03.10.2020 Views

Linguistics magazine

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.


“Attribute each of the…phrases to Ferdinand de Saussure,

Noam Chomsky, or Michael Halliday. What does the quote

tell you about their perspective on the study and analysis

of language?”.

“If we could embrace the sum of wordimages

stored in the minds of all

individuals, we could identify the social

bond that constitutes language? It is a

storehouse filled by the members of a

given community through their activity use

of speaking, a grammatical system that

has a potential existence in each brain, or,

specifically, in the brains of a group of

individuals. For language is not complete

in any speaker; it exits perfectly only within

a collectivity”

Ferdinand de Sausurre: it was posed by

Saussure, that language was a system of

signs showing a relation between a given

signified and its signifier, which can be the

image-word stored in the minds of all

individuals. But it is mentioned that signs

are not stable in terms of the relationship

between signified and signifier since there

is not an already-existing concept assigned

due to it would depend on a grupo of

individuals or their community.

“It seems clear that we must regard

linguistic competence- knowledge of a

language- as an abstract system

underlying behaviour, a system constituted

by rules that interact to determine the form

and intrinsic meaning of a potentially

infinite number of sentences”

Noam Chomsky: Chomsky‟s linguistics is

based on that everyone has got a mental

repository of the rules by which our

language or dialect organizes linguistic

elements into well-formed strings: this

means that we have a syntactic expertise

in our heads, in terms of a set of finite

rules which allows us to generate an

infinitive number of sentences, many of

which we have never Heard before.

“Every text- that is, everything that is said

or written- unfolds in some context of use;

furthermore, it is the uses of language

that, over tens of thousands of

generations, have shaped the system.

Language has evolved to satisfy human

needs; and the way it is organized is

functional with respect to these needs”

Michael Halliday: This phrase is from

Michael Halliday because he established a

dialectical relationship between language

and society. Since linguistics for Halliday

was a form of social action, his work was

involved in educational projects on this

topic and he explains that in this way the

variation of language is attributed to the

social relationships in which they emerge.

So it can be said that language not only

reflects social structures, but rather these

social structures build language.


“Linguistic theory is concerned primarily

with an ideal speaker-hearer, in a

completely homogeneous speech

community, who knows its language

perfectly and is unaffected by such

grammatically irrelevant conditions as

memory limitations, distractions, shifts of

attention and interest, errors (random or

characteristic) in applying his knowledge of

the language in actual performance”

Noam Chomsky: Chomsky was interested

in underlying mental structures rather than

on actual performance which means that

his theory was being focused on idealized

utterances, or instances of language which

are considered to be well-formed according

to the syntactic rules of a language, rather

than on a real language in use.

“Language is a system of interdependent

terms in which the value of each results

solely from the simultaneous presence of

the others… [for example]. To determine

what a five-franc piece is worth one most

know: (1) that it can be exchanged for a

fixed quantity of a different thing, e.g.

bread; and (2) that can be compared with

a similar value of the same system, e.g. a

one-franc piece, or with coins of another

system (a dollar, etc.). in the same way a

word can be exchanged for something

dissimilar, an idea; besides, it can be

compared with something of the same

nature, another word. Its value is therefore

not fixed so long as one simply states that

it can be “exchanged” for a given concept”

Ferdinand de Suasurre: in an effort to

define linguistics, Saussure presented a

principle in which is explained that

language is a set of signs that are

members of a system and defined by their

relationships to each others. So when it is

drawn our attention to the elements of

language, they are related to each other on

the paradigmatic dimensión, which

presents a set of choices where we

consider something based on the

relationship that has with others.

“Spoken and written language, then, tend

to display different KINDS of complexity;

each of them is more complex in its own

way. Written language tends to be lexically

dense but grammatically simple; spoken

language tends to be grammatically

intricate but lexically sparse”… “the value

of having some explicit knowledge of the

grammar of written language is that you

can use this knowledge, not only to analyze

the texts, but as a critical resource for

asking questions about them”

Michael Halliday: Language acquisition

includes the gradual mastery of functional

potential until the third stage, in which the

characteristic functions of adult language

have been registered. Meaning and purely

interactive processes constitute the two

pillars of the theory, which is why Michael

Halliday concluded that the conditions for

us to learn languages ​are largely

determined by culture. It's called part of

social psychology.


Linguistics, like most social sciences, has had a long way to

position itself as such, that is, a science. Although it studies

something so fundamental to the existence of society, such

as language, it has not aroused great interest; therefore its

resources have been limited. It is true that “Linguistics deals

with human language”, Bauer, Laurie.(2007) and this makes

its object of study important for other sciences and in general

for understanding human life.

Likewise, linguistics comprises

a great variety of branches, which

specialize in specific language aspects,

such is the case of semiotics, which

is the study of signs and symbols and

their interpretations and it has great

importance in the commercial and

social world, in addition, it

makes significant contributions to the

study of language, understanding it,

from the context, thus the language “is

a treasure buried by the practice of

speech in people belonging to the

same community” because is the community

of the social group who gives it meaning.

On the other hand, linguistics encompasses

philology, which is in charge of studying the

evolution of language through history,

presenting in its studies even more

data for the comprehensive study of language. We can also

name within the great repertoire of branches that linguistics

encompasses grammar, syntax, semantics, phonetics, among

others, making the study carried out from linguistics

encompass all aspects of language.

In the same way, linguistics uses the scientific method as a

basis to generate its postulates, Like many scientists,

“linguists construct hypotheses about the structure of

language and then test those hypotheses by

experimentation” Bauer, Laurie.(2007) This certifies that all

the knowledge that is produced from the studies of linguistics

has a rigorously academic foundation.


The concept of „double articulation‟ is a classic one at identifying language,

please, explain it, and give examples.

Double articulation ‟sometimes called „duality of patterning‟ refers to the

property of all human languages that meaningful units of speech are composed

ultimately by meaningless units. Wier(wd) It is a property shared by all the

languages ​of the world. According to André Martinet, language is doubly

articulated: when speaking or listening,

Rivera (2006).

In other words, we have two units,

the monemes that have meaning and

signifier, and there are two types of

lexemes, which provide the basic

meaning of the word and the morphemes

that indicate gender, number and time.

For example, in the word walker, the lexeme is walk, the verb and the ending er is the one given by the

person who performs the action.

The above refers to the first articulation of language. the second refers to the sound or the mental

representation of a sign, in this case the letter and are called phonemes, For example, in the word creator,

the phonemes are "c", "r", "e", "a", "t", "or" and "r"




Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!