectively—began studying the
influence of stimulants on octopus social
behavior. They soaked octopuses in
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine
(more commonly known as MDMA or
ecstasy) to investigate whether the MDMA
would have the same prosocial effects on
the octopuses as it has on humans. 6 MDMA
changes the way serotonin affects the
brain, and the researchers believed that
similar mechanisms might cause octopuses
to deviate from their typical antisocial
behaviors. The researchers hypothesized
that serotonin mediated pathways are
suppressed during most of the octopus life
cycle, and that they could use MDMA to
activate these mechanisms outside of the
reproductive period.
SLC6A4,
the human
serotonin
transporter gene,
has conserved
orthologs in both
humans and
octopuses.
To test their hypothesis, Edsinger and
Dölen designed a tank-based experiment
for female two-spot octopuses. They built a
special tank with three chambers that the
octopus could move between: a chamber
with a neutral object, an empty middle
chamber, and a chamber with a conspecific
social object in it. The conspecific
social object was a male octopus of the
same species and larger size than the
subject octopus. The object octopus was
constrained so that the subject octopus
could interact with it but it could not
interact back. The researchers measured
the amount of time the subject octopus
spent in each chamber, as well as observed
the quality of behavior in each chamber,
before and after MDMA exposure.
Why, though, should we expect MDMA to
have any effect on octopus behavior at
all? In humans, MDMA is known to have
prosocial effects like feelings of closeness
to others, openness to new ideas, and
increased sensory sensitivity. 7 MDMA
affects G-protein-coupled receptors
and induces spikes in dopamine and
serotonin. 8 MDMA interferes with
receptors involved with transport of
the neurotransmitters into and out of
the cell, thus it consequently promotes
release of dopamine and serotonin while
simultaneously downregulating reuptake.
MDMA prevents serotonin from getting
into cells by acting as a competitive
inhibitor at the serotonin transporter, so
MDMA gets transported into cells instead
of serotonin. MDMA promotes efflux of
serotonin out of cells by exchanging with
serotonin in an amine transporter. 9 The
combined increased release of dopamine
and serotonin and downregulation of
reuptake increases their concentrations in
extracellular space and therefore increases
activity in the brain and promotes social
behavior. Dopamine and serotonin in
particular are significant because they are
the main neurotransmitters associated
with reward and addiction; stimulating the
production of these chemicals in humans
causes a range of prosocial effects, most
notably feelings of euphoria. With these
effects on humans in mind, Edsinger and
Dölen hoped that they could use MDMA
to stimulate serotonin and dopamine
production in octopuses to produce
comparable prosocial effects. In other
words, if the octopuses have similar social
mechanisms to humans, then MDMA would
make the octopuses more friendly during
stages in their lifecycle when they would
normally be avoidant.
14 | CATALYST
octo-high:
in octopus bimaculoids
Edsinger and Dölen’s experimental results
indicate just that. While under the influence
of MDMA, the subject octopuses spent
significantly more time in the social object
chamber. The quality of their interactions
also changed: control octopuses did not
physically interact with the social object,
but subject octopuses engaged in what
the researchers described as “extensive
ventral surface contact, which appeared
to be exploratory rather than aggressive
in nature”. Essentially, the introduction of
MDMA unlocked prosocial behaviors in the
octopuses that they would normally not
express giving their current life cycle stage.
In addition to performing the tank
experiments, the researchers analyzed
several gene groups across animal
genomes to draw evolutionary connections
between species. Specifically, they
examined SLC6A, monoamine transporters,
and the SLC6A4 gene family; these genes
encode transmembrane proteins that
bind amino acids and work to transport
neurotransmitter molecules in and out
of cells. MDMA is known to interfere
with some of the proteins in this group.
Interestingly, the researchers found
that the SLC6A4, the human serotonin
transporter gene, has conserved orthologs
in both humans and octopuses. This
means that humans and octopuses share
By Kelsey Sanders
the same gene from a common ancestor
and that gene serves the same function
in both species, in this case that function
being serotonin transport. This finding
provides evidence that serotonin signaling
as a means of regulating interpersonal
behaviors is evolutionarily conserved in a
diverse range of organisms that abide by
complex social organizations.
In summation, drugs can make an octopus
do some very interesting things. The twospot
octopus is well-known for avoiding
other members of its species, with the
exception of premating aggression and
social behavior during mating. Researchers
sought to manipulate octopus behavior,
specifically inducing prosocial behavior
outside of mating stages, by immersing the
octopuses in MDMA solution. Foremost,
they found that MDMA promoted
exploratory physical contact between
subject octopuses and social objects.
They also analyzed genomic information
and discovered that octopuses and
humans share homologs of a critical gene
responsible for serotonin transport and
MDMA binding. By making headway in drug
delivery protocols for this model species
and by setting the groundwork for future
translational investigation, these results
prove important for biologists and medical
professionals alike.
Works Cited
[1] Boal, J. G. Vie et Milieu 2006, 56.2, 69-80.
[2] Forsythe, J. W.; Hanlon, R.T. Mar. Biol.
1988, 98.3, 369-379.
[3] Sinn, D.L. J. Comp. Psychol. 2001,115.4,
351.
[4] Cigliano, J.A. Animal behaviour 1993,
46.4, 677-684.
[5] Mohanty, S.; Ojanguren, A. F.; Fuiman, A.
L. Mar. Biol. 2014, 161.7, 1521-1530.
[6] Edsinger, E.; Dölen, G. Curr. Biol. 2018,
28, 1-7.
[7] Krystal, J.H. et al. Am. J. Drug Alcohol Ab.
1992, 18.3, 331-341.
[8] Bankson, M.l G.; Cunningham, K.A., JPET
2001, 297.3, 846-852.
[9] Rudnick, G.; Wall, S.C. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 1992, 89.5, 1817-1821.
DESIGN BY Sarah Swackhamer
EDITED BY Laura Jabr
Time Spent
With
Toy
With
Friend
Pre-MDMA
Post-MDMA
CATALYST | 15
IT'S ALL IN YOUR BRAIN
THE NEURAL NETWORK OF CHRONIC PAIN
By Tammita Phongmekhin
A
medical maxim goes: “The extent of
pain one feels is directly proportional
to the severity of the physical injury.”
Through decades of research, this idea
has largely been debunked by the scientific
community. However, much of the general
population still believes in this common
misconception.
This idea of pain being proportional to
the amount of tissue damage ties into
the subject of chronic pain. Chronic pain
is defined as pain that persists for longer
than three months. Those that suffer from
chronic pain conditions often feel a degree
of pain that exceeds the extent of physical
injury, if such an injury even exists. Chronic
pain can make even the most basic tasks
unbearable; additionally, these conditions
can be especially hard to treat, as they often
do not present visible symptoms. As Dr.
Leslie J. Crawford, Vanderbilt University’s
rheumatology research director, states:
“[chronic pain is] perhaps the symptom that
brings more patients into our practices than
any other, but also the symptom most likely
to make us feel helpless as healers.” 1
Chronic pain is an artifact of the brain. Just
as learning and repetition rewire the brain,
prolonged pain can alter the brain’s neural
networks, causing a heightened sensitivity
to pain which further amplify the effects it
has on emotional and cognitive abilities.
As such, chronic pain modifies the central
nervous system, induces mental disorders,
and negatively affects a person’s lifestyle. 1
Therefore, healthcare professionals consider
it to be both a physical disability and a
neurological disease.
A Negative Remolding of the Brain
There are multiple physical symptoms and
alterations that are observed in chronic pain
patients, and they are largely centralized
in the brain and the nervous system of the
body.
One symptom involves a decrease in gray
matter, which results in a decreased ability
to perform tasks involving muscle control,
sensory perceptions, and memory. Patients
may also experience shrinkage of their
prefrontal cortex, leading to difficulties
controlling the brain’s executive functions
like decision-making. Reduced hippocampus
size has also been observed in chronic pain
patients--a physiological change which
causes increased likelihood of developing
anxiety and depression. 2
“
Chronic pain can make
even the most basic
tasks unbearable. These
conditions can be
especially hard to treat, as
they often do not present
visible symptoms.
”
Additionally, studies confirm that chronic
pain patients who undergo these changes
in brain structures have cognitive and
emotional modulation of pain. As patient
conditions worsen and emerge as chronic
pain, brain activity shifts from traditional
pain-related areas of the brain to those
areas associated with emotions. 3 These
findings not only explain why many
chronic pain patients develop anxiety
and depression, but also why those who
experienced periods of high stress prior to
injury are more prone to develop chronic
pain once they are injured.
Heightened Sensitivity
In addition to physical changes in the brain,
prolonged pain affects the state of the
nervous system, resulting in heightened
sensitivity to pain and emotional difficulties.
Central sensitization is the condition in
which the nervous system experiences a
constant state of high reactivity, effectively
lowering the threshold for pain and causing
pain to last even when the initial injury may
have healed. Central sensitization is also
associated with emotional distress since the
nervous system’s high reactivity state causes
a person to be in a state of nervousness.
When patients acquire an injury or
illness, predisposing factors play roles
in determining whether or not they will
develop chronic pain. For example, a
history of stress corresponds to a more
reactive nervous system, thereby making a
16 | CATALYST
person more vulnerable to develop central
sensitization after injury. Furthermore,
antecedent factors such as stress and fear
augment the nervous system’s reactivity,
feeding into the precarious cycle of chronic
pain. 4
Treatments
Unlike acute pain, chronic pain typically does
not have a definite end and the objective
of its treatment often focuses on lifelong
management rather than complete remedy.
However, the nervous system’s ability to
adjust itself over time allows neural changes
caused by persisting pain to be reversed to
an extent through appropriate treatments.
One type of treatment aims at directly
changing the body/brain through medication
and physical therapy, while another type
aims at improving the psychological/
emotional state through counseling. As
chronic pain is physical, psychological, and
neurological, doctors often recommend a
combination of both types of treatments for
effective chronic pain management.
Medication and Physical Therapy
While medication helps reduce pain and
muscle tension, long-term use of opioids can
result in severe side effects such as bleeding
ulcers and liver failure, as well as addiction
and overdose. 5 Thus, a more effective
treatment often consists of a combination
of medication with physical therapy and
counseling.
Physical therapy and regular exercise help
patients regain flexibility, build strength and
endurance, and decrease pain and stiffness.
Moreover, exercise releases feel-good brain
chemicals that improve mood and lower
stress. Research also shows that engaging in
appropriate and frequent physical activity is
usually one the best treatments for chronic
pain. 6
Psychological counseling
Finally, psychological counseling helps
people cope with frustration and
negativity that accompany prolonged pain.
Psychologists design personalized treatment
plans where they teach the patient
relaxation techniques, change the patient’s
perspective on pain, and work with the
patient to change his or her thoughts and
behaviors so that he or she will be able to
better manage the emotional and physical
pain.
Since emotions affect the nervous system,
psychological treatments can change the
way the nervous system responds to pain.
In some cases, psychological counseling has
been shown to be as effective as physical
therapy, medication, and even surgery. 8
Conclusion
Up to 25% of the population experience
chronic pain. In addition, most of these
conditions disproportionately affect
women (up to 70% of patients suffering
from many chronic pain disorders such as
fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome,
and temporomandibular joint disorder are
women) and may take years to diagnose.
Furthermore, chronic pain is not included
in the Social Security Disability List of
Impairments, even though it oftentimes
results in unemployment and long-term
disability. 1
Since chronic pain is an invisible illness,
the general populace and even medical
practitioners tend to empathize less with
and dismiss pain reports from chronic
pain patients. 9 This stigma fosters distrust,
results in the patient feeling ashamed and
misunderstood, and discourages the patient
from seeking professional help. However,
chronic pain is a real disability that will
exacerbate without proper treatment.
Fortunately, there is great progress in
chronic pain research. New treatments are
being developed and many people have
come to realize that chronic pain is an
unseen reality that needs to be addressed.
Works Cited
[1] Crofford, L. J., Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol.
Assoc. 2015, 126, 167-183.
[2] Pain Management and Injury Relief
Medical Center. paininjuryrelief.com/
chronic-pain-brain (accessed Oct. 13, 2018).
[3] Hashmi, J. A. et al., Brain. 2013, 136,
2751–2768.
[4] McAllister, M.J., Institute for Chronic Pain.
instituteforchronicpain.org/understandingchronic-pain/
what-is-chronic-pain/centralsensitization
(accessed Oct. 13, 2018).
[5] American Society of Regional Anesthesia
and Pain Medicine. https://www.asra.com/
page/46/
treatment-options-for-chronic-pain
(accessed Oct. 17, 2018)
[6] Feinberg, S. et al. American Chronic Pain
Association. theacpa.org (accessed Oct. 17,
2018)
[7] Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/
health/chronic-pain/chronic-pain-treatmentoptions
(accessed Oct. 17, 2018)
[8] American Psychological Association.
https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/painmanagement.pdf
(accessed Oct. 31, 2018)
[9] De Ruddere, L.; Craig, K. D., PAIN. 2016,
157, 1607-1610.
DESIGN BY Anna Croyle
EDITED BY Dora Huang
Neural Symptoms
Decrease in gray matter
Leads to decreased ability to perform
tasks involving muscle control, sensory
perceptions, and memory.
Shrinkage of prefrontal cortex
Difficulties controlling the brain’s executive
functions like decision-making.
Reduced hippocampus size
Increased likelihood of developing
anxiety and depression.
CATALYST | 17
Racing towards the
cure for
cancer
By Hannah Boyd
rossing the finish line, Dr. Tour’s
car takes the victory, leading with
Ca margin of about 90 minutes. 1 On
a track of 150 nanometers, six countries
competed in France in 2017 to win the
coveted title. The first of its kind, this race
tested the speed of the smallest cars ever
designed: nanocars. After nearly 20 years of
research, Rice University professor Dr. James
Tour finally created his nanocar, christening
it “the Dipolar Racer”. While winning the
world’s first nanocar race represents an
accomplishment on its own, Tour’s novel
work in nanocar design and synthesis
furthers the discipline of nanoscience
and the manipulation of particles at the
nanoscale.
A working motorized nanocar broke
ground in molecular science, but still
many asked: What next? Inspired by the
nanocar’s molecular motor, Dr. Tour
and his lab group set out to construct
other nanomachines. Nanomachines are
any synthetically designed product that
functions at the nanoscale level. Applying
his synthetic organic research background
to the biological sciences, Dr. Tour, in the
months following the race, began designing
nanomachines which would perforate and
kill target cells. The molecular motors that
once powered the wheels of the tiniest cars
now act as the template for those driving
nanomachines.
The future medicinal application of
nanomachines appears promising. Unlike
widely-used traditional drugs which attack
cells by changing the chemical composition
around them, nanomachines operate
mechanically—leaving behind no chemical
trace. Cells are constantly adapting to their
chemical environments, finding new ways to
survive and building up immunities to each
new drug administered. Where chemical
drugs induce apoptosis (programmed cell
death), perforating cell membranes with
molecular nanomachines induces necrosis
(immediate cell death). Necrosis bypasses
the need for a cell to systematically evaluate
itself before inducing apoptosis. Since cells
cannot adapt to defend against mechanical
damage, nanomachines pave the way for a
class of novel drug designs.
Tour’s nanomachines consist of three
main parts: the fluorophore, rotor, and
the stator. The fluorophore, a particle that
fluoresces when exposed to light, allows
the machines within a sample to be easily
tracked. The rotor, held in place by a stator,
activates and spins when exposed to
ultraviolet light. After the synthesis of the
machines, the first wave of trials tested the
effectiveness and speed of different types
of nanomachines against cell bilayers. To
model targeted cells, researchers used
synthetic bilipid vesicles filled with dye. The
tested nanomachines differed in size and
motor type. After analyzing the data, Tour’s
team found that the smaller machines were
the fastest and most efficient at perforating
the synthetic membranes. 2 The second
wave of trials introduced the nanomachines
to live cells. When exposed to UV light,
the nanomachines induced a substantially
higher rate of necrotic cell death compared
to a control without nanomachines. The
next challenge would be finding a reliable
way to label specific cell to attack. Peptides
can be designed to target specific cellular
recognition sites on different cells, allowing
for the targeted induction of necrosis. After
observing the nanomachines successfully
necrotize live cells, Tour and his group
began studying the effect of adding peptides
to the machine. Matching up with receptors
on the targeted cells, the peptides direct
the machines to the cell that should be
killed. Cell specific death was successfully
observed in live cells when using longer
engineered peptide chains. 2 Being able to
direct the nanomachine to specific markers
on cells allows for huge possibilities within
drug design, especially for the targeting of
cancerous cells.
To test the machine’s effects on live cancer
cell lines, a lab in Durham tested these
molecular machines specific to human
prostate cancer cells in August of 2017.
The nanomachines operated successfully,
inducing cancerous cell-specific necrosis
when activated with ultraviolet light. Detailed
pictures of the process show the membrane
bulge as cytoplasm leaks out of the cells,
dying in as little as one to three minutes. 3
After the publication of these results, many
grew excited towards the potential of a noninvasive
treatment for tumors that resist
chemotherapy.
However, limitations still prevent
nanomachines from clinical implementation.
Tour’s lab group seeks to research methods
that will allow for easier activation of these
machines in vivo. Using ultraviolet light is
disadvantageous when trying to reach cells
within living systems. To offer a solution
to this problem, the group is designing
machines that can be activated by twophoton
absorption or infrared light.4 In
turn, this would allow the activation of
nanomachines past the skin, and aid in the
future directions of using nanotechnology as
a drug treatment for many kinds of cancers.
Work Cited
[1] Davenport, Matt. World’s first nanocar race
crowns champion. Chemical and Engineering
News. 2017, 95, 16-19
[2] Garcia-Lopez, V. et al. Molecular machines open
cell membranes. Nature 548, 567–572 (2017)
[3] Knapton, Sarah. Nanomachines that drill
into cancer cells killing them in just 60 seconds
developed by scientists. Science, 2017.
[4] Williams, Mike. Motorized molecules drill
through cells. Rice News, 2017.
DESIGN BY Abram Qiu
EDITED BY Jenny Wang
Graphic from iStock
18 | CATALYST
The Mitochondria
More Than Just the Powerhouse of the Cell
By Tasneem Mustafa
No matter how much or how little
experience you have with biology,
most of us know one thing:
mitochondria are the powerhouses
of the cell. While this has become a fun
catchphrase to help us remember the
components of a cell, the statement runs
true for a reason: mitochondria are crucial
for the production of adenosine triphosphate
(ATP) – the “energy currency of life” – by
processing sugar from the food that we
consume. However, “powerhouse” is a gross
simplification of the capabilities of this small
organelle, as mitochondria are central to
countless processes such as calcium signaling,
growth signaling, metabolic production, and
activation of multiple cell death pathways.
Here at Rice, mitochondria play a central
role in the research of Dr. Natasha Kirienko,
a professor of Biosciences, as she is
investigating mitochondria’s role in signaling
pathways, which could lead to larger, possibly
life-saving, implications.
Here on campus, Dr. Kirienko runs what
she affectionately refers to as the “worm
lab” as so much of her research has
revolved around the model organism C.
elegans. In fact, C. elegans is a species of
roundworm that is extremely useful in a
laboratory setting, which, according to the
University of Minnesota, “shares many of
the essential biological characteristics that
are central problems of human biology.”
In C. elegans, it is easier to track different
processes such as the mitochondrial damage
pathway illustrated in Figure 1. Healthy
mitochondria are essential to a healthy cell,
as the energy produced through oxidative
phosphorylation of ATP in the mitochondria
fuels the rest of the cell. However, if the
mitochondria are afflicted, the mitochondrial
surveillance pathways will be activated
to attempt salvaging the cell. However,
sometimes the deterioration of mitochondria
continues, preventing the cell from achieving
homeostasis as more functions fail. At this
point, the deteriorated cells will experience
a mitochondrial membrane potential drop
that signifies cell death and makes it a
target for recycling via mitophagy. Recycling
mitochondria may seem like an effective
mechanism to conserve resources, but a
different set of problems can arise. Proteins
can escape from the mitochondria and
end up in the cytosol, which could trigger
apoptosis or cell self-destruction. Dr. Kirienko
further details that the “overactivation of
autophagy will also trigger [a] whole cell
autophagy”, demonstrating how big of an
effect mitochondria can have. Because
of these effects and more, mitochondrial
damage can have dangerous impacts as
this amplification can lead to extensive, and
oftentimes irreversible, cellular level damage
The study of mitochondrial pathways piqued
Dr. Kiriendo’s interest long before she started
her research at Rice. As a graduate student,
she studies mitochondrial mutations in
C. elegans and found a mutant “that was
sensitive to all kinds of stresses...because it
cannot activate [its] ESRE genes”. The Ethanol
and Stress Response Element, or ESRE, that as
Dr. Kirienko explained, can“mitigate damage
from a variety of abiotic stresses”, and though
commonly triggered by ethanol, can also be
triggered by other stressors. So, the mutant
that Dr. Kirienko had found gave the first
hint that there was a connection between
ESRE and mitochondrial mutations. Through
further research, Dr. Kirienko realized that the
ESRE genes can be triggered by mitochondrial
damage due to its connection with “ethanol,
hypoxia, oxidative stress, and pseudomonas,
a common bacteria behind infections, and
iron removal by pseudomonas”. However,
more research needs to be done to further
our understanding of the mechanisms,
especially of the transcription factors,
as they are heavily involved in the in the
signal transduction cascade that starts the
mitochondrial damage.
Interestingly, while Dr. Kirienko’s lab has
always been known as the “worm lab” at
Rice, she is currently shifting her focus from
C. elegans to mammalian cells, which could
be more beneficial for potential cancer
research because they have more similarities
with human cells than C. elegans cells. As
an aid to her future research goals, a fiveyear
grant for nearly $2 million dollars from
the National Institute of General Medical
Sciences to investigate the ESRE pathway and
its mitochondria-repairing mechanisms has
been awarded to Dr. Kirienko. Additionally,
Dr. Kirienko believes that the most effective
way to carry out her research is by continuing
her cross disciplinary research approach. By
integrating different areas of research with
a “biochemical and genetic approach”, Dr.
Kirienko can develop a more comprehensive
picture about mitochondrial repairing
mechanisms. By using bioinformatics, the
Kirienko lab mines large data specifically
available for cancer-related research to
generate a list of genetic mutations and
compare those results with their projects on
C. elegans and mammalian cells. By utilizing
different approaches, Dr. Kirienko’s team can
move forward in their research and into the
world of cancer research.
The mitochondrian plays a crucial role in the
overall health of a cell. We are on the cusp of
learning more about the ESRE pathway and
the role it plays in mitochondrial damage.
If we can find a way to stop or slow down
mitochondrial damage, it will greatly mitigate
the damage as the cell will be more likely to
recover. If we can gain the reins of control
for mitochondria, it might just be the key to
defeating cancer. No wonder mitochondria
are called the powerhouse of the cell.
Repair
Mitochondrial
Surveillance
+ chaperone expression
- translation
Remove
DESIGN BY Krithika Kumar
EDITED BY Yvonne Chien
Healthy
Mitochondria (MT)
Sick
Mitochondria
mitophagy
apoptosis
CATALYST | 19
FLIES
ON THE
PRIZE
Exploring the
interconnectedness
of genetics and behavior
in Drosophila
melanogaster
By Sarah Swackhamer
Though they may seem annoying
or simply insignificant, fruit flies
are much more than a household
pest. In fact, they are model
organisms that guide behavioral scientists
and geneticists in their quest to uncover the
secrets of evolution. These scientists are
asking a big question: what influences how
we live our lives and how we experience the
world around us? In science, as in general,
that isn’t simple to answer. Dr. Julia Saltz,
however, doesn’t shy away from confronting
this conundrum. Instead, she races towards
it with excitement and determination, almost
like a fruit fly who has just spotted its favorite
food: which, incidentally, is exactly what
happens in her lab at Rice University. Using
Drosophila melanogaster and a few sister
species, the Saltz lab analyzes the behavior of
the flies as analogs to human individuals and
communities, diving into our still-unanswered
questions about genetics, behavior, and
evolution and exploring the fundamentals
of life on a small scale with wide-ranging
implications.
Behavioral science is the study of the actions
of animals in their daily lives. For Dr. Saltz,
behavioral science was always a fascinating
subject; genetics, however, didn’t always
interest her. The basics of the field are
widely-known and seemingly-immutable,
she explained: genes produce genotypes,
which contribute to the expression of certain
phenotypes or characteristics. To a young Dr.
Saltz, it seemed that this left little room for
new discovery or creative liberty in the field.
In graduate school, however, she discovered
quantitative genetics: a field working to
analyze intraspecies differences in behavior.
Interestingly, this field focuses on “characters
which are not affected by the action of just a
few major genes”. 1 Dr. Saltz was galvanized
by the opportunity to innovate and explore
she saw in the discipline, and it is at the
crossroads of this field and behavioral science
that her lab now operates.
Just as behavioral science examines the
actions of animals, in psychology, scientists
endeavor to address questions of behavior
in humans; however, they face many
limitations on the extent of research that
can be conducted. For example, a scientist
can’t expose a child to trauma simply to
observe its impacts. Another issue of human
research emerges from each individual’s
ability to uniquely process events, which
throws additional variables into any potential
experiments. Dr. Saltz notes that there are
“a lot of ideas about how individuals might
be exposed to the same thing but perceive it
differently”; in other words, your personality
can actually affect how you experience, and
thus respond to, events in the world around
you.
One surprising recent
discovery, Saltz
remarks, is a
“side preference”:
each fly may only reach
for its food if that
food is, for instance,
on the fly’s left.
Fortunately, using the Drosophila model, Dr.
Saltz is able to dive into some of the same
fundamental questions addressed by human
psychology in a much more controlled
environment. A model species is defined as
one “that has been developed over many
years to be experimentally powerful and
answer particular questions.” 2 In these
respects, Drosophila fits the bill perfectly.
“We have these genotypes that we can
make over and over,” Saltz explains. These
D. melanogaster specimens are “inbred lines
originally derived from a single population
in...North Carolina,” where a project was
developed several years ago to produce a
“community resource of natural variation”.
These clones, “can [be] test[ed]... in all kinds
of situations [without] the same kinds of
ethical and logistical implications” found in
human experiments, Saltz explains. So, these
tiny organisms can actually become vital
players in the quest to uncover fundamental
principles of behavior and evolution.
In particular, Saltz uses the Drosophila model
to help answer one central question: “how
does variation evolve?”. She explains that
this question can be addressed “within
populations and even within individuals” by
analyzing the interactions between organism
and environment. Her lab does this using
several distinct fly populations: Drosophila
melanogaster, primarily, as well as sister
species D. simulans and D. sechellia. But
what does “environment” really mean? It is
a complex idea; put simply, it’s “anything
that’s outside you,” and Saltz primary focuses
on the aspects of environment that directly
affect her flies, such as social and food
environments.
Because of the many elements involved
in evolution and behavior, the Saltz lab is
constantly busy with a variety of projects.
Currently, the primary areas of investigation
include social networks and learning. In her
social network experiment, she is exploring
the factors that play into the development
of social networks and the evolution of
network formation over time. In part, this
involves manipulating a group’s genotypes
to examine the effects on network structure
and evolving flies on different food types to
examine the co-evolution of food preferences
and social behaviors. Additionally, in her
learning experience, she tests her flies’ ability
to process and retain information from
experiences.
20 | CATALYST
In her social network experiment, Saltz and
her lab place groups of 20 flies into Petri
dishes, each containing one of 5 food types.
Each fly is genetically distinct from the
others, but each group of 20 is composed
of the same genotypes. For each trial, the
lab records the flies’ activity on video, then,
using this data, analyzes patterns of social
behavior. “For example,” Saltz explains, “which
genotypes associate with all of their group
mates? Which ones keep to themselves?” This
experiment is helpful to the Saltz lab because
it enables them to “go beyond one-on-one
interactions to understand how each fly fits
into the social structure of the group as a
whole.”
Not every discovery in lab fits perfectly into
the growing picture of evolution that Saltz
and her colleagues across the country are
creating. One surprising recent discovery,
Saltz remarks, is a “side preference”: each
fly may only reach for its food if that food
is, for instance, on the fly’s left. “I’ve sort of
become obsessed with this,” Dr. Saltz admits.
It’s certainly an interesting phenomenon, and
one for which it is difficult to find any rational
basis; “this is not what you would expect
evolution to produce,” she continued. From
the research the Saltz lab has conducted on
side preference, this is not a phenomenon
unique to Drosophila melanogaster and
sister species; it has been observed in
many animals, but researchers generally
don’t know how to handle it and the initial
variables it throws into their studies. From
Dr. Saltz’s perspective, this is an interesting
dilemma; she hopes to further study it in
order to determine whether the observed
side bias is indeed a prevalent pattern, and
if it is, she hopes to move towards a better
understanding of why and how this behavior
has developed.
In her learning project, Saltz examines how
differences in environmental preference are
modified by learning, and how environment is
linked to learning itself. Saltz’s lab conducted
this experiment using D. simulans and D.
sechellia, a sister species that has evolved
to consume specific toxic fruits. In each
trial, a fly is placed into an environment that
contains both normal fly food and food that
has been modified to mimic the toxic fruit
favored by D. sechelia. Noting the amount of
time a fly spends with each food type, the lab
the so-called dichotomy
of nature versus nurture
is really much more of a
grey area
can determine which food is preferred. After
this is established, the flies enter a “training
phase” in which one of the foods in the arena
is spiked with an “aversive bitter compound,”
which should teach the fly that it “is toxic and
should be avoided.” After the flies have been
trained, they are moved to yet another arena;
this one, like the first, contains normal and
modified food without the bitter compound.
Saltz explains that “[b]y comparing th[e flies’]
preference after training to their preference
before training, [the lab] can identify whether
the training… impacted their preference”
and thus whether they learned from the
experience. Saltz’s learning work has been
temporarily thrown off by the discovery of the
side bias, but it should be back on track soon.
Although there is still much to be discovered,
Saltz says, one important advance for
her lab has been the evidence that
“different genotypes experience different
environments” and the so-called dichotomy of
nature versus nurture is really much more of
a grey area. Saltz explains that “nature [can]
produc[e] nurture or guid[e] nurture,” and the
two are often “interacting in complex ways”
to produce the environments that Drosophila
(and we) experience. An example that may
resonate more with us as humans, she
explained, is that of a student who is naturally
athletic. This individual will probably get
access to better coaching and other sportsrelated
resources, while someone without the
same ability, or genetic predisposition, will
probably be left without these opportunities.
It makes sense, but as already discussed,
showing the idea to be true can prove difficult
in human studies. The Saltz Lab’s work,
however, shows that the interconnectedness
of nature and nurture is “real and happens,
and has implications for behavior and…
fitness” of animals.
But where does all of this lead? Dr. Saltz
hopes her research will produce an
understanding of the interactions between
individuals and environments “at multiple
spatial scales… and multiple… evolutionary
time scales” to ultimately generate a theory
that helps to predict variation in behavior.
But the steps towards reaching this goal
aren’t necessarily linear; the lab is working
on so many simultaneous projects that
the process functions more like “putting all
the pieces together” over time. As for the
impacts of her research, beyond elucidating
evolution and behavioral development, Saltz
herself remains open: “that’s the whole goal
of fundamental science, right?” she says;
“there are surprises, and many of them can
be extremely important in ways that we didn’t
predict”.
References
[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
articles/PMC2842708/
[2] https://www.dnalc.org/view/1433-Whatare-Model-Systems-1-.html
DESIGN BY Kaitlyn Xiong
EDITED BY Ananya Subramanian
CATALYST | 21
A New hope for parkinson’s disease:
induced neural
clearance
By luke cantu
Over 10 million people worldwide
live with Parkinson’s disease,
with few treatment options
available. 1 Parkinson’s is a
neurodegenerative disease that is the
result of the slow impairment or complete
loss of dopamine related neurons in the
area of the brain called the substantia
nigra. The substantia nigra is responsible
for motor control and inhibitory action
potentials that regulate signals throughout
the brain. The exact cause of Parkinson’s
disease is unknown; however, there
has been a connection formed between
the disease and the accumulation of a
protein called alpha-synuclein (a-syn) in
the substantia nigra neurons. A-syn is a
protein primarily found in the brain and
plays a role in maintaining a supply of
synaptic vesicles in presynaptic terminals,
meaning it is responsible for maintaining
the neurotransmitter transport that
facilitates the electrical signals between
neurons. This connection between a-syn
and Parkinson’s disease has been found
with other neurodegenerative diseases
and has prompted significant research
into the exact mechanisms responsible for
this connection. However, what precisely
causes a-syn to mutate and become
misfolded remains unknown. Finding
the cause of a-syn aggregation could be
a crucial step in curing Parkinson’s and
other neurodegenerative diseases, as
misfolded a-syn can aggregate and form
insoluble deposits, leading to complete
neuronal impairment or even death. Dr.
Laura Segatori, a professor of chemical and
biomolecular engineering at Rice University,
is pioneering research to answer these
questions. Her lab focuses on developing
methods to control protein levels, which
include engineering nanomaterials to
enhance cell clearance mechanisms, such
as the clearance of aggregated a-syn. She
has successfully reduced a-syn aggregation
by chemically inducing the Hsp70
chaperone system. Yet before this amazing
research can be discussed, a base level of
understanding about the chaperone system
must be established.
The central dogma of biology is that
information flows from DNA then to RNA
and then to protein, and this flow of genetic
information determines the function of
a protein. Often when there is a protein
misfolding,the cause is a mutation in the
genetic code that has resulted in a change
in the sequence of mRNA and subsequently,
affecting the amino acids that construct
the protein. To combat these mutations,
normal mRNA molecules use a family of
proteins called chaperones to help them
properly fold proteins. Chaperones possess
the ability to refold misfolded proteins
back into their proper form. One of the
most well documented small chaperones
is heat shock protein 70, or Hsp70 . Hsp70
posses two domains: an ATP/ADP binding
domain and a protein (substrate) binding
domain. These domains are independently
stable, bind to different substrates or
molecules, and have different properties
that determine the binding substrate and
function of the protein. When bound to
ADP, Hsp70 proteins have a high-affinity
for unfolded proteins and when bound to
ATP, have a low-affinity. Hsp70 proteins
can crowd around an unfolded substrate,
stabilize it, and prevent aggregation until
the unfolded molecule folds properly, at
which time the Hsp70s will lose affinity for
the molecule and diffuse away. An increase
in expression of Hsp70 also leads to a
decrease in cells undergoing apoptosis.
With this background in mind, Dr.
Segatori hypothesizes that “cells with an...
accumulation of aggregated proteins do
not have enough of these chaperones to
deal with these aggregated proteins.” To
investigate this phenomena, Dr. Segatori’s
Pore
Insoluble
aggregate
ATP
ATP
ATP
CIpB/Hsp104
(cross-section)
DnaK/Hsp70
chaperone system
Interaction of
CIpB/Hsp104,
DnaK/Hsp70,
& aggregate
ADP + P 1
Extraction &
threading of
polypeptide
ADP + P 1
Release of
unfolded
polypeptide
Spontaneous or
chaperonemediated
folding
22 | CATALYST
Normal
Parkinson’s Diseas e
Movement
Disorders
Cell Death
Dopaminer gic Neuron
Substantia
Nigra
A-syn Monomers
A-syn
Oligomers
A-syn
Aggregate
approach involves nanoparticles with
a surface layer that contains different
chemical and physical properties that
allows them to interact with different parts
of the cell in specific ways. For example,
nanoparticles in drug delivery that are
engineered for membrane passage allow
for the drug to be transported to the place
of action that the drug would not reach
on its own. Thus, the drug’s influence on
targeted tissues can be optimized and the
undesirable side effects on vital organs can
be minimized along with protecting the
drug from rapid degradation or clearance. 2
This same concept is applied with Dr.
Segatori’s work; she designs nanoparticles
that have specific chemical properties such
as polarity or solubility that allow for them
to pass cellular membranes and specifically
bind to different parts of DNA. This in turn
induces changes with the chaperone system
without inadvertently affecting other parts
of the cell. Another unique approach by
Dr. Segatori is the use of colocalization,
which employs fluorescence microscopy.
Fluorescence microscopy is when specific
proteins or molecules in a cell are stained
or made to have a specific fluorescence
through genetic alteration and are then
viewed through a fluorescent microscope.
Colocalization is simply observing if the
different fluorescent “targets” are located in
the same area of the cell or very near to one
another. This allows for the quantification
of aggregated proteins in a cell before and
after an induction of Hsp70 to determine if
there is a relationship between Hsp70 and
aggregated protein levels.
The purpose of Dr. Segatori’s research is
to demonstrate a proof of principle study
that would then allow for the further
investigation of utilizing nanoparticles to
upregulate Hsp70. In one study, Dr. Segatori
investigated the effects of carbenoxolone, a
chemical compound previously reported to
upregulate Hsp70, in human neuroglioma
cells (a model for substantia nigra neurons)
overexpressing a-syn. 3 By introducing
carbenoxolone into a cell and analyzing the
proteins present with colocalization, it was
found that carbenoxolone increased the
presence of Hsp70 by 52% and decreased
the probability of protein aggregation
from 67% to 37.2%.3 By establishing a
relationship between Hsp70 levels and
protein aggregation, researchers can
develop ways to induce changes in cell
systems to clear aggregated proteins. With
these findings, Dr. Segatori is currently
working on a new way of tackling the
problem of protein aggregation by
designing a nanoparticle that could cause
a system level change or, “essentially
reprogram the cell to respond to a stimulus
associated with a phenotypic trait of a
disease.” Dr. Segatori is searching for a
way to design a genetic circuit to interface
with these pathways and modulate the
response of cell in response to a stimulus.
Such stimulus could be the aggregation of
protein which, through the genetic circuit,
could then be linked to the ability of the cell
to induce the chaperone system to respond
to the stimulus. Then once the stress is
removed the chaperone system would
subside, hence resulting in a feedback loop.
However, there are still challenges, such
as ensuring nanoparticle passage across
the highly selective blood brain barrier and
designing a nanoparticle with a specific
genetic alterations to enact system wide
change.
The application of Dr. Segatori’s work is
limitless, but she is currently investigating
how the use of her nanoparticles could
activate clearance activity within neurons in
an attempt to prevent neurodegenerative
diseases. Dr. Segatori relates her research
and its possible applications to a two
sided coin: “This is a side of the same
coin, on one hand you are thinking of
developing a treatment for a disease, a
treatment for aggregated proteins that is
not just Parkinson’s but also misfolding
protein diseases. On the other side there is
understanding how to design nanoparticles
that will interface with biological systems.”
This dichotomy is the future of her work
and all work in biological nanoparticles.
Works Cited
[1] P. (2019, March 28). Statistics. Retrieved
from https://www.parkinson.org/
Understanding-Parkinsons/Statistics
[2] Uddin, M. D. (2019). Nanoparticles
as Nanopharmaceuticals: Smart Drug
Delivery Systems. Nanoparticulate
Drug Delivery Systems, 85-120.
doi:10.1201/9781351137263-3
[3] Kiri Kilpatrick, Jose Andres Novoa,
Tommy Hancock, Christopher J. Guerriero,
Peter Wipf, Jeffrey L. Brodsky, and Laura
Segatori ACS Chemical Biology 2013 8 (7),
1460-1468
[4] Ruipérez, V., Darios, F., & Davletov,
B. (2010). Alpha-synuclein, lipids and
Parkinson’s disease. Progress in Lipid
Research, 49(4), 420-428. doi:10.1016/j.
plipres.2010.05.004
DESIGN BY Luke Cantu
EDITED BY Minjung Kim
CATALYST | 23
UNCOVERING THE MECHANISM OF PROTEIN FOLDING
AND OTHER COMPLEX SYSTEMS
by NamTip Phongmekin
I
magine being told to fold a paper crane.
There is no representation of what the
end product should look like, and you
have a time limit to transform a sheet
of paper into an intricate piece of art. This
analogy demonstrates the two major issues
of the “protein folding problem,” which
describes the complexity of (1) how proteins
fold into three-dimensional structures
from their linear polypeptide chains, and
(2) how folding pathway(s) allow proteins
to fold so quickly [5,6]. Because proteins
are indispensable to numerous biological
processes, for decades, this problem has
puzzled and intrigued an eclectic group of
biochemists, structural biologists, chemists,
and physicists.
One such researcher is Dr. Peter G. Wolynes,
a D.R. Bullard-Welch Foundation Professor
of Science who has several positions in
the departments of Chemistry, Physics
and Astronomy, BioSciences and Materials
Science and Engineering at Rice University.
Among his long list of accolades, he is a
member of the National Academy of Sciences
and the American Academy of Arts and
Sciences. Dr. Wolynes was initially fascinated
by chemical reactions, but eventually started
to seek out new problems. He asked himself
“what are the most complicated systems
that have chemical change in them?” This
question lead him to delve into issues
with biological systems at the interface of
chemistry and biology.
Protein folding is an intriguing process that
involves various chemical and biological
change from many interactions ranging
from those of the peptide chain backbones
and amino acid side chains to interactions
between different protein subunits. Dr.
Wolynes’ research on protein folding both
describes folding kinetics and predicts
three dimensional native structures, or the
folded form of a protein. A central theme of
his work has been studying protein folding
using the energy landscape theory, which
represents the energy state of different
folding conformations in a form analogous to
a topological map [1,5,6].
Wolynes and his colleagues describe
the energy landscape of a protein as a
“rugged funnel,” in which the surfaces
of the landscape represents a statistical
description of the potential energies of
the protein [7]. The width of the funnel
corresponds to the conformational entropy
while the depth represents the total change
in Gibbs energy between the unfolded
and the folded, or native, state [x]. The
energy state of folded state corresponds to
the bottom of the funnel while the top of
the funnel represents the unfolded state
[xx]. Moreover, the “rugged funnel” model
WOLYNES LAB HAS BEEN
USING COMPUTATIONAL
TOOLS TO ANALYZE
PROTEINS INVOLVED
IN THE ASSEMBLY OF
SYNAPSES AND NEURONS
IN MEMORY FORMATION.
describes that proteins can take on many
paths, involving different intermediate
conformations to reach its final native state
of a corresponding, favorable energy level
at the bottom of the funnel [1]. This process
is represented by a “rugged” landscape
containing local minima corresponding to
different semi-stable intermediates [7]. The
rate of folding is determined the ruggedness
of the landscape; the more local minima
the landscape contains, the more likely the
protein may be trapped in its intermediate
forms, decreasing the folding rate [x]. The
smoother the surface, the faster a protein
folds [6].
The protein folding process is spontaneous,
driven by hydrophobic interactions and
intramolecular forces such as hydrogen
bonding and van der Waals interactions
[xxx]. In addition, while the conformational
entropy of the protein decreases as it moves
down the funnel (the width of the funnel
becomes narrower closer to the bottom of
the funnel), the entropy of the surrounding
water actually increases as the protein folds
due to the hydrophobic effect. These effects
drive protein to ultimately fold into its native
state.
In order to solve protein structures and gain
insight on their folding mechanisms, Wolynes
lab has utilized computer simulations of
proteins. One technique of modeling they
use is template-free, or ab initio structure
prediction, which involves modeling protein
tertiary structure using atomic models from
molecular physics rather than experimentally
resolved structures and homology models,
which may be limited by template availability
[1]. Currently, some of his projects
involve models for protein misfolding and
aggregation for multiple neurodegenerative
disorders, including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s,
and prion diseases [5,6].
Dr. Wolynes describes working on the
“memory problem,” or the problem of
setting up a fairly large structure in the
cells to form memories. Wolynes lab has
been using computational tools to analyze
proteins involved in the assembly of
synapses and neurons in memory formation.
The functional role of these proteins have
implications in neurodegenerative disorders.
Long-term memory formation involves
localized synaptic protein synthesis [13]. This
requires a stable, translational regulatory
system at synapse, however, most proteins
have a relatively short half-lives in eukaryotic
cells, and are thus not ideal for maintaining
protein synthesis in the time scales required
for long-term memory formation [13]. An
unusually stable protein, however, was
previously identified experimentally as a
potential player in this synaptic protein
synthesis process [12].Specifically, the
24 | CATALYST
protein folding funnel
energy
graphic does not represent actual protein folding steps
protein contains a Q-rich domain believed
to allow the formation of stable β-oligomeric
forms resembling those of prions molecules
[13].
Wolynes lab builds upon those
experimental findings by providing a
computational description of the kinetic
and thermodynamic stability of the folded
protein structure. They have proposed that
the interactions with synaptical cytoskeletal
elements may mechanically catalyze the
formation of the stable, fibrous prion form
of the protein. This in turns creates a positive
feedback loop that localizes fiber formation
at active synapses for forming longterm
memory [13]. Moreover, studies on
neurodegenerative disorders have identified
certain oligomeric forms that are cytotoxic.
Work in Wolynes lab has suggested that the
cytoskeletal components may be the key
to this transition from the functional to the
pathogenic fiber forms. These findings have
led to a new proposal for targeting domains
that bind to cytoskeletal components rather
than Q-rich domains for treatment of
neurodegenerative diseases[13]. Dr. Wolynes
expresses excitement from the work, stating
that “the assembly of the parts of the cell are
really quite different from the way people
[previously] thought.”
Although a major part of Wolynes lab
has focused on protein folding, research
in his group can be broadly defined as
the chemistry and physics of many-body
systems, or the study of properties and
interactions of complex systems on the
molecular level. In addition to protein
folding, one major area of research in the
Wolynes group is trying to describe the
folding and structure of chromosomes,
which are crucial to gene regulation, DNA
replication, and the cell cycle [8]. However,
predicting the folding of chromosomes
is challenging because it involves many
different players, such as protein complexes
and cytoskeletal elements [9]. Despite
progress, Dr. Wolynes describes his lab has
faced several challenges in elucidating the
structure of chromosomes. He explains, “It’s
an odd [problem] because... we can predict
the structure [of chromosomes] but we’re
not exactly sure how to build the bridge
from the structures that we can predict back
to the way that all the mechanisms work.”
Like folding an origami, the problems
of many-body biological systems can a
complicated. However, the protein and
chromosomal folding processes are crucial
for various biological systems in healthy and
disease states. In protein folding, the energy
landscape model can we used to describe
its pathways to attain the native state.
Analyses on the stability of proteins involved
in synaptic formation has shed new light
on the formation of long-term memories.
Chromosomal folding involves more players,
but analysis on their energetics has provided
new insights regarding its mechanism.
Wolynes lab works on diverse topics, and
utilizing expertise from computation,
chemistry, physics, and biology, they have
discovered and will continue to uncover
the mechanisms of many more complex
systems.
WORKS CITED
[1] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/
abs/10.1002/ijch.201300145
[2]https://www.jstor.org/stable/41703986?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[3] P. G. Wolynes in Protein folds: A Distanc[9]https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.
es Based Approach (Eds.: H Bohr, S. Brunak),
CRC, Boca Raton. 1996, pp. 3–17.
[4] P. G. Wolynes, W. A. Eaton, A. R. Fersht,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109,
17770–17771.excelsior%3Abdf36fd6e0c-
539ce246c2665d15a608b
[5] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/30304819
[6]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/30250260
[x]http://science.sciencemag.org/content/267/5204/1619.long
[xx]http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.rice.
edu/eds/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=fd-
486bec-db4a-4d58-8d8d-d44189a00fbd%-
40sessionmgr4007
[xxx]Pratt C, Cornely K (2004). “Thermodynamics”.
Essential Biochemistry. Wiley. ISBN
978-0-471-39387-0. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
[7]http://eds.a.ebscohost.com.
ezproxy.rice.edu/eds/pdfview-
er/pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=0ae-
8c8c4-8ef1-4fc7-9651-c74e4c7361cc%40sdc-v-sessmgr04
[8]https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.rice.edu/
stable/pdf/26462741.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Abdf36fd6e0c539ce246c2665d15a608b
[9]https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.rice.
edu/docview/274166830?accountid=7064
[10]http://www.pnas.org/content/113/18/5006
[11]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6504122?dopt=Abstract
[12]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/22583753
[13]https://www.pnas.org/content/113/18/5006
DESIGN BY Priscilla Li
EDITED BY Adelle Jia
CATALYST | 25
DOWN
TO THE NEURONS:
MICRO-METHODS OF MEASURING THE BRAIN
BY ADELLE JIA
H
undreds of years ago, scientists mapped
out regions of the brain by feeling different
bumps on the scalp in the practice of
phrenology. Thankfully, they have developed
much better ways to study the structure of
the most complex organ in the body. For
clinical measurements, physicians rely on
functional magnetic resonance imaging
(fMRI) or EEGs, the “swimming caps” with
hairlike wires flowing from nodes on the
scalp. However, these non-invasive methods
capture the big picture rather than look at
individual groups of neurons: fFMRIs show
blood flow in relatively large regions of the
brain, while EEGs capture the electrical
activity of millions of neurons at once [1]. To
pinpoint neural mechanisms of specific cognitive
functions such as learning, movement,
or perception, researchers implant devices
directly into the brains of animals. Dr. Jacob
T Robinson, a professor at the Bioengineering
and Electrical and Chemical departments
at Rice, is innovating new technologies
that help researchers study the brain at
this microscopic level. These technologies
include microfluidic devices, which enhance
the clarity of neural activity recordings, and
the world’s smallest lensless imaging system,
Robinson's laB has developed
a technology that uses
microfluidic channels
to eject flexible carbon
nanotube fiber (CNTf)
electrodes, which are about
ten times thinner than a
strand of hair.
which computationally constructs an image
from sensor data.
To measure the electrical activity of the
brain, scientists can use microelectrodes
inserted into the neural tissue. A basic
microelectrode consists of a glass
micropipette (10-100 microns in diameter)
that penetrates a neuron’s membrane. These
microelectrodes can accurately measure
the activity of neurons by detecting the
differences in electric potential between the
inside and outside of the cell [2]. However,
it is extremely hard to measure a good
sample of neurons with just one probe.
Imagine using this pipette to measure the
electrical activity of one square millimeter of
brain tissue, which contains approximately
one million neurons! To measure multiple
neurons at once, an optimized electrode
array can detect neuronal activity at tens of
thousands of recording sites.
When the electrode array is being implanted,
the brain doesn’t recognize the electrode
and tries to protect itself by encapsulating
the electrode in a layer of fibrotic tissue
and glial cells. “The electrode has difficulty
reading signals, and as a result, the quality
of the recordings tends to degrade over
time due to the inflammatory response.
The bottom line is that the inflammatory
effects tend to limit the longevity of the
electrodes until they tend to fail over time,”
Robinson says. To reduce an inflammatory
response and provide accurate recordings,
microelectrodes themselves have become
ultra flexible. However, the process of
injecting these flexible electrodes presents
some challenges. First, electrodes can
buckle because of their flexibility, which
prevents them from penetrating the brain.
Different techniques can temporarily provide
support to the electrode as it is inserted,
such applying a stiffening agent or attaching
a probe, but these methods temporarily
enlarge the size of the electrode, which is a
major factor in the cause of inflammation.
To address these challenges, Robinson’s
lab has developed a new method that uses
fluids to insert electrodes instead of syringes.
Fluids’ unique properties have founded
incredible natural phenomena and essential
technological applications. Robinson’s
lab has developed a technology that uses
microfluidic channels to eject flexible carbon
nanotube fiber (CNTf) electrodes, which are
about ten times thinner than a strand of hair.
Inside these channels,
the electrode travels
in viscous fluid, which
prevents both buckling
and inflammation.
These channels are built on a chip, which is
formed by using a mold that is casted with
a pattern of channels on it. “When we peel
the rubber up, it has embedded within it
the channels we’ve designed. It’s sort of like
making a jello mold.”
Inside these channels, the electrode travels
in viscous fluid, which prevents both buckling
and inflammation. This chip rests on the
surface of the brain and extrudes the
electrodes and some fluid into the brain,
leaving behind soft and flexible “cooked
spaghetti noodles.” By varying the velocity of
the fluid flow, they can control how fast and
thus how far the electrode goes. First, they
tested the microfluidic device on the Hydra
Littoralis species, which are challengingly
soft, and were able to detect the action
potentials associated with different
movements[3]. Next, they were able to drive
these electrodes several millimeters deep
first into brain slices of mice, and then cortex
of several rat brains.[3]
One major challenge of implementing this
microfluidic device was preventing the
26 | CATALYST
THE ROBINSON LAB’S MICROFLUIDIC DEVICE
uses fluids to inject electrodes instead of syringes.
FLATSCOPE, a lensless imaging system small enough to
be implanted in the brain and minimize tissue damage.
excess fluid from going into the brain and
causing intracranial damage, which is typical
of syringe injection. To solve this, they built
the chip so that it had vent channels that
prevent 93% of the fluid from entering the
brain. Just at the edge of the chip, the fluid
gets sucked out at a 90 degree angle on both
sides while the electrode continues to go
straight into the brain. Since this redirection
of fluid exerts balanced horizontal forces, the
electrode doesn’t get vertically sucked back
into the chip.
Robinson envisions that this technique “can
be employed for a variety of flexible neural
probes and may become the preferred
delivery technology.’ [3] Although this new
technique presents major steps in limiting
an inflammatory response, Robinson’s lab is
working on several future steps. While it is
hard to gauge the accuracy of implantation,
the goal is to inject lots of electrodes to
increase the probability that some of them
land in the desired area. Additionally, they
are working on looking for different animals
to test this device on.
In addition to microfluidic channels,
Robinson’s lab has also developed lensless
imaging systems small enough to be
implanted in the brain and minimize
tissue damage. Lenses focus light so that
it forms an image, which is picked up by
a sensor. Although lenses give an exact
one-to-one mapping of an image, they
have several physical limitations that make
them difficult to use as they get smaller
and smaller; resolution, light collection
efficiency, and field of view (FOV) become
severely compromised. Lens material
needed for wavelengths outside of the
visible range are expensive and harder to
fabricate. Robinson’s lab uses computational
algorithms to reconstruct an image from
data gathered from sensors. Benefits from
lensless camera include more inexpensive
and high quality production, thin size, shape
flexibility, and the ability to pick up many
ranges of wavelengths and create 3D images.
An interesting application of lensless imaging
Robinson’s lab has recently been working
on is FlatCam. The compact size and lower
cost makes FlatCam a potential candidate
for imaging applications outside of the
lab, such as face detection, surveillance,
and household appliances. Robinson’s lab
recently conducted a study to test if the
resolution of lensless imaging systems was
suitable enough for face detection. First,
they created the FlatCam Face Dataset
(FCFD) with 24,112 images of 88 faces with
different angles, lighting, expressions, etc.
to test the face detection system. As for the
computational method used to analyze the
faces, they chose an accurate method (called
Faster R-CNN), which proposes and classifies
regions that may contain certain “objects.”
Then, they used pre-existing face datasets
to train these deep-learning techniques
before testing them on the FCFD. While
lensless imaging is not yet up to par with lens
imaging, the performance is suitable enough
to detect relatively forward-facing, well-lit
faces. Thus, minimizing the quality difference
between lensless and lens imaging is another
goal researchers plan to tackle.
As for application of lensless imaging to
neuroimaging techniques, Robinson’s lab
has also been developing FlatScope, the
first lensless imaging system specifically for
fluorescence imaging of biological samples.
Genetic techniques allow expression of
proteins that convert electrical/calcium
activity into fluorescence. These fluorescent
proteins can be excited by light of one
wavelength and emit light of a different
wavelength. However, fluorescence is usually
difficult to capture without lenses because it
is an incoherent source- a light source with
photons of different frequencies and waves
WHEN THEY TESTED THE
FLATSCOPE, THEY FOUND THAT
IT COULD PRODUCE HIGH-
RESOLUTION IMAGES WITH A
FOV 10X GREATER THAN THE FOV
OF A LENS MICROSCOPE WITH A
SIMILAR SENSOR.
that are not in phase. This is opposite of
coherent sources such as laser light, which
are easy for sensors to measure because of
their uniform waves. To “sort out” the light
from an incoherent source, the FlatScope
uses different types of masks fitted to the
sensor. The mask could be a 2-D array of
pinholes fitted to the sensor that gathers
information on the angle and intensity of
the light. Instead of an array of pinholes,
this mask could also be a phase mask, which
diffuses the light and causes interference
patterns, from which the algorithms can
discern direction of light.
When they tested the FlatScope, they found
that it could produce high-resolution images
with a field of vision (FOV) 10 times greater
than the FOV of a lens microscope with
a similar sensor.[5] Additionally, it could
reconstruct 3D volume 40,000x faster than
a confocal microscope, which is a lensbased
fluorescence imaging system. All of
the data gathered by FlatScope is analyzed
on a separate computer, which can take
between 100 ms to a couple of seconds to
computationally derive an image pattern
from the interference data.
Although Robinson is working on these two
techniques of measuring or recording brain
activity separately, ideally these methods will
used in combination with each other. “One
day, we do envision these things merging,
multiple ways to record and stimulate activity
becoming one system of distributed sensors
and actuators in the nervous system.”
WORKS CITED
[1] Neuroimaging: Visualizing Brain Structure
and Function. Neuroethics http://ccnmtl.
columbia.edu/projects/neuroethics/
module1/foundationtext/index.html
(accessed Dec. 16, 2018.)
[2]Robinson, J. et al. Front. Neur. Circuits.
2013, 7, 1-7.
[3] Robinson, J. et al. Nano. Letters. 2018, 18,
326-335
[4]J. Tan, et al. IEEE Trans. Comp. Imag. 2018
[5] Robinson, et al. Sci Adv. 2017, 3
Photos courtesy of the Robinson Lab
DESIGN BY
EDITED BY
Evelyn Syau
Preetham Bachina
CATALYST | 27
M
A
gnetic
Cell Manipulation
By Amna Ibrahim
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
technology and stem cell therapies
are two prevalent widely known and
researched medical techniques that find
their connection through gadonanotubes,
which can be applied to both methods.
Magnetic resonance imaging is a medical
technique that uses magnetism, radio
waves, and computers to capture internal
images of a patient’s body. MRI contrast
agents are used to enhance visibility of
internal workings of the body, the strongest
ones being gadonanotubes. Stem cells are
undifferentiated cells that can develop into
many different types of specialized cells in
the human body. For example, stem cells can
be intentionally relocated into heart tissue so
that they can differentiate into heart muscle
cells and help regenerate damaged tissue.
Naturally, cells are not very magnetic, so
they need to be manipulated in order to be
able to move them from place to place in the
body.
Dr. Wilson has been a professor of Chemistry
at Rice University for around 45 years,
his research specializing in nanomaterial
synthesis for application in diagnostic
and therapeutic medicine spectroscopy &
imaging, as well as nanomaterial synthesis.
His research on magnetic cell manipulation
began in 2005, and intertwines chemistry
research with collaboration at the Texas
Medical Center.
Dr. Wilson’s research is centralized around
gadonanotubes, which are small pieces of
carbon nanotubes that are packed with
many superparamagnetic gadolinium ions.
As a result of their strong magnetism,
gadonanotubes are accepted as the single
most powerful and capable magnetic
resonance imaging agent material currently
known. Dr. Wilson embarked on research
using gadonanotubes in 2005, after
discovering what they were.
Initially, Dr. Wilson and his research team
were studying carbon nanotubes and were
28 | CATALYST
attempting to figure out how to manipulate
carbon nanotubes to make them small and
discrete enough to “clear the body filtering
mechanisms” of the liver and the kidneys,
and able to be excreted after fulfilling their
purpose. The research team had always
worked in the area of developing MRI
contrast agents, and so one day they decided
to take the superparamagnetic gadolinium
ions from that area of foregoing research
and combine it with their new research by
mixing the ultra-short carbon nanotubes
with the gadolinium ions. By a “sort of
serendipity,” as Dr. Wilson says, the ultrashort
tubes and the gadolinium ions had a
mutual affinity for each other and stuck to
each other to form the gadonanotubes.
Dr. Wilson and his group collaborated
“external magnetic fields
were shown to indeed keep
stem cells in place much
longer than they would have
naturally”
with research scientists at the Texas Heart
Institute who were focused on studying
the application of stem cell therapies to
repair cardiac muscle. Together, these two
research teams studied the injection of
gadonanotubes into living tissue to discover
whether this injection would allow the tissue
to be able to be moved around externally
by a magnetic field, which is a discovery that
would open up loads of clinical applications.
When stem cells are injected into a certain
area, they tend to migrate around before
they develop into specialized cells, and so
the gadonanotubes were used to retain
stem cells in the areas where they were
placed, thus allowing them differentiate
precisely at the injection site in the precise
location where they were injected. This
discovery is very beneficial when applied to
patients who have suffered heart attacks
who have damaged and deteriorated heart
tissue – through magnetic cell manipulation,
the stem cells are able to stay in place long
enough to differentiate into healthy, new
heart muscle tissue at the site of a heart
attack.
In addition to their magnetism being of great
use in stem cell therapies, gadonanotubes
are also incredibly valuable by way of their
MRI contrast abilities. Since gadonanotubes
are the most powerful MRI contrast agent
known, they can be externally imaged by MRI
to ensure that the stem cells stay in place at
the location that they are injected. Moreover,
image given by the MRI can be quantitated
in order to determine the concentration
of stem cells/gadonanotubes at the site of
injection.
The significance of the work of Dr. Wilson
and his team, as well as the researchers at
the Texas Heart Institute, was that external
magnetic fields were shown to indeed keep
stem cells in place much longer than they
would have naturally without any form of
magnetic manipulation. Therefore, they were
able to develop into healthy heart muscle
tissue and repair damaged tissue at the
location they were injected in.
The ultimate goal of this research and
its applications is for the gadonanotube
contrast agents to be useful and biocompatible
enough to be used clinically in
order to tangibly help people. However, to
get this research out into the clinic is a very
lengthy process that can take up to a couple
decades, and so this goal is a long-term one,
but instrumentally beneficial nonetheless.
Design by Anna Croyle
Edited by Andrew Mu
Images adapted from Vecteezy
DO YOU HEAR
WHAT I HEAR?
Hair Cell
Regeneration
in the Cochlea
BY MAIA HELTERBRAND
Even when you’re asleep, your ear
never stops hearing or processing
sound. However, once your hair
cells - cells that play a key role in the
auditory system - are damaged, they are
unable to be regenerated. These hair cells
are organized and specialized with inner
hair cells detecting sound and outer hair
cells adjusting the intensity of that sound.
Furthermore, these hair cells detect specific
range of frequencies. Oftentimes hair cells
in the lower part of the cochlea detect highpitched
sounds, while those in the upper
part of the cochlea detect low-pitched
sounds. However, when non-mammalian
hair cells are damaged due to loud noises,
infections, or the natural aging process, can
regenerate they are able to be regenerated.
However, this is not the case for mature
mammalian cochlea. [Put her specific
research question here]
More specifically, in order to hear, the
outer ear funnels sound waves from the
environment towards the eardrum causing
it to vibrate. These vibrations then travel
through a series of bones in the middle
ear which amplifies and sends the sound
towards the cochlea. The snail-shaped
cochlea is filled with fluid that begins to
move in a wave-like manner once the
sound waves are received. This motion then
stimulates the series of cells known as hair
cells. As the hair cells move, the microscopic
hair-like projections situated on top of the
hair cells, known as stereocilia, contact
the overlying membrane. 1 As this contact
occurs, the ion channels on the tip of the
stereocilia tilt to one side, causing ions to
rush in and generating an electrical signal.
This electrical signal is then carried to the
brain via the auditory nerve where it is
processed. 2
when non-mammalian
hair cells are
damaged due to loud
noises, infections,
or the natural
aging process,
they are able to
be regenerated.
However, this is not
the case for mature
mammalian cochlea.
Dr. Melissa McGovern, who is a post-doc
at Baylor College of Medicine, and her
colleagues are currently trying to induce
regeneration of these hair cells in the
cochlea of mature mice. Unlike the mature
mouse cochlea, if neonatal mouse hair
cells are damaged, the surrounding cells,
known as the supporting cells, are able
to spontaneously regenerate into hair
cells similar to the way hair cells in nonmammalian
species regenerate. However,
this ability readily declines as the cochlea
matures and becomes functional, with hair
cells being unable to regenerate after about
two weeks of age.
Therefore, Dr. McGovern and her colleagues
are “trying to find what cocktail of genes
we can express within the supporting cells
to turn them into hair cells” in the mature
mouse cochlea. By comparing marks such
as the number of genes expressed in these
induced(?) hair cells to the genes expressed
in supporting cells and actual hair cells,
Dr. McGovern and her colleagues are able
to see “how close to an actual hair cell”
they are. Although the conversion of a
supporting cell into a hair cell is their main
priority, tackling issues such as the location
and orientation of the hair cell are other key
concerns as they are determinants in the
function and specialization of hair cells.
Understanding the process of hair cell
regeneration and the factors that contribute
to regeneration in mature mammalian
cochlea can help with the process of
developing therapies to restore hearing in
individuals with damaged or lost hair cells.
WORKS CITED
https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/how-dowe-hear
https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/news/2009/
its-not-just-about-hair-cells-new-researchshows-tectorial-membrane-plays-moreactive
DESIGN BY Juliana Wang
EDITED BY Sarah Swackhamer
CATALYST | 29
THE
By Christine Tang
HIPPOCAMPUS
HIPPOCAMPUS
Let’s Make Some Memories
An experimental procedure left Henry
Molaison, commonly known as
the famous “patient H.M.,” unable
to form new memories. He had a
lobectomy in 1953 that removed several
deep parts of his brain, including the
hippocampus. 1-2 The hippocampus (HC)
of the brain is commonly known as the
center of learning and memory, but its
processes in storing memory have not
been fully elucidated. I had the pleasure of
working in the Neuroscience department
at UT Southwestern under Dr. Lenora
Volk, who focuses her research on the
HC and the brain’s processes in balancing
dynamic learning and persistent memory.
She is currently working on three main
projects, each related to brain function or
memory consolidation.
Learning can be separated into two major
processes: encoding and consolidation.
Dr. Volk’s first project is focused on
understanding the mechanisms of the
latter and its dependence on sleep.
Dr. Volk utilizes a phenomenon called
hippocampal replay to analyze and
compare the neural firing of animals when
awake and when asleep. Hippocampal
replay was first discovered in 1989
when Dr. Constantine Pavlides from
The Rockefeller University in New York
analyzed place cells, which record the
particular location that an organism is
in, and their effect on the brain’s spatial
tuning. 3 Spatial tuning occurs when a cell
encodes information about an associated
location in the environment. Pavlides
and other researchers performed in vivo
recordings of awake, actively moving
animals, and observed that cells fire in
spatially restricted locations and not
in other parts of the environment.3 By
recording and analyzing cell firing data,
researchers observed that the conscious
neural firing pattern is replayed during
sleep. Therefore, hippocampal replay was
proposed to be “a mechanism by which
the brain consolidates memory during
sleep” (Volk).
Although hippocampal replay is a core
component in theories of sleep models
and memory consolidation, it is largely
untested on neuronal changes because
hippocampal replay events are very short.
This makes neural firing and labeling
extremely hard to record. Dr. Volk is
collaborating with multiple researchers,
one of whom is her husband, Dr. Brad
Pfeiffer, to use a method that circumvents
this problem. When a neuron fires an
action potential, an electrical impulse
that travels down a neuron and sends
signals to the next neuron, intracellular
calcium rises. Dr. Volk takes advantage
of this phenomenon by using a reagent
in neurons that glows green when light
is shined and permanently turns red if a
lot of calcium is present. Because light is
extremely fast, she can shine a light for a
couple hundred milliseconds and see the
active-only neurons turn red. She utilizes
this technique to observe hippocampal
replays in sleep and labels active neurons
to analyze their synaptic properties
and test their long-held hypothesis that
“hippocampal replay events are actually
causing changes in the cells and the HC
and perhaps in the cortex that might be
leading to memory consolidation.”
KIBRA’s genetic
mutations and
binding partners
are associated
with a number
of learning
and memory
disorders,such as
Alzheimer’s.
Dr. Volk’s second project focuses on the
protein KIBRA, its interactional partners
and their relationships to learning and
memory. Though KIBRA’s function in the
brain is not fully known, KIBRA’s genetic
mutations and binding partners are
associated with a number of learning and
memory disorders, such as Alzheimer’s. 4-5
A study has also shown that single base
mutations in KIBRA is associated with
variations in human memory—some
people have an allele that is associated
with better memory and some have
an allele that is associated with worse
memory. 6 Therefore, Dr. Volk believes that
KIBRA in humans is likely to be important
in learning and memory regulation. She
has knocked out the KIBRA gene from
mice and discovered that these mice have
impaired learning and memory.
Dr. Volk is also using KIBRA to understand
how information processing at different
levels of scale are integrated. Even with
mathematical models and computational
data, Dr. Volk explains that scientists
cannot predict behaviors of neural
networks if they only know a single
component. “If you have a neuron and
you know everything about how that
neuron works, and then you put a whole
bunch of neurons together, that circuit
of neurons will be able to do things
and have outputs that you wouldn’t be
able to know if you only know how one
neuron functions,” she says. Bridging
the different levels of brain information
processing is important to elucidate the
mechanisms of KIBRA from microscopic
to macroscopic levels. Intracellular
information processing includes calcium
influx and signaling cascades after an
action potential. Synaptic plasticity, the
strengthening or weakening of neuron
synaptic activity in response to changes in
signal or the environment, is a higher level
of information processing that describes
the strength of communication between
two neurons. Circuit-level processing
occurs at the level of a population of
neurons and involves communication and
relationships among multiple neurons.
Behavioral output is the highest level that
scientists can usually observe without
extensive equipment—for example, the
path a rodent takes in a maze to find
food. Dr. Volk and Dr. Pfeiffer are trying to
understand these four different levels of
information processing by manipulating
KIBRA to observe changes in molecular
30 | CATALYST
machinery, synaptic plasticity and
behavior.
The third project in the lab is focused on
analyzing a novel protein that interacts
with KIBRA. “One of the best ways to
understand how a protein functions
is to know what other proteins it
interacts with,” Dr. Volk says. Dr. Volk
and a postdoctoral fellow in the lab, Dr.
Xin Shao, believe that one of KIBRA’s
binding partners is very important to
understanding learning and memory, as
KIBRA has already been implicated to be
abnormally predisposed to be associated
with neurodevelopmental disorders. They
expressed this novel protein in neurons
and discovered it might be killing them.
Dr. Volk jokingly said that this finding did
not excite her, because a dead neurons
“can’t process any information and
can’t do anything about learning and
memory.” However, they proceeded with
the experiments and found two different
versions of the protein: a long and short
version. The short version of the protein
seems to kill neurons while the long
version does not.
Dr. Volk then decided to see if the
novel protein has a role in a natural
pathophysiological condition as opposed
to cultured neurons. She collaborated
with a fellow UTSW faculty member
who worked on stroke, a natural
pathophysiological condition that is
common in people and animals. Stroke
occurs when blood flow to a part of the
brain is restricted and brain cells die from
lack of oxygen. Dr. Volk’s collaborator
induced stroke in some mice and Dr.
Volk discovered that the short version
of the novel protein was dramatically
up-regulated in the brain areas affected
by stroke. By seeing how this protein
affected neurons during stroke, Dr. Volk
and Dr. Shao might obtain molecular
information that they can use to prevent
cell death after stroke.
When commenting on her relationship
and collaboration with her husband, Dr.
Volk says that he has been invaluable
in her projects because he supplies
the technical expertise in their in
vivo recordings in both her sleep and
KIBRA projects. When asked about his
contribution to her KIBRA project, Dr.
Volk says, “One thing the collaboration
has allowed us to do, technically, is to
be able to record from animals where
we’ve deleted KIBRA or manipulated
KIBRA function to understand how it’s
affecting circuit function.” Dr. Pfeiffer’s
technical expertise lies in developing a
recording apparatus that is implanted into
rodent brains and can record hundreds
of neurons in awake, freely behaving
Without
memories,
you’re just
a walking
bag of
cells.
You have no
past, and
no future.
animals to investigate circuit function. The
recording apparatus can record electrical
signals from the HC and other cortical
regions at the same time to understand
communication among them as the
animal learns from its environment, forms
memories and stores them long-term.
Although Dr. Pfeiffer almost exclusively
studies rats because they can do more
complex tasks and their brains are
bigger and easier to record from, he has
miniaturized the recording apparatus so
that it can record in mice. This is beneficial
for Dr. Volk because her projects are
mostly based on mouse models, which
currently have more genetic experimental
manipulation capability than rat models.
Dr. Volk says that she hopes that her
three current projects will help contribute
essential understanding about memory
consolidation across multiple hierarchies
of information processing, and potentially
neurodevelopmental disorders such as
autism and schizophrenia in the future.
When asked why she chose to pursue
neuroscience and learning and memory,
she says: “It’s hard to think of anything
more fascinating or compelling than
trying to understand the things that give
us awareness and sense of self. Without
memories, you’re just a walking bag of
cells. You have no past, and no future.”
Works Cited
[1] Carey, B. No Memory, but He Filled
In the Blanks. The New York Times,
Dec. 6, 2010. https://www.nytimes.
com/2010/12/07/science/07memory.
html?ref=health (accessed February 2,
2019).
[2] Dittrich, L. The Brain That Couldn’t
Remember. The New York Times,
Aug. 3, 2016. https://www.nytimes.
com/2016/08/07/magazine/the-brain-thatcouldnt-remember.html?_r=0
(accessed
February 2, 2019).
[3] Pavlides, C.; Winson, J. J. Neurosci.
1989, 9, 2907-2918.
[4] Corneveaux, J.J. et al. Neurobiol. Aging.
2010, 31, 901-909.
[5] Schneider, A. et al. Front Aging
Neurosci. 2010, 2, 4.
[6] Papassotiropoulos, A., et al. Science.
2006, 314, 475-478.
DESIGN BY Samantha Cheng
EDITED BY Preetham Bachina
CATALYST | 31
MEDICAL MARIJUANA? MORE LIKE
MEDICAL MDMA
PARTY DRUGS AND PTSD
Aruni areti & jackson savage
Abstract
Post traumatic stress disorder, or
PTSD has a long history of treatment
through supportive medications such
as benzodiazepines and serotonin
reuptake inhibitors, both treatments
often yielding temporary results and
lacking long-term solutions. Exposure
therapy, a novel treatment process
including administering microdoses of
MDMA, has recently surged in popularity
in reducing PTSD symptoms long-term.
The purpose of this article is to identify
how MDMA can treat persistent PTSD
symptoms through its ability to provide
patients with heightened openness and
decreased Neuroticism. The review also
covers how MDMA-assisted psychotherapy
patients exhibit an increase in openness
and a decrease in Neuroticism, which
demonstrates an improvement of PTSD
symptoms and causes long-term changes
in personality structure. A landmark study
investigates these symptoms through
a randomized trial of MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy therapy. 1 Symptoms such
as Neuroticism and personality variation
improve due to responses found within
3,4-MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. An
additional study illustrates the long-term
effects of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy
by encompassing a multi-month trial
monitoring 19 subjects with a longterm
follow-up. 3 The study illustrates
that subjects, on average, maintained
statistical and clinical gains in symptom
relief from MDMA-assisted psychotherapy,
as opposed to results from previously
existing treatments. The MDMA,
administered in a therapeutic setting,
provides a balance of stable emotions
including a sense of safety and control,
allowing for more mental stability in
patients diagnosed with PTSD.
Introduction
PTSD, is related to both trauma and
stress, which share common effects
with anxiety and dissociative-disorders.
Symptoms stem from the introduction of
a traumatic event, often linked to serious
injury or the death of a significant other.
Manifestations of the disorder include
severe psychological distress and recurring
dreams or flashbacks depicting the
traumatic event. These reminders of the
event negatively affect mood, cognition,
and reactivity of those affected. Global
likelihood to experiencing a traumatic
event is estimated to be around 50-90% 2 ,
and estimated lifetime risk ranges from
6-10%, with women twice as likely to
develop PTSD as men. 3
Psychotherapy is recognised as the most
effective form of treatment for PTSD.
Within psychotherapy, there are several
treatments that have been successful,
including Cognitive Behavior Therapy
(CBT), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT),
Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral
Therapy (TF CBT), and Eye Movement
Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR).
Limited research has been conducted to
track personality changes associated with
PTSD treatment response, as personality
theorists argue that traits are relatively
stable during adulthood. There is
evidence, however, linking PTSD to certain
changes in personality after exposure to
trauma. As an example, Vietnam veterans
demonstrated high Neuroticism scores on
the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI). 3
Recently, ±3, 4-
methylenedioxymethamphetamine
(MDMA) has been coupled with
psychotherapy in clinical trials to enhance
therapeutic changes in patients. Initial
results have been promising, highlighting
significant reductions in PTSD symptoms
as well as increased longevity of treatment
effects. Evidence suggests that MDMA
increases prosocial feelings and behaviors,
which directly reduce negative moods and
fear response. For these reasons, MDMA
is considered therapeutic as it induces
increased empathy and affiliation due
to serotonin release, with effects lasting
3-6 hours3. It is important to distinguish
between the controlled use of MDMA and
the commonly abused ‘ecstasy,’ which
has unknown purity and dosage. In a
controlled setting, MDMA has the scope to
provide relief to PTSD victims by providing
them with a sense of safety and control. 4
Methods
The first methods section investigates
purported mechanisms of psychological
change coupled with previously obtained
data on MDMA-assisted psychotherapy.
There is a focus on tracking the
Neuroticism and openness variables of
the Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness
Personality Inventory-Revised test (NEO
PI-R). Screening consisted of a Structured
Clinical Interview for Axis I Diagnosis
(SCID) module, which identifies borderline
personality disorder, and a Clinician-
Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) with
at least 50 subjects having treatmentresistant
symptoms from war-related
events. Additionally, subjects that had
CAPS score of greater than 50 (moderate
to severe PTSD symptoms) were
administered serotonin-norepinephrine
reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) and provided
with 6 months of psychotherapy. 3 All
subjects suffering from major medical
conditions, other psychiatric conditions,
substance abuse (screened through a
urine test), or major depression were
excluded. Twenty subjects, entirely
32 | CATALYST
FIGURE 1 FIGURE 2
Caucasian, fit the criteria and were
followed up on once after 2 months.
NEO PI-R measurement was created
through pooling hundreds of traits stated
in a self-report questionnaire, peer ratings,
and other psychological tests to build an
overarching list of factors contributing
to personality traits. An independent
administrator conducted the CAPS test in
an interview format to determine if the
subject met the Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV TR)
criteria for PTSD diagnosis3.
The second method details 20 individual
subjects with treatment-resistant PTSD
(related to sexual abuse or assault)
subject to psychotherapy with either
MDMA or a placebo. The drug was
administered during two 8-hour sessions
3-5 weeks apart, accompanied with
bi-weekly sessions without drugs4. The
administration sessions were held in a
comfortable atmosphere, encouraging
participants to focus inward and
alternated with time spent talking to
therapists. All 20 subjects completed the
Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) questionnaire
(created by the researchers), and 17 retook
the CAPS and IES-R tests. The study
ranged from 17-74 months after final
MDMA sessions, and 10-74 months after
completion of the questionnaire4.
Both studies utilized a LTFU questionnaire
for use in later evaluations of
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. This
questionnaire was built to understand and
determine the effects of MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy and changes in quantitative
and qualitative analysis. The LTFU
questionnaire assessed the degree (with
an ordinal scale of 1-Slight to 5-Large) and
persistence (scale of 1-Small to 5-All) of
the perceived benefits and/or harms of
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for PTSD.
The MDMA provides a
balance of
stable emotions
including a
sense of safety
and control,
allowing for
more mental
stability
in patients diagnosed
with PTSD.
Results
Figure 1 and 2 compare CAPS scale scores
between the placebo and MDMA groups
after treatment. Figure 1 illustrates the
change in Openness as a covariate to
change in CAPS, while Figure 2 illustrates
the change in Neuroticism as a covariate
to change in CAPS. In Figure 1, after
changes in Openness were accounted
for, the effects of MDMA on CAPS scores
were no longer significant. For Figure
2, the MDMA group saw a significant
improvement in CAPS scores compared to
the placebo group3.
Table 1 illustrates descriptive statistics
for the examined group differences in
Openness and Neuroticism at baseline and
2-month follow-up. These results revealed
no main effect within Openness; however,
there was a significant correlation
between Openness and MDMA group,
signifying that there was an increase in
Openness within the MDMA group but a
decrease within the therapy only group
from baseline to follow-up3. In regards
to Neuroticism, there was a significant
main effect on the group, but there was
no seen significant interaction. Moreover,
the follow-up analyses were unable to
find significant group differences for
Openness or Neuroticism at baseline or
2-month follow-up. However, correlational
analysis of the significant changes within
personality traits helped indicate that
across both groups Openness increases,
Neuroticism decreases. 3
Table 2, on the other, hand illustrates
prominent data on mean differences in
Openness and Neuroticism personality
traits at the baseline in comparison to
LTFU following usage of the MDMAassisted
psychotherapy. 3 Such results
CATALYST | 33
explain that were prominent changes
in both Openness and Neuroticism in
comparison to the baseline personality
traits that come up with long-term followup
traits that follow the MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy.
Based on the LTFU questionnaire for use
in LTFU evaluations of MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy, CAPS and IES-R scores at
LTFU for the 16 study completers from
Study 2 were not statistically different
from their 2-month (short-term) mean
scores (Table 3) illustrating similar
explanation and effects toward the
study. Throughout this study, all subjects
reported a benefit from participation in
the study (median = 5, range = 3), with
at least some benefit persisting (median
= 5, range = 3) for longer than a year
post-treatment. Moreover, the 16 LTFU
CAPS completers reported some sort of
degree of benefit (median = 5 (maximum
score possible); range = 3)4. These results
illustrate that there was no clear difference
between the CAPS completers and noncompleters
in terms of the degree of and
persistence of their benefits from the
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy. Even more
striking, all participants answered “Yes”
to the question, “Do you believe more
MDMA sessions would have been helpful”
for further treatment of PTSD. Within this
study, participants stated that there was
either no change or some improvement
in their cognitive function, memory,
and concentration: 7/19 participants
reported no change, while 13 reported
improvements in these areas and none
indicated inhibition or worsened effects.
Overall, participants described the
experimental treatment as being helpful,
sometimes dramatically so (“The therapy
made it possible for me to live”), but also
as being difficult at times (“one of the
toughest things I have ever done”). Several
participants described it as a step in an
“ongoing process” rather than simply a
completed cure. 4
Discussion
The first study concluded that persistent
changes in both Neuroticism and
Openness occurred post MDMA
treatment. Patients experienced
symptom relief for up to 45.5 months
post-treatment. These results allude to
MDMA’s potential to fundamentally alter
personality traits beyond the scope of
PTSD treatment, and result in long-term
changes. The study also determined that
Openness is a key indicator linked to PTSD
symptoms, and those with MDMA assisted
psychotherapy experienced greater
changes in Openness. 3 However, some
scholars argue that personality traits, by
definition, are stable over a lifetime. The
present study and other studies suggest
that certain facets to personality are able
to be manipulated and can be relevant in
reducing PTSD symptoms. 3
The recipients of MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy characterized their
experience as cleansing. They reported
being able to explore new territory within
their mind, leading to increased Openness
and a new perspective on their trauma.
The study did not address the biochemical
aspect of MDMA, instead, the researchers
suggest that MDMA primes a susceptibility
to increased Openness in its recipients,
thus enhancing therapy’s effectiveness.
Individuals with the most change in
Openness also experienced a greater
reduction in PTSD symptoms.
The authors of this paper speculate that
both environmental factors, including
significant trauma and profound
experiences, and epigenetic factors
influence underlying personality aspects.
The question of how MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy can result in long-term
personality changes remains a debated
subject. Further research is required to
investigate what processes can manipulate
personality traits as well as to further
define what facets are encompassed in
personality. 3
Three limitations are outlined in the first
study. The trial was run as a double-blind
trial, however, many participants and
therapists correctly identified their case.
Shifts in expectations towards therapy
may have resulted from this occurrence,
as is suggested by the initial decrease
in Openness but not Neuroticism in the
placebo group3. Second, the findings of
this study rely on subjective reports by the
participants; this limitation is shared by
almost all clinical diagnoses and studies
of PTSD. Last, the sample size was limited,
but clear trends existed within this group. 3
The second study has evidence within the
LTFU study that alludes to the clinically
meaningful benefit from MDMA-assisted
psychotherapy to PTSD patients. When
looking at the final data, one must note
that 3 of the 19 subjects did not complete
the CAPS and IES-R. However, they did
complete the LTFU Questionnaire and
reported nearly the same degree of
benefit and persistence of benefit as those
who had completed the CAPS. These
results illustrate that up to 89% (17/19)
of those who received MDMA had longterm
improvement in PTSD symptoms4.
Overall, the LTFU questionnaire illustrated
some critical points: there is an clear
absence of risk for substance abuse and
neurocognitive decline when juxtaposed
with the clear improvement of symptoms
and other perceived benefits. 4
The paper claims that the data from
the LTFU Questionnaire supports the
hypothesis that MDMA can be utilized
in a clinical setting with limited risk that
participants will subsequently seek
self-administered “street ecstasy,” or
become addicted to the drug. 4 However,
this treatment must be implemented
with several precautions: MDMA being
administered in a therapeutic setting and
close follow-up of patients are essential
elements of the treatment and must be
included with clinical monitoring and
therapeutic support when MDMA is
TABLE 2
TABLE 1
34 | CATALYST
utilized4. MDMA becomes an emotional
distresser of PTSD often contributing
to the usage of intoxicants that act as
an escape at self-medication inhibiting
emotional distress in turn limiting the
subject’s motivation for drug abuse.
Moreover, the data illustrates that there is
improvement and stability within cognitive
function, memory, and concentration.
Evidence for these improvements comes
from a strong correlation between
the positive reports from the LTFU
Questionnaire and the formal evaluations
of cognitive function taken before and
after psychotherapy with MDMA versus
placebo. 4
In addition, there was improvement in
PTSD symptoms documented on the CAPS
alongside other major benefits that have
been reported by the LTFU Questionnaire.
There is additional evidence of positive
MDMA treatment effects extending
beyond the realm of symptom reduction
that are endorsed within the LTFU
Questionnaire and its comments section4.
Many subjects reported benefits that
correlate to improvement within their lives
alongside deeply meaningful therapeutic
experiences such as “increased selfawareness
and understanding” and
“enhanced spiritual life.”4 These comments
illustrates the authentic implication of the
psychological and spiritual exploration
and growth that in turn limit trauma
and symptoms promoting healthy
psychological development. Subjects have
also commented on the nature that the
effects of MDMA have given a certain level
of stability allowing them to gain the tools
to succeed and move on with a great level
of neutrality. 4
Conclusion
These studies were done in attempt to
develop and test a novel therapy for
PTSD, a clinical disorder that is in need
of a wider array of effective treatment
options. Utilizing empirical data from the
LTFU Questionnaire alongside the formal
measures of cognitive function before and
after psychotherapy between MDMA and
placebo, both Mithoefer et al. and Wagner
et al. can report long-term outcome
results in the original cohort. Both results
conclude long-term benefits to their
patients with no cases of subsequent drug
abuse and no reports of neurocognitive
decline with usage of MDMA. These
results illustrate favorable long-term risk/
benefit ratio for the administration of
MDMA in a clinical setting in conjunction
with psychotherapy for PTSD treatment.
With the results of these two studies,
and subsequent research increasing the
data that supports these findings, we
predict MDMA-assisted psychotherapy will
become a viable and accessible treatment
option for PTSD.
Works Cited
[1] Wagner, Mark T, et al. “Therapeutic
Effect of Increased Openness:
Investigating Mechanism of Action in
MDMA-Assisted Psychotherapy.” Journal of
Psychopharmacology, 21 June 2017.
[2] Sascha, Thal B, and Miriam J. J.
Lommen. “Current Perspective on MDMA-
Assisted Psychotherapy for Posttraumatic
Stress Disorder.” Journal of Contemporary
Psychotherapy, 6 June 2018.
[3] Johansen, PØ, and TS Krebs. “How
Could MDMA (Ecstasy) Help Anxiety
Disorders? A Neurobiological Rationale.”
Journal of Psychopharmacology, 2009.
[4] Mithoefer, Michael r C, et al. “Durability
of Improvement in Post-Traumatic Stress
Disorder Symptoms and Absence of
Harmful Effects or Drug Dependency
Journal of Psychopharmacology after
3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine- ©
Assisted Psychotherapy: a Prospective
Long- Term Follow-up Study.” Journal of
Psychopharmacology, 2013.
DESIGN BY Juliana Wang
EDITED BY Natalie Gault
TABLE 3
CATALYST | 35
Plant Communication
SILENT BUT NOT INVISIBLE
by Lani DuFresne
If plants had a language, what would it
sound like? For years, the concept of plant
communication was fairly nonexistent, and
hypotheses about trees sending each other
electrical signals as they were being cut down
were considered lunatic at best [1]. The
botanical world has largely been viewed as a
silent one, but the past few years of research
have finally unveiled the buzz of constant
communication between plants, all unheard
by human ears.
As it turns out, plants need to ‘talk’ to each
other for many of the same reasons humans
have developed verbal and body language:
to coexist successfully, express physiological
needs, and cooperate in protecting
the overall community. Only recent
advancements in technology have allowed
humans to gain insight into this unheard
conversation – and now we can see it as well.
Scientists have managed to visually prove
that plants warn each other of impending
dangers, negotiate with their nearest
neighbors, and send messages throughout
their populations when necessary.
For example, a curious phenomenon
called ‘crown shyness’ refers to the learned
behavior of plants, especially large trees,
to redirect and divert growth when their
leaves begin to brush up against the leaves
of surrounding vegetation [1]. It’s almost the
botanical equivalent of body language. More
common, however, are chemical signals that
spread throughout the body of one plant
and then to those closest to it. Roots of one
plant exude organic compounds into the soil
that then pass into nearby plants through
their roots, giving neighbors information
on each other’s well-being. When tested
on corn seedlings, researchers found that
seedlings would direct growth away from
plants whose roots were emanating chemical
signals of distress in an effort to avoid the
same stressors, and would also rely on these
signals to reorient themselves if they sensed
they were growing too close to each other. 2
The ability of plants to communicate with
each other is crucial in defending against
external threats like herbivory, chemical
pollution, and even lumberjacks. Scientists
had previously inferred that plants could
“...the past few years
of research have
finally unveiled the
buzz of constant
communication
between plants, all
unheard by
human ears.”
warn each other of danger after one
individual was attacked, but molecular
technology has recently provided a
remarkable visual representation of how the
process actually works [3]. When a plant is
attacked – say, by an herbivorous caterpillar
– the site of the wound triggers a release of
glutamate (a neurotransmitter that is also
found in animals), which causes a change
in calcium ion (Ca2+) concentration that
spreads throughout the plant in minutes.
The electrical signal then jumps to other
surrounding plants, resulting in a chain
reaction [4]. In cases such as an attack from
a voracious caterpillar, this rapid alert system
is useful because it allows the undamaged
leaves to quickly mount a defense response,
which usually involves the production of
hormones that make the leaves toxic or
unappetizing [3].
This entire process occurs silently and
is virtually undetectable – or was, until
scientists created a mutated species of
Arabidopsis in which calcium concentrations
could be seen under fluorescent light [4].
The final effect (seen in image) is a visually
stunning reminder of the secret signals that
lie beneath the surface.
Works Cited
[1] The Guardian. Plants ‘talk to’ each
other through their roots. https://www.
theguardian.com/science/2018/may/02/
plants-talk-to-each-other-through-their-roots
(accessed October 24, 2018).
[2] Elhakeem, A.; Markovic, D.; Broberg, A.;
Anten, N.P.R.; Ninkovic, V. Aboveground
mechanical stimuli affect belowground plantplant
communication. PLoS ONE 2018, 13(5):
e0195646.
[3] Interesting Engineering. New Discoveries
Made in How Plants Warn Each Other of
Danger. https://interestingengineering.com/
new-discoveries-made-in-how-plants-warneach-other-of-danger
(accessed October 24,
2018).
[4] Toyota, M.; Spencer, D.; Sawai-Toyota,
S.; Jiaqi, W.; Zhang, T.; Koo, A.J.; Howe, G.A.;
Gilroy, S. Glutamate triggers long-distance,
calcium-based plant defense signaling.
Science. 2018, 361(6407), 1112-1115.
DESIGN BY Priscilla Li
EDITED BY Evelyn Syau
36 | CATALYST
Dark Matter
Mapping
BY KSENIA METRUCK
What if 90% of your furniture was
invisible? You would have to think
of some pretty creative ways to
find it. Personally, I would drape sheets over
everything in my house, great for Halloween
time.
Unfortunately, it would be pretty difficult to
cover all of the invisible matter in the universe
with blankets, they just aren’t big enough.
From what astronomers have discovered, as
much as 90% of what makes up the universe
is completely “invisible.” In other words, it
does not radiate any signatures that can be
detected in the electromagnetic spectrum by
current technology [1].
The good news is that astronomers have
created a few extremely clever ways of
guessing the general mass and location of all
of this dark matter.
Individual galaxies are always evolving
because of the mutual gravitational pull of
their galactic neighbors. But we know that
the gravity caused by visible mass alone
is not enough to stretch across the large
distances between them. The gravity added
by invisible dark matter is the major factor as
we watch many galaxies growing, shrinking,
transforming, and colliding. The paths that
they take allow astronomers to find the
gravitational forces at work on them. From
these forces, we can calculate the mass of
dark matter that the galaxies must contain to
sustain their motions [2].
From what astronomers
have discovered, as much
as 90% of what makes
up the universe is
completely “invisible.”
Another way of searching for dark matter
involves examining the x-rays released by
large dust clouds. X-rays are only detectable
because dark matter between their sources
and where they are detected induce lensing.
Gravitational lensing refers to a phenomenon
where electromagnetic wave, like x-rays, are
pulled slightly towards a large mass which
gives a curve to their path. Because the path
the rays follow can be approximated, any
curves give away the location of large masses,
like dark matter. The amount of dark matter
can be estimated based on the size and shape
of the curve. So far, matter found using this
technique accounts for 20 to 30% of a galaxy
cluster’s total gravitating mass [3,4].
A similar way to detect dark matter involves
spotting rings or arcs around clusters of
galaxies called “Einstein rings”. These rings
are also caused by gravitational lensing,
however, scientists look for waves in the
visible light spectrum as opposed to x-rays. In
order to form a ring, or even a partial ring, the
two objects must be almost perfectly aligned
in relation to the observation point. The light
from the hidden object is then stretched
around the foreground object forming the
light ring seen in the image below [5]. How
well the ring is defined can be useful in
estimating the total mass of the foreground
galaxy [6].
It’s important to find out as much about
where dark matter is located as possible.
Future space missions can take advantage of
these bodies of mass to slingshot spacecrafts
into deep space, but you don’t want any
surprises with billion dollar equipment.
References
[1] http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/images/gaia_
chapter_1/dark_matter_in_the_universe.htm
[2] http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/images/gaia_
chapter_1/dark_matter_in_the_universe.htm
[3] http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/images/gaia_
chapter_1/dark_matter_in_the_universe.htm
[4] https://arxiv.org/pdf/1504.05254v3.pdf
[5] https://www.space.com/33095-nearly-perfecteinstein-ring-discovered-image.html
[6] http://www.indiana.edu/~geol105/images/gaia_
chapter_1/dark_matter_in_the_universe.htm
DESIGN BY Kaitlyn Xiong
EDITED BY Nigel Edward
Image made up from several images taken with the DECam
camera on the Blanco 4m telescope at the Cerro Tololo
Observatory in Chile.
CATALYST | 37
humans: are
we really just
crabby people?
By natalie gault
Iam sure many of us have heard the term
“cut-throat.” A rather negative adjective,
this word describes individuals who
will do anything to succeed - as the name
suggests, even “cutting the throats” of others
to get ahead. While we may not identify with
this harsh term, we may empathize more
with crabs. This comparison may appear
harmless, but the “crab mentality” can be just
as unhealthy as a “cut-throat” perspective.
The crab mentality follows that a lone crab
in a bucket can pull themselves out and
escape. However, with multiple crabs, no
crab can leave: the bottom crabs pull down
those that try to climb their way out. This
seems extremely counterintuitive; however,
the crab mentality is a common analogy and
explanatory model for human society. The
crab mentality can explain many everyday
experiences, thoughts, and behaviors. How
many times have other people silently wished
for us to fail? How many times have we
wanted other people to be unsuccessful? The
crab mentality is a very common, yet often
unacknowledged mindset with significant
consequences, particularly to our own
happiness and wellbeing. Learning about this
phenomenon can allow our metamorphosis
from craps to caring, supportive humans,
and in turn, be much happier. In addition,
understanding the crab mentality can help us
escape any toxic and negative environments
created by the crabs around us.
What makes us hold these negative wishes
for those around us? Why do we want others
to fail? Sam Woolfe states that the crab
mentality can stem from multiple causes,
including but not limited to envy, low selfesteem,
insecurity, and a competitive nature.
We like to think that these thoughts make
us happier because in the moment we do
feel a bit better: if someone else doesn’t
succeed, it means we’re not failing. Yet, while
it may lighten our mood, it is only transient
and actually fuels a continuous cycle of
feeling unworthy and incompetent. Instead
of viewing friends as people we can look up
to and mutually support, the crab mindset
portrays them as competition that we must
beat. What’s worse about the crab mindset
is that it involves multiple crabs: just as you
do with other people, they may do to you.
The environment you’re in may want your
failure just as much as you want them to not
succeed.
The crab mentality
can stem from multiple
causes, including but not
limited to envy, low selfesteem,
insecurity, and a
competitive nature.
However, the crab mentality can be
overcome: you can crawl over the bucket.
If you sense that the network you’re
currently in wants to see you fail, distancing
yourself and finding an empowering group
will help you escape the trap. Some ways
to find these supportive groups include
joining a mastermind group, working with
accountability partners for specific goals,
signing up for classes you’re interested, and
so much more. The crab mentality may feel
like the only option to feel secure in yourself
and your accomplishments, but being happy
for others can actually motivate you and urge
your own success and improvement. With
mutual support and respect, we can all climb
over the bucket.
References
Scott, S. (2019, January 02). What Is the “Crabs in
a Bucket” Mentality? Retrieved from https://www.
developgoodhabits.com/crabs-bucket/
Woolfe, Sam. (2018, July 11). The Crab Mentality:
Why Can’t We Be Happy for Other People’s
Success? Retrieved from https://www.samwoolfe.
com/2018/07/crab-mentality.html
DESIGN BY Evelyn Syau
EDITED BY Evelyn Syau
Graphic from KissPNG
38 | CATALYST
Thank you to our
Catalyst sponsors!
Rice University Center for Civic Leadership
Program in Writing and Communication
Rich Family Endowment
Wiess School of Natural Sciences
The Energy Institute High School
Young Women’s College Preparatory Academy